用户名: 密码: 验证码:
香港证券市场对我国内地跨境上市公司约束的有效性研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
近年来,关于公司跨境上市行为的研究取得了重要进展,出现了若干从公司治理角度研究跨境上市这一资本市场行为的成果。有些学者试图以约束假说作为这类研究的理论基础,但另一些学者则发现境外证券市场对跨境上市公司的监管并非更加有效,因而认为公司选择跨境上市意在规避注册地证券市场的监管。约束与规避假说相互竞争的关键在于公司跨境上市能否加强对投资者的保护。鉴于盈余管理的普遍存在,而投资者保护程度与盈余管理行为密切相关,本文从盈余管理的角度研究境外证券市场对跨境上市公司约束的有效性,试图为约束与规避这两个相互竞争假说之分歧提供进一步的证据。
     本文在借鉴国内外相关研究的基础上,结合我国内地公司跨境上市的制度背景和香港证券市场的监管现状,采用实证研究为主、规范与实证相结合的研究方法,研究香港证券市场对我国内地跨境上市公司约束的有效性,并在此基础上深入分析具体约束机制。本文的主要研究结论如下:
     第一,AH股公司的操纵性应计显著低于纯A股公司,但是AH股公司线下项目和关联销售比例与纯A股公司并不存在显著的差异。这说明香港证券市场对我国内地跨境上市公司的约束在一定程度上是有效的,但是并非全面有效。
     第二,AH股公司的线下项目和关联销售比例与纯H股公司相比不存在显著差异。这说明即使香港证券市场对我国内地跨境上市公司的约束并非全面有效,但是其约束力至少与内地证券市场对其上市公司的约束力相当,规避假说不成立。
     第三,AH股公司的公司治理水平高于纯A股公司,这主要体现在AH股公司董事会更加独立、董事更加勤勉、更多地设立了审计委员会以及董事长和总经理两职合一的比例更低。这说明内地公司跨境上市存在治理效应。
     第四,董事会的独立性(尤其是真正的独立性)和董事的勤勉能够显著降低操纵性应计,即董事会的独立性和董事勤勉程度的差异能够有助于解释操纵性应计的差异。结论一、三、四说明内地跨境上市公司面临的治理合约约束是香港证券市场实现有效约束的具体机制之一,且治理合约约束主要通过董事会独立性和董事的勤勉来体现。
     第五,H股报表采用国际会计准则编制对减少A股报表的操纵性应计有一定的作用,但是稳健性检验没有得出一致的结论。总的来说,会计准则合约约束的效果有限。
In recent years, substantial progresses have been made in the field of research oncompanies' cross-listing. Some scholars attempt to explain the cross-listingphenomenon from the perspective of corporate governance and suggest bondinghypothesis, while some other scholars believe overseas securities markets do noteffectively govern cross-listing companies and they suggest avoiding hypothesis. Thecompeting point between the bonding hypothesis and avoiding hypothesis is whethercompanies' cross-listing can offer better investor protection. Given the pervasivenessof earnings management and closely correlation between investor protection andearnings management, the dissertation examines whether overseas securities marketsbind cross-listing companies effectively from the perspective of earnings management,and provide evidence on the divergence of the two competing hypothesis.
     The dissertation studies the bonding effectiveness of Hong Kong securitiesmarket on mainland cross-listing companies and then the specific bonding mechanismon the basis of institutional background of mainland companies' cross-listing and thestatus quo of regulation of Hong Kong securities market. The main findings of thedissertation are as follows:
     1. Discretionary accruals of AH-share companies are significantly lower thanpure A-share companies, while items below the line and the ratio of related party salesof AH-share companies are not significantly different from pure A-share companies.This finding suggests Hong Kong securities market's bonding on mainlandcross-listing companies is effective to some extent, but not completely effective.
     2. Items below the line and the ratio of related party sales of AH-share companiesare not significantly different from pure H-share companies. This finding suggestsalthough Hong Kong securities market's bonding on mainland cross-listing companiesis not completely effective, it at least has the same power as mainland securitiesmarket. So avoiding hypothesis is not supported.
     3. Compared to pure A-share companies, AH-share companies have bettercorporate governance, such as AH-share companies' boards of directors are more independent; AH-share companies' board meetings are more frequent, which meansboard members devote more time to the companies; More of AH-share companies setup audit committee; Less of AH-share companies' board chairs are also the CEOs.This finding suggests mainland companies' cross-listing has governance effect.
     4. Independence of board of directors (substantial independence) and diligence ofboard members are negatively related to the discretionary accruals, which means theindependence and diligent of boards of directors can explain the difference ofdiscretionary accruals between pure A-share companies and AH-share companies.This finding suggests governance contract bonding is an effective bonding mechanismand the independence of board of directors and diligence of board members play thekey roles in governance contract bonding.
     5. Adopting international accounting standards to prepare H-share financialstatements can help reduce the level of discretionary accruals of A-share financialstatements to some extent, but robust tests do not produce the consistent results. Sothe effectiveness of accounting standard contract bonding is limited.
引文
[1]本小节的文献综述参考了王学军,肖华译,曲晓辉校.盈余管理研究回顾及其对会计准则建设的启示[J].会计研究,2000(11):52—60.
    [1]参考周正庆.证券知识读本(修订本)[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2006.
    [1]本节对投资者保护机制、发行和上市机制、争议解决机制等问题的描述主要参考王春阁.内地公司香港上市及两地监管合作研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
    [1]2002年我国最高人民法院发布的《关于受理证券市场因虚假陈述引发的民事侵权纠纷案件有关问题的通知》,为法院受理证券民事诉讼提供了制度保证,但是要求对此类案件的受理要以证监会已作过行政处罚为前提。而2003年最高人民法院出台的《关于审理证券市场因虚假陈述引发民事赔偿案件的若干规定》虽然增加了司法机关对上市公司已做过刑事判决也可作为法院受理案件的前提,但与香港《证券及期货条例》的规定相比,显示出了较高的民事诉讼门槛,不利于投资者进行民事诉讼。
    [2]见《检讨证券及期货市场规管架构运作专家小组报告书》http://www.info.gov.hk/info/expert/expertreport-c.htm
    [1]白重恩,刘俏,陆洲,宋敏,张俊喜.中国上市公司治理结构的实证研究[J].经济研究,2005,(2):81—91.
    [2]蔡春,黄益建,赵莎.关于审计质量对盈余管理影响的实证研究[J].2005,(2):3-10.
    [3]陈靖.审计师选择的协调效益与范围经济假说——基于跨市场上市公司审计师选择行为的研究[D].厦门大学博士论文打印稿,2007.
    [4]陈小悦,肖星,过晓艳.配股权与上市公司利润操纵[J].经济研究,2000,(1):30-36.
    [5]陈晓,戴翠玉.A股亏损公司的盈余管理行为与手段研究[J].中国会计评论,2004(2):299-310.
    [6]封思贤.独立董事制度对关联交易影响的实证研究[J].商业经济与管理,2005,(3):54-60.
    [7]高雷,宋顺林.关联交易、线下项目与盈余管理——来自中国上市公司的经验证据.中国会计评论,2008,(3):61-78.
    [8]高雷,张杰.公司治理、机构投资者与盈余管理[J].会计研究,2008,(9):64-72.
    [9]蒋义宏,魏刚.证券市场会计问题实证研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,1998.
    [10]蒋义宏.会计信息失真的现状、成因与对策研究——上市公司利润操纵实证研究[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2002.
    [11]柯嘉宝.香港公司治理结构及其比较与借鉴[D].暨南大学硕士论文,2004.
    [12]李延喜,包世泽,高锐,孔宪京.薪酬激励、董事会监管与上市公司盈余管理[J].南开管理评论,2007,(10):55-61.
    [13]李增泉.我国上市公司资产减值政策的实证研究[J].中国会计与财务研究,2001,(1):70-113.
    [14]林舒,魏明海.中国A股发行公司首次公开募股过程中的盈利管理[J].中国会计与财务研究,2000,(2):87-130.
    [15]刘鸿儒.资本市场与利用外资——中国企业海外上市的背景和经过[J].资本市场,1997,(3):33-43.
    [16]刘杰.中国上市公司盈余管理实证研究[D].厦门大学博士学位学位论文,1999.
    [17]刘立国,杜莹.公司治理与会计信息质量关系的实证研究[J].会计研究,2003,(2):28-35.
    [18]卢文莹.跨境上市公司与公司治理相关性研究[J].上证研究.2004(1).
    [19]吕长江,肖成民,白立红.法律环境、公司治理与利益侵占:基于中、美股票市场的比较分析[Z].工作论文,复旦大学.
    [20]陆建桥.中国亏损上市公司盈余管理实证研究[J]_会计研究,1999,(9):25-35.
    [21]陆宇建.从ROE与ROA的分布看我国上市公司的盈余管理行为[J].经济问题探索,2002,(3):63-69.
    [22]陆宇建.我国A股上市公司基于配股权的盈余管理研究[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,(4):89-94.
    [23]潘越.中国公司双重上市行为研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
    [24]沈红波.中国企业跨境上市与企业价值——基于信息环境和盈利质量的经验证据[D].上海财经大学博士论文打印稿,2006.
    [25]施东晖.上市公司控制权价值的实证研究[J].经济科学,2003,(6):83-89.
    [26]孙铮,王跃堂.1999资源配置与盈余操纵之实证研究[J].财经研究,1999,(4):3—9
    [27]唐清泉,罗党论,王莉.大股东的隧道挖掘与制衡力量——来自中国市场的经验证据[J].中国会计评论,2005,(3):63-86.
    [28]唐越军,李维安,谢仍明.大股东制衡、信息不对称与外部审计约束[J].审计研究,2006,(5):33-40.
    [29]王立彦,刘军霞.A-H股双重报告差异与公司治理[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
    [30]王跃堂.会计政策选择的经济动机[J].会计研究,2000,(12):31-40.
    [31]威廉母R.司可脱著,陈汉文,夏文贤,陈靖译.财务会计理论[M].北京:机械工业出版社.2004.
    [32]魏明海.盈余管理基本理论及其研究述评[J].会计研究,2000,(9):37-42.
    [33]希利和詹姆斯撰,王学军,肖华译,曲晓辉校.盈余管理研究回顾及其对会计准则建设的启示[J].会计研究,2000,(11):52-60.
    [34]夏立军,杨海斌.注册会计师对上市公司盈余管理的反应[J].审计研究,2002,(4):28-34.
    [35]夏立军.盈余管理计量模型在中国股票市场的应用研究[J].中国会计与财务研究,2003,(2):94-122.
    [36]薛爽,田立新,任帅.八项计提与公司盈余管理的实证研究[J].上海立信会计学院学报,2006,(3):14—19.
    [37]薛爽.亏损上市公司实证研究[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2005.
    [38]游家兴,罗胜强.政府行为、股权安排与公司治理的有效性——基于盈余质量视角的研究[J].南开管理评论,2008,(11):66-73.
    [39]于东智,池国华.董事会规模、稳定性与公司绩效:理论与经验分析[J].经济研究,2004,(4):70—79.
    [40]张祥建,郭岚.大股东控制与盈余管理行为研究——来自配股公司的证据[J].南方经济,2006,(1):72-86.
    [41]张逸杰,王艳,唐元虎,蔡来兴.上市公司董事会特征和盈余管理关系的实证研究[J]. 管理评论,2006,(3):14-19.
    [42]张兆国,刘晓霞.邢道勇.公司治理结构与盈余管理——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].中国软科学,2009,(1):122-133.
    [43]赵春光.资产减值与盈余管理——论《资产减值》准则的政策涵义[J].会计研究2006,(3):11-17.
    [44]赵明勋.中国企业海外上市的公司治理效应研究[D].复旦大学博士论文,2006.
    [45]郑剑星.大陆与香港的公司治理年报披露制度的研究[D].暨南大学硕士论文,2003.
    [1]Aharony, J., Lee, C.J., Wong, T. J. 2000. Financial packaging of IPO firms in China[J]. Journal of Accounting Research 38:103-126.
    [2]Aussenegg, W., Inwinkl, P., Schneider, G. 2008. Earnings management and local vs international accounting standards of European public firms[Z]. Working paper, Vienna University of Technology.
    [3]Bailey, W., Karolyi, G. A., Salva, C. 2006. The economic consequences of increased disclosure: evidence from international cross-listings[J].Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming.
    [4]Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., Robin, A. 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29:1-51.
    [5]Ball, R., Robin, A., Wu, J. S. 2003. Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics 36:235-270
    [6]Ball, R., Shivakumar L. 2008. Earnings quality at initial public offerings[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics 45: 324-349.
    [7]Ball, R., Shivakumar, L. 2005b. The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition[Z]. Working paper, University of Chicago.
    [8]Ball, R., Shivakumar, L. 2005a. Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 83-128.
    [9]Barth, M.E., Landsman, W.R., Lang, M.H. 2008. International accounting standards and accounting quality[J]. Journal of Accounting Research 46: 467-498.
    [10]Bartov, E. 1993. The timing of asset sales and earnings manipulation[J]. The Accounting Review 68 (4): 840-855.
    [11]Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and asymmetrically timeliness of earnings[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24: 3-37.
    [12]Beasley, M. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud[J]. Accounting Review 71: 443 - 465.
    [13]Beaver, W., Eger, C., Ryan, S., Wolfson, M. 1989. Financial reporting, supplemental disclosures and bank share prices[J]. Journal of Accounting Research 27: 157-178.
    [14] Beaver, W., McNicbols, M. 1998. The characteristics and valuation of loss reserves of property casualty insurers [Z]. Working paper, Stanford University.
    [15] Benos, E., Weisbach, M. 2004. Private benefits and cross-listings in the United States [J]. Emerging Markets Review 5: 217-240.
    [16] Bergstresser, D., Philippon T. 2006. CEO incentives and earnings management [J]. Journal of Financial Economics 80: 511-529.
    [17] Burghstahler, D., Eames, M.1998. Management of earnings and analysts' forecasts [Z].Working paper, University of Washington.
    [18] Burgstahler, D., Dichev, I.1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics 23(1): 99-126.
    [19] Bushee, B. 1998. Tbe influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior [J]. The Accounting Review 73 (3): 305-333.
    [20] Capkun , V., Cazavan-Jeny, A., Jeanjean, T., Weiss, L. A. 2007. Transition to IFRS: Value Relevance and Earnings Management [Z].Working paper, Georgetown University.
    [21] Caramanis, C, Lennox C. 2008. Audit effort and earnings management [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45:116-118.
    [22] Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L, Riley Jr., R. A. 2002. Board Characteristic and Audit Fees [J]. Contemporary Accounting Research 19: 365-384.
    [23] Chen, C.J., Chen, S., Su, X. 2001.Profitability regulation, earnings management, and modified audit opinions: evidence from China [J]. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 20:9-301.
    [24] Chen, K., Yuan H., 2004, Earnings Management and Capital Resource Allocation: Evidence from China's Accounting-based Regulation of Rights Issues [J]. The Accounting Review 79: 645-665.
    [25] Chen, S., Wu, D. 2007. Accounting conservatism in Chinese listed firms: the influence of standards, incentives, and monitoring [Z]. Working paper, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
    [26] Cheng, P., Chen, J. 2007. Related party transactions (RPTs): a second source for earnings management - evidence from Chinese IPOs [Z].Working paper, University of Surrey.
    [27] Choi, J., Kim J., Liu, X., Simunic D. 2006. Cross-listing audit fee premiums: theory and evidence [Z]. Working paper, University of British Columbia.
    [28] Chtourou, S.M., Bedard, J., Courteau, L. 2001. Corporate governance and earnings management [Z].Working paper, Laval Universtiy.
    [29] Chung, R., Firth, M., Kim, J. 2002. Institutional Monitoring and Opportunistic Earnings Management [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance 8: 29-48.
    [30] Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J., Lang, L. 2002.Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings [J].Journal of Finance 57: 2741-2771.
    [31] Coffee Jr., J. 1999. The future as history: the prospects for global convergence in corporate governance and its implications [J]. Northwestern Law Review 93: 641-707.
    [32] Coffee Jr., J. 2002. Racing towards the top?: the impact of cross-listings and stock market competition on international corporate governance [J]. Columbia Law Review 102: 1757-1831.
    [33] Collins, J., Shackelford, D., Wahlen, J. 1995. Bank difference in the coordination of regulatory capital, earnings, and taxes [J].Journal of AccountingResearch 33: 263-291.
    [34] Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R. G, Sweeney, A.P. 1995. Detecting earnings management [J]. The Accounting Review 70:193-225.
    [35] Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R. G., Sweeney, A.P. 1996. Cause and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firm subject to enforcement actions by the SEC [J]. Contemporary Accounting Research 13:1-36.
    [36] Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R.G., Sweeney, A. P. 1995, Detecting earnings management [J]. The Accounting Review 70:193-225.
    [37] Degeorge, F., Patel, J., Zeckhauser, R. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds [J]. Journal of Business 72(1): 1-33.
    [38] Dewenter, K. L., Kim, C., Lim, U., Novaes, W. 2005. Committing to protect investors in emerging markets: Can local exchange provide value-relevant bonding mechanisms? [J]. Working paper, University of Washington.
    [39] Doidge, C., Karolyi G. A., Lins K., Miller D., Stulz R. 2006. Private benefits of control, ownership, and the cross-listing decision [Z]. Working paper, University of Toronto.
    [40] Doidge, C. 2004a. U.S. cross-listings and the private benefits of control: evidence from dual-class firms [J]. Journal of Financial Economics 72: 519-553.
    [41] Doidge, C. 2004b. Do changes in laws matter for ownership and control? Evidence from emerging markets firms that list in the U.S. [Z]. Working paper, University of Toronto.
    [42] Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., Stulz, R.2004. Why are foreign firms listed in the US worth more? [J].Journal of Financial Economics 71: 205-238.
    [43] Dyck, A., Zingales, L. 2004. Private benefits of control: an international comparison [J]. Journal of Finance 59(2): 537-600.
    [44] Eugene, F., MacBeth, J.D. 1973. Risk, return and equilibrium: empirical tests [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 81 (3) : 607-636
    [45] Fama, E., Jensen, M. C. 1983. Agency problem and residual claims [J]. Journal of Law and Economics 26 :327-349.
    [46] Fan, J., Wong, T.J. 2002. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33: 401-425.
    [47] Foerster, S. R., Karolyi, G. A. 1999. The effects of market segmentation and investor recognition on asset prices: Evidence from foreign stocks listing in the United States [J]. Journal of Finance 54: 981-1013.
    [48] Fresard, L., Salva C., 2007. Does Cross-listing in the U.S. really improve corporate governance? Evidence from the value of corporate liquidity [Z]. Working paper, University of Neuchatel.
    [49] Georgieva, D., Lee W. 2007. Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley Act on cross-listing [Z]. Working paper,University of Arkansas.
    [50] Guidry, F., Leone, A. J., Rock, S. 1999. Earnings-based bonus plans and earnings management by business-unit managers [J]Journal of Accounting and Economics 26: 113-142.
    [51] Hail, L., Leuz, C.2004, Cost of capital and cash flow effects of U.S. cross-listings [Z]. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
    [52] Haw, I., M., Hu, B., Hwang, L. S., Wu, W. 2004. Ultimate ownership, income management, and legal and extra-legal institutions [J]. Journal of Accounting Research 42: 423-462.
    [53] Haw, I., Qi, D., Wu, W., Zhang, W.1998. Earnings management of listed firms in response to security regulations in China's emerging capital market [Z].Working paper, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
    [54] Healy, P. M., Wahlen, J. M. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting [J]. Accounting Horizons 13: 365-383.
    [55] Huijgen, C., Lubberink M. 2005.Earnings conservatism, litigation and contracting: the case of cross-listed firms [J]. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32(7) and (8):1275-1309.
    [56] Hung, M., Wong T.J., Zhang T. 2007. Political relations and overseas stock exchange listing: from Chinese State-owned enterprises [Z].Working paper, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
    [57] Jensen, M. 1993. The modem industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control system [J]. Journal of Finance 48: 831-880.
    [58] Jia J., Sun Q., Tong, W.2005.Privatization through an overseas listing: evidence from China's H-share firms [J]. Financial Managemen 34( 3): 5-30.
    [59] Jian, M., Wong, T. J. 2004. Earnings management and tunneling through related party transactions: evidence from Chinese corporate groups [Z].Working Paper, Nanyang Technological University and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
    [60] Joens, J. 1991.Earnings management during import relief investigation [J]. Journal of Accounting Research 8 :193-228.
    [61] Jones, J.J., 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations [J]. Journal of Accounting Research 29: 193-228.
    [62] Joos, P. 2003. Discussion of how representative are firms that are cross-listed in the United States? An analysis of accounting quality [J]. Journal of Accounting Research 41: 387-396.
    [63] Karolyi, G. A. 1998. Why do companies list abroad? A survey of the evidence and its managerial implications [M]. Financial Markets, Institutions, and Instruments. Blackwell Publishers, Boston.
    [64] Karolyi, G. A. 2006. The world of cross-listings and cross-listings of the world: challenging conventional wisdom [J]. Review of Finance 10:1-54.
    [65] Kasznik, R. 1999. On the association between voluntary disclosure and earnings management [J]. Journal ofAccounting Research 37: 276-302.
    [66] Ke, B., Rui, O., Yu, W. 2007. The effect of cross-listing on the sensitivity of managerial compensation to firm performance [Z]. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University.
    [67] King, M., Segal D., 2004. International Cross-Listing and the Bonding Hypothesis [Z]. Working paper, University of Toronto.
    [68] King, M., Segal, D. 2003. Corporate Governance, international cross listing and home bias [Z]. Working paper, University of Toronto.
    [69] La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. 1997. Legal Determinants of External Finance [ J]. The Journal of Finance 3: 1131- 1150.
    [70] La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. 1998. Law and Finance [J]. Journal of Political Economy 106: 1112-1155.
    [71] La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world [J]. Journal of Finance 54, 471-518.
    [72] La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance [J]. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 3-27.
    [73] Lang, M., Lins, K., Miller, D. 2003. ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: does cross listing in the United States improve a firm's information environment and increase market value? [J].Journal of Accounting Research 41: 317-345.
    [74] Lang, M., Raedy, J., Wilson, W. 2006. Earnings management and cross listing: are reconciled earnings comparable to U.S. earnings [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42: 255-283.
    [75] Lang, M., Raedy, J., Yetman, M. 2003. How representative are firms that are cross-listed in the United States? An analysis of accounting quality [J]. Journal ofAccounting Research 41: 363-386.
    [76] Lara, J. M. G., Osma B. G., Mora A. 2005. The effect of earnings management on the asymmetric timeliness of earnings [J]. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32(3) and (4): 691-726.
    [77] Lei, U., Miller P. 2006. International cross-listing, firm performance and top management turnover: a test of the bonding hypothesis [Z]. Working paper, Southern Methodist University.
    [78] Leuz, C. 2006. Cross listing, bonding and firms' reporting incentives: A discussion of Lang, Raedy and Wilson (2006) [J].Journal of Accounting and Economics 42: 285-299.
    [79] Leuz, C., Nanda, D., Wysocki, P. 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison [J]. Journal of Financial Economics 69: 505-527.
    [80] Licht, A. 2003. Cross-listing and corporate governance: bonding or avoiding? [J]. Chicago Journal of International Law 4: 141-163.
    [81] Licht, A. 2003. Legal plug-ins: cultural distance, cross-Listing, and corporate governance reform [Z].Working paper, Harvard Law School.
    [82] Lipton, M., Lorsch J. 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance [J]. Business Lawyer 48: 59-77.
    [83] Litvak, K. 2008.Long-Term Effect of Sarbanes-Oxley on Cross-Listing Premia [J]. European Financial Management, Forthcoming.
    [84] Liu, C., Ryan S., Wahlen J. 1997. Differential valuation implication of loan loss provisions across banks and fiscal quarters [J]. The Accounting Review 72:133-146.
    [85] Liu, Q., Lu, Z. 2007.Corporate governance and earnings management in Chinese listed companies: a tunneling perspective [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance 13:881-906.
    [86] Lo, K. 2008. Earnings management and earnings quality [J].Journal of Accounting and Economics 45: 350-357.
    [87] Lobo, G. J., Parthasarathy, K., Sivaramakrishnan, K. 2008. Growth, managerial reporting behavior, and accounting conservatism [Z]. Working paper, University of Houston
    [88] Lobo, G. J., Zhou J. 2006. Did conservatism in financial reporting increase after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? Initial evidence [J]. Accounting Horizons 20(1): 57-73.
    [89] Marosi, A., Massoud N. 2006. You Can Enter but You Cannot Leave... - U.S. securities markets and foreign firms [Z]. Working paper, University of Alberta.
    [90] Miller, D. 1999. The market reaction to international cross-listing: evidence from depositary receipts [J].Journal of Financial Economics 51: 103-123.
    [91] Miller, G. S., Skinner, D. J. 1998. Determinants of the valuation allowances for deferred tax assets under SFAS No. 109 [J]. The Accounting Review 73 (2): 213-233.
    [92] Morck, R., Bernard Y., Yu,W. 2000. The information content of stock markets: why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements? [J]. Journal of Financial Economics 58:215-260
    [93] Park, Y. W., Shin H.H. 2004 Board composition and earnings management in Canada [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance 10: 431-47.
    [94] Peasnell, K., Pope, P., Yong, S. 2005. Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? [J]. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 32:1311-1346.
    [95] Penman, S. H., Zhang, X. 2002. Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns [J].The Accounting Review, 77(2):237-264
    [96] Perry, S. E., Thomas, H.W. 1994. Earnings management preceding management buyout offers.Journal of Accounting and Economics 18:157-179.
    [97] Petroni, K. 1992. Optimistic reporting in the property-casualty insurance industry [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(4):485-508.
    [98] Pownall, G., Schipper, K. 1999. Implications of accounting research for the SEC's consideration of international accounting standards [J]. Accounting Horizons 13: 259-280.
    [99] Reese, W., Weisbach, M. 2002. Protection of minority shareholder interests, cross-listings in the United States, and subsequent equity offerings [J] Journal of Financial Economics 66: 65-104.
    [100] Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42: 335-370.
    [101] Schipper, K. 1989.Commentary: earnings management [J].Accounting Horizons (Deceomber):91-102.
    [102] Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control [J]. Journal of Political Econom, 94: 461-488.
    [103] Siegel, J. 2005. Can foreign firms bond themselves effectively by renting U.S. securities laws? [J].Journal of Financial Economics 75: 319-359.
    [104] Stulz, R. 1999. Globalization, corporate governance and the cost of capital [J]. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 12: 8-25.
    [105] Sun, Q., Tong W. 2003. China share issue privatization: the extent of its success [J]. Journal of Financial Economics 70:183-222
    [106] Sun, Q., Tong, W., Wu, Y., 2006. Bonding premium as a general phenomenon. [Z].Working paper, Xiamen University.
    [107] Sun, Q., Tong H.S., Tong, J. 2002.How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China's privatization [J]. Journal of Banking Finance and Accounting 29(1) and (2): 1-27.
    [108] Teoh, S.H., Welch I., Wong, T. J. 1998. Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offering [J]. Journal of Finance 53(6): 1935-1974.
    [109] Teoh, S. H., Welch, I., Wong, T. J. 1998. Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings [J]. Journal of Financial Economics 50: 63- 99.
    [110] Teoh, S. H., Wong, T. J, Rao, G. 1998. Are accruals during an initial public offering opportunistic? [J].Review of Accounting Studies 3: 175-208.
    [111] Teoh, S.H., Wong, T.J. 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficients [J].The Accounting Review 68: 346-367.
    [112] Thomas, J., Stolowy, H. 2008. Do accounting standards matter? An exploratory analysis of earnings management before and after IFRS adoption [J]. Journal of accounting and public policy 27: 480-494.
    [113] Vafeas, N. 1999. Board meeting frequency and firm Performance [J]. Journal of Financial Economics 53(1): 113-142.
    [114] Visvanathan, G. 1998. Deferred tax valuation allowances and earnings management [J]. Journal of Financial Statement Analysis 3 (4): 6-15.
    [115] Wang, Y. 2005. Dual-listing in Hong Kong and Its Impact on the Performance of A-shares [Z]. Working paper, Hong Kong Baptist University.
    [116] Wang, D. 2006. Founding family ownership and earnings quality [J]. Journal of Accounting Research 44: 619-656.
    [117] Warfield, T., Wild, K. L. 1995. Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and inofmration's of earnings [J]. Joumal of Business Finance and Accounting 9:29-41.
    [118] Witmer, J. 2005. Why do firms cross-(de)list? An examination of the determinants and effects of cross-delisting [Z]. Working paper, Queen's University.
    [119] Xie, B., Davidson W. N., DaDalt, P. J. 2003.Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance 9:295-316.
    [120] Yu, M. D. 2005. International earnings management and accounting standards [Z].Working paper, University of Missouri-Columbia.
    [121] Yu, Q., Du, B. Sun, Q. 2006. Earnings management at rights issues thresholds - evidence from China [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance 30(12): 3453-3468

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700