用户名: 密码: 验证码:
两种色型豌豆蚜种群数量变化机制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文从环境因子(温度和紫外辐射)、种群内及种群间竞争、天敌防控三方面研究豌豆蚜(Acyrthosiphon piusm)种下色型分化生态机制,在12~32℃温度范围内在蚕豆植株上研究了2种色型豌豆蚜生长发育、繁殖力及生命表,同时研究了紫外UV-B辐射对2种色型豌豆蚜生物学特性的影响;其次对红色型和绿色型豌豆蚜的种群内及种群间竞争进行了深入研究;最后利用周集中方法研究了异色瓢虫Harmonia axyridis (Pallas)和多异瓢虫Adonia variegata (Goeze)对2种色型豌豆蚜的选择捕食作用,通过以上试验取得了以下结果。
     1.两种色型豌豆蚜生物学特性及种群生命表研究
     研究了在12~32℃6个温度条件下2种色型豌豆蚜(Acyrthosiphon piusm)的生长发育、繁殖和生命表。高温使2种色型豌豆蚜的死亡率上升,抑制豌豆蚜的生长发育,当温度升至32℃时,2种色型豌豆蚜不能发育至成虫。2种色型豌豆蚜的净增殖率在12℃~20℃时均随着温度的增高而升高,红色型豌豆蚜的净增殖率高于绿色型,在16℃和20℃条件下差异达到显著水平(P<0.05)。在24℃时,红色型豌豆蚜的净增殖率显著下降,而绿色型豌豆蚜显著上升,红色型豌豆蚜的净增殖率显著低于绿色型(P<0.05)。到28℃时,2种色型豌豆蚜的净增殖率均显著下降。在12℃~24℃条件下,2种色型豌豆蚜的内禀增长率均随着温度的上升而增加,除16℃时红色型豌豆蚜的内禀增长率因平均世代周期延长而显著低于绿色型(P<0.05)以外,其余3个温度条件下红色型豌豆蚜的内禀增长率与绿色型相比无显著差异(P>0.05)。到28℃,红色型豌豆蚜的内禀增长率显著低于绿色型豌豆蚜(P<0.05)。表明红色型豌豆蚜在较低温度条件下适应性较强,而绿色型豌豆蚜更适合较高温度。
     2.紫外辐射UV-B对不同色型豌豆蚜生物学特性的影响
     紫外UV-B辐射对红色型和绿色型豌豆蚜当代生物学特性有显著的影响,并且与温度和苜蓿品种密切相关。在甘农3号苜蓿上,16℃时,紫外UV-B辐射对红色型和绿色型豌豆蚜均无显著影响,20℃时,紫外UV-B辐射显著延缓了红色型豌豆蚜的发育历期(P<0.05),24℃时,紫外UV-B辐射显著延缓了绿色型豌豆蚜的发育历期(P<0.05);在甘农5号苜蓿上,16℃时,紫外UV-B辐射显著延缓了红色型豌豆蚜的生长(P<0.05),20℃和24℃时,紫外UV-B辐射显著延缓了绿色型豌豆蚜的生长(P<0.05)。通过研究不同紫外(UV-B)辐射时间(1,2,4,6,8,10h)对2种色型豌豆蚜后代生物学特性的影响,结果表明,紫外辐射对2种色型豌豆蚜生长发育的影响是可遗传的,在甘农3号苜蓿上,短时间紫外辐射能够促进红色型豌豆蚜的生长发育;在甘农3号和甘农5号苜蓿上,长时间紫外辐射均能抑制2种体色型豌豆蚜的生长发育,且绿色型比红色型敏感,表明紫外胁迫对豌豆蚜的影响与苜蓿品种存在一定的相关性。
     为了评估紫外UV-B连续多代短时间(10min、20min、30min、40min)紫外辐射对2种色型豌豆蚜生长发育及繁殖的影响,本试验通过紫外UV-B连续照射两代豌豆蚜,试验结果表明,2种色型豌豆蚜的F1代和F2代的发育历期与同代同色型对照组相比均显著延长(P<0.05),当辐射时间相同时,F2代的发育历期长于同色型F1代,2种色型豌豆蚜F2代均不能产蚜。随着照射时间的延长,存活率和生殖力逐渐降低,说明连续多代紫外辐射后可能会使豌豆蚜所受的伤害叠加,2种色型豌豆蚜在连续紫外辐射两代后,表现出了种群退化现象,在UV-B的影响下,在同一世代时随着辐射时间的延长,2种色型豌豆蚜净增殖率、内禀增长率均下降;随着世代的延续,2种色型豌豆蚜净增殖率、内禀增长率均下降,2种色型豌豆蚜F1净增殖率、内禀增长率等生命参数均下降,红色型豌豆蚜的F1净增殖率、内禀增长率等生命参数均显著低于绿色型,可能紫外辐射剂量的累积,红色型豌豆蚜所受累积伤害大于绿色型。
     3.两种色型豌豆蚜的资源竞争研究
     单种色型豌豆蚜从密度8头/株增至32头/株时,随着密度的升高,2种色型豌豆蚜的产蚜期和寿命显著缩短(P<0.05),产蚜量显著降低(P<0.05),说明2种色型豌豆蚜种群密度效应均存在一定的负效应。在总密度8头和16头时,2种色型豌豆蚜混合饲养的产蚜期、寿命与单种色型饲养相比无显著差异(P>0.05);在单种色型饲养的密度与混合饲养的同一色型密度相同时,由于混合饲养的总密度高于单种色型饲养的密度,混合饲养的产蚜期、寿显著短于单种色型饲养(P<0.05),产蚜量显著低于单种色型饲养(P<0.05);在32头密度时,单种群饲养的产蚜期、寿命、单头产蚜量与混合饲养时无显著差异(P>0.05)。在单种色型饲养条件下,同一密度下(除16头/株)红色型豌豆蚜的发育历期显著长于绿色型豌豆蚜(P<0.05),在相同密度条件下,红色型豌豆蚜的产蚜期、寿命、产蚜量与绿色型相比无显著差异(P>0.05);混合饲养中,在同一密度条件下,红色型豌豆蚜的产蚜期、寿命、产蚜量与绿色型相比无显著差异(P>0.05),说明红色型豌豆蚜在该环境条件下的竞争力与绿色型相当,无明显差异,红色型豌豆蚜与绿色型共存对环境表现了一定的适生性。
     4.多异瓢虫和异色瓢虫对两种色型豌豆蚜的选择性
     对2种色型豌豆蚜的选择捕食作用研究,结果表明,当2种色型豌豆蚜共存时,异色瓢虫成虫对红色型豌豆蚜在低密度(90头)和中密度(120头)时均不表现喜(偏)好性,而在高密度(150头)时表现正喜(偏)好性,对绿色型豌豆蚜在各密度条件下均不表现喜(偏)好性,异色瓢虫对红色豌豆蚜的瞬间攻击率和处理时间分别为:0.8741、0.006,异色瓢虫对绿色型豌豆蚜的瞬间攻击率和处理时间分别为:0.9372、0.007;多异瓢虫成虫对2种色型豌豆蚜的选择捕食作用,结果表明:多异瓢虫成虫对2种色型豌豆蚜在各密度下均不表现明显的喜(偏)好性,多异瓢虫对红色型豌豆蚜的瞬间攻击率和处理时间分别为:0.6658、0.0012,多异瓢虫对绿色型豌豆蚜的瞬间攻击率和处理时间分别为:0.7077、0.014。
Study on the ecological mechanism of color morph differentiation of species of peaaphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) from environment (temperature and UV-radiation), intraspecificcompetition and interspecific competition, predators control, first of all, the development,reproduction, and life table of the two color morph pea aphid were studied (Acyrthosiphonpiusm) at six constant temperatures ranged from12to32℃, meanwhile, studied onbiological characteristics of different color morphs of pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum).Secondly, the intra-specific competition of red and green color morph of pea aphid wereexplored. At last, the selective predation of Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) and Adonia variegata(Goeze) on red and green color morph pea aphid were conducted by the method of Zhoujizhong, the following results were obtained by the above test.
     1. Biological characteristics and life table of the experimental population of pea aphid(Acyrthosiphon pisum) in fresh plant
     The study of the development, reproduction, and life table of the two color morph peaaphid (Acyrthosiphon piusm) at six constant temperatures ranged from12to32℃, the resultshowed that the high temperature led to increase the mortality rate and inhibit the growth anddevelopment of the two color morph, the pea aphid could not develop to adult at32℃. Thenet reproduction rate (R0), intrinsic rate of increase (rm) of two color morph of pea aphidincreased with increasing temperature at ranged from12to20℃, and the net reproductionrate (R0) of the red color morph higher than the green color morph at12to20℃, andsignificantly higher than the green color morph at16and20℃(P<0.05). At24℃, the netreproduction rate (R0) of red color morph significantly decreased and the net reproduction rate(R0) of green color morph significantly increased (P<0.05), the net reproduction rate (R0) ofred color morph lower significantly than the green color morph at24℃(P<0.05). Until28℃, the net reproduction rate (R0) of two color morph both significantly decreased (P<0.05). The intrinsic rate of increase (rm) of two color morph increased with increasingtemperature at12℃~24℃, the intrinsic rate of increase (rm) of the red color morph lowerthan the green color morph at only16℃(P<0.05), the intrinsic rate of increase (rm) of thered color morph had no significant differences than green color morph at other threetemperature(P>0.05). Until28℃, the intrinsic rate of increase (rm) of the red color morph significantly lower than green color morph (P<0.05). It indicated that the red color morphhas great adaptable ability at lower temperature and the green color morph has great adaptableability at higher temperature.
     2. Effect of UV-B radiation on biological characteristics of different color morphs ofpea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum)
     In order to clarify the obvious effects of UV-B radiation on biological characteristics ofdifferent color morphs of pea aphid themselve, and the responses were relative to varieties ofalfalfa and temperature. At the16℃, UV-radiation had lesser effects on the growth durationand mass and MRGR of the red and green color morphs on Gannong3(P>0.05), at the20℃,delayed the development duration and reduced the MRGR of red color morph on Gannong3(P<0.05), but had lesser effect on the mass of red color morph on Gannong3(P>0.05), andat24℃, delayed the development duration and reduced the mass and MRGR of green colormorph on Gannong3(P<0.05), while at16℃, UV-B radiation had delayed the developmentduration and reduced the mass and MRGR of red color morph on Gannong5(P<0.05), but at20℃and24℃, delayed the development duration and reduced the mass and MRGR of greencolor morph on Gannong5(P<0.05). The objective of the paper was to study the influenceof different UV-radiation time(1,2,4,6,8,10h) on the offspring of red and green morphsof pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), Therefore, the results showed that the effects ofUV-B radiation on pea aphid is inherited; Exposure to relatively short duration of UV-Bradiation(1,2h) can only accelerate the development rate of red color morph on Gannong3,while exposure to relatively long time(10h) of UV-B radiation can reduce development ofboth color morphs on Gannong3and Gannong5, and the green color morph is more sensitiveto UV-B radiation than red color morph, the responses of two color morphs for UV-radiationrespectively were relative to varieties of alfalfa.
     The effect of the growth, development and reproduction of two color morph of pea aphidwere evaluated by the different UV-B time(10min、20min、30min、40min)for twosuccessive generations, the results show that the developmental duration of F1and F2generation significantly longer than the same color morph control (P<0.05), the developmentduration of F2generation longer than F1generation at same UV-radiation time, and the F2 generation of two color morph pea aphid can’t produce. The survive rate and fecundity slowlydecreased with increasing UV-radiation time, it indicated that the successive UV-radiationmay be caused the damage superposition, delayed growth and development, and the pea aphidcan’t produce offspring. The two color morph pea aphid showed the degradation ofpopulation after UV-B for two successive generations, with increasing UV-radidation timeand generation, the net reproduction rate (Ro) and intrinsic rate of increase (rm) of two colormorph in same generation were decreased, the the net reproduction rate (Ro) and intrinsic rateof increase (rm) of two color morph of F1generation decreased, and the the net reproductionrate (Ro) and intrinsic rate of increase (rm) of the red color morph of F1generationsignificantly lower than the green color morph, maybe the accumulation of UV-radiation, thedamage that the red color morph were radiated by UV-B greater than the green color morph.
     3. The intra-specific competition of red and green color morph of pea aphid
     When the single color morph pea aphid of the density of8,16,24and32pea aphids perplant are reared, the reproductive periods and longevity and progeny per aphid of two colormorph of pea aphid were decreased with the increasing density. Therefore, indicated thatnegative density-dependent effects were observed in this two color morph when they reacheda certain density. For two color morph of pea aphid, the total density of8and16pea aphidper plant, when the total density are same, the reproductive periods and longevity and progenyof which the red and green color morph reared together have no significant difference than thesingle color morph reared, the density of single color morph reared were same with the singlecolor morph of mixed reared, because the total density of mixed reared were more higher thansingle reared, so the the reproductive periods and longevity and progeny of mixed reared werelower than single color morph reared. the total density of32pea aphid per plant, thereproductive periods and longevity and progeny of the single color morph reared had nosignificant difference than mixed reared. Compared the biological parameters of two colormorph pea aphid single were reared in the same density, the development duration of redcolor morph were obviously longer than the green color morph in every density only thedensity of16pea aphid per plant (P<0.05). At the same density, the reproductive periods andlongevity and progeny of red color morph had no significant difference than the green color morph(P>0.05). Compared the biological parameters of mixed reared two color morph peaaphid in same density, the reproductive periods and longevity and progeny of red color morphhad no significant difference than the green color morph (P>0.05). Indicated that the abilityof competition of red color morph of pea aphid had significant difference than the greenmorph in environment conditions, red color morph performed certain adaptability at thisenvironment, because red color morph and green color morph coexistent on sameenvironment.
     4. Selective predation of Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) and Adonia variegata (Goeze) onred and green color morph pea aphid
     In this test, study on selective predation of the adult of Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) andAdonia variegata (Goeze) on red and green color morphs pea aphid Agyrthosiphon pisum.First of all, study on selective predation of the adult of Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) on red andgreen color morphs pea aphid, and the results showed that the adult beetle had no preferenceto red color morph in the low and midde to tal prey density (120and150), and positivepreference in the high total prey density (150). And no preference to green color morph in alldegrees of total prey density. The instaneous attack rate (a’) and treatment time (Th) ofHarmonia axyridis (Pallas) on red color morph were0.8741and0.006, the instaneous attackrate (a’) and treatmen time (Th) of Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) on th green color morph were0.9372and0.007. study on selective predation of the adult of Adonia variegata (Goeze) onred and green color morph pea aphid, and the results showed that the adult beetle had nopreference to red and green color morphs pea aphid. The instaneous attack rate (a’) andtreatment tiime (Th) of Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) on red color morph were0.6658and0.0012, the instaneous attack rate (a’) and treatment time (Th) of Adonia variegata (Goeze)on th green color morph were0.7077and0.014.
引文
[1]特木尔布和,乌日图,金小龙,双全.蚜虫对苜蓿危害的初步研究[J].内蒙古草业,2005,17(4):56-59
    [2]Harrington C D. Biological races of the pea aphid[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology,1945,38:12-22
    [3]Kugler J. L., Ratcliffe R. H. Resistance in alfalfa to a red form of the pea aphid (Homoptera:Aphididae)[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology,1983,76(1):74-76
    [4]Bommarco R, Ekbom B. Variation in pea aphid population development in three different habitats[J].Ecological Entomology,1996,21:235-240
    [5]张柳平,卢利霞,刘石娟,等.蚜虫基因组及功能基因组研究进展[J].应用昆虫学报,2011,48(6):1539-1542
    [6]张燕,吴国星,郭昆,等.豌豆蚜唾液蛋白家族的克隆及在不同发育阶段的表达[J].昆虫学报,2011,54(12):1445-1451
    [7]Campbell A, Mackauer M. Reproduction and population growth of the pea aphid (Homoptera:Aphididae) under laboratory and field conditions[J]. Canadian Entomologist,1997,109(2):277-284
    [8]Roitberg B D, Myers J H. Behavioural and physiological adaptations of pea aphids (Homoptera:Aphididae) to high ground temperatures and predator disturbance[J]. Canadian Entomologist,1979,111(4):515-519
    [9]Morgan D, Walters KFA, Aegerter J N. Effect of temperature and cultivar on pea aphid, Acyrthosiphonpisum (Homoptera: Aphididae) life history[J]. Bulletin of Entomological Research,2001,91(1):47-52
    [10]高有华,刘长仲.不同温度下的豌豆蚜实验种群生命表研究[J].植物保护,2008,34(4):57-59
    [11]Stacey D A, Fellowes MDE. Influence of temperature on pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera:Aphididae) resistance to natural enemy attack[J]. Bulletin of Entomological Research,2002,92(4):351-357
    [12]Julia F, Charles GHJ, Adam F S, Kim P, Sara V. Population differentiation and genetic variation inhost choice among pea aphids from eight host plant genera[J]. Evolution,2006,60(8):1574-1579
    [13]Radeliffe E B, Weires R W, Stucker R E. Influence of cultivars and pesticides on pea aphid, spottedalfalfa aphid, and associated arthropod tax a in aMinnesota alfalfa ecosystem[J]. EnvironmentalEntomology,1976,5(6):1195-1207
    [14]Buchman N, Cuddington K. Influence of Pea Morphology and Interacting Factors on Pea Aphid(Homoptera: Aphididae) Reproduction.[J]. Environmental Entomology,2009,38(4):962-970
    [15]武德功,王森山,刘长仲,等.豌豆蚜刺吸胁迫对不同苜蓿品种体内单宁含量及生理活性的影响[J].草地学报,2011,19(2):351-355
    [16]武德功,贺春贵,刘长仲,等.不同苜蓿品种对豌豆蚜的生华抗性机制[J].草地学报,2011,19(3):497-501
    [17]Sylwia G, Leszczynski B, Wieslaw O. Effect of low and high-saponin lines of alfalfa on pea aphid[J].Journal of Insect Physiology,2006,52(7):737-743
    [18]Harper A M, Sehaber B D, Story T P. Effect of swathing and clear-cutting alfalfa on insect populationsin Southern Alberta[J]. Journal of Entomological Science,2007,42(2):200-206
    [19]刘长仲,严林,魏列新,等.刈割对苜蓿主要害虫种群数量动态的影响[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(3):691-694
    [20]刘长仲,严林,张新瑞,等.蚜虱净对苜蓿主要害虫及天敌种群数量的影响[J].生态学报,2008,28(10):5188-5193
    [21]Chow A, Mackauer M. The influence of prior ovipositional experience on host selection in four speciesof aphidid wasps (Hymenoptera:Aphidiidae)[J]. Journal of Insect Behavior,1992,5(1):99-108
    [22]Libbrecht R, Gwynn D, Fellowes M. Aphidius ervi Preferentially Attacks the Green Morph of the PeaAphid,Acyrthosiphon pisum[J]. Journal of Insect Behavior,2007,20(1):25-32
    [23]Liu Chang-zhong, Zhou Shurong, Yan Lin, et al. Competition among the adults of three grasshoppers(Orthoptera:Acrididae) on an alpine grassland[J]. Journal of Applied Entomology,2007,131(3):153-159
    [24]Muller C B, Godfray HCJ. Apparent competition between two aphid species[J]. Journal of AnimalEcology,1997,66(1):57-64
    [25]Abrama P A, Kawecki T J. Apparent competition or Apparent mutualism? Shared predation whenpopulation cycles[J]. Ecology,1998,79(1):201-212
    [26]Liu Changzhong, Yan Lin, Li Huangrong, et al. Effects of predator-mediated apparent competition onthe population dynamics of Tetranychus urticae[J]. BioControl,2006,51(4):453-463
    [27]Kunert G, Trautsch J, Weisser W W. Density dependence of the alarm phenomone effect in pea aphids,Acyrthosiphon pisum (Stemorrhyncha:Aphididae)[J]. European Journal of Entomology,2007,104(1):47-50
    [28]Schwartzheng E G, Kunert G, Stephan C, et al. Real-time analysis of alarm pheromone emission by thepea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) under predation[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology,2008,34(1):1-6
    [29]高有华,刘长仲.多异瓢虫对豆无网长管蚜捕食作用研究[J].植物保护,2006,32(6):51-53
    [30]Dukas R, Duan JJ. Potential titness consequences of associative learning in a parasitoid wasp[J].Behavioral Ecology,2000,11(5):536-543
    [31]Weisser, W.W and Braendle, C. Body colour and genetic variation in winged morph production in thepea aphid[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,2001,99:217-223
    [32]Weisser, W W, Braendle, C, Minoretti, N. Predtor-induce morphological shift in the pea aphid[J].Proceedings:Royal Society,266(1424):1175-1181
    [33]Henry L M, Gillespie D R, Roitberg B D. Does mother really know best? Oviposition preferencereduces reproductive performance in the generalist parasitoid Aphidius ervi[J]. EntomologiaExperimentaliset Applicata,2005,116(3):167-174
    [34]Amanda Chau&Manfre Mackauer. Host-instar selection in the aphid parasitoid Monoctonus paulensis(Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae): a preference for small pea aphids [J]. European Journal ofEntomology,2000,97:347-353
    [35]Dill L M, Fraser AHG, Roitberg B D. The economics of escape behavior in the pea aphid,Acyrthosiphon pisum[J]. Oecologia,1990,83(4):473-478
    [36]He X Z, Wang Q, Teulon DAJ. Host Age preference behavior in aphidius ervi haliday (Hymenoptera:Aphidiidae)[J]. Journal Insect Behaviour,2011,24(6):447-455
    [37]Losey J E, Harmon J, Ballantyne F, et al. A polymorphism maintained by opposite patterns ofparasitism and predation[J]. Nature,1997,338:269-272
    [38]Henter H J, Via S. The potential for coevolution in a host-parasitoid system.1.Genetic variation withinan aphid population in susceptibility to a parasitic wasp[J]. Evolution,1995,49(3):427-438
    [39]Langley S A, Tilmon K J, Cardinale B J, et al. Learning by the parasitoid wasp, Aphidiuservi(Hymenoptera: Braconidae), alters individual fixed preferences for pea aphid color morphs[J].Oecologia,2006,150(1):172-179
    [40]Campbell A, Mackauer M. Reproduction and population growth of the pea aphid(Homoptera:Aphididae) under laboratory and field conditions[J]. The Canadian Entomologist,1977,109(2):277-284
    [41]Frazer B D, Gill B. Hunger, movement and predation of Coccinella californica on pea aphids in thelaboratory and in the field[J]. The Canadian Entomologist,1981,113(11):1025-1033
    [42]Weisser W W, Braendle C, Minoretti N. Predator-induced morphological shift in the pea aphid[J].Proceedings of the Royal Society B,1999,226(1424):1175-1181
    [43]Dettner K. Chemosystematics and evolution of beetle chemical defenses[J]. Annual Review ofEntomology,1987,32:17-48
    [44]Montgomery M E, Nault L R. Effects of age and wing polymorphism on the sensitivity of Myzuspersicae to alarm pheromone[J]. Annals of the Entomological Society of America,1978,71(5):788-790
    [45]Chau A, Mackauer M. Dropping of pea aphids from feeding site: a consequence of parasitism by thewasp, Monoctonus paulensis[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,2007,83(3):247-252
    [46]Hiroyuki TAKEMOTO, Wilf Powell, John PICKETT, et al. TAKABAYASHI. Learning is involved inthe response of parasitic wasps Aphidius ervi(Haliday)(Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to volatiles fromabroad bean plant, Vicia faba (Fabaceae), infested by aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris)(Homoptera:Aphididae)[J]. Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology,2009,44(1):23-28
    [47]Battaglia D, Pennacchio F, Romano A, et al. The role of physical cues in the regulation of hostrecognition and acceptance behavior of Aphidius ervi haliday (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)[J]. Jourmalof Insect Behavior,1995,8(6):739-750
    [48]Braendle C, Weisser W W. Variation in escape behavior of red and green clones of the pea aphid[J].Journal of Insect Behavior,2001,14(4):497-509
    [49]Evans D L,Schmidt J O. Insect Defenses:Adaptive mechanisms and strategies of prey and predators[M].State University of New York,1990,482
    [50]Dixon AFG. The escape responses shown by certain aphids to the presence of the coccinellid, Adaliadecempunctata(L.)[J]. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London,1958,110(11):319-334
    [51]黄晓磊,乔格侠.蚜虫类昆虫生物学特性及蚜虫学研究现状(1)[J].生物学通报,2005,11:5-7
    [52]黄晓磊,乔格侠.蚜虫类昆虫生物学特性及蚜虫学研究现状(2)[J].生物学通报,2005,12:5-6
    [53]Mousseaux E, Beygui F, Bittoun J, et al. Mass and geometry of the left ventricle. Contribution ofultrafast computed x-ray tomography and magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Archives des maladies duCoeur et des vaisseaux,1991,84(4):29-38
    [54]程茂高,乔卿梅,原国辉.昆虫体色分化研究进展[J].昆虫知识,2005,(05):502-505
    [55]吴云锋,周广和,柳树斌.蚜虫传毒专化与病毒付着蛋白的关系[J].西北农业大学,1999,8(4):5-7
    [56]吴云锋.麦蚜循回传毒过程的超微结构研究[J].西北农业学报,1999,8(3):25-28
    [57]武德功,贺春贵,刘长仲,等.不同苜蓿品种对豌豆蚜的生化抗性机制[J].草地学报,2011,19(3):497-501
    [58]武德功,王森山,刘长仲,等.豌豆蚜刺吸胁迫对不同苜蓿品种体内单宁含量及生理活性的影响[J].草地学报,2011,19(2):351-355
    [59]何承刚,杨志新,邵建平,等.增强UV-B辐射对两个烤烟品种主要化学成分的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(6):767-771
    [60]Mckenzie R L, Bj rn L O, Bais A, etal. Changes in biologically active ultraviolet radiation reaching theEarth's surface[J]. Journal of Photochemistry&Photobiology B: Biology,2003,2:5-15
    [61]唐莉娜,林文雄,梁义元,等. UV-B辐射增强对水稻蛋白质及核酸的影响研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12(1):40-42
    [62]Wilson S R, Solomon K R, Tang X. Changes in tropospheric composition and air quality due tostratospheric ozone depletion and climate change[J]. Photochemical&Photobiological Sciences,2007,6(3):301-310
    [63]Teramura A H, Ziska L H, Sztein A. Changes in growth and photosynthetic capacity of rice withincreased UV-B radiation[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,1991,83(3):373-380
    [64]He J, Humang L K, Chow W S, et al. Reaponse of rice and pea plants to hardening with low doses ofultraviolet-B radiation[J].Australian Journal of Plant Physiology,1994,21(5):563-574
    [65]唐莉娜,林文雄,梁义元,等. UV-B辐射增强对水稻蛋白质及核酸的影响研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12(1):40-42
    [66]吴杏春,林文雄,郭玉春,等.植物对UV-B辐射增强响应的研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2001,9(3):52-55
    [67]闫生荣,周青.紫外辐射与复合胁迫对植物抗氧化酶系统的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(3):195-197
    [68]李元,王勋陵.增强的UV-B辐射对麦田生态系统中种群数量动态的影响[J].生态学报,2001,21(1):131-135
    [69]祭美菊,冯虎元,安黎哲,等.增强的UV-B辐射对植物影响的研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(3):359-364
    [70]李元,祖艳群,王勋陵.增强的UV-B辐射对春小麦植株化学成分、真菌定殖和分解的影响[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(2):223-225
    [71]安黎哲,冯虎元,王勋陵.增强的紫外线–B辐射对几种作物和品种生长的影响[J].生态学报,2001,21(2):249-253
    [72]余多慰,柯惟中.水溶液中DNA紫外辐射损伤的分子机制研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2000,20(3):311-314
    [73]杨志敏,颜景义,郑有飞.紫外线辐射增加对大豆光合作用和生长的影响[J].生态学报,1996,16(2):154-159
    [74]余多慰,柯惟中.水溶液中DNA紫外辐射损伤的分子机制研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2000,20(3):311-314
    [75]林文雄,吴兴春,梁康迳,等. UV-B辐射增强对水稻多胺代谢及内源激素含量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(7):807-813
    [76]张建民.紫外线对黑尾果蝇的生物学效应[J].昆虫知识,1994,31(4):242-244
    [77]姚建秀,赵惠燕.紫外条件诱导下麦长管蚜DNA的变异研究[J].西北农业学报,2001,10(1):33-36
    [78]蔡风环,赵惠燕.麦长管蚜自然群体的遗传变异研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2004,32(2):21-24
    [79]都二霞,郭建文,赵惠燕.紫外辐射诱导桃蚜DNA变异[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(7):1245-1249
    [80]胡祖庆,赵惠燕,亢菊侠,等.紫外辐射对两种体色型麦长管蚜生物学特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(4):1002-1006
    [81]胡祖庆,亢菊侠,赵惠燕,等.不同紫外(UV-B)辐射时间对两种体色型麦长管蚜后代生物学特征的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(7):1812-1816
    [82]Gross,p,and Price,P.W. Plant influences on parasitism of two leafminer: a test of enemy-fee space[J].Ecology,1988,69(5):1506-1516
    [83]Thompson J N. Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference andperformance of offspring in phytophagous insects[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,1988,47(1):3-14
    [84]娄永根,程家安.植物-植食性昆虫-天敌三营养层次的相互作用及其研究方法[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(3):325-331
    [85]李运瓷,李百炼,张国安.昆虫生态学概论[M].湖北:湖北科学技术出版社,1987
    [86]梅流柱,周昌清.种内竞争对桔小实蝇种群动态的影响[J].中山大学学报论丛,1995,2:41-46
    [87]孟玲,李保平.棉蚜种内竞争对其种群数量的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报,2000,23(3):42-44
    [88]Strong D R, Lawton J H, Southwood S R. Insects on plants Community patterns and mechanisms[M].Harvard University Press,Cambridge. Massachusetts. USA,1984
    [89]李慧仁,迟德富,李晓灿,等.林间蚜虫3种天敌间竞争干扰的研究[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(11):145-150.
    [90]Moran N A, Whitham T G. Interspecific competition between root-feeding and leaf-feeding aphidsmediated by host-plant resistanced[J]. Ecology,1990,71(3):1050-1058
    [91]邹运鼎,王弘法.农业昆虫生态学[M].安徽:安徽科技出版社,1987
    [92]Denno R F, Mark,S.,Mcclure,M.S. Interspecific interactions inphytopha-gous insects: Competitionreexamined and resurrected[J]. Annual. Review of Entomology,1995,40:297-331
    [93]张孝義.昆虫生态及预测预报(3版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001
    [94]Grasswitz T R, Resse B D. Biology and host selection behavior of the aphid hyperparasitoid alloxystavictrix in association with the primary parasitoid Aphidius colemani and the host aphid Myzuspersicae[J]. Biocontrol,1998,43(3):261-271
    [95]Vison S B. Host selection by insect parasitoids[J]. Annual review of entomology,1976.21:109-133
    [96]Okuda T, Ceryngier P. Host discrimination in Dinocampus coccinellae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), asolitary parasitoid of coccinellid beetles[J]. Applied Entomology and Zoology,2000,35(4):535-540
    [97]Salt,G. Experimental studies in insect parasitism.V.Thesense used by Trichogramma to distinguishbetween parasitized and unparasitized hosts[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society.London.B,1937,122:57-75.
    [98]刘树生,汪庆庚.菜蛾啮小蜂对寄主龄期的选择性和适合性[J].中国生物防治,1999,15(1):1-4
    [99]Godfray H C J. Parasitoids:Behavioural and Evolutionary Ecology[M]. Princeton University Press,Chichester,UK.,1984
    [100]曹林,李保平.寄主龄期对可疑柄瘤蚜茧蜂寄生及其后代适合度的影响[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(11):1380-1383
    [101]甘明,苗雪霞,丁德诚.日本柄瘤蚜茧蜂与其寄主豆蚜的相互作用:寄主龄期选择及其对发育的影响[J].昆虫学报,2003,46(5):598-604
    [102]甘明,苗雪霞,丁德诚.日本柄瘤蚜茧蜂的寄生对黑豆蚜生化代谢的影响[J].植物保护学报,2003,30(3):255-260
    [103]Chau A, Mackauer M. Host-instar selection in the aphid parasitoid Monoctonus paulensis(Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiidae): a preference for small pea aphids[J]. European Journal ofEntomology,2000,97:347-353
    [104]Ueno,T. Host age preference and sex allocation in the pupal parasitoid Itoplecis naranyae(Hymenoptera:Ichneunomidae)[J].Annals of the Entomological Society of America,1997,90(5):640-645
    [105]甘明.日本柄瘤蚜茧蜂的寄生对黑豆蚜的发育和生化代谢影响的研究[D].2002
    [106]丁德诚,潘务耀,唐予颖.松突圆蚧花角蚜小蜂的生物学[J].昆虫学报刊,1995,38(1):42-53
    [107]王方海,古德祥,温瑞贞.寄生蜂对寄主生长发育的调控[J].昆虫天敌,2000,22(4):177-181
    [108]Kitano,H. Possible role of teratocytes of the gregarious parasitoid, Cotesia (Apanteles) glomerata inthe suppression of phenoloxidase activity in the larval host, Pieris rapae crucivora[J]. Archives fofInsect Biochemistry and Physiology,1990,13(3-4):177-185
    [109]戈峰,丁岩钦.棉田害虫生态调控的原理与方法[C].全国首届新学说、新观点学术讨论会论文集,中国科学技术出版社,1993,214-217
    [110]戈峰,丁岩钦.龟纹瓢虫对瓜蚜的捕食行为[J].昆虫学报,1995,38(4):436-441
    [111]丁岩钦.中华草蛉对棉铃虫和瓜蚜的捕食作用研究[J].生物防治通报,1986,2(3):97-102
    [112]李超,丁岩钦.草间小黑蛛对瓜铃虫幼虫的捕食作用及模拟的研究,捕食者-单种猎物系统的研究[J].生态学报,1982,2(3):239-253
    [113]崔素贞.小花蝽生物学特性及其对主要棉虫控制作用的研究[J].棉花学报,1994,6(增刊):78-83
    [114]荆英,黄建,韩巨才,等.小黑瓢虫与两种猎物作用系统研究:选择捕食作用[J].生态学报,2004,24(2):292-296
    [115]田静,高宝嘉,马建昭,等.环斑猛猎蝽对猎物的选择不是作用[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(10):1563-1568
    [116]贺春贵.苜蓿病虫草鼠害防治[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004
    [117]张新瑞,刘长仲,严林,等.苜蓿田主要节肢动物种群数量研究[J].草地学报,2007,15(6):556-560
    [118]徐林波,刘爱萍,王慧,等.龟纹瓢虫对苜蓿蚜的捕食效应[J].草地学报,2007,15(3):296-298
    [119]白文辉,刘爱萍,宋银芳,等.我国北方主要栽培牧草害虫种类的调查[J].中国草地,1990,(5):58-60
    [120]He C G, Zhang X G. Field evaluation of Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) for resistance to aphids innorthern China[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,2006,57(4):471-475
    [121]Morris R F, Miller C A. The development of life tables for the spruce budworm[J]. Canadian Journalof Zoology,1954,32:283-301
    [122]刘长仲,杜军利,张廷伟,等.温度对三叶草彩斑蚜种群参数的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(7):1927-1932
    [123]苗伟,吕昭智,于江南.温度对棉蚜发育与繁殖力影响[J].新疆农业科学,2008,45(6):1130-1135
    [124]刘长仲.二斑叶螨实验种群生命表的组建与分析[J].植物保护,2000,26(4):15-17
    [125]牛永浩,周长勇,花蕾.二斑叶螨在4种寄主植物上的实验种群生命表组建与分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2008,36(3):166-170
    [126]高有华.苜蓿田豆无网长管蚜的消长动态研究[D].2006.
    [127]赵惠燕,张改生,汪世泽.棉蚜体色变化与染色体观察[J].昆虫知识,1993,30(4):218-220
    [128]杜桂林,李克斌,尹娇,等.影响麦长管蚜体色变化的主导因素[J].昆虫知识,2007,44(2):353-357
    [129]邓明明,高欢欢,李丹,等.温度对麦长管蚜体色变化的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(23):7203-7210
    [130]Blackman R L. Stability and variation in aphid colonal lineages[J]. Biological Journal of the LinneanSociety,1979,11(3):259-277.
    [131]原国辉,彭红,潘森.棉蚜在不同寄主上的体色分化研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2002,36(1):7-10
    [132]高有华,刘长仲.不同温度下的豌豆蚜实验种群生命表研究[J].植物保护,2008,34(4):57-59
    [133]宫亚军,石宝才,路虹,等.温度对3种蚜虫生长发育及繁殖的影响[J].华北农学报,2006,21(5):96-98
    [134]冯亚宁,张栋海,刘智敏,等.温度对苜蓿试验种群参数的影响[J].草原与草坪,2008,3:60-61
    [135]Almeida E S, Varanda E M, Barosela J R. Resistance and susceptibility of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)Cultivars to the aphid Therioaphis maculate (Homoptera:Aphididae): insect biology and cultivarevaluation[J]. Insect science,2006,13(1):55-60
    [136]陈应武,窦彩红.5种恒定温度下苜蓿斑蚜实验种群生命表的研究[J].河南农业科学,2008,3:78-82
    [137]古丽加马丽·吐尔汗,王登元,王华,等.5种恒定温度下桃粉蚜实验种群的研究[J].新疆农业科学,2011,48(12):2230-2233
    [138]Bacher S,lunder S. Picky predatators and the function of the faecal shield of a cassidine larva[J].Functional Ecology,2005,19(2):263-272
    [139]McCloud E S, Berenbaurn M. Effects of enhanced UV-B radiation on aweedy forb (plantagolanceolata) and its interactions with a generalist and specialist herbivore[J]. EntomologiaExperimentalis et Applicata,1999,93(3):233-247
    [140]Chyzik R, Dobrinin S, Antignus Y. Effect of a UV-deficient environment on the biology and flightactivity of Myzus persicae and its hymenopterous parasite Aphidius matricariae[J]. Phytoparasitica,2003,31(5):467-477
    [141]Chiel E, Messika Y. Steinberg S, Antignus Y. The effect of UV-absorbing plastic sheet on theattraction and host location ability of three parasitoids:Aphidius colemani,Diglyphus isaea andEretmocerus mundus[J]. BioControl,2006,51(1):65-78
    [142]朱国平,杨杰,张丽,等.连续多代UV-B处理麦长管蚜生态学的影响[J].西北农业学报,2012,21(8):63-67
    [143]张迎梅,李元,王勋陵,等.紫外辐射增强对麦二叉蚜发生量的影响[J].环境科学,1999,20(3):66-68
    [144]Caillaud C M, Dedryver C A, Simon J C. Development and reproductive potential of the cereal aphidSitobion avenae on resistant wheat lines (Triticum monococcum)[J]. Annals of Applied Biology,1994,125(2):219-232
    [145] Caldwell M M, Flint S D. Stratospheric ozone reduction, solar UV-B radiation and terrestrialecosystem[J]. Climatic Change,1994,28(4):375-394
    [146]Stebbing A R D. Hormesis the stimulation of growth by low levels of inhibitors[J]. Science of theTotal Environment,1982,22(3):213-234
    [147]任广伟,史万华,张连涛.山东烟蚜种群动态变异及其两种色型的消长规律研究[J].中国农业通报,2002,18(4):65-66
    [148]周蕊,崔晋波,邓永学,等.不同温度下玉米象与谷蠹种内和种间竞争研究[J].浙江农业大学报,2012,24(4):637-641
    [149]顾耘.二斑叶螨与山楂叶螨种间竞争的研究[J].华东昆虫学报,1997,6(1):71-76
    [150]周昌清,梅流柱.瓜实蝇和南瓜实蝇的种内竞争[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),1999,38(2):61-64
    [151]周亦红,赵志模,邓新平.美洲斑潜蝇和南美斑潜蝇同龄幼虫种内竞争的研究[J].植物保护,2000,26(6):1-3
    [152]胡玲玲,刘勇,徐洪富,等.桃蚜、萝卜蚜的种内密度和种间竞争效应[J].华东昆虫学报,2004,13(1):77-84
    [153]胡玲玲.桃蚜和萝卜蚜的种内种间效应研究[D].山东农业大学硕士论文,2004
    [154]周集中,陈常铭.模拟模型的研究Ⅱ.单种捕食者-单种猎物系统的模拟模型及其稳定性分析[J].生态学报,1986,6(3):238-247
    [155]周集中,陈常铭.拟环狼蛛对褐飞虱的捕食作用及其模拟模型的研究[J].生态学报,1987,7(4):349-358
    [156]周集中,陈常铭.拟环纹狼蛛对褐飞虱的捕食作用及其模拟模型的研究Ⅲ.选择捕食作用[J].1987,7(3):228-237
    [157]阎桂云,蔡晓明,陈济丁,等.七星瓢虫对麦长管蚜、禾谷縊管蚜捕食捕食选择性研究[J].生物数学学报,1993,8(2):48-56
    [158]郭丽娜,王洪平.异色瓢虫对麦蚜和红蜘蛛的捕食功能反应[J].河南农业科学,2008,4:72-73
    [159]王涛,张悦,孙玉刚,等.异色瓢虫显明变种对白杨毛蚜和白毛蚜选择效应研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(28):17286-17287
    [160]王涛,张悦,王金秀,等异色瓢虫显现变种对白杨毛蚜和白毛蚜选择效应研究[J].辽宁林业科技,2011,5:8-11
    [161]荆英.小黑瓢虫与其猎物及竞争种作用系统的研究[D].福建农林大学博士论文,2003
    [162]刘万学,张毅波,万方浩.龟纹瓢虫对烟粉虱和棉蚜取食选择及适合度比较研究[J].中国生物防治,2008,24(4):293-297
    [163]马江,何玉琳,刘科雨,等.两种捕食性天敌对棉虫及卵的选择效应[J].新疆农业科学,2002,39(3):139-142
    [164]杨惠玲.七星瓢虫对松大蚜和棉蚜的选择效应[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(8):149-150

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700