东濮凹陷白庙及其周边地区古近系沙河街组深层沙三中—下段储层有效性分析
|
摘要
钻井资料表明，东濮凹陷白庙及其周边地区在沙河街组深层沙三中-沙三下段地层中，油气显示多,勘探潜力大，但该区深层有效储层储集空间类型、发育特征、成因机制、主要控制因素等一直不清楚，未做系统研究，严重制约了勘探的进展。鉴于此，论文主要解决以下三个问题：在成岩演化分析基础上，总结深部有效储层的孔隙类型组成和演化规律；系统研究有效储层的主控因素及其作用方式；探讨深部储层分类方法及评价标准。
沉积微相研究是进行储层研究的基础，是砂体物性差异的主导因素，白庙及其周边地区沙三中-沙三下段地层中主要发育扇三角洲前缘、三角洲前缘等亚相，主要发育的沉积微相有水下分流河道、河口坝、席状砂等沉积微相，其中水下分流河道砂体为本区最有利砂体。
深部储层由于受沉积、成岩作用和构造运动等因素的共同作用，形成了多种孔隙类型，按照成因可划分为残留原生孔隙、混合孔隙、次生孔隙和裂缝。储层大部分孔隙都是在原生孔隙的基础上成岩演化而成。不同高异常孔隙带孔隙类型具有以下分布特征：残余原生孔隙对现今孔隙的贡献和储层埋深、孔隙度及岩石组分等因素有关，一般随埋深增加，残余原生孔隙的贡献变小；原始孔隙度值越高，残余原生孔隙的贡献越大；深部储层构造裂缝分布较广，但裂缝发育不均，构造缝以垂直缝和高角度缝为主。
储层在深埋藏成岩过程中发生的成岩作用主要有压实和压溶作用，铁方解石、铁白云石的交代、胶结作用，硬石膏的交代、胶结作用，石英的次生加大作用，溶蚀作用和沥青充填作用等。根据岩石结构特征、古地温、有机质成熟度、粘土矿物转化等成岩阶段划分的依据，将深层储层成岩阶段划分为中成岩A期、B期和晚成岩期三个时期。
深部储层有效性的影响和控制的因素主要包括储层沉积物的特征（包括砂岩类型、粒度、分选、成分以及单砂层厚度等）、裂缝的分布、烃类充注、酸性流体溶蚀、压实强度等多种因素等，这些因素之间有时也是互相作用、互相影响、互相制约的，关系错综复杂。通过综合和认真分析总结和高度归纳概括，发现影响和控制研究区深部储层储集空间发育和演化的最重要的因素可以表述为三个方面，即沉积物特征、埋藏压实与流体保护与改造（烃类和酸性流体），因此针对白庙及其周边深层砂岩储层提出三因素控制的观点。依据这一观点，结合研究地区的成岩作用、岩性特征、粒度、孔渗数据以及前期的研究成果，建立东濮凹陷白庙及其周边地区的储层空间演化模式。
根据本次研究并结合前人的研究成果，建立了白庙及其周边地区深层储层的划分标准，对重点井与重点区块开展储层评价：白庙地区沙三中亚段储层多属于Ⅰ~Ⅱ类储层，沙三下亚段储层多属于Ⅲ类储层，少数为Ⅱ类储层；杜寨地区沙三中亚段多为致密储层Ⅰ类或常规储层，沙三下大于4250m层段，一般属于致密储层Ⅱ类。桥口地区沙三中（上）亚段储层以Ⅰ类储层为主，沙三中（下）亚段储层相当于致密储层Ⅰ～Ⅱ类，埋深大于4200m的沙三下亚段储层属于Ⅲ类致密储层。
Drilling data have been uncover that there are more frequent hydrocarbonappearances and bigger exploration potential in the deep Shahejie formation (S3-S4),Baimiao and its surrounding areas of Dongpu sag. However, for this issue, such as thereservoir space type, development characteristics, genetic mechanism and majorcontrolling factors, which will comprehensively control the effective reservoir of thedeep formation, are not clear and never conduct the systematic research, and then itwill seriously restrict exploration. Therefore, three aspects of problem will be solvedin this paper, they are:(1) summarizing the composition of porosity type andevolution rules base on the analysis to diagenetic evolution,(2) systematicallystudying the main controlling factor and action model of the effective reservoir, and (3)discussing the classification methods and evaluation standards for the deep reservoirs.
The study of sedimentary microfacies is the base of reservoir study, and it alsothe dominant factors for the property difference of the sandbody. The deep Shahejieformations (S3-S4) mainly grow the subfacies in Baimiao and its surrounding area,such as the fan delta front and delta front, including the sedimentary microfacies asthe underwater distributary channel, estuary dam and sheet sand, of the sandstonesresulted from the underwater distributary channel is the most advantageous sandbody.
For the reason of deposition, diagenesis and tectonic movement, which willcombine with each other to act the deep reservoirs, and result in the various porositytypes, and according to their generation mechanics, can be classified into the residualoriginal pore, mixed pore and secondary pore and fissures. Most of the pore inreservoir was evolved from the original pore. The Pore type within the different highabnormal pore zone possess the following distribution characteristics:(1) the residualoriginal pore which will contribute to the current pore, is related to the reservoir burialdepth and porosity and rock components, generally speaking for the residual originalpore, the deeper burial depth is, the less contribution to the pore;(2) the bigger valueof the original porosity and the more contribution will be.(3) The distribution for thestructural fissures is wider in deep reservoirs, while their distribution is not unevenand among them are the vertical fissure and the fissures with high angle.
The diagenetic process, occurred in the deep bury in the study area, are those asfollowings: secondary overgrowth of quartz, metasomatism and cementation ofanhydrite and ferrocalcite and ankerite, squeezing action and pressure solution,dissolution and asphalt packing action. Based on rock texture feature, palaeogeotherm,maturity of organic matter and clay mineral transformation, diagenetic stage of deepreservoir can be divided into three stages including mesozone rock A stage and Bstage and late diagenesis stage.
Factors that influence and control effectiveness of the deep reservoir mainlyinclude the reservoir sediment characteristics(such as sandstone type, grain size,sorting, composition and thickness of single sand beds), distribution of fissure,hydrocarbon charging, acid fluid corrosion, compaction strength, etc., of which willinterplay and interact and inter-restrict each other and also with complicatedrelationship. Through analyzing and summarizing and highly generalization, it showsthat the most important factors of influencing and controlling the development andevolution of deep reservoir space in the study area can be clarified as three aspects,such as sediment characteristics, bury and compaction, fluid protection anddisplacement(hydrocarbon and acid fluids). Therefore, viewpoint of ternarycontrolling reservoir is put forward aiming at deep sandstone reservoir in Baimiao andsurrounding areas. Based on it and combined with diagenetic process and lithologiccharacteristics and grain size and porosity and permeability data and previous researchachievements in this research area, the reservoir space evolution models areconstructed for Baimiao and surrounding areas of Dongpu sag.
Based on this and previous research results, the standard of classification fordeep reservoir in Baimiao and surrounding areas was constructed in this paper andreservoir assessment for important wells and blocks were carried out as follows. Themost middle formation of S3member in Baimiao area belongs to reservoir type Ⅰ~Ⅱ. The most lower formation of S3member in Baimiao area belongs to reservoir typeⅢ and minority belongs to reservoir type Ⅱ. The middle formation of S3member inDuzhai area mainly belongs to tight reservoir typeⅠ or general reservoir Ⅱ. Thelower formation of S3member of burial depth above4250m generally belongs to thetight reservoir type Ⅱ. The middle(upper) formation of S3member in Qiaokou areamainly belongs to reservoir type Ⅰ and the middle(lower) formation of S3memberare equivalent to tight reservoir type Ⅰ~Ⅱ. The lower formation of S3member ofburial depth above4250m generally belong to the tight reservoir type Ⅲ.
沉积微相研究是进行储层研究的基础，是砂体物性差异的主导因素，白庙及其周边地区沙三中-沙三下段地层中主要发育扇三角洲前缘、三角洲前缘等亚相，主要发育的沉积微相有水下分流河道、河口坝、席状砂等沉积微相，其中水下分流河道砂体为本区最有利砂体。
深部储层由于受沉积、成岩作用和构造运动等因素的共同作用，形成了多种孔隙类型，按照成因可划分为残留原生孔隙、混合孔隙、次生孔隙和裂缝。储层大部分孔隙都是在原生孔隙的基础上成岩演化而成。不同高异常孔隙带孔隙类型具有以下分布特征：残余原生孔隙对现今孔隙的贡献和储层埋深、孔隙度及岩石组分等因素有关，一般随埋深增加，残余原生孔隙的贡献变小；原始孔隙度值越高，残余原生孔隙的贡献越大；深部储层构造裂缝分布较广，但裂缝发育不均，构造缝以垂直缝和高角度缝为主。
储层在深埋藏成岩过程中发生的成岩作用主要有压实和压溶作用，铁方解石、铁白云石的交代、胶结作用，硬石膏的交代、胶结作用，石英的次生加大作用，溶蚀作用和沥青充填作用等。根据岩石结构特征、古地温、有机质成熟度、粘土矿物转化等成岩阶段划分的依据，将深层储层成岩阶段划分为中成岩A期、B期和晚成岩期三个时期。
深部储层有效性的影响和控制的因素主要包括储层沉积物的特征（包括砂岩类型、粒度、分选、成分以及单砂层厚度等）、裂缝的分布、烃类充注、酸性流体溶蚀、压实强度等多种因素等，这些因素之间有时也是互相作用、互相影响、互相制约的，关系错综复杂。通过综合和认真分析总结和高度归纳概括，发现影响和控制研究区深部储层储集空间发育和演化的最重要的因素可以表述为三个方面，即沉积物特征、埋藏压实与流体保护与改造（烃类和酸性流体），因此针对白庙及其周边深层砂岩储层提出三因素控制的观点。依据这一观点，结合研究地区的成岩作用、岩性特征、粒度、孔渗数据以及前期的研究成果，建立东濮凹陷白庙及其周边地区的储层空间演化模式。
根据本次研究并结合前人的研究成果，建立了白庙及其周边地区深层储层的划分标准，对重点井与重点区块开展储层评价：白庙地区沙三中亚段储层多属于Ⅰ~Ⅱ类储层，沙三下亚段储层多属于Ⅲ类储层，少数为Ⅱ类储层；杜寨地区沙三中亚段多为致密储层Ⅰ类或常规储层，沙三下大于4250m层段，一般属于致密储层Ⅱ类。桥口地区沙三中（上）亚段储层以Ⅰ类储层为主，沙三中（下）亚段储层相当于致密储层Ⅰ～Ⅱ类，埋深大于4200m的沙三下亚段储层属于Ⅲ类致密储层。
Drilling data have been uncover that there are more frequent hydrocarbonappearances and bigger exploration potential in the deep Shahejie formation (S3-S4),Baimiao and its surrounding areas of Dongpu sag. However, for this issue, such as thereservoir space type, development characteristics, genetic mechanism and majorcontrolling factors, which will comprehensively control the effective reservoir of thedeep formation, are not clear and never conduct the systematic research, and then itwill seriously restrict exploration. Therefore, three aspects of problem will be solvedin this paper, they are:(1) summarizing the composition of porosity type andevolution rules base on the analysis to diagenetic evolution,(2) systematicallystudying the main controlling factor and action model of the effective reservoir, and (3)discussing the classification methods and evaluation standards for the deep reservoirs.
The study of sedimentary microfacies is the base of reservoir study, and it alsothe dominant factors for the property difference of the sandbody. The deep Shahejieformations (S3-S4) mainly grow the subfacies in Baimiao and its surrounding area,such as the fan delta front and delta front, including the sedimentary microfacies asthe underwater distributary channel, estuary dam and sheet sand, of the sandstonesresulted from the underwater distributary channel is the most advantageous sandbody.
For the reason of deposition, diagenesis and tectonic movement, which willcombine with each other to act the deep reservoirs, and result in the various porositytypes, and according to their generation mechanics, can be classified into the residualoriginal pore, mixed pore and secondary pore and fissures. Most of the pore inreservoir was evolved from the original pore. The Pore type within the different highabnormal pore zone possess the following distribution characteristics:(1) the residualoriginal pore which will contribute to the current pore, is related to the reservoir burialdepth and porosity and rock components, generally speaking for the residual originalpore, the deeper burial depth is, the less contribution to the pore;(2) the bigger valueof the original porosity and the more contribution will be.(3) The distribution for thestructural fissures is wider in deep reservoirs, while their distribution is not unevenand among them are the vertical fissure and the fissures with high angle.
The diagenetic process, occurred in the deep bury in the study area, are those asfollowings: secondary overgrowth of quartz, metasomatism and cementation ofanhydrite and ferrocalcite and ankerite, squeezing action and pressure solution,dissolution and asphalt packing action. Based on rock texture feature, palaeogeotherm,maturity of organic matter and clay mineral transformation, diagenetic stage of deepreservoir can be divided into three stages including mesozone rock A stage and Bstage and late diagenesis stage.
Factors that influence and control effectiveness of the deep reservoir mainlyinclude the reservoir sediment characteristics(such as sandstone type, grain size,sorting, composition and thickness of single sand beds), distribution of fissure,hydrocarbon charging, acid fluid corrosion, compaction strength, etc., of which willinterplay and interact and inter-restrict each other and also with complicatedrelationship. Through analyzing and summarizing and highly generalization, it showsthat the most important factors of influencing and controlling the development andevolution of deep reservoir space in the study area can be clarified as three aspects,such as sediment characteristics, bury and compaction, fluid protection anddisplacement(hydrocarbon and acid fluids). Therefore, viewpoint of ternarycontrolling reservoir is put forward aiming at deep sandstone reservoir in Baimiao andsurrounding areas. Based on it and combined with diagenetic process and lithologiccharacteristics and grain size and porosity and permeability data and previous researchachievements in this research area, the reservoir space evolution models areconstructed for Baimiao and surrounding areas of Dongpu sag.
Based on this and previous research results, the standard of classification fordeep reservoir in Baimiao and surrounding areas was constructed in this paper andreservoir assessment for important wells and blocks were carried out as follows. Themost middle formation of S3member in Baimiao area belongs to reservoir type Ⅰ~Ⅱ. The most lower formation of S3member in Baimiao area belongs to reservoir typeⅢ and minority belongs to reservoir type Ⅱ. The middle formation of S3member inDuzhai area mainly belongs to tight reservoir typeⅠ or general reservoir Ⅱ. Thelower formation of S3member of burial depth above4250m generally belongs to thetight reservoir type Ⅱ. The middle(upper) formation of S3member in Qiaokou areamainly belongs to reservoir type Ⅰ and the middle(lower) formation of S3memberare equivalent to tight reservoir type Ⅰ~Ⅱ. The lower formation of S3member ofburial depth above4250m generally belong to the tight reservoir type Ⅲ.
引文
[1]Simmons MR.The world s giant oilfields[J].Hubbert Center News letter,2002,21(1):1-62.
[2]Biteau J J,Marrec A L,Michel L V,et al.The Aquitaine Basin[J]. PetroleumGeosicence,2006,12:247-273.
[3]王宇，苏劲，王凯等.全球深层油气分布特征及聚集规律[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23（3）:527-536.
[4]Munz I A,Wangen A,Girard J P,et al. Pressure temperatue time composition(P-T-t-X)constraints of multiple petroleum charges in the Hild field,Norwegain NoorthSea[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2004,21:1043-1060.
[5]钟大康,朱筱敏,王红军.中国深层优质碎屑岩储层特征与形成机理分析[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2008(38)增刊Ⅰ:11-18.
[6]Wilkinson M,Darby D,Haszeldine R S,et al.Secondary porosity generation duringdeep burial associated with overpressure leak-off:Furmar Formation,United KingdomCentral Graben.AAPG Bull,1997,81(5):803-813.
[7]常兴浩,张枝焕,李艳霞等.黄骅坳陷三马地区中深层储层孔隙发育及主控因素分析[J].地球学报,2005,(26)1:75-82.
[8]张文才,李贺,李会军,等.南堡凹陷高柳地区深层次生孔隙成因及分布特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2008,35(3):308-313.
[9]高勇,张连雪.板桥-北大港地区深层碎屑岩储集层特征及影响因素研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(2):36-40.
[10]谯汉生.中国东部深层石油地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[11]王生郎，任来义,等.盐湖环境成岩作用特征及其对高孔隙带形成的影响[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(5):47-49.
[12]胡海燕.油气充注对成岩作用的影响[J].海相油气地质，2004,9(1-2):85-89.
[13]A. B. Frana, L. M. Arajo et al. Secondary porosity formed by deep meteoricleaching: Botucatu eolianite, southern South America [J]. AAPG Bulletin,2003,87(8):1073-1082．
[14]陈丽华,赵澄林,等.碎屑岩天然气储集层次生孔隙的三种成因机理[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(5):77-79.
[15]Hege M. Nordgrd Bols, Christian Hermanrud, Gunn M. G. Teige. Origin ofoverpressures in shales: Constraints from basin modeling[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2004,88(12):193-211.
[16]蔡春芳,梅博文,马亭,等.塔里木盆地有机酸来源、分布及对成岩作用的影响[J].沉积学报,1997,15(3):103-109.
[17]Bloch S, Robert H L, Bonnell L. A nomalously high porosity and permeabilityin deeply buried sandstone reservoirs: Origin and predictability[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(2):301-328.
[18]Ezat Heydari. Meteoric versus burial control on porosity evolution of theSmackover Formation [J]. AAPG Bulletin,2003,87(12):1779-1797.
[19]李艳霞，刘洪军，袁东山，等．石油充注对储层成岩矿物的影响[J]．石油与天然气地质，2003，24(3)：274—281.
[20]杨波.焉耆盆地博南凹陷深层储层特征及控制因素.华北水利水电学院学报[J],2010,31(1):92-96.
[21] Hancock N J．Possible cause of Rotliegend sandstone diagenesis in northern WestGermany[J]．Journal of the Geological Society，1978，135：35-40.
[22]王成，邵红梅，洪淑新，等．松辽盆地北部深层次生孔隙分布特征.大庆石油地质与开发，2004，23（5）：37-39.
[23]杨小萍，白玉宝．陕甘宁中生代地层异常压力对次生孔隙形成的作用.西安石油学院学报（自然科学版），2000，15（3）：4-6.
[24]张小莉，沈英，陈文学．利用测井资料分析成岩作用对储集层的影响.沉积学报,2000，18（1）：127-131.
[25]朱抱荃，程中第，应凤祥．地层干酪根有机酸与储层次生孔隙的关系.石油实验地质，1996，18（2）206-215.
[26]Vail P R, Mitchum Rm Jr, and Thompson S. Seismic startigraphy and global changesof sea level, part3： Relative changes of sea level from cosastal onlap, in C. E.Payton, ed., Seismic stratigraphy——applications to hydrocarbon exploration：Tulsa,Oklahoma, AAPG Memoir,1977,26：63-81.
[27]朱筱敏编著.层序地层学[M].山东：石油大学出版社，2003：17-42.
[28]Zeng H L. From Seismic Stratigraphy to Seismic Sedimentology： A SensibleTransition. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions,2001, LI：413-420.
[29]Posamentier H W and Kolla V. Seismic Geomorphology and Stratigraphy ofDepositional Elements in Deep-water Settings. Journal of Sedimentary Research，2003,73(3)：367-388.
[30]Zeng H L, Backus M M, and Barrow K T. Facies Mapping from Three-DimensionalSeismic Data： Potential and Guildelines from a Tertiary Sandstone-Shale SequenceModel, Powderhorn Field, Calhoun County, Texas.AAPG,1996,80(1)：16-46.
[31]Carter D C.3-D seismic geomorphology： Insights into fluvial reservoirdeposition and performance, Widuri field, Java Sea.AAPG,2003,87(6)：909-934.
[32]Zeng H L and Hentz T F. High-frequency sequence stratigraphy from seismicsedimentology： Applied to Miocene, Vermilion Block50, Tiger Shoal area, OffshoreLouisina.AAPG Bulletin,2004,88(2)：153-174.
[33]Hongliu Zeng, Robert G. Loucks, and L. Frank Brown Jr. Mappingsediment-dispersal patterns and associated systems tracts in fourth-andfifth-order sequences using seismic sedimentology：Example from Corpus Christi Bay,Texas.AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(7)：981-1003.
[34]Jack E. Deibert and Phyllis A. Camilleri. Sedimentologic and tectonic originof an incised-valley-fill sequence along an extensional marginal-lacustrine systemin the Basin and Range province, United States: Implications for predictive modelsof the location of incised valleys.AAPG Bulletin,2006,90(2)：209-235.
[35]董春梅，张宪国，林承焰.有关地震沉积学若干问题的探讨.石油地球物理勘探，2006，41（4）：405-409.
[36]林承焰，张宪国，董春梅.地震沉积学及其初步应用.石油学报，2007，28（2）：69-71.
[37]李思田，杨恭，林畅松.论沉积盆地的等时地层格架和基本建造单元.沉积学报，1992，10（4）：11-22.
[38]Paul L. Heller, Chris Paola, In-Gul Hwang，et al.Geomorphology and sequencestratigraphy due to slow and rapid base-level changes in an experimental subsidingbasin (XES96-1). AAPG Bulletin,2001,85(5)：817-838.
[39]John Martin, Chris Paola, Vitor Abreu.Sequence stratigraphy of experimentalstrata under known conditions of differential subsidence and variable base level.AAPG Bulletin,2012,93(4)：503-533.
[40]Noel P. James, Rowan C. Martindale, Isabelle Malcolm，et al.Surficial sedimentson the continental shelf of Tasmania, Australia. Sedimentary Geology,2008,201：33-52.
[41]Wan Yang.Cycle symmetry and its causes，Cisco Group（Virgilian and Wolfcampian），Texas. Journal of Sedimentary Research，1996，66（6）：1102-1121.
[42]R.Daams，M.Diaz－Molina，R.Mas.Uncertainties in the Statigraphic analysis offluvial deposits from the Loranca Basin，central Spain.Sedimentary Geology，1996，102：187-209.
[43]Wan Yang，Michelle A.Kominz，R.P.Major.Distinguishing the roles of autogeneticversus allogenic process in cyclic sedimentation， Cisco Group （Virgilian andWolfcampian），north－central Texas. GSA Bulletin，1998，110（10）：1333-1353.
[44]Wan Yang，Michelle A.Kominz.Testing periodicity of depositional cyclicity，Cisco Group（Virgilian and Wolfcampian），Texas. Journal of Sedimentary Research，1999，69（6）：1209-1231.
[45]Johan H.ten Veen，George Postma.Astronomically forced variations in gamma-rayintensity：Late Miocene hemipelgic successions in the eastern Mediterranean basinas a test case.Geology，1996，24（1）：15-18.
[46]A.Berger，M.F.Louter，J.Laskar.Stability of the astronomical frequencies overthe Earth，history for Paleoclimate Studies.Science，1992，255（31）：560-565.
[47]E.J.Anderson，P.W.Goodwin.The significance of metre-scale allocycles in thequest for a fundamental stratigraphic unit.Journal of Geological Society，1990，147：507-518.
[48]Wolfgang Schlager. Fractal nature of stratigraphic sequences.Geology,2004,32(3):185-188.
[49]C.J. Van der Zwan.The impact of Milankovitch-scale climatic forcing on sedimentsupply. Sedimentary Geology,2002,147：271-294.
[50]Andrew E. Richards.Self-organisation, fractal scaling and cyclicity in LateMidlandian glacio-deltaic sediments associated with Glacial Lake Blessington, Co.Wicklow. Sedimentary Geology,2002,149：127-143.
[51]Esther Stouthamer, Henk J.A. Berendsen.Avulsion: The relative roles ofautogenic and allogenic processes. Sedimentary Geology,2007,198：309-325.
[52]John C. Tipper.Patterns of stratigraphic cyclicity.Journal of SedimentaryResearch[J]，2008，70(6)：1262-1279.
[53]Arthur H. Saller, Jesse T. Noah, Alif Prama Ruzuar.Linked lowstand delta tobasin-floor fan deposition, offshore Indonesia: An analog for deep-water reservoirsystems[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2004,88(1)：21-46.
[54]Piret Plink-Bjorklund，Ron Steel.Sea-level fall below the shelf edge,withoutbasin-floor fans[J]. Geology,2002,30(2):115-118.
[55]Michael C. Page，Gerald R. Dickens，Gavin B. Dunbar.Tropical view of Quaternarysequence stratigraphy: Siliciclastic accumulation on slopes east of the GreatBarrier Reef since the Last Glacial Maximum[J].. Geology,2003,31(11):1013-1016.
[56]陈洪德等.中国南方古生界层序格架中的生储盖组合类型及特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(1):62~69.
[57]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春等.中国南方二叠纪层序岩相古地理特征及演化[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):510~521.
[58]陈洪德，郭彤楼等.中上扬子叠合盆地沉积充填过程与物质分布规律[M].北京：科学技术出版社.2012.
[59]Ron Boyd，Kevin Ruming，Ian Goodwin,et al.Highstand transport of coastal sandto the deep ocean: A case study from Fraser Island, southeast Australia[J].Geology,2008,36(1):15-18.
[60]刘家铎，田景春，张翔，等.塔里木盆地寒武系层序界面特征及其油气地质意义[J].矿物岩石，2009，29（4）：1－6.
[61]刘家铎，田景春，张翔，等.鄂尔多斯盆地北部塔巴庙地区山西组一段海相、过渡相沉积标志研究及环境演化分析[J].沉积学报，2006，24（1）：36－42.
[62]祝贺,刘家铎,田景春,等.塔北—塔中地区三叠系层序地层及岩性油气藏特征[J].新疆石油地质，2012，18（2）：162-166.
[63]杨永剑,刘家铎,田景春.等.塔里木盆地上奥陶统桑塔木组混合沉积特征及控制因素[J].地质评论，2011，57（2）：185-192.
[64]王峻，刘家铎，王元君.塔河油田XX井区白垩系层序—古地理特征[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)，2012，34（3）：56-64.
[65]Ronald C. Surdam, Laura J. Crossey, E.Sven Hagen,et al. Organic-inorganicinteractions and sandstone diagenesis[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(1):1-23.
[66]Rodrio,D.L.,Luiz，F.D.R.. The role of depositional setting and diagenesis onthe reservoir quality of Devonian sandstones from the Solimoes Basin,BrazilianAmazonia[J].Marine and Petroleum geology，2002,19:1047-1071.
[67]陈洪德,侯明才,刘文均等.海西－印支期中国南方的盆地演化与层序格架[J].成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）,2004,31(6):629~635.
[68]陈洪德,侯明才,许效松等.加里东期华南的盆地演化与层序格架[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006,33(1):1~8.
[69]陈洪德，侯明才，林良彪等．不同尺度构造—层序岩相古地理研究思路与实践[J]．沉积学报，2010,28（5）：894-905．
[70]陈洪德,黄福喜,徐胜林等.中上扬子地区海相成烃物质聚集分布规律及主控因素[J].成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）,2004,36(6):569~577.
[71]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春等.右江盆地层序充填动力学初探[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):165~171.
[72]陈洪德,田景春,刘文均等.中国南方海相震旦系—中三叠统层序划分与对比[J].成都理工学院学报,2002,29(4):355~379.
[73]曲爱英，孟元林，肖丽华，等.储层钻前质量预测方法探讨――以松辽盆地汪家屯地区为例[J].石油实验地质，2009，27（1）：94－97.
[74]寿建峰，朱国华.砂岩储层孔隙保存的定量预测研究[J].地质科学,1998,33（2）：244－250.
[75]F.Schneider,S.Hay.Compaction model for quartzose sandstones application to theGarn Formation, Haltenbanken,Mid-Norwegian Continental Shelf. Marine and Petroleumgeology[J],2001,18,833-848.
[76]S.T.Paxton.,J.O.Szobo.,J.M.Ajdukiwicz.,et al.Construction of an intergranularvolume compaction curve for evaluating and predicting compaction and porosity lossin rigid-grain sandstone reservoirs[J].AAPG,2002,86（12）:2047-2067.
[77]S.Bloch.,K.P.Helmold..Approaches to predicting reservoir quality in sandstones.AAPG,1995,v.19No.1:97-115.
[78]邹才能，薛叔浩，池英柳.岩性地层油气藏形成条件与分布规律[G]//勘探与生产分公司编.岩性地层油气藏勘探理论与实践培训教材.北京：石油工业出版社，2005：422－425.
[79]王英民,金武弟,刘书会,等.断陷湖盆多级坡折带的成因类型、展布及其勘探意义.石油与天然气地质，2003,24（3）：199－203.
[80]林畅松,潘元林,肖建新,等.构造坡折带――断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念.地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2000,25（3）:260-265.
[81]陈洪德,王成善,刘文均等.华南二叠纪层序地层与盆地演化[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):529~535.陈洪德,徐胜林.川西地区晚侏罗世蓬莱镇期构造隆升的沉积响应[J].成都理工大学学报.2010.37（4）：353-358.
[82]陈洪德,曾允孚.广西丹池盆地上泥盆统留江组硅质岩沉积特征及成因讨论[J].矿物岩石,1989,9(4):22-28.
[83]刘树根,李志武,刘顺,等.大巴山前陆盆地-冲断带的形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社.2006:202-209.刘树根,罗志立,戴苏兰等.龙门山冲断带的隆升和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].地质学报,1995.69(3):205-213.
[84]刘树根，罗志立，赵锡奎等.中国西部盆山系统的耦合关系及其动力学模式—以龙门山造山带—川西前陆盆地系统为例[J].地质学报.2003,77（2）：177-186.
[85]刘树根.龙门山冲断带与川西前陆盆地的形成演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社.1993:17-117.
[86]赵俊兴,陈洪德,时志强.古地貌恢复技术方法及其研究意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪沉积前古地貌研究为例[J].成都理工学院学报.2001.28(3):260-266.
[87]赵俊兴,吕强,李凤杰,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长6时期物源状况分析[J].沉积学报,2008,26(4):610~616.
[88]郑荣才，李国晖，戴朝成等.四川类前陆盆地盆—山耦合系统和沉积学响应[J].地质学报.2012,86（1）：170-180.李勇，曾允孚，伊海生.龙门山前陆盆地沉积及构造演化[M].成都:科技出版社，1995.
[89]刘豪,王英民,王媛,等.大型坳陷湖盆坡折带的研究及其意义――以准噶尔盆地西北缘侏罗纪坳陷湖盆为例.沉积学报，2004,22（1）：95－102.
[90]王英民,刘豪,李立诚,等.准噶尔大型坳陷湖盆坡折带的类型和分布特征.地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2007,27(6):683－688.
[91]冯有良,徐秀生.同沉积构造坡折带对岩性油气藏富集带的控制作用——以渤海湾盆地古近系为例.石油勘探与开发，2006,33(1):22-31.
[92]魏魁生,徐怀大，叶淑芬,等.松辽盆地白垩纪系高分辨率层序地层格架.石油与天然气地质，1997,18（1）：8－14.
[93]王多云，李树同，王彬,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠纪延长期湖盆底形形态和岩性油藏分布特征.低渗透油气田，2006（3）：12－21.
[94]胡宗全，朱筱敏.具有地形坡折带的坳陷湖盆层序地层模拟.沉积学报，2002，20（2）：217-221.
[95]Juan Contreras，Christopher H. Scholz.Evolution of stratigraphic sequences inmultisegmented continental rift basins: Comparison of computer models with thebasins of the East African rift system respectively. AAPG Bulletin,2001,85(9)：1565-1581.
[96]Jack E. Deibert， Phyllis A. Camilleri.Sedimentologic and tectonic origin ofan incised-valley-fill sequence along an extensional marginal-lacustrine system inthe Basin and Range province, United States: Implications for predictive models ofthe location of incised valleys. AAPG Bulletin,2006,90(2)：209-235.
[97]赖生华，李晓宏.断陷盆地沉积体系研究新思路：从古地貌、岩性变化、水体深度到沉积体系.沉积学报，2007，25（5）：663-670.
[98]寿建峰，朱国华.砂岩储层孔隙保存的定量预测研究[J].地质科学,1998,33（2）：244－250.
[99]Paola De Rossi Fontanelli,Luiz Fernando De Ros,Marcus Vinicius DornelesRemus.Provenance of deep-water reservoir sandstones from the Jubarte oilfeld,Campos Basin, Eastern Brazilian Margin[J] Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26:1274-1298.
[100]蔡进功.东营箕状断陷沉积物源的演变[J].油气地质与采收率，2001，8（6）：5-8.
[101]Surdam R.C.，et al.The chemistry of secondary porosity.In：Clastic diagenesisD.A.Mc Donald and R.C. Surdam eds，AAPG，Mem.37.
[102]罗晓容.油气运聚动力学研究进展及存在问题[J].天然气地球科学,2003，14（5），337-346.
[103]Chilingarian G.V.，Mazzullo S.J. and Rieke H.H.，et al.Carbonate ReservoirCharacterization：A Geologic-Engineering Analysis，PartⅠ.Elsevier，1992，Amsterdam，pp.1-35.
[104] Ronald C. Surdam, Laura J. Crossey, E.Sven Hagen,et al. Organic-inorganicinteractions and sandstone diagenesis[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(1):1-23.
[105]罗晓容.油气运聚动力学研究进展及存在问题[J].天然气地球科学,2003，14（5），337-346.
[106]孙利，刘家铎,王峻,等.东濮凹陷超压形成机制及对油气富集的影响[J].中国矿业，2012（11）：70-74.
[107]王文之,田景春，张翔,等.川南丹凤—塘河地区嘉陵江组沉积环境分析[J].岩性油气藏，2011（6）：50-55.
[108]孙利，刘家铎,王峻,等.普光地区飞仙关组储层主控因素分析[J].中国矿业，2013（2）：68-75.
[109]王琪，史基安，肖立新，等.石油侵位对碎屑储集岩成岩序列的影响及其与孔隙演化的关系[J].沉积学报，1998，16（3）：97-101.
[110]胡海燕.油气充注对成岩作用的影响[J].海相油气地质,2004,9(1-2):85-89.
[111]罗静兰，刘小洪，林潼,等.成岩作用与油气侵位对鄂尔多斯盆地延长组砂岩储层物性的影响[J].地质学报，2006，80（5）：664-672.
[112]蔡进功，张枝焕，朱筱敏，等.东营凹陷烃类充注与储集层化学成岩作用[J].石油勘探与开发，2003，30（3）：79-83.
[113]葛云锦，陈勇，周瑶琪.不同成岩条件下油气充注对碳酸盐岩成岩作用的影响[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版)，2009，33（1）：18-22.
[114] David,W.H..Assessing the relative importance of compaction processes andcementation to reduction of porosity in sandstones[J].AAPG,1987,71(6):633-642.
[115]刘国勇，刘阳，张刘平等.压实作用对砂岩储层物性的影响.西安石油大学学报（自然科学版），2006，21（4）：24-28.
[116]应凤祥，罗平，何东博，等.中国含油气盆地碎屑岩储集层成岩作用与成岩数值模拟.石油工业出版社,2004（12）,p1-293.
[117]赵澄林、刘孟慧等.东濮凹陷文留地区盐下含气层系（沙四段）砂体微相及成岩作用的研究.1988，内部报告.
[118]刘孟慧、赵澄林、纪友亮等.东濮凹陷下第三系碎屑岩储层成岩作用模式及其演化特征砂体微相及成岩作用的研究.1990，内部报告.
[119]焦大庆、王德仁等.文西地区深层低渗致密砂岩储层成岩变化及有利孔隙带预测.1992，内部报告.
[120]胡永全，李治平，李德敏.东濮凹陷东部含气区深层凝析气藏评价及储层改造攻关.中原油田分公司内部报告，2004年7月，p92-95.
[121]慕小水，高渐珍，许书堂，等.东濮凹陷稳产资源基础及关键技术.中原油田分公司内部报告，2010.12，p136-138.
[122]裘亦楠,等.油气储层评价技术.石油工业出版社，1991：p218.
[2]Biteau J J,Marrec A L,Michel L V,et al.The Aquitaine Basin[J]. PetroleumGeosicence,2006,12:247-273.
[3]王宇，苏劲，王凯等.全球深层油气分布特征及聚集规律[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23（3）:527-536.
[4]Munz I A,Wangen A,Girard J P,et al. Pressure temperatue time composition(P-T-t-X)constraints of multiple petroleum charges in the Hild field,Norwegain NoorthSea[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2004,21:1043-1060.
[5]钟大康,朱筱敏,王红军.中国深层优质碎屑岩储层特征与形成机理分析[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2008(38)增刊Ⅰ:11-18.
[6]Wilkinson M,Darby D,Haszeldine R S,et al.Secondary porosity generation duringdeep burial associated with overpressure leak-off:Furmar Formation,United KingdomCentral Graben.AAPG Bull,1997,81(5):803-813.
[7]常兴浩,张枝焕,李艳霞等.黄骅坳陷三马地区中深层储层孔隙发育及主控因素分析[J].地球学报,2005,(26)1:75-82.
[8]张文才,李贺,李会军,等.南堡凹陷高柳地区深层次生孔隙成因及分布特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2008,35(3):308-313.
[9]高勇,张连雪.板桥-北大港地区深层碎屑岩储集层特征及影响因素研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(2):36-40.
[10]谯汉生.中国东部深层石油地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[11]王生郎，任来义,等.盐湖环境成岩作用特征及其对高孔隙带形成的影响[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(5):47-49.
[12]胡海燕.油气充注对成岩作用的影响[J].海相油气地质，2004,9(1-2):85-89.
[13]A. B. Frana, L. M. Arajo et al. Secondary porosity formed by deep meteoricleaching: Botucatu eolianite, southern South America [J]. AAPG Bulletin,2003,87(8):1073-1082．
[14]陈丽华,赵澄林,等.碎屑岩天然气储集层次生孔隙的三种成因机理[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(5):77-79.
[15]Hege M. Nordgrd Bols, Christian Hermanrud, Gunn M. G. Teige. Origin ofoverpressures in shales: Constraints from basin modeling[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2004,88(12):193-211.
[16]蔡春芳,梅博文,马亭,等.塔里木盆地有机酸来源、分布及对成岩作用的影响[J].沉积学报,1997,15(3):103-109.
[17]Bloch S, Robert H L, Bonnell L. A nomalously high porosity and permeabilityin deeply buried sandstone reservoirs: Origin and predictability[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(2):301-328.
[18]Ezat Heydari. Meteoric versus burial control on porosity evolution of theSmackover Formation [J]. AAPG Bulletin,2003,87(12):1779-1797.
[19]李艳霞，刘洪军，袁东山，等．石油充注对储层成岩矿物的影响[J]．石油与天然气地质，2003，24(3)：274—281.
[20]杨波.焉耆盆地博南凹陷深层储层特征及控制因素.华北水利水电学院学报[J],2010,31(1):92-96.
[21] Hancock N J．Possible cause of Rotliegend sandstone diagenesis in northern WestGermany[J]．Journal of the Geological Society，1978，135：35-40.
[22]王成，邵红梅，洪淑新，等．松辽盆地北部深层次生孔隙分布特征.大庆石油地质与开发，2004，23（5）：37-39.
[23]杨小萍，白玉宝．陕甘宁中生代地层异常压力对次生孔隙形成的作用.西安石油学院学报（自然科学版），2000，15（3）：4-6.
[24]张小莉，沈英，陈文学．利用测井资料分析成岩作用对储集层的影响.沉积学报,2000，18（1）：127-131.
[25]朱抱荃，程中第，应凤祥．地层干酪根有机酸与储层次生孔隙的关系.石油实验地质，1996，18（2）206-215.
[26]Vail P R, Mitchum Rm Jr, and Thompson S. Seismic startigraphy and global changesof sea level, part3： Relative changes of sea level from cosastal onlap, in C. E.Payton, ed., Seismic stratigraphy——applications to hydrocarbon exploration：Tulsa,Oklahoma, AAPG Memoir,1977,26：63-81.
[27]朱筱敏编著.层序地层学[M].山东：石油大学出版社，2003：17-42.
[28]Zeng H L. From Seismic Stratigraphy to Seismic Sedimentology： A SensibleTransition. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions,2001, LI：413-420.
[29]Posamentier H W and Kolla V. Seismic Geomorphology and Stratigraphy ofDepositional Elements in Deep-water Settings. Journal of Sedimentary Research，2003,73(3)：367-388.
[30]Zeng H L, Backus M M, and Barrow K T. Facies Mapping from Three-DimensionalSeismic Data： Potential and Guildelines from a Tertiary Sandstone-Shale SequenceModel, Powderhorn Field, Calhoun County, Texas.AAPG,1996,80(1)：16-46.
[31]Carter D C.3-D seismic geomorphology： Insights into fluvial reservoirdeposition and performance, Widuri field, Java Sea.AAPG,2003,87(6)：909-934.
[32]Zeng H L and Hentz T F. High-frequency sequence stratigraphy from seismicsedimentology： Applied to Miocene, Vermilion Block50, Tiger Shoal area, OffshoreLouisina.AAPG Bulletin,2004,88(2)：153-174.
[33]Hongliu Zeng, Robert G. Loucks, and L. Frank Brown Jr. Mappingsediment-dispersal patterns and associated systems tracts in fourth-andfifth-order sequences using seismic sedimentology：Example from Corpus Christi Bay,Texas.AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(7)：981-1003.
[34]Jack E. Deibert and Phyllis A. Camilleri. Sedimentologic and tectonic originof an incised-valley-fill sequence along an extensional marginal-lacustrine systemin the Basin and Range province, United States: Implications for predictive modelsof the location of incised valleys.AAPG Bulletin,2006,90(2)：209-235.
[35]董春梅，张宪国，林承焰.有关地震沉积学若干问题的探讨.石油地球物理勘探，2006，41（4）：405-409.
[36]林承焰，张宪国，董春梅.地震沉积学及其初步应用.石油学报，2007，28（2）：69-71.
[37]李思田，杨恭，林畅松.论沉积盆地的等时地层格架和基本建造单元.沉积学报，1992，10（4）：11-22.
[38]Paul L. Heller, Chris Paola, In-Gul Hwang，et al.Geomorphology and sequencestratigraphy due to slow and rapid base-level changes in an experimental subsidingbasin (XES96-1). AAPG Bulletin,2001,85(5)：817-838.
[39]John Martin, Chris Paola, Vitor Abreu.Sequence stratigraphy of experimentalstrata under known conditions of differential subsidence and variable base level.AAPG Bulletin,2012,93(4)：503-533.
[40]Noel P. James, Rowan C. Martindale, Isabelle Malcolm，et al.Surficial sedimentson the continental shelf of Tasmania, Australia. Sedimentary Geology,2008,201：33-52.
[41]Wan Yang.Cycle symmetry and its causes，Cisco Group（Virgilian and Wolfcampian），Texas. Journal of Sedimentary Research，1996，66（6）：1102-1121.
[42]R.Daams，M.Diaz－Molina，R.Mas.Uncertainties in the Statigraphic analysis offluvial deposits from the Loranca Basin，central Spain.Sedimentary Geology，1996，102：187-209.
[43]Wan Yang，Michelle A.Kominz，R.P.Major.Distinguishing the roles of autogeneticversus allogenic process in cyclic sedimentation， Cisco Group （Virgilian andWolfcampian），north－central Texas. GSA Bulletin，1998，110（10）：1333-1353.
[44]Wan Yang，Michelle A.Kominz.Testing periodicity of depositional cyclicity，Cisco Group（Virgilian and Wolfcampian），Texas. Journal of Sedimentary Research，1999，69（6）：1209-1231.
[45]Johan H.ten Veen，George Postma.Astronomically forced variations in gamma-rayintensity：Late Miocene hemipelgic successions in the eastern Mediterranean basinas a test case.Geology，1996，24（1）：15-18.
[46]A.Berger，M.F.Louter，J.Laskar.Stability of the astronomical frequencies overthe Earth，history for Paleoclimate Studies.Science，1992，255（31）：560-565.
[47]E.J.Anderson，P.W.Goodwin.The significance of metre-scale allocycles in thequest for a fundamental stratigraphic unit.Journal of Geological Society，1990，147：507-518.
[48]Wolfgang Schlager. Fractal nature of stratigraphic sequences.Geology,2004,32(3):185-188.
[49]C.J. Van der Zwan.The impact of Milankovitch-scale climatic forcing on sedimentsupply. Sedimentary Geology,2002,147：271-294.
[50]Andrew E. Richards.Self-organisation, fractal scaling and cyclicity in LateMidlandian glacio-deltaic sediments associated with Glacial Lake Blessington, Co.Wicklow. Sedimentary Geology,2002,149：127-143.
[51]Esther Stouthamer, Henk J.A. Berendsen.Avulsion: The relative roles ofautogenic and allogenic processes. Sedimentary Geology,2007,198：309-325.
[52]John C. Tipper.Patterns of stratigraphic cyclicity.Journal of SedimentaryResearch[J]，2008，70(6)：1262-1279.
[53]Arthur H. Saller, Jesse T. Noah, Alif Prama Ruzuar.Linked lowstand delta tobasin-floor fan deposition, offshore Indonesia: An analog for deep-water reservoirsystems[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2004,88(1)：21-46.
[54]Piret Plink-Bjorklund，Ron Steel.Sea-level fall below the shelf edge,withoutbasin-floor fans[J]. Geology,2002,30(2):115-118.
[55]Michael C. Page，Gerald R. Dickens，Gavin B. Dunbar.Tropical view of Quaternarysequence stratigraphy: Siliciclastic accumulation on slopes east of the GreatBarrier Reef since the Last Glacial Maximum[J].. Geology,2003,31(11):1013-1016.
[56]陈洪德等.中国南方古生界层序格架中的生储盖组合类型及特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(1):62~69.
[57]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春等.中国南方二叠纪层序岩相古地理特征及演化[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):510~521.
[58]陈洪德，郭彤楼等.中上扬子叠合盆地沉积充填过程与物质分布规律[M].北京：科学技术出版社.2012.
[59]Ron Boyd，Kevin Ruming，Ian Goodwin,et al.Highstand transport of coastal sandto the deep ocean: A case study from Fraser Island, southeast Australia[J].Geology,2008,36(1):15-18.
[60]刘家铎，田景春，张翔，等.塔里木盆地寒武系层序界面特征及其油气地质意义[J].矿物岩石，2009，29（4）：1－6.
[61]刘家铎，田景春，张翔，等.鄂尔多斯盆地北部塔巴庙地区山西组一段海相、过渡相沉积标志研究及环境演化分析[J].沉积学报，2006，24（1）：36－42.
[62]祝贺,刘家铎,田景春,等.塔北—塔中地区三叠系层序地层及岩性油气藏特征[J].新疆石油地质，2012，18（2）：162-166.
[63]杨永剑,刘家铎,田景春.等.塔里木盆地上奥陶统桑塔木组混合沉积特征及控制因素[J].地质评论，2011，57（2）：185-192.
[64]王峻，刘家铎，王元君.塔河油田XX井区白垩系层序—古地理特征[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)，2012，34（3）：56-64.
[65]Ronald C. Surdam, Laura J. Crossey, E.Sven Hagen,et al. Organic-inorganicinteractions and sandstone diagenesis[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(1):1-23.
[66]Rodrio,D.L.,Luiz，F.D.R.. The role of depositional setting and diagenesis onthe reservoir quality of Devonian sandstones from the Solimoes Basin,BrazilianAmazonia[J].Marine and Petroleum geology，2002,19:1047-1071.
[67]陈洪德,侯明才,刘文均等.海西－印支期中国南方的盆地演化与层序格架[J].成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）,2004,31(6):629~635.
[68]陈洪德,侯明才,许效松等.加里东期华南的盆地演化与层序格架[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006,33(1):1~8.
[69]陈洪德，侯明才，林良彪等．不同尺度构造—层序岩相古地理研究思路与实践[J]．沉积学报，2010,28（5）：894-905．
[70]陈洪德,黄福喜,徐胜林等.中上扬子地区海相成烃物质聚集分布规律及主控因素[J].成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）,2004,36(6):569~577.
[71]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春等.右江盆地层序充填动力学初探[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):165~171.
[72]陈洪德,田景春,刘文均等.中国南方海相震旦系—中三叠统层序划分与对比[J].成都理工学院学报,2002,29(4):355~379.
[73]曲爱英，孟元林，肖丽华，等.储层钻前质量预测方法探讨――以松辽盆地汪家屯地区为例[J].石油实验地质，2009，27（1）：94－97.
[74]寿建峰，朱国华.砂岩储层孔隙保存的定量预测研究[J].地质科学,1998,33（2）：244－250.
[75]F.Schneider,S.Hay.Compaction model for quartzose sandstones application to theGarn Formation, Haltenbanken,Mid-Norwegian Continental Shelf. Marine and Petroleumgeology[J],2001,18,833-848.
[76]S.T.Paxton.,J.O.Szobo.,J.M.Ajdukiwicz.,et al.Construction of an intergranularvolume compaction curve for evaluating and predicting compaction and porosity lossin rigid-grain sandstone reservoirs[J].AAPG,2002,86（12）:2047-2067.
[77]S.Bloch.,K.P.Helmold..Approaches to predicting reservoir quality in sandstones.AAPG,1995,v.19No.1:97-115.
[78]邹才能，薛叔浩，池英柳.岩性地层油气藏形成条件与分布规律[G]//勘探与生产分公司编.岩性地层油气藏勘探理论与实践培训教材.北京：石油工业出版社，2005：422－425.
[79]王英民,金武弟,刘书会,等.断陷湖盆多级坡折带的成因类型、展布及其勘探意义.石油与天然气地质，2003,24（3）：199－203.
[80]林畅松,潘元林,肖建新,等.构造坡折带――断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念.地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2000,25（3）:260-265.
[81]陈洪德,王成善,刘文均等.华南二叠纪层序地层与盆地演化[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):529~535.陈洪德,徐胜林.川西地区晚侏罗世蓬莱镇期构造隆升的沉积响应[J].成都理工大学学报.2010.37（4）：353-358.
[82]陈洪德,曾允孚.广西丹池盆地上泥盆统留江组硅质岩沉积特征及成因讨论[J].矿物岩石,1989,9(4):22-28.
[83]刘树根,李志武,刘顺,等.大巴山前陆盆地-冲断带的形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社.2006:202-209.刘树根,罗志立,戴苏兰等.龙门山冲断带的隆升和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].地质学报,1995.69(3):205-213.
[84]刘树根，罗志立，赵锡奎等.中国西部盆山系统的耦合关系及其动力学模式—以龙门山造山带—川西前陆盆地系统为例[J].地质学报.2003,77（2）：177-186.
[85]刘树根.龙门山冲断带与川西前陆盆地的形成演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社.1993:17-117.
[86]赵俊兴,陈洪德,时志强.古地貌恢复技术方法及其研究意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪沉积前古地貌研究为例[J].成都理工学院学报.2001.28(3):260-266.
[87]赵俊兴,吕强,李凤杰,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长6时期物源状况分析[J].沉积学报,2008,26(4):610~616.
[88]郑荣才，李国晖，戴朝成等.四川类前陆盆地盆—山耦合系统和沉积学响应[J].地质学报.2012,86（1）：170-180.李勇，曾允孚，伊海生.龙门山前陆盆地沉积及构造演化[M].成都:科技出版社，1995.
[89]刘豪,王英民,王媛,等.大型坳陷湖盆坡折带的研究及其意义――以准噶尔盆地西北缘侏罗纪坳陷湖盆为例.沉积学报，2004,22（1）：95－102.
[90]王英民,刘豪,李立诚,等.准噶尔大型坳陷湖盆坡折带的类型和分布特征.地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2007,27(6):683－688.
[91]冯有良,徐秀生.同沉积构造坡折带对岩性油气藏富集带的控制作用——以渤海湾盆地古近系为例.石油勘探与开发，2006,33(1):22-31.
[92]魏魁生,徐怀大，叶淑芬,等.松辽盆地白垩纪系高分辨率层序地层格架.石油与天然气地质，1997,18（1）：8－14.
[93]王多云，李树同，王彬,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠纪延长期湖盆底形形态和岩性油藏分布特征.低渗透油气田，2006（3）：12－21.
[94]胡宗全，朱筱敏.具有地形坡折带的坳陷湖盆层序地层模拟.沉积学报，2002，20（2）：217-221.
[95]Juan Contreras，Christopher H. Scholz.Evolution of stratigraphic sequences inmultisegmented continental rift basins: Comparison of computer models with thebasins of the East African rift system respectively. AAPG Bulletin,2001,85(9)：1565-1581.
[96]Jack E. Deibert， Phyllis A. Camilleri.Sedimentologic and tectonic origin ofan incised-valley-fill sequence along an extensional marginal-lacustrine system inthe Basin and Range province, United States: Implications for predictive models ofthe location of incised valleys. AAPG Bulletin,2006,90(2)：209-235.
[97]赖生华，李晓宏.断陷盆地沉积体系研究新思路：从古地貌、岩性变化、水体深度到沉积体系.沉积学报，2007，25（5）：663-670.
[98]寿建峰，朱国华.砂岩储层孔隙保存的定量预测研究[J].地质科学,1998,33（2）：244－250.
[99]Paola De Rossi Fontanelli,Luiz Fernando De Ros,Marcus Vinicius DornelesRemus.Provenance of deep-water reservoir sandstones from the Jubarte oilfeld,Campos Basin, Eastern Brazilian Margin[J] Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26:1274-1298.
[100]蔡进功.东营箕状断陷沉积物源的演变[J].油气地质与采收率，2001，8（6）：5-8.
[101]Surdam R.C.，et al.The chemistry of secondary porosity.In：Clastic diagenesisD.A.Mc Donald and R.C. Surdam eds，AAPG，Mem.37.
[102]罗晓容.油气运聚动力学研究进展及存在问题[J].天然气地球科学,2003，14（5），337-346.
[103]Chilingarian G.V.，Mazzullo S.J. and Rieke H.H.，et al.Carbonate ReservoirCharacterization：A Geologic-Engineering Analysis，PartⅠ.Elsevier，1992，Amsterdam，pp.1-35.
[104] Ronald C. Surdam, Laura J. Crossey, E.Sven Hagen,et al. Organic-inorganicinteractions and sandstone diagenesis[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(1):1-23.
[105]罗晓容.油气运聚动力学研究进展及存在问题[J].天然气地球科学,2003，14（5），337-346.
[106]孙利，刘家铎,王峻,等.东濮凹陷超压形成机制及对油气富集的影响[J].中国矿业，2012（11）：70-74.
[107]王文之,田景春，张翔,等.川南丹凤—塘河地区嘉陵江组沉积环境分析[J].岩性油气藏，2011（6）：50-55.
[108]孙利，刘家铎,王峻,等.普光地区飞仙关组储层主控因素分析[J].中国矿业，2013（2）：68-75.
[109]王琪，史基安，肖立新，等.石油侵位对碎屑储集岩成岩序列的影响及其与孔隙演化的关系[J].沉积学报，1998，16（3）：97-101.
[110]胡海燕.油气充注对成岩作用的影响[J].海相油气地质,2004,9(1-2):85-89.
[111]罗静兰，刘小洪，林潼,等.成岩作用与油气侵位对鄂尔多斯盆地延长组砂岩储层物性的影响[J].地质学报，2006，80（5）：664-672.
[112]蔡进功，张枝焕，朱筱敏，等.东营凹陷烃类充注与储集层化学成岩作用[J].石油勘探与开发，2003，30（3）：79-83.
[113]葛云锦，陈勇，周瑶琪.不同成岩条件下油气充注对碳酸盐岩成岩作用的影响[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版)，2009，33（1）：18-22.
[114] David,W.H..Assessing the relative importance of compaction processes andcementation to reduction of porosity in sandstones[J].AAPG,1987,71(6):633-642.
[115]刘国勇，刘阳，张刘平等.压实作用对砂岩储层物性的影响.西安石油大学学报（自然科学版），2006，21（4）：24-28.
[116]应凤祥，罗平，何东博，等.中国含油气盆地碎屑岩储集层成岩作用与成岩数值模拟.石油工业出版社,2004（12）,p1-293.
[117]赵澄林、刘孟慧等.东濮凹陷文留地区盐下含气层系（沙四段）砂体微相及成岩作用的研究.1988，内部报告.
[118]刘孟慧、赵澄林、纪友亮等.东濮凹陷下第三系碎屑岩储层成岩作用模式及其演化特征砂体微相及成岩作用的研究.1990，内部报告.
[119]焦大庆、王德仁等.文西地区深层低渗致密砂岩储层成岩变化及有利孔隙带预测.1992，内部报告.
[120]胡永全，李治平，李德敏.东濮凹陷东部含气区深层凝析气藏评价及储层改造攻关.中原油田分公司内部报告，2004年7月，p92-95.
[121]慕小水，高渐珍，许书堂，等.东濮凹陷稳产资源基础及关键技术.中原油田分公司内部报告，2010.12，p136-138.
[122]裘亦楠,等.油气储层评价技术.石油工业出版社，1991：p218.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |