区域运输结构优化研究
|
摘要
我国交通运输的瓶颈制约在一定程度上得到缓解,但还没有从根本上彻底解决,交通运输的瓶颈制约已由“显性”转变为“隐性”,目前存在许多运输结构性矛盾,其协调发展问题十分突出,特别是交通运输可持续发展问题日益严重。为解决目前由于运输结构不合理而导致交通运输发展存在的诸多问题,通过搜集国内外大量相关文献资料,并经综合分析研究,基本掌握目前10个方面的研究现状,找出存在“4重4轻”研究方面的问题和不足,具体做了以下几个方面的研究工作和取得以下几点成绩：
1.在运输结构的演变及其规律方面。首先论述运输结构及其演变的概念,研究运输结构的分类和表达式；运用系统自组织(他组织)原理,分析研究运输系统结构演变的耗散结构特征、自组织机理、一般过程和形式等；运用Logistic分析模型,研究各种运输方式间的竞争与协同关系；分析研究了客货运输需求结构演变的影响因素,以及客货运输结构演变的影响因素、主要原因和一般机理,交通科技的进步对运输结构演变的影响等；运用归纳法和演绎法,揭示客货运输结构演变的主要影响因素、一般规律及其对运输结构优化的启示。
研究结果表明：各种运输方式间竞争与协同的相互依存过程就是运输结构的动态演变过程,其相互转化是运输结构演变的主要推动力；交通科技的进步对运输结构演变起着重要作用；运输结构的演变至少存在6条一般规律及其对运输结构优化的8点重要启示,对运输结构优化应遵循这些规律性。
2.在基于运输供需双重特性的运输结构优化分析方面。运用运输经济学原理、系统科学和信息熵理论等,首先对运输需求、运输供给等若干基本概念辨析,定量分析这些概念间的相互关系,同时探讨运输需求预测的有效性以及运输结构优化应遵循的基本原则；分析研究客货运输需求特性及其要素,定量研究客运需求成本(L)和货运需求成本(H),并建立了相关计量模型等；分析研究5种运输方式的供给特性(即技术经济特性)、适用范围及定量比较,并定量研究几个主要供给特性,建立相关计量模型；重点分析研究了运输供需特性及其对应状况对运输结构优化的影响；运用信息熵理论,分别构建客货运输需求结构信息熵和供给结构信息熵,以及基于供需结构信息熵的运输结构适应性分析与评判模型、标准和方法；最后进行案例分析研究。
研究结果表明：运输需求具有8个主要特性和6个基本要素；运输供需特性及其对应状况对区域运输结构优化产生重大影响；运输结构优化应遵循6项基本原则；客货运输供需结构特性可用供需结构信息熵来测度,供需结构信息熵值两者大小应接近,且其熵函数变化趋势和变化速率也应一致,两者熵函数值的相对离差系数C(t)应趋于0,适应度G(t)应趋于1。
3.在区域微观层次运输结构优化方面。首先论述运输结构的区位特征；运用复合系统理论和协同学原理,分析研究运输系统的协调特征、结构关联类型及其协调机制；构建运输系统结构协调发展的机理模型及其协调步骤；重点构建微观运输结构发展指数、协调指数和持续指数分析模型；研究了微观运输结构优化评价问题。
研究结果表明：运输结构具有区位特征；运输系统结构存在4种关联类型；用以上指数分析模型,能测度和分析评价区域微观层次运输结构的协调发展持续状况及诸要素间的匹配性；可从各运输子系统(方式)主导要素的超前性及其诸要素间的匹配性2方面,分析评价微观运输结构的优化状况。
4.在区域中观层次运输结构优化方面。在4.3节基础上,推导出中观运输结构发展指数、协调指数和持续指数分析模型；应用Markov链模型对中观运输结构预测与优化并进行决策分析；运用经济控制论,构建中观运输结构径路优化模型与2种算法；建立了各运输方式间质的协调性和量的比例性评价指标体系；运用产业结构优化理论与方法,构建运输结构优化效率、优化效益和比较优势评价模型,评价运输结构的合理化程度,利用相似判别法和距离判别法,评价运输结构的高度化水平；最后,对珠江三角洲客运结构进行实证研究,以验证预测模型和径路优化模型与算法的有效性。
研究结果表明：利用以上指数分析模型,能测度和分析评价中观运输结构的协调发展持续状况以及各运输方式间的协调性；利用Markov链模型能预测客运结构和推算其未来平衡状态结构,并进行相关优化与决策分析；利用路径优化模型与算法,能求解交通运输系统总周转量增长率不低于既定比例的前提下,各运输方式每年应分别以多大的增长率增长,至少需要多少年才能达到某个理想的合理运输结构目标；利用以上中观运输结构质的协调性和量的比例性评价指标、3个评价模型和2种判别法,可分别评价中观运输结构的协调性、合理化程度和高度化水平。
5.在区域宏观层次运输结构优化方面。在4.3节和5.2节基础上,推导出宏观层次运输结构发展指数、协调指数和持续指数,以及整个运输系统结构协调发展持续指数分析模型；运用灰色关联分析法,构建客货运输结构适应性分析与评价模型与算法,研究宏观运输结构的适应性；应用投入产出分析法,对宏观运输结构的投入产出特征优化分析与决策分析,求解基于最终纯收入率(或最终产值率)s最高的宏观运输结构最佳总投资(或总产出)结构比,以及现实总投资结构比与其最佳总投资结构比两者间的偏离度ηη及协调度γ等指数；构建基于可持续发展观的宏观运输结构优化模型与算法；分别建立宏观运输结构外部适应性、路网覆盖形态特性和可持续发展的一系列评价指标体系与评价方法。其中,重点推导出基于分形维数的路网覆盖形态特性评价指数模型与算法,利用路网覆盖度和覆盖深度测度和分析评价交通路网覆盖性；构建基于灰色信息熵的运输结构可持续发展综合评价模型与算法,定性定量综合评价其可持续发展状况。最后,对珠三角客货运输结构的适应性进行实证研究,对一运输区域的路网覆盖形态特性进行分析评价,以验证基于灰色关联度的适应性分析评价模型,及路网覆盖形态特性评价模型与算法的有效性。
研究结果表明：用以上指数分析模型,能测度和分析评价宏观运输结构以及整个运输系统结构的协调发展持续状况、外部适应性和协调性；利用基于灰色关联度的适应性分析模型与算法,能分析评价区域宏观运输结构的适应性；利用以上最佳总投资结构比以及偏离度η和协调度γ等指数,能确定交通运输业现实总投资结构比的调整优化方向和程度等,为交通投资结构的优化决策提供依据；利用基于可持续发展观的运输结构优化模型与算法,能求解在既定条件下,符合可持续发展观的合理运输结构；用覆盖度和覆盖深度评价路网覆盖形态特性比路网密度等指数更科学合理,因此应尽量使用这2个指数,覆盖度D(r))1.661及相应覆盖深度r可作为评判区域路网形态结构是否合理和功能是否完善的基本标准。
以上分析研究,以期为区域运输结构优化研究和路网规划提供新的思路和方法。
Bottleneck condition of transportation in China was relaxed on a certain extent, but not solved radically, Its "obvious" restrict was replaced by "latent" restrict, there is a lot of contradiction on transportation structure, the development of transportation is not obviously harmonious, sustainable development of transportation is increasingly severe. in order to solve a lot of problems induced by irrational transportation structure, On the basis of collecting a great deal of domestic and overseas literatures,10actualitys and4insufficiencys on the studyof transportation structure are held by analyzing and studying synthetically, mostly research works and main research results was made as follows:
1. On the evolvement and its law of transportation structure. First, the conception of transportation structure and its evolvement were elucidated, the classify and expression of transportation structure were studied. Dissipation structure character, selforganizing mechanism, common process and form of the evolvement of transportation system structure were researched by the use of the principle of system selforganizing and elseorganizing; the relationship between competition and collaboration for transportation modes each other was studied by using Logistic model; the main influence factors of the evolvement of passenger and goods transportation demand structure were analyzed and studied; the influence factors, main causations and general mechanism of the evolvement of transportation structure were researched; the influence of the progress of traffic science and technology to the evolvement of transportation structure were researched; the main influence factors&common laws of the evolvement of transportation structure, and its revelation for optimization of transportation structure were concluded by the use of induction and deductive method.
Research result indicates:dependence process between competition and collaboration is the dynamic evolvement process of transportation structure, their translation is main promoting power each other; it is very importance role for traffic science and technology to the evolvement of transportation structure; there are at least6common laws of the evolvement of transportation structure and8revelations for optimization of transportation structure. These laws need be followed by optimization of transportation structure.
2. On the optimization analysis of transportation structure based on supply and demand character, by the use of the principles of transportation economics, system science and自助theory of information entropy, many basic concepts (for example, transportation demand and supply etc.)were differentiated, the interrelations between these concepts were analysed quantitatively, the validity of forecasting of transportation demand and the basic principles of optimization of transportation structure were discussed; demand characters and basic elements of passenger and goods transportation were analyzed, demand costs were studied quantitatively, measuring models were founded respectively; the supply characters(namely technology and economy character)and applicable scopes of5transportation modes were analyzed respectively and compared quantitatively, the measuring models of main supply characters were founded respectively; it was primarily analyzed and studied that optimization of transportation structure was influenced by transportation supply and demand character and the homologous status between them; information entropy models of supply and demand structure of passenger and goods transportation were set up respectively, the appraising model and criterion of the adaptability between transportation supply and demand structure were founded based on structure information entropy; a cases was studied.
Research result shows:there are at least8charactes and6basic elements of transportation demand; the optimization of transportation structure is gravely influenced by transportation supply and demand characters and the homologous status between them;6basic principles need be followed by optimization of transportation structure; the characters of transportation supply and demand structure are measured by making use of structure information entropy, entropy value of supply structure is needed to be consistent with entropy value of demand structure, changing trend or velocity of entropy functions are well consistent with each other; difference coefficient Cv(t) is relatively close to0, adaptability degree G(t) is close to1. these laws should be followed by optimization of transportation structure.
3. On optimization of regional microcosmic-level transportation structure. First of all, district character of transportation structure was elucidated; by utilizing the theory of complex system and the principle of harmonization theory, harmonious character, relationship types and harmonious mechanism of transportation system structure were analyzed and studied; mechanism model and harmonious steps of the development of transportation system structure were brought forward; index models of development, harmonization and persistence of microcosmic-level transportation structure were mainly set up respectively; optimization appraising was studied.
the research result indicates that transportation structure possesses regional character; there are4relationship types; the status of development, harmonization and persistence of microcosmic-level transportation structure are measured and appraised by the hereinbefore index models; the status of optimization of microcosmic-level transportation structure is also appraised by exceeding degree of dominant factor and matching degree between factors of transportation subsystem.
4. On optimization of regional middle-level transportation structure. On the basis of4.3chapter, the index models of development, harmonization and persistence of middle-level transportation structure were educed respectively; middle-level transportation structure was forecasted, analysed and controlled by employing Markov chain model; the path model and two arithmetics of optimization of middle-level transportation structure were furnished based on economy cybernetics; on the appraising of the rationalization of transportation structure, the appraising indexs of qualitative harmonization and quantitative proportion between transportation modes were founded, the appraising modes of efficiency, benefit, and comparative preponderance of transportation structure optimization were weightly set up respectively by applying the theory of industrial structure optimization; the upgrading of transportation structure was appraised by similarity discriminant and distance discriminant; Finally, the passenger transportation structure in The Pearl River Delta Area was researched by demonstration, correlation decision-making analysis was made in order to validate the validity of the models and arithmetics of structure forecasting and path optimization.
the research result indicates that the status of development, harmonization and persistence of middle-level transportation structure are measured and appraised by the hereinbefore index models; the structure and balance structure of future passenger transportation are forecasted and calculated respectively, and optimization analysis is made by Markov chain model; in order to achieve a certain perfect transportation structure, annual increaseing ratio of turnover gross of each transportation mode and least year number are calculated respectively by hereinbefore path optimization model when the increaseing ratio of turnover gross of transportation system is not less than a certain proportion; the degrees of harmonization, rationalization and upgrading of regional middle-level transportation structure are appraised by hereinbefore indexs of qualitative harmonization&quantitative proportion,3appraising modes and2discriminant respectively.
5. On optimization of regional macroscopical-level transportation structure. On the basis of4.3and5.2chapter, the index models of development, harmonization and persistence of macroscopical-level transportation structure, and the index of harmonization and development of the whole transportation system structure were educed respectively; the analysis&appraising model and its arithmetic of the adaptability of passenger and goods transportation structure were set up and used to research the adaptability of transportation structure by employing grey relationship analytical (GRA) method; by the use of input-output analytical (IOA) method, the input-output character of optimization of macroscopical-level transportation structure and correlation decision-making was analyzed and researched, the ratio of optimum investment structure of transportation structure was sought based on maximizing the ratio s of final net income (or final production value) of macroscopical-level transportation structure, departure degree η and harmonization degree γ between the ratios of practical investment and optimum investment structure was educed;
the model and arithmetic of optimization of macroscopical-level transportation structure were founded based on the concept of sustainable development; a series of appraising indexs and methods of adaptability, modality character and sustainable development of macroscopical-level transportation structure were provided respectively, thereinto, the appraising model and arithmetic of modality character of road network were emphatically educed based on fractal dimension of Fractal Geometry, modality character was appraised by the indexs of the covering degree and covering deepness of road network; the appraising model and arithmetic of sustainable development of transportation structure were Primarily founded based on degree of grey incidence and information entropy. Finally, the adaptability of passenger and goods transportation structure in The Pearl River Delta Area and the modality character of a regional road network were researched by demonstration, correlation decision-making analysis was made in order to validate the validity of the models and arithmetics of adaptability analysis and modality character appraising of transportation structure.
the research result indicates that the status of development, harmonization and persistence of macroscopical-level transportation and the whole transportation system structure are measured and appraised by hereinbefore index models; the adaptability of regional transp-ortation structure is appraised by the model and arithmetic based on degree of grey incidence; the optimal direction and degree of practical investment structure adjusting of transportation industry are confirmed by the use of hereinbefore ratio of optimal investment structure, departure degree η and harmonious degree y, and used to provide decision-making basis for the optimization of investment structure of transportation industry; rational transportation structure under established condition is sought by using hereinbefore model based on the concept of sustainable developmen; the covering degree and covering deepness of road network are more science and more rationalization than its density index, thus ought to be made the most of, covering degree D(r))1.661and its covering deepness r are used to judge whether covering modality structure of regional road network is rationalization, and its function is perfect.
The intention of hereinbefore analysis and research is to provide new thinking and method in order to optimize the structure of regional transportation.
1.在运输结构的演变及其规律方面。首先论述运输结构及其演变的概念,研究运输结构的分类和表达式；运用系统自组织(他组织)原理,分析研究运输系统结构演变的耗散结构特征、自组织机理、一般过程和形式等；运用Logistic分析模型,研究各种运输方式间的竞争与协同关系；分析研究了客货运输需求结构演变的影响因素,以及客货运输结构演变的影响因素、主要原因和一般机理,交通科技的进步对运输结构演变的影响等；运用归纳法和演绎法,揭示客货运输结构演变的主要影响因素、一般规律及其对运输结构优化的启示。
研究结果表明：各种运输方式间竞争与协同的相互依存过程就是运输结构的动态演变过程,其相互转化是运输结构演变的主要推动力；交通科技的进步对运输结构演变起着重要作用；运输结构的演变至少存在6条一般规律及其对运输结构优化的8点重要启示,对运输结构优化应遵循这些规律性。
2.在基于运输供需双重特性的运输结构优化分析方面。运用运输经济学原理、系统科学和信息熵理论等,首先对运输需求、运输供给等若干基本概念辨析,定量分析这些概念间的相互关系,同时探讨运输需求预测的有效性以及运输结构优化应遵循的基本原则；分析研究客货运输需求特性及其要素,定量研究客运需求成本(L)和货运需求成本(H),并建立了相关计量模型等；分析研究5种运输方式的供给特性(即技术经济特性)、适用范围及定量比较,并定量研究几个主要供给特性,建立相关计量模型；重点分析研究了运输供需特性及其对应状况对运输结构优化的影响；运用信息熵理论,分别构建客货运输需求结构信息熵和供给结构信息熵,以及基于供需结构信息熵的运输结构适应性分析与评判模型、标准和方法；最后进行案例分析研究。
研究结果表明：运输需求具有8个主要特性和6个基本要素；运输供需特性及其对应状况对区域运输结构优化产生重大影响；运输结构优化应遵循6项基本原则；客货运输供需结构特性可用供需结构信息熵来测度,供需结构信息熵值两者大小应接近,且其熵函数变化趋势和变化速率也应一致,两者熵函数值的相对离差系数C(t)应趋于0,适应度G(t)应趋于1。
3.在区域微观层次运输结构优化方面。首先论述运输结构的区位特征；运用复合系统理论和协同学原理,分析研究运输系统的协调特征、结构关联类型及其协调机制；构建运输系统结构协调发展的机理模型及其协调步骤；重点构建微观运输结构发展指数、协调指数和持续指数分析模型；研究了微观运输结构优化评价问题。
研究结果表明：运输结构具有区位特征；运输系统结构存在4种关联类型；用以上指数分析模型,能测度和分析评价区域微观层次运输结构的协调发展持续状况及诸要素间的匹配性；可从各运输子系统(方式)主导要素的超前性及其诸要素间的匹配性2方面,分析评价微观运输结构的优化状况。
4.在区域中观层次运输结构优化方面。在4.3节基础上,推导出中观运输结构发展指数、协调指数和持续指数分析模型；应用Markov链模型对中观运输结构预测与优化并进行决策分析；运用经济控制论,构建中观运输结构径路优化模型与2种算法；建立了各运输方式间质的协调性和量的比例性评价指标体系；运用产业结构优化理论与方法,构建运输结构优化效率、优化效益和比较优势评价模型,评价运输结构的合理化程度,利用相似判别法和距离判别法,评价运输结构的高度化水平；最后,对珠江三角洲客运结构进行实证研究,以验证预测模型和径路优化模型与算法的有效性。
研究结果表明：利用以上指数分析模型,能测度和分析评价中观运输结构的协调发展持续状况以及各运输方式间的协调性；利用Markov链模型能预测客运结构和推算其未来平衡状态结构,并进行相关优化与决策分析；利用路径优化模型与算法,能求解交通运输系统总周转量增长率不低于既定比例的前提下,各运输方式每年应分别以多大的增长率增长,至少需要多少年才能达到某个理想的合理运输结构目标；利用以上中观运输结构质的协调性和量的比例性评价指标、3个评价模型和2种判别法,可分别评价中观运输结构的协调性、合理化程度和高度化水平。
5.在区域宏观层次运输结构优化方面。在4.3节和5.2节基础上,推导出宏观层次运输结构发展指数、协调指数和持续指数,以及整个运输系统结构协调发展持续指数分析模型；运用灰色关联分析法,构建客货运输结构适应性分析与评价模型与算法,研究宏观运输结构的适应性；应用投入产出分析法,对宏观运输结构的投入产出特征优化分析与决策分析,求解基于最终纯收入率(或最终产值率)s最高的宏观运输结构最佳总投资(或总产出)结构比,以及现实总投资结构比与其最佳总投资结构比两者间的偏离度ηη及协调度γ等指数；构建基于可持续发展观的宏观运输结构优化模型与算法；分别建立宏观运输结构外部适应性、路网覆盖形态特性和可持续发展的一系列评价指标体系与评价方法。其中,重点推导出基于分形维数的路网覆盖形态特性评价指数模型与算法,利用路网覆盖度和覆盖深度测度和分析评价交通路网覆盖性；构建基于灰色信息熵的运输结构可持续发展综合评价模型与算法,定性定量综合评价其可持续发展状况。最后,对珠三角客货运输结构的适应性进行实证研究,对一运输区域的路网覆盖形态特性进行分析评价,以验证基于灰色关联度的适应性分析评价模型,及路网覆盖形态特性评价模型与算法的有效性。
研究结果表明：用以上指数分析模型,能测度和分析评价宏观运输结构以及整个运输系统结构的协调发展持续状况、外部适应性和协调性；利用基于灰色关联度的适应性分析模型与算法,能分析评价区域宏观运输结构的适应性；利用以上最佳总投资结构比以及偏离度η和协调度γ等指数,能确定交通运输业现实总投资结构比的调整优化方向和程度等,为交通投资结构的优化决策提供依据；利用基于可持续发展观的运输结构优化模型与算法,能求解在既定条件下,符合可持续发展观的合理运输结构；用覆盖度和覆盖深度评价路网覆盖形态特性比路网密度等指数更科学合理,因此应尽量使用这2个指数,覆盖度D(r))1.661及相应覆盖深度r可作为评判区域路网形态结构是否合理和功能是否完善的基本标准。
以上分析研究,以期为区域运输结构优化研究和路网规划提供新的思路和方法。
Bottleneck condition of transportation in China was relaxed on a certain extent, but not solved radically, Its "obvious" restrict was replaced by "latent" restrict, there is a lot of contradiction on transportation structure, the development of transportation is not obviously harmonious, sustainable development of transportation is increasingly severe. in order to solve a lot of problems induced by irrational transportation structure, On the basis of collecting a great deal of domestic and overseas literatures,10actualitys and4insufficiencys on the studyof transportation structure are held by analyzing and studying synthetically, mostly research works and main research results was made as follows:
1. On the evolvement and its law of transportation structure. First, the conception of transportation structure and its evolvement were elucidated, the classify and expression of transportation structure were studied. Dissipation structure character, selforganizing mechanism, common process and form of the evolvement of transportation system structure were researched by the use of the principle of system selforganizing and elseorganizing; the relationship between competition and collaboration for transportation modes each other was studied by using Logistic model; the main influence factors of the evolvement of passenger and goods transportation demand structure were analyzed and studied; the influence factors, main causations and general mechanism of the evolvement of transportation structure were researched; the influence of the progress of traffic science and technology to the evolvement of transportation structure were researched; the main influence factors&common laws of the evolvement of transportation structure, and its revelation for optimization of transportation structure were concluded by the use of induction and deductive method.
Research result indicates:dependence process between competition and collaboration is the dynamic evolvement process of transportation structure, their translation is main promoting power each other; it is very importance role for traffic science and technology to the evolvement of transportation structure; there are at least6common laws of the evolvement of transportation structure and8revelations for optimization of transportation structure. These laws need be followed by optimization of transportation structure.
2. On the optimization analysis of transportation structure based on supply and demand character, by the use of the principles of transportation economics, system science and自助theory of information entropy, many basic concepts (for example, transportation demand and supply etc.)were differentiated, the interrelations between these concepts were analysed quantitatively, the validity of forecasting of transportation demand and the basic principles of optimization of transportation structure were discussed; demand characters and basic elements of passenger and goods transportation were analyzed, demand costs were studied quantitatively, measuring models were founded respectively; the supply characters(namely technology and economy character)and applicable scopes of5transportation modes were analyzed respectively and compared quantitatively, the measuring models of main supply characters were founded respectively; it was primarily analyzed and studied that optimization of transportation structure was influenced by transportation supply and demand character and the homologous status between them; information entropy models of supply and demand structure of passenger and goods transportation were set up respectively, the appraising model and criterion of the adaptability between transportation supply and demand structure were founded based on structure information entropy; a cases was studied.
Research result shows:there are at least8charactes and6basic elements of transportation demand; the optimization of transportation structure is gravely influenced by transportation supply and demand characters and the homologous status between them;6basic principles need be followed by optimization of transportation structure; the characters of transportation supply and demand structure are measured by making use of structure information entropy, entropy value of supply structure is needed to be consistent with entropy value of demand structure, changing trend or velocity of entropy functions are well consistent with each other; difference coefficient Cv(t) is relatively close to0, adaptability degree G(t) is close to1. these laws should be followed by optimization of transportation structure.
3. On optimization of regional microcosmic-level transportation structure. First of all, district character of transportation structure was elucidated; by utilizing the theory of complex system and the principle of harmonization theory, harmonious character, relationship types and harmonious mechanism of transportation system structure were analyzed and studied; mechanism model and harmonious steps of the development of transportation system structure were brought forward; index models of development, harmonization and persistence of microcosmic-level transportation structure were mainly set up respectively; optimization appraising was studied.
the research result indicates that transportation structure possesses regional character; there are4relationship types; the status of development, harmonization and persistence of microcosmic-level transportation structure are measured and appraised by the hereinbefore index models; the status of optimization of microcosmic-level transportation structure is also appraised by exceeding degree of dominant factor and matching degree between factors of transportation subsystem.
4. On optimization of regional middle-level transportation structure. On the basis of4.3chapter, the index models of development, harmonization and persistence of middle-level transportation structure were educed respectively; middle-level transportation structure was forecasted, analysed and controlled by employing Markov chain model; the path model and two arithmetics of optimization of middle-level transportation structure were furnished based on economy cybernetics; on the appraising of the rationalization of transportation structure, the appraising indexs of qualitative harmonization and quantitative proportion between transportation modes were founded, the appraising modes of efficiency, benefit, and comparative preponderance of transportation structure optimization were weightly set up respectively by applying the theory of industrial structure optimization; the upgrading of transportation structure was appraised by similarity discriminant and distance discriminant; Finally, the passenger transportation structure in The Pearl River Delta Area was researched by demonstration, correlation decision-making analysis was made in order to validate the validity of the models and arithmetics of structure forecasting and path optimization.
the research result indicates that the status of development, harmonization and persistence of middle-level transportation structure are measured and appraised by the hereinbefore index models; the structure and balance structure of future passenger transportation are forecasted and calculated respectively, and optimization analysis is made by Markov chain model; in order to achieve a certain perfect transportation structure, annual increaseing ratio of turnover gross of each transportation mode and least year number are calculated respectively by hereinbefore path optimization model when the increaseing ratio of turnover gross of transportation system is not less than a certain proportion; the degrees of harmonization, rationalization and upgrading of regional middle-level transportation structure are appraised by hereinbefore indexs of qualitative harmonization&quantitative proportion,3appraising modes and2discriminant respectively.
5. On optimization of regional macroscopical-level transportation structure. On the basis of4.3and5.2chapter, the index models of development, harmonization and persistence of macroscopical-level transportation structure, and the index of harmonization and development of the whole transportation system structure were educed respectively; the analysis&appraising model and its arithmetic of the adaptability of passenger and goods transportation structure were set up and used to research the adaptability of transportation structure by employing grey relationship analytical (GRA) method; by the use of input-output analytical (IOA) method, the input-output character of optimization of macroscopical-level transportation structure and correlation decision-making was analyzed and researched, the ratio of optimum investment structure of transportation structure was sought based on maximizing the ratio s of final net income (or final production value) of macroscopical-level transportation structure, departure degree η and harmonization degree γ between the ratios of practical investment and optimum investment structure was educed;
the model and arithmetic of optimization of macroscopical-level transportation structure were founded based on the concept of sustainable development; a series of appraising indexs and methods of adaptability, modality character and sustainable development of macroscopical-level transportation structure were provided respectively, thereinto, the appraising model and arithmetic of modality character of road network were emphatically educed based on fractal dimension of Fractal Geometry, modality character was appraised by the indexs of the covering degree and covering deepness of road network; the appraising model and arithmetic of sustainable development of transportation structure were Primarily founded based on degree of grey incidence and information entropy. Finally, the adaptability of passenger and goods transportation structure in The Pearl River Delta Area and the modality character of a regional road network were researched by demonstration, correlation decision-making analysis was made in order to validate the validity of the models and arithmetics of adaptability analysis and modality character appraising of transportation structure.
the research result indicates that the status of development, harmonization and persistence of macroscopical-level transportation and the whole transportation system structure are measured and appraised by hereinbefore index models; the adaptability of regional transp-ortation structure is appraised by the model and arithmetic based on degree of grey incidence; the optimal direction and degree of practical investment structure adjusting of transportation industry are confirmed by the use of hereinbefore ratio of optimal investment structure, departure degree η and harmonious degree y, and used to provide decision-making basis for the optimization of investment structure of transportation industry; rational transportation structure under established condition is sought by using hereinbefore model based on the concept of sustainable developmen; the covering degree and covering deepness of road network are more science and more rationalization than its density index, thus ought to be made the most of, covering degree D(r))1.661and its covering deepness r are used to judge whether covering modality structure of regional road network is rationalization, and its function is perfect.
The intention of hereinbefore analysis and research is to provide new thinking and method in order to optimize the structure of regional transportation.
引文
[1]张文尝,王姣娥,金凤君等.新中国交通运输60年发展与巨变[J].经济地理,2009,29(11)：1770-1776.
[2]毛保华,孙全欣,陈绍宽.2008年中国综合交通结构分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2009,9(1)：10-18.
[3]贾顺平.中国未来综合交通建设与发展[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2010,10(6)：1-10
[4]王庆云.扩大内需与交通基础设施的建设与发展[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2009,9(3)：1-5.
[5]肖昭升.我国综合运输结构问题成因分析[J].综合运输,2003,(2)：98-11.
[6]张国强.交通运输发展的经济分析[M].北京：经济科学出版社,201O.
[7]张国强,王庆云,张宁.中国交通运输发展理论研究综述[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2007,7(4)：13-18.
[8]王洪伟.“十二五”规划下我国地区交通运输结构优化研究[J].中国水运,2011(11)：8-9.
[9]孙启鹏.综合运输理论与方法[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2007.
[10]中国运输结构问题研究[R].北京：北京中交协物流研究院,2007.
[11]刘冰.交通运输与区域经济发展的适应性分析[D].北京：北京交通大学,2007.
[12]Carey.G.W. Accessibility, Urbanization and Transportation:Towards an operational model transport policy and urban rank:A model for the optimization of transport infrastructure. the transport Geography study group at the department of geography, university of salford.2005.
[13]李莹英.运输结构分析与协调性评价研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2010.
[14]郝静.区域交通运输结构优化研究[D].西安：长安大学,2008.
[15]高家驹.综合运输概论[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,1993.
[16]张文尝,金凤君,荣朝和,唐秀芳.空间运输联系—理论研究·实证研究·预测方法[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,1992.
[17]荣朝和.论运输化[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,1993.
[18]张国伍.交通运输系统分析[M].成都：西南交通出版社,2006.
[19]管楚度.新视域运输经济学[M].北京：人民交通出版社,2002.
[20]管楚度.交通区位论及其应用[M].北京：人民交通出版社,2000.
[21]王德荣.中国运输布局[M].北京：科学出版社,1986.
[22]王德荣.交通运输产业政策研究[M].北京：科学技术文献出版社,1989.
[23]胡思继.综合运输工程学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,北京交通大学出版社,2006.
[24]沈志云.交通运输工程[M].北京：人民交通出版社,1999.
[25]刘其斌,马桂贞.枢纽内各种运输方式的协调[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,1988.
[26]赵一平,胡安洲.运输结构演变的理论分析[J].重庆交通学院学报,1993,12(2)：1-8.
[27]赵一平.货物运输结构演变自组织机理的分析[J].铁道学报,1995,17(1)：9-14.
[28]赵一平,胡安洲.关于综合运输理论研究的几个问题[J].重庆交通学院学报,1994,13(2)：1-7.
[29]成耀荣.综合运输学[M].北京：人民交通出版社,2003.
[30]胡列格,刘中,杨明.交通枢纽与港站[M].北京：人民交通出版社,2007.
[31]彭辉.综合交通运输系统及规划[M].成都：西南交通出版社,2006.
[32]陈贻龙,邵振一.运输经济学[M].北京：人民交通出版社,2002.
[33]许庆斌,荣朝和,马运,等.运输经济学导论[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2006.
[34]赵锡铎.运输经济学[M].大连：大连海事大学出版社,2006.
[35]荣朝和.西方运输经济学[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2010.
[36]王吉东.综合运输系统结构问题研究[D].大连：大连海事大学,2000.
[37]张磊,李振林.对我国运输结构演进趋势的分析[J],综合运输.2007,(5)：12-15.
[38]刘奕,贾元华,朱俊峰.综合运输通道结构演化的自组织机制研究[J].综合运输,2009,(8)：24-27.
[39]朱文英,马天山.我国交通运输结构发展历程简析[J],交通企业管理,2009,(5)：62-63.
[40]袁静.交通运输供需结构均衡研究[D].西安：长安大学,2007.
[41]苗东升.系统科学精要[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2006.
[42]刘奕,贾元华,税常峰.区域运输结构的自组织演化机制研究—基于logistic模型的分析[J].技术经济与管理研究,2011,(9)：1-6.
[43]毛亮.城市道路交通系统自组织现象研究[D].成都：西南交通大学,2004.
[44]姜克锦,张殿业,刘帆佼.城市交通系统自组织与他组织复合演化过程[J].西南交通大学学报,2008,43(5)：605-609.
[45]Russ Marion, Thousand Oaks, etc. The Edge of Organization:Chaos andComplexity Theories of Formal Social Systems [J]. Scand. J. Mgmt.2002, 18:113-130.
[46]郭延结.运输结构合理化的评价原则和标准[J].公路交通科技,1993,10(2)：54-62.
[47]Arnulf Grubler. The Rise and Fall of Infrastructures-Dynamics of Evolution and Technological Change in Transport [M]. Heidelberg:Physica-Verlag,1990.
[48]范海洲,马鸿梅.基于Logistic模型的企业竞争互动分析[J].工业工程,2010,13(3)：39-42.
[49]韩俊林,陈励.随机效应Logistic模型的参数估计[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005(1)：93-98.
[50]王子龙,谭清美,许箫迪.企业集群共生演化模型及实证研究[J].中国管理学,2006(2)：141-148.
[51]李艳红.综合运输通道客运结构优化理论与方法研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2010.
[52]高艳红.综合运输通道耗散结构分析[J].交通标准化.2011(22)：143-145.
[53]吴群琪,陈文强.交通运输系统演化机理与发展趋势[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2009,11(2)：13-17.
[54]桂萍.我国交通运输结构的演变回顾及展望[J],综合运输,1999(11)：14-18.
[55]石钦文.综合运输系统结构协调发展理论研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2010.
[56]张周堂.影响综合运输体系结构演变的系统因素[J].综合运输,2005(12)：10-14.
[57]魏际刚,邱成利,胡吉平,荣朝和.运输方式涨落的系统动力学模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2001(4)：89-91.
[58]毛敏.交通运输走廊自组织演化机理[J].西南交通大学学报,2007,42(5)：631-635.
[59]邱玉琢,陈森发.运输方式互利共生的非线性动力学模型[J].系统工程,2006,24(7)：8-12.
[60]McGill, Brian. A mechanistic model of a mutualism and its ecological and evolutionary dynamics [J]. Ecological Modeling.2005,18 (7):413-425.
[61]马 运.运输需求的特性及其分析特点[J].北方交通大报,1994,18(3)：426-430.
[62]李伟达.交通运输结构发展演变规律的理论分析[J].水运管理,2000(6)：2-7.
[63]王吉霞.产业结构优化升级的影响因素探析[J].商业时代,2009(14)：106-107.
[64]沈利生.最终需求结构变动怎样影响产业结构变动—基于投入产出模型的分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2011(12)：82-95.
[65]吴 峰,施其洲.基于熵值理论的产业结构与交通运输结构关系研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2006,6(1)：71-74.
[66]李新民,唐建桥.论现代科技革命与交通运输发展的关系[J].科技进步与对策,2008 (suppl.):39-41.
[67]刘亚刚,刘世贵.现代科学技术革命及其影响[J].西南民族学院学报.2001(12).
[68]傅扬.科学、技术、生产的辨证关系[J].生产力研究,2006(3).
[69]杨艳萍.论现代科技革命对经济的影响[J].科技革命与对策,2002(7).
[70]彭列汉,吴元强.论交通与科技的互动[J].学术论坛,2005(2).
[71]Rudolph Daniels. Trains across the continent:North American railroad history (seco-ndedition) [M]. Bloomington, Indiana:Indiana University Press,2001.
[72]安文娟.区域运输通道客运需求结构分析及预测研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2011
[73]王岳平.产业结构对交通运输业发展影响的定量分析[J].管理世界,2004(6) ：65-72.
[74]王明志.运输供给与运输需求平衡论[M].北京：人民交通出版社,1998.
[75]罗诗屹,罗仁坚.我国交通运输结构的第三次转变及运营策略调整[J].铁道运输与经济,2012,34(3)：51-55.
[76]葛 云.江苏省交通运输结构及优势里程分析[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2004,32(4)：463-466.
[77]徐丽娟,孟岳松.运输方式及其市场需求结构关系研究[C]//中国交通研究与探索.北京：人民交通出版社,1999：1230--1231.
[78]张铱莹.客运专线对区际运输通道的影响研究[D].成都：西南交通大学,2007：1 1-14.
[79]肖昭升.高速铁路发展对完善综合运输体系的影响分析[J].综合运输,2011(9)： 9-13.
[80]赵丽霞,高月娥.关于世界交通运输发展历程及启示[J].黑龙江交通科技,2009(3)：108-111.
[81]隋秀娟,张祖超.美国运输政策的变迁及对我们的启示[J].漯河职业技术学院学报,2009,8(4)：78-80.
[82]晏绍明,李维智.试论我国交通运输结构合理发展的途径[J].长沙铁道学院学报,1997,15(9)：48-52.
[83]黄静兰.公路运输结构现状分析及调整建议[J].公路交通科技,2002,19(5)：156-159.
[84]魏际刚.制度激励与中国运输结构变迁[J].中国软科学,2001(7)：53-57.
[85]王钰.论综合运输[J].武汉交通管理干部学院学报,1991(3)：62-67.
[86]唐建桥,王慈光等.论运输需求预测的有效性[J].铁道运输与经济,2008,30(6)：82-85.
[87]吴文征.交通运输供给与需求均衡的理论研究与实证分析[D].西安：长安大学,2005.
[88]杨洪年.综合运输体系发展论析[J].综合运输,2009(11)：16-17.
[89]Jifeng Wu, Gang-len Chang. An integrated optimal control and algorithm for commuting corridors [J]. Intermational Transportations in Operational Research, 2009,6 (1):39-55.
[90]Markos Papageorgious. An integrated control approach for traffic corridors [J] Transportation Research C,2005,3 (1):19-30.
[91]Cristina Diakaki, Markos Papagerious, Tom Mclean. Simulation studies of integrated corridor control in Glasgow[J]. Transportation Research C,2007(5): 211-224.
[92]Van Henggel. Citizens near the path of least resistance:travel behavior of century of freeway corridor residents [D]. University of California, Ph.D,1996.
[93]Osuji, lifford Ihejirika. Impact of anticipated transportation improvement on land values in Chicago [D]. University of Illinois at Chicago, Ph.D,2004.
[94]国家计委综合运输所.我国各种运输方式协调发展结构优化研究[R].北京：国家计委综合运输研究所,1998：18-20.
[95]杨艳.运输需求的不均衡性与运输方式的适应性研究[J].价值工程,2012：23-24.
[96]吴群琪,运输需求经济分析[J].交通运输工程学报,2001,1(2)：114-119.
[97]张铱莹,彭其渊.客运专线对运输通道分担率的影响[J].铁道运输与经济,2006,16(12)：16-19.
[98]黄海波,何琳.城市间旅客运输需求的研究[J].铁道学报,1999(5)：5-9.
[99]毛保华等.交通规划模型及其应用[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,1998.
[100]彭辉,续宗芳,韩永启等.城市群城际运输结构配置客流分担率模型[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(2)：91-95.
[101]陈 怡.我国交通运输需求总量及结构分析[D].西安：长安大学,2006.
[102]肯尼斯.巴顿(英).运输经济学[M].北京：商务印书馆,2001.
[103]秦四平.运输经济学[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2005.
[104]袁长伟.对运输需求预测理论的再认识[J].综合运输,2005(1)：15-17.
[105]吴群琪.对运输需求理论问题的再认识[J].综合运输,2004(3)：8-11.
[106]吴群琪.运输供给的品质特性[J].长安大学(社会科学版),2006,8(1)：1-4.
[107]张圣忠.论中国道路货物运输供给的结构性失衡[J].长安大学(社会科学版),2005,7(3)：16-19.
[108]何新才,李峻利.货运方式选择模型研究[J].重庆交通学院学报,1992,1 1(4)：87-92
[109]Park.Y, HA.H.K. Analysis of the impaet of high-speed railroad service on air tra-nsport demand [J]. Transportation Researeh Part E,2006,42 (2):95-104.
[110]黄启乐,丁宏飞,周嘉男.基于旅客分担率的运输方式竞争力评价[J].铁 道运输与经济,2012,34(6)：69-73.
[111]李 茜.京沪通道：旅客运输方式选择分析[J].综合运输,2006(4)：65-68.
[112]南敬林.京沪通道旅客行为时间价值研究[J].铁道经济研究,2002(3)：36-38.
[113]王建伟.空间运输联系与运输通道系统合理配置研究[D].西安：长安大学,2004.
[114]孙启鹏,吴群琪.我国综合运输布局规划的基本原则和思路[J].交通企业管理,2007(8)：21-22.
[115]韩彪.各种运输方式之间的发展关系分析[J].北方交通大报,1994,18(3)：320-326.
[116]编辑部(摘编).关于建立我国快速货物运输系统的问题(上)[J].辽宁交通科技,1998,23(5)：47-48.
[117]李五四等.基于市场博弈的运输产业优化研究[J].生产力研究,2011(12)：229-230.
[118]Meyer. Mchadl, Eric.miller. Intercity Rail:A Comparative Analysis between the EEC and the US [J]. http://www.maven.grti.gateeh.eud,1994.
[119]Marchetti, C. Infrastructure for Movement, Techno, Forecasting and Soci[J]. Change,1987,32:373-393.
[120]唐建桥,王慈光.基于信息熵的区域货运供需结构适应性分析[J].公路交通科技,2013,30(4)148-154.
[121]许国志.系统科学[M].上海：上海科技教育出版社,2005：208-213.
[122]汪应洛.系统工程[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2005：22-27.
[123]孙东川,林福永.系统工程引论[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2004：94-100.
[124]刘芳.熵权法在评价企业竞争能力的应用[J].生产力研究,2000,30(12)：26-28.
[125]张运凯,王方伟等.基于模糊类和信息熵的综合评价方法研究[J].吉林大学学报(信息科学版),2004,22(6)：643-647.
[126]YU Shijun, LIU Yingshun, LIANG Xiandeng. Evolution of Regional Transport Structure Information Entropy and Its Dynamic analysis [J]. Journal of Transportation System Engineering & information Technology,2011,11 (4): 91-96.
[127]于世军,刘英舜,梁先登.区域交通运输结构信息熵演变及动力分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2011,11(4)：91-96.
[128]帅 斌,李 明等.交通运输经济[M].成都：西南交通大学出版社,2011：27-29.
[129]匡 敏.运输效率论[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2005.
[130]谢季坚,刘承平.模糊数学方法及其应用[M].武汉：华中科技大学出版社,2006：143-191.
[131]高咏玲,杨浩.基于灰关联熵的重庆运输结构实证分析[J].综合运输,2006,(6)： 53-56.
[132]聂伟,邵春福,王雪.北京都市圈综合交通规划新研究[J].昆明理工大学学报,2004,(3)；91-99.
[133]邱玉琢,陈森发.综合运输通道客运结构配置的随机饱和熵模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,7(2)：104-108.
[134]Akio Imai, EtsLIko Nishimura, Stratos Papadimituiou. Berth allocation in a cont-ainer Port:using a continuous location space approach [J]. Transportation Research Part B,2005,39:199-221.
[135]Krunoslav Perie. Bi - level mode for transportation vehicle alloeation intermodal networks [D]. The State University of New Jersey,2006.
[136]Jose Holguin-Veras, Sergio Jara-Diaz. Optimal Princing for Priority service and space allocation in container Ports [J]. Transportation Researeh Part B,1999, 33:81-106.
[137]M.E.O'Kelly. Hub location with flow economies of scale [J]. Transportation Researeh Part B,1998,32:605-616.
[138]Mark W.Homer, MortonE.O, Kelly. Embedding economies of seale coneepts for hub network design [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2001 (9):255-265.
[139]Illia Racuniea, LauraWynter. Optimal location of intermodal freight hubs[J]. Tra nsportation Research Part B,2005,39:453-477.
[140]李德刚,罗霞.基于用户的综合运输通道结构配置[J].西南交通大学学报,2005,40(2)：249-253.
[141]段国钦.交通走廊运输需求分析及其运输结构优化研究[D].西安：西安公路交通大学,2000.
[142]刘舒燕.多种运输方式综合运输优化模型研究[J].交通科技,2000(5)：50-51.
[143]杨忻.渤海湾地区(南侧)经济增长及其合理运输结构研究[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),1991,31(6)：97-102.
[144]袁长伟,王建伟,林文新.中国运输区域划分方法[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2006(4)：79-82.
[145]王明仪.对公路运输系统技术结构问题的探讨[J].中国公路学报,1994,7(2)：60-69.
[146]H.哈肯.高等.协同学[D].北京：北京科学出版社,1992.
[147]吴大进等.协同学原理与应用[M].武汉：华中理工大学出版社,1990.
[148]袁旭梅,韩文秀.复合系统的协调与可持续性发展[J].中国人口资源,1998(6).
[149]王孝坤.综合运输复合系统协调发展研究[D].西安：长安大学,2003.
[150]石钦文.综合运输系统结构协调发展理论研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2010.
[151]张生瑞,邵春福.交通运输系统协调发展理论与模型[J].研究数学的实践与认识,2007,37(6)：1-6.
[152]张生瑞,严宝杰.交通运输系统协调发展的理论分析[J].长安大学学报(自然版),2002,22(2)：51-53.
[153]毛保华.运输系统协调理论研究[J].系统工程,1994,12(4)：48-53.
[154]江波,陈森发.综合交通运输体系中子系统间协调分析[J].综合运输,2007,(6)：8-11.
[155]曾珍香,顾培亮著.可持续发展的系统分析与评价[M].科学出版社,2000.
[156]付慧敏.运输通道公铁系统协调发展研究[D].西安：长安大学,2006.
[157]徐利民.交通运输结构规划理论研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2004.
[158]Parsons-clough Harbor. Existing corridor conditions and opportunities-1-87 multimodal Corridor study [R]. New York:New York State Department of Transportation,2004.
[159]Christopher Kennedy. The four pillar of sustainable urban transportation[J]. Tran sort review,2005,25 (4): 393-414.
[160]Afandizadeh Zargari, Shahriar. Optimization of Integrated Multimodal Urban Transportation Corridors [M]. Carleton University,1997.
[161]D.A.Hensher. A Practieal apporaeh to identifying the market Potential for high speedrail:a case study in the Sydney-Canberra cortidor [J]. Transportation Research A,1997,31 (6):431-446.
[162]Ruth Banomyong. Multimodal Transport Corridors in South East Asia:A Case Study Approach [D]. University of wales, Ph.D,2000.
[163]Chang, lejoon. A network-based model for market share estimation among compet-ing transportation modes in a regional corridor [M]. Dissertation abstracts inter-national,62 (12), Seetion B,1999:58-57.
[164]McFadden, Manheim, Ben. AKiva. Combined revealed and stated Preferences dataM]. Springer Netherlands,1994.
[165]E.R.Petersen. A highway corridor Planning model:QROAD[J]. Transportation Research Part A,2002,36 (2):107-125.
[166]盛骤,谢式千,潘承毅.概率论与数理统计(第三版)[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2004：354-371.
[167]中山大学数学力学系.概率论与数理统计[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1984：304-311.
[168]陈玉祥,张汉亚.预测技术与应用[M],北京：机械工业出版社,1985：136-146.
[169]冯文权.经济预测与决策技术(第五版)[M],武汉：武汉大学出版社.2012.
[170]金俊武,卢艳秋,范海燕.道路客运市场车辆结构优化模型研究[J].公路交通科技,2002,19(1)：128-131.
[171]杨文军.应用多产品替代预测对外交通分向流量[J].城市规划.1994：58-60.
[172]金俊武,孙家庆,隽志才.综合运输系统运输量分配模型研究[J].吉林工业大学学报,1990,(4)：93-97.
[173]韩丽飞.区域综合交通客运结构分析与优化研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学,2011.
[174]李艳红.综合运输通道客运结构优化理论与方法研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2010.
[175]任露泉.试验设计及其优化[M],北京：科学出版社.2011：7-51.
[176]闫新华.对我国交通运输业结构变化分析[J].山西财大学报,2002, 24(12)：37.
[177]钟卫.马尔柯夫转移概率矩阵的估计及其在市场占有率预测中的应用[J].山西统计,2001(5)：24-25.
[178]林术生.一种运输结构趋势分析的定量方法[J].预测,1988(5)：39-42.
[179]铁道部科技局.现代化管理技术[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,1986：138-142.
[180]沈景明.机械工业技术经济学[M].北京：机械工业出版社,1987：72-77.
[181]狄娟.江苏省交通运输结构变化分析和预测[D].南京：东南大学,2005.
[182]Bortis, Heinrich. Some considerations on structure and change [J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2002,11 (1):185-195.
[183]Domingo, Carlos. Towards a theory of structural change[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2002,11 (1):209-225.
[184]Sukui J T, Murakami Y, Turnpike. Optimality in Input-output Systems, Theory and Application for Planning [M]. In Amsterdam:North-Holland,1979.
[185]李玉凤.黑龙江省产业结构优化及仿真[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨理工大学,2009：173-177.
[186]Dorfman R, Samuelson P A, Solow R M. Linear programming and economic analysis [M]. New York:McGrawHill,1958:35-86.
[187]党耀国,刘思峰,王庆丰.区域产业结构优化理论与实践[M].北京：科学出版社,2011：99-101.
[188]罗仁会,侯萍.产业结构调整路径优化模型[J].数学的实践与认识,2008,38(15)：1-6.
[189]《运筹学》教材编写组.运筹学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2005：180-183.
[190]胡运权.运筹学教程(第二版)[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2004：182-184.
[191]郭耀煌.运筹学原理与方法[M].成都：西南交通大学出版社,2000：182-187.
[192]杨海花.运输通道交通线路布局研究[D].西安：长安大学,2005.
[193]丁以中.交通运输网络规划综合评价方法[J].上海海运学院学报,2000(3).
[194]李军,孙彦彬.产业结构优化模型及其评价机制研究[M].广州：华南理工大学出版社,2006：82-83.
[195]杨华龙,赛令香,孙光听.我国交通运输结构调整分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2002,2(2)：11-13.
[196]樊彦龙.关于我国运输通道客运交通结构的研究西安[D].西安：长安大学,2004.
[197]吴卫平,王东.我国各种运输方式协调发展研究[J].铁道经济研究,2005,36(2)：29-33.
[198]邹海波,吴群琪.交通运输方式协调发展的状态评价[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,7(6)：24-29.
[199]吴 丹.基于DEA的综合交通运输系统协调发展评价研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2009.
[200]Matthew GKarlaftis. A DEA Approach for evahiating the efficiency and effectivness of urban transit systems [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,15 (2):354-364.
[201]广东省统计局. 广东统计年鉴(2010年)[EB/OL]. (2011-09-12) [2012-11-20]. http://www. gdstats.gov.cn/.
[202]广东省统计局.2011年广东国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/ OL]. (2012-08-12) [2012-11-20] http://www. gdstats.gov.cn/.
[203]刘思峰,党耀国,方志耕等.灰色系统理论及其应用(第三版)[M].北京：科学出版社,2004：50-95.
[204]邓聚龙.灰理论基础[M].武汉：华中科技大学出版社,2002.137-150.
[205]门宝辉,赵燮京,梁川.多目标决策灰色关联投影法在水利工程开发中的应用[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2003,36(8)：36-39.
[206]程祖德.上海交通运输结构的灰色关联分析[J].上海海运学院学报,1992(2)：57-65.
[207]汪传旭.交通运输业对国民经济贡献的衡量方法[J].中国公路学报,2004,(1)：13-17.
[208]张喜.我国各种运输方式货物运输相关关系分析[J].系统工程,1991,9(2)：51-57.[209]周溪召,张琦.交通运输系统结构优化及投资分析[J].上海交通大学学报,2000,34(11)：1570-1573.
[210]陈锡康,杨翠红.投入产出技术[M].北京：科学出版社,2011.
[211]华罗庚.计划经济大范围最优化的数学理论—(1)量粽与消耗系数方阵[J].科学通报,1984,29(12)：705-409.
[212]Wang Tong. Input-output characteristic analysis[J]. Journal of applied input-output analysis,1997, (4):63-69.
[213]朱道元,葛颖恩.提高最终产品率的研究[J].系统工程,1997,15(4)：12-15.
[214]李国平,许炀.产业结构特征的定量分析方法[J].数量经济技术经济研究.1992(2)：39-46.
[215]郭菊娥.利用投入产出特征分析我国产业结构[J].系统工程理论与实践,1991,(2)： 59-64.
[216]吉彩红,佟仁城,张媛媛.基于投入产出特征法的我国产业结构分析[J].数学的实践与认识,2008,38(19)：21-26.
[217]陈宏,韩轶,戴华.利用投入产出模型研究最优产业结构[J].电子科技大学学报,1997,26(3)：293-297.
[218]汪传旭.航运业社会效益的投入产出分析[J].系统工程,1996,(1)：27-31.
[219]Baiding Hu, Michael McAleer. Input-output structureand growth in China [J]. Mathematics and Computersin Simulation,2004,6 (4):193-202.
[220]沈 未,陆化普.基于可持续发展的城市交通结构优化模型与应用[J].中南公路工程,2005,30(1)：150-153.
[221]隽海民.城市客运交通方式生态特性与结构优化研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学,2012.
[222]陈 帅,孙有望.资源紧缺型社会的综合交通运输体系结构优化[J].交通科技与经济,2007(4)：97-99.
[223]张树伟,姜克隽,刘德顺.中国交通发展的能源消费与对策研究[J].中国软科学,2006(5)：58-62.
[224]L. Fulton and Eads. IEA/SMP Model Documentation and Reference Case Projection [R]. WESCD,2004.
[225]J.W. Sun, B.W. Ang. Some Properties of an Exact Energy Decomposition Model [J]. Energy,2000,25:1177-1188.
[226]J.W. Sun. Changes in Energy Consumption and Energy Intensity:A Complete Decomposition Model [J]. Energy Economics,1998,20:85-100.
[227]J.W. Sun. Accounting for Energy Use in China:1980-1994 [J]. Energy,1998, 23:835-849.
[228]毛敏.城市化进程中区域客运走廊的发展研究[D].成都：西南交通大学, 2005.
[229]毛敏,蒲云,喻翔.外部成本对城市客运交通结构的影响分析[J].公路交通科技,2004,21(11)：121-124.
[230]欧洲运输部长联合会,经济合作与发展组织.交通运输成本的内部化[C].北京：中国环境科学出版社,1996.
[231]Erik Verhoef. External effects and social costs of road[J]. transport Res.-A.1994, 28 (4):273-287.
[232]韩彪.交通经济论—城市交通理论、政策与实践[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2000.
[233]Gunter Ellwnager. The External Effects of Trnasport [J]. Rail International, 1997 (4):10-14.
[234]张新宇,陈景艳.交通运输外部成本评估及内部化[J].北方交通大学学报,1999,23(3)：62-67.
[235]D.M.Levinson, D.Gillen. The full cost of intercity highway transportation [J]. Transpot-Res. D,1998,3 (4):207-223.
[236]颜月霞,王花兰.基于偏差最大化和信息熵定量比较多种城市交通方式的研究[J].石家庄铁道学院学报,2006(3).
[237]窦慧娟,李新乐.灰色关联分析法在交通方式优选中的应用[J].大连民族学院学报,2007(3)
[238]吕 慎,田 锋,李旭宏.我国大城市客运交通结构发展模式研究—应用层次分析-主成分分析组合评判法[J].土木工程学报,2003,36(1)：30-35.
[239]吕 慎,田 锋,李旭宏.大城市客运交通结构优化模型研究[J].公路交通科技,2007,24(7)：117-120.
[240]邹胜勇,面向可持续发展的城市总体交通结构优化[J],交通运输系统工程与信息,2006(4)：106-110.
[241]陆建.城市交通系统可持续发展规划理论与方法[D].南京：东南大学,2003.
[242]陆锡明,陈小雁.客运规划与城市发展[M].上海：华东理工大学出版社,1996.
[243]程斌.轨道交通与城市交通可持续发展[M].中国铁道出版社,2001.
[244]李婧,谭清美,白俊红.可持续发展视角下城市交通结构优化模型研究[J].开发研究,2009(3)：144-148.
[245]Carlsson-Kanyama, lindena. Travel patterns and environmental effects now and in the future:implications of differences in energy consumption among socio-economics groups [J]. Ecological Economics,1999,30:156-178.
[246]Folkec, Janssona, lindena. Travel patterns and environmental effects now and in the future:implications of differences in energy consumption among socio-economics groups [J]. Ecological Economics,1999,30:405-417.
[247]冯芬玲,魏天娇.基于循环经济的长株潭交通运输结构优化研究[J].科技和产业,2011(11)：17-19.
[248]张鹏.基于可持续发展的城市交通运输结构体系优化研究[D].北京：清华大学,2001.
[249]田 锋.我国大城市客运交通结构发展模式研究[D].南京：东南大学,2002.
[250]John Whitelegg. Transportation for a Sustainable Future, The Case for Europe [M]. Belhaven Press,1993.
[251]The World Bank. Sustainable Transport:Priorities for Policy Reform [M].The World Bank,1996.
[252]K.Obeng. Expense preference behavior in public transit systems[J]. Transportation Research Part E,2000,36:249-265.
[253]K.Obeng, R.Sakano. Total factor Productivity decomposition, input Price ineff-Iciencies, and Public transit systems [J]. Transportation Research Part E,2002, 38:19-36.
[254]R.Daielis, E.Marcucci. Bottleneck road congestion pricing with a competing railroad service [J]. Transportation Research Part E,2002,38:379-388.
[255]M.G.Karlaftis, P.Mcarthy. Cost structures of public transit systems a panel data analysis [J]. Transportation Research Part E,2002,38:1-18.
[256]Stephen R.Alderson, Yorgos J.Stephandees. Transortation Corridor Strategies and Land Use [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering,1986,12 (1):15-28.
[257]QY Wang, on the Methods and Practice of Integrated Transport Network Planning [J], Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Teehnoloy, 2005,5 (1):11-15.
[258]IEA. Energy Statistics and Balances [M]. International Energy Agency,2004.
[259]Ojoon Chang, a Network-based Modes for Market Share Estimation among Compet-ing Transportation Modes in a Regional Corridor [D]. UMI,2001.
[260]Kltamurar. R.Chen.C. Micro-simulation of Daily Activity travel Patternas for Travel Demand Forecastiing [J]. Transportation Research,2000.
[261]Clark. S, Watling.D. Modeling network travel time reliability under stochastic demand Forecasting Method [J]. Transportation Research,2005.
[262]JUAN Zhi-cai, Li Zhi-yao, ZONG Fasng. A Review of Activity-based Travel Dema-nd Forecasting Method [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2005.
[263]Ferng.X, Zhang.J, Fujiwara A and Senbil M. Evaluating environmentally sustainable urban and transport policies for a developing city based on a travel demand model with feedback mechanisms[J]. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies,2007.
[264]MAO Baohua, SUN Quanxin, CHEN Shaokuan. Structural Analysis on 2008 Intercity Transport Systerm of China [J]. J Transpn Sys Eng & IT,2009.
[265]Scheiner J. Interrelations between travel mode choice and trip distance[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2009.
[266]Werner Gronau, Andreas Kagermeier. Key factors for successful leisure and tourism public transport provision [J].2007 (5)
[267]洪卫,乔乐中,张运.可持续发展与运输结构变动[J].重庆交通学院学报,2001(1)：50-54.
[268]林震,杨浩城市交通结构的优化模型分析[J].土木工程学报,2005(5)：100-104.
[269]王召强,李彬道.路网容量约束下的交通结构优化方法研究[J].交通规划,2006,(12)：19-22.
[270]陆化普,王建伟,张鹏基.于能源消耗的城市交通结构优化[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版).2004,(3)：383-386.
[271]杨明,谢辉.基于循环经济的城市客运交通结构优化模型[J].长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版).2006(12)：23-27.
[272]A fndizadeh Zargari, Shahriar. Optimization of Integrated Multimodal Urban TranSportation Corridors [M]. Carleton University,1997.
[273]Pedro J. Perez-Martinez and Ivan A. Sorba. Energy consumption of passenger land transport modes [J]. Energy and Environment,2010,21 (6):577-600.
[274]Joffre Swait, Wiktor Adamowicz. Choice and temporal welfare impacts:incorpor ating history into discrete choice models [J]. Environmental Economics and Management,2004,47 (1):94-116.
[275]Christopher Kennedy. The four pillar sustainable urban transportation [J] Tran-sport Reviews,2005,25 (4):393-414.
[276]Shi Jing, Yang Lang, Jiao pengpeng. Transportation structure model for sustainable development in Beijing [C]. The World Engineers'Convention,2004:105-110.
[277]Stephane Hess, Michel Bierlaire, John W.Polak. Estimation of value of travel-time savings using mixed Logit models [J]. Transportation Research Part A.2005, 39:221-236.
[278]Hong K.Lo, Chun-Wing Yip, Quentin K.Wan. Modeling competitive multimodal transit services:a nested Logit approach [J]. Transportation Research Part D.2004,12:251-272.
[279]M.L. Tam, William H.K. Lam. Maximum car ownership under constraints of road capacity and parking space [J]. Transportation Research Part A,2000,34: 145-170.
[280]William H.K.Lam, Zhi-Chun Li, Hai-Jun Huang, etc. The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2006,40:709-730.
[281]Fry, Chris, Tomlinson and Panl, Integrated appraisai for transport [J]. Transportation Research Part A,2003.
[282]Basso, Leonardo J, Jara-Diaz, Seigio R. Are returns to scale with variable network size adequate for transport industry structure analysis[J]. Transportation Seience, 2006.
[283]Benguigui L, Daoud M. Is the urban railway system a fractal [J]. Geographical Analysis,1991,23:362-368.
[284]Frankhouser P. Aspects fractal desstructures urbaines [J]. L'Espace Geograph ique,1990,19 (1):45-69.
[285]刘晓佳.城市交通系统可持续发展协调能力的综合评价[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2008,27(1)：105-8.
[286]刘晓佳.基于和谐交通理念的综合交通运输系统评价研究[D].上海：同济大学,2007.
[287]张铮,陈亮,魏洪涛.基于分形理论的区域路网覆盖性评价研究[J].河北工业大学成人教育学院学报,2005,20(1)：10-13.
[288]Benoit B. Mandelnbrot. The Fractal Geometry of Nature [M]. Freeman, San Francisco,1982.
[289]丁以中,楼勇.分形理论在交通运输网络评价中的应用[J].上海海运学院学报,1998,19(4)：7-12.
[290]杨东援,吴海燕,宗伟苓.采用分形几何方法概述路网覆盖形态[J].中国公路学报,1996,9(3)：29-35.
[291]许志海,张昭云.分形理论在交通网络分布形态研究中的应用[J].测绘工程,2006,15(1)：27-30.
[292]黄佩蓓,刘妙龙.基于GIS的城市交通网络分形特征研究[J].同济大学学报,2002,30：1370-1374.
[293]刘妙龙,黄佩蓓.上海大都市交通网络分形的时空特征演变研究[J].地理科学,2004,24：144-149.
[294]王秋平,张琦,刘茂.基于分形方法的城市路网交通形态分析[J].城市问题,2007,(6)：52-55.
[295]冯永玖,刘妙龙,童小华.广东省公路交通网络分形空间特征研究[J].地球信息科学.2008,11(1)：26-33.
[296]曲国庆.用分形维数评价路网结构[J].淄博学院学报(自然科学与工程版),2000,2(4)：66-68.
[297]柏春广,蔡先华.中国路网空间体系的分形结构及其区域差异[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2008,8(4)：11-15.
[298]景国胜.城市区域性交通改善规划与可持续发展的关系[J].城市规划,2000(3)：15-16.
[299]马立平.统计数据标准化——无量纲化方法[J].北京统计,2000,3(2)：34-35.
[300]王明涛.多指标综合评价中权系数的综合分析方法[J].系统工程,1999,17(2)：56-61.
[301]冯 灏,刘 斌,朱楠.多指标系统分析及应用[J].小型微型计算机系 统,2000,21(5)：527-529.
[302]荀志远,于彩华.加权灰色关联度法在工程投资估算中的应用[J].建筑技术开发,2001,28(9)：47-49.
[303]朱健梅.西南地区交通运输发展战略研究[D].成都：西南交通大学,2002.
[304]朱健梅,闫海峰,王波.地区交通运输结构优化研究[J].西南交通大学学报,2003,38(2)：188-191.
[305]武旭,胡思继,崔艳萍等.交通运输与经济协调发展评价的研究[J].北京交通大学学报(社科版),2005,(2)：10-15.
[306]彭少兵,刘建勋,王花兰.基于DEA理论的道路运输结构经济适应性评价[J].交通科技与经济,2009,(2)：88-90.
[307]丁以中.交通运输与经济的关系研究[J].系统工程理论方法应用,1997(2)：34-38.
[308]朱顺应.公路交通与经济发展适应性客观模糊评价[J].重庆交通学院学报,2004(1)：2-7.
[309]朱佳翔.都市圈交通体系结构演化与优化研究[D].南京：南京航空航天大学,2010.
[2]毛保华,孙全欣,陈绍宽.2008年中国综合交通结构分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2009,9(1)：10-18.
[3]贾顺平.中国未来综合交通建设与发展[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2010,10(6)：1-10
[4]王庆云.扩大内需与交通基础设施的建设与发展[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2009,9(3)：1-5.
[5]肖昭升.我国综合运输结构问题成因分析[J].综合运输,2003,(2)：98-11.
[6]张国强.交通运输发展的经济分析[M].北京：经济科学出版社,201O.
[7]张国强,王庆云,张宁.中国交通运输发展理论研究综述[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2007,7(4)：13-18.
[8]王洪伟.“十二五”规划下我国地区交通运输结构优化研究[J].中国水运,2011(11)：8-9.
[9]孙启鹏.综合运输理论与方法[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2007.
[10]中国运输结构问题研究[R].北京：北京中交协物流研究院,2007.
[11]刘冰.交通运输与区域经济发展的适应性分析[D].北京：北京交通大学,2007.
[12]Carey.G.W. Accessibility, Urbanization and Transportation:Towards an operational model transport policy and urban rank:A model for the optimization of transport infrastructure. the transport Geography study group at the department of geography, university of salford.2005.
[13]李莹英.运输结构分析与协调性评价研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2010.
[14]郝静.区域交通运输结构优化研究[D].西安：长安大学,2008.
[15]高家驹.综合运输概论[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,1993.
[16]张文尝,金凤君,荣朝和,唐秀芳.空间运输联系—理论研究·实证研究·预测方法[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,1992.
[17]荣朝和.论运输化[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,1993.
[18]张国伍.交通运输系统分析[M].成都：西南交通出版社,2006.
[19]管楚度.新视域运输经济学[M].北京：人民交通出版社,2002.
[20]管楚度.交通区位论及其应用[M].北京：人民交通出版社,2000.
[21]王德荣.中国运输布局[M].北京：科学出版社,1986.
[22]王德荣.交通运输产业政策研究[M].北京：科学技术文献出版社,1989.
[23]胡思继.综合运输工程学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,北京交通大学出版社,2006.
[24]沈志云.交通运输工程[M].北京：人民交通出版社,1999.
[25]刘其斌,马桂贞.枢纽内各种运输方式的协调[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,1988.
[26]赵一平,胡安洲.运输结构演变的理论分析[J].重庆交通学院学报,1993,12(2)：1-8.
[27]赵一平.货物运输结构演变自组织机理的分析[J].铁道学报,1995,17(1)：9-14.
[28]赵一平,胡安洲.关于综合运输理论研究的几个问题[J].重庆交通学院学报,1994,13(2)：1-7.
[29]成耀荣.综合运输学[M].北京：人民交通出版社,2003.
[30]胡列格,刘中,杨明.交通枢纽与港站[M].北京：人民交通出版社,2007.
[31]彭辉.综合交通运输系统及规划[M].成都：西南交通出版社,2006.
[32]陈贻龙,邵振一.运输经济学[M].北京：人民交通出版社,2002.
[33]许庆斌,荣朝和,马运,等.运输经济学导论[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2006.
[34]赵锡铎.运输经济学[M].大连：大连海事大学出版社,2006.
[35]荣朝和.西方运输经济学[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2010.
[36]王吉东.综合运输系统结构问题研究[D].大连：大连海事大学,2000.
[37]张磊,李振林.对我国运输结构演进趋势的分析[J],综合运输.2007,(5)：12-15.
[38]刘奕,贾元华,朱俊峰.综合运输通道结构演化的自组织机制研究[J].综合运输,2009,(8)：24-27.
[39]朱文英,马天山.我国交通运输结构发展历程简析[J],交通企业管理,2009,(5)：62-63.
[40]袁静.交通运输供需结构均衡研究[D].西安：长安大学,2007.
[41]苗东升.系统科学精要[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2006.
[42]刘奕,贾元华,税常峰.区域运输结构的自组织演化机制研究—基于logistic模型的分析[J].技术经济与管理研究,2011,(9)：1-6.
[43]毛亮.城市道路交通系统自组织现象研究[D].成都：西南交通大学,2004.
[44]姜克锦,张殿业,刘帆佼.城市交通系统自组织与他组织复合演化过程[J].西南交通大学学报,2008,43(5)：605-609.
[45]Russ Marion, Thousand Oaks, etc. The Edge of Organization:Chaos andComplexity Theories of Formal Social Systems [J]. Scand. J. Mgmt.2002, 18:113-130.
[46]郭延结.运输结构合理化的评价原则和标准[J].公路交通科技,1993,10(2)：54-62.
[47]Arnulf Grubler. The Rise and Fall of Infrastructures-Dynamics of Evolution and Technological Change in Transport [M]. Heidelberg:Physica-Verlag,1990.
[48]范海洲,马鸿梅.基于Logistic模型的企业竞争互动分析[J].工业工程,2010,13(3)：39-42.
[49]韩俊林,陈励.随机效应Logistic模型的参数估计[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005(1)：93-98.
[50]王子龙,谭清美,许箫迪.企业集群共生演化模型及实证研究[J].中国管理学,2006(2)：141-148.
[51]李艳红.综合运输通道客运结构优化理论与方法研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2010.
[52]高艳红.综合运输通道耗散结构分析[J].交通标准化.2011(22)：143-145.
[53]吴群琪,陈文强.交通运输系统演化机理与发展趋势[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2009,11(2)：13-17.
[54]桂萍.我国交通运输结构的演变回顾及展望[J],综合运输,1999(11)：14-18.
[55]石钦文.综合运输系统结构协调发展理论研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2010.
[56]张周堂.影响综合运输体系结构演变的系统因素[J].综合运输,2005(12)：10-14.
[57]魏际刚,邱成利,胡吉平,荣朝和.运输方式涨落的系统动力学模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2001(4)：89-91.
[58]毛敏.交通运输走廊自组织演化机理[J].西南交通大学学报,2007,42(5)：631-635.
[59]邱玉琢,陈森发.运输方式互利共生的非线性动力学模型[J].系统工程,2006,24(7)：8-12.
[60]McGill, Brian. A mechanistic model of a mutualism and its ecological and evolutionary dynamics [J]. Ecological Modeling.2005,18 (7):413-425.
[61]马 运.运输需求的特性及其分析特点[J].北方交通大报,1994,18(3)：426-430.
[62]李伟达.交通运输结构发展演变规律的理论分析[J].水运管理,2000(6)：2-7.
[63]王吉霞.产业结构优化升级的影响因素探析[J].商业时代,2009(14)：106-107.
[64]沈利生.最终需求结构变动怎样影响产业结构变动—基于投入产出模型的分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2011(12)：82-95.
[65]吴 峰,施其洲.基于熵值理论的产业结构与交通运输结构关系研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2006,6(1)：71-74.
[66]李新民,唐建桥.论现代科技革命与交通运输发展的关系[J].科技进步与对策,2008 (suppl.):39-41.
[67]刘亚刚,刘世贵.现代科学技术革命及其影响[J].西南民族学院学报.2001(12).
[68]傅扬.科学、技术、生产的辨证关系[J].生产力研究,2006(3).
[69]杨艳萍.论现代科技革命对经济的影响[J].科技革命与对策,2002(7).
[70]彭列汉,吴元强.论交通与科技的互动[J].学术论坛,2005(2).
[71]Rudolph Daniels. Trains across the continent:North American railroad history (seco-ndedition) [M]. Bloomington, Indiana:Indiana University Press,2001.
[72]安文娟.区域运输通道客运需求结构分析及预测研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2011
[73]王岳平.产业结构对交通运输业发展影响的定量分析[J].管理世界,2004(6) ：65-72.
[74]王明志.运输供给与运输需求平衡论[M].北京：人民交通出版社,1998.
[75]罗诗屹,罗仁坚.我国交通运输结构的第三次转变及运营策略调整[J].铁道运输与经济,2012,34(3)：51-55.
[76]葛 云.江苏省交通运输结构及优势里程分析[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2004,32(4)：463-466.
[77]徐丽娟,孟岳松.运输方式及其市场需求结构关系研究[C]//中国交通研究与探索.北京：人民交通出版社,1999：1230--1231.
[78]张铱莹.客运专线对区际运输通道的影响研究[D].成都：西南交通大学,2007：1 1-14.
[79]肖昭升.高速铁路发展对完善综合运输体系的影响分析[J].综合运输,2011(9)： 9-13.
[80]赵丽霞,高月娥.关于世界交通运输发展历程及启示[J].黑龙江交通科技,2009(3)：108-111.
[81]隋秀娟,张祖超.美国运输政策的变迁及对我们的启示[J].漯河职业技术学院学报,2009,8(4)：78-80.
[82]晏绍明,李维智.试论我国交通运输结构合理发展的途径[J].长沙铁道学院学报,1997,15(9)：48-52.
[83]黄静兰.公路运输结构现状分析及调整建议[J].公路交通科技,2002,19(5)：156-159.
[84]魏际刚.制度激励与中国运输结构变迁[J].中国软科学,2001(7)：53-57.
[85]王钰.论综合运输[J].武汉交通管理干部学院学报,1991(3)：62-67.
[86]唐建桥,王慈光等.论运输需求预测的有效性[J].铁道运输与经济,2008,30(6)：82-85.
[87]吴文征.交通运输供给与需求均衡的理论研究与实证分析[D].西安：长安大学,2005.
[88]杨洪年.综合运输体系发展论析[J].综合运输,2009(11)：16-17.
[89]Jifeng Wu, Gang-len Chang. An integrated optimal control and algorithm for commuting corridors [J]. Intermational Transportations in Operational Research, 2009,6 (1):39-55.
[90]Markos Papageorgious. An integrated control approach for traffic corridors [J] Transportation Research C,2005,3 (1):19-30.
[91]Cristina Diakaki, Markos Papagerious, Tom Mclean. Simulation studies of integrated corridor control in Glasgow[J]. Transportation Research C,2007(5): 211-224.
[92]Van Henggel. Citizens near the path of least resistance:travel behavior of century of freeway corridor residents [D]. University of California, Ph.D,1996.
[93]Osuji, lifford Ihejirika. Impact of anticipated transportation improvement on land values in Chicago [D]. University of Illinois at Chicago, Ph.D,2004.
[94]国家计委综合运输所.我国各种运输方式协调发展结构优化研究[R].北京：国家计委综合运输研究所,1998：18-20.
[95]杨艳.运输需求的不均衡性与运输方式的适应性研究[J].价值工程,2012：23-24.
[96]吴群琪,运输需求经济分析[J].交通运输工程学报,2001,1(2)：114-119.
[97]张铱莹,彭其渊.客运专线对运输通道分担率的影响[J].铁道运输与经济,2006,16(12)：16-19.
[98]黄海波,何琳.城市间旅客运输需求的研究[J].铁道学报,1999(5)：5-9.
[99]毛保华等.交通规划模型及其应用[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,1998.
[100]彭辉,续宗芳,韩永启等.城市群城际运输结构配置客流分担率模型[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(2)：91-95.
[101]陈 怡.我国交通运输需求总量及结构分析[D].西安：长安大学,2006.
[102]肯尼斯.巴顿(英).运输经济学[M].北京：商务印书馆,2001.
[103]秦四平.运输经济学[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2005.
[104]袁长伟.对运输需求预测理论的再认识[J].综合运输,2005(1)：15-17.
[105]吴群琪.对运输需求理论问题的再认识[J].综合运输,2004(3)：8-11.
[106]吴群琪.运输供给的品质特性[J].长安大学(社会科学版),2006,8(1)：1-4.
[107]张圣忠.论中国道路货物运输供给的结构性失衡[J].长安大学(社会科学版),2005,7(3)：16-19.
[108]何新才,李峻利.货运方式选择模型研究[J].重庆交通学院学报,1992,1 1(4)：87-92
[109]Park.Y, HA.H.K. Analysis of the impaet of high-speed railroad service on air tra-nsport demand [J]. Transportation Researeh Part E,2006,42 (2):95-104.
[110]黄启乐,丁宏飞,周嘉男.基于旅客分担率的运输方式竞争力评价[J].铁 道运输与经济,2012,34(6)：69-73.
[111]李 茜.京沪通道：旅客运输方式选择分析[J].综合运输,2006(4)：65-68.
[112]南敬林.京沪通道旅客行为时间价值研究[J].铁道经济研究,2002(3)：36-38.
[113]王建伟.空间运输联系与运输通道系统合理配置研究[D].西安：长安大学,2004.
[114]孙启鹏,吴群琪.我国综合运输布局规划的基本原则和思路[J].交通企业管理,2007(8)：21-22.
[115]韩彪.各种运输方式之间的发展关系分析[J].北方交通大报,1994,18(3)：320-326.
[116]编辑部(摘编).关于建立我国快速货物运输系统的问题(上)[J].辽宁交通科技,1998,23(5)：47-48.
[117]李五四等.基于市场博弈的运输产业优化研究[J].生产力研究,2011(12)：229-230.
[118]Meyer. Mchadl, Eric.miller. Intercity Rail:A Comparative Analysis between the EEC and the US [J]. http://www.maven.grti.gateeh.eud,1994.
[119]Marchetti, C. Infrastructure for Movement, Techno, Forecasting and Soci[J]. Change,1987,32:373-393.
[120]唐建桥,王慈光.基于信息熵的区域货运供需结构适应性分析[J].公路交通科技,2013,30(4)148-154.
[121]许国志.系统科学[M].上海：上海科技教育出版社,2005：208-213.
[122]汪应洛.系统工程[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2005：22-27.
[123]孙东川,林福永.系统工程引论[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2004：94-100.
[124]刘芳.熵权法在评价企业竞争能力的应用[J].生产力研究,2000,30(12)：26-28.
[125]张运凯,王方伟等.基于模糊类和信息熵的综合评价方法研究[J].吉林大学学报(信息科学版),2004,22(6)：643-647.
[126]YU Shijun, LIU Yingshun, LIANG Xiandeng. Evolution of Regional Transport Structure Information Entropy and Its Dynamic analysis [J]. Journal of Transportation System Engineering & information Technology,2011,11 (4): 91-96.
[127]于世军,刘英舜,梁先登.区域交通运输结构信息熵演变及动力分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2011,11(4)：91-96.
[128]帅 斌,李 明等.交通运输经济[M].成都：西南交通大学出版社,2011：27-29.
[129]匡 敏.运输效率论[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2005.
[130]谢季坚,刘承平.模糊数学方法及其应用[M].武汉：华中科技大学出版社,2006：143-191.
[131]高咏玲,杨浩.基于灰关联熵的重庆运输结构实证分析[J].综合运输,2006,(6)： 53-56.
[132]聂伟,邵春福,王雪.北京都市圈综合交通规划新研究[J].昆明理工大学学报,2004,(3)；91-99.
[133]邱玉琢,陈森发.综合运输通道客运结构配置的随机饱和熵模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,7(2)：104-108.
[134]Akio Imai, EtsLIko Nishimura, Stratos Papadimituiou. Berth allocation in a cont-ainer Port:using a continuous location space approach [J]. Transportation Research Part B,2005,39:199-221.
[135]Krunoslav Perie. Bi - level mode for transportation vehicle alloeation intermodal networks [D]. The State University of New Jersey,2006.
[136]Jose Holguin-Veras, Sergio Jara-Diaz. Optimal Princing for Priority service and space allocation in container Ports [J]. Transportation Researeh Part B,1999, 33:81-106.
[137]M.E.O'Kelly. Hub location with flow economies of scale [J]. Transportation Researeh Part B,1998,32:605-616.
[138]Mark W.Homer, MortonE.O, Kelly. Embedding economies of seale coneepts for hub network design [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2001 (9):255-265.
[139]Illia Racuniea, LauraWynter. Optimal location of intermodal freight hubs[J]. Tra nsportation Research Part B,2005,39:453-477.
[140]李德刚,罗霞.基于用户的综合运输通道结构配置[J].西南交通大学学报,2005,40(2)：249-253.
[141]段国钦.交通走廊运输需求分析及其运输结构优化研究[D].西安：西安公路交通大学,2000.
[142]刘舒燕.多种运输方式综合运输优化模型研究[J].交通科技,2000(5)：50-51.
[143]杨忻.渤海湾地区(南侧)经济增长及其合理运输结构研究[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),1991,31(6)：97-102.
[144]袁长伟,王建伟,林文新.中国运输区域划分方法[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2006(4)：79-82.
[145]王明仪.对公路运输系统技术结构问题的探讨[J].中国公路学报,1994,7(2)：60-69.
[146]H.哈肯.高等.协同学[D].北京：北京科学出版社,1992.
[147]吴大进等.协同学原理与应用[M].武汉：华中理工大学出版社,1990.
[148]袁旭梅,韩文秀.复合系统的协调与可持续性发展[J].中国人口资源,1998(6).
[149]王孝坤.综合运输复合系统协调发展研究[D].西安：长安大学,2003.
[150]石钦文.综合运输系统结构协调发展理论研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2010.
[151]张生瑞,邵春福.交通运输系统协调发展理论与模型[J].研究数学的实践与认识,2007,37(6)：1-6.
[152]张生瑞,严宝杰.交通运输系统协调发展的理论分析[J].长安大学学报(自然版),2002,22(2)：51-53.
[153]毛保华.运输系统协调理论研究[J].系统工程,1994,12(4)：48-53.
[154]江波,陈森发.综合交通运输体系中子系统间协调分析[J].综合运输,2007,(6)：8-11.
[155]曾珍香,顾培亮著.可持续发展的系统分析与评价[M].科学出版社,2000.
[156]付慧敏.运输通道公铁系统协调发展研究[D].西安：长安大学,2006.
[157]徐利民.交通运输结构规划理论研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2004.
[158]Parsons-clough Harbor. Existing corridor conditions and opportunities-1-87 multimodal Corridor study [R]. New York:New York State Department of Transportation,2004.
[159]Christopher Kennedy. The four pillar of sustainable urban transportation[J]. Tran sort review,2005,25 (4): 393-414.
[160]Afandizadeh Zargari, Shahriar. Optimization of Integrated Multimodal Urban Transportation Corridors [M]. Carleton University,1997.
[161]D.A.Hensher. A Practieal apporaeh to identifying the market Potential for high speedrail:a case study in the Sydney-Canberra cortidor [J]. Transportation Research A,1997,31 (6):431-446.
[162]Ruth Banomyong. Multimodal Transport Corridors in South East Asia:A Case Study Approach [D]. University of wales, Ph.D,2000.
[163]Chang, lejoon. A network-based model for market share estimation among compet-ing transportation modes in a regional corridor [M]. Dissertation abstracts inter-national,62 (12), Seetion B,1999:58-57.
[164]McFadden, Manheim, Ben. AKiva. Combined revealed and stated Preferences dataM]. Springer Netherlands,1994.
[165]E.R.Petersen. A highway corridor Planning model:QROAD[J]. Transportation Research Part A,2002,36 (2):107-125.
[166]盛骤,谢式千,潘承毅.概率论与数理统计(第三版)[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2004：354-371.
[167]中山大学数学力学系.概率论与数理统计[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1984：304-311.
[168]陈玉祥,张汉亚.预测技术与应用[M],北京：机械工业出版社,1985：136-146.
[169]冯文权.经济预测与决策技术(第五版)[M],武汉：武汉大学出版社.2012.
[170]金俊武,卢艳秋,范海燕.道路客运市场车辆结构优化模型研究[J].公路交通科技,2002,19(1)：128-131.
[171]杨文军.应用多产品替代预测对外交通分向流量[J].城市规划.1994：58-60.
[172]金俊武,孙家庆,隽志才.综合运输系统运输量分配模型研究[J].吉林工业大学学报,1990,(4)：93-97.
[173]韩丽飞.区域综合交通客运结构分析与优化研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学,2011.
[174]李艳红.综合运输通道客运结构优化理论与方法研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2010.
[175]任露泉.试验设计及其优化[M],北京：科学出版社.2011：7-51.
[176]闫新华.对我国交通运输业结构变化分析[J].山西财大学报,2002, 24(12)：37.
[177]钟卫.马尔柯夫转移概率矩阵的估计及其在市场占有率预测中的应用[J].山西统计,2001(5)：24-25.
[178]林术生.一种运输结构趋势分析的定量方法[J].预测,1988(5)：39-42.
[179]铁道部科技局.现代化管理技术[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,1986：138-142.
[180]沈景明.机械工业技术经济学[M].北京：机械工业出版社,1987：72-77.
[181]狄娟.江苏省交通运输结构变化分析和预测[D].南京：东南大学,2005.
[182]Bortis, Heinrich. Some considerations on structure and change [J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2002,11 (1):185-195.
[183]Domingo, Carlos. Towards a theory of structural change[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2002,11 (1):209-225.
[184]Sukui J T, Murakami Y, Turnpike. Optimality in Input-output Systems, Theory and Application for Planning [M]. In Amsterdam:North-Holland,1979.
[185]李玉凤.黑龙江省产业结构优化及仿真[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨理工大学,2009：173-177.
[186]Dorfman R, Samuelson P A, Solow R M. Linear programming and economic analysis [M]. New York:McGrawHill,1958:35-86.
[187]党耀国,刘思峰,王庆丰.区域产业结构优化理论与实践[M].北京：科学出版社,2011：99-101.
[188]罗仁会,侯萍.产业结构调整路径优化模型[J].数学的实践与认识,2008,38(15)：1-6.
[189]《运筹学》教材编写组.运筹学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2005：180-183.
[190]胡运权.运筹学教程(第二版)[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2004：182-184.
[191]郭耀煌.运筹学原理与方法[M].成都：西南交通大学出版社,2000：182-187.
[192]杨海花.运输通道交通线路布局研究[D].西安：长安大学,2005.
[193]丁以中.交通运输网络规划综合评价方法[J].上海海运学院学报,2000(3).
[194]李军,孙彦彬.产业结构优化模型及其评价机制研究[M].广州：华南理工大学出版社,2006：82-83.
[195]杨华龙,赛令香,孙光听.我国交通运输结构调整分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2002,2(2)：11-13.
[196]樊彦龙.关于我国运输通道客运交通结构的研究西安[D].西安：长安大学,2004.
[197]吴卫平,王东.我国各种运输方式协调发展研究[J].铁道经济研究,2005,36(2)：29-33.
[198]邹海波,吴群琪.交通运输方式协调发展的状态评价[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,7(6)：24-29.
[199]吴 丹.基于DEA的综合交通运输系统协调发展评价研究[D].北京：北京交通大学,2009.
[200]Matthew GKarlaftis. A DEA Approach for evahiating the efficiency and effectivness of urban transit systems [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,15 (2):354-364.
[201]广东省统计局. 广东统计年鉴(2010年)[EB/OL]. (2011-09-12) [2012-11-20]. http://www. gdstats.gov.cn/.
[202]广东省统计局.2011年广东国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/ OL]. (2012-08-12) [2012-11-20] http://www. gdstats.gov.cn/.
[203]刘思峰,党耀国,方志耕等.灰色系统理论及其应用(第三版)[M].北京：科学出版社,2004：50-95.
[204]邓聚龙.灰理论基础[M].武汉：华中科技大学出版社,2002.137-150.
[205]门宝辉,赵燮京,梁川.多目标决策灰色关联投影法在水利工程开发中的应用[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2003,36(8)：36-39.
[206]程祖德.上海交通运输结构的灰色关联分析[J].上海海运学院学报,1992(2)：57-65.
[207]汪传旭.交通运输业对国民经济贡献的衡量方法[J].中国公路学报,2004,(1)：13-17.
[208]张喜.我国各种运输方式货物运输相关关系分析[J].系统工程,1991,9(2)：51-57.[209]周溪召,张琦.交通运输系统结构优化及投资分析[J].上海交通大学学报,2000,34(11)：1570-1573.
[210]陈锡康,杨翠红.投入产出技术[M].北京：科学出版社,2011.
[211]华罗庚.计划经济大范围最优化的数学理论—(1)量粽与消耗系数方阵[J].科学通报,1984,29(12)：705-409.
[212]Wang Tong. Input-output characteristic analysis[J]. Journal of applied input-output analysis,1997, (4):63-69.
[213]朱道元,葛颖恩.提高最终产品率的研究[J].系统工程,1997,15(4)：12-15.
[214]李国平,许炀.产业结构特征的定量分析方法[J].数量经济技术经济研究.1992(2)：39-46.
[215]郭菊娥.利用投入产出特征分析我国产业结构[J].系统工程理论与实践,1991,(2)： 59-64.
[216]吉彩红,佟仁城,张媛媛.基于投入产出特征法的我国产业结构分析[J].数学的实践与认识,2008,38(19)：21-26.
[217]陈宏,韩轶,戴华.利用投入产出模型研究最优产业结构[J].电子科技大学学报,1997,26(3)：293-297.
[218]汪传旭.航运业社会效益的投入产出分析[J].系统工程,1996,(1)：27-31.
[219]Baiding Hu, Michael McAleer. Input-output structureand growth in China [J]. Mathematics and Computersin Simulation,2004,6 (4):193-202.
[220]沈 未,陆化普.基于可持续发展的城市交通结构优化模型与应用[J].中南公路工程,2005,30(1)：150-153.
[221]隽海民.城市客运交通方式生态特性与结构优化研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学,2012.
[222]陈 帅,孙有望.资源紧缺型社会的综合交通运输体系结构优化[J].交通科技与经济,2007(4)：97-99.
[223]张树伟,姜克隽,刘德顺.中国交通发展的能源消费与对策研究[J].中国软科学,2006(5)：58-62.
[224]L. Fulton and Eads. IEA/SMP Model Documentation and Reference Case Projection [R]. WESCD,2004.
[225]J.W. Sun, B.W. Ang. Some Properties of an Exact Energy Decomposition Model [J]. Energy,2000,25:1177-1188.
[226]J.W. Sun. Changes in Energy Consumption and Energy Intensity:A Complete Decomposition Model [J]. Energy Economics,1998,20:85-100.
[227]J.W. Sun. Accounting for Energy Use in China:1980-1994 [J]. Energy,1998, 23:835-849.
[228]毛敏.城市化进程中区域客运走廊的发展研究[D].成都：西南交通大学, 2005.
[229]毛敏,蒲云,喻翔.外部成本对城市客运交通结构的影响分析[J].公路交通科技,2004,21(11)：121-124.
[230]欧洲运输部长联合会,经济合作与发展组织.交通运输成本的内部化[C].北京：中国环境科学出版社,1996.
[231]Erik Verhoef. External effects and social costs of road[J]. transport Res.-A.1994, 28 (4):273-287.
[232]韩彪.交通经济论—城市交通理论、政策与实践[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2000.
[233]Gunter Ellwnager. The External Effects of Trnasport [J]. Rail International, 1997 (4):10-14.
[234]张新宇,陈景艳.交通运输外部成本评估及内部化[J].北方交通大学学报,1999,23(3)：62-67.
[235]D.M.Levinson, D.Gillen. The full cost of intercity highway transportation [J]. Transpot-Res. D,1998,3 (4):207-223.
[236]颜月霞,王花兰.基于偏差最大化和信息熵定量比较多种城市交通方式的研究[J].石家庄铁道学院学报,2006(3).
[237]窦慧娟,李新乐.灰色关联分析法在交通方式优选中的应用[J].大连民族学院学报,2007(3)
[238]吕 慎,田 锋,李旭宏.我国大城市客运交通结构发展模式研究—应用层次分析-主成分分析组合评判法[J].土木工程学报,2003,36(1)：30-35.
[239]吕 慎,田 锋,李旭宏.大城市客运交通结构优化模型研究[J].公路交通科技,2007,24(7)：117-120.
[240]邹胜勇,面向可持续发展的城市总体交通结构优化[J],交通运输系统工程与信息,2006(4)：106-110.
[241]陆建.城市交通系统可持续发展规划理论与方法[D].南京：东南大学,2003.
[242]陆锡明,陈小雁.客运规划与城市发展[M].上海：华东理工大学出版社,1996.
[243]程斌.轨道交通与城市交通可持续发展[M].中国铁道出版社,2001.
[244]李婧,谭清美,白俊红.可持续发展视角下城市交通结构优化模型研究[J].开发研究,2009(3)：144-148.
[245]Carlsson-Kanyama, lindena. Travel patterns and environmental effects now and in the future:implications of differences in energy consumption among socio-economics groups [J]. Ecological Economics,1999,30:156-178.
[246]Folkec, Janssona, lindena. Travel patterns and environmental effects now and in the future:implications of differences in energy consumption among socio-economics groups [J]. Ecological Economics,1999,30:405-417.
[247]冯芬玲,魏天娇.基于循环经济的长株潭交通运输结构优化研究[J].科技和产业,2011(11)：17-19.
[248]张鹏.基于可持续发展的城市交通运输结构体系优化研究[D].北京：清华大学,2001.
[249]田 锋.我国大城市客运交通结构发展模式研究[D].南京：东南大学,2002.
[250]John Whitelegg. Transportation for a Sustainable Future, The Case for Europe [M]. Belhaven Press,1993.
[251]The World Bank. Sustainable Transport:Priorities for Policy Reform [M].The World Bank,1996.
[252]K.Obeng. Expense preference behavior in public transit systems[J]. Transportation Research Part E,2000,36:249-265.
[253]K.Obeng, R.Sakano. Total factor Productivity decomposition, input Price ineff-Iciencies, and Public transit systems [J]. Transportation Research Part E,2002, 38:19-36.
[254]R.Daielis, E.Marcucci. Bottleneck road congestion pricing with a competing railroad service [J]. Transportation Research Part E,2002,38:379-388.
[255]M.G.Karlaftis, P.Mcarthy. Cost structures of public transit systems a panel data analysis [J]. Transportation Research Part E,2002,38:1-18.
[256]Stephen R.Alderson, Yorgos J.Stephandees. Transortation Corridor Strategies and Land Use [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering,1986,12 (1):15-28.
[257]QY Wang, on the Methods and Practice of Integrated Transport Network Planning [J], Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Teehnoloy, 2005,5 (1):11-15.
[258]IEA. Energy Statistics and Balances [M]. International Energy Agency,2004.
[259]Ojoon Chang, a Network-based Modes for Market Share Estimation among Compet-ing Transportation Modes in a Regional Corridor [D]. UMI,2001.
[260]Kltamurar. R.Chen.C. Micro-simulation of Daily Activity travel Patternas for Travel Demand Forecastiing [J]. Transportation Research,2000.
[261]Clark. S, Watling.D. Modeling network travel time reliability under stochastic demand Forecasting Method [J]. Transportation Research,2005.
[262]JUAN Zhi-cai, Li Zhi-yao, ZONG Fasng. A Review of Activity-based Travel Dema-nd Forecasting Method [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2005.
[263]Ferng.X, Zhang.J, Fujiwara A and Senbil M. Evaluating environmentally sustainable urban and transport policies for a developing city based on a travel demand model with feedback mechanisms[J]. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies,2007.
[264]MAO Baohua, SUN Quanxin, CHEN Shaokuan. Structural Analysis on 2008 Intercity Transport Systerm of China [J]. J Transpn Sys Eng & IT,2009.
[265]Scheiner J. Interrelations between travel mode choice and trip distance[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2009.
[266]Werner Gronau, Andreas Kagermeier. Key factors for successful leisure and tourism public transport provision [J].2007 (5)
[267]洪卫,乔乐中,张运.可持续发展与运输结构变动[J].重庆交通学院学报,2001(1)：50-54.
[268]林震,杨浩城市交通结构的优化模型分析[J].土木工程学报,2005(5)：100-104.
[269]王召强,李彬道.路网容量约束下的交通结构优化方法研究[J].交通规划,2006,(12)：19-22.
[270]陆化普,王建伟,张鹏基.于能源消耗的城市交通结构优化[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版).2004,(3)：383-386.
[271]杨明,谢辉.基于循环经济的城市客运交通结构优化模型[J].长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版).2006(12)：23-27.
[272]A fndizadeh Zargari, Shahriar. Optimization of Integrated Multimodal Urban TranSportation Corridors [M]. Carleton University,1997.
[273]Pedro J. Perez-Martinez and Ivan A. Sorba. Energy consumption of passenger land transport modes [J]. Energy and Environment,2010,21 (6):577-600.
[274]Joffre Swait, Wiktor Adamowicz. Choice and temporal welfare impacts:incorpor ating history into discrete choice models [J]. Environmental Economics and Management,2004,47 (1):94-116.
[275]Christopher Kennedy. The four pillar sustainable urban transportation [J] Tran-sport Reviews,2005,25 (4):393-414.
[276]Shi Jing, Yang Lang, Jiao pengpeng. Transportation structure model for sustainable development in Beijing [C]. The World Engineers'Convention,2004:105-110.
[277]Stephane Hess, Michel Bierlaire, John W.Polak. Estimation of value of travel-time savings using mixed Logit models [J]. Transportation Research Part A.2005, 39:221-236.
[278]Hong K.Lo, Chun-Wing Yip, Quentin K.Wan. Modeling competitive multimodal transit services:a nested Logit approach [J]. Transportation Research Part D.2004,12:251-272.
[279]M.L. Tam, William H.K. Lam. Maximum car ownership under constraints of road capacity and parking space [J]. Transportation Research Part A,2000,34: 145-170.
[280]William H.K.Lam, Zhi-Chun Li, Hai-Jun Huang, etc. The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2006,40:709-730.
[281]Fry, Chris, Tomlinson and Panl, Integrated appraisai for transport [J]. Transportation Research Part A,2003.
[282]Basso, Leonardo J, Jara-Diaz, Seigio R. Are returns to scale with variable network size adequate for transport industry structure analysis[J]. Transportation Seience, 2006.
[283]Benguigui L, Daoud M. Is the urban railway system a fractal [J]. Geographical Analysis,1991,23:362-368.
[284]Frankhouser P. Aspects fractal desstructures urbaines [J]. L'Espace Geograph ique,1990,19 (1):45-69.
[285]刘晓佳.城市交通系统可持续发展协调能力的综合评价[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2008,27(1)：105-8.
[286]刘晓佳.基于和谐交通理念的综合交通运输系统评价研究[D].上海：同济大学,2007.
[287]张铮,陈亮,魏洪涛.基于分形理论的区域路网覆盖性评价研究[J].河北工业大学成人教育学院学报,2005,20(1)：10-13.
[288]Benoit B. Mandelnbrot. The Fractal Geometry of Nature [M]. Freeman, San Francisco,1982.
[289]丁以中,楼勇.分形理论在交通运输网络评价中的应用[J].上海海运学院学报,1998,19(4)：7-12.
[290]杨东援,吴海燕,宗伟苓.采用分形几何方法概述路网覆盖形态[J].中国公路学报,1996,9(3)：29-35.
[291]许志海,张昭云.分形理论在交通网络分布形态研究中的应用[J].测绘工程,2006,15(1)：27-30.
[292]黄佩蓓,刘妙龙.基于GIS的城市交通网络分形特征研究[J].同济大学学报,2002,30：1370-1374.
[293]刘妙龙,黄佩蓓.上海大都市交通网络分形的时空特征演变研究[J].地理科学,2004,24：144-149.
[294]王秋平,张琦,刘茂.基于分形方法的城市路网交通形态分析[J].城市问题,2007,(6)：52-55.
[295]冯永玖,刘妙龙,童小华.广东省公路交通网络分形空间特征研究[J].地球信息科学.2008,11(1)：26-33.
[296]曲国庆.用分形维数评价路网结构[J].淄博学院学报(自然科学与工程版),2000,2(4)：66-68.
[297]柏春广,蔡先华.中国路网空间体系的分形结构及其区域差异[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2008,8(4)：11-15.
[298]景国胜.城市区域性交通改善规划与可持续发展的关系[J].城市规划,2000(3)：15-16.
[299]马立平.统计数据标准化——无量纲化方法[J].北京统计,2000,3(2)：34-35.
[300]王明涛.多指标综合评价中权系数的综合分析方法[J].系统工程,1999,17(2)：56-61.
[301]冯 灏,刘 斌,朱楠.多指标系统分析及应用[J].小型微型计算机系 统,2000,21(5)：527-529.
[302]荀志远,于彩华.加权灰色关联度法在工程投资估算中的应用[J].建筑技术开发,2001,28(9)：47-49.
[303]朱健梅.西南地区交通运输发展战略研究[D].成都：西南交通大学,2002.
[304]朱健梅,闫海峰,王波.地区交通运输结构优化研究[J].西南交通大学学报,2003,38(2)：188-191.
[305]武旭,胡思继,崔艳萍等.交通运输与经济协调发展评价的研究[J].北京交通大学学报(社科版),2005,(2)：10-15.
[306]彭少兵,刘建勋,王花兰.基于DEA理论的道路运输结构经济适应性评价[J].交通科技与经济,2009,(2)：88-90.
[307]丁以中.交通运输与经济的关系研究[J].系统工程理论方法应用,1997(2)：34-38.
[308]朱顺应.公路交通与经济发展适应性客观模糊评价[J].重庆交通学院学报,2004(1)：2-7.
[309]朱佳翔.都市圈交通体系结构演化与优化研究[D].南京：南京航空航天大学,2010.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |