中国南方古生界典型古油气藏解剖及勘探启示
|
摘要
中国南方古生界历经半个多世纪的油气勘探,已在四川盆地及其周缘的中组合(D-T2)发现了普光、元坝等大型天然气田,油气勘探已取得了的重大突破,但除此之外的南方广大地区却一直处于徘徊状态,尤其是中国南方下组合(Z-S)的油气勘探,除威远气田外,未能获得有工业价值的勘探成果。中国南方古生界众多的油气显示,无疑证明了中国南方古生界具有良好的生烃条件,并在地质历史时期有过大规模的成藏过程。因此,具体分析中国南方古生界的古油气藏成因,探索中国南方古生界油气的成藏规律,将为寻找新的油气勘探领域和方向提供一些启示和借鉴。
中国南方系统的古油气藏研究始于上世纪70年代末期,随着麻江特大型古油气藏的发现,众多石油地质工作者开始了古油气藏的成因探索。古油气藏泛指已经破坏了的但可以进行圈闭恢复的油气藏,其原生油气藏形成时期相对较早,中国南方多形成于古生代。中国南方古生界的古油气藏主要分布于江南-雪峰隆起以西至四川盆地的广大地区,现今残存物为沥青、油苗和井下天然气,在海相砂岩与碳酸盐岩的孔隙、裂缝、晶洞、溶孔、溶洞中产出,尤以裂缝中最为发育。下古生界以沥青显示为主,奥陶系有少量油苗显示,主要显示于雪峰隆起西侧及黔中隆起周缘;上古生界以油苗和井下天然气显示为主,主要显示于古隆起周缘及湘中坳陷。古油气藏在平面上的分布受控于古隆起的位置及深大断裂的走向,主体沿北东方向于深大断裂附近产出。
中国南方巨厚的古生代沉积为古油气藏的形成奠定了雄厚的物质基础。早古生代沉积了被动陆缘-宽缓斜坡沉积层;晚古生代由台盆-克拉通内海相沉积层组成。下古生界的斜坡及深海盆地相区,广泛发育下寒武统黑色碳质页岩,为古油气藏的提供了良好的烃源,台地及上斜坡相区发育的白云岩、砂岩为油气的储集提供了良好的空间,下寒武统泥岩及下志留统泥岩为古油气藏提供了保存条件,共同构成了中国南方的下古生界的含油气组合(z-s下组合)。都匀运动、广西运动不仅为下古生界古油气藏的形成提供了规模聚集的场所,也为古油气藏的聚积提供了油气运移的动力,下古生界古油藏初始形成于加里东期的大型正向构造之中。加里东运动之后,扬子板块与华夏板块拼合,形成统一的华南板块,中泥盆世-中三叠世,中国南方接受了广泛的厚度巨大的海相沉积,使得下组合油藏向气藏转化;印支运动的大规模抬升和燕山运动的挤压、推覆加剧了古油气藏的破坏。
中国南方古生界典型古油气藏解剖表明:古油气藏是多期构造运动改造与叠加的综合产物,古油气藏一般经历了油藏-气藏-残留的演化过程,其中,加里东运动、印支-燕山运动对古油气藏的形成与演化起着至关重要的作用,古油气藏被改造、破坏的根本原因是后期地层的抬升、剥蚀幅度过大。
中国南方典型古油气藏成因分析表明:中国南方古生界仍然是我国油气勘探的一个重要领域。但是,在今后的勘探中,应特别重视古油气藏与今油气藏的差异:古油气藏的最终结果是被破坏与逸散;而今油气藏需要被保存与聚集。二者的成藏机理有着本质的区别:古油气藏的源来自于烃源岩,而下古生代的烃源岩现今都已进入的过成熟期,不可能为有效烃源岩,其早期生成的烃类必须以特殊的方式方能保存下来,成为有效次级源,为后期的晚期成藏提高足够的物质补给。威远气田的水溶气出溶成藏模式对中国南方寻找古老油气藏具有普遍的指导意义,就中国南方而言,形成古老油气藏至少须满足2个条件:(1)较好的后期保存条件;(2)早期深埋和后期大幅抬升。现今缺乏保存条件的地区或埋藏深度过大的地区都不可能取得下古生代的油气勘探突破。依据上述分析,雪峰隆起西南缘的武陵坳陷、黔南坳陷、湘鄂西地区的秭归复向斜和雪峰隆起东南缘的湘中、桂中坳陷、四川盆地古隆起区乃是今后下古生代油气勘探的重点地区。
Oil & gas exploration in Paleozoic in southern China have undergone for more than half a century. Huge natural gas fields such as Puguang and Yuanba have been found in Sichuan Basin and its margin and great breaks have been gotten in oil & gas exploration, but except for these, vast areas in southern China can not get commercial exploration results. Many oil & gas shows in Paleozoic in south China prove that Paleozoic in south China possesses favorable hydrocarbon generating conditions and it has undergone great reservoir formation process in geological history. Therefore, to analyze the factors for forming palaeo-reservoirs in Paleozoic in south China and probe the rules of forming palaeo-reservoirs in south China will provide some revelations and references for finding new areas and direction for oil & gas exploration.
The study on palaeo-reservoir system in southern China starts from the end of the 1970s. With the discovery of the huge Majiang Palaeo-Reservoir, a great deal of petroleum geologists then began to study the origin of palaeo-reservoirs. Palaeo-reservoirs are the reservoirs that had been destructed but can be resumed, the original/primary reservoirs were formed in relatively early times and many palaeo-reservoirs in southern China were formed in Paleozoic. The palaeo-reservoirs in southern China are distributed widely from western part of Jiangnan-Xuefeng Uplift to vast area of Sichuan Basin, the bitumen, oil shows and well natural gas remained are discovered in pores, fractures, cavities, leach holes and corroded hollows, specially in the fractures. Oil and gas shows in Lower Paleozoic are dominated by bitumen and Ordovician by a spot of oil shows, which are mainly showed in the western side of Xuefeng Uplift and margins of Qianzhong Uplifts. Oil & Gas shows in Upper Paleozoic are dominated by oil shows and downhole gas shows, which are mainly showed in margins of palaeo-uplifts and Central Hunan Depression. The planar distribution of palaeo-reservoirs is controlled by location of uplifts and trend of great deep faults, its main part is distributed in great deep fault in east-northern direction.
Great Paleozoic sediments in southern China have set great material base for formation of Palaeo-reservoirs. In early Paleozoic there deposited passive continental margin—wide gentle slope sedimentary layers and late Paleozoic are consisted of platform basin-intracratonic marine sedimentary layers. There widely develop black carbonic shale of lower Cambrian in slope and deep sea basin of lower Paleozoic, which is dominated by ascending oceanic current and provide abundant hydrocarbon source base for formation of palaeo-reservoirs. The dolomites and sandstones in platform and upper slope provide favorable storage space for oil & gas, the mudstones of lower Cambrian and lower Silurian provides preservation conditions for palaeo-reservoirs. All these form the petroliferous combination (z-s Lower Combine) of lower Paleozoic in southern China. Duyun Structural Movement and Guangxi Structural Movement not only provide accumulating places in large scale for formation of palaeo-reserviors of lower Paleozoic in southern China, but also provide motivate force to accumulate oil & gas for palaeo-reservoirs. The palaeo-reservoirs of lower Paleozoic were initially formed in great positive structures. After Caledonian Structure Movement, Yangtze Plate and Cathaysian Plate jointed to form an uniform plate named Southern China Plate. From mid Devonian to mid Triassic, southern China accepted marine deposits with great thickness, on one side it made the oil reservoirs of lower combination(Z-S) transform to gas reservoirs, on the other side new petroliferous combinations came into being in Devonian, Carboniferous and mid Triassic(D-T Combinations).
Analyses on typical palaeo-reservoirs of Paleozoic in southern China show: palaeo-reservoirs are comprehensive products from multiple structural movements and their superimpositions and generally the palaeo-reservoirs underwent the evolution course of oil reservoir—gas reservoir-residual in which Caledonian movement and indo-China—Yanshanian movement play key role in paleo-reservoirs farmation and their evolution. The basic reasons for reform and destruction of palaeo-reservoirs are the great elevation and erosion of strata in the later period.
According to the analyses above, Paleozoic in south China is still an important field for oil & gas exploration in China. Our exploration works in future should attach more attention to the difference between paleao-reservoirs and present reservoirs. The paleao-reservoirs were nearly destructed finally while the present reservoirs need to be preserved. The forming mechanism of paleao-reservoirs are essentially different. Hydrocarbon resources of paleao-reservoirs come from source rocks. However, the lower Paleozoic source rocks can never be effective source rocks due to their overly thermal maturities. Therefore, hydrocarbons that generated in early times must be preserved in special way and then become effective secondary sources as the substantial supply to the latter reservoir forming. The water-solution gas reservoir forming model of Weiyuan field has set a guidence for discovery of paleo-reservoirs in south China. As for south China area, two conditions must be satisfied for the paleo-reservoirs formation, one is favorable later preserving conditions and the other is that the deeply buried reservoirs in early stage must be considerably uplifted later. Exploration breakthrough will never attained in areas with on preserving conditions or overly buried depth. According to these above analyses, Wuling Depression, Qiannan Depression in south-western edge of Xuefeng Uplift, Zigui Synclinorium, Guizhong Depression in the areas of Western part of Hunan and Huabei Province are considered to be the major exploration area in future.
中国南方系统的古油气藏研究始于上世纪70年代末期,随着麻江特大型古油气藏的发现,众多石油地质工作者开始了古油气藏的成因探索。古油气藏泛指已经破坏了的但可以进行圈闭恢复的油气藏,其原生油气藏形成时期相对较早,中国南方多形成于古生代。中国南方古生界的古油气藏主要分布于江南-雪峰隆起以西至四川盆地的广大地区,现今残存物为沥青、油苗和井下天然气,在海相砂岩与碳酸盐岩的孔隙、裂缝、晶洞、溶孔、溶洞中产出,尤以裂缝中最为发育。下古生界以沥青显示为主,奥陶系有少量油苗显示,主要显示于雪峰隆起西侧及黔中隆起周缘;上古生界以油苗和井下天然气显示为主,主要显示于古隆起周缘及湘中坳陷。古油气藏在平面上的分布受控于古隆起的位置及深大断裂的走向,主体沿北东方向于深大断裂附近产出。
中国南方巨厚的古生代沉积为古油气藏的形成奠定了雄厚的物质基础。早古生代沉积了被动陆缘-宽缓斜坡沉积层;晚古生代由台盆-克拉通内海相沉积层组成。下古生界的斜坡及深海盆地相区,广泛发育下寒武统黑色碳质页岩,为古油气藏的提供了良好的烃源,台地及上斜坡相区发育的白云岩、砂岩为油气的储集提供了良好的空间,下寒武统泥岩及下志留统泥岩为古油气藏提供了保存条件,共同构成了中国南方的下古生界的含油气组合(z-s下组合)。都匀运动、广西运动不仅为下古生界古油气藏的形成提供了规模聚集的场所,也为古油气藏的聚积提供了油气运移的动力,下古生界古油藏初始形成于加里东期的大型正向构造之中。加里东运动之后,扬子板块与华夏板块拼合,形成统一的华南板块,中泥盆世-中三叠世,中国南方接受了广泛的厚度巨大的海相沉积,使得下组合油藏向气藏转化;印支运动的大规模抬升和燕山运动的挤压、推覆加剧了古油气藏的破坏。
中国南方古生界典型古油气藏解剖表明:古油气藏是多期构造运动改造与叠加的综合产物,古油气藏一般经历了油藏-气藏-残留的演化过程,其中,加里东运动、印支-燕山运动对古油气藏的形成与演化起着至关重要的作用,古油气藏被改造、破坏的根本原因是后期地层的抬升、剥蚀幅度过大。
中国南方典型古油气藏成因分析表明:中国南方古生界仍然是我国油气勘探的一个重要领域。但是,在今后的勘探中,应特别重视古油气藏与今油气藏的差异:古油气藏的最终结果是被破坏与逸散;而今油气藏需要被保存与聚集。二者的成藏机理有着本质的区别:古油气藏的源来自于烃源岩,而下古生代的烃源岩现今都已进入的过成熟期,不可能为有效烃源岩,其早期生成的烃类必须以特殊的方式方能保存下来,成为有效次级源,为后期的晚期成藏提高足够的物质补给。威远气田的水溶气出溶成藏模式对中国南方寻找古老油气藏具有普遍的指导意义,就中国南方而言,形成古老油气藏至少须满足2个条件:(1)较好的后期保存条件;(2)早期深埋和后期大幅抬升。现今缺乏保存条件的地区或埋藏深度过大的地区都不可能取得下古生代的油气勘探突破。依据上述分析,雪峰隆起西南缘的武陵坳陷、黔南坳陷、湘鄂西地区的秭归复向斜和雪峰隆起东南缘的湘中、桂中坳陷、四川盆地古隆起区乃是今后下古生代油气勘探的重点地区。
Oil & gas exploration in Paleozoic in southern China have undergone for more than half a century. Huge natural gas fields such as Puguang and Yuanba have been found in Sichuan Basin and its margin and great breaks have been gotten in oil & gas exploration, but except for these, vast areas in southern China can not get commercial exploration results. Many oil & gas shows in Paleozoic in south China prove that Paleozoic in south China possesses favorable hydrocarbon generating conditions and it has undergone great reservoir formation process in geological history. Therefore, to analyze the factors for forming palaeo-reservoirs in Paleozoic in south China and probe the rules of forming palaeo-reservoirs in south China will provide some revelations and references for finding new areas and direction for oil & gas exploration.
The study on palaeo-reservoir system in southern China starts from the end of the 1970s. With the discovery of the huge Majiang Palaeo-Reservoir, a great deal of petroleum geologists then began to study the origin of palaeo-reservoirs. Palaeo-reservoirs are the reservoirs that had been destructed but can be resumed, the original/primary reservoirs were formed in relatively early times and many palaeo-reservoirs in southern China were formed in Paleozoic. The palaeo-reservoirs in southern China are distributed widely from western part of Jiangnan-Xuefeng Uplift to vast area of Sichuan Basin, the bitumen, oil shows and well natural gas remained are discovered in pores, fractures, cavities, leach holes and corroded hollows, specially in the fractures. Oil and gas shows in Lower Paleozoic are dominated by bitumen and Ordovician by a spot of oil shows, which are mainly showed in the western side of Xuefeng Uplift and margins of Qianzhong Uplifts. Oil & Gas shows in Upper Paleozoic are dominated by oil shows and downhole gas shows, which are mainly showed in margins of palaeo-uplifts and Central Hunan Depression. The planar distribution of palaeo-reservoirs is controlled by location of uplifts and trend of great deep faults, its main part is distributed in great deep fault in east-northern direction.
Great Paleozoic sediments in southern China have set great material base for formation of Palaeo-reservoirs. In early Paleozoic there deposited passive continental margin—wide gentle slope sedimentary layers and late Paleozoic are consisted of platform basin-intracratonic marine sedimentary layers. There widely develop black carbonic shale of lower Cambrian in slope and deep sea basin of lower Paleozoic, which is dominated by ascending oceanic current and provide abundant hydrocarbon source base for formation of palaeo-reservoirs. The dolomites and sandstones in platform and upper slope provide favorable storage space for oil & gas, the mudstones of lower Cambrian and lower Silurian provides preservation conditions for palaeo-reservoirs. All these form the petroliferous combination (z-s Lower Combine) of lower Paleozoic in southern China. Duyun Structural Movement and Guangxi Structural Movement not only provide accumulating places in large scale for formation of palaeo-reserviors of lower Paleozoic in southern China, but also provide motivate force to accumulate oil & gas for palaeo-reservoirs. The palaeo-reservoirs of lower Paleozoic were initially formed in great positive structures. After Caledonian Structure Movement, Yangtze Plate and Cathaysian Plate jointed to form an uniform plate named Southern China Plate. From mid Devonian to mid Triassic, southern China accepted marine deposits with great thickness, on one side it made the oil reservoirs of lower combination(Z-S) transform to gas reservoirs, on the other side new petroliferous combinations came into being in Devonian, Carboniferous and mid Triassic(D-T Combinations).
Analyses on typical palaeo-reservoirs of Paleozoic in southern China show: palaeo-reservoirs are comprehensive products from multiple structural movements and their superimpositions and generally the palaeo-reservoirs underwent the evolution course of oil reservoir—gas reservoir-residual in which Caledonian movement and indo-China—Yanshanian movement play key role in paleo-reservoirs farmation and their evolution. The basic reasons for reform and destruction of palaeo-reservoirs are the great elevation and erosion of strata in the later period.
According to the analyses above, Paleozoic in south China is still an important field for oil & gas exploration in China. Our exploration works in future should attach more attention to the difference between paleao-reservoirs and present reservoirs. The paleao-reservoirs were nearly destructed finally while the present reservoirs need to be preserved. The forming mechanism of paleao-reservoirs are essentially different. Hydrocarbon resources of paleao-reservoirs come from source rocks. However, the lower Paleozoic source rocks can never be effective source rocks due to their overly thermal maturities. Therefore, hydrocarbons that generated in early times must be preserved in special way and then become effective secondary sources as the substantial supply to the latter reservoir forming. The water-solution gas reservoir forming model of Weiyuan field has set a guidence for discovery of paleo-reservoirs in south China. As for south China area, two conditions must be satisfied for the paleo-reservoirs formation, one is favorable later preserving conditions and the other is that the deeply buried reservoirs in early stage must be considerably uplifted later. Exploration breakthrough will never attained in areas with on preserving conditions or overly buried depth. According to these above analyses, Wuling Depression, Qiannan Depression in south-western edge of Xuefeng Uplift, Zigui Synclinorium, Guizhong Depression in the areas of Western part of Hunan and Huabei Province are considered to be the major exploration area in future.
引文
[1]张学清,陈长秀.滇黔桂地区泥盆系资源评价报告.广西石油指挥部.1983
[2]刘培初,李治平.滇黔桂地区石炭系-三叠系海相生油岩特征及评价专题研究报告.云南石油地质科研所.1983
[3]齐敬文,李治平.滇黔桂上扬子地区海相碳酸盐岩成岩作用与保存条件研究.云南石油地质科研所.1990
[4]杨惠民.滇黔桂上扬子地区海相碳酸盐岩油气演化与保存条件研究.滇黔桂石油地质科研所.1990
[5]杨传忠,邓宗淮.滇黔桂上扬子地区油气盖层及水文地质条件研究.贵州石油指挥部.1990
[6]张水昌,刘培初.滇黔桂上扬子地区海相沉积有机质特征与成烃演化.石油研究院廊坊分院,贵州石油指挥部.1990
[7]何邦俊.南盘江地区二叠系生物礁研究报告.贵州石油指挥部101队.1982
[8]向容宁.南盘江地区石油地质综合研究报告.贵州石油指挥部103队.1983
[9]刘炳温.黔南二叠纪古礁油藏研究.贵州石油指挥部.1989
[10]陈焕江,廖宗延.广西大厂生物礁古油藏专题报告.同济大学.1995
[11]杨宏.滇黔桂地区泥盆纪生物礁、滩综合评价研究.石油05工程处.1995
[12]刘培初,邓宗淮.滇黔桂地区有机质成熟度与古地温研究.贵州石油指挥部.1995
[13]曾鼎乾,刘炳温.中国各地质时期生物礁.石油工业出版社.1988
[14]王光等.滇黔桂地区早古生代沉积及油气成藏条件研究.石油05工程处.1995
[15]云贵勘探处.黔南泥盆系含油性研究报告.1965
[16]贵州石油指挥部.贵州中泥盆世沉积相及含油性研究报告.1983
[17]贵州石油指挥部104队.广西南丹大厂泥盆纪生物礁研究报告.1983
[18]梅冥相,李浩,邓军,等.贵阳乌当二叠系茅口组白云岩型古油藏的初步观察与研究.现代地质2004,18(3):353-359
[19]周锋.江南隆起北缘油气成藏带解剖及成藏规律探讨.中国地质大学硕士学位论文(D),2006
[20]刘东鹰.江苏下扬子区海相中、古生界石油天然气成藏机制、成藏过程研究.中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所)博士学位论文(D),2004
[21]王显东,姜振学,庞雄奇.古油气水界面恢复方法综述.地球科学进展.2003,18(3):412-419
[22]戴俊生,马占荣,冀国盛,等.扬子板块中部南山坪背斜的形成与演化.中国地质.2003,30(4):367-371
[23]刘光祥,王守德,潘文蕾,等.四川广元天井山古油藏剖析.海相油气地质,2003,8(1):103-107
[24]王志雄,徐国盛.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格庙气田上古气藏成藏机理研究.断块油气田,2003,10(3):9-11
[25]牟传戈,谭钦银,王立全,等.四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁古油藏的发现及其重要意义.地质论评,2003,49(3):315-315
[26]孙玉善,金英爱,顾乔元,等.塔东2井古油藏成藏期分析.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(5):31-33,61
[27]牟传龙,谭钦银,余谦,等.四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁古油藏剖面序列.沉积与特提斯地质,2003,23(3):60-64
[28]姚建军,陈孟晋,华爱刚,等.川中乐山—龙女寺古隆起震旦系天然气成藏条件分析.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(4):7-9
[29]姚建军,郑浚茂.四川盆地高石梯—磨溪构造带震旦系含油气系统研究.天然气地球科学,2002,13(5):74-79
[30]赵政璋,李永铁.羌塘盆地南部海相侏罗系古油藏例析.海相油气地质,2002,7(3):34-36
[31]金强,田海芹.微量元素组成在固体沥青—源岩对比中的应用.石油实验地质,2001,23(3):285-290
[32]徐云俊,赵宗举.南盘江坳陷油气系统分析.海相油气地质,2001,6(2):13-20
[33]赵宗举,冯加良.湖南慈利灯影组古油藏的发现及意义.石油与天然气地质,2001,22(2):114-118
[34]沈安江.南盘江地区二叠纪生物礁成因类型及潜伏礁预测.石油勘探与开发,2001,28(3):29-32
[35]王东旭,徐文.长庆气田下古气藏储层渗透率模型的建立方法.低渗透油气田,2001,6(3):17-21
[36]王勇,卢涛.利用泥岩压实曲线特征预测下古气藏高产区带.低渗透油气田,001,6(2):45-49
[37]张明禄,卢涛.长庆气田下古气藏高产富集规律和高产井筛选.低渗透油气田,2001,6(1):34-42
[38]韩晓东,李国会.塔中4油田CⅢ古油藏及地质意义.勘探家,2000,5(2):21-24
[39]邵树勋,张乾.丹寨汞金矿床卤素元素与古油藏关系探讨.地质地球化学,1999,27(4):23-28
[40]陈学时,耿忠霞.广西十万大山盆地下二叠统生物礁古油藏及隐伏礁预测.地质学报,999,73(4):350-359
[41]廖宗廷,李光明.巴力—头山生物礁古油气藏的特征及成因.同济大学学报:自然科学版,1999,27(1):92-95
[42]陈学时.广西宁明下二叠统礁古油藏储层及成藏机理.石油学报.1998,19(4):41-49
[43]陈学时.广西宁明亭亮下二叠统古油藏储层三史演化与成藏机理.海相油气地质,1998,3(2):16-21
[44]陈学时,耿忠霞.十万大山盆地下二叠统生物礁古油藏剖析及其地下隐伏礁的分布预测.海相油气地质,1997,2(1):21-27
[45]支家生.旧话重提:“康山古油藏”质疑.海相油气地质.1997,2(1):42-43
[46]王守德,郑冰.中国南方古油藏与油气评价.海相油气地质,1997,2(1):44-5
[47]罗璋,徐克定.下扬子区海相地层典型古油藏剖析.海相油气地质,1996,1(1):34-39
[48]林壬子,张敏,等编译.油藏地球化学进展.西安:陕西科学技术出版社.1996
[49]姜振学,庞雄奇,黄志龙.叠合盆地油气运聚期次研究方法及应用.石油勘探与开发,2000,27(4):22-25
[50]梁狄刚,黄第藩,马新华,等.有机地球化学新进展.北京:石油工业出版社,2002.423-427
[51]庞雄奇,陈章明,陈发景.含油气盆地地史、热史、生留排烃史数值模拟研究与烃源岩定量评价.北京:地质出版社,1993
[52]朱扬明.流体包裹体在油气勘探中的应用.勘探家,1999,4(4):29-32
[53]岳伏生,郭彦如,马龙,等.成藏动力学系统的研究现状及发展趋势.地球科学进展,2003,18(1);122-126
[54]石广仁.油气盆地数值模拟方法.北京:石油工业出版社,1994
[55]康永尚,庞雄奇.油气成藏流体动力新系统分析原理及应用.沉积学报,1998,16(3):80-84
[56]梁狄刚,张水昌,张宝民,等.从塔里木盆地看中国海相生油问题.地学前缘,2000,7(4):534-547
[57] Price LC.A critical overview and proposed working model of surface Geochemical exploration.in:Davidson M J.Unconventional methods inexploration for petroleum and natural gas.Dallas:Southern Methods University Press.1995.245-285
[58] Leythaeuser D.Role of diffusion in primary migration of hydrocarbon. AAPG Bull, 1981, 66(4);408-429
[59] Brown A.Evaluation of possible gas microsepage mechanisms. AAPG Bull, 2000,84(11);1775-1789
[60] Morley C K.Patterns of displacement analog large normal faults: implication for basin evolution and fault propagation,base on examples from East Africa. AAPG Bull,1999,83(4);613-634
[61]何登发,马永生,杨明虎.油气保存单元的概念与评价原理.石油与天然气地质,2004,25(1):1-8
[62]马力,叶舟,梁兴.南方重点盆地海相油气勘探新进展.北京:石油工业出版社,1998,133-152
[63]戴少武,贺自爱,王津义,等.整体封存体系的内涵.石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):107-114
[64]赵宗举,朱琰,李大成,等.中国南方构造形变对油气藏的控制作用.石油与天然气地质,2002,23(1):19-26
[65]赵文智,何登发,瞿辉,等.复合含油气系统中油气运移流向研究的意义.石油学报,2001,22(4):7-12
[66]费琪.成油体系分析与模拟.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997.1-300
[67]赵文智,何登发,李小地,等.石油地质综合研究导论。北京:石油工业出版社,1999.232-326
[68]魏志红.楚雄盆地油气系统演化与油气藏改造.勘探家,2000,5(2):13-17
[69]王根海,赵宗举,李大成,等.中国南方海相油气地质及勘探前景.见:高瑞祺,赵政璋.中国新区油气勘探(卷五).北京:石油工业出版社,2001.243-269
[70] Dow W G.Application of oil correlation and souce rock data to exploration in Williston basin (abs) .AAPG Bull, 1972, 56: 615
[71] Dow W G.Application of oil correlation and souce rock data to exploration in Williston basin.AAPG Bull,1974, 58(7):1158-1178
[72] White D A.Oil and gas plays maps in exploration and assessment.AAPG, Bull,1988,72:940-949
[73] Magoon L B,Dow W G.The petroleum system-from souce to trap.AAPG Memoir, 1994,60:3-24
[74] Surdam R C.Seals,traps,and the petroleum system. AAPG,Memoir,1997, 67: 31-48,57-84
[75] Knippe R J.Juxtaposition and sealing diagrams to help analyze fault seals in hydrocarbon reservoirs. AAPG,Bull,1997,81(2):187-195
[76]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春,等.中国南方古生界层序格架中的生储盖组合类型及特征.石油与天然气地质,2004,25(1):62-69
[77]侯方浩.华南陆块西南部晚古生代深水碳酸盐岩的控油气性.石油勘探与开发,1990,10(2):1-9
[78]方少仙,侯方浩,董兆雄.黔桂泥盆、石炭系白云岩的形成模式.石油与天然气地质,1999,20(1):33-38
[79]曹慧缇,张义刚,徐翔,等.碳酸盐岩生烃机制新认识.石油实验地质,1991,13(3):222-236
[80]郝石生,高岗,王飞宇,等.高过成熟海相烃源岩.北京:石油工业出版社,1996.139-175
[81]张文正,斐戈.烃源岩排烃生成与演化的热压模拟实验.石油勘探与开发,1991,18(3):7-15
[82]钟宁宁,秦勇.碳酸盐岩有机岩石学.北京:科学出版社,1995.130-155
[83] Lewan M D.Effects of thermal maturation on stable organic isotopes as determined by hydrous pyrolysis of woodfood shale.Geochim.Cosmochim. Acta.1983,47:1471-1479
[84] Lewan M D,Winter J C,MacDonald J H.Generation of oil-like pyrolyzates fromorganic-rich shale.Science,1979,203:897-899
[85] Mayer L M.Extent of coverage of mineral surfaces by organic matter in marine sediments. Geochim.Cosmochim.Acta.1999,63:207-215
[86]徐言岗,祁开令.湘中坳陷海相油气勘探前景再认识.石油实验地质,2005,27(6):594-597
[87]徐言岗,贺自爱,曾凡刚.川东北天然气成藏特征.石油与天然气地质,2004, 25(3): 274-278
[88]凡睿、高林.川东北飞仙关组鲕滩储层地震预测,勘探地球物理进展,2003,26(3):199-203
[89]马永生,牟传龙,郭旭升,等四川盆地东北部K兴组沉积特征与沉积格局,地质论评,2006,52(1):25-29
[90]马永生,牟传龙,谭钦银,等.关于开江—梁平海槽的认识.石油与天然气地质,2006,27(3):326-331
[91]马永生,牟传龙,谭钦银,等. Permian / Triassic Boundary and Its Correlation in Daxian—XuanhanArea,NortheasternSichuan Province,China. Acta geologica Sinica,2007,80(1):137-151
[92]马永生,郭旭升,凡睿.川东北普光气田飞仙关组鲕滩储集层预测.石油勘探与开发,2005,32(4):60-64
[93]马永生,郭旭升,郭彤楼,等.四川盆地普光大型气田的发现与勘探启示.地质论评,2005,5l(4):477-480
[94]马永生,蔡勋育,李国雄.四川盆地普光大型气藏基本特征及成藏富集规律.地质学报,2005,79(6):P858-865
[95]马永生、牟传龙、郭彤楼.四川盆地东北部长兴组层序地层与储层分布.地学前缘,2005,12(3):179-185
[96]马永生、牟传龙、郭彤楼,等.四川盆地东北部飞仙关组层序地层与储层分布.矿物岩石,2005,25(4):73-79
[97]王永刚,乐友喜,张军华.地震属性分析技术,北京:中国石油大学出版社. 2007
[98]王生海,强子同.四川华蓥山涧水沟上二叠统生物礁.石油与天然气地质,1992,12(2):147-154
[99]王兴志,张帆,马青,等.四川盆地东部晚二叠世-早三叠世飞仙关期礁、滩特征与海平面变化.沉积学报,2002,20(2):249-254
[100]王炯祥,刘大成,周志军.通南巴构造带嘉二段油气勘探目标选择及开发意义.天然气勘探与开发,2005,2 (2):9-10
[101]王铁冠.生物标志物地球化学研究.北京:中国地质大学出版社.1990
[102]王燮培,费琪.石油勘探构造分析.北京:中国地质大学出版社.1990
[103]任兴国,姚声贤,罗利,等.川东生物礁测井响应及判别模式.测井技术,1999, 23(3):190-197。
[104]刘划一,张静,洪海涛.四川盆地东北部长兴组飞仙关组气藏形成条件研究.天然气勘探与开发,2001,24(2):30-38
[105]刘宝君,许效松.,中国南方岩相古地理图集.北京:科学出版社.1994
[106]孙珍芹.四川盆地普光气田长兴组生物礁研究.南方油气,2006,19(2-3):15-18
[107]牟传龙,马永生,余谦,等.四川宣汉盘龙洞生物礁古油气藏汕气源分析.石油实验地质,2005,27(6):570-574
[108]牟传龙,马永生,谭饮银,等.四川通江—南江—巴中地区长兴组—飞仙关组沉积模式.地质学报,2007,81(6):820-826
[109]牟传龙,谭钦银,王立全,等.四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁古油藏剖面序列.沉积与特提斯地质,2003,23(3):60-64
[110]牟传龙,谭钦银,王立全,等.四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁古油藏的发现及其重要意义.地质论评,2001,11(3):315
[111]范嘉松,吴亚生.川东二叠纪生物礁再认识.石油与天然气地质,2002,23(1):12-18
[112]厚东琳,黄仁春.通南巴构造带嘉二段碳酸岩盐储层特征及其控制因素.南方油气,2006,19(2-3):10-14
[113]倪新峰,陈洪德,韦东晓礁滩复合型气藏物质聚集分布及储层特征研究—以川东北地区普光气田长兴组—飞仙关组为例.中国地质,.2007,34(6):1045-1054
[114]陈洪德,田景春,刘文均,等.中国南方海相震旦系-中三叠统层序划分与对比.成都理工学院学报,2002,43(04):355-379
[115]祝厚勤,孟闲龙.盐城凹陷含油气系统特征分析.天然气工业,2004,24(02):18-21
[116]郭正吾,邓康龄.四川盆地形成与演化.北京:地质出版社.1994
[117]储昭宏,文,坚,盘昌林,等.从宣汉—达县到巴中的储层勘探—以飞仙关—长兴组为例.南方油气,2006,19(4):1-4
[118]彭平,文敏,盂琳.川东地区飞仙关组沉积模式对储层展布特征的影响.天然气勘探与开发,2004,27(2):5-10
[119]曾萍,谭钦银、余谦等.四川盆地东北部飞仙关组暴露浅滩、非暴露浅滩与储层关系.沉积与特提斯地质,2003,23(4):41-45
[120]蔡勋育,马永生,李国雄,等.普光气田下三叠统统飞仙关组储层特征,石油天然气学报,2005,27(1): 43-45
[2]刘培初,李治平.滇黔桂地区石炭系-三叠系海相生油岩特征及评价专题研究报告.云南石油地质科研所.1983
[3]齐敬文,李治平.滇黔桂上扬子地区海相碳酸盐岩成岩作用与保存条件研究.云南石油地质科研所.1990
[4]杨惠民.滇黔桂上扬子地区海相碳酸盐岩油气演化与保存条件研究.滇黔桂石油地质科研所.1990
[5]杨传忠,邓宗淮.滇黔桂上扬子地区油气盖层及水文地质条件研究.贵州石油指挥部.1990
[6]张水昌,刘培初.滇黔桂上扬子地区海相沉积有机质特征与成烃演化.石油研究院廊坊分院,贵州石油指挥部.1990
[7]何邦俊.南盘江地区二叠系生物礁研究报告.贵州石油指挥部101队.1982
[8]向容宁.南盘江地区石油地质综合研究报告.贵州石油指挥部103队.1983
[9]刘炳温.黔南二叠纪古礁油藏研究.贵州石油指挥部.1989
[10]陈焕江,廖宗延.广西大厂生物礁古油藏专题报告.同济大学.1995
[11]杨宏.滇黔桂地区泥盆纪生物礁、滩综合评价研究.石油05工程处.1995
[12]刘培初,邓宗淮.滇黔桂地区有机质成熟度与古地温研究.贵州石油指挥部.1995
[13]曾鼎乾,刘炳温.中国各地质时期生物礁.石油工业出版社.1988
[14]王光等.滇黔桂地区早古生代沉积及油气成藏条件研究.石油05工程处.1995
[15]云贵勘探处.黔南泥盆系含油性研究报告.1965
[16]贵州石油指挥部.贵州中泥盆世沉积相及含油性研究报告.1983
[17]贵州石油指挥部104队.广西南丹大厂泥盆纪生物礁研究报告.1983
[18]梅冥相,李浩,邓军,等.贵阳乌当二叠系茅口组白云岩型古油藏的初步观察与研究.现代地质2004,18(3):353-359
[19]周锋.江南隆起北缘油气成藏带解剖及成藏规律探讨.中国地质大学硕士学位论文(D),2006
[20]刘东鹰.江苏下扬子区海相中、古生界石油天然气成藏机制、成藏过程研究.中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所)博士学位论文(D),2004
[21]王显东,姜振学,庞雄奇.古油气水界面恢复方法综述.地球科学进展.2003,18(3):412-419
[22]戴俊生,马占荣,冀国盛,等.扬子板块中部南山坪背斜的形成与演化.中国地质.2003,30(4):367-371
[23]刘光祥,王守德,潘文蕾,等.四川广元天井山古油藏剖析.海相油气地质,2003,8(1):103-107
[24]王志雄,徐国盛.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格庙气田上古气藏成藏机理研究.断块油气田,2003,10(3):9-11
[25]牟传戈,谭钦银,王立全,等.四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁古油藏的发现及其重要意义.地质论评,2003,49(3):315-315
[26]孙玉善,金英爱,顾乔元,等.塔东2井古油藏成藏期分析.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(5):31-33,61
[27]牟传龙,谭钦银,余谦,等.四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁古油藏剖面序列.沉积与特提斯地质,2003,23(3):60-64
[28]姚建军,陈孟晋,华爱刚,等.川中乐山—龙女寺古隆起震旦系天然气成藏条件分析.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(4):7-9
[29]姚建军,郑浚茂.四川盆地高石梯—磨溪构造带震旦系含油气系统研究.天然气地球科学,2002,13(5):74-79
[30]赵政璋,李永铁.羌塘盆地南部海相侏罗系古油藏例析.海相油气地质,2002,7(3):34-36
[31]金强,田海芹.微量元素组成在固体沥青—源岩对比中的应用.石油实验地质,2001,23(3):285-290
[32]徐云俊,赵宗举.南盘江坳陷油气系统分析.海相油气地质,2001,6(2):13-20
[33]赵宗举,冯加良.湖南慈利灯影组古油藏的发现及意义.石油与天然气地质,2001,22(2):114-118
[34]沈安江.南盘江地区二叠纪生物礁成因类型及潜伏礁预测.石油勘探与开发,2001,28(3):29-32
[35]王东旭,徐文.长庆气田下古气藏储层渗透率模型的建立方法.低渗透油气田,2001,6(3):17-21
[36]王勇,卢涛.利用泥岩压实曲线特征预测下古气藏高产区带.低渗透油气田,001,6(2):45-49
[37]张明禄,卢涛.长庆气田下古气藏高产富集规律和高产井筛选.低渗透油气田,2001,6(1):34-42
[38]韩晓东,李国会.塔中4油田CⅢ古油藏及地质意义.勘探家,2000,5(2):21-24
[39]邵树勋,张乾.丹寨汞金矿床卤素元素与古油藏关系探讨.地质地球化学,1999,27(4):23-28
[40]陈学时,耿忠霞.广西十万大山盆地下二叠统生物礁古油藏及隐伏礁预测.地质学报,999,73(4):350-359
[41]廖宗廷,李光明.巴力—头山生物礁古油气藏的特征及成因.同济大学学报:自然科学版,1999,27(1):92-95
[42]陈学时.广西宁明下二叠统礁古油藏储层及成藏机理.石油学报.1998,19(4):41-49
[43]陈学时.广西宁明亭亮下二叠统古油藏储层三史演化与成藏机理.海相油气地质,1998,3(2):16-21
[44]陈学时,耿忠霞.十万大山盆地下二叠统生物礁古油藏剖析及其地下隐伏礁的分布预测.海相油气地质,1997,2(1):21-27
[45]支家生.旧话重提:“康山古油藏”质疑.海相油气地质.1997,2(1):42-43
[46]王守德,郑冰.中国南方古油藏与油气评价.海相油气地质,1997,2(1):44-5
[47]罗璋,徐克定.下扬子区海相地层典型古油藏剖析.海相油气地质,1996,1(1):34-39
[48]林壬子,张敏,等编译.油藏地球化学进展.西安:陕西科学技术出版社.1996
[49]姜振学,庞雄奇,黄志龙.叠合盆地油气运聚期次研究方法及应用.石油勘探与开发,2000,27(4):22-25
[50]梁狄刚,黄第藩,马新华,等.有机地球化学新进展.北京:石油工业出版社,2002.423-427
[51]庞雄奇,陈章明,陈发景.含油气盆地地史、热史、生留排烃史数值模拟研究与烃源岩定量评价.北京:地质出版社,1993
[52]朱扬明.流体包裹体在油气勘探中的应用.勘探家,1999,4(4):29-32
[53]岳伏生,郭彦如,马龙,等.成藏动力学系统的研究现状及发展趋势.地球科学进展,2003,18(1);122-126
[54]石广仁.油气盆地数值模拟方法.北京:石油工业出版社,1994
[55]康永尚,庞雄奇.油气成藏流体动力新系统分析原理及应用.沉积学报,1998,16(3):80-84
[56]梁狄刚,张水昌,张宝民,等.从塔里木盆地看中国海相生油问题.地学前缘,2000,7(4):534-547
[57] Price LC.A critical overview and proposed working model of surface Geochemical exploration.in:Davidson M J.Unconventional methods inexploration for petroleum and natural gas.Dallas:Southern Methods University Press.1995.245-285
[58] Leythaeuser D.Role of diffusion in primary migration of hydrocarbon. AAPG Bull, 1981, 66(4);408-429
[59] Brown A.Evaluation of possible gas microsepage mechanisms. AAPG Bull, 2000,84(11);1775-1789
[60] Morley C K.Patterns of displacement analog large normal faults: implication for basin evolution and fault propagation,base on examples from East Africa. AAPG Bull,1999,83(4);613-634
[61]何登发,马永生,杨明虎.油气保存单元的概念与评价原理.石油与天然气地质,2004,25(1):1-8
[62]马力,叶舟,梁兴.南方重点盆地海相油气勘探新进展.北京:石油工业出版社,1998,133-152
[63]戴少武,贺自爱,王津义,等.整体封存体系的内涵.石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):107-114
[64]赵宗举,朱琰,李大成,等.中国南方构造形变对油气藏的控制作用.石油与天然气地质,2002,23(1):19-26
[65]赵文智,何登发,瞿辉,等.复合含油气系统中油气运移流向研究的意义.石油学报,2001,22(4):7-12
[66]费琪.成油体系分析与模拟.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997.1-300
[67]赵文智,何登发,李小地,等.石油地质综合研究导论。北京:石油工业出版社,1999.232-326
[68]魏志红.楚雄盆地油气系统演化与油气藏改造.勘探家,2000,5(2):13-17
[69]王根海,赵宗举,李大成,等.中国南方海相油气地质及勘探前景.见:高瑞祺,赵政璋.中国新区油气勘探(卷五).北京:石油工业出版社,2001.243-269
[70] Dow W G.Application of oil correlation and souce rock data to exploration in Williston basin (abs) .AAPG Bull, 1972, 56: 615
[71] Dow W G.Application of oil correlation and souce rock data to exploration in Williston basin.AAPG Bull,1974, 58(7):1158-1178
[72] White D A.Oil and gas plays maps in exploration and assessment.AAPG, Bull,1988,72:940-949
[73] Magoon L B,Dow W G.The petroleum system-from souce to trap.AAPG Memoir, 1994,60:3-24
[74] Surdam R C.Seals,traps,and the petroleum system. AAPG,Memoir,1997, 67: 31-48,57-84
[75] Knippe R J.Juxtaposition and sealing diagrams to help analyze fault seals in hydrocarbon reservoirs. AAPG,Bull,1997,81(2):187-195
[76]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春,等.中国南方古生界层序格架中的生储盖组合类型及特征.石油与天然气地质,2004,25(1):62-69
[77]侯方浩.华南陆块西南部晚古生代深水碳酸盐岩的控油气性.石油勘探与开发,1990,10(2):1-9
[78]方少仙,侯方浩,董兆雄.黔桂泥盆、石炭系白云岩的形成模式.石油与天然气地质,1999,20(1):33-38
[79]曹慧缇,张义刚,徐翔,等.碳酸盐岩生烃机制新认识.石油实验地质,1991,13(3):222-236
[80]郝石生,高岗,王飞宇,等.高过成熟海相烃源岩.北京:石油工业出版社,1996.139-175
[81]张文正,斐戈.烃源岩排烃生成与演化的热压模拟实验.石油勘探与开发,1991,18(3):7-15
[82]钟宁宁,秦勇.碳酸盐岩有机岩石学.北京:科学出版社,1995.130-155
[83] Lewan M D.Effects of thermal maturation on stable organic isotopes as determined by hydrous pyrolysis of woodfood shale.Geochim.Cosmochim. Acta.1983,47:1471-1479
[84] Lewan M D,Winter J C,MacDonald J H.Generation of oil-like pyrolyzates fromorganic-rich shale.Science,1979,203:897-899
[85] Mayer L M.Extent of coverage of mineral surfaces by organic matter in marine sediments. Geochim.Cosmochim.Acta.1999,63:207-215
[86]徐言岗,祁开令.湘中坳陷海相油气勘探前景再认识.石油实验地质,2005,27(6):594-597
[87]徐言岗,贺自爱,曾凡刚.川东北天然气成藏特征.石油与天然气地质,2004, 25(3): 274-278
[88]凡睿、高林.川东北飞仙关组鲕滩储层地震预测,勘探地球物理进展,2003,26(3):199-203
[89]马永生,牟传龙,郭旭升,等四川盆地东北部K兴组沉积特征与沉积格局,地质论评,2006,52(1):25-29
[90]马永生,牟传龙,谭钦银,等.关于开江—梁平海槽的认识.石油与天然气地质,2006,27(3):326-331
[91]马永生,牟传龙,谭钦银,等. Permian / Triassic Boundary and Its Correlation in Daxian—XuanhanArea,NortheasternSichuan Province,China. Acta geologica Sinica,2007,80(1):137-151
[92]马永生,郭旭升,凡睿.川东北普光气田飞仙关组鲕滩储集层预测.石油勘探与开发,2005,32(4):60-64
[93]马永生,郭旭升,郭彤楼,等.四川盆地普光大型气田的发现与勘探启示.地质论评,2005,5l(4):477-480
[94]马永生,蔡勋育,李国雄.四川盆地普光大型气藏基本特征及成藏富集规律.地质学报,2005,79(6):P858-865
[95]马永生、牟传龙、郭彤楼.四川盆地东北部长兴组层序地层与储层分布.地学前缘,2005,12(3):179-185
[96]马永生、牟传龙、郭彤楼,等.四川盆地东北部飞仙关组层序地层与储层分布.矿物岩石,2005,25(4):73-79
[97]王永刚,乐友喜,张军华.地震属性分析技术,北京:中国石油大学出版社. 2007
[98]王生海,强子同.四川华蓥山涧水沟上二叠统生物礁.石油与天然气地质,1992,12(2):147-154
[99]王兴志,张帆,马青,等.四川盆地东部晚二叠世-早三叠世飞仙关期礁、滩特征与海平面变化.沉积学报,2002,20(2):249-254
[100]王炯祥,刘大成,周志军.通南巴构造带嘉二段油气勘探目标选择及开发意义.天然气勘探与开发,2005,2 (2):9-10
[101]王铁冠.生物标志物地球化学研究.北京:中国地质大学出版社.1990
[102]王燮培,费琪.石油勘探构造分析.北京:中国地质大学出版社.1990
[103]任兴国,姚声贤,罗利,等.川东生物礁测井响应及判别模式.测井技术,1999, 23(3):190-197。
[104]刘划一,张静,洪海涛.四川盆地东北部长兴组飞仙关组气藏形成条件研究.天然气勘探与开发,2001,24(2):30-38
[105]刘宝君,许效松.,中国南方岩相古地理图集.北京:科学出版社.1994
[106]孙珍芹.四川盆地普光气田长兴组生物礁研究.南方油气,2006,19(2-3):15-18
[107]牟传龙,马永生,余谦,等.四川宣汉盘龙洞生物礁古油气藏汕气源分析.石油实验地质,2005,27(6):570-574
[108]牟传龙,马永生,谭饮银,等.四川通江—南江—巴中地区长兴组—飞仙关组沉积模式.地质学报,2007,81(6):820-826
[109]牟传龙,谭钦银,王立全,等.四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁古油藏剖面序列.沉积与特提斯地质,2003,23(3):60-64
[110]牟传龙,谭钦银,王立全,等.四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁古油藏的发现及其重要意义.地质论评,2001,11(3):315
[111]范嘉松,吴亚生.川东二叠纪生物礁再认识.石油与天然气地质,2002,23(1):12-18
[112]厚东琳,黄仁春.通南巴构造带嘉二段碳酸岩盐储层特征及其控制因素.南方油气,2006,19(2-3):10-14
[113]倪新峰,陈洪德,韦东晓礁滩复合型气藏物质聚集分布及储层特征研究—以川东北地区普光气田长兴组—飞仙关组为例.中国地质,.2007,34(6):1045-1054
[114]陈洪德,田景春,刘文均,等.中国南方海相震旦系-中三叠统层序划分与对比.成都理工学院学报,2002,43(04):355-379
[115]祝厚勤,孟闲龙.盐城凹陷含油气系统特征分析.天然气工业,2004,24(02):18-21
[116]郭正吾,邓康龄.四川盆地形成与演化.北京:地质出版社.1994
[117]储昭宏,文,坚,盘昌林,等.从宣汉—达县到巴中的储层勘探—以飞仙关—长兴组为例.南方油气,2006,19(4):1-4
[118]彭平,文敏,盂琳.川东地区飞仙关组沉积模式对储层展布特征的影响.天然气勘探与开发,2004,27(2):5-10
[119]曾萍,谭钦银、余谦等.四川盆地东北部飞仙关组暴露浅滩、非暴露浅滩与储层关系.沉积与特提斯地质,2003,23(4):41-45
[120]蔡勋育,马永生,李国雄,等.普光气田下三叠统统飞仙关组储层特征,石油天然气学报,2005,27(1): 43-45
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |