技术特征变动下市场结构变迁及企业技术策略性行为研究
摘要
市场结构的决定因素一直以来都是产业组织理论的核心问题,学界从很多方面都进行了分析。本文从技术特征变化这个角度提出了市场结构的变化是基于一系列的技术性因素,这些因素的变革使得市场结构发生变化。在理论分析后,对这一结论进行经验性验证。基于技术对于市场结构的决定性影响,企业有动力致力于技术创新行为,使得技术进步成为企业的策略性行为。在此基础上本文进一步分析企业微观的技术策略性行为,一方面通过非参数方法度量出我国制造业的技术进步,分析我国制造业的技术进步路径,另一方面试图发现企业把技术进步作为策略性行为对企业生产水平产生怎样的影响。
In the recent 30 years, the Chinese economy grows very fast, this mainly because of the reform and opening. The reform mainly aims at the domestic economy, and it’s a asymptotic expression reform. The market system deepens gradually, and displays in each aspect of economic life. But the most remarkable change is the profit-guidance reform of the enterprises.Private enterprises, foreign enterprises and the joint-vetures appeared in the market and competed with the State enterprises in the market. The development of all kinds of enterprises enable China's economy to have earth-shaking changes. It’s exactly the competition behavior of all kinds of enterprises that enables China's industrial structure to obtain the optimization, which promotes the economic growth. Simultaneously, the inter-industry competition deepens unceasingly, and the way of competition had changed significantly. The enterprise's micro-behavior has been richer, this has brought new task for market mechanism's vicissitude, and provided the opportunity for the Industrial organization theory's development. In order to promote the economic development, it’s important for the government to formulates reasonable industrial policy, this also needs to understand the profoundly own law of industrial development.
This paper mainly concentrates in the technology characteristics, the industrial structure, and firms’technology strategic conducts. How theoretically does the deep research industrial structure is form, the industrial structure vicissitude is also by these factor decision, the enterprise is also rests on any condition to implement own strategic conducts, thus captures the market influence pointed to formulate the industrial policy promotion industrial structure optimization promotion regarding the government to have the vital significance, simultaneously deepened to the industrial structure and the business strategystrategic conducts's understanding, has certain theory significance.
This paper is divided into seven chapters, the specific structure and content as follows:
Chapter1: The 1st chapter proposed this article studies the question and the background, and carried on to the existing domestic and foreign achievements have combed, then clear this article studied question and significance. In this chapter first from the technical feature and the market mechanism, the market mechanism and enterprise's strategy sex act, the technical change has carried on the summary with enterprise's strategy sex act three aspects to the existing research results. This article plans from the microeconomics classical manufacturer theory to embark, takes the analysis by the manufacturer production function and the cost function the foundation, from supplies angle, careful thorough portray enterprise's technical feature. First is carries on essential the standard to the technical scope. Then obtains the monopoly degree through the Lenard index's decomposition or to compete the degree and the typical manufacturer cost relatedness, but cost determination in manufacturer production technology height, thus establishment monopoly and technical connection.
Chapter2: The 2nd chapter in reviewed in the former Industrial organization fundamental research classical pattern - - SCP model foundation carries on to the technical feature to the market mechanism decision and the technical strategy sex act analyzes. Elaborated the technical feature to the market mechanism influence way and the way, as well as under different market mechanism enterprise technology strategy sex act. Usually involves the market mechanism definition, is mainly, it which in the Industrial organization economic stipulated usually has most main or the most important nature is. Scale, concentration ratio and product differentiated. To be specific, the market mechanism contains the essential factor includes. An industry's enterprise quantity, enterprise's market share or in the market centralization's degree, the enterprise size and the distribution, the identical industry's product variation's degree, enters industrial difficulty degree and so on, namely all involves different industrial the internal structure variable. The research technical feature the significance which decided to the market mechanism lies in. The economist attempts to discover that between market mechanism and technical feature whether to have the relations which some kind of causal relation or decided mutually. If exists, then this kind of causes and effects decision's conduction mechanism is also what kind of? In such foundation, the structure variable which and the technical feature variable reciprocity model the establishment may observe, can understand intrinsic mechanism and the development regularity conveniently.
Chapter3: The 3rd chapter technical feature and market mechanism description measure and to our country manufacturing industry empirical analysis. Carries on the technical scope in this chapter the limits and the technical feature selection analysis, because is extremely broad regarding the technical extension, uses easily to give rise to controversy, in this part is mainly profits from the microeconomics the manufacturer theory makes limits theoretically to the industrial technology and the characteristic. Then we act according to certain criterion selection most to be able the concentrated reflection technology change and the characteristic target, then carries on portrays thoroughly carefully. And in this chapter also to descripe the market mechanism theory and real diagnosis target analysis. Because market mechanism's description still does not have completely the unification until now, the scholars regarding use what kind of theory tool to describe the market mechanism also to exist argued that we advocated in the use Industrial organization theory the most popular market mechanism description way describes the market mechanism theory connotation. Then carries on the market mechanism from the industrial stratification plane the theory description and the choice appropriate portray target. Plans the target which selects is the market concentration degree responds industrial the market mechanism difference. This chapter carries on the market mechanism finally from the enterprise stratification plane the theory description and the choice appropriate portray target.
Chapter4: The 4th chapter from the cross industrial stratification, carries on the empirical analysis to the technical feature and market mechanism's relations. In the cross industrial stratification plane's analysis, considered between each profession non-uniformity influence fully, to obtain the technical feature and the market mechanism relations reasonably, used the related kneading board data to carry on the empirical analysis. Cooperated the reorganization through the kneading board to discuss has confirmed the technical feature to the market mechanism influence. The research discovers High moderate industrial capital essential factor compared to, although has the negative influence to the concentration degree, but is not remarkable, is also the boundary technology substitution rate speaking of the High moderate industry market mechanism influence is not the determining factor. Its explanation lay in the High moderate industry the technical level already to arrive at the very high level, technical and the work disposition relative stabilization, caused between the capital and the work has formed the fixed proportional relationship. May see according to the data reality High moderate industry's essential factor substitution rate target's change tendency thought except the petroleum extraction industry, other four industries result in the essential factor substitution rate basically not to have the change. But the low concentration degree industry's capital essential factor compared to having the remarkable negative influence to the concentration degree, was also the boundary technology substitution rate in the low concentration degree industry to the market mechanism influence is the determining factor, the labor-intensive form low concentration degree industry has used the inexpensive labor force fully.
Chapter5: The 5th chapter from the industrial internal analysis, has selected the automobile profession related time series data, the use error correction model to the automobile profession, the technical feature has carried on the analysis to market mechanism's dynamic effect relations. The research discovered that the automobile profession the industrial concentration degree, the most superior average scale, the capital work essential factor has the long-term balanced relations compared to between. The short-term fluctuation has affects the effect temporarily, attacks after temporarily appears, the error correction mechanism will guarantee between the variable long-term balanced relational restraining; Moreover, we discovered that the industrial concentration degree the error correction and the lag explanatory variable's significance is stronger, also explained that the economies of scale and ratio of the work capital essential factor has a stronger forecast and the explanatory ability to the market concentration degree..
Chapter 6: The 6th chapter our country manufacturing industry technology vicissitude measure and analysis. The technical vicissitude (technology change) is the technical dynamic change manifestation. At present our country academic circle's research mainly concentrates in the related profession technology vicissitude influencing factor analysis, but lacks the related experience research. In the related technical vicissitude question's research's crucial question is the related technical vicissitude situation determination and the measure. This chapter unifies the related measure technology vicissitude the non-parameter production front surface theory and the method, has carried on the analysis and the measure to our country manufacturing industry's technical vicissitude situation.
Chapter 7: The 7th chapter the technical vicissitude and business immovable property can use the level the relational research. Whether the technical vicissitude will produce to the profession can have the influence using the level, since the academic circle had not had the consistent reply to this question. Produced in this chapter based on the peak value law to our country manufacturing industry can the level carry on the measure, and the union this article 6th chapter of profession technology vicissitude's measure result, the use dynamic kneading board data model to produced to
the technical vicissitude can carry on the portray using the level dynamic effect.
The conclusion part obtains this article the main conclusion and the pointed policy suggestion. Finally, since lots of content in this article is a maiden attempt and the ways and means of the research maybe limited, it is inevitable that anything important is ignored or anything wrong. So any suggestion or comment is welcome, thank you in advance.
In the recent 30 years, the Chinese economy grows very fast, this mainly because of the reform and opening. The reform mainly aims at the domestic economy, and it’s a asymptotic expression reform. The market system deepens gradually, and displays in each aspect of economic life. But the most remarkable change is the profit-guidance reform of the enterprises.Private enterprises, foreign enterprises and the joint-vetures appeared in the market and competed with the State enterprises in the market. The development of all kinds of enterprises enable China's economy to have earth-shaking changes. It’s exactly the competition behavior of all kinds of enterprises that enables China's industrial structure to obtain the optimization, which promotes the economic growth. Simultaneously, the inter-industry competition deepens unceasingly, and the way of competition had changed significantly. The enterprise's micro-behavior has been richer, this has brought new task for market mechanism's vicissitude, and provided the opportunity for the Industrial organization theory's development. In order to promote the economic development, it’s important for the government to formulates reasonable industrial policy, this also needs to understand the profoundly own law of industrial development.
This paper mainly concentrates in the technology characteristics, the industrial structure, and firms’technology strategic conducts. How theoretically does the deep research industrial structure is form, the industrial structure vicissitude is also by these factor decision, the enterprise is also rests on any condition to implement own strategic conducts, thus captures the market influence pointed to formulate the industrial policy promotion industrial structure optimization promotion regarding the government to have the vital significance, simultaneously deepened to the industrial structure and the business strategystrategic conducts's understanding, has certain theory significance.
This paper is divided into seven chapters, the specific structure and content as follows:
Chapter1: The 1st chapter proposed this article studies the question and the background, and carried on to the existing domestic and foreign achievements have combed, then clear this article studied question and significance. In this chapter first from the technical feature and the market mechanism, the market mechanism and enterprise's strategy sex act, the technical change has carried on the summary with enterprise's strategy sex act three aspects to the existing research results. This article plans from the microeconomics classical manufacturer theory to embark, takes the analysis by the manufacturer production function and the cost function the foundation, from supplies angle, careful thorough portray enterprise's technical feature. First is carries on essential the standard to the technical scope. Then obtains the monopoly degree through the Lenard index's decomposition or to compete the degree and the typical manufacturer cost relatedness, but cost determination in manufacturer production technology height, thus establishment monopoly and technical connection.
Chapter2: The 2nd chapter in reviewed in the former Industrial organization fundamental research classical pattern - - SCP model foundation carries on to the technical feature to the market mechanism decision and the technical strategy sex act analyzes. Elaborated the technical feature to the market mechanism influence way and the way, as well as under different market mechanism enterprise technology strategy sex act. Usually involves the market mechanism definition, is mainly, it which in the Industrial organization economic stipulated usually has most main or the most important nature is. Scale, concentration ratio and product differentiated. To be specific, the market mechanism contains the essential factor includes. An industry's enterprise quantity, enterprise's market share or in the market centralization's degree, the enterprise size and the distribution, the identical industry's product variation's degree, enters industrial difficulty degree and so on, namely all involves different industrial the internal structure variable. The research technical feature the significance which decided to the market mechanism lies in. The economist attempts to discover that between market mechanism and technical feature whether to have the relations which some kind of causal relation or decided mutually. If exists, then this kind of causes and effects decision's conduction mechanism is also what kind of? In such foundation, the structure variable which and the technical feature variable reciprocity model the establishment may observe, can understand intrinsic mechanism and the development regularity conveniently.
Chapter3: The 3rd chapter technical feature and market mechanism description measure and to our country manufacturing industry empirical analysis. Carries on the technical scope in this chapter the limits and the technical feature selection analysis, because is extremely broad regarding the technical extension, uses easily to give rise to controversy, in this part is mainly profits from the microeconomics the manufacturer theory makes limits theoretically to the industrial technology and the characteristic. Then we act according to certain criterion selection most to be able the concentrated reflection technology change and the characteristic target, then carries on portrays thoroughly carefully. And in this chapter also to descripe the market mechanism theory and real diagnosis target analysis. Because market mechanism's description still does not have completely the unification until now, the scholars regarding use what kind of theory tool to describe the market mechanism also to exist argued that we advocated in the use Industrial organization theory the most popular market mechanism description way describes the market mechanism theory connotation. Then carries on the market mechanism from the industrial stratification plane the theory description and the choice appropriate portray target. Plans the target which selects is the market concentration degree responds industrial the market mechanism difference. This chapter carries on the market mechanism finally from the enterprise stratification plane the theory description and the choice appropriate portray target.
Chapter4: The 4th chapter from the cross industrial stratification, carries on the empirical analysis to the technical feature and market mechanism's relations. In the cross industrial stratification plane's analysis, considered between each profession non-uniformity influence fully, to obtain the technical feature and the market mechanism relations reasonably, used the related kneading board data to carry on the empirical analysis. Cooperated the reorganization through the kneading board to discuss has confirmed the technical feature to the market mechanism influence. The research discovers High moderate industrial capital essential factor compared to, although has the negative influence to the concentration degree, but is not remarkable, is also the boundary technology substitution rate speaking of the High moderate industry market mechanism influence is not the determining factor. Its explanation lay in the High moderate industry the technical level already to arrive at the very high level, technical and the work disposition relative stabilization, caused between the capital and the work has formed the fixed proportional relationship. May see according to the data reality High moderate industry's essential factor substitution rate target's change tendency thought except the petroleum extraction industry, other four industries result in the essential factor substitution rate basically not to have the change. But the low concentration degree industry's capital essential factor compared to having the remarkable negative influence to the concentration degree, was also the boundary technology substitution rate in the low concentration degree industry to the market mechanism influence is the determining factor, the labor-intensive form low concentration degree industry has used the inexpensive labor force fully.
Chapter5: The 5th chapter from the industrial internal analysis, has selected the automobile profession related time series data, the use error correction model to the automobile profession, the technical feature has carried on the analysis to market mechanism's dynamic effect relations. The research discovered that the automobile profession the industrial concentration degree, the most superior average scale, the capital work essential factor has the long-term balanced relations compared to between. The short-term fluctuation has affects the effect temporarily, attacks after temporarily appears, the error correction mechanism will guarantee between the variable long-term balanced relational restraining; Moreover, we discovered that the industrial concentration degree the error correction and the lag explanatory variable's significance is stronger, also explained that the economies of scale and ratio of the work capital essential factor has a stronger forecast and the explanatory ability to the market concentration degree..
Chapter 6: The 6th chapter our country manufacturing industry technology vicissitude measure and analysis. The technical vicissitude (technology change) is the technical dynamic change manifestation. At present our country academic circle's research mainly concentrates in the related profession technology vicissitude influencing factor analysis, but lacks the related experience research. In the related technical vicissitude question's research's crucial question is the related technical vicissitude situation determination and the measure. This chapter unifies the related measure technology vicissitude the non-parameter production front surface theory and the method, has carried on the analysis and the measure to our country manufacturing industry's technical vicissitude situation.
Chapter 7: The 7th chapter the technical vicissitude and business immovable property can use the level the relational research. Whether the technical vicissitude will produce to the profession can have the influence using the level, since the academic circle had not had the consistent reply to this question. Produced in this chapter based on the peak value law to our country manufacturing industry can the level carry on the measure, and the union this article 6th chapter of profession technology vicissitude's measure result, the use dynamic kneading board data model to produced to
the technical vicissitude can carry on the portray using the level dynamic effect.
The conclusion part obtains this article the main conclusion and the pointed policy suggestion. Finally, since lots of content in this article is a maiden attempt and the ways and means of the research maybe limited, it is inevitable that anything important is ignored or anything wrong. So any suggestion or comment is welcome, thank you in advance.
引文
[1]保罗.杰罗斯基、理查德.吉尔伯特等著,崔小刚翻译:《进入壁垒和策略性竞争》,北京大学出版社,2004。
[2]陈佳贵著:《中国工业现代化问题研究》,中国社会科学出版社,2004,第一版。
[3]大琢启二郎、刘德强、村上直树:《中国的工业改革》,上海人民出版社和上海三联书店,2000,第一版。
[4]戴维?罗默:《高级宏观经济学》,中译本,商务印书馆,1999,第一版。
[5]多纳德?海、德里克?莫瑞斯:《产业经济学与组织》,经济科学出版社,2001,第一版。
[6]费景汉、拉尼斯:《增长和发展:演进观点》,中译本,商务印书馆,2004,第二版。
[7]干春晖:《企业策略性行为研究》,经济管理出版社,2005,第一版。
[8]高铁梅、王金明、吴桂珍、刘玉红著:《计量经济分析方法与建模》,清华大学出版社,2006,第一版。
[9]蒋殿春:《高级微观经济学》,北京大学出版社,2006,第一版。
[10]李江涛著:《产能过剩—问题、理论及治理机制》,中国财政经济出版社,2006,第一版。
[11]李京文:《生产率与中美日经济增长研究》,中国社会科学出版社,2000,第一版。
[12]刘伟、李绍荣著:《转轨中的经济增长与经济结构》,中国发展出版社,2005,第一版。
[13]刘伟等著:《工业化进程中的产业结构研究》,中国人民大学出版社,1995,第一版。
[14]罗伯特.M.索洛等:《经济增长因素分析》,中译本,商务印书馆,1991,第一版。
[15]孙巍:《生产资源配置效率—生产前沿面理论及其应用》,社会科学文献出版社,2000,第一版。
[16]威廉.H.格林,《经济计量分析》,中国社会科学出版社,1998,第一版。
[17]殷醒民:《中国工业发展与技术发展》,上海人民出版社,2003,第一版。
[18]于立等著:《当代西方产业组织学》,东北财经大学出版社,2004,第一版。
[19]袁志刚、宋铮:《高级宏观经济学》,复旦大学出版社,2001,第一版。
[20]臧旭恒等著:《产业经济学》,经济科学出版社,2005,第三版。
[21]张军:《中国的工业改革与经济增长:问题与解释》,上海人民出版社,2003。
[22]张军:《资本形成、投资效率与中国的经济增长—实证研究》,清华大学出版社,2001。
[23]郑玉歆、罗斯基:《体制转换中的中国工业生产率》,社会科学文献出版社,1999,第一版。
[24]安同良、施浩:《中国制造业企业R&D行为模式的观测与实证—基于江苏省制造业企业问卷调查的实证分析》,《经济研究》,2006年第2期。
[25]陈勇、李小平:《中国工业行业的面板数据构造及资本深化评估》,工作论文,2006。
[26]陈勇、唐朱昌:《中国工业的技术选择与技术进步》,《经济研究》,2006第9期。
[27]郭庆旺、贾俊雪:《中国全要素生产率的估算:1979—2004》,《经济研究》,2005年第6期。
[28]胡永泰、海闻、金毅彪:《中国企业改革究竟获得了多大成功》,《经济研究》,1994第6期。
[29]孔翔、Rorbert E. Marks、万广华:《国有企业全要素生产率变化及其决定因素:1990- 1994》,《经济研究》,1999年第7期。
[30]李国璋等:《市场可竞争性与绩效:对我国工业行业的实证分析》,《统计研究》,2006年第6期。
[31]李小平、朱仲棣:《中国工业全要素生产率的测算—基于各行业面板数据的分析》,《管理世界》,2005年第3期。
[32]李治国、唐国兴:《资本形成路径与资本存量调整模型—基于中国转型时期的分析》,《经济研究》,2003年第2期。
[33]刘小玄、郑京海:《国有企业效率的决定因素:1985-1994》,《经济研究》,1998年第1期。
[34]刘小玄:《中国转轨经济中的产权结构和市场结构—产业绩效水平的决定因素》,《经济研究》,2003年第1期。
[35]陆挺、刘小玄:《企业改制模式和改制绩效—基于企业数据调查的经验分析》,《经济研究》,2005年第6期。
[36]孙琳琳、任若恩:《资本投入测量综述》,《中国经济学(季刊)》,2005年第4期。
[37]孙巍、张屹山:《全要素生产率的非参数测度与分解研究》,21世纪数量经济学(第一卷).北京:中国统计出版。
[38]孙巍:《基于非参数投入前沿面的Malmquist生产率指数研究》,《中国管理科学》,2000年第1期。
[39]孙巍:《生产投入可处置性测度理论及其非参数方法的应用研究》,《数量经济技术经济研究》,1999年第2期。
[40]孙巍:《转轨时期中国工业生产要素拥挤的特征分析》,《管理科学学报》,2004年第7卷。
[41]涂正革、肖耿:《中国的工业生产力革命—用随机前沿生产模型对中国大中型工业企业全要素生产率增长的分解及分析》,《经济研究》,2005年第3期。
[42]谢千里、罗斯基、郑玉歆:《改革以来中国工业生产率变动趋势的估计及其可靠性分析》,《经济研究》,1995年第12期。
[43]姚战琪、夏杰长:《资本深化、技术进步对中国就业效应的经验分析》,《世界经济》,2005年第1期。
[44]易纲、樊纲、李岩:《关于中国经济增长与全要素生产率的理论思考》,《经济研究》,2003年第8期。
[45]张军、施少华:《中国经济全要素生产率变动:1952—1998》,《世界经济文汇》,2003年第2期。
[46] Baltagi B.H.(2001),Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley, Chichester.
[47] Cheng Hsiao(1986),Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge University Press.
[48] Fare.R., S.Grosskopf and C.A.K.Lovell(1994), Production frontiers,Cambridge University Press.
[49] G.S. Maddala(1986),Econometrics, McGraw-Hill International Inc.
[50] Hal.R.Varian(2002), Intermediate Microeconomics:A Modern Approach, New York W. Norton & Company.
[51] Havey.A.C.(1993),Time Series Models, New York: Wiley Press.
[52] Hoffman, W.(1958),Growth of Industrial Economics, Manchester University Press.
[53] J.D. Hamilton(1994),Time Series Analysis, Princeton University Press.
[54] M.D.Intriligator,R.G.Bodkin,Cheng Hsiao(1996),Econometric Models, Techniques, and Applications, Prentice-Hall International Inc.
[55] Scherer, F. M(1980), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Second edition: Boston, MA: houghton-Mifflin.
[56] Stephen Martin(2002), Advanced Industrial Economics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
[57] Sutton, John (1998), Technology and market structure: theory and history, Cambridge: Mass MIT Press.
[58] Takeshi Amemiy(1985),Advanced Econometrics, Basil Blackwell.
[59] Tirole, Jean(1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[60] Aiger.D,Lovell.K, Schmidt.P.(1977), Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production models, Journal of Econometrics, Vol.6: 598-632.
[61] Anming Zhang, Yimin Zhang(2001), Impact of Ownership and Competition on the productivity of Chinese Enterprises, Journal of Comparative Economics,Vol.29:327-346.
[62] Avner Shaked,John Sutton(1990),Multiproduct Firms and Market Structure,the Land Journal of Economics,vol.1: 45-62 .
[63] Baltagi,B. and C.Kao(2000),Nonstationary Panels, Cointegration in Panels and Dynamic Panels: A Survey, Advances in Econometrics,vol.15:7-52.
[64] Banerjee,A.(1999),Panel Data Unit Roots and Cointegration:An Overview,Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,vol.61:607-630.
[65] Brockett.P.L., W.W. Cooper, Yuying Wang, Hong-chul Shin(1998),Inefficiency and congestion in Chinese production before and after the 1978 economic reforms, Socio-Economic Planning Science, Vol.32: 1-20.
[66] Bulow, J., Geanakoplos, J., and Klemperer, P.(1985), Holding idle capacity to deter entry, Economic Journal, vol.95:178-182.
[67] Carmel. U., Chiswick(1985), The Elasticity of Substitution Revisited: the Effects of Secular Changes in Labor Force Structure, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol.3:490-507.
[68] Charles R. Hulten(2000),Total Factor Productivity:A Short Biography, NBER Working Paper, No. 7471.
[69] Charles. W. Cobb, Paul. H. Douglas(1928), A Theory of Production, American Economic Review, Vol.18:1-94.
[70] Charnes, A., W.W.Cooper, and E.Rhodes(1978),Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,European Journal of OperationsResearch ,vol.2:429-444.
[71] Chiang, M. and C. Kao(2002),Nonstationary Panel Time Series Using NPT 1.3-A User Guide, Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University.
[72] Comanor,William,S. and Wilson, Thomas, A.(1967), Adertising market structure and performance, Review of Economics and statistics, vol.49: 423-440.
[73] Cooper.W.W., Honghui Deng, Bisheng Gu, Shanling Li, R.M.Thrall(2001), Using DEA to improve the management of congestion in Chinese industries(1981-1997), Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol.35:227-242.
[74] Cooper.W.W., Honghui Deng, Zhimin M. Huang, Susan X. Li(2002),A one-model approach to congestion in data envelopment analysis, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol.36: 231-238.
[75] Cooper.W.W., L.M. Seiford and J. Zhu(2000),A unified additive model approach for evaluating inefficiency and congestion with associated measures in DEA,Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol.3:1-25.
[76] David B.Audretsch(1991),New-Firm Survival and the Technological Regime,The Review of Economics,vol.8: 441-450.
[77] Delbert.A(1976), Fitchett, Capital-labor Substitution in the Manufacturing Sector of Panama, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol.24:577-592.
[78] Delbert.A,Fitchett(1976),Capital-Labor Substitution in the Manufacturing Sector of Panama, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol.24:577-592.
[79] Dixit A(1980), The role of investment in entry deterrence, Economic Journal,vol.90:95-106.
[80] Dong Xiaoyuan,Louis Puttterman(1997),Productivity and Organization in China’s Rural Industries : A Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol.24: 459-482.
[81] Douglas Needhan(1975), Market Structure and Firms R&D behavior,The Journal of Industrial Economics,vol.6:241 -255.
[82] Duncan K.Foley,Thomas R. Michel(2001),The Production Function and Productivity, Journal of Economic Perspective,Vol.15:257-258.
[83] Edwin Burmeister,Stephen J.Turnovshy(1972),Capital Deepening Response in an Economy with Heterogeneous Capital Goods, AmericanEconomic Review,Vol.62:842-853.
[84] Engle,R. and C.Granger(1987),Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing, Econometrica,vol.55:251-276.
[85] Evans, P. (1996),Using cross-country variances to evaluate growth theories, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,vol.23:256-274.
[86] Evans, P. (1998),Using Panel Data to Evaluate Growth Theories, International Economic Review, vol.39:295-306.
[87] Fare R.,Grosskopf,S. and Lovell,C.A.K.(1992),Productivity Change in Swedish Pharmacies 1980-1989:A Nonparametric Malmquist Approach,Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol.3:85-101.
[88] Fare, R. and L. Suensson(1980), Congestion of Production Factors, Econometrica, vol.48: 1745-53.
[89] Fare.R.S.(2000),Grosskopf. Slacks and congestion: a comment, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol.34:27-33.
[90] Farrel, M.J.(1957),The Measurement of Productivity Efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol.120:1026-1058.
[91] Fudenberg, Drew and Tirole, Jean(1983), Capital as a commitment: strategic investment to deter entry, Journal of Economic Theory,vol.31:227-250.
[92] Galenson.W. and H.Leibenstein(1955),Investment Criteria, Productivity, and Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics,vol.69:343-370.
[93] Gary H.,Jefferson,Thomas G.Rawski,Wang Li and Zheng Yuxin(2000), Ownership, Productivity Change,and Financial Performance in Chinese Industry, Journal of Comparative Economics,vol.28: 786-813.
[94] Gary Jefferson, Albert G.Z.Hu,Xiaojing Guan,Xiaoyun Yu(2003), Ownership, Performance, and Innovation in China’s Large2 and Medium2 size Industrial Enterprise Sector, China Economic Review,vol.14:89-113.
[95] Gerald Granderson(1999),The Impact of Regulation on Technical Change,Southern Economic Journal,vol.4:1023-1050.
[96] Gustav Ranis(1981),Technology Choice and the Distribution of Income,Annals of American Political and Social Science, Vol.458:41-53.
[97] Hadri, K.(2000),Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data, Econometrics Journal, vol.3: 148-161.
[98] Hollis B.,Chenery(1961),Comparative Advantage and Development Policy,American Economic Review,Vol.51:18-51.
[99] Howard Pack(1981),Appropriate industrial Technology: benefits and obstacles,Annals of the American,Academy of Political and Social Science,vol.11:54-96.
[100] Im K.S., M.H.Pesaran and Y.Shin(2003),Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels, Journal of Econometrics, Vol.115:53-74.
[101] Jeffrey. M. Gillespie, Kostas Karantininis, Gary. G. Storey(1997), The Expansion and Evolution of Vertical Coordination in the Quebec hog Industry, Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol.19:350-370.
[102] Johansen, S.(1991),Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models, Econometrica, vol.59:1551-1580.
[103] John.D.,Culberson(1989),Econometric Tests of the Market Structural Determinants of R& D Investment: Consistency of Absolute and Relative Firm Size Models,The Journal of Industrial Economics,vol.9:100-150.
[104] Joseph. P. Kalt(1978), Technological Change and Factor Substitution in the United States: 1929-1967, International Economic Review, Vol.19:761-775.
[105] Kao,C. and M.H.Chiang(2000),On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data, Advances in Econometrics, Vol.15:1024-1052.
[106] Kao,C.(1999),Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data,Journal of Econometrics, vol.90:1-44.
[107] Lieberman.M(1987), Excess Capacity as a Barrier to Entry: An Empirical Appraisal, the Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.35:607-627.
[108] Mark Funk, Jack Straus(2000),The Long2run relationship Between Productivity and Capital, Economic Letters,vol.69:213-217.
[109] Maskin.E,Qian.Y,Xu.C(2000), Incentives, Scale Economies and Organization Forms, Review of Economic Studies, Vol.67: 359-378.
[110] Medoff. J, J. Fay(1985), Labor and output over the business cycle: some direct evidence, American Economic Review, Vol.75:638-655.
[111] Michael L.Tushman,Richard R.Nelson(1990), Introduction: technology, organizations, innovation, Administrative Science Quaterly,vol.3:1-8.
[112] Michele Cincera,Patents(1997),R&D,technological Spillovers at the firm level:some evidence from econometric count models for panel data,Journal of applied econometrics, vol.9:56-91.
[113] Nagesh Kumar(1990), Mobility Barriers and Profitability of Multinational and local Enterprises in Indian Manufacturing, The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.38:449-463.
[114] Nagesh Kumar(1990), Mobility Barriers and Profitability of Multinational and Local Enterprises in Indian Manufacturing, The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.38:449-463.
[115] Paul Stoneman,Myung Joong Kwon(1996),Technology Adoption and Firm Profitability,The Economic Journal,vol.7:952-962.
[116] Pedroni, P.(1995),Panel Cointegration:Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests, with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis, Indiana University Working Papers in Economics.
[117] Pedroni,P.(1999),Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol.61:653-678.
[118] Pedroni,P.(2000),Full modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels,Advances in Econometrics, Vol.15:45-81.
[119] Pedroni,P.(2004),Panel Cointegration:Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis, Econometric Theory, vol.20:597-625.
[120] Qian Yingyi and Barry R.Weingast(1996), China’s Transition to Markets:Market Preserving Federalism, Chinese Style, Journal of Policy Reform,vol.1:149-185.
[121] Robert.M.Solow(1957), Technical Change and Aggregate Production Function, The Review of Economic and Statistics, Vol.39:312-320.
[122] Roger Clarke(1992),Sunk Costs and Market Structure:Price Competition, Advertising and the Evolution of Concentration,The Economic Journal,vol.11:1576-1577.
[123] Shaw. R.W, Shaw. S. A(1983), Excess Capacity and Rationalization in the West European Synthetic Fabre Industry, the Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.32:149-166.
[124] Shmalensee, Richard(1988), Industrial Economics: An Overview, The Economic Journal, vol.98:56-89.
[125] Spence. A. Michael(1977), Entry, capacity, investment oligopolistic pricing, Bell Journal of Economics,Vol.8:534-44.
[126] Steven Rosefielde, C. A. Know Lovell(1977), The Impact of Adjusted Factor Cost Valuation on the CES Interpretation of Postwar Soviet Economic, Economica, Vol.44:381-392.
[127] Tim Coelli(1996), A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1:A Data Envelopment Analysis (computer) Program, http :PPwww. uq. edu. auPeconomicsP cepaPdeap. htm.
[128] Timoth Koeller .C.(1995),Innovtion,Market Structure and Firm Size:A Simultaneous Equations Model,Managerial and Decision Economics,vol.3:259-269.
[129] Timothy H.Hanan,John M.McDowel(1984),Market Concentration and the Diffusion of New Technology in the Banking Industry,The Review of Economics and Statistics,vol.11:686 -691.
[130] Timothy H.Hanan,John M.McDowell(1990),The inpact of technology adaption on the market structure, The Review of Economics and Statistics,vol.2:164 -168 .
[131] Von Ungern Sternberg, Thomas(1988), Excess capacity as a commitment to promote entry, Journal of Industrial Economics,vol.37:113-122.
[132] Woodland.A.D.(1975), Substitution of Structures. Equipment and Labor in Canadian Production International,Economic Review, Vol.16:171-187.
[133] Zhang Anming,Yimin Zhang and Ronald Zhao(2001),Impact of Ownership and Competition on the Productivity of Chinese Enterprises, Journal of Comparative Economics,vol.29:327-346.
[134] Zoltan J.Acs,David B(1987),Audresch.Innovation,Market Structure ,and Firm Size,The review of Economics and Statistics,vol.11:567-574.
[135] Zoltan J.Acs,David B.Audresch,Maryann P.,Feldman(1994),R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size,The review of Economics and Statistics,vol.5:336-340.
[2]陈佳贵著:《中国工业现代化问题研究》,中国社会科学出版社,2004,第一版。
[3]大琢启二郎、刘德强、村上直树:《中国的工业改革》,上海人民出版社和上海三联书店,2000,第一版。
[4]戴维?罗默:《高级宏观经济学》,中译本,商务印书馆,1999,第一版。
[5]多纳德?海、德里克?莫瑞斯:《产业经济学与组织》,经济科学出版社,2001,第一版。
[6]费景汉、拉尼斯:《增长和发展:演进观点》,中译本,商务印书馆,2004,第二版。
[7]干春晖:《企业策略性行为研究》,经济管理出版社,2005,第一版。
[8]高铁梅、王金明、吴桂珍、刘玉红著:《计量经济分析方法与建模》,清华大学出版社,2006,第一版。
[9]蒋殿春:《高级微观经济学》,北京大学出版社,2006,第一版。
[10]李江涛著:《产能过剩—问题、理论及治理机制》,中国财政经济出版社,2006,第一版。
[11]李京文:《生产率与中美日经济增长研究》,中国社会科学出版社,2000,第一版。
[12]刘伟、李绍荣著:《转轨中的经济增长与经济结构》,中国发展出版社,2005,第一版。
[13]刘伟等著:《工业化进程中的产业结构研究》,中国人民大学出版社,1995,第一版。
[14]罗伯特.M.索洛等:《经济增长因素分析》,中译本,商务印书馆,1991,第一版。
[15]孙巍:《生产资源配置效率—生产前沿面理论及其应用》,社会科学文献出版社,2000,第一版。
[16]威廉.H.格林,《经济计量分析》,中国社会科学出版社,1998,第一版。
[17]殷醒民:《中国工业发展与技术发展》,上海人民出版社,2003,第一版。
[18]于立等著:《当代西方产业组织学》,东北财经大学出版社,2004,第一版。
[19]袁志刚、宋铮:《高级宏观经济学》,复旦大学出版社,2001,第一版。
[20]臧旭恒等著:《产业经济学》,经济科学出版社,2005,第三版。
[21]张军:《中国的工业改革与经济增长:问题与解释》,上海人民出版社,2003。
[22]张军:《资本形成、投资效率与中国的经济增长—实证研究》,清华大学出版社,2001。
[23]郑玉歆、罗斯基:《体制转换中的中国工业生产率》,社会科学文献出版社,1999,第一版。
[24]安同良、施浩:《中国制造业企业R&D行为模式的观测与实证—基于江苏省制造业企业问卷调查的实证分析》,《经济研究》,2006年第2期。
[25]陈勇、李小平:《中国工业行业的面板数据构造及资本深化评估》,工作论文,2006。
[26]陈勇、唐朱昌:《中国工业的技术选择与技术进步》,《经济研究》,2006第9期。
[27]郭庆旺、贾俊雪:《中国全要素生产率的估算:1979—2004》,《经济研究》,2005年第6期。
[28]胡永泰、海闻、金毅彪:《中国企业改革究竟获得了多大成功》,《经济研究》,1994第6期。
[29]孔翔、Rorbert E. Marks、万广华:《国有企业全要素生产率变化及其决定因素:1990- 1994》,《经济研究》,1999年第7期。
[30]李国璋等:《市场可竞争性与绩效:对我国工业行业的实证分析》,《统计研究》,2006年第6期。
[31]李小平、朱仲棣:《中国工业全要素生产率的测算—基于各行业面板数据的分析》,《管理世界》,2005年第3期。
[32]李治国、唐国兴:《资本形成路径与资本存量调整模型—基于中国转型时期的分析》,《经济研究》,2003年第2期。
[33]刘小玄、郑京海:《国有企业效率的决定因素:1985-1994》,《经济研究》,1998年第1期。
[34]刘小玄:《中国转轨经济中的产权结构和市场结构—产业绩效水平的决定因素》,《经济研究》,2003年第1期。
[35]陆挺、刘小玄:《企业改制模式和改制绩效—基于企业数据调查的经验分析》,《经济研究》,2005年第6期。
[36]孙琳琳、任若恩:《资本投入测量综述》,《中国经济学(季刊)》,2005年第4期。
[37]孙巍、张屹山:《全要素生产率的非参数测度与分解研究》,21世纪数量经济学(第一卷).北京:中国统计出版。
[38]孙巍:《基于非参数投入前沿面的Malmquist生产率指数研究》,《中国管理科学》,2000年第1期。
[39]孙巍:《生产投入可处置性测度理论及其非参数方法的应用研究》,《数量经济技术经济研究》,1999年第2期。
[40]孙巍:《转轨时期中国工业生产要素拥挤的特征分析》,《管理科学学报》,2004年第7卷。
[41]涂正革、肖耿:《中国的工业生产力革命—用随机前沿生产模型对中国大中型工业企业全要素生产率增长的分解及分析》,《经济研究》,2005年第3期。
[42]谢千里、罗斯基、郑玉歆:《改革以来中国工业生产率变动趋势的估计及其可靠性分析》,《经济研究》,1995年第12期。
[43]姚战琪、夏杰长:《资本深化、技术进步对中国就业效应的经验分析》,《世界经济》,2005年第1期。
[44]易纲、樊纲、李岩:《关于中国经济增长与全要素生产率的理论思考》,《经济研究》,2003年第8期。
[45]张军、施少华:《中国经济全要素生产率变动:1952—1998》,《世界经济文汇》,2003年第2期。
[46] Baltagi B.H.(2001),Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley, Chichester.
[47] Cheng Hsiao(1986),Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge University Press.
[48] Fare.R., S.Grosskopf and C.A.K.Lovell(1994), Production frontiers,Cambridge University Press.
[49] G.S. Maddala(1986),Econometrics, McGraw-Hill International Inc.
[50] Hal.R.Varian(2002), Intermediate Microeconomics:A Modern Approach, New York W. Norton & Company.
[51] Havey.A.C.(1993),Time Series Models, New York: Wiley Press.
[52] Hoffman, W.(1958),Growth of Industrial Economics, Manchester University Press.
[53] J.D. Hamilton(1994),Time Series Analysis, Princeton University Press.
[54] M.D.Intriligator,R.G.Bodkin,Cheng Hsiao(1996),Econometric Models, Techniques, and Applications, Prentice-Hall International Inc.
[55] Scherer, F. M(1980), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Second edition: Boston, MA: houghton-Mifflin.
[56] Stephen Martin(2002), Advanced Industrial Economics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
[57] Sutton, John (1998), Technology and market structure: theory and history, Cambridge: Mass MIT Press.
[58] Takeshi Amemiy(1985),Advanced Econometrics, Basil Blackwell.
[59] Tirole, Jean(1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[60] Aiger.D,Lovell.K, Schmidt.P.(1977), Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production models, Journal of Econometrics, Vol.6: 598-632.
[61] Anming Zhang, Yimin Zhang(2001), Impact of Ownership and Competition on the productivity of Chinese Enterprises, Journal of Comparative Economics,Vol.29:327-346.
[62] Avner Shaked,John Sutton(1990),Multiproduct Firms and Market Structure,the Land Journal of Economics,vol.1: 45-62 .
[63] Baltagi,B. and C.Kao(2000),Nonstationary Panels, Cointegration in Panels and Dynamic Panels: A Survey, Advances in Econometrics,vol.15:7-52.
[64] Banerjee,A.(1999),Panel Data Unit Roots and Cointegration:An Overview,Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,vol.61:607-630.
[65] Brockett.P.L., W.W. Cooper, Yuying Wang, Hong-chul Shin(1998),Inefficiency and congestion in Chinese production before and after the 1978 economic reforms, Socio-Economic Planning Science, Vol.32: 1-20.
[66] Bulow, J., Geanakoplos, J., and Klemperer, P.(1985), Holding idle capacity to deter entry, Economic Journal, vol.95:178-182.
[67] Carmel. U., Chiswick(1985), The Elasticity of Substitution Revisited: the Effects of Secular Changes in Labor Force Structure, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol.3:490-507.
[68] Charles R. Hulten(2000),Total Factor Productivity:A Short Biography, NBER Working Paper, No. 7471.
[69] Charles. W. Cobb, Paul. H. Douglas(1928), A Theory of Production, American Economic Review, Vol.18:1-94.
[70] Charnes, A., W.W.Cooper, and E.Rhodes(1978),Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,European Journal of OperationsResearch ,vol.2:429-444.
[71] Chiang, M. and C. Kao(2002),Nonstationary Panel Time Series Using NPT 1.3-A User Guide, Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University.
[72] Comanor,William,S. and Wilson, Thomas, A.(1967), Adertising market structure and performance, Review of Economics and statistics, vol.49: 423-440.
[73] Cooper.W.W., Honghui Deng, Bisheng Gu, Shanling Li, R.M.Thrall(2001), Using DEA to improve the management of congestion in Chinese industries(1981-1997), Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol.35:227-242.
[74] Cooper.W.W., Honghui Deng, Zhimin M. Huang, Susan X. Li(2002),A one-model approach to congestion in data envelopment analysis, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol.36: 231-238.
[75] Cooper.W.W., L.M. Seiford and J. Zhu(2000),A unified additive model approach for evaluating inefficiency and congestion with associated measures in DEA,Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol.3:1-25.
[76] David B.Audretsch(1991),New-Firm Survival and the Technological Regime,The Review of Economics,vol.8: 441-450.
[77] Delbert.A(1976), Fitchett, Capital-labor Substitution in the Manufacturing Sector of Panama, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol.24:577-592.
[78] Delbert.A,Fitchett(1976),Capital-Labor Substitution in the Manufacturing Sector of Panama, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol.24:577-592.
[79] Dixit A(1980), The role of investment in entry deterrence, Economic Journal,vol.90:95-106.
[80] Dong Xiaoyuan,Louis Puttterman(1997),Productivity and Organization in China’s Rural Industries : A Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol.24: 459-482.
[81] Douglas Needhan(1975), Market Structure and Firms R&D behavior,The Journal of Industrial Economics,vol.6:241 -255.
[82] Duncan K.Foley,Thomas R. Michel(2001),The Production Function and Productivity, Journal of Economic Perspective,Vol.15:257-258.
[83] Edwin Burmeister,Stephen J.Turnovshy(1972),Capital Deepening Response in an Economy with Heterogeneous Capital Goods, AmericanEconomic Review,Vol.62:842-853.
[84] Engle,R. and C.Granger(1987),Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing, Econometrica,vol.55:251-276.
[85] Evans, P. (1996),Using cross-country variances to evaluate growth theories, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,vol.23:256-274.
[86] Evans, P. (1998),Using Panel Data to Evaluate Growth Theories, International Economic Review, vol.39:295-306.
[87] Fare R.,Grosskopf,S. and Lovell,C.A.K.(1992),Productivity Change in Swedish Pharmacies 1980-1989:A Nonparametric Malmquist Approach,Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol.3:85-101.
[88] Fare, R. and L. Suensson(1980), Congestion of Production Factors, Econometrica, vol.48: 1745-53.
[89] Fare.R.S.(2000),Grosskopf. Slacks and congestion: a comment, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol.34:27-33.
[90] Farrel, M.J.(1957),The Measurement of Productivity Efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol.120:1026-1058.
[91] Fudenberg, Drew and Tirole, Jean(1983), Capital as a commitment: strategic investment to deter entry, Journal of Economic Theory,vol.31:227-250.
[92] Galenson.W. and H.Leibenstein(1955),Investment Criteria, Productivity, and Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics,vol.69:343-370.
[93] Gary H.,Jefferson,Thomas G.Rawski,Wang Li and Zheng Yuxin(2000), Ownership, Productivity Change,and Financial Performance in Chinese Industry, Journal of Comparative Economics,vol.28: 786-813.
[94] Gary Jefferson, Albert G.Z.Hu,Xiaojing Guan,Xiaoyun Yu(2003), Ownership, Performance, and Innovation in China’s Large2 and Medium2 size Industrial Enterprise Sector, China Economic Review,vol.14:89-113.
[95] Gerald Granderson(1999),The Impact of Regulation on Technical Change,Southern Economic Journal,vol.4:1023-1050.
[96] Gustav Ranis(1981),Technology Choice and the Distribution of Income,Annals of American Political and Social Science, Vol.458:41-53.
[97] Hadri, K.(2000),Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data, Econometrics Journal, vol.3: 148-161.
[98] Hollis B.,Chenery(1961),Comparative Advantage and Development Policy,American Economic Review,Vol.51:18-51.
[99] Howard Pack(1981),Appropriate industrial Technology: benefits and obstacles,Annals of the American,Academy of Political and Social Science,vol.11:54-96.
[100] Im K.S., M.H.Pesaran and Y.Shin(2003),Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels, Journal of Econometrics, Vol.115:53-74.
[101] Jeffrey. M. Gillespie, Kostas Karantininis, Gary. G. Storey(1997), The Expansion and Evolution of Vertical Coordination in the Quebec hog Industry, Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol.19:350-370.
[102] Johansen, S.(1991),Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models, Econometrica, vol.59:1551-1580.
[103] John.D.,Culberson(1989),Econometric Tests of the Market Structural Determinants of R& D Investment: Consistency of Absolute and Relative Firm Size Models,The Journal of Industrial Economics,vol.9:100-150.
[104] Joseph. P. Kalt(1978), Technological Change and Factor Substitution in the United States: 1929-1967, International Economic Review, Vol.19:761-775.
[105] Kao,C. and M.H.Chiang(2000),On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data, Advances in Econometrics, Vol.15:1024-1052.
[106] Kao,C.(1999),Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data,Journal of Econometrics, vol.90:1-44.
[107] Lieberman.M(1987), Excess Capacity as a Barrier to Entry: An Empirical Appraisal, the Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.35:607-627.
[108] Mark Funk, Jack Straus(2000),The Long2run relationship Between Productivity and Capital, Economic Letters,vol.69:213-217.
[109] Maskin.E,Qian.Y,Xu.C(2000), Incentives, Scale Economies and Organization Forms, Review of Economic Studies, Vol.67: 359-378.
[110] Medoff. J, J. Fay(1985), Labor and output over the business cycle: some direct evidence, American Economic Review, Vol.75:638-655.
[111] Michael L.Tushman,Richard R.Nelson(1990), Introduction: technology, organizations, innovation, Administrative Science Quaterly,vol.3:1-8.
[112] Michele Cincera,Patents(1997),R&D,technological Spillovers at the firm level:some evidence from econometric count models for panel data,Journal of applied econometrics, vol.9:56-91.
[113] Nagesh Kumar(1990), Mobility Barriers and Profitability of Multinational and local Enterprises in Indian Manufacturing, The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.38:449-463.
[114] Nagesh Kumar(1990), Mobility Barriers and Profitability of Multinational and Local Enterprises in Indian Manufacturing, The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.38:449-463.
[115] Paul Stoneman,Myung Joong Kwon(1996),Technology Adoption and Firm Profitability,The Economic Journal,vol.7:952-962.
[116] Pedroni, P.(1995),Panel Cointegration:Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests, with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis, Indiana University Working Papers in Economics.
[117] Pedroni,P.(1999),Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol.61:653-678.
[118] Pedroni,P.(2000),Full modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels,Advances in Econometrics, Vol.15:45-81.
[119] Pedroni,P.(2004),Panel Cointegration:Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis, Econometric Theory, vol.20:597-625.
[120] Qian Yingyi and Barry R.Weingast(1996), China’s Transition to Markets:Market Preserving Federalism, Chinese Style, Journal of Policy Reform,vol.1:149-185.
[121] Robert.M.Solow(1957), Technical Change and Aggregate Production Function, The Review of Economic and Statistics, Vol.39:312-320.
[122] Roger Clarke(1992),Sunk Costs and Market Structure:Price Competition, Advertising and the Evolution of Concentration,The Economic Journal,vol.11:1576-1577.
[123] Shaw. R.W, Shaw. S. A(1983), Excess Capacity and Rationalization in the West European Synthetic Fabre Industry, the Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.32:149-166.
[124] Shmalensee, Richard(1988), Industrial Economics: An Overview, The Economic Journal, vol.98:56-89.
[125] Spence. A. Michael(1977), Entry, capacity, investment oligopolistic pricing, Bell Journal of Economics,Vol.8:534-44.
[126] Steven Rosefielde, C. A. Know Lovell(1977), The Impact of Adjusted Factor Cost Valuation on the CES Interpretation of Postwar Soviet Economic, Economica, Vol.44:381-392.
[127] Tim Coelli(1996), A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1:A Data Envelopment Analysis (computer) Program, http :PPwww. uq. edu. auPeconomicsP cepaPdeap. htm.
[128] Timoth Koeller .C.(1995),Innovtion,Market Structure and Firm Size:A Simultaneous Equations Model,Managerial and Decision Economics,vol.3:259-269.
[129] Timothy H.Hanan,John M.McDowel(1984),Market Concentration and the Diffusion of New Technology in the Banking Industry,The Review of Economics and Statistics,vol.11:686 -691.
[130] Timothy H.Hanan,John M.McDowell(1990),The inpact of technology adaption on the market structure, The Review of Economics and Statistics,vol.2:164 -168 .
[131] Von Ungern Sternberg, Thomas(1988), Excess capacity as a commitment to promote entry, Journal of Industrial Economics,vol.37:113-122.
[132] Woodland.A.D.(1975), Substitution of Structures. Equipment and Labor in Canadian Production International,Economic Review, Vol.16:171-187.
[133] Zhang Anming,Yimin Zhang and Ronald Zhao(2001),Impact of Ownership and Competition on the Productivity of Chinese Enterprises, Journal of Comparative Economics,vol.29:327-346.
[134] Zoltan J.Acs,David B(1987),Audresch.Innovation,Market Structure ,and Firm Size,The review of Economics and Statistics,vol.11:567-574.
[135] Zoltan J.Acs,David B.Audresch,Maryann P.,Feldman(1994),R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size,The review of Economics and Statistics,vol.5:336-340.