战略性新兴产业创新政策的差异化研究
|
摘要
自2008年金融危机爆发以来,世界各国纷纷加大对科技创新的投入,力争通过开发新技术和培育新产业率先走出危机。由于新兴产业在产生初期较为弱小,但却代表着未来的发展方向,因此许多国家都会选择一些对整体经济具有战略性的新兴产业进行政策扶植和引导,旨在推动本国经济快速增长。新一轮的科技革命已经开始,对中国而言,通过培育战略性新兴产业以抢占科技制高点成为当务之急。自从发展战略性新兴产业的国家战略提出之后,理论界也掀起了相关理论与实证研究的热潮。这是因为战略性新兴产业给经济学理论提出了诸多新问题,战略性新兴产业的发展也需要经济理论的支持与推动。
由于技术创新基础薄弱、技术储备不足等原因,培育发展战略性新兴产业面临技术源缺乏和重大突破研究进展缓慢等问题。在2010年年初的政府工作报告中,温家宝总理明确指出要大力培育发展战略性新兴产业。为了培育发展战略性新兴产业、优化战略性新兴产业政策环境,中央和各级地方政府密集出台了一系列战略性新兴产业扶持政策。战略性新兴产业是以重大技术突破为基础的,科技创新对于战略性新兴产业的发展起着至关重要的作用,政府创新扶持政策是否能够引导和推动企业创新水平和绩效的发展就显得尤为重要。研究战略性新兴产业的创新政策离不开对微观企业类型和产业特征的把握,从而完善培育发展战略性新兴产业的创新政策体系。
政府对企业的创新扶持政策需要了解企业自身的创新激励特点,才能更有针对性的实行创新扶持政策,从而弥补企业创新激励的不足,提高企业的创新水平。自熊彼特提出创新理论以来,企业类型对创新的影响一直是理论和经验研究者重点关注的热点问题,如企业规模的大小、在位者还是新进入者、垄断者还是竞争者、国有企业还是民营企业等等。在国家大力发展战略性新兴产业的大背景下,许多企业纷纷进入战略性新兴产业,这些企业之中有的在进入之前属于相关或不相关的传统领域,有的则是在成立时就进入了战略性新兴产业。本文按照企业进入战略性新兴产业的不同来源将其划分为两类：传统转型企业和新生企业,分别考察两者不同的创新激励特点。本文首先阐述了企业类型视角下的差异化创新政策的理论基础,然后在分析和回顾了中国创新政策演进的大背景下对战略性新兴产业创新政策进行了定性分析和定量分析相结合的政策评价。在对传统转型企业和新生企业的创新激励差异的研究中,首先建立了研发竞争博弈模型,然后通过上市公司的面板数据,采用Bootstrap组间差异检验的方法考察了企业进入时机、企业规模对这两种类型企业的影响是否存在显著差异。研究结果表明：在同一时点进入战略性新兴产业的传统转型企业与新生企业相比具有较小的研发创新激励。然而对战略性新兴产业的研究不仅需要整体研究还需要局部研究,因此本文选取了高端装备制造业和碳纤维产业进行了案例研究。通过考察了这两个具体产业的技术演进特点,提出了基于企业类型视角的创新政策优化建议。通过理论和实证研究,本文认为对于需要在传统产业基础上通过技术融合形成的战略性新兴产业来说,政府创新政策的重点应是传统转型企业,从而弥补传统转型企业的创新激励不足,引导和促进其创新,在具体的子产业案例分析中以高端装备制造业为例；而对于需要通过技术跨越形成与发展的战略性新兴产业来说,政府创新政策的重点应是新生企业,引导新生企业大量进入战略性新兴产业并发挥其创新动力,在具体的子产业案例分析中以新材料产业中的碳纤维产业为例。由此可见,政府创新政策需要针对传统转型企业和新生企业的不同创新特点对其采用差异化的创新扶持政策。
在研究方法的选取方面,本文将规范研究和经验研究相结合,利用国内外对所研究问题的研究成果和理论基础,联系中国战略性新兴产业发展实际,并力求逻辑和历史方法相结合。本文以产业经济学、发展经济学、财政学和管理学等多学科理论为基础,通过演绎与推理相结合,博弈论、计量经济学方法,案例研究方法对所研究问题进行了深入的研究。
本文可能的创新点主要体现在：
(1)紧密围绕支持战略性新兴产业培育发展的创新政策体系,结合中国具体国情特点和实践经验,深入剖析中国战略性新兴产业发展中的创新政策的现实问题,丰富和完善战略性新兴产业发展的创新政策理论和作用机理。坚持学术研究和现实问题的双导向原则,着力破解制约战略性新兴产业发展的技术创新政策现实瓶颈问题,为战略性新兴产业培育发展实践提供科学的理论依据。
(2)针对中国战略性新兴产业发展中的现实问题,从企业进入战略性新兴产业不同来源的新视角,将企业划分为传统转型企业和新生企业,对这两类企业的创新激励差异进行理论和实证研究,并将其创新激励差异与战略性新兴产业创新政策联系在一起,通过具体产业的案例研究提出了战略性新兴产业差异化创新政策的优化建议。
(3)在实证研究方面,本文针对微观企业层面的数据,通过计量经济学的实证方法有效评价了中国战略性新兴产业创新扶持政策的总体状况,并运用重复抽样的统计方法检验了传统转型企业和新生企业的创新激励差异,为政府相关部门制定和实施战略新兴产业创新扶持政策提供了有针对性的政策建议。
本文进行的研究在理论和实证两个方面均做了一定的创新性尝试。然而,从目前的研究内容和结果来看,仍然存在一些不足之处并有待于今后的进一步研究。在理论分析方面,由于将进入战略性新兴产业的企业按照企业来源划分为传统转型企业和新生企业的做法是一种新的尝试,因此难免存在理论基础仍不扎实的情况。但这正是由于伴随着战略性新兴产业出现了与以往传统产业所不同的新问题,这些新问题也对经济理论提出了新的要求和挑战。因此在下一步的研究,需要进一步夯实理论基础和理论分析内容。数理模型方面,只考虑了降低成本的工艺创新,并没有考虑产品创新的情况,因此在进一步的研究中,需要对产品创新的数理模型进行研究。在实证分析方面,由于现阶段战略性新兴产业中企业层面的数据非常缺乏,因此为确保足够的样本量,本文实证分析的样本选择包含了多个产业的数据。对于七大战略性新兴产业中的某个具体产业来说,其必然会有区别于其他产业的个性特征,因此关于企业创新的研究结论可能会因产业不同而存在一定差别。我们下一步的研究方向是选定七大战略性新兴产业中的几个重点产业进行深入广泛的调查研究、搜集大量的一手数据来进行经验研究。对企业的调查研究可以采取不同的形式,如问卷调查,实地考察、与企业座谈等方式搜集数据。通过深入调查扩大样本量,从而得到针对某个具体产业的研究结论,进而对战略性新兴产业政府创新政策提出更有针对性和建设性的政策建议。
Since the outbreak of the financial crisis in2008, the countries of the world have increased investment in science and technology innovation, and strive to take the lead out of the crisis through the development of new technologies and foster new industries. The new round of technological revolution has begun to become a top priority in order to seize the technological high ground, through the development of strategic emerging industries of China. Since the national strategy for the development of strategic emerging industries, theorists also set off a craze of relevant theoretical and empirical research. This is because the strategic emerging industries to economic theory raised many new issues, and the development of strategic emerging industries also need the support and promotion of the economic theory.
The emerging industry is relatively weak in the production early, but it represents the future direction of development, many countries will choose the overall economy has strategic emerging industries, policy support and guidance, and to promote the rapid growth of the national economy. Since the beginning of2010in the government work report, Premier Wen Jiabao pointed out the need to make great efforts to cultivate the development of strategic emerging industries, the central and local governments at all levels in order to foster the development of strategic emerging industries, optimize emerging industries of strategic policy environment, intensive issued a series of clear strategic emerging industries support policies. Due to the weak foundation of technological innovation, lack of technical reserves and other reasons, to foster the development of strategic emerging industries facing the lack of technological resources and a major breakthrough in research progress slow. Strategic emerging industries in major technological breakthrough is based on scientific and technological innovation plays a vital role in the development of strategic emerging industries, government innovation support policy to guide and promote the level of innovation and performance is particularly important. Strategic emerging industries, innovation policy is inseparable from the micro-enterprise heterogeneity and industry characteristics, thus perfect to foster the development of emerging industries of strategic innovation policy system, which is undoubtedly a great theoretical significance and practical value.
By distinguishing R&D incentives between different enterprises, government can implement innovation support policy more effectively. Since Schumpeter proposed innovation theory, the impact of corporate attributes of innovation has been the theoretical and empirical researchers focus on hot issues, such as the size of firm size, enter the sequence, monopoly or competitors, state-owned enterprises or private enterprises and so on. In the context of the country vigorously develop strategic emerging industries, many companies have been pouring into a strategic emerging industries, some of these enterprises to enter the traditional enterprise, while others are newly established enterprises. In order to analyze the R&D incentive of enterprises, we divide the enterprises in the strategic emerging industries into traditional enterprises in transition and newborn enterprises. Government innovation policy enterprise sources Perspective This paper describes the theoretical basis and the analysis and review of policy evaluation of the background of China's innovation policy system a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis of the emerging industries of strategic innovation policy system. In the study of differences in the traditional transformation of enterprises and new enterprises innovation incentives, first establish a R&D competition game model, then we undertakes an econometric analysis of the effects of enter timing and firm size on R&D expenditure by using the data of the listed companies of103strategic emerging enterprises from2006though2011. We use bootstrap test to examine whether there are statistically significant differences between regression coefficients of traditional enterprises in transition and newborn enterprises. Studies have shown that the newborn enterprises have greater R&D incentives to innovate compared to traditional enterprises in transition which entered the strategic emerging industries at the same time point. Strategic emerging industries requires not only the overall research also need local research. This article selected high-end equipment manufacturing and new materials industry case studies. The two industry-specific R&D innovation and technical efficiency, and industrial innovation policy perspective based enterprises sources. By distinguishing between enterprises of different characteristics of the R&D incentives, the government can more effectively against enterprise innovation support policy. Through theoretical and empirical research, the paper argues for traditional industries based on technology convergence formed strategic emerging industries, government innovation fund to invest in, in order to compensate for the lack of traditional corporate R&D in transition should focus on traditional businesses in transition; need Government innovation Fund to invest in technology across the formation and development of strategic emerging industries should focus on R&D incentives newborn enterprises. Government innovation policies need to adopt differentiated innovation support policy for the innovative features of the traditional transformation of enterprises and new enterprises.
In the selection of the research methods, this article will regulate research and experience, the use of research at home and abroad on the research questions and theoretical foundation, contact the actual development of strategic emerging industries in China and strive combination of logic and history. Through the perspective of the evolution and development of the theoretical basis of the study and other content. Multidisciplinary theory of industrial economics, development economics, finance and management science, through the combination of deductive and reasoning, game theory, econometric methods, in-depth study of the case study method on the research questions.
This article may innovation is mainly reflected in:
(1) Tightly around the support of strategic emerging industries to nurture the development of innovation policy system, combined with the characteristics of China's national conditions and practice experience, in-depth analysis of the practical issues of innovation policy in the development of China's strategic emerging industries, enrich and improve the development of strategic emerging industries innovation policy theory and mechanism of action. Adhere to the double guiding principle of academic research and practical problems efforts to crack the technology innovation policy reality bottleneck restricting the development of strategic emerging industries, nurture and develop the practice to provide the scientific and theoretical basis for China's strategic emerging industries.
(2) For the development of China's strategic emerging industries in reality, from the enterprise into a new perspective of the different sources of strategic emerging industries, the business is divided into the traditional transformation of enterprises and new enterprises theoretical differences of these two types of enterprise innovation incentives and empirical research, and incentives to innovate differences emerging industries of strategic innovation policy linked to the emerging industries of strategic innovation policy differences.
(3) In terms of empirical research, for micro-enterprise level data econometrics, empirical method effective evaluation of the overall situation of China's strategic emerging industries to support policies and use repeated sampling of statistical methods to test the traditional transformation of enterprises and the differences in the innovation of new enterprises incentive for the relevant government departments to develop and implement strategic emerging industry innovation support policies to provide targeted policy recommendations.
The research carried out some innovative attempts in two aspects of theoretical and empirical. However, there are still some inadequacies and need further study in the future from the contents of current study and results. In the content of theoretical analysis, there is still inevitably lack of theoretical foundation due to the innovative attempts. However, along with national strategy of strategic emerging industries, there will be new problems and challenge for economists and government. Therefore, in the next step of the research, we need to reinforce the theoretical basis and of the content. In the content of mathematical model, we only considerate the process innovation except the product innovation. So for the next step of the research, we will discuss the mathematical model of product innovation. In the content of Empirical analysis, in order to overcome the lack of firm-level data strategic emerging industries and ensure adequate sample size, we use the data of seven industries of strategy of strategic emerging industries. However, the each of seven strategic emerging industries has its personality characteristics. Therefore, in the next step of the research, we will undertake extensive survey of several typical industries, collect a large number of first-hand data for more empirical research. The survey of enterprises can take different forms, such as questionnaire, field trips, and informal discussion. Through in-depth investigation we can expand the sample size, and obtain the conclusion of specific industry, and then make a more targeted and constructive policy recommendations for the differentiated innovation policy of strategic emerging industries.
由于技术创新基础薄弱、技术储备不足等原因,培育发展战略性新兴产业面临技术源缺乏和重大突破研究进展缓慢等问题。在2010年年初的政府工作报告中,温家宝总理明确指出要大力培育发展战略性新兴产业。为了培育发展战略性新兴产业、优化战略性新兴产业政策环境,中央和各级地方政府密集出台了一系列战略性新兴产业扶持政策。战略性新兴产业是以重大技术突破为基础的,科技创新对于战略性新兴产业的发展起着至关重要的作用,政府创新扶持政策是否能够引导和推动企业创新水平和绩效的发展就显得尤为重要。研究战略性新兴产业的创新政策离不开对微观企业类型和产业特征的把握,从而完善培育发展战略性新兴产业的创新政策体系。
政府对企业的创新扶持政策需要了解企业自身的创新激励特点,才能更有针对性的实行创新扶持政策,从而弥补企业创新激励的不足,提高企业的创新水平。自熊彼特提出创新理论以来,企业类型对创新的影响一直是理论和经验研究者重点关注的热点问题,如企业规模的大小、在位者还是新进入者、垄断者还是竞争者、国有企业还是民营企业等等。在国家大力发展战略性新兴产业的大背景下,许多企业纷纷进入战略性新兴产业,这些企业之中有的在进入之前属于相关或不相关的传统领域,有的则是在成立时就进入了战略性新兴产业。本文按照企业进入战略性新兴产业的不同来源将其划分为两类：传统转型企业和新生企业,分别考察两者不同的创新激励特点。本文首先阐述了企业类型视角下的差异化创新政策的理论基础,然后在分析和回顾了中国创新政策演进的大背景下对战略性新兴产业创新政策进行了定性分析和定量分析相结合的政策评价。在对传统转型企业和新生企业的创新激励差异的研究中,首先建立了研发竞争博弈模型,然后通过上市公司的面板数据,采用Bootstrap组间差异检验的方法考察了企业进入时机、企业规模对这两种类型企业的影响是否存在显著差异。研究结果表明：在同一时点进入战略性新兴产业的传统转型企业与新生企业相比具有较小的研发创新激励。然而对战略性新兴产业的研究不仅需要整体研究还需要局部研究,因此本文选取了高端装备制造业和碳纤维产业进行了案例研究。通过考察了这两个具体产业的技术演进特点,提出了基于企业类型视角的创新政策优化建议。通过理论和实证研究,本文认为对于需要在传统产业基础上通过技术融合形成的战略性新兴产业来说,政府创新政策的重点应是传统转型企业,从而弥补传统转型企业的创新激励不足,引导和促进其创新,在具体的子产业案例分析中以高端装备制造业为例；而对于需要通过技术跨越形成与发展的战略性新兴产业来说,政府创新政策的重点应是新生企业,引导新生企业大量进入战略性新兴产业并发挥其创新动力,在具体的子产业案例分析中以新材料产业中的碳纤维产业为例。由此可见,政府创新政策需要针对传统转型企业和新生企业的不同创新特点对其采用差异化的创新扶持政策。
在研究方法的选取方面,本文将规范研究和经验研究相结合,利用国内外对所研究问题的研究成果和理论基础,联系中国战略性新兴产业发展实际,并力求逻辑和历史方法相结合。本文以产业经济学、发展经济学、财政学和管理学等多学科理论为基础,通过演绎与推理相结合,博弈论、计量经济学方法,案例研究方法对所研究问题进行了深入的研究。
本文可能的创新点主要体现在：
(1)紧密围绕支持战略性新兴产业培育发展的创新政策体系,结合中国具体国情特点和实践经验,深入剖析中国战略性新兴产业发展中的创新政策的现实问题,丰富和完善战略性新兴产业发展的创新政策理论和作用机理。坚持学术研究和现实问题的双导向原则,着力破解制约战略性新兴产业发展的技术创新政策现实瓶颈问题,为战略性新兴产业培育发展实践提供科学的理论依据。
(2)针对中国战略性新兴产业发展中的现实问题,从企业进入战略性新兴产业不同来源的新视角,将企业划分为传统转型企业和新生企业,对这两类企业的创新激励差异进行理论和实证研究,并将其创新激励差异与战略性新兴产业创新政策联系在一起,通过具体产业的案例研究提出了战略性新兴产业差异化创新政策的优化建议。
(3)在实证研究方面,本文针对微观企业层面的数据,通过计量经济学的实证方法有效评价了中国战略性新兴产业创新扶持政策的总体状况,并运用重复抽样的统计方法检验了传统转型企业和新生企业的创新激励差异,为政府相关部门制定和实施战略新兴产业创新扶持政策提供了有针对性的政策建议。
本文进行的研究在理论和实证两个方面均做了一定的创新性尝试。然而,从目前的研究内容和结果来看,仍然存在一些不足之处并有待于今后的进一步研究。在理论分析方面,由于将进入战略性新兴产业的企业按照企业来源划分为传统转型企业和新生企业的做法是一种新的尝试,因此难免存在理论基础仍不扎实的情况。但这正是由于伴随着战略性新兴产业出现了与以往传统产业所不同的新问题,这些新问题也对经济理论提出了新的要求和挑战。因此在下一步的研究,需要进一步夯实理论基础和理论分析内容。数理模型方面,只考虑了降低成本的工艺创新,并没有考虑产品创新的情况,因此在进一步的研究中,需要对产品创新的数理模型进行研究。在实证分析方面,由于现阶段战略性新兴产业中企业层面的数据非常缺乏,因此为确保足够的样本量,本文实证分析的样本选择包含了多个产业的数据。对于七大战略性新兴产业中的某个具体产业来说,其必然会有区别于其他产业的个性特征,因此关于企业创新的研究结论可能会因产业不同而存在一定差别。我们下一步的研究方向是选定七大战略性新兴产业中的几个重点产业进行深入广泛的调查研究、搜集大量的一手数据来进行经验研究。对企业的调查研究可以采取不同的形式,如问卷调查,实地考察、与企业座谈等方式搜集数据。通过深入调查扩大样本量,从而得到针对某个具体产业的研究结论,进而对战略性新兴产业政府创新政策提出更有针对性和建设性的政策建议。
Since the outbreak of the financial crisis in2008, the countries of the world have increased investment in science and technology innovation, and strive to take the lead out of the crisis through the development of new technologies and foster new industries. The new round of technological revolution has begun to become a top priority in order to seize the technological high ground, through the development of strategic emerging industries of China. Since the national strategy for the development of strategic emerging industries, theorists also set off a craze of relevant theoretical and empirical research. This is because the strategic emerging industries to economic theory raised many new issues, and the development of strategic emerging industries also need the support and promotion of the economic theory.
The emerging industry is relatively weak in the production early, but it represents the future direction of development, many countries will choose the overall economy has strategic emerging industries, policy support and guidance, and to promote the rapid growth of the national economy. Since the beginning of2010in the government work report, Premier Wen Jiabao pointed out the need to make great efforts to cultivate the development of strategic emerging industries, the central and local governments at all levels in order to foster the development of strategic emerging industries, optimize emerging industries of strategic policy environment, intensive issued a series of clear strategic emerging industries support policies. Due to the weak foundation of technological innovation, lack of technical reserves and other reasons, to foster the development of strategic emerging industries facing the lack of technological resources and a major breakthrough in research progress slow. Strategic emerging industries in major technological breakthrough is based on scientific and technological innovation plays a vital role in the development of strategic emerging industries, government innovation support policy to guide and promote the level of innovation and performance is particularly important. Strategic emerging industries, innovation policy is inseparable from the micro-enterprise heterogeneity and industry characteristics, thus perfect to foster the development of emerging industries of strategic innovation policy system, which is undoubtedly a great theoretical significance and practical value.
By distinguishing R&D incentives between different enterprises, government can implement innovation support policy more effectively. Since Schumpeter proposed innovation theory, the impact of corporate attributes of innovation has been the theoretical and empirical researchers focus on hot issues, such as the size of firm size, enter the sequence, monopoly or competitors, state-owned enterprises or private enterprises and so on. In the context of the country vigorously develop strategic emerging industries, many companies have been pouring into a strategic emerging industries, some of these enterprises to enter the traditional enterprise, while others are newly established enterprises. In order to analyze the R&D incentive of enterprises, we divide the enterprises in the strategic emerging industries into traditional enterprises in transition and newborn enterprises. Government innovation policy enterprise sources Perspective This paper describes the theoretical basis and the analysis and review of policy evaluation of the background of China's innovation policy system a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis of the emerging industries of strategic innovation policy system. In the study of differences in the traditional transformation of enterprises and new enterprises innovation incentives, first establish a R&D competition game model, then we undertakes an econometric analysis of the effects of enter timing and firm size on R&D expenditure by using the data of the listed companies of103strategic emerging enterprises from2006though2011. We use bootstrap test to examine whether there are statistically significant differences between regression coefficients of traditional enterprises in transition and newborn enterprises. Studies have shown that the newborn enterprises have greater R&D incentives to innovate compared to traditional enterprises in transition which entered the strategic emerging industries at the same time point. Strategic emerging industries requires not only the overall research also need local research. This article selected high-end equipment manufacturing and new materials industry case studies. The two industry-specific R&D innovation and technical efficiency, and industrial innovation policy perspective based enterprises sources. By distinguishing between enterprises of different characteristics of the R&D incentives, the government can more effectively against enterprise innovation support policy. Through theoretical and empirical research, the paper argues for traditional industries based on technology convergence formed strategic emerging industries, government innovation fund to invest in, in order to compensate for the lack of traditional corporate R&D in transition should focus on traditional businesses in transition; need Government innovation Fund to invest in technology across the formation and development of strategic emerging industries should focus on R&D incentives newborn enterprises. Government innovation policies need to adopt differentiated innovation support policy for the innovative features of the traditional transformation of enterprises and new enterprises.
In the selection of the research methods, this article will regulate research and experience, the use of research at home and abroad on the research questions and theoretical foundation, contact the actual development of strategic emerging industries in China and strive combination of logic and history. Through the perspective of the evolution and development of the theoretical basis of the study and other content. Multidisciplinary theory of industrial economics, development economics, finance and management science, through the combination of deductive and reasoning, game theory, econometric methods, in-depth study of the case study method on the research questions.
This article may innovation is mainly reflected in:
(1) Tightly around the support of strategic emerging industries to nurture the development of innovation policy system, combined with the characteristics of China's national conditions and practice experience, in-depth analysis of the practical issues of innovation policy in the development of China's strategic emerging industries, enrich and improve the development of strategic emerging industries innovation policy theory and mechanism of action. Adhere to the double guiding principle of academic research and practical problems efforts to crack the technology innovation policy reality bottleneck restricting the development of strategic emerging industries, nurture and develop the practice to provide the scientific and theoretical basis for China's strategic emerging industries.
(2) For the development of China's strategic emerging industries in reality, from the enterprise into a new perspective of the different sources of strategic emerging industries, the business is divided into the traditional transformation of enterprises and new enterprises theoretical differences of these two types of enterprise innovation incentives and empirical research, and incentives to innovate differences emerging industries of strategic innovation policy linked to the emerging industries of strategic innovation policy differences.
(3) In terms of empirical research, for micro-enterprise level data econometrics, empirical method effective evaluation of the overall situation of China's strategic emerging industries to support policies and use repeated sampling of statistical methods to test the traditional transformation of enterprises and the differences in the innovation of new enterprises incentive for the relevant government departments to develop and implement strategic emerging industry innovation support policies to provide targeted policy recommendations.
The research carried out some innovative attempts in two aspects of theoretical and empirical. However, there are still some inadequacies and need further study in the future from the contents of current study and results. In the content of theoretical analysis, there is still inevitably lack of theoretical foundation due to the innovative attempts. However, along with national strategy of strategic emerging industries, there will be new problems and challenge for economists and government. Therefore, in the next step of the research, we need to reinforce the theoretical basis and of the content. In the content of mathematical model, we only considerate the process innovation except the product innovation. So for the next step of the research, we will discuss the mathematical model of product innovation. In the content of Empirical analysis, in order to overcome the lack of firm-level data strategic emerging industries and ensure adequate sample size, we use the data of seven industries of strategy of strategic emerging industries. However, the each of seven strategic emerging industries has its personality characteristics. Therefore, in the next step of the research, we will undertake extensive survey of several typical industries, collect a large number of first-hand data for more empirical research. The survey of enterprises can take different forms, such as questionnaire, field trips, and informal discussion. Through in-depth investigation we can expand the sample size, and obtain the conclusion of specific industry, and then make a more targeted and constructive policy recommendations for the differentiated innovation policy of strategic emerging industries.
引文
① 李惠钰：《把握发展契机碳纤维产业亟待技术升级》,《中国高新技术产业导报》2012年4月1日
[1](美)V. K. Narayanan.程源,高建,杨湘玉译.技术战略与创新——竞争优势的源泉[M].北京：电子工业出版社,2002.
[2](美)托马斯·库恩.《科学革命的结构》[M].金吾伦,胡新和译.北京：北京大学出版社,2003.
[3](意)多西等.《技术进步与经济理论》[M].钟学义等译.北京：经济科学出版社,1992.
[4]陈宝森.剖析美国“新经济”[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2007.
[5]陈德智,胡代平.技术跨越的旋进路径分析[J].中国管理科学,2006(6)：144-148.
[6]陈德智.技术跨越概念与标志界定研究[J].科学学研究,2006(3)：364-367.
[7]陈洪涛,陈劲,施放,等.新兴产业发展中的政府作用机制研究—基于国家政治制度结构的理论分析模型[J].科研管理,2009(3)：1-8.
[8]陈力田,赵晓庆.技术跨越述评及其在发展中国家的应用[J].科学学研究,2008(S2)：258-263.
[9]陈衍泰,宁钟,宁玹钰.全球风能产业动态演化——企业能力与公共政策互动视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(9)：74-82.
[10]邓龙安.战略性新兴产业科技创新体系建设路径选择研究[J].科学管理研究,2012(2)：37-41.
[11]封凯栋.传统产业与高新技术结合应是国家创新体系的核心[J].宏观经济研究,2013(2)：3-9+33.
[12]冯根福,温军.中国上市公司治理与企业技术创新关系的实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2008(7)：91-101.
[13]付玉秀,张洪石.突破性创新：概念界定与比较[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2004(3)：73-83.
[14]傅家骥.技术创新学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1998.
[15]桂黄宝.战略性新兴产业成长动力机制分析——以我国新能源汽车为例[J].科学管理研究,2012(3)：48-51.
[16]郭晓丹,何文韬.融合与跨越：新旧产业间技术升级路径研究[J].东北财经大学学报,2012(1)：27-34.
[17]郭晓丹,何文韬.战略性新兴产业规模、竞争力提升与“保护性空间”设定[J].改革,2012(2)：34-41.
[18]郭晓丹,何文韬.战略性新兴产业政府R&D补贴信号效应的动态分析[J].经济学动态,2011(9)：88-93.
[19]郭晓丹,宋维佳.战略性新兴产业的进入时机选择：领军还是跟进[J].中国工业经济,2011,(5)：119-128.
[20]韩雪莲,谢理,赵文霞.战略性新兴产业中的企业进入、时机与绩效——基于180家上市公司的实证分析[J].财经问题研究,2011(4)：45-52.
[21]贺俊,吕铁.战略性新兴产业：从政策概念到理论问题[J].财贸经济,2012(5)：106-113.
[22]侯国清.谈谈跨越式技术创新[J].中国软科学,2000(3)：38-41.
[23]後藤晃.创新和日本经济[M].东京：岩波新书出版社,2000.
[24]胡汉辉,邢华.产业融合理论以及对我国发展信息产业的启示[J].中国工业经济,2003(2)：23-29.
[25]黄玲文,姚洋.国有企业改制对就业的影响——来自11个城市的证据[J].经济研究,2007(3)：57-69.
[26]黄永春,郑江淮,谭洪波,等.后发地区发展战略性新兴产业的时机选择与赶超路径——以平板显示技术的赶超实践为例[J].科学学研究,2012(7)：1031-1038.
[27]季丹,郭政.破坏性创新：概念、比较与识别[J].经济与管理,2009(5)：16-20.
[28]姜红,赵树宽,余海晴.技术轨道理论研究综述及展望[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011(7)：11-14.
[29]金军,邹锐.集成创新与技术跨越式发展[J].中国软科学,2002(12)：49-52.
[30]剧锦文.战略性新兴产业的发展“变量”：政府与市场分工[J].改革,2011(3)：31-37.
[31]寇宗来.通往创新国家之路——改革年代的产业创新[M].上海：格致出版社、上海人民出版社.2008.
[32]李春涛,宋敏.中国制造业企业的创新活动：所有制和CEO激励的作用[J].经济研究,2010(5)：55-67.
[33]李宏舟.战略性新兴产业与创业投资体系[J].财经问题研究,2012(4)：22-29.
[34]李楠,乔榛.国有企业改制政策效果的实证分析——基于双重差分模型的估计[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2010(2)：3-21.
[35]李姝,姜春海.战略性新兴产业主导的产业结构调整对能源消费影响分析[J].宏观经济研究,2011(1)：36-40+49.
[36]李姝.中国战略性新兴产业发展思路与对策[J].宏观经济研究,2012(2)：50-55.
[37]李晓华,吕铁.战略性新兴产业的特征与政策导向研究[J].宏观经济研究,2010(9)：20-26.
[38]李艳华.产业技术跨越政策的逻辑模型及政策体系[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(10)：16-20.
[39]连燕华,关于技术创新策体系的思考[J].科学学与科学技术管理,1999,20(4)：12-14.
[40]林学军.战略性新兴产业的发展与形成模式研究[J].中国软科学,2012(2)：26-34.
[41]林云.内生性技术创新动力与效率研究[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,2011.
[42]刘宝铭,孙建广,檀润华.破坏性创新理论综述[J].科技管理研究,2011(24)：9-12.
[43]刘澄,顾强,董瑞青.产业政策在战略性新兴产业发展中的作用[J].经济社会体制比较,2011(1)：196-203.
[44]刘家庆.促进战略性新兴产业发展的财政政策研究——以甘肃省为例[J].财政研究,2011(4)：31-34.
[45]刘美平.战略性新兴产业技术创新路径的共生模式研究[J].当代财经,2011(11)：105-111.
[46]刘小玄,吴延兵.企业生产率增长及来源：创新还是需求拉动[J].经济研究,2009(7)：45-54.
[47]刘阳,王前.企业技术跨越过程的系统整体观[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(6)：77-80.
[48]柳卸林,高伟,吕萍,等.从光伏产业看中国战略性新兴产业的发展模式[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(1)：116-125.
[49]陆国庆.中国中小板上市公司产业创新的绩效研究[J].经济研究,2011(2)：138-148.
[50]陆立军,于斌斌.传统产业与战略性新兴产业的融合演化及政府行为：理论与实证[J].中国软科学,2012(5)：28-39.
[51]吕铁,余剑.金融支持战略性新兴产业发展的实践创新、存在问题及政策建议[J].宏观经济研究,2012(5)：18-26.
[52]罗福凯,永胜.技术资本：战略性新兴产业的核心资本选择[J].科学管理研究,2012(2)：33-36.
[53]聂辉华,谭松涛,王宇锋.创新、企业规模和市场竞争：基于中国企业层面的面板数据分析[J].世界经济,2008(7)：57-66.
[54]彭灿.基于模仿创新的企业技术跨越[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002(12)：91-93.
[55]钱霞.创业投资引导基金扶持战略性新兴产业浅析[J].经济体制改革,2011(5)：130-133.
[56]乔晓楠,李宏生.中国战略性新兴产业的成长机制研究——基于污水处理产业的经验[J].经济社会体制比较,2011(2)：69-77.
[57]申俊喜.创新产学研合作视角下我国战略性新兴产业发展对策研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(2)：37-43.
[58]孙军,高彦彦.产业结构演变的逻辑及其比较优势——基于传统产业升级与战略性新兴产业互动的视角[J].经济学动态,2012(7)：70-76.
[59]孙延臣,刘则渊.论技术跨越概念[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(3)：19-21.
[60]孙延臣.技术跨越论[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,2005.
[61]汪秀婷,杜海波.系统视角下战略性新兴产业创新系统架构与培育路径研究[J].科学管理研究,2012(1)：10-14.
[62]王建彬.不同生命周期产业创新政策之评估研究,[J].科技发展政策报道,2006(10)：1171-1201.
[63]王胜光.创新政策的概念与范围[J].科学学研究,1993,11(3)：16-23.
[64]王新新.战略性新兴产业发展规律及发展对策分析研究[J].科学管理研究,2011(4)：1-5.
[65]王玉峰.技术跨越的另一种解读：复杂性理论的视角[J].科学学研究,2009(1)：5-10.
[66]温军,冯根福.异质机构、企业性质与自主创新[J].经济研究,2012(3)：53-64.
[67]吴福象,王新新.行业集中度、规模差异与创新绩效——基于GVC模式下要素集聚对战略性新兴产业创新绩效影响的实证分析[J].上海经济研究,2011(7)：69-76.
[68]吴联灿,申曙光.新型农村合作医疗制度对农民健康影响的实证研究[J].保险研究,2010(6)：60-68.
[69]吴晓波,陈宗年,曹体杰.技术跨越的环境分析与模式选择——以中国视频监控行业为例[J].研究与发展管理,2005(1)：66-72.
[70]吴晓波,姜雁斌.技术跨度：概念与测量[J].科学学研究,2010(12)：1799-1805.
[71]吴晓波,章威,陈宗年.高科技企业技术跨越战略研究[J].研究与发展管理,2006(2)：15-21.
[72]吴延兵.企业规模、市场力量与创新：一个文献综述[J].经济研究,2007(5)：125-138.
[73]吴照云,余焕新.中国新兴产业市场结构演变规律探究——以有机硅产业为例[J].中国工业经济,2008(12)：134-143.
[74]夏纪军,张晏.控制权与激励的冲突——兼对股权激励有效性的实证分析[J].经济研究,2008(3)：87-98.
[75]肖兴志,韩超,赵文霞,等.发展战略、产业升级与战略性新兴产业选择[J].财经问题研究,2010(8)：40-47.
[76]肖兴志,姜晓婧.战略性新兴产业政府创新基金投向：传统转型企业还是新生企业[J].中国工业经济,2013(1)：128-140.
[77]肖兴志,王建林.谁更适合发展战略性新兴产业——对国有企业与非国有企业研发行为的比较[J].财经问题研究,2011(10)：25-31.
[78]肖兴志,谢理.中国战略性新兴产业创新效率的实证分析[J].经济管理,2011(11)：26-35.
[79]肖兴志.中国战略性新兴产业发展的财税政策建议[J].财政研究,2011(12)：51-54.
[80]肖兴志.中国战略性新兴产业发展战略研究[J].经济研究参考,2011(7)：47-60.
[81]熊勇清,李世才.战略性新兴产业与传统产业耦合发展的过程及作用机制探讨[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(11)：84-87+109.
[82]熊勇清,李世才.战略性新兴产业与传统产业耦合发展研究[J].财经问题研究,2010(10)：38-44.
[83]熊正德,林雪.战略性新兴产业上市公司金融支持效率及其影响因素研究[J].经济管理,2010(11)：26-33.
[84]薛澜,柳卸林,穆荣平等译.OECD中国创新政策研究报告[M].北京：科学出版社,2011.
[85]严兵.效率增进、技术进步与全要素生产率增长——制造业内外资企业生产率比较[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008(11)：16-27.
[86]杨瑞龙,刘刚.企业的异质性假设和企业竞争优势的内生性分析[J].中国工业经济,2002(1)：88-95.
[87]杨以文,郑江淮,黄永春.传统产业升级与战略新兴产业发展——基于昆山制造企业的经验数据分析[J].财经科学,2012(2)：71-77.
[88]于斌斌.传统产业与战略性新兴产业的创新链接机理——基于产业链上下游企业进化博弈模型的分析[J].研究与发展管理,2012(3)：100-109.
[89]喻登科,涂国平,陈华.战略性新兴产业集群协同发展的路径与模式研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(4)：114-120.
[90]袁晓玲,张宝山.中国商业银行全要素生产率的影响因素研究——基于DEA模型的Malmquist指数分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009(4)：93-104+116.
[91]袁泽沛,陈金贤.产业退出障碍及后进企业实现技术跨越的机会窗口[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2001(7)：92-95.
[92]张晶.“技术跨越”的解读与重构[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(5)：9-14.
[93]张明玉.技术跨越战略与企业跨越式发展[J].中国软科学,1999(12)：69-71.
[94]张鹏,朱常俊.论技术跨越的实现途径以及对我国政府的启示[J].科学学研究,2007(1)：57-61.
[95]张耀辉.技术创新与产业组织演变[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2004.
[96]张永伟.从追赶到前沿——技术创新与产业升级之路[M].北京：中信出版社,2011.
[97]章亮.简述Christensen破坏性创新理论[J].企业导报,2012(5)：237-238.
[98]赵明剑,司春林.基于突破性技术创新的技术跨越机会窗口研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(5)：54-59.
[99]周黎安,陈烨.中国农村税费改革的政策效果：基于双重差分模型的估计[J].经济研究,2005(8)：44-53.
[100]周黎安,罗凯.企业规模与创新：来自中国省级水平的经验证据[J].经济学(季刊),2005(2)：623-638.
[101]周绍东.战略性新兴产业创新系统研究述评[J].科学管理研究,2012(4)：40-42+56.
[102]周振华.产业融合：产业发展及经济增长的新动力[J].中国工业经济,2003(4)：46-52.
[103]庄子银.知识产权、市场结构、模仿和创新[J].经济研究,2009(11)：95-104.
[104]Aerts, K., Czarnitzki, D.,2006, "The impact of public R&D—Funding in Flanders", Brussels, Belgium:IWT Study No.54.
[105]Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P.,2009, & Prantl, S, "The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity", Review of Economics and Statistics, 91.PP20-32.
[106]Aigner, D. J., C.A.K Lovell, and Schmidt.,1977, "Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Functions Models", Journal of Econometrics,6, PP21-37.
[107]Almus, M., Czarnitzki, D.,2003, "The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities:The case of East Germany", Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,21(2), PP226-236.
[108]Ames, E. and Rosenberg, N.,1997, "Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry,1840-1910", in Rosenberg, N. ed, Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[109]Arnold, E., Kuhlmann, S., van der Meulen, B.,2001, A Singular Council. Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway, Study Commissioned by the Norwegian Government (manuscript).
[110]Arrow, K. J.,1962, "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing", Review of Economic Studies,29(3), PP 155-173.
[111]Arrow, K. J.,1962, "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing", The Review of Economic Studies,29(3), PP155-173.
[112]Arthur, W.B.,2007, "The Structure of Invention", Research Policy,36(2), PP274-287.
[113]AZ Fu, WH Dow, GG Liu,2007, "Propensity score and difference-in-difference methods:a study of second-generation antidepressant use in patients with bipolar disorder", Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology,7, PP23-38.
[114]Bain, J. S. (1956), Barriers to New Competition, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
[115]Barros P. P., and Nilssen, T.,1999, Industrial Policy and Firm Heterogeneity, Scand. J. of Economic,101(4), PP597-616.
[116]Battese, E. and Coelli, T.,1992, "Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data:With Application to Paddy Farmers in India", Journal of Productivity Analysis, (3), PP153-169.
[117]Battese, E. and Coelli, T.,1995, "A model of technical in efficiency effects in stochastic frontier production for panel data", Empirical Economics, (20), PP325-332.
[118]Battese, G. E., & G. S. Corra.,1977, "Estimation of a Production Frontier Model: With Application to the Pastoral Zone of Eastern Australia", Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, (21), PP 169-179.
[119]Becker, S., A. Ichino,2002, "Estimation of Average Treatment Eff ects based on Propensity Scores", Stata Journal,2 (4), PP358-377.
[120]Brand Stewart,1987, The Media Lab:Inventing The Future at MIT [M], New York: Viking Press.
[121]Breschi, S., F. Malerba, et al.,2000, "Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation", Economic Journal,110, PP388-410.
[122]Carpenter, G. S and Nakamoto, K.,1990, "Competitive Strategies for Late Entry into a Market with a Dominant Brand", Management Science, Vol.36, No.10, PP 1268-1278.
[123]Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R.,1982, "The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity", Econometrica,1982,50(6), PP1393-1414.
[124]Cefis, E.,2003, "Is there persistence in innovative activities?" International Journal of Industrial Organization,21, PP489-515.
[125]Chidamber, S.R. and Kon H.B.,1994, "A research retrospective of innovation inception and success-the technology-push, demand-pull question", International Journal of Technology Management,9(1), PP94-112.
[126]Christensen, C. M.,1993, "The Rigid Disk Drive Industry:A History of Commercial and Technological Turbulence," Business History Review,67 (Winter) PP531-88.
[127]Christensen, C. M.,1997, The Innovator's Dilemma:When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston:HBS Press.
[128]Christensen, Clayton M.; Raynor, Michael E.; Anthony, Scott D.,2003, Six Keys to CreatingNew-Growth Businesses, Harvard Management Update,8 (1), PP3-6.
[129]Cleary, S.,1999, "The Relationship between Firm Investment and Financial Status", Journal of Finance,54 (2), PP673-692.
[130]Cohen, W" Levinthal, D.,1990, "Absorptive capacity:A new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly,35, PP128-152.
[131]Cubbin, J. and P. Geroski,1987, "The Convergence of Profits in the Long Run: Inter-firm and Intra-industry Comparisons", Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, PP427-442.
[132]Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K.,2004, "The link between R&D subsidies, R&D spending, and technological performance", Mannheim, Germany:ZEW Discussion Paper No.04-56.
[133]Dehejia, R. H., S. Wahba,,2002, "Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies", Review of Economics and Statistics,84 (1), PP151-161.
[134]Dehejia, R. H., S. Wahba,2002, "Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies", Review of Economics and Statistics,84(1), PP151-161.
[135]Demsetz, H.,1973, "Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy", Journal of Law and Economics,16, PP1-9.
[136]Dosi, G,1988, "Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic effects of innovation", Journal of Economic Literature,26, PP1120-1711.
[137]Dutrenit, G.,2007, "The Transition from Building-up Innovative Technological Capabilities to Leadership by Latecomer Firms", Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.15, No.2, pp. PP125-149.
[138]Fagerberg, J., David C. Mowery and Richard R. Nelson,2005, The Oxford Handbook of innovation, The Oxford Press, PP611-615.
[139]Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, CAK.,1994, Production frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[140]Farrell, M. J.,1957, "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency", Journal of Royal Statistical Society,120, PP 253-281.
[141]Flannery, M. J., K. P. Rangan,2006, "Partial adjustment toward target capital structures", Journal of Financial Economics,79 (3), PP469-506.
[142]Frankel, M.,1955, "Obsolescence and technological change in a maturing economy", The American Economic Review,45(3), PP296-319.
[143]Freeman, C.,1974, The Economics of Industrial Innovation, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[144]Garcia, R. and Calantone, R.,2002, "A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology:a literature review", Journal of Product Innovation Management,19, PP110-132.
[145]Ghemawat, Pankaj,1991, "Market Incumbency and Technological Inertia," Marketing Science,10 (Spring), PP 161-171.
[146]Gilson, R.J.,2003, "Engineering a venture capital market:Lessons from the American experience", Stanford Law Review,55, PP1067.
[147]Grabowski, H. G,1968, "The Determinants of Industrial Research and Development: A Study of the Chemical, Drug, and Petroleum Industries", Journal of Political Economy,76(2), PP292-306.
[148]Greene, W.,1990, "A Gamma Distributed Stochastic Frontier Model", Journal of Econometrics, (46), PP 141-164.
[149]Hansen, G. S. and Hill, C.W.L.1991, "Are Institutional Investors Myopic? A Time-series Study of Four Technology Driven Industries". Strategic Management Journal, (12),PP1-16.
[150]Hawawini, G, Subramanian, V. and Verdin, P.,2003, "Is performance driven by industry or firm specific factors? A new look at the evidence", Strategic Management Journal,24, PP1-16.
[151]Henderson, R.,1993, "Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation:Evidence from the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry", RAND Journal of Economics,24(2), PP248-270.
[152]Henderson, Rebecca,1993, "Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation:Evidence from the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry," RAND Journal of Economics,24 (Summer),248-71.
[153]Hobday, M.,1995, Innovation in East Asia:The Challenge to Japan, Edward Elgar. Hants.
[154]Hoogma, R., Kemp, R., Schot, J. et al.2002, Experimenting for sustainable transport, The approach of strategic niche management, London:Spon Press.
[155]Howe, J.D. and McFetridge, D.G.,1976, "The Determinants of R&D Expenditures", Canadian Journal of Economics,9(1), PP57-71.
[156]Irwin, D., Klenow, P.,1996, "High tech R&D subsidies:Estimating the effects of Sematech", Journal of International Economics,40, PP323-344.
[157]Jeng, L., Wells, P.,2000, "The determinants of venture funding:Evidence across countries", Journal of Corporate Finance,6, PP241-289.
[158]Jensen, J.B. and McGuckin, R.H.,1997, Firm Performance and Evolution: Empirical Regularities in the U.S. Microdata, In:Laaksonen, S. (ed.), The Evolution of Firms and Industries. Statistics Finland, Research Reports,223, PP24-49.
[159]Jensen, J.B., and McGuckin, R.H.,1997, "Firm Performance and Evolution: Empirical Regularities in the U.S." Microdata, In:Laaksonen, S. (ed.), The Evolution of Firms and Industries, Statistics Finland, Research Reports 223, PP24-49.
[160]Kleinekneht,1989, "A. Firm Size and Innovation", Small Business Economics,1(1), PP215-222.
[161]Kleinknecht, A. and Verspagen, B.,1990, "Demand and innovation:Schmookler re-examined", Research Policy,19(4), PP387-394.
[162]Klepper, S.,1997, "Industry life cycles", Industrial and Corporate Change,6, PP145-181.
[163]Kogut, B. and Zander, V.,1992, "Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology", Organization Science,3, PP383-397.
[164]Lei, D. T.,2000, "Industry Evolution and Competence Development:the Imperatives of Technological Convergence", International Journal of Technology Management, 19(7-8):726.
[165]Lengrand, L. et al.,2002, Innovation tomorrow, innovation policy and the regulatory framework:making innovation an integral part of the broader structural agenda. Innovation papers No 28. Luxemburgo:Directorate-General for Enterprise, European Commission.
[166]Lerner, J.,1999, "The government as venture capitalist:The long-run effects of the SBIR program", Journal of Business,72, PP285-318.
[167]Lichtenberg, F.R.,1986, "Energy prices and induced innovation", Research Policy, 15(2),PP67-75.
[168]Lieberman, M. B. and Montgomery, D. B.,1988, "First-mover Advantage", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.9, Special Issue:Strategy Content Research (Summer), PP 41-58.
[169]Loeb, P.D., and Lin, V.,1977, "Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry-A Specification Error Approach", Journal of Industrial Economics,26(1), PP45-51.
[170]Lundvall, B-A & Borras, S.,2005, "Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy", in J Fagerberg, DC Mowery & RR Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, PP599-631.
[171]Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo,1996, "The Dynamics and Evolution of Industries", Industrial and Corporate Change,5, PP51-87.
[172]Malerba, F.,2005, "Sectoral systems:How and why innovation differ across sectors" in J.Fagerberg, D. Mowery, R. Nelson (EDS), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press.
[173]Malmquist, S.,1953, "Index numbers and indifference surfaces", Trabajos de estatistica,4, PP209-242.
[174]Marjolein C., Romijn. H.2008, "Strategic niche management:towards a policy tool for sustainable development", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,20(2), PP245-266.
[175]Meeusen. W. & J. vanden Broeck.,1977, "Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error", International Economic Review, (18), PP435-444.
[176]Monteverde, K. and Teece, D.,1982, "Supplier Switching Costs and Vertical Integration in the Automobile Industry", Bell Journal of Economics,13, PP206-213.
[177]Morgan, Stephen L. and David J. Harding,2006, "Matching Estimators of Causal Effects Prospects and Pitfalls in Theory and Practice", Sociological Methods and Research,35(1), PP3-60.
[178]Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N.,1979, "The influence of market demand upon innovation:a critical review of some recent empirical studies", Research Policy,8(2), PP102-153.
[179]Mueller, D. C.,1986, Profits in the Long Run, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
[180]NawazSharif,1999, Strategic role of technological self-reliance in development management, Technological Forecasting and Social Change,62, PP219-238.
[181]Nelson, R. R.,1959, "The Economics of Parallel R and D Efforts:a Sequential-Decision Analysis", RAND Memorandum RM-2482.
[182]Nelson, R. R.,1991, "Why do firms differ and how does it matter?", Strategic Management Journal, winter special issue, PP61-74.
[183]Nelson, R. R.,1995, "Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change", Journal of Economic Literature, (33), PP48-90.
[184]Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.,1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[185]Nett, L.,1994, "Why Private Firms are More Ininovative than Public Firms", European Journal of Political Economy,10, PP639-653.
[186]OECD,1982, Innovation Policy, Research report, Paris.
[187]OECD,1993, OECD Frascati Manual Fifth edition, Annex 2, para.29. page 116.
[188]Parsons, M., Furuya, T., Pal, S., Kessler, P.,2001, "Biogenesis and function of peroxisomes and glycosomes", Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology,115 (1), PP19-28.
[189]Pavitt, K.,1984, "Sectoral patterns of technical change-towards a taxonomy and a theory", Research Policy,13(6), PP343-373.
[190]Pitt, M. and Lee, L.,1981, "The Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in Indonesian Weaving Industry", Journal of Development Economics, (9), PP43-64.
[191]Popp, D.,2002, "Induced innovation and energy prices", American Economic Review, 92(1), PP160-180.
[192]Rajesh K. Chandy and Gerard J. Tellis,2000, "The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation", Journal of Marketing, Vol.64, No.3, PP1-17.
[193]Rosenbaum, P., D. Rubin,1983, "The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects", Biometrika 70 (1), PP41-55.
[194]Rosenberg Nathan,1963, "Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840-1910", The Journal of Economic History,23(4), PP414-443.
[195]Rosenberg, N.,1969, "Direction of technological change-inducement mechanisms and focusing devices", Economic Development and Cultural Change,18(1), PP1-24.
[196]Rosenberg, N.,1974, "Science, invention and economic growth", Economic Journal, 84(333), PP90-108.
[197]Rosenberg, N.,1994, Exploring the Black Box:Technology, Economics, and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[198]Rothwell, R. & Zegveld, W.,1981, Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s. London:Frances Printer.
[199]Rumelt, R.P., Schendel, D. and Teece, D.J.,1991, "Strategic management and economics", Strategic Management Journal,12, PP5-29.
[200]Scherer, F.M.,1965, "Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions." American Economic Review,55(5), PP1097-1125.
[201]Schmookler, J.,1966, Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[202]Schot, J., R. Hoogma, et al.,1994, "Strategies for shifting technological systems:The case of the automobile system", Futures,26(10), PP 1060-1076.
[203]Simon, H.A.,1959, "Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science", The American Economic Review,49(3), PP253-283.
[204]Soete, L., Turner, R.,1985. International Diffusion of Technology, Industrial Development and Technological Leapfrogging, World Development,13(3), PP409-422.
[205]Soete, L.L.G.,1979, "Firm Size and Innovation Activity", European Economic Review,12, PP319-340.
[206]Timmons, J.,2006, New Venture Creation:Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., U.S.A.
[207]Tushman, M. and Anderson, P.,1986, "Technological discontinuities and organization environments", Administrative Science Quarterly,31(3), PP439-465.
[208]Utterback, J.,1996, Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
[209]Wallsten, S.,2000, "The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D:The case of the Small Business Innovation Research program", RAND Journal of Economics,31,PP82-100.
[210]Winter, S.G.,1984, "Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological environments", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,5, PP287-320.
[211]Wu, X.,2012, "The Evolution of Innovation Policy in China:A Brief Introduction", Australian Economic Review,45, PP463-466.
[1](美)V. K. Narayanan.程源,高建,杨湘玉译.技术战略与创新——竞争优势的源泉[M].北京：电子工业出版社,2002.
[2](美)托马斯·库恩.《科学革命的结构》[M].金吾伦,胡新和译.北京：北京大学出版社,2003.
[3](意)多西等.《技术进步与经济理论》[M].钟学义等译.北京：经济科学出版社,1992.
[4]陈宝森.剖析美国“新经济”[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2007.
[5]陈德智,胡代平.技术跨越的旋进路径分析[J].中国管理科学,2006(6)：144-148.
[6]陈德智.技术跨越概念与标志界定研究[J].科学学研究,2006(3)：364-367.
[7]陈洪涛,陈劲,施放,等.新兴产业发展中的政府作用机制研究—基于国家政治制度结构的理论分析模型[J].科研管理,2009(3)：1-8.
[8]陈力田,赵晓庆.技术跨越述评及其在发展中国家的应用[J].科学学研究,2008(S2)：258-263.
[9]陈衍泰,宁钟,宁玹钰.全球风能产业动态演化——企业能力与公共政策互动视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(9)：74-82.
[10]邓龙安.战略性新兴产业科技创新体系建设路径选择研究[J].科学管理研究,2012(2)：37-41.
[11]封凯栋.传统产业与高新技术结合应是国家创新体系的核心[J].宏观经济研究,2013(2)：3-9+33.
[12]冯根福,温军.中国上市公司治理与企业技术创新关系的实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2008(7)：91-101.
[13]付玉秀,张洪石.突破性创新：概念界定与比较[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2004(3)：73-83.
[14]傅家骥.技术创新学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1998.
[15]桂黄宝.战略性新兴产业成长动力机制分析——以我国新能源汽车为例[J].科学管理研究,2012(3)：48-51.
[16]郭晓丹,何文韬.融合与跨越：新旧产业间技术升级路径研究[J].东北财经大学学报,2012(1)：27-34.
[17]郭晓丹,何文韬.战略性新兴产业规模、竞争力提升与“保护性空间”设定[J].改革,2012(2)：34-41.
[18]郭晓丹,何文韬.战略性新兴产业政府R&D补贴信号效应的动态分析[J].经济学动态,2011(9)：88-93.
[19]郭晓丹,宋维佳.战略性新兴产业的进入时机选择：领军还是跟进[J].中国工业经济,2011,(5)：119-128.
[20]韩雪莲,谢理,赵文霞.战略性新兴产业中的企业进入、时机与绩效——基于180家上市公司的实证分析[J].财经问题研究,2011(4)：45-52.
[21]贺俊,吕铁.战略性新兴产业：从政策概念到理论问题[J].财贸经济,2012(5)：106-113.
[22]侯国清.谈谈跨越式技术创新[J].中国软科学,2000(3)：38-41.
[23]後藤晃.创新和日本经济[M].东京：岩波新书出版社,2000.
[24]胡汉辉,邢华.产业融合理论以及对我国发展信息产业的启示[J].中国工业经济,2003(2)：23-29.
[25]黄玲文,姚洋.国有企业改制对就业的影响——来自11个城市的证据[J].经济研究,2007(3)：57-69.
[26]黄永春,郑江淮,谭洪波,等.后发地区发展战略性新兴产业的时机选择与赶超路径——以平板显示技术的赶超实践为例[J].科学学研究,2012(7)：1031-1038.
[27]季丹,郭政.破坏性创新：概念、比较与识别[J].经济与管理,2009(5)：16-20.
[28]姜红,赵树宽,余海晴.技术轨道理论研究综述及展望[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011(7)：11-14.
[29]金军,邹锐.集成创新与技术跨越式发展[J].中国软科学,2002(12)：49-52.
[30]剧锦文.战略性新兴产业的发展“变量”：政府与市场分工[J].改革,2011(3)：31-37.
[31]寇宗来.通往创新国家之路——改革年代的产业创新[M].上海：格致出版社、上海人民出版社.2008.
[32]李春涛,宋敏.中国制造业企业的创新活动：所有制和CEO激励的作用[J].经济研究,2010(5)：55-67.
[33]李宏舟.战略性新兴产业与创业投资体系[J].财经问题研究,2012(4)：22-29.
[34]李楠,乔榛.国有企业改制政策效果的实证分析——基于双重差分模型的估计[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2010(2)：3-21.
[35]李姝,姜春海.战略性新兴产业主导的产业结构调整对能源消费影响分析[J].宏观经济研究,2011(1)：36-40+49.
[36]李姝.中国战略性新兴产业发展思路与对策[J].宏观经济研究,2012(2)：50-55.
[37]李晓华,吕铁.战略性新兴产业的特征与政策导向研究[J].宏观经济研究,2010(9)：20-26.
[38]李艳华.产业技术跨越政策的逻辑模型及政策体系[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(10)：16-20.
[39]连燕华,关于技术创新策体系的思考[J].科学学与科学技术管理,1999,20(4)：12-14.
[40]林学军.战略性新兴产业的发展与形成模式研究[J].中国软科学,2012(2)：26-34.
[41]林云.内生性技术创新动力与效率研究[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,2011.
[42]刘宝铭,孙建广,檀润华.破坏性创新理论综述[J].科技管理研究,2011(24)：9-12.
[43]刘澄,顾强,董瑞青.产业政策在战略性新兴产业发展中的作用[J].经济社会体制比较,2011(1)：196-203.
[44]刘家庆.促进战略性新兴产业发展的财政政策研究——以甘肃省为例[J].财政研究,2011(4)：31-34.
[45]刘美平.战略性新兴产业技术创新路径的共生模式研究[J].当代财经,2011(11)：105-111.
[46]刘小玄,吴延兵.企业生产率增长及来源：创新还是需求拉动[J].经济研究,2009(7)：45-54.
[47]刘阳,王前.企业技术跨越过程的系统整体观[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(6)：77-80.
[48]柳卸林,高伟,吕萍,等.从光伏产业看中国战略性新兴产业的发展模式[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(1)：116-125.
[49]陆国庆.中国中小板上市公司产业创新的绩效研究[J].经济研究,2011(2)：138-148.
[50]陆立军,于斌斌.传统产业与战略性新兴产业的融合演化及政府行为：理论与实证[J].中国软科学,2012(5)：28-39.
[51]吕铁,余剑.金融支持战略性新兴产业发展的实践创新、存在问题及政策建议[J].宏观经济研究,2012(5)：18-26.
[52]罗福凯,永胜.技术资本：战略性新兴产业的核心资本选择[J].科学管理研究,2012(2)：33-36.
[53]聂辉华,谭松涛,王宇锋.创新、企业规模和市场竞争：基于中国企业层面的面板数据分析[J].世界经济,2008(7)：57-66.
[54]彭灿.基于模仿创新的企业技术跨越[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002(12)：91-93.
[55]钱霞.创业投资引导基金扶持战略性新兴产业浅析[J].经济体制改革,2011(5)：130-133.
[56]乔晓楠,李宏生.中国战略性新兴产业的成长机制研究——基于污水处理产业的经验[J].经济社会体制比较,2011(2)：69-77.
[57]申俊喜.创新产学研合作视角下我国战略性新兴产业发展对策研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(2)：37-43.
[58]孙军,高彦彦.产业结构演变的逻辑及其比较优势——基于传统产业升级与战略性新兴产业互动的视角[J].经济学动态,2012(7)：70-76.
[59]孙延臣,刘则渊.论技术跨越概念[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(3)：19-21.
[60]孙延臣.技术跨越论[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,2005.
[61]汪秀婷,杜海波.系统视角下战略性新兴产业创新系统架构与培育路径研究[J].科学管理研究,2012(1)：10-14.
[62]王建彬.不同生命周期产业创新政策之评估研究,[J].科技发展政策报道,2006(10)：1171-1201.
[63]王胜光.创新政策的概念与范围[J].科学学研究,1993,11(3)：16-23.
[64]王新新.战略性新兴产业发展规律及发展对策分析研究[J].科学管理研究,2011(4)：1-5.
[65]王玉峰.技术跨越的另一种解读：复杂性理论的视角[J].科学学研究,2009(1)：5-10.
[66]温军,冯根福.异质机构、企业性质与自主创新[J].经济研究,2012(3)：53-64.
[67]吴福象,王新新.行业集中度、规模差异与创新绩效——基于GVC模式下要素集聚对战略性新兴产业创新绩效影响的实证分析[J].上海经济研究,2011(7)：69-76.
[68]吴联灿,申曙光.新型农村合作医疗制度对农民健康影响的实证研究[J].保险研究,2010(6)：60-68.
[69]吴晓波,陈宗年,曹体杰.技术跨越的环境分析与模式选择——以中国视频监控行业为例[J].研究与发展管理,2005(1)：66-72.
[70]吴晓波,姜雁斌.技术跨度：概念与测量[J].科学学研究,2010(12)：1799-1805.
[71]吴晓波,章威,陈宗年.高科技企业技术跨越战略研究[J].研究与发展管理,2006(2)：15-21.
[72]吴延兵.企业规模、市场力量与创新：一个文献综述[J].经济研究,2007(5)：125-138.
[73]吴照云,余焕新.中国新兴产业市场结构演变规律探究——以有机硅产业为例[J].中国工业经济,2008(12)：134-143.
[74]夏纪军,张晏.控制权与激励的冲突——兼对股权激励有效性的实证分析[J].经济研究,2008(3)：87-98.
[75]肖兴志,韩超,赵文霞,等.发展战略、产业升级与战略性新兴产业选择[J].财经问题研究,2010(8)：40-47.
[76]肖兴志,姜晓婧.战略性新兴产业政府创新基金投向：传统转型企业还是新生企业[J].中国工业经济,2013(1)：128-140.
[77]肖兴志,王建林.谁更适合发展战略性新兴产业——对国有企业与非国有企业研发行为的比较[J].财经问题研究,2011(10)：25-31.
[78]肖兴志,谢理.中国战略性新兴产业创新效率的实证分析[J].经济管理,2011(11)：26-35.
[79]肖兴志.中国战略性新兴产业发展的财税政策建议[J].财政研究,2011(12)：51-54.
[80]肖兴志.中国战略性新兴产业发展战略研究[J].经济研究参考,2011(7)：47-60.
[81]熊勇清,李世才.战略性新兴产业与传统产业耦合发展的过程及作用机制探讨[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(11)：84-87+109.
[82]熊勇清,李世才.战略性新兴产业与传统产业耦合发展研究[J].财经问题研究,2010(10)：38-44.
[83]熊正德,林雪.战略性新兴产业上市公司金融支持效率及其影响因素研究[J].经济管理,2010(11)：26-33.
[84]薛澜,柳卸林,穆荣平等译.OECD中国创新政策研究报告[M].北京：科学出版社,2011.
[85]严兵.效率增进、技术进步与全要素生产率增长——制造业内外资企业生产率比较[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008(11)：16-27.
[86]杨瑞龙,刘刚.企业的异质性假设和企业竞争优势的内生性分析[J].中国工业经济,2002(1)：88-95.
[87]杨以文,郑江淮,黄永春.传统产业升级与战略新兴产业发展——基于昆山制造企业的经验数据分析[J].财经科学,2012(2)：71-77.
[88]于斌斌.传统产业与战略性新兴产业的创新链接机理——基于产业链上下游企业进化博弈模型的分析[J].研究与发展管理,2012(3)：100-109.
[89]喻登科,涂国平,陈华.战略性新兴产业集群协同发展的路径与模式研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012(4)：114-120.
[90]袁晓玲,张宝山.中国商业银行全要素生产率的影响因素研究——基于DEA模型的Malmquist指数分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009(4)：93-104+116.
[91]袁泽沛,陈金贤.产业退出障碍及后进企业实现技术跨越的机会窗口[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2001(7)：92-95.
[92]张晶.“技术跨越”的解读与重构[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(5)：9-14.
[93]张明玉.技术跨越战略与企业跨越式发展[J].中国软科学,1999(12)：69-71.
[94]张鹏,朱常俊.论技术跨越的实现途径以及对我国政府的启示[J].科学学研究,2007(1)：57-61.
[95]张耀辉.技术创新与产业组织演变[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2004.
[96]张永伟.从追赶到前沿——技术创新与产业升级之路[M].北京：中信出版社,2011.
[97]章亮.简述Christensen破坏性创新理论[J].企业导报,2012(5)：237-238.
[98]赵明剑,司春林.基于突破性技术创新的技术跨越机会窗口研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(5)：54-59.
[99]周黎安,陈烨.中国农村税费改革的政策效果：基于双重差分模型的估计[J].经济研究,2005(8)：44-53.
[100]周黎安,罗凯.企业规模与创新：来自中国省级水平的经验证据[J].经济学(季刊),2005(2)：623-638.
[101]周绍东.战略性新兴产业创新系统研究述评[J].科学管理研究,2012(4)：40-42+56.
[102]周振华.产业融合：产业发展及经济增长的新动力[J].中国工业经济,2003(4)：46-52.
[103]庄子银.知识产权、市场结构、模仿和创新[J].经济研究,2009(11)：95-104.
[104]Aerts, K., Czarnitzki, D.,2006, "The impact of public R&D—Funding in Flanders", Brussels, Belgium:IWT Study No.54.
[105]Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P.,2009, & Prantl, S, "The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity", Review of Economics and Statistics, 91.PP20-32.
[106]Aigner, D. J., C.A.K Lovell, and Schmidt.,1977, "Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Functions Models", Journal of Econometrics,6, PP21-37.
[107]Almus, M., Czarnitzki, D.,2003, "The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities:The case of East Germany", Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,21(2), PP226-236.
[108]Ames, E. and Rosenberg, N.,1997, "Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry,1840-1910", in Rosenberg, N. ed, Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[109]Arnold, E., Kuhlmann, S., van der Meulen, B.,2001, A Singular Council. Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway, Study Commissioned by the Norwegian Government (manuscript).
[110]Arrow, K. J.,1962, "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing", Review of Economic Studies,29(3), PP 155-173.
[111]Arrow, K. J.,1962, "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing", The Review of Economic Studies,29(3), PP155-173.
[112]Arthur, W.B.,2007, "The Structure of Invention", Research Policy,36(2), PP274-287.
[113]AZ Fu, WH Dow, GG Liu,2007, "Propensity score and difference-in-difference methods:a study of second-generation antidepressant use in patients with bipolar disorder", Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology,7, PP23-38.
[114]Bain, J. S. (1956), Barriers to New Competition, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
[115]Barros P. P., and Nilssen, T.,1999, Industrial Policy and Firm Heterogeneity, Scand. J. of Economic,101(4), PP597-616.
[116]Battese, E. and Coelli, T.,1992, "Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data:With Application to Paddy Farmers in India", Journal of Productivity Analysis, (3), PP153-169.
[117]Battese, E. and Coelli, T.,1995, "A model of technical in efficiency effects in stochastic frontier production for panel data", Empirical Economics, (20), PP325-332.
[118]Battese, G. E., & G. S. Corra.,1977, "Estimation of a Production Frontier Model: With Application to the Pastoral Zone of Eastern Australia", Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, (21), PP 169-179.
[119]Becker, S., A. Ichino,2002, "Estimation of Average Treatment Eff ects based on Propensity Scores", Stata Journal,2 (4), PP358-377.
[120]Brand Stewart,1987, The Media Lab:Inventing The Future at MIT [M], New York: Viking Press.
[121]Breschi, S., F. Malerba, et al.,2000, "Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation", Economic Journal,110, PP388-410.
[122]Carpenter, G. S and Nakamoto, K.,1990, "Competitive Strategies for Late Entry into a Market with a Dominant Brand", Management Science, Vol.36, No.10, PP 1268-1278.
[123]Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R.,1982, "The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity", Econometrica,1982,50(6), PP1393-1414.
[124]Cefis, E.,2003, "Is there persistence in innovative activities?" International Journal of Industrial Organization,21, PP489-515.
[125]Chidamber, S.R. and Kon H.B.,1994, "A research retrospective of innovation inception and success-the technology-push, demand-pull question", International Journal of Technology Management,9(1), PP94-112.
[126]Christensen, C. M.,1993, "The Rigid Disk Drive Industry:A History of Commercial and Technological Turbulence," Business History Review,67 (Winter) PP531-88.
[127]Christensen, C. M.,1997, The Innovator's Dilemma:When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston:HBS Press.
[128]Christensen, Clayton M.; Raynor, Michael E.; Anthony, Scott D.,2003, Six Keys to CreatingNew-Growth Businesses, Harvard Management Update,8 (1), PP3-6.
[129]Cleary, S.,1999, "The Relationship between Firm Investment and Financial Status", Journal of Finance,54 (2), PP673-692.
[130]Cohen, W" Levinthal, D.,1990, "Absorptive capacity:A new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly,35, PP128-152.
[131]Cubbin, J. and P. Geroski,1987, "The Convergence of Profits in the Long Run: Inter-firm and Intra-industry Comparisons", Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, PP427-442.
[132]Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K.,2004, "The link between R&D subsidies, R&D spending, and technological performance", Mannheim, Germany:ZEW Discussion Paper No.04-56.
[133]Dehejia, R. H., S. Wahba,,2002, "Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies", Review of Economics and Statistics,84 (1), PP151-161.
[134]Dehejia, R. H., S. Wahba,2002, "Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies", Review of Economics and Statistics,84(1), PP151-161.
[135]Demsetz, H.,1973, "Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy", Journal of Law and Economics,16, PP1-9.
[136]Dosi, G,1988, "Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic effects of innovation", Journal of Economic Literature,26, PP1120-1711.
[137]Dutrenit, G.,2007, "The Transition from Building-up Innovative Technological Capabilities to Leadership by Latecomer Firms", Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.15, No.2, pp. PP125-149.
[138]Fagerberg, J., David C. Mowery and Richard R. Nelson,2005, The Oxford Handbook of innovation, The Oxford Press, PP611-615.
[139]Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, CAK.,1994, Production frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[140]Farrell, M. J.,1957, "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency", Journal of Royal Statistical Society,120, PP 253-281.
[141]Flannery, M. J., K. P. Rangan,2006, "Partial adjustment toward target capital structures", Journal of Financial Economics,79 (3), PP469-506.
[142]Frankel, M.,1955, "Obsolescence and technological change in a maturing economy", The American Economic Review,45(3), PP296-319.
[143]Freeman, C.,1974, The Economics of Industrial Innovation, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[144]Garcia, R. and Calantone, R.,2002, "A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology:a literature review", Journal of Product Innovation Management,19, PP110-132.
[145]Ghemawat, Pankaj,1991, "Market Incumbency and Technological Inertia," Marketing Science,10 (Spring), PP 161-171.
[146]Gilson, R.J.,2003, "Engineering a venture capital market:Lessons from the American experience", Stanford Law Review,55, PP1067.
[147]Grabowski, H. G,1968, "The Determinants of Industrial Research and Development: A Study of the Chemical, Drug, and Petroleum Industries", Journal of Political Economy,76(2), PP292-306.
[148]Greene, W.,1990, "A Gamma Distributed Stochastic Frontier Model", Journal of Econometrics, (46), PP 141-164.
[149]Hansen, G. S. and Hill, C.W.L.1991, "Are Institutional Investors Myopic? A Time-series Study of Four Technology Driven Industries". Strategic Management Journal, (12),PP1-16.
[150]Hawawini, G, Subramanian, V. and Verdin, P.,2003, "Is performance driven by industry or firm specific factors? A new look at the evidence", Strategic Management Journal,24, PP1-16.
[151]Henderson, R.,1993, "Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation:Evidence from the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry", RAND Journal of Economics,24(2), PP248-270.
[152]Henderson, Rebecca,1993, "Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation:Evidence from the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry," RAND Journal of Economics,24 (Summer),248-71.
[153]Hobday, M.,1995, Innovation in East Asia:The Challenge to Japan, Edward Elgar. Hants.
[154]Hoogma, R., Kemp, R., Schot, J. et al.2002, Experimenting for sustainable transport, The approach of strategic niche management, London:Spon Press.
[155]Howe, J.D. and McFetridge, D.G.,1976, "The Determinants of R&D Expenditures", Canadian Journal of Economics,9(1), PP57-71.
[156]Irwin, D., Klenow, P.,1996, "High tech R&D subsidies:Estimating the effects of Sematech", Journal of International Economics,40, PP323-344.
[157]Jeng, L., Wells, P.,2000, "The determinants of venture funding:Evidence across countries", Journal of Corporate Finance,6, PP241-289.
[158]Jensen, J.B. and McGuckin, R.H.,1997, Firm Performance and Evolution: Empirical Regularities in the U.S. Microdata, In:Laaksonen, S. (ed.), The Evolution of Firms and Industries. Statistics Finland, Research Reports,223, PP24-49.
[159]Jensen, J.B., and McGuckin, R.H.,1997, "Firm Performance and Evolution: Empirical Regularities in the U.S." Microdata, In:Laaksonen, S. (ed.), The Evolution of Firms and Industries, Statistics Finland, Research Reports 223, PP24-49.
[160]Kleinekneht,1989, "A. Firm Size and Innovation", Small Business Economics,1(1), PP215-222.
[161]Kleinknecht, A. and Verspagen, B.,1990, "Demand and innovation:Schmookler re-examined", Research Policy,19(4), PP387-394.
[162]Klepper, S.,1997, "Industry life cycles", Industrial and Corporate Change,6, PP145-181.
[163]Kogut, B. and Zander, V.,1992, "Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology", Organization Science,3, PP383-397.
[164]Lei, D. T.,2000, "Industry Evolution and Competence Development:the Imperatives of Technological Convergence", International Journal of Technology Management, 19(7-8):726.
[165]Lengrand, L. et al.,2002, Innovation tomorrow, innovation policy and the regulatory framework:making innovation an integral part of the broader structural agenda. Innovation papers No 28. Luxemburgo:Directorate-General for Enterprise, European Commission.
[166]Lerner, J.,1999, "The government as venture capitalist:The long-run effects of the SBIR program", Journal of Business,72, PP285-318.
[167]Lichtenberg, F.R.,1986, "Energy prices and induced innovation", Research Policy, 15(2),PP67-75.
[168]Lieberman, M. B. and Montgomery, D. B.,1988, "First-mover Advantage", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.9, Special Issue:Strategy Content Research (Summer), PP 41-58.
[169]Loeb, P.D., and Lin, V.,1977, "Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry-A Specification Error Approach", Journal of Industrial Economics,26(1), PP45-51.
[170]Lundvall, B-A & Borras, S.,2005, "Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy", in J Fagerberg, DC Mowery & RR Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, PP599-631.
[171]Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo,1996, "The Dynamics and Evolution of Industries", Industrial and Corporate Change,5, PP51-87.
[172]Malerba, F.,2005, "Sectoral systems:How and why innovation differ across sectors" in J.Fagerberg, D. Mowery, R. Nelson (EDS), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press.
[173]Malmquist, S.,1953, "Index numbers and indifference surfaces", Trabajos de estatistica,4, PP209-242.
[174]Marjolein C., Romijn. H.2008, "Strategic niche management:towards a policy tool for sustainable development", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,20(2), PP245-266.
[175]Meeusen. W. & J. vanden Broeck.,1977, "Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error", International Economic Review, (18), PP435-444.
[176]Monteverde, K. and Teece, D.,1982, "Supplier Switching Costs and Vertical Integration in the Automobile Industry", Bell Journal of Economics,13, PP206-213.
[177]Morgan, Stephen L. and David J. Harding,2006, "Matching Estimators of Causal Effects Prospects and Pitfalls in Theory and Practice", Sociological Methods and Research,35(1), PP3-60.
[178]Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N.,1979, "The influence of market demand upon innovation:a critical review of some recent empirical studies", Research Policy,8(2), PP102-153.
[179]Mueller, D. C.,1986, Profits in the Long Run, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
[180]NawazSharif,1999, Strategic role of technological self-reliance in development management, Technological Forecasting and Social Change,62, PP219-238.
[181]Nelson, R. R.,1959, "The Economics of Parallel R and D Efforts:a Sequential-Decision Analysis", RAND Memorandum RM-2482.
[182]Nelson, R. R.,1991, "Why do firms differ and how does it matter?", Strategic Management Journal, winter special issue, PP61-74.
[183]Nelson, R. R.,1995, "Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change", Journal of Economic Literature, (33), PP48-90.
[184]Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.,1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[185]Nett, L.,1994, "Why Private Firms are More Ininovative than Public Firms", European Journal of Political Economy,10, PP639-653.
[186]OECD,1982, Innovation Policy, Research report, Paris.
[187]OECD,1993, OECD Frascati Manual Fifth edition, Annex 2, para.29. page 116.
[188]Parsons, M., Furuya, T., Pal, S., Kessler, P.,2001, "Biogenesis and function of peroxisomes and glycosomes", Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology,115 (1), PP19-28.
[189]Pavitt, K.,1984, "Sectoral patterns of technical change-towards a taxonomy and a theory", Research Policy,13(6), PP343-373.
[190]Pitt, M. and Lee, L.,1981, "The Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in Indonesian Weaving Industry", Journal of Development Economics, (9), PP43-64.
[191]Popp, D.,2002, "Induced innovation and energy prices", American Economic Review, 92(1), PP160-180.
[192]Rajesh K. Chandy and Gerard J. Tellis,2000, "The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation", Journal of Marketing, Vol.64, No.3, PP1-17.
[193]Rosenbaum, P., D. Rubin,1983, "The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects", Biometrika 70 (1), PP41-55.
[194]Rosenberg Nathan,1963, "Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840-1910", The Journal of Economic History,23(4), PP414-443.
[195]Rosenberg, N.,1969, "Direction of technological change-inducement mechanisms and focusing devices", Economic Development and Cultural Change,18(1), PP1-24.
[196]Rosenberg, N.,1974, "Science, invention and economic growth", Economic Journal, 84(333), PP90-108.
[197]Rosenberg, N.,1994, Exploring the Black Box:Technology, Economics, and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[198]Rothwell, R. & Zegveld, W.,1981, Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s. London:Frances Printer.
[199]Rumelt, R.P., Schendel, D. and Teece, D.J.,1991, "Strategic management and economics", Strategic Management Journal,12, PP5-29.
[200]Scherer, F.M.,1965, "Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions." American Economic Review,55(5), PP1097-1125.
[201]Schmookler, J.,1966, Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[202]Schot, J., R. Hoogma, et al.,1994, "Strategies for shifting technological systems:The case of the automobile system", Futures,26(10), PP 1060-1076.
[203]Simon, H.A.,1959, "Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science", The American Economic Review,49(3), PP253-283.
[204]Soete, L., Turner, R.,1985. International Diffusion of Technology, Industrial Development and Technological Leapfrogging, World Development,13(3), PP409-422.
[205]Soete, L.L.G.,1979, "Firm Size and Innovation Activity", European Economic Review,12, PP319-340.
[206]Timmons, J.,2006, New Venture Creation:Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., U.S.A.
[207]Tushman, M. and Anderson, P.,1986, "Technological discontinuities and organization environments", Administrative Science Quarterly,31(3), PP439-465.
[208]Utterback, J.,1996, Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
[209]Wallsten, S.,2000, "The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D:The case of the Small Business Innovation Research program", RAND Journal of Economics,31,PP82-100.
[210]Winter, S.G.,1984, "Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological environments", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,5, PP287-320.
[211]Wu, X.,2012, "The Evolution of Innovation Policy in China:A Brief Introduction", Australian Economic Review,45, PP463-466.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |