用户名: 密码: 验证码:
发展中国家的市场结构和技术进步
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在现代市场经济环境下,市场结构、企业研发投入和技术进步之间的一般关系是:市场结构和企业研发投入是企业在一定经济、技术和制度环境下进行产品竞争和研发竞争的内生结果,而技术进步则是产品竞争和研发竞争过程的经济产出。对于发展中国家而言,其特殊性体现在发展中国家企业的研发活动是以技术引进和技术模仿为主要方式;其国内企业面临具有技术优势的跨国企业的严重威胁;市场机制,特别是金融体系并不完善。那么这些因素在上述企业研发活动、市场结构和技术进步的一般机制下对发展中国家市场结构和技术进步具有什么影响?在这种情况下,什么样的市场结构能够促进发展中国家的技术进步,进而推动经济的可持续增长?其中合适的政府政策和制度安排又是什么?
     本文通过构建内生市场结构的增长模型,并考虑到发展中国家所具有的特征,试图对上述问题进行初步的探讨。文章的主要内容包括以下几点:
     (1)分别引入拟固定成本和外生进入壁垒,在消费者多样性偏好下,构建了两个内生市场结构的模型。揭示了企业研发投入、市场结构和技术进步之间的一般关系,为针对发展中国家问题的分析提供模型化的研究平台。
     (2)通过分析创新活动和模仿活动在知识外溢性上的不同表现,以及创新活动和模仿活动对研发项目规模和研发项目效率要求上的差异,刻画了发展中国家在不同技术差距水平下的研发活动的特征,解释了适合于发展中国家技术进步的市场结构因发展中国家所处于的技术差距水平不同而异的经验观察。并以日本和韩国为例对上述结论进行了佐证和进一步的探讨。
     (3)分析了来自发达国家具有技术优势的跨国企业进入发展中国家市场对其企业研发行为和市场结构的作用,并讨论了金融限制对这一结果的影响,同时还利用模型的主要结论剖析了巴西经济开放过程中所出现的问题。
     (4)以基于进入壁垒的内生市场结构模型中技术差距大于门槛值的部分为基础,将产业政策和竞争政策同时作为参数纳入到模型分析里,探讨了发展中国家产业政策和竞争政策的选择和协调问题。
     论文分七章阐述了以上问题,第1章为绪论,第2章为对市场结构和技术进步建模工作的文献综述,第3章为两种内生市场结构的增长模型,第4章为封闭经济条件下的市场结构和发展中国家的技术进步,第5章为外资进入条件下的市场结构和发展中国家的技术进步,第6章为发展中国家产业政策和竞争政策的选择和协调,第7章为本文的主要结论、研究的不足和进一步研究的方向。
In modern market economy, the relations between market structure, the research input of enterprises and the improvement of technology can be interpreted as below: market structure and the research input are the endogenous results caused by the product and research competition of enterprises in certain economic, technological and institutional environment; the improvement of technology is the economical outcome of these competitions. As for developing countries, their particularity lies in these facts, first, import and imitation of technology constitute most researches of enterprise in those countries; second, enterprises in those countries are confronted with the challenge from international enterprises which have an edge in technology; third, the market mechanisms especially the financial system is not sound. The questions are, first, how these facts affect the market structure and the technology improvement? Second, which kind of market structure can help to give an impetus to the technology improvement and the sustainable economic development in developing countries? Third, what is the appropriate policy and institutions needed?
     This paper constitutes a growth model with endogenous market structure concerning the characteristics of developing countries to discuss about questions mentioned above. The discussion includes these below:
     (1) Taking quasi-fixed cost and exogenous barrier into account respectively, this paper constitutes two endogenous market structure models under the hypothesis of different consumer preference. These models uncover the relations between the research input, market structure and technology improvement, providing a analytical model for the research focusing on the developing countries.
     (2) Concerning the different effects of creation and imitation in the overflow of knowledges, and the different choice decided by the scale or efficiency of the research programs, this paper maps a picture of characteristics of developing countries in different stages of technology, offers an explanation to the fact that the appropriate market structure varies because of different stages of technology. And the examples of Japan and Korea provide evidence and further discussions for such conclusions.
     (3) Analyze the affect of international enterprises from developed countries, also the affect of financial limitation. Meanwhile. Give an analysis of the problems existing in Brazil's opening up using the conclusion of the model.
     (4) Taking the industrial policies and competition policies into account as parameters, and basing on the tech. difference in the model, this paper discusses the selection and cooperation of industrial policies and competition policies in developing countries.
     The paper is divided into seven parts, of which the first part is introduction, and the 2nd chapter gives a literature review of researches already existed. The 3rd chapter describes two kinds of models. The 4th chapter discusses the market structure in closed economy and the technology improvement in developing countries. The 5th chapter argues the market structure with the foreign investment and the technology improvement in developing countries. The 6th chapter discusses the selection and cooperation of industrial policies and competition policies in developing countries. The 7th chapter argues the major conclusions and some flaws of this research, as well as some possible directions of further research.
引文
1这两个假说是:垄断力量或市场集中度与研发投入成正相关;企业规模与研发投入成正相关。它们指出垄断有利于技术进步,可以给经济体带来动态的收益。
    2约翰·伊特维尔,默里·米尔盖特,彼得·纽曼编.新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1996.第一卷,804页。
    3约翰·伊特维尔,默里·米尔盖特,彼得·纽曼编.新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1996.第二卷,576页。
    4例如,在《竞争政策—理论与实践》中,马西莫·莫塔把垄断程度或市场势力定义为“厂商把价格提高到竞争水平以上的能力”。
    5约翰·伊特维尔,默里·米尔盖特,彼得·纽曼编.新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1996.第一卷,577页。
    6 Merriam-Webster英语大辞典,235页。
    7马西莫·莫塔.竞争政策——理论与实践[M].沈国华译.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2006.第43页。
    8 这也是产业组织理论中的判断不同市场结构垄断、竞争性质的主要标准。
    9陈志鹏.中国轿车行业市场结构分析[J].华东经济管理,2006,第4期。
    10威廉·鲍莫尔.资本主义的增长奇迹——自由市场创新机器[M].郭梅军,唐宇,彭敬,李青译.北京:中信出版社,2004.第137页。
    11Cayseele,P.,1996,"Market Structure and Innovation:A Survey",De Economist,146,391-417.
    12研发活动所构成的“内生进入壁垒”的实证证据是高技术密集型和高资本密集型行业中的企业数目要小于劳动密集型行业中的企业数目。
    [1][美]E·赫尔普曼.经济增长的秘密[M].王世华,吴莜译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
    [2][德]埃尔玛·沃夫斯岱特.高级微观经济学——产业组织理论、拍卖和激励理论[M].范翠红译.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2003.
    [3][美]本·斯泰尔,戴维·维克托,理查德·内尔森.技术创新与经济绩效[M].浦东新区科学技术局,浦东产业研究院译.上海:上海人民出版社,2006.
    [4]陈志鹏.中国轿车行业市场结构分析[J].华东经济管理,2006,第4期.
    [5][英]大卫·兰德斯.解除束缚的普罗米修斯:1750年迄今西欧的技术变革和工业发展[M].谢怀筑等译.北京:华夏出版社,2007.
    [6][日]大野健一.从江户到平成:解密日本经济发展之路[M].臧馨,臧新远译.北京:中信出版社,2006.
    [7]冯骁琦,万军.从产业政策到竞争政策:东亚地区政府干预方式的转型及对中国的启示[J].南开经济研究,2005,第5期.
    [8]龚维敏.中国反垄断法理论与实践及其对中国的启迪[J].经济评论,2005,第4期.
    [9]焦震蘅.巴西工业从衰退走向复苏的原因[J].拉丁美洲研究,1997,第4期.
    [10]兰星,李永平.韩国经济增长模式的转变、特征及其借鉴[J].华中理工大学学报(社会科学版),1996,第3期.
    [11]郎贵飞.美日德的汽车产业政策及其启示[J].经济问题探索,2006,第11期.
    [12]林毅夫.制度、技术与中国农业发展[M].上海:上海人民出版社和上海三联出版社,1994.
    [13]李平.国际技术扩散对发展中国家技术进步的影响:机制、效果及对策分析[M].北京:三联书店,2007.
    [14]李秀芝,王振锋.对竞争理论演变的分析与评述[J].学术交流,2006,第9期.
    [15]李志强,冀丽俊.市场结构与技术创新——兼论中国企业技术创新的市场结构安排[J].中国软科学,2001,第10期.
    [16]刘劲松,舒玲敏.论产业政策和竞争政策的战略搭配——以日本为例[J].当代财经,2006,第7期.
    [17]刘强.中国经济的收敛性分析[J].经济研究,2001,第6期.
    [18]刘士余,李培育.巴西的经济改革与政策协调及启示[J].管理世界,1995,第3期.
    [19]陆建新.西方产业组织理论的新发展[J].中南财经大学学报,1996,第5期.
    [20]卢新德.韩国经济率先全面复苏的原因[J].当代亚太,1999,第8期.
    [21]罗飞.中国汽车产业集中度分析[J].统计与决策,2005,第3期.
    [22][意]马西莫·莫塔.竞争政策——理论与实践[M].沈国华译.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2006.
    [23][美]迈克尔·D·温斯顿.反垄断经济学前沿[M].张嫚,吴绪亮,章爱民译.大连:东北财经大学出版社,2007.
    [24][美]内森·罗森伯格.探索黑箱——技术、经济学和历史[M].王文勇,吕睿译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
    [25][荷]尼尔斯·赫米斯,罗伯特·伦辛克.金融发展与经济增长——发展中国家(地区)的理论与经验[M].余昌淼等译.北京:经济科学出版社,2001.
    [26][美]乔治·J·施蒂格勒.产业组织[M].王永钦,薛锋译.上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,2006.
    [27]舒元等.现代经济增长模型[M].上海:复旦大学出版社出版,1998.
    [28]上海财经大学产业经济研究中心.中国产业发展报告——国际化与产业竞争力》[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2007.
    [29]施东晖.转型经济中的所有权与竞争[J].经济研究,2003,第8期.
    [30][美]斯蒂芬·马丁.高级产业经济学[M].史东辉等译.上海:上海财经大 学出版社,2003.
    [31][法]泰勒尔.产业组织理论[M].马捷等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.
    [32]唐晓云.国际技术转移的非线性分析与经济增长[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2005.
    [33]涂正革,肖耿.中国的生产力革命[J].经济研究,2005,第3期.
    [34]王春法.金融危机以来的韩国四大经济改革措施及其经济复兴[J].世界经济,2001,第5期.
    [35]王伟光.技术创新与市场结构演化:从A-U、PLC到SCP[J].沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版),2004,第6期.
    [36]王伟光.中国工业行业技术创新实证研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2003.
    [37]王世豪.经济全球化背景下地区家电制造产业的现状、问题剖析——以顺德家电制造业为例[J].软科学,2005,第4期.
    [38]王俊豪等.中国垄断性产业结构重组分类管制与协调政策[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005.
    [39][美]威廉·鲍莫尔.资本主义的增长奇迹——自由市场创新机器[M].郭梅军,唐宇,彭敬,李青译.北京:中信出版社,2004.
    [40][美]小艾尔弗雷德·钱德勒.规模与范围:工业资本主义的原动力[M].张逸人等译.北京:华夏出版社,2006.
    [41]肖彦山.寡头垄断与反垄断法.集团经济研究[J],2007,第6期.
    [42]吴小丁.反垄断与经济发展——日本竞争政策研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2006.
    [43]吴延兵.企业规模、市场力量与创新:一个文献综述[J].经济研究,2007,第5期.
    [44]约翰·伊特维尔,默里·米尔盖特,彼得·纽曼编.新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1996.
    [45]徐国兴.市场进入壁垒理论[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2007.
    [46]杨蕙馨,徐向艺等.开放经济与中国产业组织研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2006.
    [47]杨治,宋芳晖.中国工业企业技术创新状况的行业差异[J].经济理论与经济管理,1999,第6期.
    [48]张登文.经济全球化与后发资本主义国家[M].人民出版社,2007.
    [49]张荣健.欧盟产业政策与竞争法的关系探析[J].中国水运(理论版),2004,第4期.
    [50]张彤玉,丁国杰.技术进步与产业组织变迁[J].经济社会体制比较,2006,第3期.
    [51]左大培.内生稳态增长模型的生产结构[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.
    [52][日]中村哲.东亚近代经济的形成与发展——东亚近代经济形成史(一)[M].王玉茹译.人民出版社,2005.
    [53]Acemoglu,D.,and E Zilibotti,1999,"Productivity Differences",NBER Working Paper,6879.
    [54]Acemoglu,D.,2001,"Directed Technical Change",NBER working paper,8287.
    [55]Acemoglu,D.,Johnson,S.,and Mitton,T.,2003,"Institutions and Market Structure",MIT Mimeo.
    [56]Acemoglu,D.,Aghion,P.,and Zilibotti,F.,2003,"Distance to frontier,Selection,and Economic Growth",NBER Working Paper No.9066.
    [57]Aghion,P.,Bloom,N.,Blundell,R.,Griffith,R.,and Howitt,P.,2003,"Competition and Innovation:an Inverted U Relationship",NBER Working Paper 9269.
    [58]Aghion,P.,and Griffith,R.,2005,Competition and Growth:Reconciling Theory and Evidence,MIT Press.
    [59]Aghion,P.,Harris,C.,and Vickers,J.,1997,"Competition and Growth with Step-by-step Innovation:An Example",European Economic review,41,771-782.
    [60]Aghion,P.,Harris,c.,Howitt,P.and Vickers,J.,2001,"Competition,Imitation and Growth with Step-by-step Innovation",Review of Economic Studies, 68,467-492.
    
    [61]Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1990, "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction", NBER Work Paper, 5436.
    
    [62] Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1998. "Endogeneous Growth Theory", M.I.T. Press.
    
    [63]Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1998, "Market Structure and the Growth Process", Review of Economic Dynamics, 1, 276-305.
    
    [64] Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., and Prantl, S., 2003, "The Effect of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity", paghion@arrow.fast.harvard.edu.
    
    [65]Aitken, D., and Harrison, S., 1999, "Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela." American Economic Reciew, 89(3), 605-618.
    
    [66]Alvarez, Luis H.R., 1998, "Exit Strategies and Price Uncertainty: A Greenian Approach", Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol.29:43—56.
    
    [67] Alvarez, Luis H.R., and Rune Stenbacka, 2001, "Adoption of Uncertain Multi stage Technology Projects: A Real Options Approach", Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol.35:71—97.
    
    [68] Arrow, Kenneth J., 1962, "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing", Journal of Public Economics, August, 25-44.
    
    [69]Atkinson and Stiglitz,.J.E., 1969, "A New View of Technological Change." Economic Journal, LXXIX, 573-578.
    
    [70] Bain, J.S., Barriers to New Competition. Harvard University Press, 1956.
    
    [71]Bala,Venkatesh,and Sanjeev Goyal, 2000, "A Noncooperative Model of Network Formation", Econometrica, Vol.68, No.5:1181 —1229.
    
    [72]Barro, R. J., and Xavier, Sala-I-Martin, 1995, Economic Growth, McGraw-Hill.
    
    [73]Barro, R. J., and Xavier, Sala-I-Martin, 1997, "Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth" , Journal of Economic Growth, 2,1-27.
    
    [74]Barro, R.J., 1991, "Government Spending in A Simple Model of Endogenous Growth", Journal of Political Economy, 99,103-125.
    [75]Basu, S., and D.Weil, 1998, "Appropriate Technology and Growth", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Nov, 1025 — 1054.
    
    [76]Baumol, W.J., 1986, "Productivity Growth, Convergence and Welfare: What the Long Run Data Show", American Economic Review, Dec, 1072—1085.
    
    [77]Bayoumi, T., D.Coe, and E.Helpman, 1996, "R&D Spillovers and Global Growth", NBER Working Paper 5628.
    
    [78] Bloom, D., D., Canning, and J., Sevilla, 2002, "Technological Diffusion, Conditional Convergence and Economic Growth", NBER Working Paper 8713.
    
    [79]Blunder, R., Griffith, R., and Van Reenen, J., 1995, "Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation", Economic Journal, 105,333-344.
    
    [80]Brezis, E., P., Krugman, and D.Tsiddon, 1993, "Leapfrogging in International Competition: A theory of Cycles in National Technological Leadership", American Economic Review, Dec, 1211 — 1219.
    
    [81]Budd, C., Harris, C.J., and Vickers, J.S., 1993, "A Model of the Evolution of Duopoly", Review of Economic Studies, 60, 543-573.
    
    [82]Cass, D., 1965, "Optimum Growth in an Aggregate Model of Capital Accumulation", Review of Economic Studies, 32, 233—240.
    
    [83] Caves, C., 1971, Multinational Enterprises and Economic Analysis, London.
    
    [84] Cayseele, P., 1996, "Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey", De Economist, 146,391-417.
    
    [85] Chung Yi Tse, 2001, "The Distribution of Demand, Market Structure and Investment in Technology", Journal of Economics, 3, 275-297.
    
    [86] Cohen, W., M., and Levin R.C., 1988, "Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure", Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol.2, Amsterdam, North-Holland.
    
    [87]Cohen, W., M., and P., Lecinthal, 1989, "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D." Economic Journal, 99,569-596.
    
    [88]Congleton, Roger, D., and Viktor J., Vanberg, 2001, "Help, Harm or Avoid? On the Personal Advantage of Dispositions to Cooperate and Punish in Multilateral PD Games with Exit", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol.44:145-167.
    
    [89]Dasgupta, P., 1988, "Patents, Priority and Imitation or the Economics of Races and Waiting Games", Economic Journal, 98, 66-80.
    
    [90]Dasgupta, P., and J., E., Stigliz, 1980, "Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity", Economic Journal, 90,266-293.
    
    [91]Dinopoulos, Ellas and Peter Thompson, 1998, "Schumpeter Growth without Scale Effect", Journal of Economic Growth, vol (3), 313-335.
    
    [92]Diwan, I., and Rodrik, Patents, 1991, "Appropriate Technology, and North South Trade", Journal of International Economics, Jan, 27—47.
    
    [93]Dixit, A., K., and J., E., Stigliz, 1977, "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity", American Economic Review, 70(2):461-90.
    
    [94]Domar, Evsey D., 1946, "Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment", Econometrica, vol (3), 46-58.
    
    [95]Doraszelski, U., 2003, "An R&D Race with Knowledge Accumulation", Rand Journal of Economics, 19-41.
    
    [96]Easterly J., and P., Levine, 2001, "It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models" , World Bank Economic Review, 15,177-219.
    
    [97]Ethier, Wilfred J., 1982, "National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade", American Economic Review, 72:389-405.
    
    [98]Etro, F., 2004, "Innovation by Leaders", Economic Journal, 114, 281-303.
    
    [99]Freedman, David, 1983, Brownian Motion and Diffusion, SanFrancisco: Holderr Day.
    
    [100] Gerschenkron, A., 1962, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
    
    [101] Gilbert, R., and Newbery D., 1982, "Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly", American Economic Review, 72,514-526.
    
    [102] Glass, M., and H., Saggi, 1998, "International Technology Transfer and the Technology Gap " , Journal of Development Economics, 55, 369-398.
    [103] Griffith, R., Redding, S. and Van Reenen, J., 2004, "Mapping the Two Faces of R&D", Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 883-895.
    
    [104] Grossman, Gene M., 1992, "Imperfect Competition and International Trade", American Economic Review, 82, 620-643.
    
    [105] Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman, 1986, "Product Development and International Trade" , Journal of Public Economics, June, 220-237.
    
    [106] Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman, 1990, "Comparative Advantage and Long-run Growth" , American Economic Review, 80, 765-815.
    
    [107] Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman, 1990, Innovation and Growth in Global Economy, M.I.T. Press.
    
    [108] Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman, 1990, "The "New" Growth Theory Trade, Innovation, and Growth " , American Economic Review, 80, 765-815.
    
    [109] Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman, 1991a, "Quality Ladders and Product Cycles", Querterly Journal of Economics, 106, 557-586
    
    [110] Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman, 1991b, "Trade, Knowledge spillovers, and Growth", European Economic Review, 35, forthcoming.
    
    [111] Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman, 1991c, "Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth", Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43-61.
    
    [112] Grossman, Gene M., and Shapiro, C., 1987, "Dynamic R&D Competition", Economics Journal, 97, 372-387.
    
    [113] Harris, C., J., and Vickers, J., S., 1985, "Perfect Equilibrium in a Model of a Race", Review of Economic Studies, 54,1-21.
    
    [114] Harrod, Roy F., 1939, "An Essay in Dynamic Theory", The Economic Journal, 49,14-33.
    
    [115] Howitt, P., 2000, "Endogenous Growth and Cross-country Income Difference", American Economic Review, 90,829-846.
    
    [116] Jackson, Matthew O., and Asher Wolinsky, 1996, "A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks", Journal of Economic Theory, 71, 44-74.
    [117] Jones, C., 1995, "Time Series Test of Growth Models", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110,495—525.
    
    [118] Judd, Kenneth L., 1985, "On the Performance of Patents", Econometrica, 53, 567-586.
    
    [119] Kamien, M., I.., and Schwartz, N., L., 1974, "Patent Life and R&D Rivalry", American Economic Review, 64,183-187.
    
    [120] Kamien, M., and Schwartz, N., 1991, Dynamic Optimization, North-Holland.
    
    [121] Kash, Don E., and Robert W. Rycoft, 2000, "Patterns of Innovating Complex Technologies: A Frame work for Adaptive Networks trategies", Research Policy, 29, 819-831.
    
    [122] Kokko, 1994, "Technology, Market, Characteristics and Spillover", Journal of Development Economics, 43, 279-293.
    
    [123] Koizumi and Kopecky, 1981, "Economic Growth, Capital Movement and the International Transfer of Technical Knowledge", Journal of International Economics, 7,45-65.
    
    [124] Koopmans, Tjalling C., 1965, "On the Concept of Optimal Economic Growth", In The Economic Approach to Development Planning, Amsterdam, North-Holland.
    
    [125] Kreiner, Kristian, and Majken Schultz, 1993, "Informal Collaboration in R&D: The Formation of Networks across Organizations", Organization Studies, Vol.14, No.2,189-209.
    
    [126] Kremer, M., 1993, "Population Growth and Technological Change: One Million B.C. to 1990", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 681—716.
    
    [127] Krugman, Paul R., 1979, "Increasing Return, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade", Journal of Political Economy, 87, 253-266.
    
    [128] Krugman, Paul R., 1987, "The Narrow Moving Band, the Dutch Disease and the Competitive Consequence of Mrs. Thatcher", Journal of Development Economics, 27, 41-55.
    
    [129] Krugman, Paul R., 1990, "Endogenous Innovation, International Trade and Growth", Rethinking of Trade, Cambridge, MIT Press.
    [130] Lai, E., 1998, "Schumpeterian Growth with Gradual Product Obsolescence", Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 81-103.
    
    [131] Lee, T., and Wilde, L., L., 1980, "Market Structure and Innovation: a Reformulation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, 429-436.
    
    [132] Lippman, S., and McCardle, K., 1988, "Preemption in R&D Races", European Economic Review, 32,661-669.
    
    [133] Lippman, S., and Mamer, J., 1992, "Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly", Economic Letters, 38, 83-91.
    
    [134] Loury, G, 1979, "Market Structure and Innovation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93, 395-410.
    
    [135] Lucas, Robert E., 1988, "On the Mechanics of Economic development", Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
    
    [136] Lyons, B., Matraves, C., and Moffatt, P., 2001, "Industrial Concentration and Market Integration in the European Union", Economica, 68,1-26.
    
    [137] MacDougall, 1960, "The Benefits and Costs of Private Investment from Abroad: A Theoretical Approach", Economic Record, 36,13-35.
    
    [138] Nickell, S., 1996, "Competition and Corporate Performance", Journal of Political Economy, 104, 724-746.
    
    [139] Orbell, J., M., and R., M., Dawes, 1993, "Social Welfare, Cooperators'Advantage, and the Option of Not Playing the Game", American Sociological Review, 58, 787-800.
    
    [140] Oksendal, B., 1985, Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications, Berlin, Springer Verlag.
    
    [141] Parente, S., L., and Prescott, E., C., 1999, "Monopoly Rights: A Barrier to Riches", American Economic Review, 89, 1216-1233.
    
    [142] Peretto, P., 1999, "Cost Reduction, Entry, and the Interdependence of Market Structure and Economic Growth"', Journal of Monetary Economics, 43, 173-195.
    
    [143] Pearson, etal, 1969, Partners in Development: Report of the Commission on International Development, New York: Praeger.
    [144] Pritchett, D., 1997, "Divergence, Big-time" , Journal ofEconomic Perspective 11, 3-17.
    
    [145] Quah, 1997, " Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization, and Convergence Clubs" , Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 27-59.
    
    [146] Quelin, Bertrand, 2000, "Core Competencies, R&D Management and Partnerships", European Management Journal, 18, 476-487.
    
    [147] Ramsey, E, 1928, "A Mathematical Theory of Saving", Economic Journal, 38:543-559.
    
    [148] Reiganum, J., 1981, "Dynamic Games of Innovation", Journal of Economic Theory, 25, 21-41.
    
    [149] Reiganum, J., 1982, "A Dynamic Game of R&D: Patent Protection and Competitive Behavior", Econometrica, 50, 671-688.
    
    [150] Reiganum, J., 1983, "Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly", American Economic Review, 73,741-748.
    
    [151] Reiganum, J., 1985, "Two-Stage Model of Research and Development with Endogenous Second-Mover Advantages", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 3, 275-292.
    
    [152] Robinson, W., T., and Chiang, J., 1996, "Are Sutton's Predictions Robust? Empirical Insights into Advertising, R&D and Concentration", Journal of Industrial Economics, 44, 389-408.
    
    [153] Rodriguez Clare, 1996, "Multinationals, Linkages, and Economic Development" , American Economic Reciew, 86(4), 852-873.
    
    [154] Romer, P., M., and Elhanan Helpman, 1985, Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Return, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy, MIT Press.
    
    [155] Romer, Paul M., 1986, "Increasing return and long-run growth", Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037.
    
    [156] Romer, Paul M., 1987, "Growth Based on Increasing Return due to Specialization", American Economic Review, 77, 321-342.
    [157] Romer, Paul M., 1990, "Endogenous Technological Change", Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102.
    
    [158] Romer Mankin, G., D., and D., Weil, A., 1992, "Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 358—374.
    
    [159] Sah, R., K., and Stiglitz, J., E., 1988, "Committees, Hierarchies and Poliarchies", Economic Journal, 98, 451-470.
    
    [160] Schumpeter, Joseph A, 1934, The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press.
    
    [161] Segerstrom, P., T., and E., Dinopoulos, 1990, "Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle", American Economic Review, Dec, 1077—1092.
    
    [162] Segerstrom, P.S., and Zolnierek, J., M., 1999, "The R&D Incentive Industry leaders", International Economic Review, 40,745-766.
    
    [163] Sheshinske, E., 1967, Optimal Accumulation with Learning by Doing, MIT Press.
    
    [164] Solow, R., 1957, "Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function", Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312—320.
    
    [165] Solow, R., 1956, "Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65 — 94.
    
    [166] Spence, Michale, 1976, "Product Selection, Fix Cost, and Monopolistic Competition", Review of Economic Study, 43, 217-236.
    
    [167] Sutton, J., 1991, Sunk Cost and Market Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    
    [168] Sutton, J., 1998, Technology and Market Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    
    [169] Van Wijnbergen, Sweder, and Venables, Anthony J., 1993, "Trade Liberalization, Productivity and competition: The Mexican Experience", Manuscript. London: London School Econ., Centre Econ. Performance.
    
    [170] Walz, 1997, " Innovation, Foreign Direct Investment and Growth" , Economica, 64, 63-79.
    [171] Wang and Blomstorm, 1992, "Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer: A Simple Model" , European Economic Review, 36, 23-47.
    
    [172] Younge, Alwyn, 1991, "Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effect of International Trade", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 369-406.
    
    [173] Younge, Alwyn, 1993, "Substitution and Complementarity in Endogenous innovation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108,105-117.
    
    [174] Younge, Alwyn, 1995, "The Tyranny of Numbers: confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 351-362.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700