产业集群发展中的人力资本积累研究
|
摘要
改革开放30多年来,产业集群在全国各地蓬勃发展,已经成为推动区域经济发展的重要增长点。然而,目前其发展成就的取得主要是在过度依赖物质资本和自然资源投入的基础上,这种过度依赖性制约着产业集群的进一步发展。而随着产业集群的升级和转型,人力资本要素在产业集群发展中的作用日益凸显。如何提高人力资本积累水平并使之与产业集群协调发展,已经成为当前国内外学术界关注的重要课题。近年来,为了提高集群人力资本积累水平,促进产业集群发展,各级政府和集群企业均采取了一系列举措。本文研究集群外部政策支持和集群内部企业投入对集群发展的影响效应,对于面临人员规模扩张受限、生产率提升速度缓慢和人力资本结构不合理的杭州高新软件园来说,具有重要的理论和现实意义。
本研究以产业集群理论和入力资本理论为基础,首先全面梳理了国内外者关产业集群发展中人力资本积累的研究成果,从人力资本积累的投资主体、投资类型、积累形式和积累过程四个方面,结合集群人力资本积累的特征,提出了产业集群人力资本积累的形成机制。然后,运用系统动力学原理构建了反映产业集群人力资本积累特点与形成机制的理论模型。在此基础上,针对杭州高新软件园人力资本积累现状、问题及影响因素,对理论模型在变量和参数上进行拓展,详细描述模型的构建过程和结构特征,得到系统反映杭州高新软件园集群人力资本数量积累、质量积累和结构水平与集群发展目标相互影响与作用的系统动力学仿真模型。最后,运用该仿真模型,模拟分析在集群外部政策和内部投入变化情景下集群人力资本积累水平对产业集群发展的影响效应。本研究的主要内容与结论包含以下五个方面：
第一,产业集群人力资本积累问题研究的理论分析框架。在相关理论与文献述评的基础上,结合产业集群人力资本积累的特点,深入分析产业集群人力资本积累的形成机制,运用系统动力学原理,分别构建了反映产业集群人力资本数量积累、质量积累和结构水平与产业集群发展相互影响与作用的理论模型,为下文研究提供了一般分析思路与方法。
第二,杭州高新软件园人力资本积累影响因素分析。在对软件园被调研企业数据进行描述性统计分析的基础上,将统计分析的结果与软件园整体统计数据进行对比,确认被调研企业选取的典型性,并提出了软件园人力资本积累的影响因素为：政府支持、企业投入、集群发展空间、集群发展目标和人力资本结构,并就每一因素与产业集群发展之间的关系进行了深入分析。上述影响因素既是后文模型构建的关键性变量,也是模型仿真模拟情景选择的理论基础。
第三,杭州高新软件园人力资本积累的系统动力学仿真模型构建。根据软件园人力资本积累的影响因素,从数量、质量和结构三个维度分别对理论模型进行变量和参数上的进一步拓展,用函数详细描述变量及参数间关系,并根据软件园实地调研数据和描述性统计分析结果,对参数进行赋值,使之具体反映软件园人力资本数量积累、质量积累和结构水平与政府预期的集群发展目标相互影响与作用的特点。
第四,仿真模型在不同情景下的模拟分析。本文对杭州高新软件园人力资本数量积累、质量积累和结构优化的仿真模型分别设计了不同的情景进行模拟分析,主要结果表明：(1)现实情形下软件园人力资本积累水平与集群发展目标不相一致,其人力资本在数量、质量和结构各维度上均存在调整的空间；(2)政府配置于集群人才引进、安置上的投入占人力资本总投入的比例从17%提高至24%,或者将支持企业研发和员工培训的投入占人力资本总投入的比例从83%提高至95.5%,集群人力资本积累水平可满足政府预期的集群发展目标要求。(3)集群企业用于人力资本数量积累的费用从利润的5%提高至7.1%,或者将配置于研发和员工培训的费用从利润的25%提高至28.6%时,集群人力资本积累水平亦能实现集群发展目标；(4)在软件园发展空间不受限的情景下,政府和企业的人力资本数量积累投入均比质量积累投入更有效,但事实上从2014年开始软件园发展空间将制约软件园人员规模的进一步扩张。政府应从软件园长远发展权衡其在人力资本数量和质量积累上的投入比例,企业应提高研发投入和员工培训投入的产出效益。(5)在保持招聘时间周期不变的条件下,岗前培训时间周期从0.25年调整至0.5年时,未上岗人员数量和已上岗人员数量的增长趋势符合软件园发展实际；(6)将初级和中级人才的成长时间分别从5年和2年缩短为3年和1年,使中、高级人才的比例分别保持在36%和60%左右,则优化的集群人力资本结构可使软件园实现政府期望的发展水平。
第五,主要结论与政策启示。在归纳本文主要研究结论的基础上,以提高集群人力资本积累水平并使之与产业集群协调发展为目标,从完善劳动力市场体系、加强集群外部环境建设、健全政府人力资本投资体系、加强中高级人才引进力度、完善企业培训体系、提高企业培训及研发的投资效益以及优化人力资本结构等方面提出了本文的政策启示。
本文将人力资本积累问题置于产业集群这一特殊的组织形态下进行研究,拓展了人力资本研究的组织界限,突破了以往从产业集群和人力资本积累角度分别进行研究的不足。而且,本文从人力资本的各个维度对产业集群人力资本积累问题进行研究,突破了以往对人力资本积累从单个维度或其中两者进行研究的不足。本文结合产业集群人力资本积累特征和杭州高新软件园人力资本积累现状构建的产业集群人力资本积累各模型系统性地揭示出集群人力资本数量、质量和结构水平与产业集群发展目标之间的影响关系与作用机制。上述模型可以在后续研究中通过不断更新模型参数数据,发展成为一套能长期使用的、用于研究同类软件产业集群或其他知识密集型产业集群人力资本积累问题的科学的分析工具。基于上述仿真模型的模拟分析所得出的研究结论对地方政府制定行之有效的产业集群发展战略具有较高的实用价值,为集群人员规模扩张、生产率提升以及人力资本结构调整等方面提供了前瞻性的决策依据。
Since over30years reform and opening up, industrial clusters have been flourishing across the country and becoming important economic growth point for regional development. However, the achievements that have been made are excessively relied on the input of material capital and natural resources. So, human capital, as a factor of production, is playing an increasingly important role in the industrial cluster development. It has become an important issue for academic researchers on how to improve the level of human capital accumulation and thus to accord with the development of industrial clusters. In recent years, in order to enhance the clusters'human capital accumulation performance, governments at all levels have taken a series of initiatives. The dissertation studies the performance effects on the development goal of the industry cluster by government's support and enterprises' input, and is of great theoretical and practical significance to Hangzhou Hi-tech Software Park who is facing staff's scale limit, average productivity's low increase and human capital structure's impropriety.
The dissertation, based on industrial cluster theory and human capital theory, firstly sorts out the studying achievements on human capital accumulation issues within the development of industrial clusters, and proposes the mechanism of industrial cluster's human capital accumulation from the respects of investors, investment forms, accumulation dimensions and accumulation procedures. Secondly, by employing system dynamics theory, this paper constructs the theoretical models which manifests the features and the forming mechanism of industrial cluster's human capital accumulation. Based on these theoretical models, integrating the present situations, problems and influence factors of Hangzhou Hi-tech Software Park, the paper expands the models with variables and parameters, and describes the constructing procedures and structures'characters in detail, and concludes in system dynamics simulation models demonstrating the mutual relationships between Software Park's human capital's quantity accumulation, quality accumulation and structure level with the goal of the industry cluster. Finally, under the changing senarios of external supporting policy and internal investments, this research analyzes the effects of cluster's human capital accumulation level to the development of the industry cluster by employing the above simulation models. The main contents and the conclusions of this study are as follows.
First, the theoretical analyzing framework about the issue of human capital accumulation in industry cluster's development is built. Based on the relative theories and literatures' review and integrated the characteristics of human capital accumulation in industry clusters, this paper analyzes the forming mechanism of cluster's human capital accumulation in depth, and then constructs the theoretical models manifesting the mutual influence of cluster human capital's quantity accumulation, quality accumulation and structure level with the development of industry cluster by employing the theory of system dynamics, and this provides the basic analysis methodology for the following research.
Second, the influence factors of human capital accumulation for Hangzhou Hi-tech Software Park are analyzed. Base on the descriptive statistical analysis results from the surveyed enterprises data of the software park, this paper compares these results with the statistical data of the whole park, and confirms the typicality of the surveyed enterprises, and puts forward the influence factors of human capital accumulation, namely government's support, enterprises' investments, cluster development space and human capital structure, and analyzes the relationship between each factor and the cluster's development goal. These influence factors are the key variables for the models to be constructed later, and are also the theory foundation to the senarios' selection for the simulation.
Third, system dynamics simulation models of human capital accumulation are constructed for Hangzhou Hi-tech Software Park. According to the influence factors of the Park, the paper expands the models with variables and parameters, and describes the relationships between variables and parameters, and then assign the initial values of the above parameters with the surveyed data and statistical analysis results and thus to specifically reflect the mutual influence effects of quantity accumulation, quality accumulation and structure level with cluster's development goal.
Fourth, simulation analysis is done under different scenarios. Proper scenarios are designed to simulation models of human capital's quantity accumulation, quality accumulation and structure optimization respectively. The main conclusions show that:(1) it is feasible to adjust the cluster's human capital accumulation level in quantity, quality and structure respectively under the current inconsistency situation in software park's human capital accumulation and the cluster's development goal;(2) the cluster's human capital accumulation level can meet the cluster's development requirement if the government raises the proportion of human capital's quantity accumulation fee in the total human capital investments from17%to24%, or raises the proportion of human capital's quality accumulation fee in the total human capital investments from83%to95.5%;(3) if enterprises within the park raises the proportion of human capital's quantity accumulation fee of the profit from5%to7.1%, or raises the proportion of human capital's quality accumulation fee of the profit from25%to28.6%; the above goal can be achieved as well;(4) under the scenario that without the limit of cluster's development space, it is more efficient to invest in human capital's quantity accumulation than quality accumulation either for government or for the enterprises. In fact, from the end of2013, the cluster's development space available will be the most important restraint to the further staff scale's expansion. So, the government should make the trade-off in human capital's quantity investments and quality ones while the enterprises should enhance the input and output efficiency on R&D and staff's training;(5) without changing the recruiting time length, when the newly recruited staff's training time is adjusted from0.25year to0.5year, the increasing trends both for the newly recruited staff t and the working staff are more suitable to the actual development of the cluster;(6) if the upgrade time of primary level talents and medium level talents shortens from5years and2years to3years and1year respectively, the optimized structure with the proportion of36%for medium level staff and60%for high level staff can make the park achieve the desired goal.
Fifth, according to the above theoretical research and simulation analysis, main conclusions are drawn and policy enlightenments are proposed to enhance the cluster's human capital accumulation level and thus to be accord with the cluster's development. The main policy implications points out that the government should make the labor market system mature, strengthen the cluster's external environments' construction and improve human capital investments system while the enterprises within the cluster should establish and develop its staff training system, speed up in personnel training, raise intensity to attract high-quality personnel, enhance the efficiency of R&D investments, and optimize the human capital structure.
Laying on the special organization pattern of industry cluster for the issue of human capital accumulation, the dissertation breaks through the limitations of previous studies either on the industry cluster issue or on human capital accumulation issue separately and extends the study's boundary limit, And what's more, it breaks through the limitation of previous studies on one or two dimensions of human capital accumulation instead of the three. The theoretical models featuring the characteristics of industry cluster's human capital accumulation and the present situation of Hangzhou Hi-tech Software Park reveals the relationship and mechanism of cluster's human capital accumulation in quantity, quality and structure with cluster's development goal. The conclusions drawn based on the analysis of the above simulation models are of high practical value both to local government's strategies making and the cluster staff scale's expanding, productivity's enhancing and structure's adjusting.
本研究以产业集群理论和入力资本理论为基础,首先全面梳理了国内外者关产业集群发展中人力资本积累的研究成果,从人力资本积累的投资主体、投资类型、积累形式和积累过程四个方面,结合集群人力资本积累的特征,提出了产业集群人力资本积累的形成机制。然后,运用系统动力学原理构建了反映产业集群人力资本积累特点与形成机制的理论模型。在此基础上,针对杭州高新软件园人力资本积累现状、问题及影响因素,对理论模型在变量和参数上进行拓展,详细描述模型的构建过程和结构特征,得到系统反映杭州高新软件园集群人力资本数量积累、质量积累和结构水平与集群发展目标相互影响与作用的系统动力学仿真模型。最后,运用该仿真模型,模拟分析在集群外部政策和内部投入变化情景下集群人力资本积累水平对产业集群发展的影响效应。本研究的主要内容与结论包含以下五个方面：
第一,产业集群人力资本积累问题研究的理论分析框架。在相关理论与文献述评的基础上,结合产业集群人力资本积累的特点,深入分析产业集群人力资本积累的形成机制,运用系统动力学原理,分别构建了反映产业集群人力资本数量积累、质量积累和结构水平与产业集群发展相互影响与作用的理论模型,为下文研究提供了一般分析思路与方法。
第二,杭州高新软件园人力资本积累影响因素分析。在对软件园被调研企业数据进行描述性统计分析的基础上,将统计分析的结果与软件园整体统计数据进行对比,确认被调研企业选取的典型性,并提出了软件园人力资本积累的影响因素为：政府支持、企业投入、集群发展空间、集群发展目标和人力资本结构,并就每一因素与产业集群发展之间的关系进行了深入分析。上述影响因素既是后文模型构建的关键性变量,也是模型仿真模拟情景选择的理论基础。
第三,杭州高新软件园人力资本积累的系统动力学仿真模型构建。根据软件园人力资本积累的影响因素,从数量、质量和结构三个维度分别对理论模型进行变量和参数上的进一步拓展,用函数详细描述变量及参数间关系,并根据软件园实地调研数据和描述性统计分析结果,对参数进行赋值,使之具体反映软件园人力资本数量积累、质量积累和结构水平与政府预期的集群发展目标相互影响与作用的特点。
第四,仿真模型在不同情景下的模拟分析。本文对杭州高新软件园人力资本数量积累、质量积累和结构优化的仿真模型分别设计了不同的情景进行模拟分析,主要结果表明：(1)现实情形下软件园人力资本积累水平与集群发展目标不相一致,其人力资本在数量、质量和结构各维度上均存在调整的空间；(2)政府配置于集群人才引进、安置上的投入占人力资本总投入的比例从17%提高至24%,或者将支持企业研发和员工培训的投入占人力资本总投入的比例从83%提高至95.5%,集群人力资本积累水平可满足政府预期的集群发展目标要求。(3)集群企业用于人力资本数量积累的费用从利润的5%提高至7.1%,或者将配置于研发和员工培训的费用从利润的25%提高至28.6%时,集群人力资本积累水平亦能实现集群发展目标；(4)在软件园发展空间不受限的情景下,政府和企业的人力资本数量积累投入均比质量积累投入更有效,但事实上从2014年开始软件园发展空间将制约软件园人员规模的进一步扩张。政府应从软件园长远发展权衡其在人力资本数量和质量积累上的投入比例,企业应提高研发投入和员工培训投入的产出效益。(5)在保持招聘时间周期不变的条件下,岗前培训时间周期从0.25年调整至0.5年时,未上岗人员数量和已上岗人员数量的增长趋势符合软件园发展实际；(6)将初级和中级人才的成长时间分别从5年和2年缩短为3年和1年,使中、高级人才的比例分别保持在36%和60%左右,则优化的集群人力资本结构可使软件园实现政府期望的发展水平。
第五,主要结论与政策启示。在归纳本文主要研究结论的基础上,以提高集群人力资本积累水平并使之与产业集群协调发展为目标,从完善劳动力市场体系、加强集群外部环境建设、健全政府人力资本投资体系、加强中高级人才引进力度、完善企业培训体系、提高企业培训及研发的投资效益以及优化人力资本结构等方面提出了本文的政策启示。
本文将人力资本积累问题置于产业集群这一特殊的组织形态下进行研究,拓展了人力资本研究的组织界限,突破了以往从产业集群和人力资本积累角度分别进行研究的不足。而且,本文从人力资本的各个维度对产业集群人力资本积累问题进行研究,突破了以往对人力资本积累从单个维度或其中两者进行研究的不足。本文结合产业集群人力资本积累特征和杭州高新软件园人力资本积累现状构建的产业集群人力资本积累各模型系统性地揭示出集群人力资本数量、质量和结构水平与产业集群发展目标之间的影响关系与作用机制。上述模型可以在后续研究中通过不断更新模型参数数据,发展成为一套能长期使用的、用于研究同类软件产业集群或其他知识密集型产业集群人力资本积累问题的科学的分析工具。基于上述仿真模型的模拟分析所得出的研究结论对地方政府制定行之有效的产业集群发展战略具有较高的实用价值,为集群人员规模扩张、生产率提升以及人力资本结构调整等方面提供了前瞻性的决策依据。
Since over30years reform and opening up, industrial clusters have been flourishing across the country and becoming important economic growth point for regional development. However, the achievements that have been made are excessively relied on the input of material capital and natural resources. So, human capital, as a factor of production, is playing an increasingly important role in the industrial cluster development. It has become an important issue for academic researchers on how to improve the level of human capital accumulation and thus to accord with the development of industrial clusters. In recent years, in order to enhance the clusters'human capital accumulation performance, governments at all levels have taken a series of initiatives. The dissertation studies the performance effects on the development goal of the industry cluster by government's support and enterprises' input, and is of great theoretical and practical significance to Hangzhou Hi-tech Software Park who is facing staff's scale limit, average productivity's low increase and human capital structure's impropriety.
The dissertation, based on industrial cluster theory and human capital theory, firstly sorts out the studying achievements on human capital accumulation issues within the development of industrial clusters, and proposes the mechanism of industrial cluster's human capital accumulation from the respects of investors, investment forms, accumulation dimensions and accumulation procedures. Secondly, by employing system dynamics theory, this paper constructs the theoretical models which manifests the features and the forming mechanism of industrial cluster's human capital accumulation. Based on these theoretical models, integrating the present situations, problems and influence factors of Hangzhou Hi-tech Software Park, the paper expands the models with variables and parameters, and describes the constructing procedures and structures'characters in detail, and concludes in system dynamics simulation models demonstrating the mutual relationships between Software Park's human capital's quantity accumulation, quality accumulation and structure level with the goal of the industry cluster. Finally, under the changing senarios of external supporting policy and internal investments, this research analyzes the effects of cluster's human capital accumulation level to the development of the industry cluster by employing the above simulation models. The main contents and the conclusions of this study are as follows.
First, the theoretical analyzing framework about the issue of human capital accumulation in industry cluster's development is built. Based on the relative theories and literatures' review and integrated the characteristics of human capital accumulation in industry clusters, this paper analyzes the forming mechanism of cluster's human capital accumulation in depth, and then constructs the theoretical models manifesting the mutual influence of cluster human capital's quantity accumulation, quality accumulation and structure level with the development of industry cluster by employing the theory of system dynamics, and this provides the basic analysis methodology for the following research.
Second, the influence factors of human capital accumulation for Hangzhou Hi-tech Software Park are analyzed. Base on the descriptive statistical analysis results from the surveyed enterprises data of the software park, this paper compares these results with the statistical data of the whole park, and confirms the typicality of the surveyed enterprises, and puts forward the influence factors of human capital accumulation, namely government's support, enterprises' investments, cluster development space and human capital structure, and analyzes the relationship between each factor and the cluster's development goal. These influence factors are the key variables for the models to be constructed later, and are also the theory foundation to the senarios' selection for the simulation.
Third, system dynamics simulation models of human capital accumulation are constructed for Hangzhou Hi-tech Software Park. According to the influence factors of the Park, the paper expands the models with variables and parameters, and describes the relationships between variables and parameters, and then assign the initial values of the above parameters with the surveyed data and statistical analysis results and thus to specifically reflect the mutual influence effects of quantity accumulation, quality accumulation and structure level with cluster's development goal.
Fourth, simulation analysis is done under different scenarios. Proper scenarios are designed to simulation models of human capital's quantity accumulation, quality accumulation and structure optimization respectively. The main conclusions show that:(1) it is feasible to adjust the cluster's human capital accumulation level in quantity, quality and structure respectively under the current inconsistency situation in software park's human capital accumulation and the cluster's development goal;(2) the cluster's human capital accumulation level can meet the cluster's development requirement if the government raises the proportion of human capital's quantity accumulation fee in the total human capital investments from17%to24%, or raises the proportion of human capital's quality accumulation fee in the total human capital investments from83%to95.5%;(3) if enterprises within the park raises the proportion of human capital's quantity accumulation fee of the profit from5%to7.1%, or raises the proportion of human capital's quality accumulation fee of the profit from25%to28.6%; the above goal can be achieved as well;(4) under the scenario that without the limit of cluster's development space, it is more efficient to invest in human capital's quantity accumulation than quality accumulation either for government or for the enterprises. In fact, from the end of2013, the cluster's development space available will be the most important restraint to the further staff scale's expansion. So, the government should make the trade-off in human capital's quantity investments and quality ones while the enterprises should enhance the input and output efficiency on R&D and staff's training;(5) without changing the recruiting time length, when the newly recruited staff's training time is adjusted from0.25year to0.5year, the increasing trends both for the newly recruited staff t and the working staff are more suitable to the actual development of the cluster;(6) if the upgrade time of primary level talents and medium level talents shortens from5years and2years to3years and1year respectively, the optimized structure with the proportion of36%for medium level staff and60%for high level staff can make the park achieve the desired goal.
Fifth, according to the above theoretical research and simulation analysis, main conclusions are drawn and policy enlightenments are proposed to enhance the cluster's human capital accumulation level and thus to be accord with the cluster's development. The main policy implications points out that the government should make the labor market system mature, strengthen the cluster's external environments' construction and improve human capital investments system while the enterprises within the cluster should establish and develop its staff training system, speed up in personnel training, raise intensity to attract high-quality personnel, enhance the efficiency of R&D investments, and optimize the human capital structure.
Laying on the special organization pattern of industry cluster for the issue of human capital accumulation, the dissertation breaks through the limitations of previous studies either on the industry cluster issue or on human capital accumulation issue separately and extends the study's boundary limit, And what's more, it breaks through the limitation of previous studies on one or two dimensions of human capital accumulation instead of the three. The theoretical models featuring the characteristics of industry cluster's human capital accumulation and the present situation of Hangzhou Hi-tech Software Park reveals the relationship and mechanism of cluster's human capital accumulation in quantity, quality and structure with cluster's development goal. The conclusions drawn based on the analysis of the above simulation models are of high practical value both to local government's strategies making and the cluster staff scale's expanding, productivity's enhancing and structure's adjusting.
引文
1 亚当.斯密.郭大力,王亚南译.国民财富的性质和原因的研究.北京：商务印书馆,2008.
2 Mill, J.S. Consideration of representative government,1903.
3 萨伊.陈福生,陈振骅译.政治经济学概论：财富的生产、分配和消费.北京：商务印书馆,1997.
1 柏拉图.郭斌和,张竹明译.理想国.北京：商务印书馆,1986.
2 色诺芬.沈默译.色诺芬注疏集：居鲁士的教育.北京：华夏出版社,2007.
3 威廉·配第.马妍译.赋税论.北京：中国社会科学出版社,2010.
4 亚当.斯密.郭大力等译.国富论.上海：上海三联书店,2009.
5 马克思.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编.资本论节选本.人民出版社,1998.
1 李福柱.人力资本结构与区域经济发展研究.东北大学博士论文.2006.P25
[1]Acemoglu, D.A. Microfoundation for social increasing returns in human capital accumulation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1996,111(3),779-804.
[2]Anderson, T., Hansson, E., & Serger, S.S. The cluster policies whitebook, IKED, August,2004,1-45.
[3]Arthur, M. B., Defillippi, R.J., & Lindsay, V. J. Careers, communities and industry evolution:links to complexity theory. International Journal of Innovation Management,2001,5(2),239-255.
[4]Bandura, A. Self-efficacy:Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review,1977,84(2),191-215.
[5]Baptista, R. & Swann, P. Do firms in clusters innovate more? Rearch Policy, 1998,27,525-540.
[6]Baptista, R. Do Innovations Diffuse Faster within Geographical Clusters? International Journal of Industrial Organization.2000,18(3),515-535.
[7]Barett, A., Connell, P. J. Does training generally work? The return to in company training. Industrial and Labor Relations Review,2001,54(3),647-662.
[8]Barlas, Y. Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review,1996,12(3),183-210.
[9]Barney, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17(1),99-120.
[10]Barron, J., Berger, M. & Black, D. Do workers pay for on-the-job training? Journal of Human Resources,1999,34(2),235-252.
[11]Barron, J.M., Black, D.A. & Loewenstein, M.A. Employer size:The implications for search, training, capital investment, starting wages, and wage growth, Journal of Labor Economics,1987,5(1),76-89.
[12]Bartel, A.P. Training, wage growth, and job Performance:Evidence from a company database, Journal of Labor Economics,1995,13(3),401-425.
[13]Becker, G.S. Human capital:a theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. New York. NBER,1966.
[14]Becker, G. S. Investment in human capital:A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy,1962,70(5),9-49.
[15]Bell, M.,& Albu, M. Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. World Development,1999,27(9), 1715-1734.
[16]Benhabib, Jess.,& Spiegel, M.M. The role of human capital in economic development evidence for aggregate cross country data. Journal of Monetary economics,1994, (34),143-173.
[17]Bent, D. The Formation of knowledge-based clusters in North Jutland and Western Sweden. Working Paper to the DRUID Conference on National Innovation Systems,1999,1-56.
[18]Berry, C.R.,& Glaeser, E.L. The divergence of human capital levels across cities. Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion Paper 2005, (9) No.2091.
[19]Bertinelli, L.,& Zou, B.T. Does urbanization foster human capital accumulation. The Journal of Developing Areas,2008,41(2),171-184.
[20]Best, M.H. Cluster dynamics, the new competitive advantage:The renewal of American industry. London:Oxford University Press,2001.
[21]Bisehi, H., & David, M. Spillover effects and the evolution of firm clusters. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,2003, (50),47-75
[22]Black., Sandra., & Lynch, L. Human Capital Investments and Productivity, American Economic Review,1996,86(2),263-267.
[23]Blackburn, K.,& Varvarigos, D. Human capital accumulation and output growth in a stochastic environment.2008,36(3),435-452.
[24]Blasio, G.,& Addario, S. Do workers benefit more from industrial agglomeration? Journal of Regional Sciences,45(4),797-827.
[25]Brenner T. Simulating the evolution of localized Industrial clusters:An identification of the basic mechanisms. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation,2003, (03),56-89.
[26]Brenner, T.,& Weigelt, N. The evolution of industrial clusters:Simulating spatial dynamics. Advances in Complex System,2001,4(1),127-147.
[27]Bresnahan, T. Gambardella, A.,& Saxenian, A. "Old economy" inputs for "new economy" outcomes:cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys. Industrial and Corporate Change,2001, (10),835-860.
[28]Calantone, R.J. Cavusgil, S.T., & Zhao, Y. Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management,2002, 31(6),515-524.
[29]Capello, R. Spatial transfer of knowledge in high technology milieu:learning versus collective learning process. Regional Studies,1999,33(4),353-365.
[30]Chaninade, C., & Vang, J. Globalization of knowledge production and regional innovation policy:supporting specialized hubs in the Bangalore software industry. Research Policy,37,1684-1696.
[31]Chou, C.Y., & Chen, G.H. How to win the war for talent? Case study in biotech related industries of U.K. Journal of Human Resource Management,2004,4(4): 131-154.
[32]Chung, W., & Kalnins. A agglomeration effects and performance:a test of the Texas lodging industry. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(10),969-988.
[33]Ciccone, A, & Hall, R.E. Productivity and the density of economic activity. The American Economic Review,1996,86(1),54-70.
[34]Ciccone, A. Agglomeration effects in Europe. Europe Economic Review,2002, 46,213-227.
[35]Cindy, F. C., Scott, & Allen, J. Industrial agglomeration and development:A survey of spatial economic issues in East Asia and a statistical analysis of Chinese Regions. Economic Geography,2003,79 (1),295-319.
[36]Coase, R. The nature of the firm. Economica.1937,4,385-405.
[37]Cooke, P. & Lazzeretti, L. Creative cities, cultural clusters and local economic Development, Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing,2008,258-286.
[38]Crespo, N., & Fontoura, M.P. Economic centrality, per capital of Economics and Management, Technical University of Lisbon,2006, (28).
[39]Dangelico, R.M., Garavelli, A.C., & Petruzzelli, A.M. A system dynamics model to analyze technology districts'evolution in a knowledge-based perspective. Technovation,2010, (30),142-153.
[40]Danson, M. New regions and regionalization through clusters:City-regions and new problems for the periphery. International Journal of Public Sector Management,2009,22(3),260-271.
[41]Davis, J.P., Eisenhardt, K.M., & Bingham, C.B. Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review,2007,32(2),480-499.
[42]Dean, A., & Hermessy. The emergence of a Cluster? The biotechnology community in London. Ontario, Rotman School of Management University of Toronto, ISRN Conference, May,2003,1-125.
[43]Doeringer P.B., & Terkla, D.G. Business strategy and cross-industry clusters. Economic Development Quarterly,1999,9(3),225-237.
[44]Eisenhardt, K.M. & Graebner, M.E. Theory building from cases:Opportunities and challenges. The Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(1),25-32.
[45]Enright M.J. Regional clusters and economic development:A research agenda, business networks:prospects for regional development,1996, Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
[46]Enright M.J. Regional clusters:what we know and what should we know, The University of Hong Kong,2001, (11),59-68.
[47]Feldman, M.P. Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography:Location and innovation:The new economic geography of innovation, spillover, and agglomeration. London:Oxford University Press,2000.
[48]Feldman, M.P., Francis, J. & Bercovitz, J. Creating a cluster while building a firm:entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. Regional studies, 2005,39(1),50-129.
[49]Feser, E., Bergman, E., National industry cluster templates:A Framework for Applied Regional Cluster Analysis, Regional Studies,2000,34(3),1-19
[50]Firer, S., & Williams, S.M. Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital,2003, (4),27-31.
[51]Forrester J W. Industrial dynamics:a breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review,1958,36(4),37-66.
[52]Forrester J W. The system dynamics national model:macrobehavior from microstructure modeling growth strategy in a biotechonology startup firm. System Dynamics Review,1989,7(2),93-116.
[53]Forrester J W.,& Senge P. Tests for building confidence in system dynamics. System dynamics TIMS studies in the management sciences. New York: North-Holland,1980,209-228.
[54]Fujita, M.,& Krugman, P. The new economic geography:past, present and the future. Papers in Regional Science,2004,1-83.
[55]Garavan, T.N., Morley M.,& Gunnigle, P., et al. Human capital accumulation, the role of human resource development. Journal of European Industrial Training,2001,25(2),48-68.
[56]Gerlter, M. Tack knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being there. Journal of Economic Geography,2003, (3), 75-99.
[57]Giannini, M. Multiple regimes in human capital accumulation. International Journal of Manpower,21(3/4),246-263.
[58]Giuliani, E. Cluster absorptive capability:An evolutionary approach for industrial clusters in developing countries. The DRUID Summer Conference, 2002,1-13.
[59]Glaeser, E. Geographic concentration in US manufacturing industries:a dart-board approach. Journal of Political Economy,1997, (5),889-927.
[60]Glaeser, E. L., & Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. Journal of Monetary Economics,1995, (36),117-143.
[61]Glaeser, E. L.Learning in Cities. Journal of Urban Economics,1999, (46), 254-277.
[62]Gordon. I., & Mccaml, P. Industrial clusters:complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks, Urban Studies,2000, (37),513-532.
[63]Gyala., & Bakacsi. Eastern European cluster:tradition and transition. Journal of World Business,2002, (37),69-80.
[64]Harrison, B. Industrial districts:Old Wine in new bottles. Regional Studies, 1992,26,469-483.
[65]Harrison, R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G, R., & Carley, K.M. Simulation Modeling in Organizational and Management Research. The Academy of Management Review,2007,32(4),1229-1245.
[66]Harrison, R., Lin, Z., & Carroll, G.R., et al. Simulation modeling in orgni zational and management Research. The Academy of Management Review, 2007,32(4),1229-1245.
[67]He, C.F., Wei, Y.H., & Pan F.H. Geographical concentration of industries in China:the importance of spatial and industrial scale. Eurasian Geography and Economics,48(5),603-625.
[68]Helsley, R. W., & William, C. S. Matching and agglomeration economies in a system of cities. Regional Science and Urban Economies,1990, (2),189-212.
[69]Hill, E.W.,& Brennan, J.F. A methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters:The foundation of regional competitive advantage. Economic Development Quarterly,2000,14(1),65-96.
[70]Holmes, T., & Stevens, J. Geographic concentration and establishment scale. The review of Economics and Statistics,2002,84,682-690.
[71]Holzer, H.J., Block, R.N.,& Cheatham, M., et al. Are training subsidies for firms effective? The Michigan experience, Industrial and Labor Relations Review,1993,46(4),625-636.
[72]Hoobler, J.M.& Johnson, N.B. An analysis of current human resource management. Personnel Review,2004,33 (2),665-676.
[73]Hu, B., & Weng, Q.X. Why talent concentrates to industrial clusters? 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking, and Mobile Computing, WICOM,2008,1-6.
[74]Hu, L.F. Driving Mechanism for service industry cluster in e-business. International Conference on Management and Service Science (MASS), Piscataway:IEEE Computer Society,2011,1-3.
[75]Huang, C., Lina.,& Mei, C., et al. Elucidating the industrial cluster effect from a system dynamics perspective. Technovation,2006(26),473-482.
[76]Huang, C.L. On human capital absorptive multiplication:system dynamics model simulation and policy implications. Statistic Application in Scientific and Social Reform, IISMES,2010,158-169.
[77]Hwang, J.S. Characteristics and development of industrial districts:the case of software clusters in Seoul, South Korea. Knowledge, Industry and Environment: Institutions and innovation in territorial perspective,2002,107-125.
[78]Jan, C.G., Chan, C.C., & Teng, C.H. The effect of clusters on the development of the software industry in Dalian, China. Technology in Society,2012,34, 163-173.
[79]Joo, B.K.,& Mclean, G.N. Best employer studies:A conceptual model from a literature review and a case study. Human Resource Development Review,2006, 5(2),228-257.
[80]Keeble, D., & Wilkinson, F. Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high technology SMEs in Europe. Regional Studies,1999,33(4),295-303.
[81]Klepper, S. The origin and growth of industry clusters:The making of Silicon Valley and Detroit, Journal of Urban Economics,2010, (67),15-32.
[82]Kolko, J. Silicon mountains, silicon molehills:Geographic concentration and convergence of internet industries in the US. Information and Policy,2002,14 (2),211-232.
[83]Krugman, P. Development, geography and economic theory. Cambridge:MIT Press,1995.
[84]Learmonth, D., Munro, A.,& Swales, J.K. Multi-sectoral cluster modeling:The evaluation of Scottish enterprise cluster policy. European Planning Studies, 2003,11(5),567-585.
[85]Lee, J.W.,&. Barro, R.J. Schooling quality in a cross-section of countries. Economica,2001,68(272),465-488.
[86]Liu, R.Z., Weng, Q.X.,& Mao, G.F., et al. Industrial cluster, government agency and entrepreneurial development:A case study of Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province. Chinese Management Studies.2013,7(2),253-280.
[87]Lucas, R.E. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics,1988(22),139-191.
[88]Lucas, R.E. Why doesn't capital flow form rich to poor countries? American Economic Review,1990,80(2),92-96.
[89]Lundvall, B.A. Innovation as an interactive process:From user-producer interaction to the National Innovation Systems. Technology and Economic Theory. London:Pinter Publishers,1988.
[90]Markusen, A. Sticky places in slippery space:a typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography,72(3),293-313.
[91]Marshall, A. Elements of the economics of industry. London:Macmillan Press, 1892.
[92]Marshall, A. Principles of Economics. London:Macmillan Press,1920.
[93]Marshell, P. Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographic cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change,2001, (10),147-160.
[94]Martin, R., & Sunley, P. Paul Krugman's geographical economies and its implications for regional development theory:A critical assessment. Economic Geography.1996,72(3),259-292.
[95]Maskell, E. Knowledge creation and diffusion in geographic clusters. International Journal of Innovation Management,2003, (5),213-237.
[96]Maskell, P. Towards a knowledge based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change,2001, (10),167-185.
[97]Mo, L., Hu, H.Y., & Sun, W.B. Learning levels of collective learning mechanism in industrial cluster. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management,2008, (1),43-62.
[98]Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review,1998,23(2), 242-266.
[99]Naresh, R. P., Gary, AS. Cook., & GM. P. Swann. A comparison of clustering dynamics in the British broadcasting and financial services industries, economics of business,2002 (2),195-224.
[100]Nowak, M.J., & Grantham, C.E. The virtual incubator:managing human capital in the software industry. Research Policy,2000(29),125-134.
[101]Oakey, R., & Cooper, S. High technology industry:agglomeration and the potential for peripherally sited small firms. Regional Studies,1989,23(4), 347-360.
[102]Oliva, R. A dynamic theory of service delivery:implications for managing service quality. PhD thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management,1996.
[103]Packer, D. Resource acquisition in corporate growth. Cambridge MA:MIT Press,1964.
[104]Peppard, J.,& Rylander, A. Leveraging intellectual capital at APION. Journal of Intellectual Capital,2001,2(3),225-235.
[105]Phillimore, J. Beyond the linear view of innovation in science park evaluation: an analysis of Western Australian Technology Park. Technovation,1999,19(11), 673-680.
[106]Pinch, S,& Henry, N. Paul Krugman's geographical economics, industrial clustering and the British motor sport industry. Regional Studies 1999,33 (9), 815-827.
[107]Piore, M.J. The second industrial divide:possibilities for prosperity. Basic books,1984.
[108]Porter, M.E. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review,1998,76(6),77-90.
[109]Porter, M.E. Location, competition and economic development:Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly,2000,14(1),15-34.
[110]Porter, M.E. The competitive advantage of nations. London:Macmillan.1990,
[111]Rabellotti, R. Footware industrial districts in Italy and Mexico in enterprise clusters and networks in developing countries. Frank CASS,1997.
[112]Rauch, J. E. Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: evidence from the cities. Journal of Urban Economics,1993, (34),380-400.
[113]Rolf S, Timo L., Regional clusters in Germany:Their geography and their relevance for entrepreneurial activities. European Planning Studies,12(6), 767-791.
[114]Romer, P. Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 1990,98,71-99.
[115]Romer, P. Growth based on increasing returns to specialization. American Economic Review,1987, (77),56-62.
[116]Romer, P. Increasing returns and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 1986,(94),1002-1037.
[117]Saxenian, A. Regional advantage:culture competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Boston:Harvard University Press,1994,1-97.
[118]Schultz, T.W., Investment in human capital, presidential address before the American economic association. American Economic Review,1961,51(1), 1-17.
[119]Scott, A. New industrial spaces:Flexible production organizations and regional development in north America and western Europe. London:Pion,1988.
[120]Shapiro, J. M. Smart cities:quality of life, productivity, and the growth effects of human capital. NBER working paper,2005, (9), No.W11615.
[121]Simon, C.J. & Nardinelli, C. Human capital and the rise of American cities, 1900-1990. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2002, (32),59-96.
[122]Simon, C.J. Human capital and metropolitan employment growth. Journal of Urban Economics,1998, (43),223-243.
[123]Simona, I., & Philip, M.C. The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillover. Research Policy,2006(35), 1018-1036.
[124]Solow, R.M. Technical change and the aggregate production function, Review of Economics and Statistics,1957, (39),312-320.
[125]Sterman J.D. All models are wrong:reflections on becoming a systems scientist. System Dynamics Review,2002,18,501-531.
[126]Sterman J.D. Business dynamics, systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York:McGraw-Hill,2000.
[127]Sterman J.D. Modeling managerial behavior:misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science,1989,35(3), 321-339.
[128]Toulemonde., & Eric. Acquisition of skills, labor subsidies, and agglomeration of firms. Journal of Urban Economies,2006, (59),420-439.
[129]Wang, J.C., & Mei, L.X. Dynamics of labor-intensive clusters in China:Relying exclusively on labor costs or cultivating innovation, Geneva. ILO Working Paper,2008,1-42.
[130]Wang, Z. Liu, C.X., & Mao, K.J. Industry cluster:spatial density and optimal scale. Annual Regional Science.2011, (6),1-13.
[131]Weng, Q.X. The influence of industrial clusters, character on the growth of talents:an empirical research in four industrial clusters in China. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management,2008, (8), 150-162.
[132]Williamson, O. Markets and hierarchies:analysis of antitrust implications. New York:Free Press,1975.
[133]Williamson, O.E. Organization of work:a comparative institutional assessment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1980,1,5-38.
[134]Williamson, O.E. The economic Institutions of capitalism:firms, markets, relational contracting. New York:The Free Press,1985.
[135]Wright, P., & Snell, S. Toward an integrative view of strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review,1991,1(2),203-225.
[136]Youndt, M.A., Scott A.S.,& James W.D., et al. Human resource management, manufacturing strategy and firm performance. Academy of Mangement Journal, 1996,39(4),836-866.
[137]Zhou, Y. The inside story of China's high-tech industry:Making Silicon Valley in Beijing. London:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,2008.
[138]阿尔弗雷德·韦伯.李刚剑,陈志人,张英保译.工业区位论.北京：商务印书馆,1997.
[139]安应民.企业人力资本投资与管理.北京：人民出版社,2003.
[140]蔡柏,吉晓莉.促进产业集群发展的政策选择.统计与决策,2002(7),23-24.
[141]蔡宁,吴结兵.企业集群的竞争优势：资源的结构性整合.中国工业经济.2002,(7),45-50.
[142]陈建军.企业家、企业家资源分布及其评价指标体系——结合浙江的分析.浙江大学学报.人文社会科学版,2003(7),56-64.
[143]陈剑峰,唐振鹏.国外产业集群研究综述.外国经济与管理,2002,24(8),22-27.
[144]陈柳钦.产业集群与产业竞争力,南京社会科学,2005(5),15-23.
[145]陈平,盛亚.集群发展的国际经验：提升我国产业集群竞争力.杭州：浙江大学出版社,2007.
[146]陈全国.中部地区人力资本积累与经济发展相关性研究.博士学位论文,武汉理工大学,2004.
[147]崔祥民,梅强.基于系统动力学的产业集群演进研究.科技管理研究,2010,(8),213-215.
[148]董亚娟.基于人力资本视角的浙江区域经济差异统计研究.博士学位论文,浙江工商大学,2008.
[149]段会娟,梁琦.知识溢出关联与产业集聚.软科学,2009,23(11),9-12.
[150]冯子标.人力资本运营论(第一版).北京：经济科学出版社,2000.
[151]高素英,赵曙明,田立法.人力资本、创新战略与企业绩效关系研究——基于中国上市公司的经验证据.山西财经大学学报,2011(8),76-83.
[152]古耀杰.产业集群中人力资本效应研究.博士学位论文,山西财经大学,2013.
[153]郭利平.产业群落的空间演化模式研究.北京：经济管理出版社,2006.
[154]郭曦,郝蕾.产业集群竞争力影响因素的层次分析——基于国家级经济开 发区的统计回归.南开经济研究,2005(4),34-40.
[155]杭州政府网.杭州市十大产业发展总体规划.http://www.hangzhou.gov.cn/ main/wjgg/zxwj/wjjd/sdcygh/
[156]和金生,白景美.产业集群竞争力评价.科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(4),179-180.
[157]胡蓓,翁清雄.产业集群特征对集群内人才根植意愿的影响——基于我国四个产业集群的一项实证研究.工业工程与管理,2008(5),113-119+123.
[158]胡蓓,周均旭,翁清雄.高科技产业集群特性对人才吸引力的影响——基于武汉光谷、北京中关村等产业集群的实证.研究与发展管理,2009,21(1),51-57.
[159]胡蓓,周均旭.产业集群人才吸引力纵向分层研究——以佛山地区产业集群为例.中国科技论坛,2009(1),94-97.
[160]胡蓓.产业集群的人才集聚效应——理论与实证研究.北京：科学出版社,2009.
[161]胡晨光.产业集聚的集聚动力——一个文献综述.经济学家,2011(6),93-101.
[162]胡永远,刘智勇.不同类型人力资本对经济增长的影响.人口与经济,2004,(2),55-58.
[163]胡永远.人力资本投资理论研究新进展.经济学动态,2005(1),72-75.
[164]黄崇利,彭正龙.基于系统动力学的人力资本增殖研究.北京：科学出版社,2012.
[165]黄江泉.人力资本集聚的机理研究——以长株潭地区人力资本集聚情况为例.中国人力资源开发,2010(11),5-9.
[166]黄文正.人力资本积累——动态比较优势与发展中国家经济增长.博士学位论文,东北财经大学,2010.
[167]加里·S·贝克尔,梁小民.人力资本：特别是关于教育的理论与经验分析.北京：北京大学出版社,1987.
[168]贾冀南,袁修月.河北省产业集聚与人力资本集聚的机制研究.河北工程大学学报(社会科学版),2011,28(4),13-16.
[169]贾伟强,黄有方.农村人力资本积累复杂系统建模与分析.系统科学学报,2011,9(3),5-61.
[170]克利斯·弗里曼,罗克·苏特.华宏勋等译.工业创新经济学.北京：北京大学出版社,2004.
[171]赖明勇,张新,彭水军.包群.经济增长的源泉：人力资本、研究开发与技术外溢.中国社会科学,2005,(2),32-48.
[172]蓝庆新.基于竞争优势的产业集群动态创新能力研究.北京：对外经济贸 易大学出版社,2009.
[173]李福柱.入力资本结构与区域经济发展研究.博士学位论文,东北师范大学,2006.
[174]李刚,牛芳.人才集聚与产业集聚.中国人才,2005(6),26-28.
[175]李广科,李录堂.人力资本区域集聚机制分析.华南理工大学学报(社会科学版),2009(5),23-27.
[176]李建玲,孙铁山.推进北京高新技术产业集聚与发展中的政府作用研究.科研管理,2003,24(5),92-97.
[177]李丽红,尹贻林,范道津.论入力资本集聚的经济效应,统计与决策,2008,(24),130-132.
[178]李玲.人力资本运动与中国经济增长.北京：中国计划出版社,2003.
[179]李乃文,李方正.产业集群与人才集群的互动关系初探——基于系统动力学的思想框架.产经评论,2011(5),14-22.
[180]李乃文,刘会贞.基于系统动力学的产业发展不同阶段人才集聚的决定因素分析.2012,29(5),152-155.
[181]李思慧.产业集聚、人力资本与企业能源效率——以高新技术企业为例.财贸经济,2011(9),128-134.
[182]李旭.社会系统动力学——政策研究的原理、方法和应用.上海：复旦大学出版社,2011.
[183]李永华,吴治国,石金涛.论产业集群生成机制中的人力资本要素.深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,23(6),37-40.
[184]李勇,史占中,屠梅曾.企业集群的发展动力及其创新能力的演进.科学管理研究,2004(8),7-12.
[185]李玉江、徐光平.人力资本空间集聚对产业集群发展的影响.山东师范大学学报,2008(3),91-96.
[186]李忠民.人力资本：一个理论框架及其对中国一些问题的解释.北京：经济科学出版社,1999.
[187]梁琦.产业集聚论.北京：商务印书馆,2004.
[188]廖楚晖.中国人力资本和物质资本的结构及政府教育投入.中国社会科学,2006,(1),23-33+205-206.
[189]林钦.人力资本与产业集群发展的关系研究.浙江大学硕士论文,2007.
[190]刘恒江,陈继祥,周莉娜.产业集群动力机制研究的最新动态.外国经济与管理,2004(7),2-11.
[191]刘恒江,陈继祥.要素、动力机制与竞争优势：产业集群的发展逻辑.中国软科学,2005(2),125-130.
[192]刘恒江.高科技产业集群动力机制与竞争力研究.博士学位论文,上海交通 大学,2005.
[193]刘军,陈健,姜彩楼.人力资本对产业聚集作用的实证研究.统计与决策,2008(19),103-104.
[194]刘筱,王铮,赵晶媛.政府在高技术产业集群中的作用——以深圳为例,科研管理,2006,27(4),36-43.
[195]陆根尧,李勇军.人力资本增强产业集群创新的途径、机理及对策研究.浙江理工大学学报,2009,26(2),266-271.
[196]陆根尧.经济增长中的人力资本效应：对中国高速增长区域的统计分析统计研究.统计研究,2002,(10),13-16.
[197]陆根尧.人力资本对产业集群竞争力影响的研究.北京：经济科学出版社,2008.
[198]陆文聪,胡雷芳,祁慧博.知识密集型产业集群发展动力机制模型构建与探讨——人力资本集聚的视角.科技进步与对策,2013,30(5),65-68.
[199]吕文栋,朱华晟.浙江产业集群的动力机制——基于企业家的视角.中国工业经济,2005(4),86-93.
[200]罗永泰.论人力资本聚集效应.科学管理研究,2004(8),213-215.
[201]毛军.产业集聚与人力资本积累——以珠三角、长三角为例.北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2006,198(6),103-110.
[202]毛军.人力资本与高技术产业集聚——以京津_长三角_珠三角为例的分析.北京社会科学,2006(5),82-86.
[203]莫莉.产业集群人才成长机理研究.博士学位论文,华中科技大学,2008.
[204]宁钟,刘学应.产业集群演进的系统动力学分析.预测,2004,23(2),66-69.
[205]牛冲槐.人才集聚效应及其评判.中国软科学,2006(4),114-123.
[206]牛冲槐.山西省地级市科技型人才聚集效应的实证研究,科技进步与对策,2012,29(2),149-153.
[207]潘镇,鲁明泓.中小企业绩效的决定因素——一项对426家企业的实证研究.南开管理评论,2005,8(3),54-59.
[208]钱雪亚,张小蒂.农村人力资本积累及其收益特征.中国农村经济,2000,(3),25-31.
[209]钱雪亚.人力资本水平：方法与实证.北京：商务印书馆,2011.
[210]秦志华.人力资源管理(第三版).北京：中国人民大学出版社,2012.
[211]任炜,牟刚.员工培训与企业绩效关系的实证研究——来自中国A股市场的经验证据.中国商贸,2011(9),67-68.
[212]阮建青,张晓波,卫龙宝.基于产业集群的包买商制与企业家才能.管理世界,2008(11),119-128.
[213]阮建青,张晓波,卫龙宝.危机与制造业产业集群的质量升级——基于浙 江产业集群的研究.管理世界,2010(2),69-79.
[214]盛世豪,郑燕伟.浙江现象：产业集群与区域经济发展.北京：清华大学出版社,2004.
[215]舒尔茨.论人力资本投资.北京：北京经济管理学院出版社,1999.
[216]舒尔茨.人力资本投资：教育和研究的作用.北京：商务印书馆,1990.
[217]孙健.人才集聚与产业集聚的互动关系研究.管理世界,2008(3),177-178.
[218]孙维峰,黄祖辉.广告支出、研发支出与企业绩效.科研管理,2013,34(2),44-51.
[219]孙晓华.产业集聚效应的系统动力学分析.科技管理研究.2007(12),248-250.
[220]孙晓华.产业集聚效应的系统动力学建模与仿真.科学学与科学技术管理,2008,(4),71-76.
[221]孙晓华.产业集聚效应的系统动力学模型研究.经济与管理,2007,21(5),10-13.
[222]孙熠,张静.关于产业集群中的人力资本效应分析.商场现代化.2008,(6)310-311.
[223]唐平.产业集群人力资本集聚效应实证研究.现代物业,2010,9(7),133-135.
[224]陶小龙.中国经济增长的人力资本结构问题研究,博士学位论文,云南大学,2012.
[225]汪华林.人才集聚：发展产业集群的基础保障.经济问题探索,2004(12)104-106.
[226]王安民.基于产业集群创新的创新型人力资本增值路径研究.中国科技论坛,2010(2),41-47.
[227]王秉安.产业集群竞争力构成要素模型研究——以晋江运动鞋产业集群为例,福建行政学院福建经济管理干部学院学报,2005(2),42-46.
[228]王崇曦,胡蓓.关于顺德产业集群环境对人才吸引的调研报告.世界经济文汇,2006(6),45-46.
[229]王奋,韩伯棠.科技人力资源区域集聚效应的实证研究.中国软科学,2006,(3),91-100.
[230]王奋,杨波.科技人力资源区域集聚影响因素的实证研究——以北京地区为例.科学学研究,2006,24(5),722-726.
[231]王国红,吴晓明,唐丽艳.基于系统动力学的高技术集群产学研集成创新研究.科学进步与对策,2011,28(7),61-66.
[232]王缉慈.创新的空间——企业集群与区域发展.北京：北京大学出版社,2001.
[233]王缉慈.关于中国产业集群研究的若干概念辨析.地理学报,2004(10),47-52.
[234]王建民.人力资本生产制度研究.北京：经济科学出版社,2001.
[235]王金营,贾少萌.中国区域人力资本积聚路径和机制研究.中国人口科学,2011,21-33.
[236]王金营.人力资本与经济增长——理论与实证北京：中国财政经济出版社,2001.
[237]王开国,宗兆昌.论人力资本性质与特征的理论渊源及其发展.中国社会科学,1999(6),33-46.
[238]王其藩.系统动力学(修订版).上海：上海财经大学出版社,2009.
[239]王业强,魏后凯.中国产业集群战略与政策考察.经济研究参考,2009(55),2-19.
[240]魏江,魏勇.产业集群学习机制多层解析.中国软科学,2004(1),121-125.
[241]魏江,朱海燕.高技术产业集群创新过程模式演化及发展研究——以杭州软件产业集群为例.研究与发展管理,2006,18(6),116-121.
[242]魏江,朱海燕.知识密集型服务业与产业集群发展的互动模式研究——以慈溪家电产业集群为例.研究与发展管理,2006,18(2),58-63.
[243]魏守华.集群竞争力的动力机制以及实证分析.中国工业经济,2002,(10),27-34.
[244]翁清雄,胡蓓,古家军.产业集群特征对集群内人才成长的影响——基于我国四个产业集群的一项实证研究.科研管理,2008,29(4),103-110.
[245]吴贵明,周碧华.产业集群人才优势形成机理研究,生产力研究,2007,(17)93-94+138.
[246]吴国玺,李长坡,郑敬刚.创新型产业集聚区形成的机理及发展模式研究.资源开发与市场,2010(12)：1105-1107.
[247]吴结兵,蔡宁.产业集群理论述评——从三个角度看集群理论的融合与发展.重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2007(6),16-21.
[248]吴结兵,郭斌.企业适应性行为、网络化与产业集群的共同演化——绍兴县纺织业集群发展的纵向案例研究.管理世界,2010(2),141-155.
[249]吴结兵,徐梦周.网络密度与集群竞争优势：集聚经济与集体学习的中介作用——2001～2004年浙江纺织业集群的实证分析.管理世界,2008(8),69-76.
[250]吴瑾,刘会武,王胜光.欧美产业集群政策的比较研究与思考.科研管理,2008,29(1),102-106.
[251]吴勤堂.产业集群与区域经济发展耦合机理分析,管理世界,2004(2),133-134.
[252]武勇,陈剑.人力资本、产业集群与区域产业结构间的影响机理分析.商业时代,2011(12),115-117.
[253]夏德孝.人力资本积累与城市经济增长研究.博士学位论文,西北大学,2008.
[254]徐光平.人力资本空间集聚与产业集群发展互动研究.硕士学位论文,山东师范大学,2008.
[255]徐健.基于人力资本管理的产业集群发展动力学探讨.人类工效学,2009(6),57-59.
[256]许庆瑞,毛凯军.试论企业集群形成的条件.科研管理,2003,24(1),72-76.
[257]雅各布·明塞尔.人力资本研究.北京：中国经济出版社,2003.
[258]杨长辉,高阳.人力资源集群与虚拟团队.科学管理研究,2003(2),99-101.
[259]杨建芳,龚六堂,张庆华.人力资本形成及其对经济增长的影响——一个包含教育和健康投入的内生增长模型及其检验.管理世界,2006,(5),10-18+34.
[260]杨文斌.基于系统动力学的企业成长研究.博士学位论文,复旦大学,2006.
[261]杨小凯,黄有光.张玉纲译.专业化与经济组织：一种新兴古典微观经济学框架.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[262]杨小凯.张定胜,张永生,李利明译.经济学——新兴古典与新古典框架.社会科学文献出版社,2003.
[263]姚先国,翁杰.企业对员工的入力资本投资研究.中国工业经济,2005,203(2),87-95.
[264]叶建亮.企业集群与知识溢出.经济科学,2001,3,23-30.
[265]喻萧萧.人力资本空间集聚机理研究——以山东省为例.国土与自然资源研究,2008(3),6-9.
[266]约翰·布里顿,杰弗里·高德,徐芬丽,吴晓卿,孙涛等译.人力资源管理理论与实践(第三版).北京：经济管理出版社,2005.
[267]岳书敬,刘朝明.人力资本与区域全要素生产率分析.经济研究,2006,(4),90-96+127.
[268]张帆.中国的物质资本和人力资本估算.经济研究,2000(8),65-71.
[269]张钢.人力资本、组织资本与组织创新.科学学研究,2000,18(1),67-76
[270]张国民,张咏,陈进.产业集群演化和发展中的人力资本作用研究.企业活力,2011(5),5-9.
[271]张嫘.人力资本积累.北京：中国农业出版社,2009.
[272]张敏.产业集群生成与发展的动力探源.生产力研究,2011(7),152-156.
[273]张西奎.产业集群人才集聚与人才吸引力实证研究.硕士学位论文,华中 科技大学,2006.
[274]张樨樨.产业集聚与人才集聚的互动关系评析.商业时代,2010(18),119-120.
[275]张霞,蔡根女.人才集群与产业集群的互动发展,重庆大学学报,2007,13(5),55-60.
[276]赵修文.人力资本整合与产业集群竞争力提升研究.成都：西南财经大学出版社,2011.
[277]赵玉林,李文超.基于系统动力学的产业结构演变规律仿真模拟实验研究.系统科学学报,2008,16(4),51-58.
[278]郑江淮,高彦彦,胡小文.企业“扎堆”、技术升级与经济绩效——开发区集聚效应的实证分析.经济研究,2008(5),33-47.
[279]中国产业集群发展报告课题组.中国产业集群发展报告.北京：机械工业出版社,2009.
[280]周均旭.产业集群人才吸引力影响机制研究.武汉：湖北人民出版社、湖北长江出版集团湖北人民出版社,2011.
[281]朱华晟,王玉华,彭慧.政企互动与产业集群空间结构演变——以浙江省为例.中国软科学,2005(1),107-113.
[282]朱华晟.浙江产业群——产业网络、成长轨迹与发展动力.杭州：浙江大学出版社,2003.
[283]朱杏珍.人才集聚过程中的羊群行为分析.数量经济技术经济研究,2002,(7)：53-56.
[284]朱杏诊.人才集聚的动力因素分析——以浙江省为例,社会科学战线,2010,(1),280-282.
[285]邹薇,代谦.技术模仿、人力资本积累与经济赶超.中国社会科学,2003,24(5),26-38.
2 Mill, J.S. Consideration of representative government,1903.
3 萨伊.陈福生,陈振骅译.政治经济学概论：财富的生产、分配和消费.北京：商务印书馆,1997.
1 柏拉图.郭斌和,张竹明译.理想国.北京：商务印书馆,1986.
2 色诺芬.沈默译.色诺芬注疏集：居鲁士的教育.北京：华夏出版社,2007.
3 威廉·配第.马妍译.赋税论.北京：中国社会科学出版社,2010.
4 亚当.斯密.郭大力等译.国富论.上海：上海三联书店,2009.
5 马克思.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编.资本论节选本.人民出版社,1998.
1 李福柱.人力资本结构与区域经济发展研究.东北大学博士论文.2006.P25
[1]Acemoglu, D.A. Microfoundation for social increasing returns in human capital accumulation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1996,111(3),779-804.
[2]Anderson, T., Hansson, E., & Serger, S.S. The cluster policies whitebook, IKED, August,2004,1-45.
[3]Arthur, M. B., Defillippi, R.J., & Lindsay, V. J. Careers, communities and industry evolution:links to complexity theory. International Journal of Innovation Management,2001,5(2),239-255.
[4]Bandura, A. Self-efficacy:Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review,1977,84(2),191-215.
[5]Baptista, R. & Swann, P. Do firms in clusters innovate more? Rearch Policy, 1998,27,525-540.
[6]Baptista, R. Do Innovations Diffuse Faster within Geographical Clusters? International Journal of Industrial Organization.2000,18(3),515-535.
[7]Barett, A., Connell, P. J. Does training generally work? The return to in company training. Industrial and Labor Relations Review,2001,54(3),647-662.
[8]Barlas, Y. Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review,1996,12(3),183-210.
[9]Barney, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17(1),99-120.
[10]Barron, J., Berger, M. & Black, D. Do workers pay for on-the-job training? Journal of Human Resources,1999,34(2),235-252.
[11]Barron, J.M., Black, D.A. & Loewenstein, M.A. Employer size:The implications for search, training, capital investment, starting wages, and wage growth, Journal of Labor Economics,1987,5(1),76-89.
[12]Bartel, A.P. Training, wage growth, and job Performance:Evidence from a company database, Journal of Labor Economics,1995,13(3),401-425.
[13]Becker, G.S. Human capital:a theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. New York. NBER,1966.
[14]Becker, G. S. Investment in human capital:A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy,1962,70(5),9-49.
[15]Bell, M.,& Albu, M. Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. World Development,1999,27(9), 1715-1734.
[16]Benhabib, Jess.,& Spiegel, M.M. The role of human capital in economic development evidence for aggregate cross country data. Journal of Monetary economics,1994, (34),143-173.
[17]Bent, D. The Formation of knowledge-based clusters in North Jutland and Western Sweden. Working Paper to the DRUID Conference on National Innovation Systems,1999,1-56.
[18]Berry, C.R.,& Glaeser, E.L. The divergence of human capital levels across cities. Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion Paper 2005, (9) No.2091.
[19]Bertinelli, L.,& Zou, B.T. Does urbanization foster human capital accumulation. The Journal of Developing Areas,2008,41(2),171-184.
[20]Best, M.H. Cluster dynamics, the new competitive advantage:The renewal of American industry. London:Oxford University Press,2001.
[21]Bisehi, H., & David, M. Spillover effects and the evolution of firm clusters. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,2003, (50),47-75
[22]Black., Sandra., & Lynch, L. Human Capital Investments and Productivity, American Economic Review,1996,86(2),263-267.
[23]Blackburn, K.,& Varvarigos, D. Human capital accumulation and output growth in a stochastic environment.2008,36(3),435-452.
[24]Blasio, G.,& Addario, S. Do workers benefit more from industrial agglomeration? Journal of Regional Sciences,45(4),797-827.
[25]Brenner T. Simulating the evolution of localized Industrial clusters:An identification of the basic mechanisms. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation,2003, (03),56-89.
[26]Brenner, T.,& Weigelt, N. The evolution of industrial clusters:Simulating spatial dynamics. Advances in Complex System,2001,4(1),127-147.
[27]Bresnahan, T. Gambardella, A.,& Saxenian, A. "Old economy" inputs for "new economy" outcomes:cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys. Industrial and Corporate Change,2001, (10),835-860.
[28]Calantone, R.J. Cavusgil, S.T., & Zhao, Y. Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management,2002, 31(6),515-524.
[29]Capello, R. Spatial transfer of knowledge in high technology milieu:learning versus collective learning process. Regional Studies,1999,33(4),353-365.
[30]Chaninade, C., & Vang, J. Globalization of knowledge production and regional innovation policy:supporting specialized hubs in the Bangalore software industry. Research Policy,37,1684-1696.
[31]Chou, C.Y., & Chen, G.H. How to win the war for talent? Case study in biotech related industries of U.K. Journal of Human Resource Management,2004,4(4): 131-154.
[32]Chung, W., & Kalnins. A agglomeration effects and performance:a test of the Texas lodging industry. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(10),969-988.
[33]Ciccone, A, & Hall, R.E. Productivity and the density of economic activity. The American Economic Review,1996,86(1),54-70.
[34]Ciccone, A. Agglomeration effects in Europe. Europe Economic Review,2002, 46,213-227.
[35]Cindy, F. C., Scott, & Allen, J. Industrial agglomeration and development:A survey of spatial economic issues in East Asia and a statistical analysis of Chinese Regions. Economic Geography,2003,79 (1),295-319.
[36]Coase, R. The nature of the firm. Economica.1937,4,385-405.
[37]Cooke, P. & Lazzeretti, L. Creative cities, cultural clusters and local economic Development, Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing,2008,258-286.
[38]Crespo, N., & Fontoura, M.P. Economic centrality, per capital of Economics and Management, Technical University of Lisbon,2006, (28).
[39]Dangelico, R.M., Garavelli, A.C., & Petruzzelli, A.M. A system dynamics model to analyze technology districts'evolution in a knowledge-based perspective. Technovation,2010, (30),142-153.
[40]Danson, M. New regions and regionalization through clusters:City-regions and new problems for the periphery. International Journal of Public Sector Management,2009,22(3),260-271.
[41]Davis, J.P., Eisenhardt, K.M., & Bingham, C.B. Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review,2007,32(2),480-499.
[42]Dean, A., & Hermessy. The emergence of a Cluster? The biotechnology community in London. Ontario, Rotman School of Management University of Toronto, ISRN Conference, May,2003,1-125.
[43]Doeringer P.B., & Terkla, D.G. Business strategy and cross-industry clusters. Economic Development Quarterly,1999,9(3),225-237.
[44]Eisenhardt, K.M. & Graebner, M.E. Theory building from cases:Opportunities and challenges. The Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(1),25-32.
[45]Enright M.J. Regional clusters and economic development:A research agenda, business networks:prospects for regional development,1996, Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
[46]Enright M.J. Regional clusters:what we know and what should we know, The University of Hong Kong,2001, (11),59-68.
[47]Feldman, M.P. Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography:Location and innovation:The new economic geography of innovation, spillover, and agglomeration. London:Oxford University Press,2000.
[48]Feldman, M.P., Francis, J. & Bercovitz, J. Creating a cluster while building a firm:entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. Regional studies, 2005,39(1),50-129.
[49]Feser, E., Bergman, E., National industry cluster templates:A Framework for Applied Regional Cluster Analysis, Regional Studies,2000,34(3),1-19
[50]Firer, S., & Williams, S.M. Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital,2003, (4),27-31.
[51]Forrester J W. Industrial dynamics:a breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review,1958,36(4),37-66.
[52]Forrester J W. The system dynamics national model:macrobehavior from microstructure modeling growth strategy in a biotechonology startup firm. System Dynamics Review,1989,7(2),93-116.
[53]Forrester J W.,& Senge P. Tests for building confidence in system dynamics. System dynamics TIMS studies in the management sciences. New York: North-Holland,1980,209-228.
[54]Fujita, M.,& Krugman, P. The new economic geography:past, present and the future. Papers in Regional Science,2004,1-83.
[55]Garavan, T.N., Morley M.,& Gunnigle, P., et al. Human capital accumulation, the role of human resource development. Journal of European Industrial Training,2001,25(2),48-68.
[56]Gerlter, M. Tack knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being there. Journal of Economic Geography,2003, (3), 75-99.
[57]Giannini, M. Multiple regimes in human capital accumulation. International Journal of Manpower,21(3/4),246-263.
[58]Giuliani, E. Cluster absorptive capability:An evolutionary approach for industrial clusters in developing countries. The DRUID Summer Conference, 2002,1-13.
[59]Glaeser, E. Geographic concentration in US manufacturing industries:a dart-board approach. Journal of Political Economy,1997, (5),889-927.
[60]Glaeser, E. L., & Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. Journal of Monetary Economics,1995, (36),117-143.
[61]Glaeser, E. L.Learning in Cities. Journal of Urban Economics,1999, (46), 254-277.
[62]Gordon. I., & Mccaml, P. Industrial clusters:complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks, Urban Studies,2000, (37),513-532.
[63]Gyala., & Bakacsi. Eastern European cluster:tradition and transition. Journal of World Business,2002, (37),69-80.
[64]Harrison, B. Industrial districts:Old Wine in new bottles. Regional Studies, 1992,26,469-483.
[65]Harrison, R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G, R., & Carley, K.M. Simulation Modeling in Organizational and Management Research. The Academy of Management Review,2007,32(4),1229-1245.
[66]Harrison, R., Lin, Z., & Carroll, G.R., et al. Simulation modeling in orgni zational and management Research. The Academy of Management Review, 2007,32(4),1229-1245.
[67]He, C.F., Wei, Y.H., & Pan F.H. Geographical concentration of industries in China:the importance of spatial and industrial scale. Eurasian Geography and Economics,48(5),603-625.
[68]Helsley, R. W., & William, C. S. Matching and agglomeration economies in a system of cities. Regional Science and Urban Economies,1990, (2),189-212.
[69]Hill, E.W.,& Brennan, J.F. A methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters:The foundation of regional competitive advantage. Economic Development Quarterly,2000,14(1),65-96.
[70]Holmes, T., & Stevens, J. Geographic concentration and establishment scale. The review of Economics and Statistics,2002,84,682-690.
[71]Holzer, H.J., Block, R.N.,& Cheatham, M., et al. Are training subsidies for firms effective? The Michigan experience, Industrial and Labor Relations Review,1993,46(4),625-636.
[72]Hoobler, J.M.& Johnson, N.B. An analysis of current human resource management. Personnel Review,2004,33 (2),665-676.
[73]Hu, B., & Weng, Q.X. Why talent concentrates to industrial clusters? 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking, and Mobile Computing, WICOM,2008,1-6.
[74]Hu, L.F. Driving Mechanism for service industry cluster in e-business. International Conference on Management and Service Science (MASS), Piscataway:IEEE Computer Society,2011,1-3.
[75]Huang, C., Lina.,& Mei, C., et al. Elucidating the industrial cluster effect from a system dynamics perspective. Technovation,2006(26),473-482.
[76]Huang, C.L. On human capital absorptive multiplication:system dynamics model simulation and policy implications. Statistic Application in Scientific and Social Reform, IISMES,2010,158-169.
[77]Hwang, J.S. Characteristics and development of industrial districts:the case of software clusters in Seoul, South Korea. Knowledge, Industry and Environment: Institutions and innovation in territorial perspective,2002,107-125.
[78]Jan, C.G., Chan, C.C., & Teng, C.H. The effect of clusters on the development of the software industry in Dalian, China. Technology in Society,2012,34, 163-173.
[79]Joo, B.K.,& Mclean, G.N. Best employer studies:A conceptual model from a literature review and a case study. Human Resource Development Review,2006, 5(2),228-257.
[80]Keeble, D., & Wilkinson, F. Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high technology SMEs in Europe. Regional Studies,1999,33(4),295-303.
[81]Klepper, S. The origin and growth of industry clusters:The making of Silicon Valley and Detroit, Journal of Urban Economics,2010, (67),15-32.
[82]Kolko, J. Silicon mountains, silicon molehills:Geographic concentration and convergence of internet industries in the US. Information and Policy,2002,14 (2),211-232.
[83]Krugman, P. Development, geography and economic theory. Cambridge:MIT Press,1995.
[84]Learmonth, D., Munro, A.,& Swales, J.K. Multi-sectoral cluster modeling:The evaluation of Scottish enterprise cluster policy. European Planning Studies, 2003,11(5),567-585.
[85]Lee, J.W.,&. Barro, R.J. Schooling quality in a cross-section of countries. Economica,2001,68(272),465-488.
[86]Liu, R.Z., Weng, Q.X.,& Mao, G.F., et al. Industrial cluster, government agency and entrepreneurial development:A case study of Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province. Chinese Management Studies.2013,7(2),253-280.
[87]Lucas, R.E. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics,1988(22),139-191.
[88]Lucas, R.E. Why doesn't capital flow form rich to poor countries? American Economic Review,1990,80(2),92-96.
[89]Lundvall, B.A. Innovation as an interactive process:From user-producer interaction to the National Innovation Systems. Technology and Economic Theory. London:Pinter Publishers,1988.
[90]Markusen, A. Sticky places in slippery space:a typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography,72(3),293-313.
[91]Marshall, A. Elements of the economics of industry. London:Macmillan Press, 1892.
[92]Marshall, A. Principles of Economics. London:Macmillan Press,1920.
[93]Marshell, P. Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographic cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change,2001, (10),147-160.
[94]Martin, R., & Sunley, P. Paul Krugman's geographical economies and its implications for regional development theory:A critical assessment. Economic Geography.1996,72(3),259-292.
[95]Maskell, E. Knowledge creation and diffusion in geographic clusters. International Journal of Innovation Management,2003, (5),213-237.
[96]Maskell, P. Towards a knowledge based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change,2001, (10),167-185.
[97]Mo, L., Hu, H.Y., & Sun, W.B. Learning levels of collective learning mechanism in industrial cluster. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management,2008, (1),43-62.
[98]Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review,1998,23(2), 242-266.
[99]Naresh, R. P., Gary, AS. Cook., & GM. P. Swann. A comparison of clustering dynamics in the British broadcasting and financial services industries, economics of business,2002 (2),195-224.
[100]Nowak, M.J., & Grantham, C.E. The virtual incubator:managing human capital in the software industry. Research Policy,2000(29),125-134.
[101]Oakey, R., & Cooper, S. High technology industry:agglomeration and the potential for peripherally sited small firms. Regional Studies,1989,23(4), 347-360.
[102]Oliva, R. A dynamic theory of service delivery:implications for managing service quality. PhD thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management,1996.
[103]Packer, D. Resource acquisition in corporate growth. Cambridge MA:MIT Press,1964.
[104]Peppard, J.,& Rylander, A. Leveraging intellectual capital at APION. Journal of Intellectual Capital,2001,2(3),225-235.
[105]Phillimore, J. Beyond the linear view of innovation in science park evaluation: an analysis of Western Australian Technology Park. Technovation,1999,19(11), 673-680.
[106]Pinch, S,& Henry, N. Paul Krugman's geographical economics, industrial clustering and the British motor sport industry. Regional Studies 1999,33 (9), 815-827.
[107]Piore, M.J. The second industrial divide:possibilities for prosperity. Basic books,1984.
[108]Porter, M.E. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review,1998,76(6),77-90.
[109]Porter, M.E. Location, competition and economic development:Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly,2000,14(1),15-34.
[110]Porter, M.E. The competitive advantage of nations. London:Macmillan.1990,
[111]Rabellotti, R. Footware industrial districts in Italy and Mexico in enterprise clusters and networks in developing countries. Frank CASS,1997.
[112]Rauch, J. E. Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: evidence from the cities. Journal of Urban Economics,1993, (34),380-400.
[113]Rolf S, Timo L., Regional clusters in Germany:Their geography and their relevance for entrepreneurial activities. European Planning Studies,12(6), 767-791.
[114]Romer, P. Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 1990,98,71-99.
[115]Romer, P. Growth based on increasing returns to specialization. American Economic Review,1987, (77),56-62.
[116]Romer, P. Increasing returns and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 1986,(94),1002-1037.
[117]Saxenian, A. Regional advantage:culture competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Boston:Harvard University Press,1994,1-97.
[118]Schultz, T.W., Investment in human capital, presidential address before the American economic association. American Economic Review,1961,51(1), 1-17.
[119]Scott, A. New industrial spaces:Flexible production organizations and regional development in north America and western Europe. London:Pion,1988.
[120]Shapiro, J. M. Smart cities:quality of life, productivity, and the growth effects of human capital. NBER working paper,2005, (9), No.W11615.
[121]Simon, C.J. & Nardinelli, C. Human capital and the rise of American cities, 1900-1990. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2002, (32),59-96.
[122]Simon, C.J. Human capital and metropolitan employment growth. Journal of Urban Economics,1998, (43),223-243.
[123]Simona, I., & Philip, M.C. The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillover. Research Policy,2006(35), 1018-1036.
[124]Solow, R.M. Technical change and the aggregate production function, Review of Economics and Statistics,1957, (39),312-320.
[125]Sterman J.D. All models are wrong:reflections on becoming a systems scientist. System Dynamics Review,2002,18,501-531.
[126]Sterman J.D. Business dynamics, systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York:McGraw-Hill,2000.
[127]Sterman J.D. Modeling managerial behavior:misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science,1989,35(3), 321-339.
[128]Toulemonde., & Eric. Acquisition of skills, labor subsidies, and agglomeration of firms. Journal of Urban Economies,2006, (59),420-439.
[129]Wang, J.C., & Mei, L.X. Dynamics of labor-intensive clusters in China:Relying exclusively on labor costs or cultivating innovation, Geneva. ILO Working Paper,2008,1-42.
[130]Wang, Z. Liu, C.X., & Mao, K.J. Industry cluster:spatial density and optimal scale. Annual Regional Science.2011, (6),1-13.
[131]Weng, Q.X. The influence of industrial clusters, character on the growth of talents:an empirical research in four industrial clusters in China. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management,2008, (8), 150-162.
[132]Williamson, O. Markets and hierarchies:analysis of antitrust implications. New York:Free Press,1975.
[133]Williamson, O.E. Organization of work:a comparative institutional assessment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1980,1,5-38.
[134]Williamson, O.E. The economic Institutions of capitalism:firms, markets, relational contracting. New York:The Free Press,1985.
[135]Wright, P., & Snell, S. Toward an integrative view of strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review,1991,1(2),203-225.
[136]Youndt, M.A., Scott A.S.,& James W.D., et al. Human resource management, manufacturing strategy and firm performance. Academy of Mangement Journal, 1996,39(4),836-866.
[137]Zhou, Y. The inside story of China's high-tech industry:Making Silicon Valley in Beijing. London:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,2008.
[138]阿尔弗雷德·韦伯.李刚剑,陈志人,张英保译.工业区位论.北京：商务印书馆,1997.
[139]安应民.企业人力资本投资与管理.北京：人民出版社,2003.
[140]蔡柏,吉晓莉.促进产业集群发展的政策选择.统计与决策,2002(7),23-24.
[141]蔡宁,吴结兵.企业集群的竞争优势：资源的结构性整合.中国工业经济.2002,(7),45-50.
[142]陈建军.企业家、企业家资源分布及其评价指标体系——结合浙江的分析.浙江大学学报.人文社会科学版,2003(7),56-64.
[143]陈剑峰,唐振鹏.国外产业集群研究综述.外国经济与管理,2002,24(8),22-27.
[144]陈柳钦.产业集群与产业竞争力,南京社会科学,2005(5),15-23.
[145]陈平,盛亚.集群发展的国际经验：提升我国产业集群竞争力.杭州：浙江大学出版社,2007.
[146]陈全国.中部地区人力资本积累与经济发展相关性研究.博士学位论文,武汉理工大学,2004.
[147]崔祥民,梅强.基于系统动力学的产业集群演进研究.科技管理研究,2010,(8),213-215.
[148]董亚娟.基于人力资本视角的浙江区域经济差异统计研究.博士学位论文,浙江工商大学,2008.
[149]段会娟,梁琦.知识溢出关联与产业集聚.软科学,2009,23(11),9-12.
[150]冯子标.人力资本运营论(第一版).北京：经济科学出版社,2000.
[151]高素英,赵曙明,田立法.人力资本、创新战略与企业绩效关系研究——基于中国上市公司的经验证据.山西财经大学学报,2011(8),76-83.
[152]古耀杰.产业集群中人力资本效应研究.博士学位论文,山西财经大学,2013.
[153]郭利平.产业群落的空间演化模式研究.北京：经济管理出版社,2006.
[154]郭曦,郝蕾.产业集群竞争力影响因素的层次分析——基于国家级经济开 发区的统计回归.南开经济研究,2005(4),34-40.
[155]杭州政府网.杭州市十大产业发展总体规划.http://www.hangzhou.gov.cn/ main/wjgg/zxwj/wjjd/sdcygh/
[156]和金生,白景美.产业集群竞争力评价.科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(4),179-180.
[157]胡蓓,翁清雄.产业集群特征对集群内人才根植意愿的影响——基于我国四个产业集群的一项实证研究.工业工程与管理,2008(5),113-119+123.
[158]胡蓓,周均旭,翁清雄.高科技产业集群特性对人才吸引力的影响——基于武汉光谷、北京中关村等产业集群的实证.研究与发展管理,2009,21(1),51-57.
[159]胡蓓,周均旭.产业集群人才吸引力纵向分层研究——以佛山地区产业集群为例.中国科技论坛,2009(1),94-97.
[160]胡蓓.产业集群的人才集聚效应——理论与实证研究.北京：科学出版社,2009.
[161]胡晨光.产业集聚的集聚动力——一个文献综述.经济学家,2011(6),93-101.
[162]胡永远,刘智勇.不同类型人力资本对经济增长的影响.人口与经济,2004,(2),55-58.
[163]胡永远.人力资本投资理论研究新进展.经济学动态,2005(1),72-75.
[164]黄崇利,彭正龙.基于系统动力学的人力资本增殖研究.北京：科学出版社,2012.
[165]黄江泉.人力资本集聚的机理研究——以长株潭地区人力资本集聚情况为例.中国人力资源开发,2010(11),5-9.
[166]黄文正.人力资本积累——动态比较优势与发展中国家经济增长.博士学位论文,东北财经大学,2010.
[167]加里·S·贝克尔,梁小民.人力资本：特别是关于教育的理论与经验分析.北京：北京大学出版社,1987.
[168]贾冀南,袁修月.河北省产业集聚与人力资本集聚的机制研究.河北工程大学学报(社会科学版),2011,28(4),13-16.
[169]贾伟强,黄有方.农村人力资本积累复杂系统建模与分析.系统科学学报,2011,9(3),5-61.
[170]克利斯·弗里曼,罗克·苏特.华宏勋等译.工业创新经济学.北京：北京大学出版社,2004.
[171]赖明勇,张新,彭水军.包群.经济增长的源泉：人力资本、研究开发与技术外溢.中国社会科学,2005,(2),32-48.
[172]蓝庆新.基于竞争优势的产业集群动态创新能力研究.北京：对外经济贸 易大学出版社,2009.
[173]李福柱.入力资本结构与区域经济发展研究.博士学位论文,东北师范大学,2006.
[174]李刚,牛芳.人才集聚与产业集聚.中国人才,2005(6),26-28.
[175]李广科,李录堂.人力资本区域集聚机制分析.华南理工大学学报(社会科学版),2009(5),23-27.
[176]李建玲,孙铁山.推进北京高新技术产业集聚与发展中的政府作用研究.科研管理,2003,24(5),92-97.
[177]李丽红,尹贻林,范道津.论入力资本集聚的经济效应,统计与决策,2008,(24),130-132.
[178]李玲.人力资本运动与中国经济增长.北京：中国计划出版社,2003.
[179]李乃文,李方正.产业集群与人才集群的互动关系初探——基于系统动力学的思想框架.产经评论,2011(5),14-22.
[180]李乃文,刘会贞.基于系统动力学的产业发展不同阶段人才集聚的决定因素分析.2012,29(5),152-155.
[181]李思慧.产业集聚、人力资本与企业能源效率——以高新技术企业为例.财贸经济,2011(9),128-134.
[182]李旭.社会系统动力学——政策研究的原理、方法和应用.上海：复旦大学出版社,2011.
[183]李永华,吴治国,石金涛.论产业集群生成机制中的人力资本要素.深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,23(6),37-40.
[184]李勇,史占中,屠梅曾.企业集群的发展动力及其创新能力的演进.科学管理研究,2004(8),7-12.
[185]李玉江、徐光平.人力资本空间集聚对产业集群发展的影响.山东师范大学学报,2008(3),91-96.
[186]李忠民.人力资本：一个理论框架及其对中国一些问题的解释.北京：经济科学出版社,1999.
[187]梁琦.产业集聚论.北京：商务印书馆,2004.
[188]廖楚晖.中国人力资本和物质资本的结构及政府教育投入.中国社会科学,2006,(1),23-33+205-206.
[189]林钦.人力资本与产业集群发展的关系研究.浙江大学硕士论文,2007.
[190]刘恒江,陈继祥,周莉娜.产业集群动力机制研究的最新动态.外国经济与管理,2004(7),2-11.
[191]刘恒江,陈继祥.要素、动力机制与竞争优势：产业集群的发展逻辑.中国软科学,2005(2),125-130.
[192]刘恒江.高科技产业集群动力机制与竞争力研究.博士学位论文,上海交通 大学,2005.
[193]刘军,陈健,姜彩楼.人力资本对产业聚集作用的实证研究.统计与决策,2008(19),103-104.
[194]刘筱,王铮,赵晶媛.政府在高技术产业集群中的作用——以深圳为例,科研管理,2006,27(4),36-43.
[195]陆根尧,李勇军.人力资本增强产业集群创新的途径、机理及对策研究.浙江理工大学学报,2009,26(2),266-271.
[196]陆根尧.经济增长中的人力资本效应：对中国高速增长区域的统计分析统计研究.统计研究,2002,(10),13-16.
[197]陆根尧.人力资本对产业集群竞争力影响的研究.北京：经济科学出版社,2008.
[198]陆文聪,胡雷芳,祁慧博.知识密集型产业集群发展动力机制模型构建与探讨——人力资本集聚的视角.科技进步与对策,2013,30(5),65-68.
[199]吕文栋,朱华晟.浙江产业集群的动力机制——基于企业家的视角.中国工业经济,2005(4),86-93.
[200]罗永泰.论人力资本聚集效应.科学管理研究,2004(8),213-215.
[201]毛军.产业集聚与人力资本积累——以珠三角、长三角为例.北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2006,198(6),103-110.
[202]毛军.人力资本与高技术产业集聚——以京津_长三角_珠三角为例的分析.北京社会科学,2006(5),82-86.
[203]莫莉.产业集群人才成长机理研究.博士学位论文,华中科技大学,2008.
[204]宁钟,刘学应.产业集群演进的系统动力学分析.预测,2004,23(2),66-69.
[205]牛冲槐.人才集聚效应及其评判.中国软科学,2006(4),114-123.
[206]牛冲槐.山西省地级市科技型人才聚集效应的实证研究,科技进步与对策,2012,29(2),149-153.
[207]潘镇,鲁明泓.中小企业绩效的决定因素——一项对426家企业的实证研究.南开管理评论,2005,8(3),54-59.
[208]钱雪亚,张小蒂.农村人力资本积累及其收益特征.中国农村经济,2000,(3),25-31.
[209]钱雪亚.人力资本水平：方法与实证.北京：商务印书馆,2011.
[210]秦志华.人力资源管理(第三版).北京：中国人民大学出版社,2012.
[211]任炜,牟刚.员工培训与企业绩效关系的实证研究——来自中国A股市场的经验证据.中国商贸,2011(9),67-68.
[212]阮建青,张晓波,卫龙宝.基于产业集群的包买商制与企业家才能.管理世界,2008(11),119-128.
[213]阮建青,张晓波,卫龙宝.危机与制造业产业集群的质量升级——基于浙 江产业集群的研究.管理世界,2010(2),69-79.
[214]盛世豪,郑燕伟.浙江现象：产业集群与区域经济发展.北京：清华大学出版社,2004.
[215]舒尔茨.论人力资本投资.北京：北京经济管理学院出版社,1999.
[216]舒尔茨.人力资本投资：教育和研究的作用.北京：商务印书馆,1990.
[217]孙健.人才集聚与产业集聚的互动关系研究.管理世界,2008(3),177-178.
[218]孙维峰,黄祖辉.广告支出、研发支出与企业绩效.科研管理,2013,34(2),44-51.
[219]孙晓华.产业集聚效应的系统动力学分析.科技管理研究.2007(12),248-250.
[220]孙晓华.产业集聚效应的系统动力学建模与仿真.科学学与科学技术管理,2008,(4),71-76.
[221]孙晓华.产业集聚效应的系统动力学模型研究.经济与管理,2007,21(5),10-13.
[222]孙熠,张静.关于产业集群中的人力资本效应分析.商场现代化.2008,(6)310-311.
[223]唐平.产业集群人力资本集聚效应实证研究.现代物业,2010,9(7),133-135.
[224]陶小龙.中国经济增长的人力资本结构问题研究,博士学位论文,云南大学,2012.
[225]汪华林.人才集聚：发展产业集群的基础保障.经济问题探索,2004(12)104-106.
[226]王安民.基于产业集群创新的创新型人力资本增值路径研究.中国科技论坛,2010(2),41-47.
[227]王秉安.产业集群竞争力构成要素模型研究——以晋江运动鞋产业集群为例,福建行政学院福建经济管理干部学院学报,2005(2),42-46.
[228]王崇曦,胡蓓.关于顺德产业集群环境对人才吸引的调研报告.世界经济文汇,2006(6),45-46.
[229]王奋,韩伯棠.科技人力资源区域集聚效应的实证研究.中国软科学,2006,(3),91-100.
[230]王奋,杨波.科技人力资源区域集聚影响因素的实证研究——以北京地区为例.科学学研究,2006,24(5),722-726.
[231]王国红,吴晓明,唐丽艳.基于系统动力学的高技术集群产学研集成创新研究.科学进步与对策,2011,28(7),61-66.
[232]王缉慈.创新的空间——企业集群与区域发展.北京：北京大学出版社,2001.
[233]王缉慈.关于中国产业集群研究的若干概念辨析.地理学报,2004(10),47-52.
[234]王建民.人力资本生产制度研究.北京：经济科学出版社,2001.
[235]王金营,贾少萌.中国区域人力资本积聚路径和机制研究.中国人口科学,2011,21-33.
[236]王金营.人力资本与经济增长——理论与实证北京：中国财政经济出版社,2001.
[237]王开国,宗兆昌.论人力资本性质与特征的理论渊源及其发展.中国社会科学,1999(6),33-46.
[238]王其藩.系统动力学(修订版).上海：上海财经大学出版社,2009.
[239]王业强,魏后凯.中国产业集群战略与政策考察.经济研究参考,2009(55),2-19.
[240]魏江,魏勇.产业集群学习机制多层解析.中国软科学,2004(1),121-125.
[241]魏江,朱海燕.高技术产业集群创新过程模式演化及发展研究——以杭州软件产业集群为例.研究与发展管理,2006,18(6),116-121.
[242]魏江,朱海燕.知识密集型服务业与产业集群发展的互动模式研究——以慈溪家电产业集群为例.研究与发展管理,2006,18(2),58-63.
[243]魏守华.集群竞争力的动力机制以及实证分析.中国工业经济,2002,(10),27-34.
[244]翁清雄,胡蓓,古家军.产业集群特征对集群内人才成长的影响——基于我国四个产业集群的一项实证研究.科研管理,2008,29(4),103-110.
[245]吴贵明,周碧华.产业集群人才优势形成机理研究,生产力研究,2007,(17)93-94+138.
[246]吴国玺,李长坡,郑敬刚.创新型产业集聚区形成的机理及发展模式研究.资源开发与市场,2010(12)：1105-1107.
[247]吴结兵,蔡宁.产业集群理论述评——从三个角度看集群理论的融合与发展.重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2007(6),16-21.
[248]吴结兵,郭斌.企业适应性行为、网络化与产业集群的共同演化——绍兴县纺织业集群发展的纵向案例研究.管理世界,2010(2),141-155.
[249]吴结兵,徐梦周.网络密度与集群竞争优势：集聚经济与集体学习的中介作用——2001～2004年浙江纺织业集群的实证分析.管理世界,2008(8),69-76.
[250]吴瑾,刘会武,王胜光.欧美产业集群政策的比较研究与思考.科研管理,2008,29(1),102-106.
[251]吴勤堂.产业集群与区域经济发展耦合机理分析,管理世界,2004(2),133-134.
[252]武勇,陈剑.人力资本、产业集群与区域产业结构间的影响机理分析.商业时代,2011(12),115-117.
[253]夏德孝.人力资本积累与城市经济增长研究.博士学位论文,西北大学,2008.
[254]徐光平.人力资本空间集聚与产业集群发展互动研究.硕士学位论文,山东师范大学,2008.
[255]徐健.基于人力资本管理的产业集群发展动力学探讨.人类工效学,2009(6),57-59.
[256]许庆瑞,毛凯军.试论企业集群形成的条件.科研管理,2003,24(1),72-76.
[257]雅各布·明塞尔.人力资本研究.北京：中国经济出版社,2003.
[258]杨长辉,高阳.人力资源集群与虚拟团队.科学管理研究,2003(2),99-101.
[259]杨建芳,龚六堂,张庆华.人力资本形成及其对经济增长的影响——一个包含教育和健康投入的内生增长模型及其检验.管理世界,2006,(5),10-18+34.
[260]杨文斌.基于系统动力学的企业成长研究.博士学位论文,复旦大学,2006.
[261]杨小凯,黄有光.张玉纲译.专业化与经济组织：一种新兴古典微观经济学框架.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2000.
[262]杨小凯.张定胜,张永生,李利明译.经济学——新兴古典与新古典框架.社会科学文献出版社,2003.
[263]姚先国,翁杰.企业对员工的入力资本投资研究.中国工业经济,2005,203(2),87-95.
[264]叶建亮.企业集群与知识溢出.经济科学,2001,3,23-30.
[265]喻萧萧.人力资本空间集聚机理研究——以山东省为例.国土与自然资源研究,2008(3),6-9.
[266]约翰·布里顿,杰弗里·高德,徐芬丽,吴晓卿,孙涛等译.人力资源管理理论与实践(第三版).北京：经济管理出版社,2005.
[267]岳书敬,刘朝明.人力资本与区域全要素生产率分析.经济研究,2006,(4),90-96+127.
[268]张帆.中国的物质资本和人力资本估算.经济研究,2000(8),65-71.
[269]张钢.人力资本、组织资本与组织创新.科学学研究,2000,18(1),67-76
[270]张国民,张咏,陈进.产业集群演化和发展中的人力资本作用研究.企业活力,2011(5),5-9.
[271]张嫘.人力资本积累.北京：中国农业出版社,2009.
[272]张敏.产业集群生成与发展的动力探源.生产力研究,2011(7),152-156.
[273]张西奎.产业集群人才集聚与人才吸引力实证研究.硕士学位论文,华中 科技大学,2006.
[274]张樨樨.产业集聚与人才集聚的互动关系评析.商业时代,2010(18),119-120.
[275]张霞,蔡根女.人才集群与产业集群的互动发展,重庆大学学报,2007,13(5),55-60.
[276]赵修文.人力资本整合与产业集群竞争力提升研究.成都：西南财经大学出版社,2011.
[277]赵玉林,李文超.基于系统动力学的产业结构演变规律仿真模拟实验研究.系统科学学报,2008,16(4),51-58.
[278]郑江淮,高彦彦,胡小文.企业“扎堆”、技术升级与经济绩效——开发区集聚效应的实证分析.经济研究,2008(5),33-47.
[279]中国产业集群发展报告课题组.中国产业集群发展报告.北京：机械工业出版社,2009.
[280]周均旭.产业集群人才吸引力影响机制研究.武汉：湖北人民出版社、湖北长江出版集团湖北人民出版社,2011.
[281]朱华晟,王玉华,彭慧.政企互动与产业集群空间结构演变——以浙江省为例.中国软科学,2005(1),107-113.
[282]朱华晟.浙江产业群——产业网络、成长轨迹与发展动力.杭州：浙江大学出版社,2003.
[283]朱杏珍.人才集聚过程中的羊群行为分析.数量经济技术经济研究,2002,(7)：53-56.
[284]朱杏诊.人才集聚的动力因素分析——以浙江省为例,社会科学战线,2010,(1),280-282.
[285]邹薇,代谦.技术模仿、人力资本积累与经济赶超.中国社会科学,2003,24(5),26-38.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |