用户名: 密码: 验证码:
具象思维心身合一属性的表面肌电特征实验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:
     具象思维是具有中医学特征的思维形式,课题组前期实验已证明具象思维是独立于抽象思维和形象思维,并可与之并列的一种思维形式,具象思维有独特的脑电活动规律。本实验预实验结果表明,具象思维作业时,与内部思维操作同步的外部生理肌电信号发生较明显的波动,而抽象思维作业和形象思维作业并未显示这种改变,提示具象思维是一种以心身合一为特征的独特思维形式。为进一步证实该实验结论,本实验设计三种不同思维主题,每个思维主题选择两个肌电检测点,通过受试者不同思维形式作业时生理肌电信号的特征,说明具象思维是具有高度心身相关关系属性的独特思维形式。
     方法:
     运用导师刘天君教授总结并提出的“双向设计、相互释义、关联检测”的实验研究模式,即同时设计内在操作与外部检测,并同步同时进行客观仪器指标与主观体验指标的检测,对实验的结果采用内、外之间的相互说明。对于本次实验,内部操作指不同的思维主题和思维形式的设计与完成,外部检测指肌电指标的检测与分析,观察内在的思维作业与外部肌电检测指标之间的关系,由此说明不同思维形式的身心关系。
     按照实验对象的纳入、排除和脱落标准,选择32例在校大学生和研究生,经过3次实验培训,按照实验设计方案进行思维作业,同时进行与内在思维形式作业同步的外在肌电检测。所用主要表面肌电检测仪器为表面肌电数据采集系统(ME6000-T8Mega Electronics Ltd FINLAND),肌电电极选择北京天润阳光医疗用品有限公司生产的一次性使用电极,数据处理采用MegaWin2.3a7数据处理软件。将每位受试者每次测量肌电图形信号转化为数字信号,得到波幅的均根方值,每秒得到十个均根方值,20秒钟得到200组波幅均根方值数据。对所得数据进行分析,求得波幅均值、极大值、极小值、标准差和极差(极大极小值之差),并求出表征波幅分布的偏度分布系数和峰度分布系数,对分布系数取绝对值后计算两次测量均值。应用SPSS13.0统计软件进行数据统计,分别将各思维状态与安静状态的相应指标进行两两比较,观察不同思维形式的表面肌电信号特征,以p<0.05为两组差异有统计学意义,得出实验结果与结论。
     结果
     对于思维主题:“我右脚心的外侧被叩诊槌从后向前划了多次”,胫骨前肌肌电点所测肌电信号波幅强度分析结果表明:抽象思维、形象思维与安静状态比较,波幅的标准差和极差均大于安静态,但各指标均未显示出统计学差异;具象思维与安静状态相比较,波幅均值无显著性差异,波幅的标准差存在显著性差异(p<0.05),极差存在极显著性差异(p<0.01)。趾长伸肌肌电点所测肌电信号波幅强度分析结果表明:抽象、形象思维与安静状态比较,波幅的标准差和极差均大于安静态,但差异均无统计学意义;具象思维与安静状态相比较,波幅均值无显著性差异,波幅的标准差与极差均存在极显著性差异(p<0.01)。
     对于思维主题:“针灸针在我右腿足三里穴位上行针”,胫骨前肌肌肌电点所测肌电信号波幅强度分析结果表明:抽象思维与安静态比较,各指标均无明显差异;形象思维与安静态相比,波幅标准差与极差虽大于安静态,但差异也无统计学意义;具象思维与安静态比较,波幅均值无明显差异,波幅标准差大于安静态,差异无统计学意义,波幅极差大于安静态,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。腓肠肌肌电点所测肌电信号时域分析结果表明:抽象、形象思维与安静态比较,各指标均无显著性差异;具象思维与安静态比较,波幅均值无显著性差异,波幅标准差与极差均存在极显著性差异(p<0.01)。
     对于思维主题:“我右手拇指指腹被针灸针反复刺了多次”,大鱼际肌肌电点所测肌电信号波幅强度分析结果表明:抽象思维与安静状态比较,肌电信号各指标均无显著性差异;形象思维与安静态比较,波幅均值无显著性差异,波幅标准差与极差均存在显著性差异(p<0.05);具象思维与安静态相比,波幅均值无显著性差异,波幅标准差与极差均存在极显著性差异(p<0.001)。肱桡肌肌电点所测肌电信号时域分析结果表明:抽象思维、形象思维、具象思维与安静态比较,各时域分析指标均无显著性差异;
     表征波幅分布的偏度系数及峰度系数分析结果表明:对于思维主题一胫骨前肌、趾长伸肌肌电检测点,抽象思维与安静状态比较,各指标均无明显差异;形象思维与安静态比较,各指标均值均大于安静态,但差异无统计学意义;具象思维与安静态相比,各指标均大于安静态,且二者相比存在显著性差异(p<0.01和p<0.05);对于思维主题二胫骨前肌、腓肠肌肌电检测点,抽象思维与安静态比较,各指标均无明显差异;形象思维与安静态比较,各指标虽在均值上均大于安静态指标,但只有胫骨前肌峰度系数差异有统计学意义,其余指标差异均无统计学意义;具象思维与安静态相比,各肌电点偏度系数与峰度系数均大于安静态,且差值均有统计学意义(p<0.01和p<0.05)。思维主题三大鱼际肌肌电检测点,抽象思维与安静状态比较,各指标均无明显差异;形象思维与安静状态比较,各肌电点偏度系数与峰度系数均值均大于安静态,且二者相比均存在显著性差异(p<0.01);具象思维与安静状态相比较,偏度系数与峰度系数均值均大于安静态,且二者相比均存在显著性差异(p<0.01);肱桡肌肌电检测点,三种思维形式与安静状态比较,各指标均无显著性差异。
     结论:
     表面肌电信号分析结果表明,与安静态相比,具象思维时肌电波幅强度波动较大,且波幅分布比安静态波幅分布更加离散;抽象思维或形象思维时肌电波幅强度波动不明显,且波幅分布与安静态波幅分布相似。对于内部设计的不同思维形式,外部肌肉电信号的不同变化说明了内部思维操作的不同特征。抽象思维和形象作业时,控制肌肉运动状态的神经电流活动不明显;具象思维作业时,控制肌肉运动状态的神经电流活动明显。说明受试者具象思维作业时心理和生理指标发生了明显的同步改变;而抽象思维与形象思维作业时,生理指标与心理状态的同步变化不明显,说明具象思维是以心身合一为主要特征的独特思维形式。
Purpose
     Perceptual thinking is a thinking form with unique TCM characteristics. Previous electroencephalographic (EEG) study has shown that the perceptual thinking is another thinking form together with the abstract thinking and the imagery thinking, and the EEG characteristics during perceptual thinking are different compared with the other two thinking forms. This study is aimed to observe the characteristics of the fluctuation of the surface electromyogramthe (sEMG) signal during the three different thinking forms by comparing the signal before (rest state) and after manipularing the respective thinking form..
     Methods
     The method of "Two-way layout, correlated detection and mutual paraphrase" was proposed by Professor Liu Tianjun. In this method "Two-way layout" refers to design both schemes of internal operation and external detection; the whole design project includes a subjective part and an objective part."Correlated detection" refers to detect objective indexes from outside and subjective operational indexes from inside simultaneously during examination."Mutual paraphrase" refers to give the meaning of the experimental result by explaining internal and external indexes to each other.
     We set three different thinking topics, and let32subjects finish the thinking tasks for every thinking topic respectively, every subjects is trained for three times. We collect the sEMG signal and then get the amplitude mean value, the amplitude's standard deviation and range during20seconds, amplitude's coefficient of kurtosis and skewness during20seconds. Then see whether there is change for the sMEG signal between every thinking mode and the rest state for the amplitude value and range and for the amplitude distribution. The instrument we use include:data acquisition system for sMEG (ME6000-T8Mega Electronics Ltd FINLAND), disposable electrical electrode (Beijing Tianrunweiye Medical Instrument Factory), etc. And we use Mega Win2.3a7data processing software to process the data. We use the statistical software SPSS11.0editions for the statistical analysis, there was significant difference between two groups when p is less than0.05.
     Results
     There had no significant change for the amplitude value and it's fluctuation for all the three thinking topics during the abstract thinking form and There only had significant changes for the amplitude value and it's fluctuation for part of the three thinking topics during the imagery thinking form. While there had significant changes for the amplitude value and it's fluctuation for all the three thinking topics during the perceptual thinking form.
     There had no significant change for the amplitude distribution for all the three thinking topics during the abstract thinking form and There only had significant change for the amplitude distribution for part of the three thinking topics during the imagery thinking form. While there had significant change for the amplitude'distribution for all the three thinking topics during the perceptual thinking form.
     Conclusions
     The result of the experiment show that:the sEMG signals fluctuate obviously during the perceptual thinking, while it doesn't show the same fluctuation during the abstract thinking and the imagery thinking. The physiological index and the mental index change simultaneously during the perceptual thinking, while they don't change simultaneously during the abstract thinking and the imagery thinking. Perceptual thinking is a particularly thingking form compared with abstract thinking and imagery thinking. It is a kind of thinking mode in which the body and the mind take action simultaneously.
引文
[1]刘天君.中医气功学[M].2版.北京:中国中医药出版社,2011.
    [2]刘天君.医学气功入静境界的四个阶段[C].世界医学气功学会第七届学术交流会议论文集,2012,170-171.
    [3]刘天君.禅定中的思维操作[M].北京:人民体育出版社,1994.
    [4]刘天君.具象思维是中医学基本的思维形式[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,1995,1(1):33-34.
    [5]王永炎,张启明.象思维与中医辨证的相关性[J].自然杂志,2011,33(3):133-136.
    [6]王建云,王新月,王永炎.唯象思维与中医临证方法[J].中医杂志,2013,54(2):91-93.
    [7]王永炎,于智敏.象思维的路径[J].天津中医药,2011,28(1):1-4.
    [8]刘天君.论具象思维[J].思维科学通讯,1991,8(3):2-6.
    [9]刘天君.体验科学方法论的框架(上)—传统中医学方法论的基本内容[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,1996,2(3):23-26.
    [10]刘天君.体验科学方法论的框架(上)—传统中医学方法论的基本内容[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,1996,2(2):13-15.
    [11]郭建红,陈昌乐,刘冬全,等.具象思维心身合一属性的肌电表征[J].北京中医药大学学报,2013,36(10):684-686.
    [12]大辞海编辑委员会.大辞海(哲学卷)[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2003.
    [13]汤建民.从“思维是什么”到“如何思维”—关于思维分类和思维定义的再思考[J].哈尔滨学院学报,2005,26(1):11-15.
    [14]张世富.心理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1988.
    [15]叶奕乾.心理学[M].上海:华东师大出版社,1988.
    [16]克鲁捷茨基著,赵壁如译.心理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1985.
    [17]孟昭兰.普通心理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1994.
    [18]张颖.医用基础心理学[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2006.
    [19]李传银.普通心理学[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
    [20]程素萍,林慧莲.心理学基础[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2011.
    [21]张彦云,吴会东,勾晓铭.心理学[M].河北:河北大学出版社,2010.
    [22]朱智贤,林崇德.思维发展心理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1986.
    [23]车文博.心理学原理[M].黑龙江:黑龙江人民出版社,1986.
    [24]张友谊.论思维的涵义及其分类.理论学刊,1990,7(6):19-23.
    [25]刘天君.气功的研究现状与发展方向[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,1998,4(1):57-59.
    [26]张海波,刘天君.具象思维的概念及意义探讨[J].北京中医药大学学报(临床医学版),2011,18(5):43-45.
    [27]魏玉龙.具象思维的形成、发展和研究[J].中医学报,2009,24(6):18-20.
    [28]魏玉龙.关于具象思维形式独立性的脑电特征研究[D].北京中医药大学,2008.
    [29]张海波.具象思维作业的脑电空间与频域特征研究[D].北京中医药大学,2011.
    [30]刘峰.劳宫部位观想温热感的实验研究[D].北京中医药大学,2004.
    [31]翟向阳.少林禅修的脑电特异性研究[D].北京中医药大学,2010.
    [32]夏宇欣,吴晓云,刘天君.移空技术小组活动对慢性应激反应的干预效果[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(3):450-454.
    [33]吴晓云.移空技术的操作要点与理论解析[D].北京中医药大学,2013.
    [34]麻彦坤,赵娟.具身认知:心身关系的新思考[J].徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,36(5):138-142.
    [35]Lakoff G, Johnson M. Philosophy in the Flesh:The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought[M]. New York:Basic Books Inc,1999.
    [36]Borghi A M, Scorolli C, Caligiore D, et al. The embodied mind extended:using words as social tools[J]. Frontiers in psychology,2013,4(5):214-223.
    [37]Gallese V. Before and below 'theory of mind':embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,2007,362(1480):659-669.
    [38]Mizen R. The embodied mind[J]. Journal of Analytical Psychology,2009,54(2): 253-272.
    [39]李恒威.认知主体的本性—简述《具身心智:认知科学和人类经验》[J].哲学分析,2010,1(4):176-182.
    [40]Varela F J, Thompson E, Rosch E. The Embodied Mind:Cognitive Science and Human Experience [M]. Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press,1991.
    [41]Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system[J]. Annual review of neuroscience, 2004,27:169-192.
    [42]Aziz-Zadeh L, Koski L, Zaidel E, et al. Lateralization of the human mirror neuron system[J]. The Journal of neuroscience,2006,26(11):2964-2970.
    [43]Wells G L, Petty R E. The effects of overt headmovements on persuasion:compatibility andincompatibility of Responses[J]. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,1980,1(3): 219-230.
    [44]Jostman N B, Lakens D, Schuber T W. Weight as an embodiment of importance[J]. Psychological Science,2009,20(9):1169-1174.
    [45]Schubert T W, Koole S L. The embodied self:making a fist enhances men's power-related self-conceptions[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2009,45(4):828-834.
    [46]Stepper S, Strack F. Proprioceptive determinantsof emotional and nonemotional feelings[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1993,64(2):211-220.
    [47]Niedenthal P M. Embodying emotion[J]. Science,2007,316:1002-1005.
    [48]Williams L E, Bargh J. Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth[J]. Science,2008,322:606-607.
    [49]Shapiro L. The embodied cognition research programme [J]. Philosophy Compass,2007, 2(2):338-346.
    [50]袁艳,吴贻刚,苏彦炬,等.振动频率和负荷重量对半蹲起大腿肌群表面肌电活动的影响[J].体育科学,2012,32(10):64-68.
    [51]谢辉.表面肌电与运动员肌肉训练[J].当代体育科技,2012,2(14):10-12.
    [52]Gligorijevic I, van Dijk J P, Mijovic B, et al. A new and fast approach towards sEMG decomposition[J]. Medical & biological engineering & computing,2013,51(5):593-605.
    [53]康乐,张建国,刘合荣.日常生活活动中人体下肢肌肉的表面肌电特性[J].中国康复理论与实践,2012,18(9):816-819.
    [54]李强,杨基海,褚雪忠,等.基于运动神经元激励的表面肌电信号仿真研究[J].北京生物医学工程,2007,26(4):342-347.
    [55]王健,金德闻.康复医学领域的表面肌电应用研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2006,21(1):6-7.
    [56]胡明霞.表面肌电信号识别特征提取的仿真研究[J].计算机仿真,2013,30(5):345-348.
    [57]罗炯,金季春.表面肌电的处理方法及在体育科研中的应用前景[J].山东体育学院学报,2005,21(2):56-59.
    [58]汪洁.表面肌电图临床应用的可能性与限制[J].国外医学(物理医学与康复学分册),1995,(4):169-171.
    [59]付聪,李强,李博.表面肌电信号采集与降噪处理[J].现代生物医学进展,2011,11(20):3951-3953.
    [60]张红奎,汪地,杨浩,等.表面肌电信号采集及动作识别系统[J].机械设计与制造,2013,(8):38-40.
    [61]吴銮,黄鹏程,鲍官军,等.表面肌电信号分析及其在康复医学中的应用[J].机电工程,2011,28(11):1368-1373.
    [62]罗炯,金季春.表面肌电的处理方法及在体育科研中应用前景[J].福建体育科技,2005,21(2):31-34.
    [63]王健,方红光,刘加海.表面肌电信号分析:下腰痛研究中的新方法[J].中国康复医学杂志,2004,19(08):67-70.
    [64]张瑞红,王人成,金德闻.人体下肢表面肌电信号的检测与分析.清华大学学报(自然科学版),2000:40(8):73-76.
    [65]何庆华,吴宝明,彭承琳.表面肌电信号的分析与应用[J].国外医学(生物医学工程分册),2000,23(5):299-303.
    [66]王晓,王丽荣,宋雅娟,等.基于小波变换的按摩手法肌电信号分析[J].吉林大学学报(信息科学版),2013,31(3):255-259.
    [67]吴玉玲,孙晓敏,吴立红,等.表面肌电生物反馈在脑卒中康复中的应用[J].中国康复理论与实践,2012,18(11):1024-1025.
    [68]李雪芹,庞洪波.肌电生物反馈治疗脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能障碍的疗效观察[J].安徽医学,2008,29(4):446-447.
    [69]Wolf S L, Binder-MacLeod S A. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemipligic patients:changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status [J]. Phys Ther,1983,63(9):1393-1403.
    [70]张华,王宏娟,罗英姿,等.肌电生物反馈疗法对急性脑梗死患者神经功能及认知障碍的影响[J].中国康复,2007,22(4):232-234.
    [71]缪萍,王楚怀.表面肌电图在髌股疼痛综合征中的应用进展[J].医学综述,2012,18(21):3652-3654.
    [72]Callaghan MJ, McCarthy CJ, Oldham JA. Electromyographic fatigue characteristics of the quadriceps in patellofemoral pain syndrome[J]. Man ther,2001,6(1):27-33.
    [73]Cowan SM, Hodges PW, Bennell KL, et al. Altered vastii recruitment when people with patellofemoral pain syndrome complete a postural task[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2002, 83(7):989-995.
    [74]Tang SF, Chen CK, Hsu R, et al. Vastus medialis obliquus and vastus lateralis activity in open and closed kinetic chain exercises in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome:an electromyographicstudy[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2010,82(10):1441-1445.
    [75]李桂华,王金贵,徐昭,等.表面肌电信号检测在腰背肌功能评定中的应用进展[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2013,22(21):2382-2383.
    [76]卫杰,赵平,周卫,等.表面肌电指标屈曲伸直比诊断非特异性慢性腰背痛的可靠性研究[J].中国骨伤,2008,21(6):411-413.
    [77]顾非,房敏.等速测试表面肌电图在推拿治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床研究中的应用[J].时珍国医国药,2010,21(12):3225-3227.
    [78]刘天君.双向设计关联检测相互释义—气功现代科学研究的方法论探索[J].上海中医药杂志,2007,41(7):1-2.
    [79]刘天君.实验科学与体验科学—中西医方法论比较[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,1996,2(1):33-34.
    [80]魏玉龙,刘天君,翟向阳,等.思维作业的脑电研究概况与分析[J].中医学报,2011,26(10):1188-1190.
    [81]刘峰,刘天君.整体观念在中医现代化研究中的理论思考[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2011,17(6):595-595.
    [82]魏玉龙,尤海燕,刘天君.基于a频带脑电功率谱分析具象思维形式的独立性特征[J].北京中医药大学学报,2012,35(9):598-602.
    [83]魏玉龙,刘天君.基于p频段功率谱分析具象思维形式脑电的特异性[J].中国针灸学会年会论文集,2011:459-462.
    [84]张海波.气功调心、调息分别与协同操作的脑电研究[D].北京中医药大学,2006.
    [85]谢辉.表面肌电与运动员肌肉训练[J].当代体育科技,2012,2(14):10-12.
    [86]熊开宇,陈昊,胡英琪,等.离子浓度和温度变化对骨骼肌表面肌电变化的影响[J].北京体育大学学报,2006,29(3):334-336.
    [87]李卓.表面肌电的信号分析及在体育科研中的应用[J].体育科技文献通报,2006,14(03):31-33.
    [88]Bueno D R, Montano L. An optimized model for estimation of muscle contribution and human joint torques from sEMG information[C].34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE,2012:3364-3367.
    [89]Conradsen I, Beniczky S, Wolf P, et al. Evaluation of novel algorithm embedded in a wearable sEMG device for seizure detection[C].34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE,2012:2048-2051.
    [90]Liu J, He J, Sheng X, et al. A new feature extraction method based on autoregressive power spectrum for improving sEMG classification[C].35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE,2013:5746-5749.
    [91]郑萍,吴春薇.表面肌电在脑卒中偏瘫患者肢体功能评测中的应用[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2013,22(18):1966-1968.
    [92]杨进波.以表面肌电谱彩色作图法评价脊柱肌肉系统疾患[J].国外医学(卫生学分册),1999,26(4):247-248.
    [93]Fan Z, Zhao C, Luo L, et al. Study on sEMG-based exercise therapy for upper limb of severe hemiplegic patients [C].35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE,2013: 6643-6646.
    [94]宋海燕,张建国,刘涛然,等.日常生活活动中人体上肢肌肉表面肌电特性研究[J].生物医学工程学杂志,2009,26(6):1177-1180.
    [95]王静,吴效明.基于表面肌电的步态分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2012,16(26):4834-4840.
    [96]张佑磊.表面肌电图在体育领域中的应用[J].体育科技文献通报,2011,19(12):145-147.
    [97]张爱国.健康男性伏案4小时表面肌电的变化观察研究[J].实用医技杂志,2008,15(31):4521-4522.
    [98]石新燕.长时间使用两种不同鼠标造成指屈伸肌群的疲劳分析[J].体育科技,2013,34(2):66-67.
    [99]韩子玉,曹郁琦.应用解剖彩色图谱[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1996.
    [100]Mcminn R M H, Hutchings R T著,万选才主译.人体解剖彩色图谱[J].北京:人民卫生出版社,1990.
    [101]徐国成,韩秋生,霍琨主编.人体解剖彩色图谱[J].辽宁:辽宁科学技术出版社,2005.
    [102]苏富忠.论抽象思维—自然语言基本思维方式系列研究之二[J].哈尔滨学院学报(社会科学版),2002,23(3):30-37.
    [103]孙红侠.浅论阅读的抽象思维[J].图书馆理论与实践,2004,(3):48-49.
    [104]Drury SS. Abstract thinking:how much do we really know[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2010,49(1):1-2.
    [105]Halloran L. Abstract thinking[J]. Advance for nurse practitioners,2005,13(10):84.
    [106]危辉,潘云鹤.形象思维的视表象基础[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2001,35(02): 36-40.
    [107]李浚平.形象思维与艺术语言[J].昆明师专学报,1992,13(01):74-79.
    [108]Kundel HL, Krupinski EA. Soft-copy viewing calls for new way of thinking about images[J]. Diagn Imaging (San Franc),1999,21(11):137-138.
    [109]Mcgrath M, Sullivan MC, Brem F, et al. Mastery motivation and cognitive development in 4-year-old children born at various degrees of medical risk[J]. J Pediatr Nurs,1995, 10(5):287-95.
    [110]Samuelson LK. Abstract Thinking in Space and Time:Using The Environment to Learn Words[J]. Cogn Brain Behav,2011,15(4):571-581.
    [111]李杰,彭月英.抽象思维与设计模式[J].计算机与信息技术,2011,(6):37-39.
    [112]朱铁成.形象思维和抽象思维的本质及其对物理教学的启示[J].浙江师大学报(自然科学版),2001,24(1):24-28.
    [113]邓婷,贾建平,吴格日勒.巴宾斯基征拇趾背屈持续时间和引出巴宾斯基征敏感轨迹点的研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,2007,13(11):1091.
    [114]Dohrmann G J, Nowack W J. The upgoing great toe optimal method of elicitation[J]. The Lancet,1973,301(7799):339-341.
    [115]朱静华,丛林.表面肌电分析在速度滑冰中的应用[J].冰雪运动,2010,31(1):18-21.
    [116]李卓.表面肌电的信号分析及在体育科研中的应用[J].体育科技文献通报,2006,14(03):30-33.
    [117]罗炯,金季春.表面肌电的处理方法及在体育科研中应用前景[J].福建体育科技,2005,21(02):31-34.
    [118]王学民.偏度和峰度概念的认识误区[J].统计与决策,2008,(12):145-146.
    [119]阚兴莉.关于偏度和峰度的讨论[J].考试周刊,2011 5(52):63-63.
    [120]王红军,田铮,武新乾.二元正态混合模型的偏度与峰度[J].系统仿真学报,2008,20(04):855-857.
    [121]金秉福.粒度分析中偏度系数的影响因素及其意义[J].海洋科学,2012,(02):129-135.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700