用户名: 密码: 验证码:
设计驱动式创新机理与设计模式演化研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着知识经济的兴起、消费社会的形成以及制造业成本的上升,越来越多企业认识到,良好的设计是其应对市场挑战并获得竞争优势的重要战略工具。大量领先企业开始探索实践“设计驱动式创新”(Design driven innovation),即通过对现存技术元素和社会文化元素的创造性组合来形成创新性的产品解决方案。这种新型的创新模式强调从产品与人、产品与社会的角度出发,通过产品创新来创造人类的可能性。
     较之于国际上领先企业的成功经验,中国企业仍面临“设计驱动式创新黑箱”问题,即对设计和创新的关系认识不够全面,对设计主导下的创新过程中资源、能力、创新绩效之间的关系缺乏系统性的理解。针对以上问题,本文在文献研究和企业调研的基础上,提出三个基本的研究问题:(1)企业在实施设计驱动式创新过程中,需要哪些资源,这些资源会形成哪些关键能力,最后如何影响到企业的创新绩效?也即基于资源观的设计驱动式创新机理问题;(2)企业如何通过战略和组织上的变革将自己改造为设计驱动型企业;(3)我国企业和政府如何应对设计驱动式创新的管理挑战?
     本文对设计驱动创新、知识网络、资源观和组织学习等相关理论进行了回顾,并对五个较为典型的中国企业设计驱动式创新实践的案例进行了探索性研究,由此归纳出基于资源观的设计驱动式创新机理的概念模型,这一机理可概括为设计资源→设计创新能力→创新绩效;并结合已有研究成果对这一概念模型进行细化,构建了企业设计资源、设计创新能力及创新绩效关系的理论模型,并给出相应假设;最后通过大样本问卷调查和统计分析方法对这些理论假设进行验证。
     本文通过对现有文献的整理总结出评价企业设计能力的维度和主要指标,提出“设计模式”的概念,并根据战略和组织两个维度将现有设计模式分为五类。在此基础上,对企业所处设计模式与其设计能力之间的关系提出若干假设,并通过对纺织服装企业的问卷调查来检验假设的合理性。最后针对企业设计模式选择与设计能力升级问题进行典型案例研究。
     针对实证研究结果,本文探讨了我国企业和政府面向设计驱动式创新所应采取的管理措施。
     本文的研究内容和研究结论主要有以下几个方面:
     1.企业的设计资源包含内部设计资源、外部社会文化资源、外部技术资源三个因素。这三个因素对企业提高创新绩效具有重要价值,从对绩效的直接影响来看,其中最重要的是内部设计资源,这说明企业在实施设计驱动式创新中须以我为主,同时又要重视与外部社会文化知识和技术知识间的联系。
     2.企业的设计创新能力可分为产品语义设计能力和产品功能设计能力,这两方面能力都对创新绩效有显著的影响,而设计资源对创新绩效的影响实际上是通过这两种能力来完成的。从影响路径来看,企业内部设计资源可通过两种设计能力影响创新绩效,而外部社会文化资源只能通过产品语义设计能力影响创新绩效,外部技术资源只能通过产品功能设计能力影响创新绩效。
     3.设计能力可分为基本设计能力、专业设计能力、设计竞争能力、设计创新能力四个层次。企业可通过在战略和组织两方面的主动变革促成自身设计模式演化,进而推动设计能力的升级。
     4.由于中国社会文化网络和技术网络之间的分裂及结论2,我国企业往往很难同时拥有较强的产品语义设计能力和产品功能设计能力,且对已拥有的那种设计创新能力形成路径依赖。为解决这一悖论,企业应作好面对社会文化网络和技术网络的双向开放和学习,并从组织、流程和渠道三方面重新整合内部资源;政府应通过政策支持、设计教育、市场教育三种方法来改变外部知识网络的结构。
     总的来看,本文的理论和实证研究成果丰富和完善了设计驱动式创新理论,为中国企业提升设计能力、完成转型升级、提高创新绩效提供了有效的理论指导和方法工具。
Due to the rise of the knowledge-based economy, the formation of the consumer society, and the increase of the manufacturing cost, more and more enterprises realize that a good design is the key to the success in market competition. At the same time, some leading enterprises have been exploring and taking a kind of new innovation model, the "design-driven innovation". This model creatively integrates social, cultural and technological factors into an innovative product. It focuses on the enhancement of human creativity through product innovation from the viewpoint of the relationship between the product and the human, as well as that between the product and the society.
     However, Chinese enterprises have encountered a "design-driven innovation black box" for they lack a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between the design and the innovation. They do not understand the systematic interaction among the resource, the capability and the innovation performance in the design-driven innovation. Under this background, through literature reviews and enterprise case studies, this thesis raises three fundamental problems that need to be addressed. They are (1) what are the elements of design resources for an enterprise to implement design-driven innovation? How do they affect the innovation capabilities and, in turn, the innovation performance? (2) How do enterprises improve their design capabilities by means of strategic and structural reformation. (3) How can government and enterprises conduct design-driven innovation strategy.
     This thesis begins with a thorough review of related work on design-driven innovation, resource-based view, knowledge network and organization study. It presents an exploratory case study on five typical design-driven innovation projects in China. The study concludes with a conceptual model of design-driven innovation which is based on the resource-based view. The model can be summarized as a path of three steps:from the design resources to the design innovation capabilities and,finally, to the innovation performance. This model is further elaborated with a set of hypotheses on these three steps. These hypotheses are then validated through large-scale questionnaires and statistics analysis.
     This thesis then surveys the dimensions and metrics used in existing work to measure the design capabilities. A concept of "design pattern" is proposed accordingly. We argue that existing design patterns can be categorized into 5 groups along the dimensions of the strategy and the organization. A set of hypotheses about the relationship between the choice of the design patterns and the design capabilities is proposed, which is tested and validated through a case study on the textile and garment industry in Zhejiang, China. The result suggests that the enterprises'design capabilities of different design patterns have significant differences, and the development of the design capabilities is path-dependent along the evolution of the patterns.
     Finally, this thesis suggests management solutions for Chinese enterprises to deal with challenges in the design-driven innovation.
     The outline and conclusion of this research is as follows:
     1. There are three types of resources including internal design resources, external social-cultural resources, and external technological resources for enterprises. These resources are important to improve the effectiveness and the efficiency of innovation. We argue that internal design resources are of the greatest importance since they have the most direct impact on performance. This implies that an enterprise must depend primarily on itself during the implementation of the design-driven innovation, and in the mean time pay enough attention to potential benefits from external social-cultural knowledge and technological knowledge.
     2. Enterprises'capabilities of design innovation have two folds, one of which is the design of the semantics of the product, the other is the design of the functions of the product. This two capabilities have an important effect on design performance. In fact,the impact of design resource on the innovation performance works through these two capabilities. However, the internal design resources affects the innovation performance through both capabilities, while external social-cultural resources can have an impact on the innovation performance through the semantic design capability only. Likewise, the external technological resources affect the innovation performance only through the functional design capability.
     3. The design capabilities can be in four different levels including the basic capability, the professional capability, the competitive capability and the innovation capability. An enterprise can promote the evolution of design patterns and improve its design capabilities through active reformation of both its strategy and its structure.
     4. Because of the gap between the social-cultural network and the technological network, it is often difficult for Chinese enterprises to have good capabilities in both product design and product semantics. Meanwhile, they typically over rely on their existing approaches to design capabilities. To get out of such a dead loop, this thesis suggests that an enterprise be open to both its social-cultural network and its technological network, and learn to reintegrate its internal resources from its organization, its business process and other channels. It also suggests that the government reconstruct the external knowledge network by means of policy support, design training as well as market training.
     The case studies proposed in this thesis enrich the work on the design-driven innovation. The systematic set of theories and methodologies presented helps Chinese enterprises to improve their design capabilities and innovative performances.
引文
[1]Abecassis-Moedas, C.,& Mahmoud-Jouini, S.B. Absorptive Capacity and Source-Recipient Complementarity in Designing New Products:An Empirically Derived Framework. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2008.25(5), 473-490.
    [2]Abrams, C.L., Cross, R.,& Erie, L. Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Exceutive,2003,17(4),64-77.
    [3]Adler, P.S. Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination:The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface. Organization Science,1995,6(2):147-167.
    [4]Ahn-Sook, H. INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGY, MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT INNOVATION. Research Technology Management,2004, 47(4),27-31.
    [5]Ahuja, G. The duality of collaboration:Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3), 317-343.
    [6]Ahuja, G. Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes and Innovation:A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly,2000,45(4),425-455.
    [7]Ahuja, G.,& Lampert, C.M. Entrepreneur ship in the Large Corporation:A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions, Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(5):521-543.
    [8]Alison, R., Adrian, H.,& Jonathan, G. Hybrid Organizations as a Strategy for Supporting New Product Development. Design Management Review,2005, 16(1):48-55.
    [9]Andersson, U., Forsgren, M.,& Holm, U. The strategic impact of external networks:subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(9),979-996.
    [10]Andries, V.O. Semiotics in Design Practice. Design+Research Conference, Milano,2000.
    [11]Ainamo, A. Coordination mechanisms in cross-functional teams:a product design perspective. Journal of Marketing Management,2007,23(9/10), 841-860.
    [12]Allen, J., Andrew D.J.,& Gamlen, P. Formal versus informal knowledge networks in R&D:a case study using social network analysis. R&D Management.,2007,37(3),179-192.
    [13]Anklam, P. KM and the social network. KM Magazine,2003(8),24-28.
    [14]Antioco, M., Moenaert, R.K.,& Lindgreen, A. Reducing Ongoing Product Design Decision-Making Bias. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2008,25(6),528-545.
    [15]Ardayfio, D.D. Principles and Practices of Design Innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2000,6(1),34-40.
    [16]Argote, L.,& Ingram, P. Knowledge transfer:a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2000,82(1), 150-169.
    [17]Argyris C., Schon, D.A. Organizational Learning Reading. MA:Addison-Wesley.1978.
    [18]Aubert, J-E. Innvation in Small and Medium Firms. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development,1982.
    [19]Aubert, J-E. The approach of design and concepts of innovation policy, in: Langdon, R and Rothewll, R. Design and Innvation:Policy and Management. London:The Design Council,1985.
    [20]Bailetti, A.J.& Callahan, J.R. Coordination at different stages of the product design process. R&D Management,1998.28(4),237.
    [21]Barabasi A.L.,& Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 1999,286(5),509-512.
    [22]Barney, J.B. Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17(1):99-120.
    [23]Barney, J.B. The resource-based view of the firm:ten years after 1991. Journal of Management.,2001,27(6),625-641.
    [24]Barrat, A.,& Weigt, M., On the properties of small-world network models. The European Physical Journal-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems,2000, 13(3),547-560.
    [25]Bayazit, N. Investigating Design:A Review of Forty Years of Design Research. Design Issues,2004.20(1),16-29.
    [26]Besford, J. Designing a Quality Product. Journal of Marketing Management, 1987,3(2),133-143.
    [27]Bertola, P.& Teixeira, J.C. Design as a knowledge agent:How design as a knowledge process is embedded into organizations to foster innovation. Design Studies,2003.24(2),181-194.
    [28]Best, P. Branding and Design Innovation Leadership:What's Next? Design Management Review,2008.19(3),44-55.
    [29]Bettina Von, S. Innovation-What's Design Got to Do with It? Design Management Review,2004.15(1),10-17.
    [30]Beverland, M.B. Managing the Design Innovation-Brand Marketing Interface: Resolving the Tension between Artistic Creation and Commercial Imperatives. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2005.22(2),193-207.
    [31]Birk, S.M. Application of network analysis in evaluating knowledge capacity. New Directions for Evaluation,2005,3(1),69-79.
    [32]Blythe, M.A.,& Wright, P.C. Pastiche scenarios:Fiction as a resource for user centred design. Interacting with Computers,2006,18(5),1139-1164.
    [33]Brown, J.S. Research That Reinvents the Corporation. Harvard business review. 2010(6):67-87.
    [34]Bruce, M. Integrating Marketing and Design for Commercial Benefit. Marketing Intelligence & Planning,1991.9(5),23-28.
    [35]Bruce, M.,& Morris, B. Managing external design professionals in the product development process. Technovation,1994,14(9),585-600.
    [36]Bruce, M., Cooper, R.& Vazquez, D. Effective design management for small businesses. Design Studies,1999,20(3),297-315.
    [37]Bruce, M.,& Cooper, R. Creative Product Design:A Practical Guide to Requirements Capture Management. Chichester:JOHN WILEY & SONS, LTD. 2000.
    [38]Bruce, M.& Daly, L. Design and marketing connections:creating added value. Journal of Marketing Management,2007.23(9/10),929-953.
    [39]Bruce, M., Daly L.,& Kahn, K.B. Delineating Design Factors that Influence the Global Product Launch Process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2007.24(5),456-470.
    [40]Bucciarelli, L.L. Between thought and object in engineering design. Design Studies,2002.23(3),219-231.
    [41]Cagan, J.,& Vogel, C.M. Creating Breakthrough Products Innovation From Prouduct Planning to Program Approval. Prentice-Hall Inc.2002.
    [42]Candi, M. Design as an element of Innovation:evaluating Design emphasis in technology-based firms. International Journal of Innovation Management,2006. 10(4),351-374.
    [43]Candi, M. The role of design in the development of technology-based services. Design Studies,2007.28(6),559-583.
    [44]Candi, M. and R. Saemundsson, Oil in water? Explaining differences in aesthetic design emphasis in new technology-based firms. Technovation,2008. 26(9),933-946.
    [45]Candy, L. Representations of strategic knowledge in design. Knowledge-Based Systems,1998.11(7-8),379-390.
    [46]Cappetta, R., Cillo, P.& Ponti, A. Convergent designs in fine fashion:An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation. Research Policy,2006.32(9), 1569-1588.
    [47]Chang, W.,& Chiang, Z. A STUDY ON HOW TO ELEVATE ORGA-NISATIONAL CREATIVITY IN TAIWANESE DESIGN ORGANISATION. International Journal of Innovation Management,2008.12(4),699-723.
    [48]Chang, W.& Hsu, Y.E.N. STRATEGIC GROUPS, PERFORMANCE, AND ISSUES RELATED TO PRODUCT DESIGN STRATEGY. International Journal of Innovation Management,2005.9(2),133-154.
    [49]Chiesa, V. Measuring Performance in New Product Development Projects:A Case Study in the Aerospace Industry. Project Management Journal,2007.38(4), 45-59.
    [50]Chinowsky, P., Keith, M.& Allison. R. Learning Organizations in Construction. Journal of Management in Engineering,2007,23(1),27-34.
    [51]Chiva, R.& Alegre, J. Linking design management skills and design function organization:An empirical study of Spanish and Italian ceramic tile producers. Technovation,2007.20(3),297-315.
    [52]Chiva, R.& Alegre, J. Investment in Design and Firm Performance:The Mediating Role of Design Management. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2009.26(4),424-440.
    [53]Chiva-Gomez, R. Repercussions of complex adaptive systems on product design management. Technovation,2004.18(4), Ⅴ-Ⅵ.
    [54]Christensen, C. M., The Innovator's Dilemma:When New Technologies Cause Firms to Fail, New York:Harper Collins Publishers,1997.
    [55]Christensen, C. M.& Overdorf, M. Meeting the challenge of disruptive change, Boston:Harvard Business School Press.2000.
    [56]Christensen, J.F. Asset profiles for technological innovation. Research Policy, 1995.24(5),727-745.
    [57]Chroneer, D.& K. Laurell-Stenlund. DETERMINANTS OF AN EFFECTIVE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS:TOWARDS A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROCESS INDUSTRY. International Journal of Innovation Management,2006.10(3),237-269.
    [58]Clark, K.B. The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Research Policy,1985.14(5),235-251.
    [59]Clark, K.B.& Fujimoto, T. Product Development Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.1991.
    [60]Coombs R,& Metcalfe J.S. Organizing for Innovation:Co-coordinating Distributed Innovation Capabilities. In:Foss N, Mahnke. Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship..Oxford:Oxford University Press. 2002,209-231.
    [61]Cooper, R.,& Chew, W.B. Control tomorrow's cost by today's design. Boston: Harvard Business Review,1996(1),88-97
    [62]Cooper, A. The inmates are running the asylum:Why high-tech products drive us crazy and hot we restore the sanity. Pearson Education,2004.
    [63]Cooper, R.G. New products:The factors that drive success. International Marketing Review,1994.11(1),60.
    [64]Cooper, R.G. Winning at New Product:Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch (3rd Edition). CM:Perseus Publishing,2001.
    [65]Cooper, R.G., Edgett, S.J.,& Kleinschmidt, E.J. Optimizing the Stage-Gate Process:What Best-Practice Companies Do. Research Technology Management, 2002,45(6),43-49
    [66]COMMUNITIES, C.O.T.E. Design as a driver of user-centred innovation.2009.
    [67]Cross, R., Parker, Andrew.,& Borgatti, S.P. A bird's-eye view:using social network analysis to improve knowledge creation and sharing. IBM Institute for Business Value.
    [68]Cross, N. Observations of teamwork and social processes in design. Design Studies,1995.16(2),143-170.
    [69]Cross, N.& Cross, A.C. Winning by design:the methods of Gordon Murray, racing car designer. Design Studies,1996.17(1),91-107.
    [70]Creusen, M.E.H.& Schoormans, J.P.L. The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2005.22(1),63-81.
    [71]Cunningham, P. National and regional policies for design, creativity and user-driven innovation.2008.
    [72]Davenport, T.,& Philip, K. Managing customer support knowledge. California Management Review,1998,40(3),195-208.
    [73]Deanne, B. Design's strategic role at Herman Miller. Design Management Review,2004.15(2),40-48.
    [74]Dell'Era, C. Marchesi, A.& Verganti, R. LINGUISTIC NETWORK CONFIGURATIONS:MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION IN DESIGN-INTENSIVE FIRMS. International Journal of Innovation Management,2008.12(1),1-19.
    [75]Dell'Era, C.& Verganti, R. Design-driven laboratories:organization and strategy of laboratories specialized in the development of radical design-driven innovations. R&D Management,2009.39(1),1-20.
    [76]Dell'Era, C., Marchesi, A.,& Verganti, R. MASTERING TECHNOLOGIES IN DESIGN-DRIVEN INNOVATION. Research Technology Management, 2010.53(2),12-23.
    [77]Dell'Era, C.& Verganti, R. Collaborative Strategies in Design-intensive Industries:Knowledge Diversity and Innovation. Long Range Planning,2010. 43(1),2-5.
    [78]Demaid, A.,& Quintas, P. Knowledge across cultures in the construction industry:sustainability, innovation and design. Technovation,2006.26(4), 273-274.
    [79]Desbarats, G. Creating Better Connections:Strategic Gains from Holistic Design. Design Management Review,2007.18(1),44.
    [80]Dickson, K.& Coles, A. Design protection and copyright issues for small textile firms. Design Studies,1998.29(3),137-139.
    [81]Dickson, K.& Coles, A. Textile design protection:Copyright, CAD and competition. Technovation,2000.23(3),267-268.
    [82]Dickson, P., Schneider, W., Lawrence, P.,& Hytry, R. Managing design in small high growth companies. Journal of Product Innovation Management,1995, 12(5),406-415.
    [83]Design Council. Measuring design. London:The Design Council.2005.
    [84]Design Council. Eleven lessons:managing design in eleven global brands. London, The Design Council.2008.
    [85]Design Council. Finding and working with a designer. London, The Design Council.2008.
    [86]Design Council. Design Industry Research 2010 FactSheets(England). The Design Council.2009.
    [87]Dong-Sung, C. Design, Economic Development, and National Policy:Lessons from Korea. Design Management Review,2004.15(4) 10-22.
    [88]Dorst, K. Design Research:a revolution-waiting-to-happen. Design Studies. 2008,29(1),4-11.
    [89]Dorogovtsev S. N.,& Mendes, J.F.F. Evolution of networks with aging of sites. Physical Review E,2000,62(2),1842-1845.
    [90]Dorogovtsev S. N.,& Mendes, J.F.F. Scaling properties of scale-free evolving networks:continuous approach. Physical Review E,2001,63(5),125-128.
    [91]Dreyfuss, H. Designing for People. New York:Paragraphic Books,1967.
    [92]Dyer, J.H.,& Nobeoka, K. Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network:The Toyota case. Strategic management Journal, 2000,21(3),345-367.
    [93]Duncan J. W. The new science of networks. Annual Review of Sociology,2004, 30(2),243-270.
    [94]Eilouti, B.H. Design knowledge recycling using precedent-based analysis and synthesis models. Design Studies,2009.30(4),340-368.
    [95]Eisenhardt, K. M. Building Theory From Case Study. Academy of Management Review,1989,14(4),532-550.
    [96]Eisenhardt, K.M.,& Martin,J.A. Dynamic capabilities:What are they? Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(10),1105-1121.
    [97]EMMITT, S. Technological gatekeepers:the management of trade literature by design offices. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management,2001. 8(1),2-8.
    [98]Ettlie, J.E. PERSPECTIVE:Empirical Generalization and the Role of Culture in New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2007. 24(2),180-183.
    [99]Euchner, J.A. MANAGING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY. Research Technology Management,2010,53(2),11-11.
    [100]Fang, W.,& J.H. Rogerson, Value engineering for managing the design process. International Journal of Quality& Reliability Management,1998.16(1),42-55.
    [101]Fowler, F.J. Survey Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.1988.
    [102]Franco, L. The Nature of Design. Design Management Review,2005.16(1),56.
    [103]Franke, N.,& F. Piller. Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design:The Case of the Watch Market. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2004.21(6),401-415.
    [104]Freeman, C. Design and British economic performance, in:C. Freeman (Editor), The economics of hope. Essays on technical change, economic growth.1992.
    [105]Frishammar, J.,& Horte, S.A. The Role of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation for New Product Development Performance in Manufacturing Firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2007. 19(6),765-788.
    [106]Gangemi, V., Malanga, R.,& Ranzo, P. Environmental management of the design process. Managing multidisciplinary design:the role of environmental consultancy. Renewable Energy,2000.19(1/2),277-284.
    [107]Gero, J.S. Computational Models of Innovative and Creative Design Processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2000.64(2/3),183-196.
    [108]Gerstheimer, O.,& Lupp, C. Needs versus technology--the challenge to design third-generation mobile applications. Journal of Business Research,2004. 57(12),1409-1415.
    [109]Gilsing, V.,& Nooteboom, B. Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems:The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy,2006, 35(1),1-23.
    [110]Gorb, P.,& Dumas, A. Silent design. Design Studies,1987(8),150.
    [111]Gorb, P. Managing design in an uncertain world. European Management Journal, 1995,13(1),120-127.
    [112]Gornick, N. convergence:new management imperatives and their impact on design activity. Design Management Review,2006.17(2),35-46.
    [113]Granovetter, M. Economic action and social structure:The problem of embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3),481-510.
    [114]Nohria, N.,& Eccles, R. Networks and Organizations:Structure, Form and Action. Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press,1992.25-56.
    [115]Granovetter, M. Economic action and social structure:The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3),481-510.
    [116]Gulati, R.,& Gargiulo, M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology,1999,104(5),1439-1493.
    [117]Gulati, R.,& Sytch, M. Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Interorganizational Relationships:Effects of Embeddedness on a Manufacturer's Performance in Procurement Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,2007,52(1),32-69.
    [118]Hansen, M. T. The Search-Transfer Problem:The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits". Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999(44),82-111.
    [119]Haon, C., Gotteland D.,& Fornerino, M. Familiarity and competence diversity in new product development teams:Effects on new product performance. Marketing Letters,2009.20(1),75-89.
    [120]Hakonsson, H. Industrial technological development:a network approach. London,1987.
    [121]Hargadon, A.B.& Douglas, Y. When Innovations Meet Institutions:Edison and the Design of the Electric Light. Administrative Science Quarterly,2001. 46(3),476-501.
    [122]Hargadon, A.,& Sutton, I.R. Technology brokering and Innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997.42(4), 716-749.
    [123]Hedlund, G. Organization of Transnational Corporations, The United Nations Library on Transnational Corporations, London 1993(8).
    [124]Helleloid, D.,& Simonin, B. Organizational Learning and a Firms'core Competence. in Hamel, Gary.,& Heene A(ed.). Competence-Based Competition. NewYork:John Wiely and Sons,1994,213-240.
    [125]Henderson, M.R.& Clark, B.K. Architectural innovation:the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990.35(1),9-30.
    [126]Hertenstein, J.H., Platt, M.B.& Veryzer, R.W. The Impact of Industrial Design Effectiveness on Corporate Financial Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2005.22(1),3-21.
    [127]Heskett, J.,& Present, P. Future in Design for Industry. Design Issues,2001. 17(1),18-26.
    [128]Houston, L.,& Sakkab, N. Connect and Develop:Inside P&G's New Model for Innovation. Harvard Business Review.2006(3),58-66.
    [129]Holland, S., Gaston, K.& Gomes, J. Critical success factors for cross-functional teamwork in new product development. International Journal of Management Reviews,2000.2(3),231-255.
    [130]Hollanders, H.,& Cruysen, V.A. Design, Creativity and Innovation:A Scoreboard Approach. Europe-Inno Metrics.2009(1),1-36.
    [131]Hidding, G. J.,& Catterall, S. M. Anatomy of a learning organization:Turning knowledge into capital at Anderson. Knowledge and Process Management,1998, 5(1),3-13.
    [132]Huber, G.P. Organizational Learning:The Contributing Processes and the Literatures, Organization Science,1991(2),88-115.
    [133]Hummel, M., et al. Product design planning with the analytic hierarchy process in inter-organizational networks. R&D Management,2002.32(5):p.451-458.
    [134]Hwang, A. INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGY, MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT INNOVATION. Research Technology Management,47(4), 2004,27-31.
    [135]INNO-GRIPS, Global Review of Innovation Intelligence and Policy Studies. 2008.
    [136]Jacoby, R.& Rodriguez, D. Innovation, Growth, and Getting to Where You Want to Go. Design Management Review,2007.18(1),10-20.
    [137]James, W., Forecasting the Frontiers of Design. Design Management Review, 2006.17(4):p.31.
    [138]Jang, S., etc., Design-Oriented New Product Development:LG Electronics' Chocolate Phone illustrates what it takes to be successful. Research Technology Management,2009(2):36-46
    [139]Jefrey, L.,& Cummings, Ring. Transferring R&D knowledge:the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management,2003,20(1/2),39-68.
    [140]Jevnaker, B.H. Vita Active:On Relationships Between Design(ers) and Business. Design Issues,2005.21(3),25-48.
    [141]Jenkins, J. Creating the Right Environment for Design. Design Management Review,2008.19(3),16.
    [142]Kalogerakis, K., Luthje, C.& Herstatt, C. Developing Innovations Based on Analogies:Experience from Design and Engineering Consultants. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2010.27(3),418-436.
    [143]Kichuk, S.L.,& Wiesner, W.H. The Big Five personality factors and team performance:implications for selecting successful product design teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,1997,14(3-4),195-221.
    [144]Kotler, P.,& Alexander R.G. Design:A Powerful But Neglected Strategic Tool. Journal of Business Strategy,1984(fall),16-21.
    [145]Kreuzbauer, R.& Malter, A.J. Embodied Cognition and New Product Design: Changing Product Form to Influence Brand Categorization*. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2005.22(2),165-176.
    [146]Kruger, C.,& Cross, N. Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes. Design Studies,2006,27(5),527-548.
    [147]Kurvinen, E. How industrial design interacts with technology:A case study on design of a stone crusher. Journal of Engineering Design,2005,16(4),373-383.
    [148]Kumar, V. A process for practicing design innovation. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS STRATEGY,2009.30(2/3),91-100.
    [149]Lee, J. The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Information & Management, 2001(3),323-335.
    [150]Leifer, M.,& O'Connor., et al. Radical innovation:how mature companies can outsmart upstarts. Boston:Harvard Business School Press,2000.
    [151]Leonard-Barton, D. Core capabilities and core rigidities:a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 1992:111-125.
    [152]Liebowitz, J. Linking social network analysis with the analytic hierarchy process for knowledge mapping in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management. Kempston,2005,9(1),76-110.
    [153]Lin, N., Ensel, W.M.,& Vaughn, J.C. Social Resources and Strength of Ties: Structural Factors in Occupational Status Attainment. American Sociological Review,1981,46 (4),393-405.
    [154]Love, T. Constructing a coherent cross-disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs:some philosophical issues. Design Studies,2002,23(3), 345-361.
    [155]Lundvall, B.A. Why the New Economy is a Learning Economy. DRUID Working Paper, Department of Business Studies, Aalborg, Aalborg University.2004.
    [156]MacPherson, A. The role of international design orientation and market intelligence in the export performance. R&D Management,2000.30(2),167.
    [157]Manzini, E. New design knowledge. Design Studies,2009,30(1),4-12.
    [158]Martin, X.& Mitchell, W. The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market. Research Policy, 1998,82(1),135-172.
    [159]Marxt, C.,& Hacklin, F. Design, product development, innovation:all the same in the end? A short discussion on terminology. Journal of Engineering Design, 2005,16(4),413-421.
    [160]Matsumoto, I.T., et al. Developing a framework to measure organizational and employee skills development in a professional engineering design consultancy. Construction Innovation,2005,5(1),53-66.
    [161]McCutcheon, D.M., Grant R.A.& J. Hartley. Determinants of new product designers' satisfaction with suppliers' contributions. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,1997,14(3/4),273-290.
    [162]McLean, K., Scully,J.,& Tergas, L. Inland Revenue New Zealand:Service Design in a Regulatory Context. Design Management Review,2008,19(1), 28-33.
    [163]Mick, G.D.& Fournier, S. Paradoxes of technology:consumer cognizance, emotions and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research,1998. 25(September),123-144.
    [164]Monalisa,-M., et al. MANAGING GLOBAL DESIGN TEAMS. Research Technology Management,2008,51(4),48-59.
    [165]Moultrie, J. International Design Scoreboard:Initial indicators.2009.
    [166]Moultrie. J. Company spending on design:Exploratory survey of UK firms 2008.
    [167]Mozota, B.B.D. Design and competitive edge:A model for design management excellence in European SMEs. Design Management Journal,2002,13(2),88-97.
    [168]Mozota, B.B.D. The Four Powers of Design:A Value Model in Design Management. Design Management Review,2006,17(2),44-50.
    [169]Mozota, B.B., A Theoretical Model for Design in Management Science:The Paradigm Shift in the Design Profession, from Management as a Constraint to Management Science as an Opportunity. Design Management Journal, 2007,18(3),30-37.
    [170]Muller, W. and Pasman, G.. Typology and the organization of design knowledge. Design Studies,1996,17(2),111-130.
    [171]Munsch, K. OUTSOURCING DESIGN AND INNOVATION. Research Technology Management,2004,47(1),27-30.
    [172]Nerkar, A.& Paruchuri, S. Evolution of R&D Capabilities:The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm. Management Science,2005,51(5), 771-785.
    [173]Nevis, E.C., DiBella, A.J.,& Gould, J.M. Understanding Organizational Learning Systems, Sloan Managaement Review,1995(Winter),73-85.
    [174]Newbury, D. Knowledge and research in art and design. Design Studies,1996. 17(2),215-219.
    [175]Nobelius, D. Towards the sixth generation of R&D management. International Journal of Project Management,2004,22(5),369-375.
    [176]Norman, DA. The Design of Everyday Things. New York:Basic Books,2002.
    [177]Nonaka, I.;& Takeuchi, H. The knowledge-creating company:how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York:Oxford University Press.1995.
    [178]O'Connor, G.C. Major Innovation as a Dynamic Capability:A Systems. Approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2008.25(4),313-330.
    [179]OECD. The nature of innovation and the evolution of the productive system: technology and productivity-the challenge for economic policy. Paris:OECD, 1991,303-14.
    [180]OECD. The Knowledge-based Economy. Paris:OECD,1996.
    [181]OECD. International Symposium Measuring Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experiences, Issues, and Prospects. Paris:OECD,1999.
    [182]OECD. Oslo Manual (5th Edition). Paris:OECD,2005.
    [183]Panuwatwanich, K., Stewart R.A.,& Mohamed, S. Critical pathways to enhanced innovation diffusion and business performance in Australian design firms. Automation in Construction,2009,18(6),790-797.
    [184]Page, A.L. Assessing new product development practices and performance: Establishing crucial norms. Journal of Product Innovation Management,1993. 10(4),273-290.
    [185]Papanek, V. Design for the Real World, Human Ecology and Social Change,2 Ed.1984.
    [186]London:Thames and Hudson.
    [187]Patrick, R. Design with markets Leveraging knowledge for innovation. Design Management Journal,2002,13(2),38-44.
    [188]Patrick, R. Dynamic contexts for innovation strategy:Utilizing customer knowledge. Design Management Journal,2002,13(2),37-45.
    [189]Pavitt, K. Technology, innovation, and strategic management, in:McGee., J. & Thomas., H(Editors). Strategic Management Research. A European Perspective. New York:John Wiley & Sons.1986.
    [190]Peansupap, V.,& Walker, D.H.T. Exploratory factors influencing design practice learning within a Thai context. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management,2009,16(3),238-253.
    [191]Prahalad, C.K.,& Hamel, G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review,1990(3/4),79-91.
    [192]Prahalad, C.K.,& Bettis R.A. The dominant logic. A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal,1986(7),485-501.
    [193]Perks, H., Cooper, R.,& Jones, C. Characterizing the role of design in new product development:an empirical taxonomy. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2005,22(2),111-127.
    [194]Peteraf, M. The cornerstones of competitive advantage:a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal,1993(14),179-191.
    [195]Pham, N.T.& Swierczek, F.W. Facilitators of organizational learning in design. The Learning Organization,2006,13(2),186-201.
    [196]Piatier, A. Barriers to innovation. London:Francis Pinter Publishers,1984.
    [197]PILOT. Low-Tech Industriesand the Knowledge Economy:State of the Art and Research Challenges. Dortmund:PILOT.2003.
    [198]PILOT. Low-Tech Industries:Innovativeness and Development Perspectives. Dortmund:PILOT.2005.
    [199]PILOT. Non-science based innovativeness on capabilities relevant to generate profitable novelty. Dortmund:PILOT.2005.
    [200]PILOT. Peculiarities and Relevance of Non-Research-Intensive Industries in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Dortmund:PILOT.2006.
    [201]PILOT. Towards a new understanding of innovativeness and of innovation based indicators. Dortmund:PILOT.2005.
    [202]Pisano, G.P. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning-an empirical-analysis of process development.1994.
    [203]Podsakoff, P.M.,& D. Organ. Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management,1986,12(4),531-544.
    [204]Polanyi, K. The Great Transformation:The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA:Beacon Press.1944.
    [205]Powell, W., Koput, K.,& Smith-Doerr, L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation:Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996,41(1),116-145.
    [206]Purcell, A.T.& Gero, J.S. Drawings and the design process:A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology. Design Studies,1998.19(4),389-430.
    [207]Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P.,& Finklestein, S. Managing Professional Intellect:Making The Most of The Best, Harvard Business Review,1996(3/4), 71-80.
    [208]Rafaeli, A.& Vilnai-Yavetz, I. Emotion as a Connection of Physical Artifacts and Organizations. Organization Science,2004,15(6),671-686.
    [209]Ravasi, D.& Lojacono, G. Managing design and designers for strategic renewal. Long Range Planning,2005,4(1),121-122.
    [210]Reid, S.E.& Brentani, U. d. The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations:A Theoretical Model. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2004,21(3),170-184.
    [211]Ricardo & Chiva-Gomez, J.A.R.L. A model of product design management in the Spanish ceramic sector. European Journal of Innovation Management,2004, 7(2):p.150-161.
    [212]Rindova, V.P.& Petkova, A.P. When Is a New Thing a Good Thing? Technological Change, Product Form Design, and Perceptions of Value for Product Innovations. Organization Science,2007,18(2),217-232.
    [213]RitaSue, S. Managing design consulting firms to survive in tough times. Design Management Journal,2003,14(3),48-55.
    [214]Rob S., Josef H.,& et al. The Knowledge Strategy Process,Handbook on Knowledge Management. Heidalberg:Springer-Verlag.2002.
    [215]Robinson, M.A., et al. Design engineering competencies:future requirements and predicted changes in the forthcoming decade. Design Studies,2005.26(2), 123-153.
    [216]Robertson,T.S., et al. New Product Announcement Signals and Incumbent Reactions. Journal of Marketing,1995,59(7),1-15.
    [217]Roy, R.& Riedel, J.C.K.H. Design and innovation in successful product competition. Technovation,1997,20(8),4-6.
    [218]Saco, R.,& Goncalves, A. Service Design:An Appraisal. Design Management Review,2008,19(1),10-19.
    [219]Salter, A.& Gann, D. Sources of ideas for innovation in engineering design. Research Policy,2003.23(1),120-130.
    [220]Schraudolph, U. Industrial Design in Product Development. Innovation,2007. 7(2),22-23.
    [221]Seidel, V.,& Pinto, J. Social Science Strategies for User-Focused Innovation and Design Management. Design Management Review,2005.16(4),73.
    [222]Seongkeun, J. et al. DESIGN-ORIENTED NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT. Research Technology Management,2009,52(2),36-46.
    [223]Seufert, A., Krogh, G.,& Bach, A. Towards knowledge networking. Journal of Knowledge Management,1999,3 (3),180-190.
    [224]Sharifi, S.& Pawar, K.S. Product design as a means of integrating differentiation. Technovation,1996,44(3),189-199.
    [225]Shin, D., Boradkar, P.& Fischer, A. A Green Dream Team. Design Management Review,2008.19(4),49-56.
    [226]Slappendel, C. Industrial design utilization in New Zealand firms. Design Studies,1996.17(1),3-18.
    [227]Smith, B. Design management and new product development. European Journal of Marketing,1981,15(5),51-60.
    [228]Strogatz, S.H. Exploring complex networks. Nature,2001,410(6825),268-276.
    [229]Sinkula, J.M. Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning. Journal of Marketing,1994,58(January),35-45.
    [230]Souder, W.E.,& Sone, X.M. Contingent Product Design and Marketing Strategies Influencing New Product Success and Failure in U.S. and Japanese Electronics Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management,1997,14(1), 21-34.
    [231]Stephen, R.R.,& C. Mark. Ethnographies in the Front End:Designing for Enhanced Customer Experiences. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2006,23(3),215-237.
    [232]Strzalecki, A. Creativity in Design:General Model and Its Verification. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2000,28(3),303-312.
    [233]Sun, H.& Wing, W.C. Critical success factors for new product development in the Hong Kong toy industry. Technovation,2005,25(3),293-303.
    [234]Swan, K.S., Kotabe M.& Allred, B.B. Exploring Robust Design Capabilities, Their Role in Creating Global Products, and Their Relationship to Firm Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2005,22(2), 144-164.
    [235]Swann, P.& Birke, D. How do Creativity and Design Enhance Business Performance? A Framework for Interpreting the Evidence. Nottingham: Department of Trade and Industry,2005,1-45.
    [236]Talke, K., et al. What about Design Newness? Investigating the Relevance of a Neglected Dimension of Product Innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2009,26(6),601-615.
    [237]Teece, D.J. Book. reviews:International Technology Transfer:Concepts, Measures, and Comparisons. Journal of Economic Literature,1987,25(1), 160-161.
    [238]Teece, D.J. Profiting from technological innovation:Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy,1986, 15(2),285-305.
    [239]Teece, D.J.,& Pisano, G.,& Shuen. A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal,1997(18),509-533.
    [240]Tether, B. Think piece on the Role of Design in Business Performance. University of Manchester,2005.
    [241]Thenint, H. Design as a tool for innovation. Report from INNO-GRIPS workshop inMarseille, June 2008.
    [242]Tidd, J. Development of novel products through intraorganizational and interorganizational networks the case of home automation. Journal of Product Innovation Management,1995,3(3),181-199.
    [243]Tsai, W. Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks:Effect of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(5),996-1004.
    [244]Tsai, W. Social structure of "Coopetition" Within a multiunit organization: Coordination,competition and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science,2002,13(2),179-190.
    [245]Uduma, K. Innovations in Auto Safety Design, a Key to Quality Improvement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2000,40(2),227-243.
    [246]Ulrich, K.T.& Pearson, S. Assessing the importance of design through product archaeology. Management Science,1998.44(3),352-369.
    [247]Ulrich, K.T.,& Eppinger, S.D. Product Design and Development. New York: McGrawHill/Irwin Series in Marketing,2003.
    [248]Utterback, J.M.& Abernathy, W. J. A Dynamic Model of Product and Process Innovation, Omega,1975.3(6),639-656.
    [249]Utterback, J.M. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press,1994.
    [250]Utterback, J., et al. Design inspired innovation. New York:world Scientific. 2006.
    [251]Ulla-Mutanen. Developing organizational design capability in a Finland-based engineering corporation:the case of Metso. Design Study,2008,29(5),500-520.
    [252]Uzzi, B. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital:How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review. 1999,64(4),481-505.
    [253]Verganti, R. Design as brokering of languages:Innovation strategies in Italian firms. Design Management Journal,2003.13(3),34-42.
    [254]Verganti, R. Innovating Through DESIGN. Harvard Business Review,2006. 84(12),114-122.
    [255]Verganti, R. Design, Meanings, and Radical Innovation:A Meta-model and a Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2008,25(5), 436-456.
    [256]Verganti, R. Design-driven innovation:Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean.2009, Boston:Harvard Business Press.
    [257]Veryzer, R.W. The Roles of Marketing and Industrial Design in Discontinuous New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2005., 22(1),22-41.
    [258]Veryzer, R.W.,& Mozota, B.B.D. The Impact of User-Oriented Design on New Product Development:An Examination of Fundamental Relationships. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2005,22(2),128-143.
    [259]Visser, F.S., Lugt R.,& Stappers, P.J. Sharing User Experiences in the Product Innovation Process:Participatory Design Needs Participatory Communication. Creativity and Innovation Management,2007.16(1),35-45.
    [260]Von Hippel, E. The sources of innovation. New York:Oxford University Press, 1988.
    [261]Von Der Weth, R.& Frankenberger, E. Strategies, competence and style--Problem solving in engineering design. Learning and Instruction,1995, 5(4),357-383.
    [262]Walsh, V.,& Roy, R. The designer as gatekeeper in manufacturing industry Design Studies.1985,6(2),127-135.
    [263]Walsh, V., Roy, R., Bruce, M.,& Potter, S. Winning by Design:Technology, Product Design and International Competitiveness. Cambridge, MA:Blackwell Business,1992.
    [264]Walsh, V., Design, innovation and the boundaries of the firm. Research Policy, 1996.24(5),727-745.
    [265]Watts, D. J., Strogatz, S. H. Collective dynamics of'small-world'networks. Nature,1998,393(6684),440-442.
    [266]West, B.N.& Emmitt, S. Functional design? An analysis of new speculative house plans in the UK. Design Studies,2004,25(3),275-299.
    [267]Wiig, K.M. Knowledge management:The central management focus for intelligent-acting organizations. Arlington, TX:Schema Press,1994.
    [268]Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia (2005). Retrieved 15 December 2005 from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vitruvius&oldid=30882077.
    [269]Winter, S. The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(9):981-996.
    [270]Xu, J. Mining static and dynamic structural patterns in networks for knowledge management:A computational framework and case studies. Ph.D. Source:Dissertation Abstracts International,66(3), Section:A,1079
    [271]Yang, S.& Fan, C. Social capital, behavioural control, and tacit knowledge sharing--A multi-informant design. International Journal of Information Management,2009,29(3),210-218.
    [272]Yazdani, B.& Holmes, C. Four Models of Design Definition:Sequential, Design Centered, Concurrent and Dynamic. Journal of Engineering Design, 1999.10(1),25-37.
    [273]Zukin, S.,& DiMaggio, P. Introduction Structures of capital. The social organization of the economy. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990.
    [274]埃里克·冯·希普尔,陈劲和朱朝晖译.民主化创新:用户创新如何提升公司的效率.北京:知识产权出版社,2007.
    [275]陈劲,陈钰芬.开放创新体系与企业技术创新资源配置.科研管理,2006,27(3):1-8.
    [276]陈劲.集成创新的理论模式.中国软科学,2002(12),23-29.
    [277]陈劲.管理学.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
    [278]陈劲,俞湘珍.基于设计的创新-理论初探.技术经济,2010(6),11-15.
    [279]陈劲,陈雪颂.设计驱动式创新-一种开放社会下的创新模式.技术经济,2010(8),1-5.
    [280]陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立.组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
    [281]陈雪颂,陈劲.设计驱动型创新理论评介——创新中的意义创造.外国经济与管理,2010(1):58-64.
    [282]陈钰芬.开放式创新的机理与动态模式研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
    [283]德鲁克,刘毓玲译.21世纪的管理挑战.北京:生活.读书.新知三联书店,2003.
    [284]方锦清,汪小帆,郑志刚等.一门崭新的交叉科学:网络科学(上).物理学进展,2007,27(3),239-343.
    [285]方锦清,汪小帆,郑志刚等.一门崭新的交叉科学:网络科学(下).物理学进展,2007,27(4),361-448.
    [286]费尔迪南·德·索绪尔[瑞士],高名凯译.普通语言学教程.北京,商务印书馆,1999.
    [287]侯吉刚,刘益,李西垚,.基于企业网络结构属性的知识管理研究.科学管理研究,2008,26(1),74-77.
    [288]侯杰泰,温忠麟和成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用.北京:教育科学出版社,2004.
    [289]胡飞.艺术设计符号基础.北京:清华大学出版社,2008.
    [290]纪慧生,卢凤君.企业知识网络研究综述.现代商业,2007(21),130-133.
    [291]贾根良.后发工业化国家制度创新的三种境界一演化经济学假说并与杨小凯教授商榷.南开经济研究,2003(5).
    [292]金鑫.面向分布式创新的知识共享机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2009.
    [293]凯瑟琳·贝斯特.美国设计管理高级教程.上海:上海人民美术出版社,2007.
    [294]李怀祖.管理研究方法论,西安:西安交通大学出版社,2004.
    [295]李久鑫.基于社会网络的企业动态知识管理模式研究.复旦大学博士学位论文.2002,179.
    [296]李文博.知识网络结构、组织学习与创新绩效的实证研究.科技管理研究.2009(8).
    [297]廖必虎.国内品牌手机制造企业发展战略.硕士学位论文,北京交通大学,2006.
    [298]梁梅.意大利设计--生活的美学和艺术化.美术观察,2002(6).
    [299]刘常勇. 几个有关知识管理议题之初探,http: //www.cme.org.tw/know.1999.
    [300]刘雪锋.网络嵌入性与差异化战略及企业绩效关系研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
    [301]刘子建.产品语言及其视觉语义性.西北轻工业学院学报,1998(04).
    [302]卢纹岱.SPSS fo Windows统计分析(第三版).北京:电子工业出版社,2009.
    [303]罗家德.社会网分析讲义.北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
    [304]罗斯韦尔[Roy Rothwell][英].产业创新:成功、战略和趋势[A].1994.陈劲等译.创新聚集-产业创新手册.2 000马德辉,包昌火.论企业知识网络能力的培养.情报理论与实践,2008.31(1):56-60.
    [305]马鸿飞.技术创新中工业设计的主导作用.技术经济,2001(11).
    [306]马科斯·本泽[德],伊丽莎白·瓦尔特[德],徐恒醇译.广义符号学及其在设计中的应用.北京:科学出版社,1992.
    [307]马庆国.管理统计,北京:科学出版社,2002.
    [308]青木昌彦.比较制度分析.上海:上海远东出版社.2001.
    [309]青木昌彦.模块时代.上海:上海远东出版社,2003,53-80.
    [310]让·波德里亚[法]著,刘成富和全志刚译.消费社会.南京:南京大学出版社,2001.
    [311]上海科技发展研究中心.创新网络:为先行者带来收益、繁荣与发展—创 新网络的主要应用与实际效果.上海科技发展研究中心,2006(19),3-4.
    [312]施振.再造宏基.上海:上海远东出版社,1996.
    [313]斯蒂芬.P.罗宾斯,组织行为学.孙建敏,李原等译.北京中国人民大学出版社,1997,277.
    [314]斯科特·拉什,约翰·厄里.符号经济与空间经济.北京:商务印书馆,2006.
    [315]宋建元.成熟型大企业开展破坏性创新的机理与途径研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2005.
    [316]宋建元,陈劲.企业隐性知识的共享方法与组织文化研究.技术经济,2005(4).
    [317]宋建元,陈劲.企业隐性知识共享的效率分析.科学与科学技术管理,2005(2).
    [318]宋建元,张钢.组织网络化中的知识共享:一个基于知识链的分析.研究与发展管理,2004(8).
    [319]苏杰.人人都是产品经理.北京:电子工业出版社,2009.
    [320]孙海法,刘运国,方琳.案例研究的方法论.科研管理,2004(2):107-112.
    [321]王重鸣.心理学研究方法,北京:人民教育出版社,1990.
    [322]王飞绒.基于组织间学习的技术联盟与企业创新绩效关系研究——以生物技术产业为例.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
    [323]王炯.全球制造网络中网络嵌入性对企业绩效的影响研究.硕士学位论文,浙江大学.2006.
    [324]王蕊.工业设计创新的现状与对策.艺术与设计(理论),2008(04).
    [325]王婉珍.网络嵌入性与产业集群竞争力.哈尔滨商业大学学报,2008,6:69-73.
    [326]王效杰,金海.设计管理.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2008.
    [327]王义高.工业设计创新的价值.中国发明与专利,2005(10).
    [328]王志玮.企业外部知识网络嵌入性对破坏性创新绩效的影响机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2010.
    [329]魏江.企业技术能力论.北京:科学出版社,2002.
    [330]魏江.企业购并战略新思维—基于核心能力的企业购并与整合管理模式.北京:科学出版社,2002.
    [331]魏江,王艳.企业内部知识共享模式研究.技术经济与管理研究,2004(1),68-69.
    [332]韦影.企业社会资本对技术创新绩效的影响:基于吸收能力的视角.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2005.
    [333]邬爱其.企业网络化成长--国外企业成长研究新领域.外国经济与管理, 2005(10),10-18.
    [334]伍蓓.企业研发外包的模式、机理及动态演化研究.浙江大学博士论文,201 0.
    [335]邬关荣.加工贸易转型升级研究——以服装产业为例.北京:经济科学出版社,2007.
    [336]吴永忠.企业创新网络的形成及其演化.自然辩证法研究,2005.9,69-72.
    [337]吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务.北京:科学出版社,2003.
    [338]吴明隆.结构方程模型——AMOS的操作与运用.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009.
    [339]肖冬平,顾新,彭雪红.基于嵌入视角下知识网络中的知识流动研究.情报杂志,2009,28(8):117-125.
    [340]许冠南.关系嵌入性对技术创新绩效的影响机制研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
    [341]许庆瑞.全面创新管理的理论与实践.科学出版社,2008(4).
    [342]约翰·霍金斯.创意经济:如何点石成金.上海:上海三联书店,2006.
    [343]章利国.现代设计社会学.湖南:湖南科学技术出版社,2005.
    [344]张洪石,陈劲.突破性创新的组织模式,科学学研究,2005(4).
    [345]赵晓庆.我国企业技术能力提高的外部知识源研究.科学学研究,2004,22(4),399-404.
    [346]朱媛.回归设计的起点.硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
    [347]朱朝晖.基于开放式创新的技术学习协同与机理研究.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
    [348]竹内弘高,野中郁次郎,李萌(译).组织知识创造螺旋:知识管理理论与案例研究.北京:知识产权出版社,2006,79-80.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700