企业技术创新投入对技术创新绩效影响研究
|
摘要
在知识经济时代的今天,经济活动的全球化加速对企业的技术创新提出了新的挑战,它推动着企业将促进技术创新视为提高竞争力的必然选择。当前,企业与外部环境的边界变得越来越模糊,任何企业都已不可能完全孤立的进行技术创新活动。在这种情况下,传统的封闭式创新模式已经不能满足企业的实践需要,开放式创新逐渐成为企业必然的发展趋势。随着改革开放的不断深入和市场经济的不断完善,我国一些企业为了达到提高产出绩效和市场竞争能力的目的,不断加大研发方面的投入。一些企业甚至认为,研发投入就是技术创新投入,投入越多,其产出绩效的显著性就越高。然而一些企业却由于缺乏控制的一味加大技术创新投入,致使企业创新绩效的下降,甚至造成了企业的倒闭。由此可见,开放式创新环境下的企业技术创新投入是存在风险的,技术创新投入与技术创新绩效之间并不是直接的影响关系,而是存在其它因素对创新投入和创新产出之间产生影响作用。本文提出的问题是,企业的技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的影响作用究竟如何?有哪些因素影响技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的关系?不同行业的技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的影响关系又存在什么差异?
本文的研究结合技术创新理论、开放式创新理论和吸收能力理论,建立了技术创新投入通过吸收能力和技术创新能力的中介作用对技术创新绩效产生影响作用的研究模型,研究了企业技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的影响作用,以及吸收能力在模型中影响作用的行业差异性。主要的研究内容如下：
第一章主要分析本文的理论研究背景和现实研究背景,提出本文研究的问题,说明本文研究的理论意义与现实意义,并阐述研究方法和研究内容等。
第二章在对国内外文献进行阅读和研究的基础上,系统的回顾和总结技术创新理论、开放式创新理论、吸收能力理论的相关研究,构建本文研究的理论基础。
第三章基于对文献综述和理论分析的基础,提出企业技术创新投入对技术创新绩效影响关系研究模型,对相关概念在本文的研究中进行界定,并提出本文的各个研究假设。
第四章就问卷设计、数据收集、数据合并有效性以及研究分析方法进行阐述。从问卷调查研究方法方面叙述调查问卷设计的过程,指出问卷调查法的注意事项,提出避免产生偏差的一些可行措施,介绍本研究调查对象的确定和问卷发放及回收过程,通过对样本无差异性检验保证样本的合并有效性,对本研究所采用的分析方法进行阐述。
第五章首先对变量的测量进行设计,说明对各个变量的测量所采用问项的合理性,根据问卷调查获得的数据对前一章所提出的理论模型中的研究假设进行实证检验。通过将检验结果与预期假设和已有研究结论进行比较分析的方法,按照“创新投入—能力—创新绩效”的研究框架,研究技术创新投入通过吸收能力和技术创新能力对技术创新绩效进行影响的作用机制。
第六章通过对不同行业类型的数据进行对比分析,研究不同行业的技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的影响关系差异,包括内部研发投入、外部技术购买和合作研发投入对技术创新绩效的不同作用,以及吸收能力在不同行业的技术创新投入模型中的不同作用。
第七章的结论与展望对本文研究的主要结论进行阐述,总结本文研究的理论贡献、实践意义和主要创新点,并对本研究在理论和方法上存在的局限和不足之处进行了说明,最后对未来研究方向进行了展望。
运用理论研究与实证研究相结合的方法,本文得出以下主要结论：
第一,企业的技术创新投入与技术创新绩效之间不存在直接影响关系,而是通过吸收能力和技术创新能力这两个中介变量的作用,间接影响技术创新绩效。通过运用结构方程模型(SEM)分析发现,加入吸收能力和技术创新能力这两个中介变量以后,技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的直接影响关系变得不再显著。这说明了企业的技术创新投入与技术创新绩效之间并无直接的影响关系,而是通过吸收能力和技术创新能力这两个变量的中介作用,间接的影响技术创新绩效。这也说明了不能通过简单的增加技术创新投入来达到增加技术创新绩效的目的,注重技术创新投入与吸收能力和技术创新能力的配合、协调发展,才能够最终达到提高企业技术创新绩效的目标。
第二,本文验证了吸收能力在企业技术创新活动中的重要作用。研究结果显示出吸收能力对技术创新能力存在显著正向影响关系,同时吸收能力对技术创新绩效存在着显著正向影响关系以及技术创新能力对技术创新绩效存在显著正向影响关系。研究结果显示了技术创新能力对吸收能力和技术创新绩效之间的部分中介作用。由此验证了前人研究中得到的结论,即吸收能力在企业技术创新投入对技术创新绩效影响关系中起到重要作用。
第三,不同产业类型的企业,其技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的影响作用有所差异,吸收能力在经验驱动型的行业和科技驱动型的行业中,中介作用有所不同。通过不同产业类型的数据对比分析发现,技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的影响作用有所差异。由于经验驱动型产业的创新知识以隐性知识为主导地位,其知识粘性较大,吸收能力的作用较小,因此内部研发投入对技术创新绩效的作用明显大于科技驱动型产业；而科技驱动型产业的创新知识以显性知识为主导地位,其知识粘性较小,吸收能力的作用较大,因此技术购买投入和合作研发投入对技术创新绩效的作用明显大于经验驱动型产业。吸收能力对外部技术获取和技术创新绩效之间的中介作用在科技驱动型产业中,其较在经验驱动型产业中的作用更大。这也导致了不同技术创新投入活动对技术创新绩效的影响作用的行业差异。
本文的创新点包括以下几个：
第一,本文首次使用以过程为导向的吸收能力和以结果为导向的技术创新能力同时作为中介变量,构建了技术创新投入对技术创新绩效影响关系模型。该模型的建立在—定程度上解释了技术创新的“投入—产出悖论”现象,指出企业的技术创新投入不是直接影响技术创新绩效,而是通过吸收能力和技术创新能力的中介作用,间接的影响技术创新绩效。
第二,本文的研究发现了吸收能力和技术创新能力对技术购买投入和技术创新绩效之间影响关系的不同作用。研究结果显示,技术创新投入中的技术购买投入通过吸收能力对技术创新绩效产生间接影响作用；技术购买投入对技术创新能力的直接影响作用不显著,只是通过吸收能力的中介作用对技术创新能力产生间接影响作用,从而对技术创新绩效产生间接影响作用。
第三,本文的研究发现了吸收能力在不同产业类型的企业中,对技术创新投入和技术创新绩效之间的中介作用存在较为明显的差异。吸收能力在科技驱动型产业中,其对外部技术获取和技术创新绩效之间的中介作用较大；在经验驱动型产业中,其对内部研发投入和技术创新绩效之间的中介作用较大,对外部技术获取和技术创新绩效之间的中介作用较小。
In the knowledge economy of today, the globalization of economic activity accelerate technology innovation, present some new challenges, and it is driving companies to take technological innovation as the inevitable choice to improve their international competitiveness. Currently, the boundary of the enterprise and external environment has become increasingly blurred, any technological innovation activities can not be completely isolated. Under this situation, the traditional close innovation model has not meet the need of practice and open innovation is gradually being accepted by the enterprise. With the further reform and opening and national economic construction of rapid and sustainable development, in order to improve the output performance and market competitiveness, more companies continue to increase R&D investment, some companies even believe that R&D investment is the technological innovation investment of resources, the more they input, the higher they get output performance significantly. However, due to the lack of control, some companies, decline their corporate performance and even cause the collapse because they blindly increase innovation investment, we can see from that enterprise innovation investment is at risk under the open innovation environment. In this paper, we pay more attention to solve the following3problems:(1) what are the effect mechanism of technological innovation investment to technological innovation performance of enterprise?(2) what factors should be emphasized in the relation between technological innovation investment and the technological innovation output performance?(3) what's the difference for technological innovation investment effect technology innovation performance in different types of industries?
Combined with the theory of technological innovation, the theory of open innovation and absorptive capacity theory, this study, based on the interaction between absorptive capacity and technological innovation capability, builds a relational model on the relation between technological innovation investment and technological innovation performance. The main contents are as follows:
The chapter1analyzes the research background, research questions, realistic and theoretical significance of the research, and elaborates the contents and methods.
The chapter2, on the basis of home and abroad literature, systematically retrospects the technology innovation theory, the open innovation theory, absorption capacity theory and research resource theory, summarizes existing research important discovery, theory and research methods problem, clears the entry point of the study and builds the theoretical foundation of this paper.
The chapter3, based on the basis of literature review and theoretical analysis of chapter2, proposes a technological innovation performance model on the relation between enterprise technical innovation investment and technological innovation performance, defines the relevant concepts, and proposed various hypotheses of this article.
The chapter4elaborates questionnaire design, data collection, data consolidation validity and research analysis method. In the questionnaire design part, the questionnaire design process and measures to avoid bias, the data collection process, the subjects of the investigation to identify and questionnaire method and recovery process are introduced; at the same time, through no difference tests on a sample consolidation validity to ensure the validity of the merger of the sample; besides all of above, a chosen analysis method is discussed in this part.
The chapter5designs all variables and measurement items, implements an empirical test on a series of hypotheses proposed in Chapter4according to the survey data and the theoretical model from chapter4, and compares and analyses test results with the expected assumptions and research conclusions. According to " Innovation inputs-ability performance" mechanism, this study explores the interactive mechanism between technological innovation investment and technological innovation performance through absorptive capacity and technological innovation capability.
Chapter6does researches on comparative analysis on impact of technological innovation investment to technological innovation performance through different types of industry data, including different interaction between technological innovation performance and interior R&D investment, exterior technological merge and cooperated R&D investment, and absorptive capability in different industries.
Chapter7summarizes the theoretical contribution, practical significance and major innovation points, while this study still have some deficiency on the theory and methods need to be carried on in future research.
Use the method of combining theoretical research and empirical research, we draw the following main conclusions:
Firstly, there is no directly influential relation between technology innovation investment and technology innovation performance, technology innovation investment impose an indirect impact on technology innovation performance through two mediate variables:absorption capability and technological innovation capability.
We can discover from SEM analysis result that there is no significant impactive relation between technological innovation investment and technological innovation performance because of the join of absorptive capacity and technological innovation capability, which also demonstrate that there is no directly influential relation between technological innovation investment and technological innovation performance, and technological innovation investment impose an indirect impact on technological innovation performance through two mediate variables:absorption capability and technological innovation capability, which also demonstrate that It is not a simple practical way to increase investment in technological innovation to increase the performance of technical innovation, the only feasible way to improve enterprise technological innovation performance focuses on the coordinated development of the absorptive capacity, technological innovation capability and technological innovation investment.
Secondly, we verified the important role of absorptive capacity in technological innovation activities of enterprises.
The results showed that there exists significant positive impact relationship between absorptive capacity and technological innovation capability, at the same time there is a significant positive relationship between absorptive capacity and technological innovation performance, and significant positive impact between technological innovation capability and technological innovation performance. The results show that technological innovation capability plays a part of the intermediary role between absorptive capacity and technological innovation performance. Which proves the conclusion in the previous studies, that the absorptive capacity plays an important role in the relationship of enterprise technology innovation investment to technological innovation performance.
Thirdly, the types of enterprises of different industries, the effect of its technological innovation investment technological to innovation performance are different, absorptive capacity plays different intermediary role in industry of experience-driven and industry of technology-driven.
By different data analysis of industries types, we found that the effect of technological innovation investment and technological innovation performance are different. In Experience-driven industrial innovation knowledge, tacit knowledge as the dominant position, their knowledge viscous, so absorptive capacity plays role of internal R&D investment on technological innovation performance significantly greater than technology-driven industry; in technology-driven industries innovative knowledge, explicit knowledge as dominant position, their knowledge is less viscous, absorptive capacity, technology purchase investment and cooperation R&D investment is significantly greater than the role of technological innovation performance experience-driven industry. Absorptive capacity plays more important role between the external technology acquisition and technological innovation performance in technology-driven industries, representing a less important role in experience-driven industry. This also led to technological innovation investment activities on technological innovation performance industry differences.
This study mainly reflects the following aspects of innovations:
Firstly, this research builds a relational model of technological innovation investment and technological innovation performance, which creatively use process-oriented absorptive capacity and results-oriented technological innovation capability as mediate variables to explain the impactive mechanism of technological innovation investment to in technological innovation performance. The model explains to a certain extent the phenomenon of "input-output paradox", and points out that technological innovation investment of enterprises is not directly affect the technological innovation performance, but also indirectly affect the technological innovation performance by the interactive roles of absorptive capacity and technological innovation capability.
Secondly, this study found the different role that absorptive capacity and technological innovation capability affect the relationship between technology purchase investment and technological innovation performance. The results display, technology purchased investment in technological innovation investment produce an indirect impact on the relationship of absorption capacity to technological innovation performance; technology purchase investment directly affect role of technological innovation capability is not significant, just generated by the absorptive capacity of the intermediary role of technological innovation capability indirect effects of an indirect effect on technical innovation performance.
Thirdly, this study found that the absorptive capacity of the intermediary role of technological innovation investment on technological innovation performance there was obvious difference in the types of businesses in different industries. Dominant position in technology-driven industries, business innovation knowledge dominant scientific and technological knowledge, explicit knowledge is less viscous absorption capacity in science and technology-driven industry model, its intermediary role; experience-driven industries, business innovation knowledge hidden technical know-how dominant position, the tacit knowledge viscous, the absorption capacity in experience-driven industry model, the smaller intermediary role.
本文的研究结合技术创新理论、开放式创新理论和吸收能力理论,建立了技术创新投入通过吸收能力和技术创新能力的中介作用对技术创新绩效产生影响作用的研究模型,研究了企业技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的影响作用,以及吸收能力在模型中影响作用的行业差异性。主要的研究内容如下：
第一章主要分析本文的理论研究背景和现实研究背景,提出本文研究的问题,说明本文研究的理论意义与现实意义,并阐述研究方法和研究内容等。
第二章在对国内外文献进行阅读和研究的基础上,系统的回顾和总结技术创新理论、开放式创新理论、吸收能力理论的相关研究,构建本文研究的理论基础。
第三章基于对文献综述和理论分析的基础,提出企业技术创新投入对技术创新绩效影响关系研究模型,对相关概念在本文的研究中进行界定,并提出本文的各个研究假设。
第四章就问卷设计、数据收集、数据合并有效性以及研究分析方法进行阐述。从问卷调查研究方法方面叙述调查问卷设计的过程,指出问卷调查法的注意事项,提出避免产生偏差的一些可行措施,介绍本研究调查对象的确定和问卷发放及回收过程,通过对样本无差异性检验保证样本的合并有效性,对本研究所采用的分析方法进行阐述。
第五章首先对变量的测量进行设计,说明对各个变量的测量所采用问项的合理性,根据问卷调查获得的数据对前一章所提出的理论模型中的研究假设进行实证检验。通过将检验结果与预期假设和已有研究结论进行比较分析的方法,按照“创新投入—能力—创新绩效”的研究框架,研究技术创新投入通过吸收能力和技术创新能力对技术创新绩效进行影响的作用机制。
第六章通过对不同行业类型的数据进行对比分析,研究不同行业的技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的影响关系差异,包括内部研发投入、外部技术购买和合作研发投入对技术创新绩效的不同作用,以及吸收能力在不同行业的技术创新投入模型中的不同作用。
第七章的结论与展望对本文研究的主要结论进行阐述,总结本文研究的理论贡献、实践意义和主要创新点,并对本研究在理论和方法上存在的局限和不足之处进行了说明,最后对未来研究方向进行了展望。
运用理论研究与实证研究相结合的方法,本文得出以下主要结论：
第一,企业的技术创新投入与技术创新绩效之间不存在直接影响关系,而是通过吸收能力和技术创新能力这两个中介变量的作用,间接影响技术创新绩效。通过运用结构方程模型(SEM)分析发现,加入吸收能力和技术创新能力这两个中介变量以后,技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的直接影响关系变得不再显著。这说明了企业的技术创新投入与技术创新绩效之间并无直接的影响关系,而是通过吸收能力和技术创新能力这两个变量的中介作用,间接的影响技术创新绩效。这也说明了不能通过简单的增加技术创新投入来达到增加技术创新绩效的目的,注重技术创新投入与吸收能力和技术创新能力的配合、协调发展,才能够最终达到提高企业技术创新绩效的目标。
第二,本文验证了吸收能力在企业技术创新活动中的重要作用。研究结果显示出吸收能力对技术创新能力存在显著正向影响关系,同时吸收能力对技术创新绩效存在着显著正向影响关系以及技术创新能力对技术创新绩效存在显著正向影响关系。研究结果显示了技术创新能力对吸收能力和技术创新绩效之间的部分中介作用。由此验证了前人研究中得到的结论,即吸收能力在企业技术创新投入对技术创新绩效影响关系中起到重要作用。
第三,不同产业类型的企业,其技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的影响作用有所差异,吸收能力在经验驱动型的行业和科技驱动型的行业中,中介作用有所不同。通过不同产业类型的数据对比分析发现,技术创新投入对技术创新绩效的影响作用有所差异。由于经验驱动型产业的创新知识以隐性知识为主导地位,其知识粘性较大,吸收能力的作用较小,因此内部研发投入对技术创新绩效的作用明显大于科技驱动型产业；而科技驱动型产业的创新知识以显性知识为主导地位,其知识粘性较小,吸收能力的作用较大,因此技术购买投入和合作研发投入对技术创新绩效的作用明显大于经验驱动型产业。吸收能力对外部技术获取和技术创新绩效之间的中介作用在科技驱动型产业中,其较在经验驱动型产业中的作用更大。这也导致了不同技术创新投入活动对技术创新绩效的影响作用的行业差异。
本文的创新点包括以下几个：
第一,本文首次使用以过程为导向的吸收能力和以结果为导向的技术创新能力同时作为中介变量,构建了技术创新投入对技术创新绩效影响关系模型。该模型的建立在—定程度上解释了技术创新的“投入—产出悖论”现象,指出企业的技术创新投入不是直接影响技术创新绩效,而是通过吸收能力和技术创新能力的中介作用,间接的影响技术创新绩效。
第二,本文的研究发现了吸收能力和技术创新能力对技术购买投入和技术创新绩效之间影响关系的不同作用。研究结果显示,技术创新投入中的技术购买投入通过吸收能力对技术创新绩效产生间接影响作用；技术购买投入对技术创新能力的直接影响作用不显著,只是通过吸收能力的中介作用对技术创新能力产生间接影响作用,从而对技术创新绩效产生间接影响作用。
第三,本文的研究发现了吸收能力在不同产业类型的企业中,对技术创新投入和技术创新绩效之间的中介作用存在较为明显的差异。吸收能力在科技驱动型产业中,其对外部技术获取和技术创新绩效之间的中介作用较大；在经验驱动型产业中,其对内部研发投入和技术创新绩效之间的中介作用较大,对外部技术获取和技术创新绩效之间的中介作用较小。
In the knowledge economy of today, the globalization of economic activity accelerate technology innovation, present some new challenges, and it is driving companies to take technological innovation as the inevitable choice to improve their international competitiveness. Currently, the boundary of the enterprise and external environment has become increasingly blurred, any technological innovation activities can not be completely isolated. Under this situation, the traditional close innovation model has not meet the need of practice and open innovation is gradually being accepted by the enterprise. With the further reform and opening and national economic construction of rapid and sustainable development, in order to improve the output performance and market competitiveness, more companies continue to increase R&D investment, some companies even believe that R&D investment is the technological innovation investment of resources, the more they input, the higher they get output performance significantly. However, due to the lack of control, some companies, decline their corporate performance and even cause the collapse because they blindly increase innovation investment, we can see from that enterprise innovation investment is at risk under the open innovation environment. In this paper, we pay more attention to solve the following3problems:(1) what are the effect mechanism of technological innovation investment to technological innovation performance of enterprise?(2) what factors should be emphasized in the relation between technological innovation investment and the technological innovation output performance?(3) what's the difference for technological innovation investment effect technology innovation performance in different types of industries?
Combined with the theory of technological innovation, the theory of open innovation and absorptive capacity theory, this study, based on the interaction between absorptive capacity and technological innovation capability, builds a relational model on the relation between technological innovation investment and technological innovation performance. The main contents are as follows:
The chapter1analyzes the research background, research questions, realistic and theoretical significance of the research, and elaborates the contents and methods.
The chapter2, on the basis of home and abroad literature, systematically retrospects the technology innovation theory, the open innovation theory, absorption capacity theory and research resource theory, summarizes existing research important discovery, theory and research methods problem, clears the entry point of the study and builds the theoretical foundation of this paper.
The chapter3, based on the basis of literature review and theoretical analysis of chapter2, proposes a technological innovation performance model on the relation between enterprise technical innovation investment and technological innovation performance, defines the relevant concepts, and proposed various hypotheses of this article.
The chapter4elaborates questionnaire design, data collection, data consolidation validity and research analysis method. In the questionnaire design part, the questionnaire design process and measures to avoid bias, the data collection process, the subjects of the investigation to identify and questionnaire method and recovery process are introduced; at the same time, through no difference tests on a sample consolidation validity to ensure the validity of the merger of the sample; besides all of above, a chosen analysis method is discussed in this part.
The chapter5designs all variables and measurement items, implements an empirical test on a series of hypotheses proposed in Chapter4according to the survey data and the theoretical model from chapter4, and compares and analyses test results with the expected assumptions and research conclusions. According to " Innovation inputs-ability performance" mechanism, this study explores the interactive mechanism between technological innovation investment and technological innovation performance through absorptive capacity and technological innovation capability.
Chapter6does researches on comparative analysis on impact of technological innovation investment to technological innovation performance through different types of industry data, including different interaction between technological innovation performance and interior R&D investment, exterior technological merge and cooperated R&D investment, and absorptive capability in different industries.
Chapter7summarizes the theoretical contribution, practical significance and major innovation points, while this study still have some deficiency on the theory and methods need to be carried on in future research.
Use the method of combining theoretical research and empirical research, we draw the following main conclusions:
Firstly, there is no directly influential relation between technology innovation investment and technology innovation performance, technology innovation investment impose an indirect impact on technology innovation performance through two mediate variables:absorption capability and technological innovation capability.
We can discover from SEM analysis result that there is no significant impactive relation between technological innovation investment and technological innovation performance because of the join of absorptive capacity and technological innovation capability, which also demonstrate that there is no directly influential relation between technological innovation investment and technological innovation performance, and technological innovation investment impose an indirect impact on technological innovation performance through two mediate variables:absorption capability and technological innovation capability, which also demonstrate that It is not a simple practical way to increase investment in technological innovation to increase the performance of technical innovation, the only feasible way to improve enterprise technological innovation performance focuses on the coordinated development of the absorptive capacity, technological innovation capability and technological innovation investment.
Secondly, we verified the important role of absorptive capacity in technological innovation activities of enterprises.
The results showed that there exists significant positive impact relationship between absorptive capacity and technological innovation capability, at the same time there is a significant positive relationship between absorptive capacity and technological innovation performance, and significant positive impact between technological innovation capability and technological innovation performance. The results show that technological innovation capability plays a part of the intermediary role between absorptive capacity and technological innovation performance. Which proves the conclusion in the previous studies, that the absorptive capacity plays an important role in the relationship of enterprise technology innovation investment to technological innovation performance.
Thirdly, the types of enterprises of different industries, the effect of its technological innovation investment technological to innovation performance are different, absorptive capacity plays different intermediary role in industry of experience-driven and industry of technology-driven.
By different data analysis of industries types, we found that the effect of technological innovation investment and technological innovation performance are different. In Experience-driven industrial innovation knowledge, tacit knowledge as the dominant position, their knowledge viscous, so absorptive capacity plays role of internal R&D investment on technological innovation performance significantly greater than technology-driven industry; in technology-driven industries innovative knowledge, explicit knowledge as dominant position, their knowledge is less viscous, absorptive capacity, technology purchase investment and cooperation R&D investment is significantly greater than the role of technological innovation performance experience-driven industry. Absorptive capacity plays more important role between the external technology acquisition and technological innovation performance in technology-driven industries, representing a less important role in experience-driven industry. This also led to technological innovation investment activities on technological innovation performance industry differences.
This study mainly reflects the following aspects of innovations:
Firstly, this research builds a relational model of technological innovation investment and technological innovation performance, which creatively use process-oriented absorptive capacity and results-oriented technological innovation capability as mediate variables to explain the impactive mechanism of technological innovation investment to in technological innovation performance. The model explains to a certain extent the phenomenon of "input-output paradox", and points out that technological innovation investment of enterprises is not directly affect the technological innovation performance, but also indirectly affect the technological innovation performance by the interactive roles of absorptive capacity and technological innovation capability.
Secondly, this study found the different role that absorptive capacity and technological innovation capability affect the relationship between technology purchase investment and technological innovation performance. The results display, technology purchased investment in technological innovation investment produce an indirect impact on the relationship of absorption capacity to technological innovation performance; technology purchase investment directly affect role of technological innovation capability is not significant, just generated by the absorptive capacity of the intermediary role of technological innovation capability indirect effects of an indirect effect on technical innovation performance.
Thirdly, this study found that the absorptive capacity of the intermediary role of technological innovation investment on technological innovation performance there was obvious difference in the types of businesses in different industries. Dominant position in technology-driven industries, business innovation knowledge dominant scientific and technological knowledge, explicit knowledge is less viscous absorption capacity in science and technology-driven industry model, its intermediary role; experience-driven industries, business innovation knowledge hidden technical know-how dominant position, the tacit knowledge viscous, the absorption capacity in experience-driven industry model, the smaller intermediary role.
引文
[1]爱迪思、赵睿,等.企业生命周期[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[2]白洁.技术寻求、开放式自主创新与中国企业的海外投资战略[J].改革与战略,2009,(6)：40-41.
[3]白洁.基于吸收能力的逆向技术溢出效应实证研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(012)：41-45.
[4]彼得.德鲁克.后资本主义社会[M].上海：东方出版社,2009.
[5]曹达华、朱桂龙,等.吸收能力对产学研合作效率调节作用的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2012,32(11)：9-12.
[6]曹勇、苏凤娇,等.技术创新资源投入与产出绩效的关联性研究—基于电子与通信设备制造行业的面板数据分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,31(12)：29-35.
[7]柴金艳.基于开放式创新模式的企业知识产权管理[J].工业技术经济,2008,(9)：18-20.
[8]陈劲,陈钰芬.开放创新体系与企业技术创新资源配置[J].科研管理,2006,27(3)：1-8.
[9]陈劲,吴波.开放式技术创新范式下企业全面创新投入研究[J].管理工程学报,2011,25(4)：227-234.
[10]陈其荣.技术创新的哲学视野[J].复旦学报,2000,(001)：14-20.
[11]陈莞,谢富纪.开放式自主创新与其支撑体系互动机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(3)：58-61.
[12]陈钰芬.开放式创新的机理与动态模式研究[D].浙江大学.博士学位论文,2007.
[13]陈钰芬.企业开放式创新的动态模式研究[J].科研管理,2009,(5)：1-11.
[14]池仁勇、蔡曜宇,等.不同技术创新投入结构下的企业成长性分析——以浙江省高新技术企业为例[J].科技进步与对策,2012,(5)：1-5.
[15]冯鹏志.论技术创新行动的环境变量与特征—一种社会学的分析视角[J].自然辨证法通讯1997,19(4)：39-46.
[16]冯鹏志.技术创新社会行动系统论[M].中国言实出版社,2000.
[17]冯之浚.国家创新系统的理论与政策[M].北京：群言出版社,1999.
[18]傅家骥.技术创新经济学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2006.
[19]傅家骥.技术创新—中国企业发展之路[M].北京：企业管理出版社,1992.
[20]高健.技术创新评价指标研究[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1997.
[21]葛秋萍.经济收益驱力下开放式创新模式的实施条件选择[J].自然辩证法研究,2010,(2)：83-88.
[22]龚春兰.技术交易方式及其成本分析[J].海南大学学报社会科学版,1998,16(3)：32-36.
[23]官建成、史晓敏.技术创新能力和创新绩效关系研究[J].中国机械工程,2004,15(11)：1000-1004.
[24]郭大力、王亚南译.国民财富的性质和原因的研究[M].北京：商务印书馆,1972.
[25]韩霞、白雪.基于开放式创新战略的企业研发模式分析[J].中国科技论坛,2009,(1)：64-67.
[26]郝冉.PLS路径建模在2007北京市诚信调查中的应用研究[D].首都经济贸易大学.硕士学位论文,2008.
[27]何郁冰、陈劲.开放式全面创新-理论框架与案例分析[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社科版),2009(3)：59-64.
[28]后锐、张毕西.企业开放式创新：概念、模型及其风险规避[J].科技进步与对策,2006,(3)：140-142.
[29]胡承浩、金明浩.论开放式创新模式下的企业知识产权战略[J].科技与法律,2008,(2)：49-53.
[30]胡志坚、金吾伦,等.国家创新系统：理论分析与国际比较[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[31]蒋殿春、黄静.微观层面吸收能力对FDI技术外溢的影响[J].经济与管理研究,2006,(11)：75-79.
[32]靖飞、俞立平,等.高技术产业不同创新路径绩效的比较研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2012,12(3)：110-117.
[33]柯贤能、王强,等.开放式创新模式下的技术搜索及其流程研究[J].图书情报工作,2009,(12)：21-25.
[34]孔继红、茅宁.吸收能力与组织探索性—开发性创新的形成及惯性[J].南京师大学报(社会版),2007,(5)：63-67.
[35]李怀祖.管理研究方法论[M].西安：西安交通大学出版社,2004.
[36]李龙一、陶立华.基于信息技术的开放式创新研究[J].科技管理研究,2009, (11)：19-23.
[37]李娜、李建华.基于专利信息的技术创新能力研究[J].情报科学,2010,(4)：611-615.
[38]李娜、王静敏,等.对企业技术创新能力的解析[J].嘉应学院学报,2010,28(007)：35-37.
[39]李武威.外资研发、技术创新资源投入与本土企业创新绩效：命题与模型[J].情报杂志,2012,31(6)：191-196.
[40]李贞、杨洪涛.吸收能力、关系学习及知识整合对企业创新绩效的影响研究——来自科技型中小企业的实证研究[J],科研管理,2012,33(1)：79-89.
[41]梁莱歆、张焕凤.高科技上市公司R&D投入绩效的实证研究[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(4)：232-236.
[42]刘常勇、谢洪明.企业知识吸收能力的主要影响因素[J].科学学研究,2003,21(003)：307-310.
[43]刘名.开放式创新下的自主知识产权创造研究[D].华中科技大学.硕士学位论文,2008.
[44]刘新智.西部地区开放式科技创新体系构建研究[J].发展研究,2008,(2)：10-13.
[45]柳卸林.技术创新经济学[M].北京：中国经济出版,1993.
[46]路甬祥.创新与未来：面向知识经济时代的国家创新体系[M].北京：科学出版社,1998.
[47]吕世生、张诚.当地企业吸收能力与FDI溢出效应的实证分析—以天津为例[J].南开经济研究,2004,(06)：72-77.
[48]罗炜、唐元虎.合作创新的交易成本分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2001,6(5)：5-6.
[49]倪光南.企业应努力成为自主创新的主体[N].中国企业报,2006,5.11.
[50]宁东玲.知识吸收能力构成维度的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(11)：133-136.
[51]彭正龙.组织认知对中国企业开放式创新的启示[J].山东社会科学,2010,(2)：103-105.
[52]彭志华译.创新与企业家精神[M].北京：企业管理出版社,1989.
[53]任寒青、徐震,等.企业转型中组织学习与开放式创新战略的研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006,(10)：72-74.
[54]荣泰生.企业研究方法[M].北京：中国税务出版社,2005.
[55]茹运青、孙本芝.我国OFDI不同进入方式的逆向技术溢出分析——基于技术创新投入产出视角的实证检验[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(10)：16-20.
[56]森谷正规.日本的技术—以最少的耗费取得最好的成就[M].上海：上海翻译出版社公司,1985.
[57]沈坤荣、耿强.外国直接投资的外溢效应分析[J].金融研究,2000,3：103-110.
[58]沈伟国、陈艺春.我国开放式自主创新体系要素模型分析[J].中国软科学,2007,(11)：129-135.
[59]宋东风.技术能力对企业创新绩效的影响---基于创新战略中介作用的分析[J].科技进步与对策,2012,(15)：1-7.
[60]唐方成、全允桓.经济全球化背景下的开放式创新与企业的知识产权保护[J].中国软科学,2007,(6)：58-62.
[61]汤业国、徐向艺.中小上市公司股权激励与技术创新投入的关联性——基于不同终极产权性质的实证研究[J].财贸研究,2012,(2)：127-133.
[62]陶永明.问卷调查法应用中的注意事项[J].中国城市经济,2011,(4)：305-306.
[63]王长峰.吸收能力与企业创新绩效[J].技术经济与管理研究,2011,(4)：31-34.
[64]王凤洲、宋洁.技术创新投入与绩效的关系研究——基于福建省上市公司的实证分析[J].福建论坛·人文社会科学版,2012,(2)：158-161.
[65]王海花、彭正龙.企业社会责任表现与开放式创新的互动关系研究[J].科学管理研究,2010,(1)：18-21.
[66]王海山.技术创新评价指标研究[J].科学学研究,1993,11(2)：41-48.
[67]王雎.开放式创新下的占有制度：基于知识产权的探讨[J].科研管理,2010,(1)：153-159.
[68]王娟茹、赵嵩正,等.基于知识溢出和吸收能力的知识联盟动态模型[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(1)：107-110.
[69]王明友.知识经济与技术创新[M].北京：经济管理出版社,1999.
[70]王永贵、张玉利,等.对组织学习、核心竞争能力、战略柔性与企业竞争绩效的理论剖析与实证研究—探索中国企业增强动态竞争优势之路[J].南开管理评论,2003,(4)：54-61.
[71]王永齐.贸易溢出、人力资本与经济增长—基于中国数据的经验分析[J].南开经济研究,2006,(1)：101-113.
[72]王玉春、郭媛嫣.上市公司R&D投入与产出效果的实证分析[J].产业经济研究,2008,(6)：44-52.
[73]王圆圆.企业创新：从封闭到开放[J].管理学家,2008,(2)：48-52.
[74]王圆圆、付敏.虚拟经营打造真实品牌[J].管理学家,2008,(9)：62-64.
[75]韦影.企业社会资本与技术创新：基于吸收能力的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2007,9(11)：9-126.
[76]魏江、寒午.企业技术创新能力的界定及其与核心能力的关联[J].科研管理,1998,(6)：12-17.
[77]魏江、许庆瑞.企业创新能力的概念、结构、度量与评价[J].科学管理研究,1995,(5)：50-55.
[78]魏江、许庆瑞.企业技术能力与技术创新能力的协调性研究[J].科学管理研究,1996,14(4)：15-21.
[79]魏江、许庆瑞.企业技术能力与技术创新能力之关系研究[J].科研管理,1996,17(001)：22-26.
[80]温忠麟、侯杰泰.结构方程模型检验：拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2)：186-194.
[81]吴爱华、苏敬勤.人力资本专用性、创新能力与新产品开发绩效—基于技术创新类型的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2012,30(6)：950-960.
[82]吴波.开放式创新范式下企业技术创新资源投入研究[D].浙江大学.博士学位论文,2011.
[83]吴隆增、许长青,等.吸收能力对组织学习和组织创新的影响——珠三角地区高科技企业的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2008,(5)：135-138.
[84]吴婷、李德勇,等.基于开放式创新的产学研联盟知识共享研究[J].情报杂志,2010,(3)：99-102.
[85]吴晓波.二次创新的进化过程[J].科研管理,1995,16(2)：27-35.
[86]夏清华.联盟企业的治理结构、吸收能力与弱势企业的学[J].财经问题研究,2006,(02)：92-96.
[87]肖利平.技术追赶机制研究——一个基于吸收能力与R&D的理论模型[J],财经理论与实践,2011,32(3)：89-93.
[88]谢富纪、徐恒敏.知识,知识流与知识溢出的经济学分析[J].同济大学学报：社会科学版,2001,12(002)：54-57.
[89]谢小芳.市场认同研发投入的价值吗?[J].中国会计评论,2009,(3)：299-314.
[90]徐二明、张晗.企业知识吸收能力与绩效的关系研究[J].管理学报,2008,(6)：841-848.
[91]许庆瑞.研究、发展与技术创新管理[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2000.
[92]薛红志、张玉利.突破性创新,互补性资产与企业间合作的整合研究[J].中国 工业经济,2006,(8)：101-108.
[93]薛云奎、王志台.无形资产信息披露及其价值相关性研究-来自上海股市的经验证据[J].”会计研究,2001,(11)：40-47.
[94]杨静武.开放式创新模式下的技术创新能力研究[J].财经理论与实践,2007,(2)：98-102.
[95]杨仕辉、熊艳,等.吸收能力、研发合作创新激励与补贴政策[J].中国管理科学,2003,(01)：95-100.
[96]杨武.基于开放式创新的知识产权管理理论研究[J].科学学研究,2006,(2)：311-314.
[97]于晓艳.企业集群与开放式技术创新关系研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2010,(2)：44-47.
[98]袁建红、李慧华.开放式创新对企业创新新颖程度的影响[J].科学学研究,2009,(12)：1892-1899.
[99]远德玉.企业技术创新能力的综合评价和动态分析[J].科学管理研究,1994,12(2)：50-52.
[100]袁月.技术创新投入对财务绩效与风险的影响分析——从苹果公司复苏看技术创新的力量[J].财会通讯,2012,(4)：40-41.
[101]曾德明、贾曙光,等.吸收能力视角下联盟企业关系资本对创新能力影响研究[J].中国科技论坛,2011,(5)：21-26.
[102]曾国屏、李正风.世界各国创新系统：知识的生产,扩散与利用[M].济南：山东教育出版社,1999.
[103]张方华.知识型企业的社会资本与技术创新绩效的关系研究[D].浙江大学.博士学位论文,2004.
[104]张继林.价值网络下企业开放式技术创新过程模式及运营条件研究[D].天津财经大学.博士学位论文,2009.
[105]张洁、戚安邦,等.吸收能力形成的前因变量及其对企业创新绩效的影响分析——吸收能力作为中介变量的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(005)：29-37.
[106]张瑶、刘德学.基于全球生产网络的开放式产业创新体系构建[J].科技管理研究,2007,(2)：169-171.
[107]张小兵.知识吸收能力与组织绩效关系：组织学习视角的实证研究[J].管理学报,2011,8(6)：844-851.
[108]张永成、郝冬冬,等.开放条件下企业自主创新与技术引进的关系研究[J].科 技管理研究,2009,(20)：26-29.
[109]张震宇、陈劲.基于开放式创新模式的企业创新资源构成、特征及其管理[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,(11)：61-65.
[110]赵富强、张磊,等.基于PLS路径模型的顾客满意度测评研究[J].北京理工大学学报：社会科学版,2010,12(4)：61-65.
[111]郑小平、刘立京,等.企业开放式创新的产权欲望研究[J].科学管理研究,2007,(3)：42-45.
[112]朱朝晖.基于开放式创新的技术学习动态协同模式研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,(4)：99-103.
[113]Abernathy, W. J., K. B. Clark,1985, "Innovation:Mapping the winds of creative destruction ", Research policy 14(1):3-22.
[114]Ahuja, G., R.Katila,2001, "Technological acquisitions, the innovation performance of acquiring firms:A longitudinal study", Strategic management journal 22(3):197-220.
[115]Amidon, D.,1996, "The challenge of fifth generation R&D", Research Technology Management 39(4):33-41.
[116]Anderson, J. R., C.F.Boyle, et al.,1987, " Cognitive principles in the design of computer tutors ", Modelling cognition:93-133.
[117]Andrawina, L., R. Govindaraju, et al.,2008, Absorptive capacity moderates the relationship between knowledge sharing capability, innovation capability, IEEE.
[118]Archibugi, D.,1992, "Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation:a review", Science, Public Policy 19(6):357-368.
[119]Arora, A., A. Gambardella,1994, "Evaluating technological information, utilizing it:Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 24(1):91-114.
[120]Arora, R.,2002, "Implementing KM:a balanced score card approach", Journal of Knowledge Management 6(3):240-249.
[121]Arundel, A., I. Kabla,1998, "What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms ", Research policy 27(2):127-141.
[122]Atuahene-Gima, K.,1992, "Inward technology licensing as an alternative to internal R&D in new product development:a conceptual framework", Journal of Product Innovation Management 9(2):156-167.
[123]Balbinot, Z.,2005, Building technological capability in Brazilian firms through alliances. Montreal, Theoretical Paper.HEC.
[124]Barney, J.,1991, ""Firm resources, sustained competitive advantage", Journal of management 17(1):99-120.
[125]Barney, J. B.,1999, "How a firm's capabilities affect boundary decisions", Sloan Management Review 40(3):137-145.
[126]Baron, R. M., D.A.Kenny,1986, " The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations ", Journal of personality, social psychology 51 (6):1173.
[127]Barton, D. L.,1992, "Core capabilities, core rigidities:A paradox in managing new product development", Strategic management journal 13(S1):111-125.
[128]Bayona, C., T. Garcia-Marco, et al.,2001, "Firms' motivations for cooperative R&D:an empirical analysis of Spanish firms", Research policy 30(8):1289-1307.
[129]Becker, B. E., M. A. Huselid,1998, "High performance work systems, firm performance:A synthesis of research, managerial implications", Research in personnel, human resource management 16:53-101.
[130]Beecham, M. A., M. Cordey-Hayes,1998, "Partnering, knowledge transfer in the UK motor industry", Technovation 18(3):191-205.
[131]Beije, P. R.,1998, Technological change in the modern economy:basic topics, new developments, Edward Elgar Pub.
[132]Benner, M.J., M.L.Tushman,2003, "Exploitation, exploration, and process management:The productivity dilemma revisited", Academy of Management Review 28(2):238-256.
[133]Bessant, J. R., M. Dodgson,1996, Effective innovation policy:a new apporach, Routledge.
[134]Bontis, N., M. M. Crossan, et al.,2002, "Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks, flows", Journal of management studies 39(4):437-469.
[135]Borensztein, E., J. De Gregorio, et al.,1998, "How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? ", Journal of international Economics 45(1):115-135.
[136]Boynton, A. C., R. W. Zmud, et al.,1994, " The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations", Mis Quarterly:299-318.
[137]Bretschger, L.,1999, "Growth theory, sustainable development", Recherche 67: 02.
[138]Brooking, A.,1996, Intellectual capital, Thomson Learning.
[139]Brouwer, E., A. Kleinknecht,1999, "Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent:An exploration of CIS micro data ", Research policy 28(6):615-624.
[140]Brown, S. L., K. M. Eisenhardt,1997, "The art of continuous change:Linking complexity theory, time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations", Administrative science quarterly:1-34.
[141]Burgelman, R. A., M. M. A, et al.,1988, Strategic management of technology, innovation. New York, McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
[142]Chacko, T. I., J. G. Wacker,2001," An examination of strategic goals, management practices of Russian enterprises", International Business Review 10(4):475-490.
[143]Chen, C. J.,2004, "The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance", R&D Management 34(3):311-321.
[144]Chesbrough, H., A. K. Crowther,2006, "Beyond high tech:early adopters of open innovation in other industries", R&D Management 36(3):229-236.
[145]Chesbrough, H., R. S. Rosenbloom,2002, "The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation:evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies", Industrial, corporate change 11(3):529-555.
[146]Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke, et al.,2008, Open innovation:Researching a new paradigm, OUP Oxford.
[147]Chesbrough, H. W.,2003, Open innovation:The new imperative for creating, profiting from technology, Harvard Business Press.
[148]Chesbrough, H. W.,2007, "Why companies should have open business models", MIT Sloan management review 48(2):22-28.
[149]Chiu, Y.C., H.C.Lai, et al.,2008," Technological diversification, complementary assets,, performance", Technological Forecasting, Social Change 75(6):875-892.
[150]Christensen, C. M.,2006, "The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption", Journal of Product Innovation Management 23(1):39-55.
[151]Christensen, J. F., M. H. Olesen, et al.,2005, "The industrial dynamics of Open Innovation-Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics", Research policy 34(10):1533-1549.
[152]Christmann, P.,2000, "Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage:The role of complementary assets", Academy of Management Journal:663-680.
[153]Churchill Jr, G. A.,1979, "A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs", Journal of marketing research:64-73.
[154]Cieri, R. M., M. M. Morgan,1999, "Licensing Intellectual Property, Technology from the Financially-Troubled or Startup Company:Prebankruptcy Strategies to Minimize the Risk in a Licensee's Intellectual Property, Technology Investment", Bus. Law.55:1649.
[155]Clark, K.B.,1989, "Project scope, project performance:the effect of parts strategy, supplier involvement on product development", Management science: 1247-1263.
[156]Clark, K.B., T. Fujimoto,1991, Product development performance:Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry, Harvard Business Press.
[157]Coase, R.H.,1937, "The nature of the firm", Economica 4(16):386-405.
[158]Cockburn, I. M., R. M. Henderson,1998, "Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery", The Journal of Industrial Economics 46(2):157-182.
[159]Cohen, W. M., D. A. Levinthal,1989, "Innovation, learning:the two faces of R & D", The economic journal 99(397):569-596.
[160]Cohen, W. M., D. A. Levinthal,1990, "Absorptive capacity:a new perspective on learning, innovation", Administrative science quarterly:128-152.
[161]Conner, K. R.,1991, "A historical comparison of resource-based theory, five schools of thought within industrial organization economics:do we have a new theory of the firm?", Journal of management 17(1):121-154.
[162]Contractor, F. J.,1980, "The composition of licensing fees, arrangements as a function of economic development of technology recipient nations", Journal of International Business Studies 11(3):47-62.
[163]Crepon, B., E. Duguet, et al.,1998, "Research, Innovation, Productivity:An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level", Economics of Innovation, New Technology 7(2):115-158.
[164]Das, T. K., B. S. Teng,2000, " A resource-based theory of strategic alliances", Journal of management 26(1):31-61.
[165]Davenport, T. H., L. Prusak,2000, Working knowledge:How organizations manage what they know, Harvard Business Press.
[166]Day, G. S.,1990, "Market driven strategy:Processes for creating value", Journal of Marketing 55(4).
[167]Day, G. S., R. Wensley,1988, "Assessing advantage:a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority", The Journal of Marketing:1-20.
[168]Dierickx, I., K.Cool,1989, "Asset stock accumulation, sustainability of competitive advantage", Management science:1504-1511.
[169]Dittrich, K., G. Duysters, et al.,2007," Strategic repositioning by means of alliance networks:The case of IBM", Research policy 36(10):1496-1511.
[170]Dodgson, M., D. Gann, et al.,2006, "The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation:the case of Procter & Gamble", R&D Management 36(3): 333-346.
[171]Dosi, G.,1982, "Technological paradigms, technological trajectories:a suggested interpretation of the determinants, directions of technical change", Research policy 11(3):147-162.
[172]Dosi, G.,1988, "Sources, procedures,, microeconomic effects of innovation", Journal of economic literature:1120-1171.
[173]Dunn, S. C., R. F. Seaker, et al.,1994, "Latent variables in business logistics research:scale development, validation", Journal of Business Logistics 15: 145-145.
[174]Dyer, J. H., H. Singh,1998, "The relational view:Cooperative strategy, sources of interorganizational competitive advantage ", Academy of Management Review: 660-679.
[175]Edvinsson, L., M. S. Malone,1997, Intellectual capital:Realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower, HarperBusiness New York.
[176]Eisenhardt, K. M.,1989, "Building theories from case study research", Academy of Management Review:532-550.
[177]Eisenhardt, K. M., J.A.Martin,2000, Dynamic capabilities:what are they?
[178]Enos, J. L.,1962, Invention, innovation in the petroleum refining industry, National Bureau of Economic Reasearch.
[179]Ferguson, P. R., G. J. Ferguson,1994, Industrial economics:issues, perspectives, NYU Press.
[180]Ferris, G. R., M.M.Arthur, et al.,1998, "Toward a social context theory of the human resource management-organization effectiveness relationship", Human Resource Management Review 8(3):235-264.
[181]Fetterhoff, T. J., D. Voelkel,2006," Managing open innovation in biotechnology ", Research-Technology Management 49(3):14-18.
[182]Fiol, C.M., M.A.Lyles,1985, "Organizational learning", Academy of Management Review:803-813.
[183]Fitzgerald, M.,2003, "At risk offshore:US companies outsourcing their software development offshore can get stung by industrial espionage, poor intellectual property safeguards", CIO 17(4):1.
[184]Fornell, C., D. F. Larcker,1981, "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables, measurement error", Journal of marketing research:39-50.
[185]Fowler, F. J.,2009, Survey research methods, Sage Publications, Inc.
[186]Freeman, C., L. Soete,1997, The economics of industrial innovation, Routledge.
[187]Freeman, C., U.University of Sussex. Science Policy Research,1987, Technology policy, economic performance:lessons from Japan, Pinter Publishers London.
[188]Gallini, N. T.,2002, "The economics of patents:Lessons from recent US patent reform", The Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(2):131-154.
[189]Garcia-Morales, V. J., A.Ruiz-Moreno, et al.,2007, "Effects of technology absorptive capacity, technology proactivity on organizational learning innovation, performance:an empirical examination", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19(4):527-558.
[190]Gassmann, O.,2006, "Opening up the innovation process:towards an agenda", R&D Management 36(3):223-228.
[191]George, G., S.A.Zahra, et al.,2001, "The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics, absorptive capacity on performance:a study of biotechnology firms ", The Journal of High Technology Management Research 12(2):205-226.
[192]Gerybadze, A.,2004, "Knowledge management, cognitive coherence,, equivocality in distributed innovation processes in MNCs", MIR:Management International Revi e w:103-128.
[193]Girifalco, L. A.,1991, Dynamics of technological change, Van Nostrand Reinhold New York.
[194]Grandori, A.,2001, "Neither hierarchy nor identity:knowledge-governance mechanisms, the theory of the firm", Journal of management, Governance 5(3): 381-399.
[195]Grant, R. M.,1991, "The resource-based theory of competitive advantage", Strategy:Critical Perspectives on Business, Management 33(3):114-135.
[196]Griliches, Z.,1980, Returns to research, development expenditures in the private sector, University of Chicago Press.
[197]Griliches, Z.,1987, "R&D, productivity:measurement issues, econometric results", Science 237(4810):31.
[198]Guan, J., N. Ma,2003, "Innovative capability, export performance of Chinese firms", Technovation 23(9):737-747.
[199]Hagedoorn, J., M. Cloodt,2003, "Measuring innovative performance:is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? ", Research policy 32(8):1365-1379.
[200]Hagedoorn, J., A. N. Link, et al.,2000, "Research partnerships1", Research policy 29(4-5):567-586.
[201]Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, et al,1998, Black (1998), Multivariate data analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
[202]Hansen, M. T.,2002, "Knowledge networks:Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies", Organization science:232-248.
[203]Harabi, N.,1997, "Channels of R&D spillovers:An empirical investigation of Swiss firms", Technovation 17(11-12):627-635.
[204]Hayes, R. H., S. C. Wheelwright, et al.,1988, Dynamic manufacturing:Creating the learning organization, Free Pr.
[205]Henderson, R. M.,1988, The failure of established firms in the face of technical change:A study of photolithographic alignment equipment, Harvard University.
[206]Henderson, R.M., K.B.Clark,1990," Architectural innovation:The reconfiguration of existing product technologies, the failure of established firms", Administrative science quarterly:9-30.
[207]Hennart, J.F.,1988," A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures ", Strategic management journal 9(4):361-374.
[208]Howells, J., A.James, et al.,2003, "The sourcing of technological knowledge: distributed innovation processes, dynamic change", R&D Management 33(4): 395-409.
[209]Hunt, S. D., R. M. Morgan,1996, "The resource-advantage theory of competition: dynamics, path dependencies, and evolutionary dimensions", The Journal of Marketing:107-114.
[210]Jansen, J. J. P., F. A. J. Van Den Bosch, et al.,2005, "Managing potential, realized absorptive capacity:how do organizational antecedents matter? ", The Academy of Management Journal:999-1015.
[211]Jantunen, A.,2005," Knowledge-processing capabilities, innovative performance: an empirical study", European Journal of Innovation Management 8(3):336-349.
[212]Jensen, M. B., B. Johnson, et al.,2004, Absorptive capacity, forms of knowledge, economic development. Second Globelics Conference. Tsinghua University, Beijing.
[213]Jones, G.K., A. Lanctot, et al.,2001, "Determinants, performance impacts of external technology acquisition", Journal of Business Venturing 16(3):255-283.
[214]Jones, O., M. Craven,2001, "Expanding capabilities in a mature manufacturing firm:absorptive capacity, the TCS", International Small Business Journal 19(3): 39-55.
[215]Kathuria, V.,2001, "Foreign firms, technology transfer, knowledge spillovers to Indian manufacturing firms:a stochastic frontier analysis", Applied Economics 33(5):625-642.
[216]Katila, R., G. Ahuja,2002," Something old, something new:A longitudinal study of search behavior, new product introduction", Academy of Management Journal: 1183-1194.
[217]Kim, L.,1998, "Crisis construction, organizational learning:Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor", Organization science:506-521.
[218]Kim, L.,1999, "Building technological capability for industrialization:analytical frameworks, Korea's experience", Industrial, corporate change 8(1):111-136.
[219]King, D. R., J.G Covin, et al.,2003, "Complementary resources, the exploitation of technological innovations", Journal of management 29(4):589-606.
[220]Knudsen, L. G,2006, Determinants of "Openness" in R & D collaboration:The roles of absorptive capacity, appropriability.
[221]Kogut, B., U. Zander,1992, "Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities,, the replication of technology ", Organization science:383-397.
[222]Koza, M.P., A.Y.Lewin,1998, "The co-evolution of strategic alliances", Organization science:255-264.
[223]Kurokawa, S.,1997, "Make-or-buy decisions in R&D:small technology based firms in the United States, Japan", Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on 44(2):124-134.
[224]Lado, A.A., M.C. Wilson,1994, "Human resource systems, sustained competitive advantage:A competency-based perspective", Academy of Management Review: 699-727.
[225]Lall, S.,1992, "Technological capabilities, industrialization", World development 20(2):165-186.
[226]Lance, C.E., C.L.Noble, et al.,2002, "A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method, correlated uniqueness models for multitrait-multimethod data", Psychological Methods 7(2):228.
[227]Lanctot, A., K.S.Swan,2000, " Technology acquisition strategy in an internationally competitive environment", Journal of International Management 6(3):187-215.
[228]Lane, P. J., B. Koka, et al.,2002, A thematic analysis, critical assessment of absorptive capacity research, Academy of Management.
[229]Lane, P. J., B. R. Koka, et al.,2006, " The reification of absorptive capacity:a critical review, rejuvenation of the construct", The Academy of Management Review ARCHIVE 31(4):833-863.
[230]Lane, P. J., M. Lubatkin,1998,"Relative absorptive capacity, interorganizational learning", Strategic management journal 19(5):461-477.
[231]Langlois, R. N., P.L.Robertson,1995, Firms, markets,, economic change: A dynamic theory of business institutions, Psychology Press.
[232]Laursen, K., A.Salter,2004, "Searching high, low:what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? ", Research policy 33(8):1201-1215.
[233]Laursen, K., A. Salter,2006, "Open for innovation:the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms", Strategic management journal 27(2):131-150.
[234]Lenox, M., A. King,2004, "Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision ", Strategic management journal 25(4):331-345.
[235]Levinthal, D.A., J. G. March,1993, "The myopia of learning", Strategic management journal 14(S2):95-112.
[236]Lichtenthaler, U.,2008, " Integrated roadmaps for open innovation ", Research-Technology Management 51(3):45-49.
[237]Lichtenthaler, U., H.Ernst,2009, "Opening up the innovation process:the role of technology aggressiveness", R&D Management 39(1):38-54.
[238]Lloyd, B.,1998, "Understanding the power, responsibility, leadership, learning links:The key to successful knowledge management", Journal of Systemic Knowledge Management 1.
[239]Luo, Y.,1997, "Partner selection, venturing success:The case of joint ventures with firms in the People's Republic of China", Organization science:648-662.
[240]Lyles, M. A., J. E. Salk,1996, "Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures:an empirical examination in the Hungarian context", Journal of international business studies:877-903.
[241]Mangematin, V., L.Nesta,1999, "What kind of knowledge can a firm absorb?", International Journal of Technology Management 18(3):149-172.
[242]Mansfield, E.,1971, The economics of technical change. New York, W.W.Norton, Company.
[243]March, J. G.,1991, "Exploration, exploitation in organizational learning", Organization science:71-87.
[244]March, J. G.,1996, "Continuity, change in theories of organizational action", Administrative science quarterly:278-287.
[245]McLoughlin, I.,1999, Creative technological change:the shaping of technology, organisations, Psychology Press.
[246]Meyers, P. W.,1990, "Non-linear learning in large technological firms:Period four implies chaos", Research policy 19(2):97-115.
[247]Miotti, L., F. Sachwald,2003, "Co-operative R&D:why, with whom?:An integrated framework of analysis", Research policy 32(8):1481-1499.
[248]Miotti, L., F. Sachwald,2003, "Co-operative R&D:why, with whom?:An integrated framework of analysis ", Research policy 32(8):1481-1499.
[249]Mitchell, W., K.Singh,1992, "Incumbents' use of pre-entry alliances before expansion into new technical subfields of an industry", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 18(3):347-372.
[250]Mowery, D. C., J. E. Oxley,1995, "Inward technology transfer, competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems", Cambridge journal of economics 19(1): 67-93.
[251]Mowery, D. C., J. E. Oxley, et al.,1996, "Strategic alliances, interfirm knowledge transfer ", Strategic management j ournal 17:77-91.
[252]Mowery, D. C.,N. Rosenberg,1991, Technology, the pursuit of economic growth, Cambridge Univ Pr.
[253]Mueser, R.,1985, "Identifying technical innovations", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 32:158-176.
[254]Narula, R., J. Hagedoorn,1999, "Innovating through strategic alliances:moving towards international partnerships, contractual agreements", Technovation 19(5): 283-294.
[255]Negassi, S.,2004, "R&D co-operation, innovation a microeconometric study on French firms", Research policy 33(3):365-384.
[256]Nelson, R. R.,1993, National innovation systems:a comparative analysis, Oxford University Press, USA.
[257]Nelson, R. R., S. G Winter,1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change, Belknap press.
[258]Nemanich, L. A.,2006, The strategic impact of absorptive capacity on technological innovation:A multi-dimensional, multi-method analysis, University of Houston.
[259]Nicholls-Nixon, C.L.,1994, Absorptive capacity, techology sourcing:implications for responsiveness of established firms, Purdue University.
[260]Nicholls-Nixon, C.L., C.Y.Woo,2003, "Technology sourcing, output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change", Strategic management journal 24(7):651-666.
[261]Nieto, M., P. Quevedo,2005, "Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers,, innovative effort", Technovation 25(10):1141-1157.
[262]Nohria, N., Garcia-Point,1991, "Global strategic linkages, industry structure", Strategic management journal 12(S1):105-124.
[263]Nonaka, I., H. Takeuchi,1995, The knowledge-creating company:How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, Oxford University Press, USA.
[264]Nunnally, J. C.,1978, Psychometric theory, Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
[265]Reilly, C.A., M. L. Tushman,2004, "The ambidextrous organization", Harvard business review 82(4):74-83.
[266]Ocasio, W.,1997, "Towards an attention-based view of the firm", Strategic management journal 18(S1):187-206.
[267]O'Connor, G. C.,2006, "Open, radical innovation:toward an integrated model in large established firms ", Open innovation:researching a new paradigm:62-81.
[268]Odagiri, H.,2003, "Transaction costs, capabilities as determinants of the R&D boundaries of the firm:a case study of the ten largest pharmaceutical firms in Japan ", Managerial, Decision Economics 24:187-211.
[269]Oslo, M.,2005, " Guidelines for Collecting, Interpreting Innovation Data.2005 ", A joint publication of OECD, Eurostat, Organization for Economic Co-Operation, Development. Statistical Office of the European Communities.
[270]Pack, H., L. E. Westphal,1986, "Industrial strategy, technological change:Theory versus reality", Journal of development economics 22(1):87-128.
[271]Pavitt, K.,1984, "Sectoral patterns of technical change:towards a taxonomy, a theory", Research policy 13(6):343-373.
[272]Pavitt, K.,1990," What we know about the strategic management of technology ", California Management Review 32:17-26.
[273]Penrose, E. T., C. N. Pitelis, et al.,1995, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford University Press Oxford.
[274]Peteraf, M. A.,1993," The cornerstones of competitive advantage:a resource-based view", Strategic management journal 14(3):179-191.
[275]Piller, F. T., C. Schaller, et al.,2004, "Customers as co-designers:A framework for open innovation", Munchen:TUM Business School, Department of General, Industrial Management, Technische Universitaet Munchen, Paper 116.
[276]Pisano, G.P.,1990, "The R&D boundaries of the firm:an empirical analysis", Administrative science quarterly:153-176.
[277]Polanyi, M.,1962, Personal knowledge:Towards a post-critical philosophy, Psychology Press.
[278]Powell, W. W.,1998, Learning from Collaboration:Knowledge, Networksin the Biotechnology, Pharmaceutical Industries, Wiley Online Library.
[279]Prahalad, C. K., G.Hamel,1990, "The core competence of the corporation", Harvard business review 68(3):79-91.
[280]Prugl, R., M. Schreier,2006, " "Learning from leading-edge customers at The Sims:opening up the innovation process using toolkits", R&D Management 36(3): 237-250.
[281]Rangone, A.,1999, " A resource-based approach to strategy analysis in small-medium sized enterprises", Small Business Economics 12(3):233-248.
[282]Rothwell, R., M. Dodgson,1991, "External linkages, innovation in small, medium-sized enterprises", R&D Management 21(2):125-138.
[283]Sakakibara, M.,1997, "Heterogeneity of firm capabilities, cooperative research, development:an empirical examination of motives", Strategic management journal 18(S1):143-164.
[284]Sapienza, H. J., A. Parhankangas, et al.,2004, "Knowledge relatedness, post-spin-off growth", Journal of Business Venturing 19(6):809-829.
[285]Sawhney, M., E. Prandelli,2000, "Managing Distributed Innovation in Turbulent Markets ", California Management Review 42(4):31.
[286]Schmidt, T.,2005, "Absorptive Capacity-One size fits all? A Firm-level analysis of absorptive capacity for different kinds of knowledge", ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No.05-072.
[287]Schumpeter, E.,1934, The theory of economic development. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
[288]Shenkar, O., J. Li,1999, "Knowledge search in international cooperative ventures ", Organization science:134-143.
[289]Simon, H. A.,1955, "A behavioral model of rational choice", The quarterly journal of economics 69(1):99-118.
[290]Simon, H. A.,1956, "Rational choice, the structure of the environment", Psychological Review; Psychological Review 63(2):129.
[291]Simon, H. A., C.I.Barnard,1976, Administrative behavior, Cambridge Univ Press.
[292]Simonin, B. L.,1997, "The importance of collaborative know-how:An empirical test of the learning organization ", Academy of Management Journal:1150-1174.
[293]Sirmon, D. G., M. A. Hitt, et al.,2007, "Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value:Looking inside the black box", The Academy of Management Review ARCHIVE 32(1):273-292.
[294]Soh, P. H., E.B.Roberts,2005, "Technology alliances, networks:an external link to research capability", Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on 52(4):419-428.
[295]Solow, R. M.,1956, "A contribution to the theory of economic growth", The quarterly journal of economics 70(1):65-94.
[296]Song, M., C. Droge, et al.,2005, "Marketing, technology resource complementarity:an analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts", Strategic management journal 26(3):259-276.
[297]Soo, C. W., D. F. Midgley, et al.,1999, The process of knowledge creation in organizations, Centre for Corporate Change, Australian Graduate School of Management, University of New South Wales.
[298]Souitaris, V.,2002, "Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation", Research policy 31(6):877-898.
[299]Stock, G N., N. P. Greis, et al.,2001, "Absorptive capacity, new product development", The Journal of High Technology Management Research 12(1): 77-91.
[300]Stokey, N. L.,1995, "R&D, economic growth", the Review of Economic studies 62(3):469-489.
[301]Stoneman, P.,1976, Technological diffusion, the computer revolution:the UK experience, CUP Archive.
[302]Suarez, F. F.,2004, " Battles for technological dominance:an integrative framework", Research policy 33(2):271-286.
[303]Subramaniam, M., M. A. Youndt,2005, "The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities", The Academy of Management Journal: 450-463.
[304]Teece, D. J.,1986, "Profiting from technological innovation:Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, public policy", Research policy 15(6): 285-305.
[305]Teece, D. J.,2006, "Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation"", Research policy 35(8):1131-1146.
[306]Teece, D. J., G Pisano, et al.,2005, " Dynamic capabilities, strategic management", Knowledge management:critical perspectives on business, management 2(7):234.
[307]Therin, F.,2003, Organizational learning, innovation in high-tech small firms, IEEE.
[308]Thomke, S.H., E.v.Hippel,2003,'‘让客户帮你创新”,哈佛商业评论(01M)：110-119.
[309]Tidd, J., M. J. Trewhella,1997, "Organizational, technological antecedents for knowledge acquisition, learning", R&D Management 27(4):359-375.
[310]Tracey, M., M. A. Vonderembse, et al.,1999,"Manufacturing technology, strategy formulation:keys to enhancing competitiveness, improving performance", Journal of Operations Management 17(4):411-428.
[311]Tripsas, M.,1997, " Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets, incumbent survival in the typesetter industry", Strategic management journal 18(s 1):119-142.
[312]Tsai, K. H., J. C. Wang,2007, "Inward technology licensing, firm performance: a longitudinal study", R&D Management 37(2):151-160.
[313]Tsai, W.,2001, "Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks:Effects of network position, absorptive capacity on business unit innovation, performance", Academy of Management Journal:996-1004.
[314]Tsang, E. W. K.,1997, "Choice of international technology transfer mode:A resource-based view", MIR:Management International Review:151-168.
[315]Tu, Q., M. A. Vonderembse, et al.,2006, " Absorptive capacity:Enhancing the assimilation of time-based manufacturing practices ", Journal of Operations Management 24(5):692-710.
[316]Tushman, M.L., P. Anderson,1986," Technological discontinuities, organizational environments", Administrative science quarterly:439-465.
[317]Tushman, M.L., D.Nadler,1986, "Organizing for innovation", California Management Review 27(3).
[318]Tyler, B.B., H. Kevin Steensma,1995, "Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities:A cognitive modeling perspective", Strategic management journal 16(S1):43-70.
[319]Utterback, J. M., M. H. Meyer,1993," The product family, the dynamics of core capability", Sloan Management Review 34:29-47.
[320]Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., H. W. Volberda, et al.,1999, " Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity, knowledge environment:Organizational forms, combinative capabilities ", Organization science:551-568.
[321]Van der Meer, H.,2007, "Open innovation-the Dutch treat:challenges in thinking in business models", Creativity, Innovation Management 16(2):192-202.
[322]Vanhaverbeke, W., M. Cloodt,2010,价值网络的开放式创新.北京：科学出版社.亨利.切萨布鲁夫,维姆.范哈佛贝克,乔.韦斯特,开放创新的新范式.
[323]Veugelers,R.,1997,"Internal R & D expenditures, external technology sourcing", Research policy 26(3):303-315.
[324]Veugelers, R., B. Cassiman,2005, "R&D cooperation between firms, universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing", International Journal of Industrial Organization 23(5):355-379.
[325]Vinding, A. L.,2006, "Absorptive capacity, innovative performance:A human capital approach", Economics of Innovation, New Technology 15(4-5):507-517.
[326]Von Hippel, E.,1986, "Lead users:a source of novel product concepts", Management science:791-805.
[327]Von Hippel, E.,1988, The sources of innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
[328]Von Hippel, E., G. Von Krogh,2006, "Free revealing, the private-collective model for innovation incentives", R&D Management 36(3):295-306.
[329]Wang, C., I. Lu, et al.,2008, "Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty", Technovation 28(6):349-363.
[330]Wernerfelt, B.,1984, "A resource-based view of the firm", Strategic management journal 5(2):171-180.
[331]West, J.,2006, "Does appropriability enable or retard open innovation?", Open innovation:researching a new paradigm:109-133.
[332]West, J., S. Gallagher,2006, "Challenges of open innovation:the paradox of firm investment in open-source software ", R&D Management 36(3):319-331.
[333]Williamson, O. E.,1979, "Transaction-cost economics:the governance of contractual relations ", Journal of law, economics 22(2):233-261.
[334]Wong, V., V.Shaw, et al.,1999, "Intra-firm learning in technology transfer:a study of Taiwanese information technology firms", International Journal of Innovation Management 3:427-458.
[335]Wu, B., J.Chen,2008, Definition, configuration, evaluation of Technology Innovation Capability in Open Innovation paradigm, IEEE.
[336]Yam, R., J. C. Guan, et al.,2004, "An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms:some empirical findings in Beijing, China", Research policy 33(8):1123-1140.
[337]Yli-Renko, H. E. Autio, et al.,2001, "Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology based firms ", Strategic management journal 22:587-613.
[338]Yoshikawa, T.,2003, "Technology development, acquisition strategy", International Journal of Technology Management 25(6):666-674.
[339]Zahra, S. A., G. George,2002, " Absorptive capacity:A review, reconceptualization,, extension", Academy of Management Review:185-203.
[2]白洁.技术寻求、开放式自主创新与中国企业的海外投资战略[J].改革与战略,2009,(6)：40-41.
[3]白洁.基于吸收能力的逆向技术溢出效应实证研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(012)：41-45.
[4]彼得.德鲁克.后资本主义社会[M].上海：东方出版社,2009.
[5]曹达华、朱桂龙,等.吸收能力对产学研合作效率调节作用的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2012,32(11)：9-12.
[6]曹勇、苏凤娇,等.技术创新资源投入与产出绩效的关联性研究—基于电子与通信设备制造行业的面板数据分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,31(12)：29-35.
[7]柴金艳.基于开放式创新模式的企业知识产权管理[J].工业技术经济,2008,(9)：18-20.
[8]陈劲,陈钰芬.开放创新体系与企业技术创新资源配置[J].科研管理,2006,27(3)：1-8.
[9]陈劲,吴波.开放式技术创新范式下企业全面创新投入研究[J].管理工程学报,2011,25(4)：227-234.
[10]陈其荣.技术创新的哲学视野[J].复旦学报,2000,(001)：14-20.
[11]陈莞,谢富纪.开放式自主创新与其支撑体系互动机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(3)：58-61.
[12]陈钰芬.开放式创新的机理与动态模式研究[D].浙江大学.博士学位论文,2007.
[13]陈钰芬.企业开放式创新的动态模式研究[J].科研管理,2009,(5)：1-11.
[14]池仁勇、蔡曜宇,等.不同技术创新投入结构下的企业成长性分析——以浙江省高新技术企业为例[J].科技进步与对策,2012,(5)：1-5.
[15]冯鹏志.论技术创新行动的环境变量与特征—一种社会学的分析视角[J].自然辨证法通讯1997,19(4)：39-46.
[16]冯鹏志.技术创新社会行动系统论[M].中国言实出版社,2000.
[17]冯之浚.国家创新系统的理论与政策[M].北京：群言出版社,1999.
[18]傅家骥.技术创新经济学[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2006.
[19]傅家骥.技术创新—中国企业发展之路[M].北京：企业管理出版社,1992.
[20]高健.技术创新评价指标研究[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1997.
[21]葛秋萍.经济收益驱力下开放式创新模式的实施条件选择[J].自然辩证法研究,2010,(2)：83-88.
[22]龚春兰.技术交易方式及其成本分析[J].海南大学学报社会科学版,1998,16(3)：32-36.
[23]官建成、史晓敏.技术创新能力和创新绩效关系研究[J].中国机械工程,2004,15(11)：1000-1004.
[24]郭大力、王亚南译.国民财富的性质和原因的研究[M].北京：商务印书馆,1972.
[25]韩霞、白雪.基于开放式创新战略的企业研发模式分析[J].中国科技论坛,2009,(1)：64-67.
[26]郝冉.PLS路径建模在2007北京市诚信调查中的应用研究[D].首都经济贸易大学.硕士学位论文,2008.
[27]何郁冰、陈劲.开放式全面创新-理论框架与案例分析[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社科版),2009(3)：59-64.
[28]后锐、张毕西.企业开放式创新：概念、模型及其风险规避[J].科技进步与对策,2006,(3)：140-142.
[29]胡承浩、金明浩.论开放式创新模式下的企业知识产权战略[J].科技与法律,2008,(2)：49-53.
[30]胡志坚、金吾伦,等.国家创新系统：理论分析与国际比较[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[31]蒋殿春、黄静.微观层面吸收能力对FDI技术外溢的影响[J].经济与管理研究,2006,(11)：75-79.
[32]靖飞、俞立平,等.高技术产业不同创新路径绩效的比较研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2012,12(3)：110-117.
[33]柯贤能、王强,等.开放式创新模式下的技术搜索及其流程研究[J].图书情报工作,2009,(12)：21-25.
[34]孔继红、茅宁.吸收能力与组织探索性—开发性创新的形成及惯性[J].南京师大学报(社会版),2007,(5)：63-67.
[35]李怀祖.管理研究方法论[M].西安：西安交通大学出版社,2004.
[36]李龙一、陶立华.基于信息技术的开放式创新研究[J].科技管理研究,2009, (11)：19-23.
[37]李娜、李建华.基于专利信息的技术创新能力研究[J].情报科学,2010,(4)：611-615.
[38]李娜、王静敏,等.对企业技术创新能力的解析[J].嘉应学院学报,2010,28(007)：35-37.
[39]李武威.外资研发、技术创新资源投入与本土企业创新绩效：命题与模型[J].情报杂志,2012,31(6)：191-196.
[40]李贞、杨洪涛.吸收能力、关系学习及知识整合对企业创新绩效的影响研究——来自科技型中小企业的实证研究[J],科研管理,2012,33(1)：79-89.
[41]梁莱歆、张焕凤.高科技上市公司R&D投入绩效的实证研究[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(4)：232-236.
[42]刘常勇、谢洪明.企业知识吸收能力的主要影响因素[J].科学学研究,2003,21(003)：307-310.
[43]刘名.开放式创新下的自主知识产权创造研究[D].华中科技大学.硕士学位论文,2008.
[44]刘新智.西部地区开放式科技创新体系构建研究[J].发展研究,2008,(2)：10-13.
[45]柳卸林.技术创新经济学[M].北京：中国经济出版,1993.
[46]路甬祥.创新与未来：面向知识经济时代的国家创新体系[M].北京：科学出版社,1998.
[47]吕世生、张诚.当地企业吸收能力与FDI溢出效应的实证分析—以天津为例[J].南开经济研究,2004,(06)：72-77.
[48]罗炜、唐元虎.合作创新的交易成本分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2001,6(5)：5-6.
[49]倪光南.企业应努力成为自主创新的主体[N].中国企业报,2006,5.11.
[50]宁东玲.知识吸收能力构成维度的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(11)：133-136.
[51]彭正龙.组织认知对中国企业开放式创新的启示[J].山东社会科学,2010,(2)：103-105.
[52]彭志华译.创新与企业家精神[M].北京：企业管理出版社,1989.
[53]任寒青、徐震,等.企业转型中组织学习与开放式创新战略的研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006,(10)：72-74.
[54]荣泰生.企业研究方法[M].北京：中国税务出版社,2005.
[55]茹运青、孙本芝.我国OFDI不同进入方式的逆向技术溢出分析——基于技术创新投入产出视角的实证检验[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(10)：16-20.
[56]森谷正规.日本的技术—以最少的耗费取得最好的成就[M].上海：上海翻译出版社公司,1985.
[57]沈坤荣、耿强.外国直接投资的外溢效应分析[J].金融研究,2000,3：103-110.
[58]沈伟国、陈艺春.我国开放式自主创新体系要素模型分析[J].中国软科学,2007,(11)：129-135.
[59]宋东风.技术能力对企业创新绩效的影响---基于创新战略中介作用的分析[J].科技进步与对策,2012,(15)：1-7.
[60]唐方成、全允桓.经济全球化背景下的开放式创新与企业的知识产权保护[J].中国软科学,2007,(6)：58-62.
[61]汤业国、徐向艺.中小上市公司股权激励与技术创新投入的关联性——基于不同终极产权性质的实证研究[J].财贸研究,2012,(2)：127-133.
[62]陶永明.问卷调查法应用中的注意事项[J].中国城市经济,2011,(4)：305-306.
[63]王长峰.吸收能力与企业创新绩效[J].技术经济与管理研究,2011,(4)：31-34.
[64]王凤洲、宋洁.技术创新投入与绩效的关系研究——基于福建省上市公司的实证分析[J].福建论坛·人文社会科学版,2012,(2)：158-161.
[65]王海花、彭正龙.企业社会责任表现与开放式创新的互动关系研究[J].科学管理研究,2010,(1)：18-21.
[66]王海山.技术创新评价指标研究[J].科学学研究,1993,11(2)：41-48.
[67]王雎.开放式创新下的占有制度：基于知识产权的探讨[J].科研管理,2010,(1)：153-159.
[68]王娟茹、赵嵩正,等.基于知识溢出和吸收能力的知识联盟动态模型[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(1)：107-110.
[69]王明友.知识经济与技术创新[M].北京：经济管理出版社,1999.
[70]王永贵、张玉利,等.对组织学习、核心竞争能力、战略柔性与企业竞争绩效的理论剖析与实证研究—探索中国企业增强动态竞争优势之路[J].南开管理评论,2003,(4)：54-61.
[71]王永齐.贸易溢出、人力资本与经济增长—基于中国数据的经验分析[J].南开经济研究,2006,(1)：101-113.
[72]王玉春、郭媛嫣.上市公司R&D投入与产出效果的实证分析[J].产业经济研究,2008,(6)：44-52.
[73]王圆圆.企业创新：从封闭到开放[J].管理学家,2008,(2)：48-52.
[74]王圆圆、付敏.虚拟经营打造真实品牌[J].管理学家,2008,(9)：62-64.
[75]韦影.企业社会资本与技术创新：基于吸收能力的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2007,9(11)：9-126.
[76]魏江、寒午.企业技术创新能力的界定及其与核心能力的关联[J].科研管理,1998,(6)：12-17.
[77]魏江、许庆瑞.企业创新能力的概念、结构、度量与评价[J].科学管理研究,1995,(5)：50-55.
[78]魏江、许庆瑞.企业技术能力与技术创新能力的协调性研究[J].科学管理研究,1996,14(4)：15-21.
[79]魏江、许庆瑞.企业技术能力与技术创新能力之关系研究[J].科研管理,1996,17(001)：22-26.
[80]温忠麟、侯杰泰.结构方程模型检验：拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2)：186-194.
[81]吴爱华、苏敬勤.人力资本专用性、创新能力与新产品开发绩效—基于技术创新类型的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2012,30(6)：950-960.
[82]吴波.开放式创新范式下企业技术创新资源投入研究[D].浙江大学.博士学位论文,2011.
[83]吴隆增、许长青,等.吸收能力对组织学习和组织创新的影响——珠三角地区高科技企业的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2008,(5)：135-138.
[84]吴婷、李德勇,等.基于开放式创新的产学研联盟知识共享研究[J].情报杂志,2010,(3)：99-102.
[85]吴晓波.二次创新的进化过程[J].科研管理,1995,16(2)：27-35.
[86]夏清华.联盟企业的治理结构、吸收能力与弱势企业的学[J].财经问题研究,2006,(02)：92-96.
[87]肖利平.技术追赶机制研究——一个基于吸收能力与R&D的理论模型[J],财经理论与实践,2011,32(3)：89-93.
[88]谢富纪、徐恒敏.知识,知识流与知识溢出的经济学分析[J].同济大学学报：社会科学版,2001,12(002)：54-57.
[89]谢小芳.市场认同研发投入的价值吗?[J].中国会计评论,2009,(3)：299-314.
[90]徐二明、张晗.企业知识吸收能力与绩效的关系研究[J].管理学报,2008,(6)：841-848.
[91]许庆瑞.研究、发展与技术创新管理[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2000.
[92]薛红志、张玉利.突破性创新,互补性资产与企业间合作的整合研究[J].中国 工业经济,2006,(8)：101-108.
[93]薛云奎、王志台.无形资产信息披露及其价值相关性研究-来自上海股市的经验证据[J].”会计研究,2001,(11)：40-47.
[94]杨静武.开放式创新模式下的技术创新能力研究[J].财经理论与实践,2007,(2)：98-102.
[95]杨仕辉、熊艳,等.吸收能力、研发合作创新激励与补贴政策[J].中国管理科学,2003,(01)：95-100.
[96]杨武.基于开放式创新的知识产权管理理论研究[J].科学学研究,2006,(2)：311-314.
[97]于晓艳.企业集群与开放式技术创新关系研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2010,(2)：44-47.
[98]袁建红、李慧华.开放式创新对企业创新新颖程度的影响[J].科学学研究,2009,(12)：1892-1899.
[99]远德玉.企业技术创新能力的综合评价和动态分析[J].科学管理研究,1994,12(2)：50-52.
[100]袁月.技术创新投入对财务绩效与风险的影响分析——从苹果公司复苏看技术创新的力量[J].财会通讯,2012,(4)：40-41.
[101]曾德明、贾曙光,等.吸收能力视角下联盟企业关系资本对创新能力影响研究[J].中国科技论坛,2011,(5)：21-26.
[102]曾国屏、李正风.世界各国创新系统：知识的生产,扩散与利用[M].济南：山东教育出版社,1999.
[103]张方华.知识型企业的社会资本与技术创新绩效的关系研究[D].浙江大学.博士学位论文,2004.
[104]张继林.价值网络下企业开放式技术创新过程模式及运营条件研究[D].天津财经大学.博士学位论文,2009.
[105]张洁、戚安邦,等.吸收能力形成的前因变量及其对企业创新绩效的影响分析——吸收能力作为中介变量的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(005)：29-37.
[106]张瑶、刘德学.基于全球生产网络的开放式产业创新体系构建[J].科技管理研究,2007,(2)：169-171.
[107]张小兵.知识吸收能力与组织绩效关系：组织学习视角的实证研究[J].管理学报,2011,8(6)：844-851.
[108]张永成、郝冬冬,等.开放条件下企业自主创新与技术引进的关系研究[J].科 技管理研究,2009,(20)：26-29.
[109]张震宇、陈劲.基于开放式创新模式的企业创新资源构成、特征及其管理[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,(11)：61-65.
[110]赵富强、张磊,等.基于PLS路径模型的顾客满意度测评研究[J].北京理工大学学报：社会科学版,2010,12(4)：61-65.
[111]郑小平、刘立京,等.企业开放式创新的产权欲望研究[J].科学管理研究,2007,(3)：42-45.
[112]朱朝晖.基于开放式创新的技术学习动态协同模式研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,(4)：99-103.
[113]Abernathy, W. J., K. B. Clark,1985, "Innovation:Mapping the winds of creative destruction ", Research policy 14(1):3-22.
[114]Ahuja, G., R.Katila,2001, "Technological acquisitions, the innovation performance of acquiring firms:A longitudinal study", Strategic management journal 22(3):197-220.
[115]Amidon, D.,1996, "The challenge of fifth generation R&D", Research Technology Management 39(4):33-41.
[116]Anderson, J. R., C.F.Boyle, et al.,1987, " Cognitive principles in the design of computer tutors ", Modelling cognition:93-133.
[117]Andrawina, L., R. Govindaraju, et al.,2008, Absorptive capacity moderates the relationship between knowledge sharing capability, innovation capability, IEEE.
[118]Archibugi, D.,1992, "Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation:a review", Science, Public Policy 19(6):357-368.
[119]Arora, A., A. Gambardella,1994, "Evaluating technological information, utilizing it:Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 24(1):91-114.
[120]Arora, R.,2002, "Implementing KM:a balanced score card approach", Journal of Knowledge Management 6(3):240-249.
[121]Arundel, A., I. Kabla,1998, "What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms ", Research policy 27(2):127-141.
[122]Atuahene-Gima, K.,1992, "Inward technology licensing as an alternative to internal R&D in new product development:a conceptual framework", Journal of Product Innovation Management 9(2):156-167.
[123]Balbinot, Z.,2005, Building technological capability in Brazilian firms through alliances. Montreal, Theoretical Paper.HEC.
[124]Barney, J.,1991, ""Firm resources, sustained competitive advantage", Journal of management 17(1):99-120.
[125]Barney, J. B.,1999, "How a firm's capabilities affect boundary decisions", Sloan Management Review 40(3):137-145.
[126]Baron, R. M., D.A.Kenny,1986, " The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations ", Journal of personality, social psychology 51 (6):1173.
[127]Barton, D. L.,1992, "Core capabilities, core rigidities:A paradox in managing new product development", Strategic management journal 13(S1):111-125.
[128]Bayona, C., T. Garcia-Marco, et al.,2001, "Firms' motivations for cooperative R&D:an empirical analysis of Spanish firms", Research policy 30(8):1289-1307.
[129]Becker, B. E., M. A. Huselid,1998, "High performance work systems, firm performance:A synthesis of research, managerial implications", Research in personnel, human resource management 16:53-101.
[130]Beecham, M. A., M. Cordey-Hayes,1998, "Partnering, knowledge transfer in the UK motor industry", Technovation 18(3):191-205.
[131]Beije, P. R.,1998, Technological change in the modern economy:basic topics, new developments, Edward Elgar Pub.
[132]Benner, M.J., M.L.Tushman,2003, "Exploitation, exploration, and process management:The productivity dilemma revisited", Academy of Management Review 28(2):238-256.
[133]Bessant, J. R., M. Dodgson,1996, Effective innovation policy:a new apporach, Routledge.
[134]Bontis, N., M. M. Crossan, et al.,2002, "Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks, flows", Journal of management studies 39(4):437-469.
[135]Borensztein, E., J. De Gregorio, et al.,1998, "How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? ", Journal of international Economics 45(1):115-135.
[136]Boynton, A. C., R. W. Zmud, et al.,1994, " The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations", Mis Quarterly:299-318.
[137]Bretschger, L.,1999, "Growth theory, sustainable development", Recherche 67: 02.
[138]Brooking, A.,1996, Intellectual capital, Thomson Learning.
[139]Brouwer, E., A. Kleinknecht,1999, "Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent:An exploration of CIS micro data ", Research policy 28(6):615-624.
[140]Brown, S. L., K. M. Eisenhardt,1997, "The art of continuous change:Linking complexity theory, time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations", Administrative science quarterly:1-34.
[141]Burgelman, R. A., M. M. A, et al.,1988, Strategic management of technology, innovation. New York, McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
[142]Chacko, T. I., J. G. Wacker,2001," An examination of strategic goals, management practices of Russian enterprises", International Business Review 10(4):475-490.
[143]Chen, C. J.,2004, "The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance", R&D Management 34(3):311-321.
[144]Chesbrough, H., A. K. Crowther,2006, "Beyond high tech:early adopters of open innovation in other industries", R&D Management 36(3):229-236.
[145]Chesbrough, H., R. S. Rosenbloom,2002, "The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation:evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies", Industrial, corporate change 11(3):529-555.
[146]Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke, et al.,2008, Open innovation:Researching a new paradigm, OUP Oxford.
[147]Chesbrough, H. W.,2003, Open innovation:The new imperative for creating, profiting from technology, Harvard Business Press.
[148]Chesbrough, H. W.,2007, "Why companies should have open business models", MIT Sloan management review 48(2):22-28.
[149]Chiu, Y.C., H.C.Lai, et al.,2008," Technological diversification, complementary assets,, performance", Technological Forecasting, Social Change 75(6):875-892.
[150]Christensen, C. M.,2006, "The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption", Journal of Product Innovation Management 23(1):39-55.
[151]Christensen, J. F., M. H. Olesen, et al.,2005, "The industrial dynamics of Open Innovation-Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics", Research policy 34(10):1533-1549.
[152]Christmann, P.,2000, "Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage:The role of complementary assets", Academy of Management Journal:663-680.
[153]Churchill Jr, G. A.,1979, "A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs", Journal of marketing research:64-73.
[154]Cieri, R. M., M. M. Morgan,1999, "Licensing Intellectual Property, Technology from the Financially-Troubled or Startup Company:Prebankruptcy Strategies to Minimize the Risk in a Licensee's Intellectual Property, Technology Investment", Bus. Law.55:1649.
[155]Clark, K.B.,1989, "Project scope, project performance:the effect of parts strategy, supplier involvement on product development", Management science: 1247-1263.
[156]Clark, K.B., T. Fujimoto,1991, Product development performance:Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry, Harvard Business Press.
[157]Coase, R.H.,1937, "The nature of the firm", Economica 4(16):386-405.
[158]Cockburn, I. M., R. M. Henderson,1998, "Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery", The Journal of Industrial Economics 46(2):157-182.
[159]Cohen, W. M., D. A. Levinthal,1989, "Innovation, learning:the two faces of R & D", The economic journal 99(397):569-596.
[160]Cohen, W. M., D. A. Levinthal,1990, "Absorptive capacity:a new perspective on learning, innovation", Administrative science quarterly:128-152.
[161]Conner, K. R.,1991, "A historical comparison of resource-based theory, five schools of thought within industrial organization economics:do we have a new theory of the firm?", Journal of management 17(1):121-154.
[162]Contractor, F. J.,1980, "The composition of licensing fees, arrangements as a function of economic development of technology recipient nations", Journal of International Business Studies 11(3):47-62.
[163]Crepon, B., E. Duguet, et al.,1998, "Research, Innovation, Productivity:An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level", Economics of Innovation, New Technology 7(2):115-158.
[164]Das, T. K., B. S. Teng,2000, " A resource-based theory of strategic alliances", Journal of management 26(1):31-61.
[165]Davenport, T. H., L. Prusak,2000, Working knowledge:How organizations manage what they know, Harvard Business Press.
[166]Day, G. S.,1990, "Market driven strategy:Processes for creating value", Journal of Marketing 55(4).
[167]Day, G. S., R. Wensley,1988, "Assessing advantage:a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority", The Journal of Marketing:1-20.
[168]Dierickx, I., K.Cool,1989, "Asset stock accumulation, sustainability of competitive advantage", Management science:1504-1511.
[169]Dittrich, K., G. Duysters, et al.,2007," Strategic repositioning by means of alliance networks:The case of IBM", Research policy 36(10):1496-1511.
[170]Dodgson, M., D. Gann, et al.,2006, "The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation:the case of Procter & Gamble", R&D Management 36(3): 333-346.
[171]Dosi, G.,1982, "Technological paradigms, technological trajectories:a suggested interpretation of the determinants, directions of technical change", Research policy 11(3):147-162.
[172]Dosi, G.,1988, "Sources, procedures,, microeconomic effects of innovation", Journal of economic literature:1120-1171.
[173]Dunn, S. C., R. F. Seaker, et al.,1994, "Latent variables in business logistics research:scale development, validation", Journal of Business Logistics 15: 145-145.
[174]Dyer, J. H., H. Singh,1998, "The relational view:Cooperative strategy, sources of interorganizational competitive advantage ", Academy of Management Review: 660-679.
[175]Edvinsson, L., M. S. Malone,1997, Intellectual capital:Realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower, HarperBusiness New York.
[176]Eisenhardt, K. M.,1989, "Building theories from case study research", Academy of Management Review:532-550.
[177]Eisenhardt, K. M., J.A.Martin,2000, Dynamic capabilities:what are they?
[178]Enos, J. L.,1962, Invention, innovation in the petroleum refining industry, National Bureau of Economic Reasearch.
[179]Ferguson, P. R., G. J. Ferguson,1994, Industrial economics:issues, perspectives, NYU Press.
[180]Ferris, G. R., M.M.Arthur, et al.,1998, "Toward a social context theory of the human resource management-organization effectiveness relationship", Human Resource Management Review 8(3):235-264.
[181]Fetterhoff, T. J., D. Voelkel,2006," Managing open innovation in biotechnology ", Research-Technology Management 49(3):14-18.
[182]Fiol, C.M., M.A.Lyles,1985, "Organizational learning", Academy of Management Review:803-813.
[183]Fitzgerald, M.,2003, "At risk offshore:US companies outsourcing their software development offshore can get stung by industrial espionage, poor intellectual property safeguards", CIO 17(4):1.
[184]Fornell, C., D. F. Larcker,1981, "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables, measurement error", Journal of marketing research:39-50.
[185]Fowler, F. J.,2009, Survey research methods, Sage Publications, Inc.
[186]Freeman, C., L. Soete,1997, The economics of industrial innovation, Routledge.
[187]Freeman, C., U.University of Sussex. Science Policy Research,1987, Technology policy, economic performance:lessons from Japan, Pinter Publishers London.
[188]Gallini, N. T.,2002, "The economics of patents:Lessons from recent US patent reform", The Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(2):131-154.
[189]Garcia-Morales, V. J., A.Ruiz-Moreno, et al.,2007, "Effects of technology absorptive capacity, technology proactivity on organizational learning innovation, performance:an empirical examination", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19(4):527-558.
[190]Gassmann, O.,2006, "Opening up the innovation process:towards an agenda", R&D Management 36(3):223-228.
[191]George, G., S.A.Zahra, et al.,2001, "The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics, absorptive capacity on performance:a study of biotechnology firms ", The Journal of High Technology Management Research 12(2):205-226.
[192]Gerybadze, A.,2004, "Knowledge management, cognitive coherence,, equivocality in distributed innovation processes in MNCs", MIR:Management International Revi e w:103-128.
[193]Girifalco, L. A.,1991, Dynamics of technological change, Van Nostrand Reinhold New York.
[194]Grandori, A.,2001, "Neither hierarchy nor identity:knowledge-governance mechanisms, the theory of the firm", Journal of management, Governance 5(3): 381-399.
[195]Grant, R. M.,1991, "The resource-based theory of competitive advantage", Strategy:Critical Perspectives on Business, Management 33(3):114-135.
[196]Griliches, Z.,1980, Returns to research, development expenditures in the private sector, University of Chicago Press.
[197]Griliches, Z.,1987, "R&D, productivity:measurement issues, econometric results", Science 237(4810):31.
[198]Guan, J., N. Ma,2003, "Innovative capability, export performance of Chinese firms", Technovation 23(9):737-747.
[199]Hagedoorn, J., M. Cloodt,2003, "Measuring innovative performance:is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? ", Research policy 32(8):1365-1379.
[200]Hagedoorn, J., A. N. Link, et al.,2000, "Research partnerships1", Research policy 29(4-5):567-586.
[201]Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, et al,1998, Black (1998), Multivariate data analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
[202]Hansen, M. T.,2002, "Knowledge networks:Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies", Organization science:232-248.
[203]Harabi, N.,1997, "Channels of R&D spillovers:An empirical investigation of Swiss firms", Technovation 17(11-12):627-635.
[204]Hayes, R. H., S. C. Wheelwright, et al.,1988, Dynamic manufacturing:Creating the learning organization, Free Pr.
[205]Henderson, R. M.,1988, The failure of established firms in the face of technical change:A study of photolithographic alignment equipment, Harvard University.
[206]Henderson, R.M., K.B.Clark,1990," Architectural innovation:The reconfiguration of existing product technologies, the failure of established firms", Administrative science quarterly:9-30.
[207]Hennart, J.F.,1988," A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures ", Strategic management journal 9(4):361-374.
[208]Howells, J., A.James, et al.,2003, "The sourcing of technological knowledge: distributed innovation processes, dynamic change", R&D Management 33(4): 395-409.
[209]Hunt, S. D., R. M. Morgan,1996, "The resource-advantage theory of competition: dynamics, path dependencies, and evolutionary dimensions", The Journal of Marketing:107-114.
[210]Jansen, J. J. P., F. A. J. Van Den Bosch, et al.,2005, "Managing potential, realized absorptive capacity:how do organizational antecedents matter? ", The Academy of Management Journal:999-1015.
[211]Jantunen, A.,2005," Knowledge-processing capabilities, innovative performance: an empirical study", European Journal of Innovation Management 8(3):336-349.
[212]Jensen, M. B., B. Johnson, et al.,2004, Absorptive capacity, forms of knowledge, economic development. Second Globelics Conference. Tsinghua University, Beijing.
[213]Jones, G.K., A. Lanctot, et al.,2001, "Determinants, performance impacts of external technology acquisition", Journal of Business Venturing 16(3):255-283.
[214]Jones, O., M. Craven,2001, "Expanding capabilities in a mature manufacturing firm:absorptive capacity, the TCS", International Small Business Journal 19(3): 39-55.
[215]Kathuria, V.,2001, "Foreign firms, technology transfer, knowledge spillovers to Indian manufacturing firms:a stochastic frontier analysis", Applied Economics 33(5):625-642.
[216]Katila, R., G. Ahuja,2002," Something old, something new:A longitudinal study of search behavior, new product introduction", Academy of Management Journal: 1183-1194.
[217]Kim, L.,1998, "Crisis construction, organizational learning:Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor", Organization science:506-521.
[218]Kim, L.,1999, "Building technological capability for industrialization:analytical frameworks, Korea's experience", Industrial, corporate change 8(1):111-136.
[219]King, D. R., J.G Covin, et al.,2003, "Complementary resources, the exploitation of technological innovations", Journal of management 29(4):589-606.
[220]Knudsen, L. G,2006, Determinants of "Openness" in R & D collaboration:The roles of absorptive capacity, appropriability.
[221]Kogut, B., U. Zander,1992, "Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities,, the replication of technology ", Organization science:383-397.
[222]Koza, M.P., A.Y.Lewin,1998, "The co-evolution of strategic alliances", Organization science:255-264.
[223]Kurokawa, S.,1997, "Make-or-buy decisions in R&D:small technology based firms in the United States, Japan", Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on 44(2):124-134.
[224]Lado, A.A., M.C. Wilson,1994, "Human resource systems, sustained competitive advantage:A competency-based perspective", Academy of Management Review: 699-727.
[225]Lall, S.,1992, "Technological capabilities, industrialization", World development 20(2):165-186.
[226]Lance, C.E., C.L.Noble, et al.,2002, "A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method, correlated uniqueness models for multitrait-multimethod data", Psychological Methods 7(2):228.
[227]Lanctot, A., K.S.Swan,2000, " Technology acquisition strategy in an internationally competitive environment", Journal of International Management 6(3):187-215.
[228]Lane, P. J., B. Koka, et al.,2002, A thematic analysis, critical assessment of absorptive capacity research, Academy of Management.
[229]Lane, P. J., B. R. Koka, et al.,2006, " The reification of absorptive capacity:a critical review, rejuvenation of the construct", The Academy of Management Review ARCHIVE 31(4):833-863.
[230]Lane, P. J., M. Lubatkin,1998,"Relative absorptive capacity, interorganizational learning", Strategic management journal 19(5):461-477.
[231]Langlois, R. N., P.L.Robertson,1995, Firms, markets,, economic change: A dynamic theory of business institutions, Psychology Press.
[232]Laursen, K., A.Salter,2004, "Searching high, low:what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? ", Research policy 33(8):1201-1215.
[233]Laursen, K., A. Salter,2006, "Open for innovation:the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms", Strategic management journal 27(2):131-150.
[234]Lenox, M., A. King,2004, "Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision ", Strategic management journal 25(4):331-345.
[235]Levinthal, D.A., J. G. March,1993, "The myopia of learning", Strategic management journal 14(S2):95-112.
[236]Lichtenthaler, U.,2008, " Integrated roadmaps for open innovation ", Research-Technology Management 51(3):45-49.
[237]Lichtenthaler, U., H.Ernst,2009, "Opening up the innovation process:the role of technology aggressiveness", R&D Management 39(1):38-54.
[238]Lloyd, B.,1998, "Understanding the power, responsibility, leadership, learning links:The key to successful knowledge management", Journal of Systemic Knowledge Management 1.
[239]Luo, Y.,1997, "Partner selection, venturing success:The case of joint ventures with firms in the People's Republic of China", Organization science:648-662.
[240]Lyles, M. A., J. E. Salk,1996, "Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures:an empirical examination in the Hungarian context", Journal of international business studies:877-903.
[241]Mangematin, V., L.Nesta,1999, "What kind of knowledge can a firm absorb?", International Journal of Technology Management 18(3):149-172.
[242]Mansfield, E.,1971, The economics of technical change. New York, W.W.Norton, Company.
[243]March, J. G.,1991, "Exploration, exploitation in organizational learning", Organization science:71-87.
[244]March, J. G.,1996, "Continuity, change in theories of organizational action", Administrative science quarterly:278-287.
[245]McLoughlin, I.,1999, Creative technological change:the shaping of technology, organisations, Psychology Press.
[246]Meyers, P. W.,1990, "Non-linear learning in large technological firms:Period four implies chaos", Research policy 19(2):97-115.
[247]Miotti, L., F. Sachwald,2003, "Co-operative R&D:why, with whom?:An integrated framework of analysis", Research policy 32(8):1481-1499.
[248]Miotti, L., F. Sachwald,2003, "Co-operative R&D:why, with whom?:An integrated framework of analysis ", Research policy 32(8):1481-1499.
[249]Mitchell, W., K.Singh,1992, "Incumbents' use of pre-entry alliances before expansion into new technical subfields of an industry", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 18(3):347-372.
[250]Mowery, D. C., J. E. Oxley,1995, "Inward technology transfer, competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems", Cambridge journal of economics 19(1): 67-93.
[251]Mowery, D. C., J. E. Oxley, et al.,1996, "Strategic alliances, interfirm knowledge transfer ", Strategic management j ournal 17:77-91.
[252]Mowery, D. C.,N. Rosenberg,1991, Technology, the pursuit of economic growth, Cambridge Univ Pr.
[253]Mueser, R.,1985, "Identifying technical innovations", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 32:158-176.
[254]Narula, R., J. Hagedoorn,1999, "Innovating through strategic alliances:moving towards international partnerships, contractual agreements", Technovation 19(5): 283-294.
[255]Negassi, S.,2004, "R&D co-operation, innovation a microeconometric study on French firms", Research policy 33(3):365-384.
[256]Nelson, R. R.,1993, National innovation systems:a comparative analysis, Oxford University Press, USA.
[257]Nelson, R. R., S. G Winter,1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change, Belknap press.
[258]Nemanich, L. A.,2006, The strategic impact of absorptive capacity on technological innovation:A multi-dimensional, multi-method analysis, University of Houston.
[259]Nicholls-Nixon, C.L.,1994, Absorptive capacity, techology sourcing:implications for responsiveness of established firms, Purdue University.
[260]Nicholls-Nixon, C.L., C.Y.Woo,2003, "Technology sourcing, output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change", Strategic management journal 24(7):651-666.
[261]Nieto, M., P. Quevedo,2005, "Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers,, innovative effort", Technovation 25(10):1141-1157.
[262]Nohria, N., Garcia-Point,1991, "Global strategic linkages, industry structure", Strategic management journal 12(S1):105-124.
[263]Nonaka, I., H. Takeuchi,1995, The knowledge-creating company:How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, Oxford University Press, USA.
[264]Nunnally, J. C.,1978, Psychometric theory, Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
[265]Reilly, C.A., M. L. Tushman,2004, "The ambidextrous organization", Harvard business review 82(4):74-83.
[266]Ocasio, W.,1997, "Towards an attention-based view of the firm", Strategic management journal 18(S1):187-206.
[267]O'Connor, G. C.,2006, "Open, radical innovation:toward an integrated model in large established firms ", Open innovation:researching a new paradigm:62-81.
[268]Odagiri, H.,2003, "Transaction costs, capabilities as determinants of the R&D boundaries of the firm:a case study of the ten largest pharmaceutical firms in Japan ", Managerial, Decision Economics 24:187-211.
[269]Oslo, M.,2005, " Guidelines for Collecting, Interpreting Innovation Data.2005 ", A joint publication of OECD, Eurostat, Organization for Economic Co-Operation, Development. Statistical Office of the European Communities.
[270]Pack, H., L. E. Westphal,1986, "Industrial strategy, technological change:Theory versus reality", Journal of development economics 22(1):87-128.
[271]Pavitt, K.,1984, "Sectoral patterns of technical change:towards a taxonomy, a theory", Research policy 13(6):343-373.
[272]Pavitt, K.,1990," What we know about the strategic management of technology ", California Management Review 32:17-26.
[273]Penrose, E. T., C. N. Pitelis, et al.,1995, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford University Press Oxford.
[274]Peteraf, M. A.,1993," The cornerstones of competitive advantage:a resource-based view", Strategic management journal 14(3):179-191.
[275]Piller, F. T., C. Schaller, et al.,2004, "Customers as co-designers:A framework for open innovation", Munchen:TUM Business School, Department of General, Industrial Management, Technische Universitaet Munchen, Paper 116.
[276]Pisano, G.P.,1990, "The R&D boundaries of the firm:an empirical analysis", Administrative science quarterly:153-176.
[277]Polanyi, M.,1962, Personal knowledge:Towards a post-critical philosophy, Psychology Press.
[278]Powell, W. W.,1998, Learning from Collaboration:Knowledge, Networksin the Biotechnology, Pharmaceutical Industries, Wiley Online Library.
[279]Prahalad, C. K., G.Hamel,1990, "The core competence of the corporation", Harvard business review 68(3):79-91.
[280]Prugl, R., M. Schreier,2006, " "Learning from leading-edge customers at The Sims:opening up the innovation process using toolkits", R&D Management 36(3): 237-250.
[281]Rangone, A.,1999, " A resource-based approach to strategy analysis in small-medium sized enterprises", Small Business Economics 12(3):233-248.
[282]Rothwell, R., M. Dodgson,1991, "External linkages, innovation in small, medium-sized enterprises", R&D Management 21(2):125-138.
[283]Sakakibara, M.,1997, "Heterogeneity of firm capabilities, cooperative research, development:an empirical examination of motives", Strategic management journal 18(S1):143-164.
[284]Sapienza, H. J., A. Parhankangas, et al.,2004, "Knowledge relatedness, post-spin-off growth", Journal of Business Venturing 19(6):809-829.
[285]Sawhney, M., E. Prandelli,2000, "Managing Distributed Innovation in Turbulent Markets ", California Management Review 42(4):31.
[286]Schmidt, T.,2005, "Absorptive Capacity-One size fits all? A Firm-level analysis of absorptive capacity for different kinds of knowledge", ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No.05-072.
[287]Schumpeter, E.,1934, The theory of economic development. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
[288]Shenkar, O., J. Li,1999, "Knowledge search in international cooperative ventures ", Organization science:134-143.
[289]Simon, H. A.,1955, "A behavioral model of rational choice", The quarterly journal of economics 69(1):99-118.
[290]Simon, H. A.,1956, "Rational choice, the structure of the environment", Psychological Review; Psychological Review 63(2):129.
[291]Simon, H. A., C.I.Barnard,1976, Administrative behavior, Cambridge Univ Press.
[292]Simonin, B. L.,1997, "The importance of collaborative know-how:An empirical test of the learning organization ", Academy of Management Journal:1150-1174.
[293]Sirmon, D. G., M. A. Hitt, et al.,2007, "Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value:Looking inside the black box", The Academy of Management Review ARCHIVE 32(1):273-292.
[294]Soh, P. H., E.B.Roberts,2005, "Technology alliances, networks:an external link to research capability", Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on 52(4):419-428.
[295]Solow, R. M.,1956, "A contribution to the theory of economic growth", The quarterly journal of economics 70(1):65-94.
[296]Song, M., C. Droge, et al.,2005, "Marketing, technology resource complementarity:an analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts", Strategic management journal 26(3):259-276.
[297]Soo, C. W., D. F. Midgley, et al.,1999, The process of knowledge creation in organizations, Centre for Corporate Change, Australian Graduate School of Management, University of New South Wales.
[298]Souitaris, V.,2002, "Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation", Research policy 31(6):877-898.
[299]Stock, G N., N. P. Greis, et al.,2001, "Absorptive capacity, new product development", The Journal of High Technology Management Research 12(1): 77-91.
[300]Stokey, N. L.,1995, "R&D, economic growth", the Review of Economic studies 62(3):469-489.
[301]Stoneman, P.,1976, Technological diffusion, the computer revolution:the UK experience, CUP Archive.
[302]Suarez, F. F.,2004, " Battles for technological dominance:an integrative framework", Research policy 33(2):271-286.
[303]Subramaniam, M., M. A. Youndt,2005, "The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities", The Academy of Management Journal: 450-463.
[304]Teece, D. J.,1986, "Profiting from technological innovation:Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, public policy", Research policy 15(6): 285-305.
[305]Teece, D. J.,2006, "Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation"", Research policy 35(8):1131-1146.
[306]Teece, D. J., G Pisano, et al.,2005, " Dynamic capabilities, strategic management", Knowledge management:critical perspectives on business, management 2(7):234.
[307]Therin, F.,2003, Organizational learning, innovation in high-tech small firms, IEEE.
[308]Thomke, S.H., E.v.Hippel,2003,'‘让客户帮你创新”,哈佛商业评论(01M)：110-119.
[309]Tidd, J., M. J. Trewhella,1997, "Organizational, technological antecedents for knowledge acquisition, learning", R&D Management 27(4):359-375.
[310]Tracey, M., M. A. Vonderembse, et al.,1999,"Manufacturing technology, strategy formulation:keys to enhancing competitiveness, improving performance", Journal of Operations Management 17(4):411-428.
[311]Tripsas, M.,1997, " Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets, incumbent survival in the typesetter industry", Strategic management journal 18(s 1):119-142.
[312]Tsai, K. H., J. C. Wang,2007, "Inward technology licensing, firm performance: a longitudinal study", R&D Management 37(2):151-160.
[313]Tsai, W.,2001, "Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks:Effects of network position, absorptive capacity on business unit innovation, performance", Academy of Management Journal:996-1004.
[314]Tsang, E. W. K.,1997, "Choice of international technology transfer mode:A resource-based view", MIR:Management International Review:151-168.
[315]Tu, Q., M. A. Vonderembse, et al.,2006, " Absorptive capacity:Enhancing the assimilation of time-based manufacturing practices ", Journal of Operations Management 24(5):692-710.
[316]Tushman, M.L., P. Anderson,1986," Technological discontinuities, organizational environments", Administrative science quarterly:439-465.
[317]Tushman, M.L., D.Nadler,1986, "Organizing for innovation", California Management Review 27(3).
[318]Tyler, B.B., H. Kevin Steensma,1995, "Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities:A cognitive modeling perspective", Strategic management journal 16(S1):43-70.
[319]Utterback, J. M., M. H. Meyer,1993," The product family, the dynamics of core capability", Sloan Management Review 34:29-47.
[320]Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., H. W. Volberda, et al.,1999, " Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity, knowledge environment:Organizational forms, combinative capabilities ", Organization science:551-568.
[321]Van der Meer, H.,2007, "Open innovation-the Dutch treat:challenges in thinking in business models", Creativity, Innovation Management 16(2):192-202.
[322]Vanhaverbeke, W., M. Cloodt,2010,价值网络的开放式创新.北京：科学出版社.亨利.切萨布鲁夫,维姆.范哈佛贝克,乔.韦斯特,开放创新的新范式.
[323]Veugelers,R.,1997,"Internal R & D expenditures, external technology sourcing", Research policy 26(3):303-315.
[324]Veugelers, R., B. Cassiman,2005, "R&D cooperation between firms, universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing", International Journal of Industrial Organization 23(5):355-379.
[325]Vinding, A. L.,2006, "Absorptive capacity, innovative performance:A human capital approach", Economics of Innovation, New Technology 15(4-5):507-517.
[326]Von Hippel, E.,1986, "Lead users:a source of novel product concepts", Management science:791-805.
[327]Von Hippel, E.,1988, The sources of innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
[328]Von Hippel, E., G. Von Krogh,2006, "Free revealing, the private-collective model for innovation incentives", R&D Management 36(3):295-306.
[329]Wang, C., I. Lu, et al.,2008, "Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty", Technovation 28(6):349-363.
[330]Wernerfelt, B.,1984, "A resource-based view of the firm", Strategic management journal 5(2):171-180.
[331]West, J.,2006, "Does appropriability enable or retard open innovation?", Open innovation:researching a new paradigm:109-133.
[332]West, J., S. Gallagher,2006, "Challenges of open innovation:the paradox of firm investment in open-source software ", R&D Management 36(3):319-331.
[333]Williamson, O. E.,1979, "Transaction-cost economics:the governance of contractual relations ", Journal of law, economics 22(2):233-261.
[334]Wong, V., V.Shaw, et al.,1999, "Intra-firm learning in technology transfer:a study of Taiwanese information technology firms", International Journal of Innovation Management 3:427-458.
[335]Wu, B., J.Chen,2008, Definition, configuration, evaluation of Technology Innovation Capability in Open Innovation paradigm, IEEE.
[336]Yam, R., J. C. Guan, et al.,2004, "An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms:some empirical findings in Beijing, China", Research policy 33(8):1123-1140.
[337]Yli-Renko, H. E. Autio, et al.,2001, "Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology based firms ", Strategic management journal 22:587-613.
[338]Yoshikawa, T.,2003, "Technology development, acquisition strategy", International Journal of Technology Management 25(6):666-674.
[339]Zahra, S. A., G. George,2002, " Absorptive capacity:A review, reconceptualization,, extension", Academy of Management Review:185-203.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |