矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展机理及评价研究
摘要
近年来,我国经济社会保持了良好的发展态势,但同时也面临着资源约束趋紧、环境污染严重、生态系统退化等严峻形势。特别是在国民经济发展中扮演着重要角色的矿产资源密集型区域,由于其自身发展所倚重的矿产资源具有不可再生性和可耗竭性,这些区域多数都面临着资源趋于枯竭甚至生存危机的局面。
随着矿产资源的逐渐枯竭及相关资源产业的逐渐衰退,矿产资源密集型区域不同程度地出现了较为典型的经济、社会以及生态环境等方面的问题,诸多问题的出现,使得这些区域的持续健康发展受到一定的影响。如何调整发展策略,在发展中逐步解决这些问题,进而探索出一条可持续发展之路,推动矿产资源密集型区域绿色转型,实现资源节约、环境友好的新型可持续发展模式,成为全社会广泛关注的紧迫而重要的现实课题。
绿色发展的本质是通过减少对能源资源的过度消耗,加强环境保护和生态治理,追求经济、社会、生态全面协调可持续发展。面对日趋强化的资源环境约束,国家“十二五”规划纲要明确提出要坚持绿色发展,综合运用多种手段,增强可持续发展能力,充分彰显了政府坚定走绿色发展之路的决心和信心。当下,研究并探索建立一套有利于推动矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展的综合评价指标体系,进而动态评价矿产资源密集型区域的绿色发展能力,显得必要而迫切。
基于此,本文在系统总结国内外相关研究成果的基础上,综合运用可持续发展理论、系统科学理论、自组织理论等多学科理论,初步界定了矿产资源密集型区域及其绿色发展的内涵,接着对矿产资源密集型区域的绿色发展机理进行了分析,并结合矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标体系的构建目标和原则,从定性角度初步构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标体系,并进一步用定量方法对指标进行筛选,然后构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展评价的熵权系数评价模型以及指标预测模型,并结合河南嵩县进行了实证研究,最后提出了相应的保障措施。
本文的主要研究工作及结论如下：
(1)界定了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展的内涵,明确了矿产资源密集型区域的发展目标及方向。矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展是以绿色发展理念为指导,立足于当前科技水平和经济社会发展实际,在资源环境承载力允许范围内,通过改变企业、产业及政府等主体的行为,实现企业绿色运营、产业绿色重构和政府绿色管理,形成社会和谐美好、经济健康发展、技术创新进步、资源节约利用、生态环境友好的新型可持续发展模式。
(2)建立了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展机理分析三力模型。矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展系统模型由动力系统、推力系统和效力系统共同构成。动力系统解决的是矿产资源密集型区域为何进行绿色发展的问题,它由社会、经济、技术、资源、环境等五大因素组成。推力系统解决的是矿产资源密集型区域如何进行绿色发展的问题,涉及企业、产业、政府等三大主体。效力系统解决的是矿产资源密集型区域进行绿色发展要达到何种程度的问题,也即绿色发展的效果度量问题,是对上述五大因素和三大主体的综合考察反馈。
(3)建立了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标体系。以矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标体系构建的目标和原则为指导,从定性角度初步海选了127个二级指标,其中包括社会、经济、技术、资源、环境等五大因素以及企业、产业、政府等三大主体的各个层面,并结合研究区域实际,按照指标筛选流程,从定量方面构建了8个一级指标、20个子类指标、79个二级指标组成的嵩县绿色发展综合评价指标体系。
(4)构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价的熵权系数评价模型。借鉴基于主分量分析法、模糊综合评价法、层次分析法、协调度评价法、多目标综合评价法、熵权系数法等区域可持续发展评价模型,构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价的熵权系数评价模型,并介绍了评价过程。
(5)构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标的预测模型。通过五个常用模型的计算,发现线性模型在所有指标的拟合过程中效果最好,于是本文选用其作为矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标的预测模型。
(6)实证评价了嵩县绿色发展能力,预测了各指标10年后的数据。通过本文构建的矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价的熵权系数评价模型,结合指标筛选后的综合评价指标体系,对嵩县的区域绿色发展能力进行了实证研究。结果表明,除了资源指标,嵩县其他7项指标都表现出较强或很强的绿色发展能力。
(7)提出了相应的保障措施。本文从五大动力系统因素和三大推力主体角度分别就社会、经济、科教、资源、环境、企业、产业、政府等八个方面提出了相关保障措施,即：社会因素方面,要充分调动社会公众参与绿色发展的主动性,改善人口结构,提高居民生活质量,扩大社会保障覆盖面；经济因素方面,以绿色经济理念为指导,实现矿产资源密集型区域经济的可持续发展,注重经济效率,改善经济结构；科教因素方面,树立“科技引领经济、科技支撑发展”的指导思想,加大科技普及力度,调整教育结构,提高教育水平；资源因素方面,树立资源节约,高效利用的理念,控制资源总量,合理开发资源；环境因素方面,大力推广新工艺,加大环境污染治理力度,加强生态环境保护,完善矿产资源开发利用生态恢复补偿机制；企业主体角度,要强化企业节能减排主体地位,建立绿色企业运营制度,增强企业自主创新能力；产业主体角度,构建绿色产业体系,加快服务业市场建设,开展地质旅游项目；政府主体角度,实施绿色管理,营造绿色发展环境,大力发展社会事业,加快推动城镇化进程。
本文可能的创新点如下：
(1)初步建立了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展机理分析三力模型。矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展系统模型由动力系统、推力系统和效力系统共同构成。动力系统解决的是矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展的原因问题,推力系统解决的是矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展该如何做的问题,效力系统解决的是矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展达到什么程度的问题。
(2)初步建立了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标体系。以矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标体系构建的目标和原则为指导,首先从定性的角度海选指标,然后根据建立的指标筛选流程图,从定量方面筛选构建研究区域的绿色发展综合评价指标体系。
(3)初步构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价的熵权系数评价模型。借鉴模糊综合评价法、层次分析法、协调度评价法、多目标综合评价法、熵权系数法等区域可持续发展评价模型,初步构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价的熵权系数评价模型,并介绍了评价过程。
In recent years, China's economy and society have maintained a good momentum of development, but also facing tight resource constraints, and serious environmental pollution, ecosystem degradation grim situations. As the major supplier of energy and raw materials, mineral resource-intensive regions have been important for the national economy, which play an important supporting role in the sustained and rapid development of the national economy.
However, as time goes on, these regions are prone to exhausted or even to die out due to the natural of the mineral resources such as non-renewable and easily exhaustible. With the gradually exhaustion of the resource and the recession of the leading industry, a serious of economic and social issues has emerged in these regions and the issues has inevitably affect the further development. How to avoid the die out of resource and how to explore a sustainable way for the further development have arose the widely concern among the society. Whether these regions can success in sustainable development does have a tight connect with the development of the nation and the stability of the society. It has become a emergent and significant issue that how to optimize the strategies of the development in order to promote the sustainable development.
The essence of green development is the pursuit of comprehensive, balanced and sustainable development of economy, society and ecology by reducing the excessive consumption of energy resources and strengthening environmental protection and ecological management. Faced of increasingly constraints of resources and environment, the national "12th Five-Year Plan" has been made to adhere to green development, focus on energy conservation and emission reduction, improve the incentive and restraint mechanisms, accelerate the construction of resource-saving and environment-friendly production methods and consumption patterns, enhance the capacity of sustainable development, and improve the level of ecological civilization. This has fully demonstrated the determination of persisting in the path of green development. It is necessary and urgent to explore a comprehensive evaluation index system which is conducive to promote the green development in mineral resource-intensive regions, as well as the vital foundation to assess dynamically the capacity of green development in mineral resource-intensive regions.
Based on the above-mentioned situation, starting from the research of these regions and summarized the researching result of both domestic and foreign countries, making use of sustainable development theory, system theory, self-organization theory, this paper initially defines the mineral resource-intensive region and its green development, and then this paper has carried on the analysis to the mineral resource-intensive regional green development mechanism. And also combined with the construction of goal and the principle of green development for mineral resource-intensive regions, comprehensive evaluation of the mineral resource-intensive regional green development is constructed from a qualitative point of view system. Followed by a further screening for the indicators with quantitative method, this paper builds a mineral resource-intensive region of green development evaluation entropy coefficient evaluation model as well as indicators of predictive models,with the empirical study of Song Xian County, finally puts forward corresponding safeguard measures.
The main research work and conclusions of this paper are as follows:
(1)It defines the green development of mineral resource-intensive regions' content and clears the development goal and direction of the mineral resource-intensive regions. The green development of the mineral resource-intensive regions guided as green development idea, based on nowadays economic society's development and resources environment's tolerance. Through changing the operation systems of companies, constitution of industry and government's management, to achieve companies'green operation, refactoring green industry and government's green management, it turns traditional black economy into green economy, develops a sustainable model of development of harmonious society, economic growth, technological progress, resource conservation and friendly environment.
(2)It establishes the green development of the mineral resource-intensive regions mechanism analysis three-force model. This model is made up of dynamical system, pushing system and effective system. Dynamical system solves the cause of the green development of the intensive mineral resources, and it is made up of five factors which are society subsystem, economic subsystem, technical subsystem, resource subsystem and environment subsystem. Pushing system deals how to do the green development of the intensive mineral resources, and it relates to company, industry and government. Efficacy or effective system is dealing how far could the green development of the intensive mineral resources could go. And effective system is a integrated survey of the five factors and three main subjects mentioned above.
(3)It establishes the comprehensive assessment index system of the green development of mineral resource-intensive regions. It was guided as the green development of the intensive mineral resources' goal and principle, and preliminary was choosed127secondary indexes from qualitative analysis angle which cover five factors as social, economy, science and education, resource and environment and three main subjects like company, industry and government. Besides that, it unites the reality of Song Xian County and selects the process according to the indexes, establishes8first-level indexes,20subclass indexes and79secondary indexes of Song Xian County green development comprehensive evaluation from quantitative aspect.
(4)It establishes the green development of mineral resource-intensive regions' comprehensive evaluation's entropy weight coefficient model. Drawn on regional sustainable development evaluation model of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, AHP, coordination degree evaluation method, multi-objective comprehensive evaluation method, entropy weight coefficient method, we have initially established a entropy coefficient evaluation model of comprehensive evaluation of mineral resource-intensive regions'green development and also described the evaluation process.
(5) It builds a forecast model for the synthetic assess of the mineral resource-intensive regions.According to the calculation of five models, we find out the linear model present the best result. Therefore, we choose it as the model of the synthetic assessing of the mineral resource-intensive regions.
(6) It empirically evaluates the green development of Song Xian County and forecasts the index after10years.Through the entropy coefficient evaluation model of the comprehensive evaluation of the mineral resource-intensive regions of green development, this paper studied on the green development ability of Song Xian County.The results suggested that except the resource indicator, the other7indicators in Song Xian County show a strong ability of the green development.
(7) It proposes some relative suggestions. This paper makes suggestions from the aspect of five driving force and three pushing factors. It includes eight aspects as society, economy, education, resource, environment, enterprise, industry and government. To begin with, in social aspect, we need to mobilize the public activity to make them participant in and optimize the population structure to improve people's living condition, and broaden the cover up of the social security, put emphasis on the economic efficiency. Secondly, in educational aspect, we should establish guiding thoughts as "science lead economy, science support development to strengthen the popular of science, to optimize the educational structure, to promote the educational level.In resource aspect, we should establish the idea of improve the efficiency of utilizing resource and control the total amount of resource to develop the resource rationally. As to the environmental aspect, we should give great impetus to the new methods and strengthen the rules to manage the environmental pollution. At the same time, we should perfect the compensation mechanism for the exploration of the resource. As to the aspect of the enterprise, we should strengthen the important position of energy conservation and emission reduction. We should build the environmentally friendly operating regulation to highlight the creativity of each company. As to the aspect of the industry, we should establish the green production system and accelerate the building of service industry and launch the geology travel project at the same time.Finally,as to the aspect of the government, they should implement green management, to form a green environment and develop public industry so as to boost the development of rural countries.
The innovation of this paper may be as follows:
(1)The three-force model which describes mineral resource-intensive regions' green development mechanism has been established initially. The model consists of the power system, thrust system and the effectiveness of the system. Power system is to solve the problem of mineral resource-intensive regions of green development. The thrust system is to solve the problem of what to do for the green development of mineral resource-intensive regions. The effectiveness of the system is to solve the green development of mineral resource-intensive regions to what extent problems.
(2) A comprehensive evaluation index system of mineral resource-intensive regions has been established. Based on objectives and principles of building comprehensive evaluation index system of green development of mineral resource-intensive regions, we firstly select indicators from the qualitative point of view. Then, according to flowchart of indicators, we construct the index system from the quantitative aspects.
(3) The entropy coefficient evaluation model of the comprehensive evaluation of the mineral resource-intensive regions of green development has been established. Drawn on regional sustainable development evaluation model of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, AHP, coordination degree evaluation method, multi-objective comprehensive evaluation method, entropy weight coefficient method, we have initially established a entropy coefficient evaluation model of comprehensive evaluation of mineral resource-intensive regions' green development and also described the evaluation process.
随着矿产资源的逐渐枯竭及相关资源产业的逐渐衰退,矿产资源密集型区域不同程度地出现了较为典型的经济、社会以及生态环境等方面的问题,诸多问题的出现,使得这些区域的持续健康发展受到一定的影响。如何调整发展策略,在发展中逐步解决这些问题,进而探索出一条可持续发展之路,推动矿产资源密集型区域绿色转型,实现资源节约、环境友好的新型可持续发展模式,成为全社会广泛关注的紧迫而重要的现实课题。
绿色发展的本质是通过减少对能源资源的过度消耗,加强环境保护和生态治理,追求经济、社会、生态全面协调可持续发展。面对日趋强化的资源环境约束,国家“十二五”规划纲要明确提出要坚持绿色发展,综合运用多种手段,增强可持续发展能力,充分彰显了政府坚定走绿色发展之路的决心和信心。当下,研究并探索建立一套有利于推动矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展的综合评价指标体系,进而动态评价矿产资源密集型区域的绿色发展能力,显得必要而迫切。
基于此,本文在系统总结国内外相关研究成果的基础上,综合运用可持续发展理论、系统科学理论、自组织理论等多学科理论,初步界定了矿产资源密集型区域及其绿色发展的内涵,接着对矿产资源密集型区域的绿色发展机理进行了分析,并结合矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标体系的构建目标和原则,从定性角度初步构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标体系,并进一步用定量方法对指标进行筛选,然后构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展评价的熵权系数评价模型以及指标预测模型,并结合河南嵩县进行了实证研究,最后提出了相应的保障措施。
本文的主要研究工作及结论如下：
(1)界定了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展的内涵,明确了矿产资源密集型区域的发展目标及方向。矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展是以绿色发展理念为指导,立足于当前科技水平和经济社会发展实际,在资源环境承载力允许范围内,通过改变企业、产业及政府等主体的行为,实现企业绿色运营、产业绿色重构和政府绿色管理,形成社会和谐美好、经济健康发展、技术创新进步、资源节约利用、生态环境友好的新型可持续发展模式。
(2)建立了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展机理分析三力模型。矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展系统模型由动力系统、推力系统和效力系统共同构成。动力系统解决的是矿产资源密集型区域为何进行绿色发展的问题,它由社会、经济、技术、资源、环境等五大因素组成。推力系统解决的是矿产资源密集型区域如何进行绿色发展的问题,涉及企业、产业、政府等三大主体。效力系统解决的是矿产资源密集型区域进行绿色发展要达到何种程度的问题,也即绿色发展的效果度量问题,是对上述五大因素和三大主体的综合考察反馈。
(3)建立了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标体系。以矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标体系构建的目标和原则为指导,从定性角度初步海选了127个二级指标,其中包括社会、经济、技术、资源、环境等五大因素以及企业、产业、政府等三大主体的各个层面,并结合研究区域实际,按照指标筛选流程,从定量方面构建了8个一级指标、20个子类指标、79个二级指标组成的嵩县绿色发展综合评价指标体系。
(4)构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价的熵权系数评价模型。借鉴基于主分量分析法、模糊综合评价法、层次分析法、协调度评价法、多目标综合评价法、熵权系数法等区域可持续发展评价模型,构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价的熵权系数评价模型,并介绍了评价过程。
(5)构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标的预测模型。通过五个常用模型的计算,发现线性模型在所有指标的拟合过程中效果最好,于是本文选用其作为矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标的预测模型。
(6)实证评价了嵩县绿色发展能力,预测了各指标10年后的数据。通过本文构建的矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价的熵权系数评价模型,结合指标筛选后的综合评价指标体系,对嵩县的区域绿色发展能力进行了实证研究。结果表明,除了资源指标,嵩县其他7项指标都表现出较强或很强的绿色发展能力。
(7)提出了相应的保障措施。本文从五大动力系统因素和三大推力主体角度分别就社会、经济、科教、资源、环境、企业、产业、政府等八个方面提出了相关保障措施,即：社会因素方面,要充分调动社会公众参与绿色发展的主动性,改善人口结构,提高居民生活质量,扩大社会保障覆盖面；经济因素方面,以绿色经济理念为指导,实现矿产资源密集型区域经济的可持续发展,注重经济效率,改善经济结构；科教因素方面,树立“科技引领经济、科技支撑发展”的指导思想,加大科技普及力度,调整教育结构,提高教育水平；资源因素方面,树立资源节约,高效利用的理念,控制资源总量,合理开发资源；环境因素方面,大力推广新工艺,加大环境污染治理力度,加强生态环境保护,完善矿产资源开发利用生态恢复补偿机制；企业主体角度,要强化企业节能减排主体地位,建立绿色企业运营制度,增强企业自主创新能力；产业主体角度,构建绿色产业体系,加快服务业市场建设,开展地质旅游项目；政府主体角度,实施绿色管理,营造绿色发展环境,大力发展社会事业,加快推动城镇化进程。
本文可能的创新点如下：
(1)初步建立了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展机理分析三力模型。矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展系统模型由动力系统、推力系统和效力系统共同构成。动力系统解决的是矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展的原因问题,推力系统解决的是矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展该如何做的问题,效力系统解决的是矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展达到什么程度的问题。
(2)初步建立了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标体系。以矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价指标体系构建的目标和原则为指导,首先从定性的角度海选指标,然后根据建立的指标筛选流程图,从定量方面筛选构建研究区域的绿色发展综合评价指标体系。
(3)初步构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价的熵权系数评价模型。借鉴模糊综合评价法、层次分析法、协调度评价法、多目标综合评价法、熵权系数法等区域可持续发展评价模型,初步构建了矿产资源密集型区域绿色发展综合评价的熵权系数评价模型,并介绍了评价过程。
In recent years, China's economy and society have maintained a good momentum of development, but also facing tight resource constraints, and serious environmental pollution, ecosystem degradation grim situations. As the major supplier of energy and raw materials, mineral resource-intensive regions have been important for the national economy, which play an important supporting role in the sustained and rapid development of the national economy.
However, as time goes on, these regions are prone to exhausted or even to die out due to the natural of the mineral resources such as non-renewable and easily exhaustible. With the gradually exhaustion of the resource and the recession of the leading industry, a serious of economic and social issues has emerged in these regions and the issues has inevitably affect the further development. How to avoid the die out of resource and how to explore a sustainable way for the further development have arose the widely concern among the society. Whether these regions can success in sustainable development does have a tight connect with the development of the nation and the stability of the society. It has become a emergent and significant issue that how to optimize the strategies of the development in order to promote the sustainable development.
The essence of green development is the pursuit of comprehensive, balanced and sustainable development of economy, society and ecology by reducing the excessive consumption of energy resources and strengthening environmental protection and ecological management. Faced of increasingly constraints of resources and environment, the national "12th Five-Year Plan" has been made to adhere to green development, focus on energy conservation and emission reduction, improve the incentive and restraint mechanisms, accelerate the construction of resource-saving and environment-friendly production methods and consumption patterns, enhance the capacity of sustainable development, and improve the level of ecological civilization. This has fully demonstrated the determination of persisting in the path of green development. It is necessary and urgent to explore a comprehensive evaluation index system which is conducive to promote the green development in mineral resource-intensive regions, as well as the vital foundation to assess dynamically the capacity of green development in mineral resource-intensive regions.
Based on the above-mentioned situation, starting from the research of these regions and summarized the researching result of both domestic and foreign countries, making use of sustainable development theory, system theory, self-organization theory, this paper initially defines the mineral resource-intensive region and its green development, and then this paper has carried on the analysis to the mineral resource-intensive regional green development mechanism. And also combined with the construction of goal and the principle of green development for mineral resource-intensive regions, comprehensive evaluation of the mineral resource-intensive regional green development is constructed from a qualitative point of view system. Followed by a further screening for the indicators with quantitative method, this paper builds a mineral resource-intensive region of green development evaluation entropy coefficient evaluation model as well as indicators of predictive models,with the empirical study of Song Xian County, finally puts forward corresponding safeguard measures.
The main research work and conclusions of this paper are as follows:
(1)It defines the green development of mineral resource-intensive regions' content and clears the development goal and direction of the mineral resource-intensive regions. The green development of the mineral resource-intensive regions guided as green development idea, based on nowadays economic society's development and resources environment's tolerance. Through changing the operation systems of companies, constitution of industry and government's management, to achieve companies'green operation, refactoring green industry and government's green management, it turns traditional black economy into green economy, develops a sustainable model of development of harmonious society, economic growth, technological progress, resource conservation and friendly environment.
(2)It establishes the green development of the mineral resource-intensive regions mechanism analysis three-force model. This model is made up of dynamical system, pushing system and effective system. Dynamical system solves the cause of the green development of the intensive mineral resources, and it is made up of five factors which are society subsystem, economic subsystem, technical subsystem, resource subsystem and environment subsystem. Pushing system deals how to do the green development of the intensive mineral resources, and it relates to company, industry and government. Efficacy or effective system is dealing how far could the green development of the intensive mineral resources could go. And effective system is a integrated survey of the five factors and three main subjects mentioned above.
(3)It establishes the comprehensive assessment index system of the green development of mineral resource-intensive regions. It was guided as the green development of the intensive mineral resources' goal and principle, and preliminary was choosed127secondary indexes from qualitative analysis angle which cover five factors as social, economy, science and education, resource and environment and three main subjects like company, industry and government. Besides that, it unites the reality of Song Xian County and selects the process according to the indexes, establishes8first-level indexes,20subclass indexes and79secondary indexes of Song Xian County green development comprehensive evaluation from quantitative aspect.
(4)It establishes the green development of mineral resource-intensive regions' comprehensive evaluation's entropy weight coefficient model. Drawn on regional sustainable development evaluation model of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, AHP, coordination degree evaluation method, multi-objective comprehensive evaluation method, entropy weight coefficient method, we have initially established a entropy coefficient evaluation model of comprehensive evaluation of mineral resource-intensive regions'green development and also described the evaluation process.
(5) It builds a forecast model for the synthetic assess of the mineral resource-intensive regions.According to the calculation of five models, we find out the linear model present the best result. Therefore, we choose it as the model of the synthetic assessing of the mineral resource-intensive regions.
(6) It empirically evaluates the green development of Song Xian County and forecasts the index after10years.Through the entropy coefficient evaluation model of the comprehensive evaluation of the mineral resource-intensive regions of green development, this paper studied on the green development ability of Song Xian County.The results suggested that except the resource indicator, the other7indicators in Song Xian County show a strong ability of the green development.
(7) It proposes some relative suggestions. This paper makes suggestions from the aspect of five driving force and three pushing factors. It includes eight aspects as society, economy, education, resource, environment, enterprise, industry and government. To begin with, in social aspect, we need to mobilize the public activity to make them participant in and optimize the population structure to improve people's living condition, and broaden the cover up of the social security, put emphasis on the economic efficiency. Secondly, in educational aspect, we should establish guiding thoughts as "science lead economy, science support development to strengthen the popular of science, to optimize the educational structure, to promote the educational level.In resource aspect, we should establish the idea of improve the efficiency of utilizing resource and control the total amount of resource to develop the resource rationally. As to the environmental aspect, we should give great impetus to the new methods and strengthen the rules to manage the environmental pollution. At the same time, we should perfect the compensation mechanism for the exploration of the resource. As to the aspect of the enterprise, we should strengthen the important position of energy conservation and emission reduction. We should build the environmentally friendly operating regulation to highlight the creativity of each company. As to the aspect of the industry, we should establish the green production system and accelerate the building of service industry and launch the geology travel project at the same time.Finally,as to the aspect of the government, they should implement green management, to form a green environment and develop public industry so as to boost the development of rural countries.
The innovation of this paper may be as follows:
(1)The three-force model which describes mineral resource-intensive regions' green development mechanism has been established initially. The model consists of the power system, thrust system and the effectiveness of the system. Power system is to solve the problem of mineral resource-intensive regions of green development. The thrust system is to solve the problem of what to do for the green development of mineral resource-intensive regions. The effectiveness of the system is to solve the green development of mineral resource-intensive regions to what extent problems.
(2) A comprehensive evaluation index system of mineral resource-intensive regions has been established. Based on objectives and principles of building comprehensive evaluation index system of green development of mineral resource-intensive regions, we firstly select indicators from the qualitative point of view. Then, according to flowchart of indicators, we construct the index system from the quantitative aspects.
(3) The entropy coefficient evaluation model of the comprehensive evaluation of the mineral resource-intensive regions of green development has been established. Drawn on regional sustainable development evaluation model of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, AHP, coordination degree evaluation method, multi-objective comprehensive evaluation method, entropy weight coefficient method, we have initially established a entropy coefficient evaluation model of comprehensive evaluation of mineral resource-intensive regions' green development and also described the evaluation process.
引文
[1]张米尔.市场化进程中的资源型城市产业转型[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2004.
[2]J.P.Dorian and H.B.Humphreys.Economic impacts of miningfJ].Natural Resources Forum.1994,18(1):32-41.
[3]孙雅静.资源型城市转型与发展出路[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2006.
[4]Roger Perman,Yue Ma,James McGilvarv,Michael Common.Natural Resource and Environmental Economics(Second Edition).Pearson Education Limited,1999.
[5]King S P.The Behavior of Declining Industry Economic Record(Australia).1998(4):72-77.
[6]S.lrumley,Patrick Armstrong.Some of the Nineteenth Century Origins of the Sustainability Concept[J].Environment,Development and Sustainability,2004(6):12-13.
[7]张以诚.矿业城市与可持续发展[M].北京：石油工业出版社,1998.
[8]胡魁.中国矿业城市基本问题[J].资源·产业,2001(5)：8-10.
[9]国家计委宏观经济研究院课题组.我国资源型城市的界定与分类[J].宏观经济研究,2002(11)：37-39.
[10]程叶青.矿业区域经济可持续发展研究[D].西北大学,2003.
[11]沈镭.中国资源型城市转型的理论与案例研究[D].中国科学院研究生院,2005.
[12]于凯生.中国矿产资源型城市(地区)产业竞争力提升研究[D].东北林业大学,2007.
[13]余际从.矿业城市界定及可持续发展研究[J].北京：地质出版社,2009.
[14]高天明.我国资源型城市界定及发展特征研究[D].中国地质大学(北京),2010.
[15]陈龙桂.区域发展评价方法研究[M].北京：中国市场出版社,2011.
[16]Hilson G,Murck B.Sustainable development in the mining industry :clarifying the corporate perspective[J]. Resources Policy,2000(26):227-238.
[17]Hilson G. Putting theory into practice:how has the gold mining industry interpreted the concept of sustainable development?[J].Mineral Resource Engineering,2001,10(4):397-413.
[18]Hilson,Basu A J.Devising indicators of sustainable development for the mining and minerals industry.an analysis of critical background issues[J].The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology,2003(10):319-332.
[19]Azapagic A. Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2004(12):639-662.
[20]Fiona Solomon,Evie Katz,etal. Social dimensions of mining:Research, policy and practice challenges for the minerals industry in Australia[J].Resources Policy,2008,1(33):142-149.
[21]Daniel M. Franks, David V. Boger, Claire M. Cote, David R. Mulligan. Sustainable development principles for the disposal of mining and mineral processing wastes[J]. Resources Policy,2011,36(2):114-122.
[22]GRI. Sustainability reporting guidelines on economie,environmental and social performance.Global reporting initiative,2000,6. www.globalreporting.org (30 Oct 2002).
[23]Horowitz L.Editorial Section 2:mining and sustainable development[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2006(14):307-308.
[24]Mudd G M. Global trends in gold mining:towards quantifying environmental and resource sustainability?[J] Resources Policy,2007(32):42-56.
[25]Gray J..Minerals and energy:workplace human rights[c].Minerals Council of Australia Sustainable Development Conference,Perth, Western Australia,2006(10):23-27.
[26]Guerin T. A survey of sustainable development initiatives in the Australian mining and minerals industry[J]. Miner Energy,2006,20 (34):11-44.
[27]Rhys Worrall, David Neil et al. Towards a sustainability criteria and indicators framework for legacy mine land[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2009(17):1426-1434.
[28]Gavin M.Mudd. The Environmental sustainability of mining in Australia:key mega-trends and looming constraints [J]. Resources Policy,2010,35(1):98-115.
[29]何志强.矿区可持续发展——资源、经济与环境[D].辽宁工程技术大学,2003.
[30]闫军印.区域矿产资源开发生态经济系统研究[D].天津大学,2007.
[31]耿殿明.矿区可持续发展的系统分析与评价[D].山东科技大学,2003.
[32]李堂军,刘金辉,孙承爱.矿区可持续发展能力的实证分析与对策研究[J].中国软科学,2003(10)：124-128.
[33]王付民.矿区生态环境可持续发展评价研究[D].西安建筑科技大学,2004.
[34]彭秀平.矿业可持续发展基本理论与动态评价方法[D].中南大学,2004.
[35]朱明峰,洪天求,叶强.基于神经网络的资源型城市可持续发展指标体系[J].中国科学技术大学学报,2005,35(3)：423-428.
[36]朱丕凯.矿区环境影响元素分析及可持续发展评价研究[D].山东科技大学,2007.
[37]龙如银,周德群.矿业城市可持续发展的系统结构及其调控研究[J].科学管理研究,2003,21(2)：43-46.
[38]李晶.资源枯竭型城市可持续发展评价指标体系模型初探[J].资源·产业,2005,7(4)：7-8.
[39]苏哲.西部矿产资源可持续力可持续发展指标评价体系研究[J].环境与可持续发展,2007(5)：19-22.
[40]王菲.矿产矿产资源可持续力可持续发展评价指标体系的构建研究[J].内蒙古石油化工,2008(8)：25-27.
[41]姚平,孙璐,梁静国等.煤炭城市可持续发展的系统动力学模拟与调控[J].数学的实践与认识,2008,11(38)：83-93.
[42]杨明,潘长良,程赐胜.矿业发展的可持续性评价[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2003,10(30)：104-112.
[43]孙玉峰.矿区可持续发展动态评价方法研究[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2006.
[44]余敬,姚书振.矿产资源可持续力及其系统构建[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2002, 27(1)：85-89.
[45]晚春东,鞠耀绩,汤万金.矿区生态经济系统特征与演化原理研究[J].技术经济,2003,(2)：11-13.
[46]万会,沈镭.矿业城市发展的影响因素及可持续发展对策[J].资源科学,2005,27(1)：20-25.
[47]强慧.资源型城市发展系统动力学模型及实证研究——以格尔木市为例[D].青海师范大学,2009.
[48]叶蔓.资源型城市经济可持续发展研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学,2009.
[49]Azapagic,A.Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry[J] J.Cleaner Prod,2004,(12):639-662.
[50]Damjan Krajnc, Peter Glavic.A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,2005,43(2):189-208.
[51]杨昌明,洪水峰.矿产资源可持续发展指标探讨——焦点问题法,资源·产业,2001(1)：29-31.
[52]余敬,高谋艳.矿业城市矿产资源可持续力比较评价[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2007,32(1)：123-129.
[53]王世鹏.我国区域矿产资源、环境与经济社会协调发展度评价研究[J].资源与产业,2010(6)：125-129.
[54]齐义军,付桂军.典型资源型区域可持续发展评价[J].中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,39(3)：117-123.
[55]Regan and Moles. Using system dynamics to model the interaction between environmental and economic factors in the mining industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2006,(14):689-707.
[56]Merlina Missimer, Karl-Henrik Robert, Goran Broman, Harald Sverdrup. Exploring the possibility of a systematic and generic approach to social sustainability[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2010,18(10):1107-1112.
[57]Philip Sinclair.Describing the elephant:A framework for supporting sustainable development processes[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2011,15(6): 2990-2998.
[58]Mirjana Golusin, Olja Munitlak Ivanovic, Natasa Teodorovic. The review of the achieved degree of sustainable development in South Eastern Europe--The use of linear regression method[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2011,15(1):766-772.
[59]汤万金,高林,吴刚,李祥仪.矿区可持续发展系统动力学模拟与调控[J].生态学报,2000(1)：20-27.
[60]闫旭骞,胡丽竹,王广成.矿区可持续发展评价方法研究[J].有色金属(矿山部分),2003,55(4)：2-4.
[61]龙如银.中国矿业城市可持续发展：理论与方法研究[M].徐州：中国矿业大学出版社,2005.
[62]张永凯.熵值法在干旱区资源型城市可持续发展评价中的应用[J].资源与产业, 2006(10)：1-6.
[63]李春民,李克荣,王云海.基于BP神经网络方法的矿业城市可持续发展综合评价模型[J].中国矿业,2006,15(9)：25-28.
[64]曹继萍.基于数据包络分析的资源型城市可持续发展评价研究——以攀枝花市为例[D].成都理工大学,2009.
[65]许丽萍.基于生态足迹模型的鄂尔多斯市可持续发展研究[D].内蒙古大学,2010.
[66]单惠婷.黑龙江省经济可持续发展能力研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学,2011.
[67]John M. Hartwick. Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources[J]. The American Economic Review,1977,67(5):972-974.
[68]Raymond F Mikesell. Viewpoint:Sustainable development and mineral resources[J]. Resources Policy,1994,20 (2):83-86.
[69]Priemus,Hugo.Sustainable cities:How to realize an ecological breakthrough:A Dutch approach[J],International Planning Studies,1999.
[70]Gavin M. Hilson. Introduction to this special issue, "Improving Environmental:Economic and Ethical Performance in the Mining Industry". Part 1:Environmental Management and Sustainable Development [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2006 (14):225-226.
[71]Jan Fagerberg. Bart Verspagen. Innovation studies-The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy.2009.
[72]Bjornar Saether, Arne Isaksen, Asbjorn Karlsen. Innovation by co-evolution in natural resource industries:The Norwegian experience. Geoforum.,2011.
[73]沈镭,程静.论矿业城市经济发展中的优势转换战略[J].经济地理,1998(2)：41-45.
[74]沈镭,程静.矿业城市可持续发展的机理初探[J].资源科学,1999(1)：44-50.
[75]毕军贤.资源型城市经济增长因素相关性分析[J].中国煤炭经济学院学报,2002(6)：126-129.
[76]赵天石.我国资源型城市产业结构转型的制约因素及对策分析[J].理论探讨,2004(6)：61-62.
[77]朱明峰,冯少茹,潘国林.资源型城市可持续发展与生态城市建设[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2005(2)：155-158.
[78]康乐.山西省资源型城市可持续发展对策[J].广砥师范学院学报(自然科学版),2006(6)：73-77.
[79]李咏梅.资源型城市的环境保护与可持续发展[J].生产力研究,2006(6)：125-127.
[80]张久铭.自然资源安全与资源型城市可持续发展[J].平顶山学院学报,2007(10)：104-107.
[81]李茹宝.税收政策如何支持资源型城市可持续发展[J].研究与探索,2008(5)：29-31.
[82]田秀兰,于恒辉,刘广.外汇外贸政策调整与资源型城市可持续发展问题研究[J].甘肃金融,2008(5)：28-30.
[83]程骏,张薇等.资源型城市可持续发展的路径选择与模式设计[J].情报杂志,2008(1)：30-32.
[84]于喜展,隋映辉.基于生命周期的资源产业转型与科技创新互动研究[J].内蒙古社会科 学,2009(9)：105-109.
[85]张树良,张志强,熊永兰.矿产资源领域国际科技发展态势分析[J].资源科学,2010(11)：2216-2228.
[86]施晓清.产业生态系统及其资源生态管理理论研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010(6)：80-86.
[87]闫军印,吴楠,宋怡.矿业城市资源产业循环经济系统的设计与优化[J].资源科学,2010(7)：1362-1370.
[88]谢雄标,严良,罗斌.矿产资源产业可持续发展模式及机制分析[J].科技管理研究,2011(22)：108-112.
[89]杜剑,杨志银.矿产资源采空区生态重建经济政策的国际借鉴及启示[J].煤炭技术,2011(10)：1-2.
[90]段彩芹,李宁,崔爱平,金浩.矿产资源型城市经济转型中接替主导产业研究[J].河北经贸大学学报,2011(4)：67-70.
[91]高建民.矿产资源型县域经济的内涵、特征与发展趋势[J].河北师范大学学报,2011(11)：52-61.
[92]高建民.矿产资源型县域经济发展的困境与出路——关于河北省鹿泉市县域经济发展转型的调查报告[J].经济研究导刊,2011(28)：153-157.
[93]高建民.矿产资源型县域经济发展转型研究——以河北省矿产资源县为例[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2012.
[94]孙理军,严良.基于生态创新系统的矿产资源密集型区域可持续发展模式研究[J].宏观经济研究,2012(12)：68-73.
[95]杨多贵,高飞鹏.“绿色”发展道路的理论解析[J].科学管理研究,2006,24(5)：20-23.
[96]George,V.& Page,R.(eds.).ModernThinkers on Welfare.London:Prentice Hall,1995.
[97]刘继同.生态运动与绿色主义福利思想：生态健康科学与新型公共卫生框架[J].北京科技大学学报,2005,21(3)：66-70.
[98]王毅.实施绿色发展,转变经济发展方式[J].中国科学院院刊,2010,25(2)：121-126.
[99]Ekins P. Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability:The Prospects for Green Growth.. London/New York:Routledge,2000.
[101]UNESCAP.Energy Security and Sustainable Development in Asia and the Pacific. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific(ESCAP), Banngkok.2008.
[102]OECD.Green Growth:Overcoming the Crisis and Beyond.2009-11-15. http://www. oecd.org/dataoecd/4/40/43176103.pdf
[103]De Brujn H et al. Creating System Innovation. London:Taylor & Francis,2004
[104]Weaver P M. National Systems of Innovation. In:Hargroves K. C, Smith M H, eds. The Natural Advantage of Nations:Business Opportunities, Innovation and Governance in the 21st Century. London:Earthscan/James & James.2005
[105]Kemp R, Arundel A, Smith K.. Survey Indicators for Environmental Innovation. Paper for the International Conference "Towards Environmental Innovation Systems",2001(9):27-29, Garmisch-Partenkirchen.
[106]Beisea M,Rennings K. Lead Markets and Regulation:A Framework for Analyzing the International Diffusion of Environmental Innovations.Ecological Economics,2005 (52):5-17.
[107]Rennings K. Redefining Innovation-Eco-Innovation Research and the Contribution form Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics,2000(32):319-332.
[108]Horbach J et al. Indicator Systems for Sustainable Innovation. Heidelberg: Phisica-verlag.2005.
[109]Walz R et al. Research and Technological Competences for a Sustainable Development in the BRICS Countries. Stuttgart:IRB publisher.2008.
[110]Elzen B, Geels F W, Green K. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.2004.
[111]OECD.Towards Green Growth [R].OECD Publishing,2011.doi:10.1787/9789264111318- en.
[112]科学技术部社会发展科技司,中国21世纪议程管理中心.绿色发展与科技创新[M].北京：科学出版社,2011.
[113]中国社会科学院可持续发展战略研究组.2010中国可持续发展战略报告——绿色发展与创新[M].北京：科学出版社,2010.
[114]孔德新.绿色发展与生态文明——绿色视野中的可持续发展[M].合肥：合肥工业大学出版社,2007.
[115]苏立宁,李放.“全球绿色新政”与我国“绿色经济”政策改革[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(8)：95-99.
[116]高红贵.中国绿色经济发展中的诸方博弈研究[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2012,22(4)：13-18.
[117]胡鞍钢.中国：创新绿色发展循[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2012.
[118]王珂,秦成逊.西部地区实现绿色发展的路径探析[J].经济问题探索,2013(1)：89-93.
[119]郝栋.绿色发展道路的哲学探析[D].中共中央党校,2012.
[120]郝栋.绿色发展是建设生态文明的必然道路选择[J].中国党政干部论坛,2013(1)：18-20.
[121]欧阳志云,赵娟娟,桂振华等.中国城市的绿色发展评价[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2009,19(5)：11-15.
[122]2009中国城市绿色发展报告[C].中国绿色发展高层论坛,2009.
[123]张晨.我国资源型城市绿色转型复合系统研究[D].南开大学,2010.
[124]赵彦云,林寅,陈昊.发达国家建立绿色经济发展测度体系的经验及借鉴[J].经济纵横,2011(1)：34-37.
[125]黄羿,杨蕾,王小兴等.城市绿色发展评价指标体系研究——以广州市为例[J].科技管理研究,2012,(17)：55-59.
[126]王艳秋,胡乃联,苏以权.我国资源型城市绿色转型能力评价[J].技术经济,2012,31(5)：72-76.
[127]薛珑.绿色经济发展测度体系的构建[J].统计与决策,2012(18)：21-24.
[128]北京师范大学科学发展观与经济可持续发展研究基地,西南财经大学绿色经济与经济可持续发展研究基地,国家统计局中国经济景气监测中心.2010中国绿色发展指数年度报告——省际比较[M].北京：北京师范大学出版社,2010.
[129]北京师范大学科学发展观与经济可持续发展研究基地,西南财经大学绿色经济与经济可持续发展研究基地,国家统计局中国经济景气监测中p.2011中国绿色发展指数报告——区域比较[M].北京：北京师范大学出版社,2011.
[130]北京师范大学科学发展观与经济可持续发展研究基地,西南财经大学绿色经济与经济可持续发展研究基地,国家统计局中国经济景气监测中心.2012中国绿色发展指数报告——区域比较[M].北京：北京师范大学出版社,2012.
[131]陈明.可持续发展概论[M].北京：冶金工业出版社,2008.
[132]王民.可持续发展教育概论[M].北京：地质出版社,2006.
[133]李建华.资源型城市可持续发展研究[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2007.
[134]杨开忠.一般持续发展论(上)[J].中国人口资源与环境,1994,4(1)：11-15.
[135]洪银兴.可持续发展经济学[M].北京：商务出版社,2000.
[136]刘培哲.可持续发展——通向未来的新发展观[J].中国人口资源与环境,1994,4(3)：13-18.
[137]美国世界资源研究所.世界资源手册(1992-1993)[M].中国环境科学出版社,1993.
[138]See Giles Atkinson, etc., Measuring sustainable development, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.,UK,1997.
[139]常亚平.资源富集地区县域经济可持续发展研究[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2008.
[140]钱学森.论系统工程[M].长沙：湖南科学技术出版社,1982.
[141]吴广谋.系统原理与方法[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2005.
[142]中国系统工程学会.2009—2010系统科学与系统工程学科发展报告[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,2010.
[143]吴今培,李学伟.系统科学发展概论[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2010.
[144]唐幼纯,范君晖.系统工程——方法与应用[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2011.
[145]肖艳玲.系统工程理论与方法(第二版)[M].北京：石油工业出版社,2012.
[146]Hermann Haken. Information and Self-Organization:A Macroscopic Approach to Complex System[M], Berlin,Springer-Verlag,1988.
[147]李桂花.自组织经济理论：和谐理性与循环累积增长[M].上海：上海社会科学院出版社,2007.
[148]Portugali J. Self-Organization and City [M] Berlin:Springer-Verlag,2000.
[149]李慧娟,龙如银,史彩玲.资源型城市产业转型熵及其对策——基于力学分析的视角[J].工业技术经济,2012(4)：59-62.
[150]王艳秋,胡乃联,苏以权.资源型城市绿色转型影响因素的TPE模型构建及其作用机理[J].商业时代,2012(31)：102-103.
[151]万会.我国资源枯竭型矿业城市可持续发展评价及经济转型研究[D].中国地质大学(北 京),2006.
[152]蒋耀.基于综合评价理论的区域可持续发展研究[D].上海交通大学,2008.
[153]毕普云.中国矿业城市可持续发展能力研究[D].中国地质大学(北京),2010.
[154]李祚泳,汪嘉杨,熊建秋,徐婷婷.可持续发展评价模型与应用[M].北京：科学出版社,2007.
[2]J.P.Dorian and H.B.Humphreys.Economic impacts of miningfJ].Natural Resources Forum.1994,18(1):32-41.
[3]孙雅静.资源型城市转型与发展出路[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2006.
[4]Roger Perman,Yue Ma,James McGilvarv,Michael Common.Natural Resource and Environmental Economics(Second Edition).Pearson Education Limited,1999.
[5]King S P.The Behavior of Declining Industry Economic Record(Australia).1998(4):72-77.
[6]S.lrumley,Patrick Armstrong.Some of the Nineteenth Century Origins of the Sustainability Concept[J].Environment,Development and Sustainability,2004(6):12-13.
[7]张以诚.矿业城市与可持续发展[M].北京：石油工业出版社,1998.
[8]胡魁.中国矿业城市基本问题[J].资源·产业,2001(5)：8-10.
[9]国家计委宏观经济研究院课题组.我国资源型城市的界定与分类[J].宏观经济研究,2002(11)：37-39.
[10]程叶青.矿业区域经济可持续发展研究[D].西北大学,2003.
[11]沈镭.中国资源型城市转型的理论与案例研究[D].中国科学院研究生院,2005.
[12]于凯生.中国矿产资源型城市(地区)产业竞争力提升研究[D].东北林业大学,2007.
[13]余际从.矿业城市界定及可持续发展研究[J].北京：地质出版社,2009.
[14]高天明.我国资源型城市界定及发展特征研究[D].中国地质大学(北京),2010.
[15]陈龙桂.区域发展评价方法研究[M].北京：中国市场出版社,2011.
[16]Hilson G,Murck B.Sustainable development in the mining industry :clarifying the corporate perspective[J]. Resources Policy,2000(26):227-238.
[17]Hilson G. Putting theory into practice:how has the gold mining industry interpreted the concept of sustainable development?[J].Mineral Resource Engineering,2001,10(4):397-413.
[18]Hilson,Basu A J.Devising indicators of sustainable development for the mining and minerals industry.an analysis of critical background issues[J].The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology,2003(10):319-332.
[19]Azapagic A. Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2004(12):639-662.
[20]Fiona Solomon,Evie Katz,etal. Social dimensions of mining:Research, policy and practice challenges for the minerals industry in Australia[J].Resources Policy,2008,1(33):142-149.
[21]Daniel M. Franks, David V. Boger, Claire M. Cote, David R. Mulligan. Sustainable development principles for the disposal of mining and mineral processing wastes[J]. Resources Policy,2011,36(2):114-122.
[22]GRI. Sustainability reporting guidelines on economie,environmental and social performance.Global reporting initiative,2000,6. www.globalreporting.org (30 Oct 2002).
[23]Horowitz L.Editorial Section 2:mining and sustainable development[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2006(14):307-308.
[24]Mudd G M. Global trends in gold mining:towards quantifying environmental and resource sustainability?[J] Resources Policy,2007(32):42-56.
[25]Gray J..Minerals and energy:workplace human rights[c].Minerals Council of Australia Sustainable Development Conference,Perth, Western Australia,2006(10):23-27.
[26]Guerin T. A survey of sustainable development initiatives in the Australian mining and minerals industry[J]. Miner Energy,2006,20 (34):11-44.
[27]Rhys Worrall, David Neil et al. Towards a sustainability criteria and indicators framework for legacy mine land[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2009(17):1426-1434.
[28]Gavin M.Mudd. The Environmental sustainability of mining in Australia:key mega-trends and looming constraints [J]. Resources Policy,2010,35(1):98-115.
[29]何志强.矿区可持续发展——资源、经济与环境[D].辽宁工程技术大学,2003.
[30]闫军印.区域矿产资源开发生态经济系统研究[D].天津大学,2007.
[31]耿殿明.矿区可持续发展的系统分析与评价[D].山东科技大学,2003.
[32]李堂军,刘金辉,孙承爱.矿区可持续发展能力的实证分析与对策研究[J].中国软科学,2003(10)：124-128.
[33]王付民.矿区生态环境可持续发展评价研究[D].西安建筑科技大学,2004.
[34]彭秀平.矿业可持续发展基本理论与动态评价方法[D].中南大学,2004.
[35]朱明峰,洪天求,叶强.基于神经网络的资源型城市可持续发展指标体系[J].中国科学技术大学学报,2005,35(3)：423-428.
[36]朱丕凯.矿区环境影响元素分析及可持续发展评价研究[D].山东科技大学,2007.
[37]龙如银,周德群.矿业城市可持续发展的系统结构及其调控研究[J].科学管理研究,2003,21(2)：43-46.
[38]李晶.资源枯竭型城市可持续发展评价指标体系模型初探[J].资源·产业,2005,7(4)：7-8.
[39]苏哲.西部矿产资源可持续力可持续发展指标评价体系研究[J].环境与可持续发展,2007(5)：19-22.
[40]王菲.矿产矿产资源可持续力可持续发展评价指标体系的构建研究[J].内蒙古石油化工,2008(8)：25-27.
[41]姚平,孙璐,梁静国等.煤炭城市可持续发展的系统动力学模拟与调控[J].数学的实践与认识,2008,11(38)：83-93.
[42]杨明,潘长良,程赐胜.矿业发展的可持续性评价[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2003,10(30)：104-112.
[43]孙玉峰.矿区可持续发展动态评价方法研究[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2006.
[44]余敬,姚书振.矿产资源可持续力及其系统构建[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2002, 27(1)：85-89.
[45]晚春东,鞠耀绩,汤万金.矿区生态经济系统特征与演化原理研究[J].技术经济,2003,(2)：11-13.
[46]万会,沈镭.矿业城市发展的影响因素及可持续发展对策[J].资源科学,2005,27(1)：20-25.
[47]强慧.资源型城市发展系统动力学模型及实证研究——以格尔木市为例[D].青海师范大学,2009.
[48]叶蔓.资源型城市经济可持续发展研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学,2009.
[49]Azapagic,A.Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry[J] J.Cleaner Prod,2004,(12):639-662.
[50]Damjan Krajnc, Peter Glavic.A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,2005,43(2):189-208.
[51]杨昌明,洪水峰.矿产资源可持续发展指标探讨——焦点问题法,资源·产业,2001(1)：29-31.
[52]余敬,高谋艳.矿业城市矿产资源可持续力比较评价[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2007,32(1)：123-129.
[53]王世鹏.我国区域矿产资源、环境与经济社会协调发展度评价研究[J].资源与产业,2010(6)：125-129.
[54]齐义军,付桂军.典型资源型区域可持续发展评价[J].中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,39(3)：117-123.
[55]Regan and Moles. Using system dynamics to model the interaction between environmental and economic factors in the mining industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2006,(14):689-707.
[56]Merlina Missimer, Karl-Henrik Robert, Goran Broman, Harald Sverdrup. Exploring the possibility of a systematic and generic approach to social sustainability[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2010,18(10):1107-1112.
[57]Philip Sinclair.Describing the elephant:A framework for supporting sustainable development processes[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2011,15(6): 2990-2998.
[58]Mirjana Golusin, Olja Munitlak Ivanovic, Natasa Teodorovic. The review of the achieved degree of sustainable development in South Eastern Europe--The use of linear regression method[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2011,15(1):766-772.
[59]汤万金,高林,吴刚,李祥仪.矿区可持续发展系统动力学模拟与调控[J].生态学报,2000(1)：20-27.
[60]闫旭骞,胡丽竹,王广成.矿区可持续发展评价方法研究[J].有色金属(矿山部分),2003,55(4)：2-4.
[61]龙如银.中国矿业城市可持续发展：理论与方法研究[M].徐州：中国矿业大学出版社,2005.
[62]张永凯.熵值法在干旱区资源型城市可持续发展评价中的应用[J].资源与产业, 2006(10)：1-6.
[63]李春民,李克荣,王云海.基于BP神经网络方法的矿业城市可持续发展综合评价模型[J].中国矿业,2006,15(9)：25-28.
[64]曹继萍.基于数据包络分析的资源型城市可持续发展评价研究——以攀枝花市为例[D].成都理工大学,2009.
[65]许丽萍.基于生态足迹模型的鄂尔多斯市可持续发展研究[D].内蒙古大学,2010.
[66]单惠婷.黑龙江省经济可持续发展能力研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学,2011.
[67]John M. Hartwick. Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources[J]. The American Economic Review,1977,67(5):972-974.
[68]Raymond F Mikesell. Viewpoint:Sustainable development and mineral resources[J]. Resources Policy,1994,20 (2):83-86.
[69]Priemus,Hugo.Sustainable cities:How to realize an ecological breakthrough:A Dutch approach[J],International Planning Studies,1999.
[70]Gavin M. Hilson. Introduction to this special issue, "Improving Environmental:Economic and Ethical Performance in the Mining Industry". Part 1:Environmental Management and Sustainable Development [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2006 (14):225-226.
[71]Jan Fagerberg. Bart Verspagen. Innovation studies-The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy.2009.
[72]Bjornar Saether, Arne Isaksen, Asbjorn Karlsen. Innovation by co-evolution in natural resource industries:The Norwegian experience. Geoforum.,2011.
[73]沈镭,程静.论矿业城市经济发展中的优势转换战略[J].经济地理,1998(2)：41-45.
[74]沈镭,程静.矿业城市可持续发展的机理初探[J].资源科学,1999(1)：44-50.
[75]毕军贤.资源型城市经济增长因素相关性分析[J].中国煤炭经济学院学报,2002(6)：126-129.
[76]赵天石.我国资源型城市产业结构转型的制约因素及对策分析[J].理论探讨,2004(6)：61-62.
[77]朱明峰,冯少茹,潘国林.资源型城市可持续发展与生态城市建设[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2005(2)：155-158.
[78]康乐.山西省资源型城市可持续发展对策[J].广砥师范学院学报(自然科学版),2006(6)：73-77.
[79]李咏梅.资源型城市的环境保护与可持续发展[J].生产力研究,2006(6)：125-127.
[80]张久铭.自然资源安全与资源型城市可持续发展[J].平顶山学院学报,2007(10)：104-107.
[81]李茹宝.税收政策如何支持资源型城市可持续发展[J].研究与探索,2008(5)：29-31.
[82]田秀兰,于恒辉,刘广.外汇外贸政策调整与资源型城市可持续发展问题研究[J].甘肃金融,2008(5)：28-30.
[83]程骏,张薇等.资源型城市可持续发展的路径选择与模式设计[J].情报杂志,2008(1)：30-32.
[84]于喜展,隋映辉.基于生命周期的资源产业转型与科技创新互动研究[J].内蒙古社会科 学,2009(9)：105-109.
[85]张树良,张志强,熊永兰.矿产资源领域国际科技发展态势分析[J].资源科学,2010(11)：2216-2228.
[86]施晓清.产业生态系统及其资源生态管理理论研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010(6)：80-86.
[87]闫军印,吴楠,宋怡.矿业城市资源产业循环经济系统的设计与优化[J].资源科学,2010(7)：1362-1370.
[88]谢雄标,严良,罗斌.矿产资源产业可持续发展模式及机制分析[J].科技管理研究,2011(22)：108-112.
[89]杜剑,杨志银.矿产资源采空区生态重建经济政策的国际借鉴及启示[J].煤炭技术,2011(10)：1-2.
[90]段彩芹,李宁,崔爱平,金浩.矿产资源型城市经济转型中接替主导产业研究[J].河北经贸大学学报,2011(4)：67-70.
[91]高建民.矿产资源型县域经济的内涵、特征与发展趋势[J].河北师范大学学报,2011(11)：52-61.
[92]高建民.矿产资源型县域经济发展的困境与出路——关于河北省鹿泉市县域经济发展转型的调查报告[J].经济研究导刊,2011(28)：153-157.
[93]高建民.矿产资源型县域经济发展转型研究——以河北省矿产资源县为例[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2012.
[94]孙理军,严良.基于生态创新系统的矿产资源密集型区域可持续发展模式研究[J].宏观经济研究,2012(12)：68-73.
[95]杨多贵,高飞鹏.“绿色”发展道路的理论解析[J].科学管理研究,2006,24(5)：20-23.
[96]George,V.& Page,R.(eds.).ModernThinkers on Welfare.London:Prentice Hall,1995.
[97]刘继同.生态运动与绿色主义福利思想：生态健康科学与新型公共卫生框架[J].北京科技大学学报,2005,21(3)：66-70.
[98]王毅.实施绿色发展,转变经济发展方式[J].中国科学院院刊,2010,25(2)：121-126.
[99]Ekins P. Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability:The Prospects for Green Growth.. London/New York:Routledge,2000.
[101]UNESCAP.Energy Security and Sustainable Development in Asia and the Pacific. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific(ESCAP), Banngkok.2008.
[102]OECD.Green Growth:Overcoming the Crisis and Beyond.2009-11-15. http://www. oecd.org/dataoecd/4/40/43176103.pdf
[103]De Brujn H et al. Creating System Innovation. London:Taylor & Francis,2004
[104]Weaver P M. National Systems of Innovation. In:Hargroves K. C, Smith M H, eds. The Natural Advantage of Nations:Business Opportunities, Innovation and Governance in the 21st Century. London:Earthscan/James & James.2005
[105]Kemp R, Arundel A, Smith K.. Survey Indicators for Environmental Innovation. Paper for the International Conference "Towards Environmental Innovation Systems",2001(9):27-29, Garmisch-Partenkirchen.
[106]Beisea M,Rennings K. Lead Markets and Regulation:A Framework for Analyzing the International Diffusion of Environmental Innovations.Ecological Economics,2005 (52):5-17.
[107]Rennings K. Redefining Innovation-Eco-Innovation Research and the Contribution form Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics,2000(32):319-332.
[108]Horbach J et al. Indicator Systems for Sustainable Innovation. Heidelberg: Phisica-verlag.2005.
[109]Walz R et al. Research and Technological Competences for a Sustainable Development in the BRICS Countries. Stuttgart:IRB publisher.2008.
[110]Elzen B, Geels F W, Green K. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.2004.
[111]OECD.Towards Green Growth [R].OECD Publishing,2011.doi:10.1787/9789264111318- en.
[112]科学技术部社会发展科技司,中国21世纪议程管理中心.绿色发展与科技创新[M].北京：科学出版社,2011.
[113]中国社会科学院可持续发展战略研究组.2010中国可持续发展战略报告——绿色发展与创新[M].北京：科学出版社,2010.
[114]孔德新.绿色发展与生态文明——绿色视野中的可持续发展[M].合肥：合肥工业大学出版社,2007.
[115]苏立宁,李放.“全球绿色新政”与我国“绿色经济”政策改革[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(8)：95-99.
[116]高红贵.中国绿色经济发展中的诸方博弈研究[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2012,22(4)：13-18.
[117]胡鞍钢.中国：创新绿色发展循[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2012.
[118]王珂,秦成逊.西部地区实现绿色发展的路径探析[J].经济问题探索,2013(1)：89-93.
[119]郝栋.绿色发展道路的哲学探析[D].中共中央党校,2012.
[120]郝栋.绿色发展是建设生态文明的必然道路选择[J].中国党政干部论坛,2013(1)：18-20.
[121]欧阳志云,赵娟娟,桂振华等.中国城市的绿色发展评价[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2009,19(5)：11-15.
[122]2009中国城市绿色发展报告[C].中国绿色发展高层论坛,2009.
[123]张晨.我国资源型城市绿色转型复合系统研究[D].南开大学,2010.
[124]赵彦云,林寅,陈昊.发达国家建立绿色经济发展测度体系的经验及借鉴[J].经济纵横,2011(1)：34-37.
[125]黄羿,杨蕾,王小兴等.城市绿色发展评价指标体系研究——以广州市为例[J].科技管理研究,2012,(17)：55-59.
[126]王艳秋,胡乃联,苏以权.我国资源型城市绿色转型能力评价[J].技术经济,2012,31(5)：72-76.
[127]薛珑.绿色经济发展测度体系的构建[J].统计与决策,2012(18)：21-24.
[128]北京师范大学科学发展观与经济可持续发展研究基地,西南财经大学绿色经济与经济可持续发展研究基地,国家统计局中国经济景气监测中心.2010中国绿色发展指数年度报告——省际比较[M].北京：北京师范大学出版社,2010.
[129]北京师范大学科学发展观与经济可持续发展研究基地,西南财经大学绿色经济与经济可持续发展研究基地,国家统计局中国经济景气监测中p.2011中国绿色发展指数报告——区域比较[M].北京：北京师范大学出版社,2011.
[130]北京师范大学科学发展观与经济可持续发展研究基地,西南财经大学绿色经济与经济可持续发展研究基地,国家统计局中国经济景气监测中心.2012中国绿色发展指数报告——区域比较[M].北京：北京师范大学出版社,2012.
[131]陈明.可持续发展概论[M].北京：冶金工业出版社,2008.
[132]王民.可持续发展教育概论[M].北京：地质出版社,2006.
[133]李建华.资源型城市可持续发展研究[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2007.
[134]杨开忠.一般持续发展论(上)[J].中国人口资源与环境,1994,4(1)：11-15.
[135]洪银兴.可持续发展经济学[M].北京：商务出版社,2000.
[136]刘培哲.可持续发展——通向未来的新发展观[J].中国人口资源与环境,1994,4(3)：13-18.
[137]美国世界资源研究所.世界资源手册(1992-1993)[M].中国环境科学出版社,1993.
[138]See Giles Atkinson, etc., Measuring sustainable development, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.,UK,1997.
[139]常亚平.资源富集地区县域经济可持续发展研究[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2008.
[140]钱学森.论系统工程[M].长沙：湖南科学技术出版社,1982.
[141]吴广谋.系统原理与方法[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2005.
[142]中国系统工程学会.2009—2010系统科学与系统工程学科发展报告[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社,2010.
[143]吴今培,李学伟.系统科学发展概论[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2010.
[144]唐幼纯,范君晖.系统工程——方法与应用[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2011.
[145]肖艳玲.系统工程理论与方法(第二版)[M].北京：石油工业出版社,2012.
[146]Hermann Haken. Information and Self-Organization:A Macroscopic Approach to Complex System[M], Berlin,Springer-Verlag,1988.
[147]李桂花.自组织经济理论：和谐理性与循环累积增长[M].上海：上海社会科学院出版社,2007.
[148]Portugali J. Self-Organization and City [M] Berlin:Springer-Verlag,2000.
[149]李慧娟,龙如银,史彩玲.资源型城市产业转型熵及其对策——基于力学分析的视角[J].工业技术经济,2012(4)：59-62.
[150]王艳秋,胡乃联,苏以权.资源型城市绿色转型影响因素的TPE模型构建及其作用机理[J].商业时代,2012(31)：102-103.
[151]万会.我国资源枯竭型矿业城市可持续发展评价及经济转型研究[D].中国地质大学(北 京),2006.
[152]蒋耀.基于综合评价理论的区域可持续发展研究[D].上海交通大学,2008.
[153]毕普云.中国矿业城市可持续发展能力研究[D].中国地质大学(北京),2010.
[154]李祚泳,汪嘉杨,熊建秋,徐婷婷.可持续发展评价模型与应用[M].北京：科学出版社,2007.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |