基于组织间信任的知识链演化研究
摘要
在知识经济时代背景之下,企业竞争优势和核心能力来源已经由物质资源转变为知识资源。管理大师彼得·德鲁克指出：“知识已成为关键的经济资源,而且是竞争优势的主导性来源,甚至可能是唯一的来源”。但是,在目前的企业管理实践中,却大量存在“知识孤岛”现象。“知识孤岛”是指由于组织中知识和信息资源得不到有效的交叉融合和知识共享,因而导致的知识板块之间相互割裂而形成的无序状态,仿佛大海中的一个个“孤岛”。在产业间、行业间及部门间存在着大量的“知识孤岛”现象,将导致企业整体知识资源浪费、低透明度和低效率,难以达到企业组织间的知识共享,并正在使企业组织自身逐渐丧失核心竞争力而难以获取知识竞争优势。严重的“知识孤岛”甚至成为一些代工企业陷入“OEM”锁定的原因之一
知识经济带来了巨大的社会变革,外部环境变化快速而迅猛,企业日益处于复杂多变和充满不确定性的信息化和知识化冲击之中,新技术革命对传统的企业组织理论及其组织形式提出了新的挑战,激烈的竞争也导致企业组织形式趋于复杂化和网络化演变,以企业流程或过程为中心的组织新模式应运而生,主要包括网络组织、虚拟组织、战略联盟、产业集群、价值星系等新兴中间组织形式。当代企业组织必须拥有高效及较高透明度的知识交流系统和知识共享平台才能应对以知识经济为背景的产业和市场竞争。企业组织间知识链的建立可以有效解决“知识孤岛”现象,企业组织应当建立组织间的知识关联,通过建立中间组织的知识链来进行知识获取和更新、知识求助和协作、知识创新和应用,整合来自中间组织的知识共享型专家经验、技术论坛和最佳实践等等,从而有效地使“知识孤岛”向“知识大陆”转换。
然而,面对当前企业实践中所存在的大量知识链演化问题,理论研究领域却处于相对滞后的现状。在当前产业与市场竞争实践中,随着知识链载体组织形式的扩展,战略合作伙伴、战略联盟、产业联盟的知识链演化问题突出,而这些知识链载体间存在什么样的组织间关系?组织间关系又如何影响知识链演化?知识链演化的系统动力机制以及演化过程和演化阶段各是什么?如果研究者能够关注当前企业知识管理实践中出现的新问题和新现象,对知识链演化的载体假设做出必要的扩展,对知识链演化的研究视角加以必要的调整,则可以在企业管理学领域构建起一个知识链演化研究的较为科学而完整的框架,对以上问题的现实思考也构成了本文写作的一个逻辑起点。
本文根据相应的研究逻辑和研究脉络,将各章研究内容安排如下：
第1章,绪论。主要围绕研究问题阐述了本文的研究背景、研究意义、研究目标、研究框架、研究方法及创新点。
第2章,文献综述。主要对与本文研究相关的基本概念和内涵进行了辨析；介绍了现有理论中不同研究视角对知识链研究的理论进展；对与本研究密切相关的组织间信任理论、中间组织理论、知识链生命周期理论以及系统演化理论进行了综述,介绍了各个理论的主要观点,并提出了以上理论基础对本研究的启示。对知识链演化理论进行了评述,指出了现有知识链演化研究的不足之处,并提出了本研究的立论依据。
第3章,基于组织间信任的知识链演化动力系统研究。主要分析了知识链演化系统的基本内容、基本特征和基本演化机理。首先,提出了知识链演化系统的内涵。其次,根据系统演化中的转型演化理论及“势垒沟”理论,分析了知识链演化转型演化序列,探讨了因心智模式、习惯性防卫和组织惰性形成“势垒沟”的原因。通过对知识链演化系统内涵及演化形态的剖析,提出了知识链演化问题的实质是组织形态和组织形式的根本性变化的研究观点；指出了知识链演化系统所具有的非线性、自组织及耗散结构、系统动力性的特征；以系统动力学方法解析了组织间信任对知识链演化动力系统的作用机理。
第4章,知识链演化中的组织间信任影响因素研究。进一步通过对基于知识基础观的组织间关系理论、基于社会交换观与交易成本的组织间信任理论及其分类的回顾,指出知识链演化中的组织间信任的动态变迁轨迹；提出了知识链、组织间信任和合作效果之间在本质上存在协同演化关系的研究观点；采用问卷调查法,利用SPSS17.0软件对所回收的有效问卷进行了验证性因子分析、探索性因子分析和主成分因子分析,最终得到包含由4个维度和9个影响因素构成的知识链演化中的组织间信任影响因素模型。
第5章,基于组织间信任的知识链演化系统动力机制与演化过程研究。进一步通过对组织转型及其动力机制相关研究的回顾,分析了知识链演化系统的各个子系统间的相互作用,从而构建起基于组织间信任的知识链演化系统动力机制；以演化经济学的基本框架对组织间信任作用下的知识链演化进行分析,构建起知识链演化的分析框架：R-S-N-C(惯例-搜寻-新惯例-环境选择)；通过对知识创新相关理论的回顾,揭示了基于组织间信任的知识链创新和变异的演化过程,并以福田汽车战略联盟和TD-SCDMA产业联盟的跨案例分析进行了较深层次的探讨,得出了企业个体知识链管理对中间组织知识链管理有着显著的影响的研究结论,并由此得出了基于组织间信任的知识链演化整合模型。
第6章,组织间信任对知识链演化作用的实证研究。通过问卷调查法进一步分析了企业个体知识链管理、环境动态性、组织间信任等知识链演化要素与中间组织知识链管理的关系。得出以下研究结果：组织间信任对企业个体知识链管理与中间组织知识链管理的中介效应成立；环境动态性对企业个体知识链管理与组织间信任的部分调节效应成立。
第7章,结论与展望。归纳和总结了本文主要的研究结论,提出了研究展望并指出了研究尚存在的不足之处,依据本文所提出的研究结论为我国企业组织进行知识链管理实践提出了具有可操作性的应用建议。
本文的创新点主要有以下两点：
1.从组织间信任的研究视角对知识链演化载体间的关系进行了探讨。本文提出了一个知识链演化研究的新视角——组织间信任视角。“组织间信任”作为组织间关系中最为紧密的关系维度,是从组织的心理层面来深入研究知识链在不同层次和维度的信任关系下的演化过程与系统动力机制问题,是站在“组织内透视”的角度来探析知识链演化过程“黑箱”,对现有知识链演化文献中忽视组织间关系和合作机理的研究不足是一个较为有力的补充,并对当代动态环境下的企业间知识资源合作实践具有较强的指导意义,是对知识链演化问题从“理论模糊地带”到“实践清晰地带”的有益尝试。
2.从知识链、合作效果和组织间信任的协同演化关系中进一步揭示出知识链演化的系统规律。本文构建的理论模型不仅是对知识链演化阶段具有“生命周期性”特征的一般性规律的揭示,更是进一步揭示出知识链成员组织间信任是随着知识链生命周期而逐步建立并具有层次演进性的,多层次的组织间信任又成为知识链渐进性演化的“系统动力机制”的内驱动因,即在本质上,组织间信任、知识链、合作效果具有动态的协同演化关系。对知识链演化规律的进一步揭示,是对知识链演化本质问题的“归核化”,是对知识链演化研究从单一化到系统化的有益尝试,一定程度上丰富并拓展了现有知识链研究的理论框架。
In the era of knowledge economy, knowledge resources into competitive advantage and core competitiveness of the source view has been widely recognized. Management guru Peter Drucker pointed out that "knowledge has become the key economic resources, and is the dominant source of competitive advantage, and may even be the only source." However, in the current business practices, but there are a lot of knowledge solitary island phenomenon. Knowledge Island is to enable enterprises to gradually lose the core competitiveness is difficult to obtain knowledge of competitive advantage."Knowledge island" phenomenon refers to the organization, knowledge and information resources can not be effectively cross-integration and knowledge sharing, and thus result in knowledge section between the split and the formation of the disordered state, as if the sea in a solitary island."Between sectors, between institutions and between a large number of "knowledge island", and "knowledge island" will lead directly to the overall interests of the business organization, inefficiency, poor transparency and knowledge of the waste of resources, it is difficult to achieve business inter-organizational knowledge sharing and win-win. Serious "Knowledge Island" has also become some of the foundry business into one of the reasons for the "OEM" lock.
The knowledge-based economy has brought great social change, quick and rapid changes in the external environment, businesses are increasingly complex and changeable and full of uncertainty into the information and knowledge impacted technological revolution on the traditional corporate organizational theory and organizational forms, new challenges, fierce competition has also led to the corporate form of organization tends to complicate and network evolution, the new model of the business process or process-centered organization to be shipped students, including network organization, virtual organizations, strategic alliances, industry clusters, the value of galaxies and other emerging forms of intermediary organizations. Business organizations in order to adapt to the changing industry and market challenges, quick to adapt strategies and coordinated action, you must have a higher transparency of the exchange of knowledge systems and knowledge-sharing platform. The face of the "knowledge island", business organizations can do is to establish the association of inter-organizational knowledge, knowledge through the establishment of the knowledge chain of intermediary organizations to access and update knowledge the assistance and collaboration, knowledge innovation and application integration from intermediate organizations, knowledge sharing expertise, technical forums and best practices, thus effectively "knowledge island" conversion to the knowledge of the mainland.
However, faced with the question of the evolution of business practices in the existence of a large enterprise knowledge chain, the field of theoretical research is lagging behind the status quo. In the current industry and market competition in practice, the organization in the form of the knowledge chain carrier has been extended to intermediary organizations, such as strategic partners, strategic alliances, and industry alliance of the knowledge chain evolution problems outstanding, while between these knowledge chain carrier existences of what kind of organization between relationships? Organizational relationships and how they affect the evolution of the knowledge chain? What is the system dynamic evolution of knowledge chain mechanism and evolutionary process and the evolutionary stage? If the researcher to focus on new problems and new phenomena appear in the current enterprise knowledge management practices, and assumptions to make the necessary expansion to be the necessary adjustments, the evolution of knowledge chain perspective on the evolution of the carrier of the knowledge chain, you can learn in business management areas build a knowledge chain evolution is more scientific and complete framework for thinking of the reality of the above problems also constitute a logical starting point of this writing.
According to the logic and context, each chapter is organized as follows:
Chapter1Introduction. Mainly around the research questions described the research background and significance, the research objectives of this study, research, study structure, research methods and research and innovation, and inadequacies.
Chapter2Summary of the relevant theory. Discrimination; the basic concept and content related to this study describes the theoretical developments of the existing theory perspective on the knowledge chain; trust theory of this study is closely related to organization, the intermediate organization theory, knowledge chain The life cycle theory, and system evolution theory are reviewed to introduce the main ideas of each theory, and the revelation of the above theoretical basis of this study. The knowledge chain evolution theories are reviewed, pointing out that the evolution of the inadequacies of existing knowledge chain, and put forward the argument basis of this study.
Chapter3The evolution of dynamical systems based on inter-organizational trust in the knowledge chain. The main analysis of the basic content of knowledge-based chain of evolution is the basic features and basic evolution mechanism. First of all, the connotation of the knowledge chain evolution. Secondly, according to evolutionary theory in transition in the evolution of the system and barrier ditch "theory, the knowledge chain evolution transformation evolutionary sequences, and investigate the reasons for the habitual defense and organizational inertia, the formation of mental models, the barrier ditch. Analysis of the evolution of the system content and evolution of the morphology of the knowledge chain, draw the essence of the question of the evolution of the knowledge chain is a research point of view of the fundamental changes in the morphology and forms of organization. The paper points out the nonlinear evolution of knowledge chain system. Self-organization and dissipative structures means the system dynamic characteristics. Use system dynamics method, to explain the inter-organizational trust in the mechanism evolution of dynamical systems of knowledge chain.
Chapter4The Influence Factors of Knowledge Chain in Inter-firm Network based on the knowledge chain evolution. Further review of the theory and its classification based on the knowledge-based view of inter-organizational relations theory, based on the concept of social exchange transaction costs of inter-organizational trust, and pointed out that the dynamic trajectories of change in inter-organizational trust in the evolution of the knowledge chain. The chain of knowledge, trust and cooperation in inter-organizational in nature there is a synergistic effect between the three research point of view of evolutionary relationships. Questionnaire using SPSS17.0software on the recovery of valid questionnaires conducted a confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis and principal component factor analysis method is the ultimate knowledge contained by the four dimensions, for a total of nine influence factors organization in the chain of evolution of trust between the impact factor models.
Chapter5The system power mechanism and evolution of evolution based on inter-organizational trust in the knowledge chain. Further review of organizational change associated with the transition and its dynamic mechanism, the interaction between the various subsystems of the evolution of knowledge chain, to build a dynamic mechanism of the evolution of the knowledge chain system based on inter-organizational trust. The role of knowledge under the chain of evolution to analyze the basic framework of evolutionary economics, inter-organizational trust, built up the knowledge chain analysis of the evolution of the framework:R-S-N-C (Practice-Search-New Practice-Environmental Selection); review of the theory of knowledge innovation reveal the evolution of the knowledge chain innovation and variation based on inter-organizational trust, and a deeper level of cross-case analysis of Foton Motor and TD-SCDMA Industry Alliance, come to the individual enterprise knowledge chain management intermediary organizations The knowledge chain management has a significant impact on the conclusions, and the resulting evolution of knowledge chain model based on inter-organizational trust.
Chapter6The empirical research of Inter-organizational trust in the role of the evolution of the knowledge chain. Individual the enterprise knowledge chain management, environmental dynamic, inter-organizational trust relationship with the middle of organizational knowledge chain management through the questionnaire further. Come to the following findings:inter-organizational trust establishment of knowledge chain management's mediating effect on individual enterprise knowledge chain management and intermediary organizations; environmental dynamics on the individual enterprise knowledge chain management and inter-organizational trust relationship adjustment effect partially substantiated
Chapter7The research conclusions and outlook. The conclusions of this paper summarize the proposed research prospects, and relatively reasonable and possible recommendations for our enterprise knowledge chain practice in accordance with the conclusions of the study.
Innovation may in this paper are mainly the following two points:
(1) The inter-organizational trust is a new research perspective. In this paper, the New Perspective on the evolution of a knowledge chain-the inter-organizational trust perspective."Inter-organizational trust" as the dimension of the close relationship in the inter-organizational relations, from the psychological level of the organization's in-depth study of the knowledge chain in the evolution of different levels of trust relationships and the system dynamic mechanism,"Standing in the organization to Analysis of the evolution of the knowledge chain "process black box" perspective "point of view, to ignore the inter-organizational relations and cooperation mechanism is the lack of a powerful complement to existing knowledge chain evolution literature, and contemporary dynamic environment of the enterprise knowledge resources cooperation practice with a strong guiding significance to the question of the evolution of knowledge chain from the theory of a gray area to the practice of clear zone "the possibility of a useful attempt.
(2) Reveal the evolution of the knowledge chain further. The theoretical model constructed in this paper is not only the evolutionary stage of the chain of knowledge to reveal the general laws of life cyclical characteristics, further revealed trust in the knowledge chain member organizations with the knowledge chain life cycle gradually established and has a level evolutionary, multi-level inter-organizational trust has become the progressive evolution of the knowledge chain system dynamic mechanism induced factors, that is, in essence, inter-organizational trust, knowledge chain, the effectiveness of cooperation with dynamic symbiotic relationship. Further revealed the evolution of the knowledge chain, the nature of the problem of evolution of knowledge chain "Refocusing" Evolution of the knowledge chain from a single useful to try to systematic, and expand the theoretical framework of the knowledge chain also help to break the black box "of knowledge-based chain of evolution" process, and is conducive to supplement the resources of the individual knowledge is limited "knowledge gap" and "knowledge island", knowledge sharing, improve the cooperative performance.
知识经济带来了巨大的社会变革,外部环境变化快速而迅猛,企业日益处于复杂多变和充满不确定性的信息化和知识化冲击之中,新技术革命对传统的企业组织理论及其组织形式提出了新的挑战,激烈的竞争也导致企业组织形式趋于复杂化和网络化演变,以企业流程或过程为中心的组织新模式应运而生,主要包括网络组织、虚拟组织、战略联盟、产业集群、价值星系等新兴中间组织形式。当代企业组织必须拥有高效及较高透明度的知识交流系统和知识共享平台才能应对以知识经济为背景的产业和市场竞争。企业组织间知识链的建立可以有效解决“知识孤岛”现象,企业组织应当建立组织间的知识关联,通过建立中间组织的知识链来进行知识获取和更新、知识求助和协作、知识创新和应用,整合来自中间组织的知识共享型专家经验、技术论坛和最佳实践等等,从而有效地使“知识孤岛”向“知识大陆”转换。
然而,面对当前企业实践中所存在的大量知识链演化问题,理论研究领域却处于相对滞后的现状。在当前产业与市场竞争实践中,随着知识链载体组织形式的扩展,战略合作伙伴、战略联盟、产业联盟的知识链演化问题突出,而这些知识链载体间存在什么样的组织间关系?组织间关系又如何影响知识链演化?知识链演化的系统动力机制以及演化过程和演化阶段各是什么?如果研究者能够关注当前企业知识管理实践中出现的新问题和新现象,对知识链演化的载体假设做出必要的扩展,对知识链演化的研究视角加以必要的调整,则可以在企业管理学领域构建起一个知识链演化研究的较为科学而完整的框架,对以上问题的现实思考也构成了本文写作的一个逻辑起点。
本文根据相应的研究逻辑和研究脉络,将各章研究内容安排如下：
第1章,绪论。主要围绕研究问题阐述了本文的研究背景、研究意义、研究目标、研究框架、研究方法及创新点。
第2章,文献综述。主要对与本文研究相关的基本概念和内涵进行了辨析；介绍了现有理论中不同研究视角对知识链研究的理论进展；对与本研究密切相关的组织间信任理论、中间组织理论、知识链生命周期理论以及系统演化理论进行了综述,介绍了各个理论的主要观点,并提出了以上理论基础对本研究的启示。对知识链演化理论进行了评述,指出了现有知识链演化研究的不足之处,并提出了本研究的立论依据。
第3章,基于组织间信任的知识链演化动力系统研究。主要分析了知识链演化系统的基本内容、基本特征和基本演化机理。首先,提出了知识链演化系统的内涵。其次,根据系统演化中的转型演化理论及“势垒沟”理论,分析了知识链演化转型演化序列,探讨了因心智模式、习惯性防卫和组织惰性形成“势垒沟”的原因。通过对知识链演化系统内涵及演化形态的剖析,提出了知识链演化问题的实质是组织形态和组织形式的根本性变化的研究观点；指出了知识链演化系统所具有的非线性、自组织及耗散结构、系统动力性的特征；以系统动力学方法解析了组织间信任对知识链演化动力系统的作用机理。
第4章,知识链演化中的组织间信任影响因素研究。进一步通过对基于知识基础观的组织间关系理论、基于社会交换观与交易成本的组织间信任理论及其分类的回顾,指出知识链演化中的组织间信任的动态变迁轨迹；提出了知识链、组织间信任和合作效果之间在本质上存在协同演化关系的研究观点；采用问卷调查法,利用SPSS17.0软件对所回收的有效问卷进行了验证性因子分析、探索性因子分析和主成分因子分析,最终得到包含由4个维度和9个影响因素构成的知识链演化中的组织间信任影响因素模型。
第5章,基于组织间信任的知识链演化系统动力机制与演化过程研究。进一步通过对组织转型及其动力机制相关研究的回顾,分析了知识链演化系统的各个子系统间的相互作用,从而构建起基于组织间信任的知识链演化系统动力机制；以演化经济学的基本框架对组织间信任作用下的知识链演化进行分析,构建起知识链演化的分析框架：R-S-N-C(惯例-搜寻-新惯例-环境选择)；通过对知识创新相关理论的回顾,揭示了基于组织间信任的知识链创新和变异的演化过程,并以福田汽车战略联盟和TD-SCDMA产业联盟的跨案例分析进行了较深层次的探讨,得出了企业个体知识链管理对中间组织知识链管理有着显著的影响的研究结论,并由此得出了基于组织间信任的知识链演化整合模型。
第6章,组织间信任对知识链演化作用的实证研究。通过问卷调查法进一步分析了企业个体知识链管理、环境动态性、组织间信任等知识链演化要素与中间组织知识链管理的关系。得出以下研究结果：组织间信任对企业个体知识链管理与中间组织知识链管理的中介效应成立；环境动态性对企业个体知识链管理与组织间信任的部分调节效应成立。
第7章,结论与展望。归纳和总结了本文主要的研究结论,提出了研究展望并指出了研究尚存在的不足之处,依据本文所提出的研究结论为我国企业组织进行知识链管理实践提出了具有可操作性的应用建议。
本文的创新点主要有以下两点：
1.从组织间信任的研究视角对知识链演化载体间的关系进行了探讨。本文提出了一个知识链演化研究的新视角——组织间信任视角。“组织间信任”作为组织间关系中最为紧密的关系维度,是从组织的心理层面来深入研究知识链在不同层次和维度的信任关系下的演化过程与系统动力机制问题,是站在“组织内透视”的角度来探析知识链演化过程“黑箱”,对现有知识链演化文献中忽视组织间关系和合作机理的研究不足是一个较为有力的补充,并对当代动态环境下的企业间知识资源合作实践具有较强的指导意义,是对知识链演化问题从“理论模糊地带”到“实践清晰地带”的有益尝试。
2.从知识链、合作效果和组织间信任的协同演化关系中进一步揭示出知识链演化的系统规律。本文构建的理论模型不仅是对知识链演化阶段具有“生命周期性”特征的一般性规律的揭示,更是进一步揭示出知识链成员组织间信任是随着知识链生命周期而逐步建立并具有层次演进性的,多层次的组织间信任又成为知识链渐进性演化的“系统动力机制”的内驱动因,即在本质上,组织间信任、知识链、合作效果具有动态的协同演化关系。对知识链演化规律的进一步揭示,是对知识链演化本质问题的“归核化”,是对知识链演化研究从单一化到系统化的有益尝试,一定程度上丰富并拓展了现有知识链研究的理论框架。
In the era of knowledge economy, knowledge resources into competitive advantage and core competitiveness of the source view has been widely recognized. Management guru Peter Drucker pointed out that "knowledge has become the key economic resources, and is the dominant source of competitive advantage, and may even be the only source." However, in the current business practices, but there are a lot of knowledge solitary island phenomenon. Knowledge Island is to enable enterprises to gradually lose the core competitiveness is difficult to obtain knowledge of competitive advantage."Knowledge island" phenomenon refers to the organization, knowledge and information resources can not be effectively cross-integration and knowledge sharing, and thus result in knowledge section between the split and the formation of the disordered state, as if the sea in a solitary island."Between sectors, between institutions and between a large number of "knowledge island", and "knowledge island" will lead directly to the overall interests of the business organization, inefficiency, poor transparency and knowledge of the waste of resources, it is difficult to achieve business inter-organizational knowledge sharing and win-win. Serious "Knowledge Island" has also become some of the foundry business into one of the reasons for the "OEM" lock.
The knowledge-based economy has brought great social change, quick and rapid changes in the external environment, businesses are increasingly complex and changeable and full of uncertainty into the information and knowledge impacted technological revolution on the traditional corporate organizational theory and organizational forms, new challenges, fierce competition has also led to the corporate form of organization tends to complicate and network evolution, the new model of the business process or process-centered organization to be shipped students, including network organization, virtual organizations, strategic alliances, industry clusters, the value of galaxies and other emerging forms of intermediary organizations. Business organizations in order to adapt to the changing industry and market challenges, quick to adapt strategies and coordinated action, you must have a higher transparency of the exchange of knowledge systems and knowledge-sharing platform. The face of the "knowledge island", business organizations can do is to establish the association of inter-organizational knowledge, knowledge through the establishment of the knowledge chain of intermediary organizations to access and update knowledge the assistance and collaboration, knowledge innovation and application integration from intermediate organizations, knowledge sharing expertise, technical forums and best practices, thus effectively "knowledge island" conversion to the knowledge of the mainland.
However, faced with the question of the evolution of business practices in the existence of a large enterprise knowledge chain, the field of theoretical research is lagging behind the status quo. In the current industry and market competition in practice, the organization in the form of the knowledge chain carrier has been extended to intermediary organizations, such as strategic partners, strategic alliances, and industry alliance of the knowledge chain evolution problems outstanding, while between these knowledge chain carrier existences of what kind of organization between relationships? Organizational relationships and how they affect the evolution of the knowledge chain? What is the system dynamic evolution of knowledge chain mechanism and evolutionary process and the evolutionary stage? If the researcher to focus on new problems and new phenomena appear in the current enterprise knowledge management practices, and assumptions to make the necessary expansion to be the necessary adjustments, the evolution of knowledge chain perspective on the evolution of the carrier of the knowledge chain, you can learn in business management areas build a knowledge chain evolution is more scientific and complete framework for thinking of the reality of the above problems also constitute a logical starting point of this writing.
According to the logic and context, each chapter is organized as follows:
Chapter1Introduction. Mainly around the research questions described the research background and significance, the research objectives of this study, research, study structure, research methods and research and innovation, and inadequacies.
Chapter2Summary of the relevant theory. Discrimination; the basic concept and content related to this study describes the theoretical developments of the existing theory perspective on the knowledge chain; trust theory of this study is closely related to organization, the intermediate organization theory, knowledge chain The life cycle theory, and system evolution theory are reviewed to introduce the main ideas of each theory, and the revelation of the above theoretical basis of this study. The knowledge chain evolution theories are reviewed, pointing out that the evolution of the inadequacies of existing knowledge chain, and put forward the argument basis of this study.
Chapter3The evolution of dynamical systems based on inter-organizational trust in the knowledge chain. The main analysis of the basic content of knowledge-based chain of evolution is the basic features and basic evolution mechanism. First of all, the connotation of the knowledge chain evolution. Secondly, according to evolutionary theory in transition in the evolution of the system and barrier ditch "theory, the knowledge chain evolution transformation evolutionary sequences, and investigate the reasons for the habitual defense and organizational inertia, the formation of mental models, the barrier ditch. Analysis of the evolution of the system content and evolution of the morphology of the knowledge chain, draw the essence of the question of the evolution of the knowledge chain is a research point of view of the fundamental changes in the morphology and forms of organization. The paper points out the nonlinear evolution of knowledge chain system. Self-organization and dissipative structures means the system dynamic characteristics. Use system dynamics method, to explain the inter-organizational trust in the mechanism evolution of dynamical systems of knowledge chain.
Chapter4The Influence Factors of Knowledge Chain in Inter-firm Network based on the knowledge chain evolution. Further review of the theory and its classification based on the knowledge-based view of inter-organizational relations theory, based on the concept of social exchange transaction costs of inter-organizational trust, and pointed out that the dynamic trajectories of change in inter-organizational trust in the evolution of the knowledge chain. The chain of knowledge, trust and cooperation in inter-organizational in nature there is a synergistic effect between the three research point of view of evolutionary relationships. Questionnaire using SPSS17.0software on the recovery of valid questionnaires conducted a confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis and principal component factor analysis method is the ultimate knowledge contained by the four dimensions, for a total of nine influence factors organization in the chain of evolution of trust between the impact factor models.
Chapter5The system power mechanism and evolution of evolution based on inter-organizational trust in the knowledge chain. Further review of organizational change associated with the transition and its dynamic mechanism, the interaction between the various subsystems of the evolution of knowledge chain, to build a dynamic mechanism of the evolution of the knowledge chain system based on inter-organizational trust. The role of knowledge under the chain of evolution to analyze the basic framework of evolutionary economics, inter-organizational trust, built up the knowledge chain analysis of the evolution of the framework:R-S-N-C (Practice-Search-New Practice-Environmental Selection); review of the theory of knowledge innovation reveal the evolution of the knowledge chain innovation and variation based on inter-organizational trust, and a deeper level of cross-case analysis of Foton Motor and TD-SCDMA Industry Alliance, come to the individual enterprise knowledge chain management intermediary organizations The knowledge chain management has a significant impact on the conclusions, and the resulting evolution of knowledge chain model based on inter-organizational trust.
Chapter6The empirical research of Inter-organizational trust in the role of the evolution of the knowledge chain. Individual the enterprise knowledge chain management, environmental dynamic, inter-organizational trust relationship with the middle of organizational knowledge chain management through the questionnaire further. Come to the following findings:inter-organizational trust establishment of knowledge chain management's mediating effect on individual enterprise knowledge chain management and intermediary organizations; environmental dynamics on the individual enterprise knowledge chain management and inter-organizational trust relationship adjustment effect partially substantiated
Chapter7The research conclusions and outlook. The conclusions of this paper summarize the proposed research prospects, and relatively reasonable and possible recommendations for our enterprise knowledge chain practice in accordance with the conclusions of the study.
Innovation may in this paper are mainly the following two points:
(1) The inter-organizational trust is a new research perspective. In this paper, the New Perspective on the evolution of a knowledge chain-the inter-organizational trust perspective."Inter-organizational trust" as the dimension of the close relationship in the inter-organizational relations, from the psychological level of the organization's in-depth study of the knowledge chain in the evolution of different levels of trust relationships and the system dynamic mechanism,"Standing in the organization to Analysis of the evolution of the knowledge chain "process black box" perspective "point of view, to ignore the inter-organizational relations and cooperation mechanism is the lack of a powerful complement to existing knowledge chain evolution literature, and contemporary dynamic environment of the enterprise knowledge resources cooperation practice with a strong guiding significance to the question of the evolution of knowledge chain from the theory of a gray area to the practice of clear zone "the possibility of a useful attempt.
(2) Reveal the evolution of the knowledge chain further. The theoretical model constructed in this paper is not only the evolutionary stage of the chain of knowledge to reveal the general laws of life cyclical characteristics, further revealed trust in the knowledge chain member organizations with the knowledge chain life cycle gradually established and has a level evolutionary, multi-level inter-organizational trust has become the progressive evolution of the knowledge chain system dynamic mechanism induced factors, that is, in essence, inter-organizational trust, knowledge chain, the effectiveness of cooperation with dynamic symbiotic relationship. Further revealed the evolution of the knowledge chain, the nature of the problem of evolution of knowledge chain "Refocusing" Evolution of the knowledge chain from a single useful to try to systematic, and expand the theoretical framework of the knowledge chain also help to break the black box "of knowledge-based chain of evolution" process, and is conducive to supplement the resources of the individual knowledge is limited "knowledge gap" and "knowledge island", knowledge sharing, improve the cooperative performance.
引文
[1]陈叶烽,叶航,汪丁丁,信任水平的测度及其对合作的影响—来自一组实验微观数据的证据[J].管理世界,2010(4)：pp.54-64.
[2]陈莉平,王凤彬,企业组织理论新发展[J].经济学动态,2005(2)：pp.66-69.
[3]蔡翔,严宗光,易海强,知识供应链：概念,特征,主体[J].科学管理研究,2000(6)：pp.12-14.
[4]陈志祥,陈荣秋,马士华,论知识链与知识管理[J].科研管理,2000(1)：pp.14-18.
[5]陈红儿,刘斯敖,中间性组织理论评析[J].经济学动态,2003(7)：pp.23
[6]常荔,邹珊刚,李顺才,基于知识链的知识扩散的影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2001(5)：pp.122-127.
[7]蔡兵,顾新,王维成,知识链的绩效评价[J].四川大学学报：哲学社会科学版,2006(5)：pp.134-139.
[8]程斌,武忠,基于分形的知识链评价模型[J].科技情报开发与经济,2006(7)：pp.159-161.
[9]杜绍厚,系统演化的五种形态[J].自然辩证法研究,1987,(4)：pp.72.
[10]丁勇,梁昌勇,蒋翠清,基于证据理论的企业知识链绩效评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2007(19)：pp.245-248.
[11]弗朗西斯·福山,信任：社会美德与创造经济繁荣[M].海南：海南出版社,2006.
[12]福轩.探寻福田汽车自主创新模式[N].中国工业报,2006-05-19(A02)
[13]福轩.集成知识链合创新[N].首都建设报,2006-05-10(004)
[14]冯文娜,杨蕙馨,中间性组织的演化过程分析—基于分工理论的解释[J].理论学刊,2007(7)：pp.38-42.
[15]方征,中国企业声誉测评指标体系构建研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2008(2)：pp.43.
[16]高良谋,内生与动态：熊彼特企业家理论的两个支点[J].财经问题研究,1998(7)：pp.60-64.
[17]高维和,陈信康,组织间关系：基于心理契约的建构[J].经济管理,2008(Z2)：pp.101-107.
[18]顾新,郭耀煌,李久平,社会资本及其在知识链中的作用[J].科研管理,2003,24(5)：pp.44-48.
[19]顾新,郭耀煌,罗利,知识链成员之间利益分配的二人合作博弈分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004(7)：pp.24-37.
[20]顾新,李久平,王维成,基于生命周期的知识链管理研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(3).pp.98-103.
[21]顾新,李久平,知识链成员之间的相互信任[J].经济问题探索,2005(2)：pp.67.
[22]郝云宏,李文博.基于耗散结构理论视角的企业知识网络演化机制探析[J].商业经济与管理,2009(04)：pp.23-28.
[23]今井贤一,企业集团[M].北京：经济科学出版社,1996：pp.273-274.
[24]姜璐,王德胜,于秀彬,认识系统演化的方法[J].哲学动态,1993(7)：pp.31.
[25]鲁义轩.解析TD-SCDMA发展轨迹[J].通信世界,2005(31)：pp.22.
[26]兰军.商用车产业链合创新[N].消费日报,2006-05-08(A02)
[27]林忠,鞠蕾.组织隐性知识积累路径研究：基于演化的视角[A].中国管理现代化研究会.第五届(2010)中国管理学年会—组织行为与人力资源管理分会场论文集[C].中国管理现代化研究会,2010：pp.444-448.
[28]刘冀生,吴金希,论基于知识的企业核心竞争力与企业知识链管理[J].清华大学学报,2002(1)：pp.68-72.
[29]柳卸林,马池,池世国,什么是国家创新体系[J].数量经济技术经究,1999,16(5)：pp.20-22.
[30]刘勇军,聂规划,面向供应链的知识链模型及其管理策略[J].情报杂志,2007(6)：pp.24-26.
[31]李自杰,李毅,郑艺,信任对知识获取的影响机制[J].管理世界,2010(8)：pp.179-180.
[32]李东红,李蕾,组织间信任理论研究回顾与展望[J].经济管理,2009(4)：pp.173-177.
[33]李勖,汪应洛,孙林岩,组织的环境适应性及生存战略—基于知识供应链的分析[J].南开管理评论,2003,6(4)：pp.61-65.
[34]李长玲,知识供应链及其管理[J].情报杂志,2004(11)：pp.9-11.
[35]罗珉,王雎,组织间关系的拓展与演进：基于组织间知识互动的研究[J].中国工业经济,2008(1)：pp.40-49.
[36]罗珉,德鲁克管理思想解读[M].四川成都：西南财经大学出版社,2009(4)：pp.314-323.
[37]罗珉.组织间关系理论研究的深度与解释力辨析[J].外国经济与管理,2008(1).pp.23-30.
[38]罗珉.组织间关系理论最新研究视角探析[J].外国经济与管理,2007(1).pp.25-32.
[39]刘凤芹.论企业的边界和规模：近期文献的一个评述[J].社会科学战线,2005(3).pp.262-271.
[40]刘彦辉,供应链企业间知识链管理过程及提升模型研究[D].昆明理工大学：昆明理工大学,2006.
[41]马华维,杨柳,姚琦,组织间信任研究述评[J].心理学探新,2011,31(2)：pp.186-191.
[42]苗东升,系统科学精要[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2006.
[43]彼得·德鲁克著,王永贵译,管理：使命、责任、实务(实务篇)[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2009.
[44]迈克尔·迪屈奇.交易成本经济学[M].北京：经济科学出版社,1999.
[45]彭双,顾新,知识链组织间知识创造的动力机制研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010(3)：pp.112-115.
[46]彭灿,供应链中的知识流动与组织间学习[J].科研管理,2004,25(3)：pp.81-85.
[47]邱国栋,公司发展战略：企业的资源与范围[M].北京：人民出版社,2005.
[48]邱国栋,白景坤.价值生成分析：一个协同效应的理论框架[J].中国工业经济,2007,(06)：88-95.
[49]邱国栋.企业决策组织重组[J].中国人力资源开发,2004,(10)：4-8.
[50]邱国栋.竞争优势的经济学逻辑[J].经济管理,2002,(10)：15-19.
[51]邱国栋,魏家强.“扩展企业”与“虚拟企业”[J].现代企业,2001,(12)：42-43.
[52]邱毅,变革：恐龙型企业的再造[J].台北：中华征信所,1998：pp.78-86.
[53]白景坤.组织惰性的生成与克服研究[D].东北财经大学：东北财经大学,2009.
[54]青木昌彦,比较制度分析[M].上海远东出版社,2001.
[55]任银荣,网络成员间信任机制的实证研究[D].天津财经大学：企业管理,2010.
[56]任丽丽.组织间关系的社会逻辑观评价[J].外国经济与管理,2008,31(8)：pp.11-18.
[57]孙东川,叶飞,张红,虚拟企业生命周期系统管理[J].系统工程,2002(1)：pp.36-41.
[58]孙刚,颜士梅,占怡,战略联盟中信任发展的阶段模式-基于案例的分析[J].工业技术经济,2007(12)：pp.106-109.
[59]苏海,蒋祖华,梁军,网络环境下基于知识地图的产品设计知识链管理[J].上海交通大学学报,2007,41(7)：pp.1061-1065.
[60]吴洁,刘思峰,施琴芬,基于知识供应链的知识创新与转移模型研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006,23(12)：pp.123-125.
[61]温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量[J].心理学报,2006,(3)：pp.448-452.
[62]温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云,中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004(5)：pp.614-620.
[63]温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷,调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005(2)：pp.268-274.
[64]温有奎,徐国华,赖伯年,信息整流与知识增值服务[J].情报学报,2003(3)：pp.273-277.
[65]谭劲松,林润辉TD-SCDMA与电信行业标准竞争的战略选择[J].管理世界,2006,(06)：pp.71-84；173.
[66]唐晓华,王丹.集群企业合作隐性契约的博弈分析[J].中国工业经济,2005,(09)：pp.19-25.
[67]唐洋.福田“裂变”[J].时代汽车,2006,(07)：pp.58-59.
[68]王平,杨斌,基于知识链的企业战略知识管理框架[J].情报杂志,2005,24(6)：pp.83-85.
[69]王作军,任浩.组织间关系：演变与发展框架[J].科学学研究,2009(12)：pp.1801-1807.
[70]王作军,任浩,田颖男.企业组织间关系：结构与战略选择[J].科学管理研究,2008(4)：pp.82-85.
[71]吴冰,刘仲英,供应链中的知识创新网络[J].科学学研究,2006(8)：pp.280-285.
[72]丸川知雄,关于企业集团中间组织产生的理论依据[J].中国工业经济研究,1992(9)：pp.50.
[73]王询,论企业与市场间的不同形态[J].经济研究,1998(7)：pp.35-41.
[74]吴绍波,顾新,彭双,知识链组织合作创新的技术轨道的形成—一个有关我国TD—SCDMA创新的案例分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(05)：pp.79-84.
[75]王赛楠,刘玉龙,关于中间性组织界定问题的述评[J].全国商情(经济理论研究),2007(9)：pp.31.
[76]王雅娟,中间组织知识链论析[J].黑龙江社会科学,2011(6)：pp.55-58.
[77]王雅娟,基于价值创造的中间组织知识链影响因素研究[J].管理科学,2011(6)：pp.38-48.
[78]王雅娟,国有与家族企业集团相位转变的差异性探析——基于指挥链不同驱动模式的跨案例分析[J].学术交流,2010(11)：pp.103-106.
[79]王涛,顾新,知识链成员间相互信任的建立与演化过程研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010(14)：pp.8-10.
[80]J.M.伍德里奇,译者：费剑平,计量经济学导论[M].中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[81]肖冬平,顾新,知识网络中组织间信任形成机制研究—基于博弈论视角[J].科技管理研究,2009(3)：pp.208-210.
[82]肖冬平,顾新,基于自组织理论的知识网络结构演化研究[J].科技进步与对策,2009(19)：pp.168-172.
[83]肖冬平,顾新,知识网络中的知识合作原理及其实现途径[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(09)：pp.89-96.
[84]徐建锁,王正欧,李淑伟,基于知识链的管理[J].天津大学学报社会科学版,2003(2)：pp.133-136.
[85]徐焕良,李绪蓉,知识链模型研究[J].计算机科学,2005(2)：pp.185-192.
[86]杨蕙馨,冯文娜,中间性组织的运行机制、组织结构及其有效规模研究[C].中国工业经济研究与开发促进会2005年会暨“产业组织与政府规制”研讨会论文集,2005：pp.336-348.
[87]杨蕙馨,冯文娜,中间性组织的组织形态及其相互关系研究[J].财经问题研究,2005(9)：pp.55-61.
[88]杨蕙馨,冯文娜,中间性组织存在的合理性与稳定性分析[J].经济学动态,2004,(9)：pp.28-32.
[89]杨蕙馨,冯文娜,基于博弈分析的中间性组织的运行研究[J].经济学动态,2005,(6)：pp.35-39.
[90]杨蕙馨,冯文娜,中间性组织网络中企业间信任关系对企业合作的作用研究[J].山东经济,2008,(2)：pp.5-10.
[91]伊查克·爱迪斯,企业生命周期[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[92]应力,钱省三,知识管理的内涵[J].科学学研究,2001(1)：pp.64-69.
[93]张曙,李爱平,技术创新和知识供应链[J].中国机械工程,1999,10(2)：pp.224-228.
[94]庄芳丽,杨中华,知识链模型研究现状与评述[J].科技与管理,2008,21(125)：pp.17.
[95]张志亮,程钧谟,基于知识相图的企业知识链研究[J].华东经济管理,2006(6)：pp.86-88.
[96]赵学礼,企业间合作机理与信任关系构建研究[D].复旦大学：企业管理,2008.
[97]Andrew, C.Inkpen, Steven, C.Currall,2004,"The co-evolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures", Organization Science, Vol.15, pp.586-599.
[98]Aulakh, Preets S.Kotabe Massaki, Sahay.Arvind,2008, "Trust and Performance in Cross-Border Maketing Partnerships:A Behavioral Approach", Journal of International Business, Vol.3, pp.1005-1032.
[99]Alchian, A., Demsetz, H.,1972, "Production, information costs, and economic organization", American Economic Review, Vol.62, pp.777-795.
[100]AdamM.Brandenburger.,Barry.J.,Nalebuff,1996,"Co-Opetition",NewYork:Broadway Business.
[101]Ansoff, I.,1984, "Implanting Strategic Management", New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
[102]Adizes, I.,1979, "Organizational passages:diagnosing and treating life cycle problem of organizations", Organizational Dynamics Summer Issue.
[103]Burke, W.Wamer, GeorgeH.Litwin.1992, "A Causal Model of Organizational Performance and Change", Journal of Management, Vol.18, pp.523-545.
[104]Bamey Hansen,1991, "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage" Joumal of Management, Vol.17, pp.99-120.
[105]Bruce Kogut, Udo Zander,1992, "Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology" Organization Science,Vol.3,pp.383-397.
[106]Burton Jones, A.Knowledge.,1999,"Capitalism:Business,work,and learning in the new economy",Oxford:Oxford University Press.
[107]Bukowitz W R,Williams R L.,1999,"The knowledge management ".Field book, London:Prentice Hall,pp.45-76.
[108]B.klein, R.Crowford, A.Alchian,1978,"Vertical Intigration Appropriable Rents and the Competitive Contracting Process",Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.21,pp. 297-326.
[109]Coase R H.,1937, "The Nature of the firm.London", Economics, New Series, Vol.11, No.4, pp.386-405.
[110]Cohen, DJ.2007, "The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource management:Reasons for the divide and concrete solutions of bridging the gap", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.5, pp.1013-1019.
[111]Child,J.,1972, "Organizational Srructure,Encironment, and Perfomance:The Role of Strategic Choice",Sociology, Vol.6,No.1,pp.38-67.
[112]C.Oliver.,1990,"Determinants Interorganizational Relationships:Integrationand Future Directions",Cademy of Management Review, Vol.15,No.2,pp.241-265.
[113]Cohen & Levinthal,1990, "Absorptive capacity:A new per-sperctive on learning and innovation",Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.3,No.5,pp.128-152.
[114]Clyde W H, M S.,2000, "The knowledge chain model", Atlanta:Third Annual Conference of the Southern Association for Information Systems (SAIS), pp.45-87.
[115]Cohen W, Levinthal D.,1990, "Absorptive capacity:A New perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, pp.128-15.
[116]DiMaggio, P., W.Powell,1991, "Introduction in P.Di Maggio.W.Powell, eds, The New Institutionalismin Organizational Analysis", Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
[117]Dahlman, C.J.,1979, "The problem of externality",Journal of law and Economics, Vol.22, pp.141-162.
[118]Denise M.Rousseau, Sim B.Sitkin, Ronald S.Burt.,1998, "Coun Camerer Not So Different After All:A Crossdiscipline View of Trust", Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.3, pp.393-404.
[119]Doney, P.M., J.P.Cannon.,1997, "An examination of the trust in buyer-seller relationships", Journal of Marketing, Vol.61, No.2,pp.35-51.
[120]Dyer J, Chu W.,2003,"The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance:empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea",Organization Science,Vol.14,No.1,pp.57-68.
[121]Doney,P.M.,Cannon,J.P.,&Mullen,M.R.,1998,"Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the development of Trust",Academy of Management Review,Vol.23,No.3,pp.601-620.
[122]Erakovic, Ljiljana Marie Wilson.,2005, "Conditions of Radical Transformation in State-Owned Enterprise", British Journal of Management, Vol.16, No.4, pp.293-313.
[123]Easton G.,1995, "Case research as a methodology for industrial networks:a realist apologia.Proceedings from", Manchester:Mancherster Federal School of Business and Management, pp.368-562.
[124]Eli Gottlieb,2007, "Mandel Leadership Institute.Learning How to Believe:Epistemic Development in Cultural Contex", Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol.16, pp.78-95.
[125]Eisenhardt, K.M.,1989, "Building Theories from Case Srudy Research", Academy of Management Review, Vol.14, No.4, pp.532-550.
[126]Fligstein, N.,1919-1979, "The Structural Transformation of American Industry:An Insrirurional Account of the Causes of Diversification in the Largest Firms, in W.W.Powell and P.J.DiMaggio, eds.", The New Institutional Analysis, Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, pp.311-336.
[127]Forrester, Jay W., Peter M. Senge.,1980, "Tests for Building Confidence in System Dynamics Models. In A. A. Legasto Jr., J. W. Forrester,& J. M. Lyneis (ed.),System Dynamics,Vol.14 Series:TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences",New York: North-Holland,pp.209-228.
[128]Gulati, R.,1998, "Network Location and Learning:The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.20, pp.397-420.
[129]Gulati Ranjay,1995, Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns:A Longitudinal Analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.40, pp.619-652.
[130]Greenwood, C.R.Hinings.,1988, "Design Archetypes, Tracks and the Dynamics of Strategic Change", Organization Studies, Vol.9, No.3, pp.293-316.
[131]Gupta A K, Govindarajan V.,2000, "Knowledge flows within multinational corporations ", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, No.4, pp.473-496.
[132]Greenwood. C.R.Hinings.,1996, "Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing together the Old and the New Institutionalism", Academy of Management Review, Vol.21, No.4, pp.1022-1054.
[133]Grandori A.,1987, "Perspectives on organization theory", Cambridge:Mass. Ballinger Pub.
[134]He,Z.L.P.K Wong.,2004,"Exploration vs.Exploitation:An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis",Organization Science,Vol.15,No.4,pp.481-491.
[135]Hannan,Michael T.,1984,"John Freeman.,Structural Inertia and Organizational Change",American Soiological Review, Vol.49,No.2,pp.149-164.
[136]Hannan,M.T.,J.Freeman,1977,"The population ecology of organizations",A4merican Journal of Sociology,pp.929-984.
[137]Hannan,M.T.,J.Freeman,1984,"Structured inertia and organizational change", American Sociological Review, Vol.49, pp.149-164.
[138]Ikujiro,N.,K.Noboru.,1998,"The concept of "ba":Building a foundation for knowledge creation", California Management Review,Vol.40,No.3,pp.40.
[139]Iain A. Davies.2008, "Alliances and Networks:Creating Success in the UK Fair Trade Market", Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.8, pp.74-86.
[140]Jeroen C.J.M.van den Bergh & Marjan W.Hofkes,1998, "Theory and Implementation of Economic Models for Sustainability Development", Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.39-65.
[141]Jarvenpaa,S.L., Leidner,D.E.,1998,"Communication and trust in global virtual teams" Journal of Computer Mediated Communication,Vol.3,No.4,pp.1-36.
[142]Jarvenpaa,S.L.,Leidner,D.E.,1999,"Communication and trust in global virtual teams"Organization Science,Vol.10,pp.791-815.
[143]Kotter,J.P.,L.A.Schlesinger.,1979,"Choosing Strategies for Change",Harvard Business Review,Vol.57, No.2,pp.106-117.
[144]Kendall W. Artz, Thomas H. Brush.,2000, "Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms:an examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances", Journal of Economic Behavior & organization, Vol.41, pp.337-362.
[145]Keate, B.W., and Hitt, M.A.,1988, "Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics and Performance", Academy of Management Jounal, Vol.31, pp.47-65.
[146]Kevin McLaughlin, Sylvain Coderre, Garth Mortis, Gordon Fick, Henry Man din., 2010, "Can Concept Sorting Provide a Reliable, Valid and Sensitive Measure of Medical Knowledge Structure?". Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol.12, pp.3-12.
[147]Lawrence, P.R., J.W.Lorsch,1967, "Organization and Environment:Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston:Graduate School of Business Administration", Harvard University, pp.78-92.
[148]Lewin.K,1947, "Frontiers in Group Dynamics", Human Relations, Vol.1, pp.5-41.
[149]Lewicki, R.L.&B.B.Bunker.,1995, "Trust in Relationships:A Model of Development and Associates (Eds.), Conflict, Cooperation and Justice:Essay Inspired by the Work of 241 Morton Deustch", San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, pp.133-174.
[150]Luhmenn, N.,1979, "Trust and Power", New York:John Wlley.
[151]Lado A.A., Boyd N.G., Hanlon S.G.,1997, "Competition, Cooperation and the Search for Economic Rents:A Syncretic Mode", Academy of Management Review, Vol.22, pp.110-141.
[152]Maria Holmlund, Janake Tornroos,1997, "What Are Relationships in Business Network", Management Decision, Vol.35, pp.304-309.
[153]McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., Chervany, N.L.,1998, "Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships", Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, pp.473-490.
[154]Miller, D.,&Friesen, P.H.,1982, "Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms:Two Models of Strategic Momentum", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.3, pp.56-91.
[155]March,J.G.,1999,"ThePursuitofOrganizationalIntelligence",Oxford:Blackwell.
[156]Miner,A.,1994,"Seeking Adaptive Advantage:Evolutionary Theory and Managerial Action",Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations, New York:Oxford University Press.
[157]McAllister.,D.,1995,"Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations", Academy of Management Jour anl, Vol.38, No.1,pp.24-59.
[158]Mandal A., Antunes D.,2005, "Virtual Coopetition:Mutual Value Preservation in the Management Consulting Industry", Academy of Management Best, Conference Paper, pp.45-90.
[159]Michael E P.,1985,"Competitive advantage",New York:Free press,pp.67-96.
[160]Mark S. Granovetter.,1985,"Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness", The American Journal of Sociology, Vol.91, No.3, pp.63.
[161]Michael H, James C,1993, "Reengineering the corporation", New York:Harper Business, pp.38-97.
[162]Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S.1998,"Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage", The Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.2, pp.242-266.
[163]Nooteboom, B.,2000, "Learning by Interaction:Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance", Journal of Management and Governance, Vol.4, pp.69-92.
[164]Nelson, R.R., S.G. Winter,1982, "An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change" Cambridge University Press.
[165]NeilRackham,1998,“合作竞争大未来”,北京：经济管理出版社.
[166]Nonaka, Ikujiro.HiortakaTakeuchi,1995, "The Knowledge Creating Company", New York:Oxford University Press.
[167]Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.,1991,"The Knowledge-Creating Company", Harvard Business Review, Vol.11, pp.94-104.
[168]Nelson, R.R Winter, S.G,1982, "An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press.
[169]Nonaka I.,1991,"The Knowledge Creating Company", Harvard Business Review, Vol.11-12, pp.96-104.
[170]Oliver E W.,1975, "Markets and Hierarchies:Anti-Trust Implication", New York: The Free Press.
[171]OECD,1996, "The knowledge-Based Economy",Paris:Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
[172]Popper, K.R,1971, "Objective Knowledge", Clarendon:Oxford.
[173]Pfeffer, J.2007, "A modest proposal:How we might change the process and product of managerial research", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.6, pp.1334-1345.
[174]Oliver.E.W,1991, "Comparative economic organization:the analysis of discrete structural alternatives", Administrative science quarterly, pp.269-296.
[175]Pfeifer, J., GR.Salancik,1998,"The External Control of Organizations, A Resource Dependence Perspective", New York:Harper & Row.
[176]Paul M. Romer.,1986,"Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth", Political Economy, Vol.94, pp.1002-1037.
[177]Patton,M.Q.,1987,"How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation",Newbury Park,CA,Sage,pp.23-85.
[178]Peter F. Drucher.1982, "Managing in a time of change", New York:Truman Talley Books.Dutton, pp.43-67.
[179]Peter F. Drucher.1985, "Innovation and entrepreneurship:Practices and principle", London:Heinemann, Ch.2.
[180]Peter M S.1990, "The fifth discipline", New York:Currency, pp.89-108.
[181]Payne R L, Clark M C.,2003, "Dispositional and situational determinants of trust in two types of managers", International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.14, No.1,pp.128-138.
[182]R.M.Morgan, S.Hunt.1999, "Relationship-Based Competitive Advantage:The Role of Relationship Marketing in Marketing Strategy", Journal of Business Research, Vol.46, pp.281-290.
[183]R Duane Ireland, Michael A Hitt, Deepa Vaidyanath.,2002, "Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage", Journal of Management, Vol.28, No.3, pp.413-446.
[184]Robert M.Morgan, Shelby D.Hunt,1994, "The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing", Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, No.6, pp.20-38.
[185]Roger C.MayerJames H.Davis,F.David Schoorman.,1995,"An Integrative Model of Organiztional Trust",Academy of Management Review, Vol.20,No.3,pp.709-734.
[186]Rechard Hall, Pierpaolo,1998, "Andriani Management focuses analyzing intangible resources and managing knowledge in a supply chain context", European Management Journal, Vol.16, No.6, pp.685-697.
[187]Richard A S.,1998, "The knowledge chain", Business Horizons, Vol.11,pp.4-14.
[188]Richard H.Hall et al,1997, "Patterns of Interoroganizational Relationships", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.22, No.3, pp.47-75.
[189]Richard L.,1993, "The handshake between invisible and visible hands", New York: International Studies of Management and Organization, Vol.23, No., pp.87-106.
[190]Sako, M., Prices,1992, "Quality, and Trust:Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Japan", Cambridge University Press.
[191]Schakenraad,J. Hagedoorn.,1994, "The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15, pp.291-309.
[192]Sull, D,1999, "Why Good Companies Go Bad".Harvard Business Review, Vol.77, No.4, pp.42-52.
[193]Steven C.Currall, Marc J.Epstein.,2003, "The fragility of organization trust:Lessons from the Rise and Fall of Enron", Organizational Dynameics, Vol.32, No.2, pp.193-206.
[194]S. J. Addison, S. J. Thorpe.,2011, "Factors involved in the formation of attitudes towards those who are mentally ill", Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Vol.39, pp.56-77.
[195]S. M. Cadarette,M. A. M. Gignac,D. E. Beaton,S. B. Jaglal.G. A. Hawker.2011, "Psychometric properties of the Osteoporosis and You questionnaire:osteoporosis knowledge deficits among older community-dwelling women", Osteoporosis International, Vol.18, pp.29-34.
[196]Storper,M.,A.J.Scott,2005,"Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development", London, Rouledge.
[197]Seoll,A.J.,2010,"弹性生产系统和区域发展：北美和西欧新产业空间的兴起Reading Economic Geography.Trevor J.Barnes,J.Peck,Sherpand and A.Tickell",北京：商务印书馆,pp.14-58.
[198]Thomas Doring, Jan Schnellenbach.,2011, "What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth:A survey of the literature", Regional Studies, Vol.40, pp.78-95.
[199]Tom J. Weert.2006, "Education of the twenty-first century:New professionalism in lifelong learning, knowledge development and knowledge sharing", Education and Information Technologies, Vol.11, pp.3-4.
[200]Vinh Lu.2009, "Organizational Drivers of Relationship Trust:An Investigation of Service Exporters", Journal of Relationship Marketing, Vol.8, pp.4-13.
[201]Whitener E,Brodt S,Korsgaard M A,et al.,1998,"Managers as initiators of trust:an exchange relationship for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior",cademy of Management Journal,Vol.23,No.3,pp.513-530.
[202]Wright, P., Szeto, W.F., Cheng, T.W.,2002, "Guanxi and professional conduct in China:A management development perspective", International Journal of Human Resource Management Journal, Vol.13.No.1, pp.156-182.
[203]Yin, R.K.,1994, "Case Study Research:Design and Methods", Sage Publications, London, pp.171.
[204]Yang Xu, Alain B.2010, "Knowledge value chain:an effective tool to measure Knowledge value", International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol.11,pp.957-964.
[205]Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V.,1998, "Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance", Organization Science, Vol.9, No.2,pp.141-159.
[206]Zueker, L.G.,1986, "Production of trust:institutional sources of economic structures", Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.8, pp.53-111.
[207]Zaheer, A.VenkatramanN,1995, "Relational Governance as Interorganizational Strategy:An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust in Economic Exchange", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16, pp.373-392.
[2]陈莉平,王凤彬,企业组织理论新发展[J].经济学动态,2005(2)：pp.66-69.
[3]蔡翔,严宗光,易海强,知识供应链：概念,特征,主体[J].科学管理研究,2000(6)：pp.12-14.
[4]陈志祥,陈荣秋,马士华,论知识链与知识管理[J].科研管理,2000(1)：pp.14-18.
[5]陈红儿,刘斯敖,中间性组织理论评析[J].经济学动态,2003(7)：pp.23
[6]常荔,邹珊刚,李顺才,基于知识链的知识扩散的影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2001(5)：pp.122-127.
[7]蔡兵,顾新,王维成,知识链的绩效评价[J].四川大学学报：哲学社会科学版,2006(5)：pp.134-139.
[8]程斌,武忠,基于分形的知识链评价模型[J].科技情报开发与经济,2006(7)：pp.159-161.
[9]杜绍厚,系统演化的五种形态[J].自然辩证法研究,1987,(4)：pp.72.
[10]丁勇,梁昌勇,蒋翠清,基于证据理论的企业知识链绩效评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2007(19)：pp.245-248.
[11]弗朗西斯·福山,信任：社会美德与创造经济繁荣[M].海南：海南出版社,2006.
[12]福轩.探寻福田汽车自主创新模式[N].中国工业报,2006-05-19(A02)
[13]福轩.集成知识链合创新[N].首都建设报,2006-05-10(004)
[14]冯文娜,杨蕙馨,中间性组织的演化过程分析—基于分工理论的解释[J].理论学刊,2007(7)：pp.38-42.
[15]方征,中国企业声誉测评指标体系构建研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2008(2)：pp.43.
[16]高良谋,内生与动态：熊彼特企业家理论的两个支点[J].财经问题研究,1998(7)：pp.60-64.
[17]高维和,陈信康,组织间关系：基于心理契约的建构[J].经济管理,2008(Z2)：pp.101-107.
[18]顾新,郭耀煌,李久平,社会资本及其在知识链中的作用[J].科研管理,2003,24(5)：pp.44-48.
[19]顾新,郭耀煌,罗利,知识链成员之间利益分配的二人合作博弈分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004(7)：pp.24-37.
[20]顾新,李久平,王维成,基于生命周期的知识链管理研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(3).pp.98-103.
[21]顾新,李久平,知识链成员之间的相互信任[J].经济问题探索,2005(2)：pp.67.
[22]郝云宏,李文博.基于耗散结构理论视角的企业知识网络演化机制探析[J].商业经济与管理,2009(04)：pp.23-28.
[23]今井贤一,企业集团[M].北京：经济科学出版社,1996：pp.273-274.
[24]姜璐,王德胜,于秀彬,认识系统演化的方法[J].哲学动态,1993(7)：pp.31.
[25]鲁义轩.解析TD-SCDMA发展轨迹[J].通信世界,2005(31)：pp.22.
[26]兰军.商用车产业链合创新[N].消费日报,2006-05-08(A02)
[27]林忠,鞠蕾.组织隐性知识积累路径研究：基于演化的视角[A].中国管理现代化研究会.第五届(2010)中国管理学年会—组织行为与人力资源管理分会场论文集[C].中国管理现代化研究会,2010：pp.444-448.
[28]刘冀生,吴金希,论基于知识的企业核心竞争力与企业知识链管理[J].清华大学学报,2002(1)：pp.68-72.
[29]柳卸林,马池,池世国,什么是国家创新体系[J].数量经济技术经究,1999,16(5)：pp.20-22.
[30]刘勇军,聂规划,面向供应链的知识链模型及其管理策略[J].情报杂志,2007(6)：pp.24-26.
[31]李自杰,李毅,郑艺,信任对知识获取的影响机制[J].管理世界,2010(8)：pp.179-180.
[32]李东红,李蕾,组织间信任理论研究回顾与展望[J].经济管理,2009(4)：pp.173-177.
[33]李勖,汪应洛,孙林岩,组织的环境适应性及生存战略—基于知识供应链的分析[J].南开管理评论,2003,6(4)：pp.61-65.
[34]李长玲,知识供应链及其管理[J].情报杂志,2004(11)：pp.9-11.
[35]罗珉,王雎,组织间关系的拓展与演进：基于组织间知识互动的研究[J].中国工业经济,2008(1)：pp.40-49.
[36]罗珉,德鲁克管理思想解读[M].四川成都：西南财经大学出版社,2009(4)：pp.314-323.
[37]罗珉.组织间关系理论研究的深度与解释力辨析[J].外国经济与管理,2008(1).pp.23-30.
[38]罗珉.组织间关系理论最新研究视角探析[J].外国经济与管理,2007(1).pp.25-32.
[39]刘凤芹.论企业的边界和规模：近期文献的一个评述[J].社会科学战线,2005(3).pp.262-271.
[40]刘彦辉,供应链企业间知识链管理过程及提升模型研究[D].昆明理工大学：昆明理工大学,2006.
[41]马华维,杨柳,姚琦,组织间信任研究述评[J].心理学探新,2011,31(2)：pp.186-191.
[42]苗东升,系统科学精要[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2006.
[43]彼得·德鲁克著,王永贵译,管理：使命、责任、实务(实务篇)[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2009.
[44]迈克尔·迪屈奇.交易成本经济学[M].北京：经济科学出版社,1999.
[45]彭双,顾新,知识链组织间知识创造的动力机制研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010(3)：pp.112-115.
[46]彭灿,供应链中的知识流动与组织间学习[J].科研管理,2004,25(3)：pp.81-85.
[47]邱国栋,公司发展战略：企业的资源与范围[M].北京：人民出版社,2005.
[48]邱国栋,白景坤.价值生成分析：一个协同效应的理论框架[J].中国工业经济,2007,(06)：88-95.
[49]邱国栋.企业决策组织重组[J].中国人力资源开发,2004,(10)：4-8.
[50]邱国栋.竞争优势的经济学逻辑[J].经济管理,2002,(10)：15-19.
[51]邱国栋,魏家强.“扩展企业”与“虚拟企业”[J].现代企业,2001,(12)：42-43.
[52]邱毅,变革：恐龙型企业的再造[J].台北：中华征信所,1998：pp.78-86.
[53]白景坤.组织惰性的生成与克服研究[D].东北财经大学：东北财经大学,2009.
[54]青木昌彦,比较制度分析[M].上海远东出版社,2001.
[55]任银荣,网络成员间信任机制的实证研究[D].天津财经大学：企业管理,2010.
[56]任丽丽.组织间关系的社会逻辑观评价[J].外国经济与管理,2008,31(8)：pp.11-18.
[57]孙东川,叶飞,张红,虚拟企业生命周期系统管理[J].系统工程,2002(1)：pp.36-41.
[58]孙刚,颜士梅,占怡,战略联盟中信任发展的阶段模式-基于案例的分析[J].工业技术经济,2007(12)：pp.106-109.
[59]苏海,蒋祖华,梁军,网络环境下基于知识地图的产品设计知识链管理[J].上海交通大学学报,2007,41(7)：pp.1061-1065.
[60]吴洁,刘思峰,施琴芬,基于知识供应链的知识创新与转移模型研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006,23(12)：pp.123-125.
[61]温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量[J].心理学报,2006,(3)：pp.448-452.
[62]温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云,中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004(5)：pp.614-620.
[63]温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷,调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005(2)：pp.268-274.
[64]温有奎,徐国华,赖伯年,信息整流与知识增值服务[J].情报学报,2003(3)：pp.273-277.
[65]谭劲松,林润辉TD-SCDMA与电信行业标准竞争的战略选择[J].管理世界,2006,(06)：pp.71-84；173.
[66]唐晓华,王丹.集群企业合作隐性契约的博弈分析[J].中国工业经济,2005,(09)：pp.19-25.
[67]唐洋.福田“裂变”[J].时代汽车,2006,(07)：pp.58-59.
[68]王平,杨斌,基于知识链的企业战略知识管理框架[J].情报杂志,2005,24(6)：pp.83-85.
[69]王作军,任浩.组织间关系：演变与发展框架[J].科学学研究,2009(12)：pp.1801-1807.
[70]王作军,任浩,田颖男.企业组织间关系：结构与战略选择[J].科学管理研究,2008(4)：pp.82-85.
[71]吴冰,刘仲英,供应链中的知识创新网络[J].科学学研究,2006(8)：pp.280-285.
[72]丸川知雄,关于企业集团中间组织产生的理论依据[J].中国工业经济研究,1992(9)：pp.50.
[73]王询,论企业与市场间的不同形态[J].经济研究,1998(7)：pp.35-41.
[74]吴绍波,顾新,彭双,知识链组织合作创新的技术轨道的形成—一个有关我国TD—SCDMA创新的案例分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(05)：pp.79-84.
[75]王赛楠,刘玉龙,关于中间性组织界定问题的述评[J].全国商情(经济理论研究),2007(9)：pp.31.
[76]王雅娟,中间组织知识链论析[J].黑龙江社会科学,2011(6)：pp.55-58.
[77]王雅娟,基于价值创造的中间组织知识链影响因素研究[J].管理科学,2011(6)：pp.38-48.
[78]王雅娟,国有与家族企业集团相位转变的差异性探析——基于指挥链不同驱动模式的跨案例分析[J].学术交流,2010(11)：pp.103-106.
[79]王涛,顾新,知识链成员间相互信任的建立与演化过程研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010(14)：pp.8-10.
[80]J.M.伍德里奇,译者：费剑平,计量经济学导论[M].中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[81]肖冬平,顾新,知识网络中组织间信任形成机制研究—基于博弈论视角[J].科技管理研究,2009(3)：pp.208-210.
[82]肖冬平,顾新,基于自组织理论的知识网络结构演化研究[J].科技进步与对策,2009(19)：pp.168-172.
[83]肖冬平,顾新,知识网络中的知识合作原理及其实现途径[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(09)：pp.89-96.
[84]徐建锁,王正欧,李淑伟,基于知识链的管理[J].天津大学学报社会科学版,2003(2)：pp.133-136.
[85]徐焕良,李绪蓉,知识链模型研究[J].计算机科学,2005(2)：pp.185-192.
[86]杨蕙馨,冯文娜,中间性组织的运行机制、组织结构及其有效规模研究[C].中国工业经济研究与开发促进会2005年会暨“产业组织与政府规制”研讨会论文集,2005：pp.336-348.
[87]杨蕙馨,冯文娜,中间性组织的组织形态及其相互关系研究[J].财经问题研究,2005(9)：pp.55-61.
[88]杨蕙馨,冯文娜,中间性组织存在的合理性与稳定性分析[J].经济学动态,2004,(9)：pp.28-32.
[89]杨蕙馨,冯文娜,基于博弈分析的中间性组织的运行研究[J].经济学动态,2005,(6)：pp.35-39.
[90]杨蕙馨,冯文娜,中间性组织网络中企业间信任关系对企业合作的作用研究[J].山东经济,2008,(2)：pp.5-10.
[91]伊查克·爱迪斯,企业生命周期[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,1997.
[92]应力,钱省三,知识管理的内涵[J].科学学研究,2001(1)：pp.64-69.
[93]张曙,李爱平,技术创新和知识供应链[J].中国机械工程,1999,10(2)：pp.224-228.
[94]庄芳丽,杨中华,知识链模型研究现状与评述[J].科技与管理,2008,21(125)：pp.17.
[95]张志亮,程钧谟,基于知识相图的企业知识链研究[J].华东经济管理,2006(6)：pp.86-88.
[96]赵学礼,企业间合作机理与信任关系构建研究[D].复旦大学：企业管理,2008.
[97]Andrew, C.Inkpen, Steven, C.Currall,2004,"The co-evolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures", Organization Science, Vol.15, pp.586-599.
[98]Aulakh, Preets S.Kotabe Massaki, Sahay.Arvind,2008, "Trust and Performance in Cross-Border Maketing Partnerships:A Behavioral Approach", Journal of International Business, Vol.3, pp.1005-1032.
[99]Alchian, A., Demsetz, H.,1972, "Production, information costs, and economic organization", American Economic Review, Vol.62, pp.777-795.
[100]AdamM.Brandenburger.,Barry.J.,Nalebuff,1996,"Co-Opetition",NewYork:Broadway Business.
[101]Ansoff, I.,1984, "Implanting Strategic Management", New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
[102]Adizes, I.,1979, "Organizational passages:diagnosing and treating life cycle problem of organizations", Organizational Dynamics Summer Issue.
[103]Burke, W.Wamer, GeorgeH.Litwin.1992, "A Causal Model of Organizational Performance and Change", Journal of Management, Vol.18, pp.523-545.
[104]Bamey Hansen,1991, "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage" Joumal of Management, Vol.17, pp.99-120.
[105]Bruce Kogut, Udo Zander,1992, "Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology" Organization Science,Vol.3,pp.383-397.
[106]Burton Jones, A.Knowledge.,1999,"Capitalism:Business,work,and learning in the new economy",Oxford:Oxford University Press.
[107]Bukowitz W R,Williams R L.,1999,"The knowledge management ".Field book, London:Prentice Hall,pp.45-76.
[108]B.klein, R.Crowford, A.Alchian,1978,"Vertical Intigration Appropriable Rents and the Competitive Contracting Process",Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.21,pp. 297-326.
[109]Coase R H.,1937, "The Nature of the firm.London", Economics, New Series, Vol.11, No.4, pp.386-405.
[110]Cohen, DJ.2007, "The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource management:Reasons for the divide and concrete solutions of bridging the gap", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.5, pp.1013-1019.
[111]Child,J.,1972, "Organizational Srructure,Encironment, and Perfomance:The Role of Strategic Choice",Sociology, Vol.6,No.1,pp.38-67.
[112]C.Oliver.,1990,"Determinants Interorganizational Relationships:Integrationand Future Directions",Cademy of Management Review, Vol.15,No.2,pp.241-265.
[113]Cohen & Levinthal,1990, "Absorptive capacity:A new per-sperctive on learning and innovation",Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.3,No.5,pp.128-152.
[114]Clyde W H, M S.,2000, "The knowledge chain model", Atlanta:Third Annual Conference of the Southern Association for Information Systems (SAIS), pp.45-87.
[115]Cohen W, Levinthal D.,1990, "Absorptive capacity:A New perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, pp.128-15.
[116]DiMaggio, P., W.Powell,1991, "Introduction in P.Di Maggio.W.Powell, eds, The New Institutionalismin Organizational Analysis", Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
[117]Dahlman, C.J.,1979, "The problem of externality",Journal of law and Economics, Vol.22, pp.141-162.
[118]Denise M.Rousseau, Sim B.Sitkin, Ronald S.Burt.,1998, "Coun Camerer Not So Different After All:A Crossdiscipline View of Trust", Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.3, pp.393-404.
[119]Doney, P.M., J.P.Cannon.,1997, "An examination of the trust in buyer-seller relationships", Journal of Marketing, Vol.61, No.2,pp.35-51.
[120]Dyer J, Chu W.,2003,"The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance:empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea",Organization Science,Vol.14,No.1,pp.57-68.
[121]Doney,P.M.,Cannon,J.P.,&Mullen,M.R.,1998,"Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the development of Trust",Academy of Management Review,Vol.23,No.3,pp.601-620.
[122]Erakovic, Ljiljana Marie Wilson.,2005, "Conditions of Radical Transformation in State-Owned Enterprise", British Journal of Management, Vol.16, No.4, pp.293-313.
[123]Easton G.,1995, "Case research as a methodology for industrial networks:a realist apologia.Proceedings from", Manchester:Mancherster Federal School of Business and Management, pp.368-562.
[124]Eli Gottlieb,2007, "Mandel Leadership Institute.Learning How to Believe:Epistemic Development in Cultural Contex", Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol.16, pp.78-95.
[125]Eisenhardt, K.M.,1989, "Building Theories from Case Srudy Research", Academy of Management Review, Vol.14, No.4, pp.532-550.
[126]Fligstein, N.,1919-1979, "The Structural Transformation of American Industry:An Insrirurional Account of the Causes of Diversification in the Largest Firms, in W.W.Powell and P.J.DiMaggio, eds.", The New Institutional Analysis, Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, pp.311-336.
[127]Forrester, Jay W., Peter M. Senge.,1980, "Tests for Building Confidence in System Dynamics Models. In A. A. Legasto Jr., J. W. Forrester,& J. M. Lyneis (ed.),System Dynamics,Vol.14 Series:TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences",New York: North-Holland,pp.209-228.
[128]Gulati, R.,1998, "Network Location and Learning:The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.20, pp.397-420.
[129]Gulati Ranjay,1995, Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns:A Longitudinal Analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.40, pp.619-652.
[130]Greenwood, C.R.Hinings.,1988, "Design Archetypes, Tracks and the Dynamics of Strategic Change", Organization Studies, Vol.9, No.3, pp.293-316.
[131]Gupta A K, Govindarajan V.,2000, "Knowledge flows within multinational corporations ", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, No.4, pp.473-496.
[132]Greenwood. C.R.Hinings.,1996, "Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing together the Old and the New Institutionalism", Academy of Management Review, Vol.21, No.4, pp.1022-1054.
[133]Grandori A.,1987, "Perspectives on organization theory", Cambridge:Mass. Ballinger Pub.
[134]He,Z.L.P.K Wong.,2004,"Exploration vs.Exploitation:An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis",Organization Science,Vol.15,No.4,pp.481-491.
[135]Hannan,Michael T.,1984,"John Freeman.,Structural Inertia and Organizational Change",American Soiological Review, Vol.49,No.2,pp.149-164.
[136]Hannan,M.T.,J.Freeman,1977,"The population ecology of organizations",A4merican Journal of Sociology,pp.929-984.
[137]Hannan,M.T.,J.Freeman,1984,"Structured inertia and organizational change", American Sociological Review, Vol.49, pp.149-164.
[138]Ikujiro,N.,K.Noboru.,1998,"The concept of "ba":Building a foundation for knowledge creation", California Management Review,Vol.40,No.3,pp.40.
[139]Iain A. Davies.2008, "Alliances and Networks:Creating Success in the UK Fair Trade Market", Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.8, pp.74-86.
[140]Jeroen C.J.M.van den Bergh & Marjan W.Hofkes,1998, "Theory and Implementation of Economic Models for Sustainability Development", Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.39-65.
[141]Jarvenpaa,S.L., Leidner,D.E.,1998,"Communication and trust in global virtual teams" Journal of Computer Mediated Communication,Vol.3,No.4,pp.1-36.
[142]Jarvenpaa,S.L.,Leidner,D.E.,1999,"Communication and trust in global virtual teams"Organization Science,Vol.10,pp.791-815.
[143]Kotter,J.P.,L.A.Schlesinger.,1979,"Choosing Strategies for Change",Harvard Business Review,Vol.57, No.2,pp.106-117.
[144]Kendall W. Artz, Thomas H. Brush.,2000, "Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms:an examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances", Journal of Economic Behavior & organization, Vol.41, pp.337-362.
[145]Keate, B.W., and Hitt, M.A.,1988, "Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics and Performance", Academy of Management Jounal, Vol.31, pp.47-65.
[146]Kevin McLaughlin, Sylvain Coderre, Garth Mortis, Gordon Fick, Henry Man din., 2010, "Can Concept Sorting Provide a Reliable, Valid and Sensitive Measure of Medical Knowledge Structure?". Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol.12, pp.3-12.
[147]Lawrence, P.R., J.W.Lorsch,1967, "Organization and Environment:Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston:Graduate School of Business Administration", Harvard University, pp.78-92.
[148]Lewin.K,1947, "Frontiers in Group Dynamics", Human Relations, Vol.1, pp.5-41.
[149]Lewicki, R.L.&B.B.Bunker.,1995, "Trust in Relationships:A Model of Development and Associates (Eds.), Conflict, Cooperation and Justice:Essay Inspired by the Work of 241 Morton Deustch", San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, pp.133-174.
[150]Luhmenn, N.,1979, "Trust and Power", New York:John Wlley.
[151]Lado A.A., Boyd N.G., Hanlon S.G.,1997, "Competition, Cooperation and the Search for Economic Rents:A Syncretic Mode", Academy of Management Review, Vol.22, pp.110-141.
[152]Maria Holmlund, Janake Tornroos,1997, "What Are Relationships in Business Network", Management Decision, Vol.35, pp.304-309.
[153]McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., Chervany, N.L.,1998, "Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships", Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, pp.473-490.
[154]Miller, D.,&Friesen, P.H.,1982, "Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms:Two Models of Strategic Momentum", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.3, pp.56-91.
[155]March,J.G.,1999,"ThePursuitofOrganizationalIntelligence",Oxford:Blackwell.
[156]Miner,A.,1994,"Seeking Adaptive Advantage:Evolutionary Theory and Managerial Action",Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations, New York:Oxford University Press.
[157]McAllister.,D.,1995,"Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations", Academy of Management Jour anl, Vol.38, No.1,pp.24-59.
[158]Mandal A., Antunes D.,2005, "Virtual Coopetition:Mutual Value Preservation in the Management Consulting Industry", Academy of Management Best, Conference Paper, pp.45-90.
[159]Michael E P.,1985,"Competitive advantage",New York:Free press,pp.67-96.
[160]Mark S. Granovetter.,1985,"Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness", The American Journal of Sociology, Vol.91, No.3, pp.63.
[161]Michael H, James C,1993, "Reengineering the corporation", New York:Harper Business, pp.38-97.
[162]Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S.1998,"Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage", The Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.2, pp.242-266.
[163]Nooteboom, B.,2000, "Learning by Interaction:Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance", Journal of Management and Governance, Vol.4, pp.69-92.
[164]Nelson, R.R., S.G. Winter,1982, "An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change" Cambridge University Press.
[165]NeilRackham,1998,“合作竞争大未来”,北京：经济管理出版社.
[166]Nonaka, Ikujiro.HiortakaTakeuchi,1995, "The Knowledge Creating Company", New York:Oxford University Press.
[167]Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.,1991,"The Knowledge-Creating Company", Harvard Business Review, Vol.11, pp.94-104.
[168]Nelson, R.R Winter, S.G,1982, "An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press.
[169]Nonaka I.,1991,"The Knowledge Creating Company", Harvard Business Review, Vol.11-12, pp.96-104.
[170]Oliver E W.,1975, "Markets and Hierarchies:Anti-Trust Implication", New York: The Free Press.
[171]OECD,1996, "The knowledge-Based Economy",Paris:Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
[172]Popper, K.R,1971, "Objective Knowledge", Clarendon:Oxford.
[173]Pfeffer, J.2007, "A modest proposal:How we might change the process and product of managerial research", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.6, pp.1334-1345.
[174]Oliver.E.W,1991, "Comparative economic organization:the analysis of discrete structural alternatives", Administrative science quarterly, pp.269-296.
[175]Pfeifer, J., GR.Salancik,1998,"The External Control of Organizations, A Resource Dependence Perspective", New York:Harper & Row.
[176]Paul M. Romer.,1986,"Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth", Political Economy, Vol.94, pp.1002-1037.
[177]Patton,M.Q.,1987,"How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation",Newbury Park,CA,Sage,pp.23-85.
[178]Peter F. Drucher.1982, "Managing in a time of change", New York:Truman Talley Books.Dutton, pp.43-67.
[179]Peter F. Drucher.1985, "Innovation and entrepreneurship:Practices and principle", London:Heinemann, Ch.2.
[180]Peter M S.1990, "The fifth discipline", New York:Currency, pp.89-108.
[181]Payne R L, Clark M C.,2003, "Dispositional and situational determinants of trust in two types of managers", International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.14, No.1,pp.128-138.
[182]R.M.Morgan, S.Hunt.1999, "Relationship-Based Competitive Advantage:The Role of Relationship Marketing in Marketing Strategy", Journal of Business Research, Vol.46, pp.281-290.
[183]R Duane Ireland, Michael A Hitt, Deepa Vaidyanath.,2002, "Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage", Journal of Management, Vol.28, No.3, pp.413-446.
[184]Robert M.Morgan, Shelby D.Hunt,1994, "The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing", Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, No.6, pp.20-38.
[185]Roger C.MayerJames H.Davis,F.David Schoorman.,1995,"An Integrative Model of Organiztional Trust",Academy of Management Review, Vol.20,No.3,pp.709-734.
[186]Rechard Hall, Pierpaolo,1998, "Andriani Management focuses analyzing intangible resources and managing knowledge in a supply chain context", European Management Journal, Vol.16, No.6, pp.685-697.
[187]Richard A S.,1998, "The knowledge chain", Business Horizons, Vol.11,pp.4-14.
[188]Richard H.Hall et al,1997, "Patterns of Interoroganizational Relationships", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.22, No.3, pp.47-75.
[189]Richard L.,1993, "The handshake between invisible and visible hands", New York: International Studies of Management and Organization, Vol.23, No., pp.87-106.
[190]Sako, M., Prices,1992, "Quality, and Trust:Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Japan", Cambridge University Press.
[191]Schakenraad,J. Hagedoorn.,1994, "The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15, pp.291-309.
[192]Sull, D,1999, "Why Good Companies Go Bad".Harvard Business Review, Vol.77, No.4, pp.42-52.
[193]Steven C.Currall, Marc J.Epstein.,2003, "The fragility of organization trust:Lessons from the Rise and Fall of Enron", Organizational Dynameics, Vol.32, No.2, pp.193-206.
[194]S. J. Addison, S. J. Thorpe.,2011, "Factors involved in the formation of attitudes towards those who are mentally ill", Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Vol.39, pp.56-77.
[195]S. M. Cadarette,M. A. M. Gignac,D. E. Beaton,S. B. Jaglal.G. A. Hawker.2011, "Psychometric properties of the Osteoporosis and You questionnaire:osteoporosis knowledge deficits among older community-dwelling women", Osteoporosis International, Vol.18, pp.29-34.
[196]Storper,M.,A.J.Scott,2005,"Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development", London, Rouledge.
[197]Seoll,A.J.,2010,"弹性生产系统和区域发展：北美和西欧新产业空间的兴起Reading Economic Geography.Trevor J.Barnes,J.Peck,Sherpand and A.Tickell",北京：商务印书馆,pp.14-58.
[198]Thomas Doring, Jan Schnellenbach.,2011, "What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth:A survey of the literature", Regional Studies, Vol.40, pp.78-95.
[199]Tom J. Weert.2006, "Education of the twenty-first century:New professionalism in lifelong learning, knowledge development and knowledge sharing", Education and Information Technologies, Vol.11, pp.3-4.
[200]Vinh Lu.2009, "Organizational Drivers of Relationship Trust:An Investigation of Service Exporters", Journal of Relationship Marketing, Vol.8, pp.4-13.
[201]Whitener E,Brodt S,Korsgaard M A,et al.,1998,"Managers as initiators of trust:an exchange relationship for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior",cademy of Management Journal,Vol.23,No.3,pp.513-530.
[202]Wright, P., Szeto, W.F., Cheng, T.W.,2002, "Guanxi and professional conduct in China:A management development perspective", International Journal of Human Resource Management Journal, Vol.13.No.1, pp.156-182.
[203]Yin, R.K.,1994, "Case Study Research:Design and Methods", Sage Publications, London, pp.171.
[204]Yang Xu, Alain B.2010, "Knowledge value chain:an effective tool to measure Knowledge value", International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol.11,pp.957-964.
[205]Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V.,1998, "Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance", Organization Science, Vol.9, No.2,pp.141-159.
[206]Zueker, L.G.,1986, "Production of trust:institutional sources of economic structures", Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.8, pp.53-111.
[207]Zaheer, A.VenkatramanN,1995, "Relational Governance as Interorganizational Strategy:An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust in Economic Exchange", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16, pp.373-392.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |