跨越制度边界的互动——国际制度与非成员国关系研究
|
摘要
国际制度的出现改变了国际社会的版图,在成员国和非成员国之间树立起了无形的边界。探讨国际制度的社会作用,不仅需要考察它在何种程度上促进制度框架内成员国之间的合作,也需要讨论它在何种程度上推动成员国和非成员国之间跨越制度边界的互动。研究国际制度与非成员国的关系,实际上是把现有研究未予重视的经验事实纳入到理论分析的框架之中,因而具有重要的理论价值。
为了确立起分析国际制度与非成员国关系的理论框架,本文首先讨论了国际制度对成员国和非成员国社会影响的差异。从国际制度的实际运行来看,一方面,成员国试图扩大制度规则的适用范围,并且会通过纳入新成员的方式提高组织机构的行动能力。另一方面,非成员国也希望通过接触国际制度实现如下目标:对国际制度构成的社会环境作出反应、分享国际制度在推进全球治理中带来的实际利益、以及取得国际社会的认同。当彼此有了交往的需要时,跨越制度边界的互动将成为可能。
在讨论了跨界互动的起源之后,本文对跨界互动的规则基础进行了讨论。国际制度作为既成事实,不仅改变了国际社会的治理空白状态,也使得既定行为方式取得了一定的社会认可。在这个意义上,制度规则构成了跨界互动的规则基础。然而,国际制度对制度成员和非成员构成了不同社会约束。质言之,国际制度对成员国产生制度框架内的作用,而对非成员国的作用则通常以后者同意承受拘束为前提。因此,有必要分析驱使非成员国同意承受约束的社会因素。这里提出了国际制度和非成员国相互合法化的解释模式,一方面,非成员国在一定程度上接受制度宗旨;另一方面,国际制度也相应地纳入非成员国的重要关切。
本文进一步指出,国际制度和非成员国的相互合法化,不是谁改变了谁的单向因果链条,而是双方协同演化的过程。在这一过程中,国际制度的“教学”作用固然是重要的一个方面,但是国际制度的“学习”功能也不容忽视。否则,制度先行者和后来者之间的冲突将变得不可调解,进而导致跨界互动的中断甚至终止。本文以六方会谈机制、英国入盟欧共体、印度与核不扩散体制关系为例,对上述机理进行了阐释。
关于中国全面参与国际制度的提法,本文指出,深化参与已加入国际制度和扩大参与未加入国际制度是两个不同的范畴。处理好中国同未加入国际制度关系,不仅能为中国开辟新的外交场合,而且能带来更高的边际收益。论文就不同事务领域中国未加入国际制度的基本情况进行了考察,同时也结合出口控制领域的有关史实对中国与外部世界的相互合法化作了初步探讨。
本文得出结论认为,相互合法化的程度对跨界互动的进程,以及跨界互动形成的结构都有重要影响。在国际关系研究中,讨论国际制度的社会作用,不仅要关注它如何推动了成员国之间的合作,还应该探讨它如何促进了非成员国和成员国的相互靠拢,直至非成员国改变身份成为制度成员。
International institutions are created to promote cooperation, with a byproduct of institutional borders distinguishing members with non-members. Social effects of an international institution, therefore, are not only how it affects cooperation among members within the context of institution, but also how it affects the relationship between institutional insiders and outsiders. For this reason, it is theoretically enlightening to analysis how institutions affect social behavior of nonmembers, more or less ignored in current research agenda.
To begin with, this dissertation seeks to find out how it differs for member states and nonmembers in facing an institution. The author contends that members endeavor to broaden the scope an institution covers and build up institutional capacity to cope with public concern. Whereas, nonmembers initiate outreach activities to react to the social environment an institution creates, take a share of institutional benefit of global governance, and gain sufficient international recognition. When these two sets of individual needs match with each other, it then paves way for two sides to meet and interact with each other.
Insofar as the rules applicable, the author claims that the institution in being constitutes a foundation based on which interaction unfolds. The institution in being may as well advance certain modes of behavior, making the tabula rasa of international society a thing of past. Yet, an international institution confines and enables nonmembers in different ways from it does to members. While it affects members within the context of the institution, this does not happen without non-members’prior adherence to this institution. Therefore, it is necessary to explain why non-members decide to adhere to the principles embedded in an institution. The author points out that the need for mutual legitimization brings institutional insiders and outsiders together. More often than not, non-members need to adhere to the mission and principles advanced, whereas the institution needs to add concerns of outsiders or newcomers in its rule system.
The mutual legitimization, however, does not happen accidentally. Here, the logic of who-shapes-whom does not apply, instead, co-evolution between institution and non-members counts. Institution not only teaches, but also learns. The absence of organizational learning makes mutual legitimization difficult if not impossible. The author then takes Six-party talk, UK’s EC entry, and Indian nuclear diplomacy for examples to illustrate above mentioned dynamics.
Concerning the empirical experience of China, the author points out that comprehensive participation in international society not only requires China to deepen participation in the context of institutions joined in, but also calls for broadened participation in institutions from which China is still absent. Investment in institutions of the latter category means to China a bright diplomatic opportunity and higher marginal return. The author also takes a sketch over institutions China yet to join and concentrates on the field of non-proliferation to evaluate the extent to which China and international society mutually legitimized.
It concludes that mutual legitimization significantly affects both the process of interaction between institutional insiders and outsiders and the realignment of international society as a result. In the field of international relations, when discussing the social effects of international institutions, besides the question of how institutions shapes members’behavior, the phenomenal hits of institutional insiders and outsiders are also noteworthy.
为了确立起分析国际制度与非成员国关系的理论框架,本文首先讨论了国际制度对成员国和非成员国社会影响的差异。从国际制度的实际运行来看,一方面,成员国试图扩大制度规则的适用范围,并且会通过纳入新成员的方式提高组织机构的行动能力。另一方面,非成员国也希望通过接触国际制度实现如下目标:对国际制度构成的社会环境作出反应、分享国际制度在推进全球治理中带来的实际利益、以及取得国际社会的认同。当彼此有了交往的需要时,跨越制度边界的互动将成为可能。
在讨论了跨界互动的起源之后,本文对跨界互动的规则基础进行了讨论。国际制度作为既成事实,不仅改变了国际社会的治理空白状态,也使得既定行为方式取得了一定的社会认可。在这个意义上,制度规则构成了跨界互动的规则基础。然而,国际制度对制度成员和非成员构成了不同社会约束。质言之,国际制度对成员国产生制度框架内的作用,而对非成员国的作用则通常以后者同意承受拘束为前提。因此,有必要分析驱使非成员国同意承受约束的社会因素。这里提出了国际制度和非成员国相互合法化的解释模式,一方面,非成员国在一定程度上接受制度宗旨;另一方面,国际制度也相应地纳入非成员国的重要关切。
本文进一步指出,国际制度和非成员国的相互合法化,不是谁改变了谁的单向因果链条,而是双方协同演化的过程。在这一过程中,国际制度的“教学”作用固然是重要的一个方面,但是国际制度的“学习”功能也不容忽视。否则,制度先行者和后来者之间的冲突将变得不可调解,进而导致跨界互动的中断甚至终止。本文以六方会谈机制、英国入盟欧共体、印度与核不扩散体制关系为例,对上述机理进行了阐释。
关于中国全面参与国际制度的提法,本文指出,深化参与已加入国际制度和扩大参与未加入国际制度是两个不同的范畴。处理好中国同未加入国际制度关系,不仅能为中国开辟新的外交场合,而且能带来更高的边际收益。论文就不同事务领域中国未加入国际制度的基本情况进行了考察,同时也结合出口控制领域的有关史实对中国与外部世界的相互合法化作了初步探讨。
本文得出结论认为,相互合法化的程度对跨界互动的进程,以及跨界互动形成的结构都有重要影响。在国际关系研究中,讨论国际制度的社会作用,不仅要关注它如何推动了成员国之间的合作,还应该探讨它如何促进了非成员国和成员国的相互靠拢,直至非成员国改变身份成为制度成员。
International institutions are created to promote cooperation, with a byproduct of institutional borders distinguishing members with non-members. Social effects of an international institution, therefore, are not only how it affects cooperation among members within the context of institution, but also how it affects the relationship between institutional insiders and outsiders. For this reason, it is theoretically enlightening to analysis how institutions affect social behavior of nonmembers, more or less ignored in current research agenda.
To begin with, this dissertation seeks to find out how it differs for member states and nonmembers in facing an institution. The author contends that members endeavor to broaden the scope an institution covers and build up institutional capacity to cope with public concern. Whereas, nonmembers initiate outreach activities to react to the social environment an institution creates, take a share of institutional benefit of global governance, and gain sufficient international recognition. When these two sets of individual needs match with each other, it then paves way for two sides to meet and interact with each other.
Insofar as the rules applicable, the author claims that the institution in being constitutes a foundation based on which interaction unfolds. The institution in being may as well advance certain modes of behavior, making the tabula rasa of international society a thing of past. Yet, an international institution confines and enables nonmembers in different ways from it does to members. While it affects members within the context of the institution, this does not happen without non-members’prior adherence to this institution. Therefore, it is necessary to explain why non-members decide to adhere to the principles embedded in an institution. The author points out that the need for mutual legitimization brings institutional insiders and outsiders together. More often than not, non-members need to adhere to the mission and principles advanced, whereas the institution needs to add concerns of outsiders or newcomers in its rule system.
The mutual legitimization, however, does not happen accidentally. Here, the logic of who-shapes-whom does not apply, instead, co-evolution between institution and non-members counts. Institution not only teaches, but also learns. The absence of organizational learning makes mutual legitimization difficult if not impossible. The author then takes Six-party talk, UK’s EC entry, and Indian nuclear diplomacy for examples to illustrate above mentioned dynamics.
Concerning the empirical experience of China, the author points out that comprehensive participation in international society not only requires China to deepen participation in the context of institutions joined in, but also calls for broadened participation in institutions from which China is still absent. Investment in institutions of the latter category means to China a bright diplomatic opportunity and higher marginal return. The author also takes a sketch over institutions China yet to join and concentrates on the field of non-proliferation to evaluate the extent to which China and international society mutually legitimized.
It concludes that mutual legitimization significantly affects both the process of interaction between institutional insiders and outsiders and the realignment of international society as a result. In the field of international relations, when discussing the social effects of international institutions, besides the question of how institutions shapes members’behavior, the phenomenal hits of institutional insiders and outsiders are also noteworthy.
引文
①可参阅袁正清:《国际制度研究:理论·实证·趋势》,载李慎明、王逸舟主编《2005年:全球政治与安全报告》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2004年版。
②Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons,“Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol.52, No.4, (Autumn 1998), p.730.
③当然,他们未必都是制度主义的信徒。但毫无疑问,他们的研究丰富了制度分析的内容。
④A. Glenn Mower, Jr.,“Observer Countries: Quasi Members of the United Nations,”International Organization, Vol.20, No.2, 1966, pp. 266-283.
⑤Stephen R. Hurt,“Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and ACP states and the end of the Lome Convention,”Third World Quarterly, Vol.24, No.1, 2003, p.173.
①苏长和:《中国与国际制度:一项研究议程》,载《世界经济与政治》2002年第10期,第7页。
②梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第3-12页。
③John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The role of international institutions in globalization: the challenge of reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, pp.65-73.
①Mark Beeson, Institutions of the Asia-Pacific: ASEAN, APEC and Beyond, London and New York: Routledge, 2009, pp.41-43.
②Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Jana von Stein and Erik Gartzke,“International Organizations Count,”Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.52, No.2, (April, 2008), pp.175-188.
③Frank Schimmelfennig,“Strategic Calculation and International Socialization: Membership Incentives, Party Constellations, and Sustained Compliance in Central and Eastern Europe,”International Organization, Vol.59, No.4, (fall 2005), pp.827-860.
④Judith Kelley,“International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 3, (Summer 2004), p.454.
⑤Alexandra Gheciu,“Security Institution as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the New Europe,”International Organization 59, Fall 2005, pp.973-1012.
⑥Iain Hardie and Layna Mosley,“Market Pressures, Membership Conditionality, and EU Accession: Turkey’s Convergence Tale,”January 2007.
⑦Kemal Kirisci and Zeynep Gülsah Capan, Turkey on the Edges of the Convention on the“Future of the Europe”, in Sonia Lucarelli and Claudio M. Radaelli eds., Mobilizing Politics and Society? The EU Convention’s Impact on Southern Europe, London and New York: Routledge, 2005.
⑧Hongyi Harry Lai,“Behind China's World Trade Organization Agreement with the USA,”Third World Quarterly, Vol 22, No 2, 2001, pp.237-255; Veron Mei-Ying Hung,“China's WTO Commitment on Independent Judicial Review: Impact on Legal and Political Reform,”The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol.52, No.1, (Winter, 2004), pp.82-127.
⑨马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版。
①梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第331-332页。
②梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第335页。
③参阅曾令良:《朝鲜核试验的国际法考量》,载《世界经济与政治》2007年第1期。
④饶戈平:《论政府间国际组织的法律人格》,载其主编《全球化进程中的国际组织》,北京大学出版社2005年版,第92-100页。
①[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版,第201页。
②James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, Last Updated Jan.23, 2007.
①Ronald B. Mitchell,“Of Course International Institutions Matter: But When and How?”in Frank Biermann, Rainer Brohm and Klaus Dingwerth eds., Proceedings of the 2001 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Global Environmental Change and the Nation State, Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 2002, pp.16-25.
①[加]杰克逊、[丹]索伦森:《国际关系学理论与方法》,吴勇、宋德星译,天津人民出版社2008年版。
②梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,《国际组织法》,第335页。
③参见饶戈平:《论政府间国际组织的法律人格》,载其主编《全球化时代的国际组织》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
①John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p.71.
②Judith Kelley,“International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 3, (Summer 2004), p.454.
③Mitchell P. Koza and Arie Y. Lewin,“The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances,”Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, Special Issue: Managing Partnerships and Strategic Alliances (May - Jun., 1998), pp.255-264.
④Samuel S. Kim, China, the United Nations, and World Order, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.
⑤Jack Knight, Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.转引自唐世平:《制度变迁的广义理论》,手稿。
①分别参见马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版;萨缪尔·金(金淳基):《中国与联合国》,载[美]伊丽莎白·埃克诺米、米歇尔·奥克森伯格主编:《中国参与世界》,华宏勋、闫循华等译,北京:新华出版社2000年版。
②李宝臣:《文化冲击中的制度惯性》,北京:中国城市出版社2002年版。
③[美]詹姆斯·马奇、马丁·舒尔茨、周雪光:《规则的动态演变:成文组织规则的变化》,童根兴译,上海人民出版社2005年版。
①Stephen M. Walt,“International Relations: One World, Many Theories,”Foreign Policy, No.110, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge, (Spring, 1998), pp.29-46.
①Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons,“Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol.52, No.4, (Autumn 1998), p.730.
②Daniel W. Drezner, ed., Locating the Proper Authorities: The Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.
①王鸣鸣:《外交政策分析:理论与方法》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2008年版。
②Greg Mastel,“The WTO and Nonmarket Economies,”in Charles W. Kegley, Jr., Eugene R. Wittkopf eds., The Global Agenda: Issues and Perspectives, 6th edition, Beijing: Peking University Press, 2003.
③Joseph Cirincione, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Hearing on China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007; Shirley A. Kan,“China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues”, CRS Report RL31555, Updated March 6th, 2008.
①可参阅李少军:《国际关系学研究方法》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2008年版。
①分别见中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室编:《现代汉语词典》第5版,北京:商务印书馆2005年版,第1756页、第1820页。
②.
③参阅苏长和:《重新定义国际制度》,载《欧洲》1999年第6期,第22-27页。
④Geoffrey M. Hodgson,“What are Institutions?”Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XL, No.1, (March 2006), p.1.
⑤可参阅张旭昆:《制度演化分析导论》,杭州:浙江大学出版社2007年版,第90-91页;Geoffrey M. Hodgson,“What are Institutions?”Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XL, No.1, (March 2006), pp.1-25;John Duffield,“What Are International Institutions?”International Studies Review (2007) 9, pp.1–22.
①Sue E. S. Crawford and Elinor Ostrom,“A Grammer of Institutions,”The American Political Science Review, Vol.89, No.3, (Sep., 1995), pp.582-600.
②Stephen D. Krasner, International Regime, Beijing University Press, 2005, p.2.
③Marc A. Levy, Oran R. Young and Michael Zürn,“The Study of International Regimes,”European Journal of International Relations, Vol.1, No.3, (1995), p.270.
④Abram Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes,“On Compliance,”International Organization, Vol.47, No.2, (Spring 1993), p.177.
⑤Marc A. Levy, Oran R. Young and Michael Zürn,“The Study of International Regimes,”European Journal of International Relations, Vol.1, No.3, (1995), p.272.
⑥Stephan Haggard and Beth A. Simmons,“Theories of International Regimes,”International Organization, Vol.41, No.3, (Summer 1987), p.494.
⑦Robert O. Keohane,“International Institutions: Two Approaches,”International Studies Quarterly, Vol.32, No.4, (Dec. 1988), p.384.
⑧唐任伍:《“扶强抑弱”的全球化规则研究》,北京师范大学出版社2006年版。
①韦森:《博弈论制度分析史上的第一块里程碑:肖特<社会制度的经济理论>中译本序》,载[美]安德鲁·肖特:《社会制度的经济理论》,陆铭、陈钊译,上海财经大学出版社2003年版。
①张旭昆:《制度演化分析导论》,杭州:浙江大学出版社2007年版,第92-93页。
②参阅袁正清:《国际制度研究:理论·实证·趋势》,载李慎明、王逸舟主编《2005年:全球政治与安全报告》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2004年版。
③梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第3-12页。
④[美]道格拉斯·诺思:《制度、制度变迁与经济绩效》,杭行译,上海人民出版社2008年版,第5页。
⑤[美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,门洪华译,北京大学出版社2004年版,第174页。最高审计机关亚洲组织(INTOSAI)把国际制度等同于国际组织:“国际制度就是不论是否经由条约而成立的国际组织,其成员包括两个或两个以上的国家、或政府机构及公共资助的实体,其共同(财务)利益受到一个治理实体的监管”。Working Group on the Audit of International Institutions, List of International Institutions, 18th International Congress of Supreme Audit Institutions (INCOSAI XVIII): Budapest, 2004.
①Abram Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes,“On Compliance,”International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 2, (Spring 1993), p.175.
②马蒂亚斯·科尼格-阿尔基布吉:《绘制全球治理》,载戴维·赫尔德、安东尼·麦克格鲁主编《治理全球化:权力、权威与全球治理》,曹荣湘、龙虎等译,社会科学文献出版社2004年版。图中国际组织的中文译名见附录。
③分别参见中国社会科学院法学研究所:《国际人权文件和国际人权机构》,社会科学文献出版社1993年版。
④参阅饶戈平:《全球化进程中的国际组织》,载其主编《全球化进程中的国际组织》,北京大学出版社2005年版,第4-5页。该文引用的是UIA, ed., Yearbook of International Organization, 1998/1999, Vol.2, p.1759.
⑤马蒂亚斯·科尼格-阿尔基布吉:《绘制全球治理》,载戴维·赫尔德、安东尼·麦克格鲁主编《治理全球化:权力、权威与全球治理》,曹荣湘、龙虎等译,社会科学文献出版社2004年版。图中国际组织的中文译名见附录。
①可参阅廖诗评:《条约冲突基础问题研究》,北京:法律出版社2008年版。
②Amy F. Woolf, Arms Control and Nonproliferation: A Catalog of Treaties and Agreements, CRS report RL33865, Updated April 9, 2008.
③James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, 2009 edition, Monterey Institute of International Studies, 2009.
①梁漱溟:《中国文化要义》,上海人民出版社2005年版,第51页。
②Glenn H. Snyder,“Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics”, World Politics, Vol.36, No.4 (Jul.,1984), pp.461-495.
③Frank Schimmelfennig and Ulrich Sedelmeier,“Theorizing EU enlargement: research focus, hypotheses, and the state of research,”Journal of European Public Policy 9:4 August 2002, pp.500–528.
①梁西:《国际组织法》(总论),(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第3-12页。
②B. Rumelili,“Transforming Conflicts on EU Borders,”Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (1), 2007, pp105-126; George Christou,“The EU, Conflict Resolution and The Case Of Cyprus,”Paper prepared for the GARNET Conference,‘The EU in International Affairs’, Brussels, April 24-26, 2008.
③NTI, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 Database,.
①[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版,第200页。
①Jonathan B. Tucker,“Strengthening the CWC Regime for Transfers of Dual-Use Chemicals,”Pugwash Meeting No.324, 52nd Pugwash CBW Workshop, 10 Years of the OPCW: Taking Stock and Looking Forward, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, March 17-18, 2007; Paul Ingram,“Taking Responsibility: What Can NPT States Realistically Do To Build on Today's Momentum behind Nuclear Disarmament?”Paper presented at a meeting held alongside the NPT Preparatory Committee, 2nd Session, Geneva, May 8, 2008.
②Gerald Chan, China and International Organizations: Participation in Non-Governmental Organizations Since 1971, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989; Samuel S. Kim,“International Organizations in Chinese Foreign Policy,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.519, China's Foreign Relations, (Jan., 1992), pp.140-157.
③John Miller,“The Weight of the Past: East Asia’s China Debate,”in Satu P. Limaye ed., Asia’s China Debate, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Special Report, December 2003, pp.2-10.
④[美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《局部全球化世界中的治理》,载《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,门洪华译,北京大学出版社2004年版,第296页。
⑤江忆恩:《美国学者关于中国与国际组织关系研究概述》,福特基金会资助课题工作论文系列之二,.
①苏长和:《中国与国际制度:一项研究议程》,载《世界经济与政治》2002年第10期,第10页。
①参阅[美]奥兰·扬:《世界事务中的治理》,陈玉刚、薄燕译,上海人民出版社2007年版,第49-66页。
①樊勇明:《从国际公共产品到区域性公共产品:国际关系理论研究的新增长点》,载“国际关系研究的创新与发展:新理论、新领域、新方法”论文集,上海复旦大学2009,第165-173页。
①Madeleine Albright,“Enlarging NATO: Why Bigger Is Better,”in Eugene R. Wittkopf and Christopher M. Jones eds., The Future of American Foreign Policy, Beijing: Peking University Press 2003.
②Thomas Wright,“Toward Effective Multilateralism: Why Bigger May Not Be Better,”The Washington Quarterly: 32, 3, 2009, pp.163-180.
①《世界人权宣言》序言,引自中国社会科学院法学研究所:《国际人权文件与国际人权机构》,社会科学文献出版社1993年版,第3-4页。
②Economic and Social Council- High Commission for Human Rights, Compendium Of International And Regional Standards Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia And Related Intolerance, E/CN.4/2004/WG.21/5, January 13, 2004; James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, 2009 edition, Monterey Institute of International Studies, 2009.
①[美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,门洪华译,北京大学出版社2004年版;[美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《霸权之后:世界政治经济事务中的合作与纷争》,苏长和等译,上海:世纪出版集团2001年版。
①[美]奥兰·扬:《世界事务中的治理》,陈玉刚、薄燕译,上海人民出版社2007年版,第103页。
②Abram Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes,“On Compliance,”International Organization, Vol.47, No.2, (Spring 1993), p.178; Jeffrey T. Checkel,“Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change,”International Organization, Vol.55, No.3, (Summer 2001), p.554.
③Jonas Tallberg,“Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and European Union,”International Organization, Vol.56, No.3, (Summer 2002), pp.609-643.
④中华人民共和国外交部:《维也纳条约法公约》,.
⑤[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版,第201页。
①庄贵阳:《气候变化与可持续发展》,载《世界经济与政治》2004年第4期。
②Thomas Wright, "On Reforming the International Order: Policy Analysis Brief," Innovative approaches to Peace and Security From The Stanley Foundation, February 2009.
③Annette Schnabel,“What Makes Collective Goods a Shared Concern? Re-Constructing the Construction of the Collectiveness of Goods,”Rationality and Society, Vol.18, No.1, (Spring 2006), p.8.
④Garrett Hardin,“The Tragedy of Commons,”Science: 162, 13, Dec., 1968.
①Peter M. Hass,“Do Regime Matter: Epistemic Community and Mediterranean Pollution Control,”International Organization, Vol.43, No.3, (Summer 1989), pp.377-403.
①Thomas Wright, "On Reforming the International Order: Policy Analysis Brief," Innovative approaches to Peace and Security From The Stanley Foundation, February 2009.
②Thomas Wright, "On Reforming the International Order: Policy Analysis Brief," Innovative approaches to Peace and Security From The Stanley Foundation, February 2009.
③James Lee Ray,“Promise or Peril? Neorealism, Neoliberalism, and the Future of International Politics,”载:[美]凯格利主编:《国际关系理论论争:现实主义和新自由主义的挑战》,北京大学出版社2004年版,第337页。
④Seema Gahlaut and Vioctor Zaborsky, "Do Export Control Regimes Have Members They Really Need?" Comparative Strategy, Vol.23, No.1, Jan-Mar 2004, pp.73-94; Richard Cupitt and Igor Khripunov, "New Strategyies For the Nuclear Suppliers Group," Comparative Strategy, Vol.16, No.3, Jul-Sep 1997, pp.305-315.转引自刘宏松:《国际防扩散体系中的非正式机制》,复旦大学博士论文,2007。
①Charles A. Goldman and Jonathan D. Pollack,“Engaging China in International Export Control Process: Options for U.S. Policy,”Rand Report, 1997.
②马蒂亚斯·科尼格-阿尔基布吉:《绘制全球治理》,载戴维·赫尔德、安东尼·麦克格鲁主编《治理全球化:权力、权威与全球治理》,曹荣湘、龙虎等译,北京:社会科学文献出版社2004年版。
③张立平:《意识形态与美国外交政策》,上海人民出版社2006年版,第五章。
④[美]奥兰?扬:《世界事务中的治理》,陈玉刚、薄燕译,上海人民出版社2007年版,第1-6页。
①S. J. Grossman and O. Hart,“Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and The Theory of The Corporation,”Bell Journal of Economics 11, 1980, pp.42-64.
②Alastair Iain Johnston,“Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,”International Studies Quarterly, Vol.45, No.3, December 2001.
③唐世平:《制度变迁的广义理论》,手稿。
①[美]安德鲁·肖特:《社会制度的经济理论》,陆铭、陈钊译,上海财经大学出版社2003年版,第13页。
①James G. March and Johan P. Olsen,“The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,”International Organization, Vol.52, No.4, (autumn 1998), pp.943-969.
②[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版,第203页。
③Mark Beeson, Institutions of the Asia-Pacific: ASEAN, APEC and Beyond, London and New York: Routledge, 2009, pp.41-43.
④新华网:.
①Stephen R. Hurt,“Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and ACP States and the End of the Lome Convention,”Third World Quarterly, Vol.24, No.1, (2003), pp.161-176; Tenu Avafia and Dirk Hansohm,“The inclusion of political conditions into trade agreements between the EU and ACP countries: An analysis of the legal and economic implications of Cotonou’s provisions,”Paper prepared for an ECSA-SA conference on The relationship between Africa and the European Union, University of the Western Cape, 22-23 January 2004.
②杨逢珉:《<洛美协定>下的欧盟与非加太国家关系》,上海人民出版社2006年版。
③John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p.71.
①Jon C. Pevehouse,“Democratization, Credible Commitments, and Joining International Organizations,”in Daniel W. Drezner, Ed., Locating Proper Authority: The Interaction of International and Domestic Institutions, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003, p.27.
②Marybeth Peterson Ulrich, Democratizing Communist Militaries: The Cases of the Czech and Russian Armed Forces, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1999, p.104.
③Andrew P. Cortell and Susan Peterson,“Altered States: Explaining Domestic Institutional Change,”British Journal of Political Science, Vol.29, No.1 (Jan., 1999), pp.177-203; Michael McFaul,“State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatization in Russia,”World Politics, Vol.47, No.2 (Jan., 1995), pp.210-243.
①[美]赫伯特·金迪斯、萨缪尔·鲍尔斯等:《人类的趋社会性及其研究:一个超越经济学的经济分析》,浙江大学跨学科社会科学研究中心译,上海人民出版社2005年版,第55-56页。
②可参阅钱穆:《中国文化史导论》,北京:商务印书馆1994年修订版,第39-44页。
③John Carlson,“Challenges to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: Can the Regime Survive? An Australian Perspective,”Paper presented to the Carnegie Moscow Center, 29 May 2007.
④梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第335页。
⑤[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版,第202页。
①John Carlson, Russell Leslie and Annette Berriman,“Strengthening the Nonproliferation Regime,”Paper presented to Annual Meeting of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, Phoenix, Arizona, 13-17 July 2003
②赵恒:《核不扩散机制:历史与理论》,北京:世界图书出版社2009年版,第215页。
①《维也纳条约法公约》,见附录。
②[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版,第94页。
③杨友孙:《欧盟东扩与制度互动:从一个入盟标准说起》,北京:世界图书出版社2008年版。
④梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第26-29页。
①D. G. Webster, The Dynamics of Atlantic Fisheries Arrangement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The MIT Press, 2009.
①Samuel S. Kim,“International Organizations in Chinese Foreign Policy,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 519, China's Foreign Relations, (Jan., 1992), pp. 140-157.
②[法]孟德斯鸠:《论法的精神》(下),北京:商务印书馆2004年版,第3页。
①[法]拉哈:《欧洲一体化史:1945-2004》,彭姝祎、陈志瑞译,北京:中国社会科学出版社2005年版,第66页。
②参阅马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版。
③中华人民共和国外交部:《中国与德国政府发表联合声明》,2004.5.4..
④[加]詹姆斯·怀特:《加拿大和中国同处在新的安全环境中》(演讲摘要),北京,2006年1月20日。.
⑤王光亚:《不断完善防扩散机制,促进国际和平与发展——中国的防扩散政策与实践》,《人民日报》2002年10月16日。
①可参阅袁易:《中国与导弹建制:国际规范的挑战与遵循》,见《问题与研究》第43卷第3期,民国93年5、6月。
②中华人民共和国外交部:《中华人民共和国与欧洲联盟关于防扩散和军备控制问题的联合声明》,2004.12.8..
①[美]詹姆斯·马奇、马丁·舒尔茨、周雪光:《规则的动态演变:成文组织规则的变化》,童根兴译,上海人民出版社2005年版,第158页。
①John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p.71.
②卢新波:《论学习型体制转型:后发国家市场化进程的逻辑》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2007年版,第125页。
③.
④Christian Reus-smit,“The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Instituions,”International Organization, Vol.51, No.4, (Autumn 1997), pp.555-589.
⑤梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第335页。
①参阅[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版。
②可参阅曾令良:《朝鲜核试验的国际法考量》,载《世界经济与政治》2007年第1期。
③另外,朝鲜1974年参加国际原子能机构,后于1994年退出。.
④可参阅曾令良:《朝鲜核试验的国际法考量》,载《世界经济与政治》2007年第1期。
③James D. Morrow, "The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties," International Organization, Vol.55, No.4, (Autumn 2001), pp. 971-991.
①James D. Morrow, "The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties," International Organization, Vol.55, No.4, (Autumn 2001), p.975.
②Jonathan F. Vance, Objects of Concern: Canadian Prisoners of War through the Twentieth Century, Vancouver: UBC Press, 1994. See, James D. Morrow, "The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties," International Organization, Vol.55, No.4, (Autumn 2001), p.975.
③Peter D. Feaver,“Command and Control in Emerging Nuclear Nations,”International Security, Vol.17, No.3, (Winter, 1992-1993), pp. 160-187; Michael J. Mazarr,“Going Just a Little Nuclear: Nonproliferation Lessons from North Korea,”International Security, Vol.20, No.2, (Autumn, 1995), pp. 92-122; Dan Blumenthal,“Facing a Nuclear North Korea,”Asian Outlook, June–July 2005; John Carlson,“Challenges to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: Can the Regime Survive? An Australian Perspective,”Paper presented to the Carnegie Moscow Center, 29 May 2007; Hajime Izumi and Katsuhisa Furukawa, Not Going Nuclear: Japan’s Response to North Korea’s Nuclear Test,.
①Llewelyn Hughes,“Why Japaan Will Not Go Nuclear (yet): International and Domestic Constraints on the Nuclearization of Japan,”International Security, Vol.31, No.4, (2007), pp.67-96.
①唐世平:《制度变迁的广义理论》,手稿。此文回顾了解释制度变迁的两种范式:冲突模式与和谐模式。文章指出它们各自存在的逻辑缺陷并兼容了它们的核心观点,从社会进化的角度解释制度变迁。
②张宇燕:《美国宪法的经济学含义》,载《社会科学战线》1996年第4期,第39-46页。
③Thomas Wright,“On Reforming the International Order: Policy Analysis Brief,”Innovative approaches to Peace and Security from the Stanley Foundation, February 2009, http://www.stanleyfoundation.org/publications/pab/ WrightPAB209.pdf.
④关于合法性问题的专门讨论见,[美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《多边合作的俱乐部模式与民主合法性问题》,载罗伯特·基欧汉著,门洪华译:《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,北京大学2004年版,第247-275页;Ian Hurd,“Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics,”International Organization, Vol.53, No.2, (Spring 1999), pp.379-408; Michael Zürn,“Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems,”Government and Opposition, Vol.39, Issue 2, 2004, pp.260-287.
⑤门洪华:《合法性、有效性与局限性——评估国际机制作用的理论框架》,载《香港社会科学学报》2002年冬季卷(总第二十四期),第137-175页。此文分析了合法性的概念、表现、合法化过程等相关问题。
①中华人民共和国外交部:《维也纳条约法公约》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/zlb/tyfg/t83909.htm。
①中华人民共和国外交部:《维也纳条约法公约》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/zlb/tyfg/t83909.htm.。
②中华人民共和国外交部:《中国参加国际公约情况一览表(1875-2003)》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ chn/pds/ziliao/tytj/tyfg/t4985.htm。
③中华人民共和国外交部:《中国代表团在第60届联大一委关于“防止弹道导弹扩散海牙行为准则”决议案( L.22 )的投票后解释性发言》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/zlb/ldzyjh/t271283.htm。
④中华人民共和国外交部:《维也纳条约法公约》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/zlb/tyfg/t83909.htm。
⑤[美]詹姆斯·马奇、马丁·舒尔茨、周雪光著,童根兴译:《规则的动态演变:成文组织规则的变化》,上海人民出版社2005年版,第158页。
①John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen,ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p.75.
②Frédérique Déjean and Jean-Pascal Gond,“Measuring the Unmeasured: An Institutional Entrepreneur Strategy in an Emerging Industry,”Human Relations, Vol. 57, No. 6, (2004), pp.741-764.
③唐贤兴主编:《近现代国际关系史》,上海:复旦大学出版社2002年版,第206页。
④John Gerard Ruggie,“Multilateralism: the Anatomy of an Institution,”International Organization, Vol.46, No.3, (Summer, 1992), p.587.
①门洪华:《美国霸权之翼——论国际制度的战略价值》,载《开放导报》2005年第5期。
②John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p.71.
③.
①刘伟:《从“猴子实验”看制度和民主政治建构背后的逻辑》,载《民主与科学》2005年第1期。
②John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p.71.
③Judith Kelley,“International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 3 (Summer 2004), p.454.
④.
⑤Amy F. Woolf, Arms Control and Nonproliferation: A Catalog of Treaties and Agreements, CRS report RL33865,Updated April 9, 2008, p.32.
①莫大华:《国际关系理论的辩论、对话与综合:美国“防止扩散安全提议”国际规范的个案分析》,载《问题与研究》,2006年第45卷第5期,第17-60页。
②James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, 2009 edition, Monterey Institute of International Studies, pp.540-544.
③Jeremy Rabkin,“The Law of the Sea Treaty: A Bad Deal for America,”Comparative Expertise Institute Report 2006 No.3,.
①可参阅[美]亚历山大·温特:《国际政治的社会理论》,北京大学出版社2005年影印版,第322页。
②克劳德(Inis L. Claude)首先讨论了国际组织使某些个体行为合法化的功能,金淳基(Samuel S. Kim)在谈论中国与联合国关系时用到了相互合法化(mutual legitimization)的概念。分别参见:Inis L. Claude,“Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations,”International Organization, Vol.20, No.3, 1966, p.367;Samuel S. Kim, China, the United Nations, and World Order, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979。
③[美]赫伯特·金迪斯、萨缪尔·鲍尔斯等:《人类的趋社会性及其研究:一个超越经济学的经济分析》,浙江大学跨学科社会科学研究中心译,上海人民出版社2005年版,第61-62页。
①.
②林毅夫:《关于制度变迁的经济学理论:诱致性变迁与强制性变迁》,载[美]诺思、阿尔钦、科斯等:《财产权利与制度变迁:产权学派与新制度学译文集》,上海人民出版社1994年版。
①[法]托克维尔:《论美国的民主》,北京:商务印书馆1996年版,第297页。
②[美]罗伯特·杰维斯著,李少军等译:《系统效应:政治与社会生活中的复杂性》,上海人民出版社2008年版,第42页。
①[美]奥兰·扬:《世界事务中的治理》,陈玉刚、薄燕译,上海人民出版社2007年版,第59-66页。
③中华人民共和国外交部:《2003年2月11日外交部发言人在记者招待会上答记者问》,2003年2月11日。
①中华人民共和国外交部:《落实共同声明起步行动》,2007年2月13日。
②中华人民共和国外交部:《落实共同声明第二阶段行动》,2007年10月3日。
①中华人民共和国外交部:《六方会谈中国代表团团长王毅举行中外记者招待会》,2003年8月29日。
②中华人民共和国外交部:《关于六方会谈工作组的概念文件》,2004年6月26日。
③中华人民共和国外交部:《第三轮六方会谈主席声明》,2004年6月26日。
④中华人民共和国外交部:《第四轮六方会谈共同声明》,2005年9月19日。
⑤中华人民共和国外交部:《落实共同声明起步行动》,2007年2月13日。
⑥中华人民共和国外交部:《落实共同声明第二阶段行动》,2007年10月3日。
①这里借用了学者关于中日关系的表述。可参阅鲁义:《中日相互理解还有多远:关于两国民众相互认识的比较研究》,世界知识出版社2005年版,第42页。
②可参阅马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版,第三章之内容,特别见第132、139、149页。
①JiríSchneider and Alexandr Vondra,“Ukraine: Near Abroad of the European Union? -Overcoming a Curse of Dual-Periphery,”PASS Policy Paper No. 2,“Ukraine in Europe and the World”Conference, February 20-21, 2004, Kyiv, Ukraine.
①Alexander Wendt,“Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,”International Organization, Vol.46, No.2, (Spring 1992), pp.391-425.
①可参阅马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版。
②Avner Cohen and Thomas Graham Jr.,“An NPT for Non Members,”Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 60, No. 3, (May/June 2004), pp.40-44.
③转引自刘宏松:《国际防扩散体系中的非正式机制》,复旦大学博士论文,2007,第6页。
④Charles A.Goldman and Jonathan D. Pollack,“Engaging China in International Export Control Process: Options for U.S. Policy,”Rand Report, 1997, http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/1547442.
⑤《关于防扩散问题的一些看法中国外交部军控司司长沙祖康在美国卡内基研讨会上的发言》,http://www.china-botschaft.de/chn/zt/fksyckgz/zyjhhwj/t129477.htm。
①中华人民共和国外交部:《中国与德国政府发表联合声明》, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/wzb/zxxx/ t94742.htm。
②Shirley A. Kan,“China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues,”CRS Report RL31555, http://www.fas.org/asmp/resources/govern/crs-rl31555.pdf, p.42.
③.
④Daryl G. Kimball,“Achieving Entry Into Force of the CTBT,”Paper presented to "Atlanta Consultation on the Future of the NPT", The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, Jan. 26-28, 2005; Oliver Meier,“Political Significance of the CTBT and Perspectives of Entry into Force,”Paper presented to Twelve Years of the CTBT: Achievements andPerspectives, July 1-2, 2008, Istanbul, Turkey.
①George A. MacLean,“Advancing the Comprehensive (Nuclear) Test Ban Treaty: Capabilities, Implementation, and Entry into Force,”Paper prepared for the International Security Research and Outreach Program, International Security Bureau, Ottawa, October 2002.
②Michael Crowley,“The CTBT: lack of progress in the Middle East and South Asia,”Trust & Verify, Issue Number 121, July–September 2005.
③Deepti Choubey,“Don’t Wait for the United States”, CTBTO Spectrum, Issue 12, April 2009.
①苏长和:《导读:跨国关系与国内政治》,载[美]罗伯特·基欧汉、海伦·米尔纳主编:《国际化与国内政治》,姜鹏、董素华译,北京大学出版社2003年版,第12-14页。
②参见:Daniel W. Drezner,“Introduction: The Interaction of International and Domestic Institutions,”in Daniel W. Drezner, ed., Locating the Proper Authorities: The Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003, pp.3-15.
③[美]玛莎·费丽莫:《国际社会中的国家利益》,袁正清译,浙江人民出版社2001年版;Alastair Iain Johnston,“Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,”International Studies Quarterly, Vol.45, No.3, December 2001.关于学习理论的详细综述,可参阅:James Clay Moltz,“Divergent Learning and the Failed Politics of Soviet Economic Reform,”World Politics, Vol. 45, No. 2, (Jan., 1993), pp. 301-325.
④Amitav Acharya,“How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 2, (Spring 2004), pp. 239-275.
⑤Kenneth Benoit and Jacqueline Hayden,“Institutional Change and Persistence: The Evolution of Poland'sElectoral System, 1989-2001,”The Journal of Politics, Vol. 66, No. 2 (May, 2004), p.424.
①钱穆:《中国历代政治得失》,三联书店2001年版,前言部分。
②Russell D. Howard, Albert S. Willner,“China’s Rise and the U.S. Army: Leaning Forward,”Working Paper of Us Military Academy- West Point, NY 10996, May 2002; Larry M. Wortzel,“Trade with China But Avoid Strengthening Its Military,”www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/EM749.cfm; Bates Gill,“Limited Engagement,”Foreign Affairs, July/August 1999; Bates Gill,“Can China's Tolerance Last?”Arms Control Today, January 1, 2002; John J. Mearsheimer,“China's Unpeaceful Rise,”Current History, Vol.105, No. 690 (April 2006), pp.160-162.
①Mitchell P. Koza and Arie Y. Lewin,“The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances,”Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, Special Issue: Managing Partnerships and Strategic Alliances (May - Jun., 1998), pp. 255-264.
③Judith Kelley,“International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 3 (Summer 2004), pp. 425-457.
①卢新波:《论学习型体制转型:后发国家市场化进程的逻辑》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2007年版,第159页。
②Arthur Stein,“Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in An Anarchic World,”in David A. Baldwin, ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, NY: Columbia University Press, 1993.
①[法]拉哈:《欧洲一体化史:1945-2004》,彭姝祎、陈志瑞译,北京:中国社会科学出版社2005年版,第66页。
②马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版,第45页。
③Andrew K. Rose, 2004.“Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?”American Economic Review. 94 (March): 98-114.
①马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版,第109-110页。
②马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版,第7页。
③马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版,第119页。
①主要参考马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版。
②李世安、刘丽云等著:《欧洲一体化史》(第二版),石家庄:河北人民出版社2006年版,第99-100页。
③马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版,第151页。
①李少军:《国际核不扩散体制与中国》,载王逸舟主编:《磨合中的建构:中国与国际组织关系的多视角透视》,北京:中国发展出版社2003年版。
②Amy F. Woolf, Arms Control and Nonproliferation: A Catalog of Treaties and Agreements, CRS report RL33865, Updated April 9, 2008; NTI, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 Database,.
④Thomas Wright, On Reforming the International Order, Policy Analysis Brief, Innovative approaches to Peace and Security From The Stanley Foundation, February 2009.
①Deepti Choubey,“Don’t Wait for the United States”, CTBTO Spectrum, Issue 12, April 2009.
②Thomas Donnelly and Melissa Wisner,“A Global Partnership between the U.S. and India,”AEI report on Asian Outlook, (August-September), 2005.
③.
①Indian Ambitions and the Limits of American Influence,.
②SIPRI YEARBOOK 2009: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Summary), pp.20-21.
①中国国家原子能机构:< http://www.caea.gov.cn/n602669/n602674/n602695/n602701/33861.html>.
②American Society of International Law,“Congress Approves Authorizing Legislation for India Nuclear Agreement; President Issues Signing Statement,”The American Journal of International Law, Vol.101, No.2, (Apr., 2007), pp. 496-499.关于美国国会批准的过程见.
③[印度]拉贾·莫汉,《落实印美核协议》,马文编译,载《东方早报》2005年12月22日。
④Daryl G . Kimball,“The Enduring Value of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty and New Prospects for Entry Into Force,”CTBTO Spectrum 11, September 2008.
⑤陈刚:《集体行动逻辑与国际合作:<京都议定书>中的选择性激励》,北京:外交学院博士论文,2006。
①关于这一问题的系统讨论见王逸舟主编:《磨合中的建构:中国与国际组织关系的多视角透视》,北京:中国发展出版社2003年版;苏长和:《中国与国际制度:一项研究议程》,载《世界经济与政治》2002年第10期; Gerald Chan, China and international Organizations: Participation in Non-governmental Organizations since 1971, Hong Kong, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989; Samuel S. Kim,“International Organizations in Chinese Foreign Policy,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.519, China's Foreign Relations, (Jan., 1992), pp.140-157; Stuart Harris and Gary Klintworth eds., China as a Great Power: Myths, Realities and Challenges in the Asia-Pacific Region, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995; Weixing Hu, Gerald Chan and Daojiong zha eds., China’s International Relations in the 21st Century: Dynamics of Paradigm Shifts, Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America, 2000; Yong Deng, China’s Struggle for Status: The Realignment of International Relations, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madride, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo, Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
①Jim Rolfe,“Welcome in Asia: China’s Multilateral Presence,”in Satu P. Limaye ed., Asia’s China Debate, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, Special Assessment December, 2003.
②李少军:《国际关系学研究方法》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2008年版,第146页。
①国家宗教事务局政策法规司编:《国际文书有关宗教条款汇编》北京:宗教文化出版社2008年版。
②周江陵:《武装冲突法概论》,南京:东南大学2007年版,第10页。
③周江陵:《武装冲突法概论》,南京:东南大学2007年版,第15-16页。
①Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, Last Updated: 1/23/2007.
①张明谦:《国际组织与集团的综合研究》,载渠梁、韩德主编:《国际组织与集团研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社1989年版,第4页。
②王正毅:《理解中国转型:战略目标、制度调整与国际力量》,载《世界经济与政治》2005年第6期。
③张宇雁:《利益集团与制度非中性》,载《改革》1994年第2期。
①王超:《当代中国身份定位的演变对其参与国际合作的影响》,2008年6月,提交给“第三届全国国际关系博士生论坛”的会议论文。
②Jing-dong Yuan, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Commission: China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007, p.2.
③苏长和:《中国与国际制度——一项研究议程》,载《世界经济与政治》2002年第10期,第10页。
④Charles A. Goldman, Jonathan D. Pollack,“Engaging China in International Export Control Process: Options for U.S. Policy,”Rand Report, 1997, pp.4-11.
①Michael Lipson,“The Reincarnation of COCOM: Explaining Post-Cold War Export Controls,”The Non-proliferation Review/Winter, 1999, p.33.
②Shirley A. Kan, Congressional Research Service,“China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues”, RL31555, Updated on March 6th, 2008, p.49.
①Michael Lipson,“The Reincarnation of COCOM: Explaining Post-Cold War Export Controls,”The Non-proliferation Review/ Winter, 1999, p.38.
①中国经济信息网:《IDB与中国》,2005年4月19日,
②中国经济信息网:《IDB与中国》,2005年4月19日,
③Nina Graeger,“Environmental Security?”Journal of Peace Research, Vol.33, No.1, (Feb., 1996), pp.109-116; Keith Krause, Michael C. Williams, Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods,”Mershon International Studies Review, Vol.40, No.2, (Oct., 1996), pp.229-254; Johan Eriksson,“Agendas, Threats, and Politics: Securitization in Sweden,”Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, workshop‘Redefining Security’, Mannheim, March 26-31, 1999.
①李文志、蕭文軒:《大湄公河流域爭霸戰：大湄公河經濟合作的推展及其戰略意涵》，载《台湾东南亚学刊》,2005年4月第2卷第1期,第83-125页。
②中华人民共和国外交部:《湄公河委员会希望进一步加强与中国合作》,2008年11月18日,.
①中国化工机械网:《美呼吁中国加入国际能源署,帮助稳定石油市场》,2008年5月26日。
②ZCOM电子杂志:《中国和国际能源署的距离只差4天》,
③Joseph Cirincione, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Hearing on China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007, pp.2-3.
④Shirley A. Kan, Congressional Research Service,“China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues”, RL31555, Updated on March 6th, 2008.
⑤笔者检索了美国公开的法律文集,没有发现这一条文。(U.S. Government Printing Office, Proliferation and Export Control Provisions of Public Law 106-65, in Selected Defense-related Laws, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington: 2004, pp.437-445.)据信,这一条文出现在国会研究局的报告中,可能是因为报告作者能够接触到该法令的保密版本(classified version)。
⑥.
①Shirley A. Kan, Congressional Research Service,“China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues”, RL31555, Updated on March 6th, 2008, pp.40-41.
②郑永年:《环保经济可助中国赢得国际话语权》,转自《参考消息》2009年12月2日第16版。
①曾峻:《公共秩序的制度安排:国家与社会关系的框架及其运用》,上海:学林出版社2005年版,附录《权利-义务对称与当代中国权力关系重组》。
②萨缪尔·金(金淳基):《中国与联合国》,载伊丽莎白·埃克诺米、米歇尔·奥克森伯格主编:《中国参与世界》,华宏勋等译,北京:新华出版社2000年版,第79-80页。
①中华人民共和国外交部:《中国政府关于促进裁军和防扩散领域的多边主义问题的看法》,2006年5月23日,.
②中华人民共和国外交部:《中国的防扩散政策及措施》,2009年7月27日,.
①联合国裁军事务部:《联合国裁军年鉴2004》,,第8页。
②《关于防扩散问题的一些看法中国外交部军控司司长沙祖康在美国卡内基研讨会上的发言》,2000年11月7日,.
③John Toye,“Order and Justice in the International Trade System,”in John-ren Chen ed., The role of international institutions in globalization: The Challenges of Reform, Cheltenham, Massachussets: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., 2003, p.66.
①Study Group on Enhancing Multilateral Export Controls for US National Security, Final Report, Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center, April 2001.
②U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Armed Services, Selected Defense-Related Laws (Amended through December 31, 2003), Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004, pp.437-445.
③中华人民共和国外交部:《中国的防扩散政策及措施》,2009年7月27日,.
①Avery Goldstein,“Great Expectations: Interpreting China’s Arrival,”International Security, Vol.22, No. 3 (Winter, 1997-1998), pp.36-73; Thomas J. Christensen,“Posing Problems without Catching Up, China’s Rise and Challenges for US Security Policy,”International Security, Vol. 25, No.4, (Spring 2001), pp.5-40; David Shambaugh,“China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order,”International Security, Vol. 29, No.3 (Winter 2004/05), pp.64-99; John J. Mearsheimer,“China's Unpeaceful Rise,”Current History, Vol. 105, No.690 (April 2006), pp.160-162; Thomas J.Christensen,“Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster? The Rise of China and US Policy toward East Asia,”International Security, Vol. 31, No.1 (Summer 2006), pp. 81-126.
②Joseph Cirincione, "Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission," Hearing on China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007, p.3.
③Jing-dong Yuan, "Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission," Hearing on China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007, p.1.
④Shirley A. Kan, China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues, CRS Report RL31555, Updated on March 6th, 2008.
⑤U.S. Department of State, Adherence To And Compliance With Arms Control, Nonproliferation And Disarmament Agreements And Commitments, August 2005, p.38.
⑥中华人民共和国外交部:《中国与德国政府发表联合声明》, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/wzb/zxxx/ t94742.htm。
⑦[加]詹姆斯·怀特:《加拿大和中国同处在新的安全环境中》(演讲摘要),北京,2006年1月20日。.
⑧Yong Deng, China’s Struggle for Status: The Realignment of International Relations, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madride, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo, Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp.60-69.
①Samuel S. Kim,“International Organizations in Chinese Foreign Policy,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.519, China's Foreign Relations, (Jan., 1992), pp. 140-157.
①可参阅张磊:《中国与国际刑事法院:现状与展望》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社2009年版。关于国际社会建立国际刑事法院的一般说明,可参阅联合国文件:《2001年11月27日加拿大和荷兰常驻联合国代表团给秘书长的普通照会——设立国际刑事法院》,2001年12月1日,A/56/677.
①吴展:《关于全面禁止核试验的问题》,载《美国研究》1998年第3期,第7-29页。
②何祚庥:《核爆炸和平利用前景广阔》,载《中国科学报》1998年12月27日。
①关于该条约文本内容,可参阅张慧勤、东勇挥译:《关于国家与国际组织或国际组织相互间条约的法规维也纳公约》,载《国外环境科学技术》1992年第4期,第1-19页。
①卢仁法等:《加入世贸组织后中国税制改革走向》,北京:人民出版社2006年版,第7页。
②吴孟真:《从国际规范看中国大陆的环境政策发展及其影响》,< http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/macs/ 3_activity/2007b/20080603-1.doc>.
③新华网:《中华人民共和国香港特别行政区基本法》,.
④中华人民共和国外交部:《涉及香港和澳门的条约与法律工作》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/pds/ ziliao/tytj/tyfg/t4824.htm>.
①当然,陈智宏(Gerald Chan)的系统考察表明,中国台湾地区参加非政府间国际组织的方式,在上世纪七八十年代已经得到较好的模式化解决。Gerald Chan, China and International Organizations: Participation in Non-Governmental Organizations Since 1971, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989.
1. [德]柯武刚和史漫飞:《制度经济学》,韩朝华译,商务印书馆,2001年版。
2. [法]孟德斯鸠:《论法的精神》(下),北京:商务印书馆2004年版。
3. [加]杰克逊、[丹]索伦森:《国际关系学理论与方法》,吴勇、宋德星译,天津人民出版社2008年版。
4. [加]詹姆斯·怀特:《加拿大和中国同处在新的安全环境中》(演讲摘要),北京,2006年1月20日。
5. [美]阿马蒂亚·森:《以自由看待发展》,任赜于真译,北京:中国人民大学出版社2002年版。
6. [美]安德鲁·肖特:《社会制度的经济理论》,陆铭、陈钊译,上海财经大学出版社2003年版。
7. [美]奥兰·扬:《世界事务中的治理》,陈玉刚、薄燕译,上海人民出版社2007年版。
8. [美]达夫特:《组织理论与设计精要》,北京:机械工业出版社2002年影印版。
9. [美]道格拉斯·诺思:《制度、制度变迁与经济绩效》,杭行译,上海人民出版社2008年版。
10. [美]赫伯特·金迪斯、萨缪尔·鲍尔斯等:《人类的趋社会性及其研究:一个超越经济学的经济分析》,浙江大学跨学科社会科学研究中心译,上海人民出版社2005年版。
11. [美]吉纳斯特:《冲突与合作:演进中的国际关系理论》,北京大学出版社2003年版。
12. [美]凯格利主编:《国际关系理论论争:现实主义和新自由主义的挑战》,北京大学出版社2004年版。
13. [美]理查德·罗斯克兰斯、阿瑟·斯坦主编:《大战略的国内基础》,刘东国译,北京大学出版社2005年版。
14. [美]罗宾斯:《组织行为学精要》(第5版),郑晓明译,机械工业出版社2000年版。
15. [美]罗伯特·阿克塞尔罗德:《合作的进化》(修订版),上海人民出版社2007年版。
16. [美]罗伯特·阿瑟:《美国大战略》,郭树勇译,北京大学出版社2005年版。
17. [美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《霸权之后:世界政治经济事务中的合作与纷争》,苏长和等译,上海:世纪出版集团2001年版。
18. [美]罗伯特·基欧汉、约瑟夫·奈:《权力与相互依赖》,门洪华译,北京大学出版社2002年版。
19. [美]罗伯特·基欧汉、海伦·米尔纳主编:《国际化与国内政治》,姜鹏、董素华译,北京大学出版社2003年版。
20. [美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,门洪华译,北京大学出版社2004年版。
21. [美]罗伯特·杰维斯:《系统效应:政治与社会生活中的复杂性》,李少军等译,上海人民出版社2008年版。
22. [美]玛莎·费丽莫:《国际社会中的国家利益》,袁正清译,浙江人民出版社2001年版.
23. [美]诺思、阿尔钦、科斯等:《财产权利与制度变迁:产权学派与新制度学译文集》,上海人民出版社1994年版。
24. [美]斯蒂芬·范埃弗拉:《政治学研究方法指南》,陈琪译,北京大学出版社2006年版。
25. [美]伊丽莎白·埃克诺米、米歇尔·奥克森伯格主编:《中国参与世界》,华宏勋、闫循华等译,北京:新华出版社2000年版。
26. [美]约瑟夫·奈:《硬权力与软权力》,门洪华译,北京大学出版社2005年版。
27. [美]约瑟夫·奈、约翰·唐纳胡主编:《全球化世界的治理》,王勇等译,世界知识出版社2003年版。
28. [美]詹姆斯·多尔蒂、小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫:《争论中的国际关系理论》(第五版),阎学通、陈寒溪等译,北京:世界图书出版社2002年版。
29. [美]詹姆斯·马奇、马丁·舒尔茨、周雪光:《规则的动态演变:成文组织规则的变化》,童根兴译,上海人民出版社2005年版。
30. [日]滨田道代、顾耕耘主编:《公司治理:国际借鉴与制度设计》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
31. [英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版。
32. [英]戴维·赫尔德、安东尼·麦克格鲁主编《治理全球化:权力、权威与全球治理》,曹荣湘、龙虎等译,社会科学文献出版社2004年版。
33. [英]赫德利·布尔:《无政府社会:世界政治秩序研究》,张小明译,北京:世界图书出版社2003年版。
34. [英]弗里德里希·冯·哈耶克:《哈耶克文选》,冯克利译,南京:江苏人民出版社2006年版。
35. [英]伊特韦尔等编:《新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典》,北京:经济科学出版社1996年版。
36. [英]约翰·伯顿:《国际冲突的国内根源》,马学印、谭朝洁译,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社1991版。
37.蔡鹏鸿:《强国之路和中国参与国际组织》,载《社会科学》2004年第4期。
38.蔡拓:《全球化与政治的转型》,北京大学出版社2007年版。
39.陈刚:《集体行动逻辑与国际合作:<京都议定书>中的选择性激励》,北京:外交学院博士论文,2006.
40.程霖:《中国近代银行制度建设思想研究:1859-1949》,上海财经大学出版社1999年版。
41.《复旦政治学评论》第二辑:《制度建设与国家成长》,上海辞书出版社2003年版。
42.樊勇明:《从国际公共产品到区域性公共产品:国际关系理论研究的新增长点》,载“国际关系研究的创新与发展:新理论、新领域、新方法”论文集,上海复旦大学2009,第165-173页。
43.何新:《世纪之交的中国与世界:何新与西方记者谈话录》,成都:四川人民出版社1992年版。
44.何祚庥:《核爆炸和平利用前景广阔》,载《中国科学报》1998年12月27日。
45.何增科等:《中国政治体制改革研究》,北京:中央编译出版社2004年版。
46.郝雨凡、林甦主编:《中国外交决策:开放与多元的社会因素分析》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2007年版。
47.胡鞍钢、王绍光、周建明:《第二次转型:国家制度建设》,北京:清华大学出版社2003年版。
48.郭树勇:《国际制度的融入与国家利益:中国外交的一种历史分析》,载《世界经济与政治》1999年第4期。
49.郭树勇:《评“国际制度和平论”》,载《美国研究》2000年第1期,第24-39页。
50.张慧勤、东勇挥译:《关于国家与国际组织或国际组织相互间条约的法规维也纳公约》,载《国外环境科学技术》1992年第4期,第1-19页。
51.江忆恩:《美国学者关于中国与国际组织关系研究概述》,福特基金会资助课题工作论文系列之二,.
52.李宝臣:《文化冲击中的制度惯性》,北京:中国城市出版社2002年版。
53.李少军:《国际政治学概论》(第二版),上海人民出版社2005年版。
54.李少军:《国际关系学研究方法》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2008年版。
55.李文志、蕭文軒:《大湄公河流域爭霸戰：大湄公河經濟合作的推展及其戰略意涵》，载《台湾东南亚学刊》,2005年4月第2卷第1期,第83-125页。
56.李兆祥:《近代中国的外交转型研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2008年版。
57.联合国文件:《2001年11月27日加拿大和荷兰常驻联合国代表团给秘书长的普通照会——设立国际刑事法院》,2001年12月1日,A/56/677.
58.联合国裁军事务部:《联合国裁军年鉴2004》,。
59.梁漱溟:《中国文化要义》,上海人民出版社2005年版。
60.梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版。
61.廖诗评:《条约冲突基础问题研究》,北京:法律出版社2008年版。
62.林毅夫:《关于制度变迁的经济学理论:诱致性变迁与强制性变迁》,载[美]诺思、阿尔钦、科斯等:《财产权利与制度变迁:产权学派与新制度学译文集》,上海人民出版社1994年版。
63.刘宏松:《国际防扩散体系中的非正式机制》,复旦大学博士论文,2007。
64.刘青建:《发展中国家国际制度选择的困境及其理性思考》,载《世界经济与政治》2002年第12期。
65.刘伟:《从“猴子实验”看制度和民主政治建构背后的逻辑》,载《民主与科学》2005年第1期。
66.卢新波:《论学习型体制转型:后发国家市场化进程的逻辑》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2007年版。
67.卢仁法等:《加入世贸组织后中国税制改革走向》,北京:人民出版社2006年版,第7页。
68.鲁义:《中日相互理解还有多远:关于两国民众相互认识的比较研究》,世界知识出版社2005年版。
69.马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版。
70.门洪华:《合法性、有效性与局限性:评估国际机制作用的理论框架》,载《香港社会科学学报》2002年冬季卷(总第24期),第137-175页。
71.门洪华:《霸权之翼:美国国际制度战略》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
72.门洪华:《压力、认知与国际形象:关于中国参与国际制度战略的历史解释》,载《世界经济与政治》2005年第4期。
73.门洪华:《霸权之翼:国际制度的战略价值》,载《开放导报》2005年第5期。
74.门洪华:《构建中国大战略的框架:国家实力、战略观念与国际制度》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
75.莫大华:《国际关系理论的辩论、对话与综合:美国“防止扩散安全提议”国际规范的个案分析》,载《问题与研究》,2006年第45卷第5期,第17-60页。
76.钱穆:《中国文化史导论》,北京:商务印书馆1994年修订版。
77.秦亚青:《权力、制度、文化:国际关系理论与方法研究文集》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
78.饶戈平:《论政府间国际组织的法律人格》,载其主编《全球化进程中的国际组织》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
79.饶戈平:《全球化进程中的国际组织》,载其主编《全球化进程中的国际组织》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
80.芮明杰:《管理学:现代的观点》,上海人民出版社1999年版。
81.时殷弘:《中国与国际社会:中国的选择与命运》,载时殷弘:《现当代国际关系史:从
16世纪到20世纪末》,北京:中国人民大学出版社2006年版。
82.宋秀琚:《国际合作理论:批判与建构》,北京:世界知识出版社2006年版。
83.苏长和:《重新定义国际制度》,载《欧洲》1999年第6期,第22-27页。
84.苏长和:《全球公共问题与国际合作:一种制度的分析》,上海人民出版社2000年版。
85.苏长和:《中国与国际制度:一项研究议程》,载《世界经济与政治》2002年第10期。
86.苏长和:《发现中国新外交:多边国际制度与中国外交新思维》,载《世界经济与政治》2005年第4期。
87.苏长和:《导读:跨国关系与国内政治》,载[美]罗伯特·基欧汉、海伦·米尔纳主编:《国际化与国内政治》,姜鹏、董素华译,北京大学出版社2003年版。
88.唐任伍:《“扶强抑弱”的全球化规则研究》,北京师范大学出版社2006年版。
89.唐世平:《制度变迁的广义理论》,手稿。
90.唐贤兴主编:《近现代国际关系史》,上海:复旦大学出版社2002年版。
91.许嘉、蔡玮:《国际制度与中国的选择》,载《国际政治研究》2007年第4期。
92.许新主编:《转型经济的产权改革:俄罗斯、东欧、中亚国家的私有化》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2003年版。
93.王光亚:《不断完善防扩散机制,促进国际和平与发展——中国的防扩散政策与实践》,《人民日报》2002年10月16日。
94.王鸣鸣:《外交政策分析:理论与方法》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2008年版。
95.王学东:《外交战略中的声誉因素分析:冷战后中国参与国际制度的解释》,天津人民出版社2007年版。
96.王逸舟:《西方国际政治学:历史与理论》,上海人民大学出版社1998年版。
97.王逸舟主编:《磨合中的建构:中国与国际组织关系的多视角透视》,北京:中国发展出版社2003年版。
98.王雨辰、宋叶萍:《国内外热点问题述评》,北京:中国财政经济出版社2005年版。
99.魏明德:《全球化与中国》,北京:商务印书馆2002年版。
100.韦森:《博弈论制度分析史上的第一块里程碑:肖特<社会制度的经济理论>中译本序》。
101.吴大英、刘瀚主编:《政治体制改革与法制建设》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2007年版。
102.吴孟真:《从国际规范看中国大陆的环境政策发展及其影响》, < http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/macs/3_activity/2007b/20080603-1.doc>.
103.吴展:《关于全面禁止核试验的问题》,载《美国研究》1998年第3期,第7-29页。
104.武良成:《转型国家的汇率制度选择与经济稳定性研究:中国、俄罗斯汇率制度选择的比较分析》,北京:中国经济出版社2006年版。
105.新华网:《中华人民共和国香港特别行政区基本法》,.
106.徐更生主编:《21世纪初:中国与世界》,北京:经济科学出版社2002年版。
107.杨逢珉:《<洛美协定>下的欧盟与非加太国家关系》,上海人民出版社2006年版。
108.杨友孙:《欧盟东扩与制度互动:从一个入盟标准说起》,北京:世界图书出版社2008年版。
109.俞可平:《全球化与政治发展》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2003年版。
110.袁易:《中国遵循国际弹道导弹建制的解析:一个社会建构论的观点》,台北:五南图书出版公司2004年版。
111.袁易:《中国与导弹建制:国际规范的挑战与遵循》,见《问题与研究》第43卷第3期,民国93年5、6月。
112.袁正清:《国际制度研究:理论·实证·趋势》,载李慎明、王逸舟主编《2005年:全球政治与安全报告》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2004年版。
113.曾峻:《公共秩序的制度安排:国家与社会关系的框架及其运用》,上海:学林出版社2005年版。
114.曾康霖、邱伟:《中国转型期信用制度建设研究》,北京:中国金融出版社2007年版。
115.曾令良:《论冷战后时代的国家主权》,载《中国法学》1998年第1期。
116.曾令良:《朝鲜核试验的国际法考量》,载《世界经济与政治》2007年第1期。
117.曾令良主编:《21世纪初的国际法与中国》,武汉大学出版社2005年版。
118.张磊:《中国与国际刑事法院:现状与展望》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社2009年版。
119.张旭昆:《制度演化分析导论》,杭州:浙江大学出版社2007年版。
120.张宇燕:《美国宪法的经济学含义》,载《社会科学战线》1996年第4期,第39-46页。
121.张占斌:《中国式崛起:渐进改革与国家经济安全体系》,北京:中央文献出版社2003年版。
122.赵恒:《核不扩散机制:历史与理论》,北京:世界图书出版社2009年版。
123.周弘:《东扩:欧盟的既定战略方针》,载《人民论坛》2002年第12期.
124.庄贵阳:《气候变化与可持续发展》,载《世界经济与政治》2004年第4期。
125.中国经济信息网:《IDB与中国》,2005年4月19日,
126.中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室:《中国的军控、裁军和防扩散努力》,2005年9月。
127.中华人民共和国外交部:《关于防扩散问题的一些看法中国外交部军控司司长沙祖康在美国卡内基研讨会上的发言》,1999.1.11.
128.中华人民共和国外交部:《湄公河委员会希望进一步加强与中国合作》,2008年11月18日。
129.中华人民共和国外交部:《2003年2月11日外交部发言人在记者招待会上答记者问》。
130.中华人民共和国外交部:《2003年3月25日外交部发言人在记者招待会上答记者问》。
131.中华人民共和国外交部:《六方会谈中国代表团团长王毅举行中外记者招待会》,2003年8月29日。
132.中华人民共和国外交部:《关于六方会谈工作组的概念文件》,2004年6月26日。
133.中华人民共和国外交部:《第三轮六方会谈主席声明》,2004年6月26日。
134.中华人民共和国外交部:《第四轮六方会谈共同声明》,2005年9月19日。
135.中华人民共和国外交部:《落实共同声明起步行动》,2007年2月13日。
136.中华人民共和国外交部:《落实共同声明第二阶段行动》,2007年10月3日。
137.中华人民共和国外交部:《中国政府关于促进裁军和防扩散领域的多边主义问题的看法》,2006年5月23日,.
138.中华人民共和国外交部:《中国观察员代表团团长王群大使在(渥太华禁雷公约)第九届缔约国会议上的发言》,2008年11月24日。
139.中华人民共和国外交部:《中国的防扩散政策及措施》,2009年7月27日。.
140.中华人民共和国外交部:《中国观察员代表团团长、外交部军控司司长成竞业在(渥太华禁雷公约)第二次审议大会上的发言》,2009年12月21日。
141.中华人民共和国外交部:《二OO六年中国参加的多边条约一览表》,.
142.中华人民共和国外交部:《2007年中国参加的主要多边条约一览表》,< http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/zlb/tyfg/t575555.htm >.
143.中华人民共和国外交部:《2008年中国参加国际公约情况,包括签署、批准、接受、加入及生效情况》,.
144.中华人民共和国外交部:《涉及香港和澳门的条约与法律工作》,.
145.中华人民共和国外交部:《维也纳条约法公约》,.
146.中国社会科学院法学研究所:《国际人权文件和国际人权机构》,社会科学文献出版社1993年版.
147.中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室编:《现代汉语词典》第5版,北京:商务印书馆2005年版。
1. Abram Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes,“On Compliance,”International Organization, Vol.47, No.2, (Spring 1993), pp.175-205.
2. Alberto Amurgo-Pacheco,“Mutual Recognition Agreements and Trade Diversion: Consequences for Developing Nations,”Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva2007.
3. Alastair Iain Johnston,“Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,”International Studies Quarterly, Vol.45, No.3, December 2001.
4. Alexander Wendt,“Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,”International Organization, Vol.46, No.2, (Spring 1992), pp.391-425.
5. Alexandra Gheciu,“Security Institution as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the New Europe,”International Organization 59, Fall 2005, pp.973-1012.
6. Amitav Acharya,“How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 2, (Spring, 2004), pp. 239-275.
7. Amy F. Woolf, Arms Control and Nonproliferation: A Catalog of Treaties and Agreements, CRS report RL33865, Updated April 9, 2008.
8. Andrew P. Cortell and Susan Peterson,“Altered States: Explaining Domestic Institutional Change,”British Journal of Political Science, Vol.29, No.1 (Jan., 1999), pp.177-203.
9. Annette Schnabel,“What Makes Collective Goods a Shared Concern? Re-Constructing the Construction of the Collectiveness of Goods,”Rationality and Society, Vol.18, No.1, (Spring 2006), pp.5-34.
10. Arthur Stein,“Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World,”in Stephen Krasner, ed., International Regimes, Beijing University Press, 2005.
11. Arvind Panagariya,“Preferential Trade Liberalization: The traditional Theory and New Developments,”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.38, No. 2, 2000, pp.287–331.
12. Avery Goldstein,“Great Expectations: Interpreting China’s Arrival,”International Security, Vol.22, No. 3 (Winter, 1997-1998), pp.36-73.
13. Avner Cohen and Thomas Graham Jr.,“An NPT for Non Members,”Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 60, No. 3, (May/June 2004), pp.40-44.
14. B. Rumelili,“Transforming Conflicts on EU Borders,”Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (1), 2007, pp105-126.
15. Barbara Koremenos, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal,“Rational Design: Looking Back to Move Forward,”International Organization, Vol.55, No.4, The Rational Design of International Institutions, (autumn, 2001), pp.1051-1082.
16. Bartram S. Brown,“The United States and The Politicization Of The World Bank: Issues Of International Law And Policy,”1992.
17. Beth Simmons and Lisa Martin, International Organizations and Institutions, in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth Simmons eds., Handbook of International Relations, London et al.: Sage, 2002.
18. Catherine L. Mann and Xuepeng Liu,“The Information Technology Agreement: Sui Generis or Model Stepping Stone?”Paper presented at the Conference on Multilateralising Regionalism, Geneva, September 2007.
19. Celeste A. Wallander,“Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War,”International Organization, Vol.54, No.4, (Autumn 2000), pp.705-735.
20. Center for Nonproliferation Studies Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes: Membership of Nonproliferation Export Control Regimes, ICOC and PSI.
21. Charles A. Goldman, Jonathan D. Pollack,“Engaging China in International Export Control Process: Options for U.S. Policy,”Rand Report, 1997, pp.4-11.
22. Charles L. Glaser,“Why NATO is Still Best: Future Security Arrangements for Europe,”International Security, Vol.18, No.1, (Summer, 1993), pp.5-50.
23. Chrysostomos Tabakis,“FREE TRADE AREAS AND MANAGED TRADE,”Working paper of Columbia University, November 23, 2004.
24. D. G. Webster, The Dynamics of Atlantic Fisheries Arrangement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The MIT Press, 2009.
25. Dan Blumenthal,“Facing a Nuclear North Korea,”Asian Outlook, June–July 2005.
26. Daniel W. Drezner, ed., Locating the Proper Authorities: The Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.
27. Daryl G. Kimball,“Achieving Entry Into Force of the CTBT,”Paper presented to "Atlanta Consultation on the Future of the NPT", The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, Jan. 26-28, 2005.
28. David A. Baldwin, ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, NY: Columbia University Press, 1993.
29. David A. Lake,“Beyond Anarchy: The Importance of Security Institutions,”International Security, Vol. 26, No. 1, (Summer, 2001), pp. 129-160.
30. David Lektzian and Mark Souva,“Institutions and International Cooperation: An Event History Analysis of the Effects of Economic Sanctions,”The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 45, No. 1, (Feb., 2001), pp. 61-79.
31. David Mitchell,“Do International Institutions Matter?”International Studies Review, Vol. 5, No. 3, (Sep., 2003), pp. 360-363.
32. David Mowat, Mark Purdy and Julie Adams,“Managing the unknown,”Outlook, Number 2, 2003.
33. David Shambaugh,“China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order,”International Security, Vol. 29, No.3 (Winter 2004/05), pp.64-99.
34. Deepti Choubey,“Don’t Wait for the United States”, CTBTO Spectrum, Issue 12, April 2009.
35. Economic and Social Council- High Commission for Human Rights, Compendium Of International And Regional Standards Against Racism, Racial Ldiscrimination, Xenophobia And Related Intolerance, E/CN.4/2004/WG.21/5, January 13, 2004.
36. Edward D. Mansfield,“Review: International Institutions and Economic Sanctions,”World Politics, Vol. 47, No. 4. (Jul., 1995), pp. 575-605.
37. Edward Wilson, Sociology: The New Synthesis, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975, 28.
38. Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Jana von Stein and Erik Gartzke,“International Organizations Count,”Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.52, No.2, (April, 2008), pp.175-188.
39. Evan S. Medeiros, Chasing the Dragon: Assessing China’s System of Export Controls for WMD-Related Goods and Technologies, Rand report MG-533, 2005.
40. Frank Schimmelfennig,“Strategic Calculation and International Socialization: Membership Incentives, Party Constellations, and Sustained Compliance in Central and Eastern Europe,”International Organization, Vol.59, No.4, (fall 2005), pp.827-860.
41. Frédérique Déjean and Jean-Pascal Gond,“Measuring the Unmeasured: An Institutional Entrepreneur Strategy in an Emerging Industry,”Human Relations, Vol. 57, No. 6, (2004), pp.741-764.
42. Friedrich Kratochwil and Edward D. Mansfield eds., International Organization and Global Governance: A Reader 2nd, NY: Pearson Education Inc., 2006.
43. G. John Ikenberry, Liberal Order and Imperial Ambition: Essays on American Power and World Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006.
44. G. R. Price,“Selection and Covairance,”Nature 227(1970): pp.520-521.
45. Garrett Hardin,“The Tragedy of Commons,”Science: 162, 13, Dec., 1968.
46. Geoffrey M. Hodgson,“What are Institutions?”Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XL, No.1, (March 2006), pp.1-25.
47. George A. MacLean,“Advancing the Comprehensive (Nuclear) Test Ban Treaty: Capabilities, Implementation, and Entry into Force,”Paper prepared for the International Security Research and Outreach Program, International Security Bureau, Ottawa, October 2002.
48. George Christou,“The EU, Conflict Resolution and The Case of Cyprus,”Paper prepared for the GARNET Conference,‘The EU in International Affairs’, Brussels, April 24-26, 2008.
49. George Tsebelis and Geoffrey Garrett,“The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union,”International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 2, (Spring, 2001), pp. 357-390.
50. Gerald Chan, China and International Organizations: Participation in Non-Governmental Organizations Since 1971, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989.
51. Glenn H. Snyder,“Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics”, World Politics, Vol.36, No.4 (Jul.,1984), pp.461-495.
52. Greg Mastel,“The WTO and Nonmarket Economies,”in Charles W. Kegley, Jr., Eugene R. Wittkopf eds., The Global Agenda: Issues and Perspectives, 6th edition, Beijing: Peking University Press, 2003.
53. Hai Wen,“The WTO and China’s Objectives as a Trading Power,”Beijing: China Center for Economic Research, Peking University, 1997.
54. Hajime Izumi and Katsuhisa Furukawa, Not Going Nuclear: Japan’s Response to North Korea’s Nuclear Test,.
55. Helen Milner, Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.
56. Hongyi Harry Lai,“Behind China's World Trade Organization Agreement with the USA,”Third World Quarterly, Vol 22, No 2, 2001, pp.237-255.
57. Hungdah SU,“The Dynamics of Widening on the Deepening of the European Union - The Constitutionalization of Enhanced Cooperation,”EURAMERICA Vol. 35, No. 3 (September 2005), pp.501-545.
58. Ian Hurd, Security Council reform, in Bruce Russert Ed., The once and future Security Council, 1997.
59. Iain Hardie and Layna Mosley,“Market Pressures, Membership Conditionality, and EU Accession: Turkey’s Convergence Tale,”January 2007.
60. Inis L. Claude,“Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations,”International Organization, Vol.20, No.3, (Summer 1966).
61. International Law Commission:“Unilateral acts of States”, Updated Nov. 2006,.
62. Jack Donnelly, Realism and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
63. Jack Knight, Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
64. James Clay Moltz,“Divergent Learning and the Failed Politics of Soviet Economic Reform,”World Politics, Vol. 45, No. 2, (Jan., 1993), pp. 301-325.
65. James D. Morrow,“The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties,”International Organization, Vol.55, No.4, (autumn 2001), pp. 971-991.
66. James G. March and Johan P. Olsen,“The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,”International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, (Autumn1998), pp. 943-969.
67. James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, Last Updated Jan.23, 2007.
68. James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, 2009 edition, Monterey Institute of International Studies, 2009.
69. James R. Scarritt,“Institutional Reform as the Key to Sustainable Development,”Mershon International Studies Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, (Apr., 1995), pp. 126-129.
70. Jeffrey Kucik and Eric Reinhardt,“Does Flexibility Promote Cooperation? An Application to the Global Trade Regime,”International Organization 62, (Summer 2008), pp. 477-505.
71. Jeffrey T. Checkel,“Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change,”International Organization, Vol.55, No.3, (Summer 2001), pp.553-588.
72. Jeffrey T. Checkel,“International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework,”International Organization 59, (Fall 2005), pp. 801-826.
73. Jeffrey W. Legro,“Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the‘Failure’of Internationalism,”International Organization, Vol. 51, No. 1, (Winter, 1997), pp. 31-63.
74. Jeffrey W. Knopf,“Beyond Two-Level Games: Domestic-International Interaction in the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Negotiations,”International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 4, (autumn, 1993), pp. 599-628.
75. Jeremy Rabkin,“The Law of the Sea Treaty: A Bad Deal for America,”Comparative Expertise Institute Report 2006 No.3,.
76. Jing-dong Yuan, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Commission: China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007.
77. Ji?íSchneider and Alexandr Vondra,“Ukraine: Near Abroad of the European Union? -Overcoming a Curse of Dual-Periphery,”PASS Policy Paper No. 2,“Ukraine in Europe and the World”Conference, February 20-21, 2004, Kyiv, Ukraine.
78. John Carlson,“Challenges to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: Can the Regime Survive? An Australian Perspective,”Paper presented to the Carnegie Moscow Center, 29 May 2007.
79. John Duffield,“What Are International Institutions?”International Studies Review (2007) 9, pp.1–22.
80. John Gerard Ruggie,“Multilateralism: the Anatomy of an Institution,”International Organization, Vol.46, No.3, (Summer, 1992), pp.561-598.
81. John J. Mearsheimer,“China's Unpeaceful Rise,”Current History, Vol. 105, No.690 (April 2006), pp.160-162.
82. John M. Owen,“The Foreign Imposition of Domestic Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 2 (Spring, 2002), pp. 375-409.
83. Joseph Cirincione, "Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission," Hearing on China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007, p.3.
84. Johan Eriksson,“Agendas, Threats, and Politics: Securitization in Sweden,”Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, workshop‘Redefining Security’, Mannheim, March 26-31, 1999.
85. Jonas Tallberg,“Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and European Union,”International Organization, Vol.56, No.3, (Summer 2002), pp.609-643.
86. Jonathan B. Tucker,“Strengthening the CWC Regime for Transfers of Dual-Use Chemicals,”Pugwash Meeting No.324, 52nd Pugwash CBW Workshop, 10 Years of the OPCW: Taking Stock and Looking Forward, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, March 17-18, 2007.
87. Jonathan E. Davis, Export Controls in the People’s Republic of China, Athens, GA: Center for International Trade and Security, the University of Georgia, 2005.
88. John Gerard Ruggie,“Multilateralism: the Anatomy of an Institution,”International Organization, Vol.46, No.3, (Summer, 1992), pp.561-598.
89. John Miller,“The Weight of the Past: East Asia’s China Debate,”in Satu P. Limaye ed., Asia’s China Debate, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Special Report, December 2003, pp.2-10.
90. John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003.
91. Jon C. Pevehouse, Democratization, Credible Commitments, and Joining InternationalOrganizations, in Daniel W. Drezner, Ed., Locating Proper Authority: The Interaction of International and Domestic Institutions, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.
92. Joseph Cirincione, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Hearing on China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007.
93. Judith L. Goldstein, Douglas Rivers, and Michael Tomz,“Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade,”International Organization 61, (Winter 2007), pp.37–67.
94. Judith Kelley,“International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 3 (Summer 2004), pp. 425-457.
95. Katherine Barbieri, The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2002.
96. Kathy Powers and Gary Goertz,“The evolution of Regional Economic Institutions (REI) into security institutions or The demise of realist military alliances?”National Science Foundation Grant (SES–02415754), October 29, 2006.
97. Keith Krause, Michael C. Williams, Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods,”Mershon International Studies Review, Vol.40, No.2, (Oct., 1996), pp.229-254.
98. Kemal Kirisci and Zeynep Gülsah Capan, Turkey on the Edges of the Convention on the“Future of the Europe”, in Sonia Lucarelli and Claudio M. Radaelli eds., Mobilizing Politics and Society? The EU Convention’s Impact on Southern Europe, London and New York: Routledge, 2005.
99. Kenneth A. Oye,“Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies,”World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 1, (Oct., 1985), pp.1-24.
100. Kenneth Benoit and Jacqueline Hayden,“Institutional Change and Persistence: The Evolution of Poland's Electoral System, 1989-2001,”The Journal of Politics, Vol. 66, No. 2 (May, 2004), pp.396-427.
101. Kenneth S. Blazejewski,“The FATF and Its Institutional Partners: Improving The Effectiveness and Accountability of Transgovernmental Networks,”New York, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, 2007.
102. Kristin Marie Haugevik,“Strategic Adaptation or Identity Change? An Analysis of Britain’s Approach to the ESDP 1998-2004”, Working paper of Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, No. 688-2005.
103. Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons,“Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol.52, No.4, (Autumn 1998), pp.729-757.
104. Liliana Botcheva and Lisa L. Martin,“Institutional Effects on State Behavior: Convergence and Divergence,”International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 1, (Mar., 2001), pp. 1-26.
105. Llewelyn Hughes,“Why Japan Will Not Go Nuclear (yet): International and Domestic Constraints on the Nuclearization of Japan,”International Security, Vol.31, No.4, (2007), pp.67-96.
106. Madeleine Albright,“Enlarging NATO: Why Bigger Is Better,”in Eugene R. Wittkopf and Christopher M. Jones eds., The Future of American Foreign Policy, Beijing: Peking University Press 2003.
107. Marc A. Levy, Oran R. Young and Michael Zürn,“The Study of International Regimes,”European Journal of International Relations, Vol.1, No.3, (1995), p.270.
108. Mark Beeson, Institutions of the Asia-Pacific: ASEAN, APEC and Beyond, London and New York: Routledge, 2009.
109. Martha Finnemore,“International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cutural Organization and Science Policy,”InternationalOrganization, Vol. 47, No. 4, (Autumn, 1993), pp. 565-597.
110. Marvin Miller and Lawrence Scheinman,“Israel, India, and Pakistan: Engaging the Non-NPT States in the Nonproliferation Regime,”Arms Control Today, December 2003.
111. Marybeth Peterson Ulrich, Democratizing Communist Militaries: The Cases of the Czech and Russian Armed Forces, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1999.
112. Michael Crowley,“The CTBT: lack of progress in the Middle East and South Asia,”Trust & Verify, Issue Number 121, July–September 2005.
113. Michael D. Swaine, Ashley J. Tellis, Interpreting China's Grand Strategy: Past, Present, and Future, 2000, Rand Report MR-1121-AF.
114. Michael J. Mazarr,“Going Just a Little Nuclear: Nonproliferation Lessons from North Korea,”International Security, Vol.20, No.2, (autumn 1995), pp. 92-122.
115. Michael Lipson,“The Reincarnation of COCOM: Explaining Post-Cold War Export Controls,”The Non-proliferation Review/ Winter, 1999, pp.33-51.
116. Michael McFaul,“State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatization in Russia,”World Politics, Vol.47, No.2 (Jan., 1995), pp.210-243.
117. Mitchell P. Koza and Arie Y. Lewin,“The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances,”Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, Special Issue: Managing Partnerships and Strategic Alliances (May - Jun., 1998), pp.255-264.
118. Nina Graeger,“Environmental Security?”Journal of Peace Research, Vol.33, No.1, (Feb., 1996), pp.109-116.
119. Nora Bensahel, The Counterterror Coalitions: Cooperation with Europe, NATO, and the European Union, Rand Report MR-1746, 2003.
120. NTI, UNSC Resolution 1540 Database,.
121. Oliver Meier,“Political Significance of the CTBT and Perspectives of Entry into Force,”Paper presented to Twelve Years of the CTBT: Achievements and Perspectives, July 1-2, 2008, Istanbul, Turkey.
122. Oran R. Young,“Review: International Regimes: Toward a New Theory of Institutions,”World Politics, Vol.39, No.1, (Oct., 1986), pp. 104-122.
123. Paul Ingram,“Taking Responsibility: What Can NPT States Realistically Do To Build on Today's Momentum behind Nuclear Disarmament?”Paper presented at a meeting held alongside the NPT Preparatory Committee, 2nd Session, Geneva, May 8, 2008.
124. Pauline Jones Luong, Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perception, and Pacts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
125. Peter B. Evans, Harold K. Jacbson, Robert D. Putnam, eds., Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1993.
126. Peter D. Feaver,“Command and Control in Emerging Nuclear Nations,”International Security, Vol.17, No.3, (Winter, 1992-1993), pp. 160-187.
127. Peter Gourevitch, Politics In Hard Times: Comparative Responses To International Economic Crisis, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1986.
128. Peter M. Hass,“Do Regime Matter: Epistemic Community and Mediterranean Pollution Control,”International Organization, Vol.43, No.3, (Summer 1989), pp.377-403.
129. Richard Cupitt and Igor Khripunov, "New Strategyies For the Nuclear Suppliers Group," Comparative Strategy, Vol.16, No.3, Jul-Sep 1997, pp.305-315.
130. Robert Axelrod and Robert O. Keohane,“Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions,”World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 1, (Oct., 1985), pp. 226-254.
131. Robert Jervis,“Cooperation under the Security Dilemma,”World Politics, Vol. 30, No. 2, (Jan., 1978), pp. 167-214.
132. Robert Jervis,“Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate,”International Security, Vol. 24, No. 1, (Summer, 1999), pp. 42-63.
133. Robert O. Keohane,“International Institutions: Two Approaches,”in Friedrich Kratochwil and Edward D. Mansfield, International Organization and Global Governance, NJ: Pearson Education Inc., 2006.
134. Robert Keohane:“The Demand for International Regimes,”International Organization, Vol. 36, No. 2, (Spring 1982), pp.141-171.
135. Robert O. Keohane, Lisa L. Martin,“The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,”International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Summer, 1995), pp. 39-51.
136. Ronald B. Mitchell,“Of Course International Institutions Matter: But When and How?”in Frank Biermann, Rainer Brohm and Klaus Dingwerth eds., Proceedings of the 2001 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Global Environmental Change and the Nation State, Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 2002, pp.16-25.
137. S. J. Grossman and O. Hart,“Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and The Theory of The Corporation,”Bell Journal of Economics, 11, 1980, pp.42-64.
138. Samuel S. Kim, China, the United Nations, and World Order, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.
139. Samuel S. Kim,“International Organizations in Chinese Foreign Policy,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.519, China's Foreign Relations, (Jan., 1992), pp.140-157.
140. Satu P. Limaye ed., Asia’s China Debate, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Special Report, December 2003.
141. Seema Gahlaut and Vioctor Zaborsky, "Do Export Control Regimes Have Members They Really Need?" Comparative Strategy, Vol.23, No.1, Jan-Mar 2004, pp.73-94.
142. Seymour Maxwell Finger,“United States Policy Toward International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 30, No. 2, (Spring, 1976), pp. 347-360.
143. Shiping Tang, Social Evolution of International Politics: A Macro History and Sociology of Grand Theories, forthcoming.
144. Shirley A. Kan,“China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues”, CRS Report RL31555, Updated March 6th, 2008.
145. Stephen R. Hurt,“Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and ACP states and the end of the Lome Convention,”Third World Quarterly, Vol.24, No.1, 2003, p.173.
146. Stephen D. Krasner, International Regime, Beijing University Press, 2005.
147. Stephan Haggard and Beth A. Simmons,“Theories of International Regimes,”International Organization, Vol.41, No.3, (Summer 1987), pp.491-517.
148. Stephen M. Walt,“International Relations: One World, Many Theories,”Foreign Policy, No.110, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge, (Spring, 1998), pp.29-46.
149. Stephen P. Robbins and Mary Coultar, Management, 5th ed., NJ: Prentice Hall International Inc., 1996.
150. Study Group on Enhancing Multilateral Export Controls for US National Security, Final Report, Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center, April 2001.
151. Sue E. S. Crawford and Elinor Ostrom,“A Grammer of Institutions,”The American Political Science Review, Vol.89, No.3, (Sep., 1995), pp.582-600.
152. Tenu Avafia and Dirk Hansohm,“The inclusion of political conditions into trade agreements between the EU and ACP countries: An analysis of the legal and economic implications of Cotonou’s provisions,”Paper prepared for an ECSA-SA conference on The relationship between Africa and the European Union, University of the Western Cape, Jan. 22-23, 2004.
153. The Union of Concerned Scientists,“The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: SenateRatification Would Enhance U.S. Security,”UCS March 2009.
154. Thomas Bernauer,“The Effect of International Environmental Institutions: How We Might Learn More,”International Organization, Vol. 49, No. 2, (Spring, 1995), pp. 351-377.
155. Thomas J. Christensen,“Posing Problems without Catching Up, China’s Rise and Challenges for US Security Policy,”International Security, Vol. 25, No.4, (Spring 2001), pp.5-40.
156. Thomas J. Christensen,“Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster? The Rise of China and US Policy toward East Asia,”International Security, Vol. 31, No.1 (Summer 2006), pp. 81-126.
157. Thomas Risse-Kappen, ed., Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-state Actors, Domestic Structure, and International Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
158. Thomas Wright,“On Reforming The International Order,”Policy Analysis Brief of The Stanley Foundation, February 2009.
159. Thomas Wright,“Toward Effective Multilateralism: Why Bigger May Not Be Better,”The Washington Quarterly: 32, 3, 2009, pp.163-180.
160. U.S. Department of State, Adherence To And Compliance With Arms Control, Nonproliferation And Disarmament Agreements And Commitments, August 2005.
161. U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment, Technology and East-West Trade, 1979, Stock No. 052-003 -00723-1.
162. U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment,“Arming Our Allies: Cooperation and Competition in Defense Technology,”OTA-ISC-449, May 1990.
163. U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Armed Services, Selected Defense-Related Laws (Amended through December 31, 2003), Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004.
164. Veron Mei-Ying Hung,“China's WTO Commitment on Independent Judicial Review: Impact on Legal and Political Reform,”The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol.52, No.1, (Winter, 2004), pp.82-127.
165. Vincent A. Mahler,“Britain, the European Community, and the Developing Commonwealth: Dependence, Interdependence, and the Political Economy of Sugar,”International Organization, Vol.35, No.3, (Summer 1981), pp.467-492.
166. Volker Nitsch,“Does the G7/G8 Promote Trade?”Address at Freie Universit?t Berlin, February 20, 2006.
167. Weixing Hu, Gerald Chan, and Daojiong Zha, China’s International Relations in 21st Century: Dynamics of Paradigm Shifts, Lanham, New York, and Oxford: University Press of America, 2000.
168. William J. Long,“Economic Incentives and International Cooperation: Technology Transfer to the People's Republic of China, 1978-86,”Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 28, No. 2, (May, 1991), pp. 175-189.
169. Working Group on the Audit of International Institutions, List of International Institutions, 18th International Congress of Supreme Audit Institutions (INCOSAI XVIII): Budapest, 2004.
170. Yong Deng, China’s Struggle for Status: The Realignment of International Relations, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madride, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo, Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
②Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons,“Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol.52, No.4, (Autumn 1998), p.730.
③当然,他们未必都是制度主义的信徒。但毫无疑问,他们的研究丰富了制度分析的内容。
④A. Glenn Mower, Jr.,“Observer Countries: Quasi Members of the United Nations,”International Organization, Vol.20, No.2, 1966, pp. 266-283.
⑤Stephen R. Hurt,“Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and ACP states and the end of the Lome Convention,”Third World Quarterly, Vol.24, No.1, 2003, p.173.
①苏长和:《中国与国际制度:一项研究议程》,载《世界经济与政治》2002年第10期,第7页。
②梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第3-12页。
③John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The role of international institutions in globalization: the challenge of reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, pp.65-73.
①Mark Beeson, Institutions of the Asia-Pacific: ASEAN, APEC and Beyond, London and New York: Routledge, 2009, pp.41-43.
②Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Jana von Stein and Erik Gartzke,“International Organizations Count,”Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.52, No.2, (April, 2008), pp.175-188.
③Frank Schimmelfennig,“Strategic Calculation and International Socialization: Membership Incentives, Party Constellations, and Sustained Compliance in Central and Eastern Europe,”International Organization, Vol.59, No.4, (fall 2005), pp.827-860.
④Judith Kelley,“International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 3, (Summer 2004), p.454.
⑤Alexandra Gheciu,“Security Institution as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the New Europe,”International Organization 59, Fall 2005, pp.973-1012.
⑥Iain Hardie and Layna Mosley,“Market Pressures, Membership Conditionality, and EU Accession: Turkey’s Convergence Tale,”January 2007.
⑦Kemal Kirisci and Zeynep Gülsah Capan, Turkey on the Edges of the Convention on the“Future of the Europe”, in Sonia Lucarelli and Claudio M. Radaelli eds., Mobilizing Politics and Society? The EU Convention’s Impact on Southern Europe, London and New York: Routledge, 2005.
⑧Hongyi Harry Lai,“Behind China's World Trade Organization Agreement with the USA,”Third World Quarterly, Vol 22, No 2, 2001, pp.237-255; Veron Mei-Ying Hung,“China's WTO Commitment on Independent Judicial Review: Impact on Legal and Political Reform,”The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol.52, No.1, (Winter, 2004), pp.82-127.
⑨马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版。
①梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第331-332页。
②梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第335页。
③参阅曾令良:《朝鲜核试验的国际法考量》,载《世界经济与政治》2007年第1期。
④饶戈平:《论政府间国际组织的法律人格》,载其主编《全球化进程中的国际组织》,北京大学出版社2005年版,第92-100页。
①[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版,第201页。
②James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, Last Updated Jan.23, 2007.
①Ronald B. Mitchell,“Of Course International Institutions Matter: But When and How?”in Frank Biermann, Rainer Brohm and Klaus Dingwerth eds., Proceedings of the 2001 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Global Environmental Change and the Nation State, Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 2002, pp.16-25.
①[加]杰克逊、[丹]索伦森:《国际关系学理论与方法》,吴勇、宋德星译,天津人民出版社2008年版。
②梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,《国际组织法》,第335页。
③参见饶戈平:《论政府间国际组织的法律人格》,载其主编《全球化时代的国际组织》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
①John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p.71.
②Judith Kelley,“International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 3, (Summer 2004), p.454.
③Mitchell P. Koza and Arie Y. Lewin,“The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances,”Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, Special Issue: Managing Partnerships and Strategic Alliances (May - Jun., 1998), pp.255-264.
④Samuel S. Kim, China, the United Nations, and World Order, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.
⑤Jack Knight, Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.转引自唐世平:《制度变迁的广义理论》,手稿。
①分别参见马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版;萨缪尔·金(金淳基):《中国与联合国》,载[美]伊丽莎白·埃克诺米、米歇尔·奥克森伯格主编:《中国参与世界》,华宏勋、闫循华等译,北京:新华出版社2000年版。
②李宝臣:《文化冲击中的制度惯性》,北京:中国城市出版社2002年版。
③[美]詹姆斯·马奇、马丁·舒尔茨、周雪光:《规则的动态演变:成文组织规则的变化》,童根兴译,上海人民出版社2005年版。
①Stephen M. Walt,“International Relations: One World, Many Theories,”Foreign Policy, No.110, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge, (Spring, 1998), pp.29-46.
①Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons,“Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol.52, No.4, (Autumn 1998), p.730.
②Daniel W. Drezner, ed., Locating the Proper Authorities: The Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.
①王鸣鸣:《外交政策分析:理论与方法》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2008年版。
②Greg Mastel,“The WTO and Nonmarket Economies,”in Charles W. Kegley, Jr., Eugene R. Wittkopf eds., The Global Agenda: Issues and Perspectives, 6th edition, Beijing: Peking University Press, 2003.
③Joseph Cirincione, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Hearing on China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007; Shirley A. Kan,“China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues”, CRS Report RL31555, Updated March 6th, 2008.
①可参阅李少军:《国际关系学研究方法》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2008年版。
①分别见中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室编:《现代汉语词典》第5版,北京:商务印书馆2005年版,第1756页、第1820页。
②
③参阅苏长和:《重新定义国际制度》,载《欧洲》1999年第6期,第22-27页。
④Geoffrey M. Hodgson,“What are Institutions?”Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XL, No.1, (March 2006), p.1.
⑤可参阅张旭昆:《制度演化分析导论》,杭州:浙江大学出版社2007年版,第90-91页;Geoffrey M. Hodgson,“What are Institutions?”Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XL, No.1, (March 2006), pp.1-25;John Duffield,“What Are International Institutions?”International Studies Review (2007) 9, pp.1–22.
①Sue E. S. Crawford and Elinor Ostrom,“A Grammer of Institutions,”The American Political Science Review, Vol.89, No.3, (Sep., 1995), pp.582-600.
②Stephen D. Krasner, International Regime, Beijing University Press, 2005, p.2.
③Marc A. Levy, Oran R. Young and Michael Zürn,“The Study of International Regimes,”European Journal of International Relations, Vol.1, No.3, (1995), p.270.
④Abram Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes,“On Compliance,”International Organization, Vol.47, No.2, (Spring 1993), p.177.
⑤Marc A. Levy, Oran R. Young and Michael Zürn,“The Study of International Regimes,”European Journal of International Relations, Vol.1, No.3, (1995), p.272.
⑥Stephan Haggard and Beth A. Simmons,“Theories of International Regimes,”International Organization, Vol.41, No.3, (Summer 1987), p.494.
⑦Robert O. Keohane,“International Institutions: Two Approaches,”International Studies Quarterly, Vol.32, No.4, (Dec. 1988), p.384.
⑧唐任伍:《“扶强抑弱”的全球化规则研究》,北京师范大学出版社2006年版。
①韦森:《博弈论制度分析史上的第一块里程碑:肖特<社会制度的经济理论>中译本序》,载[美]安德鲁·肖特:《社会制度的经济理论》,陆铭、陈钊译,上海财经大学出版社2003年版。
①张旭昆:《制度演化分析导论》,杭州:浙江大学出版社2007年版,第92-93页。
②参阅袁正清:《国际制度研究:理论·实证·趋势》,载李慎明、王逸舟主编《2005年:全球政治与安全报告》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2004年版。
③梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第3-12页。
④[美]道格拉斯·诺思:《制度、制度变迁与经济绩效》,杭行译,上海人民出版社2008年版,第5页。
⑤[美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,门洪华译,北京大学出版社2004年版,第174页。最高审计机关亚洲组织(INTOSAI)把国际制度等同于国际组织:“国际制度就是不论是否经由条约而成立的国际组织,其成员包括两个或两个以上的国家、或政府机构及公共资助的实体,其共同(财务)利益受到一个治理实体的监管”。Working Group on the Audit of International Institutions, List of International Institutions, 18th International Congress of Supreme Audit Institutions (INCOSAI XVIII): Budapest, 2004.
①Abram Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes,“On Compliance,”International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 2, (Spring 1993), p.175.
②马蒂亚斯·科尼格-阿尔基布吉:《绘制全球治理》,载戴维·赫尔德、安东尼·麦克格鲁主编《治理全球化:权力、权威与全球治理》,曹荣湘、龙虎等译,社会科学文献出版社2004年版。图中国际组织的中文译名见附录。
③分别参见中国社会科学院法学研究所:《国际人权文件和国际人权机构》,社会科学文献出版社1993年版。
④参阅饶戈平:《全球化进程中的国际组织》,载其主编《全球化进程中的国际组织》,北京大学出版社2005年版,第4-5页。该文引用的是UIA, ed., Yearbook of International Organization, 1998/1999, Vol.2, p.1759.
⑤马蒂亚斯·科尼格-阿尔基布吉:《绘制全球治理》,载戴维·赫尔德、安东尼·麦克格鲁主编《治理全球化:权力、权威与全球治理》,曹荣湘、龙虎等译,社会科学文献出版社2004年版。图中国际组织的中文译名见附录。
①可参阅廖诗评:《条约冲突基础问题研究》,北京:法律出版社2008年版。
②Amy F. Woolf, Arms Control and Nonproliferation: A Catalog of Treaties and Agreements, CRS report RL33865, Updated April 9, 2008.
③James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, 2009 edition, Monterey Institute of International Studies, 2009.
①梁漱溟:《中国文化要义》,上海人民出版社2005年版,第51页。
②Glenn H. Snyder,“Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics”, World Politics, Vol.36, No.4 (Jul.,1984), pp.461-495.
③Frank Schimmelfennig and Ulrich Sedelmeier,“Theorizing EU enlargement: research focus, hypotheses, and the state of research,”Journal of European Public Policy 9:4 August 2002, pp.500–528.
①梁西:《国际组织法》(总论),(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第3-12页。
②B. Rumelili,“Transforming Conflicts on EU Borders,”Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (1), 2007, pp105-126; George Christou,“The EU, Conflict Resolution and The Case Of Cyprus,”Paper prepared for the GARNET Conference,‘The EU in International Affairs’, Brussels, April 24-26, 2008.
③NTI, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 Database,
①[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版,第200页。
①Jonathan B. Tucker,“Strengthening the CWC Regime for Transfers of Dual-Use Chemicals,”Pugwash Meeting No.324, 52nd Pugwash CBW Workshop, 10 Years of the OPCW: Taking Stock and Looking Forward, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, March 17-18, 2007; Paul Ingram,“Taking Responsibility: What Can NPT States Realistically Do To Build on Today's Momentum behind Nuclear Disarmament?”Paper presented at a meeting held alongside the NPT Preparatory Committee, 2nd Session, Geneva, May 8, 2008.
②Gerald Chan, China and International Organizations: Participation in Non-Governmental Organizations Since 1971, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989; Samuel S. Kim,“International Organizations in Chinese Foreign Policy,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.519, China's Foreign Relations, (Jan., 1992), pp.140-157.
③John Miller,“The Weight of the Past: East Asia’s China Debate,”in Satu P. Limaye ed., Asia’s China Debate, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Special Report, December 2003, pp.2-10.
④[美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《局部全球化世界中的治理》,载《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,门洪华译,北京大学出版社2004年版,第296页。
⑤江忆恩:《美国学者关于中国与国际组织关系研究概述》,福特基金会资助课题工作论文系列之二,
①苏长和:《中国与国际制度:一项研究议程》,载《世界经济与政治》2002年第10期,第10页。
①参阅[美]奥兰·扬:《世界事务中的治理》,陈玉刚、薄燕译,上海人民出版社2007年版,第49-66页。
①樊勇明:《从国际公共产品到区域性公共产品:国际关系理论研究的新增长点》,载“国际关系研究的创新与发展:新理论、新领域、新方法”论文集,上海复旦大学2009,第165-173页。
①Madeleine Albright,“Enlarging NATO: Why Bigger Is Better,”in Eugene R. Wittkopf and Christopher M. Jones eds., The Future of American Foreign Policy, Beijing: Peking University Press 2003.
②Thomas Wright,“Toward Effective Multilateralism: Why Bigger May Not Be Better,”The Washington Quarterly: 32, 3, 2009, pp.163-180.
①《世界人权宣言》序言,引自中国社会科学院法学研究所:《国际人权文件与国际人权机构》,社会科学文献出版社1993年版,第3-4页。
②Economic and Social Council- High Commission for Human Rights, Compendium Of International And Regional Standards Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia And Related Intolerance, E/CN.4/2004/WG.21/5, January 13, 2004; James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, 2009 edition, Monterey Institute of International Studies, 2009.
①[美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,门洪华译,北京大学出版社2004年版;[美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《霸权之后:世界政治经济事务中的合作与纷争》,苏长和等译,上海:世纪出版集团2001年版。
①[美]奥兰·扬:《世界事务中的治理》,陈玉刚、薄燕译,上海人民出版社2007年版,第103页。
②Abram Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes,“On Compliance,”International Organization, Vol.47, No.2, (Spring 1993), p.178; Jeffrey T. Checkel,“Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change,”International Organization, Vol.55, No.3, (Summer 2001), p.554.
③Jonas Tallberg,“Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and European Union,”International Organization, Vol.56, No.3, (Summer 2002), pp.609-643.
④中华人民共和国外交部:《维也纳条约法公约》,
⑤[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版,第201页。
①庄贵阳:《气候变化与可持续发展》,载《世界经济与政治》2004年第4期。
②Thomas Wright, "On Reforming the International Order: Policy Analysis Brief," Innovative approaches to Peace and Security From The Stanley Foundation, February 2009.
③Annette Schnabel,“What Makes Collective Goods a Shared Concern? Re-Constructing the Construction of the Collectiveness of Goods,”Rationality and Society, Vol.18, No.1, (Spring 2006), p.8.
④Garrett Hardin,“The Tragedy of Commons,”Science: 162, 13, Dec., 1968.
①Peter M. Hass,“Do Regime Matter: Epistemic Community and Mediterranean Pollution Control,”International Organization, Vol.43, No.3, (Summer 1989), pp.377-403.
①Thomas Wright, "On Reforming the International Order: Policy Analysis Brief," Innovative approaches to Peace and Security From The Stanley Foundation, February 2009.
②Thomas Wright, "On Reforming the International Order: Policy Analysis Brief," Innovative approaches to Peace and Security From The Stanley Foundation, February 2009.
③James Lee Ray,“Promise or Peril? Neorealism, Neoliberalism, and the Future of International Politics,”载:[美]凯格利主编:《国际关系理论论争:现实主义和新自由主义的挑战》,北京大学出版社2004年版,第337页。
④Seema Gahlaut and Vioctor Zaborsky, "Do Export Control Regimes Have Members They Really Need?" Comparative Strategy, Vol.23, No.1, Jan-Mar 2004, pp.73-94; Richard Cupitt and Igor Khripunov, "New Strategyies For the Nuclear Suppliers Group," Comparative Strategy, Vol.16, No.3, Jul-Sep 1997, pp.305-315.转引自刘宏松:《国际防扩散体系中的非正式机制》,复旦大学博士论文,2007。
①Charles A. Goldman and Jonathan D. Pollack,“Engaging China in International Export Control Process: Options for U.S. Policy,”Rand Report, 1997.
②马蒂亚斯·科尼格-阿尔基布吉:《绘制全球治理》,载戴维·赫尔德、安东尼·麦克格鲁主编《治理全球化:权力、权威与全球治理》,曹荣湘、龙虎等译,北京:社会科学文献出版社2004年版。
③张立平:《意识形态与美国外交政策》,上海人民出版社2006年版,第五章。
④[美]奥兰?扬:《世界事务中的治理》,陈玉刚、薄燕译,上海人民出版社2007年版,第1-6页。
①S. J. Grossman and O. Hart,“Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and The Theory of The Corporation,”Bell Journal of Economics 11, 1980, pp.42-64.
②Alastair Iain Johnston,“Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,”International Studies Quarterly, Vol.45, No.3, December 2001.
③唐世平:《制度变迁的广义理论》,手稿。
①[美]安德鲁·肖特:《社会制度的经济理论》,陆铭、陈钊译,上海财经大学出版社2003年版,第13页。
①James G. March and Johan P. Olsen,“The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,”International Organization, Vol.52, No.4, (autumn 1998), pp.943-969.
②[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版,第203页。
③Mark Beeson, Institutions of the Asia-Pacific: ASEAN, APEC and Beyond, London and New York: Routledge, 2009, pp.41-43.
④新华网:
①Stephen R. Hurt,“Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and ACP States and the End of the Lome Convention,”Third World Quarterly, Vol.24, No.1, (2003), pp.161-176; Tenu Avafia and Dirk Hansohm,“The inclusion of political conditions into trade agreements between the EU and ACP countries: An analysis of the legal and economic implications of Cotonou’s provisions,”Paper prepared for an ECSA-SA conference on The relationship between Africa and the European Union, University of the Western Cape, 22-23 January 2004.
②杨逢珉:《<洛美协定>下的欧盟与非加太国家关系》,上海人民出版社2006年版。
③John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p.71.
①Jon C. Pevehouse,“Democratization, Credible Commitments, and Joining International Organizations,”in Daniel W. Drezner, Ed., Locating Proper Authority: The Interaction of International and Domestic Institutions, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003, p.27.
②Marybeth Peterson Ulrich, Democratizing Communist Militaries: The Cases of the Czech and Russian Armed Forces, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1999, p.104.
③Andrew P. Cortell and Susan Peterson,“Altered States: Explaining Domestic Institutional Change,”British Journal of Political Science, Vol.29, No.1 (Jan., 1999), pp.177-203; Michael McFaul,“State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatization in Russia,”World Politics, Vol.47, No.2 (Jan., 1995), pp.210-243.
①[美]赫伯特·金迪斯、萨缪尔·鲍尔斯等:《人类的趋社会性及其研究:一个超越经济学的经济分析》,浙江大学跨学科社会科学研究中心译,上海人民出版社2005年版,第55-56页。
②可参阅钱穆:《中国文化史导论》,北京:商务印书馆1994年修订版,第39-44页。
③John Carlson,“Challenges to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: Can the Regime Survive? An Australian Perspective,”Paper presented to the Carnegie Moscow Center, 29 May 2007.
④梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第335页。
⑤[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版,第202页。
①John Carlson, Russell Leslie and Annette Berriman,“Strengthening the Nonproliferation Regime,”Paper presented to Annual Meeting of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, Phoenix, Arizona, 13-17 July 2003
②赵恒:《核不扩散机制:历史与理论》,北京:世界图书出版社2009年版,第215页。
①《维也纳条约法公约》,见附录。
②[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版,第94页。
③杨友孙:《欧盟东扩与制度互动:从一个入盟标准说起》,北京:世界图书出版社2008年版。
④梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第26-29页。
①D. G. Webster, The Dynamics of Atlantic Fisheries Arrangement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The MIT Press, 2009.
①Samuel S. Kim,“International Organizations in Chinese Foreign Policy,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 519, China's Foreign Relations, (Jan., 1992), pp. 140-157.
②[法]孟德斯鸠:《论法的精神》(下),北京:商务印书馆2004年版,第3页。
①[法]拉哈:《欧洲一体化史:1945-2004》,彭姝祎、陈志瑞译,北京:中国社会科学出版社2005年版,第66页。
②参阅马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版。
③中华人民共和国外交部:《中国与德国政府发表联合声明》,2004.5.4.
④[加]詹姆斯·怀特:《加拿大和中国同处在新的安全环境中》(演讲摘要),北京,2006年1月20日。
⑤王光亚:《不断完善防扩散机制,促进国际和平与发展——中国的防扩散政策与实践》,《人民日报》2002年10月16日。
①可参阅袁易:《中国与导弹建制:国际规范的挑战与遵循》,见《问题与研究》第43卷第3期,民国93年5、6月。
②中华人民共和国外交部:《中华人民共和国与欧洲联盟关于防扩散和军备控制问题的联合声明》,2004.12.8.
①[美]詹姆斯·马奇、马丁·舒尔茨、周雪光:《规则的动态演变:成文组织规则的变化》,童根兴译,上海人民出版社2005年版,第158页。
①John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p.71.
②卢新波:《论学习型体制转型:后发国家市场化进程的逻辑》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2007年版,第125页。
③
④Christian Reus-smit,“The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Instituions,”International Organization, Vol.51, No.4, (Autumn 1997), pp.555-589.
⑤梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版,第335页。
①参阅[英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版。
②可参阅曾令良:《朝鲜核试验的国际法考量》,载《世界经济与政治》2007年第1期。
③另外,朝鲜1974年参加国际原子能机构,后于1994年退出。
④可参阅曾令良:《朝鲜核试验的国际法考量》,载《世界经济与政治》2007年第1期。
③James D. Morrow, "The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties," International Organization, Vol.55, No.4, (Autumn 2001), pp. 971-991.
①James D. Morrow, "The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties," International Organization, Vol.55, No.4, (Autumn 2001), p.975.
②Jonathan F. Vance, Objects of Concern: Canadian Prisoners of War through the Twentieth Century, Vancouver: UBC Press, 1994. See, James D. Morrow, "The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties," International Organization, Vol.55, No.4, (Autumn 2001), p.975.
③Peter D. Feaver,“Command and Control in Emerging Nuclear Nations,”International Security, Vol.17, No.3, (Winter, 1992-1993), pp. 160-187; Michael J. Mazarr,“Going Just a Little Nuclear: Nonproliferation Lessons from North Korea,”International Security, Vol.20, No.2, (Autumn, 1995), pp. 92-122; Dan Blumenthal,“Facing a Nuclear North Korea,”Asian Outlook, June–July 2005; John Carlson,“Challenges to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: Can the Regime Survive? An Australian Perspective,”Paper presented to the Carnegie Moscow Center, 29 May 2007; Hajime Izumi and Katsuhisa Furukawa, Not Going Nuclear: Japan’s Response to North Korea’s Nuclear Test,
①Llewelyn Hughes,“Why Japaan Will Not Go Nuclear (yet): International and Domestic Constraints on the Nuclearization of Japan,”International Security, Vol.31, No.4, (2007), pp.67-96.
①唐世平:《制度变迁的广义理论》,手稿。此文回顾了解释制度变迁的两种范式:冲突模式与和谐模式。文章指出它们各自存在的逻辑缺陷并兼容了它们的核心观点,从社会进化的角度解释制度变迁。
②张宇燕:《美国宪法的经济学含义》,载《社会科学战线》1996年第4期,第39-46页。
③Thomas Wright,“On Reforming the International Order: Policy Analysis Brief,”Innovative approaches to Peace and Security from the Stanley Foundation, February 2009, http://www.stanleyfoundation.org/publications/pab/ WrightPAB209.pdf.
④关于合法性问题的专门讨论见,[美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《多边合作的俱乐部模式与民主合法性问题》,载罗伯特·基欧汉著,门洪华译:《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,北京大学2004年版,第247-275页;Ian Hurd,“Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics,”International Organization, Vol.53, No.2, (Spring 1999), pp.379-408; Michael Zürn,“Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems,”Government and Opposition, Vol.39, Issue 2, 2004, pp.260-287.
⑤门洪华:《合法性、有效性与局限性——评估国际机制作用的理论框架》,载《香港社会科学学报》2002年冬季卷(总第二十四期),第137-175页。此文分析了合法性的概念、表现、合法化过程等相关问题。
①中华人民共和国外交部:《维也纳条约法公约》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/zlb/tyfg/t83909.htm。
①中华人民共和国外交部:《维也纳条约法公约》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/zlb/tyfg/t83909.htm.。
②中华人民共和国外交部:《中国参加国际公约情况一览表(1875-2003)》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ chn/pds/ziliao/tytj/tyfg/t4985.htm。
③中华人民共和国外交部:《中国代表团在第60届联大一委关于“防止弹道导弹扩散海牙行为准则”决议案( L.22 )的投票后解释性发言》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/zlb/ldzyjh/t271283.htm。
④中华人民共和国外交部:《维也纳条约法公约》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/zlb/tyfg/t83909.htm。
⑤[美]詹姆斯·马奇、马丁·舒尔茨、周雪光著,童根兴译:《规则的动态演变:成文组织规则的变化》,上海人民出版社2005年版,第158页。
①John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen,ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p.75.
②Frédérique Déjean and Jean-Pascal Gond,“Measuring the Unmeasured: An Institutional Entrepreneur Strategy in an Emerging Industry,”Human Relations, Vol. 57, No. 6, (2004), pp.741-764.
③唐贤兴主编:《近现代国际关系史》,上海:复旦大学出版社2002年版,第206页。
④John Gerard Ruggie,“Multilateralism: the Anatomy of an Institution,”International Organization, Vol.46, No.3, (Summer, 1992), p.587.
①门洪华:《美国霸权之翼——论国际制度的战略价值》,载《开放导报》2005年第5期。
②John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p.71.
③
①刘伟:《从“猴子实验”看制度和民主政治建构背后的逻辑》,载《民主与科学》2005年第1期。
②John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p.71.
③Judith Kelley,“International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 3 (Summer 2004), p.454.
④
⑤Amy F. Woolf, Arms Control and Nonproliferation: A Catalog of Treaties and Agreements, CRS report RL33865,Updated April 9, 2008, p.32.
①莫大华:《国际关系理论的辩论、对话与综合:美国“防止扩散安全提议”国际规范的个案分析》,载《问题与研究》,2006年第45卷第5期,第17-60页。
②James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, 2009 edition, Monterey Institute of International Studies, pp.540-544.
③Jeremy Rabkin,“The Law of the Sea Treaty: A Bad Deal for America,”Comparative Expertise Institute Report 2006 No.3,
①可参阅[美]亚历山大·温特:《国际政治的社会理论》,北京大学出版社2005年影印版,第322页。
②克劳德(Inis L. Claude)首先讨论了国际组织使某些个体行为合法化的功能,金淳基(Samuel S. Kim)在谈论中国与联合国关系时用到了相互合法化(mutual legitimization)的概念。分别参见:Inis L. Claude,“Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations,”International Organization, Vol.20, No.3, 1966, p.367;Samuel S. Kim, China, the United Nations, and World Order, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979。
③[美]赫伯特·金迪斯、萨缪尔·鲍尔斯等:《人类的趋社会性及其研究:一个超越经济学的经济分析》,浙江大学跨学科社会科学研究中心译,上海人民出版社2005年版,第61-62页。
①
②林毅夫:《关于制度变迁的经济学理论:诱致性变迁与强制性变迁》,载[美]诺思、阿尔钦、科斯等:《财产权利与制度变迁:产权学派与新制度学译文集》,上海人民出版社1994年版。
①[法]托克维尔:《论美国的民主》,北京:商务印书馆1996年版,第297页。
②[美]罗伯特·杰维斯著,李少军等译:《系统效应:政治与社会生活中的复杂性》,上海人民出版社2008年版,第42页。
①[美]奥兰·扬:《世界事务中的治理》,陈玉刚、薄燕译,上海人民出版社2007年版,第59-66页。
③中华人民共和国外交部:《2003年2月11日外交部发言人在记者招待会上答记者问》,2003年2月11日。
①中华人民共和国外交部:《落实共同声明起步行动》,2007年2月13日。
②中华人民共和国外交部:《落实共同声明第二阶段行动》,2007年10月3日。
①中华人民共和国外交部:《六方会谈中国代表团团长王毅举行中外记者招待会》,2003年8月29日。
②中华人民共和国外交部:《关于六方会谈工作组的概念文件》,2004年6月26日。
③中华人民共和国外交部:《第三轮六方会谈主席声明》,2004年6月26日。
④中华人民共和国外交部:《第四轮六方会谈共同声明》,2005年9月19日。
⑤中华人民共和国外交部:《落实共同声明起步行动》,2007年2月13日。
⑥中华人民共和国外交部:《落实共同声明第二阶段行动》,2007年10月3日。
①这里借用了学者关于中日关系的表述。可参阅鲁义:《中日相互理解还有多远:关于两国民众相互认识的比较研究》,世界知识出版社2005年版,第42页。
②可参阅马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版,第三章之内容,特别见第132、139、149页。
①JiríSchneider and Alexandr Vondra,“Ukraine: Near Abroad of the European Union? -Overcoming a Curse of Dual-Periphery,”PASS Policy Paper No. 2,“Ukraine in Europe and the World”Conference, February 20-21, 2004, Kyiv, Ukraine.
①Alexander Wendt,“Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,”International Organization, Vol.46, No.2, (Spring 1992), pp.391-425.
①可参阅马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版。
②Avner Cohen and Thomas Graham Jr.,“An NPT for Non Members,”Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 60, No. 3, (May/June 2004), pp.40-44.
③转引自刘宏松:《国际防扩散体系中的非正式机制》,复旦大学博士论文,2007,第6页。
④Charles A.Goldman and Jonathan D. Pollack,“Engaging China in International Export Control Process: Options for U.S. Policy,”Rand Report, 1997, http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/1547442.
⑤《关于防扩散问题的一些看法中国外交部军控司司长沙祖康在美国卡内基研讨会上的发言》,http://www.china-botschaft.de/chn/zt/fksyckgz/zyjhhwj/t129477.htm。
①中华人民共和国外交部:《中国与德国政府发表联合声明》, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/wzb/zxxx/ t94742.htm。
②Shirley A. Kan,“China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues,”CRS Report RL31555, http://www.fas.org/asmp/resources/govern/crs-rl31555.pdf, p.42.
③
④Daryl G. Kimball,“Achieving Entry Into Force of the CTBT,”Paper presented to "Atlanta Consultation on the Future of the NPT", The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, Jan. 26-28, 2005; Oliver Meier,“Political Significance of the CTBT and Perspectives of Entry into Force,”Paper presented to Twelve Years of the CTBT: Achievements andPerspectives, July 1-2, 2008, Istanbul, Turkey.
①George A. MacLean,“Advancing the Comprehensive (Nuclear) Test Ban Treaty: Capabilities, Implementation, and Entry into Force,”Paper prepared for the International Security Research and Outreach Program, International Security Bureau, Ottawa, October 2002.
②Michael Crowley,“The CTBT: lack of progress in the Middle East and South Asia,”Trust & Verify, Issue Number 121, July–September 2005.
③Deepti Choubey,“Don’t Wait for the United States”, CTBTO Spectrum, Issue 12, April 2009.
①苏长和:《导读:跨国关系与国内政治》,载[美]罗伯特·基欧汉、海伦·米尔纳主编:《国际化与国内政治》,姜鹏、董素华译,北京大学出版社2003年版,第12-14页。
②参见:Daniel W. Drezner,“Introduction: The Interaction of International and Domestic Institutions,”in Daniel W. Drezner, ed., Locating the Proper Authorities: The Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003, pp.3-15.
③[美]玛莎·费丽莫:《国际社会中的国家利益》,袁正清译,浙江人民出版社2001年版;Alastair Iain Johnston,“Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,”International Studies Quarterly, Vol.45, No.3, December 2001.关于学习理论的详细综述,可参阅:James Clay Moltz,“Divergent Learning and the Failed Politics of Soviet Economic Reform,”World Politics, Vol. 45, No. 2, (Jan., 1993), pp. 301-325.
④Amitav Acharya,“How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 2, (Spring 2004), pp. 239-275.
⑤Kenneth Benoit and Jacqueline Hayden,“Institutional Change and Persistence: The Evolution of Poland'sElectoral System, 1989-2001,”The Journal of Politics, Vol. 66, No. 2 (May, 2004), p.424.
①钱穆:《中国历代政治得失》,三联书店2001年版,前言部分。
②Russell D. Howard, Albert S. Willner,“China’s Rise and the U.S. Army: Leaning Forward,”Working Paper of Us Military Academy- West Point, NY 10996, May 2002; Larry M. Wortzel,“Trade with China But Avoid Strengthening Its Military,”www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/EM749.cfm; Bates Gill,“Limited Engagement,”Foreign Affairs, July/August 1999; Bates Gill,“Can China's Tolerance Last?”Arms Control Today, January 1, 2002; John J. Mearsheimer,“China's Unpeaceful Rise,”Current History, Vol.105, No. 690 (April 2006), pp.160-162.
①Mitchell P. Koza and Arie Y. Lewin,“The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances,”Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, Special Issue: Managing Partnerships and Strategic Alliances (May - Jun., 1998), pp. 255-264.
③Judith Kelley,“International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 3 (Summer 2004), pp. 425-457.
①卢新波:《论学习型体制转型:后发国家市场化进程的逻辑》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2007年版,第159页。
②Arthur Stein,“Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in An Anarchic World,”in David A. Baldwin, ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, NY: Columbia University Press, 1993.
①[法]拉哈:《欧洲一体化史:1945-2004》,彭姝祎、陈志瑞译,北京:中国社会科学出版社2005年版,第66页。
②马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版,第45页。
③Andrew K. Rose, 2004.“Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?”American Economic Review. 94 (March): 98-114.
①马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版,第109-110页。
②马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版,第7页。
③马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版,第119页。
①主要参考马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版。
②李世安、刘丽云等著:《欧洲一体化史》(第二版),石家庄:河北人民出版社2006年版,第99-100页。
③马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版,第151页。
①李少军:《国际核不扩散体制与中国》,载王逸舟主编:《磨合中的建构:中国与国际组织关系的多视角透视》,北京:中国发展出版社2003年版。
②Amy F. Woolf, Arms Control and Nonproliferation: A Catalog of Treaties and Agreements, CRS report RL33865, Updated April 9, 2008; NTI, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 Database,
④Thomas Wright, On Reforming the International Order, Policy Analysis Brief, Innovative approaches to Peace and Security From The Stanley Foundation, February 2009.
①Deepti Choubey,“Don’t Wait for the United States”, CTBTO Spectrum, Issue 12, April 2009.
②Thomas Donnelly and Melissa Wisner,“A Global Partnership between the U.S. and India,”AEI report on Asian Outlook, (August-September), 2005.
③
①Indian Ambitions and the Limits of American Influence,
②SIPRI YEARBOOK 2009: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Summary), pp.20-21.
①中国国家原子能机构:< http://www.caea.gov.cn/n602669/n602674/n602695/n602701/33861.html>.
②American Society of International Law,“Congress Approves Authorizing Legislation for India Nuclear Agreement; President Issues Signing Statement,”The American Journal of International Law, Vol.101, No.2, (Apr., 2007), pp. 496-499.关于美国国会批准的过程见
③[印度]拉贾·莫汉,《落实印美核协议》,马文编译,载《东方早报》2005年12月22日。
④Daryl G . Kimball,“The Enduring Value of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty and New Prospects for Entry Into Force,”CTBTO Spectrum 11, September 2008.
⑤陈刚:《集体行动逻辑与国际合作:<京都议定书>中的选择性激励》,北京:外交学院博士论文,2006。
①关于这一问题的系统讨论见王逸舟主编:《磨合中的建构:中国与国际组织关系的多视角透视》,北京:中国发展出版社2003年版;苏长和:《中国与国际制度:一项研究议程》,载《世界经济与政治》2002年第10期; Gerald Chan, China and international Organizations: Participation in Non-governmental Organizations since 1971, Hong Kong, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989; Samuel S. Kim,“International Organizations in Chinese Foreign Policy,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.519, China's Foreign Relations, (Jan., 1992), pp.140-157; Stuart Harris and Gary Klintworth eds., China as a Great Power: Myths, Realities and Challenges in the Asia-Pacific Region, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995; Weixing Hu, Gerald Chan and Daojiong zha eds., China’s International Relations in the 21st Century: Dynamics of Paradigm Shifts, Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America, 2000; Yong Deng, China’s Struggle for Status: The Realignment of International Relations, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madride, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo, Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
①Jim Rolfe,“Welcome in Asia: China’s Multilateral Presence,”in Satu P. Limaye ed., Asia’s China Debate, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, Special Assessment December, 2003.
②李少军:《国际关系学研究方法》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2008年版,第146页。
①国家宗教事务局政策法规司编:《国际文书有关宗教条款汇编》北京:宗教文化出版社2008年版。
②周江陵:《武装冲突法概论》,南京:东南大学2007年版,第10页。
③周江陵:《武装冲突法概论》,南京:东南大学2007年版,第15-16页。
①Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, Last Updated: 1/23/2007.
①张明谦:《国际组织与集团的综合研究》,载渠梁、韩德主编:《国际组织与集团研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社1989年版,第4页。
②王正毅:《理解中国转型:战略目标、制度调整与国际力量》,载《世界经济与政治》2005年第6期。
③张宇雁:《利益集团与制度非中性》,载《改革》1994年第2期。
①王超:《当代中国身份定位的演变对其参与国际合作的影响》,2008年6月,提交给“第三届全国国际关系博士生论坛”的会议论文。
②Jing-dong Yuan, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Commission: China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007, p.2.
③苏长和:《中国与国际制度——一项研究议程》,载《世界经济与政治》2002年第10期,第10页。
④Charles A. Goldman, Jonathan D. Pollack,“Engaging China in International Export Control Process: Options for U.S. Policy,”Rand Report, 1997, pp.4-11.
①Michael Lipson,“The Reincarnation of COCOM: Explaining Post-Cold War Export Controls,”The Non-proliferation Review/Winter, 1999, p.33.
②Shirley A. Kan, Congressional Research Service,“China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues”, RL31555, Updated on March 6th, 2008, p.49.
①Michael Lipson,“The Reincarnation of COCOM: Explaining Post-Cold War Export Controls,”The Non-proliferation Review/ Winter, 1999, p.38.
①中国经济信息网:《IDB与中国》,2005年4月19日,
②中国经济信息网:《IDB与中国》,2005年4月19日,
③Nina Graeger,“Environmental Security?”Journal of Peace Research, Vol.33, No.1, (Feb., 1996), pp.109-116; Keith Krause, Michael C. Williams, Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods,”Mershon International Studies Review, Vol.40, No.2, (Oct., 1996), pp.229-254; Johan Eriksson,“Agendas, Threats, and Politics: Securitization in Sweden,”Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, workshop‘Redefining Security’, Mannheim, March 26-31, 1999.
①李文志、蕭文軒:《大湄公河流域爭霸戰：大湄公河經濟合作的推展及其戰略意涵》，载《台湾东南亚学刊》,2005年4月第2卷第1期,第83-125页。
②中华人民共和国外交部:《湄公河委员会希望进一步加强与中国合作》,2008年11月18日,
①中国化工机械网:《美呼吁中国加入国际能源署,帮助稳定石油市场》,2008年5月26日。
②ZCOM电子杂志:《中国和国际能源署的距离只差4天》,
③Joseph Cirincione, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Hearing on China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007, pp.2-3.
④Shirley A. Kan, Congressional Research Service,“China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues”, RL31555, Updated on March 6th, 2008.
⑤笔者检索了美国公开的法律文集,没有发现这一条文。(U.S. Government Printing Office, Proliferation and Export Control Provisions of Public Law 106-65, in Selected Defense-related Laws, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington: 2004, pp.437-445.)据信,这一条文出现在国会研究局的报告中,可能是因为报告作者能够接触到该法令的保密版本(classified version)。
⑥
①Shirley A. Kan, Congressional Research Service,“China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues”, RL31555, Updated on March 6th, 2008, pp.40-41.
②郑永年:《环保经济可助中国赢得国际话语权》,转自《参考消息》2009年12月2日第16版。
①曾峻:《公共秩序的制度安排:国家与社会关系的框架及其运用》,上海:学林出版社2005年版,附录《权利-义务对称与当代中国权力关系重组》。
②萨缪尔·金(金淳基):《中国与联合国》,载伊丽莎白·埃克诺米、米歇尔·奥克森伯格主编:《中国参与世界》,华宏勋等译,北京:新华出版社2000年版,第79-80页。
①中华人民共和国外交部:《中国政府关于促进裁军和防扩散领域的多边主义问题的看法》,2006年5月23日,
②中华人民共和国外交部:《中国的防扩散政策及措施》,2009年7月27日,
①联合国裁军事务部:《联合国裁军年鉴2004》,
②《关于防扩散问题的一些看法中国外交部军控司司长沙祖康在美国卡内基研讨会上的发言》,2000年11月7日,
③John Toye,“Order and Justice in the International Trade System,”in John-ren Chen ed., The role of international institutions in globalization: The Challenges of Reform, Cheltenham, Massachussets: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., 2003, p.66.
①Study Group on Enhancing Multilateral Export Controls for US National Security, Final Report, Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center, April 2001.
②U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Armed Services, Selected Defense-Related Laws (Amended through December 31, 2003), Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004, pp.437-445.
③中华人民共和国外交部:《中国的防扩散政策及措施》,2009年7月27日,
①Avery Goldstein,“Great Expectations: Interpreting China’s Arrival,”International Security, Vol.22, No. 3 (Winter, 1997-1998), pp.36-73; Thomas J. Christensen,“Posing Problems without Catching Up, China’s Rise and Challenges for US Security Policy,”International Security, Vol. 25, No.4, (Spring 2001), pp.5-40; David Shambaugh,“China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order,”International Security, Vol. 29, No.3 (Winter 2004/05), pp.64-99; John J. Mearsheimer,“China's Unpeaceful Rise,”Current History, Vol. 105, No.690 (April 2006), pp.160-162; Thomas J.Christensen,“Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster? The Rise of China and US Policy toward East Asia,”International Security, Vol. 31, No.1 (Summer 2006), pp. 81-126.
②Joseph Cirincione, "Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission," Hearing on China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007, p.3.
③Jing-dong Yuan, "Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission," Hearing on China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007, p.1.
④Shirley A. Kan, China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues, CRS Report RL31555, Updated on March 6th, 2008.
⑤U.S. Department of State, Adherence To And Compliance With Arms Control, Nonproliferation And Disarmament Agreements And Commitments, August 2005, p.38.
⑥中华人民共和国外交部:《中国与德国政府发表联合声明》, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/wzb/zxxx/ t94742.htm。
⑦[加]詹姆斯·怀特:《加拿大和中国同处在新的安全环境中》(演讲摘要),北京,2006年1月20日。
⑧Yong Deng, China’s Struggle for Status: The Realignment of International Relations, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madride, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo, Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp.60-69.
①Samuel S. Kim,“International Organizations in Chinese Foreign Policy,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.519, China's Foreign Relations, (Jan., 1992), pp. 140-157.
①可参阅张磊:《中国与国际刑事法院:现状与展望》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社2009年版。关于国际社会建立国际刑事法院的一般说明,可参阅联合国文件:《2001年11月27日加拿大和荷兰常驻联合国代表团给秘书长的普通照会——设立国际刑事法院》,2001年12月1日,A/56/677.
①吴展:《关于全面禁止核试验的问题》,载《美国研究》1998年第3期,第7-29页。
②何祚庥:《核爆炸和平利用前景广阔》,载《中国科学报》1998年12月27日。
①关于该条约文本内容,可参阅张慧勤、东勇挥译:《关于国家与国际组织或国际组织相互间条约的法规维也纳公约》,载《国外环境科学技术》1992年第4期,第1-19页。
①卢仁法等:《加入世贸组织后中国税制改革走向》,北京:人民出版社2006年版,第7页。
②吴孟真:《从国际规范看中国大陆的环境政策发展及其影响》,< http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/macs/ 3_activity/2007b/20080603-1.doc>.
③新华网:《中华人民共和国香港特别行政区基本法》,
④中华人民共和国外交部:《涉及香港和澳门的条约与法律工作》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/pds/ ziliao/tytj/tyfg/t4824.htm>.
①当然,陈智宏(Gerald Chan)的系统考察表明,中国台湾地区参加非政府间国际组织的方式,在上世纪七八十年代已经得到较好的模式化解决。Gerald Chan, China and International Organizations: Participation in Non-Governmental Organizations Since 1971, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989.
1. [德]柯武刚和史漫飞:《制度经济学》,韩朝华译,商务印书馆,2001年版。
2. [法]孟德斯鸠:《论法的精神》(下),北京:商务印书馆2004年版。
3. [加]杰克逊、[丹]索伦森:《国际关系学理论与方法》,吴勇、宋德星译,天津人民出版社2008年版。
4. [加]詹姆斯·怀特:《加拿大和中国同处在新的安全环境中》(演讲摘要),北京,2006年1月20日。
5. [美]阿马蒂亚·森:《以自由看待发展》,任赜于真译,北京:中国人民大学出版社2002年版。
6. [美]安德鲁·肖特:《社会制度的经济理论》,陆铭、陈钊译,上海财经大学出版社2003年版。
7. [美]奥兰·扬:《世界事务中的治理》,陈玉刚、薄燕译,上海人民出版社2007年版。
8. [美]达夫特:《组织理论与设计精要》,北京:机械工业出版社2002年影印版。
9. [美]道格拉斯·诺思:《制度、制度变迁与经济绩效》,杭行译,上海人民出版社2008年版。
10. [美]赫伯特·金迪斯、萨缪尔·鲍尔斯等:《人类的趋社会性及其研究:一个超越经济学的经济分析》,浙江大学跨学科社会科学研究中心译,上海人民出版社2005年版。
11. [美]吉纳斯特:《冲突与合作:演进中的国际关系理论》,北京大学出版社2003年版。
12. [美]凯格利主编:《国际关系理论论争:现实主义和新自由主义的挑战》,北京大学出版社2004年版。
13. [美]理查德·罗斯克兰斯、阿瑟·斯坦主编:《大战略的国内基础》,刘东国译,北京大学出版社2005年版。
14. [美]罗宾斯:《组织行为学精要》(第5版),郑晓明译,机械工业出版社2000年版。
15. [美]罗伯特·阿克塞尔罗德:《合作的进化》(修订版),上海人民出版社2007年版。
16. [美]罗伯特·阿瑟:《美国大战略》,郭树勇译,北京大学出版社2005年版。
17. [美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《霸权之后:世界政治经济事务中的合作与纷争》,苏长和等译,上海:世纪出版集团2001年版。
18. [美]罗伯特·基欧汉、约瑟夫·奈:《权力与相互依赖》,门洪华译,北京大学出版社2002年版。
19. [美]罗伯特·基欧汉、海伦·米尔纳主编:《国际化与国内政治》,姜鹏、董素华译,北京大学出版社2003年版。
20. [美]罗伯特·基欧汉:《局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理》,门洪华译,北京大学出版社2004年版。
21. [美]罗伯特·杰维斯:《系统效应:政治与社会生活中的复杂性》,李少军等译,上海人民出版社2008年版。
22. [美]玛莎·费丽莫:《国际社会中的国家利益》,袁正清译,浙江人民出版社2001年版.
23. [美]诺思、阿尔钦、科斯等:《财产权利与制度变迁:产权学派与新制度学译文集》,上海人民出版社1994年版。
24. [美]斯蒂芬·范埃弗拉:《政治学研究方法指南》,陈琪译,北京大学出版社2006年版。
25. [美]伊丽莎白·埃克诺米、米歇尔·奥克森伯格主编:《中国参与世界》,华宏勋、闫循华等译,北京:新华出版社2000年版。
26. [美]约瑟夫·奈:《硬权力与软权力》,门洪华译,北京大学出版社2005年版。
27. [美]约瑟夫·奈、约翰·唐纳胡主编:《全球化世界的治理》,王勇等译,世界知识出版社2003年版。
28. [美]詹姆斯·多尔蒂、小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫:《争论中的国际关系理论》(第五版),阎学通、陈寒溪等译,北京:世界图书出版社2002年版。
29. [美]詹姆斯·马奇、马丁·舒尔茨、周雪光:《规则的动态演变:成文组织规则的变化》,童根兴译,上海人民出版社2005年版。
30. [日]滨田道代、顾耕耘主编:《公司治理:国际借鉴与制度设计》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
31. [英]安托尼·奥斯特:《现代条约法与实践》,江国青译,北京:中国人民出版社2004年版。
32. [英]戴维·赫尔德、安东尼·麦克格鲁主编《治理全球化:权力、权威与全球治理》,曹荣湘、龙虎等译,社会科学文献出版社2004年版。
33. [英]赫德利·布尔:《无政府社会:世界政治秩序研究》,张小明译,北京:世界图书出版社2003年版。
34. [英]弗里德里希·冯·哈耶克:《哈耶克文选》,冯克利译,南京:江苏人民出版社2006年版。
35. [英]伊特韦尔等编:《新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典》,北京:经济科学出版社1996年版。
36. [英]约翰·伯顿:《国际冲突的国内根源》,马学印、谭朝洁译,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社1991版。
37.蔡鹏鸿:《强国之路和中国参与国际组织》,载《社会科学》2004年第4期。
38.蔡拓:《全球化与政治的转型》,北京大学出版社2007年版。
39.陈刚:《集体行动逻辑与国际合作:<京都议定书>中的选择性激励》,北京:外交学院博士论文,2006.
40.程霖:《中国近代银行制度建设思想研究:1859-1949》,上海财经大学出版社1999年版。
41.《复旦政治学评论》第二辑:《制度建设与国家成长》,上海辞书出版社2003年版。
42.樊勇明:《从国际公共产品到区域性公共产品:国际关系理论研究的新增长点》,载“国际关系研究的创新与发展:新理论、新领域、新方法”论文集,上海复旦大学2009,第165-173页。
43.何新:《世纪之交的中国与世界:何新与西方记者谈话录》,成都:四川人民出版社1992年版。
44.何祚庥:《核爆炸和平利用前景广阔》,载《中国科学报》1998年12月27日。
45.何增科等:《中国政治体制改革研究》,北京:中央编译出版社2004年版。
46.郝雨凡、林甦主编:《中国外交决策:开放与多元的社会因素分析》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2007年版。
47.胡鞍钢、王绍光、周建明:《第二次转型:国家制度建设》,北京:清华大学出版社2003年版。
48.郭树勇:《国际制度的融入与国家利益:中国外交的一种历史分析》,载《世界经济与政治》1999年第4期。
49.郭树勇:《评“国际制度和平论”》,载《美国研究》2000年第1期,第24-39页。
50.张慧勤、东勇挥译:《关于国家与国际组织或国际组织相互间条约的法规维也纳公约》,载《国外环境科学技术》1992年第4期,第1-19页。
51.江忆恩:《美国学者关于中国与国际组织关系研究概述》,福特基金会资助课题工作论文系列之二,
52.李宝臣:《文化冲击中的制度惯性》,北京:中国城市出版社2002年版。
53.李少军:《国际政治学概论》(第二版),上海人民出版社2005年版。
54.李少军:《国际关系学研究方法》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2008年版。
55.李文志、蕭文軒:《大湄公河流域爭霸戰：大湄公河經濟合作的推展及其戰略意涵》，载《台湾东南亚学刊》,2005年4月第2卷第1期,第83-125页。
56.李兆祥:《近代中国的外交转型研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2008年版。
57.联合国文件:《2001年11月27日加拿大和荷兰常驻联合国代表团给秘书长的普通照会——设立国际刑事法院》,2001年12月1日,A/56/677.
58.联合国裁军事务部:《联合国裁军年鉴2004》,
59.梁漱溟:《中国文化要义》,上海人民出版社2005年版。
60.梁西:《国际组织法(总论)》(修订第五版),武汉大学出版社2001年版。
61.廖诗评:《条约冲突基础问题研究》,北京:法律出版社2008年版。
62.林毅夫:《关于制度变迁的经济学理论:诱致性变迁与强制性变迁》,载[美]诺思、阿尔钦、科斯等:《财产权利与制度变迁:产权学派与新制度学译文集》,上海人民出版社1994年版。
63.刘宏松:《国际防扩散体系中的非正式机制》,复旦大学博士论文,2007。
64.刘青建:《发展中国家国际制度选择的困境及其理性思考》,载《世界经济与政治》2002年第12期。
65.刘伟:《从“猴子实验”看制度和民主政治建构背后的逻辑》,载《民主与科学》2005年第1期。
66.卢新波:《论学习型体制转型:后发国家市场化进程的逻辑》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2007年版。
67.卢仁法等:《加入世贸组织后中国税制改革走向》,北京:人民出版社2006年版,第7页。
68.鲁义:《中日相互理解还有多远:关于两国民众相互认识的比较研究》,世界知识出版社2005年版。
69.马瑞映:《疏离与合作:英国与欧共体关系研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2007年版。
70.门洪华:《合法性、有效性与局限性:评估国际机制作用的理论框架》,载《香港社会科学学报》2002年冬季卷(总第24期),第137-175页。
71.门洪华:《霸权之翼:美国国际制度战略》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
72.门洪华:《压力、认知与国际形象:关于中国参与国际制度战略的历史解释》,载《世界经济与政治》2005年第4期。
73.门洪华:《霸权之翼:国际制度的战略价值》,载《开放导报》2005年第5期。
74.门洪华:《构建中国大战略的框架:国家实力、战略观念与国际制度》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
75.莫大华:《国际关系理论的辩论、对话与综合:美国“防止扩散安全提议”国际规范的个案分析》,载《问题与研究》,2006年第45卷第5期,第17-60页。
76.钱穆:《中国文化史导论》,北京:商务印书馆1994年修订版。
77.秦亚青:《权力、制度、文化:国际关系理论与方法研究文集》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
78.饶戈平:《论政府间国际组织的法律人格》,载其主编《全球化进程中的国际组织》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
79.饶戈平:《全球化进程中的国际组织》,载其主编《全球化进程中的国际组织》,北京大学出版社2005年版。
80.芮明杰:《管理学:现代的观点》,上海人民出版社1999年版。
81.时殷弘:《中国与国际社会:中国的选择与命运》,载时殷弘:《现当代国际关系史:从
16世纪到20世纪末》,北京:中国人民大学出版社2006年版。
82.宋秀琚:《国际合作理论:批判与建构》,北京:世界知识出版社2006年版。
83.苏长和:《重新定义国际制度》,载《欧洲》1999年第6期,第22-27页。
84.苏长和:《全球公共问题与国际合作:一种制度的分析》,上海人民出版社2000年版。
85.苏长和:《中国与国际制度:一项研究议程》,载《世界经济与政治》2002年第10期。
86.苏长和:《发现中国新外交:多边国际制度与中国外交新思维》,载《世界经济与政治》2005年第4期。
87.苏长和:《导读:跨国关系与国内政治》,载[美]罗伯特·基欧汉、海伦·米尔纳主编:《国际化与国内政治》,姜鹏、董素华译,北京大学出版社2003年版。
88.唐任伍:《“扶强抑弱”的全球化规则研究》,北京师范大学出版社2006年版。
89.唐世平:《制度变迁的广义理论》,手稿。
90.唐贤兴主编:《近现代国际关系史》,上海:复旦大学出版社2002年版。
91.许嘉、蔡玮:《国际制度与中国的选择》,载《国际政治研究》2007年第4期。
92.许新主编:《转型经济的产权改革:俄罗斯、东欧、中亚国家的私有化》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2003年版。
93.王光亚:《不断完善防扩散机制,促进国际和平与发展——中国的防扩散政策与实践》,《人民日报》2002年10月16日。
94.王鸣鸣:《外交政策分析:理论与方法》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2008年版。
95.王学东:《外交战略中的声誉因素分析:冷战后中国参与国际制度的解释》,天津人民出版社2007年版。
96.王逸舟:《西方国际政治学:历史与理论》,上海人民大学出版社1998年版。
97.王逸舟主编:《磨合中的建构:中国与国际组织关系的多视角透视》,北京:中国发展出版社2003年版。
98.王雨辰、宋叶萍:《国内外热点问题述评》,北京:中国财政经济出版社2005年版。
99.魏明德:《全球化与中国》,北京:商务印书馆2002年版。
100.韦森:《博弈论制度分析史上的第一块里程碑:肖特<社会制度的经济理论>中译本序》。
101.吴大英、刘瀚主编:《政治体制改革与法制建设》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2007年版。
102.吴孟真:《从国际规范看中国大陆的环境政策发展及其影响》, < http://www2.nsysu.edu.tw/macs/3_activity/2007b/20080603-1.doc>.
103.吴展:《关于全面禁止核试验的问题》,载《美国研究》1998年第3期,第7-29页。
104.武良成:《转型国家的汇率制度选择与经济稳定性研究:中国、俄罗斯汇率制度选择的比较分析》,北京:中国经济出版社2006年版。
105.新华网:《中华人民共和国香港特别行政区基本法》,
106.徐更生主编:《21世纪初:中国与世界》,北京:经济科学出版社2002年版。
107.杨逢珉:《<洛美协定>下的欧盟与非加太国家关系》,上海人民出版社2006年版。
108.杨友孙:《欧盟东扩与制度互动:从一个入盟标准说起》,北京:世界图书出版社2008年版。
109.俞可平:《全球化与政治发展》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2003年版。
110.袁易:《中国遵循国际弹道导弹建制的解析:一个社会建构论的观点》,台北:五南图书出版公司2004年版。
111.袁易:《中国与导弹建制:国际规范的挑战与遵循》,见《问题与研究》第43卷第3期,民国93年5、6月。
112.袁正清:《国际制度研究:理论·实证·趋势》,载李慎明、王逸舟主编《2005年:全球政治与安全报告》,北京:社会科学文献出版社2004年版。
113.曾峻:《公共秩序的制度安排:国家与社会关系的框架及其运用》,上海:学林出版社2005年版。
114.曾康霖、邱伟:《中国转型期信用制度建设研究》,北京:中国金融出版社2007年版。
115.曾令良:《论冷战后时代的国家主权》,载《中国法学》1998年第1期。
116.曾令良:《朝鲜核试验的国际法考量》,载《世界经济与政治》2007年第1期。
117.曾令良主编:《21世纪初的国际法与中国》,武汉大学出版社2005年版。
118.张磊:《中国与国际刑事法院:现状与展望》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社2009年版。
119.张旭昆:《制度演化分析导论》,杭州:浙江大学出版社2007年版。
120.张宇燕:《美国宪法的经济学含义》,载《社会科学战线》1996年第4期,第39-46页。
121.张占斌:《中国式崛起:渐进改革与国家经济安全体系》,北京:中央文献出版社2003年版。
122.赵恒:《核不扩散机制:历史与理论》,北京:世界图书出版社2009年版。
123.周弘:《东扩:欧盟的既定战略方针》,载《人民论坛》2002年第12期.
124.庄贵阳:《气候变化与可持续发展》,载《世界经济与政治》2004年第4期。
125.中国经济信息网:《IDB与中国》,2005年4月19日,
126.中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室:《中国的军控、裁军和防扩散努力》,2005年9月。
127.中华人民共和国外交部:《关于防扩散问题的一些看法中国外交部军控司司长沙祖康在美国卡内基研讨会上的发言》,1999.1.11.
128.中华人民共和国外交部:《湄公河委员会希望进一步加强与中国合作》,2008年11月18日。
129.中华人民共和国外交部:《2003年2月11日外交部发言人在记者招待会上答记者问》。
130.中华人民共和国外交部:《2003年3月25日外交部发言人在记者招待会上答记者问》。
131.中华人民共和国外交部:《六方会谈中国代表团团长王毅举行中外记者招待会》,2003年8月29日。
132.中华人民共和国外交部:《关于六方会谈工作组的概念文件》,2004年6月26日。
133.中华人民共和国外交部:《第三轮六方会谈主席声明》,2004年6月26日。
134.中华人民共和国外交部:《第四轮六方会谈共同声明》,2005年9月19日。
135.中华人民共和国外交部:《落实共同声明起步行动》,2007年2月13日。
136.中华人民共和国外交部:《落实共同声明第二阶段行动》,2007年10月3日。
137.中华人民共和国外交部:《中国政府关于促进裁军和防扩散领域的多边主义问题的看法》,2006年5月23日,
138.中华人民共和国外交部:《中国观察员代表团团长王群大使在(渥太华禁雷公约)第九届缔约国会议上的发言》,2008年11月24日。
139.中华人民共和国外交部:《中国的防扩散政策及措施》,2009年7月27日。
140.中华人民共和国外交部:《中国观察员代表团团长、外交部军控司司长成竞业在(渥太华禁雷公约)第二次审议大会上的发言》,2009年12月21日。
141.中华人民共和国外交部:《二OO六年中国参加的多边条约一览表》,
142.中华人民共和国外交部:《2007年中国参加的主要多边条约一览表》,< http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/zlb/tyfg/t575555.htm >.
143.中华人民共和国外交部:《2008年中国参加国际公约情况,包括签署、批准、接受、加入及生效情况》,
144.中华人民共和国外交部:《涉及香港和澳门的条约与法律工作》,
145.中华人民共和国外交部:《维也纳条约法公约》,
146.中国社会科学院法学研究所:《国际人权文件和国际人权机构》,社会科学文献出版社1993年版.
147.中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室编:《现代汉语词典》第5版,北京:商务印书馆2005年版。
1. Abram Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes,“On Compliance,”International Organization, Vol.47, No.2, (Spring 1993), pp.175-205.
2. Alberto Amurgo-Pacheco,“Mutual Recognition Agreements and Trade Diversion: Consequences for Developing Nations,”Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva2007.
3. Alastair Iain Johnston,“Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,”International Studies Quarterly, Vol.45, No.3, December 2001.
4. Alexander Wendt,“Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,”International Organization, Vol.46, No.2, (Spring 1992), pp.391-425.
5. Alexandra Gheciu,“Security Institution as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the New Europe,”International Organization 59, Fall 2005, pp.973-1012.
6. Amitav Acharya,“How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 2, (Spring, 2004), pp. 239-275.
7. Amy F. Woolf, Arms Control and Nonproliferation: A Catalog of Treaties and Agreements, CRS report RL33865, Updated April 9, 2008.
8. Andrew P. Cortell and Susan Peterson,“Altered States: Explaining Domestic Institutional Change,”British Journal of Political Science, Vol.29, No.1 (Jan., 1999), pp.177-203.
9. Annette Schnabel,“What Makes Collective Goods a Shared Concern? Re-Constructing the Construction of the Collectiveness of Goods,”Rationality and Society, Vol.18, No.1, (Spring 2006), pp.5-34.
10. Arthur Stein,“Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World,”in Stephen Krasner, ed., International Regimes, Beijing University Press, 2005.
11. Arvind Panagariya,“Preferential Trade Liberalization: The traditional Theory and New Developments,”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.38, No. 2, 2000, pp.287–331.
12. Avery Goldstein,“Great Expectations: Interpreting China’s Arrival,”International Security, Vol.22, No. 3 (Winter, 1997-1998), pp.36-73.
13. Avner Cohen and Thomas Graham Jr.,“An NPT for Non Members,”Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 60, No. 3, (May/June 2004), pp.40-44.
14. B. Rumelili,“Transforming Conflicts on EU Borders,”Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (1), 2007, pp105-126.
15. Barbara Koremenos, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal,“Rational Design: Looking Back to Move Forward,”International Organization, Vol.55, No.4, The Rational Design of International Institutions, (autumn, 2001), pp.1051-1082.
16. Bartram S. Brown,“The United States and The Politicization Of The World Bank: Issues Of International Law And Policy,”1992.
17. Beth Simmons and Lisa Martin, International Organizations and Institutions, in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth Simmons eds., Handbook of International Relations, London et al.: Sage, 2002.
18. Catherine L. Mann and Xuepeng Liu,“The Information Technology Agreement: Sui Generis or Model Stepping Stone?”Paper presented at the Conference on Multilateralising Regionalism, Geneva, September 2007.
19. Celeste A. Wallander,“Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War,”International Organization, Vol.54, No.4, (Autumn 2000), pp.705-735.
20. Center for Nonproliferation Studies Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes: Membership of Nonproliferation Export Control Regimes, ICOC and PSI.
21. Charles A. Goldman, Jonathan D. Pollack,“Engaging China in International Export Control Process: Options for U.S. Policy,”Rand Report, 1997, pp.4-11.
22. Charles L. Glaser,“Why NATO is Still Best: Future Security Arrangements for Europe,”International Security, Vol.18, No.1, (Summer, 1993), pp.5-50.
23. Chrysostomos Tabakis,“FREE TRADE AREAS AND MANAGED TRADE,”Working paper of Columbia University, November 23, 2004.
24. D. G. Webster, The Dynamics of Atlantic Fisheries Arrangement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The MIT Press, 2009.
25. Dan Blumenthal,“Facing a Nuclear North Korea,”Asian Outlook, June–July 2005.
26. Daniel W. Drezner, ed., Locating the Proper Authorities: The Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.
27. Daryl G. Kimball,“Achieving Entry Into Force of the CTBT,”Paper presented to "Atlanta Consultation on the Future of the NPT", The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, Jan. 26-28, 2005.
28. David A. Baldwin, ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, NY: Columbia University Press, 1993.
29. David A. Lake,“Beyond Anarchy: The Importance of Security Institutions,”International Security, Vol. 26, No. 1, (Summer, 2001), pp. 129-160.
30. David Lektzian and Mark Souva,“Institutions and International Cooperation: An Event History Analysis of the Effects of Economic Sanctions,”The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 45, No. 1, (Feb., 2001), pp. 61-79.
31. David Mitchell,“Do International Institutions Matter?”International Studies Review, Vol. 5, No. 3, (Sep., 2003), pp. 360-363.
32. David Mowat, Mark Purdy and Julie Adams,“Managing the unknown,”Outlook, Number 2, 2003.
33. David Shambaugh,“China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order,”International Security, Vol. 29, No.3 (Winter 2004/05), pp.64-99.
34. Deepti Choubey,“Don’t Wait for the United States”, CTBTO Spectrum, Issue 12, April 2009.
35. Economic and Social Council- High Commission for Human Rights, Compendium Of International And Regional Standards Against Racism, Racial Ldiscrimination, Xenophobia And Related Intolerance, E/CN.4/2004/WG.21/5, January 13, 2004.
36. Edward D. Mansfield,“Review: International Institutions and Economic Sanctions,”World Politics, Vol. 47, No. 4. (Jul., 1995), pp. 575-605.
37. Edward Wilson, Sociology: The New Synthesis, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975, 28.
38. Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Jana von Stein and Erik Gartzke,“International Organizations Count,”Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.52, No.2, (April, 2008), pp.175-188.
39. Evan S. Medeiros, Chasing the Dragon: Assessing China’s System of Export Controls for WMD-Related Goods and Technologies, Rand report MG-533, 2005.
40. Frank Schimmelfennig,“Strategic Calculation and International Socialization: Membership Incentives, Party Constellations, and Sustained Compliance in Central and Eastern Europe,”International Organization, Vol.59, No.4, (fall 2005), pp.827-860.
41. Frédérique Déjean and Jean-Pascal Gond,“Measuring the Unmeasured: An Institutional Entrepreneur Strategy in an Emerging Industry,”Human Relations, Vol. 57, No. 6, (2004), pp.741-764.
42. Friedrich Kratochwil and Edward D. Mansfield eds., International Organization and Global Governance: A Reader 2nd, NY: Pearson Education Inc., 2006.
43. G. John Ikenberry, Liberal Order and Imperial Ambition: Essays on American Power and World Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006.
44. G. R. Price,“Selection and Covairance,”Nature 227(1970): pp.520-521.
45. Garrett Hardin,“The Tragedy of Commons,”Science: 162, 13, Dec., 1968.
46. Geoffrey M. Hodgson,“What are Institutions?”Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XL, No.1, (March 2006), pp.1-25.
47. George A. MacLean,“Advancing the Comprehensive (Nuclear) Test Ban Treaty: Capabilities, Implementation, and Entry into Force,”Paper prepared for the International Security Research and Outreach Program, International Security Bureau, Ottawa, October 2002.
48. George Christou,“The EU, Conflict Resolution and The Case of Cyprus,”Paper prepared for the GARNET Conference,‘The EU in International Affairs’, Brussels, April 24-26, 2008.
49. George Tsebelis and Geoffrey Garrett,“The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union,”International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 2, (Spring, 2001), pp. 357-390.
50. Gerald Chan, China and International Organizations: Participation in Non-Governmental Organizations Since 1971, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989.
51. Glenn H. Snyder,“Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics”, World Politics, Vol.36, No.4 (Jul.,1984), pp.461-495.
52. Greg Mastel,“The WTO and Nonmarket Economies,”in Charles W. Kegley, Jr., Eugene R. Wittkopf eds., The Global Agenda: Issues and Perspectives, 6th edition, Beijing: Peking University Press, 2003.
53. Hai Wen,“The WTO and China’s Objectives as a Trading Power,”Beijing: China Center for Economic Research, Peking University, 1997.
54. Hajime Izumi and Katsuhisa Furukawa, Not Going Nuclear: Japan’s Response to North Korea’s Nuclear Test,
55. Helen Milner, Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.
56. Hongyi Harry Lai,“Behind China's World Trade Organization Agreement with the USA,”Third World Quarterly, Vol 22, No 2, 2001, pp.237-255.
57. Hungdah SU,“The Dynamics of Widening on the Deepening of the European Union - The Constitutionalization of Enhanced Cooperation,”EURAMERICA Vol. 35, No. 3 (September 2005), pp.501-545.
58. Ian Hurd, Security Council reform, in Bruce Russert Ed., The once and future Security Council, 1997.
59. Iain Hardie and Layna Mosley,“Market Pressures, Membership Conditionality, and EU Accession: Turkey’s Convergence Tale,”January 2007.
60. Inis L. Claude,“Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations,”International Organization, Vol.20, No.3, (Summer 1966).
61. International Law Commission:“Unilateral acts of States”, Updated Nov. 2006,
62. Jack Donnelly, Realism and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
63. Jack Knight, Institutions and Social Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
64. James Clay Moltz,“Divergent Learning and the Failed Politics of Soviet Economic Reform,”World Politics, Vol. 45, No. 2, (Jan., 1993), pp. 301-325.
65. James D. Morrow,“The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties,”International Organization, Vol.55, No.4, (autumn 2001), pp. 971-991.
66. James G. March and Johan P. Olsen,“The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,”International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, (Autumn1998), pp. 943-969.
67. James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, Last Updated Jan.23, 2007.
68. James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes, 2009 edition, Monterey Institute of International Studies, 2009.
69. James R. Scarritt,“Institutional Reform as the Key to Sustainable Development,”Mershon International Studies Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, (Apr., 1995), pp. 126-129.
70. Jeffrey Kucik and Eric Reinhardt,“Does Flexibility Promote Cooperation? An Application to the Global Trade Regime,”International Organization 62, (Summer 2008), pp. 477-505.
71. Jeffrey T. Checkel,“Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change,”International Organization, Vol.55, No.3, (Summer 2001), pp.553-588.
72. Jeffrey T. Checkel,“International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework,”International Organization 59, (Fall 2005), pp. 801-826.
73. Jeffrey W. Legro,“Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the‘Failure’of Internationalism,”International Organization, Vol. 51, No. 1, (Winter, 1997), pp. 31-63.
74. Jeffrey W. Knopf,“Beyond Two-Level Games: Domestic-International Interaction in the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Negotiations,”International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 4, (autumn, 1993), pp. 599-628.
75. Jeremy Rabkin,“The Law of the Sea Treaty: A Bad Deal for America,”Comparative Expertise Institute Report 2006 No.3,
76. Jing-dong Yuan, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Commission: China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007.
77. Ji?íSchneider and Alexandr Vondra,“Ukraine: Near Abroad of the European Union? -Overcoming a Curse of Dual-Periphery,”PASS Policy Paper No. 2,“Ukraine in Europe and the World”Conference, February 20-21, 2004, Kyiv, Ukraine.
78. John Carlson,“Challenges to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: Can the Regime Survive? An Australian Perspective,”Paper presented to the Carnegie Moscow Center, 29 May 2007.
79. John Duffield,“What Are International Institutions?”International Studies Review (2007) 9, pp.1–22.
80. John Gerard Ruggie,“Multilateralism: the Anatomy of an Institution,”International Organization, Vol.46, No.3, (Summer, 1992), pp.561-598.
81. John J. Mearsheimer,“China's Unpeaceful Rise,”Current History, Vol. 105, No.690 (April 2006), pp.160-162.
82. John M. Owen,“The Foreign Imposition of Domestic Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 2 (Spring, 2002), pp. 375-409.
83. Joseph Cirincione, "Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission," Hearing on China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007, p.3.
84. Johan Eriksson,“Agendas, Threats, and Politics: Securitization in Sweden,”Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, workshop‘Redefining Security’, Mannheim, March 26-31, 1999.
85. Jonas Tallberg,“Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and European Union,”International Organization, Vol.56, No.3, (Summer 2002), pp.609-643.
86. Jonathan B. Tucker,“Strengthening the CWC Regime for Transfers of Dual-Use Chemicals,”Pugwash Meeting No.324, 52nd Pugwash CBW Workshop, 10 Years of the OPCW: Taking Stock and Looking Forward, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, March 17-18, 2007.
87. Jonathan E. Davis, Export Controls in the People’s Republic of China, Athens, GA: Center for International Trade and Security, the University of Georgia, 2005.
88. John Gerard Ruggie,“Multilateralism: the Anatomy of an Institution,”International Organization, Vol.46, No.3, (Summer, 1992), pp.561-598.
89. John Miller,“The Weight of the Past: East Asia’s China Debate,”in Satu P. Limaye ed., Asia’s China Debate, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Special Report, December 2003, pp.2-10.
90. John Toye, Order and Justice in International Trade System, in John-ren Chen ed., The Role of International Institutions in Globalization: The Challenge of Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003.
91. Jon C. Pevehouse, Democratization, Credible Commitments, and Joining InternationalOrganizations, in Daniel W. Drezner, Ed., Locating Proper Authority: The Interaction of International and Domestic Institutions, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.
92. Joseph Cirincione, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Hearing on China’s Proliferation and the Impact of Trade Policy on Defense Industries in the United States and China, July 12, 2007.
93. Judith L. Goldstein, Douglas Rivers, and Michael Tomz,“Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade,”International Organization 61, (Winter 2007), pp.37–67.
94. Judith Kelley,“International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 3 (Summer 2004), pp. 425-457.
95. Katherine Barbieri, The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2002.
96. Kathy Powers and Gary Goertz,“The evolution of Regional Economic Institutions (REI) into security institutions or The demise of realist military alliances?”National Science Foundation Grant (SES–02415754), October 29, 2006.
97. Keith Krause, Michael C. Williams, Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods,”Mershon International Studies Review, Vol.40, No.2, (Oct., 1996), pp.229-254.
98. Kemal Kirisci and Zeynep Gülsah Capan, Turkey on the Edges of the Convention on the“Future of the Europe”, in Sonia Lucarelli and Claudio M. Radaelli eds., Mobilizing Politics and Society? The EU Convention’s Impact on Southern Europe, London and New York: Routledge, 2005.
99. Kenneth A. Oye,“Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies,”World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 1, (Oct., 1985), pp.1-24.
100. Kenneth Benoit and Jacqueline Hayden,“Institutional Change and Persistence: The Evolution of Poland's Electoral System, 1989-2001,”The Journal of Politics, Vol. 66, No. 2 (May, 2004), pp.396-427.
101. Kenneth S. Blazejewski,“The FATF and Its Institutional Partners: Improving The Effectiveness and Accountability of Transgovernmental Networks,”New York, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, 2007.
102. Kristin Marie Haugevik,“Strategic Adaptation or Identity Change? An Analysis of Britain’s Approach to the ESDP 1998-2004”, Working paper of Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, No. 688-2005.
103. Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons,“Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol.52, No.4, (Autumn 1998), pp.729-757.
104. Liliana Botcheva and Lisa L. Martin,“Institutional Effects on State Behavior: Convergence and Divergence,”International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 1, (Mar., 2001), pp. 1-26.
105. Llewelyn Hughes,“Why Japan Will Not Go Nuclear (yet): International and Domestic Constraints on the Nuclearization of Japan,”International Security, Vol.31, No.4, (2007), pp.67-96.
106. Madeleine Albright,“Enlarging NATO: Why Bigger Is Better,”in Eugene R. Wittkopf and Christopher M. Jones eds., The Future of American Foreign Policy, Beijing: Peking University Press 2003.
107. Marc A. Levy, Oran R. Young and Michael Zürn,“The Study of International Regimes,”European Journal of International Relations, Vol.1, No.3, (1995), p.270.
108. Mark Beeson, Institutions of the Asia-Pacific: ASEAN, APEC and Beyond, London and New York: Routledge, 2009.
109. Martha Finnemore,“International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cutural Organization and Science Policy,”InternationalOrganization, Vol. 47, No. 4, (Autumn, 1993), pp. 565-597.
110. Marvin Miller and Lawrence Scheinman,“Israel, India, and Pakistan: Engaging the Non-NPT States in the Nonproliferation Regime,”Arms Control Today, December 2003.
111. Marybeth Peterson Ulrich, Democratizing Communist Militaries: The Cases of the Czech and Russian Armed Forces, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1999.
112. Michael Crowley,“The CTBT: lack of progress in the Middle East and South Asia,”Trust & Verify, Issue Number 121, July–September 2005.
113. Michael D. Swaine, Ashley J. Tellis, Interpreting China's Grand Strategy: Past, Present, and Future, 2000, Rand Report MR-1121-AF.
114. Michael J. Mazarr,“Going Just a Little Nuclear: Nonproliferation Lessons from North Korea,”International Security, Vol.20, No.2, (autumn 1995), pp. 92-122.
115. Michael Lipson,“The Reincarnation of COCOM: Explaining Post-Cold War Export Controls,”The Non-proliferation Review/ Winter, 1999, pp.33-51.
116. Michael McFaul,“State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatization in Russia,”World Politics, Vol.47, No.2 (Jan., 1995), pp.210-243.
117. Mitchell P. Koza and Arie Y. Lewin,“The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances,”Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, Special Issue: Managing Partnerships and Strategic Alliances (May - Jun., 1998), pp.255-264.
118. Nina Graeger,“Environmental Security?”Journal of Peace Research, Vol.33, No.1, (Feb., 1996), pp.109-116.
119. Nora Bensahel, The Counterterror Coalitions: Cooperation with Europe, NATO, and the European Union, Rand Report MR-1746, 2003.
120. NTI, UNSC Resolution 1540 Database,
121. Oliver Meier,“Political Significance of the CTBT and Perspectives of Entry into Force,”Paper presented to Twelve Years of the CTBT: Achievements and Perspectives, July 1-2, 2008, Istanbul, Turkey.
122. Oran R. Young,“Review: International Regimes: Toward a New Theory of Institutions,”World Politics, Vol.39, No.1, (Oct., 1986), pp. 104-122.
123. Paul Ingram,“Taking Responsibility: What Can NPT States Realistically Do To Build on Today's Momentum behind Nuclear Disarmament?”Paper presented at a meeting held alongside the NPT Preparatory Committee, 2nd Session, Geneva, May 8, 2008.
124. Pauline Jones Luong, Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perception, and Pacts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
125. Peter B. Evans, Harold K. Jacbson, Robert D. Putnam, eds., Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1993.
126. Peter D. Feaver,“Command and Control in Emerging Nuclear Nations,”International Security, Vol.17, No.3, (Winter, 1992-1993), pp. 160-187.
127. Peter Gourevitch, Politics In Hard Times: Comparative Responses To International Economic Crisis, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1986.
128. Peter M. Hass,“Do Regime Matter: Epistemic Community and Mediterranean Pollution Control,”International Organization, Vol.43, No.3, (Summer 1989), pp.377-403.
129. Richard Cupitt and Igor Khripunov, "New Strategyies For the Nuclear Suppliers Group," Comparative Strategy, Vol.16, No.3, Jul-Sep 1997, pp.305-315.
130. Robert Axelrod and Robert O. Keohane,“Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions,”World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 1, (Oct., 1985), pp. 226-254.
131. Robert Jervis,“Cooperation under the Security Dilemma,”World Politics, Vol. 30, No. 2, (Jan., 1978), pp. 167-214.
132. Robert Jervis,“Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate,”International Security, Vol. 24, No. 1, (Summer, 1999), pp. 42-63.
133. Robert O. Keohane,“International Institutions: Two Approaches,”in Friedrich Kratochwil and Edward D. Mansfield, International Organization and Global Governance, NJ: Pearson Education Inc., 2006.
134. Robert Keohane:“The Demand for International Regimes,”International Organization, Vol. 36, No. 2, (Spring 1982), pp.141-171.
135. Robert O. Keohane, Lisa L. Martin,“The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,”International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Summer, 1995), pp. 39-51.
136. Ronald B. Mitchell,“Of Course International Institutions Matter: But When and How?”in Frank Biermann, Rainer Brohm and Klaus Dingwerth eds., Proceedings of the 2001 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Global Environmental Change and the Nation State, Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 2002, pp.16-25.
137. S. J. Grossman and O. Hart,“Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and The Theory of The Corporation,”Bell Journal of Economics, 11, 1980, pp.42-64.
138. Samuel S. Kim, China, the United Nations, and World Order, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.
139. Samuel S. Kim,“International Organizations in Chinese Foreign Policy,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.519, China's Foreign Relations, (Jan., 1992), pp.140-157.
140. Satu P. Limaye ed., Asia’s China Debate, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Special Report, December 2003.
141. Seema Gahlaut and Vioctor Zaborsky, "Do Export Control Regimes Have Members They Really Need?" Comparative Strategy, Vol.23, No.1, Jan-Mar 2004, pp.73-94.
142. Seymour Maxwell Finger,“United States Policy Toward International Institutions,”International Organization, Vol. 30, No. 2, (Spring, 1976), pp. 347-360.
143. Shiping Tang, Social Evolution of International Politics: A Macro History and Sociology of Grand Theories, forthcoming.
144. Shirley A. Kan,“China and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Missiles: Policy Issues”, CRS Report RL31555, Updated March 6th, 2008.
145. Stephen R. Hurt,“Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and ACP states and the end of the Lome Convention,”Third World Quarterly, Vol.24, No.1, 2003, p.173.
146. Stephen D. Krasner, International Regime, Beijing University Press, 2005.
147. Stephan Haggard and Beth A. Simmons,“Theories of International Regimes,”International Organization, Vol.41, No.3, (Summer 1987), pp.491-517.
148. Stephen M. Walt,“International Relations: One World, Many Theories,”Foreign Policy, No.110, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge, (Spring, 1998), pp.29-46.
149. Stephen P. Robbins and Mary Coultar, Management, 5th ed., NJ: Prentice Hall International Inc., 1996.
150. Study Group on Enhancing Multilateral Export Controls for US National Security, Final Report, Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center, April 2001.
151. Sue E. S. Crawford and Elinor Ostrom,“A Grammer of Institutions,”The American Political Science Review, Vol.89, No.3, (Sep., 1995), pp.582-600.
152. Tenu Avafia and Dirk Hansohm,“The inclusion of political conditions into trade agreements between the EU and ACP countries: An analysis of the legal and economic implications of Cotonou’s provisions,”Paper prepared for an ECSA-SA conference on The relationship between Africa and the European Union, University of the Western Cape, Jan. 22-23, 2004.
153. The Union of Concerned Scientists,“The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: SenateRatification Would Enhance U.S. Security,”UCS March 2009.
154. Thomas Bernauer,“The Effect of International Environmental Institutions: How We Might Learn More,”International Organization, Vol. 49, No. 2, (Spring, 1995), pp. 351-377.
155. Thomas J. Christensen,“Posing Problems without Catching Up, China’s Rise and Challenges for US Security Policy,”International Security, Vol. 25, No.4, (Spring 2001), pp.5-40.
156. Thomas J. Christensen,“Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster? The Rise of China and US Policy toward East Asia,”International Security, Vol. 31, No.1 (Summer 2006), pp. 81-126.
157. Thomas Risse-Kappen, ed., Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-state Actors, Domestic Structure, and International Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
158. Thomas Wright,“On Reforming The International Order,”Policy Analysis Brief of The Stanley Foundation, February 2009.
159. Thomas Wright,“Toward Effective Multilateralism: Why Bigger May Not Be Better,”The Washington Quarterly: 32, 3, 2009, pp.163-180.
160. U.S. Department of State, Adherence To And Compliance With Arms Control, Nonproliferation And Disarmament Agreements And Commitments, August 2005.
161. U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment, Technology and East-West Trade, 1979, Stock No. 052-003 -00723-1.
162. U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment,“Arming Our Allies: Cooperation and Competition in Defense Technology,”OTA-ISC-449, May 1990.
163. U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Armed Services, Selected Defense-Related Laws (Amended through December 31, 2003), Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004.
164. Veron Mei-Ying Hung,“China's WTO Commitment on Independent Judicial Review: Impact on Legal and Political Reform,”The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol.52, No.1, (Winter, 2004), pp.82-127.
165. Vincent A. Mahler,“Britain, the European Community, and the Developing Commonwealth: Dependence, Interdependence, and the Political Economy of Sugar,”International Organization, Vol.35, No.3, (Summer 1981), pp.467-492.
166. Volker Nitsch,“Does the G7/G8 Promote Trade?”Address at Freie Universit?t Berlin, February 20, 2006.
167. Weixing Hu, Gerald Chan, and Daojiong Zha, China’s International Relations in 21st Century: Dynamics of Paradigm Shifts, Lanham, New York, and Oxford: University Press of America, 2000.
168. William J. Long,“Economic Incentives and International Cooperation: Technology Transfer to the People's Republic of China, 1978-86,”Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 28, No. 2, (May, 1991), pp. 175-189.
169. Working Group on the Audit of International Institutions, List of International Institutions, 18th International Congress of Supreme Audit Institutions (INCOSAI XVIII): Budapest, 2004.
170. Yong Deng, China’s Struggle for Status: The Realignment of International Relations, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madride, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo, Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |