嫩江下游水生生物多样性及生态系统健康评价
|
摘要
近年来,随着嫩江流域社会经济的快速发展,流域城市建设、工业布局、引水工程、农业灌溉、初具规模,但同时流域的生态问题也日益突出。由于人类对水资源、生物资源的开发利用强度的日益加剧,嫩江下游水生生物多样性受到严重威胁。另外,关于嫩江下游鱼类、底栖动物、浮游生物等方面的研究资料相对匮乏,同时,水生生物生物完整性也是河流生态系统健康评价指标体系中,非常重要的指标之一,为了有效地保护嫩江下游水生生物物种资源,保证其资源的可持续利用和环境的健康发展,开展水生生物多样性方面的研究是十分必要的。
本研究2011年分5月、7月、9月、10月开展浮游生物、底栖动物和鱼类调查,2012年分5月、7月、9月继续开展底栖动物和鱼类调查。调查期间,嫩江干流下游共采集浮游植物201种属,其中硅藻门种类最多为92种属。浮游植物平均数量和生物量分别为146.41×104ind/L、1.7737mg/L。从全年平均来看,浮游植物生物多样性丰富；浮游动物共采集69种属,其中轮虫种类最多为40种属。浮游动物平均数量和生物量分别为1322.15ind/L、0.6763mg/L。浮游动物多样性较好,Shannon-Wiener指数、Pielou均匀度指数和Simpson指数呈明显一致性,均是春季最高,秋季最低；共采集底栖动物151种,其中水生昆虫种类最多为114种。优势种有秀丽白虾、黑龙江短沟蜷和圆顶珠蚌3种,重要种类30种。底栖动物平均密度和生物量分别为37.40ind/m2.3.94g/m2。各功能摄食类群中,刮食者种类最多为52种。K-优势曲线与多样性指数,分析结果相吻合,嫩江下游底栖动物多样性表现为春季>夏季>秋季；共采集鱼类60种,占嫩江下游鱼类总数的81.08%。列入《中国濒危动物红皮书·鱼类》的鱼类仅雷氏七鳃鳗1种。底层鱼类平均密度为66.04ind/m3,平均生物量为178.63g/m3.相对重要性指数(IRI)值排在前5位的鱼类占了全部尾数的70.02%。底层鱼类优势种中除银鲫和鲇外,其他种类均为小型鱼类,其平均体重均小于30g。嫩江下游底层鱼类群落多样性指数偏低,表明了嫩江下鱼类群落优势种群的单一化和小型化,渔业资源质量总体下滑,鱼类个体小型化趋势明显。
本文在充分调查、分析嫩江下游生态环境现状以及变化趋势的基础上,根据现有的技术水平和监测能力,建立了涵盖水生生物、水质、水文水资源、河岸带物理结构及社会服务功能等方面的综合评价指标体系,其中指标层包括17项指标,要素层包括8项指标,并确定各层次及各项指标的评价和赋分标准。基于博弈论的组合赋权法得到河流健康评价指标体系的最终权重值。对构建的河流生态系统健康评价指标体系对嫩江下游进行实例应用。河流健康评估采用分级指标评分法,逐级加权,综合评分。对6个河段的评价结果表明,尼尔基坝址～同盟段为不健康状态,其余河段均处于健康状态,光荣村～洮儿河出口河段赋分最高为77.46分。为准确、客观地反映嫩江下游河流健康状况。在对水生生物、水质、水文水资源、河岸物理结构等4个准则层河流层面赋分时,各河段断面尺度及河段尺度的准则层及指标采用河段长度加权,进行河流的赋分计算。最终计算出嫩江下游(尼尔基至三岔河口段)河流健康评估指数为68.09分,该河流属于健康状况。根据嫩江下游健康状况和主要影响因素进行评价,提出嫩江下游生态系统健康评价中存在的问题,针对存在的生态问题,从加强嫩江下游生态综合管理；规范人类开发活动,减轻水生态系统压力；保护重要生态敏感区与修复受损生态系统等3方面提出相应的对策和建议。同时提出“嫩江大安段乌苏里拟鲿国家级水产种质资源保护区”和“嫩江镇赉段国家级水产种质资源保护区”的生态的保护措施。
In recent years, the city construction, industrial layout, abstraction works and agricultural irrigation have begun to take shape with the rapid development of social economy in Nengjiang River basin, but at the same time, the ecological issues are becoming increasingly prominent. The biodiversity of hydrobios suffered serious threat in the downstream of Nenjiang River, because of the increasingly sharpen of development and utilization strength to water resource and biological resources. In addition, the research data of fishes, zoobenthos and plankton were relative lack, and hydrobios index of biotic integrity was one of the very important indicators in the river ecosystem health evaluation. In order to effectively protect the aquatic species resources of the Nenjiang River and ensure the sustainable use of resources and the healthy development of environment, it was very necessary to carry out the research of aquatic biodiversity.
An investigation of plankton, zoobenthos and fishes were conducted in May, July, September, and October in2011, and the investigation of zoobenthos and fishes were carried out in May, July and September in2012. A total of201phytoplankton species were collected, among which the species number of Bacillariophyta was the largest (92species). The average quantity and biomass of phytoplankton were146.41×104ind/L and1.7737mg/L, respectively, and the biodiversity of phytoplankton was abundant from the view of annual average. A total of69zooplankton species were sampled, and the species number of rotifer was the most (40species). The average quantity and biomass of zooplankton were1322.15ind/L and0.6763mg/L, respectively. The diversity of zooplankton was better, and the trend of Shannon-Wiener index, Pielou evenness index and Simpson diversity index was consistent. The diversity of zooplankton was the highest in spring and was the lowest in autumn.151zoobenthos species were collected, and the maximum species number was aquatic insects with114species. The dominant species were Palaemon modestus, Semisulcospira amurensis and Unio dougladiae, and there were30important species. The average density and biomass of phytoplankton were37.40ind/m、3.94g/m2, respectively. The species number of epigrowth feeders was the most with52species in all functional feeding groups. The results of K-dominant curves analysis were consistent with the diversity index. The diversity index of zoobenthos was the highest in spring, followed by summer and autumn in the downstream of Nenjiang River.60fish species were sampled, which account for81.08%of the total fish species in the downstream of Nenjiang River. Only one species Lampetra reissneri (Dybowski) was included in the "China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals-Pisces". The average density and biomass of demersal fishes were66.04ind/m3and178.63g/m3, respectively. Index of relative importance (IRI) value of the top five fish accounted for70.02%of all mantissa. In addition to Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch) and Silurus asotus (Linnaeus), the other dominant species were small fishes, and the average body weight was less than30g. The community diversity index of demersal fish was lower in the downstream of Nenjiang River, which indicated the community dominant populations was single and miniaturized, the overall quality of fisheries resources declined, and miniaturization offish individuals was obvious.
The state of ecological environment and trend of the downstream of Nenjiang River were fully study. An integrated evaluation index system covering hydrobios, water quality, hydrology and water resources, the physical structure of river banks and social service functions, and so on, according to the existing level of technology and monitoring capabilities. Among which index layer included17indicators and element layer included8indicators, and the evaluation and scoring criterion of each layer and indicators was established. The final weight values for river health assessment index system was get using combination weighting method based on game theory. The practicability of above river ecosystem health assessment index system was verified with the downstream of Nenjiang River health assessment as a case study. The grading index scoring, progressively weighted and comprehensive score were adopted in river health assessment. The results suggested the Nierji dam to Tongmen river section belong to unhealthy state, the other river sections belong to health state, and the scoring of Guangrong village to the export of Taoer River was the highest with77.46score. In order to accurately and objectively reflect the river health status of Nenjiang River, the length weight was adopted in scoring hydrobios, water quality, hydrology and water resources, the physical structure of river banks. The final river health assessment index was68.09score in the downstream of Nenjiang River, and this river section belong to healthy state. The existing problems of ecosystem health assessment in the downstream of Nenjiang River were proposed based on the health status and main factors, and corresponding countermeasures and suggestions including strengthening the ecological management, regulating human development activities to reduce the pressure of the water ecosystem and protecting important ecologically sensitive areas and recovering impaired ecosystem were proposed. The ecological protection measures were proposed on "national aquatic germ plasm protection areas of Pelteobagrus ussuriensis (Dybowski) in Daan river section of Nenjiang River" and "national aquatic germ plasm protection areas of Zhenlai river section of Nenjiang River"
本研究2011年分5月、7月、9月、10月开展浮游生物、底栖动物和鱼类调查,2012年分5月、7月、9月继续开展底栖动物和鱼类调查。调查期间,嫩江干流下游共采集浮游植物201种属,其中硅藻门种类最多为92种属。浮游植物平均数量和生物量分别为146.41×104ind/L、1.7737mg/L。从全年平均来看,浮游植物生物多样性丰富；浮游动物共采集69种属,其中轮虫种类最多为40种属。浮游动物平均数量和生物量分别为1322.15ind/L、0.6763mg/L。浮游动物多样性较好,Shannon-Wiener指数、Pielou均匀度指数和Simpson指数呈明显一致性,均是春季最高,秋季最低；共采集底栖动物151种,其中水生昆虫种类最多为114种。优势种有秀丽白虾、黑龙江短沟蜷和圆顶珠蚌3种,重要种类30种。底栖动物平均密度和生物量分别为37.40ind/m2.3.94g/m2。各功能摄食类群中,刮食者种类最多为52种。K-优势曲线与多样性指数,分析结果相吻合,嫩江下游底栖动物多样性表现为春季>夏季>秋季；共采集鱼类60种,占嫩江下游鱼类总数的81.08%。列入《中国濒危动物红皮书·鱼类》的鱼类仅雷氏七鳃鳗1种。底层鱼类平均密度为66.04ind/m3,平均生物量为178.63g/m3.相对重要性指数(IRI)值排在前5位的鱼类占了全部尾数的70.02%。底层鱼类优势种中除银鲫和鲇外,其他种类均为小型鱼类,其平均体重均小于30g。嫩江下游底层鱼类群落多样性指数偏低,表明了嫩江下鱼类群落优势种群的单一化和小型化,渔业资源质量总体下滑,鱼类个体小型化趋势明显。
本文在充分调查、分析嫩江下游生态环境现状以及变化趋势的基础上,根据现有的技术水平和监测能力,建立了涵盖水生生物、水质、水文水资源、河岸带物理结构及社会服务功能等方面的综合评价指标体系,其中指标层包括17项指标,要素层包括8项指标,并确定各层次及各项指标的评价和赋分标准。基于博弈论的组合赋权法得到河流健康评价指标体系的最终权重值。对构建的河流生态系统健康评价指标体系对嫩江下游进行实例应用。河流健康评估采用分级指标评分法,逐级加权,综合评分。对6个河段的评价结果表明,尼尔基坝址～同盟段为不健康状态,其余河段均处于健康状态,光荣村～洮儿河出口河段赋分最高为77.46分。为准确、客观地反映嫩江下游河流健康状况。在对水生生物、水质、水文水资源、河岸物理结构等4个准则层河流层面赋分时,各河段断面尺度及河段尺度的准则层及指标采用河段长度加权,进行河流的赋分计算。最终计算出嫩江下游(尼尔基至三岔河口段)河流健康评估指数为68.09分,该河流属于健康状况。根据嫩江下游健康状况和主要影响因素进行评价,提出嫩江下游生态系统健康评价中存在的问题,针对存在的生态问题,从加强嫩江下游生态综合管理；规范人类开发活动,减轻水生态系统压力；保护重要生态敏感区与修复受损生态系统等3方面提出相应的对策和建议。同时提出“嫩江大安段乌苏里拟鲿国家级水产种质资源保护区”和“嫩江镇赉段国家级水产种质资源保护区”的生态的保护措施。
In recent years, the city construction, industrial layout, abstraction works and agricultural irrigation have begun to take shape with the rapid development of social economy in Nengjiang River basin, but at the same time, the ecological issues are becoming increasingly prominent. The biodiversity of hydrobios suffered serious threat in the downstream of Nenjiang River, because of the increasingly sharpen of development and utilization strength to water resource and biological resources. In addition, the research data of fishes, zoobenthos and plankton were relative lack, and hydrobios index of biotic integrity was one of the very important indicators in the river ecosystem health evaluation. In order to effectively protect the aquatic species resources of the Nenjiang River and ensure the sustainable use of resources and the healthy development of environment, it was very necessary to carry out the research of aquatic biodiversity.
An investigation of plankton, zoobenthos and fishes were conducted in May, July, September, and October in2011, and the investigation of zoobenthos and fishes were carried out in May, July and September in2012. A total of201phytoplankton species were collected, among which the species number of Bacillariophyta was the largest (92species). The average quantity and biomass of phytoplankton were146.41×104ind/L and1.7737mg/L, respectively, and the biodiversity of phytoplankton was abundant from the view of annual average. A total of69zooplankton species were sampled, and the species number of rotifer was the most (40species). The average quantity and biomass of zooplankton were1322.15ind/L and0.6763mg/L, respectively. The diversity of zooplankton was better, and the trend of Shannon-Wiener index, Pielou evenness index and Simpson diversity index was consistent. The diversity of zooplankton was the highest in spring and was the lowest in autumn.151zoobenthos species were collected, and the maximum species number was aquatic insects with114species. The dominant species were Palaemon modestus, Semisulcospira amurensis and Unio dougladiae, and there were30important species. The average density and biomass of phytoplankton were37.40ind/m、3.94g/m2, respectively. The species number of epigrowth feeders was the most with52species in all functional feeding groups. The results of K-dominant curves analysis were consistent with the diversity index. The diversity index of zoobenthos was the highest in spring, followed by summer and autumn in the downstream of Nenjiang River.60fish species were sampled, which account for81.08%of the total fish species in the downstream of Nenjiang River. Only one species Lampetra reissneri (Dybowski) was included in the "China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals-Pisces". The average density and biomass of demersal fishes were66.04ind/m3and178.63g/m3, respectively. Index of relative importance (IRI) value of the top five fish accounted for70.02%of all mantissa. In addition to Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch) and Silurus asotus (Linnaeus), the other dominant species were small fishes, and the average body weight was less than30g. The community diversity index of demersal fish was lower in the downstream of Nenjiang River, which indicated the community dominant populations was single and miniaturized, the overall quality of fisheries resources declined, and miniaturization offish individuals was obvious.
The state of ecological environment and trend of the downstream of Nenjiang River were fully study. An integrated evaluation index system covering hydrobios, water quality, hydrology and water resources, the physical structure of river banks and social service functions, and so on, according to the existing level of technology and monitoring capabilities. Among which index layer included17indicators and element layer included8indicators, and the evaluation and scoring criterion of each layer and indicators was established. The final weight values for river health assessment index system was get using combination weighting method based on game theory. The practicability of above river ecosystem health assessment index system was verified with the downstream of Nenjiang River health assessment as a case study. The grading index scoring, progressively weighted and comprehensive score were adopted in river health assessment. The results suggested the Nierji dam to Tongmen river section belong to unhealthy state, the other river sections belong to health state, and the scoring of Guangrong village to the export of Taoer River was the highest with77.46score. In order to accurately and objectively reflect the river health status of Nenjiang River, the length weight was adopted in scoring hydrobios, water quality, hydrology and water resources, the physical structure of river banks. The final river health assessment index was68.09score in the downstream of Nenjiang River, and this river section belong to healthy state. The existing problems of ecosystem health assessment in the downstream of Nenjiang River were proposed based on the health status and main factors, and corresponding countermeasures and suggestions including strengthening the ecological management, regulating human development activities to reduce the pressure of the water ecosystem and protecting important ecologically sensitive areas and recovering impaired ecosystem were proposed. The ecological protection measures were proposed on "national aquatic germ plasm protection areas of Pelteobagrus ussuriensis (Dybowski) in Daan river section of Nenjiang River" and "national aquatic germ plasm protection areas of Zhenlai river section of Nenjiang River"
引文
[1]Karr J R, Chu E W. Sustaining Living Rivers[J]. Hydrobiologia,2000,422/423:1-14
[2]黄宝强,李荣昉,曹文洪.河流生态系统健康评价及其对我国河流健康保护的启示[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(8)：4600-4602,4641
[3]Palmer M A,Bernhardt E S, Allan J D,et al. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2005,42:208-217
[4]嵇晓燕,崔广柏.河流健康修复方法综述[J].三峡大学学报(自然科学版),2008,30(1)：38-44
[5]Noris R H,Hawkins C P. Monitoring River Health[J]. Hydrobiologia,2000,435:5-7
[6]Raport D J,Costanza R, Michael A J. Assessing Ecosystem Health [J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,1998,13:397-402
[7]James R K. Defining and measuring river health[J]. Freshwater Biology,1999, (41):221-234
[8]赵彦伟,杨志峰.河流健康概念、评价方法与方向[J].地理科学,2005,25(1)：119-124
[9]Schofleld N J, Davies P E. Measuring the health of our rivers[J].Water,1996,56(23):39-43
[10]Meyer J L. Stream health:incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecology[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society,1997,16(2):439-447
[11]Vugteveen P, Leuven R S E W, Huljbregts M A J, et al. Redefinition and elaboration of river ecosystem health:perspective for river management [J]. Hydrobiologia,2006,565: 289-308
[12]龙笛.国外健康流域评价理论与实践[J].海河水利,2005,(3)：1-5
[13]崔树彬,刘俊勇,陈军.对中国河流健康评价的探讨[J].水利发展研究,2006,12：7-11
[14]文伏波,韩其为,许炯心.河流健康的定义与内涵[J].水科学进展,2007,18(1)：140-150
[15]刘昌明,刘晓燕.河流健康理论初探[J].地理学报,2008,63(7)：683-692
[16]吴阿娜.河流健康评价：理论、方法与实践[D].上海：华东师范大学,2008
[17]何兴军,李琦,宋令勇.河流生态健康评价研究综述[J].地下水,2011,33(2)：64～66
[18]董哲仁.国外河流健康评估技术[J].水利水电技术,2005,36(11)：15-19
[19]Gallopin G C. the Potential of Agro Ecosystem Health As a Guiding Concept for Agriculture Research[J]. Ecosystem Health,1995,1:129-141
[20]庞治国,王世岩,胡明罡.河流生态系统健康评价及展望[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2006,4(2)：151～155
[21]Marsden M W,Smith MR,Sargent RJ. Trophic state of rivers in the Forth catchment, Scotland[J]. Aquat Cons,1997,7:211-221
[22]霍堂斌,刘曼红,姜作发,等.松花江干流大型底栖动物群落结构与水质生物评价[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(1)：247-254
[23]Kolb T E, Wagner M R, Covington W W. Concept of Forest Health:Utilitarian and Ecosystem Perspectives [J]. Journal of Forestry,1994,92:10-15
[24]Norris R H, Thorns M C. What Is the River Health[J]. Freshwater Biology,1999,41: 197-209
[25]唐涛,蔡庆华,刘建康.河流生态系统健康及其评价[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(9)：1191～1194
[26]Kelly M G, Whitton B A. Biological monitoring of eutrophication in rivers [J]. Hydrobiologia,1998,384:55-67
[27]Kwandrans J,Eloranta P,Kawecka B,et al. Use of benthicdiatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of southern Poland[J]. JAppl Phycol,1998,10:193-201
[28]Sladecek V. Diatom as indictors of organic pollution[J]. ActaHydrochim Hydrobiol, 1986,14:555-566
[29]顾晓英,陶磊,施慧雄.象山港大型底栖动物生物多样性现状[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(6)：1551～1557
[30]王备新,杨莲芳.大型底栖无脊椎动物水质快速生物评价的研究进展[J].南京农业大学学报,2001,24(4)：107～111
[31]王备新,杨莲芳,胡本进.应用底栖动物完整性指数B-IBI评价溪流健康.生态学报[J].2005,25(6)：1481～1490.
[32]李强,杨莲芳,吴璟.底栖动物完整性指数评价西苕溪溪流健康[J].环境科学, 2007.28(9)：2141～2147
[33]张远,徐成斌,马溪平.辽河流域河流底栖动物完整性评价指标与标准[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(6)：919～927.
[34]张方方,张萌,刘足根.基于底栖生物完整性指数的赣江流域河流健康评价[J].水生生物学报,2005,25(6)：1481～1490
[35]王建华,田景汉,吕宪.挠力河流域河流的B～IBI评价[J].生态学报,2009,29(12)：6672～6680
[36]渠晓东,刘志刚,张远.标准化方法筛选参照点构建大型底栖动物生物完整性指数[J].生态学报,2012,32(15)：4661-4672
[37]杨柳,李泳慧,王俊才,等.基于B-IBI指数的温榆河生态健康评价[J].生态学报,2012,32(11)：3313～3322
[38]Karr J R. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities[J]. Fisheries,1981,6(6): 21-27
[39]Thierry O, Didier P, Bernard H, et al. Development and validation of a fish-based index for the assessment of'river health'in France[J]. Freshwater Biology,2002,47:1720-1734
[40]Townsend C R, Riley R H. Assessmentof riverhealth:accounting for perturbation pathways in physical and ecological space[J].Freshwater Biology,1999,41:393-405
[41]Goede R E,Barton B A. Organisimic indices and an qutopsybased assessment as indicators of health and codition of fish[J]. American Fisheries Society Symposiu,1990,(8):93-108
[42]Kleynhans C J.The development of a fish index to assess the biological intergrity of South African rivers [J]. Water Sa,1999,25(3):265-278
[43]Paul L Angermeier,Grigored Davideanu. Using fish communities to assess streams in Romania:initial development of an index of biotic integrity[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2004,511(1):65-78
[44]周林飞,左建军,陈发先.基于模糊模式识别的城市河流生态系统健康评价研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2011,(4)：41-44,49
[45]孔红梅,赵景柱,姬兰柱,等.生态系统健康评价方法初探[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(4)：486～490
[46]Petersen R C. The RCE:a riparian, channel, and environmental inventory for small streams in the agricultural landscape[J]. Freshwater Biology,1992,27(2):295-306.
[47]Ladson A R, White L J, Doolan J A, et al. Development and testing of an index of stream condition for waterway management in Australia[J]. Freshwater Biology,1999,41(2): 453-468
[48]Kleynhans C J. A qualitative procedure for the assessment of the habitat integrity status of the Luvuvhu River[J]. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health,1996 (5):41 - 54
[49]Barbour M T, Gerritsen J, Snyder B D, et al. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers:Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition[M]. Washington D C:EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Enviroment Protection Agency; Office of Water,1999:1 - 10
[50]刘永,郭怀成,载永立,等.湖泊生态系统健康评价方法研究[J].环境科学学报,2004,24(4)：723～729
[51]耿雷华,刘恒,钟华平.健康河流的评价指标和评价标准[J].水利学报,2006,37(3)：253～258
[52]刘保.南渡江下游河流生态系统健康评价研究[J].人民珠江,2008,(6)：43-45,70
[53]冯琳.和田河流域中游生态系统健康评价研究[J].新疆农业科学2010,47(2)：357-362
[54]陈毅,张可刚,郭纯青,等.河流生态健康评价研究—以潮白河为例[J].水利科技与经济,2011,17(2)：9～12
[55]龚雷婷.太湖流域典型入湖河流的健康评价[D].南京：南京大学,2012
[56]高永胜,王浩,王芳.河流健康生命评价指标体系的构建[J].水科学进展,2007,18(2)：252-257
[57]王国胜.河流健康评价指标体系与AHP—-模糊综合评价模型研究[D].广州：广东工业大学,2007
[58]夏霆,朱伟,姜谋余,等.城市河流栖息地评价方法与应用[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(12)：2095-2104
[59]王煜,黄强,刘昌明.基于系统有序度熵的河流健康评判方法研究[J].水文,2007,27(1)：1～3
[60]秦鹏,王英华,王维汉,等.河流健康评价的模糊层次与可变模糊集耦合模型[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2011,45(12)：2169～2175
[61]张又,刘凌,闫峰.基于模糊物元模型的河流健康评价研究[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(1)：382～384,453
[62]高宇婷,高甲荣,顾岚,等.基于模糊矩阵法的河流健康评价体系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(4)：196～199
[63]闫峰,刘凌,徐丽娜,等.隶属度向量分析法在河流健康评价中的应用[J].水电能源科学,2012,30(10)：30～32,214
[64]山成菊,董增川,樊孔明,等.组合赋权法在河流健康评价权重计算中的应用[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(6)：622-628
[65]孙雪岚,胡春宏.河流健康评价指标体系初探[J].泥沙研究,2008,(4)：21-27
[66]杨馥,曾光明,刘鸿亮,等.城市河流健康评价指标体系的不确定性研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(5)：63-66
[67]夏自强,郭文献.河流健康研究进展与前瞻[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(2)：252-255
[68]唐涛,蔡庆华,刘建康.河流生态系统健康及其评价[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(9)：1191～1194
[69]Haase R, Nolte U. The invertebrate species index (ISI) for streams in southeast queensland, Australia [J]. Ecological Indicators,2008, (8):599-613
[70]Feio M J, Alves T, Boavida M, et al. Functional indicators of stream health:a river-basin approach[J]. Freshwater Biology,2010, (55):1050-1065
[71]林木隆,李向阳,杨明海.珠江流域河流健康评价指标体系初探[J].人民珠江,2006,(4)：1～3,4
[72]张国平.基于生态系统服务功能的龙河流域生态系统健康研究[D].重庆：重庆大学,2006
[73]罗辑.城市河流生态系统健康评价研究—以湘江长沙段为例[D].长沙：湖南大学,2009
[74]郭艳丽.图们江下游湿地生态系统健康评价研究[D].延吉：延边大学,2011
[75]龚蕾婷.太湖流域典型入湖河流的健康评价[D].南京：南京大学,2012
[76]熊文,黄思平,杨轩.河流生态系统健康评价关键指标研究[J].人民长江,2010,41(12)：7～12
[77]庞治国,王世岩,胡明罡.河流生态系统健康评价及展望[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2006,26,4(2)：151～155
[78]黄艺,文航,蔡佳亮.基于环境管理的河流健康评价体系的研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(4)：967-973
[79]Raven P J,Holmes N T H,et al. Using river habitat survey for environmental assessment and catchment planning in the UK[J]. Hydrobiologia,2000:422-423
[80]刘晓燕,张建中,张原锋.黄河健康生命的指标体系[J].地理学报,2006,61(5)：451-460
[81]吴道喜,黄思平.健康长江指标体系研究[J].水利水电快报,2007,28(12)：1～3
[82]张觉民.黑龙江省鱼类志[M]..哈尔滨：黑龙江科技出版社,1995.
[83]解玉浩.东北地区淡水鱼类[M].沈阳：辽宁科学技术出版社,2007
[84]朱松泉.中国淡水鱼类检索表[M].南京：江苏科学技术出版社,1995.
[85]陈宜瑜.中国动物志·硬骨鱼纲·鲤形目(中卷)[M].北京：科学出版社,1998.
[86]张觉民,何志辉.内陆水域渔业自然资源调查手册[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1991：12-122.
[87]胡鸿钧,魏印心.中国淡水藻类—系统、分类及生态[M].北京：科学出版社,2006：23-915
[88]周凤霞,陈剑虹.淡水微型生物图谱[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2005：35-192
[89]国家环保总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京：中国环境科学出版社,2002
[90]Shannon C E, Weaver W W. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press,1963
[91]Ludwig J A, Reynolds J F. Statistical Ecology:A Primer on Methods and Computing. New York:John Wiley and Sons,1988
[92]Pielou E C. Ecological Diversity. New York:Wiley Interscience,1975
[93]马克平.试论生物多样性的概念[J].生物多样性,1993,1(1)：20～22
[94]Hilsenhoff W L. Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family level biotic index[J]. Journal of North American Benthological Society,1988,7(1):65-68
[95]Pinkas L,Oliphant M S,Iverson I L K. Food habits of albacore,bluefin tuna,and bonito in California waters. California Department of Fish and Game, Fish Bulletin.1971,152:1-105
[96]Cummins K W. Structure and function of stream ecosystems[J]. Bio Science,1974(24): 631-641
[97]Cummins K W, Klug M J. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1979(10):147-172
[98]Wetzel R G. Limnology (second edition) [M]. Philadelphia:Saunders College Publishing, 1983
[99]刘健康.高级水生生物学[M].北京：科学出版社,1993
[100]乐佩琦,陈宜瑜.中国濒危动物红皮书·鱼类[M].北京：科学出版社,1998
[101]倪勇,朱成德.太湖鱼类志[M].上海：上海科学技术出版社,2005
[102]李喆,姜作发,霍堂斌.黑龙江中游浮游植物多样性动态变化及水质评价[J].中国水产科学2012,19(4)：671～678
[103]孟顺龙,陈家长,范立民,等.2007年太湖五里湖浮游植物生态学特征[J].湖泊科学,2009,21(6)：845～854
[104]姜作发,唐富江,董崇智.黑龙江水系主要江河浮游动物种群结构特征[J].东北林业大学学报,2006,34(4)：64-66
[105]苏洁,姜作发,李池陶.黑龙江浮游动物群落结构特征[J].水产学杂志,2005,18(1)：18～23
[106]蔡赫,于洪贤,霍堂斌.春季嫩江下游底栖动物群落结构及水质评价[J].水产学杂志,2012,25(3)：41～46
[107]霍堂斌,李喆,姜作发,等.黑龙江中游底栖动物群落结构与水质生物评价[J].中国水产科学,2013,20(1)：177～188
[108]Belinda W T, Martin J R,Jonathan S S.Cost-efficientmethods for marine pollution monitoring at Casey Station,East Antarctica:the choice of sieve meshsizeand taxonomic resolution[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin,2003,46:232-243
[109]Westawski J M,Szymelfenig M,Zajaczkowski M,et al. Influence of salinity and suspended matter on benthos of an Arctic ridal flat[J]. ICES Journal of Marine Science,1999,56:194-202
[110]李宝泉,李新正,于海燕,等.胶州湾底栖软体动物与环境因子的关系[J].海洋与湖沼,2005,36(3)：193～198
[111]张觉民.黑龙江省渔业资源[M].牡丹江：黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社,1985
[112]霍堂斌,姜作发,马波.黑龙江中游底层鱼类群落结构及多样性[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(10)：2591～2598
[113]陈国宝,李永振,陈新军.南海主要珊瑚礁水域的鱼类物种多样性研究[J].生物多样性,2007,15(4)：373～381
[114]毛志刚,谷孝鸿,曾庆飞,等.太湖鱼类群落结构及多样性[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(12)：2836-2842
[115]Magurran A E. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement[J]. New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1988
[116]Jungwirth M, Muhar S, Schmutz, S. Re-establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes[J]. Freshwater Biology,2002,47 (4):867-887
[117]McKone P D. Streams and their corridors-flmctions and values[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering,2000,5:28-29
[118]邓红兵,王青春,王庆礼,等.河岸植被缓冲带与河岸带管理[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(6)：951-954
[119]国家环境保护总局,国家质量监督检验检疫总局.中华人民共和国地表水环境质量标准[S].2002
[120]水利部水资源司河湖健康评估全国技术工作组.河流健康评估指标、方法与标准(1.0)[S].2010
[121]Morley S A, Karr J R. Assessing and restoring the health of urban steams in the Puget Sound Basin[J]. Conservation Biology,2002,16:1498-1509
[122]Blocksom K A, Kurtenbach J P,Klemm D J,et al. Development and evaluation of the lake macroinvertebrate in tegrity index for New Jersey lakes and reservoirs [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Asessment,2002,77:311 -333
[123]Barbour M T,Gerrisen J,Griffith G E,et al. A framework for biological criteria for Florida steams using benthic macminvertebrates[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society,1996,15:185-211
[124]Adriaanse A. Environmental policy performance indicators. Astudy on the development of indicators for environmental policy in the Netherlands[M]. Uitgeverij,The Hague,1993
[125]邱菀华.管理决策与应用熵学[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2001
[126]李俊玲.河流健康评价指标体系及权重模型研究[D].南京：河海大学,2008
[127]刘丽涵.嫩江(齐齐哈尔段)水环境保护治理情况分析[J].黑龙江环境通报,2011,35(1)：6-7,16
[128]黄惟灏,韦肖杭,姚伟忠,等.采砂业对渔业生态环境及资源的影响[J].宁波大学学报：理工版,2002,15(3)：28-32
[129]王宝,姜维军.莫莫格湿地面临的困境及其解决途径探讨[J].吉林林业科技,2004,33(6)：29～31
[130]王小雨,冯江,王静.莫莫格湿地油田开采区土壤石油烃污染及对土壤性质的影响[J].环境科学,2009,30(8)：2394～2401
[131]唐蕴,王浩,严登华,等.嫩江流域近45年来径流演变规律研究[J].地理科学,2009,29(6)：864～868
[2]黄宝强,李荣昉,曹文洪.河流生态系统健康评价及其对我国河流健康保护的启示[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(8)：4600-4602,4641
[3]Palmer M A,Bernhardt E S, Allan J D,et al. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2005,42:208-217
[4]嵇晓燕,崔广柏.河流健康修复方法综述[J].三峡大学学报(自然科学版),2008,30(1)：38-44
[5]Noris R H,Hawkins C P. Monitoring River Health[J]. Hydrobiologia,2000,435:5-7
[6]Raport D J,Costanza R, Michael A J. Assessing Ecosystem Health [J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,1998,13:397-402
[7]James R K. Defining and measuring river health[J]. Freshwater Biology,1999, (41):221-234
[8]赵彦伟,杨志峰.河流健康概念、评价方法与方向[J].地理科学,2005,25(1)：119-124
[9]Schofleld N J, Davies P E. Measuring the health of our rivers[J].Water,1996,56(23):39-43
[10]Meyer J L. Stream health:incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecology[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society,1997,16(2):439-447
[11]Vugteveen P, Leuven R S E W, Huljbregts M A J, et al. Redefinition and elaboration of river ecosystem health:perspective for river management [J]. Hydrobiologia,2006,565: 289-308
[12]龙笛.国外健康流域评价理论与实践[J].海河水利,2005,(3)：1-5
[13]崔树彬,刘俊勇,陈军.对中国河流健康评价的探讨[J].水利发展研究,2006,12：7-11
[14]文伏波,韩其为,许炯心.河流健康的定义与内涵[J].水科学进展,2007,18(1)：140-150
[15]刘昌明,刘晓燕.河流健康理论初探[J].地理学报,2008,63(7)：683-692
[16]吴阿娜.河流健康评价：理论、方法与实践[D].上海：华东师范大学,2008
[17]何兴军,李琦,宋令勇.河流生态健康评价研究综述[J].地下水,2011,33(2)：64～66
[18]董哲仁.国外河流健康评估技术[J].水利水电技术,2005,36(11)：15-19
[19]Gallopin G C. the Potential of Agro Ecosystem Health As a Guiding Concept for Agriculture Research[J]. Ecosystem Health,1995,1:129-141
[20]庞治国,王世岩,胡明罡.河流生态系统健康评价及展望[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2006,4(2)：151～155
[21]Marsden M W,Smith MR,Sargent RJ. Trophic state of rivers in the Forth catchment, Scotland[J]. Aquat Cons,1997,7:211-221
[22]霍堂斌,刘曼红,姜作发,等.松花江干流大型底栖动物群落结构与水质生物评价[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(1)：247-254
[23]Kolb T E, Wagner M R, Covington W W. Concept of Forest Health:Utilitarian and Ecosystem Perspectives [J]. Journal of Forestry,1994,92:10-15
[24]Norris R H, Thorns M C. What Is the River Health[J]. Freshwater Biology,1999,41: 197-209
[25]唐涛,蔡庆华,刘建康.河流生态系统健康及其评价[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(9)：1191～1194
[26]Kelly M G, Whitton B A. Biological monitoring of eutrophication in rivers [J]. Hydrobiologia,1998,384:55-67
[27]Kwandrans J,Eloranta P,Kawecka B,et al. Use of benthicdiatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of southern Poland[J]. JAppl Phycol,1998,10:193-201
[28]Sladecek V. Diatom as indictors of organic pollution[J]. ActaHydrochim Hydrobiol, 1986,14:555-566
[29]顾晓英,陶磊,施慧雄.象山港大型底栖动物生物多样性现状[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(6)：1551～1557
[30]王备新,杨莲芳.大型底栖无脊椎动物水质快速生物评价的研究进展[J].南京农业大学学报,2001,24(4)：107～111
[31]王备新,杨莲芳,胡本进.应用底栖动物完整性指数B-IBI评价溪流健康.生态学报[J].2005,25(6)：1481～1490.
[32]李强,杨莲芳,吴璟.底栖动物完整性指数评价西苕溪溪流健康[J].环境科学, 2007.28(9)：2141～2147
[33]张远,徐成斌,马溪平.辽河流域河流底栖动物完整性评价指标与标准[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(6)：919～927.
[34]张方方,张萌,刘足根.基于底栖生物完整性指数的赣江流域河流健康评价[J].水生生物学报,2005,25(6)：1481～1490
[35]王建华,田景汉,吕宪.挠力河流域河流的B～IBI评价[J].生态学报,2009,29(12)：6672～6680
[36]渠晓东,刘志刚,张远.标准化方法筛选参照点构建大型底栖动物生物完整性指数[J].生态学报,2012,32(15)：4661-4672
[37]杨柳,李泳慧,王俊才,等.基于B-IBI指数的温榆河生态健康评价[J].生态学报,2012,32(11)：3313～3322
[38]Karr J R. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities[J]. Fisheries,1981,6(6): 21-27
[39]Thierry O, Didier P, Bernard H, et al. Development and validation of a fish-based index for the assessment of'river health'in France[J]. Freshwater Biology,2002,47:1720-1734
[40]Townsend C R, Riley R H. Assessmentof riverhealth:accounting for perturbation pathways in physical and ecological space[J].Freshwater Biology,1999,41:393-405
[41]Goede R E,Barton B A. Organisimic indices and an qutopsybased assessment as indicators of health and codition of fish[J]. American Fisheries Society Symposiu,1990,(8):93-108
[42]Kleynhans C J.The development of a fish index to assess the biological intergrity of South African rivers [J]. Water Sa,1999,25(3):265-278
[43]Paul L Angermeier,Grigored Davideanu. Using fish communities to assess streams in Romania:initial development of an index of biotic integrity[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2004,511(1):65-78
[44]周林飞,左建军,陈发先.基于模糊模式识别的城市河流生态系统健康评价研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2011,(4)：41-44,49
[45]孔红梅,赵景柱,姬兰柱,等.生态系统健康评价方法初探[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(4)：486～490
[46]Petersen R C. The RCE:a riparian, channel, and environmental inventory for small streams in the agricultural landscape[J]. Freshwater Biology,1992,27(2):295-306.
[47]Ladson A R, White L J, Doolan J A, et al. Development and testing of an index of stream condition for waterway management in Australia[J]. Freshwater Biology,1999,41(2): 453-468
[48]Kleynhans C J. A qualitative procedure for the assessment of the habitat integrity status of the Luvuvhu River[J]. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health,1996 (5):41 - 54
[49]Barbour M T, Gerritsen J, Snyder B D, et al. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers:Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition[M]. Washington D C:EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Enviroment Protection Agency; Office of Water,1999:1 - 10
[50]刘永,郭怀成,载永立,等.湖泊生态系统健康评价方法研究[J].环境科学学报,2004,24(4)：723～729
[51]耿雷华,刘恒,钟华平.健康河流的评价指标和评价标准[J].水利学报,2006,37(3)：253～258
[52]刘保.南渡江下游河流生态系统健康评价研究[J].人民珠江,2008,(6)：43-45,70
[53]冯琳.和田河流域中游生态系统健康评价研究[J].新疆农业科学2010,47(2)：357-362
[54]陈毅,张可刚,郭纯青,等.河流生态健康评价研究—以潮白河为例[J].水利科技与经济,2011,17(2)：9～12
[55]龚雷婷.太湖流域典型入湖河流的健康评价[D].南京：南京大学,2012
[56]高永胜,王浩,王芳.河流健康生命评价指标体系的构建[J].水科学进展,2007,18(2)：252-257
[57]王国胜.河流健康评价指标体系与AHP—-模糊综合评价模型研究[D].广州：广东工业大学,2007
[58]夏霆,朱伟,姜谋余,等.城市河流栖息地评价方法与应用[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(12)：2095-2104
[59]王煜,黄强,刘昌明.基于系统有序度熵的河流健康评判方法研究[J].水文,2007,27(1)：1～3
[60]秦鹏,王英华,王维汉,等.河流健康评价的模糊层次与可变模糊集耦合模型[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2011,45(12)：2169～2175
[61]张又,刘凌,闫峰.基于模糊物元模型的河流健康评价研究[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(1)：382～384,453
[62]高宇婷,高甲荣,顾岚,等.基于模糊矩阵法的河流健康评价体系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(4)：196～199
[63]闫峰,刘凌,徐丽娜,等.隶属度向量分析法在河流健康评价中的应用[J].水电能源科学,2012,30(10)：30～32,214
[64]山成菊,董增川,樊孔明,等.组合赋权法在河流健康评价权重计算中的应用[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(6)：622-628
[65]孙雪岚,胡春宏.河流健康评价指标体系初探[J].泥沙研究,2008,(4)：21-27
[66]杨馥,曾光明,刘鸿亮,等.城市河流健康评价指标体系的不确定性研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(5)：63-66
[67]夏自强,郭文献.河流健康研究进展与前瞻[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(2)：252-255
[68]唐涛,蔡庆华,刘建康.河流生态系统健康及其评价[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(9)：1191～1194
[69]Haase R, Nolte U. The invertebrate species index (ISI) for streams in southeast queensland, Australia [J]. Ecological Indicators,2008, (8):599-613
[70]Feio M J, Alves T, Boavida M, et al. Functional indicators of stream health:a river-basin approach[J]. Freshwater Biology,2010, (55):1050-1065
[71]林木隆,李向阳,杨明海.珠江流域河流健康评价指标体系初探[J].人民珠江,2006,(4)：1～3,4
[72]张国平.基于生态系统服务功能的龙河流域生态系统健康研究[D].重庆：重庆大学,2006
[73]罗辑.城市河流生态系统健康评价研究—以湘江长沙段为例[D].长沙：湖南大学,2009
[74]郭艳丽.图们江下游湿地生态系统健康评价研究[D].延吉：延边大学,2011
[75]龚蕾婷.太湖流域典型入湖河流的健康评价[D].南京：南京大学,2012
[76]熊文,黄思平,杨轩.河流生态系统健康评价关键指标研究[J].人民长江,2010,41(12)：7～12
[77]庞治国,王世岩,胡明罡.河流生态系统健康评价及展望[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2006,26,4(2)：151～155
[78]黄艺,文航,蔡佳亮.基于环境管理的河流健康评价体系的研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(4)：967-973
[79]Raven P J,Holmes N T H,et al. Using river habitat survey for environmental assessment and catchment planning in the UK[J]. Hydrobiologia,2000:422-423
[80]刘晓燕,张建中,张原锋.黄河健康生命的指标体系[J].地理学报,2006,61(5)：451-460
[81]吴道喜,黄思平.健康长江指标体系研究[J].水利水电快报,2007,28(12)：1～3
[82]张觉民.黑龙江省鱼类志[M]..哈尔滨：黑龙江科技出版社,1995.
[83]解玉浩.东北地区淡水鱼类[M].沈阳：辽宁科学技术出版社,2007
[84]朱松泉.中国淡水鱼类检索表[M].南京：江苏科学技术出版社,1995.
[85]陈宜瑜.中国动物志·硬骨鱼纲·鲤形目(中卷)[M].北京：科学出版社,1998.
[86]张觉民,何志辉.内陆水域渔业自然资源调查手册[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1991：12-122.
[87]胡鸿钧,魏印心.中国淡水藻类—系统、分类及生态[M].北京：科学出版社,2006：23-915
[88]周凤霞,陈剑虹.淡水微型生物图谱[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2005：35-192
[89]国家环保总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京：中国环境科学出版社,2002
[90]Shannon C E, Weaver W W. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press,1963
[91]Ludwig J A, Reynolds J F. Statistical Ecology:A Primer on Methods and Computing. New York:John Wiley and Sons,1988
[92]Pielou E C. Ecological Diversity. New York:Wiley Interscience,1975
[93]马克平.试论生物多样性的概念[J].生物多样性,1993,1(1)：20～22
[94]Hilsenhoff W L. Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family level biotic index[J]. Journal of North American Benthological Society,1988,7(1):65-68
[95]Pinkas L,Oliphant M S,Iverson I L K. Food habits of albacore,bluefin tuna,and bonito in California waters. California Department of Fish and Game, Fish Bulletin.1971,152:1-105
[96]Cummins K W. Structure and function of stream ecosystems[J]. Bio Science,1974(24): 631-641
[97]Cummins K W, Klug M J. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1979(10):147-172
[98]Wetzel R G. Limnology (second edition) [M]. Philadelphia:Saunders College Publishing, 1983
[99]刘健康.高级水生生物学[M].北京：科学出版社,1993
[100]乐佩琦,陈宜瑜.中国濒危动物红皮书·鱼类[M].北京：科学出版社,1998
[101]倪勇,朱成德.太湖鱼类志[M].上海：上海科学技术出版社,2005
[102]李喆,姜作发,霍堂斌.黑龙江中游浮游植物多样性动态变化及水质评价[J].中国水产科学2012,19(4)：671～678
[103]孟顺龙,陈家长,范立民,等.2007年太湖五里湖浮游植物生态学特征[J].湖泊科学,2009,21(6)：845～854
[104]姜作发,唐富江,董崇智.黑龙江水系主要江河浮游动物种群结构特征[J].东北林业大学学报,2006,34(4)：64-66
[105]苏洁,姜作发,李池陶.黑龙江浮游动物群落结构特征[J].水产学杂志,2005,18(1)：18～23
[106]蔡赫,于洪贤,霍堂斌.春季嫩江下游底栖动物群落结构及水质评价[J].水产学杂志,2012,25(3)：41～46
[107]霍堂斌,李喆,姜作发,等.黑龙江中游底栖动物群落结构与水质生物评价[J].中国水产科学,2013,20(1)：177～188
[108]Belinda W T, Martin J R,Jonathan S S.Cost-efficientmethods for marine pollution monitoring at Casey Station,East Antarctica:the choice of sieve meshsizeand taxonomic resolution[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin,2003,46:232-243
[109]Westawski J M,Szymelfenig M,Zajaczkowski M,et al. Influence of salinity and suspended matter on benthos of an Arctic ridal flat[J]. ICES Journal of Marine Science,1999,56:194-202
[110]李宝泉,李新正,于海燕,等.胶州湾底栖软体动物与环境因子的关系[J].海洋与湖沼,2005,36(3)：193～198
[111]张觉民.黑龙江省渔业资源[M].牡丹江：黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社,1985
[112]霍堂斌,姜作发,马波.黑龙江中游底层鱼类群落结构及多样性[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(10)：2591～2598
[113]陈国宝,李永振,陈新军.南海主要珊瑚礁水域的鱼类物种多样性研究[J].生物多样性,2007,15(4)：373～381
[114]毛志刚,谷孝鸿,曾庆飞,等.太湖鱼类群落结构及多样性[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(12)：2836-2842
[115]Magurran A E. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement[J]. New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1988
[116]Jungwirth M, Muhar S, Schmutz, S. Re-establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes[J]. Freshwater Biology,2002,47 (4):867-887
[117]McKone P D. Streams and their corridors-flmctions and values[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering,2000,5:28-29
[118]邓红兵,王青春,王庆礼,等.河岸植被缓冲带与河岸带管理[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(6)：951-954
[119]国家环境保护总局,国家质量监督检验检疫总局.中华人民共和国地表水环境质量标准[S].2002
[120]水利部水资源司河湖健康评估全国技术工作组.河流健康评估指标、方法与标准(1.0)[S].2010
[121]Morley S A, Karr J R. Assessing and restoring the health of urban steams in the Puget Sound Basin[J]. Conservation Biology,2002,16:1498-1509
[122]Blocksom K A, Kurtenbach J P,Klemm D J,et al. Development and evaluation of the lake macroinvertebrate in tegrity index for New Jersey lakes and reservoirs [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Asessment,2002,77:311 -333
[123]Barbour M T,Gerrisen J,Griffith G E,et al. A framework for biological criteria for Florida steams using benthic macminvertebrates[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society,1996,15:185-211
[124]Adriaanse A. Environmental policy performance indicators. Astudy on the development of indicators for environmental policy in the Netherlands[M]. Uitgeverij,The Hague,1993
[125]邱菀华.管理决策与应用熵学[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2001
[126]李俊玲.河流健康评价指标体系及权重模型研究[D].南京：河海大学,2008
[127]刘丽涵.嫩江(齐齐哈尔段)水环境保护治理情况分析[J].黑龙江环境通报,2011,35(1)：6-7,16
[128]黄惟灏,韦肖杭,姚伟忠,等.采砂业对渔业生态环境及资源的影响[J].宁波大学学报：理工版,2002,15(3)：28-32
[129]王宝,姜维军.莫莫格湿地面临的困境及其解决途径探讨[J].吉林林业科技,2004,33(6)：29～31
[130]王小雨,冯江,王静.莫莫格湿地油田开采区土壤石油烃污染及对土壤性质的影响[J].环境科学,2009,30(8)：2394～2401
[131]唐蕴,王浩,严登华,等.嫩江流域近45年来径流演变规律研究[J].地理科学,2009,29(6)：864～868
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |