创新、企业生产率与国际市场进入模式选择
|
摘要
经济全球化和贸易自由化的不断深入促进了生产要素的全球优化配置和价值链条的世界战略布局,潜移默化地改变着当今世界的政治经济版图。越来越多的企业为了规避贸易壁垒、获取战略资源、吸收共性技术、优化产品结构、扩大经营收益、重塑市场格局等,纷纷走出国门,走向世界市场,开展国际化经营,在符合当今世界政治多极化和经济全球化发展趋势的同时,促进了企业品牌化、资本化和高端化,增强了国家竞争力、影响力和吸引力,成为当代中国企业国际化舞台上一道靓丽的风景线。
国际市场进入模式的研究始于国际投资理论,经过不断的发展、丰富而日臻完善。尤其是聚焦于异质性企业的新新贸易理论的提出,为这项研究开辟了更为广阔的发展领域和创新空间。新新贸易理论认为,只有生产率高的企业才能进入国际市场和进行国际化经营,生产率较低的企业仅能服务国内市场,生产率最低的企业不得不退出市场。长期以来,我国企业自主创新能力较低,企业生产率整体水平不高,国际化发展经验尚浅,缺乏清晰的国际化战略。选择适宜的国际市场进入模式是企业能否成功走向国际市场,进行国际化经营的关键。
本文在企业异质性视角下,将创新、企业生产率与国际市场进入模式选择三者联系起来,系统研究了三者之间相互影响的内在机理,并用企业微观数据进行检验。具体来说,本文从文献综述入手,回顾和评述了企业国际化理论和新新贸易理论的国内外研究进展,并将创新、企业生产率和国际市场进入模式选择问题作为本文的研究重点(第二章)。首先,本文进行了企业异质性理论分析,探讨企业异质性的内涵和在国际贸易中的普适性,较为详细地介绍了HMY框架下异质性企业国际市场进入模式选择,将创新因素纳入其中(第三章)。接着,本文在企业异质性视角下分别探讨了创新、企业生产率与国际市场进入模式之间的互动关系,充分考虑企业国际化的实际情况,例如间接出口、创新异质(不同创新程度和不同创新类型)、联合经营、出口平台型FDI等情况(第四章、第五章)。其次,本文以出口模式为例,利用企业微观数据对前文得到的结论进行了实证分析(第六章)。最后,本文将每章的结论进行归纳概括总结得到了全文结论(第七章)。
本文的主要结论是,企业进入国际市场必须选择与生产率相适宜的模式。在异质性视角下,创新、企业生产率与国际市场进入模式之间存在良性互动关系。考虑运输成本为零和创新绩效异质的情况,创新在企业选择出口模式进入国际市场过程中发挥着重要作用。考虑联合经营和出口平台型FDI的情况,创新依然显著影响企业选择投资模式进入国际市场。当企业生产率保持不变或者保持固定增长率时,企业选择出口模式或者投资模式进入国际市场；当企业生产率保持随机波动时,出口模式不再是最优模式,企业最终将选择投资模式进入国际市场。创新能够提高企业生产率水平,缩短与生产率阀值之间的差距,减少进入国际市场之前的等待时间,促进企业选择适宜的模式进入国际市场,获得较高的国际化投资收益。
企业选择国际市场进入模式主要依据是企业生产率相对水平。对于企业来说,企业应不断进行创新,努力提高创新绩效,提升企业国际化经营水平。对于政府来说,政府应从全球视野谋划,构建以企业为主体,以市场为导向,产学研相结合的技术创新体系,更加注重企业协同创新能力,努力提高企业创新绩效。应当降低政府补贴,不断降低企业成本,逐步扩大企业规模,提高企业生产率。降低政府对企业的补贴,建立政府补贴动态监测机制和创新激励平台,通过税收优惠、反馈交互、评估累计等形式,提高企业进行技术创新的积极性。加强国内基础设施建设,全面清理好规范各种交通运输行政事业性收费,降低出口企业的市场进入成本、出口固定成本和出口运输成本。加强国际贸易合作与交流,简化和协调国内外各种贸易程序。通过消除信息盲点、堵塞信息漏洞、加强信息反馈等举措促进三者良性互动。
The pervasiveness of economic globalization and trade liberalization promotes the world optimal allocation of production factors and the world strategy layout of the value chain, subtly changing political and economic landscape in the world. In order to circumvent the trade barriers, obtain strategic resources, acquire generic technology, optimize product structure, expand operating earnings, reshape market pattern, etc., more and more companies have to go abroad, and go towards the world market, and carry out international operation, which is in accord with the trend of political multi-polarization and economic globalization in the world today, meanwhile, and promote enterprise branding, capitalization and high-end and enhance national competitiveness, influence and attractions, becoming a beautiful scenery line on the contemporary Chinese enterprises internationalization stage.
International market entry mode research, beginning with international investment theories, becomes more and more perfect by continual development and enrichment. Especially new new trade theory, focusing on the enterprise heterogeneity, comes into being to open up a broader space for development field and innovation area for the study. New new trade theory suggests that the enterprises with only high productivity can enter the international market and carry out international operation, and the enterprise with lower productivity can only serve the domestic market, enterprises with the lowest productivity have to exit the domestic market. For a long time, in China enterprise independent innovation ability is low, and the overall level of labor productivity is not high, and the internationalization development experience is superficial, and all lack of a clear internationalization strategy. Choosing an appropriate international market entry mode is a key of whether enterprise success towards the international market and carry out international operation.
From the perspective of firm heterogeneity, the article links the innovation, enterprise productivity and international market entry mode choice, systematically studies the inner mechanism between these three interactions and carries out tests with the enterprise micro data. Started by the literature review, This article reviews and comments research progress both at home and abroad of the enterprise internationalization theory and new new trade theory, and lays stress on the relationships of the innovation, firm productivity and international market entry mode selection (chapter2).
First of all, the paper analyze the enterprise heterogeneity theory, and discuss the connotation of enterprise heterogeneity and universality in international trade, and describe heterogeneous enterprise international market entry mode choice in detail under the HMY framework, so firm can choose contract mode in addition to export model and FDI mode, and dynamic factors should be considered, and innovation factors will include (chapter3).Second, from the perspective of the enterprise heterogeneity we respectively discusses the interactive relationship of innovation, firm productivity and firm international market entry mode, fully considering the actual situation of enterprise internationalization, such as indirect export, innovation heterogeneity (different innovation degree and different innovation type), joint venture, export platform FDI, and so on (chapter4, chapter5). Then, taking export model for example, we use the conclusions obtained from the enterprise microscopic data above to make empirical analysis (chapter6). Finally, we come to the conclusion from each chapter (chapter7).
In this paper, the main conclusion is that the enterprises must choose the model which is in accordance with the productivity when entering international market. From the perspective of heterogeneity, there are interactive relationships between innovation, enterprise productivity and international market entry mode. Considering transport cost is zero and the innovation performance heterogeneity, innovation plays an important role in the process of selecting the export model to enter international market. Considering the joint operation and export platform FDI mode, innovation has still significantly impact for enterprises to choose investment mode to enter the international market. When the enterprise productivity remained unchanged or maintaining a constant growth rate, companies choose the export model or investment mode to enter the international market; when productivity keeps random fluctuations, the export model is no longer the optimal mode, and firm will eventually choose investment mode to enter the international market. Innovation can improve the level of enterprise productivity, shorten the gap of productivity, reduce the waiting time before entering the international market, promote the enterprises to choose the suitable model to enter the international market, and to receive the internationalization of higher investment returns.
The main reason for enterprises choosing the international market entry mode is the productivity relative level. For enterprises, enterprises should continuously innovate, and strive to improve innovation performance, and improve enterprise international operation level. From a global perspective, the government should improve the enterprise innovation performance, and try to build technology innovation system, enterprise as the main body, market oriented, industry-university-research combination and pay more attention to enterprise synergy innovation ability, and reduce the government subsidies, and continuously reduce the enterprise cost, and gradually expand enterprise scale, and improve enterprise productivity level and reduce government subsidies for the enterprise, and establish government subsidies dynamic monitoring incentive mechanism and innovation stimulation platform, and by tax incentives, feedback and cumulative evaluation improve the enthusiasm of enterprises to carry out technical innovation, and strengthen domestic infrastructure construction, and comprehensively clean up all kinds of administrative fees, and reduce transportation market entry costs, export fixed cost and export transportation cost, and strengthen international trade cooperation and communication, and simplify and coordinate all kinds of trade program at home and abroad, and promote the benign interaction by eliminating blind spots, and plugging up loopholes in information, and strengthening information feedback information measures.
国际市场进入模式的研究始于国际投资理论,经过不断的发展、丰富而日臻完善。尤其是聚焦于异质性企业的新新贸易理论的提出,为这项研究开辟了更为广阔的发展领域和创新空间。新新贸易理论认为,只有生产率高的企业才能进入国际市场和进行国际化经营,生产率较低的企业仅能服务国内市场,生产率最低的企业不得不退出市场。长期以来,我国企业自主创新能力较低,企业生产率整体水平不高,国际化发展经验尚浅,缺乏清晰的国际化战略。选择适宜的国际市场进入模式是企业能否成功走向国际市场,进行国际化经营的关键。
本文在企业异质性视角下,将创新、企业生产率与国际市场进入模式选择三者联系起来,系统研究了三者之间相互影响的内在机理,并用企业微观数据进行检验。具体来说,本文从文献综述入手,回顾和评述了企业国际化理论和新新贸易理论的国内外研究进展,并将创新、企业生产率和国际市场进入模式选择问题作为本文的研究重点(第二章)。首先,本文进行了企业异质性理论分析,探讨企业异质性的内涵和在国际贸易中的普适性,较为详细地介绍了HMY框架下异质性企业国际市场进入模式选择,将创新因素纳入其中(第三章)。接着,本文在企业异质性视角下分别探讨了创新、企业生产率与国际市场进入模式之间的互动关系,充分考虑企业国际化的实际情况,例如间接出口、创新异质(不同创新程度和不同创新类型)、联合经营、出口平台型FDI等情况(第四章、第五章)。其次,本文以出口模式为例,利用企业微观数据对前文得到的结论进行了实证分析(第六章)。最后,本文将每章的结论进行归纳概括总结得到了全文结论(第七章)。
本文的主要结论是,企业进入国际市场必须选择与生产率相适宜的模式。在异质性视角下,创新、企业生产率与国际市场进入模式之间存在良性互动关系。考虑运输成本为零和创新绩效异质的情况,创新在企业选择出口模式进入国际市场过程中发挥着重要作用。考虑联合经营和出口平台型FDI的情况,创新依然显著影响企业选择投资模式进入国际市场。当企业生产率保持不变或者保持固定增长率时,企业选择出口模式或者投资模式进入国际市场；当企业生产率保持随机波动时,出口模式不再是最优模式,企业最终将选择投资模式进入国际市场。创新能够提高企业生产率水平,缩短与生产率阀值之间的差距,减少进入国际市场之前的等待时间,促进企业选择适宜的模式进入国际市场,获得较高的国际化投资收益。
企业选择国际市场进入模式主要依据是企业生产率相对水平。对于企业来说,企业应不断进行创新,努力提高创新绩效,提升企业国际化经营水平。对于政府来说,政府应从全球视野谋划,构建以企业为主体,以市场为导向,产学研相结合的技术创新体系,更加注重企业协同创新能力,努力提高企业创新绩效。应当降低政府补贴,不断降低企业成本,逐步扩大企业规模,提高企业生产率。降低政府对企业的补贴,建立政府补贴动态监测机制和创新激励平台,通过税收优惠、反馈交互、评估累计等形式,提高企业进行技术创新的积极性。加强国内基础设施建设,全面清理好规范各种交通运输行政事业性收费,降低出口企业的市场进入成本、出口固定成本和出口运输成本。加强国际贸易合作与交流,简化和协调国内外各种贸易程序。通过消除信息盲点、堵塞信息漏洞、加强信息反馈等举措促进三者良性互动。
The pervasiveness of economic globalization and trade liberalization promotes the world optimal allocation of production factors and the world strategy layout of the value chain, subtly changing political and economic landscape in the world. In order to circumvent the trade barriers, obtain strategic resources, acquire generic technology, optimize product structure, expand operating earnings, reshape market pattern, etc., more and more companies have to go abroad, and go towards the world market, and carry out international operation, which is in accord with the trend of political multi-polarization and economic globalization in the world today, meanwhile, and promote enterprise branding, capitalization and high-end and enhance national competitiveness, influence and attractions, becoming a beautiful scenery line on the contemporary Chinese enterprises internationalization stage.
International market entry mode research, beginning with international investment theories, becomes more and more perfect by continual development and enrichment. Especially new new trade theory, focusing on the enterprise heterogeneity, comes into being to open up a broader space for development field and innovation area for the study. New new trade theory suggests that the enterprises with only high productivity can enter the international market and carry out international operation, and the enterprise with lower productivity can only serve the domestic market, enterprises with the lowest productivity have to exit the domestic market. For a long time, in China enterprise independent innovation ability is low, and the overall level of labor productivity is not high, and the internationalization development experience is superficial, and all lack of a clear internationalization strategy. Choosing an appropriate international market entry mode is a key of whether enterprise success towards the international market and carry out international operation.
From the perspective of firm heterogeneity, the article links the innovation, enterprise productivity and international market entry mode choice, systematically studies the inner mechanism between these three interactions and carries out tests with the enterprise micro data. Started by the literature review, This article reviews and comments research progress both at home and abroad of the enterprise internationalization theory and new new trade theory, and lays stress on the relationships of the innovation, firm productivity and international market entry mode selection (chapter2).
First of all, the paper analyze the enterprise heterogeneity theory, and discuss the connotation of enterprise heterogeneity and universality in international trade, and describe heterogeneous enterprise international market entry mode choice in detail under the HMY framework, so firm can choose contract mode in addition to export model and FDI mode, and dynamic factors should be considered, and innovation factors will include (chapter3).Second, from the perspective of the enterprise heterogeneity we respectively discusses the interactive relationship of innovation, firm productivity and firm international market entry mode, fully considering the actual situation of enterprise internationalization, such as indirect export, innovation heterogeneity (different innovation degree and different innovation type), joint venture, export platform FDI, and so on (chapter4, chapter5). Then, taking export model for example, we use the conclusions obtained from the enterprise microscopic data above to make empirical analysis (chapter6). Finally, we come to the conclusion from each chapter (chapter7).
In this paper, the main conclusion is that the enterprises must choose the model which is in accordance with the productivity when entering international market. From the perspective of heterogeneity, there are interactive relationships between innovation, enterprise productivity and international market entry mode. Considering transport cost is zero and the innovation performance heterogeneity, innovation plays an important role in the process of selecting the export model to enter international market. Considering the joint operation and export platform FDI mode, innovation has still significantly impact for enterprises to choose investment mode to enter the international market. When the enterprise productivity remained unchanged or maintaining a constant growth rate, companies choose the export model or investment mode to enter the international market; when productivity keeps random fluctuations, the export model is no longer the optimal mode, and firm will eventually choose investment mode to enter the international market. Innovation can improve the level of enterprise productivity, shorten the gap of productivity, reduce the waiting time before entering the international market, promote the enterprises to choose the suitable model to enter the international market, and to receive the internationalization of higher investment returns.
The main reason for enterprises choosing the international market entry mode is the productivity relative level. For enterprises, enterprises should continuously innovate, and strive to improve innovation performance, and improve enterprise international operation level. From a global perspective, the government should improve the enterprise innovation performance, and try to build technology innovation system, enterprise as the main body, market oriented, industry-university-research combination and pay more attention to enterprise synergy innovation ability, and reduce the government subsidies, and continuously reduce the enterprise cost, and gradually expand enterprise scale, and improve enterprise productivity level and reduce government subsidies for the enterprise, and establish government subsidies dynamic monitoring incentive mechanism and innovation stimulation platform, and by tax incentives, feedback and cumulative evaluation improve the enthusiasm of enterprises to carry out technical innovation, and strengthen domestic infrastructure construction, and comprehensively clean up all kinds of administrative fees, and reduce transportation market entry costs, export fixed cost and export transportation cost, and strengthen international trade cooperation and communication, and simplify and coordinate all kinds of trade program at home and abroad, and promote the benign interaction by eliminating blind spots, and plugging up loopholes in information, and strengthening information feedback information measures.
引文
[1]安虎森,皮亚彬,薄文广.市场规模、贸易成本与出口企业生产率“悖论“[J].财经研究,2013,(5)：41-50。
[2]陈策.异质性厂商国际市场进入方式的选择和政策支持研究[D].西北大学博士论文,2010,10-12。
[3]陈超,姚利民.制造业单位劳动成本的国际比较及其对出口与福利的影响[J].世界经济研究,2007,(6)：24-29。
[4]陈洪涛,陈劲,施放,郑胜华.新兴产业发展中的政府作用机制研究—基于国家政治制度结构的理论分析模型[J].科研管理,2009,(3)：1-8。
[5]陈琳,罗长远.FDI的前后向关联和中国制造业企业生产率的提升[J].世界经济研究,2011,(2)：48-53。
[6]陈文芝.贸易自由化与行业生产率：企业异质性视野的机理分析与实证研究[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,2013：23-27。
[7]陈晓华,刘慧.出口技术复杂度赶超对经济增长影响的实证分析——基于要素密集度异质性视角的非线性检验[J].科学学研究,2012(11)：1650-1661。
[8]陈阵,隋岩.贸易成本如何影响中国出口增长的二元边际——多产品企业视角的实证分析[J].世界经济研究,2013(10)：52-63。
[9]戴觅,余淼杰.企业出口前研发投入、出口及生产率进步——来自中国制造业企业的证据[J].经济学(季刊),2011,(1)：211-230。
[10]戴小勇,成力为.中国出口企业特征及形成原因的实证研究——异质性企业贸易理论的分析视角[J].国际贸易问题,2014,(2)：35-45。
[11]樊增强,宋雅楠.企业国际化动因理论述评[J].当代经济研究,2005,(9)18-22。
[12]付建.出口贸易、企业异质性和生产率：一个比较优势的分析框架[J].经济问题,2012,(2)：4-11。
[13]高国伟.跨国公司生产率差异和国际直接投资战略选择[J].南方经济,2010,(3)：4-11。
[14]高静.技术异质下专业化分工模式与国家出口生产效率研究——基于44个国家1999—2010年面板数据分析[J].世界经济研究,2013,(5)：47-55。
[15]高宇.贸易成本与纯出口企业的异质性[J].国际贸易问题,2014,(2)：46-55。
[16]郭晶,杨艳.经济增长、技术创新与我国高技术制造业出口复杂度研究[J].国际贸易问题,2010,(2)：91-96。
[17]杭雷鸣,孙泽生,郭俊辉.国际商品价格波动与中国出口贸易的能源成本：一个实证分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2011,(2)：17-23。
[18]何暑子,范从来.人民币升值对出口企业研发活动的影响——异质性企业双寡头博弈分析[J].经济管理,2012,(5)：1-9。
[19]洪联英,罗能生.全球生产与贸易新格局下企业国际化发展路径及策略选择—基于生产率异质性理论的分析方法[J].世界经济研究,2007,(12)：55-61。
[20]黄春媛,何永江,李薇贞.FDI对我国电子工业生产率的行业内溢出效应研究[J].南开经济研究,2010,(6)：98-112。
[21]黄静波,黄小兵.异质性企业、金融约束与出口——基于中国企业的研究[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2012,(2)：181-189。
[22]黄玖立,徐旻鸿.境内运输成本与中国的地区出口模式[J].世界经济,2012,(1)：58-76。
[23]黄小兵,黄静波.异质性企业、贸易成本与出口——基于中国企业的研究[J].南开经济研究,2013,(4)：111-125。
[24]黄小兵.异质性企业、汇率波动与出口——基于中国企业的实证研究[J].国际金融研究,2011,(10)：47-54。
[25]江波,李美云.生产服务业出口贸易、创新与生产率提升：理论与实证[J].财经研究,2012,(7)：68-78。
[26]蒋为,顾凌骏.融资约束、成本异质性与企业出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2014,(2)：167-176。
[27]金祥荣,刘振兴,于蔚.企业出口之动态效应研究[J],经济学(季刊),2012,(3)：1097-1112。
[28]康志勇.出口贸易与自主创新——基于我国制造业企业的实证研究[J],国际贸易问题,2011,(2)：35-45。
[29]孔祥贞,刘海洋,徐大伟.出口固定成本、融资约束与中国企业出口参与[J].世界经济研究,2013,(4)：46-54。
[30]赖伟娟,黄静波.出口行为、企业异质性与生产率研究——基于1999-2007年中国企业普查数据的实证分析[J].国际经贸探索,2011,(7)：26-33。
[31]赖永剑.空间动态外部性、企业异质性与出口决定——基于中国制造业企业面板数据[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2011,(2)：94-102。
[32]雷欣,陈继勇.FDI、出口与区域经济增长——异质面板“格兰杰”因果检验的应用[J].经济管理,2012,(6)：10-20。
[33]李春顶,石晓军,邢春冰.“出口-生产率悖论”：对中国经验的进一步考察[J].经济学动态,2010,(8)：90-95。
[34]李春顶、王领.异质性企业的出口贸易行为选择与经济效应[J].商业经济与管理,2009,(8)：43-52。
[35]李春顶.新—新贸易理论文献综述[J].世界经济文汇,2010,(1)：102-117。
[36]李春顶.中国出口企业是否存在“生产率悖论”：基于中国制造业企业数据的检验[J],世界经济,2010,(7)：64-81。
[37]李宏兵.企业异质性与贸易中介理论研究新进展[J].西部论坛,2012,(3)：62-67。
[38]李军.企业多重异质性与出口行为：Melitz模型的拓展与来自中国制造业的证据[D].华中科技大学博士论文,2011,45-51。
[39]李平,田朔.出口贸易对技术创新影响的研究：水平溢出与垂直溢出——基于动态面板数据模型的实证分析[J].世界经济研究,2010,(2)：44-49。
[40]李善民,李昶.跨国并购还是绿地投资?——FDI进入模式选择的影响因素研究[J],经济研究,2013,(12)：134-147。
[41]李真.劳动力成本对中国出口贸易碳排放的倒逼影响[J].当代经济研究,2013,(6)：43-49。
[42]李志远,于淼杰.生产率、信贷约束与企业出口[J],经济研究,2013,(6)：85-99。
[43]梁会君,史长宽.国内外贸易成本差异、行业要素密集度与我国出口“生产率悖论”——基于中国制造业动态面板数据[J].山西财经大学学报,2013,(10)：54-67。
[44]廖利兵,陈建国,曹标.FDI、出口与企业的异质性——基于不同方式下风险差异的视角[J].世界经济研究,2013,(10)：61-69。
[45]林学军.战略性新兴产业的发展与形成模式研究[J].中国软科学,2012,(2)：26-34。
[46]刘刚.企业的异质性假设——对企业本质和行为基础的演化论解释[J].中国社会科学,2002,(2)：13-19。
[47]刘海洋,罗洋.中国高技术企业出口影响因素分析——基于异质性企业贸易理论 的视角[J].经济经纬,2012,(1)：62-66。
[48]刘慧.产品质量升级的出口效应分析——基于企业异质性视角[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(3)：14-22。
[49]刘慧.企业异质性、出口与劳动收入占比——基于要素密集度异质性视角的Stolper-Samuelson定理检验[J].当代经济科学,2013,(3)：54-62。
[50]刘凯旋,孙凤英.会计视角下的反倾销规避—基于出口产品环境成本核算角度[J].国际贸易问题,2009,(9)：56-60。
[51]刘小玄、吴延兵.企业生产率增长及来源：创新还是需求拉动[J].经济研究,2009,(7)：45-54。
[52]刘秀玲.中国出口企业技术创新异质性研究——来自上市公司的经验证据[J].中国软科学,2012,(5)：103-113。
[53]马风涛,吕智.异质性企业、生产率与出口市场选择——基于中国汽车企业的实证分析[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2012,(3)：134-140。
[54]马凌远.中国对外贸易成本的分解及其对出口的影响——基于随机前沿引力模型[J].世界经济研究,2012,(9)：66-71。
[55]毛其淋,盛斌.贸易自由化、企业异质性与出口动态——来自中国微观企业数据的证据[J].管理世界,2013,(3)：48-68。
[56]柒江艺,许和连.行业异质性、适度知识产权保护与出口技术进步[J].中国工业经济,2012,(2)：79-88。
[57]钱春海.成本信息不对称、产品市场竞争与自动出口限制政策研究[J].当代财经,2008,(3)：88-93。
[58]钱海燕,杨忠.中国企业国际化理论研究发展历程及未来展望：1978-2006[J].国际贸易,2008,(9)：121-128。
[59]钱学锋,王胜,陈勇兵.中国的多产品出口企业及其产品范围[J].管理世界,2013,(1)：9-27。
[60]钱学锋,王菊蓉,黄云湖,王胜.出口与中国工业企业的生产率——自我选择效应还是出口学习效应[J].数量经济与技术经济研究,2011,(2)：37-51。
[61]钱学锋.企业异质性、贸易成本与中国出口增长的二元边际[J].管理世界,2008,(9)：48-56。
[62]乔立、金占明.关系对企业国际化进入模式战略选择的影响[J].科学学与科学 技术管理,2009,(9)：109-113。
[63]邵敏.出口贸易是否促进了我国劳动生产率的持续增长——基于工业企业微观数据的实证检验[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012,(2)：51-67。
[64]邵敏.我国企业出口对员工收入的影响——基于企业异质性视角的经验研究[J].中国工业经济,2011(9)：67-77。
[65]施炳展.企业异质性、地理距离与中国出口产品价格的空间分布[J].南方经济,2011(3)：61-74。
[66]施炳展.中国企业出口产品质量异质性：测度与事实[J].经济学(季刊),2013,(1)：263-284。
[67]史青.出口和生产率：基于异质性企业的实证研究综述[J].国际经贸探索,2012,(8)：22-35。
[68]史长宽,梁会君.行政垄断、市场进入成本与出口生产率悖论——基于中国工业省级动态面板数据的经验分析[J].经济与管理研究,2013,(9)：28-37。
[69]宋红军.外国直接投资对中国内资企业出口溢出效应的异质性研究——基于FDI不同进入模式角度的分析[J].云南社会科学,2012,(1)：104-108。
[70]孙俊新.沉没成本对企业出口决策的影响[J].山西财经大学学报,2013,(4)：60-71。
[71]孙晓华,孙哲.出口贸易对企业生产率的异质性影响——基于行业特征、企业规模和出口比重分组的实证检验[J].世界经济研究,2012,(8)：37-43。
[72]汤二子,李影,张海英.异质性企业、出口与“生产率悖论”——基于2007年中国制造业企业层面的证据[J].南开经济研究,2011,(3)：79-96。
[73]汤二子,孙振.异质性生产率、产品质量与中国出口企业的“生产率悖论”[J].世界经济研究,2012,(11)：10-16。
[74]汤二子,邵莹,刘海洋.生产率对企业出口的影响研究——兼论新新贸易理论在中国的适用性[J].世界经济研究,2012,(1)：62-68。
[75]汤二子、孙振.引入产品质量的异质性企业贸易模型及中国经验证据[J].经济评论,2012,(4)：68-77。
[76]田东文,姚微.技术性贸易措施影响中国制造业出口的实证分析——基于企业异质性视角的研究[J].国际经贸探索,2012,(3)：99-113。
[77]田志龙,邓新明、Taieb Hafsi.企业市场行为、非市场行为与竞争互动——基于 中国家电行业的案例研究[J].管理世界,2007,(8)：116-128。
[78]汪秀婷,杜海波.系统视角下战略性新兴产业创新系统架构与培育路径研究[J].科学管理研究,2012,(1)：10-14。
[79]王国顺,郑准,杨昆.企业国际化理论的演进[M].北京：人民出版社,2009：25-50。
[80]王国顺,郑准.企业国际化研究的基本问题：理论演进视角[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(1)：5-10。
[81]王华,许和连,杨晶晶.出口、异质性与企业生产率——来自中国企业层面的证据[J].财经研究,2011,(6)：36-46。
[82]王怀民.加工贸易、劳动力成本与农民工就业——兼论新劳动法和次贷危机对我国加工贸易出口的影响[J].世界经济研究,2009,(1)：15-18。
[83]王淑云,孙泽生.出口补贴、运输成本与贸易模式——对传统分析的矫正和扩展[J].国际经贸探索,2011,(8)：76-82。
[84]王勇.异质性理论框架下产品出口的影响因素——基于宁波市的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2013,(5)：87-93。
[85]王增涛,庄贵军,樊秀峰.中国制造企业国际化的影响因素与分析框架：以TCL为例[J].南开管理评论,2005,(3)：88-94。
[86]吴福象,王新新.行业集中度、规模差异与创新绩效——基于GVC模式下要素集聚对战略性新兴产业创新绩效影响的实证分析[J].上海经济研究,2011,(7)：69-76。
[87]项松林,赵曙东.融资异质性对企业出口的影响——信贷投资与抵押贷款的比较研究[J].国际贸易问题,2013,(11)：145-154。
[88]项松林.异质性企业、结构转型与稳定出口[J].经济评论,2011,(4)：104-113。
[89]谢孟军,郭艳茹.语言交易成本对中国出口贸易的影响[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2013,(5)：102-112。
[90]熊正德、林雪.战略性新兴产业上市公司金融支持效率及其影响因素研究[J].经济管理,2010,(11)：20-25。
[91]许晖,余娟.企业国际化经营中关键风险的识别研究[J].南开管理评论,2007,(4)：92-97。
[92]许统生,陈文婷.贸易成本构件及其变化对我国出口的影响——随机前沿分析[J].江西社会科学,2013,(1)：43-48。
[93]严建苗,王辰璐.异质性、生产率与出口贸易——来自浙江民营企业的经验证据[J].浙江社会科学,2013,(4)：37-46。
[94]杨丹萍.我国出口贸易环境成本内在化效应的实证分析与政策建议[J].财贸经济,2011,(6)：94-99。
[95]杨汝岱,朱诗娥.企业、地理与出口产品价格[J].经济学(季刊),2013,(4)：1347-1368。
[96]杨瑞龙,刘刚.企业的异质性假设和企业竞争优势的内生性分析[J].中国工业经济,2002,(1)：88-95。
[97]易靖韬,傅佳莎.企业生产率与出口：浙江省企业层面的证据[J].世界经济,2011,(5)：74-92。
[98]易靖韬.企业异质性、市场进入成本、技术溢出效应与出口参与决定[J].经济研究,2009,(9)：106-115。
[99]印梅,王光伟.双边汇率变动、异质性传导与对日出口结构——基于SITC分类数据的实证分析[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2013,(4)：129-143。
[100]于春海,张胜满.市场进入成本与我国出口企业生产率之谜[J].中国人民大学学报,2013,(2)：53-61。
[101]于洪霞,龚六堂,陈玉宇.出口固定成本融资约束与企业出口行为[J].经济研究,2011,(4)：55-67。
[102]余官胜.我国出口贸易和技术创新关系实证研究——基于联立方程组[J].科学学研究,2011,(2)：300-305。
[103]余淼杰.加工贸易、企业生产率和关税减免：来自中国产品面的证据[J].经济学(季刊),2011,(4)：1251-1280。
[104]余淼杰.加工贸易与中国企业生产率[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2013：120-123。
[105]余淼杰.中国的贸易自由化与制造业企业生产率[J].经济研究,2010,(12)：97-110。
[106]俞海山.环境成本内在化的贸易效应分析——兼论近年我国出口关税调整政策[J].财贸经济,2009,(1)：89-93。
[107]张诚,蒙大斌.技术创新、行业特征与生产率绩效——基于中国工业行业的实证分析[J].当代经济科学,2012,(4)：49-55。
[108]张凤,孔庆峰.出口固定投入成本与扩展边际理论研究述评及展望[J].经济评论,2013,(6)：151-158。
[109]张杰,李勇,刘志彪.出口促进中国企业生产率提高吗?——来自中国本土制造业企业的经验证据：1999-2003[J].管理世界,2009,(12)：11-26。
[110]张杰,张培丽,黄泰岩.市场分割推动了中国企业出口吗[J].经济研究,2010,(8)：29-41。
[111]张礼卿,孙俊新.出口是否促进了异质性企业生产率的增长：来自中国制造企业的实证分析[J].南开经济研究,2011,(4)：110-122。
[112]赵春燕,黄汉民.出口工资溢价：自我选择效应还是出口学习效应?——基于企业异质性视角的经验研究[J].国际贸易问题,2013,(9)：111-119。
[113]赵金亮.异质性视角下的出口与生产率：企业动因及行业绩效[D].浙江大学博士论文,2012,45-50。
[114]赵晶,王根蓓.人力资本异质性与中国出口竞争力[J].经济学动态,2011,(9)：67-71。
[115]赵曙明,高素英,周建,刘建朝.企业国际化的条件、路径、模式及其启示[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,(1)：116-122。
[116]赵伟,陈文芝.沉没成本与出口滞后——分析中国出口持续高增长问题的新视角[J].财贸经济,2007,(10)：120-127。
[117]赵伟,韩媛媛,赵金亮.异质性、出口与中国企业技术创新[J].经济理论与经济管理,2012,(4)：5-15。
[118]赵伟,赵金亮,韩媛媛.异质性、沉没成本与中国企业出口决定：来自中国微观企业的经验证据[J].世界经济,2011,(4)：62-79。
[119]赵伟,赵金亮.生产率决定中国企业出口倾向吗——企业所有制异质性视角的分析[J].财贸经济,2011,(5)：100-105。
[120]朱英杰.融资约束、生产率与异质性企业的出口竞争力——微观基础的中国经验考察[J].世界经济研究,2012,(9)：57-66。
[121庄佩芬,蔡秋红.海峡两岸农产品出口结构调整能力与调整成本比较分析[J].国际贸易问题,2012,(3)：137-146。
[122]A.A. Shariff, A. Zaharim and K. Sopian. The Comparison Logit and Probit Regression Analyses in Estimating the Strength of Gear Teeth European Journal of Scientific Research, European Journal of Scientific Research,2009,Vol.27 (4):548-553.
[123]A.Turco and D.Maggioni. Dissecting the Impact of Innovation on Exporting in Turkey, provided by Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali in its series Working Papers with number 388,2013.
[124]Ackerberg, Daniel & Caves, Kevin & Frazer, Garth. Structural identification of production functions, provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 38349,2006.
[125]Afonso, Oscar & Silva, Armando. Non-scale Endogenous Gowth Effects of Subsidies for Exporters, Economic Modelling,2012, Vol.29 (4):1248-1257.
[126]Aghion & Antras & Helpman. Negotiating Free Trade, Journal of International Economics, Elsevier,2007, vol.73 (1):1-30.
[127]Ahn, JaeBin & Khandelwal, Amit K.& Wei, Shang-Jin. The Role of Intermediaries in Facilitating Trade, Journal of International Economics,2011, Vol.84 (1):73-85.
[128]Aida Caldera Sanchez. Innovation and Exporting:Edvidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms, provided by ULB--Universite Libre de Bruxelles in its series Working Papers ECARES with number 2009_014,2009.
[129]Akerman, Anders. A Theory on the Role of Wholesalers in International Trade based on Economies of Scope, provided by Stockholm University, Department of Economics in its series Research Papers in Economics with number 2010:1,2010.
[130]Alessia Lo Turco & Daniela Maggioni. Dissecting the impact of innovation on exporting in Turkey, provided by Universita'Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali in its series Working Papers with number 388,2013.
[131]Alex Rialp & Josep Rialp & David Urbano & Yancy Vaillant. The Born-Global Phenomenon:A Comparative Case Study Research, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2005, Vol.3 (2):133-171.
[132]Alexander Vogel and Joachim Wagner. Innovation and Exports of German Business Services Enterprises:First evidence from a new type of firm data, provided by University of Luneburg, Institute of Economics in its series Working Paper Series in Economics with number 246,2012.
[133]Alfons Palangkaraya. The Link between Innovation and Export:Evidence from Australiafs Small and Medium Enterprises, provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-08,2012.
[134]Alfredo D'Angelo. Innovation and export performance:a study of Italian high-tech SMEs, Journal of Management & Governance,2012, Vol.16 (3):393-423.
[135]Altomonte, Carlo & Ottaviano, Gianmarco. The role of international production sharing in EU productivity and competitiveness, provided by European Investment Bank, Economics Department in its series EIB Papers with number 3/2011,2011.
[136]Andrzej Cieslik & Michael Ryan. Productivity Differences and Foreign Market Entry in an Oligopolistic Industry, Open Economies Review, Springer,2012, vol. 23(3):531-557.
[137]Aneta Karasek. Innovation and Export Performance:Evidence from Lublin Voivodeship, provided by International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia in its series Knowledge and Learning:Global Empowerment; Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2012 with number 949-956, 2012.
[138]Anna Stavrianakis. Licensed to kill:the United Kingdom's arms export licensing process, Economics of Peace and Security Journal,2008, Vol.3 (1):32-39.
[139]Antoine Gervais. Product Quality and Firm Heterogeneity in International Trade, provided by Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau in its series Working Papers with number 13-08,2013.
[140]Antonietti Roberto and Cainelli Giulio. Innovation, Productivity and Export Evidence from Italy, Provided by Public policies and local development in its series Openloc Working Papers with number 1017,2010.
[141]Antonio Navas. Asymmetric trade liberalization, sector heterogeneity and Innovation, provided by Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History) in its series Working Papers in Economic Theory with number 2012/05,2012.
[142]Antras & Arnaud Costinot. Intermediation and Economic Integration, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,2010, vol.100(2):424-428.
[143]Antras & Davin Chor. Organizing the Global Value Chain, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers 18163,2012.
[144]Antras & Desai & C. Fritz Foley. Multinational Firms, FDI Flows, and Imperfect Capital Markets, Quarterly Journal of Economics,2009, Vol.124 (3):1171-1219.
[145]Antras & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Organizations and Trade, Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews,2009, vol.1(1):43-64.
[146]Antras & Helpman. Contractual Frictions and Global Sourcing, CEPR Discussion Papers 6033, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers,2007.
[147]Antras & Luis Garicano & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Offshoring in a Knowledge Economy, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2006, Vol.121 (1):31-77.
[148]Antras & Luis Garicano & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Organizing Offshoring: Middle Managers and Communication Costs, provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 12196,2006a.
[149]Antras & Yeaple. Multinational Firms and the Structure of International Trade, NBER Working Papers 18775, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc,2013.
[150]Antras et al Intermediation and Economic Integration, American Economic Review, 2010, vol.100 (2):424-428.
[151]Antras et al. Intermediated Trade, the Quarterly Journal of Economics,2011, vol. 126 (3):1319-1374.
[152]Antras. Firms, Contracts and Trade Structure, the Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,2003, vol.118(4):1375-1418.
[153]Antweiler, Copeland and Taylor. Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review,2001, Vol.91 (4):877-908.
[154]Aoife Hanley and Joaquin Monreal-Perez. Are Newly Exporting Firms more Innovative? Findings from Matched Spanish Innovators, provided by Kiel Institute for the World Economy in its series Kiel Working Papers with number 1735,2011.
[155]Aranzazu Crespo Rodriguez. Trade, innovation and productivity, provided by Instituto Madrileno de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales in its series Working Papers with number 2012-06,2012.
[156]Ari Kuncoro. Globalization and Innovation in Indonesia:Evidence from Micro-Data on Medium and Large Manufacturing Establishments, provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-09,2012.
[157]Ariel Burstein & Marc J. Melitz. Trade Liberalization and Firm Dynamics, NBER Working Papers 16960, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.,2011
[158]Ariel Burstein & Martin Eichenbaum & Sergio Rebelo. Modeling Exchange Rate Passthrough After Large Devaluations, provided by University of Rochester-Center for Economic Research (RCER) in its series RCER Working Papers with number 514,2005.
[159]Arita, Shawn & Tanaka, Kiyoyasu. Heterogeneous multinational firms and productivity gains from falling FDI barriers, provided by Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO) in its series IDE Discussion Papers with number 324,2012.
[160]Armando Silva & Oscar Afonso & Ana Paula Africano. Which firms are the most innovative? The importance of multinationals and exporters in Portugal, Acta Oeconomica, 2013, Vol.63 (2):157-184.
[161]Artur Klimek. Greenfield Foreign Direct Investment Versus Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions, Eastern European Economics,2011, Vol.49 (6):60-73.
[162]Atkeson and Burstein. Innovation, firm dynamics, and international trade, provided by Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis in its series Staff Report with number 444,2010.
[163]Aw, Bee Yan, Sakkyun Chung and Mark J. Roberts. Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market:Micro-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan(China), World Bank Economic Review,2000, Vol.14,65-90.
[164]Ayumu Tanaka. Firm productivity and the number of FDI destinations:Evidence from a non-parametric test, Economics Letters,2012,117 (1):1-3.
[165]Baily, Martin N., Bartelsman, Eric J., and John Haltiwanger. Labor Productivity: Structural Change And Cyclical Dynamics. The Review of Economics and Statistics,2001, Vol.83 (3):420-433.
[166]Baltagi, Badi H.& Egger, Peter & Pfaffermayr, Michael. Estimating models of complex FDI:Are there third-country effects? Journal of Econometrics,2007, Vol.140 (1): 260-281.
[167]Barbara Spencer. International outsourcing and incomplete contracts, Canadian Journal of Economics,2005, Vol.38 (4):1107-1135.
[168]Bart van Ark & Erik Monnikhof. Size Distribution of Output and Employment:A Data Set for Manufacturing Industries in Five OECD Countries,1960s-1990, provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Economics Department Working Papers with number 166,1996.
[169]Bartelsman and Doms. Understanding Productivity:Lessons from longitudinal microdata, Journal of Economic Literature,2000 (38):569-595.
[170]Becker and Egger. Endogenous Product versus Process Innovation and a Firm's Propensity to Export, provided by CESifo Group Munich in its series CESifo Working Paper Series with number 1906,2007.
[171]Benjamin M Oviatt & Patricia Phillips McDougall. Toward a Theory of International New ventures, Journal of International Business Studies,1994, Vol.25 (1):45-64.
[172]Bernard & Bradford J Jensen. Exporters, Skill Upgrading and The Wage Gap, Working Papers 94-13,Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau,1994.
[173]Bernard & Fort. Factoryless Goods Producers in the US NBER Working Papers 19396, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc,2013b.
[174]Bernard & J. Bradford Jensen & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott. Intrafirm Trade and Product Contractibility, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,2010, vol.100 (2):444-448.
[175]Bernard & Marco Grazzi & Chiara Tomasi. Intermediaries in International Trade: Direct Versus Indirect Modes of Export, CEP Discussion Papers dp1137, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE,2012.
[176]Bernard & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott. Multiproduct Firms and Trade Liberalization, the Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press,2011, vol. 126(3):1271-1318.
[177]Bernard & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott. Products and Productivity, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell,2009 vol.111(4):681-709.
[178]Bernard and Jensen. Why Some Firms Export, Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004, Vol.86 (2):561-569.
[179]Bernard et al. Exporter Dynamics, Firm Size and Growth and Partial Year Effects, Policy Research working paper WPS 6711,2013d.
[180]Bernard et al. Intermediaries in International Trade:Direct Versus Indirect Modes of Export, CEP Discussion Papers dp1137, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE,2012.
[181]Bernard et al. Intermediaries in International Trade:Margins of Trade and Export Flows, CEP Discussion Papers dp1137, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE,2013c.
[182]Bernard et al. Two-Sided Heterogeneity and Trade, CEPR Discussion Paper 9681. 2013a.
[183]Bernard et al. Wholesalers and Retailers in U.S. Trade. American Economic Review.2010,100 (2):408-413.
[184]Bernard&Stephen&Schott. Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms, CEPR Discussion Papers 4622, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers,2004.
[185]Bernard, Andrew B.& Jensen, J Bradford & Redding, Stephen J.& Schott, Peter K. The Empirics of Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade, CEPR Discussion Papers 8677, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers,2011.
[186]Bernard, Andrew B.& Jensen, J. Bradford & Redding, Stephen J.& Schott, Peter K.. The Margins of US Trade (Long Version), CEPR Discussion Papers 7156, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers,2009.
[187]Besedes and Prusa. Product Differentiation and Duration of US Import Trade. Journal of International Economics,2006,70,339-358.
[188]Bilkey&Tesar. The Export Behavior of Smaller-Sized Wisconsin Manufacturing Firms, Journal of International Business Studies,1977, Vol.8 (1):93-98.
[189]Bloom, Nicholas and John Van Reenen, Why Do Management Practices Differ across Firms and Countries?, Journal of Economic Perspectives,2010, Vol.24,203-224.
[190]Bloom, Nicolas, Sadun, Raffaella, and John Van Reenen. Americans Do I.T. Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle. NBER Working Paper No.13085,2007.
[191]Blum, Claros, Horstmanni. Intermediation and the Nature of Trade Costs:the Theory and Evidence, Unpublished, Rotman School of Management,2011.
[192]Bonaccorsi. On the Relationship between Firm Size and Export Intensity, Journal of International Business Studies,1992, Vol.23 (4):605-635.
[193]Brainard, S Lael. An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Trade-off between Multinational Sales and Trade, American Economic Review,1997, Vol.87 (4):520-544.
[194]Brainard, S. L..A Simple Theory of Multinational Corporations and Trade with Trade-off Between Proximity and Concentration. NBER Working Paper No.4269,1993.
[195]Breinlich, Holge. Trade Liberalization and Industrial Restructuring through Mergers and Acquisitions,Journal of International Economics,2008,Vol.76,254-266.
[196]Broda, Christian and David E. Weinstein. Globalization and the Gains from Variety. Quarterly Journal of Economics,2006, Vol.121,541-585.
[197]Bruno Cassiman, Elena Golovko Ester Martinez-Ros. Innovation, Exports and Productivity. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2010,28 (4):372-376.
[198]Bustos, P. Trade Liberalization, Exports and Technology Upgrading:Evidence on the Impact of Mercosur on Argentinean Firms, American Economic Review,2011, Vol.101, 304-340.
[199]C.Faustino Horacio,C. Lima Joana and Matos Verga Pedro. Exports, Productivity and Innovation:Evidence from Portugal using micro data. Provided by Department of Economics at the School of Economics and Management (ISEG), Technical University of Lisbon in its series Working Papers with number 2012/13,2012.
[200]Caldera, A., Innovation and exporting:evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms, Review of world Economics,2010,146(4):657-689.
[201]Caliendo&Rossi Hansberg. The Impact of Trade on Organization and Productivity, The Impact of Trade on Organization and Productivity, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2012, Vol.127 (3):1393-1467.
[202]Cassey Lee. The Relationship between Innovation, Productivity and Exports:Some Preliminary Evidence from the Malaysian Manufacturing Sector. Economics Bulletin,2008, 12 (31):1-13.
[203]Cassiman, B., Martinez-Ros, E. Product Innovation and Exports. Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing, Review of World Economics,2010,146 (4):657-689.
[204]Cassiman, Bruno & Golovko, Elena & Martinez, Ester, Innovation, exports and productivity, provided by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven in its series Open Access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven with number urn:hdl:123456789/269644, 2011.
[205]Castellani, D. and Giovannetti, G. Productivity and the International Firm: Dissecting Heterogeneity, Journal of Economic Policy Reform,2010, Vol.13 (1):25-42.
[206]Ceccagnoli and Melitz. Firm Heterogeneity, Imitation, and the Incentives for Cost Reducing R&D Effort, The Journal of Industrial Economics,2005, Vol.53(1):83-100.
[207]Ceccagnoli, M. Firm Heterogeneity, Imitation, and the Incentives for Cost Reducing R&D Effort, the Journal of Industrial Economics,2005, Vol.53 (1):83-100.
[208]Chevassus-Lozza and Latouche. Firms, markets and trade costs:access of French exporters to European agri-food markets, European Review of Agricultural Economics,2012, Vol.39 (2):257-288.
[209]Chin Hee Hahn and Chang-Gyun Park. Direction of Causality in Innovation-Exporting Linkage:Evidence on Korean Manufacturing, provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-07,2012.
[210]Cole, Elliott and Strobl, The Environmental Performance of Firms:The Role of Foreign Ownership, Training, and Experience, Ecological Economics,2008a, Vol.65 (3):538-546.
[211]Cole, M., and R. Elliott, Determining the Trade-environment Composition Effect:the Role of Capital, Labor and Environmental Regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2003,Vol.46 (3):363-383.
[212]Cole, M., R. Elliott and K. Shimamoto, Industrial Characteristics, Environmental Regulations and Air Pollution:An Analysis of the UK Manufacturing Sector, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2005, Vol.50,121-143.
[213]Cole, M., R. Elliott and S. Wu., Industrial Activity and the Environment in China: An Industry-level Analysis, China Economic Review,2008b, Vol.19 (3):393-408.
[214]Cole, M.,R.Elliott, and K. Shimamoto, Industrial Characteristics, Environmental Regulations and Air Pollution:An Analysis of the UK Manufacturing Sector, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2005,Vol.50 (1):121-143.
[215]Comin, D. and Mulani, S. Diverging Trends in Aggregate and in Firm Volatility. Review of Economics & Statistics,2006 Vol.88 (2):374-383.
[216]Comin, D. and Philippon, T..The Rise in Firm-Level Volatility:Causes and Consequences. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 20, eds. M. Gertler and K. Rogo□,MIT Press, Cambridge, MA,167-201,2005.
[217]Costantini, J.A. and Melitz, M.J. The Dynamics of Firm-Level Adjustment to Trade, 2008(In in Helpman, E., Marin, D. and Verdier, T. eds.The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy, Cambridge, and MA:Harvard University Press).
[218]Crozet, Matthieu & Lalanne, Guy & Poncet, Sandra. Wholesalers in international trade, European Economic Review, Elsevier,2013, vol.58(C):1-17.
[219]Cui, J. H. Lapan and G Moschini, Are Exporters More Environmentally Friendly than Non-Exporters? Theory and Evidence, Iowa State University, Working Paper No.12022, 2012.
[230]Cui, J. H. Lapan and G.Moschini, Are Exporters More Environmentally Friendly than Non-Exporters? Theory and Evidence, Iowa State University Working Paper No.12022, 2012.
[231]D. Engel & V. Procher. Export, FDI and firm productivity, Applied Economics, 2012,44(15):1931-1940.
[232]Dalia Marin & Thierry Verdier. Power in the multinational corporation in industry equilibrium, Economic Theory,2009, Vol.38 (3):437-464.
[233]Damijan, J. P., Kostevc, C., Polanec, S. From Innovation to Exporting or Vice versa? The World Economy,2010,33(3):374-398.
[234]Daniel Ackerberg &Paul J Devereux. Improved JIVE Estimators for Overidentified Linear Models with and without Heteroskedasticity, provided by C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number 6926,2008.
[235]Danny Leung & Cesaire Meh & Yaz Terajima. Productivity in Canada:Does Firm Size Matter? Bank of Canada Review,2008, Vol.2008 (Autumn):7-16.
[236]Dasgupta K, Jordim.Quality Uncertainty and Intermediation Trade, Preliminary Draft, University of Toronto,2011.
[237]Davies, R. and S. Batrakova, Is there an environmental benefit to being an exporter? Evidence from firm-level data, Review of World Economics,2012, Vol.148 (3):449-474.
[238]Davies, R. and S. Batrakovals. There an environmental benefit to being an exporter? Evidence from firm-level data', Review of World Economics,2012, Vol. (3):449-474
[239]Del Gatto, Massimo, Giordano Mion and Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, Trade Integration, Firm Selection and the Costs of Non-Europe, mimeo, University of Bologna, 2006.
[240]Demidova, Svetlana & Rodriguez-Clare, Andres. Trade policy under firm-level heterogeneity in a small economy, Journal of International Economics,2009, Vol.78 (1): 100-112.
[241]Desai, Foley and Hines. Capital Controls, Liberalizations, and Foreign Direct Investement, provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 10337,2004. Development Economics,2011, Vol.15 (1):33-47.
[242]Dierk Herzer. How Does Foreign Direct Investment Really Affect Developing Countries'Growth? Review of International Economics,2012, Vol.20 (2):396-414.
[243]Dierk Herzer. Outward FDI, Total Factor Productivity and Domestic Output: Evidence from Germany, International Economic Journal,2012,26(1):155-174.
[244]Dierk Herzer. The Long-Run Relationship between Outward FDI and Total Factor Productivity:Evidence for Developing Countries, provided by Verein fur Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics in its series Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 with number 41,2011.
[245]Dixit A. and Pindyck, R. Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton:Princeton University Press,1994.
[246]Dunning, J. H. International Production and the Multinational Enterprise. London: Allen and Unwin,1981.
[247]Dunning, J. H. Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE:A search for an eclectic approach. In:Ohlin, B. et al. (Eds.), The International Allocation of Economic Activity,1977, pp.395-418,London:Macmillan Press.
[248]Dutz, Mark A.& O'Connell, Stephen D. Productivity, innovation and growth in Sri Lanka:an empirical investigation, provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 6354,2013.
[249]Eaton et al. A Search and Learning Model of Export Dynamics, Mimeo,2008.
[250]Eaton, Jonathan, Samuel Kortum, and Francis Kramarz. An Anatomy of International Trade:Evidence from French Firms.NBER Working Paper No.146110,2008.
[251]Eddy Bekkers. Heterogeneous Popularity and Exporting Uncertainty Open Economies Review,2011. Vol.22 (5):797-824.
[252]Ekholm, K., Forslid, R. and Markusen, J. R. Export-Platform Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of European Economic Association,2007, Vol.5(4):776-795.
[253]Elhanan Helpman & Marc Melitz & Yona Rubinstein. Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,2008, vol.123 (2):441-487,05.
[254]Elhanan Helpman. Foreign Trade and Investment:Firm-level Perspectives, Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science,2014, Vol.81 (321):1-14, 01.
[255]Elhanan Helpman. The Structure of Foreign Trade, Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association,1999, Vol.13 (2):121-144.
[256]Elhanan Helpman. Trade, FDI, and the Organization of Firms, Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association,2006, Vol.44(3):589-630.
[257]Eric A. Verhoogen. Trade, Quality Upgrading, and Wage Inequality in the Mexican Manufacturing Sector, Quarterly Journal of Economics,2008, Vo.123 (2):489-530.
[258]Erin Anderson & Hubert Gatignon. Modes of Foreign Entry:A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions, Journal of International Business Studies,1986, Vol.17 (3):1-26.
[259]Faggio, Giulia Salvanes and John Van Reenen. The Evolution of Inequality in Productivity and Wages:Panel Data Evidence. NBER Working Paper No.13351,2007.
[260]Fajgelbaum, Pablo & Grossman, Gene M.& Helpman, Elhanan. Income distribution, product quality, and international trade, provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 5843,2011.
[261]Faqin Lin and Hsiao Chink Tang. Exporting and Innovation:Theory and Firm-Level Evidence from the People's Republic of China, provided by Asian Development Bank in its series Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration with number 111,2013.
[262]Faustino et al.Exports, Productivity and Innovation:Evidence from Portugal using micro data, provided by Department of Economics at the School of Economics and Management (ISEG), Technical University of Lisbon.in its series Working Papers with number 2012/13,2012.
[263]Felbermayr, Gabriel J.& Jung, Benjamin. Trade Intermediaries and the Organization of Exporters, Review of Internaitonala Economics,2001, Vol.19 (9):634-648.
[264]Felbermayr, Gabriel J.& Jung, Benjamin. Trade intermediaries, incomplete contracts, and the choice of export modes, provided by University of Tubingen, School of Business and Economics in its series Tubinger Diskussionsbeitrage with number 317,2008.
[265]Franco, Chiara. Exports and FDI motivations:Empirical evidence from U.S. foreign subsidiaries, International Business Review,2013, Vol.22 (1):47-62.
[266]Fryges, Helmut & Wagner, Joachim. Exports and Productivity Growth:First Evidence from a Continuous Treatment Approach, provided by ZEW-Zentrum fur Europaische Wirtschaftsforschung/Center for European Economic Research in its series ZEW Discussion Papers with number 07-032,2007.
[267]Fugazza & Molina. Optimal life-cycle portfolios for heterogeneous workers, provided by Department of Economics and Statistics (Dipartimento di Scienze Economico-Sociali e Matematico-Statistiche), University of Torino in its series Working papers with number 012,2012.
[268]Gabriel Felbermayr & Benjamin Jung. Trade Intermediation and the Organization of Exporters, Review of International Economics,2011, Vol.19 (4):634-648.
[269]Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman & Adam Szeidl. Complementarities between Outsourcing and Foreign Sourcing, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,2005, vol.95 (2):19-24.
[270]Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman. Integration Versus Outsourcing In Industry Equilibrium, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,2002, Vol.117 (1):85-120.
[271]Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman. Outsourcing in a Global Economy, Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press,2005, Vol.72(1):135-159.
[272]Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman. Outsourcing Versus FDI in Industry Equilibrium, Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press,2003, Vol. 1(2-3):317-327.
[273]Giachetti. Do service firms benefit from diversification? the moderating effect of competitive intensity and firm size, Mercatie Competitivita,2012, Vol.2012/2 (2):87-103.
[274]Giammario Impullitti & Omar Licandro. Trade, Firm selection, and innovation:the competition channel, provided by Unitat de Fonaments de l'Analisi Economica (UAB) and Institut d'Analisi Economica (CSIC) in its series UFAE and IAE Working Papers with number 841.10,2010.
[275]Girma and Hanley. R&D and Exporting:Comparison of British and Irish firms', Review of World Economics,2008a, Vol.144 (4):750-773.
[276]Girma and Tintelnot. Exporting and the Environment:A New Look with Micro-Data, Kiel Working Papers,1423, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel,2008b.
[277]Girma, Sourafel & Gorg, Holger & Strobl, Eric. Exports, international investment, and plant performance:evidence from a non-parametric test, Economics Letters, Elsevier, 2004b, vol.83(3):317-324.
[278]Girma, Sourafel, Richard Kneller and Mauro Pisu. Exports versus FDI:an Empirical Test, Review of World Economics,2005, Vol.141,193-218.
[279]Grossman & Helpman & Szeidl. Complementarities between Outsourcing and Foreign Sourcing, American Economic Review,2005, Vol.95 (2):19-24.
[280]Grossman & Helpman & Szeidl. Optimal Integration:Strategies for the Multinational Firm, CEPR Discussion Papers 4477, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers,2004.
[281]Grossman & Helpman. Comparative Advantage and Long-Run Growth, NBER Working Papers 2809, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc,1991.
[282]Grossman & Helpman. Product Development and International Trade, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press,1989, Vol.97 (6):1261-1283.
[283]Grossman & Helpman. Separation of Powers and the Budget Process, Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier,2008, vol.92(3-4):407-425.
[284]Grossman & Helpman. Separation of Powers and the Budget Process, NBER Working Papers 12332, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc,2006.
[285]Grossman & Helpman. The Politics of Free Trade Agreements, NBER Working Papers 4597, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc,1993.
[286]Grossman and Helpman. Technology and Trade, Amsterdam, New York and Elsevier, North-Holland,1995.
[]Grossman, Gene M & Helpman, Elhanan. Quality Ladders and Product Cycles, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,1991, Vol.106 (2):557-586.
[287]Grossman, Gene M & Helpman, Elhanan. Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth, Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell,1991, vol.58 (1):43-61.
[288]Grossman, Gene M & Helpman, Elhanan. Trade, Innovation, and Growth, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,1990, vol.80 (2):86-91.
[289]Grossman, Gene M.& Helpman, Elhanan & Szeidl, Adam. Optimal integration strategies for the multinational firm, Journal of International Economics, Elsevier,2006, Vol. 70 (1):216-238.
[290]Grossman, Gene M.& Helpman, Elhanan. Managerial incentives and the international organization of production, Journal of International Economics, Elsevier,2004, Vol.63 (2):237-262.
[291]Gugler, Klaus, Dennis C. Mueller, B.Burcin Yurtoglu and Christine Zulehner. The Effects of Mergers:An International Comparison, International Journal of Industrial Organization,2003, Vol.21,625-653.
[292]Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge. Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation, Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association,2009, vol.47(1):5-86.
[293]Gullstrand, Joakim. Firm and destination-specific export costs:The case of the Swedish food sector, Food Policy,2011, Vol.36 (2):204-213.
[294]Hallak and Sivadasan. Firms' Exporting Behavior under Quality Constraints, provided by Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau in its series Working Papers with number 09-13,2009.
[295]Hanley, A. and J. Monreal-Perez, Are Newly Exporting Firms More Innovative? Findings from Matched Spanish Innovators, Economics Letters,2012,Vol.116 (2):217-220.
[296]Hanley, A. and J. Monreal-Perez. Are Newly Exporting Firms more Innovative? Findings from Matched Spanish Innovators,'Economics Letters,2012, Vol.116 (2):217-220.
[297]Harald Oberhofer & Michael Pfaffermayr. FDI versus Exports:Multiple Host Countries and Empirical Evidence, the World Economy,2012, Vol.35 (3):316-330.
[298]Harms, Philipp & Meon, Pierre-Guillaume. An FDI is an FDI is an FDI? The growth effects of greenfield investment and mergers and acquisitions in developing countries, provided by Verein fur Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics in its series Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 with number 38,2011.
[299]Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Tanaka, Kiyoyasu. Export platform FDI and firm heterogeneity, Paper provided by Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO) in its series IDE Discussion Papers with number 310,2011.
[300]Head and Ries. Heterogeneity and the FDI versus export decision of Japanese manufacturers, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,2003, Vol.17 (4): 448-467.
[301]Head, K. and Ries, J.. Exporting and FDI as Alternative Strategies. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2004, Vol.20 (3):409-423.
[302]Head, Keith & Ries, John. Exporting and FDI as Alternative Strategies, Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2004, Vol.20 (3):409-423.
[303]Head, Keith & Ries, John. Heterogeneity and the FDI versus export decision of Japanese manufacturers, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,2003, Vol.17 (4):448-467.
[304]Head, Keith and John Ries. FDI as an Outcome of the Market for Corporate Control:theory and Evidence, Journal of International Economics,2008, Vol.74,2-20.
[305]Helpman & Melitz & Rubinstein. Trading Partners and Trading Volumes, DEGIT Conference Papers c011_022, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade, 2006.
[306]Helpman & Melitz & Stephen R. Yeaple. Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,2004, vol.94(1): 300-316.
[307]Helpman & Melitz & Rubinstein. Trading Partners and Trading Volumes, DEGIT Conference Papers c011_022, DEGIT,2006.
[308]Helpman & Melitz&Rubinstein. Estimating Trade Flows:Trading Partners and Trading Volumes, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2008, vol.123 (2):441-487.
[309]Helpman, Elhanan & Razin, Assaf. Welfare Aspects of International Trade in Goods and Securities:An Addendum, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,1980, vol. 94(3):615-618.
[310]Helpman. A Simple Theory of International Trade with Multinational Corporations, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press,1984, vol.92(3):451-471.
[311]Helpman. Endogenous macroeconomic growth theory, European Economic Review, Elsevier,1992, vol.36(2-3):237-267.
[312]Helpman. International Trade in the Presence of Product Differentiation, Economies of Scale and Monopolistic Competition:A Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin Approach, Journal of International Economics,1981, Vol.11 (3):305-340.
[313]Helpman. Labor Market Frictions as a Source of Comparative Advantage, with Implications for Unemployment and Inequality, CEPR Discussion Papers 7707,2010.
[314]Helpman. Multinational Corporations and Trade Structure, Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell,1985, vol.52 (3):443-457.
[315]Helpman. Trade Patterns under Uncertainty with Country Specific Shocks, Econometrica, Econometric Society,1988, Vol.56 (3):645-659.
[316]Helpman. Trade, FDI and the Organization of Firms, Journal of Economic Literature,2006, Vol.44,589-630.
[317]Helpman. Trade, FDI, and the Organization of Firms, Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association,2006, vol.44(3):589-630.
[318]Herzer, Dierk. The Long-Run Relationship between Outward FDI and Total Factor Productivity:Evidence for Developing Countries, provided by Verein fur Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics in its series Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 with number 41,2011.
[319]Hiller, Sanne & Yalcin, Erdal. Switching between Domestic Market Activity, Export and FDI, provided by University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business and Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 09-13,2009.
[320]Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Coelli, Tim. Measurement of agricultural total factor productivity growth incorporating environmental factors:A nutrients balance approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2011, Vol.62 (3) 462-474.
[321]Holmes, T. J., Levine, D. K., Schmitz, J. A.. Monopoly and the Incentive to Innovate When Adoption Involves Switchover Disruptions. NBER Working Paper No.13864, 2008.
[322]Hongshik Lee & Joon Hyung Lee. An Empirical Assessment of a Trade-off between FDI and Exports, provided by East Asian Bureau of Economic Research in its series Trade Working Papers with number 22009,2007.
[323]Hopenhayn, Hugo A. Entry, Exit, and Firm Dynamics in Long Run Equilibrium, Econometrica,1992, Vol.60 (5):1127-1150.
[324]Horst Raff & Michael Ryan & Frank Stahler. Firm Productivity and the Foreign-Market Entry Decision, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,2012, Vol.21 (3):849-871.
[325]Horst Raff & Michael Ryan & Frank Stahler. The choice of market entry mode: Greenfield investment, M&A and joint venture, International Review of Economics & Finance,2009, Vol.18 (1):3-10.
[326]Hummels, D.. Transportation Costs and International Trade in the Second Era of Globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2007, Vol.21,131-154.
[327]Ignat Stepanok. Cross-Border Mergers and Greenfield Foreign Direct Investment, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel Working Papers 1805,2012.
[328]Ilke Van Beveren & Hylke Vandenbussche. Product and process innovation and firms'decision to export, Journal of Economic Policy Reform,2010, Vol.13 (1):3-24.
[329]Irarrazabal and Opromolla. Hysteresis in Export Markets. Mimeo New York University,2006.
[330]ITO Banri & TANAKA Ayumu. Open Innovation, Productivity, and Export: Evidence from Japanese firms, provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion papers with number 13006,2013.
[331]ITO Koji. FDI in Emerging Economies:An analysis in a firm heterogeneity model, provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion papers with number 11055,2011.
[332]Jacques Mairesse & Pierre Mohnen & Yanyun Zhao & Feng Zhen. Globalization, Innovation and Productivity in Manufacturing Firms:A Study of Four Sectors of China, provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-10,2012.
[333]James E. Rauch & Alessandra Casella. Overcoming Informational Barriers to International Resource Allocation:Prices and Ties, The Economic Journal,2003, Vol.113 (484):21-42.
[334]Jan G. Jorgensen & Philipp J. H. Schroder. Tariffs and Firm-Level Heterogeneous Fixed Export Costs, provided by DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research in its series Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin with number 496,2005.
[335]Jaroslav Sixta & Kristyna Vltavska & Jaroslav Zbranek. Total Factor Productivity Measurement Based on Labour and Capital Services, Politicka ekonomie,2011, Vol.2011 (5): 599-617.
[336]Jennifer Abel-Koch. Firm Size and the Choice of Export Mode, Working Papers 1105, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz, revised 29 Mar 2011,2011.
[337]Jienwatcharamongkhol Viroj and Hossein Tavassoli Mohammad. Bridging Firm Innovation, Productivity and Export:An Analysis using Swedish CIS data. Provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA Conference Papers with number ersA8p885,2012.
[338]Johannes Becker & Clemens Fuest. Tax Competition-Greenfield Investment versus Mergers and Acquisitions, provided by CESifo Group Munich in its series CESifo Working Paper Series with number 2247,2008.
[339]John R. Baldwin & Wulong Gu. Plant Turnover and Productivity Growth in Canadian Manufacturing, provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers with number 2002/2,2012.
[340]Jonathan Eaton & Samuel Kortum & Francis Kramarz. An Anatomy of International Trade:Evidence from French Firms, provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 14610,2008.
[341]Juan A. Manez, Maria E. Rochina-Barrachina and Juan A. Sanchis Llopis. Self-selection into Exports:Productivity and/or Innovation? Applied Economics Quarterly, 2009,55 (3):219-242.
[342]Juan Carlos Hallak and Jagadeesh Sivadasan. Firms'Exporting Behavior under Quality Constraints, provided by Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau in its series Working Papers with number 09-13,2009.
[343]K.Hayakawa and K.Tanaka. Export platform FDI and firm heterogeneity, provided by Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO) in its series IDE Discussion Papers with number 310,2011.
[344]Kazunobu Hayakawa and Toshiyuki Matsuura. Complex vertical FDI and firm heterogeneity:Evidence from East Asia, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2011,25 (3):273-289.
[345]Keiko ITO. Sources of Learning-by-Exporting Effects:Does Exporting Promote Innovation?provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-06,2012.
[346]Khalid Sekkat. Manufactured Exports and FDI in the MED-11 Countries:Recent Evolution, Determinants and Prospects, provided by CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research in its series CASE Network Studies and Analyses with number 432,2012.
[347]Kimura and Kiyota. Exports, FDI, and Productivity:Dynamic Evidence from Japanese Firms, Review of World Economics,2006, Vol.142 (4):695-719.
[348]Klein, Peek and Rosengren. Troubled Banks, Impaired Foreign Direct Investment: The Role of Relative Access to Credit, American Economic Review,2002, Vol.92 (3): 664-682.
[349]Krugman, Paul. Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,1980, vol.70(5):950-59.
[350]Larry D. Qiu & Shengzu Wang. FDI Policy, Greenfield Investment and Cross-border Mergers, Review of International Economics,2011, Vol.19 (5):836-851.
[351]Laszlo Halpern and Balazs Murakozy. Innovation, Productivity and Exports:the Case of Hungary. Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2012,21 (2):151-173.
[352]Lee, In Hyeock & Rugman, Alan M. Firm-specific advantages, inward FDI origins, and performance of multinational enterprises, Journal of International Management,2012,18 (2):132-146.
[253]Lee, Khai Sheang & Tan, Soo Jiuan. E-retailing versus physical retailing:A theoretical model and empirical test of consumer choice, Journal of Business Research,2003, Vol.56 (11):877-885.
[354]Levinsohn and Pctrin. Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables, Review of Economic Studies,2003, Vol.70 (2):317-341.
[355]Levinson. Technology, International Trade and Pollution from U.S. Manufacturing, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers 13616,2007.
[356]Lin, Faqin & Tang, Hsiao Chink. Exporting and Innovation:Theory and Firm-Level Evidence from the People's Republic of China, provided by Asian Development Bank in its series Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration with number 111,2013.
[357]Liu, Xiaohui & Zou, Huan. The impact of greenfield FDI and mergers and acquisitions on innovation in Chinese high-tech industries, Journal of World Business,2008, Vol.43 (3):52-364.
[358]Lu J-Y, Lu Y, Zhang T. Intermediaries, Firm Heterogeneity and ExPorting Behavior, Tsing Hua-Hku International Economics Meeting, Working Paper,2011.
[358]Luljeta Hajderllari & Kostas Karantininis & Lartey G.Lawson. FDI as an Export-Platform:A Gravity Model for the Danish Agri-Food Industry, provided by University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics in its series IFRO Working Paper with number 2012/7,2012.
[360]Managi, S., A. Hibiki, and T. Tsurumi. Does Trade Openness Improve Environmental Quality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2009, Vol.58, 346-363.
[361]Manova and Zhang. Export Prices across Firms and Destinations, the Quarterly Journal of Economics,2012, Vol.127 (1):379-436.
[362]Marin, D. and Verdier, T. Competing in Organizations:Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade, GESY Discussion Paper no.207,2007.
[363]Martijn Boermans. Do Exports, FDI, and Outsourcing in Transition Countries Drive Firm-Level Innovation? Atlantic Economic Journal,2013, Vol.41 (2):197-198.
[364]Massimiliano Bratti & Giulia Felice, Are Exporters More Likely to Introduce Product Innovations? The World Economy,2012, Vol.35 (11):1559-1598.
[365]Matthieu Crozet & Keith Head & Thierry Mayer. Quality Sorting and Trade: Firm-level Evidence for French Wine, The Review of Economic Studies,2012, Vol.79 (2) 609-644.
[366]Maurice Kugler & Eric Verhoogen. The Quality-Complementarity Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence from Colombia, provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 14418,2008.
[367]Mayer & Melitz & Ottaviano. Market size, competition and the product mix of exporters, Working Paper Research 202, National Bank of Belgium,2010.
[368]McDonald, R. and Siegel, D. R.The Value of Waiting to Invest. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1986, Vol.101 (4):707-728.
[369]Melitz & Mayer&Ottaviano. Market Size, Competition, and the Product Mix of Exporters, Working Paper 64736, Harvard University OpenScholar,2013.
[370]Melitz & Ottaviano. Market Size, Trade, and Productivity, Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press,2008, vol.75(1):295-316.
[371]Melitz & Polanec. Dynamic Olley-Pakes Productivity Decomposition with Entry and Exit, provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 18182,2012.
[372]Melitz & Redding. Firm Heterogeneity and Aggregate Welfare, Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers 2013-11, Sciences Po Departement of Economics,2013.
[373]Melitz & Redding. Heterogeneous Firms and Trade, CEPR Discussion Papers 9317, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers,2013a.
[374]Melitz & Redding.Firm Heterogeneity and Aggregate Welfare, CEP Discussion Papers dp 1200, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE,2013b.
[375]Melitz & Treler. Gains from Trade When Firms Matter, Journal of Economic Perspectives,2012, Vol.26 (2):91-118.
[376]Melitz, Marc, Thierry Mayer, and Gianmarco IP Ottaviano. Market Size, Competition, and the Product Mix of Exporters. American Economic Review,2014,Vol.104 (2):495-536.
[377]Melitz. The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity, Econometrica, Econometric Society,2003, vol.71(6):1695-1725.
[378]Mez-Castillejo, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E.,Sanchis-Llopis, J. A., Self-selection into Exports:Productivity and/or Innovation?, Applied Economics Quarterly, 2009,55 (3):219-242.
[379]Mohamed Chaffai & Patrick Plane. Total Factor Productivity of Tunisia's manufacturing sectors:measurement, determinants and convergence towards OECD countries, provided by HAL in its series Working Papers with number halshs-00562642,2011.
[380]Mohammad Movahedi and Olivier Gaussens. Innovation, productivity, and export: Evidence from SMEs in Lower Normandy, France, Provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 40443,2012.
[381]Mora Jesse & Singh Nirvikar. Trade Productivity Upgrading, Trade Fragmentation, and FDI in Manufacturing:The Asian Development Experience, provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 37127,2012.
[382]Movahedi et al. Organizational Innovation and its Link with Technological Innovation in SMEs:Empirical Evidence for Lower Normandy-France, provided by Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes 1, University of Caen and CNRS in its series Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen) with number 201229,2012.
[383]Mrazova and Neary. Selection Effects with Heterogeneous Firms, provided by University of Oxford, Department of Economics in its series Economics Series Working Papers with number 588,2011.
[384]Murat ker. Importing, Exporting, and Innovation in Developing Countries, Review of International Economics,2012, Vol.20 (2):299-314.
[385]Nagano, Mamoru. Similarities and differences among cross-border M&A and greenfield FDI determinants:Evidence from Asia and Oceania, Emerging Markets Review, 2013, Vol.16 (C):100-118
[386]Naude, Wim & Gries, Thomas & Bilkic, Natasa. Firm-Level Heterogeneity and the Decision to Export:A Real Option Approach, provided by Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in its series IZA Discussion Papers with number 7346,2013.
[387]Navaretti, B. G, Venables, A. J.. Multinational Firms in the World Economy.Princeton University Press,2004.
[388]Neary, Peter J. Trade Costs and Foreign Direct Investment, International Review of Economics and Finance,2009, Vol.18,207-218.
[389]Nitsch. Die Another Day:Duraiton in German Import Trade. CESIFO Working Paper No.2085,2007.
[390]Nocke, V. and Yeaple, S.. Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions versus Greenfield Foreign Direct Investment:The Role of Firm Heterogeneity. Journal of International Economics,2007, Vol.72 (2):336-365.
[391]Nocke, Volker & Yeaple, Stephen. Globalization and Multiproduct Firms, Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 408, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich,2013.
[392]Nocke, Volker and Stephen Yeaple. An Assignment Theory of Foreign Direct Investment, Review of Economic Studies,2008, Vol.75,529-557.
[393]Norback, Pehr-Johan and Lars Persson. Globalization and Profitability of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions,Economic Theory,2008,Vol.35,241-266.
[394]Norback, Pehr-Johan and Lars Persson. Investment Liberalization-Why a Restrictive Cross-Border Merger Policy Can Be Counterproductive, Journal of International Economics,2007, Vol.72,366-380.
[395]Oldenski, Lindsay. Export versus FDI and the Communication of Complex Information, Journal of International Economics,2012, Vol.87 (2):312-322.
[396]Olley and Pakes. The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry, Econometrica,1996, Vol.64 (6):1263-1297.
[397]Owen Gabbitas & Paul Gretton. Firm size and export performance:some empirical evidence, provided by EconWPA in its series International Trade with number 0304003,2003.
[398]Pablo Fajgelbaum & Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman. Income Distribution, Product Quality, and International Trade, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press,2011, vol.119(4):721-765.
[399]Palangkaraya. The Link between Innovation and Export:Evidence from Australiafs Small and Medium Enterprises, provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-08,2012.
[400]Paul S. Segerstrom & Ignat Stepanok. Learning How to Export Kiel Institute for the World Economy,, Kiel Working Papers 1801,2013.
[401]Paula Bustos. The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Skill Upgrading Evidence from Argentina, Working Papers 559, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics,2011a.
[402]Paula Bustos. Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading:Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,2011, vol.101(1):304-40.
[403]Paula Neto & Antonio Brandao & Antonio Cerqueira. The Impact of FDI, Cross Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Greenfield Investments on Economic Growth, provided by Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto in its series FEP Working Papers with number 291,2008.
[404]Paula Neto & Antonio Brandao & Antonio Cerqueira. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Cross Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Greenfield Investments, provided by Gabinete de Estrategia e Estudos, Ministerio da Economia e da Inovacao in its series GEE Papers with number 0017,2009.
[405]Petropoulou D. Information Costs. Networks and Intermediation in International Trade., Discussion Paper.370. Department of Economics. University of Oxford,2007.
[406]Pierre Mohnen & Bronwyn H. Hall. Innovation and Productivity:An Update, Eurasian Business Review,2013, Vol.3 (1):47-65.
[407]Pol Antras & Elhanan Helpman. Global Sourcing, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press,2004, Vol.112 (3):552-580.
[408]Priit Vahter. Does FDI Spur Productivity, Knowledge Sourcing and Innovation by Incumbent Firms? Evidence from Manufacturing Industry in Estonia, The World Economy, 2011,34 (8):1308-1326.
[409]Puga, Diego & Trefler, Daniel. Wake up and smell the ginseng:International trade and the rise of incremental innovation in low-wage countries, Journal of Development Economics,2010, Vol.91 (1):64-76.
[410]R. Garcia and R. Calantone. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology:a literature review, The Journal of Product Innovation Management,2002(19):110-132.
[411]R.B.Davies and T.Jeppesen. Export mode, Trade Costs, and Productivity Sorting, provided by School Of Economics, University College Dublin in its series Working Papers with number 201225,2011.
[412]Rafael Rob & Nikolaos Vettas. Foreign Direct Investment and Exports with Growing Demand, Review of Economic Studies,2003, Vol.70 (3):629-648.
[413]Raff, H., Ryan, M. and Stahler, F. Firm Productivity and the Foreign-Market Entry Decision, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell,2012, vol.21(3): 849-871.
[414]Ra□, H.,Ryan, M. J.. Firm specific characteristics and the timing of foreign direct investment projects. Review of World Economics,2008, Vol.144 (1):1-31.
[415]Raff, Horst, Michael Ryan and Frank Stahler. Firm Productivity and the Foreign-Market Entry Decision,University of Kiel, mimeo,2011.
[416]Richard Baldwin & James Harrigan. Zeros, Quality, and Space:Trade Theory and Trade Evidence, American Economic Journal:Microeconomics,2011, Vol.3(2):60-88.
[417]Richard Baldwin. Heterogeneous Firms and Trade:Testable and Untestable Properties of the Melitz Model, provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 11471,2005.
[418]Rob, R., Vettas, Nikolaos. Foreign Direct Investment and Exports with Growing Demand. Review of Economic Studies,2003, Vol.70 (3):629-648.
[419]Robert E. Hall & Charles I. Jones. Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others? provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 6564,1999.
[420]Robert Rubin and Jacob Weisberg. In an Uncertain World:Tough Choices from Wall Street to Washington, Random House Trade Paperbacks Press,2004.
[421]Roberto Antonietti & Giulio Cainelli. Innovation, productivity and export Evidence from Italy, provided by Public policies and local development in its series Openloc Working Papers with number 1017,2010.
[422]Roc Armenter & Miklos Koren. Economies of Scale and the Size of Exporters, provided by Center for Firms in the Global Economy in its series CeFiG Working Papers with number 7,2009.
[423]Rodrigo Fuentes&Marco Morales. Measuring TFP:A Latent Variable Approach, provided by Central Bank of Chile in its series Working Papers Central Bank of Chile with number 419,2007.
[424]Roller, Lars-Hendrik, Johan Stennek and Frank Verboven, Effciency Gains From Mergers, Chapter in European Merger Control:Do We Need an Effciency Defence,2006.
[425]Ronald B Davies & Tine Jeppesen, Export mode, Trade Costs, and Productivity Sorting, provided by School Of Economics, University College Dublin in its series Working Papers with number 201225,2012.
[426]Ronald Davies & Lourenco Paz. Tariffs versus VAT in the presence of heterogeneous firms and an informal sector, International Tax and Public Finance, 2011,Volume.18 (5):533-554.
[427]Rosario Crind & Paolo Epifani. Productivity, Quality and Export Behaviour, The Economic Journal,2012, Vol.122 (565):1206-1243.
[428]Rudrani Bhattacharya & Ila Patnaik & Ajay Shah. Export Versus FDI in Services, The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell,2012, vol.35(1):61-78.
[429]Saliola, F.& Seker, M. Total Factor Productivity Across the Developing World, Enterprise Note Series, Enterprise Note No.23, World Bank Group,2011.
[430]Sanghamitra Das & Mark J. Roberts & James R. Tybout. Market Entry Costs, Producer Heterogeneity, and Export Dynamics, Econometrica,2007, Vol.75 (3) 837-873.
[431]Sarbapriya,Ray & Mihir, Kumar Pal. An Application of Economic Capacity Utilization to the Measurement of Total Factor Productivity Growth:Empirical Evidence from Indian Fertilizer Industry, Romanian Journal for Economic Forecasting,2011, Vol.2011 (1): 125-142.
[432]Selin Ozyurt & Timo Mitze. The Spatial Dimension of Trade-and FDI-driven Productivity Growth in Chinese Provinces-A Global Cointegration Approach, provided by Rheinisch-Westfalisches Institut fur Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Universitat Dortmund, Universitat Duisburg-Essen in its series Ruhr Economic Papers with number 0308,2012.
[433]Shawn Arita & Tanaka Kiyoyasu. Heterogeneous multinational firms and productivity gains from falling FDI barriers, provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion papers with number 12010,2012.
[434]Sourafel Girma & Holger Gorg. Outsourcing, Foreign Ownership, and Productivity: Evidence from UK Establishment-level Data, Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell,2004c, vol.12(5):817-832.
[435]Sourafel Girma & Kevin Amess. Do Stock Markets Value Firm-Level Technical Efficiency? Some UK Evidence, Discussion Papers in Economics 04/23, Department of Economics, University of Leicester,2004a.
[436]Sugata Marjit & Toru Kikuchi. Time Zones and FDI with Heterogenous Firms, provided by School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia in its series Discussion Papers Series with number 425,2011.
[437]Takechi, K.. What is Driving the Manufacturing FDI Wave in Asia?. Review of Development Economics,2011, Vol.15 (1):33-47.
[438]Tanaka Ayumu. Firm productivity and the number of FDI destinations:Evidence from a non-parametric test, Economics Letters,2012, Vol.117 (1):1-3.
[439]Tang & Zhang. Quality Differentiation and Trade Intermediation, provided by Department of Economics, Tufts University in its series Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University with number 0771,2012.
[440]Tomiura, Eiichi. Foreign outsourcing, exporting, and FDI:A productivity comparison at the firm level, Journal of International Economics,2007, Vol.72 (1):113-127.
[441]Toshiyuki Matsuura& Kazunobu Hayakawa. The Role of Trade Costs in FDI Strategy of Heterogeneous Firms:Evidence from Japanese Firm-level Data, provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-04,2012.
[442]Toshiyuki Matsuura& Kazunobu Hayakawa.Trade Liberalization and FDI Strategy in Heterogeneous Firms:Evidence from Japanese firm-level data, provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion papers with number 11033,2011.
[443]Uday Bhanu Sinha. Strategic licensing, Exports, FDI, and Host Country Welfare, Oxford Economic Papers,2010, Volume.62 (1):114-131.
[444]UNCTAD. World Investment Report 2010. New York and Geneva:United Nations, 2011.
[445]Vahter. Learning By Exporting:Evidence Based on Data of Knowledge Flows from Innovation Surveys in Estonia, provided by William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan in its series William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series with number wp1011, 2011.
[446]Van Beveren, I. V., Vandenbussche, H., Product and process innovation and the decision to export, Journal of Economic Policy Reform,2010,13(1):3-24.
[447]Van Biesebroeck, Johannes. Exporting raises productivity in sub-Saharan African manufacturing firms, Journal of International Economics,2005, Vol.67 (2):373-391.
[448]Viroj Jienwatcharamongkhol & Mohammad Hossein Tavassoli. Bridging Firm Innovation, Productivity and Export:An Analysis using Swedish CIS data, provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersA8p885,2012.
[449]Vogel Alexander& Wagner Joachim. Innovation and Exports of German Business Services Enterprises:First evidence from a new type of firm data, provided by University of Luneburg, Institute of Economics in its series Working Paper Series in Economics with number 246,2012.
[450]Volker Nocke & Stephen Yeaple. An Assignment Theory of Foreign Direct Investment, PIER Working Paper Archive 05-003, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania,2004.
[451]Wagner, Joachim. The causal effects of exports on firm size and labor productivity: First evidence from a matching approach, provided by Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA) in its series HWWA Discussion Papers with number 155,2011.
[452]Wakasugi Ryuhei & Hongyong Zhang. Effects of Ownership on Exports and FDI: Evidence from Chinese firms, provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion papers with number 12058,2012.
[453]Wakasugi Ryuhei & Natsuhara Takashi. Productivity and FDI of Taiwan Firms:A review from a nonparametric approach, provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion papers with number 12033,2012.
[454]Wang, Chengqi & Hong, Junjie & Kafouros, Mario & Boateng, Agyenim. What drives outward FDI of Chinese firms? Testing the Explanatory Power of Three Theoretical Frameworks, International Business Review,2012,21 (3):425-438.
[455]Warren J Bilkey. An Attempted Integration of the Literature on the Export Behavior of Firms, Journal of International Business Studies,1978, Vol.9 (1):33-46.
[456]Wen-Chung Hsu & Xingbo Gao & Jianhua Zhang & Hsin Mei Lin. The effects of outward FDI on home-country productivity:Do location of investment and market orientation matter? Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies,2011,4 (2):99-116.
[457]Xie. Exporting, Licensing, FDI and Productivity Choice:Theory and Evidence from Chilean Data, mimeo,2011.
[458]Xu Xinpeng and Yu Sheng. Are FDI spillovers regional? Firm-level evidence from China, Journal of Asian Economics,2012,23 (3):244-258.
[459]Yalcin, Erdal & Sala, Davide. Uncertain productivity growth and the choice between FDI and export, provided by Department of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark in its series Discussion Papers of Business and Economics with number 19/2012,2012.
[460]Yin He & Keith E. Maskus. Southern Innovation And Reverse Knowledge Spillovers:A Dynamic Fdi Model, International Economic Review,2012, Vol.53 (1) 279-302.
[2]陈策.异质性厂商国际市场进入方式的选择和政策支持研究[D].西北大学博士论文,2010,10-12。
[3]陈超,姚利民.制造业单位劳动成本的国际比较及其对出口与福利的影响[J].世界经济研究,2007,(6)：24-29。
[4]陈洪涛,陈劲,施放,郑胜华.新兴产业发展中的政府作用机制研究—基于国家政治制度结构的理论分析模型[J].科研管理,2009,(3)：1-8。
[5]陈琳,罗长远.FDI的前后向关联和中国制造业企业生产率的提升[J].世界经济研究,2011,(2)：48-53。
[6]陈文芝.贸易自由化与行业生产率：企业异质性视野的机理分析与实证研究[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,2013：23-27。
[7]陈晓华,刘慧.出口技术复杂度赶超对经济增长影响的实证分析——基于要素密集度异质性视角的非线性检验[J].科学学研究,2012(11)：1650-1661。
[8]陈阵,隋岩.贸易成本如何影响中国出口增长的二元边际——多产品企业视角的实证分析[J].世界经济研究,2013(10)：52-63。
[9]戴觅,余淼杰.企业出口前研发投入、出口及生产率进步——来自中国制造业企业的证据[J].经济学(季刊),2011,(1)：211-230。
[10]戴小勇,成力为.中国出口企业特征及形成原因的实证研究——异质性企业贸易理论的分析视角[J].国际贸易问题,2014,(2)：35-45。
[11]樊增强,宋雅楠.企业国际化动因理论述评[J].当代经济研究,2005,(9)18-22。
[12]付建.出口贸易、企业异质性和生产率：一个比较优势的分析框架[J].经济问题,2012,(2)：4-11。
[13]高国伟.跨国公司生产率差异和国际直接投资战略选择[J].南方经济,2010,(3)：4-11。
[14]高静.技术异质下专业化分工模式与国家出口生产效率研究——基于44个国家1999—2010年面板数据分析[J].世界经济研究,2013,(5)：47-55。
[15]高宇.贸易成本与纯出口企业的异质性[J].国际贸易问题,2014,(2)：46-55。
[16]郭晶,杨艳.经济增长、技术创新与我国高技术制造业出口复杂度研究[J].国际贸易问题,2010,(2)：91-96。
[17]杭雷鸣,孙泽生,郭俊辉.国际商品价格波动与中国出口贸易的能源成本：一个实证分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2011,(2)：17-23。
[18]何暑子,范从来.人民币升值对出口企业研发活动的影响——异质性企业双寡头博弈分析[J].经济管理,2012,(5)：1-9。
[19]洪联英,罗能生.全球生产与贸易新格局下企业国际化发展路径及策略选择—基于生产率异质性理论的分析方法[J].世界经济研究,2007,(12)：55-61。
[20]黄春媛,何永江,李薇贞.FDI对我国电子工业生产率的行业内溢出效应研究[J].南开经济研究,2010,(6)：98-112。
[21]黄静波,黄小兵.异质性企业、金融约束与出口——基于中国企业的研究[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2012,(2)：181-189。
[22]黄玖立,徐旻鸿.境内运输成本与中国的地区出口模式[J].世界经济,2012,(1)：58-76。
[23]黄小兵,黄静波.异质性企业、贸易成本与出口——基于中国企业的研究[J].南开经济研究,2013,(4)：111-125。
[24]黄小兵.异质性企业、汇率波动与出口——基于中国企业的实证研究[J].国际金融研究,2011,(10)：47-54。
[25]江波,李美云.生产服务业出口贸易、创新与生产率提升：理论与实证[J].财经研究,2012,(7)：68-78。
[26]蒋为,顾凌骏.融资约束、成本异质性与企业出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2014,(2)：167-176。
[27]金祥荣,刘振兴,于蔚.企业出口之动态效应研究[J],经济学(季刊),2012,(3)：1097-1112。
[28]康志勇.出口贸易与自主创新——基于我国制造业企业的实证研究[J],国际贸易问题,2011,(2)：35-45。
[29]孔祥贞,刘海洋,徐大伟.出口固定成本、融资约束与中国企业出口参与[J].世界经济研究,2013,(4)：46-54。
[30]赖伟娟,黄静波.出口行为、企业异质性与生产率研究——基于1999-2007年中国企业普查数据的实证分析[J].国际经贸探索,2011,(7)：26-33。
[31]赖永剑.空间动态外部性、企业异质性与出口决定——基于中国制造业企业面板数据[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2011,(2)：94-102。
[32]雷欣,陈继勇.FDI、出口与区域经济增长——异质面板“格兰杰”因果检验的应用[J].经济管理,2012,(6)：10-20。
[33]李春顶,石晓军,邢春冰.“出口-生产率悖论”：对中国经验的进一步考察[J].经济学动态,2010,(8)：90-95。
[34]李春顶、王领.异质性企业的出口贸易行为选择与经济效应[J].商业经济与管理,2009,(8)：43-52。
[35]李春顶.新—新贸易理论文献综述[J].世界经济文汇,2010,(1)：102-117。
[36]李春顶.中国出口企业是否存在“生产率悖论”：基于中国制造业企业数据的检验[J],世界经济,2010,(7)：64-81。
[37]李宏兵.企业异质性与贸易中介理论研究新进展[J].西部论坛,2012,(3)：62-67。
[38]李军.企业多重异质性与出口行为：Melitz模型的拓展与来自中国制造业的证据[D].华中科技大学博士论文,2011,45-51。
[39]李平,田朔.出口贸易对技术创新影响的研究：水平溢出与垂直溢出——基于动态面板数据模型的实证分析[J].世界经济研究,2010,(2)：44-49。
[40]李善民,李昶.跨国并购还是绿地投资?——FDI进入模式选择的影响因素研究[J],经济研究,2013,(12)：134-147。
[41]李真.劳动力成本对中国出口贸易碳排放的倒逼影响[J].当代经济研究,2013,(6)：43-49。
[42]李志远,于淼杰.生产率、信贷约束与企业出口[J],经济研究,2013,(6)：85-99。
[43]梁会君,史长宽.国内外贸易成本差异、行业要素密集度与我国出口“生产率悖论”——基于中国制造业动态面板数据[J].山西财经大学学报,2013,(10)：54-67。
[44]廖利兵,陈建国,曹标.FDI、出口与企业的异质性——基于不同方式下风险差异的视角[J].世界经济研究,2013,(10)：61-69。
[45]林学军.战略性新兴产业的发展与形成模式研究[J].中国软科学,2012,(2)：26-34。
[46]刘刚.企业的异质性假设——对企业本质和行为基础的演化论解释[J].中国社会科学,2002,(2)：13-19。
[47]刘海洋,罗洋.中国高技术企业出口影响因素分析——基于异质性企业贸易理论 的视角[J].经济经纬,2012,(1)：62-66。
[48]刘慧.产品质量升级的出口效应分析——基于企业异质性视角[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(3)：14-22。
[49]刘慧.企业异质性、出口与劳动收入占比——基于要素密集度异质性视角的Stolper-Samuelson定理检验[J].当代经济科学,2013,(3)：54-62。
[50]刘凯旋,孙凤英.会计视角下的反倾销规避—基于出口产品环境成本核算角度[J].国际贸易问题,2009,(9)：56-60。
[51]刘小玄、吴延兵.企业生产率增长及来源：创新还是需求拉动[J].经济研究,2009,(7)：45-54。
[52]刘秀玲.中国出口企业技术创新异质性研究——来自上市公司的经验证据[J].中国软科学,2012,(5)：103-113。
[53]马风涛,吕智.异质性企业、生产率与出口市场选择——基于中国汽车企业的实证分析[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2012,(3)：134-140。
[54]马凌远.中国对外贸易成本的分解及其对出口的影响——基于随机前沿引力模型[J].世界经济研究,2012,(9)：66-71。
[55]毛其淋,盛斌.贸易自由化、企业异质性与出口动态——来自中国微观企业数据的证据[J].管理世界,2013,(3)：48-68。
[56]柒江艺,许和连.行业异质性、适度知识产权保护与出口技术进步[J].中国工业经济,2012,(2)：79-88。
[57]钱春海.成本信息不对称、产品市场竞争与自动出口限制政策研究[J].当代财经,2008,(3)：88-93。
[58]钱海燕,杨忠.中国企业国际化理论研究发展历程及未来展望：1978-2006[J].国际贸易,2008,(9)：121-128。
[59]钱学锋,王胜,陈勇兵.中国的多产品出口企业及其产品范围[J].管理世界,2013,(1)：9-27。
[60]钱学锋,王菊蓉,黄云湖,王胜.出口与中国工业企业的生产率——自我选择效应还是出口学习效应[J].数量经济与技术经济研究,2011,(2)：37-51。
[61]钱学锋.企业异质性、贸易成本与中国出口增长的二元边际[J].管理世界,2008,(9)：48-56。
[62]乔立、金占明.关系对企业国际化进入模式战略选择的影响[J].科学学与科学 技术管理,2009,(9)：109-113。
[63]邵敏.出口贸易是否促进了我国劳动生产率的持续增长——基于工业企业微观数据的实证检验[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012,(2)：51-67。
[64]邵敏.我国企业出口对员工收入的影响——基于企业异质性视角的经验研究[J].中国工业经济,2011(9)：67-77。
[65]施炳展.企业异质性、地理距离与中国出口产品价格的空间分布[J].南方经济,2011(3)：61-74。
[66]施炳展.中国企业出口产品质量异质性：测度与事实[J].经济学(季刊),2013,(1)：263-284。
[67]史青.出口和生产率：基于异质性企业的实证研究综述[J].国际经贸探索,2012,(8)：22-35。
[68]史长宽,梁会君.行政垄断、市场进入成本与出口生产率悖论——基于中国工业省级动态面板数据的经验分析[J].经济与管理研究,2013,(9)：28-37。
[69]宋红军.外国直接投资对中国内资企业出口溢出效应的异质性研究——基于FDI不同进入模式角度的分析[J].云南社会科学,2012,(1)：104-108。
[70]孙俊新.沉没成本对企业出口决策的影响[J].山西财经大学学报,2013,(4)：60-71。
[71]孙晓华,孙哲.出口贸易对企业生产率的异质性影响——基于行业特征、企业规模和出口比重分组的实证检验[J].世界经济研究,2012,(8)：37-43。
[72]汤二子,李影,张海英.异质性企业、出口与“生产率悖论”——基于2007年中国制造业企业层面的证据[J].南开经济研究,2011,(3)：79-96。
[73]汤二子,孙振.异质性生产率、产品质量与中国出口企业的“生产率悖论”[J].世界经济研究,2012,(11)：10-16。
[74]汤二子,邵莹,刘海洋.生产率对企业出口的影响研究——兼论新新贸易理论在中国的适用性[J].世界经济研究,2012,(1)：62-68。
[75]汤二子、孙振.引入产品质量的异质性企业贸易模型及中国经验证据[J].经济评论,2012,(4)：68-77。
[76]田东文,姚微.技术性贸易措施影响中国制造业出口的实证分析——基于企业异质性视角的研究[J].国际经贸探索,2012,(3)：99-113。
[77]田志龙,邓新明、Taieb Hafsi.企业市场行为、非市场行为与竞争互动——基于 中国家电行业的案例研究[J].管理世界,2007,(8)：116-128。
[78]汪秀婷,杜海波.系统视角下战略性新兴产业创新系统架构与培育路径研究[J].科学管理研究,2012,(1)：10-14。
[79]王国顺,郑准,杨昆.企业国际化理论的演进[M].北京：人民出版社,2009：25-50。
[80]王国顺,郑准.企业国际化研究的基本问题：理论演进视角[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(1)：5-10。
[81]王华,许和连,杨晶晶.出口、异质性与企业生产率——来自中国企业层面的证据[J].财经研究,2011,(6)：36-46。
[82]王怀民.加工贸易、劳动力成本与农民工就业——兼论新劳动法和次贷危机对我国加工贸易出口的影响[J].世界经济研究,2009,(1)：15-18。
[83]王淑云,孙泽生.出口补贴、运输成本与贸易模式——对传统分析的矫正和扩展[J].国际经贸探索,2011,(8)：76-82。
[84]王勇.异质性理论框架下产品出口的影响因素——基于宁波市的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2013,(5)：87-93。
[85]王增涛,庄贵军,樊秀峰.中国制造企业国际化的影响因素与分析框架：以TCL为例[J].南开管理评论,2005,(3)：88-94。
[86]吴福象,王新新.行业集中度、规模差异与创新绩效——基于GVC模式下要素集聚对战略性新兴产业创新绩效影响的实证分析[J].上海经济研究,2011,(7)：69-76。
[87]项松林,赵曙东.融资异质性对企业出口的影响——信贷投资与抵押贷款的比较研究[J].国际贸易问题,2013,(11)：145-154。
[88]项松林.异质性企业、结构转型与稳定出口[J].经济评论,2011,(4)：104-113。
[89]谢孟军,郭艳茹.语言交易成本对中国出口贸易的影响[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2013,(5)：102-112。
[90]熊正德、林雪.战略性新兴产业上市公司金融支持效率及其影响因素研究[J].经济管理,2010,(11)：20-25。
[91]许晖,余娟.企业国际化经营中关键风险的识别研究[J].南开管理评论,2007,(4)：92-97。
[92]许统生,陈文婷.贸易成本构件及其变化对我国出口的影响——随机前沿分析[J].江西社会科学,2013,(1)：43-48。
[93]严建苗,王辰璐.异质性、生产率与出口贸易——来自浙江民营企业的经验证据[J].浙江社会科学,2013,(4)：37-46。
[94]杨丹萍.我国出口贸易环境成本内在化效应的实证分析与政策建议[J].财贸经济,2011,(6)：94-99。
[95]杨汝岱,朱诗娥.企业、地理与出口产品价格[J].经济学(季刊),2013,(4)：1347-1368。
[96]杨瑞龙,刘刚.企业的异质性假设和企业竞争优势的内生性分析[J].中国工业经济,2002,(1)：88-95。
[97]易靖韬,傅佳莎.企业生产率与出口：浙江省企业层面的证据[J].世界经济,2011,(5)：74-92。
[98]易靖韬.企业异质性、市场进入成本、技术溢出效应与出口参与决定[J].经济研究,2009,(9)：106-115。
[99]印梅,王光伟.双边汇率变动、异质性传导与对日出口结构——基于SITC分类数据的实证分析[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2013,(4)：129-143。
[100]于春海,张胜满.市场进入成本与我国出口企业生产率之谜[J].中国人民大学学报,2013,(2)：53-61。
[101]于洪霞,龚六堂,陈玉宇.出口固定成本融资约束与企业出口行为[J].经济研究,2011,(4)：55-67。
[102]余官胜.我国出口贸易和技术创新关系实证研究——基于联立方程组[J].科学学研究,2011,(2)：300-305。
[103]余淼杰.加工贸易、企业生产率和关税减免：来自中国产品面的证据[J].经济学(季刊),2011,(4)：1251-1280。
[104]余淼杰.加工贸易与中国企业生产率[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2013：120-123。
[105]余淼杰.中国的贸易自由化与制造业企业生产率[J].经济研究,2010,(12)：97-110。
[106]俞海山.环境成本内在化的贸易效应分析——兼论近年我国出口关税调整政策[J].财贸经济,2009,(1)：89-93。
[107]张诚,蒙大斌.技术创新、行业特征与生产率绩效——基于中国工业行业的实证分析[J].当代经济科学,2012,(4)：49-55。
[108]张凤,孔庆峰.出口固定投入成本与扩展边际理论研究述评及展望[J].经济评论,2013,(6)：151-158。
[109]张杰,李勇,刘志彪.出口促进中国企业生产率提高吗?——来自中国本土制造业企业的经验证据：1999-2003[J].管理世界,2009,(12)：11-26。
[110]张杰,张培丽,黄泰岩.市场分割推动了中国企业出口吗[J].经济研究,2010,(8)：29-41。
[111]张礼卿,孙俊新.出口是否促进了异质性企业生产率的增长：来自中国制造企业的实证分析[J].南开经济研究,2011,(4)：110-122。
[112]赵春燕,黄汉民.出口工资溢价：自我选择效应还是出口学习效应?——基于企业异质性视角的经验研究[J].国际贸易问题,2013,(9)：111-119。
[113]赵金亮.异质性视角下的出口与生产率：企业动因及行业绩效[D].浙江大学博士论文,2012,45-50。
[114]赵晶,王根蓓.人力资本异质性与中国出口竞争力[J].经济学动态,2011,(9)：67-71。
[115]赵曙明,高素英,周建,刘建朝.企业国际化的条件、路径、模式及其启示[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,(1)：116-122。
[116]赵伟,陈文芝.沉没成本与出口滞后——分析中国出口持续高增长问题的新视角[J].财贸经济,2007,(10)：120-127。
[117]赵伟,韩媛媛,赵金亮.异质性、出口与中国企业技术创新[J].经济理论与经济管理,2012,(4)：5-15。
[118]赵伟,赵金亮,韩媛媛.异质性、沉没成本与中国企业出口决定：来自中国微观企业的经验证据[J].世界经济,2011,(4)：62-79。
[119]赵伟,赵金亮.生产率决定中国企业出口倾向吗——企业所有制异质性视角的分析[J].财贸经济,2011,(5)：100-105。
[120]朱英杰.融资约束、生产率与异质性企业的出口竞争力——微观基础的中国经验考察[J].世界经济研究,2012,(9)：57-66。
[121庄佩芬,蔡秋红.海峡两岸农产品出口结构调整能力与调整成本比较分析[J].国际贸易问题,2012,(3)：137-146。
[122]A.A. Shariff, A. Zaharim and K. Sopian. The Comparison Logit and Probit Regression Analyses in Estimating the Strength of Gear Teeth European Journal of Scientific Research, European Journal of Scientific Research,2009,Vol.27 (4):548-553.
[123]A.Turco and D.Maggioni. Dissecting the Impact of Innovation on Exporting in Turkey, provided by Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali in its series Working Papers with number 388,2013.
[124]Ackerberg, Daniel & Caves, Kevin & Frazer, Garth. Structural identification of production functions, provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 38349,2006.
[125]Afonso, Oscar & Silva, Armando. Non-scale Endogenous Gowth Effects of Subsidies for Exporters, Economic Modelling,2012, Vol.29 (4):1248-1257.
[126]Aghion & Antras & Helpman. Negotiating Free Trade, Journal of International Economics, Elsevier,2007, vol.73 (1):1-30.
[127]Ahn, JaeBin & Khandelwal, Amit K.& Wei, Shang-Jin. The Role of Intermediaries in Facilitating Trade, Journal of International Economics,2011, Vol.84 (1):73-85.
[128]Aida Caldera Sanchez. Innovation and Exporting:Edvidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms, provided by ULB--Universite Libre de Bruxelles in its series Working Papers ECARES with number 2009_014,2009.
[129]Akerman, Anders. A Theory on the Role of Wholesalers in International Trade based on Economies of Scope, provided by Stockholm University, Department of Economics in its series Research Papers in Economics with number 2010:1,2010.
[130]Alessia Lo Turco & Daniela Maggioni. Dissecting the impact of innovation on exporting in Turkey, provided by Universita'Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali in its series Working Papers with number 388,2013.
[131]Alex Rialp & Josep Rialp & David Urbano & Yancy Vaillant. The Born-Global Phenomenon:A Comparative Case Study Research, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2005, Vol.3 (2):133-171.
[132]Alexander Vogel and Joachim Wagner. Innovation and Exports of German Business Services Enterprises:First evidence from a new type of firm data, provided by University of Luneburg, Institute of Economics in its series Working Paper Series in Economics with number 246,2012.
[133]Alfons Palangkaraya. The Link between Innovation and Export:Evidence from Australiafs Small and Medium Enterprises, provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-08,2012.
[134]Alfredo D'Angelo. Innovation and export performance:a study of Italian high-tech SMEs, Journal of Management & Governance,2012, Vol.16 (3):393-423.
[135]Altomonte, Carlo & Ottaviano, Gianmarco. The role of international production sharing in EU productivity and competitiveness, provided by European Investment Bank, Economics Department in its series EIB Papers with number 3/2011,2011.
[136]Andrzej Cieslik & Michael Ryan. Productivity Differences and Foreign Market Entry in an Oligopolistic Industry, Open Economies Review, Springer,2012, vol. 23(3):531-557.
[137]Aneta Karasek. Innovation and Export Performance:Evidence from Lublin Voivodeship, provided by International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia in its series Knowledge and Learning:Global Empowerment; Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2012 with number 949-956, 2012.
[138]Anna Stavrianakis. Licensed to kill:the United Kingdom's arms export licensing process, Economics of Peace and Security Journal,2008, Vol.3 (1):32-39.
[139]Antoine Gervais. Product Quality and Firm Heterogeneity in International Trade, provided by Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau in its series Working Papers with number 13-08,2013.
[140]Antonietti Roberto and Cainelli Giulio. Innovation, Productivity and Export Evidence from Italy, Provided by Public policies and local development in its series Openloc Working Papers with number 1017,2010.
[141]Antonio Navas. Asymmetric trade liberalization, sector heterogeneity and Innovation, provided by Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History) in its series Working Papers in Economic Theory with number 2012/05,2012.
[142]Antras & Arnaud Costinot. Intermediation and Economic Integration, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,2010, vol.100(2):424-428.
[143]Antras & Davin Chor. Organizing the Global Value Chain, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers 18163,2012.
[144]Antras & Desai & C. Fritz Foley. Multinational Firms, FDI Flows, and Imperfect Capital Markets, Quarterly Journal of Economics,2009, Vol.124 (3):1171-1219.
[145]Antras & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Organizations and Trade, Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews,2009, vol.1(1):43-64.
[146]Antras & Helpman. Contractual Frictions and Global Sourcing, CEPR Discussion Papers 6033, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers,2007.
[147]Antras & Luis Garicano & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Offshoring in a Knowledge Economy, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2006, Vol.121 (1):31-77.
[148]Antras & Luis Garicano & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Organizing Offshoring: Middle Managers and Communication Costs, provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 12196,2006a.
[149]Antras & Yeaple. Multinational Firms and the Structure of International Trade, NBER Working Papers 18775, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc,2013.
[150]Antras et al Intermediation and Economic Integration, American Economic Review, 2010, vol.100 (2):424-428.
[151]Antras et al. Intermediated Trade, the Quarterly Journal of Economics,2011, vol. 126 (3):1319-1374.
[152]Antras. Firms, Contracts and Trade Structure, the Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,2003, vol.118(4):1375-1418.
[153]Antweiler, Copeland and Taylor. Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review,2001, Vol.91 (4):877-908.
[154]Aoife Hanley and Joaquin Monreal-Perez. Are Newly Exporting Firms more Innovative? Findings from Matched Spanish Innovators, provided by Kiel Institute for the World Economy in its series Kiel Working Papers with number 1735,2011.
[155]Aranzazu Crespo Rodriguez. Trade, innovation and productivity, provided by Instituto Madrileno de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales in its series Working Papers with number 2012-06,2012.
[156]Ari Kuncoro. Globalization and Innovation in Indonesia:Evidence from Micro-Data on Medium and Large Manufacturing Establishments, provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-09,2012.
[157]Ariel Burstein & Marc J. Melitz. Trade Liberalization and Firm Dynamics, NBER Working Papers 16960, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.,2011
[158]Ariel Burstein & Martin Eichenbaum & Sergio Rebelo. Modeling Exchange Rate Passthrough After Large Devaluations, provided by University of Rochester-Center for Economic Research (RCER) in its series RCER Working Papers with number 514,2005.
[159]Arita, Shawn & Tanaka, Kiyoyasu. Heterogeneous multinational firms and productivity gains from falling FDI barriers, provided by Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO) in its series IDE Discussion Papers with number 324,2012.
[160]Armando Silva & Oscar Afonso & Ana Paula Africano. Which firms are the most innovative? The importance of multinationals and exporters in Portugal, Acta Oeconomica, 2013, Vol.63 (2):157-184.
[161]Artur Klimek. Greenfield Foreign Direct Investment Versus Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions, Eastern European Economics,2011, Vol.49 (6):60-73.
[162]Atkeson and Burstein. Innovation, firm dynamics, and international trade, provided by Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis in its series Staff Report with number 444,2010.
[163]Aw, Bee Yan, Sakkyun Chung and Mark J. Roberts. Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market:Micro-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan(China), World Bank Economic Review,2000, Vol.14,65-90.
[164]Ayumu Tanaka. Firm productivity and the number of FDI destinations:Evidence from a non-parametric test, Economics Letters,2012,117 (1):1-3.
[165]Baily, Martin N., Bartelsman, Eric J., and John Haltiwanger. Labor Productivity: Structural Change And Cyclical Dynamics. The Review of Economics and Statistics,2001, Vol.83 (3):420-433.
[166]Baltagi, Badi H.& Egger, Peter & Pfaffermayr, Michael. Estimating models of complex FDI:Are there third-country effects? Journal of Econometrics,2007, Vol.140 (1): 260-281.
[167]Barbara Spencer. International outsourcing and incomplete contracts, Canadian Journal of Economics,2005, Vol.38 (4):1107-1135.
[168]Bart van Ark & Erik Monnikhof. Size Distribution of Output and Employment:A Data Set for Manufacturing Industries in Five OECD Countries,1960s-1990, provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Economics Department Working Papers with number 166,1996.
[169]Bartelsman and Doms. Understanding Productivity:Lessons from longitudinal microdata, Journal of Economic Literature,2000 (38):569-595.
[170]Becker and Egger. Endogenous Product versus Process Innovation and a Firm's Propensity to Export, provided by CESifo Group Munich in its series CESifo Working Paper Series with number 1906,2007.
[171]Benjamin M Oviatt & Patricia Phillips McDougall. Toward a Theory of International New ventures, Journal of International Business Studies,1994, Vol.25 (1):45-64.
[172]Bernard & Bradford J Jensen. Exporters, Skill Upgrading and The Wage Gap, Working Papers 94-13,Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau,1994.
[173]Bernard & Fort. Factoryless Goods Producers in the US NBER Working Papers 19396, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc,2013b.
[174]Bernard & J. Bradford Jensen & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott. Intrafirm Trade and Product Contractibility, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,2010, vol.100 (2):444-448.
[175]Bernard & Marco Grazzi & Chiara Tomasi. Intermediaries in International Trade: Direct Versus Indirect Modes of Export, CEP Discussion Papers dp1137, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE,2012.
[176]Bernard & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott. Multiproduct Firms and Trade Liberalization, the Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press,2011, vol. 126(3):1271-1318.
[177]Bernard & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott. Products and Productivity, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell,2009 vol.111(4):681-709.
[178]Bernard and Jensen. Why Some Firms Export, Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004, Vol.86 (2):561-569.
[179]Bernard et al. Exporter Dynamics, Firm Size and Growth and Partial Year Effects, Policy Research working paper WPS 6711,2013d.
[180]Bernard et al. Intermediaries in International Trade:Direct Versus Indirect Modes of Export, CEP Discussion Papers dp1137, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE,2012.
[181]Bernard et al. Intermediaries in International Trade:Margins of Trade and Export Flows, CEP Discussion Papers dp1137, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE,2013c.
[182]Bernard et al. Two-Sided Heterogeneity and Trade, CEPR Discussion Paper 9681. 2013a.
[183]Bernard et al. Wholesalers and Retailers in U.S. Trade. American Economic Review.2010,100 (2):408-413.
[184]Bernard&Stephen&Schott. Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms, CEPR Discussion Papers 4622, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers,2004.
[185]Bernard, Andrew B.& Jensen, J Bradford & Redding, Stephen J.& Schott, Peter K. The Empirics of Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade, CEPR Discussion Papers 8677, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers,2011.
[186]Bernard, Andrew B.& Jensen, J. Bradford & Redding, Stephen J.& Schott, Peter K.. The Margins of US Trade (Long Version), CEPR Discussion Papers 7156, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers,2009.
[187]Besedes and Prusa. Product Differentiation and Duration of US Import Trade. Journal of International Economics,2006,70,339-358.
[188]Bilkey&Tesar. The Export Behavior of Smaller-Sized Wisconsin Manufacturing Firms, Journal of International Business Studies,1977, Vol.8 (1):93-98.
[189]Bloom, Nicholas and John Van Reenen, Why Do Management Practices Differ across Firms and Countries?, Journal of Economic Perspectives,2010, Vol.24,203-224.
[190]Bloom, Nicolas, Sadun, Raffaella, and John Van Reenen. Americans Do I.T. Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle. NBER Working Paper No.13085,2007.
[191]Blum, Claros, Horstmanni. Intermediation and the Nature of Trade Costs:the Theory and Evidence, Unpublished, Rotman School of Management,2011.
[192]Bonaccorsi. On the Relationship between Firm Size and Export Intensity, Journal of International Business Studies,1992, Vol.23 (4):605-635.
[193]Brainard, S Lael. An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Trade-off between Multinational Sales and Trade, American Economic Review,1997, Vol.87 (4):520-544.
[194]Brainard, S. L..A Simple Theory of Multinational Corporations and Trade with Trade-off Between Proximity and Concentration. NBER Working Paper No.4269,1993.
[195]Breinlich, Holge. Trade Liberalization and Industrial Restructuring through Mergers and Acquisitions,Journal of International Economics,2008,Vol.76,254-266.
[196]Broda, Christian and David E. Weinstein. Globalization and the Gains from Variety. Quarterly Journal of Economics,2006, Vol.121,541-585.
[197]Bruno Cassiman, Elena Golovko Ester Martinez-Ros. Innovation, Exports and Productivity. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2010,28 (4):372-376.
[198]Bustos, P. Trade Liberalization, Exports and Technology Upgrading:Evidence on the Impact of Mercosur on Argentinean Firms, American Economic Review,2011, Vol.101, 304-340.
[199]C.Faustino Horacio,C. Lima Joana and Matos Verga Pedro. Exports, Productivity and Innovation:Evidence from Portugal using micro data. Provided by Department of Economics at the School of Economics and Management (ISEG), Technical University of Lisbon in its series Working Papers with number 2012/13,2012.
[200]Caldera, A., Innovation and exporting:evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms, Review of world Economics,2010,146(4):657-689.
[201]Caliendo&Rossi Hansberg. The Impact of Trade on Organization and Productivity, The Impact of Trade on Organization and Productivity, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2012, Vol.127 (3):1393-1467.
[202]Cassey Lee. The Relationship between Innovation, Productivity and Exports:Some Preliminary Evidence from the Malaysian Manufacturing Sector. Economics Bulletin,2008, 12 (31):1-13.
[203]Cassiman, B., Martinez-Ros, E. Product Innovation and Exports. Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing, Review of World Economics,2010,146 (4):657-689.
[204]Cassiman, Bruno & Golovko, Elena & Martinez, Ester, Innovation, exports and productivity, provided by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven in its series Open Access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven with number urn:hdl:123456789/269644, 2011.
[205]Castellani, D. and Giovannetti, G. Productivity and the International Firm: Dissecting Heterogeneity, Journal of Economic Policy Reform,2010, Vol.13 (1):25-42.
[206]Ceccagnoli and Melitz. Firm Heterogeneity, Imitation, and the Incentives for Cost Reducing R&D Effort, The Journal of Industrial Economics,2005, Vol.53(1):83-100.
[207]Ceccagnoli, M. Firm Heterogeneity, Imitation, and the Incentives for Cost Reducing R&D Effort, the Journal of Industrial Economics,2005, Vol.53 (1):83-100.
[208]Chevassus-Lozza and Latouche. Firms, markets and trade costs:access of French exporters to European agri-food markets, European Review of Agricultural Economics,2012, Vol.39 (2):257-288.
[209]Chin Hee Hahn and Chang-Gyun Park. Direction of Causality in Innovation-Exporting Linkage:Evidence on Korean Manufacturing, provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-07,2012.
[210]Cole, Elliott and Strobl, The Environmental Performance of Firms:The Role of Foreign Ownership, Training, and Experience, Ecological Economics,2008a, Vol.65 (3):538-546.
[211]Cole, M., and R. Elliott, Determining the Trade-environment Composition Effect:the Role of Capital, Labor and Environmental Regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2003,Vol.46 (3):363-383.
[212]Cole, M., R. Elliott and K. Shimamoto, Industrial Characteristics, Environmental Regulations and Air Pollution:An Analysis of the UK Manufacturing Sector, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2005, Vol.50,121-143.
[213]Cole, M., R. Elliott and S. Wu., Industrial Activity and the Environment in China: An Industry-level Analysis, China Economic Review,2008b, Vol.19 (3):393-408.
[214]Cole, M.,R.Elliott, and K. Shimamoto, Industrial Characteristics, Environmental Regulations and Air Pollution:An Analysis of the UK Manufacturing Sector, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2005,Vol.50 (1):121-143.
[215]Comin, D. and Mulani, S. Diverging Trends in Aggregate and in Firm Volatility. Review of Economics & Statistics,2006 Vol.88 (2):374-383.
[216]Comin, D. and Philippon, T..The Rise in Firm-Level Volatility:Causes and Consequences. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 20, eds. M. Gertler and K. Rogo□,MIT Press, Cambridge, MA,167-201,2005.
[217]Costantini, J.A. and Melitz, M.J. The Dynamics of Firm-Level Adjustment to Trade, 2008(In in Helpman, E., Marin, D. and Verdier, T. eds.The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy, Cambridge, and MA:Harvard University Press).
[218]Crozet, Matthieu & Lalanne, Guy & Poncet, Sandra. Wholesalers in international trade, European Economic Review, Elsevier,2013, vol.58(C):1-17.
[219]Cui, J. H. Lapan and G Moschini, Are Exporters More Environmentally Friendly than Non-Exporters? Theory and Evidence, Iowa State University, Working Paper No.12022, 2012.
[230]Cui, J. H. Lapan and G.Moschini, Are Exporters More Environmentally Friendly than Non-Exporters? Theory and Evidence, Iowa State University Working Paper No.12022, 2012.
[231]D. Engel & V. Procher. Export, FDI and firm productivity, Applied Economics, 2012,44(15):1931-1940.
[232]Dalia Marin & Thierry Verdier. Power in the multinational corporation in industry equilibrium, Economic Theory,2009, Vol.38 (3):437-464.
[233]Damijan, J. P., Kostevc, C., Polanec, S. From Innovation to Exporting or Vice versa? The World Economy,2010,33(3):374-398.
[234]Daniel Ackerberg &Paul J Devereux. Improved JIVE Estimators for Overidentified Linear Models with and without Heteroskedasticity, provided by C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number 6926,2008.
[235]Danny Leung & Cesaire Meh & Yaz Terajima. Productivity in Canada:Does Firm Size Matter? Bank of Canada Review,2008, Vol.2008 (Autumn):7-16.
[236]Dasgupta K, Jordim.Quality Uncertainty and Intermediation Trade, Preliminary Draft, University of Toronto,2011.
[237]Davies, R. and S. Batrakova, Is there an environmental benefit to being an exporter? Evidence from firm-level data, Review of World Economics,2012, Vol.148 (3):449-474.
[238]Davies, R. and S. Batrakovals. There an environmental benefit to being an exporter? Evidence from firm-level data', Review of World Economics,2012, Vol. (3):449-474
[239]Del Gatto, Massimo, Giordano Mion and Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, Trade Integration, Firm Selection and the Costs of Non-Europe, mimeo, University of Bologna, 2006.
[240]Demidova, Svetlana & Rodriguez-Clare, Andres. Trade policy under firm-level heterogeneity in a small economy, Journal of International Economics,2009, Vol.78 (1): 100-112.
[241]Desai, Foley and Hines. Capital Controls, Liberalizations, and Foreign Direct Investement, provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 10337,2004. Development Economics,2011, Vol.15 (1):33-47.
[242]Dierk Herzer. How Does Foreign Direct Investment Really Affect Developing Countries'Growth? Review of International Economics,2012, Vol.20 (2):396-414.
[243]Dierk Herzer. Outward FDI, Total Factor Productivity and Domestic Output: Evidence from Germany, International Economic Journal,2012,26(1):155-174.
[244]Dierk Herzer. The Long-Run Relationship between Outward FDI and Total Factor Productivity:Evidence for Developing Countries, provided by Verein fur Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics in its series Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 with number 41,2011.
[245]Dixit A. and Pindyck, R. Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton:Princeton University Press,1994.
[246]Dunning, J. H. International Production and the Multinational Enterprise. London: Allen and Unwin,1981.
[247]Dunning, J. H. Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE:A search for an eclectic approach. In:Ohlin, B. et al. (Eds.), The International Allocation of Economic Activity,1977, pp.395-418,London:Macmillan Press.
[248]Dutz, Mark A.& O'Connell, Stephen D. Productivity, innovation and growth in Sri Lanka:an empirical investigation, provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 6354,2013.
[249]Eaton et al. A Search and Learning Model of Export Dynamics, Mimeo,2008.
[250]Eaton, Jonathan, Samuel Kortum, and Francis Kramarz. An Anatomy of International Trade:Evidence from French Firms.NBER Working Paper No.146110,2008.
[251]Eddy Bekkers. Heterogeneous Popularity and Exporting Uncertainty Open Economies Review,2011. Vol.22 (5):797-824.
[252]Ekholm, K., Forslid, R. and Markusen, J. R. Export-Platform Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of European Economic Association,2007, Vol.5(4):776-795.
[253]Elhanan Helpman & Marc Melitz & Yona Rubinstein. Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,2008, vol.123 (2):441-487,05.
[254]Elhanan Helpman. Foreign Trade and Investment:Firm-level Perspectives, Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science,2014, Vol.81 (321):1-14, 01.
[255]Elhanan Helpman. The Structure of Foreign Trade, Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association,1999, Vol.13 (2):121-144.
[256]Elhanan Helpman. Trade, FDI, and the Organization of Firms, Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association,2006, Vol.44(3):589-630.
[257]Eric A. Verhoogen. Trade, Quality Upgrading, and Wage Inequality in the Mexican Manufacturing Sector, Quarterly Journal of Economics,2008, Vo.123 (2):489-530.
[258]Erin Anderson & Hubert Gatignon. Modes of Foreign Entry:A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions, Journal of International Business Studies,1986, Vol.17 (3):1-26.
[259]Faggio, Giulia Salvanes and John Van Reenen. The Evolution of Inequality in Productivity and Wages:Panel Data Evidence. NBER Working Paper No.13351,2007.
[260]Fajgelbaum, Pablo & Grossman, Gene M.& Helpman, Elhanan. Income distribution, product quality, and international trade, provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 5843,2011.
[261]Faqin Lin and Hsiao Chink Tang. Exporting and Innovation:Theory and Firm-Level Evidence from the People's Republic of China, provided by Asian Development Bank in its series Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration with number 111,2013.
[262]Faustino et al.Exports, Productivity and Innovation:Evidence from Portugal using micro data, provided by Department of Economics at the School of Economics and Management (ISEG), Technical University of Lisbon.in its series Working Papers with number 2012/13,2012.
[263]Felbermayr, Gabriel J.& Jung, Benjamin. Trade Intermediaries and the Organization of Exporters, Review of Internaitonala Economics,2001, Vol.19 (9):634-648.
[264]Felbermayr, Gabriel J.& Jung, Benjamin. Trade intermediaries, incomplete contracts, and the choice of export modes, provided by University of Tubingen, School of Business and Economics in its series Tubinger Diskussionsbeitrage with number 317,2008.
[265]Franco, Chiara. Exports and FDI motivations:Empirical evidence from U.S. foreign subsidiaries, International Business Review,2013, Vol.22 (1):47-62.
[266]Fryges, Helmut & Wagner, Joachim. Exports and Productivity Growth:First Evidence from a Continuous Treatment Approach, provided by ZEW-Zentrum fur Europaische Wirtschaftsforschung/Center for European Economic Research in its series ZEW Discussion Papers with number 07-032,2007.
[267]Fugazza & Molina. Optimal life-cycle portfolios for heterogeneous workers, provided by Department of Economics and Statistics (Dipartimento di Scienze Economico-Sociali e Matematico-Statistiche), University of Torino in its series Working papers with number 012,2012.
[268]Gabriel Felbermayr & Benjamin Jung. Trade Intermediation and the Organization of Exporters, Review of International Economics,2011, Vol.19 (4):634-648.
[269]Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman & Adam Szeidl. Complementarities between Outsourcing and Foreign Sourcing, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,2005, vol.95 (2):19-24.
[270]Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman. Integration Versus Outsourcing In Industry Equilibrium, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,2002, Vol.117 (1):85-120.
[271]Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman. Outsourcing in a Global Economy, Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press,2005, Vol.72(1):135-159.
[272]Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman. Outsourcing Versus FDI in Industry Equilibrium, Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press,2003, Vol. 1(2-3):317-327.
[273]Giachetti. Do service firms benefit from diversification? the moderating effect of competitive intensity and firm size, Mercatie Competitivita,2012, Vol.2012/2 (2):87-103.
[274]Giammario Impullitti & Omar Licandro. Trade, Firm selection, and innovation:the competition channel, provided by Unitat de Fonaments de l'Analisi Economica (UAB) and Institut d'Analisi Economica (CSIC) in its series UFAE and IAE Working Papers with number 841.10,2010.
[275]Girma and Hanley. R&D and Exporting:Comparison of British and Irish firms', Review of World Economics,2008a, Vol.144 (4):750-773.
[276]Girma and Tintelnot. Exporting and the Environment:A New Look with Micro-Data, Kiel Working Papers,1423, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel,2008b.
[277]Girma, Sourafel & Gorg, Holger & Strobl, Eric. Exports, international investment, and plant performance:evidence from a non-parametric test, Economics Letters, Elsevier, 2004b, vol.83(3):317-324.
[278]Girma, Sourafel, Richard Kneller and Mauro Pisu. Exports versus FDI:an Empirical Test, Review of World Economics,2005, Vol.141,193-218.
[279]Grossman & Helpman & Szeidl. Complementarities between Outsourcing and Foreign Sourcing, American Economic Review,2005, Vol.95 (2):19-24.
[280]Grossman & Helpman & Szeidl. Optimal Integration:Strategies for the Multinational Firm, CEPR Discussion Papers 4477, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers,2004.
[281]Grossman & Helpman. Comparative Advantage and Long-Run Growth, NBER Working Papers 2809, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc,1991.
[282]Grossman & Helpman. Product Development and International Trade, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press,1989, Vol.97 (6):1261-1283.
[283]Grossman & Helpman. Separation of Powers and the Budget Process, Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier,2008, vol.92(3-4):407-425.
[284]Grossman & Helpman. Separation of Powers and the Budget Process, NBER Working Papers 12332, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc,2006.
[285]Grossman & Helpman. The Politics of Free Trade Agreements, NBER Working Papers 4597, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc,1993.
[286]Grossman and Helpman. Technology and Trade, Amsterdam, New York and Elsevier, North-Holland,1995.
[]Grossman, Gene M & Helpman, Elhanan. Quality Ladders and Product Cycles, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,1991, Vol.106 (2):557-586.
[287]Grossman, Gene M & Helpman, Elhanan. Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth, Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell,1991, vol.58 (1):43-61.
[288]Grossman, Gene M & Helpman, Elhanan. Trade, Innovation, and Growth, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,1990, vol.80 (2):86-91.
[289]Grossman, Gene M.& Helpman, Elhanan & Szeidl, Adam. Optimal integration strategies for the multinational firm, Journal of International Economics, Elsevier,2006, Vol. 70 (1):216-238.
[290]Grossman, Gene M.& Helpman, Elhanan. Managerial incentives and the international organization of production, Journal of International Economics, Elsevier,2004, Vol.63 (2):237-262.
[291]Gugler, Klaus, Dennis C. Mueller, B.Burcin Yurtoglu and Christine Zulehner. The Effects of Mergers:An International Comparison, International Journal of Industrial Organization,2003, Vol.21,625-653.
[292]Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge. Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation, Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association,2009, vol.47(1):5-86.
[293]Gullstrand, Joakim. Firm and destination-specific export costs:The case of the Swedish food sector, Food Policy,2011, Vol.36 (2):204-213.
[294]Hallak and Sivadasan. Firms' Exporting Behavior under Quality Constraints, provided by Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau in its series Working Papers with number 09-13,2009.
[295]Hanley, A. and J. Monreal-Perez, Are Newly Exporting Firms More Innovative? Findings from Matched Spanish Innovators, Economics Letters,2012,Vol.116 (2):217-220.
[296]Hanley, A. and J. Monreal-Perez. Are Newly Exporting Firms more Innovative? Findings from Matched Spanish Innovators,'Economics Letters,2012, Vol.116 (2):217-220.
[297]Harald Oberhofer & Michael Pfaffermayr. FDI versus Exports:Multiple Host Countries and Empirical Evidence, the World Economy,2012, Vol.35 (3):316-330.
[298]Harms, Philipp & Meon, Pierre-Guillaume. An FDI is an FDI is an FDI? The growth effects of greenfield investment and mergers and acquisitions in developing countries, provided by Verein fur Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics in its series Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 with number 38,2011.
[299]Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Tanaka, Kiyoyasu. Export platform FDI and firm heterogeneity, Paper provided by Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO) in its series IDE Discussion Papers with number 310,2011.
[300]Head and Ries. Heterogeneity and the FDI versus export decision of Japanese manufacturers, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,2003, Vol.17 (4): 448-467.
[301]Head, K. and Ries, J.. Exporting and FDI as Alternative Strategies. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2004, Vol.20 (3):409-423.
[302]Head, Keith & Ries, John. Exporting and FDI as Alternative Strategies, Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2004, Vol.20 (3):409-423.
[303]Head, Keith & Ries, John. Heterogeneity and the FDI versus export decision of Japanese manufacturers, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,2003, Vol.17 (4):448-467.
[304]Head, Keith and John Ries. FDI as an Outcome of the Market for Corporate Control:theory and Evidence, Journal of International Economics,2008, Vol.74,2-20.
[305]Helpman & Melitz & Rubinstein. Trading Partners and Trading Volumes, DEGIT Conference Papers c011_022, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade, 2006.
[306]Helpman & Melitz & Stephen R. Yeaple. Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,2004, vol.94(1): 300-316.
[307]Helpman & Melitz & Rubinstein. Trading Partners and Trading Volumes, DEGIT Conference Papers c011_022, DEGIT,2006.
[308]Helpman & Melitz&Rubinstein. Estimating Trade Flows:Trading Partners and Trading Volumes, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2008, vol.123 (2):441-487.
[309]Helpman, Elhanan & Razin, Assaf. Welfare Aspects of International Trade in Goods and Securities:An Addendum, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,1980, vol. 94(3):615-618.
[310]Helpman. A Simple Theory of International Trade with Multinational Corporations, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press,1984, vol.92(3):451-471.
[311]Helpman. Endogenous macroeconomic growth theory, European Economic Review, Elsevier,1992, vol.36(2-3):237-267.
[312]Helpman. International Trade in the Presence of Product Differentiation, Economies of Scale and Monopolistic Competition:A Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin Approach, Journal of International Economics,1981, Vol.11 (3):305-340.
[313]Helpman. Labor Market Frictions as a Source of Comparative Advantage, with Implications for Unemployment and Inequality, CEPR Discussion Papers 7707,2010.
[314]Helpman. Multinational Corporations and Trade Structure, Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell,1985, vol.52 (3):443-457.
[315]Helpman. Trade Patterns under Uncertainty with Country Specific Shocks, Econometrica, Econometric Society,1988, Vol.56 (3):645-659.
[316]Helpman. Trade, FDI and the Organization of Firms, Journal of Economic Literature,2006, Vol.44,589-630.
[317]Helpman. Trade, FDI, and the Organization of Firms, Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association,2006, vol.44(3):589-630.
[318]Herzer, Dierk. The Long-Run Relationship between Outward FDI and Total Factor Productivity:Evidence for Developing Countries, provided by Verein fur Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics in its series Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 with number 41,2011.
[319]Hiller, Sanne & Yalcin, Erdal. Switching between Domestic Market Activity, Export and FDI, provided by University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business and Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 09-13,2009.
[320]Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Coelli, Tim. Measurement of agricultural total factor productivity growth incorporating environmental factors:A nutrients balance approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2011, Vol.62 (3) 462-474.
[321]Holmes, T. J., Levine, D. K., Schmitz, J. A.. Monopoly and the Incentive to Innovate When Adoption Involves Switchover Disruptions. NBER Working Paper No.13864, 2008.
[322]Hongshik Lee & Joon Hyung Lee. An Empirical Assessment of a Trade-off between FDI and Exports, provided by East Asian Bureau of Economic Research in its series Trade Working Papers with number 22009,2007.
[323]Hopenhayn, Hugo A. Entry, Exit, and Firm Dynamics in Long Run Equilibrium, Econometrica,1992, Vol.60 (5):1127-1150.
[324]Horst Raff & Michael Ryan & Frank Stahler. Firm Productivity and the Foreign-Market Entry Decision, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,2012, Vol.21 (3):849-871.
[325]Horst Raff & Michael Ryan & Frank Stahler. The choice of market entry mode: Greenfield investment, M&A and joint venture, International Review of Economics & Finance,2009, Vol.18 (1):3-10.
[326]Hummels, D.. Transportation Costs and International Trade in the Second Era of Globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2007, Vol.21,131-154.
[327]Ignat Stepanok. Cross-Border Mergers and Greenfield Foreign Direct Investment, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel Working Papers 1805,2012.
[328]Ilke Van Beveren & Hylke Vandenbussche. Product and process innovation and firms'decision to export, Journal of Economic Policy Reform,2010, Vol.13 (1):3-24.
[329]Irarrazabal and Opromolla. Hysteresis in Export Markets. Mimeo New York University,2006.
[330]ITO Banri & TANAKA Ayumu. Open Innovation, Productivity, and Export: Evidence from Japanese firms, provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion papers with number 13006,2013.
[331]ITO Koji. FDI in Emerging Economies:An analysis in a firm heterogeneity model, provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion papers with number 11055,2011.
[332]Jacques Mairesse & Pierre Mohnen & Yanyun Zhao & Feng Zhen. Globalization, Innovation and Productivity in Manufacturing Firms:A Study of Four Sectors of China, provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-10,2012.
[333]James E. Rauch & Alessandra Casella. Overcoming Informational Barriers to International Resource Allocation:Prices and Ties, The Economic Journal,2003, Vol.113 (484):21-42.
[334]Jan G. Jorgensen & Philipp J. H. Schroder. Tariffs and Firm-Level Heterogeneous Fixed Export Costs, provided by DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research in its series Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin with number 496,2005.
[335]Jaroslav Sixta & Kristyna Vltavska & Jaroslav Zbranek. Total Factor Productivity Measurement Based on Labour and Capital Services, Politicka ekonomie,2011, Vol.2011 (5): 599-617.
[336]Jennifer Abel-Koch. Firm Size and the Choice of Export Mode, Working Papers 1105, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz, revised 29 Mar 2011,2011.
[337]Jienwatcharamongkhol Viroj and Hossein Tavassoli Mohammad. Bridging Firm Innovation, Productivity and Export:An Analysis using Swedish CIS data. Provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA Conference Papers with number ersA8p885,2012.
[338]Johannes Becker & Clemens Fuest. Tax Competition-Greenfield Investment versus Mergers and Acquisitions, provided by CESifo Group Munich in its series CESifo Working Paper Series with number 2247,2008.
[339]John R. Baldwin & Wulong Gu. Plant Turnover and Productivity Growth in Canadian Manufacturing, provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers with number 2002/2,2012.
[340]Jonathan Eaton & Samuel Kortum & Francis Kramarz. An Anatomy of International Trade:Evidence from French Firms, provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 14610,2008.
[341]Juan A. Manez, Maria E. Rochina-Barrachina and Juan A. Sanchis Llopis. Self-selection into Exports:Productivity and/or Innovation? Applied Economics Quarterly, 2009,55 (3):219-242.
[342]Juan Carlos Hallak and Jagadeesh Sivadasan. Firms'Exporting Behavior under Quality Constraints, provided by Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau in its series Working Papers with number 09-13,2009.
[343]K.Hayakawa and K.Tanaka. Export platform FDI and firm heterogeneity, provided by Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO) in its series IDE Discussion Papers with number 310,2011.
[344]Kazunobu Hayakawa and Toshiyuki Matsuura. Complex vertical FDI and firm heterogeneity:Evidence from East Asia, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2011,25 (3):273-289.
[345]Keiko ITO. Sources of Learning-by-Exporting Effects:Does Exporting Promote Innovation?provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-06,2012.
[346]Khalid Sekkat. Manufactured Exports and FDI in the MED-11 Countries:Recent Evolution, Determinants and Prospects, provided by CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research in its series CASE Network Studies and Analyses with number 432,2012.
[347]Kimura and Kiyota. Exports, FDI, and Productivity:Dynamic Evidence from Japanese Firms, Review of World Economics,2006, Vol.142 (4):695-719.
[348]Klein, Peek and Rosengren. Troubled Banks, Impaired Foreign Direct Investment: The Role of Relative Access to Credit, American Economic Review,2002, Vol.92 (3): 664-682.
[349]Krugman, Paul. Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,1980, vol.70(5):950-59.
[350]Larry D. Qiu & Shengzu Wang. FDI Policy, Greenfield Investment and Cross-border Mergers, Review of International Economics,2011, Vol.19 (5):836-851.
[351]Laszlo Halpern and Balazs Murakozy. Innovation, Productivity and Exports:the Case of Hungary. Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2012,21 (2):151-173.
[352]Lee, In Hyeock & Rugman, Alan M. Firm-specific advantages, inward FDI origins, and performance of multinational enterprises, Journal of International Management,2012,18 (2):132-146.
[253]Lee, Khai Sheang & Tan, Soo Jiuan. E-retailing versus physical retailing:A theoretical model and empirical test of consumer choice, Journal of Business Research,2003, Vol.56 (11):877-885.
[354]Levinsohn and Pctrin. Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables, Review of Economic Studies,2003, Vol.70 (2):317-341.
[355]Levinson. Technology, International Trade and Pollution from U.S. Manufacturing, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers 13616,2007.
[356]Lin, Faqin & Tang, Hsiao Chink. Exporting and Innovation:Theory and Firm-Level Evidence from the People's Republic of China, provided by Asian Development Bank in its series Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration with number 111,2013.
[357]Liu, Xiaohui & Zou, Huan. The impact of greenfield FDI and mergers and acquisitions on innovation in Chinese high-tech industries, Journal of World Business,2008, Vol.43 (3):52-364.
[358]Lu J-Y, Lu Y, Zhang T. Intermediaries, Firm Heterogeneity and ExPorting Behavior, Tsing Hua-Hku International Economics Meeting, Working Paper,2011.
[358]Luljeta Hajderllari & Kostas Karantininis & Lartey G.Lawson. FDI as an Export-Platform:A Gravity Model for the Danish Agri-Food Industry, provided by University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics in its series IFRO Working Paper with number 2012/7,2012.
[360]Managi, S., A. Hibiki, and T. Tsurumi. Does Trade Openness Improve Environmental Quality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2009, Vol.58, 346-363.
[361]Manova and Zhang. Export Prices across Firms and Destinations, the Quarterly Journal of Economics,2012, Vol.127 (1):379-436.
[362]Marin, D. and Verdier, T. Competing in Organizations:Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade, GESY Discussion Paper no.207,2007.
[363]Martijn Boermans. Do Exports, FDI, and Outsourcing in Transition Countries Drive Firm-Level Innovation? Atlantic Economic Journal,2013, Vol.41 (2):197-198.
[364]Massimiliano Bratti & Giulia Felice, Are Exporters More Likely to Introduce Product Innovations? The World Economy,2012, Vol.35 (11):1559-1598.
[365]Matthieu Crozet & Keith Head & Thierry Mayer. Quality Sorting and Trade: Firm-level Evidence for French Wine, The Review of Economic Studies,2012, Vol.79 (2) 609-644.
[366]Maurice Kugler & Eric Verhoogen. The Quality-Complementarity Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence from Colombia, provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 14418,2008.
[367]Mayer & Melitz & Ottaviano. Market size, competition and the product mix of exporters, Working Paper Research 202, National Bank of Belgium,2010.
[368]McDonald, R. and Siegel, D. R.The Value of Waiting to Invest. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1986, Vol.101 (4):707-728.
[369]Melitz & Mayer&Ottaviano. Market Size, Competition, and the Product Mix of Exporters, Working Paper 64736, Harvard University OpenScholar,2013.
[370]Melitz & Ottaviano. Market Size, Trade, and Productivity, Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press,2008, vol.75(1):295-316.
[371]Melitz & Polanec. Dynamic Olley-Pakes Productivity Decomposition with Entry and Exit, provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 18182,2012.
[372]Melitz & Redding. Firm Heterogeneity and Aggregate Welfare, Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers 2013-11, Sciences Po Departement of Economics,2013.
[373]Melitz & Redding. Heterogeneous Firms and Trade, CEPR Discussion Papers 9317, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers,2013a.
[374]Melitz & Redding.Firm Heterogeneity and Aggregate Welfare, CEP Discussion Papers dp 1200, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE,2013b.
[375]Melitz & Treler. Gains from Trade When Firms Matter, Journal of Economic Perspectives,2012, Vol.26 (2):91-118.
[376]Melitz, Marc, Thierry Mayer, and Gianmarco IP Ottaviano. Market Size, Competition, and the Product Mix of Exporters. American Economic Review,2014,Vol.104 (2):495-536.
[377]Melitz. The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity, Econometrica, Econometric Society,2003, vol.71(6):1695-1725.
[378]Mez-Castillejo, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E.,Sanchis-Llopis, J. A., Self-selection into Exports:Productivity and/or Innovation?, Applied Economics Quarterly, 2009,55 (3):219-242.
[379]Mohamed Chaffai & Patrick Plane. Total Factor Productivity of Tunisia's manufacturing sectors:measurement, determinants and convergence towards OECD countries, provided by HAL in its series Working Papers with number halshs-00562642,2011.
[380]Mohammad Movahedi and Olivier Gaussens. Innovation, productivity, and export: Evidence from SMEs in Lower Normandy, France, Provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 40443,2012.
[381]Mora Jesse & Singh Nirvikar. Trade Productivity Upgrading, Trade Fragmentation, and FDI in Manufacturing:The Asian Development Experience, provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 37127,2012.
[382]Movahedi et al. Organizational Innovation and its Link with Technological Innovation in SMEs:Empirical Evidence for Lower Normandy-France, provided by Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes 1, University of Caen and CNRS in its series Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen) with number 201229,2012.
[383]Mrazova and Neary. Selection Effects with Heterogeneous Firms, provided by University of Oxford, Department of Economics in its series Economics Series Working Papers with number 588,2011.
[384]Murat ker. Importing, Exporting, and Innovation in Developing Countries, Review of International Economics,2012, Vol.20 (2):299-314.
[385]Nagano, Mamoru. Similarities and differences among cross-border M&A and greenfield FDI determinants:Evidence from Asia and Oceania, Emerging Markets Review, 2013, Vol.16 (C):100-118
[386]Naude, Wim & Gries, Thomas & Bilkic, Natasa. Firm-Level Heterogeneity and the Decision to Export:A Real Option Approach, provided by Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in its series IZA Discussion Papers with number 7346,2013.
[387]Navaretti, B. G, Venables, A. J.. Multinational Firms in the World Economy.Princeton University Press,2004.
[388]Neary, Peter J. Trade Costs and Foreign Direct Investment, International Review of Economics and Finance,2009, Vol.18,207-218.
[389]Nitsch. Die Another Day:Duraiton in German Import Trade. CESIFO Working Paper No.2085,2007.
[390]Nocke, V. and Yeaple, S.. Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions versus Greenfield Foreign Direct Investment:The Role of Firm Heterogeneity. Journal of International Economics,2007, Vol.72 (2):336-365.
[391]Nocke, Volker & Yeaple, Stephen. Globalization and Multiproduct Firms, Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 408, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich,2013.
[392]Nocke, Volker and Stephen Yeaple. An Assignment Theory of Foreign Direct Investment, Review of Economic Studies,2008, Vol.75,529-557.
[393]Norback, Pehr-Johan and Lars Persson. Globalization and Profitability of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions,Economic Theory,2008,Vol.35,241-266.
[394]Norback, Pehr-Johan and Lars Persson. Investment Liberalization-Why a Restrictive Cross-Border Merger Policy Can Be Counterproductive, Journal of International Economics,2007, Vol.72,366-380.
[395]Oldenski, Lindsay. Export versus FDI and the Communication of Complex Information, Journal of International Economics,2012, Vol.87 (2):312-322.
[396]Olley and Pakes. The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry, Econometrica,1996, Vol.64 (6):1263-1297.
[397]Owen Gabbitas & Paul Gretton. Firm size and export performance:some empirical evidence, provided by EconWPA in its series International Trade with number 0304003,2003.
[398]Pablo Fajgelbaum & Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman. Income Distribution, Product Quality, and International Trade, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press,2011, vol.119(4):721-765.
[399]Palangkaraya. The Link between Innovation and Export:Evidence from Australiafs Small and Medium Enterprises, provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-08,2012.
[400]Paul S. Segerstrom & Ignat Stepanok. Learning How to Export Kiel Institute for the World Economy,, Kiel Working Papers 1801,2013.
[401]Paula Bustos. The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Skill Upgrading Evidence from Argentina, Working Papers 559, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics,2011a.
[402]Paula Bustos. Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading:Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms, American Economic Review, American Economic Association,2011, vol.101(1):304-40.
[403]Paula Neto & Antonio Brandao & Antonio Cerqueira. The Impact of FDI, Cross Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Greenfield Investments on Economic Growth, provided by Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto in its series FEP Working Papers with number 291,2008.
[404]Paula Neto & Antonio Brandao & Antonio Cerqueira. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Cross Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Greenfield Investments, provided by Gabinete de Estrategia e Estudos, Ministerio da Economia e da Inovacao in its series GEE Papers with number 0017,2009.
[405]Petropoulou D. Information Costs. Networks and Intermediation in International Trade., Discussion Paper.370. Department of Economics. University of Oxford,2007.
[406]Pierre Mohnen & Bronwyn H. Hall. Innovation and Productivity:An Update, Eurasian Business Review,2013, Vol.3 (1):47-65.
[407]Pol Antras & Elhanan Helpman. Global Sourcing, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press,2004, Vol.112 (3):552-580.
[408]Priit Vahter. Does FDI Spur Productivity, Knowledge Sourcing and Innovation by Incumbent Firms? Evidence from Manufacturing Industry in Estonia, The World Economy, 2011,34 (8):1308-1326.
[409]Puga, Diego & Trefler, Daniel. Wake up and smell the ginseng:International trade and the rise of incremental innovation in low-wage countries, Journal of Development Economics,2010, Vol.91 (1):64-76.
[410]R. Garcia and R. Calantone. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology:a literature review, The Journal of Product Innovation Management,2002(19):110-132.
[411]R.B.Davies and T.Jeppesen. Export mode, Trade Costs, and Productivity Sorting, provided by School Of Economics, University College Dublin in its series Working Papers with number 201225,2011.
[412]Rafael Rob & Nikolaos Vettas. Foreign Direct Investment and Exports with Growing Demand, Review of Economic Studies,2003, Vol.70 (3):629-648.
[413]Raff, H., Ryan, M. and Stahler, F. Firm Productivity and the Foreign-Market Entry Decision, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell,2012, vol.21(3): 849-871.
[414]Ra□, H.,Ryan, M. J.. Firm specific characteristics and the timing of foreign direct investment projects. Review of World Economics,2008, Vol.144 (1):1-31.
[415]Raff, Horst, Michael Ryan and Frank Stahler. Firm Productivity and the Foreign-Market Entry Decision,University of Kiel, mimeo,2011.
[416]Richard Baldwin & James Harrigan. Zeros, Quality, and Space:Trade Theory and Trade Evidence, American Economic Journal:Microeconomics,2011, Vol.3(2):60-88.
[417]Richard Baldwin. Heterogeneous Firms and Trade:Testable and Untestable Properties of the Melitz Model, provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 11471,2005.
[418]Rob, R., Vettas, Nikolaos. Foreign Direct Investment and Exports with Growing Demand. Review of Economic Studies,2003, Vol.70 (3):629-648.
[419]Robert E. Hall & Charles I. Jones. Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others? provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 6564,1999.
[420]Robert Rubin and Jacob Weisberg. In an Uncertain World:Tough Choices from Wall Street to Washington, Random House Trade Paperbacks Press,2004.
[421]Roberto Antonietti & Giulio Cainelli. Innovation, productivity and export Evidence from Italy, provided by Public policies and local development in its series Openloc Working Papers with number 1017,2010.
[422]Roc Armenter & Miklos Koren. Economies of Scale and the Size of Exporters, provided by Center for Firms in the Global Economy in its series CeFiG Working Papers with number 7,2009.
[423]Rodrigo Fuentes&Marco Morales. Measuring TFP:A Latent Variable Approach, provided by Central Bank of Chile in its series Working Papers Central Bank of Chile with number 419,2007.
[424]Roller, Lars-Hendrik, Johan Stennek and Frank Verboven, Effciency Gains From Mergers, Chapter in European Merger Control:Do We Need an Effciency Defence,2006.
[425]Ronald B Davies & Tine Jeppesen, Export mode, Trade Costs, and Productivity Sorting, provided by School Of Economics, University College Dublin in its series Working Papers with number 201225,2012.
[426]Ronald Davies & Lourenco Paz. Tariffs versus VAT in the presence of heterogeneous firms and an informal sector, International Tax and Public Finance, 2011,Volume.18 (5):533-554.
[427]Rosario Crind & Paolo Epifani. Productivity, Quality and Export Behaviour, The Economic Journal,2012, Vol.122 (565):1206-1243.
[428]Rudrani Bhattacharya & Ila Patnaik & Ajay Shah. Export Versus FDI in Services, The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell,2012, vol.35(1):61-78.
[429]Saliola, F.& Seker, M. Total Factor Productivity Across the Developing World, Enterprise Note Series, Enterprise Note No.23, World Bank Group,2011.
[430]Sanghamitra Das & Mark J. Roberts & James R. Tybout. Market Entry Costs, Producer Heterogeneity, and Export Dynamics, Econometrica,2007, Vol.75 (3) 837-873.
[431]Sarbapriya,Ray & Mihir, Kumar Pal. An Application of Economic Capacity Utilization to the Measurement of Total Factor Productivity Growth:Empirical Evidence from Indian Fertilizer Industry, Romanian Journal for Economic Forecasting,2011, Vol.2011 (1): 125-142.
[432]Selin Ozyurt & Timo Mitze. The Spatial Dimension of Trade-and FDI-driven Productivity Growth in Chinese Provinces-A Global Cointegration Approach, provided by Rheinisch-Westfalisches Institut fur Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Universitat Dortmund, Universitat Duisburg-Essen in its series Ruhr Economic Papers with number 0308,2012.
[433]Shawn Arita & Tanaka Kiyoyasu. Heterogeneous multinational firms and productivity gains from falling FDI barriers, provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion papers with number 12010,2012.
[434]Sourafel Girma & Holger Gorg. Outsourcing, Foreign Ownership, and Productivity: Evidence from UK Establishment-level Data, Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell,2004c, vol.12(5):817-832.
[435]Sourafel Girma & Kevin Amess. Do Stock Markets Value Firm-Level Technical Efficiency? Some UK Evidence, Discussion Papers in Economics 04/23, Department of Economics, University of Leicester,2004a.
[436]Sugata Marjit & Toru Kikuchi. Time Zones and FDI with Heterogenous Firms, provided by School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia in its series Discussion Papers Series with number 425,2011.
[437]Takechi, K.. What is Driving the Manufacturing FDI Wave in Asia?. Review of Development Economics,2011, Vol.15 (1):33-47.
[438]Tanaka Ayumu. Firm productivity and the number of FDI destinations:Evidence from a non-parametric test, Economics Letters,2012, Vol.117 (1):1-3.
[439]Tang & Zhang. Quality Differentiation and Trade Intermediation, provided by Department of Economics, Tufts University in its series Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University with number 0771,2012.
[440]Tomiura, Eiichi. Foreign outsourcing, exporting, and FDI:A productivity comparison at the firm level, Journal of International Economics,2007, Vol.72 (1):113-127.
[441]Toshiyuki Matsuura& Kazunobu Hayakawa. The Role of Trade Costs in FDI Strategy of Heterogeneous Firms:Evidence from Japanese Firm-level Data, provided by Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) in its series Working Papers with number DP-2012-04,2012.
[442]Toshiyuki Matsuura& Kazunobu Hayakawa.Trade Liberalization and FDI Strategy in Heterogeneous Firms:Evidence from Japanese firm-level data, provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion papers with number 11033,2011.
[443]Uday Bhanu Sinha. Strategic licensing, Exports, FDI, and Host Country Welfare, Oxford Economic Papers,2010, Volume.62 (1):114-131.
[444]UNCTAD. World Investment Report 2010. New York and Geneva:United Nations, 2011.
[445]Vahter. Learning By Exporting:Evidence Based on Data of Knowledge Flows from Innovation Surveys in Estonia, provided by William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan in its series William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series with number wp1011, 2011.
[446]Van Beveren, I. V., Vandenbussche, H., Product and process innovation and the decision to export, Journal of Economic Policy Reform,2010,13(1):3-24.
[447]Van Biesebroeck, Johannes. Exporting raises productivity in sub-Saharan African manufacturing firms, Journal of International Economics,2005, Vol.67 (2):373-391.
[448]Viroj Jienwatcharamongkhol & Mohammad Hossein Tavassoli. Bridging Firm Innovation, Productivity and Export:An Analysis using Swedish CIS data, provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersA8p885,2012.
[449]Vogel Alexander& Wagner Joachim. Innovation and Exports of German Business Services Enterprises:First evidence from a new type of firm data, provided by University of Luneburg, Institute of Economics in its series Working Paper Series in Economics with number 246,2012.
[450]Volker Nocke & Stephen Yeaple. An Assignment Theory of Foreign Direct Investment, PIER Working Paper Archive 05-003, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania,2004.
[451]Wagner, Joachim. The causal effects of exports on firm size and labor productivity: First evidence from a matching approach, provided by Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA) in its series HWWA Discussion Papers with number 155,2011.
[452]Wakasugi Ryuhei & Hongyong Zhang. Effects of Ownership on Exports and FDI: Evidence from Chinese firms, provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion papers with number 12058,2012.
[453]Wakasugi Ryuhei & Natsuhara Takashi. Productivity and FDI of Taiwan Firms:A review from a nonparametric approach, provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion papers with number 12033,2012.
[454]Wang, Chengqi & Hong, Junjie & Kafouros, Mario & Boateng, Agyenim. What drives outward FDI of Chinese firms? Testing the Explanatory Power of Three Theoretical Frameworks, International Business Review,2012,21 (3):425-438.
[455]Warren J Bilkey. An Attempted Integration of the Literature on the Export Behavior of Firms, Journal of International Business Studies,1978, Vol.9 (1):33-46.
[456]Wen-Chung Hsu & Xingbo Gao & Jianhua Zhang & Hsin Mei Lin. The effects of outward FDI on home-country productivity:Do location of investment and market orientation matter? Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies,2011,4 (2):99-116.
[457]Xie. Exporting, Licensing, FDI and Productivity Choice:Theory and Evidence from Chilean Data, mimeo,2011.
[458]Xu Xinpeng and Yu Sheng. Are FDI spillovers regional? Firm-level evidence from China, Journal of Asian Economics,2012,23 (3):244-258.
[459]Yalcin, Erdal & Sala, Davide. Uncertain productivity growth and the choice between FDI and export, provided by Department of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark in its series Discussion Papers of Business and Economics with number 19/2012,2012.
[460]Yin He & Keith E. Maskus. Southern Innovation And Reverse Knowledge Spillovers:A Dynamic Fdi Model, International Economic Review,2012, Vol.53 (1) 279-302.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |