用户名: 密码: 验证码:
知识流动视角下跨国公司技术创新网络结构优化研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在知识与经济迅猛发展的今天,以前沿科学技术为核心的知识作为一种战略性基础资源,它逐渐发展为决定生产力水平的最主要因素之一,毋庸置疑企业、产业乃至国家提高核心竞争力的重要途径,在现阶段就是加强知识基础建设。R&D国际化已成为全球经济一体化的一个重要组成部分,跨国公司在全球范围内实现研发资源优化配置,降低交易成本,提高效率,实现了全球性研发、技术合作与转移的目标。跨国公司R&D国际化触角已经渗透到我国创新体系的方方面面,促进了知识在体系内部各个要素之间及体系内外部之间的流动。因此,在知识流动的视角下,研究跨国公司技术创新网络的结构优化问题,对提升我国的创新能力,充分利用国际科技资源具有重要的理论和实践意义。
     跨国公司技术创新网络结构的影响因素众多,要素间关系复杂,研究跨国公司技术创新网络:一是要把影响知识在跨国公司技术创新网络中流动的重要因素找出来,二是如何内化增值活动于跨国公司技术创新网络中,三是如何获取外部资源和如何优化跨国公司技术创新网络结构。本文运用系统动力学方法分析了跨国公司技术创新网络中知识流动的重要影响因素,采取定性分析与定量分析相结合的方法,以知识流动成本最小化为目标,构建了跨国公司技术创新网络结构优化模型,得到最优的网络结构,促使跨国公司高效的利用全球创新资源,以期促进技术创新网络中的知识流动。
     首先,本文分析了跨国公司技术创新网络的结构及特征。跨国公司技术创新网络分为跨国公司内部技术创新网络和外部技术创新网络,具有复杂网络特有的聚集性、非线性、小世界网络、无尺度、流动性和多样性等特征。在跨国公司内部技术创新网络中,构建了子公司之间、母子公司之间知识关系的多层次结构模型,分析得出跨国公司内部技术创新网络中的知识流动,不仅取决于知识关系主体,而且与母公司的支持和环境因素密不可分。在跨国公司外部技术创新网络中,分析了网络中各主体在知识流动中的角色,及协作R&D网络、技术标准联盟等主要知识流动模式。
     其次,研究了跨国公司外部技术创新网络知识流动的主要模式,分析了知识默会性与知识转移能力对跨国公司海外进入模式选择的影响,通过跨国公司融入全球R&D网络的动态规划模型,得到开展协作R&D的最优策略。通过对技术标准联盟成员间的博弈分析后,应用信号传递模型,解决了技术标准联盟组建中专利许可交易的“逆向选择”问题,并提出了技术标准联盟的内部治理结构及专利定价方法。
     第三,利用了系统动力学方法构建跨国公司技术创新网络知识流动的系统模型。在此模型中,以分析创新网络知识存量增长与知识流动的关系为基础,把知识流动在跨国公司技术创新网络中的各种活动看成一个系统。基于跨国公司技术创新网络中各主体间的因果关系,模拟出知识流动对跨国公司技术创新网络知识存量的贡献。通过调整有关敏感性参数,对在不同情况下知识流动对跨国公司技术创新网络知识贡献大小进行预测分析,从而找出了影响跨国公司技术创新网络中知识流动的重要因素。
     第四,本文以跨国公司网络结构配置和控制管理成本最小化为目标,建立了跨国公司技术创新网络结构的最优化模型。应用全球化理论,在分析知识价值链增值的各个环节产生的知识流动成本的基础上,考虑地理距离、文化距离、产品类型、市场需求等因素,构建了总成本最小的跨国公司技术创新网络结构优化模型,为跨国公司的区域配置和和管理控制配置提供最优解决方案。
     最后,检验最优化模型的有效性和灵敏度,利用OECD、世界银行组织等2010年发布的相关数据,通过优化模型求解,得出了跨国公司技术创新网络的最优结构。同时,结合本文的研究结果,提出了促进跨国公司技术创新网络中知识流动应采取的相关对策,并基于国家、产业、企业三个层面给出了相关政策建议。
In the age of knowledge-based economy, the knowledge based on the latest science and technology is not only the most important resources as a strategic base, but also the chief factor that determines the level of productivity. Knowledge base has become an important platform for enterprises, industries and the government to enhance their core competitiveness. As a platform for innovation entities to mutually exchange resources and transmit information, transnational innovation networks have offered a flexible and efficient cooperation platform for complicated innovation. R&D internationalization has become an important part of global economic integration. Throughout the world, multinational enterprises try to optimize the allocation of their R&D resources, reduce their costs of transaction, enhance their efficiency, and achieve their goal of global R&D and technological cooperation and transfer. Transnational innovation networks have become an important base for Chinese innovation system to survive and develop. The antenna of R&D internationalization of multinational enterprises has already penetrated every aspect of Chinese innovation system, and has promoted the flow of knowledge among various factors inside the system and between the inside and the outside of the system. Therefore, we should study the structure optimization of the technological innovation networks of multinational enterprises from the perspective of knowledge flow, which has an important theoretical and practical significance for enhancing Chinese innovation ability and making full use of international resources.
     There are many factors that affect the structure of technological innovation networks of multinational enterprises. How to find out the important factors that affect the flow of knowledge in technological innovation networks of transnational companies, how to internalize the value-added activities of multinational enterprises in technological innovation networks, how to obtain external resources, and how to optimize the structure of technological innovation networks of transnational companies, are all problems that we should urgently solve while studying technological innovation networks of transnational companies. This thesis plans to analyze important factors that affect the flow of knowledge in technological innovation networks of multinational enterprises by using the method of system dynamics. Moreover, by combining the method of qualitative and quantitative analysis, this thesis tries to set up the models of optimizing the structure of technological innovation networks of transnational companies, find out the optimal network structure, urge multinational enterprises to efficiently use global innovative resources, and promote the flow of knowledge in technological innovation networks, so as to minimize the costs of knowledge flow.
     Firstly, the structure and characteristics of technological innovation networks of multinational enterprises are analyzed. Technological innovation networks of multinational enterprises include internal and external technological innovation networks of transnational companies. Just like other complicated networks, they are uniquely characterized by aggregation, nonlinearity, small world networks, and absence of scale, mobility and diversity. A multi-level structure model of knowledge relationship among subsidiaries and between parent companies and their subsidiaries has been set up in the internal technological innovation networks of transnational companies. Then, the knowledge flow in internal technological innovation networks of multinational enterprises has been derived through analysis. This not only depends on the entities of knowledge relationship, but also is closely related to the support of parent companies and the environmental factor. In external technological innovation networks of transnational companies, this thesis has analyzed the roles of various networks entities in knowledge flow, and major models of knowledge flow, including coordinative R&D networks and alliances of technological standards.
     Secondly, we analyze the main modes of knowledge flow in multinational enterprises technology innovation networks, analyzing the influence of the pattern choice about tacit knowledge and knowledge transfer ability of MNEs'overseas. We develop essential dynamic programming model to study the partner selection issue among R&D networks organization. The patent owner should apply for patent holders from technical standards alliances. But the information is asymmetrical, creates "adverse selection" the question appearance. We measure the value brought by the technical value in the multinational enterprises technical standards alliances. We put forward the method of technical standard of internal management structure and union patent pricing.
     Thirdly, we use the method of system dynamics; build the system dynamics model of knowledge flow in multinational enterprises technological innovation network. In this model, we analyze innovation network knowledge and knowledge flow of growth stock relation of foundation and knowledge flow in a multinational enterprises technology innovation networks in various activities as a system. Through the analysis of the multinational enterprises technology innovation networks in the causal relationships between different subjects, knowledge flow on the multinational enterprises simulation technology innovation network knowledge the contribution of stock. By adjusting the sensitivity parameter, in different circumstances knowledge flow for multinational enterprises technology innovation network knowledge contribution forecasting analysis, so as to realize the technology innovation affecting multinational enterprises in the network of the important factors of knowledge flow target.
     Fourthly, we establish a configuration optimization model of knowledge flow for that the expectations of profit is minimized. We apply the global system view to the location and control strategies of firms. We develop a location-allocation, mixed integer linear model that simultaneously evaluates a substantial number of multinational enterprise (MNE) location and control configurations to yield an optimal network, considering R&D, production and marketing facilities, produced in-house and/or outsourced. The model places special emphasis on the role of intra-firm, inter-firm and extra-firm knowledge flows in addressing cost minimize considerations of MNEs. A simulation analysis is undertaken to evaluate potential solutions from such a framework and to analyze their consistency with theoretical expectations.
     Finally, we examine the effectiveness of the optimization model and sensitivity. We apply the OECD, World Bank group of the related data published in2010, getting the multinational enterprise technology innovation network optimal structure based on the knowledge flow, and combining with the results of the study, put forward the related countermeasures about knowledge flow in multinational enterprises to promote technology innovation network. Based on three levels of the national, industry and enterprise, we give the relevant policy suggestions.
引文
[1]Mora F, Coatrieux J L, Passariello G G. An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Based Systems for Ccu Patient-Management - the 1st Steps. In:Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Washington,1991,1206-1207
    [2]Harris L, Coles A M, Dickson K. Building innovation networks:Issues of strategy and expertise. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2000, 12(2):229-241
    [3]Grant M, Hezekiah J. Knowledge and beliefs about hypertension among Jamaican female clients. International Journal of Nursing Studies,1996,33(1): 58-66
    [4]Teece D J. Technology-Transfer by Multinational Firms - Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How. Economic Journal,1977,87(346): 242-261
    [5]Horstmann M, Stockschlader, Kruger M W, et al. Cyclophosphamide/Anti-thymocyte Globulin Conditioning of Patients with Severe Aplastic-Anemia for Marrow Transplantation from Hla-Matched Siblings-Preliminary-Results. Annals of Hematology,1995,71(2):77-81.
    [6]Dittmer R, Benn H P, Cassens U, et al. Measurement of alloreactive anti-recipient helper T-cell precursors following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Transfusion Medicine 1993-94,1994,32:272-275
    [7]Durken M, Agbenu J, Finckh B, et al. Kohlschutter. Deteriorating Free Radical-Trapping Capacity and Antioxidant Status in Plasma during Bone-Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation,1995,15(5): 757-762
    [8]Richard R N, Sidney G W. An Evolutionary Thoery of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press,1982,46-49
    [9]Brenner I B, Zander A, Kim S, et al. Multielement Analysis of Geological and Related Nonconducting Materials Using Spark Ablation and a Sequential Spectrometer. Spectrochimica Acta Part B-Atomic Spectroscopy,1995,50(4-7): 565-582
    [10]王大洲.企业创新网络的演技机制分析.科学学研究,2006,24(5):790-786
    [11]Ericson T, Zander J. Meteor Burst Communication without Feedback. IEEE Transactions on Communications,1995,43(2-4):851-857
    [12]Uhland K, Zander T, Ehrmann M. Synthetic Competition between Cytoplasmic Folding and Translocation of a Soluble Membrane-Protein Domain. Research in Microbiology,1995,146(2):121-128
    [13]杨艳萍,孙华.基于超循环理论的企业创新网络形成与演化机理研究.技术经济与管理研究,2008,(2):24-26
    [14]Wendler D, Mendoza E, Schleiffer T, et al. Tropheryma Whippelii Endocarditis Confirmed by Polymerase Chain-Reaction. European Heart Journal,1995,16(3): 424-425
    [15]Zeller W, Skiera D, Hossfeld D K, et al. Peripheral-Blood Stem-Cells - Graft Engineering.Onkologie,1995,18(1):94-96
    [16]Schmitz N, Dreger P, Zander A R,et al.Results of a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study of Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Colony-Stimulating Factor (Filgrast-im) in Patients with Hodgkins-Disease and Non-Hodgkins-Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Bone-Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marr-ow Transplantation,1995,15(2):261-266
    [17]Teece D. Time-Cost Tradeoffs - Elasticity Estimates and Determinants for International Technology-Transfer Projects. Management Science,1977,23(8): 830-837
    [18]Gupta A K, Govindarajan V. Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control within Multinational-Corporations. Academy of Management Review,1991, 16(4):768-792
    [19]Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness:Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal,1996, (17):27-43
    [20]Zander J. Distributed Cochannel Interference Control in Cellular Radio Systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,1992,41(3):305-311
    [21]Zander R, Gunson M R, Farmer C B, et al. The 1985 Chlorine and Fluorine Inventories in the Stratosphere Based on Atmos Observations at 30-Degrees North Latitude. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry,1992,15(2):171-186
    [22]Lehmann R, Herrmann K, Schroeteler F, et al. Braginski. Fabrication of Micrometer and Submicrometer Structures in Ybco Thin-Films. High-Temperature Superconductors:Materials Aspects,1991, (2):581-586
    [23]Zander M E. Imagetool - Image-Processing on the Sun Workstation. Applica-tions of Digital Image Processing Xiv,1991,156(7):9-14
    [24]Zander R A, Koerner E. Using Parametric Controlled Structured Network to Approach Neural Networks to Neuroscience. Artificial Neural Networks,1991, (1-2):1451-1454
    [25]Zander E. Clinical Implications of Autonomic Neuropathy. Diabetes 1991,1991, (10):275-278
    [26]Pilz W, Grandorff K, Stoll H P, et al. High-Resolution Patterning of Thin Htsc Films Evaluation of Lithography and Dry Etching. Progress in High- Tempe-rature Superconducting Transistors and Other Devices Ii,1992,159(7):73-81
    [27]Jia C L, Kabius B, Urban K, et al. The Microstructure of Epitaxial Yba2cu3o7 Films on Steep Steps in Laalo3 Substrates. Physica C-Superconductivity and Its Applications,1992,196(3-4):211-226
    [28]Zander C L, Healy N L. Elbow Flexion Contractures Treated with Serial Casts and Conservative Therapy. Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume,1992, 17(4):694-697
    [29]Jahreis G, Zander R, Ranft U, et al. Schubert. Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I - a Connecting Link between Nutrition and Growth. Zeitschrift Fur Ernahrung-swissenschaft,1992,31(1):62-69
    [30]Paulus W, Borner R, Schollhorn R, et al. Superconductor Thin-Films - Insitu X-Ray Study on the Reaction of Hydrogen with Epitaxial Yba2cu3o7 Layers. Advanced Materials,1992,4(6):416-419
    [31]杨翩翩.国外知识转移研究综述.中国科技资源导刊,2010,42(3):14-20
    [32]Mark S G. Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78(6): 1360-1380
    [33]Mark S G. Strength of Weak Ties - Reply. American Journal of Sociology,1974, 80(2):527-529
    [34]Olav S, Jan W R, Lee F. Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy,2006,35(7):994-1017
    [35]Pierre B. Distinction:A socuak Crutuqye of the Judgement of Taste. London Routledge and Kegan Paul,1984,9-13
    [36]James S C. Social Capital in the Creation of Human-Capital. American Journal of Sociology,1988,9(4):95-120
    [37]Ronald S B. Structural Hole:The Social Structure of Competition. MA:Harvard University Press,1992:57-86
    [38]席酉民,姚小涛.社会网络理论及其在企业研究中的应用.西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2003,23(3):22-27
    [39]Mross K, Bewermeier P, Kruger W, et al. Pharmacokinetics of High-Dose Chemotherapy with Etoposide in Bone-Marrow Transplantation - 6-Hour Versus 34-Hour Infusion.Experimental Hematology,1992,20(6):720-720
    [40]Albert O H. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Response to Decline in Firms, Organization, and States. Cambridge, MA:Harvad University Press,1970,2-16
    [41]Akintola A, Ezekiel C. Private Finance Initiative in the healthcare sector:trends and risk assessmen. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2005,12(6):601-616
    [42]Renzl B. Trust in management and knowledge sharing:The mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation. Omega-International Journal of Manage-ment Science,2008,36(2):206-220
    [43]Holsapple C W, Raj V, Wagner W P. An experimental investigation of the impact of domain complexity on knowledge acquisition (KA) methods. Expert Systems with Applications,2008,35(3):1084-1094
    [44]Alchian A A, Demsetz H. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.American Economic Review,1972,62(5):777-795
    [45]Brouthers K D, Brouthers L E, Werner S. Resource-based advantages in an international context. Journal of Management,2008,34(2):189-217
    [46]Coase R H. The nature of the firm. Economica,1937,4(16):386-405
    [47]Oliver E. W. The Economic Intstitutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985:47-53
    [48]Rikard L. The handshake between Invisible and Visible Hands . International Studies of Management and Organization,1993,23):87-106
    [49]Yamin M, Juliet O. Patterns of knowledge flows and MNE innovative per-formance. Journal of International Management,2004,10(2):239-258
    [50]Bruce K. Joint Ventures - Theoretical and Empirical-Perspectives. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(4):319-332
    [51]Carlos J J. On Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(1): 31-41
    [52]John H, Judith B S. Partnerships in transition economies:international strategic technology alliances in Russia. Research Policy,1998,27(2):177-185
    [53]Buckley P J, Casson M. The future of the multinational enterprise. Macmillan London,1976,5-8
    [54]Buckley P J, Casson M. The Optimal Timing of a Foreign Direct-Investment. Economic Journal,1981,91(361):75-87
    [55]Zander W. 'Bury the Blackbird Here' -Good enough, Jb. Literary Review,1992, 35(3):434-434
    [56]Buckley P J, Hashai N. A global system view of firm boundaries. Journal of International Business Studies,2004, (35):31-45
    [57]Peter J B,Martin J C. The economics of business process design:motivation, information and coordination within the firm.International Journal of the Economics of Business,1996, (3):5-24
    [58]Peter J B, Martin J C. Process and structure in knowledge management practices of British and US multinational enterprises. Journal of International Manage-ment,2002, (8):29-48
    [59]Peter J B, Martin J C. Governing knowledge sharing in multinational enterprises. Management International Review,2003,43(3):7-25
    [60]Jensen R, Szulanski G. Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal of International Business Studies, 2004,35(6):508-523
    [61]S. Zaheer,A. Zaheer. Trust across borders.Journal of International Business Studies,2006,37(1):21-29
    [62]Dunning J H, Lundan S M. Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2008,25(4): 573-593
    [63]Leidner D. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems,2000,9(2-3):101-105
    [64]孟丁磊,王宇.国内知识管理理论的发展.现代情报,2007,(8):16-21
    [65]刘冀生,吴金希.论基于知识的企业核心竞争力与企业知识链管理.清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,17(1):71-75
    [66]Ikujiro N. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2008,1-59
    [67]Robert M G. Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments:Organi-zational Capability as Knowledge Integration.Organization Science,1996,7(4): 375-387
    [68]Raymond E M, Charles C S, John A M, et al. Organizing in the knowledge age: Anticipating the cellular form. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005),1997,11(4):7-24
    [69]党兴华,李莉.技术创新合作中基于知识位势的知识创造模型研究.中国软科学,2005,(11):143-148
    [70]Wesley M C, Daniel A L. Absorptive-Capacity - a New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1):128-152
    [71]Shaker A Z, Geraro G. Absorptive capacity:A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review,2002,27(2):185-203
    [72]Gergana T, Boris D. Absorptive capacity:Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review,2007,32(3):774-786
    [73]Louise K, Annie P. Exploring the relationships between network change and network learning.Management Learning,2004,35(4):473-490
    [74]Jeffrey H D, Kentaro N. Creating and managing a high-performance know-ledgesharing network:The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal,2000, 21(3):345-367
    [75]Robert M G, Charles B F. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances.Journal of Management Studies,2004,41(1):61-84
    [76]Rajiv D B, Robert J K. The evolution of research on information systems:A fiftieth-year survey of the literature in Management Science.Management Science,2004,50(3):281-298
    [77]John H, Geert D. Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks:The efficacy of multiple contacts.Organization Studies,2002,23(4):525-548
    [78]Franco M, Luigi O. The dynamics and evolution of industries. Industrial and Corporate Change,1996,5(1):51
    [79]Walter W P. Learning from collaboration:knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. Knowledge, groupware, and the Internet,2000,65
    [80]Herman M, Ton S. Centers in connected undirected graphs: An axiomatic approach. Operations Research,2004,52(1):54-64
    [81]Cynthia H, Nelson P, Thomas B L. Resources, Knowledge and Influence:The Organizational Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration. Journal of Manage-ment Studies,2003,40(2):321-347
    [82]Hitt M A, Dacin M T, Arregle J L, et al. Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts:Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(3):449-467
    [83]Peter J L, Balaji R K,Seemantini P. The reification of absorptive capacity:a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct.The Academy of Management Review (AMR),2006,31(4):833-863
    [84]Smith R, Ahmed M. Dance with your collaborators. Research-Technology Management,2000,43(5):58-60
    [85]Kansson H H. Industrial technological development:a network approach. Croom Helm,1987,5-10
    [86]Brull P, Steinke R, Leiderer P, et al. Influence of a Protective Coating on the Aging of Epitaxial Yba2cu3o7-X Films. Superconductor Science & Technology, 1992,5(5):299-302
    [87]Zander E, Weisman S. Treatment of Acne-Vulgaris with Salicylic-Acid Pads. Clinical Therapeutics,1992,14(2):247-253
    [88]Davenport J R, Pitts M T, Provance W, et al. Influence of soil iron and aerobic status on phosphorus availability in cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait) soils. Sixth International Symposium on Vaccinium Culture,1997,44(6): 369-379
    [89]Tracey P, Clark G L. Alliances, networks and competitive strategy:Rethinking clusters of innovation.Growth and Change,2003,34(1):1-16
    [90]江小娟.理解科技全球化.管理世界,2004,(6):4-13,155
    [91]吴永忠.企业创新网络的形成及其演化.自然辩证法研究,2005,(9):69-72
    [92]Djaferis T, Davenport S. Robust control design with phase-gain margin requirements. In:Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, California,1997,2149-2150
    [93]Jamil B, Algermissen B, Osterloh K, et al. Berlien. Generation of singulet oxygen and oxygen radicals in the framework of photodynamic therapy. Journal of Investigative Dermatology,2000,115(3):571-571
    [94]Dunning J H. Location and the multinational enterprise:John Dunning's thoughts on receiving the Journal of International Business Studies 2008 Decade Award. Journal of International Business Studies,2009,40(1):20-34
    [95]Mansfield E, Rapoport J, Romeo A, et al. Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1977,91(2): 221-240
    [96]Wagner W P, Holsapple C W, Raj V. An experimental investigation of the impact of domain complexity on knowledge acquisition (KA) methods. Expert Systems with Applications,2008,35(3):1084-1094
    [97]Glazer R. Measuring the knower:Towards a theory of knowledge equity. California Management Review,1998,40(3):175
    [98]Lim F G, Campos L A. Mapping the Contemporary Studies on Alliances and Strategic Networks. Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios,2009, 11(31):168-182
    [99]Prasad R, Olsen R L, Saarnio J. Strategic vision on convergence of wired and wireless networks. Wireless Personal Communications,2006,38(1):161-166
    [100]Zhang L, Ren S J, Jiang X D, et al. Knowledge management and its application model in enterprise information systems. University as a Bridge from Technology to Society, Proceedings,2000,287-292
    [101]Wu T X. Survey knowledge management systems:An environment for social sciences research. Computers and Their Applications,2000,36(2):116-119
    [102]Sage A P, Small C T. A simulation perspective on knowledge management and sharing, and conflict and complexity in social systems management. In:2000 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, Nashville,2000, 536-541
    [103]Fennessy G. Knowledge management systems for business. Research Technology Management,1999,42(6):58-59
    [104]Morse R. Knowledge management systems:Using technology to enhance organizational learning. Challenges of Information Technology Management in the 21st Century,2000,32(6):426-429
    [105]Roy R, Leibar I. ERP systems and knowledge management. Advances in Manufacturing Technology - Xiv,2000,43(3):21-26
    [106]Xia H S. Knowledge management support of real-time decision making for customer service support systems. In:2005 International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management,2005,903-907
    [107]Fiorentini L, Rossini V, Parodi E. Safety management system for major accidents prevention:role of the knowledge management tools and advanced integrated information systems. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Manage-ment,2004, (6):3183-3188
    [108]Lewkowicz M, Zacklad M. Using problem-solving models to design efficient cooperative knowledge-management systems based on formalization and traceability of argumentation. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Proceedings,2000,193(7):288-295
    [109]Niosi J, Bellon B. The Global Interdependence of National Innovation Systems -Evidence, Limits, and Implications. Technology in Society,1994,16(2):173-197
    [110]Kitchener H C, Cruickshank M E, Farmery E. The 1993 British- Society- for-Colposcopy-and-Cervical-Pathology National Coordinating Network United-Kingdom Colposcopy Survey - Comparison with 1988 and the Response to Introduction of Guidelines. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,1995, 102(7):549-552
    [111]Wick C W, Leon L S. From Ideas to Action - Creating a Learning Organization. Human Resource Management,1995,34(2):299-311
    [112]Osterloh M, Frey B S. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science,2000,11(5):538-550
    [113]Bjorkman I, Barner R W, Li L. Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs:the impact of headquarters control mechanisms.Journal of International Business Studies,2004,35(5):443-455
    [114]Zhang M. Does accuracy of Body Mass Index based on self-reported height and weight influence extent of knowledge on cardiovascular risk factors? American Journal of Epidemiology,2001,153(11):57-57
    [115]Shaohua M, Devi G, Donald H. Foreign subsidiaries'learning from local envi-ronments:An empirical test. Management International Review,2007,47(1): 79-102
    [116]Guimon J. Policies to benefit from the globalization of corporate R&D:An exploratory study for EU countries. Technovation,2011,31(2-3):77-86
    [117]Elworth J T. The formation of inter-organizational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly,2000,45(1):173-177
    [118]Kim T, Park C. R&D, trade, and productivity growth in Korean manufacturing. Review of World Economics,2003,139(3):460-483
    [119]蒋军锋.基于规范场理论的技术创新网络知识时空测度.管理科学,2008,(5):2-10
    [120]席运江,党延忠.基于加权知识网络的个人知识存量表示与度量方法.管理学报,2007,(1):28-31
    [121]张喜征,廖斌,薛啬媛.基于雷达图的企业知识存量测评与预警研究.情报杂志,2007,(8):2-3
    [122]刘爱文,蒋军锋,王修来.技术创新网络中的知识-信息-知识作用过程研究.科学学研究,2008,28(5):1067-1072
    [123]Gupta A K, Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(4):473-496
    [124]Drucker P F. The Network Society. International Forum on Information and Documentation,1995,20(1):5-7
    [125]Zander U, Kogut B. Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities - an Empirical-Test. Organization Science,1995, 6(1):76-92
    [126]Polanyi M. Message of Hungarian-Revolution.American Scholar,1966,35(4): 661-676
    [127]Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology.Organization Science,1992,3(3):383-397
    [128]Szulanski G, Cappetta R, Jensen R J. When and how trustworthiness matters: knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of casual ambiguity. Organization Science,2004,600-613
    [129]Dixon N M.Common knowledge:how companies thrive by sharing what they know. Boston:Harvard Business School Press,2000,8-10
    [130]Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks:Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(5):996-1004
    [131]Davenport T H, Klahr P. Managing customer support knowledge. California Management Review,1998,40(3):195
    [132]Arthur K Y. Organizational learning capability. New YorK:Oxford University Press,1999,3-7
    [133]Turner K L, Makhija M V. The role of organizational controls in managing knowledge. Academy of Management Review,2006,31(1):197-217
    [134]Inkpen A C, Dinur A. Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science,1998,9(4):454-468
    [135]Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the Firm & Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation. Journal of International Business Studies,1993, 24(4):625-645
    [136]Pang T K, Pablos M A, Jsselmuiden C I. From Bangkok to Mexico:towards a framework for turning knowledge into action to improve health systems. Bulletin of the World Health Organization,2004,82(10):720-721
    [137]Lynch E B, Liu K, Kiefe C. Knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors does not influence long-term cardiovascular risk:The Cardia study. Circulation,2005, 111(14):211-212
    [138]Hamel G. Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances. Strategic Management Journal,1991, (12): 83-103
    [139]Simonin B L. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(7):595-623
    [140]Lane P J, Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal,1998,19(5):461-477
    [141]Baughn C C, Denekamp J G, Stevens J H, et al. Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances. Journal of World Business,1997,32(2):103-117
    [142]Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Scien-ce,1998,9(2):141-159
    [143]Ring P S, Van A H. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal,1992,13(7):483-498
    [144]Das T K, Teng B S. Between trust and control:Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review,1998,23(3): 491-512
    [145]Granovetter M. Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3):481-510
    [146]Nooteboom B. Governance and competence:how can they be combined? Cambridge Journal of Economics,2004,28(4):505-525
    [147]Ke W, Wei K K. Organizational culture and leadership in ERP implementation. Decision Support Systems,2008,45(2):208-218
    [148]刘翌,徐金发.母子公司知识流动:一个理论分析框架.科研管理,2002,(1):6-11
    [149]阎海峰.跨国公司网络组织及其启示.华东经济管理,2000,(6):37-38
    [150]阎海峰.知识在网络组织中的流动分析—以跨国网络结构为例.外国经济与管理,2001,(10):29-33
    [151]高茜,徐蕾.子公司知识来源对跨国公司知识流动的影响.商业研究,2005,(21):72-73
    [152]Kuemmerle W. Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. Harvard Business Review,1997,75(2):61-63
    [153]Mudambi S. Branding importance in business-to-business markets - Three buyer clusters. Industrial Marketing Management,2002,31(6):525-533
    [154]Adler N, Hashai N. Knowledge flows and the modelling of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies,2007,38(4):639-657
    [155]Ghoshal S, Bartlett C A. Creation, Adoption, and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational-Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies,1988,19(3):365-388
    [156]Kostova T, Zaheer S. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review,1999, 24(1):64-81
    [157]Foss N J, Pedersen T. Organizing knowledge processes in the multinational corporation:an introduction. Journal of International Business Studies,2004, 35(5):340-349
    [158]Andersson U, Forsgren M, Holm U. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(11):979-996
    [159]李金华.创新网络的复杂适应性.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2006,(1):132-134
    [160]李金华,孙东川.复杂网络上的知识传播模型.华南理工大学学报,2006,34(6):99-102
    [161]John D S. Business Dynamics:system thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston:McGraw Hill,2002,515-535
    [162]Felix Janszen. The Age of Innovation. London:Prentice Hall,2000,1-4
    [163]江可申,田颖杰.动态企业联盟的小世界网络模型.世界经济研究,2002,(5):84-90
    [164]Verspagen B, Duysters G. The small worlds of strategic technology alliances. Technovation,2004,24(7):563-571
    [165]Barabasi A L, Dezso Z, Ravasz E, et al. Scale-free and hierarchical structures in complex networks. Modeling of Complex Systems,2003,66(1):1-16
    [166]Barabasi A L, Bonabeau E. Scale-free networks.Scientific American,2003, 288(5):60-69
    [167]Powell W B, Carvalho T A, Godfrey G A, et al. Dynamic fleet management as a logistics queueing network.Annals of Operations Research,1995,61(165-188
    [168]Jonathan D D, James C. Wendler. Best practice and beyond:Knowledge strategies. McKinsey Quarterly,1998, (1):19-52
    [169]Cowan R, Jonard N. Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. Journal of economic Dynamics and Control,2004,28(8):1557-1575
    [170]Bonabeau E. Agent-based modeling:Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2002,99(3):72-80
    [171]Nyblom J, Borgatti S, Roslakka J, et al. Statistical analysis of network data--an application to diffusion of innovation. Social Networks,2003,25(2):175-195
    [172]Birkinshaw J, Hood N. Multinational subsidiary evolution:Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review,1998,23(4):773-795
    [173]Birkinshaw J, Hood N, Jonsson S. Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations:The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Manage-ment Journal,1998,19(3):221-241
    [174]Monteiro L F, Arvidsson N, Birkinshaw J. Knowledge flows within multinati-onal corporations:Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organization Science,2008,19(1):90-107
    [175]Mu S., Gnyawali D R, Hatfield D E. Foreign subsidiaries' learning from local environments:an empirical test. Management International Review,2007,47(1): 79-102
    [176]Mudambi R, Navarra P. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 2004,35(5):385-406
    [177]Yamin M, Otto J. Patterns of knowledge flows and innovative performance in MNEs. Journal of International Management,2004,10(2):239-258
    [178]Easterby S M, Lyles M A, Tsang E W. Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies,2008, 45(4):677-690
    [179]Gnyawali D R, Singa 1 M, Mu S. Knowledge ties among subsidiaries in MNCs: A multi-level conceptual model.Journal of International Management,2009, 15(4):387-400
    [180]Anil K, Gvindarajan G. Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal,2000, (21):473-496
    [181]Vijay G A. Gupta. Knowledge Flows Within Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal,2000, (21):473-496
    [182]Holsapple C W, Singh M. The knowledge chain model:activities for competitiveness. Expert Systems with Applications,2001,20(1):77-98
    [183]Garcia S. Exploring Internal Stickiness:Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal,1996, (17):27-43
    [184]宋建元,张钢.组织网络化中的知识共享——一个基于知识链的分析.研究与发展管理,2004,(4):25-30
    [185]蒋翠清,杨善林,梁昌勇,丁勇.发达国家企业知识创新网络连接机制及其启示.中国软科学,2006,(8):134-140
    [186]沈小贤,沈必扬.浙江企业创新网络的发展.现代企业,2007,(2):30-31
    [187]吴添祖,李一飞.我国中小企业创新网络建设存在的问题.企业活力,2004,(2):42-43
    [188]Georg V K, Ikujiro N, Kazuo I. Develop knowledge activists! European Management Journal,1997,15(5):475-483
    [189]赵涛,曾金平.企业隐性知识流动态扩展模型分析.科学学研究,2005,(4):536-539
    [190]王大洲.我国企业创新网络发展现状分析.哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(3):67-73
    [191]杜健,吴晓波,卫冬苇.我国IT企业技术获取模式与企业绩效的关系研究.管理工程学报,2008,(2):6-12
    [192]Reddy P, Sigurdson J. Strategic location of R&D and emerging patterns of globalization:the case of Astra Research Centre India. International Journal of Technology Management,1997,14(2-4):344-361
    [193]Gassmann O, Zedtwitz M V. New concepts and trends in international R&D organization. Research Policy,1999,28(2-3):231-250
    [194]曾德明,彭盾,陈春晖.高技术企业协作R&D网络与技术标准联盟契合动因分析.软科学,2008,(9):31-35
    [195]Keil T. De-facto standardization through alliances--Lessons from Bluetooth. Telecommunications Policy,2002,26(3-4):205-213
    [196]Cantwell J, Zhang Y L. Innovation and location in the multinational firm. International Journal of Technology Management,2011,54(1):116-132
    [197]Cantwell J. Location and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies,2009,40(1):35-41
    [198]Porter M E. On competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Businesss School Publishing,1998,89-94
    [199]Porter M E. On competition. Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Pub.,2008, 52-56
    [200]Kraatz M S. Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal,1998, 41(6):621-643
    [201]Williamson O E. Comparative economic organization:The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(2):269-296
    [202]Hennart J F. Explaining the swollen middle:why most transactions are a mix of market" and" hierarchy". Organization Science,1993,4(4):529-547
    [203]Buckley P J, Casson M C. An economic model of international joint venture strategy. Journal of International Business Studies,1996,27(5):849-876
    [204]Buckley P J, Casson M C. Analyzing Foreign Market Entry Strategies: Extending the Internalization Approach. Journal of International Business Studies,1998,29(2):537-561
    [205]Jenov A, Tauman Y. The private value of a patent:A cooperative approach. Mathematical Social Sciences,2009,58(1):84-97
    [206]Gallini N T. Deterrence by Market Sharing - a Strategic Incentive for Licensing. American Economic Review,1984,74(5):931-941
    [207]Gallini N T, Winter R A. Licensing in the Theory of Innovation.Rand Journal of Economics,1985,16(2):237-252
    [208]Amram M, Kulatilaka N. Disciplined decisions - Aligning strategy with the financial markets. Harvard Business Review,1999,77(1):95
    [209]Pennings E, Lint O. Market entry, phased rollout or abandonment? A real option approach. European Journal of Operational Research,2000,124(1):125-138
    [210]Lin A, Murugappan S. Silterra moving towards learning organization. In:2002 IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics, Proceedings, Kuala Lumpu,2002,576
    [211]Nash J F. The bargaining problem. Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society,1950,18(2):155-162
    [212]Nash J F. Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica:Journal of the Econo-metric Society,1953,21(1):128-140
    [213]Svejnar J. On the Theory of a Participatory Firm. Journal of Economic Theory, 1982,27(2):313-330
    [214]Svejnar J. Bargaining power, fear of disagreement, and wage settlements:theory and evidence from US industry. Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society,1986,54(5):1055-1078
    [215]Aumann R J, Kurz M. Power and Taxes. Econometrica,1977,45(5):1137-1161
    [216]Aumann R J, Kurz M. Power and Taxes in a Multi-Commodity Economy. Israel Journal of Mathematics,1977,27(3-4):185-234
    [217]Hart O, Moore J. Foundations of incomplete contracts. Review of Economic Studies,1999,66(1):115-138
    [218]Boschma R. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 2005,39(1):61-74
    [219]Alberto Q C, Marco F. Complexity and industrial clusters:dynamics and models in theory and practice. Heidelberg ; New York:Physica-Verlag,2002,15-25
    [220]Gerybadze A, Reger G. Globalization of R&D:recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy,1999, 28(2-3):251-274
    [221]Lynne G Z,Michael R D. Capturing Technological Opportunity Via Japan's Star Scientists:Evidence from Japanese Firms' Biotech Patents and Products. The Journal of Technology Transfer,2001,26(1-2):37-58
    [222]Takeda Y, Kajlkawa Y, Sakata I, et al. An analysis of geographical agglomera-tion and modularized industrial networks in a regional cluster:A case study at Yamagata prefecture in Japan. Technovation,2008,28(8):531-539
    [223]Antonelli C. The Economic-Theory of Information Networks. Economics of Information Networks,1992,5-27
    [224]Perez C, Soete L. Catching up in technology:entry barriers and windows of opportunity. In Technical Change and Economic Theory. New York:Pinter Publishers,1988,14-16
    [225]Sandra P. Come close and co-create: Proximities in pharmaceutical innovation networks. Rottordam:Erasmus University,2008,56-58
    [226]Jaffe A B. Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of Research-and- Develo-pment Evidence from Firms Patents, Profits, and Market Value. American Economic Review,1986,76(5):984-1001
    [227]Galaskiewicz J. The formation of inter-organizational networks. Contemporary Sociology-a Journal of Reviews,1999,28(1):55-56
    [228]Luo Y. Building trust in cross-cultural collaborations:toward a contingency perspective. Journal of Management,2002,28(5):669
    [229]Chen C J. The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R&D Management, 2004,34(3):311-321
    [230]Dirks K T, Ferrin D L. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science,2001,12(4):450-467
    [231]Buckley P J, Strange R. The Governance of the Multinational Enterprise: Insights from Internalization Theory. Journal of Management Studies,2011, 48(2):460-470
    [232]Kogut B. Designing Global Strategies - Profiting from Operational Flexibility. Sloan Management Review,1985,27(1):27-38
    [233]Dunning J H. Location and the multinational enterprise:A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies,1998,29(1):45-66

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700