三肇凹陷源区内外扶杨油层油成藏机制研究
|
摘要
本论文主要研究范围是松辽盆地三肇凹陷及其周边地区,重点研究该区扶杨油层油运移机制及过程、油成藏时期及模式、油成藏主控因素,进而对油成藏有利区进行预测。
通过对三肇凹陷、尚家地区、宋站南地区及长10区块扶杨油层原油物理性质进行统计,原油族组成特征分析,全烃色谱分析,并结合Pr/nC17与深度关系,Ph/nC18与深度关系,Pr/Ph与深度关系,Pr/nC17与Ph/nC18关系对比,对上述研究区内扶杨油层原油进行对比得到几个地区扶杨油层原油具有同源的特征,主要来自三肇凹陷青一段源岩；通过对源岩发育及分布特征及地球化学指标研究得到三肇凹陷青一段源岩可以为扶杨油层提供较充足的油源。通过对研究区内断裂发育特征及活动期次研究,并结合断裂与青一段源岩及扶杨油层油藏之间关系对扶杨油层油源断裂进行了拆分,得到扶杨油层的油源断裂主要是坳陷期断裂(Ⅱ型)和断陷期形成坳陷期继续活动的断裂(Ⅰ—Ⅱ型)。在研究区扶杨油层断裂和砂体输导通道类型研究的基础上,对源内和源外扶杨油层油运移机制进行研究,得到源内油运移机制有2种：一种是青一段源岩生成油在古超压作用下“倒灌”运移进入扶杨油层后,再短距离侧向运移而聚集成藏；另一种是断裂将青一段源岩错断,使青一段源岩与扶杨油层接触,青一段源岩生成的油便在浮力作用下侧向运移进入扶杨油层。源外油运移机制为先是超压作用下青一段源岩生成的油向下“倒灌”运移或是由于青一段源岩与扶杨油层侧接而侧向运移进入扶杨油层,然后沿砂体配合断裂由三肇凹陷向源外的构造高部位侧向运移,如尚家地区和宋站南地区扶杨油层；或是沿断裂配合砂体向源外构造高部位侧向运移,如长10区块。在对三肇凹陷源内和源外扶杨油层运移机制研究的基础上,对源内和源外扶杨油层油成藏主控因素进行总结,得到源内油成藏主要受青一段油向下“倒灌”运移范围；断裂密集带及断裂与砂体配合而形成的地垒构造的控制；源外油成藏主要受距离油源岩区的距离,油运移路径及圈闭内砂体发育的控制。源内油成藏模式一种是扶杨油层断层圈闭直接位于青一段源岩之下,由T2源断裂直接连接。青一段源岩生成油在超压作用下通过T2源断裂直接“倒灌”运移进入扶杨油层断层圈闭中,不须经过砂体长距离侧向运移便可以聚集成藏；另一种模式是青一段源岩和扶杨油层之间由于存在着大量的T2断裂,这些断裂将青一段源岩错断,使青一段源岩与下伏扶杨油层侧接,青一段源岩生成的油在浮力的作用下可直接向与其对接的扶杨油层中侧向运移,进入扶杨油层中的油便在其内聚集成藏。源外油成藏模式主要为三肇凹陷青一段源岩生成的油在古超压作用下“倒灌”运移或是侧接而侧向运移进入扶杨油层后,再在浮力作用下沿断裂沟通的砂体或者被砂体沟通的断裂密集带侧向运移至源外的构造高部位圈闭中聚集成藏。最后在综合上述研究的基础上对三肇凹陷、尚家地区、宋南地区及长10区块扶杨油层油成藏的有利目标区进行了预测,得到三肇凹陷扶杨油层有47个评价目标区。尚家地区优选Ⅰ类有利勘探目标区有3个,Ⅱ类有利区有5个；宋站南地区优选Ⅰ类有利勘探目标4个,Ⅱ类有利勘探目标共6个,Ⅲ类有利勘探目标3个；长10区块扶余油层优选有利勘探目标区8个。
This paper mainly discusses mechanism and process of oil migration, period and models of oil accumulation and main controlling factors of oil accumulation in Fuyang oil layer in and around Sanzhao Depression, Songliao Basin, and finally predicts the favorable regions for oil accumulation.
Statistics of oil physical property, analysis of oil group composition and total hydrocarbon chromatogram, relationship between Pr/nC17 and depth, Ph/nC18 and depth, Pr/Ph and depth and relationship between Pr/nC17 and Ph/nC18 of Fuyang oil layer in Sanzhao Depression, Shangjia area, southern Songzhan and Changshi block show oil in these areas is from the same source-source rocks of Qingyi member in Sanzhao Depression. Development and distribution of source rocks and indexes of geochemistry indicate source rocks of Qingyi member in Sanzhao Depression can provide sufficient oil for Fuyang oil layer.Synthesizing studies of development features and activity period of faults and relationship between faults and source rocks of Qingyi member or reservoirs of Fuyang oil layer, we carry out source fault separation in Fuyang oil layer and draw that faults during depression period (Ⅱtype) and faults formed in downfaulted period and still active during depression period(ⅠtoⅡtype) are main source faults in Fuyang oil layer. We draw there exist two oil migration mechanisms of Fuyang oil layer, inside and outside source rocks, on the basis of researches on faults and types of sandbody migration pathway, of which are oil generated by source rocks of Qingyi member laterally migrated a short distance to form oil reservoirs after downward migrated to Fuyang oil layer, under the influence of paleo-hyperpressure; and oil yielded by source rocks of Qingyi member laterally moved to Fuyang oil layer under the action of buoyancy after source rocks of Qingyi member connected with Fuyang oil layer because source rocks were faulted by faults.Oil migration mechanism outside source rocks is oil generated by Qingyi member laterally migrated to high area of structures outside source rocks from Sanzhao Depression along sandbody-fault matching, as Fuyang oil layer in Shangjia and Songzhan region; or laterally migrated to high area of structures outside source rocks along fault-sandbody matching, as Changshi block, after oil down migrated or laterally migrated to Fuyang oil layer because of lateral connection of source rocks and Fuyang oil layer.Main controlling factors of oil accumulation of Fuyang oil layer inside and outside source rocks, based on migration mechanism of Fuyang oil layer inside and outside source rocks of Sanzhao Depression show oil accumulation inside source rocks is dominated by down-migration extension of oil of Qingyi member, fault concentrated zones and horst matched by faults and sandbody, while oil accumulation outside source rocks mainly commandeered by distance from source rocks, oil migration pathways and development of sandbody in traps.The two models of oil accumulation inside source rocks are as follows. First, on the condition that fault traps of Fuyang oil layer are directly under source rocks of Qingyi member and linked by T2 source faults, oil produced by Qingyi member directly down migrated to fault traps in Fuyang oil layer under the action of hyperpressure along T2 source faults, which can form reservoirs without long-distance migration along sandbody. Second, if there are lots of T2 faults between source rocks of Qingyi member and oil layer of Fuyang oil layer, the faults will stagger source rocks and link source rocks and oil layer, and then, oil will laterally migrate to and accumulate in Fuyang oil layer, laterally linked to source rocks of Qingyi member, by buoyancy. Oil accumulation model outside source rocks is oil generated by source rocks of Qingyi member laterally migrated to traps in high structure area outside source rocks to form reservoirs under the action of buoyancy along sandbody connected by faults or faults connected by sandbody after oil down migrated under the influence of paleo hyperpressure or laterally transported because of lateral connection to Fuyang oil layer. We predict favorable targets for oil accumulation of Fuyang oil layer in Sanzhao Depression, Shangjia region, songzhan area and Changshi block, on the basis of the above studies, and conclude 47 evaluation targets.Favorable exploring areas of Shangjia region are three ofⅠtype and five ofⅡtype, while which of Songzhan are four ofⅠtype, six ofⅡtype and three ofⅢtype, that of Changshi block are totally eight.
通过对三肇凹陷、尚家地区、宋站南地区及长10区块扶杨油层原油物理性质进行统计,原油族组成特征分析,全烃色谱分析,并结合Pr/nC17与深度关系,Ph/nC18与深度关系,Pr/Ph与深度关系,Pr/nC17与Ph/nC18关系对比,对上述研究区内扶杨油层原油进行对比得到几个地区扶杨油层原油具有同源的特征,主要来自三肇凹陷青一段源岩；通过对源岩发育及分布特征及地球化学指标研究得到三肇凹陷青一段源岩可以为扶杨油层提供较充足的油源。通过对研究区内断裂发育特征及活动期次研究,并结合断裂与青一段源岩及扶杨油层油藏之间关系对扶杨油层油源断裂进行了拆分,得到扶杨油层的油源断裂主要是坳陷期断裂(Ⅱ型)和断陷期形成坳陷期继续活动的断裂(Ⅰ—Ⅱ型)。在研究区扶杨油层断裂和砂体输导通道类型研究的基础上,对源内和源外扶杨油层油运移机制进行研究,得到源内油运移机制有2种：一种是青一段源岩生成油在古超压作用下“倒灌”运移进入扶杨油层后,再短距离侧向运移而聚集成藏；另一种是断裂将青一段源岩错断,使青一段源岩与扶杨油层接触,青一段源岩生成的油便在浮力作用下侧向运移进入扶杨油层。源外油运移机制为先是超压作用下青一段源岩生成的油向下“倒灌”运移或是由于青一段源岩与扶杨油层侧接而侧向运移进入扶杨油层,然后沿砂体配合断裂由三肇凹陷向源外的构造高部位侧向运移,如尚家地区和宋站南地区扶杨油层；或是沿断裂配合砂体向源外构造高部位侧向运移,如长10区块。在对三肇凹陷源内和源外扶杨油层运移机制研究的基础上,对源内和源外扶杨油层油成藏主控因素进行总结,得到源内油成藏主要受青一段油向下“倒灌”运移范围；断裂密集带及断裂与砂体配合而形成的地垒构造的控制；源外油成藏主要受距离油源岩区的距离,油运移路径及圈闭内砂体发育的控制。源内油成藏模式一种是扶杨油层断层圈闭直接位于青一段源岩之下,由T2源断裂直接连接。青一段源岩生成油在超压作用下通过T2源断裂直接“倒灌”运移进入扶杨油层断层圈闭中,不须经过砂体长距离侧向运移便可以聚集成藏；另一种模式是青一段源岩和扶杨油层之间由于存在着大量的T2断裂,这些断裂将青一段源岩错断,使青一段源岩与下伏扶杨油层侧接,青一段源岩生成的油在浮力的作用下可直接向与其对接的扶杨油层中侧向运移,进入扶杨油层中的油便在其内聚集成藏。源外油成藏模式主要为三肇凹陷青一段源岩生成的油在古超压作用下“倒灌”运移或是侧接而侧向运移进入扶杨油层后,再在浮力作用下沿断裂沟通的砂体或者被砂体沟通的断裂密集带侧向运移至源外的构造高部位圈闭中聚集成藏。最后在综合上述研究的基础上对三肇凹陷、尚家地区、宋南地区及长10区块扶杨油层油成藏的有利目标区进行了预测,得到三肇凹陷扶杨油层有47个评价目标区。尚家地区优选Ⅰ类有利勘探目标区有3个,Ⅱ类有利区有5个；宋站南地区优选Ⅰ类有利勘探目标4个,Ⅱ类有利勘探目标共6个,Ⅲ类有利勘探目标3个；长10区块扶余油层优选有利勘探目标区8个。
This paper mainly discusses mechanism and process of oil migration, period and models of oil accumulation and main controlling factors of oil accumulation in Fuyang oil layer in and around Sanzhao Depression, Songliao Basin, and finally predicts the favorable regions for oil accumulation.
Statistics of oil physical property, analysis of oil group composition and total hydrocarbon chromatogram, relationship between Pr/nC17 and depth, Ph/nC18 and depth, Pr/Ph and depth and relationship between Pr/nC17 and Ph/nC18 of Fuyang oil layer in Sanzhao Depression, Shangjia area, southern Songzhan and Changshi block show oil in these areas is from the same source-source rocks of Qingyi member in Sanzhao Depression. Development and distribution of source rocks and indexes of geochemistry indicate source rocks of Qingyi member in Sanzhao Depression can provide sufficient oil for Fuyang oil layer.Synthesizing studies of development features and activity period of faults and relationship between faults and source rocks of Qingyi member or reservoirs of Fuyang oil layer, we carry out source fault separation in Fuyang oil layer and draw that faults during depression period (Ⅱtype) and faults formed in downfaulted period and still active during depression period(ⅠtoⅡtype) are main source faults in Fuyang oil layer. We draw there exist two oil migration mechanisms of Fuyang oil layer, inside and outside source rocks, on the basis of researches on faults and types of sandbody migration pathway, of which are oil generated by source rocks of Qingyi member laterally migrated a short distance to form oil reservoirs after downward migrated to Fuyang oil layer, under the influence of paleo-hyperpressure; and oil yielded by source rocks of Qingyi member laterally moved to Fuyang oil layer under the action of buoyancy after source rocks of Qingyi member connected with Fuyang oil layer because source rocks were faulted by faults.Oil migration mechanism outside source rocks is oil generated by Qingyi member laterally migrated to high area of structures outside source rocks from Sanzhao Depression along sandbody-fault matching, as Fuyang oil layer in Shangjia and Songzhan region; or laterally migrated to high area of structures outside source rocks along fault-sandbody matching, as Changshi block, after oil down migrated or laterally migrated to Fuyang oil layer because of lateral connection of source rocks and Fuyang oil layer.Main controlling factors of oil accumulation of Fuyang oil layer inside and outside source rocks, based on migration mechanism of Fuyang oil layer inside and outside source rocks of Sanzhao Depression show oil accumulation inside source rocks is dominated by down-migration extension of oil of Qingyi member, fault concentrated zones and horst matched by faults and sandbody, while oil accumulation outside source rocks mainly commandeered by distance from source rocks, oil migration pathways and development of sandbody in traps.The two models of oil accumulation inside source rocks are as follows. First, on the condition that fault traps of Fuyang oil layer are directly under source rocks of Qingyi member and linked by T2 source faults, oil produced by Qingyi member directly down migrated to fault traps in Fuyang oil layer under the action of hyperpressure along T2 source faults, which can form reservoirs without long-distance migration along sandbody. Second, if there are lots of T2 faults between source rocks of Qingyi member and oil layer of Fuyang oil layer, the faults will stagger source rocks and link source rocks and oil layer, and then, oil will laterally migrate to and accumulate in Fuyang oil layer, laterally linked to source rocks of Qingyi member, by buoyancy. Oil accumulation model outside source rocks is oil generated by source rocks of Qingyi member laterally migrated to traps in high structure area outside source rocks to form reservoirs under the action of buoyancy along sandbody connected by faults or faults connected by sandbody after oil down migrated under the influence of paleo hyperpressure or laterally transported because of lateral connection to Fuyang oil layer. We predict favorable targets for oil accumulation of Fuyang oil layer in Sanzhao Depression, Shangjia region, songzhan area and Changshi block, on the basis of the above studies, and conclude 47 evaluation targets.Favorable exploring areas of Shangjia region are three ofⅠtype and five ofⅡtype, while which of Songzhan are four ofⅠtype, six ofⅡtype and three ofⅢtype, that of Changshi block are totally eight.
引文
[1]Hubbert M K. Entrapment of petroleum under hydrodynamic conditions[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1953,37(8):1954～2026.
[2]Tissot B. Migration of hydrocarbons in sedimentary basin:a geological geochemical and historical perspective, IFP Exploration Research Conference.1987.
[3]Hunt J.M. Petroleum geochemistry and geology.San fransisco[J]. W.H Freeman,1979:617.
[4]Chapman R E. Effects of oil and gas accumulation on water movement[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1982,66(3):189～190.
[5]Toth J. Cross-formational gravity flow groundwater:a mechanics of the transport and accumulation of petroleum, problems of petroleum migration[J]. AAPG Studies in Geology, 1980,10:121～167.
[6]胡见义,徐树宝,童晓光,蔺殿忠.中国东部第三系含油气盆地地层岩性油藏形成的地质基础和分布特点[J].石油学报,1984,5(2)：1-9.
[7]胡见义,徐树宝,童晓光.渤海湾盆地复式油气聚集区(带)的形成和分布[J].石油勘探与开发,1986,1(1)：1～8.
[8]胡朝元.生油区控制油气田分布—中国东部陆相盆地进行区域勘探的有效理论[J].石油学报,1982,3(2)：10～13.
[9]胡朝元.我国海上沉积盆地油气田分布区域控制因素的探讨[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1986,6(4)：23～29.
[10]李德生.渤海湾含油气盆地的地质和构造特征[J].石油学报,1980,1(1)：6～20.
[11]Dahlberg, E, C. Applied hydrodynamic in petroleum exploration:Springer-Verlag[M], New York,1982.
[12]England W A. The movement and entrapment of petroleum fluids in the subsurface [J]. Jour Of the Geol. Soci., London,1987,144:327-347.
[13]郝石生,黄志龙,高耀斌.轻烃扩散系数的研究及天然气运聚动平衡原理[J].石油学报,1991,12(3)：17～24.
[14]石广仁.油气盆地数值模拟方法[M].北京：石油工业出版社,1994.1-172.
[15]查明,赵永军.A Study on Hydrocarbon-Generating Potential and Kinetics of Source-Rock Pyrolysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry,1995,14(3):256～263.
[16]庞雄奇,金之钧,左胜杰.油气藏动力学成因模式与分类[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4)：507～514.
[17]曾溅辉,金之钧.油气二次运移和聚集物理模拟[M].北京：石油工业出版社.2000.
[18]Hunt J M. Generation and migration of petroleum from abnormally pressured fluid compartments[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(1):1-12.
[19]张义纲.天然气生成聚集与保存(M).南京：海河大学出版社,1991,138-148.
[20]Manoon L B, W G Dow. The petroleum system[J]. AAPG Memoir60,1994,3-24.
[21]胡朝元,廖曦.成油系统概念在中国的提出及其应用[J].石油学报,1996,17(1)：10～16.
[22]田世澄,陈建渝,张树林,毕研鹏,张继国.论成藏动力学系统[J].勘探家,1996,1(2)：20～25.
[23]田世澄,孙自明,傅金华,韩军,胡春余.论成藏动力学与成藏动力系统[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(2)：129～138.
[24]康永尚,王捷.流体动力系统与油气成藏作用[J].石油学报,1999,20(1)：30～33.
[25]贾承造,何登发,石听等.中国油气晚期成藏特征[J].中国科学D辑,2006,36(5)：412-420.
[26]龚再升,王国纯.渤海新构造运动控制晚期油气成藏[J].石油学报,2001,22(2)：1-7.
[27]赵重远,张小会,任战利等.油气成藏动态预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(4)：314-320.
[28]张善文,王永诗,石砥石,等.网毯式油气成藏体系—以济阳坳陷新近系为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(1)：1-10.
[29]赵靖舟.幕式成藏理论的提出及其勘探意义[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(4)：315-321.
[30]金之钧,张一伟,王捷.油气成藏机理与分布规律[M].北京：石油工业出版社,2003.
[31]关德范,王国力,张金功等.成烃成藏理论新思维[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(5)：425～432.
[32]Price R A. The southeastern Canadian Cordillera:thrust faulting, tectonic wedging, and delamination of the lithosphere[J]. Journal of Structural Geology,1986,8:1584-1596.
[33]Smith D A.Sealing and nonsealing faults in Louisiana Gulf Coast salt basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,1980,64(1):145-172.
[34]Hooper ECD. Fluid migration along growth fault in compacting Sediments[J].Jour of Petrol Geol,1991,4(2):161-180
[35]李明诚.石油与天然气运移(第二版)[M].北京：石油工业出版社,1996.
[36]Hindle A D.1997. Petroleum migration pathways and charge concentration:a three-dimensional model[J]. AAPG Bulletin,81(9):1451-1481.
[37]Sibson R H.1977.Fault rocks and fault mechanisms. [J] Geol Soc Lond,133:191-213.
[38]华保钦.构造应力场、地震泵和油气运移[J].沉积学报,1995,13(2)：77-85.
[39]Steven L, Lorraine E, Martin S, et al. Vertical and lateral fluid flow related to a large growth fault, south Eugene island block 330 field, offshore Louisiana [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1999,283 (2):244-276.
[40]Dickinson G.Geologecal aspects of abnormal reservoir pressures in Gulf coast Loousiana[J].AAPG Bulletin,1953,37:410-432.
[41]马启富,陈斯忠,张启明,等.超压盆地与油气分布[M].北京：地质出版社,2000.1-253.
[42]Ortoleva P J. Basin Compartment and Seals [M]. AAPG memoir 61.Tulsa, Oklahoma: The AAPG Bookstore,1995:1-477.
[43]Surdam R C. Seals, traps and the petroleum system.AAPG Memoir 67 1997,317.
[44]Law B.E,B,Boles G F, Slavin Y I Aboonrmal pressures in hydrocarbon environments[A].AAPG Memoir.1998,70:1-258.
[45]Huffman A R, Bowers G L (eds).Pressure regimes in sedimentary basins and their prediction[J]. AAPG Memoir.2002,76.
[46]焦大庆.含油气盆地流体演化研究[M].北京：石油工业出版社,1998：1-178.
[47]王振峰,罗晓容.莺歌海盆地高温高压地层钻井预监测技术研究[M].北京：石油工业出版社.2004.
[48]郝芳.超压盆地生烃作用动力学与油气成藏机理[M].北京：科学出版社.2005.
[49]谢习农,李思田,刘晓峰.异常压力盆地流体动力学[M].武汉：中国地质大学出版社
[50]褚庆忠.异常压力形成机制研究综述[J].天然气勘探与开发,2001,24(2)：38-46.
[51]郝芳,姜建群,邹华耀,等.超压对有机质热演化的差异抑制作用及层次[J].中国科学D辑,2004,34(5)：443-451.
[52]郝芳,邹华耀,方勇,等.超压环境有机质热演化和生烃作用机理[J].石油学报,2006,27(5)：9-18.
[53]郝芳,蔡东升,邹华耀,等.渤中坳陷超压-构造活动联控型流体流动与油气快速成藏[J].地球科学.2004,29 (5):518-524.
[54]Roberts S J and Nunn J A.1995.Episodic fluid expulsion from geopressured sediments[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,12:195-204.
[55]Zeng J, Jin Z.Experimental investigation of episodic oil mi-gration along fault system[J].Journal of Geochemical Explo-ration,2003,78/79:493-498.
[56]侯平,罗晓容,周波,等.石油幕式运移实验研究[J].新疆石油地质,2005,26(1)：33-35.
[57]Leach W G. New exploration enhancements in south Louisiana Tertiary sediments[J].Oil and Gas Journal,1993,90(1):83～87.
[58]刘全有,刘文汇,王晓锋,王万春.不同烃源岩实验评价方法的对比[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1)：88～94.
[59]王跃文.松辽盆地滨北烃源条件评价方法研究及应用[D].大庆石油学院,2005.
[60]盛志纬,葛修丽.生油岩定量评价中的轻烃问题[J].石油实验地质,1986,8(2)：139-151.
[61]付小东,秦建中,腾格尔.四川盆地东南部海相层系优质烃源层评价—以丁山1井 为例[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(6)：621-628.
[62]曾国寿,徐梦虹.石油地球化学[M].石油工业出版社,1990：231-250.
[63]Elliott W C,Aronson J I,Matisoff G.Gautier D I.Kinetics of the smectite to illite transformation in the Denver basin:clay mineral.K-Ar data and mathematical model results[J].AAPG Bull.,1991,75(3):136-462
[64]薛海涛,卢双舫,张学军,李政,申家年.济阳坳陷下古生界碳酸盐岩烃源岩评价[J].地球化学,2006,35(6)：609-614.
[65]Mctra,Jersey S H. Applying wireline logs to estimate source rock maturity[J]. Oil & Journal,1998,96(7):76-79.
[66]Passey Q R, Creaney S. A practical model for organic richness from porosity and resistivity logs[J].AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(12):1777-1794.
[67]Fertl W H, Chillnger G V. Total organic carbon content determined from well logs[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation,1988,3(2):407-419.
[68]王鹂,唐成磊,王飞.△lg R技术在烃源岩评价中的应用[J].断块油气田,2009,16(2)：52-54.
[69]张志伟,张龙海.测井评价烃源岩的方法及其应用效果[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(3)：84-87.
[70]于翔涛.测井技术在烃源岩评价中的应用[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2009,6(2)：198-200.
[71]朱光有,金强,王锐.有效烃源岩的识别方法[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2003,
27(2)： 6-10.
[72]陈耀岑.利用测井资料研究和评价生油岩[J].石油物探,1996,35(1)：99-106.
[73]王方雄,侯英姿,夏季.烃源岩测井评价新进展[J].测井技术,2002,26(2)：89～93.
[74]程顶胜,刘松,吴培红.塔里木盆地石炭系生烃潜力的模糊数学综合评价[J].石油学报,2000,21(1)：34-39.
[75]郭长春,金强,姚军.用模糊数学方法评价烃源岩[J].石油学报,2005,26(4)：50-53.
[76]覃建雄.有机包裹体在碳酸盐岩油气源岩评价中的应用[J].西南石油学院学报,1994,16(3)：14-21.
[77]周海燕,庞雄奇.应用排烃门限理论评价汤原断陷泥质烃源岩[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(1)：25-28.
[78]钟宁宁,卢双舫,黄志龙,张有生,薛海涛.烃源岩TOC值变化与其生排烃效率关系的探讨[J].沉积学报,2004,22(S1)：73～78.
[79]刘得光,伍致中,李勇广,陈红.塔里木盆地西南坳陷烃源岩评价[J].新疆石油地质,1997,18(1)：50～53.
[80]张寒,朱光有.利用地震和测井信息预测和评价烃源岩—以渤海湾盆地富油凹陷为例[J].2007,34(1)：55～59.
[81]薛海涛,卢双舫,付晓泰等.预测原油中气油体积比的模型精度[J].大庆石油学院学报.2004.28(1)：1-3.
[82]姜振学,付广.三肇地区扶余油层油气运移形式及供油气单元特征[J].天然气工业,1994,14(6)：24-26.
[83]丛金山,吕延防,吉浥.大庆长垣以东地区油气运聚的封盖模式[J].大庆石油学院学报,1995,19(1)：21-25.
[84]谭保祥,侯德艳,林景晔.三肇地区扶余、杨大城子油层油源与油气运移模式探讨[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1995,14(1)：5-8.
[85]迟博,刘站立,王春瑞.三肇凹陷石油富集规律研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2000,19(5)：4-6.
[86]霍秋立,冯子辉.三肇凹陷低成熟原油地球化学特征及成因探讨[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1995,14(4)：6-11.
[87]迟元林,萧德铭,殷进垠.松辽盆地三肇地区上生下储“注入式”成藏机制[J].地质学报,2000,74(4)：371-377
[88]李思田,路凤香林畅松等.中国东部及邻区中、新生代盆地演化及地球动力学背景[M].武汉市：中国地质大学出版社,1997
[89]迟元林,云金表,蒙启安.松辽盆地深部结构及成盆动力学与油气聚集[M].北京：石油工业出版社,2002,10-80.
[90]朱德丰,吴相梅,张庆晨.松辽盆地构造演化对油气运聚及成藏的控制作用[R],科研报告,2000：10-40.
[91]胡望水,吕炳全,张文军,等.松辽盆地构造演化及成盆动力学探讨[J].地质科学,2005,40(1)：16-31.
[92]高瑞琪,蔡希源.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M].石油工业出版社,北京：1997,12-40.
[93]云金表,金之钧,殷进垠.松辽盆地继承性断裂带特征及其在油气聚集中的作用[J].大地构造与成矿,2002,26(4)：379-385.
[94]任延广,陈均亮,冯志强,等.喜山运动对松辽盆地含油气系统的影响[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(2)：185-190.
[95]张厚福,张万选.石油地质学[M](第二版).北京：石油工业出版社,1990.
[96]李振广,李景坤等.多元统计分析在油源对比中的应用[J].新疆石油地质,2004,25(3)：262-263
[97]卢鸿,冯小杰.油源对比常规方法的使用误区[J].西安工程学院学报,2000,22(2)：56-59
[98]陈建平,赵长毅,王兆云等.西北地区侏罗纪煤系烃源岩和油气地球化学特征[J].地质论评,1998,44(49)：149-158.
[99]霍秋立,李振广等.三肇凹陷低熟原油13C-NMR谱特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 1997,16(3)：26-30
[100]K.E.彼得斯,J.M.莫尔多万著.生物标记化合物指南[M].石油工业出版社,1995：79-187
[101]曾宪章,梁狄刚等编著.中国陆相原油和生油岩中的生物标志物[M].甘肃科学技术出版社,1989：101-225.
[102]王铁冠.陆相烃源岩有机质丰度评价指标(SY/T 5735-1995).石油工业出版社.1999.
[103]庞雄奇.排烃门限控油气理论与应用[M].北京：石油工业出版社,15-132.
[104]付广,薛永超,付晓飞.油气运移输导体系及对成藏的控制[J].新疆石油地质,2001,22(1)：24-26.
[105]张照录,王华,杨红等.含油气盆地的输导体系研究[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(2)：133-135.
[106]谢泰俊.琼东南盆地天然气运移输导体系及成藏模式[J].勘探家,5(1)：17-21.
[107]赵忠新,王华,郭奇军等.油气输导体系的类型及其输导性能在时空上的演化分析[J].石油实验地质.2002,24(6)：527-532.
[108]雷茂盛,林铁峰.松辽盆地断层纵向导流性浅析[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(1)：32-35.
[109]王震亮,陈荷立.有效运聚通道的提出与确定初探[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(1)：71-75.
[110]Galeazzi J S. Structural and stratigraphic evolution of the western Maivinas basin, Argentina[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1998,82 (4):596-636.
[111]卓勤功,宁万兴,荣娜.断陷盆地输导体系类型及控制机制[J].地质论评.2005,51(4)：416-422.
[112]梁书义,刘克奇,蔡忠贤.油气成藏体系及油气输导子系统研究[J].石油实验地质.2005,27(4)：327-332.
[113]付广,王有功.三肇凹陷青山口组源岩生成油向下“倒灌”运移层位及其研究意义[J].沉积学报,2008,26(2)：355-360.
[114]吕延防,李建民,付晓飞等.松辽盆地三肇凹陷油气下排的地质条件及找油方向[J].地质科学,2009,44(2)：525-533.
[115]付晓飞,平贵东,范瑞东,刘宗堡.三肇凹陷扶杨油层油气“倒灌”运聚成藏规律研究[J].沉积学报,2009,27(3)：558-566.
[116]王雅春,王胜男.源岩、超压和断裂空间匹配对三肇凹陷扶杨油层油成藏的控制作用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2009,39(4)：656-661.
[117]邹才能,贾承造,赵文智等。松辽盆地南部岩性—地层油气成藏动力和分布规律[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(4)：125-130.
[118]Magara K. Compaction and fluid migration-practical petroleum geology[M]. Amsterdam,Elsevier,1978.
[119]付广,王兴涛,方纯昌.利用声波时差资料研究欠压实浓度盖层抑制浓度封闭作用形成时期及其研究意义[J].石油地球物理勘探,2001,36(3)：279-284
[120]刘德来,陈发景,温祥泉.松辽盆地坳陷期T2断层成因机制分析[J].大庆石油学院学报,1996,20(1)23-27.
[121]胡望水.松辽盆地T2断层系及青山口组早期伸展裂陷[J]..石油勘探与开发,1995,22(2)： 8-12
[122]侯启军,冯志强,冯子辉.2009.松辽盆地陆相石油地质学[M].北京：石油工业出版社,460-484.
[2]Tissot B. Migration of hydrocarbons in sedimentary basin:a geological geochemical and historical perspective, IFP Exploration Research Conference.1987.
[3]Hunt J.M. Petroleum geochemistry and geology.San fransisco[J]. W.H Freeman,1979:617.
[4]Chapman R E. Effects of oil and gas accumulation on water movement[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1982,66(3):189～190.
[5]Toth J. Cross-formational gravity flow groundwater:a mechanics of the transport and accumulation of petroleum, problems of petroleum migration[J]. AAPG Studies in Geology, 1980,10:121～167.
[6]胡见义,徐树宝,童晓光,蔺殿忠.中国东部第三系含油气盆地地层岩性油藏形成的地质基础和分布特点[J].石油学报,1984,5(2)：1-9.
[7]胡见义,徐树宝,童晓光.渤海湾盆地复式油气聚集区(带)的形成和分布[J].石油勘探与开发,1986,1(1)：1～8.
[8]胡朝元.生油区控制油气田分布—中国东部陆相盆地进行区域勘探的有效理论[J].石油学报,1982,3(2)：10～13.
[9]胡朝元.我国海上沉积盆地油气田分布区域控制因素的探讨[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1986,6(4)：23～29.
[10]李德生.渤海湾含油气盆地的地质和构造特征[J].石油学报,1980,1(1)：6～20.
[11]Dahlberg, E, C. Applied hydrodynamic in petroleum exploration:Springer-Verlag[M], New York,1982.
[12]England W A. The movement and entrapment of petroleum fluids in the subsurface [J]. Jour Of the Geol. Soci., London,1987,144:327-347.
[13]郝石生,黄志龙,高耀斌.轻烃扩散系数的研究及天然气运聚动平衡原理[J].石油学报,1991,12(3)：17～24.
[14]石广仁.油气盆地数值模拟方法[M].北京：石油工业出版社,1994.1-172.
[15]查明,赵永军.A Study on Hydrocarbon-Generating Potential and Kinetics of Source-Rock Pyrolysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry,1995,14(3):256～263.
[16]庞雄奇,金之钧,左胜杰.油气藏动力学成因模式与分类[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4)：507～514.
[17]曾溅辉,金之钧.油气二次运移和聚集物理模拟[M].北京：石油工业出版社.2000.
[18]Hunt J M. Generation and migration of petroleum from abnormally pressured fluid compartments[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(1):1-12.
[19]张义纲.天然气生成聚集与保存(M).南京：海河大学出版社,1991,138-148.
[20]Manoon L B, W G Dow. The petroleum system[J]. AAPG Memoir60,1994,3-24.
[21]胡朝元,廖曦.成油系统概念在中国的提出及其应用[J].石油学报,1996,17(1)：10～16.
[22]田世澄,陈建渝,张树林,毕研鹏,张继国.论成藏动力学系统[J].勘探家,1996,1(2)：20～25.
[23]田世澄,孙自明,傅金华,韩军,胡春余.论成藏动力学与成藏动力系统[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(2)：129～138.
[24]康永尚,王捷.流体动力系统与油气成藏作用[J].石油学报,1999,20(1)：30～33.
[25]贾承造,何登发,石听等.中国油气晚期成藏特征[J].中国科学D辑,2006,36(5)：412-420.
[26]龚再升,王国纯.渤海新构造运动控制晚期油气成藏[J].石油学报,2001,22(2)：1-7.
[27]赵重远,张小会,任战利等.油气成藏动态预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23(4)：314-320.
[28]张善文,王永诗,石砥石,等.网毯式油气成藏体系—以济阳坳陷新近系为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(1)：1-10.
[29]赵靖舟.幕式成藏理论的提出及其勘探意义[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(4)：315-321.
[30]金之钧,张一伟,王捷.油气成藏机理与分布规律[M].北京：石油工业出版社,2003.
[31]关德范,王国力,张金功等.成烃成藏理论新思维[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(5)：425～432.
[32]Price R A. The southeastern Canadian Cordillera:thrust faulting, tectonic wedging, and delamination of the lithosphere[J]. Journal of Structural Geology,1986,8:1584-1596.
[33]Smith D A.Sealing and nonsealing faults in Louisiana Gulf Coast salt basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,1980,64(1):145-172.
[34]Hooper ECD. Fluid migration along growth fault in compacting Sediments[J].Jour of Petrol Geol,1991,4(2):161-180
[35]李明诚.石油与天然气运移(第二版)[M].北京：石油工业出版社,1996.
[36]Hindle A D.1997. Petroleum migration pathways and charge concentration:a three-dimensional model[J]. AAPG Bulletin,81(9):1451-1481.
[37]Sibson R H.1977.Fault rocks and fault mechanisms. [J] Geol Soc Lond,133:191-213.
[38]华保钦.构造应力场、地震泵和油气运移[J].沉积学报,1995,13(2)：77-85.
[39]Steven L, Lorraine E, Martin S, et al. Vertical and lateral fluid flow related to a large growth fault, south Eugene island block 330 field, offshore Louisiana [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1999,283 (2):244-276.
[40]Dickinson G.Geologecal aspects of abnormal reservoir pressures in Gulf coast Loousiana[J].AAPG Bulletin,1953,37:410-432.
[41]马启富,陈斯忠,张启明,等.超压盆地与油气分布[M].北京：地质出版社,2000.1-253.
[42]Ortoleva P J. Basin Compartment and Seals [M]. AAPG memoir 61.Tulsa, Oklahoma: The AAPG Bookstore,1995:1-477.
[43]Surdam R C. Seals, traps and the petroleum system.AAPG Memoir 67 1997,317.
[44]Law B.E,B,Boles G F, Slavin Y I Aboonrmal pressures in hydrocarbon environments[A].AAPG Memoir.1998,70:1-258.
[45]Huffman A R, Bowers G L (eds).Pressure regimes in sedimentary basins and their prediction[J]. AAPG Memoir.2002,76.
[46]焦大庆.含油气盆地流体演化研究[M].北京：石油工业出版社,1998：1-178.
[47]王振峰,罗晓容.莺歌海盆地高温高压地层钻井预监测技术研究[M].北京：石油工业出版社.2004.
[48]郝芳.超压盆地生烃作用动力学与油气成藏机理[M].北京：科学出版社.2005.
[49]谢习农,李思田,刘晓峰.异常压力盆地流体动力学[M].武汉：中国地质大学出版社
[50]褚庆忠.异常压力形成机制研究综述[J].天然气勘探与开发,2001,24(2)：38-46.
[51]郝芳,姜建群,邹华耀,等.超压对有机质热演化的差异抑制作用及层次[J].中国科学D辑,2004,34(5)：443-451.
[52]郝芳,邹华耀,方勇,等.超压环境有机质热演化和生烃作用机理[J].石油学报,2006,27(5)：9-18.
[53]郝芳,蔡东升,邹华耀,等.渤中坳陷超压-构造活动联控型流体流动与油气快速成藏[J].地球科学.2004,29 (5):518-524.
[54]Roberts S J and Nunn J A.1995.Episodic fluid expulsion from geopressured sediments[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,12:195-204.
[55]Zeng J, Jin Z.Experimental investigation of episodic oil mi-gration along fault system[J].Journal of Geochemical Explo-ration,2003,78/79:493-498.
[56]侯平,罗晓容,周波,等.石油幕式运移实验研究[J].新疆石油地质,2005,26(1)：33-35.
[57]Leach W G. New exploration enhancements in south Louisiana Tertiary sediments[J].Oil and Gas Journal,1993,90(1):83～87.
[58]刘全有,刘文汇,王晓锋,王万春.不同烃源岩实验评价方法的对比[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1)：88～94.
[59]王跃文.松辽盆地滨北烃源条件评价方法研究及应用[D].大庆石油学院,2005.
[60]盛志纬,葛修丽.生油岩定量评价中的轻烃问题[J].石油实验地质,1986,8(2)：139-151.
[61]付小东,秦建中,腾格尔.四川盆地东南部海相层系优质烃源层评价—以丁山1井 为例[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(6)：621-628.
[62]曾国寿,徐梦虹.石油地球化学[M].石油工业出版社,1990：231-250.
[63]Elliott W C,Aronson J I,Matisoff G.Gautier D I.Kinetics of the smectite to illite transformation in the Denver basin:clay mineral.K-Ar data and mathematical model results[J].AAPG Bull.,1991,75(3):136-462
[64]薛海涛,卢双舫,张学军,李政,申家年.济阳坳陷下古生界碳酸盐岩烃源岩评价[J].地球化学,2006,35(6)：609-614.
[65]Mctra,Jersey S H. Applying wireline logs to estimate source rock maturity[J]. Oil & Journal,1998,96(7):76-79.
[66]Passey Q R, Creaney S. A practical model for organic richness from porosity and resistivity logs[J].AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(12):1777-1794.
[67]Fertl W H, Chillnger G V. Total organic carbon content determined from well logs[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation,1988,3(2):407-419.
[68]王鹂,唐成磊,王飞.△lg R技术在烃源岩评价中的应用[J].断块油气田,2009,16(2)：52-54.
[69]张志伟,张龙海.测井评价烃源岩的方法及其应用效果[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(3)：84-87.
[70]于翔涛.测井技术在烃源岩评价中的应用[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2009,6(2)：198-200.
[71]朱光有,金强,王锐.有效烃源岩的识别方法[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2003,
27(2)： 6-10.
[72]陈耀岑.利用测井资料研究和评价生油岩[J].石油物探,1996,35(1)：99-106.
[73]王方雄,侯英姿,夏季.烃源岩测井评价新进展[J].测井技术,2002,26(2)：89～93.
[74]程顶胜,刘松,吴培红.塔里木盆地石炭系生烃潜力的模糊数学综合评价[J].石油学报,2000,21(1)：34-39.
[75]郭长春,金强,姚军.用模糊数学方法评价烃源岩[J].石油学报,2005,26(4)：50-53.
[76]覃建雄.有机包裹体在碳酸盐岩油气源岩评价中的应用[J].西南石油学院学报,1994,16(3)：14-21.
[77]周海燕,庞雄奇.应用排烃门限理论评价汤原断陷泥质烃源岩[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(1)：25-28.
[78]钟宁宁,卢双舫,黄志龙,张有生,薛海涛.烃源岩TOC值变化与其生排烃效率关系的探讨[J].沉积学报,2004,22(S1)：73～78.
[79]刘得光,伍致中,李勇广,陈红.塔里木盆地西南坳陷烃源岩评价[J].新疆石油地质,1997,18(1)：50～53.
[80]张寒,朱光有.利用地震和测井信息预测和评价烃源岩—以渤海湾盆地富油凹陷为例[J].2007,34(1)：55～59.
[81]薛海涛,卢双舫,付晓泰等.预测原油中气油体积比的模型精度[J].大庆石油学院学报.2004.28(1)：1-3.
[82]姜振学,付广.三肇地区扶余油层油气运移形式及供油气单元特征[J].天然气工业,1994,14(6)：24-26.
[83]丛金山,吕延防,吉浥.大庆长垣以东地区油气运聚的封盖模式[J].大庆石油学院学报,1995,19(1)：21-25.
[84]谭保祥,侯德艳,林景晔.三肇地区扶余、杨大城子油层油源与油气运移模式探讨[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1995,14(1)：5-8.
[85]迟博,刘站立,王春瑞.三肇凹陷石油富集规律研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2000,19(5)：4-6.
[86]霍秋立,冯子辉.三肇凹陷低成熟原油地球化学特征及成因探讨[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1995,14(4)：6-11.
[87]迟元林,萧德铭,殷进垠.松辽盆地三肇地区上生下储“注入式”成藏机制[J].地质学报,2000,74(4)：371-377
[88]李思田,路凤香林畅松等.中国东部及邻区中、新生代盆地演化及地球动力学背景[M].武汉市：中国地质大学出版社,1997
[89]迟元林,云金表,蒙启安.松辽盆地深部结构及成盆动力学与油气聚集[M].北京：石油工业出版社,2002,10-80.
[90]朱德丰,吴相梅,张庆晨.松辽盆地构造演化对油气运聚及成藏的控制作用[R],科研报告,2000：10-40.
[91]胡望水,吕炳全,张文军,等.松辽盆地构造演化及成盆动力学探讨[J].地质科学,2005,40(1)：16-31.
[92]高瑞琪,蔡希源.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M].石油工业出版社,北京：1997,12-40.
[93]云金表,金之钧,殷进垠.松辽盆地继承性断裂带特征及其在油气聚集中的作用[J].大地构造与成矿,2002,26(4)：379-385.
[94]任延广,陈均亮,冯志强,等.喜山运动对松辽盆地含油气系统的影响[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(2)：185-190.
[95]张厚福,张万选.石油地质学[M](第二版).北京：石油工业出版社,1990.
[96]李振广,李景坤等.多元统计分析在油源对比中的应用[J].新疆石油地质,2004,25(3)：262-263
[97]卢鸿,冯小杰.油源对比常规方法的使用误区[J].西安工程学院学报,2000,22(2)：56-59
[98]陈建平,赵长毅,王兆云等.西北地区侏罗纪煤系烃源岩和油气地球化学特征[J].地质论评,1998,44(49)：149-158.
[99]霍秋立,李振广等.三肇凹陷低熟原油13C-NMR谱特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 1997,16(3)：26-30
[100]K.E.彼得斯,J.M.莫尔多万著.生物标记化合物指南[M].石油工业出版社,1995：79-187
[101]曾宪章,梁狄刚等编著.中国陆相原油和生油岩中的生物标志物[M].甘肃科学技术出版社,1989：101-225.
[102]王铁冠.陆相烃源岩有机质丰度评价指标(SY/T 5735-1995).石油工业出版社.1999.
[103]庞雄奇.排烃门限控油气理论与应用[M].北京：石油工业出版社,15-132.
[104]付广,薛永超,付晓飞.油气运移输导体系及对成藏的控制[J].新疆石油地质,2001,22(1)：24-26.
[105]张照录,王华,杨红等.含油气盆地的输导体系研究[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(2)：133-135.
[106]谢泰俊.琼东南盆地天然气运移输导体系及成藏模式[J].勘探家,5(1)：17-21.
[107]赵忠新,王华,郭奇军等.油气输导体系的类型及其输导性能在时空上的演化分析[J].石油实验地质.2002,24(6)：527-532.
[108]雷茂盛,林铁峰.松辽盆地断层纵向导流性浅析[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(1)：32-35.
[109]王震亮,陈荷立.有效运聚通道的提出与确定初探[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(1)：71-75.
[110]Galeazzi J S. Structural and stratigraphic evolution of the western Maivinas basin, Argentina[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1998,82 (4):596-636.
[111]卓勤功,宁万兴,荣娜.断陷盆地输导体系类型及控制机制[J].地质论评.2005,51(4)：416-422.
[112]梁书义,刘克奇,蔡忠贤.油气成藏体系及油气输导子系统研究[J].石油实验地质.2005,27(4)：327-332.
[113]付广,王有功.三肇凹陷青山口组源岩生成油向下“倒灌”运移层位及其研究意义[J].沉积学报,2008,26(2)：355-360.
[114]吕延防,李建民,付晓飞等.松辽盆地三肇凹陷油气下排的地质条件及找油方向[J].地质科学,2009,44(2)：525-533.
[115]付晓飞,平贵东,范瑞东,刘宗堡.三肇凹陷扶杨油层油气“倒灌”运聚成藏规律研究[J].沉积学报,2009,27(3)：558-566.
[116]王雅春,王胜男.源岩、超压和断裂空间匹配对三肇凹陷扶杨油层油成藏的控制作用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2009,39(4)：656-661.
[117]邹才能,贾承造,赵文智等。松辽盆地南部岩性—地层油气成藏动力和分布规律[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(4)：125-130.
[118]Magara K. Compaction and fluid migration-practical petroleum geology[M]. Amsterdam,Elsevier,1978.
[119]付广,王兴涛,方纯昌.利用声波时差资料研究欠压实浓度盖层抑制浓度封闭作用形成时期及其研究意义[J].石油地球物理勘探,2001,36(3)：279-284
[120]刘德来,陈发景,温祥泉.松辽盆地坳陷期T2断层成因机制分析[J].大庆石油学院学报,1996,20(1)23-27.
[121]胡望水.松辽盆地T2断层系及青山口组早期伸展裂陷[J]..石油勘探与开发,1995,22(2)： 8-12
[122]侯启军,冯志强,冯子辉.2009.松辽盆地陆相石油地质学[M].北京：石油工业出版社,460-484.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |