基于德勒兹哲学的当代建筑创作思想研究
|
摘要
二十世纪六十年代，进入后工业社会以来，信息技术、数字技术以及复杂科学的迅猛发展，使当代建筑创作呈现出多元的发展趋向，新奇、复杂的建筑语言及表现形式层出不穷。在这多元化的建筑创作现象中出现了一种以德勒兹哲学概念为创新方法的建筑形式，并相应的涌现出一批先锋建筑师和大量的建筑作品。这些建筑作品表现出极大的创新特征，并迎合了时代的发展需求，由此，德勒兹哲学也体现出对当代建筑创作的巨大推动力。本文就是以法国当代哲学家吉尔·德勒兹的差异哲学为理论基础，旨在阐明德勒兹哲学与当代建筑创作之间的系统关系，并以德勒兹哲学为工具，通过分析当代复杂的建筑现象，构建适应后工业社会的建筑创作思想及理论。使德勒兹哲学更好的指导建筑实践，并为当代复杂、多元建筑作品的分析、阐释和解读提供理论和思想依据。
本文将研究视阈定为受德勒兹哲学影响的当代建筑创作现象。因此，研究对象相应的包含两个方面。其一，从二十世纪六十年代后工业社会转向至今的近五十年来，建筑在空间、结构、形态上表现出的趋于复杂化、差异化、多元化的特征及现象，以及后工业社会信息文明和生态文明并存的社会背景下，信息传播技术、生物智能技术与德勒兹哲学和建筑创作相关联而产生的数字化、智能化、多样化的建筑形式。其二，德勒兹与建筑创作相关的哲学思想及理论内容。本文在深入研究德勒兹思想框架、理论纲领及思想特质的基础上，试图建立其哲学与当代建筑创作思想之间的对话关系。本文所涉及的研究对象并非当代建筑创作的发展全貌，而是与德勒兹哲学直接或间接相关的建筑现象。本文借用了德勒兹哲学四个基本理论，即时延电影理论、平滑空间理论、无器官身体理论、动态生成论，对这些建筑创作现象进行分析与梳理，对当代建筑创作的创新形式及特征进行探究，力图构建反映信息文明和生态文明时代特点、适应时代发展方向的建筑创作思想，以期为当代建筑创作提供有价值的参考。
在研究方法上，本文采用学科交叉的方法，以德勒兹的哲学视角来诠释当代多元、复杂的建筑现象；客观解析当代建筑创作思想的内在特征及发展趋向。在整体的研究过程中，采用宏观理论思考、中观思想提炼、微观案例分析相结合的研究方法。通过对德勒兹哲学思想的整理研究，运用德勒兹哲学中的非理性法、差异法、非逻辑法分析当代建筑创作的发展趋向、建筑的生成过程及形式特征，以期在德勒兹哲学层面上获得一种对当代建筑创作现象的思想性梳理与解读。
在研究内容上，本文通过对德勒兹的哲学特质、核心概念、哲学纲领等思想框架的系统梳理，分别从时间、空间、身体、生态等四个方面建立了其哲学与建筑创作之间的关联性。从而相应的提炼出德勒兹哲学与当代建筑创作相关的四个基本理论。即：时延电影理论，平滑空间理论，无器官身体理论，动态生成论。进而，明确了德勒兹哲学与当代建筑创作之间的关系，建构了德勒兹哲学与当代建筑创作思想之间的理论转换平台，并创建性的构建了基于德勒兹哲学的四种建筑创作思想。即：基于时延电影理论的“影像”建筑思想，基于平滑空间理论的“界域”建筑思想，基于无器官身体理论的“通感”建筑思想，基于动态生成论的“中间领域”建筑思想。同时，本文引用了大量的案例对这些建筑创作思想进行阐释，对其建筑创作手法进行分析，并对建筑创作思想下的建筑创新特征进行解析。最终以期获得指导当代建筑创作实践的系统理论。
通过本文关于德勒兹哲学与当代建筑创作理论的系统建构，可以看出，德勒兹哲学从时间、空间、身体感知、生态发展层面指引了当代建筑创作的未来发展方向，并对当代建筑的形式创新提供了思想上的借鉴和操作手法上的指导。
Since the post-industrial society of the1960s, the boom of informationtechnology, digital technology and complex science have led to the diversifieddevelopment of contemporary architecture and the continuing emergence of noveland intricate architectural language and manifestations. An innovative architecturalmanifestation based on Deleuze's philosophy came into being among the diversifiedarchitecture creation and a group of pioneer architects and various architecturalworks sprang up correspondingly.These architectural works exhibited considerableinnovation and meet the development needs of the times, which embodied thatDeleuze philosophy was the tremendous impetus to contemporary architecture.Based on the theory of ‘Difference' by the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze, thepaper attempts to articulate the relationship between contemporary architecture andDeleuze's philosophy, which could be regarded as a tool,by analysing thecomplexity of the contemporary architectural phenomenon, to build up thearchitectural conception and theory adapted to post-industrial society,to guidearchitectural practice and to provide theoretical basis for the interpretation of thecomplex and diverse contemporary architectural works.
This dissertation examines the contemporary architecture phenomenoninfluenced by Deleuze's philosophy and correspondently divide into two aspects:First, from the post-industrial society of the1960s onward,under the influence ofDeleuze's philosophy, architecture tended to show the character of complexity,difference and diversification reflected by space,structure and shape. At the sametime, under the circumstance of post-industrial society in which informationcivilization and ecology civilization coexisted,the association of informationcommunicating technologies, bio-intelligence technology, Deleuze's philosophywith architecture entailed the production of the digitized, intelligent, diversifiedarchitectural forms. Second, philosophical conception and theory by Deleuzeassociated with architecture creation is the other aspect of the research. On thefoundation of Deleuze's ideological framework, theoretical creed and ideologicaltraits,the paper attempts to establish a dialogue between his philosophy andcontemporary architectural creation. Rather than referring to the panorama of thedevelopment of contemporary architecture, the paper focus on architecturalphenomenon related with Deleuze's philosophy directly or indirectly. Fourfundamental theory of Deleuze's philosophy are conferred including time-lapsefilm,smooth space,body without organs, dynamic generation, through which toanalyze and review the phenomenon and to explore the innovative forms and characteristics of contemporary architecture,in order to found architectural theorywhich will reflect the times characteristics of information and ecology civilizationand meet the needs of development, and to provide valuable reference for thecontemporary architectural creation.
As far as the research method is concerned, Interdisciplinary research underthe guide of Deleuze's philosophy are provided in the paper to interpret thediversified, complex architecture phenomenon and to analyze objectively theintrinsic characteristics and the development trend of contemporary architecturalcreation. In the whole process of research, macro-theory study and mezzo ideasextraction, combining with micro cases analysis were adopted. Irrationality,difference,Non-logic in Deleuze's philosophy are introduced to interpreted thedevelopment tendency, generation procedure and form characteristics to obtain anideological analysis of contemporary architectural creation.
In the respect of contents, through the systematically combing of theframework of Deleuze's philosophy including philosophical traits, core concept,creed,etc, the dissertation intends to associate Deleuze's philosophy witharchitectural creation in time,space,body and ecology. Accordingly, four basictheories of Deleuze's Philosophy linked with contemporary architecture creation,namely: time-lapse film, smooth space, body without organs, dynamicallygeneration are extracted.Further, the relationship between Deleuze's Philosophy andcontemporary architecture is clarified and the theoretical conversion platform isbuilt up. Besides,four architecture creation conception are proposed constructively.They are “image” based on time-lapse film theory,“territory” based on smoothspace theory,“Synaesthesia” on body without organs theory,“intermediate field”ondynamic generation. Meanwhile, a large number of cases are quoted to interpretatethese conceptions and to analyze creation technique and characteristics to set up asystematical theory guiding contemporary architecture practice finally.
Through the framework of Deleuze's Philosophy and contemporaryarchitectural theory, it can be perceived that Deleuze Philosophy in time, space,body awareness, eco-development level provides ideological reference andoperation instruction as well as future direction for the contemporary architectureinnovation.
本文将研究视阈定为受德勒兹哲学影响的当代建筑创作现象。因此，研究对象相应的包含两个方面。其一，从二十世纪六十年代后工业社会转向至今的近五十年来，建筑在空间、结构、形态上表现出的趋于复杂化、差异化、多元化的特征及现象，以及后工业社会信息文明和生态文明并存的社会背景下，信息传播技术、生物智能技术与德勒兹哲学和建筑创作相关联而产生的数字化、智能化、多样化的建筑形式。其二，德勒兹与建筑创作相关的哲学思想及理论内容。本文在深入研究德勒兹思想框架、理论纲领及思想特质的基础上，试图建立其哲学与当代建筑创作思想之间的对话关系。本文所涉及的研究对象并非当代建筑创作的发展全貌，而是与德勒兹哲学直接或间接相关的建筑现象。本文借用了德勒兹哲学四个基本理论，即时延电影理论、平滑空间理论、无器官身体理论、动态生成论，对这些建筑创作现象进行分析与梳理，对当代建筑创作的创新形式及特征进行探究，力图构建反映信息文明和生态文明时代特点、适应时代发展方向的建筑创作思想，以期为当代建筑创作提供有价值的参考。
在研究方法上，本文采用学科交叉的方法，以德勒兹的哲学视角来诠释当代多元、复杂的建筑现象；客观解析当代建筑创作思想的内在特征及发展趋向。在整体的研究过程中，采用宏观理论思考、中观思想提炼、微观案例分析相结合的研究方法。通过对德勒兹哲学思想的整理研究，运用德勒兹哲学中的非理性法、差异法、非逻辑法分析当代建筑创作的发展趋向、建筑的生成过程及形式特征，以期在德勒兹哲学层面上获得一种对当代建筑创作现象的思想性梳理与解读。
在研究内容上，本文通过对德勒兹的哲学特质、核心概念、哲学纲领等思想框架的系统梳理，分别从时间、空间、身体、生态等四个方面建立了其哲学与建筑创作之间的关联性。从而相应的提炼出德勒兹哲学与当代建筑创作相关的四个基本理论。即：时延电影理论，平滑空间理论，无器官身体理论，动态生成论。进而，明确了德勒兹哲学与当代建筑创作之间的关系，建构了德勒兹哲学与当代建筑创作思想之间的理论转换平台，并创建性的构建了基于德勒兹哲学的四种建筑创作思想。即：基于时延电影理论的“影像”建筑思想，基于平滑空间理论的“界域”建筑思想，基于无器官身体理论的“通感”建筑思想，基于动态生成论的“中间领域”建筑思想。同时，本文引用了大量的案例对这些建筑创作思想进行阐释，对其建筑创作手法进行分析，并对建筑创作思想下的建筑创新特征进行解析。最终以期获得指导当代建筑创作实践的系统理论。
通过本文关于德勒兹哲学与当代建筑创作理论的系统建构，可以看出，德勒兹哲学从时间、空间、身体感知、生态发展层面指引了当代建筑创作的未来发展方向，并对当代建筑的形式创新提供了思想上的借鉴和操作手法上的指导。
Since the post-industrial society of the1960s, the boom of informationtechnology, digital technology and complex science have led to the diversifieddevelopment of contemporary architecture and the continuing emergence of noveland intricate architectural language and manifestations. An innovative architecturalmanifestation based on Deleuze's philosophy came into being among the diversifiedarchitecture creation and a group of pioneer architects and various architecturalworks sprang up correspondingly.These architectural works exhibited considerableinnovation and meet the development needs of the times, which embodied thatDeleuze philosophy was the tremendous impetus to contemporary architecture.Based on the theory of ‘Difference' by the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze, thepaper attempts to articulate the relationship between contemporary architecture andDeleuze's philosophy, which could be regarded as a tool,by analysing thecomplexity of the contemporary architectural phenomenon, to build up thearchitectural conception and theory adapted to post-industrial society,to guidearchitectural practice and to provide theoretical basis for the interpretation of thecomplex and diverse contemporary architectural works.
This dissertation examines the contemporary architecture phenomenoninfluenced by Deleuze's philosophy and correspondently divide into two aspects:First, from the post-industrial society of the1960s onward,under the influence ofDeleuze's philosophy, architecture tended to show the character of complexity,difference and diversification reflected by space,structure and shape. At the sametime, under the circumstance of post-industrial society in which informationcivilization and ecology civilization coexisted,the association of informationcommunicating technologies, bio-intelligence technology, Deleuze's philosophywith architecture entailed the production of the digitized, intelligent, diversifiedarchitectural forms. Second, philosophical conception and theory by Deleuzeassociated with architecture creation is the other aspect of the research. On thefoundation of Deleuze's ideological framework, theoretical creed and ideologicaltraits,the paper attempts to establish a dialogue between his philosophy andcontemporary architectural creation. Rather than referring to the panorama of thedevelopment of contemporary architecture, the paper focus on architecturalphenomenon related with Deleuze's philosophy directly or indirectly. Fourfundamental theory of Deleuze's philosophy are conferred including time-lapsefilm,smooth space,body without organs, dynamic generation, through which toanalyze and review the phenomenon and to explore the innovative forms and characteristics of contemporary architecture,in order to found architectural theorywhich will reflect the times characteristics of information and ecology civilizationand meet the needs of development, and to provide valuable reference for thecontemporary architectural creation.
As far as the research method is concerned, Interdisciplinary research underthe guide of Deleuze's philosophy are provided in the paper to interpret thediversified, complex architecture phenomenon and to analyze objectively theintrinsic characteristics and the development trend of contemporary architecturalcreation. In the whole process of research, macro-theory study and mezzo ideasextraction, combining with micro cases analysis were adopted. Irrationality,difference,Non-logic in Deleuze's philosophy are introduced to interpreted thedevelopment tendency, generation procedure and form characteristics to obtain anideological analysis of contemporary architectural creation.
In the respect of contents, through the systematically combing of theframework of Deleuze's philosophy including philosophical traits, core concept,creed,etc, the dissertation intends to associate Deleuze's philosophy witharchitectural creation in time,space,body and ecology. Accordingly, four basictheories of Deleuze's Philosophy linked with contemporary architecture creation,namely: time-lapse film, smooth space, body without organs, dynamicallygeneration are extracted.Further, the relationship between Deleuze's Philosophy andcontemporary architecture is clarified and the theoretical conversion platform isbuilt up. Besides,four architecture creation conception are proposed constructively.They are “image” based on time-lapse film theory,“territory” based on smoothspace theory,“Synaesthesia” on body without organs theory,“intermediate field”ondynamic generation. Meanwhile, a large number of cases are quoted to interpretatethese conceptions and to analyze creation technique and characteristics to set up asystematical theory guiding contemporary architecture practice finally.
Through the framework of Deleuze's Philosophy and contemporaryarchitectural theory, it can be perceived that Deleuze Philosophy in time, space,body awareness, eco-development level provides ideological reference andoperation instruction as well as future direction for the contemporary architectureinnovation.
引文
[1]麦永雄.德勒兹与当代性——西方后结构主义思潮研究[M].广西师范大学出版社,2007:2,10,1-32,84-85,78.
[2]大师系列丛书编辑部.伯纳德·屈米的作品与思想[M].中国电力出版社,2005(8):19,123-124.
[3][美]彼得·埃森曼,彼得·埃森曼.图解日志[M].陈欣欣,何捷,译.中国建筑工业出版社,2005:37-38,64,65,7-59.
[4]栾乔.建筑创作中的形态柔化倾向研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学建筑学硕士学位论文,2009:16.
[5]赵榕.当代西方建筑形式设计策略研究[D].东南大学博士学位论文,2005:143,104,154,182,183,184,146,148,73,157,117,127,125.
[6]王立明.格雷戈·林恩(Greg Lynn)的数字设计研究[M].东南大学硕士学位论文,2006:43,46,29,39,38,41,42,18,20,19,35,40,12-30,29.
[7]李万林.当代非线性建筑形态设计研究[D].重庆大学硕士学位论文,2008:94,92-93,106,109,108,69.
[8]陶晓晨.数字图解——图解作为“抽象机器”在建筑设计中的应用[D].清华大学硕士学位论文,2008:49,50,105.
[9]王鹤.数字时代下的建筑形式研究[D].合肥工业大学硕士学位论文,2009:44.
[10]李昕.非线性语汇下的建筑形态生成研究[D].湖南大学硕士学位论文,2009:58,52-53,48-50,51.
[11]高天.当代建筑中折叠的发生与发展[D].同济大学硕士学位论文,2007:25,27,17-71.
[12]司露.电影影像:从运动到时间——德勒兹电影理论初探[D].华东师范大学硕士学位论文,2009:1,8.
[13]田宏.数码时代“非标准”建筑思想的产生与发展[D].清华大学硕士学位论文,2005:17,16-21,54.
[14][法]吉尔·德勒兹.福柯·褶子[M].于奇智,杨洁,译.湖南文艺版社,2001:153.
[15][法]吉尔·德勒兹.德勒兹论福柯[M].杨凯麟,译.江苏教育出版社,2006:13.
[16][法]吉尔·德勒兹,菲利克斯·迦塔利.什么是哲学[M].张祖建,译.湖南文艺版社,2007:199-216.
[17][法]吉尔·德勒兹.弗兰西斯·培根:感觉的逻辑[M].董强,译.广西师范大学出版社,2007: ii,48,51,148-149,45.
[18][法]吉尔·德勒兹.普鲁斯特与符号[M].姜宇辉,译.上海译文出版社,2008:3.
[19][法]吉尔·德勒兹.资本主义与精神分裂(卷2):千高原[M].姜宇辉,译.上海:上海书店出版社,2010:1-18,533,441-551,505-506,518-519,683,536,701,446,466,469,727,451.
[20]姜宇辉.德勒兹身体美学研究[M].华东师范大学出版社,2007:8-15,163,173,131,153,161,132,178,178.
[21] Adrian Parr. The Deleuze Dictionary. Edinburgh University Press,2005.
[22] Claire Colebrook. Understanding Deleuze. Allen&Unwin Press,2002:V-VII.
[23] Todd May. Gilles Deleuze: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press,2005:1.
[24] Graham Jones, Jon Roffe. Deleuze’s Philosophical Lineage. EdinburghUniversity Press,2009:1-6.
[25] Ronaid Bogue. Deleuze on Cinema. Rounledge New York and London Press,2003:3.
[26] Constantin V. Boundas. Deleuze and Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press,2006:3.
[27] Mark Bonta, John Protevi. Deleuze and Geophilosophy. Edinburgh UniversityPress,2006:3-11.
[28] Anna Powell. Deleuze, Altered States and Film. Edinburgh University Press,2007:1,176.
[29] Ronald Bogue. Deleuze’s Way. University of Georgia. USA,2007:1.
[30] Bernd Herzogenrath. Thinking Environments with Deleuze and Guattari.Cambridge Scholars Publishing,2008:1-22.
[31] Joe Hughes. Deleuze and the Genesis of Representation. ContinuumInternational Publishing Group,2008:ix
[32] Adrian Parr. Deleuze and Memorial Culture. Edinburgh University Press.2008:1-12.
[33] Mark Poster and David Savat. Deleuze and New Technology. EdinburghUniversity Press,2009:1-11.
[34] By Laura Cull.Deleuze and Performance. Edinburgh University Press,2009:14-15.
[35]戚广平.“非同一性的契机”:关于“建构”的现代性批判[D].同济大学工学博士学位论文,2007:192-212.
[36]李光前.图解,图解建筑和图解建筑师[D].同济大学硕士学位论文,2008:107.
[37]陈宾.动态空间[D].同济大学硕士学位论文,2008:78-80.
[38]尹志伟.非线性建筑的参数化设计及其建造研究[D].清华大学硕士学位论文,2009:4.
[39]张向宁.当代复杂性建筑形态设计研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学博士学位论文,2009:4.
[40]徐卫国.非线性建筑设计[J].建筑学报,2005(12):33.
[41]徐卫国.褶子思想,游牧空间——关于非线性建筑参数化设计的访谈[J].世界建筑,2009(8):17.
[42]虞刚.凝视折叠[J].建筑师,2003(12):36.
[43]虞刚.图解的力量——阅读格雷格·林恩的《形式表达——建筑设计中图解的原-功能潜力》[J].建筑师,2004(8):65.
[44] Bernard Cache. Translated by Boyman, Anne. Earth Moves: The Furnishingof Territories. The MIT Press,1995: xvi-3,5.
[45] Greg Lynn. Folds, Bodies&Blobs[M]. New York:Princeton Architecture Press,1998:3,225,228,139.
[46] Greg Lynn. Animate Form. Princeton Architecture Press,1999:12-80,98.
[47] Greg Lynn, Hani Rashid, Peter Weibel, Max Hollein. ArchitecturalLaboratories. NAI Publisher,2003:2.
[48] Greg Lynn. Intricacy[M]. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania,2003.
[49] GregLynn. Folding in Architecture, Second Edition[M]. Chichester:Wiley-Academy,2004:10-24,50.
[50] Ian Buchanan and Gregg Lambert. Deleuze and Space. Edinburgh UniversityPress,2005:1-15.
[51]大师系列丛书编辑部.彼得·埃森曼的作品与思想[M].中国电力出版社,2006:136-139.
[52] Peg Rawes. Space, Geometry and Aesthetic: Through Kant and TowardsDeleuze. University College London Press,2008:1-8.
[53] Andrew Ballantyne. Deleuze&Guattari for Architects. Taylor&Francise-Library,2007:13-120.
[54] E A Grosz. Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth.Columbia University Press,2008:2-3.
[55] Simone Brott. Architecture for a Free Subjectivity.Ashgate PublishingCompany,2011:1-10.
[56] Victor Gane. Parametric Design–a Paradigm Shift. Massachusetts Instituteof Technology, Department of Architecture,2004:1.
[57] Non-Linear Architectural Design Process by Yasha Jacob Grobman, AbrahamYezioro and Isaac Guedi Capeluto，2008:42.
[58] Experiencing Build Space: Affect and Movement by Eva Perez de Vega,Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, vol.2,2010:306,404.
[59] Assessing ‘Quality’: The unfolding of the‘Good’–—Collective decisionmaking in juries of urban design competitions by Joris E. Van Wezemael, JanM. Silberberger, Sofia Paisiou，Scandinavian Journal of Management (2011)27:167-172.
[60] Scenario: Co-Evolution, Shared Autonomy and Mixed Reality by Dennis DelFavero, Timothy S. Barker, IEEE International Symposium on Mixed andAugmented Reality2010Arts, Media,&Humanities Proceedings，2010:11,17,13,14.
[61] Digital Morphogenesis and Computational Architectures by Branko Kolarevic,University of Pennsylvania，2001:1.
[62] Chaos, Territory, Art. Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth by ElizabethGrosz, Women’s and Gender Studies, Rutgers University, New York,2006:18.
[63]美国亚洲艺术与设计协作联盟.终结图像[M].华中科技大学出版社,2007:9-23,189-201,141-157.
[64]美国亚洲艺术与设计协作联盟.折叠·织造·覆层[M].华中科技大学出版社,2008:6-9,210-213,218,221.
[65]美国亚洲艺术与设计协作联盟.信息生物建筑.华中科技大学出版社,2008:6-19,198-199,215-218,235-239,241-243,149-151,155-157,166,165-168,188-197.
[66] Paul Aldridge, Noemie Deville, Anna Solt, Jung Su Lee. EVOLOSKYSCRAPERS[M]. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataAvailable,2012:14,1056-1057,256-259,217-219,300-303,296-299,542-545,570-573,690-691,598-601,236-239,602-605,676-679.
[67]潘于旭.断裂的时间与“异质性”的存在——德勒兹《差异与重复》的文本解读[M].浙江大学出版社,2007:19,318.
[68] Gilles Deleuze. Difference and Repetition. Columbia University Press,1994:283.
[69]麦永雄.德勒兹生成论的魅力[J].文艺研究,2004(3):157-160.
[70][法]吉尔﹒德勒兹.时间——影像[M].谢强,蔡若明,马月,译.湖南美术出版社,2004:137,127,128,126,34,73,85-91,90,48.
[71]唐卓.影像的生命——德勒兹电影事件美学研究[D].哈尔滨师范大学硕士学位论文,2010:26,16-18,18,51-53,26.
[72] http://image.soso.com/.cgi/special/?ch=PCTP
[73]任军.当代建筑的科学之维[M].东南大学出版社,2009:158,128,159,149,88,120,119,117,118,87,162,190,191,196,197,164,103,108,116.
[74] Gilles Deleuze.A Thousand Plateaus.The University of Minnesota Press,2005:151-157.
[75]韩桂玲.试析德勒兹的“无器官的身体”[J].商丘师范学院学报,2008(1):7-9,8-9.
[76] Neil Leach,徐卫国.数字建构——青年建筑师作品[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2008:69,76,83.
[77] Somol."DummyText"inEisenman, Peter: Dia-gram Diaries.UniversePublishing. NY,1999:24.
[78]陈永国,编译.游牧思想-吉尔·德勒兹,费利克斯·瓜塔里读本[M].吉林人民出版社,2004:8,317.
[79] http://www. image.google.com/i?ct=503316780&z
[80]朱立元.当代西方文艺理论[M].华东师范大学出版社,2005:79.
[81]莫伟民,姜宇辉,王礼平.二十一世纪法国哲学[M].人民出版社,2008:39.
[82]徐俊芬.透视建筑时间之维[D].华中科技大学硕士论文,2006:23-40.
[83]朱雷.空间操作[M].东南大学出版社,2010:5-9.
[84]欧几里德.几何原本[M].燕晓东,编译.人民日报出版社,2005:23.
[85]申绍杰,李江.“身体”视野下的现当代建筑学扫描[J].建筑学报,2009(1):29.
[86]楚超超.身体与建筑[J].建筑学报,2012:174.
[87]杨震.建筑创作中的生态构思[D].重庆大学硕士学位论文,2003:8-10.
[88] Bernd Herzogenrath. An[Un] Likely Alliance: Thinking Environment[s] withDelenze/Guattari[M]. Cambridge Scholars Publishing,2008:2.
[89]尼尔.林奇,叶杨.集群城市主义[J].世界建筑,2009(8):20.
[90] Ansell Pearson. Germinal Life. London:Routledge,1999:156.
[91]黄文达.德勒兹的电影思想[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(5):72.
[92]周冬莹.论德勒兹的“潜在影像”[J].北京电影学院学报,2011(5):19.
[93] Annettew. Balkema and Henk Slager(eds.). Territorial Investigations.University of Amsterdam Press,1999:10.
[94] http://www.zaha-hadid.com/design.
[95]韩桂玲.后现代主义创造观:德勒兹的“褶子论”及其述评[J].晋阳学刊,2009(6):76,75.
[96]赵榕.从对象到场域[J].建筑师,2005(2):79-85,83.
[97]韩桂玲.吉尔·德勒兹身体创造学的一个视角[J].学术论坛理论月刊,2010(2):51,52-53.
[98]胡塞尔.生活世界的现象学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2005:57-58.
[99]白海瑞.奔跑的竹子——论德勒兹的生成论[D].陕西师范大学硕士学位论文,2011:2,17.
[100]邓亚梅.非理性认识论:德勒兹“块茎说”及其现代意义[J].燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(6):117.
[101][日]黑川纪章.共生思想[M].覃力,等译.中国建筑工业出版社,2009:195,34,152,33,59,29,302.
[102]大师系列丛书编辑部.让·努维尔的作品与思想[M].中国电力出版社,2006:8,123-128.
[103][英]冯炜.透视前后的空间体验与建构[M].李开然,译.东南大学出版社,2009:57.
[104] http://www.oma.nl/projects/2010/musee-national-des-beaux-arts-du-quebec.
[105][法]柏格森.材料与记忆[M].肖聿,译.北京:华夏出版社,1999:50.
[106]徐卫国,罗丽.建筑/非建筑[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2006:24.
[107]大师系列丛书编辑部.伯纳德·屈米的作品与思想[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2006:58.
[108][英]康威·劳埃德·摩根.让·努维尔:建筑的元素[M].白颖,译.中国建筑工业出版社,2004:189-193,142-144,102-103,179-181.
[109] http://image.soso.com.
[110]韩巍.建筑的姿态——从“蓝天组”的建构观看德累斯顿UFA电影院的建筑设计[J].南京艺术学院学报,2008(3):168.
[111]大师系列丛书编辑部.伊东丰雄的作品与思想[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2006:123,21,5.
[112]应雄.德勒兹《电影2》读解:时间影像与结晶[J].电影艺术,2010(6):102.
[113]沈克宁.时间·记忆·空间[J].时代建筑,2008(6):25.
[114]沈克宁.建筑现象学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008:1,161.
[115] http://www.daniel—1ibeskind. com.
[116]美国亚洲艺术与设计协作联盟.全息建筑生态学[M].华中科技大学出版社,2008:200-207,123-125.
[117] Gilles Deleuze. Cinema2: The Time-Image. University of Minnesota Press,1989:86-100.
[118]闫苏,仲德崑.以影像之名——电影艺术与建筑实践[J].新建筑,2008(1):23.
[119][意]贾尼·布拉费瑞.奥尔多·罗西[M].王莹,译.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2005(9):88,16.
[120]大师系列丛书编辑部.扎哈·哈迪德的作品与思想[M].中国电力出版社,2005:99-100,62-66,132,74-75.
[121]刘松茯.外国建筑史图说[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2008:324.
[122]刘松茯,李静薇.扎哈·哈迪德[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2008:98.
[123]贾巍杨.信息时代建筑设计的互动性[D].天津大学博士学位论文,2008:118,106,108.
[124]周诗岩.建筑物与像——远程在场的影像逻辑[M].东南大学出版社,2007:261-263,272,274,103.
[125] Rem Koolhaas. Content. Hohenzollernring: Taschen,2003:82.
[126] http://www.oma.nl/projects/1996/phyperbhilding.
[127][美]柯林·罗罗伯特·斯拉茨基.透明性[M].金秋野,王又佳,译.中国建筑工业出版社,2008:25.
[128]时代建筑2012(2).
[129][法]吉尔·德勒兹.哲学的客体[M].永国,尹晶,译.北京大学出版社,2010(1):182-188,66.
[130]陈荣钦，张利.数字建筑中的虚拟性浅析[J].计算机教育,2007(11):12,13.
[131] http://www.makoto-architect.com/index.htm.
[132]尹志伟.非线性建筑的参数化设计及其建造研究[D].清华大学建筑学硕士学位论文,2009:41-42.
[133] www.landscape.cn.
[134]张诃.埃舍尔魔镜[M].陕西师范大学出版社,2005:56-59.
[135]范东晖,张玉坤.复杂形态与开放建筑——评析蓝天组的“复杂学”建筑[J].建筑师,2004(12):58.
[136] Gilles Deleuze. The Fold-Leibniz and the Baroque [M]. Minnesota Press,1992:19.
[137] Peter Eisenman. Unfolding events: Frankfurt Rebstock and the possibility of anew Urbanism. In Re:working Eisenman. London Academy,1993:58-61.
[138] James Williams. Deleuze’s Ontology and Creativity:Becoming inArchitecture. University of Dundee,2009:204-208.
[139] www.abbs.com.cn./jzs/118.php
[140] www.flickr.com/explore
[141]韩怡,禹庆.浅析西方建筑中的褶子现象[J].山西建筑,2009(12):43.
[142] http://www.china-up.com/cityGls.php
[143]滕露莹.论当代建筑空间的动态性[D].同济大学建筑学硕士学位论文,2007:52.
[144]陈坚,魏春雨.“新场域精神之创造”——浅析当代建筑创作中营造场域精神之新语汇和新方式[J].华中建筑,2008(11):11-12.
[145] George Dodds and Robert Tavernor. Body and Building:Essays on theChanging Relation of Body and Architecture. The MIT Press,2002:78.
[146]韩桂玲.论身体感觉的创造价值——对德勒兹《感觉的逻辑》的解读[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2010(5):43.
[147]小约翰.传播理论[M].陈德民,等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999:578.
[148]“寄生体”:白小松.身体与媒体—迪勒与斯科菲迪奥的作品研[J]. A+CDESIGN,2009(7):43.
[149] http://www.99265.com.
[150] http://project.zhulong.com/proj.
[151] http://www.velux.com/.
[152]汪芳.查尔斯·柯里亚—国外著名建筑师从书[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2003:13-19.
[153]沈克宁.建筑现象学[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2008:161.
[154] Bemard Tschumi. Architectuer and Events. in PaPdakis Anderas. NewArchitectuer: Reaching of rhte Future. Publisher Singapore,1997:25.
[155] Iain Borden. Eds. Bartlett School of Architecture Catalogue[G]. London:UCL,2008:47.
[156][加拿大]马歇尔·麦克卢汉,理解媒介[M].何道宽,译.凤凰出版传媒集团译林出版社,2011(7):138.
[157]虞刚.软建筑[J].建筑师,2005(12):25.
[158] http://www.noxarch.com.
[159]王丽方.潮流之外——墨西哥建筑师路易斯·巴拉干[J].世界建筑,2000(3):56.
[160]姜宇辉.审美经验与身体意象[D].复旦大学博士论文,2004(4):130，159-163
[161]丁格菲.普利茨凯奖获奖建筑师的建筑设计创新研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学工学博士学位论文,2008:65,66.
[162]曾鹏,曾坚,蔡良娃.信息时代建筑的探索者——荷兰NOX作品解读[J].世界建筑,2006(4):106-109.
[163]王月涛.建筑形式的非视觉动力研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学工学博士学位论文,2008:45,59,62,36,73,79.
[164]赵之枫.城市边缘活力的再生——解读澳大利亚墨尔本联邦广场[J].新建筑,2008(5):86-91.
[165]李世芬,冯路.新有机建筑设计观念与方法研究[J].建筑学报,2008(9):15.
[166] http://vincent.callebaut.org/page1-img-coral.html.
[167] Joseph Rosa. Next GenerationArchitecture: Folds, Blobs&Boxes[M]. NewYork:Rizzoli,2003:55-57.
[168] http://image.baidu.com/i?ct=503316480&z.
[169][英]彼得·绍拉帕耶.当代建筑与数字化设计[M].吴晓,虞刚,译.中国建筑工业出版社,2007:191.
[170]“游牧机器”:伍端.褶皱——游牧机器[J].城市建筑,2010(5):78-79.
[171]李建军.从先锋派到先锋文化——美学批判语境中的当代西方先锋主义建筑[M].东南大学出版社,2010:167.
[172][德]本雅明.单行道[M].王才勇,译.江苏人民出版社，2006:59.
[173]陈永国.德勒兹思想要略[J].外国文学,2004(8):28.
[174] http://www.wallpaper.com/architecture/venice-biennale-2008.
[175] http://www.pritzkerprize.com.
[176]董岩.建筑创新与技术创新[D].天津大学硕士论文,2006:67.
[177]陆邵明.当代建筑叙事学的本体建构——叙事视野下的空间特征、方法及其对创新教育的启示[D].建筑学报,2010(4):20.
[2]大师系列丛书编辑部.伯纳德·屈米的作品与思想[M].中国电力出版社,2005(8):19,123-124.
[3][美]彼得·埃森曼,彼得·埃森曼.图解日志[M].陈欣欣,何捷,译.中国建筑工业出版社,2005:37-38,64,65,7-59.
[4]栾乔.建筑创作中的形态柔化倾向研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学建筑学硕士学位论文,2009:16.
[5]赵榕.当代西方建筑形式设计策略研究[D].东南大学博士学位论文,2005:143,104,154,182,183,184,146,148,73,157,117,127,125.
[6]王立明.格雷戈·林恩(Greg Lynn)的数字设计研究[M].东南大学硕士学位论文,2006:43,46,29,39,38,41,42,18,20,19,35,40,12-30,29.
[7]李万林.当代非线性建筑形态设计研究[D].重庆大学硕士学位论文,2008:94,92-93,106,109,108,69.
[8]陶晓晨.数字图解——图解作为“抽象机器”在建筑设计中的应用[D].清华大学硕士学位论文,2008:49,50,105.
[9]王鹤.数字时代下的建筑形式研究[D].合肥工业大学硕士学位论文,2009:44.
[10]李昕.非线性语汇下的建筑形态生成研究[D].湖南大学硕士学位论文,2009:58,52-53,48-50,51.
[11]高天.当代建筑中折叠的发生与发展[D].同济大学硕士学位论文,2007:25,27,17-71.
[12]司露.电影影像:从运动到时间——德勒兹电影理论初探[D].华东师范大学硕士学位论文,2009:1,8.
[13]田宏.数码时代“非标准”建筑思想的产生与发展[D].清华大学硕士学位论文,2005:17,16-21,54.
[14][法]吉尔·德勒兹.福柯·褶子[M].于奇智,杨洁,译.湖南文艺版社,2001:153.
[15][法]吉尔·德勒兹.德勒兹论福柯[M].杨凯麟,译.江苏教育出版社,2006:13.
[16][法]吉尔·德勒兹,菲利克斯·迦塔利.什么是哲学[M].张祖建,译.湖南文艺版社,2007:199-216.
[17][法]吉尔·德勒兹.弗兰西斯·培根:感觉的逻辑[M].董强,译.广西师范大学出版社,2007: ii,48,51,148-149,45.
[18][法]吉尔·德勒兹.普鲁斯特与符号[M].姜宇辉,译.上海译文出版社,2008:3.
[19][法]吉尔·德勒兹.资本主义与精神分裂(卷2):千高原[M].姜宇辉,译.上海:上海书店出版社,2010:1-18,533,441-551,505-506,518-519,683,536,701,446,466,469,727,451.
[20]姜宇辉.德勒兹身体美学研究[M].华东师范大学出版社,2007:8-15,163,173,131,153,161,132,178,178.
[21] Adrian Parr. The Deleuze Dictionary. Edinburgh University Press,2005.
[22] Claire Colebrook. Understanding Deleuze. Allen&Unwin Press,2002:V-VII.
[23] Todd May. Gilles Deleuze: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press,2005:1.
[24] Graham Jones, Jon Roffe. Deleuze’s Philosophical Lineage. EdinburghUniversity Press,2009:1-6.
[25] Ronaid Bogue. Deleuze on Cinema. Rounledge New York and London Press,2003:3.
[26] Constantin V. Boundas. Deleuze and Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press,2006:3.
[27] Mark Bonta, John Protevi. Deleuze and Geophilosophy. Edinburgh UniversityPress,2006:3-11.
[28] Anna Powell. Deleuze, Altered States and Film. Edinburgh University Press,2007:1,176.
[29] Ronald Bogue. Deleuze’s Way. University of Georgia. USA,2007:1.
[30] Bernd Herzogenrath. Thinking Environments with Deleuze and Guattari.Cambridge Scholars Publishing,2008:1-22.
[31] Joe Hughes. Deleuze and the Genesis of Representation. ContinuumInternational Publishing Group,2008:ix
[32] Adrian Parr. Deleuze and Memorial Culture. Edinburgh University Press.2008:1-12.
[33] Mark Poster and David Savat. Deleuze and New Technology. EdinburghUniversity Press,2009:1-11.
[34] By Laura Cull.Deleuze and Performance. Edinburgh University Press,2009:14-15.
[35]戚广平.“非同一性的契机”:关于“建构”的现代性批判[D].同济大学工学博士学位论文,2007:192-212.
[36]李光前.图解,图解建筑和图解建筑师[D].同济大学硕士学位论文,2008:107.
[37]陈宾.动态空间[D].同济大学硕士学位论文,2008:78-80.
[38]尹志伟.非线性建筑的参数化设计及其建造研究[D].清华大学硕士学位论文,2009:4.
[39]张向宁.当代复杂性建筑形态设计研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学博士学位论文,2009:4.
[40]徐卫国.非线性建筑设计[J].建筑学报,2005(12):33.
[41]徐卫国.褶子思想,游牧空间——关于非线性建筑参数化设计的访谈[J].世界建筑,2009(8):17.
[42]虞刚.凝视折叠[J].建筑师,2003(12):36.
[43]虞刚.图解的力量——阅读格雷格·林恩的《形式表达——建筑设计中图解的原-功能潜力》[J].建筑师,2004(8):65.
[44] Bernard Cache. Translated by Boyman, Anne. Earth Moves: The Furnishingof Territories. The MIT Press,1995: xvi-3,5.
[45] Greg Lynn. Folds, Bodies&Blobs[M]. New York:Princeton Architecture Press,1998:3,225,228,139.
[46] Greg Lynn. Animate Form. Princeton Architecture Press,1999:12-80,98.
[47] Greg Lynn, Hani Rashid, Peter Weibel, Max Hollein. ArchitecturalLaboratories. NAI Publisher,2003:2.
[48] Greg Lynn. Intricacy[M]. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania,2003.
[49] GregLynn. Folding in Architecture, Second Edition[M]. Chichester:Wiley-Academy,2004:10-24,50.
[50] Ian Buchanan and Gregg Lambert. Deleuze and Space. Edinburgh UniversityPress,2005:1-15.
[51]大师系列丛书编辑部.彼得·埃森曼的作品与思想[M].中国电力出版社,2006:136-139.
[52] Peg Rawes. Space, Geometry and Aesthetic: Through Kant and TowardsDeleuze. University College London Press,2008:1-8.
[53] Andrew Ballantyne. Deleuze&Guattari for Architects. Taylor&Francise-Library,2007:13-120.
[54] E A Grosz. Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth.Columbia University Press,2008:2-3.
[55] Simone Brott. Architecture for a Free Subjectivity.Ashgate PublishingCompany,2011:1-10.
[56] Victor Gane. Parametric Design–a Paradigm Shift. Massachusetts Instituteof Technology, Department of Architecture,2004:1.
[57] Non-Linear Architectural Design Process by Yasha Jacob Grobman, AbrahamYezioro and Isaac Guedi Capeluto，2008:42.
[58] Experiencing Build Space: Affect and Movement by Eva Perez de Vega,Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, vol.2,2010:306,404.
[59] Assessing ‘Quality’: The unfolding of the‘Good’–—Collective decisionmaking in juries of urban design competitions by Joris E. Van Wezemael, JanM. Silberberger, Sofia Paisiou，Scandinavian Journal of Management (2011)27:167-172.
[60] Scenario: Co-Evolution, Shared Autonomy and Mixed Reality by Dennis DelFavero, Timothy S. Barker, IEEE International Symposium on Mixed andAugmented Reality2010Arts, Media,&Humanities Proceedings，2010:11,17,13,14.
[61] Digital Morphogenesis and Computational Architectures by Branko Kolarevic,University of Pennsylvania，2001:1.
[62] Chaos, Territory, Art. Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth by ElizabethGrosz, Women’s and Gender Studies, Rutgers University, New York,2006:18.
[63]美国亚洲艺术与设计协作联盟.终结图像[M].华中科技大学出版社,2007:9-23,189-201,141-157.
[64]美国亚洲艺术与设计协作联盟.折叠·织造·覆层[M].华中科技大学出版社,2008:6-9,210-213,218,221.
[65]美国亚洲艺术与设计协作联盟.信息生物建筑.华中科技大学出版社,2008:6-19,198-199,215-218,235-239,241-243,149-151,155-157,166,165-168,188-197.
[66] Paul Aldridge, Noemie Deville, Anna Solt, Jung Su Lee. EVOLOSKYSCRAPERS[M]. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataAvailable,2012:14,1056-1057,256-259,217-219,300-303,296-299,542-545,570-573,690-691,598-601,236-239,602-605,676-679.
[67]潘于旭.断裂的时间与“异质性”的存在——德勒兹《差异与重复》的文本解读[M].浙江大学出版社,2007:19,318.
[68] Gilles Deleuze. Difference and Repetition. Columbia University Press,1994:283.
[69]麦永雄.德勒兹生成论的魅力[J].文艺研究,2004(3):157-160.
[70][法]吉尔﹒德勒兹.时间——影像[M].谢强,蔡若明,马月,译.湖南美术出版社,2004:137,127,128,126,34,73,85-91,90,48.
[71]唐卓.影像的生命——德勒兹电影事件美学研究[D].哈尔滨师范大学硕士学位论文,2010:26,16-18,18,51-53,26.
[72] http://image.soso.com/.cgi/special/?ch=PCTP
[73]任军.当代建筑的科学之维[M].东南大学出版社,2009:158,128,159,149,88,120,119,117,118,87,162,190,191,196,197,164,103,108,116.
[74] Gilles Deleuze.A Thousand Plateaus.The University of Minnesota Press,2005:151-157.
[75]韩桂玲.试析德勒兹的“无器官的身体”[J].商丘师范学院学报,2008(1):7-9,8-9.
[76] Neil Leach,徐卫国.数字建构——青年建筑师作品[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2008:69,76,83.
[77] Somol."DummyText"inEisenman, Peter: Dia-gram Diaries.UniversePublishing. NY,1999:24.
[78]陈永国,编译.游牧思想-吉尔·德勒兹,费利克斯·瓜塔里读本[M].吉林人民出版社,2004:8,317.
[79] http://www. image.google.com/i?ct=503316780&z
[80]朱立元.当代西方文艺理论[M].华东师范大学出版社,2005:79.
[81]莫伟民,姜宇辉,王礼平.二十一世纪法国哲学[M].人民出版社,2008:39.
[82]徐俊芬.透视建筑时间之维[D].华中科技大学硕士论文,2006:23-40.
[83]朱雷.空间操作[M].东南大学出版社,2010:5-9.
[84]欧几里德.几何原本[M].燕晓东,编译.人民日报出版社,2005:23.
[85]申绍杰,李江.“身体”视野下的现当代建筑学扫描[J].建筑学报,2009(1):29.
[86]楚超超.身体与建筑[J].建筑学报,2012:174.
[87]杨震.建筑创作中的生态构思[D].重庆大学硕士学位论文,2003:8-10.
[88] Bernd Herzogenrath. An[Un] Likely Alliance: Thinking Environment[s] withDelenze/Guattari[M]. Cambridge Scholars Publishing,2008:2.
[89]尼尔.林奇,叶杨.集群城市主义[J].世界建筑,2009(8):20.
[90] Ansell Pearson. Germinal Life. London:Routledge,1999:156.
[91]黄文达.德勒兹的电影思想[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(5):72.
[92]周冬莹.论德勒兹的“潜在影像”[J].北京电影学院学报,2011(5):19.
[93] Annettew. Balkema and Henk Slager(eds.). Territorial Investigations.University of Amsterdam Press,1999:10.
[94] http://www.zaha-hadid.com/design.
[95]韩桂玲.后现代主义创造观:德勒兹的“褶子论”及其述评[J].晋阳学刊,2009(6):76,75.
[96]赵榕.从对象到场域[J].建筑师,2005(2):79-85,83.
[97]韩桂玲.吉尔·德勒兹身体创造学的一个视角[J].学术论坛理论月刊,2010(2):51,52-53.
[98]胡塞尔.生活世界的现象学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2005:57-58.
[99]白海瑞.奔跑的竹子——论德勒兹的生成论[D].陕西师范大学硕士学位论文,2011:2,17.
[100]邓亚梅.非理性认识论:德勒兹“块茎说”及其现代意义[J].燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(6):117.
[101][日]黑川纪章.共生思想[M].覃力,等译.中国建筑工业出版社,2009:195,34,152,33,59,29,302.
[102]大师系列丛书编辑部.让·努维尔的作品与思想[M].中国电力出版社,2006:8,123-128.
[103][英]冯炜.透视前后的空间体验与建构[M].李开然,译.东南大学出版社,2009:57.
[104] http://www.oma.nl/projects/2010/musee-national-des-beaux-arts-du-quebec.
[105][法]柏格森.材料与记忆[M].肖聿,译.北京:华夏出版社,1999:50.
[106]徐卫国,罗丽.建筑/非建筑[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2006:24.
[107]大师系列丛书编辑部.伯纳德·屈米的作品与思想[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2006:58.
[108][英]康威·劳埃德·摩根.让·努维尔:建筑的元素[M].白颖,译.中国建筑工业出版社,2004:189-193,142-144,102-103,179-181.
[109] http://image.soso.com.
[110]韩巍.建筑的姿态——从“蓝天组”的建构观看德累斯顿UFA电影院的建筑设计[J].南京艺术学院学报,2008(3):168.
[111]大师系列丛书编辑部.伊东丰雄的作品与思想[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2006:123,21,5.
[112]应雄.德勒兹《电影2》读解:时间影像与结晶[J].电影艺术,2010(6):102.
[113]沈克宁.时间·记忆·空间[J].时代建筑,2008(6):25.
[114]沈克宁.建筑现象学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008:1,161.
[115] http://www.daniel—1ibeskind. com.
[116]美国亚洲艺术与设计协作联盟.全息建筑生态学[M].华中科技大学出版社,2008:200-207,123-125.
[117] Gilles Deleuze. Cinema2: The Time-Image. University of Minnesota Press,1989:86-100.
[118]闫苏,仲德崑.以影像之名——电影艺术与建筑实践[J].新建筑,2008(1):23.
[119][意]贾尼·布拉费瑞.奥尔多·罗西[M].王莹,译.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2005(9):88,16.
[120]大师系列丛书编辑部.扎哈·哈迪德的作品与思想[M].中国电力出版社,2005:99-100,62-66,132,74-75.
[121]刘松茯.外国建筑史图说[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2008:324.
[122]刘松茯,李静薇.扎哈·哈迪德[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2008:98.
[123]贾巍杨.信息时代建筑设计的互动性[D].天津大学博士学位论文,2008:118,106,108.
[124]周诗岩.建筑物与像——远程在场的影像逻辑[M].东南大学出版社,2007:261-263,272,274,103.
[125] Rem Koolhaas. Content. Hohenzollernring: Taschen,2003:82.
[126] http://www.oma.nl/projects/1996/phyperbhilding.
[127][美]柯林·罗罗伯特·斯拉茨基.透明性[M].金秋野,王又佳,译.中国建筑工业出版社,2008:25.
[128]时代建筑2012(2).
[129][法]吉尔·德勒兹.哲学的客体[M].永国,尹晶,译.北京大学出版社,2010(1):182-188,66.
[130]陈荣钦，张利.数字建筑中的虚拟性浅析[J].计算机教育,2007(11):12,13.
[131] http://www.makoto-architect.com/index.htm.
[132]尹志伟.非线性建筑的参数化设计及其建造研究[D].清华大学建筑学硕士学位论文,2009:41-42.
[133] www.landscape.cn.
[134]张诃.埃舍尔魔镜[M].陕西师范大学出版社,2005:56-59.
[135]范东晖,张玉坤.复杂形态与开放建筑——评析蓝天组的“复杂学”建筑[J].建筑师,2004(12):58.
[136] Gilles Deleuze. The Fold-Leibniz and the Baroque [M]. Minnesota Press,1992:19.
[137] Peter Eisenman. Unfolding events: Frankfurt Rebstock and the possibility of anew Urbanism. In Re:working Eisenman. London Academy,1993:58-61.
[138] James Williams. Deleuze’s Ontology and Creativity:Becoming inArchitecture. University of Dundee,2009:204-208.
[139] www.abbs.com.cn./jzs/118.php
[140] www.flickr.com/explore
[141]韩怡,禹庆.浅析西方建筑中的褶子现象[J].山西建筑,2009(12):43.
[142] http://www.china-up.com/cityGls.php
[143]滕露莹.论当代建筑空间的动态性[D].同济大学建筑学硕士学位论文,2007:52.
[144]陈坚,魏春雨.“新场域精神之创造”——浅析当代建筑创作中营造场域精神之新语汇和新方式[J].华中建筑,2008(11):11-12.
[145] George Dodds and Robert Tavernor. Body and Building:Essays on theChanging Relation of Body and Architecture. The MIT Press,2002:78.
[146]韩桂玲.论身体感觉的创造价值——对德勒兹《感觉的逻辑》的解读[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2010(5):43.
[147]小约翰.传播理论[M].陈德民,等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999:578.
[148]“寄生体”:白小松.身体与媒体—迪勒与斯科菲迪奥的作品研[J]. A+CDESIGN,2009(7):43.
[149] http://www.99265.com.
[150] http://project.zhulong.com/proj.
[151] http://www.velux.com/.
[152]汪芳.查尔斯·柯里亚—国外著名建筑师从书[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2003:13-19.
[153]沈克宁.建筑现象学[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2008:161.
[154] Bemard Tschumi. Architectuer and Events. in PaPdakis Anderas. NewArchitectuer: Reaching of rhte Future. Publisher Singapore,1997:25.
[155] Iain Borden. Eds. Bartlett School of Architecture Catalogue[G]. London:UCL,2008:47.
[156][加拿大]马歇尔·麦克卢汉,理解媒介[M].何道宽,译.凤凰出版传媒集团译林出版社,2011(7):138.
[157]虞刚.软建筑[J].建筑师,2005(12):25.
[158] http://www.noxarch.com.
[159]王丽方.潮流之外——墨西哥建筑师路易斯·巴拉干[J].世界建筑,2000(3):56.
[160]姜宇辉.审美经验与身体意象[D].复旦大学博士论文,2004(4):130，159-163
[161]丁格菲.普利茨凯奖获奖建筑师的建筑设计创新研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学工学博士学位论文,2008:65,66.
[162]曾鹏,曾坚,蔡良娃.信息时代建筑的探索者——荷兰NOX作品解读[J].世界建筑,2006(4):106-109.
[163]王月涛.建筑形式的非视觉动力研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学工学博士学位论文,2008:45,59,62,36,73,79.
[164]赵之枫.城市边缘活力的再生——解读澳大利亚墨尔本联邦广场[J].新建筑,2008(5):86-91.
[165]李世芬,冯路.新有机建筑设计观念与方法研究[J].建筑学报,2008(9):15.
[166] http://vincent.callebaut.org/page1-img-coral.html.
[167] Joseph Rosa. Next GenerationArchitecture: Folds, Blobs&Boxes[M]. NewYork:Rizzoli,2003:55-57.
[168] http://image.baidu.com/i?ct=503316480&z.
[169][英]彼得·绍拉帕耶.当代建筑与数字化设计[M].吴晓,虞刚,译.中国建筑工业出版社,2007:191.
[170]“游牧机器”:伍端.褶皱——游牧机器[J].城市建筑,2010(5):78-79.
[171]李建军.从先锋派到先锋文化——美学批判语境中的当代西方先锋主义建筑[M].东南大学出版社,2010:167.
[172][德]本雅明.单行道[M].王才勇,译.江苏人民出版社，2006:59.
[173]陈永国.德勒兹思想要略[J].外国文学,2004(8):28.
[174] http://www.wallpaper.com/architecture/venice-biennale-2008.
[175] http://www.pritzkerprize.com.
[176]董岩.建筑创新与技术创新[D].天津大学硕士论文,2006:67.
[177]陆邵明.当代建筑叙事学的本体建构——叙事视野下的空间特征、方法及其对创新教育的启示[D].建筑学报,2010(4):20.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |