川西北地区中、下侏罗统物质分布规律与沉积充填过程
|
摘要
川西北地区作为四川盆地天然气资源最为丰富的地区，其中侏罗系是继晚三叠世须家河组之外又一重要的碎屑岩产气层系，分布广泛，沉积厚度巨大，埋藏浅，亦是目前天然气、页岩气勘探、开发的重要对象之一。川西与川北地区在早、中侏罗世构造演化具有明显的差异性，因此导致沉积物质聚集与分布规律具有较大的差异性。随着勘探和研究的深入，有必要进一步解决前陆盆地的形成演化、沉积物质聚集分布规律和层序格架内的沉积充填过程等基础地质问题，为下一步油气资源勘探起到指导作用。本文以“构造控制沉积，沉积响应构造”的思想为指导，运用沉积学、层序地层学、构造地质学、沉积地球化学等理论与技术方法，较系统的分析周缘造山带差异隆升背景下的川西北地区中、下侏罗统的形成演化，从而揭示盆地演化过程中的物质分布规律与沉积充填过程。主要内容和成果如下：
（1）通过对野外剖面的测量以及钻井岩心的描述，结合地层划分及对比，在此基础上进行了层序界面的识别，厘定了川西北地区中、下侏罗统的层序地层划分方案，将其划分为2个构造层序和5个三级层序，建立了层序地层格架。
（2）在对研究区周缘物源区特征分析的基础上，通过川西北地区中、下侏罗统岩石学特征分析以及沉积地球化学分析等手段，揭示了川西北地区早、中侏罗世自流井组（白田坝组）、千佛崖组（新田沟组）、沙溪庙组物源的时空转换与构造幕式演化的关系。a：自流井组（白田坝组）沉积时期，川西北地区主要受到两个方向的物源供给，分别是来自盆地西部的龙门山，和来自盆地北部的米仓山—大巴山，影响范围有限。b：千佛崖组（新田沟组）沉积时期，川西地区主要受两个方向的物源影响，新都、德阳、中江等地区主要受来自西部龙门山中段物源影响。北段的江油、剑阁、广元等地区主要受到来自龙门山北段的物源区影响。川北地区主要受两个方向的物源影响，旺苍、南江等地区主要受来自大巴山北段的影响。铁溪、万源、通江、宣汉、达州等地区主要受到来自大巴山中段的物源影响。c：沙溪庙组沉积时期，川西地区龙门山前缘地区主要受来自龙门山中段物源的影响。川西北部的江油、剑阁等地区主要受到来自龙门山北段物源的影响。川西地区的中江以及靠东的地区主要受到来自川北地区的大巴山的物源影响、龙门山中段、北段的影响。川北地区南江以西地区主要受到来自大巴山北段的物源影响。大巴山前缘地区通江、万源、达州等地区主要受到来自大巴山中段的物源影响。
（3）通过野外剖面、钻井岩心、测井等资料的分析，系统识别出了5种沉积体系，包括：冲积扇沉积体系、河流沉积体系、湖泊三角洲沉积体系、扇三角洲沉积体系、湖泊沉积体系。以三级层序，下统以三级层序体系域为编图单元，系统编制了川西北地区早、中侏罗世构造—层序岩相古地理图。分析了不同时期的沉积物分布特征以及演化规律，建立了各个演化阶段的沉积模式：早侏罗世早期为扇三角洲平原—扇三角洲前缘—前扇三角洲—滨浅湖沉积阶段；早侏罗世中、晚期为小规模三角洲—大规模滨浅湖沉积阶段；中侏罗世早期为冲积扇—河流—三角洲—湖泊沉积阶段；中侏罗世中、晚期为冲积扇—河流—大规模的三角洲—湖泊沉积阶段。
（4）沉积物质的时空演化响应了周缘造山带的差异隆升过程。早侏罗世，川西北地区处于构造平静期，沉积物质呈面状展布，没有明显的沉降中心，全区以稳定的再旋回造山带物质为主；中侏罗世早期，川北地区大巴山进入了逐渐发育的逆冲推覆阶段，受到汉南隆起的向南扩展，米仓山在水下褶皱隆起，导致沉降中心由晚三叠世的川西地区迁移至现今的米仓山前缘，川北地区沉积物质具有造山隆升的特征，而川西地区较稳定与上一期相似；中侏罗世中、晚期，随着大巴山逆冲推覆运动的加强，沉积中心逐渐向大巴山前缘迁移，川北地区甚至川西中段的局部地区沉积物质具有造山隆升的特征，说明大巴山此时已全面隆升，川西地区依然与前期相似，较稳定。
（5）根据层序格架内的沉积充填差异性的分析，结合区域构造演化特征，重塑了复合造山运动下的前陆盆地演化过程。早侏罗世早期，受到秦岭地区构造运动的远端效应的影响，川西北地区发育扇三角洲沉积体系；早侏罗世中、晚期，川西北地区处于前陆盆地构造演化的平静期，以广泛的湖泊沉积为主；中侏罗世早期，受米仓山水下隆起以及大巴山的缓慢推进的联合控制，前陆盆地逐渐由平静期演化为构造活跃期，三角洲沉积向盆地延伸；中侏罗世中期，大巴山持续的向南推进，前陆盆地处于构造活跃期，大范围三角洲沉积延伸较远；中侏罗世晚期，随着大巴山推覆带的再次向南推进，前陆盆地进入了构造活动的最强时期，山前坳陷进一步沉降，沉积厚度为整个侏罗系之最。
Western and Northern Sichuan are regions where contain the most abundant gas resourcesin Sichuan Basin. Beside Xujiahe Formation in Late Triassic, Jurassic is one of the mostimportant clastic layers for gas production with wide distribution, great thickness and shallowburied depth, thus it also be a great target for exploration and development of natural and shalegas. There are obvious differences in tectonic evolution between Western and Northern Sichuanin the Early and Middle Jurassic, which lead to more differences in the regulation ofsedimentary accumulation and distribution. With the development of exploration and research,it is necessary to solve the basic geological problems like evolution of the foreland basin, theregulation of sedimentary accumulation and distribution, sedimentary filling process within thesequence stratigraphic framework deeply, which is the guidance for further il and gasexploration. This paper use the theories and technical methods such as sedimentology, sequencestratigraphy, structural geology, sedimentary geochemistry to analyse formation and evolutionof Middle and lower Jurassic under the background of differential uplift in periphery orogeniczone by the idea guidance of “sedimention not only controlled by structure, but makeresponse to it”,all of which will show regulation of sedimentary distribution and sedimentaryfilling process with the development of basin evolution. Main contents and results are asfollows:
(1) Based on the measuration of field section and description of drilling cores, combinedwith stratigraphic division and contrast, we have identificated the sequence boundaries on thebasics. Sequence stratigraphy division plan of Middle and lower Jurassic in Western andNorthern Sichuan is setted, it can be divided into2structural sequences and5third-ordersequences, and the sequence stratigraphic frame has been established.
(2) Based on the characteristics analysis of the source area in the periphery of study area,using petrological characteristics analysis and sedimentary geochemical analysis and othermeans, in Western and Northern Sichuan, we have carried out a detailed analysis of thespace-time conversion of the provenance in Ziliujing Formation (Baitianba Formation) in earlyJurassic and in Qianfoya Formation (Xintiangou Formation) and Shaximiao Formation inMiddle Jurassic.
a: During Ziliujing Formation (Baitianba Formation) deposition period, the provenancegiven of Western and Northern region mainly affected in both directions, from Longmenshan inwestern of Sichuan basin and from Micangshan-Dabashan in northern of the basin. The detrital materials provided by the two source areas are collision suture and fold-overthrust beltsediments, which belong to a recycled orogen source area. The difference is that the former oneis mainly quartz recycle source area,, and the latter one is a transitional and cuttings recyclesource area.
b: During the sedimentary period of Qianfoya Formation (Xintiangou Formation), thewestern Sichuan region was predominantly affected by two directions of provenance. Xindu,Deyang, Zhongjiang regions were mainly influenced from the middle section provenance ofwestern Longmenshan. They have characteristics of high quartz, extremely low feldspar andlow rock debris. This indicates the material of collision suture and fold-thrust belt, belonging tothe recycle-orogenic provenance zone. The northern section, such as Jiangyou, Jiange,Guangyuan regions, was chiefly affected by provenance zone from the northern section ofLongmenshan, with high quartz, increasing feldspar, and low rock debris, and indicates thematerial of collision suture and fold-mudstone belt, belonging to the tectonic setting oflandmass. The northern Sichuan region was predominantly affected by two directions ofprovenance. Wangcang, Nanjiang regions were mainly influenced from Micangshan, with lowquartz, high feldspar, high rock debris, show the material of collision suture and the substanceranging from fold-thrust belts to mixed orogenic belt, belonging to the provenance zone ofcutting island arc to landmass. And northern Sichuan region, such as Tiexi, Wangyuan,Tongjiang, XuanHan, Dazhou regions, was principally affected by provenance zone fromDabashan. They have higher content of quartz and lower content of feldspar than Wangcangand Nanjiang regions. This illustrates the material of collision suture and fold-thrust belt,belonging to the recycle-orogenic provenance zone.
c: During the sedimentary period of Shaximiao Formation, the western Sichuan region,especially the Longmenshan front area, was predominantly affected by the middle sectionprovenance of Longmenshan. It has rich quartz and lacking feldspar, shows the tectonic settingof recycle-orogenic provenance zone, belonging to the material of collision suture andfold-thrust belt. In the north of western Sichuan region, like Jiangyou, Jiange regions, waschiefly influenced from northern section provenance of Longmenshan. They havecharacteristics of high sedimentary rock debris, low metamorphic rock debris and extremelylow volcanic debris. This debris shows the tectonic setting of landmass, belonging to thematerial of collision suture and fold-thrust belt. Zhongjiang and eastern regions wereprincipally influenced from the provenance of Micangshan-Dabashan in northern Sichuanregion, with rich feldspar and poor quartz; indicate the tectonic setting of provenance zone ofcutting island arc, belonging to the material of mixed orogenic belt. Micangshan front area innorthern Sichuan, like western region of Nanjiang, was mainly affected by the provenance ofMicangshan, with high feldspar, low quartz and low rock debris. This indicates the material ofcollision suture and the substance ranging from fold-thrust belts to mixed orogenic belt,belonging to the provenance zone of cutting island arc. Dabashan front area, such as Tongjiang,Wangyuan, Dazhou regions, was chiefly affected by the provenance of Dabashan, with highquartz, high rock debris and low feldspar, indicates the material of collision suture and thesubstance ranging from fold-thrust belts to mixed orogenic belt, belonging to the mixed provenance zone of cutting island arc, mixed zone and the recycle-orogenic belt.
(3) According to outcrop and drilling cores, logs and other data analysis identified fivesedimentary system, including: alluvial fan depositional system, river depositional systems,lacustrine delta system, fan delta depositional systems, lake sedimentary system. on the basis ofthird-order sequences and tertiary sequence system tracts for the mapping unit, the preparationof western Sichuan, northern Sichuan region early and middle Jurassic epoch Tectonicsequence based lithofacies-paleogeography maps. Through sediment distribution and evolutionof different periods a depositional model is established to explain each stage of evolution: theearly Jurassic fan delta plain-fan delta front-the front fan delta-shallow lacustrine sedimentarystage; The Early Jurassic in lake sediments, the late Delta for small-scale-large-scale shallowlacustrine sedimentary stage; the early middle Jurassic alluvial fan-River-Delta-lake sedimentsstage; the early and late middle Jurassic, alluvial fan-river-a large-scale Delta-lacustrine depositphase.
(4) Differential uplift in periphery orogenic zone is responded by time-space evolution ofsediment. In the early time of Early Jurassic, sediment of recycling orogenic belt are maindeveloped in Western and Northern Sichuan in the period of tectonic calm with planarsedimentary distribution and no obvious center of subsidence. Then in the early of MiddleJurassic, Dabashan was affected by downcoast expandation of Hannan uplift, Micangshanfolded and rised underwater, which led center of subsidence in Western Sichuan of late Triassicmigrated to the front of Dabashan, the thrust nappe phase started. The sediment in NorthernSichuan has characters of orogenesis uplift, while sediment in Western Sichuan was similarwith forward. In the middle and late of Middle Jurassic, with stronger development of thrustnappe movement in Dabashan, the center of subsidence was gradually move to the front ofDabashan, and sediment in Northern Sichuan even some region in the middle of WesternSichuan had characters of orogenesis uplift, all of which showed that the whole Dabashan hadstarted to rise, while sediment in Western Sichuan was also similar with forward.
(5) Based on Differential analysis of sedimentary filling in the sequence stratigraphicframework, this paper appromately resumes evolution process of foreland basin under thebackground of compound orogeny with searches features of regional structure movement. Inthe early time of Early Jurassic, fan delta sedimentary system was developed in Western andNorthern Sichuan which affected by distal effect of tectonic movement in Qinling. Then in themiddle and late of Early Jurassic,, Lacustrine occupied larger part of searching area in tectoniccalm period. And in the early of Middle Jurassic, delta sedimentary system expanded into thebasin, because Micangshan uplift and Dabashan went forward made structure in searching areaactive. In the middle of Middle Jurassic, Dabashan was continued to go downcoast and deltasedimentary system expanded fuether. Then in the late of Middle Jurassic, with continueddowncoast going of Dabashan, structure movement was in strongest phase in foreland basin,and the sedimentary thickness was largest with piedmont depression dropped deeper.
（1）通过对野外剖面的测量以及钻井岩心的描述，结合地层划分及对比，在此基础上进行了层序界面的识别，厘定了川西北地区中、下侏罗统的层序地层划分方案，将其划分为2个构造层序和5个三级层序，建立了层序地层格架。
（2）在对研究区周缘物源区特征分析的基础上，通过川西北地区中、下侏罗统岩石学特征分析以及沉积地球化学分析等手段，揭示了川西北地区早、中侏罗世自流井组（白田坝组）、千佛崖组（新田沟组）、沙溪庙组物源的时空转换与构造幕式演化的关系。a：自流井组（白田坝组）沉积时期，川西北地区主要受到两个方向的物源供给，分别是来自盆地西部的龙门山，和来自盆地北部的米仓山—大巴山，影响范围有限。b：千佛崖组（新田沟组）沉积时期，川西地区主要受两个方向的物源影响，新都、德阳、中江等地区主要受来自西部龙门山中段物源影响。北段的江油、剑阁、广元等地区主要受到来自龙门山北段的物源区影响。川北地区主要受两个方向的物源影响，旺苍、南江等地区主要受来自大巴山北段的影响。铁溪、万源、通江、宣汉、达州等地区主要受到来自大巴山中段的物源影响。c：沙溪庙组沉积时期，川西地区龙门山前缘地区主要受来自龙门山中段物源的影响。川西北部的江油、剑阁等地区主要受到来自龙门山北段物源的影响。川西地区的中江以及靠东的地区主要受到来自川北地区的大巴山的物源影响、龙门山中段、北段的影响。川北地区南江以西地区主要受到来自大巴山北段的物源影响。大巴山前缘地区通江、万源、达州等地区主要受到来自大巴山中段的物源影响。
（3）通过野外剖面、钻井岩心、测井等资料的分析，系统识别出了5种沉积体系，包括：冲积扇沉积体系、河流沉积体系、湖泊三角洲沉积体系、扇三角洲沉积体系、湖泊沉积体系。以三级层序，下统以三级层序体系域为编图单元，系统编制了川西北地区早、中侏罗世构造—层序岩相古地理图。分析了不同时期的沉积物分布特征以及演化规律，建立了各个演化阶段的沉积模式：早侏罗世早期为扇三角洲平原—扇三角洲前缘—前扇三角洲—滨浅湖沉积阶段；早侏罗世中、晚期为小规模三角洲—大规模滨浅湖沉积阶段；中侏罗世早期为冲积扇—河流—三角洲—湖泊沉积阶段；中侏罗世中、晚期为冲积扇—河流—大规模的三角洲—湖泊沉积阶段。
（4）沉积物质的时空演化响应了周缘造山带的差异隆升过程。早侏罗世，川西北地区处于构造平静期，沉积物质呈面状展布，没有明显的沉降中心，全区以稳定的再旋回造山带物质为主；中侏罗世早期，川北地区大巴山进入了逐渐发育的逆冲推覆阶段，受到汉南隆起的向南扩展，米仓山在水下褶皱隆起，导致沉降中心由晚三叠世的川西地区迁移至现今的米仓山前缘，川北地区沉积物质具有造山隆升的特征，而川西地区较稳定与上一期相似；中侏罗世中、晚期，随着大巴山逆冲推覆运动的加强，沉积中心逐渐向大巴山前缘迁移，川北地区甚至川西中段的局部地区沉积物质具有造山隆升的特征，说明大巴山此时已全面隆升，川西地区依然与前期相似，较稳定。
（5）根据层序格架内的沉积充填差异性的分析，结合区域构造演化特征，重塑了复合造山运动下的前陆盆地演化过程。早侏罗世早期，受到秦岭地区构造运动的远端效应的影响，川西北地区发育扇三角洲沉积体系；早侏罗世中、晚期，川西北地区处于前陆盆地构造演化的平静期，以广泛的湖泊沉积为主；中侏罗世早期，受米仓山水下隆起以及大巴山的缓慢推进的联合控制，前陆盆地逐渐由平静期演化为构造活跃期，三角洲沉积向盆地延伸；中侏罗世中期，大巴山持续的向南推进，前陆盆地处于构造活跃期，大范围三角洲沉积延伸较远；中侏罗世晚期，随着大巴山推覆带的再次向南推进，前陆盆地进入了构造活动的最强时期，山前坳陷进一步沉降，沉积厚度为整个侏罗系之最。
Western and Northern Sichuan are regions where contain the most abundant gas resourcesin Sichuan Basin. Beside Xujiahe Formation in Late Triassic, Jurassic is one of the mostimportant clastic layers for gas production with wide distribution, great thickness and shallowburied depth, thus it also be a great target for exploration and development of natural and shalegas. There are obvious differences in tectonic evolution between Western and Northern Sichuanin the Early and Middle Jurassic, which lead to more differences in the regulation ofsedimentary accumulation and distribution. With the development of exploration and research,it is necessary to solve the basic geological problems like evolution of the foreland basin, theregulation of sedimentary accumulation and distribution, sedimentary filling process within thesequence stratigraphic framework deeply, which is the guidance for further il and gasexploration. This paper use the theories and technical methods such as sedimentology, sequencestratigraphy, structural geology, sedimentary geochemistry to analyse formation and evolutionof Middle and lower Jurassic under the background of differential uplift in periphery orogeniczone by the idea guidance of “sedimention not only controlled by structure, but makeresponse to it”,all of which will show regulation of sedimentary distribution and sedimentaryfilling process with the development of basin evolution. Main contents and results are asfollows:
(1) Based on the measuration of field section and description of drilling cores, combinedwith stratigraphic division and contrast, we have identificated the sequence boundaries on thebasics. Sequence stratigraphy division plan of Middle and lower Jurassic in Western andNorthern Sichuan is setted, it can be divided into2structural sequences and5third-ordersequences, and the sequence stratigraphic frame has been established.
(2) Based on the characteristics analysis of the source area in the periphery of study area,using petrological characteristics analysis and sedimentary geochemical analysis and othermeans, in Western and Northern Sichuan, we have carried out a detailed analysis of thespace-time conversion of the provenance in Ziliujing Formation (Baitianba Formation) in earlyJurassic and in Qianfoya Formation (Xintiangou Formation) and Shaximiao Formation inMiddle Jurassic.
a: During Ziliujing Formation (Baitianba Formation) deposition period, the provenancegiven of Western and Northern region mainly affected in both directions, from Longmenshan inwestern of Sichuan basin and from Micangshan-Dabashan in northern of the basin. The detrital materials provided by the two source areas are collision suture and fold-overthrust beltsediments, which belong to a recycled orogen source area. The difference is that the former oneis mainly quartz recycle source area,, and the latter one is a transitional and cuttings recyclesource area.
b: During the sedimentary period of Qianfoya Formation (Xintiangou Formation), thewestern Sichuan region was predominantly affected by two directions of provenance. Xindu,Deyang, Zhongjiang regions were mainly influenced from the middle section provenance ofwestern Longmenshan. They have characteristics of high quartz, extremely low feldspar andlow rock debris. This indicates the material of collision suture and fold-thrust belt, belonging tothe recycle-orogenic provenance zone. The northern section, such as Jiangyou, Jiange,Guangyuan regions, was chiefly affected by provenance zone from the northern section ofLongmenshan, with high quartz, increasing feldspar, and low rock debris, and indicates thematerial of collision suture and fold-mudstone belt, belonging to the tectonic setting oflandmass. The northern Sichuan region was predominantly affected by two directions ofprovenance. Wangcang, Nanjiang regions were mainly influenced from Micangshan, with lowquartz, high feldspar, high rock debris, show the material of collision suture and the substanceranging from fold-thrust belts to mixed orogenic belt, belonging to the provenance zone ofcutting island arc to landmass. And northern Sichuan region, such as Tiexi, Wangyuan,Tongjiang, XuanHan, Dazhou regions, was principally affected by provenance zone fromDabashan. They have higher content of quartz and lower content of feldspar than Wangcangand Nanjiang regions. This illustrates the material of collision suture and fold-thrust belt,belonging to the recycle-orogenic provenance zone.
c: During the sedimentary period of Shaximiao Formation, the western Sichuan region,especially the Longmenshan front area, was predominantly affected by the middle sectionprovenance of Longmenshan. It has rich quartz and lacking feldspar, shows the tectonic settingof recycle-orogenic provenance zone, belonging to the material of collision suture andfold-thrust belt. In the north of western Sichuan region, like Jiangyou, Jiange regions, waschiefly influenced from northern section provenance of Longmenshan. They havecharacteristics of high sedimentary rock debris, low metamorphic rock debris and extremelylow volcanic debris. This debris shows the tectonic setting of landmass, belonging to thematerial of collision suture and fold-thrust belt. Zhongjiang and eastern regions wereprincipally influenced from the provenance of Micangshan-Dabashan in northern Sichuanregion, with rich feldspar and poor quartz; indicate the tectonic setting of provenance zone ofcutting island arc, belonging to the material of mixed orogenic belt. Micangshan front area innorthern Sichuan, like western region of Nanjiang, was mainly affected by the provenance ofMicangshan, with high feldspar, low quartz and low rock debris. This indicates the material ofcollision suture and the substance ranging from fold-thrust belts to mixed orogenic belt,belonging to the provenance zone of cutting island arc. Dabashan front area, such as Tongjiang,Wangyuan, Dazhou regions, was chiefly affected by the provenance of Dabashan, with highquartz, high rock debris and low feldspar, indicates the material of collision suture and thesubstance ranging from fold-thrust belts to mixed orogenic belt, belonging to the mixed provenance zone of cutting island arc, mixed zone and the recycle-orogenic belt.
(3) According to outcrop and drilling cores, logs and other data analysis identified fivesedimentary system, including: alluvial fan depositional system, river depositional systems,lacustrine delta system, fan delta depositional systems, lake sedimentary system. on the basis ofthird-order sequences and tertiary sequence system tracts for the mapping unit, the preparationof western Sichuan, northern Sichuan region early and middle Jurassic epoch Tectonicsequence based lithofacies-paleogeography maps. Through sediment distribution and evolutionof different periods a depositional model is established to explain each stage of evolution: theearly Jurassic fan delta plain-fan delta front-the front fan delta-shallow lacustrine sedimentarystage; The Early Jurassic in lake sediments, the late Delta for small-scale-large-scale shallowlacustrine sedimentary stage; the early middle Jurassic alluvial fan-River-Delta-lake sedimentsstage; the early and late middle Jurassic, alluvial fan-river-a large-scale Delta-lacustrine depositphase.
(4) Differential uplift in periphery orogenic zone is responded by time-space evolution ofsediment. In the early time of Early Jurassic, sediment of recycling orogenic belt are maindeveloped in Western and Northern Sichuan in the period of tectonic calm with planarsedimentary distribution and no obvious center of subsidence. Then in the early of MiddleJurassic, Dabashan was affected by downcoast expandation of Hannan uplift, Micangshanfolded and rised underwater, which led center of subsidence in Western Sichuan of late Triassicmigrated to the front of Dabashan, the thrust nappe phase started. The sediment in NorthernSichuan has characters of orogenesis uplift, while sediment in Western Sichuan was similarwith forward. In the middle and late of Middle Jurassic, with stronger development of thrustnappe movement in Dabashan, the center of subsidence was gradually move to the front ofDabashan, and sediment in Northern Sichuan even some region in the middle of WesternSichuan had characters of orogenesis uplift, all of which showed that the whole Dabashan hadstarted to rise, while sediment in Western Sichuan was also similar with forward.
(5) Based on Differential analysis of sedimentary filling in the sequence stratigraphicframework, this paper appromately resumes evolution process of foreland basin under thebackground of compound orogeny with searches features of regional structure movement. Inthe early time of Early Jurassic, fan delta sedimentary system was developed in Western andNorthern Sichuan which affected by distal effect of tectonic movement in Qinling. Then in themiddle and late of Early Jurassic,, Lacustrine occupied larger part of searching area in tectoniccalm period. And in the early of Middle Jurassic, delta sedimentary system expanded into thebasin, because Micangshan uplift and Dabashan went forward made structure in searching areaactive. In the middle of Middle Jurassic, Dabashan was continued to go downcoast and deltasedimentary system expanded fuether. Then in the late of Middle Jurassic, with continueddowncoast going of Dabashan, structure movement was in strongest phase in foreland basin,and the sedimentary thickness was largest with piedmont depression dropped deeper.
引文
[1] Bhatia M R, Crook K A W. Trace element characteristics of gyaywake and tectonic of sedimentarybasins [J].Cureau.Mineral.Petrol.,1986,92:181-193.
[2] Carmala N. Garzione, Matt J. Ikari, Asish R. Basu, Source of Oligocene to Pliocene sedimentary rocksin the Linxia basin in northeastern Tibet from Nd isotopes: Implications for tectonic forcing ofclimate[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, Sep2005;117:1156-1166.
[3] Davis R A. Depositional systems—a genetic approach to sedimentary geology. EnglewoodCliffs:Prentice—hall inc,1983.33-42.
[4] Dickinson W R, Suczek C A. Plate tectonics and sandstone compositions. American association ofpetroleum geologists bulletin[J].1979.63(12):2164-2182.
[5] Dickinson W R. Provenance and sediment dispersal inrelation to paleotectonics and paleogeographyof sedimentary basins[A]. In: Kleinspehn K L and Paola C (eds). New perspectives in basinanalysis[C].1988.Speringer-verlag.3-26.
[6] Maynard J B. Composition of modern deep-sea sands from arc-related basins[M]∥Leggtt JK.Trench-forearc geology. Ox-ford: Blackwall Scientific Publication,1982:551-562.
[7] Roser B P, Korsch R J. Determination of tectonic setting of sandstone mudstone suites usingSiO2content and K2O/Na2Oratio[J].J. Geol.,1986,94(5):635-650.
[8] Schwab F L. Evolution of the western continental margin, French-Italian Alps: Sandstone mineralogyas an index of platetectonic setting[J].J. Geol.,1981,89(3):349-368.
[9] Shields G, Stille P. Diagenetic constrains on the use of cerium anomalies as paleoseawater redoxproxies: An isotopic and REE study of Cambrian phosphorites[J].ChemicalGeology,2001,175:29-48.
[10] Vail P R.Sequence stratigraphy workbook, fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy.AAPG AnnualConventio n Short Course:Sequence Stratigraphy Interpretation of Seismic Well and OutcropData[J].AAPG,1998:217-223.
[11]白立新,朱日祥,吴汉宁.川北旺苍—南江地区晚侏罗世古地层学研究与真极移的探讨[J].地球物理学报,1998,41(3):324-331.
[12]蔡开平,李梅.川西南部地区沙溪庙组勘探目标研究[J].天然气工业.2004.24（10）:1-5.
[13]操应长,宋玲,王健等.重矿物资料在沉积物物源分析中的应用—以涠西南凹陷古近系流三段下亚段为例[J].沉积学报,2011,29（5）:835-841.
[14]陈洪德等.2002,中国南方海相震旦系－中三叠统构造－层序岩相古地理研究及编图,中国石化科技开发部内部研究项目成果报告.
[15]陈洪德等.中国南方古生界层序格架中的生储盖组合类型及特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(1):62~69.
[16]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春等.中国南方二叠纪层序岩相古地理特征及演化[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):510~521.
[17]陈洪德,郭彤楼等.中上扬子叠合盆地沉积充填过程与物质分布规律[M].北京:科学技术出版社.2012.
[18]陈洪德,侯明才,林良彪等.不同尺度构造—层序岩相古地理研究思路与实践[J].沉积学报,2010,28（5）:894-905.
[19]陈洪德,侯明才,刘文均等.海西－印支期中国南方的盆地演化与层序格架[J].成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）,2004,31(6):629~635.
[20]陈洪德,侯明才,许效松等.加里东期华南的盆地演化与层序格架[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006,33(1):1~8.
[21]陈洪德,黄福喜,徐胜林等.中上扬子地区海相成烃物质聚集分布规律及主控因素[J].成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）,2004,36(6):569~577.
[22]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春等.右江盆地层序充填动力学初探[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):165~171.
[23]陈洪德,田景春,刘文均等.中国南方海相震旦系—中三叠统层序划分与对比[J].成都理工学院学报,2002,29(4):355~379.
[24]陈洪德,王成善,刘文均等.华南二叠纪层序地层与盆地演化[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):529~535.
[25]陈洪德,徐胜林.川西地区晚侏罗世蓬莱镇期构造隆升的沉积响应[J].成都理工大学学报.2010.37（4）:353-358.
[26]陈洪德,曾允孚.广西丹池盆地上泥盆统留江组硅质岩沉积特征及成因讨论[J].矿物岩石,1989,9(4):22-28.
[27]陈洪德,钟怡江,侯明才等.川东北地区长兴组-飞仙关组碳酸盐岩台地层序充填结构及成藏效应[J].石油与天然气地质,2009,30(5):539~547.
[28]陈竹新,贾东,魏国齐等.川西前陆盆地中-新生代沉积迁移与构造转换[J].中国地质,2008,35（3）:472-481.
[29]程万强,杨坤光.大巴山构造演化的石英ESR年代学研究[J].地学前缘,2009,16(3):197-206.
[30]程岳宏,于兴河,韩宝清等.东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段地球化学特征及地质意义[J].中国地质,2010.32(2):357-366.
[31]淡卫东,张昌民,尹太举等.川西白马庙气田上侏罗统蓬莱镇组高分辨率层序地层对比[J].沉积学报,2007,25（5）:708-715.
[32]邓宏文,钱凯.沉积地球化学与环境分析[M].兰州:甘肃科学技术出版社.1993:4-28.
[33]杜春国,郝芳,张树林等.川东北宣汉—达县地区地层剥蚀厚度恢复[J].煤田地质与勘探.2006,34（4）:1-5.
[34]杜后发,姜勇彪,侯增谦等.襄谦古近纪盆地砂岩地球化学特征及其对物源和沉积环境的指示作用[J].岩石矿物学杂志.2011.30（4）:654-664.
[35]高长林,刘光祥,张玉箴等,东秦岭—大巴山逆冲推覆构造与油气远景[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(S1):523-531.
[36]郭战峰,梁西文.东秦岭-大别造山带南侧中生代砂岩碎屑组分及其构造意义[J].吉林大学学报（地球科学版）.2006.36（5）:787-792.
[37]郭正吾,邓康龄,韩永辉等.四川盆地形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社.1996:1-275.
[38]胡晓强,陈洪德,纪相田等.川西前陆盆地侏罗系三角洲沉积体系与沉积模式[J].石油实验地质,2005.
[39]胡晓强,陈洪德,纪相田等.川西前陆盆地侏罗系层序地层[J].西南石油学院学报,2006.28(2):16-19.
[40]简星,关平,张巍.碎屑金红石:沉积物源的一种指针[J].地球科学进展.2012,27（8）:828-846.
[41]阚泽忠,梁斌,王全伟等.广元恐龙化石埋藏地沙溪庙组地球化学特征及对物源区和古风化作用的指示[J].中国地质,2006,33（5）:2013-1029.
[42]孔为龙,王松,杜叶龙等.中上扬子北缘二叠纪碎屑岩组分和地球化学特征[J].地球化学.2011.40（5）:473-486.
[43]乐光禹.大巴山造山带及其前陆盆地的构造特征和构造演化[J].矿物岩石,1998,18（s1）:8-15.
[44]李继亮,肖文交,等.盆山耦合与沉积作用[J].沉积学报,200321(1):52~60.
[45]李任伟.沉积地球化学[A].见:欧阳自远,倪集众.相仁杰.地球化学:历史、现状和发展趋势[C].北京:原子能出版社,1996.
[46]李瑞保,裴先治,刘战庆等.大巴山及川东北前陆盆地盆山物质耦合[J].地质学报.2010.84(8):1118-1134.
[47]李思田.论沉积盆地分析领域的追踪与创新[J].沉积学报,1992,10(3):10~15.
[48]李勇,王成善,曾允孚.造山作用与沉积响应[J].矿物岩石,2000,20(2):49~56.
[49]李勇,曾允孚,伊海生.龙门山前陆盆地沉积及构造演化[M].成都:科技出版社,1995.
[50]李珍,焦养泉,刘春华等.黄骅坳陷高柳地区重矿物物源分析[J].石油勘探与发,1998,25(6):5~7.
[51]李振宏,席胜利,刘新社.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界天然气成藏[J].世界地质,2005,24(2):174～181.
[52]李志明,刘家军,胡瑞忠等.兰坪中新生代盆地沉积岩源区构造背景和物源属性研究-砂岩地球化学证据[J].沉积学报.2003.21（4）:547-552.
[53]李智武,中—新生代大巴山前陆盆地—冲断带的形成演化[D].成都:成都理工大学,2006.
[54]李忠,李任伟,孙枢等.合肥盆地南部侏罗系砂岩碎屑组分特征及物源构造属性[J].岩石学报.1999.15(3):438-444.
[55]李忠,王道轩,林伟等.库车坳陷中-新生界碎屑组分对物源类型及其构造属性的指示[J].岩石学报.2004.20(3):655-666.
[56]梁积伟,肖丽,高小林等.鄂尔多斯盆地晚三叠世早期物源分析[J].西北地质,2008,41(2):82~86.
[57]梁诗明.四川盆地北部晚侏罗世和白垩纪沉积古地理演化[D].北京:中国地质大学,2009.
[58]刘成林,李景明,门相勇.川西白马庙地区上侏罗统蓬莱镇组天然气成藏研究[J].天然气工业.2002.22（2）:10-13.
[59]刘刚,周东升.微量元素分析在判别沉积环境中的应用—以江汉盆地潜江组为例[J].石油实验地质,2007.29(3):307-314.
[60]刘刚.大巴山侏罗纪前陆层序地层学研究[D].北京:中国地质科学院,2007.
[61]刘和甫,梁慧社,蔡立国等.川西龙门山冲断系构造样式与前陆盆地演化[J].地质学报,1994.68(2):100-117.
[62]刘和甫,汪泽成,熊保贤,等.中国中西部中、新生代前陆盆地与挤压造山带耦合分析[J].地学前缘,2000,7(3):55~72.
[63]刘和甫.大陆造山带与盆地耦合机制之一连锁断层系统(“造山带研究”笔谈会)[J].地学前绝,1999,6(3):13~14.
[64]刘和甫.盆地—山岭耦合体系与地球动力学机制.地球科学,2001,26(6):581-596
[65]刘和甫.前陆盆地类型及褶皱一冲断层样式[J].地学前缘,1995,2(3-4):59~68.
[66]刘树根,李志武,刘顺等.大巴山前陆盆地-冲断带的形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社.2006:202-209.
[67]刘树根,罗志立,戴苏兰等.龙门山冲断带的隆升和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].地质学报,1995.69(3):205-213.
[68]刘树根,罗志立,赵锡奎等.中国西部盆山系统的耦合关系及其动力学模式—以龙门山造山带—川西前陆盆地系统为例[J].地质学报.2003,77（2）:177-186.
[69]刘树根.龙门山冲断带与川西前陆盆地的形成演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社.1993:17-117.
[70]刘岫峰.沉积岩实验室研究方法[M].北京:地质出版社.1991:206-212.
[71]刘艳青,杨忠芳,赖木收.辽西中生代沉积岩稀土、微量元素地球化学特征及其构造背景[J].地质论评.2006.52（4）:450-458.
[72]刘云生,郭战峰,梁西文等.中上扬子地区晚三叠世-侏罗纪砂岩构造意义及盆山耦合关系[J].石油实验地质.2006.28(3):201-205.
[73]刘占国,斯春松,寿建峰等.四川盆地川中地区中下侏罗统砂岩储层异常致密成因机理[J].沉积学报.2011.29（4）:744-751.
[74]马立元,周总瑛.川西坳陷中段上三叠统须家河组天然气资源潜力分析[J].天然气地球科学.2009.20(5:):730-737.
[75]马永生,陈洪德,王国力等.中国南方层序地层与古地理[M].北京:科学出版社.2009:379-476.
[76]牟传龙,谭钦银,余谦.米仓山南缘中生代沉积盆地性质讨论[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2008,28（3）:41-45.
[77]牛树银,孙爱群,白文吉.造山带与相邻盆地间物质的横向迁移[J].地学前缘,1995,2(1):85~92.
[78]钱利军,陈洪德,林良彪等.四川盆地西缘地区中侏罗统沙溪庙组地球化学特征及其环境意义[J].沉积学报.2012.30（6）:1061-1071.
[79]钱利军,陈洪德,时志强等.川西坳陷中段蓬莱镇组物源及沉积相展布特征[J].成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）.2013.40（1）:15-24.
[80]丘东洲,付清平.川西坳陷南区侏罗系层序地层与油气.[J].天然气工业.2000.20（4）:5-10.
[81]任纪舜,王作勋,陈炳蔚等.从全球看中国大地构造-中国及邻区大地构造图简要说明[M].北京:地质出版社.1999.1-50.
[82]邵磊, Stattexer K,李文厚.从砂岩地球化学探讨盆地构造背景[J].科学通报,1998,43(9):985～987.
[83]施振生,杨威,谢增业等.四川盆地晚三叠世碎屑组分对源区分析及印支运动的指示[J].地质学报.2010,84（3）:387-397.
[84]四川省地质矿产局.中华人民共和国地质矿产部地质专报一区域地质第23号:四川省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1991.206~241
[85]童崇光.四川盆地构造演化与油气聚集[M].北京:地质出版社.1992:1-26.
[86]汪泽成,赵文智,张林等.四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探[M].北京:地质出版社.2002:1－287..
[87]汪泽成,刘和甫,熊宝贤等.从前陆盆地充填地层分析盆山耦合关系[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报.2001,26（1）:33-39.
[88]汪正江,陈洪德,张锦泉.物源分析的研究与展望[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2000,20(4):104-110.
[89]王道永.龙门山中段中生代前陆盆地的构造演化史[J].成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）.1994,21（3）:20-28.
[90]王亮国,余福林,邓康龄等.川西坳陷侏罗系沉积环境[J].油气地质与采收率,2001,8(6):13-16.
[91]王清晨,李忠.盆山耦合与沉积盆地成因[J].沉积学报,2003,21(1):24~30.
[92]王清晨,彭海波,孙枢.赣北安源煤系沉积对构造活动的响应[J].地质科学,1991,25(3):231~238.
[93]王英华.阴极发光技术在地质学中的应用[M].北京:地质出版社,1990.
[94]王永栋,付碧宏,谢小平等.四川盆地陆相三叠系与侏罗系[M].合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2010.
[95]魏显贵,杜思清,刘援朝等.米仓山推覆构造的结构样式及演化特征[J].矿物岩石,1997,17（s1）:114-122.
[96]吴崇筠.湖泊沉积相的划分[J].石油勘探与开发.1981,2:1-10.
[97]吴根耀,马力“.盆”“山”耦合和脱耦:进展,现状和努力方向.大地构造与成矿学[J].2004,28(1):81~97.
[98]肖安成,魏国齐,沈中延等.扬子地块与南秦岭造山带的盆山系统与构造耦合[J].岩石学报,2011,27(3):601-611.
[99]徐胜林,侯明才,林良彪等.川西前陆盆地侏罗纪构造层序地层格架内沉积充填特征[J].岩石学报.2011.27（8）:2327-2338.
[100]徐胜林,侯明才,林良彪等.川西前陆盆地侏罗纪构造层序地层格架内沉积充填特征[J].岩石学报.2011.27（8）:2327-2338.
[101]杨国臣,于炳松,陈建强等.川西前陆盆地上侏罗统-白垩系泥质岩稀土元素地球化学[J].现代地质.2010.24（1）:140-150.
[102]杨季凯.龙门山地区地质发展史[J].四川地质学报.1991,11（3）:181-187.
[103]杨克明,朱宏权,叶军等.川西致密砂岩气藏地质特征[M].北京:科学出版社.2012:1-10.
[104]杨守业,李从先.REE示踪沉积物物源研究进展[J].地球科学进展,1999,14(2):164~167.
[105]于兴河,王德发,郑浚茂.华北地区二叠系砂岩成分与构造背景关系的探讨[J].现代地质.1994.8(3):299-307.
[106]曾允孚,李勇.龙门山前陆盆地形成与演化[J].矿物岩石,1995.15（1）:40-49.
[107]张国伟,张本仁,袁学城等.秦岭造山带与大陆动力学[M].北京:科学出版社.2001:20-400.
[108]张国伟,董云鹏,赖绍聪等.秦岭—大别造山带南缘勉略构造带与勉略缝合带[J].中国科学（D辑）,2003,33（12）:1121-1135.
[109]张茜.米仓山隆升时代的沉积学制约[D].西安:西北大学,2012
[110]张闻林,高熙,陈洪德等.川西北部地区侏罗系层序地层特征及其与油气的关系[J].天然气技术,2007,1(3):34-37.
[111]张原庆,钱祥麟.盆山耦合概念及机制[J].中国地质.2001,28(3).
[112]张岳桥,董树文,李建华等.中生代多向挤压构造作用与四川盆地的形成和改造[J].中国地质,2011,38(2):233-250.
[113]赵俊兴,陈洪德,时志强.古地貌恢复技术方法及其研究意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪沉积前古地貌研究为例[J].成都理工学院学报.2001.28(3):260-266.
[114]赵俊兴,吕强,李凤杰等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长6时期物源状况分析[J].沉积学报,2008,26(4):610~616.
[115]赵永刚,陈景山,雷卞军等.川西邛崃县白马庙气田上侏罗统蓬莱镇组高分辨率层序地层分析[J].中国地质,2005,32(4):674-681.
[116]赵振华.关于岩石微量元素构造环境判别图解使用的有关问题[J].大地构造与成矿学.2007,31(1):92-103.
[117]郑荣才,李国晖,戴朝成等.四川类前陆盆地盆—山耦合系统和沉积学响应[J].地质学报.2012,86（1）:170-180.
[118]朱志军,陈洪德,林良彪等.川东南—湘西地区志留系小河坝组砂岩微量元素地球化学特征及意义[J].地质科技情报,2010.29(2):24-30.
[119]朱志军,陈洪德,胡晓强等.川西前陆盆地侏罗纪层序地层格架、沉积体系配置及演化[J].沉积学报,2010.28(3):451-461.
[120]朱志军,陈洪德,林良彪等.川西前陆盆地蓬莱镇组层序、岩相古地理特征及演化[J].地层学杂志,2009,33（3）:318-325.
[2] Carmala N. Garzione, Matt J. Ikari, Asish R. Basu, Source of Oligocene to Pliocene sedimentary rocksin the Linxia basin in northeastern Tibet from Nd isotopes: Implications for tectonic forcing ofclimate[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, Sep2005;117:1156-1166.
[3] Davis R A. Depositional systems—a genetic approach to sedimentary geology. EnglewoodCliffs:Prentice—hall inc,1983.33-42.
[4] Dickinson W R, Suczek C A. Plate tectonics and sandstone compositions. American association ofpetroleum geologists bulletin[J].1979.63(12):2164-2182.
[5] Dickinson W R. Provenance and sediment dispersal inrelation to paleotectonics and paleogeographyof sedimentary basins[A]. In: Kleinspehn K L and Paola C (eds). New perspectives in basinanalysis[C].1988.Speringer-verlag.3-26.
[6] Maynard J B. Composition of modern deep-sea sands from arc-related basins[M]∥Leggtt JK.Trench-forearc geology. Ox-ford: Blackwall Scientific Publication,1982:551-562.
[7] Roser B P, Korsch R J. Determination of tectonic setting of sandstone mudstone suites usingSiO2content and K2O/Na2Oratio[J].J. Geol.,1986,94(5):635-650.
[8] Schwab F L. Evolution of the western continental margin, French-Italian Alps: Sandstone mineralogyas an index of platetectonic setting[J].J. Geol.,1981,89(3):349-368.
[9] Shields G, Stille P. Diagenetic constrains on the use of cerium anomalies as paleoseawater redoxproxies: An isotopic and REE study of Cambrian phosphorites[J].ChemicalGeology,2001,175:29-48.
[10] Vail P R.Sequence stratigraphy workbook, fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy.AAPG AnnualConventio n Short Course:Sequence Stratigraphy Interpretation of Seismic Well and OutcropData[J].AAPG,1998:217-223.
[11]白立新,朱日祥,吴汉宁.川北旺苍—南江地区晚侏罗世古地层学研究与真极移的探讨[J].地球物理学报,1998,41(3):324-331.
[12]蔡开平,李梅.川西南部地区沙溪庙组勘探目标研究[J].天然气工业.2004.24（10）:1-5.
[13]操应长,宋玲,王健等.重矿物资料在沉积物物源分析中的应用—以涠西南凹陷古近系流三段下亚段为例[J].沉积学报,2011,29（5）:835-841.
[14]陈洪德等.2002,中国南方海相震旦系－中三叠统构造－层序岩相古地理研究及编图,中国石化科技开发部内部研究项目成果报告.
[15]陈洪德等.中国南方古生界层序格架中的生储盖组合类型及特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(1):62~69.
[16]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春等.中国南方二叠纪层序岩相古地理特征及演化[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):510~521.
[17]陈洪德,郭彤楼等.中上扬子叠合盆地沉积充填过程与物质分布规律[M].北京:科学技术出版社.2012.
[18]陈洪德,侯明才,林良彪等.不同尺度构造—层序岩相古地理研究思路与实践[J].沉积学报,2010,28（5）:894-905.
[19]陈洪德,侯明才,刘文均等.海西－印支期中国南方的盆地演化与层序格架[J].成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）,2004,31(6):629~635.
[20]陈洪德,侯明才,许效松等.加里东期华南的盆地演化与层序格架[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006,33(1):1~8.
[21]陈洪德,黄福喜,徐胜林等.中上扬子地区海相成烃物质聚集分布规律及主控因素[J].成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）,2004,36(6):569~577.
[22]陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春等.右江盆地层序充填动力学初探[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):165~171.
[23]陈洪德,田景春,刘文均等.中国南方海相震旦系—中三叠统层序划分与对比[J].成都理工学院学报,2002,29(4):355~379.
[24]陈洪德,王成善,刘文均等.华南二叠纪层序地层与盆地演化[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):529~535.
[25]陈洪德,徐胜林.川西地区晚侏罗世蓬莱镇期构造隆升的沉积响应[J].成都理工大学学报.2010.37（4）:353-358.
[26]陈洪德,曾允孚.广西丹池盆地上泥盆统留江组硅质岩沉积特征及成因讨论[J].矿物岩石,1989,9(4):22-28.
[27]陈洪德,钟怡江,侯明才等.川东北地区长兴组-飞仙关组碳酸盐岩台地层序充填结构及成藏效应[J].石油与天然气地质,2009,30(5):539~547.
[28]陈竹新,贾东,魏国齐等.川西前陆盆地中-新生代沉积迁移与构造转换[J].中国地质,2008,35（3）:472-481.
[29]程万强,杨坤光.大巴山构造演化的石英ESR年代学研究[J].地学前缘,2009,16(3):197-206.
[30]程岳宏,于兴河,韩宝清等.东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段地球化学特征及地质意义[J].中国地质,2010.32(2):357-366.
[31]淡卫东,张昌民,尹太举等.川西白马庙气田上侏罗统蓬莱镇组高分辨率层序地层对比[J].沉积学报,2007,25（5）:708-715.
[32]邓宏文,钱凯.沉积地球化学与环境分析[M].兰州:甘肃科学技术出版社.1993:4-28.
[33]杜春国,郝芳,张树林等.川东北宣汉—达县地区地层剥蚀厚度恢复[J].煤田地质与勘探.2006,34（4）:1-5.
[34]杜后发,姜勇彪,侯增谦等.襄谦古近纪盆地砂岩地球化学特征及其对物源和沉积环境的指示作用[J].岩石矿物学杂志.2011.30（4）:654-664.
[35]高长林,刘光祥,张玉箴等,东秦岭—大巴山逆冲推覆构造与油气远景[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(S1):523-531.
[36]郭战峰,梁西文.东秦岭-大别造山带南侧中生代砂岩碎屑组分及其构造意义[J].吉林大学学报（地球科学版）.2006.36（5）:787-792.
[37]郭正吾,邓康龄,韩永辉等.四川盆地形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社.1996:1-275.
[38]胡晓强,陈洪德,纪相田等.川西前陆盆地侏罗系三角洲沉积体系与沉积模式[J].石油实验地质,2005.
[39]胡晓强,陈洪德,纪相田等.川西前陆盆地侏罗系层序地层[J].西南石油学院学报,2006.28(2):16-19.
[40]简星,关平,张巍.碎屑金红石:沉积物源的一种指针[J].地球科学进展.2012,27（8）:828-846.
[41]阚泽忠,梁斌,王全伟等.广元恐龙化石埋藏地沙溪庙组地球化学特征及对物源区和古风化作用的指示[J].中国地质,2006,33（5）:2013-1029.
[42]孔为龙,王松,杜叶龙等.中上扬子北缘二叠纪碎屑岩组分和地球化学特征[J].地球化学.2011.40（5）:473-486.
[43]乐光禹.大巴山造山带及其前陆盆地的构造特征和构造演化[J].矿物岩石,1998,18（s1）:8-15.
[44]李继亮,肖文交,等.盆山耦合与沉积作用[J].沉积学报,200321(1):52~60.
[45]李任伟.沉积地球化学[A].见:欧阳自远,倪集众.相仁杰.地球化学:历史、现状和发展趋势[C].北京:原子能出版社,1996.
[46]李瑞保,裴先治,刘战庆等.大巴山及川东北前陆盆地盆山物质耦合[J].地质学报.2010.84(8):1118-1134.
[47]李思田.论沉积盆地分析领域的追踪与创新[J].沉积学报,1992,10(3):10~15.
[48]李勇,王成善,曾允孚.造山作用与沉积响应[J].矿物岩石,2000,20(2):49~56.
[49]李勇,曾允孚,伊海生.龙门山前陆盆地沉积及构造演化[M].成都:科技出版社,1995.
[50]李珍,焦养泉,刘春华等.黄骅坳陷高柳地区重矿物物源分析[J].石油勘探与发,1998,25(6):5~7.
[51]李振宏,席胜利,刘新社.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界天然气成藏[J].世界地质,2005,24(2):174～181.
[52]李志明,刘家军,胡瑞忠等.兰坪中新生代盆地沉积岩源区构造背景和物源属性研究-砂岩地球化学证据[J].沉积学报.2003.21（4）:547-552.
[53]李智武,中—新生代大巴山前陆盆地—冲断带的形成演化[D].成都:成都理工大学,2006.
[54]李忠,李任伟,孙枢等.合肥盆地南部侏罗系砂岩碎屑组分特征及物源构造属性[J].岩石学报.1999.15(3):438-444.
[55]李忠,王道轩,林伟等.库车坳陷中-新生界碎屑组分对物源类型及其构造属性的指示[J].岩石学报.2004.20(3):655-666.
[56]梁积伟,肖丽,高小林等.鄂尔多斯盆地晚三叠世早期物源分析[J].西北地质,2008,41(2):82~86.
[57]梁诗明.四川盆地北部晚侏罗世和白垩纪沉积古地理演化[D].北京:中国地质大学,2009.
[58]刘成林,李景明,门相勇.川西白马庙地区上侏罗统蓬莱镇组天然气成藏研究[J].天然气工业.2002.22（2）:10-13.
[59]刘刚,周东升.微量元素分析在判别沉积环境中的应用—以江汉盆地潜江组为例[J].石油实验地质,2007.29(3):307-314.
[60]刘刚.大巴山侏罗纪前陆层序地层学研究[D].北京:中国地质科学院,2007.
[61]刘和甫,梁慧社,蔡立国等.川西龙门山冲断系构造样式与前陆盆地演化[J].地质学报,1994.68(2):100-117.
[62]刘和甫,汪泽成,熊保贤,等.中国中西部中、新生代前陆盆地与挤压造山带耦合分析[J].地学前缘,2000,7(3):55~72.
[63]刘和甫.大陆造山带与盆地耦合机制之一连锁断层系统(“造山带研究”笔谈会)[J].地学前绝,1999,6(3):13~14.
[64]刘和甫.盆地—山岭耦合体系与地球动力学机制.地球科学,2001,26(6):581-596
[65]刘和甫.前陆盆地类型及褶皱一冲断层样式[J].地学前缘,1995,2(3-4):59~68.
[66]刘树根,李志武,刘顺等.大巴山前陆盆地-冲断带的形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社.2006:202-209.
[67]刘树根,罗志立,戴苏兰等.龙门山冲断带的隆升和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].地质学报,1995.69(3):205-213.
[68]刘树根,罗志立,赵锡奎等.中国西部盆山系统的耦合关系及其动力学模式—以龙门山造山带—川西前陆盆地系统为例[J].地质学报.2003,77（2）:177-186.
[69]刘树根.龙门山冲断带与川西前陆盆地的形成演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社.1993:17-117.
[70]刘岫峰.沉积岩实验室研究方法[M].北京:地质出版社.1991:206-212.
[71]刘艳青,杨忠芳,赖木收.辽西中生代沉积岩稀土、微量元素地球化学特征及其构造背景[J].地质论评.2006.52（4）:450-458.
[72]刘云生,郭战峰,梁西文等.中上扬子地区晚三叠世-侏罗纪砂岩构造意义及盆山耦合关系[J].石油实验地质.2006.28(3):201-205.
[73]刘占国,斯春松,寿建峰等.四川盆地川中地区中下侏罗统砂岩储层异常致密成因机理[J].沉积学报.2011.29（4）:744-751.
[74]马立元,周总瑛.川西坳陷中段上三叠统须家河组天然气资源潜力分析[J].天然气地球科学.2009.20(5:):730-737.
[75]马永生,陈洪德,王国力等.中国南方层序地层与古地理[M].北京:科学出版社.2009:379-476.
[76]牟传龙,谭钦银,余谦.米仓山南缘中生代沉积盆地性质讨论[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2008,28（3）:41-45.
[77]牛树银,孙爱群,白文吉.造山带与相邻盆地间物质的横向迁移[J].地学前缘,1995,2(1):85~92.
[78]钱利军,陈洪德,林良彪等.四川盆地西缘地区中侏罗统沙溪庙组地球化学特征及其环境意义[J].沉积学报.2012.30（6）:1061-1071.
[79]钱利军,陈洪德,时志强等.川西坳陷中段蓬莱镇组物源及沉积相展布特征[J].成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）.2013.40（1）:15-24.
[80]丘东洲,付清平.川西坳陷南区侏罗系层序地层与油气.[J].天然气工业.2000.20（4）:5-10.
[81]任纪舜,王作勋,陈炳蔚等.从全球看中国大地构造-中国及邻区大地构造图简要说明[M].北京:地质出版社.1999.1-50.
[82]邵磊, Stattexer K,李文厚.从砂岩地球化学探讨盆地构造背景[J].科学通报,1998,43(9):985～987.
[83]施振生,杨威,谢增业等.四川盆地晚三叠世碎屑组分对源区分析及印支运动的指示[J].地质学报.2010,84（3）:387-397.
[84]四川省地质矿产局.中华人民共和国地质矿产部地质专报一区域地质第23号:四川省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1991.206~241
[85]童崇光.四川盆地构造演化与油气聚集[M].北京:地质出版社.1992:1-26.
[86]汪泽成,赵文智,张林等.四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探[M].北京:地质出版社.2002:1－287..
[87]汪泽成,刘和甫,熊宝贤等.从前陆盆地充填地层分析盆山耦合关系[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报.2001,26（1）:33-39.
[88]汪正江,陈洪德,张锦泉.物源分析的研究与展望[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2000,20(4):104-110.
[89]王道永.龙门山中段中生代前陆盆地的构造演化史[J].成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）.1994,21（3）:20-28.
[90]王亮国,余福林,邓康龄等.川西坳陷侏罗系沉积环境[J].油气地质与采收率,2001,8(6):13-16.
[91]王清晨,李忠.盆山耦合与沉积盆地成因[J].沉积学报,2003,21(1):24~30.
[92]王清晨,彭海波,孙枢.赣北安源煤系沉积对构造活动的响应[J].地质科学,1991,25(3):231~238.
[93]王英华.阴极发光技术在地质学中的应用[M].北京:地质出版社,1990.
[94]王永栋,付碧宏,谢小平等.四川盆地陆相三叠系与侏罗系[M].合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2010.
[95]魏显贵,杜思清,刘援朝等.米仓山推覆构造的结构样式及演化特征[J].矿物岩石,1997,17（s1）:114-122.
[96]吴崇筠.湖泊沉积相的划分[J].石油勘探与开发.1981,2:1-10.
[97]吴根耀,马力“.盆”“山”耦合和脱耦:进展,现状和努力方向.大地构造与成矿学[J].2004,28(1):81~97.
[98]肖安成,魏国齐,沈中延等.扬子地块与南秦岭造山带的盆山系统与构造耦合[J].岩石学报,2011,27(3):601-611.
[99]徐胜林,侯明才,林良彪等.川西前陆盆地侏罗纪构造层序地层格架内沉积充填特征[J].岩石学报.2011.27（8）:2327-2338.
[100]徐胜林,侯明才,林良彪等.川西前陆盆地侏罗纪构造层序地层格架内沉积充填特征[J].岩石学报.2011.27（8）:2327-2338.
[101]杨国臣,于炳松,陈建强等.川西前陆盆地上侏罗统-白垩系泥质岩稀土元素地球化学[J].现代地质.2010.24（1）:140-150.
[102]杨季凯.龙门山地区地质发展史[J].四川地质学报.1991,11（3）:181-187.
[103]杨克明,朱宏权,叶军等.川西致密砂岩气藏地质特征[M].北京:科学出版社.2012:1-10.
[104]杨守业,李从先.REE示踪沉积物物源研究进展[J].地球科学进展,1999,14(2):164~167.
[105]于兴河,王德发,郑浚茂.华北地区二叠系砂岩成分与构造背景关系的探讨[J].现代地质.1994.8(3):299-307.
[106]曾允孚,李勇.龙门山前陆盆地形成与演化[J].矿物岩石,1995.15（1）:40-49.
[107]张国伟,张本仁,袁学城等.秦岭造山带与大陆动力学[M].北京:科学出版社.2001:20-400.
[108]张国伟,董云鹏,赖绍聪等.秦岭—大别造山带南缘勉略构造带与勉略缝合带[J].中国科学（D辑）,2003,33（12）:1121-1135.
[109]张茜.米仓山隆升时代的沉积学制约[D].西安:西北大学,2012
[110]张闻林,高熙,陈洪德等.川西北部地区侏罗系层序地层特征及其与油气的关系[J].天然气技术,2007,1(3):34-37.
[111]张原庆,钱祥麟.盆山耦合概念及机制[J].中国地质.2001,28(3).
[112]张岳桥,董树文,李建华等.中生代多向挤压构造作用与四川盆地的形成和改造[J].中国地质,2011,38(2):233-250.
[113]赵俊兴,陈洪德,时志强.古地貌恢复技术方法及其研究意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪沉积前古地貌研究为例[J].成都理工学院学报.2001.28(3):260-266.
[114]赵俊兴,吕强,李凤杰等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长6时期物源状况分析[J].沉积学报,2008,26(4):610~616.
[115]赵永刚,陈景山,雷卞军等.川西邛崃县白马庙气田上侏罗统蓬莱镇组高分辨率层序地层分析[J].中国地质,2005,32(4):674-681.
[116]赵振华.关于岩石微量元素构造环境判别图解使用的有关问题[J].大地构造与成矿学.2007,31(1):92-103.
[117]郑荣才,李国晖,戴朝成等.四川类前陆盆地盆—山耦合系统和沉积学响应[J].地质学报.2012,86（1）:170-180.
[118]朱志军,陈洪德,林良彪等.川东南—湘西地区志留系小河坝组砂岩微量元素地球化学特征及意义[J].地质科技情报,2010.29(2):24-30.
[119]朱志军,陈洪德,胡晓强等.川西前陆盆地侏罗纪层序地层格架、沉积体系配置及演化[J].沉积学报,2010.28(3):451-461.
[120]朱志军,陈洪德,林良彪等.川西前陆盆地蓬莱镇组层序、岩相古地理特征及演化[J].地层学杂志,2009,33（3）:318-325.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |