基于免疫遗传进化理论的安全生产应急能力跃迁机理研究
|
摘要
随着新科技的不断引进，生产方式也在动态调整，与之相适应的安全生产应急能力也应当随之适应性地跃迁。本文基于免疫、遗传和进化理论类比研究安全生产应急能力跃迁机理。应急能力的跃迁过程划分为基态、激发态和定态。基于免疫理论研究应急能力跃迁前的基态机理，基于遗传理论研究跃迁中的激发态机理，基于生物进化的相容性理论研究跃迁后的定态机理。同时在整个应急能力跃迁的过程中关注人的因素的核心作用，通过认知神经实验研究应急人员的应急反应机理。主体研究内容包括以下六个部分：
第一部分，以安全生产应急能力跃迁的内涵界定和状态划分为出发点，基于相似理论论证了运用生物学中免疫、遗传和进化理论来类比研究应急能力跃迁机理的前提条件。在此前提条件下，建立了生物学理论与应急能力理论之间具有同态对应关系的相似性模型，论证了两者之间进行类比研究的科学性和合理性。在类比研究前提论证的基础上，确立了应急能力跃迁机理的研究层次。应急能力跃迁机理的研究在跃迁过程的每个状态下按照原则性机理、原理性机理和操作性机理展开。
第二部分，在应急能力跃迁前的基态，在原则性机理中，通过免疫理论到应急能力的隐喻化，建立了应急能力的免疫调控模型。在原理性机理中，进行了应急能力的免疫功能、免疫过程、免疫结构和免疫属性的分析。在操作性机理中，通过故障模式及影响分析，监控应急能力的免疫工作状态，以综合风险指数衡量应急免疫应对事故灾难的能力，以此作为应急能力跃迁的依据。
第三部分，在应急能力跃迁中的激发态，在原则性机理中，通过遗传理论到应急能力的隐喻化，建立了应急能力的突变调控模型。在原理性机理中，分析了催生应急能力跃迁的各项动力因素，建立了应急能力跃迁的三闸门动力模型。在应急能力跃迁的过程分析中，首先进行了应急能力对安全环境的态势感知分析，然后基于生物学中的遗传理论研究了应急能力跃迁中的遗传突变过程。在操作性机理中，在企业种群进化环境下，运用突变理论的势函数分析法对本企业的应急能力水平进行定位，然后通过对标分析确定应急能力跃迁的路径。
第四部分，在应急能力跃迁后的定态，在原则性机理中，首先运用突变理论的流形分析法论证相容性在定态中的重要性，然后通过生物进化的相容性理论到应急能力的隐喻化，建立了应急能力的相容调控模型。在应急能力的原理性机理中，分析了应急能力相容的过程，提出了应急能力相容的五种基本模式。在操作性机理中，基于过程改进理论建立了应急能力相容工作的运行逻辑，给出了完成应急能力相容工作的9个步骤。
第五部分，在应急能力跃迁中人的因素方面，首先论证了人的因素在应急能力中的重要性。通过事故灾难的案例，分析了应急反应能力在人的因素中的重要性。分析了经典的研究人的反应能力的理论和不足之处，引入现代认知神经科学的理论分析了克服经典理论研究局限的方法。根据认知神经科学的方法进行了应急人员对于自动化控制界面中安全信号的反应实验。通过测试被试人员的视觉失匹配指标，揭示了应急人员对于不同类型安全信号的反应机理。
最后，针对应急能力跃迁过程中的三种状态和跃迁中人的因素特点提出提升应急能力跃迁质量的对策建议。在应急能力跃迁前的基态，建议通过应急能力运行状态的风险分析来判断应急能力跃迁的时机。在应急能力跃迁中的激发态，建议通过利用应急能力跃迁的动力，并有效寻找应急能力跃迁的应急能力要素，从两个方面提升应急能力跃迁的效率。在应急能力跃迁后的定态，建议通过应急能力的相容性操作，使应急能力尽快达到跃迁后的稳定状态。同时，根据应急能力反应机理，针对应急人员的能力选择、能力调配和能力改善提出相应的对策建议，从人的因素方面促进应急能力的跃迁。
With the continuous introduction of new technologies, mode of production is also in adynamic adjustment, and the workplace emergency capability should also be adaptive totransition. The dissertation researched transition mechanism of workplace emergencycapability based on immunity heredity evolution theories. The transition process ofemergency capability was divided into the ground state, the excited state and the steady state.The ground state mechanism of emergency capability transition was researched based onimmunity theory, the excited state mechanism of emergency capability transition wasresearched based on heredity and evolution theory, the steady state mechanism of emergencycapability transition was researched based on biocompatibility of evolution theory. At thesame time, the central role of human factors was concerned about in the entire transitionprocess of emergency capability. The reaction mechanism of emergency personnel wasresearched through cognitive neuroscience experiment. Main research contents include sixparts:
The first part, taking connotation definition and state division of workplace emergencycapability transition as a starting point, precondition that using immunity heredity evolutiontheories in biology can research emergency capability transition mechanism gotdemonstration based on the similarity theory. Under this precondition, the similarity modelwas established with homomorphic corresponding relationship between biological theory andemergency capability theory, and science and rationality were demonstrated as analogyresearch. On the premise demonstration basis of analogy research, the research levels ofemergency capability transition mechanism were analyzed. Research of emergency capabilitytransition mechanism commenced according to principle mechanism, rationale mechanismand operation mechanism in three states of transition process.
The second part, in the ground state of emergency capability transition, in the principlemechanism, immune regulation model of emergency capability was established through themetaphor of immune theory to the emergency capability. In the rationale mechanism, immunefunction, immune process, immune structure and immune properties of emergency capabilitywere analyzed. In the operation mechanism, immune work status was monitored through thefailure mode and effects analysis. The risk priority number measured the capability of emergency immune response to accidents, which was the basis of emergency capabilitytransition.
The third part, in the excited state of emergency capability transition, in the principlemechanism, catastrophe regulation model of emergency capability was established throughthe metaphor of heredity and evolution theory to the emergency capability. In the rationalemechanism, the driving force factors that gave rise to emergency capability transition wereanalyzed, and the three-gateway driving force model of emergency capability transition wasestablished. In the process analysis of emergency capability transition, situation awareness ofemergency capability response to safety environment was analyzed and hereditary variationprocess in emergency capability transition was researched based on heredity theory of biology.In the operation mechanism, emergency capability was located through potential functionanalysis of catastrophe theory in enterprise species evolution environment, and path ofemergency capability transition was determined through benchmarking.
The fourth part, in the steady state of emergency capability transition, in the principlemechanism, the importance of emergency capability compatibility was demonstrated throughthe manifold analysis of catastrophe theory. Compatibility regulation model of emergencycapability was established through the metaphor of biocompatibility theory to the emergencycapability. In the rationale mechanism, the compatible process was analyzed. The five majorcompatible patterns were given. In the operation mechanism, the operation logic ofemergency capability compatibility was established, and the9steps of completing emergencycapability compatible work were put forward.
The fifth part, for the human factors of emergency capability transition, first of all, theimportance of human factors in emergency capability was demonstrated. The importance ofemergency response capability in human factors was analyzed through accidents case study.The classical theory of human response capability and deficiency were analyzed, and themethods of overcoming classical theory limitation were introduced by modern cognitiveneuroscience theory. According to cognitive neuroscience method, the experiment which teststhe reaction capability of emergency personnel response to alarm signals in automatic controlinterface was completed. Through the test of visual MMN of the participants, the emergencyreaction mechanism of emergency personnel response to different types of alarm signals wasrevealed.
Finally, the countermeasures and suggestions were proposed for the parts of emergencycapability transition. In the ground state, the transition timing of emergency capability can bedetermined through risk analysis of running status of emergency capability. In the excitedstate, the driving forces of emergency capability transition must be used, and the elements ofemergency capability transition must be found effectively to improve the transition efficiencyof emergency capability. In the steady state, the compatibility operation of emergencycapability can improve the capability to reach the steady state after the transition as soon aspossible. According to the reaction mechanism of emergency capability, the countermeasuresand suggestions were proposed about capability selection, capability allocation and capabilityimprovement of emergency personnel, which can promote the transition of emergencycapability from the aspects of human factors.
第一部分，以安全生产应急能力跃迁的内涵界定和状态划分为出发点，基于相似理论论证了运用生物学中免疫、遗传和进化理论来类比研究应急能力跃迁机理的前提条件。在此前提条件下，建立了生物学理论与应急能力理论之间具有同态对应关系的相似性模型，论证了两者之间进行类比研究的科学性和合理性。在类比研究前提论证的基础上，确立了应急能力跃迁机理的研究层次。应急能力跃迁机理的研究在跃迁过程的每个状态下按照原则性机理、原理性机理和操作性机理展开。
第二部分，在应急能力跃迁前的基态，在原则性机理中，通过免疫理论到应急能力的隐喻化，建立了应急能力的免疫调控模型。在原理性机理中，进行了应急能力的免疫功能、免疫过程、免疫结构和免疫属性的分析。在操作性机理中，通过故障模式及影响分析，监控应急能力的免疫工作状态，以综合风险指数衡量应急免疫应对事故灾难的能力，以此作为应急能力跃迁的依据。
第三部分，在应急能力跃迁中的激发态，在原则性机理中，通过遗传理论到应急能力的隐喻化，建立了应急能力的突变调控模型。在原理性机理中，分析了催生应急能力跃迁的各项动力因素，建立了应急能力跃迁的三闸门动力模型。在应急能力跃迁的过程分析中，首先进行了应急能力对安全环境的态势感知分析，然后基于生物学中的遗传理论研究了应急能力跃迁中的遗传突变过程。在操作性机理中，在企业种群进化环境下，运用突变理论的势函数分析法对本企业的应急能力水平进行定位，然后通过对标分析确定应急能力跃迁的路径。
第四部分，在应急能力跃迁后的定态，在原则性机理中，首先运用突变理论的流形分析法论证相容性在定态中的重要性，然后通过生物进化的相容性理论到应急能力的隐喻化，建立了应急能力的相容调控模型。在应急能力的原理性机理中，分析了应急能力相容的过程，提出了应急能力相容的五种基本模式。在操作性机理中，基于过程改进理论建立了应急能力相容工作的运行逻辑，给出了完成应急能力相容工作的9个步骤。
第五部分，在应急能力跃迁中人的因素方面，首先论证了人的因素在应急能力中的重要性。通过事故灾难的案例，分析了应急反应能力在人的因素中的重要性。分析了经典的研究人的反应能力的理论和不足之处，引入现代认知神经科学的理论分析了克服经典理论研究局限的方法。根据认知神经科学的方法进行了应急人员对于自动化控制界面中安全信号的反应实验。通过测试被试人员的视觉失匹配指标，揭示了应急人员对于不同类型安全信号的反应机理。
最后，针对应急能力跃迁过程中的三种状态和跃迁中人的因素特点提出提升应急能力跃迁质量的对策建议。在应急能力跃迁前的基态，建议通过应急能力运行状态的风险分析来判断应急能力跃迁的时机。在应急能力跃迁中的激发态，建议通过利用应急能力跃迁的动力，并有效寻找应急能力跃迁的应急能力要素，从两个方面提升应急能力跃迁的效率。在应急能力跃迁后的定态，建议通过应急能力的相容性操作，使应急能力尽快达到跃迁后的稳定状态。同时，根据应急能力反应机理，针对应急人员的能力选择、能力调配和能力改善提出相应的对策建议，从人的因素方面促进应急能力的跃迁。
With the continuous introduction of new technologies, mode of production is also in adynamic adjustment, and the workplace emergency capability should also be adaptive totransition. The dissertation researched transition mechanism of workplace emergencycapability based on immunity heredity evolution theories. The transition process ofemergency capability was divided into the ground state, the excited state and the steady state.The ground state mechanism of emergency capability transition was researched based onimmunity theory, the excited state mechanism of emergency capability transition wasresearched based on heredity and evolution theory, the steady state mechanism of emergencycapability transition was researched based on biocompatibility of evolution theory. At thesame time, the central role of human factors was concerned about in the entire transitionprocess of emergency capability. The reaction mechanism of emergency personnel wasresearched through cognitive neuroscience experiment. Main research contents include sixparts:
The first part, taking connotation definition and state division of workplace emergencycapability transition as a starting point, precondition that using immunity heredity evolutiontheories in biology can research emergency capability transition mechanism gotdemonstration based on the similarity theory. Under this precondition, the similarity modelwas established with homomorphic corresponding relationship between biological theory andemergency capability theory, and science and rationality were demonstrated as analogyresearch. On the premise demonstration basis of analogy research, the research levels ofemergency capability transition mechanism were analyzed. Research of emergency capabilitytransition mechanism commenced according to principle mechanism, rationale mechanismand operation mechanism in three states of transition process.
The second part, in the ground state of emergency capability transition, in the principlemechanism, immune regulation model of emergency capability was established through themetaphor of immune theory to the emergency capability. In the rationale mechanism, immunefunction, immune process, immune structure and immune properties of emergency capabilitywere analyzed. In the operation mechanism, immune work status was monitored through thefailure mode and effects analysis. The risk priority number measured the capability of emergency immune response to accidents, which was the basis of emergency capabilitytransition.
The third part, in the excited state of emergency capability transition, in the principlemechanism, catastrophe regulation model of emergency capability was established throughthe metaphor of heredity and evolution theory to the emergency capability. In the rationalemechanism, the driving force factors that gave rise to emergency capability transition wereanalyzed, and the three-gateway driving force model of emergency capability transition wasestablished. In the process analysis of emergency capability transition, situation awareness ofemergency capability response to safety environment was analyzed and hereditary variationprocess in emergency capability transition was researched based on heredity theory of biology.In the operation mechanism, emergency capability was located through potential functionanalysis of catastrophe theory in enterprise species evolution environment, and path ofemergency capability transition was determined through benchmarking.
The fourth part, in the steady state of emergency capability transition, in the principlemechanism, the importance of emergency capability compatibility was demonstrated throughthe manifold analysis of catastrophe theory. Compatibility regulation model of emergencycapability was established through the metaphor of biocompatibility theory to the emergencycapability. In the rationale mechanism, the compatible process was analyzed. The five majorcompatible patterns were given. In the operation mechanism, the operation logic ofemergency capability compatibility was established, and the9steps of completing emergencycapability compatible work were put forward.
The fifth part, for the human factors of emergency capability transition, first of all, theimportance of human factors in emergency capability was demonstrated. The importance ofemergency response capability in human factors was analyzed through accidents case study.The classical theory of human response capability and deficiency were analyzed, and themethods of overcoming classical theory limitation were introduced by modern cognitiveneuroscience theory. According to cognitive neuroscience method, the experiment which teststhe reaction capability of emergency personnel response to alarm signals in automatic controlinterface was completed. Through the test of visual MMN of the participants, the emergencyreaction mechanism of emergency personnel response to different types of alarm signals wasrevealed.
Finally, the countermeasures and suggestions were proposed for the parts of emergencycapability transition. In the ground state, the transition timing of emergency capability can bedetermined through risk analysis of running status of emergency capability. In the excitedstate, the driving forces of emergency capability transition must be used, and the elements ofemergency capability transition must be found effectively to improve the transition efficiencyof emergency capability. In the steady state, the compatibility operation of emergencycapability can improve the capability to reach the steady state after the transition as soon aspossible. According to the reaction mechanism of emergency capability, the countermeasuresand suggestions were proposed about capability selection, capability allocation and capabilityimprovement of emergency personnel, which can promote the transition of emergencycapability from the aspects of human factors.
引文
[1] Vaughan Pomeroy. The people piece: any improvement in maritime safety has to beginwith the human element becoming central to the entire lifecycle of a vessel [J]. Marinetechnology,2012,(4)：40-46.
[2] Jeom Kee Paik. Lessons learned: what maritime accidents can teach us about humanerror, and structural design and engineering [J]. Marine technology,2012,(4)：62-66.
[3] F. Marincioni, R. Fraboni. A baseline assessment of emergency planning andpreparedness in Italian universities [J]. Disasters,2012,36(2)：291-315.
[4] Y. N. Photis, G. Grekousis. Locational planning for emergency management andresponse: An artificial intelligence approach [J]. International Journal of SustainableDevelopment and Planning,2012,7(3)：372-384.
[5] C. Gómez, J. Buriticá, M. Sánchez-Silva, L. Due as-Osorio. Optimisation-baseddecision-making for complex networks in disastrous events [J]. International Journal ofRisk Assessment and Management,2011,15(5-6)：417-436.
[6] D. K. Bird, C. Chagué-Gof, A. Gero. Human response to extreme events: A review ofthree post-tsunami disaster case studies [J]. Australian Geographer,2011,42(3)：225-239.
[7] P. N. SubbaNarasimha. Strategy in turbulent environments: the role of dynamiccompetence [J]. Managerial and Decision Economics,2001,22(4-5)：201–212.
[8] M. L. Doerfel, C. H. Lai, L. V. Chewning. The evolutionary role of interorganizationalcommunication: Modeling social capital in disaster contexts [J]. Human CommunicationResearch,2010,36(2)：125-162.
[9] M. Kim, R. Sharman, C. P. Cook-Cottone, H. R. Rao, S. J. Upadhyaya. Assessing rolesof people, technology and structure in emergency management systems: A public sectorperspective [J]. Behaviour and Information Technology,2012,31(12)：1147-1160.
[10]G. Hofinger, R. Zinke, S. Strohschneider. Role-specific psychological requirements inpreparing public transportation staff for disaster response [J]. Disaster Prevention andManagement,2011,20(4)：398-412.
[11]L. Pezzullo, R. D. Filippo. Perceptions of industrial risk and emergency managementprocedures in Hazmat Logistics: A qualitative mental model approach [J]. Safety Science,2009,47(4)：537-541.
[12]K. Adams, A. Wassell, M. G. Ceruti, E. Castro, S. F. Lehan, J. W. Mitchell.Emergency-management situational-awareness prototype [C]. IEEE1st InternationalMulti-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness andDecision Support, Miami Beach, FL.2011：110-114.
[13]M. A. Khawaja, F. Chen, N. Marcus. Analysis of collaborative communication forlinguistic cues of cognitive load [J]. Human Factors,2012,54(4)：518-529.
[14]R. Parasuraman, J. Christensen, S. Grafton. Neuroergonomics: The brain in action and atwork [J]. Neuroimage,2012,59(1)：1-3.
[15]R. Parasuraman, M. Rizzo. Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work [M]. New York：Oxford University Press，2008：3-12.
[16]R. Parasuraman. Neuroergonomics: Brain, Cognition, and Performance at Work [J].Current Directions in Psychological Science,2011,20(3)：181-186.
[17]R. Parasuraman, C. L. Baldwin, B. Knott, et al. Symposium: Neuroergonomics,technology, and cognition [J]. Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment&Rehabilitation,2012,41(1)：5167-5171.
[18]钟永光，毛中根，翁文国，杨列勋.非常规突发事件应急管理研究进展[J].系统工程理论与实践，2012，32（5）：911-918.
[19]李湖生.国内外应急准备规划体系比较研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2011，7（10）：5-10.
[20]刘铁民.应急准备任务设置与应急响应能力建设[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2012，8（10）：5-13.
[21]寇纲，彭怡，石勇.突发公共事件应急信息系统框架与功能[J].管理评论，2011，23（3）：56-59.
[22]王铮，廖悲雨，隋文娟.层次型应急设施布局模型及其应用[J].中国管理科学，2011，19（6）：88-91.
[23]张自立，李向阳，张紫琼.基于生产能力共同储备的政府和企业应急经费规划模型[J].管理工程学报，2011，25（1）：56-61.
[24]代颖，马祖军，朱道立，方涛.震后应急物资配送的模糊动态定位—路径问题[J].管理科学学报，2012，15（7）：60-70.
[25]朱莉，曹杰.灾害风险下应急资源调配的超网络优化研究[J].中国管理科学，2012，20（6）：141-148.
[26]夏一雪，郭其云.公共危机应急救援力量管理体系研究[J].中国软科学，2012，（11）：1-10.
[27]任世科，袁治平，徐渝.突发事件应急救援动态调度优化：以KX井喷事故为例[J].运筹与管理，2012，21（3）：1-7.
[28]樊治平，刘洋，沈荣鉴.基于前景理论的突发事件应急响应的风险决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践，2012，32（5）：977-984.
[29]邬文帅，寇纲，彭怡，石勇.面向突发事件的模糊多目标应急决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践，2012，32（6）：1298-1304.
[30]徐玖平，卢毅.地震救援·恢复·重建的组织技术及理论模式[J].系统工程理论与实践，2011，31（S1）：107-119.
[31]陈铎.风险免疫、预警系统及在某航空教练机项目中的应用[D].北京航空航天大学硕士学位论文.2004.
[32]仇蕾.基于免疫机理的流域生态系统健康诊断预警研究[D].河海大学博士学位论文.2006：45-62.
[33]刘浪，邓伟.基于免疫危险理论的危机预警系统设计[J].北京理工大学学报（社会科学版），2007，9（4）：37-40.
[34]赵林度，杨世才.城市重大危险源免疫机制研究[J].中国安全科学学报，2007，17（9）：146-152.
[35]王湛，杨青.应急“特异性免疫”系统建设及其运作研究[J].科技信息(学术研究)，2008，（21）：642.
[36]王湛，杨青.浅析应急“非特异性免疫”系统的建设及其运作[J].管理观察，2008，（10）：183-184.
[37]王湛.突发公共事件应急管理过程及能力评价研究[D].武汉理工大学博士学位论文.2008：42-51.
[38]马慧敏.基于免疫理论的非常规突发事件应急管理主动免疫系统研究[D].武汉理工大学博士学位论文.2010：53-133.
[39]施式亮，彭新，李润求.基于人工免疫原理的事故预防研究[J].中国安全科学学报，2009，19（1）：156-160.
[40]刘浪，黄有方.基于免疫应答原理的应急物流响应机制的构建[J].北京理工大学学报（社会科学版），2011，13（2）：70-76.
[41]段伟利.基于免疫机理的化工园区安全生产预警研究[D].华南理工大学硕士学位论文.2011：10-69.
[42]叶青，陈国华，陈清光，袁智.基于监管的化工园区事故免疫系统构建[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2011，7（7）：61-65.
[43]叶青，陈国华.基于生物免疫的化工园区事故发生机理研究[J].工业安全与环保，2012，38（6）：57-59.
[44]叶青.基于免疫机理的化工园区安全生产应急研究[D].华南理工大学硕士学位论文.2012：11-23.
[45]Ma Qingguo, Jin Jing, Wang Lei. The neural process of hazard perception and evaluationfor warning signal words: Evidence from event-related potentials [J]. NeuroscienceLetters,2010,483(3)：206–210.
[46]金晶.安全标志信号词风险信息处理实验研究[D].浙江大学硕士学位论文.2010.
[47]王凯.突发事件下决策者的框架效应研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文.2010.
[48]Wu Jianhui, Ge Yan, Zhang Kan, et al. Response inhibition in adolescent earthquakesurvivors with and without posttraumatic stress disorder: A combined behavioral andERP study [J]. Neuroscience Letters,2010,486(3)：117–121.
[49]Ge Yan, Wu Jianhui, Sun Xianghong, Zhang Kan. Enhanced mismatch negativity inadolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)[J]. International Journal ofPsychophysiology,2011,79(2)：231–235.
[50]马庆国.中国管理科学研究面临的几个关键问题[J].管理世界，2002，（8）：105-115.
[51]郭重庆.直面中国管理实践，跻身管理科学前沿—为中国管理科学的健康发展而虑[J].管理科学学报，2012，15（12）：1-9.
[52]蔡永铭.现代安全管理[M].台北：扬智文化事业股份有限公司，2009：4.
[53]中国职业安全健康协会.安全科学与工程学科发展报告[R].北京：中国科学技术出版社，2008：前言.
[54]隋鹏程，陈宝智，隋旭.安全原理[M].北京：化学工业出版社，2005：11.
[55]中国安全生产协会.安全评价师：基础知识[M].北京：中国劳动社会保障出版社，2010：276.
[56]苏宏杰，肖寒.我国安全生产标准体系的现状和对策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2011，7（6）：99-103.
[57]毛海峰，贾根武.从安全生产管理体制到安全生产运行机制[J].中国安全科学学报，2002，12（1）：5-8.
[58]魏吴晋，林柏泉，翟成.使用HAZOP分析法对重大事故进行调查分析[J].中国安全科学学报，2006，16（3）：119-123.
[59]Emergency Management Australia. Emergency Management in Australia: Concepts andPrinciples [R]. Australia: Australian Government,2004：3-6.
[60]Bruria Adini, Avishay Goldberg, Danny Laor, et al. Assessing Levels of HospitalEmergency Preparedness [J]. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine,2006,21(6)：451-457.
[61]Henstra Daniel. Evaluating Local Government Emergency Management Programs: WhatFramework Should Public Managers Adopt?[J]. Public Administration Review,2010,70(2)：236-246.
[62]Emergency Management Policy Directorate. An Emergency Management Framework forCanada [R]. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada,2011：4-5.
[63]邓云峰，郑双忠，刘功智，刘铁民.城市应急能力评估体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2005，1（6）：33-36.
[64]田依林.城市突发公共事件综合应急能力评价研究[D].武汉理工大学博士学位论文.2008：31.
[65]史波.煤矿企业应急管理系统构建与应急能力评价研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学博士学位论文.2008：144.
[66]薄涛.疾病预防控制机构突发公共卫生事件应急能力理论与评价研究[D].山东大学博士学位论文.2009：120.
[67]郭太生，寇丽平.重点单位突发事件应急能力评价指标体系研究[J].中国人民公安大学学报（社会科学版），2010，（3）：80-88.
[68]唐桂娟.城市自然灾害应急能力综合评价研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学博士学位论文.2011：35.
[69]王绍玉，孙研.基于AHP-Entropy确权法的城市公众应急反应能力评价[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报，2011，33（8）：992-996.
[70]曾谨言.量子物理学百年回顾[J].物理，2003，29（12）：665-672.
[71]Ernest Nagel著，徐向东译.科学的结构[M].上海：译文出版社，2005：122.
[72]阎耀军，吴中元.相似的未来与未来的相似——对相似性原理用于社会预测的思考[J].未来与发展，2007，（1）：11-16.
[73]George J. Klir. Facets of Systems Science [M]. London: Springer,2001：95-96.
[74]亓菁晶，陈安.突发事件与应急管理的机理体系[J].中国科学院院刊，2009，24（5）：496-503.
[75]亓菁晶，陈安.突发事件的多层次多阶段机理研究[J].三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版)，2008，30（S2）：38-40.
[76]尚鸿雁.危险货物运输突发事件机理及风险评估方法集成研究[D].长安大学博士学位论文.2009：57-59.
[77]廖洁明.突发事件应急管理绩效评估研究[D].暨南大学博士学位论文.2009：41-43.
[78]George Lakoff, Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago: University ofChicago Press,1980：5.
[79]龚非力.医学免疫学[M].北京：科学出版社，2003：2.
[80]D. H. Stamatis. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution [M].Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press,2003：21.
[81]罗云.风险分析与安全评价[M].北京：化学工业出版社，2009：129.
[82]Carl S. Carlson. Effective FMEAs: Achieving Safe, Reliable, and Economical Productsand Processes using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis [M]. Hoboken: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.,2012：107-161.
[83]Knut Georg Seet-Larsson. A Cookie Cutter Introduction to FMEA and FMECA [M].Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing,2010：28-36.
[84]Relex Software Co.&Intellect著，陈晓彤等译.可靠性实用指南[M].北京：北京航空航天大学出版社，2005：122-132.
[85]Ernest Nagel著，康锐等译.可靠性与维修性工程概论[M].北京：清华大学出版社，2010：131-135.
[86]张建民.现代遗传学[M].北京：化学工业出版社，2005：1.
[87]C. M. Rose. Design for environment: A method for formulating product end-of-lifestrategies [D]. Stanford University Ph.D. Dissertation.2000：32.
[88]凌复华.突变理论及其应用[M].上海：上海交通大学出版社，1988：1-6.
[89]A. P. Sage, W. B. Rouse. Handbook of Systems Engineering and Management [M].Hoboken: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.,2009：29-30.
[90]许小东.组织惰性行为初探[J].科研管理，2000，21（4）：56-60.
[91]M. R. Endsley. Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement [R].Proceedings of the Human Factors Society32ndAnnual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA:Human Factors Society,1988：97-101.
[92]张光宇，刘贻新，谢卫红，李华军.基于突变级数法的技术生态位评价模型[J].系统科学学报，2012，20（3）：79-83.
[93]史丽萍，杜泽文，刘强.基于突变级数法的企业反竞争情报能力评价研究[J].情报杂志，2012，31（10）：12-16.
[94]J. M. Juran, Joseph A. De feo. Juran’s quality handbook: the complete guide toperformance excellence [M]. New York: McGraw Hill,2010：439-442.
[95]J. P. Kotter著，罗立彬,翟润梅,李猛译.变革[M].北京：机械工业出版社，2005：137-164.
[96]John E. Bauer, Grace L. Duffy, Russ Westcott. The Quality Improvement Handbook [M].Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press,2006：80.
[97]孙林岩，崔凯，孙林辉.人因工程[M].北京：科学出版社，2011：4.
[98]C. D. Wickens, J. D. Lee, Yili Liu, S. E. Gordon-Becker. Introduction to Human FactorsEngineering [M]. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.,2004：2-4，121-139.
[99]林柏泉，张景林.安全系统工程[M].北京：中国劳动社会保障出版社，2007：5-10.
[100] W. Karwowski. Ergonomics and human factors: the paradigms for science,engineering, design, technology and management of human-compatible systems [J].Ergonomics,2005,48(5)：436-463.
[101] Y. Y. Haimes. Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management [M]. Hoboken: JohnWiley&Sons, Inc.,2009：24-26.
[102] Safety at Sea，上海海事局译. Costa Concordia倾覆后的反思.[EB/OL].http://www.shmsa.gov.cn/NewsContent.aspx?CatalogId=bf14321a-697d-4915-90df-b3e9b953ed8d&ContentId=48e7590d-07ee-4c15-a26c-ffc9c9c9ad2b.
[103]葛瑜玮.香港南丫岛撞船事实质聆讯继续—英国专家：撞船是人为失误造成.
[EB/OL].http://www.shmsa.gov.cn/NewsContent.aspx?CatalogId=bf14321a-697d-4915-90df-b3e9b953ed8d&ContentId=48e7590d-07ee-4c15-a26c-ffc9c9c9ad2b.
[104]佚名.香港撞船事故疑与航道灯光太亮有关.[EB/OL]. http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2012-10-04/042125298769.shtml.
[105] C. D. Wickens, J. G. Hollands, S. Banbury, R. Parasuraman. Engineering Psychologyand Human Performance [M]. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.,2013：3-6.
[106] Benjamin Niebel, Andris Freivalds著，王爱虎,鄂明成,叶飞，曾敏刚译.方法、标准与作业设计[M].北京：清华大学出版社，2007：260.
[107] Mark S. Sanders, Ernest J. McCormick著，于瑞峰,卢岚译.工程和设计中的人因学[M].北京：清华大学出版社，2009：57-62.
[108] M. S. Gazzaniga, R. B. Ivry, G. R. Mangun. Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology ofthe Mind[M]. New York：W. W. Norton&Company，2009：3.
[109]魏景汉，阎克乐等.认知神经科学基础[M].北京：人民教育出版社，2008：3.
[110]马庆国，王小毅.从神经经济学和神经营销学到神经管理学[J].管理工程学报，2006，20（3）：129-132.
[111]马庆国，王小毅.认知神经科学、神经经济学与神经管理学[J].管理世界，2006，（10）：139-149.
[112]林崇德，杨治良，黄希庭.心理学大辞典[M].上海：上海教育出版社，2003：1551，1757.
[113]罗跃嘉，魏景汉.注意的认知神经科学研究[M].北京：高等教育出版社，2004：2.
[114]霍涌泉.意识心理世界的科学重建与发展前景[D].南京师范大学博士学位论文.2005：120-124.
[115] E. Schroger. On the detection of auditory deviations: A pre-attentive activationmodel [J]. Psychophysiology,1997,34(3)：245-257.
[116] R. Naatanen, P. Paavilainen, T. Rinne, K. Alho. The mismatch negativity (MMN) inbasic research of central auditory processing: A review [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology,2007,118(12)：2544-2590.
[117] R. Naatanen, M. Tervaniemi, E. Sussman, P. Paavilainen, I. Winkler.‘Primitiveintelligence’ in the auditory cortex [J]. Trends in Neurosciences,2001,24(5)：283–288.
[118] Steven J. Luck. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique [M].Cambridge：The MIT Press，2005：39.
[119] R. Naatanen, I. Winkler. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitiveneuroscience [J]. Psychological Bulletin,1999,125(6)：826-859.
[120] I. Czigler, I. Winkler. Unconscious Memory Representations in Perception:Processes and mechanisms in the brain [M]. Amsterdam：John Benjamins PublishingCompany，2010：107-131.
[121] I. Czigler. Visual mismatch negativity-Violation of nonattended environmentalregularities [J]. Journal of Psychophysiology,2007,21(3-4)：224-230.
[122] P. Pazo-Alvarez, F. Cadaveira, E. Amenedo. MMN in the visual modality: a review[J]. Biological Psychology,2003,63(3)：199-236.
[123] I. Czigler, L. Balazs, L.G. Pato. Visual change detection: event-related potentials aredependent on stimulus location in humans [J]. Neuroscience Letters,2004,364(3)：149-153.
[124] I. Czigler, L. Balazs, I. Winkler. Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visualchanges [J]. Psychophysiology,2002,39(6)：869-873.
[125] I. Czigler, I. Sulykos. Visual mismatch negativity to irrelevant changes is sensitive totask-relevant changes [J]. Neuropsychologia,2010,48(5)：1277-1282.
[126] S. Grimm, A. Bendixen, L.Y. Deouell, E. Schroger. Distraction in a visualmulti-deviant paradigm: Behavioral and event-related potential effects [J]. InternationalJournal of Psychophysiology,2009,72(3)：260-266.
[127] R. Horimoto, M. Inagaki, T. Yano, Y. Sata, M. Kaga. Mismatch negativity of thecolor modality during a selective attention task to auditory stimuli in children with mentalretardation [J]. Brain&Development,2002,24(7)：703-709.
[128] M. Kimura, J. Katayama, H. Murohashi. Probability-independent and-dependentERPs reflecting visual change detection [J]. Psychophysiology,2006,43(2)：180-189.
[129] T. Liu, J. Shi. Event-related potentials during preattentional processing of colorstimuli [J]. Neuroreport,2008,19(12)：1221-1225.
[130] L. Mo, G. Xu, P. Kay, L.-H. Tan. Electrophysiological evidence for theleft-lateralized effect of language on preattentive categorical perception of color [J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2011,108(34)：14026-14030.
[131] D. Mueller, I. Winkler, U. Roeber, S. Schaffer, I. Czigler, E. Schroeger. VisualObject Representations Can Be Formed outside the Focus of Voluntary Attention:Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2010,22(6)：1179-1188.
[132] G. Thierry, P. Athanasopoulos, A. Wiggett, B. Dering, J.-R. Kuipers. Unconsciouseffects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception [J]. Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2009,106(11)：4567-4570.
[133] M. Y. Khodanovich, E.A. Esipenko, M.V. Svetlik. A visual analog of mismatchnegativity when stimuli differ in duration [J]. Neuroscience and behavioral physiology,2010,40：653-661.
[134] X. Qiu, X. Yang, Z. Qiao, L. Wang, N. Ning, J. Shi, L. Zhao, Y. Yang. Impairment:in processing visual information at the pre-attentive stage in patients with a majordepressive disorder: A visual mismatch negativity study [J]. Neuroscience Letters,2011,491(1)：53-57.
[135] P. Astikainen, E. Lillstrang, T. Ruusuvirta. Visual mismatch negativity for changesin orientation-a sensory memory-dependent response [J]. European Journal ofNeuroscience,2008,28(11)：2319-2324.
[136] P. Astikainen, T. Ruusuvirta, J. Wikgren, T. Korhonen. The human brain processesvisual changes that are not cued by attended auditory stimulation [J]. NeuroscienceLetters,2004,368(2)：231-234.
[137] I. Czigler, L. Pato. Unnoticed regularity violation elicits change-related brain activity[J]. Biological Psychology,2009,80(3)：339-347.
[138] M. Flynn, A. Liasis, M. Gardner, S. Boyd, T. Towell. Can illusory deviant stimuli beused as attentional distractors to record vMMN in a passive three stimulus oddballparadigm?[J]. Experimental Brain Research,2009,197(2)：153-161.
[139] M. Kimura, J.i. Katayama, H. Ohira, E. Schroeger. Visual mismatch negativity: Newevidence from the equiprobable paradigm [J]. Psychophysiology,2009,46(2)：402-409.
[140] M. Kimura, H. Ohira, E. Schroeger. Localizing sensory and cognitive systems forpre-attentive visual deviance detection: A sLORETA analysis of the data of Kimura et al.(2009)[J]. Neuroscience Letters,2010,485(3)：198-203.
[141] M. Kimura, E. Schroeger, I. Czigler, H. Ohira. Human Visual System AutomaticallyEncodes Sequential Regularities of Discrete Events [J]. Journal of CognitiveNeuroscience,2010,22(6)：1124-1139.
[142] I. Sulykos, I. Czigler. One plus one is less than two: Visual features elicitnon-additive mismatch-related brain activity [J]. Brain Research,2011,1398：64-71.
[143] K. Alho, D.L. Woods, A. Algazi, R. Naatanen. Intermodal selective attention. II.Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space [J].Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology,1992,82(5)：356-368.
[144] M. Bubrovszky, P. Thomas. Useful or not? How schizophrenic patients process therelevance of a visual stimulus [J]. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science,2011,01(5)：111-114.
[145] T. Maekawa, Y. Goto, N. Kinukawa, T. Taniwaki, S. Kanba, S. Tobimatsu.Functional characterization of mismatch negativity to a visual stimulus [J]. ClinicalNeurophysiology,2005,116(10)：2392-2402.
[146] V. Mazza, M. Turatto, M. Sarlo. Rare stimuli or rare changes: what really matters forthe brain?[J]. Neuroreport,2005,16(10)：1061-1064.
[147] C. Stagg, P. Hindley, A. Tales, S. Butler. Visual mismatch negativity: the detectionof stimulus change [J]. Neuroreport,2004,15(4)：659-663.
[148] A. Tales, S. Butler. Visual mismatch negativity highlights abnormal preattentivevisual processing in Alzheimer's disease [J]. Neuroreport,2006,17(9)：887-890.
[149] A. Tales, J. Haworth, G. Wilcock, P. Newton, S. Butler. Visual mismatch negativityhighlights abnormal pre-attentive visual processing in mild cognitive impairment andAlzheimer's disease [J]. Neuropsychologia,2008,46(5)：1224-1232.
[150] A. Tales, P. Newton, T. Troscianko, S. Butler. Mismatch negativity in the visualmodality [J]. Neuroreport,1999,10(16)：3363-3367.
[151] M. Kimura, J. Katayama, H. Murohashi. Attention switching function ofmemory-comparison-based change detection system in the visual modality [J].International Journal of Psychophysiology,2008,67(2)：101-113.
[152] P. Astikainen, J.K. Hietanen. Event-related potentials to task-irrelevant changes infacial expressions [J]. Behavioral and Brain Functions,2009,5：1-9.
[153] Y. Chang, J. Xu, N. Shi, B. Zhang, L. Zhao. Dysfunction of processingtask-irrelevant emotional faces in major depressive disorder patients revealed byexpression-related visual MMN [J]. Neuroscience Letters,2010,472(1)：33-37.
[154] M. Kimura, H. Kondo, H. Ohira, E. Schroger. Unintentional temporal-context-basedprediction of emotional faces: an electrophysiological study [J]. Cerebral Cortex,2011,22(8)：1774-1785.
[155] A. Susac, R.J. Ilmoniemi, E. Pihko, S. Supek. Neurodynamic studies on emotionaland inverted faces in an oddball paradigm [J]. Brain Topography,2004,16(4)：265-268.
[156] A. Susac, R.J. Ilmoniemi, S. Supek. Sensory-memory-based change detection in facestimuli [J]. Translational Neuroscience,2010,1(4)：286-291.
[157] L. Zhao, J. Li. Visual mismatch negativity elicited by facial expressions undernon-attentional condition [J]. Neuroscience Letters,2006,410(2)：286-291.
[158]完颜笑如，庄达民，刘伟.基于非任务相关ERP技术的飞行员脑力负荷评价方法[J].中国生物医学工程学报，2011，30（4）：528-532.
[159]完颜笑如，庄达民，芦莎莎，刘伟.与飞行任务相关的认知负荷对听觉事件相关电位的影响[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版)，2011，47（6）：995-1002.
[160]完颜笑如，庄达民，刘伟.脑力负荷对前注意加工的影响与分析[J].北京航空航天大学学报，2012，38（4）：497-501.
[161] R. Naatanen, S. Pakarinen, T. Rinne, R. Takegata. The mismatch negativity (MMN):towards the optimal paradigm [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology,2004,115(1)：140-144.
[162] D. J. Fisher, A. Labelle, V. J. Knott. The right profile: Mismatch negativity inschizophrenia with and without auditory hallucinations as measured by a multi-featureparadigm [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology,2008,119(4)：909-921.
[163] T. Kujala, S. Kuuluvainen, S. Saalasti, E. Jansson-Verkasalo, L. von Wendt, T.Lepisto. Speech-feature discrimination in children with Asperger syndrome as determinedwith the multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology,2010,121(9)：1410-1419.
[164] H. Menning, A. Renz, J. Seifert, A. Maercker. Reduced mismatch negativity inposttraumatic stress disorder: A compensatory mechanism for chronic hyperarousal?[J].International Journal of Psychophysiology,2008,68(1)：27-34.
[165] H. Thonnessen, M. Zvyagintsev, K.C. Harke, F. Boers, J. Dammers, C. Norra, K.Mathiak. Optimized mismatch negativity paradigm reflects deficits in schizophreniapatients-A combined EEG and MEG study [J]. Biological Psychology,2008,77(2)：205-216.
[166] P. Vuust, E. Brattico, E. Glerean, M. Seppanen, S. Pakarinen, M. Tervaniemi, R.Naatanen. New fast mismatch negativity paradigm for determining the neuralprerequisites for musical ability [J]. Cortex,2011,47(9)：1091-1098.
[167] Maekawa T, Tobimatsu S, Ogata K, Onitsuka T, Kanba S. Preattentive visual changedetection as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN)-Evidence for a memory-basedprocess [J]. Neuroscience Research,2009,65(1)：107-112.
[168] I. Czigler, I. Winkler, L. Pato, A. Varnagy, J. Weisz, L. Balazs. Visual temporalwindow of integration as revealed by the visual mismatch negativity event-relatedpotential to stimulus omissions [J]. Brain Research,2006,1104(1)：129-140.
[169] M. Kimura, A. Widmann, E. Schroeger. Human visual system automaticallyrepresents large-scale sequential regularities [J]. Brain Research,2010,1317(4)：165-179.
[170] I. Czigler, J. Weisz, I. Winkler. ERPs and deviance detection: Visual mismatchnegativity to repeated visual stimuli [J]. Neuroscience Letters,2006,401(1-2)：178-182.
[171] M. Fuchs, J. Kastner, M. Wagner, S. Hawes, J.S. Ebersole. A standardized boundaryelement method volume conductor model [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology,2002,113(5)：702-712.
[172] R. D. Pascual-Marqui. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetictomography (sLORETA): Technical details [J]. Methods and Findings in Experimentaland Clinical Pharmacology,2002,24：5-12.
[173] V. Jurcak, D. Tsuzuki, I. Dan.10/20,10/10, and10/5systems revisited: Theirvalidity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems [J]. Neuroimage,2007,34(4)：1600-1611.
[174] M. Wagner, M. Fuchs, J. Kastner. Evaluation of sLORETA in the presence of noiseand multiple sources [J]. Brain Topography,2004,16(4)：277-280.
[175] Mike Barnett. Watch patterns and workloads: using simulator technology to researchfatigue in watchkeeping officers [J]. Marine technology,2012,(4)：32-38.
[2] Jeom Kee Paik. Lessons learned: what maritime accidents can teach us about humanerror, and structural design and engineering [J]. Marine technology,2012,(4)：62-66.
[3] F. Marincioni, R. Fraboni. A baseline assessment of emergency planning andpreparedness in Italian universities [J]. Disasters,2012,36(2)：291-315.
[4] Y. N. Photis, G. Grekousis. Locational planning for emergency management andresponse: An artificial intelligence approach [J]. International Journal of SustainableDevelopment and Planning,2012,7(3)：372-384.
[5] C. Gómez, J. Buriticá, M. Sánchez-Silva, L. Due as-Osorio. Optimisation-baseddecision-making for complex networks in disastrous events [J]. International Journal ofRisk Assessment and Management,2011,15(5-6)：417-436.
[6] D. K. Bird, C. Chagué-Gof, A. Gero. Human response to extreme events: A review ofthree post-tsunami disaster case studies [J]. Australian Geographer,2011,42(3)：225-239.
[7] P. N. SubbaNarasimha. Strategy in turbulent environments: the role of dynamiccompetence [J]. Managerial and Decision Economics,2001,22(4-5)：201–212.
[8] M. L. Doerfel, C. H. Lai, L. V. Chewning. The evolutionary role of interorganizationalcommunication: Modeling social capital in disaster contexts [J]. Human CommunicationResearch,2010,36(2)：125-162.
[9] M. Kim, R. Sharman, C. P. Cook-Cottone, H. R. Rao, S. J. Upadhyaya. Assessing rolesof people, technology and structure in emergency management systems: A public sectorperspective [J]. Behaviour and Information Technology,2012,31(12)：1147-1160.
[10]G. Hofinger, R. Zinke, S. Strohschneider. Role-specific psychological requirements inpreparing public transportation staff for disaster response [J]. Disaster Prevention andManagement,2011,20(4)：398-412.
[11]L. Pezzullo, R. D. Filippo. Perceptions of industrial risk and emergency managementprocedures in Hazmat Logistics: A qualitative mental model approach [J]. Safety Science,2009,47(4)：537-541.
[12]K. Adams, A. Wassell, M. G. Ceruti, E. Castro, S. F. Lehan, J. W. Mitchell.Emergency-management situational-awareness prototype [C]. IEEE1st InternationalMulti-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness andDecision Support, Miami Beach, FL.2011：110-114.
[13]M. A. Khawaja, F. Chen, N. Marcus. Analysis of collaborative communication forlinguistic cues of cognitive load [J]. Human Factors,2012,54(4)：518-529.
[14]R. Parasuraman, J. Christensen, S. Grafton. Neuroergonomics: The brain in action and atwork [J]. Neuroimage,2012,59(1)：1-3.
[15]R. Parasuraman, M. Rizzo. Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work [M]. New York：Oxford University Press，2008：3-12.
[16]R. Parasuraman. Neuroergonomics: Brain, Cognition, and Performance at Work [J].Current Directions in Psychological Science,2011,20(3)：181-186.
[17]R. Parasuraman, C. L. Baldwin, B. Knott, et al. Symposium: Neuroergonomics,technology, and cognition [J]. Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment&Rehabilitation,2012,41(1)：5167-5171.
[18]钟永光，毛中根，翁文国，杨列勋.非常规突发事件应急管理研究进展[J].系统工程理论与实践，2012，32（5）：911-918.
[19]李湖生.国内外应急准备规划体系比较研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2011，7（10）：5-10.
[20]刘铁民.应急准备任务设置与应急响应能力建设[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2012，8（10）：5-13.
[21]寇纲，彭怡，石勇.突发公共事件应急信息系统框架与功能[J].管理评论，2011，23（3）：56-59.
[22]王铮，廖悲雨，隋文娟.层次型应急设施布局模型及其应用[J].中国管理科学，2011，19（6）：88-91.
[23]张自立，李向阳，张紫琼.基于生产能力共同储备的政府和企业应急经费规划模型[J].管理工程学报，2011，25（1）：56-61.
[24]代颖，马祖军，朱道立，方涛.震后应急物资配送的模糊动态定位—路径问题[J].管理科学学报，2012，15（7）：60-70.
[25]朱莉，曹杰.灾害风险下应急资源调配的超网络优化研究[J].中国管理科学，2012，20（6）：141-148.
[26]夏一雪，郭其云.公共危机应急救援力量管理体系研究[J].中国软科学，2012，（11）：1-10.
[27]任世科，袁治平，徐渝.突发事件应急救援动态调度优化：以KX井喷事故为例[J].运筹与管理，2012，21（3）：1-7.
[28]樊治平，刘洋，沈荣鉴.基于前景理论的突发事件应急响应的风险决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践，2012，32（5）：977-984.
[29]邬文帅，寇纲，彭怡，石勇.面向突发事件的模糊多目标应急决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践，2012，32（6）：1298-1304.
[30]徐玖平，卢毅.地震救援·恢复·重建的组织技术及理论模式[J].系统工程理论与实践，2011，31（S1）：107-119.
[31]陈铎.风险免疫、预警系统及在某航空教练机项目中的应用[D].北京航空航天大学硕士学位论文.2004.
[32]仇蕾.基于免疫机理的流域生态系统健康诊断预警研究[D].河海大学博士学位论文.2006：45-62.
[33]刘浪，邓伟.基于免疫危险理论的危机预警系统设计[J].北京理工大学学报（社会科学版），2007，9（4）：37-40.
[34]赵林度，杨世才.城市重大危险源免疫机制研究[J].中国安全科学学报，2007，17（9）：146-152.
[35]王湛，杨青.应急“特异性免疫”系统建设及其运作研究[J].科技信息(学术研究)，2008，（21）：642.
[36]王湛，杨青.浅析应急“非特异性免疫”系统的建设及其运作[J].管理观察，2008，（10）：183-184.
[37]王湛.突发公共事件应急管理过程及能力评价研究[D].武汉理工大学博士学位论文.2008：42-51.
[38]马慧敏.基于免疫理论的非常规突发事件应急管理主动免疫系统研究[D].武汉理工大学博士学位论文.2010：53-133.
[39]施式亮，彭新，李润求.基于人工免疫原理的事故预防研究[J].中国安全科学学报，2009，19（1）：156-160.
[40]刘浪，黄有方.基于免疫应答原理的应急物流响应机制的构建[J].北京理工大学学报（社会科学版），2011，13（2）：70-76.
[41]段伟利.基于免疫机理的化工园区安全生产预警研究[D].华南理工大学硕士学位论文.2011：10-69.
[42]叶青，陈国华，陈清光，袁智.基于监管的化工园区事故免疫系统构建[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2011，7（7）：61-65.
[43]叶青，陈国华.基于生物免疫的化工园区事故发生机理研究[J].工业安全与环保，2012，38（6）：57-59.
[44]叶青.基于免疫机理的化工园区安全生产应急研究[D].华南理工大学硕士学位论文.2012：11-23.
[45]Ma Qingguo, Jin Jing, Wang Lei. The neural process of hazard perception and evaluationfor warning signal words: Evidence from event-related potentials [J]. NeuroscienceLetters,2010,483(3)：206–210.
[46]金晶.安全标志信号词风险信息处理实验研究[D].浙江大学硕士学位论文.2010.
[47]王凯.突发事件下决策者的框架效应研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文.2010.
[48]Wu Jianhui, Ge Yan, Zhang Kan, et al. Response inhibition in adolescent earthquakesurvivors with and without posttraumatic stress disorder: A combined behavioral andERP study [J]. Neuroscience Letters,2010,486(3)：117–121.
[49]Ge Yan, Wu Jianhui, Sun Xianghong, Zhang Kan. Enhanced mismatch negativity inadolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)[J]. International Journal ofPsychophysiology,2011,79(2)：231–235.
[50]马庆国.中国管理科学研究面临的几个关键问题[J].管理世界，2002，（8）：105-115.
[51]郭重庆.直面中国管理实践，跻身管理科学前沿—为中国管理科学的健康发展而虑[J].管理科学学报，2012，15（12）：1-9.
[52]蔡永铭.现代安全管理[M].台北：扬智文化事业股份有限公司，2009：4.
[53]中国职业安全健康协会.安全科学与工程学科发展报告[R].北京：中国科学技术出版社，2008：前言.
[54]隋鹏程，陈宝智，隋旭.安全原理[M].北京：化学工业出版社，2005：11.
[55]中国安全生产协会.安全评价师：基础知识[M].北京：中国劳动社会保障出版社，2010：276.
[56]苏宏杰，肖寒.我国安全生产标准体系的现状和对策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2011，7（6）：99-103.
[57]毛海峰，贾根武.从安全生产管理体制到安全生产运行机制[J].中国安全科学学报，2002，12（1）：5-8.
[58]魏吴晋，林柏泉，翟成.使用HAZOP分析法对重大事故进行调查分析[J].中国安全科学学报，2006，16（3）：119-123.
[59]Emergency Management Australia. Emergency Management in Australia: Concepts andPrinciples [R]. Australia: Australian Government,2004：3-6.
[60]Bruria Adini, Avishay Goldberg, Danny Laor, et al. Assessing Levels of HospitalEmergency Preparedness [J]. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine,2006,21(6)：451-457.
[61]Henstra Daniel. Evaluating Local Government Emergency Management Programs: WhatFramework Should Public Managers Adopt?[J]. Public Administration Review,2010,70(2)：236-246.
[62]Emergency Management Policy Directorate. An Emergency Management Framework forCanada [R]. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada,2011：4-5.
[63]邓云峰，郑双忠，刘功智，刘铁民.城市应急能力评估体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2005，1（6）：33-36.
[64]田依林.城市突发公共事件综合应急能力评价研究[D].武汉理工大学博士学位论文.2008：31.
[65]史波.煤矿企业应急管理系统构建与应急能力评价研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学博士学位论文.2008：144.
[66]薄涛.疾病预防控制机构突发公共卫生事件应急能力理论与评价研究[D].山东大学博士学位论文.2009：120.
[67]郭太生，寇丽平.重点单位突发事件应急能力评价指标体系研究[J].中国人民公安大学学报（社会科学版），2010，（3）：80-88.
[68]唐桂娟.城市自然灾害应急能力综合评价研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学博士学位论文.2011：35.
[69]王绍玉，孙研.基于AHP-Entropy确权法的城市公众应急反应能力评价[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报，2011，33（8）：992-996.
[70]曾谨言.量子物理学百年回顾[J].物理，2003，29（12）：665-672.
[71]Ernest Nagel著，徐向东译.科学的结构[M].上海：译文出版社，2005：122.
[72]阎耀军，吴中元.相似的未来与未来的相似——对相似性原理用于社会预测的思考[J].未来与发展，2007，（1）：11-16.
[73]George J. Klir. Facets of Systems Science [M]. London: Springer,2001：95-96.
[74]亓菁晶，陈安.突发事件与应急管理的机理体系[J].中国科学院院刊，2009，24（5）：496-503.
[75]亓菁晶，陈安.突发事件的多层次多阶段机理研究[J].三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版)，2008，30（S2）：38-40.
[76]尚鸿雁.危险货物运输突发事件机理及风险评估方法集成研究[D].长安大学博士学位论文.2009：57-59.
[77]廖洁明.突发事件应急管理绩效评估研究[D].暨南大学博士学位论文.2009：41-43.
[78]George Lakoff, Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago: University ofChicago Press,1980：5.
[79]龚非力.医学免疫学[M].北京：科学出版社，2003：2.
[80]D. H. Stamatis. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution [M].Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press,2003：21.
[81]罗云.风险分析与安全评价[M].北京：化学工业出版社，2009：129.
[82]Carl S. Carlson. Effective FMEAs: Achieving Safe, Reliable, and Economical Productsand Processes using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis [M]. Hoboken: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.,2012：107-161.
[83]Knut Georg Seet-Larsson. A Cookie Cutter Introduction to FMEA and FMECA [M].Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing,2010：28-36.
[84]Relex Software Co.&Intellect著，陈晓彤等译.可靠性实用指南[M].北京：北京航空航天大学出版社，2005：122-132.
[85]Ernest Nagel著，康锐等译.可靠性与维修性工程概论[M].北京：清华大学出版社，2010：131-135.
[86]张建民.现代遗传学[M].北京：化学工业出版社，2005：1.
[87]C. M. Rose. Design for environment: A method for formulating product end-of-lifestrategies [D]. Stanford University Ph.D. Dissertation.2000：32.
[88]凌复华.突变理论及其应用[M].上海：上海交通大学出版社，1988：1-6.
[89]A. P. Sage, W. B. Rouse. Handbook of Systems Engineering and Management [M].Hoboken: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.,2009：29-30.
[90]许小东.组织惰性行为初探[J].科研管理，2000，21（4）：56-60.
[91]M. R. Endsley. Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement [R].Proceedings of the Human Factors Society32ndAnnual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA:Human Factors Society,1988：97-101.
[92]张光宇，刘贻新，谢卫红，李华军.基于突变级数法的技术生态位评价模型[J].系统科学学报，2012，20（3）：79-83.
[93]史丽萍，杜泽文，刘强.基于突变级数法的企业反竞争情报能力评价研究[J].情报杂志，2012，31（10）：12-16.
[94]J. M. Juran, Joseph A. De feo. Juran’s quality handbook: the complete guide toperformance excellence [M]. New York: McGraw Hill,2010：439-442.
[95]J. P. Kotter著，罗立彬,翟润梅,李猛译.变革[M].北京：机械工业出版社，2005：137-164.
[96]John E. Bauer, Grace L. Duffy, Russ Westcott. The Quality Improvement Handbook [M].Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press,2006：80.
[97]孙林岩，崔凯，孙林辉.人因工程[M].北京：科学出版社，2011：4.
[98]C. D. Wickens, J. D. Lee, Yili Liu, S. E. Gordon-Becker. Introduction to Human FactorsEngineering [M]. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.,2004：2-4，121-139.
[99]林柏泉，张景林.安全系统工程[M].北京：中国劳动社会保障出版社，2007：5-10.
[100] W. Karwowski. Ergonomics and human factors: the paradigms for science,engineering, design, technology and management of human-compatible systems [J].Ergonomics,2005,48(5)：436-463.
[101] Y. Y. Haimes. Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management [M]. Hoboken: JohnWiley&Sons, Inc.,2009：24-26.
[102] Safety at Sea，上海海事局译. Costa Concordia倾覆后的反思.[EB/OL].http://www.shmsa.gov.cn/NewsContent.aspx?CatalogId=bf14321a-697d-4915-90df-b3e9b953ed8d&ContentId=48e7590d-07ee-4c15-a26c-ffc9c9c9ad2b.
[103]葛瑜玮.香港南丫岛撞船事实质聆讯继续—英国专家：撞船是人为失误造成.
[EB/OL].http://www.shmsa.gov.cn/NewsContent.aspx?CatalogId=bf14321a-697d-4915-90df-b3e9b953ed8d&ContentId=48e7590d-07ee-4c15-a26c-ffc9c9c9ad2b.
[104]佚名.香港撞船事故疑与航道灯光太亮有关.[EB/OL]. http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2012-10-04/042125298769.shtml.
[105] C. D. Wickens, J. G. Hollands, S. Banbury, R. Parasuraman. Engineering Psychologyand Human Performance [M]. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.,2013：3-6.
[106] Benjamin Niebel, Andris Freivalds著，王爱虎,鄂明成,叶飞，曾敏刚译.方法、标准与作业设计[M].北京：清华大学出版社，2007：260.
[107] Mark S. Sanders, Ernest J. McCormick著，于瑞峰,卢岚译.工程和设计中的人因学[M].北京：清华大学出版社，2009：57-62.
[108] M. S. Gazzaniga, R. B. Ivry, G. R. Mangun. Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology ofthe Mind[M]. New York：W. W. Norton&Company，2009：3.
[109]魏景汉，阎克乐等.认知神经科学基础[M].北京：人民教育出版社，2008：3.
[110]马庆国，王小毅.从神经经济学和神经营销学到神经管理学[J].管理工程学报，2006，20（3）：129-132.
[111]马庆国，王小毅.认知神经科学、神经经济学与神经管理学[J].管理世界，2006，（10）：139-149.
[112]林崇德，杨治良，黄希庭.心理学大辞典[M].上海：上海教育出版社，2003：1551，1757.
[113]罗跃嘉，魏景汉.注意的认知神经科学研究[M].北京：高等教育出版社，2004：2.
[114]霍涌泉.意识心理世界的科学重建与发展前景[D].南京师范大学博士学位论文.2005：120-124.
[115] E. Schroger. On the detection of auditory deviations: A pre-attentive activationmodel [J]. Psychophysiology,1997,34(3)：245-257.
[116] R. Naatanen, P. Paavilainen, T. Rinne, K. Alho. The mismatch negativity (MMN) inbasic research of central auditory processing: A review [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology,2007,118(12)：2544-2590.
[117] R. Naatanen, M. Tervaniemi, E. Sussman, P. Paavilainen, I. Winkler.‘Primitiveintelligence’ in the auditory cortex [J]. Trends in Neurosciences,2001,24(5)：283–288.
[118] Steven J. Luck. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique [M].Cambridge：The MIT Press，2005：39.
[119] R. Naatanen, I. Winkler. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitiveneuroscience [J]. Psychological Bulletin,1999,125(6)：826-859.
[120] I. Czigler, I. Winkler. Unconscious Memory Representations in Perception:Processes and mechanisms in the brain [M]. Amsterdam：John Benjamins PublishingCompany，2010：107-131.
[121] I. Czigler. Visual mismatch negativity-Violation of nonattended environmentalregularities [J]. Journal of Psychophysiology,2007,21(3-4)：224-230.
[122] P. Pazo-Alvarez, F. Cadaveira, E. Amenedo. MMN in the visual modality: a review[J]. Biological Psychology,2003,63(3)：199-236.
[123] I. Czigler, L. Balazs, L.G. Pato. Visual change detection: event-related potentials aredependent on stimulus location in humans [J]. Neuroscience Letters,2004,364(3)：149-153.
[124] I. Czigler, L. Balazs, I. Winkler. Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visualchanges [J]. Psychophysiology,2002,39(6)：869-873.
[125] I. Czigler, I. Sulykos. Visual mismatch negativity to irrelevant changes is sensitive totask-relevant changes [J]. Neuropsychologia,2010,48(5)：1277-1282.
[126] S. Grimm, A. Bendixen, L.Y. Deouell, E. Schroger. Distraction in a visualmulti-deviant paradigm: Behavioral and event-related potential effects [J]. InternationalJournal of Psychophysiology,2009,72(3)：260-266.
[127] R. Horimoto, M. Inagaki, T. Yano, Y. Sata, M. Kaga. Mismatch negativity of thecolor modality during a selective attention task to auditory stimuli in children with mentalretardation [J]. Brain&Development,2002,24(7)：703-709.
[128] M. Kimura, J. Katayama, H. Murohashi. Probability-independent and-dependentERPs reflecting visual change detection [J]. Psychophysiology,2006,43(2)：180-189.
[129] T. Liu, J. Shi. Event-related potentials during preattentional processing of colorstimuli [J]. Neuroreport,2008,19(12)：1221-1225.
[130] L. Mo, G. Xu, P. Kay, L.-H. Tan. Electrophysiological evidence for theleft-lateralized effect of language on preattentive categorical perception of color [J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2011,108(34)：14026-14030.
[131] D. Mueller, I. Winkler, U. Roeber, S. Schaffer, I. Czigler, E. Schroeger. VisualObject Representations Can Be Formed outside the Focus of Voluntary Attention:Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2010,22(6)：1179-1188.
[132] G. Thierry, P. Athanasopoulos, A. Wiggett, B. Dering, J.-R. Kuipers. Unconsciouseffects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception [J]. Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2009,106(11)：4567-4570.
[133] M. Y. Khodanovich, E.A. Esipenko, M.V. Svetlik. A visual analog of mismatchnegativity when stimuli differ in duration [J]. Neuroscience and behavioral physiology,2010,40：653-661.
[134] X. Qiu, X. Yang, Z. Qiao, L. Wang, N. Ning, J. Shi, L. Zhao, Y. Yang. Impairment:in processing visual information at the pre-attentive stage in patients with a majordepressive disorder: A visual mismatch negativity study [J]. Neuroscience Letters,2011,491(1)：53-57.
[135] P. Astikainen, E. Lillstrang, T. Ruusuvirta. Visual mismatch negativity for changesin orientation-a sensory memory-dependent response [J]. European Journal ofNeuroscience,2008,28(11)：2319-2324.
[136] P. Astikainen, T. Ruusuvirta, J. Wikgren, T. Korhonen. The human brain processesvisual changes that are not cued by attended auditory stimulation [J]. NeuroscienceLetters,2004,368(2)：231-234.
[137] I. Czigler, L. Pato. Unnoticed regularity violation elicits change-related brain activity[J]. Biological Psychology,2009,80(3)：339-347.
[138] M. Flynn, A. Liasis, M. Gardner, S. Boyd, T. Towell. Can illusory deviant stimuli beused as attentional distractors to record vMMN in a passive three stimulus oddballparadigm?[J]. Experimental Brain Research,2009,197(2)：153-161.
[139] M. Kimura, J.i. Katayama, H. Ohira, E. Schroeger. Visual mismatch negativity: Newevidence from the equiprobable paradigm [J]. Psychophysiology,2009,46(2)：402-409.
[140] M. Kimura, H. Ohira, E. Schroeger. Localizing sensory and cognitive systems forpre-attentive visual deviance detection: A sLORETA analysis of the data of Kimura et al.(2009)[J]. Neuroscience Letters,2010,485(3)：198-203.
[141] M. Kimura, E. Schroeger, I. Czigler, H. Ohira. Human Visual System AutomaticallyEncodes Sequential Regularities of Discrete Events [J]. Journal of CognitiveNeuroscience,2010,22(6)：1124-1139.
[142] I. Sulykos, I. Czigler. One plus one is less than two: Visual features elicitnon-additive mismatch-related brain activity [J]. Brain Research,2011,1398：64-71.
[143] K. Alho, D.L. Woods, A. Algazi, R. Naatanen. Intermodal selective attention. II.Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space [J].Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology,1992,82(5)：356-368.
[144] M. Bubrovszky, P. Thomas. Useful or not? How schizophrenic patients process therelevance of a visual stimulus [J]. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science,2011,01(5)：111-114.
[145] T. Maekawa, Y. Goto, N. Kinukawa, T. Taniwaki, S. Kanba, S. Tobimatsu.Functional characterization of mismatch negativity to a visual stimulus [J]. ClinicalNeurophysiology,2005,116(10)：2392-2402.
[146] V. Mazza, M. Turatto, M. Sarlo. Rare stimuli or rare changes: what really matters forthe brain?[J]. Neuroreport,2005,16(10)：1061-1064.
[147] C. Stagg, P. Hindley, A. Tales, S. Butler. Visual mismatch negativity: the detectionof stimulus change [J]. Neuroreport,2004,15(4)：659-663.
[148] A. Tales, S. Butler. Visual mismatch negativity highlights abnormal preattentivevisual processing in Alzheimer's disease [J]. Neuroreport,2006,17(9)：887-890.
[149] A. Tales, J. Haworth, G. Wilcock, P. Newton, S. Butler. Visual mismatch negativityhighlights abnormal pre-attentive visual processing in mild cognitive impairment andAlzheimer's disease [J]. Neuropsychologia,2008,46(5)：1224-1232.
[150] A. Tales, P. Newton, T. Troscianko, S. Butler. Mismatch negativity in the visualmodality [J]. Neuroreport,1999,10(16)：3363-3367.
[151] M. Kimura, J. Katayama, H. Murohashi. Attention switching function ofmemory-comparison-based change detection system in the visual modality [J].International Journal of Psychophysiology,2008,67(2)：101-113.
[152] P. Astikainen, J.K. Hietanen. Event-related potentials to task-irrelevant changes infacial expressions [J]. Behavioral and Brain Functions,2009,5：1-9.
[153] Y. Chang, J. Xu, N. Shi, B. Zhang, L. Zhao. Dysfunction of processingtask-irrelevant emotional faces in major depressive disorder patients revealed byexpression-related visual MMN [J]. Neuroscience Letters,2010,472(1)：33-37.
[154] M. Kimura, H. Kondo, H. Ohira, E. Schroger. Unintentional temporal-context-basedprediction of emotional faces: an electrophysiological study [J]. Cerebral Cortex,2011,22(8)：1774-1785.
[155] A. Susac, R.J. Ilmoniemi, E. Pihko, S. Supek. Neurodynamic studies on emotionaland inverted faces in an oddball paradigm [J]. Brain Topography,2004,16(4)：265-268.
[156] A. Susac, R.J. Ilmoniemi, S. Supek. Sensory-memory-based change detection in facestimuli [J]. Translational Neuroscience,2010,1(4)：286-291.
[157] L. Zhao, J. Li. Visual mismatch negativity elicited by facial expressions undernon-attentional condition [J]. Neuroscience Letters,2006,410(2)：286-291.
[158]完颜笑如，庄达民，刘伟.基于非任务相关ERP技术的飞行员脑力负荷评价方法[J].中国生物医学工程学报，2011，30（4）：528-532.
[159]完颜笑如，庄达民，芦莎莎，刘伟.与飞行任务相关的认知负荷对听觉事件相关电位的影响[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版)，2011，47（6）：995-1002.
[160]完颜笑如，庄达民，刘伟.脑力负荷对前注意加工的影响与分析[J].北京航空航天大学学报，2012，38（4）：497-501.
[161] R. Naatanen, S. Pakarinen, T. Rinne, R. Takegata. The mismatch negativity (MMN):towards the optimal paradigm [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology,2004,115(1)：140-144.
[162] D. J. Fisher, A. Labelle, V. J. Knott. The right profile: Mismatch negativity inschizophrenia with and without auditory hallucinations as measured by a multi-featureparadigm [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology,2008,119(4)：909-921.
[163] T. Kujala, S. Kuuluvainen, S. Saalasti, E. Jansson-Verkasalo, L. von Wendt, T.Lepisto. Speech-feature discrimination in children with Asperger syndrome as determinedwith the multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology,2010,121(9)：1410-1419.
[164] H. Menning, A. Renz, J. Seifert, A. Maercker. Reduced mismatch negativity inposttraumatic stress disorder: A compensatory mechanism for chronic hyperarousal?[J].International Journal of Psychophysiology,2008,68(1)：27-34.
[165] H. Thonnessen, M. Zvyagintsev, K.C. Harke, F. Boers, J. Dammers, C. Norra, K.Mathiak. Optimized mismatch negativity paradigm reflects deficits in schizophreniapatients-A combined EEG and MEG study [J]. Biological Psychology,2008,77(2)：205-216.
[166] P. Vuust, E. Brattico, E. Glerean, M. Seppanen, S. Pakarinen, M. Tervaniemi, R.Naatanen. New fast mismatch negativity paradigm for determining the neuralprerequisites for musical ability [J]. Cortex,2011,47(9)：1091-1098.
[167] Maekawa T, Tobimatsu S, Ogata K, Onitsuka T, Kanba S. Preattentive visual changedetection as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN)-Evidence for a memory-basedprocess [J]. Neuroscience Research,2009,65(1)：107-112.
[168] I. Czigler, I. Winkler, L. Pato, A. Varnagy, J. Weisz, L. Balazs. Visual temporalwindow of integration as revealed by the visual mismatch negativity event-relatedpotential to stimulus omissions [J]. Brain Research,2006,1104(1)：129-140.
[169] M. Kimura, A. Widmann, E. Schroeger. Human visual system automaticallyrepresents large-scale sequential regularities [J]. Brain Research,2010,1317(4)：165-179.
[170] I. Czigler, J. Weisz, I. Winkler. ERPs and deviance detection: Visual mismatchnegativity to repeated visual stimuli [J]. Neuroscience Letters,2006,401(1-2)：178-182.
[171] M. Fuchs, J. Kastner, M. Wagner, S. Hawes, J.S. Ebersole. A standardized boundaryelement method volume conductor model [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology,2002,113(5)：702-712.
[172] R. D. Pascual-Marqui. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetictomography (sLORETA): Technical details [J]. Methods and Findings in Experimentaland Clinical Pharmacology,2002,24：5-12.
[173] V. Jurcak, D. Tsuzuki, I. Dan.10/20,10/10, and10/5systems revisited: Theirvalidity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems [J]. Neuroimage,2007,34(4)：1600-1611.
[174] M. Wagner, M. Fuchs, J. Kastner. Evaluation of sLORETA in the presence of noiseand multiple sources [J]. Brain Topography,2004,16(4)：277-280.
[175] Mike Barnett. Watch patterns and workloads: using simulator technology to researchfatigue in watchkeeping officers [J]. Marine technology,2012,(4)：32-38.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |