用户名: 密码: 验证码:
中国农业保险需求与补贴问题研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
中国农业自然灾害十分严重,农户抵御自然风险的能力也非常有限,客观上需要利用有效的风险转移工具——农业保险来抵御风险、稳定农业生产、保障农民收入。农业保险也是WTO规则中较为重要的非价格类农业支持政策,因此近年来越来越受到学术界和决策部门的重视。2004、2005、2006、2007连续4年的中央1号文件、“十一五”规划及2006年6月颁布的《国务院关于保险业改革发展的若干意见》都对政策性农业保险的发展提出了明确要求。
     我国农业保险自1934年开始试办至今已有70多年的历史,但一直步履蹒跚。在经历了20世纪80年代末至90年代初的试点高潮之后,农业保险逐步萎缩,直至2004年,新一轮农业保险试点重新在全国各地展开,才止住颓势。尽管受到决策部门的高度重视,但是由于财政支持不力,2004~2006年间农业保险仍然发展缓慢。鉴于此,2007年中央财政加大支持力度,安排10亿元资金,在全国6个省区推行政策性农业保险保费补贴试点,当年农业保险得到迅猛发展,保费收入达51.8亿元,比2006年增长504%。据悉,2008年中央财政给予政策性农业保险的保费补贴将达数十亿元,其范围将涵盖农业生产的全过程。
     正是在这种现实背景下,本研究综合运用微观经济学、数理经济学、计量经济学等相关理论和方法,在已有研究的基础上将定性和定量研究相结合,根据问卷调查、实地访谈获得的一手资料,以及其它翔实的数据资料,重点对我国农业保险需求及政策性农业保险补贴的理论与实践进行了深入分析与探讨。
     本文的主要内容及结论如下:
     第一,探究影响我国农户农业保险需求的微观因素。作者根据湖北376户农户调查资料,对农户的风险态度、风险分散方式及农业保险在各种农村保险中的排序等进行描述性实证分析。研究表明,农户的风险态度、其传统的风险分散方式及农业保险在各种农村保险中排序靠后等因素对农户农业保险需求有消极影响。同时,通过建立Logit二元选择模型,对农户农业保险购买决策的影响因素进行实证分析。研究结果表明,农户家庭总收入、种植业收入占总收入的比例、耕地面积及受访者的风险认知程度对其农业保险购买决策有明显影响。
     第二,分析不同补贴方案下我国农业保险保费的财政补贴额与农户支付额及可行性。根据目前我国农业保险实践及近期发展趋势,本文选择保成本的保障方式,在多种不同的模拟方案下,分别测算稻谷、小麦、玉米、大豆、棉花、花生、油菜籽、黄红麻、甘蔗、甜菜、烤烟等11种主要农作物和奶牛、生猪、肉鸡等3种畜禽的财政补贴额度和农户支付额,并对我国财政和各地区农户的支付能力进行分析。
     在两种典型方案下,即当上述农作物与畜禽成本保障水平分别为70%与60%、财政补贴比例分别为60%与40%、农户支付比例分别为40%与60%时,若农作物保险和畜禽保险参与率均为30%或均为50%,则财政补贴总额分别为62.86亿元与104.76亿元,农户支付总额分别为75.73亿元与45.44亿元。同时,对政府与农户各自支付能力的分析表明,在上述保障水平和财政保费补贴率下,当农作物与畜禽保险的参与率均不超过50%时,如果保费补贴由中央和地方两级财政支付,补贴政策是可行的;此时农村居民人均保费约为50元,考虑到目前我国农民人均收入及收入来源结构差别较大,约有70%以上的农户具有支付能力。
     第三,构建我国农业保险补贴体系。本研究从多维的角度构建了我国农业保险补贴体系,其中,补贴项目可考虑主要农作物多风险保险和主要家禽家畜死亡保险,如稻谷、小麦、玉米、大豆、棉花、花生和油菜籽,以及黄红麻、甘蔗、甜菜、烤烟等农作物多风险保险与能繁母猪、生猪、奶牛、肉鸡等畜禽死亡保险;补贴方式以保费补贴为主,并适当给予经营管理费补贴、税收优惠和再保险补贴;经营管理费补贴要兼顾政策需要和效率需要,建立责任制约机制,并依托基层保险和财政机构,收集保险对象的相关资料,减少补贴资金的浪费;补贴标准制定则应综合考虑农业保险区域保险费率和不同地区农户的支付能力及地方财政情况,合理规划各险种的补贴标准,循序渐进,逐步加大补贴资金的投入力度;补贴资金可以通过调整财政支出结构和财政支农支出结构及缩减政策性补贴支出等多渠道筹集。同时,还应完善农业保险补贴的配套措施,制定相关法律法规,健全国家的农业保险监管机构,保证财政补贴政策能够真正贯彻落实。
     第四,选择适合我国国情的农业保险模式。本研究通过总结国外农业保险经营模式的经验教训,并对我国现有的6种试点经营模式进行分析,提出现阶段适合我国国情的农业保险经营模式应当是政府主导下的农业保险政策性定位、多元化经营主体共存的农业保险模式。在这种模式下,政府、保险公司和农民三方都能够实现自身的目标,即政府实现社会收益最大化,保险公司实现企业利润最大化,农民实现收入最大化。
     鉴于国内针对农业保险需求的定量研究比较缺乏,针对补贴测算和补贴体系构建的系统研究较为少见,本研究在一定程度上丰富了农业保险需求和补贴的研究成果,尤其是对于我国农业保险补贴政策的制定有较为重要的参考价值。
China is one of the countries in the world suffering the severest agricultural natural disasters and it is very difficult for its farmers to cope with them.It is imperative that agricultural insurance which is the effective means of transferring risks should be made use of to cope with agricultural risks,stabilize agricultural production and guarantee farmers' income.Besides,agricultural insurance is one of the most important non-price policies supporting agriculture in WTO rules.Therefore,it has drawn more and more attention from academe and decision-making sectors.Four pieces of No.1 central document released consecutively from the year of 2004 to 2007,the "tenth-five year" planning and the document "State Council Guidance on Insurance Reform and Development" issued in June 2006 have all put forward requirement on the development of policy-oriented agricultural insurance.
     Since the first trial in 1934,China agricultural insurance has gone through a history of more than 70 years;however,its development is rather difficult all the time.Between the late 1980s and the early 1990s,agricultural insurance made great progress and reached its climax.But since then,it stagnated and began to shrink.Not until 2004 has a new round trial of agricultural insurance been carried out all through the country.However, though the decision-making sectors have attached great importance to the development of agricultural insurance,it hardly made any progress from 2004 to 2006 as a result of inadequate fiscal support.Consequently,national government finance increased financial support in 2007,arranging 1 billion yuan to promote the trial of subsidizing agricultural insurance premium in six provinces and municipalities.Agricultural insurance expanded rapidly that year with a total sum of premium reaching 5.18 billion yuan,504%higher than that in 2006.It is reported that in 2008 premium subsidy of policy-oriented agricultural insurance offered by national government finance will be more than 1 billion yuan covering the whole agricultural production process.
     Based on existing research and first-hand data from surveys and interviews,this dissertation focuses on exploring the demand for agricultural insurance and theories and practices of subsidization of policy-oriented agricultural insurance in China by making good use of theories and methods of microeconomics,mathematical economics and econometrics.
     The main content and conclusion of the research is as follows.
     Firstly,the dissertation analyzes factors affecting farmers' demand for agricultural insurance from the microeconomic perspective.With data obtained from surveys on 376 farm households in Hubei Province,first of all it makes a descriptive positive analysis on farmers' risk attitude and their means of spreading risks and ranking of agricultural insurance among all the varieties of rural insurance.It is found that factors like farmers' risk attitude,the traditional means of spreading risks and the minor ranking of agricultural insurance among varieties of rural insurance have negative impact on farmers' demand for agricultural insurance.
     Secondly,the dissertation figures out the amount of fiscal subsidization for agricultural insurance premium and farmers' corresponding payment in different schemes, together with the feasibility analysis of premium subsidization policy.According to the practice and developing trend of agricultural insurance,the mode of guaranteeing production cost selected,the author estimates the amount of fiscal subsidy and farmers' payment for insurance premium of eleven main crops that include rice,wheat,corn, soybean,cotton,peanuts,rapeseeds,jute and ambary hemp,sugar-cane,beet-roots and flue-cured tobacco,and three kinds of livestock and poultry including milk cow,pigs and poulards in different simulation scenarios.And the author makes analysis of fiscal capability to offer premium subsidy and farmers' ability to pay for premium.
     Among all the schemes,there are two typical ones.One is that the coverage level of the production cost of crops and livestock and poultry is 70%,fiscal subsidy is 60%and farmers' payment is 40%;the other is that the coverage level of the production cost of crops and livestock and poultry is 60%,fiscal subsidy is 40%and farmers' payment is 60%.If participating rate is 30%or 50%,then the total amount of fiscal premium subsidy is 6.286 billion yuan and 10.476 billion yuan respectively and correspondingly farmers' payment for premium is 7.573 billion yuan and4.544 billion yuan.On the above conditions and with a participating rate of agricultural insurance below 50%,the policy of subsidizing insurance premium is feasible if the subsidizing expenditure shared between central and local governments.When premium per farm household paid is about 50 yuan, more than 70%of the farmers are able to pay with a view to the average income gap and the different structure of income source.
     Thirdly,the dissertation establishes the subsidization system of agricultural insurance from multiple perspectives.Multiple peril crop insurance of main grain and economic crops,including rice,wheat,corn,soybean,cotton,peanuts,rapeseeds,jute and ambary hemp,sugar-cane,beet-roots and flue-cured tobacco,and death insurance of livestock and poultry,including milk cow,pigs and poulards,should be recognized as the subsidized varieties of agricultural insurance.The subsidy should be mainly offered for premium and partly for operation and management expenditures,tax preference and reinsurance. Attention should be attached to policy goals and efficiency need as subsidy for operation and management expenditures offered,the responsibility system should be established and relevant information of insurable interest should also be collected by insurance agencies and fiscal institutions at grass-roots level,in order to avoid a waste of subsidy fund.When subsidization standards determined,regional premium rates and farmers' ability to pay and the condition of local government finance of different regions should be taken into consideration,so as to figure out a reasonable planning of subsidization standards for each insurance variety and increase fiscal subsidy for agricultural insurance step by step. Subsidy fund can be raised by adjusting the structure of budgetary expenditure and that of budgetary expenditure for agriculture and cutting down expenditures of policy-oriented subsidy.In addition,it is necessary to complete supporting measures for agricultural insurance subsidization,enact relevant laws and regulations and set up national institutions supervising agricultural insurance,so that fiscal subsidizing policy will be fully implemented.
     Lastly,the dissertation establishes the management mode of China agricultural insurance which accords with its national basic conditions.On the basis of referring to foreign successful management experience of agricultural insurance and evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of current management modes of agricultural insurance trialed in China,the author proposes that at present the agricultural insurance mode should be the one predominated by the government with the participation of multiple main bodies. In such mode,the govemment,insurance companies and farmers can realize the goals they pursue,that is,the govemment achieves the maximization of social benefit,insurance companies realize the maximization of profit and farmers get the maximization of their income.
     In view of the fact that quantitative research on demand for agricultural insurance and systematic estimation of fiscal subsidy and research on the establishment of subsidization system are scarce in domestic research,this dissertation enriches the research on demand and subsidy of agricultural insurance to a certain extent,especially it is of great reference significance for establishing the subsidization policy of agricultural insurance.
引文
1 曼昆:《经济学原理》,机械工业出版社,2003年8月版,第189页。
    2 尼古拉·阿克塞拉.经济政策原理:价值与技术[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001年,第62页.
    1.蔡文远.农业灾害与农业保险的国际比较[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1992.
    2.曹前进.中国农业保险:市场缺位与市场创新[J].江西财经大学学报,2005(4):15-17.
    3.陈玲.论我国农业保险发展模式的选择[J].上海金融学院学报,2005(1):45-47.
    4.陈盛伟.中国农业保险制度建设研究.[博士学位论文].济南:山东农业大学图书馆,2006.
    5.陈锡文.中国政府支农资金使用与管理体制改革研究[M].太原:陕西经济出版社,2004.
    6.陈妍,凌远云,陈泽育等.农业保险购买意愿影响因素的实证研究[J].农业技术经济,2007(2):26-30.
    7.陈颖瑛,胡斌.浙江省农业保险发展模式的创新——建立政策性农业保险公司的构思[J].浙江金融,2007(11):46-47.
    8.程永涛,谢家智.我国农业保险发展经验模式研究[J].西南农业大学学报:社会科学版,2006,4(2):34-37.
    9.程永涛.我国农业保险经营模式研究.[硕士学位论文].重庆:西南大学图书馆,2007.
    10.楚汴英.我国农业保险现状与农业保险制度供给[J].河南财政税务高等专科学校学报,2006(12):27-29.
    11.邓国取.中国农业巨灾保险制度研究.[博士学位论文].杨凌:两北农林科技大学图书馆,2006.
    12.丁少群,庹国柱.国外农业保险发展模式及扶持政策[J].世界农业,1997(8):7-9.
    13.丁学东.西班牙农业保险政策及对我们的启示[J].农业经济问题,2005(8):75-79。
    14.杜彦坤.农业政策性保险体系的国际借鉴与构建设计[J].调研世界,2005(9):9-12,17.
    15.杜彦坤.农业政策性保险体系构建的基本思路与模式选择[J].农业经济问题,2006(1):50-53.
    16.费友海,海昌.政府主导下的政策性农业保险模式较为切合当前国情[J].经济研究参考,2005(39):33-34.
    17.费友海.我国农业保险发展困境的深层根源——基于福利经济学角度的分析[J].金融研究,2005(3):133-144.
    18.冯文丽,林宝清.美日两国农业保险模式的比较及我国的选择[J].中国金融,2002(12):46-48.
    19.冯文丽,林宝清.我国农业保险短缺的经济分析[J].福建论坛经济社会版,2003(6):17-80.
    20.冯文丽.我国农业保险市场失灵与制度供给[J].金融研究,2004(4):124-129.
    21.冯文丽.中国农业保险制度变迁研究.[博士学位论文].厦门:厦门大学图书馆,2006.
    22.高庆华等编著,中国自然灾害风险与区域安全分析[M].北京:气象出版社,2005.
    23.顾海英,张跃华.政策性农业保险的商业化运作——以上海农业保险为例[J].中国农村经济,2005(6):53-60.
    24.郭晓航,姜云亭.农业保险[M].北京:中国金融出版社,1987.
    25.郭晓航.从分配关系看我国保险经营方式的改革[J].保险研究,1984年增刊(第五期):95-100.
    26.郭晓航.关于我国农业保险实施决策的选择[J].保险研究,1984(4):35-38.
    27.郭晓航.建立农村保险基金是保障农业发展战略重点的有效措施[J].保险研究,1983(4):15-18.
    28.郭晓航.论农业政策性保险.中国保险学会学术讨论会,1986,北京.
    29.郭晓航.农业保险[M].哈尔滨:尔北财经大学出版社,1993.
    30.郭延安.我国保险发展的现状、困境与对策[J].农业经济,2007(8):77-78.
    31.郭永利.关于发展我国农村保险事业的意见《农业保险:理论、经验与问题》[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995.
    32.郭永利.关于农业保险公司体制架构的研究[J].中国保险,1996(5):18-19.
    33.郭永利.关于农业保险现状与体制改革方案的思考[J].中国软科学,1996(6):44-47.
    34.宏涛,张梅.农业保险经营模式的经济学分析[J].农村经济,2004(10):71-72.
    35.候玉生.农险概念的区分与应用[J].保险研究,1991(6):23-24.
    36.胡亦琴.论农业保险制度的基本框架与路径选择[J].农业经济问题,2003(10):40-43.
    37.黄公安.论把农业保险纳入农村社会保障体系[J].市场与人口分析,1999(1):44-48.
    38.黄如金.农业保险与农村发展.[博士学位论文].北京:中国社会科学院图书馆,1997.
    39.黄英君.论建立健全我国的农业保险制度——国外农业保险模式的借鉴[J].重庆社会科学,2005(12):15-19.
    40.姜长军.最优宏观农业风险管理理论及应用研究.[博士学位论文].北京:中国人民大学呼书馆,1997.
    41.姜鲁宁,田风.目前我国农业保险的六种经营模式[J].经济研究参考,2007(24):13-14.
    42.蒋中一.数理经济学的基本方法[M].北京:商务出版社,1999.
    43.卡尔·H·博尔奇.保险经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
    44.兰水清,裘红霞.国外农业保险模式比较及借鉴[J].财经界,2007(2):184-185.
    45.黎已铭.我国农业保险发展问题研究.[博士学位论文].重庆:西南大学图书馆,2006.
    46.李秉龙.将农业保险纳入国家农业政策保护体系[J].中国农村经济,1994(4):51-52.
    47.李超民.作物保险的政府支持与市场化运作:印度经验与中国[J].中国农村经济,2005(6):68-7.
    48.李红霞.我国政策性农业保险制度的供给模式选择[J].农村经济,2005(6):90-91.
    49.李军,皮立波.20世纪50年代农业保险回眸[N].中国保险报,2003年7月11日.
    50.李军.农业保险的性质、立法原则及发展思路[J].中国农村经济,1996(1):55-59.
    51.李艳,张涤新.我国农业保险的社会福利与效率的平衡:政府参与型模式研究[J].生产力研究,2006(12):54-56.
    52.梁敏.论相互制保险制度在农业保险中的适用性[J].农场经济管理,2007(2):10-12.
    53.刘长标.农作物区域产量保险的精算研究.[博士学位论文].北京:中国人民大学图书馆,2000.
    54.刘从军,马丽华,宋雅楠.日本农业保险模式及其在中国的实现条件[J].日本问题研究,2006(1):33-36.
    55.刘京生,中国农村保险制度论纲[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000:123-124.
    56.刘宽.我国农业保险现状、问题及对策[J].中国农村经济,1999(10):10-11.
    57.刘仁伍,新农村建设中的金融问题[M].中国金融出版社,2006(11):208-236.
    58.刘荣茂,李岳云,刘妍.建立中国政策性农业保险的对策研究[J].南京农业大学学报:社会科学版,2004,4(3):44-48.
    59.刘荣茂,刘妍.中国农业保险发展的模式选择[J].农村经济,2005(1):76-78.
    60.刘蓉.我国农业保险现状的统计分析[J].统计研究,2004(11):37-40.
    61.刘书祥,王克祥.国外农业保险模式、经验与启示[J].金融会计,2007(3):62-66.
    62.刘燕.中美农业保险发展之比较[J].江苏农村经济,2005(3):54-55.
    63.龙春霞,姜俊臣等.论农业保险体系中存在的问题及对策[J].河北农业大学学报(农林教育版),2003(3):47-49.
    64.龙文军,张显峰.农业保险主体行为的博弈分析[J].中国农村经济,2003(5):76-79.
    65.龙文军.法国农业保险制度及经验[J].世界农业,2003(5):35-37.
    66.龙文军.准来拯救农业保险:农业保险主题行为的博弈分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社出版,2004.
    67.楼永.社会主义市场经济条件下的农业保险[J].复旦大学学报,1998(5):51-55.
    68.栾存存.巨灾风险的保险研究与应对策略综述[J].经济学动态,2003(8):80-83.
    69.栾存存.我国保险业增长分析[J].经济研究,2004(1):25-32.
    70.宁满秀,苗齐,邢郦等.农户对农业保险支付意愿的实证分析——以新疆玛纳斯河流域为例[J].中国农村经济,2006(2):43-51.
    71.宁满秀,邢郦,钟甫宁.影响农户购买农业保险决策因素的实证分析——以新疆玛纳斯河流域为例[J].农业经济问题,2005(6):38-44.
    72.宁满秀.农业保险与农户生产行为关系研究.[博士学位论文].南京:南京农业大学图书馆,2006.
    73.宁满秀.农业保险制度的环境经济效应——一个基于农户生产行为的分析框架[J].农业技术经济,2007(3):28-32.
    74.帕·克·雷著,王友译.农业保险——适用于发展中国家的理论、实际和应用[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,1989.
    75.皮立波,李军.我国农村经济发展新阶段的保险需求与商业性供给分析[J].中国农村经济,2003(5):6-9.
    76.平新乔.微观经济十八讲[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
    77.钱建娣.我国农业保险面临的突出矛盾及解决途径[J].江淮论坛,2005(6):15-18.
    78.任素梅.农业保险概论[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995.
    79.沈健蓉.我国农业保险的政府补贴政策分析.[硕士学位论文].天津:南开大学图书馆,2005.
    80.石秀和.建立我国农业风险保障体系的思考[J].中国农村经济,1996(7):67-69.
    81.史建民,孟昭智.我国农业保险现状、问题及对策研究[J].农业经济问题,2003(9):45-49.
    82.史锦华.我国农业保险的发展现状及条件分析[J].经济论坛,2007(17),123-125.
    83.史清华,顾海英,张跃华.农民家庭风险保障从传统模式剑商业保险[J].管理世界,2003(11):101-108.
    84.孙蓉,朱梁.世界各国农业保险发展模式的比较及启示[J].财经科学,2004(5):108-111.
    85.田甜.我国财政补贴农业保险问题研究.[硕士学位论文].南京:南京农业大学图书馆,2006.
    86.庹国柱,丁少群.论农作物保险区划及其理论根据[J].当代经济科学,1994(3):64-69.
    87.庹国梓,丁少群.农作物保险风险分区和费率分区问题的探讨[J].中国农村经济,1994(8):43-47.
    88.庹国梓,李军,王国军.外国农业保险立法的比较与借鉴[J].中国农村经济,2001(1):74-80
    89.庹国柱,李军.农业保险[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004:61-124.
    90.庹国柱,王国军.中国农业保险与农村社会保障制度研究[M].北京:首都经济贸易出版社,2002年12月.
    91.庹国柱,杨翠迎,丁少群.农民的风险谁来担?——陕西、福建六县农村保险市场的调查[J].中国保险,2001(3):34-36.
    92.庹国梓,朱俊生.关于农业保险立法几个重要问题的探讨[J].中国农村经济,2007(2):55-63.
    93.庹国柱.农业保险体制改革模式选择[J].中国农村经济,1997(6):60-63.
    94.王和,皮立波.论发展我国政策性农业保险的策略[J].保险研究,2004(2):6-8.
    95.王静爱等著.中国自然灾害时空格局[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
    96.王克,张峭.美国、加拿大农业保险的经验和启示[J].农业展望,2007(10):25-27.
    97.王敏俊.我国农业保险的政策性分析与路径选择:一个新构想[J].农业经济问题,2007(7):64-68.
    98.王鹏.地方政策性农业保险公司经营模式探讨[J].中国保险,2006(7):42-44.
    99.王新亮,汪延法.美国农业保险的历程及启示[J].农村经济,2004(11):95-97.
    100.王亦明,冯利民,邓兰兰等.论政策性合作保险是我国农业保险的最佳模式[J].经济论坛,2007(2):118-120.
    101.韦盛信.若干国家农业保险模式比较及启示[J].农业经济问题,1992(6):60-62.
    102.文秋良,姜大峪.西班牙农业保险体系及经验简介[J].农村财政与财务,2007(10):47-48.
    103.吴扬.中国农业保险区域实践的比较分析[J].上海经济研究,2005(11):38-45.
    104.谢家智,蒲林昌.政府诱导型农业保险发展模式研究[J].保险研究,2003(11):42-44.
    105.谢家智.农业保险区域化发展问题研究[J].农业现代化研究,2004,25(1):31-34.
    106.谢汪送,郑美华.相互制保险:我国农业保险模式的理性选择[J].经济理论与经济管理,2007(3):57-60.
    107.邢鹂,黄昆.政策性农业保险保费补贴对政府财政支出和农民收入的模拟分析[J].农业技术经济,2007(3):4-9.
    108.邢鹂,于丹,刘丽娜.农业保险产品的现状和创新[J].农业展望,2007(6):28-30.
    109.邢鹂,钟甫宁.我国现行农业保险的调查分析——以新疆兵团棉花保险为例[J].农业展望,2007(3):3-5.
    110.邢鹂,钟甫宁.中国粮食作物风险区划分析[J].农业技术经济,2006(1):19-23.
    111.邢鹂.中国种植业生产风险与政策性农业保险研究.[博士学位论文].南京:南京农业大学图书馆,2004.
    112.徐斌.我国农业保险发展面临的困境及模式选择[J].湖北经济学院学报:人文社会科学版,2007,4(10):58-59,74.
    113.许兵,王赛花.影响我国保险业发展的城乡经济因素对比分析[J].统计与决策,2005(1)(下):92-94.
    114.许传永.浅析中国农业保险的发展模式及其发展思路[J].农村经济与科技,2005,16(6):25-26.
    115.许棒红,陈珂.农业保险发展模式研究[J].农业经济,2003(2):34-35.
    116.杨萍.对我国农业保险模式选择的思考[J].中国农垦,2006(11):46-47.
    117.杨同亮,门和平.农村保险体制研究[J].金融理论与实践,1994(7):47-49.
    118.杨智.论我国实施农业保险问题[J].中农月报,1941年3月2卷3期.
    119.姚海明,赵锦城.合作保险:我国农业保险模式的理性选择[J].农业经济问题,2004(9):67-70.
    120.尹成远,周稳海.日本农业保险的经验对我们的启示[J].中国乡镇会计,2006(5):35-36.
    121.袁海英,我国农业保险现状、问题及对策思考.[硕士学位论文].北京:对外经济贸易大学图书馆,2006.
    122.曾玉珍.国外农业保险成功经验对构建中国农业保险模式的启示[J].世界农业,2006(1):7-9.
    123.张波等主编,中国农业自然灾害史料集[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1994.
    124.张传洲.关于我国农业保险体系目标模式的选择[J].金融与经济,2005(5):53-54.
    125.张俊飚,易法海.论农业保险与农业持续发展[J].金融与经济,1996(5):48-50.
    126.张权辉.中外农业保险经营模式分析[J].当代经济,2006(8):96-97.
    127.张晓云.外国政府农业保险补贴的方式及其经验教训[J].财政研究,2004(9):63-65.
    128.张艳花.政策性农业保险发展:实践及启示[J].中国金融,2007(15):76-82.
    129.张跃华,顾海英,史清华.农业保险需求不足效用层面的一个解释及实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005(3):53-60.
    130.张跃华,顾海英.上海农业保险状况分析与对策探讨[J].上海农村经济,2003(11):19-21.
    131.张跃华,顾海英.准公共产品、外部性与农业保险的性质[J].中国软科学,2004(9):10-15.
    132.张跃华,何文炯,施红.市场失灵、政策性农业保险与本土化模式——基于浙江、上海、苏州农业保险试点的比较研究[J].农业经济问题,2007(6):49-55.
    133.张跃华,史清华,顾海英.农业保险需求问题的一个理论研究及实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007(4):65-75,102.
    134.张跃华.农业保险团体保险(区域保险)与中国农业保险发展[J].中国金融,2005(6):57-58.
    135.张跃华.上海、新疆、河南农业保险制度的分析与比较[J].中国金融,2004(24):54-55.
    136.张跃华.需求、福利与制度选择——中国农业保险的理论与实证研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2007.
    137.张忠明,栾立明.中国农业保险发展的困扰因素分析[J].重庆大学学报:社会科学版,2007,13(2):26-31.
    138.张忠明.市场经济条件下完善我国农业保险体系的研究.[硕士学位论文].长春:吉林大学图书馆,2005.
    139.张祖荣.国外农业保险制度模式的比较与借鉴[J].南方金融,2007(4):51-53.
    140.张祖荣.建立有中国特色的农业保险制度模式[J].农村经济,2007(10):67-69.
    141.中国保险史编审委员会.《中国保险史》[M].北京:中国金融出版社,1998.
    142.中国赴美农业保险考察团.美国农业保险考察报告[J].中国农村经济,2002(1):68-77.
    143.周蓉晖,朱建湘,倪明胜.国外农业保险模式比较与本土借鉴[J].时代经贸,2007(12):89-90.
    144.朱忠贵.论我国农业保险的模式选择[J].农业经济,1999(5):31-32.
    145.宗国富,金兆怀.发展政策性农业保险的思考——以吉林省为例[J].经济纵横,2007(6):58-60.
    146.Ahsan S.M.,Ali A.and Kuriank..Toward a theory of Agricultural insurance[J].Amer.J.Agr.Econ.64(1982):520-529.
    147. Antle, J. M. Econometric estimation of Producers' risk attitudes [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 69(1987):509-522.
    148. Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P. R., Learner E. E., Radner R., and H. Schuman. Report from the NOAA panel on Contingent Valuation, Federal Register, 1993,Vol. 58, No. 10:4601-4614.
    149. Arrow, K.. The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk bearing [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1964,31:91-96.
    150. Atwood, J.A., A. E. Baquet, and M. J. Watts. Rating procedures for IP expansion to fall seeded wheat. Unpub. Staff paper, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Montana State University, Bozeman, September 1996.
    151. Azam, J. P. The impact of floods on the adoption rate of high-yielding rice varieties in Bangledesh [J]. Agricultural Economics, 1996,13: 179-189.
    152. Babcock, B. and Hennessy. Input Demand under Yield and Revenue Insurance [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 78(1996):416-427.
    153.Barnett, B., J. Skees, and J. D. Hourigan. Explaining Participation in Federal Crop Insurance .Department of Agricultural Economics, Staff Paper 275 . University of Kentucky, August 1990.
    154. Bingfan Ke, and H. Holly Wang. An Assessment of Risk Management Strategies for Grain Growers in the Pacific Northwest[J]. Agricultural Finance Review, 2002, 62:117-133
    155. Bishop, R. C. and T. A. Heberlein . Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 61(1979):926-930.
    156. Boyle, K. J. and R. C. Bishop. Welfare Measurement Using Contingent Valuation: A Comparison of Techniques [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998,70: 20-28.
    157. Bruce A. Babcock, and David A. Hennessy. Input Demand under Yield and Revenue Insurance [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ.m 78 (May 1996): 416-427.
    158. Buccola, S. Testing for Non-Normality in Farm Net Returns [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1986, 68: 334-343.
    159. Chad E. Hart and Bruce A. Babcock. Rankings of Risk Management Strategies Combining Crop Insurance Producers and Marketing Positions. Working Paper 01-WP267, February 2001.
    160. Chambers, R. G. Insurability and Moral Hazard in Agricultural Insurance Market [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1989, 71: 604-616.
    161. Chambers, R. G., and Quiggin, J. Decomposing Input Adjustments under Price and Production Uncertainty [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001, Vol. 83, No. 1: 20-34.
    162. Chavas, J. P. and M. T. Holt. Acreage Decisions under Risk: The Case of Corn and Soybeans [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 1990. 72(3): 529-538.
    163. Coble, H. K. et al. Modeling Farmer-Lever Crop Insurance Demand with Panel Data [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 1996, 78: 439-447.
    164. D.L. Hueth and W. H. Furtan. Economics of Agricultural Crop Insurance: Theory and Evidence [M]. Kluwer Academic publishers, 1994.
    165. Gardner, B. L. and R. A. Kramer. Experience with Crop Insurance Program in the United States. Crop Insurance for Agricultural Development: Issues and Experience [M]. P. Hazell, C. Pomareda, and A. Valdes, eds. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Uuniversity Press, 1986.
    166. Glauber J.W. and Collins r, K. J., Risk Management and the Role of the Federal Government, USDA, 2001, Washington, D.C.
    167. Glauber J.W. Crop Insurance Reconsidered [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 86(2004): 1179-1195.
    168. Goodwin, B. K. An Empirical Analysis of the Demand for Multiple Peril Crop Insurance [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 1993,75: 425-434.
    169. Goodwin, B. K. Premium Rate Determination in the Federal Crop Insurance Program: What Do Averages Have to Say About Risk? [J]. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1994, 19(2): 382-395
    170. Goodwin, B. K., Matthew C. Roberts, and Keith H. Coble. Measurement of Price Rrisk in Revenue Insurance: Implications of Distributional Assumptions [J]. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2000,25(1): 195-214.
    171. Goodwin, B. K., Monte L. Vanderveer, and Joun L. Deal. An Empirical Analysis of Acreage Effects of Participation in the Federal Crop Insurance Program [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. Feb. 86(4) (Nov., 2004): 1058-1077.
    172. Goodwin, B. K., Monte Vandeveer, and John Deal. The Federal Crop [insurance Programs: An Empirical Analysis of Regional Differences in Acreage Response and Participation. Selected at the American Agricultural Economics Association's Annual Meeting, Chicago, 2001.
    173. Goodwin, B. K., V. H. Smith and C. Hammond. An Empirical Analysis of Acreage Distortions and Participation in the Federal Crop Insurance Program. Presented at the Workshop on Crop Insurance, Land Use, and the Environment, Economic Research Service, Washington, D. C, September 20-21,2000.
    174. Horowitz J. and E. Lichtenberg. Risk-Reducing and Risk-Increasing Effects of Pesticides [J]. J. of Agri. Econ, 1994,45(1): 82-89.
    175. Horowitz, J. K., and E. Lichtenberg. Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Chemical Use in Agriculture [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 1993, 75: 926-935.
    176. Islam Zahirual. A Model of Agricultural Insurance in Evaluating Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection. Unpublished Dissertation, the University of Guelph, 1996.
    177. Just, R. and N. Bockstael, eds. Agricultural and Resource Policy in Agricultural Systems. New York: Spring Publishers, 1990.
    178. Just, R.E., L. Calvin, and J. Quiggin. Adverse Selection in Crop Insurance Actuarial and Asymmetric Information Incentives [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 81(1999):834-849.
    179. Keeton, K., J. Skees, and J. Long. The Potential Influence of Risk Management Programs on Cropping Decisions [J]. Selected Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Amer. Agri. Econ. Assn, August 8-11, Nahville, TN, 1999.
    180. Knight, T. O., and K. H. Coble. Survey of U.S. Multiple Peril Crop Insurance Since 1980 [J]. Review of Agricultural Economics, 1997, 19(1): 128-156.
    181. Kramer, R. A. and D. E. Mercer. Valuing a Global Environmental Good [J]. Economic, 1998, Vol. 73, No. 2: 196-210.
    182. Leathers, H. D. and J. C. Quggin. Interactions between Agricultural and Resource Policy: the Importance of Attitudes toward Risk [J]. Amer. J.Agr. Econ., 1991,73(3): 757-764
    183. Lichtenberg, E. and D. Ziberman. The Econometrics of Damage Control: Why Specification Matters [J]. Amer. J.Agr. Econ., 1986,68: 261-273
    184. Loehman, E. and C. Nelson. Optimal Risk Management, Risk Aversion, and Production Function Properties [J]. J. of Agr and Res. Econ, 1992, 2(17): 219-231
    185. Makki S. Crop insurance in the United States: basic issues, performance, and lessons for developing countries. Presentation at the Inter-American Development Bank on June 5, in Washington,D.C, 2002
    186. Michael Rothschild, Joseph Stiglitz. Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.(90), Issue 4 (Nov., 1976):629-649.
    187. Miranda, M.J., and J.W. Glauber. Systemic Risk, Reinsurance, and the Failure of Crop Insurance Markets [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997,79: 206-215
    188. Mishra P K. Agriculture risk, insurance and income: a study of the impact and design of India's comprehensive crop insurance scheme. Aldershot: Avebury, 1996.
    189. Mishra, A. K., R.W. Nimon, and H.S. El-Osta. Is Moral Hazard Good for The Environmet? Revenue Insurance and Chemical Input Use [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005, 74: 11-20
    190. Nelson, C. and Loehman, E. Further toward a theory of agricultural insurance [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1987, 69(3): 523-531
    191. Peter Hazell, Carlos Pomareda, Alberto Valdes. Crop Insurance Agriculture Development [M]. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.
    192. Quiggin, J., G. K. Aragiannis and J Stanton. Crop Insurance and Crop Production: An Empirical Study of Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection [J]. Austr. J. Agr. Econ. 37,2 (August 1993): 95-113.
    193. Quiggin, J.. Some Observation on Insurance, Bankruptcy and Input Demand [J]. J. of Econ. Behavior and Organization, 1992, 18: 101-110.
    194. Ramaswami, B. Supply Response to Agricultural Insurance: Risk Reduction and Moral Hazard Effects [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 1993, 75: 914-925.
    195. Robert G. Chambers. Insurability and Moral Hazard in Agricultural Insurance Markets [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 1989, August: 604-616.
    196. Roderick M. Rejesus, Ketth H. Coble, Thomas O. Knight, and Yufei Jin. Developing Experience-Based Premium Rate Discounts in Crop Insurance [J]. Amer. J. Agri. Eco, 2006,88(2):409-419
    197. Saleem Shaik, Keith H. Coble, and Thomas O. Knight. Revenue Crop Insurance Demand. Selected paper presented at AAEA Annual Meetings, Providence, Rhode Island, July 24-27, 2005.
    198. Sherriek, B.J., et.al. Factors Influencing Farmers' Crop Insurance Decisions [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. Feb. 86(2004): 103-114.
    199. Siamwalla A and Valdes A. Should Crop Insurance Be Subsidized. Crop Insurance for Agricultural Development (1986). Edited by Hazell, Peter; Pomareda, Carlos and Valdes, Alberto. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1986.
    200. Skees J, Hazell P, Miranda M. New approach to crop yield insurance in developing countries. International Food Policy Research Institute, EPTD Discussion Paper No.55,1999.
    201. Skees, Jerry. "Drawing from Lessons Learned on Index Insurance to Consider Financing Famine Relief Efforts." Presentation at the Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC. February, 2003.
    202. Smith Vincent and Barry Goodwin. Crop Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Agricultural Chemical Use [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 1996, 78: 428-438.
    203. Smith, H. V, and A. E. Baquet. The Demand for Multiple Peril Crop Insurance: Evidence from Montana Wheat Farms [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 1996, 78: 189-201.
    204. Stephen E. Miller, Kandice H. Kahl, and P. James Rathwell. Evaluation of Crop Insurance Premium Rates for Georgia and South Carolina Peaches [J]. Journal of Agribusiness, 2000, 18, (3): 303-317.
    205. Teresa Serra, Barry K. Goodwin, and Allen M. Featherstone. Modeling Changes in the U.S. Demand for Crop Insurance during the 1990s. Paper prepared for presentation at the AAEA annual meeting, Montreal, Canada, July 27-30,2003.
    206. Wang, H. H. Zone-Based Group Risk Insurance [J]. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2000,25:411-431.
    207. Wang, H. H., and H. Zhang. On the Possibility of Private Crop Insurance Market: A Spatial Statistics Approach [J]. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2003,70: 113-126.
    208. Wang, H. H., S. D. Hanson, R. J. Myers, and J. R. Black. The Effects of Crop Yield Insurance Designs on Farmer Participation and Welfare [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998,80:806-820.
    209. Wright B D and Hewitt J A. All-risk crop insurance: Lessons from theory and experience. In: Economics of Agricultural Crop Insurance: Theory and Evidence. edited by D. L. Hueth and W. H. Furtan. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
    210. Wright, B. D. and J. D. Hewitt. All Risk Crop Insurance: Lessons From Theory and Experience.Giannini Foundation, California Agricultural Experiment Station, Berkeley, April 1990.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700