汶川地震灾区历史文化名城灾后价值分析与保护研究
|
摘要
5.12汶川特大地震灾区历史文化资源十分丰富,拥有众多国家级和省级历史文化名城。地震使大量历史文化名城遭受严重破坏,近千处文物保护单位、无数的历史建筑和历史文化价值极高的街区遭受灭顶之灾。灾区重建任务已全面完成,住房和基础设施建设已经解决,灾区群众生产和生活步入正轨。在此背景下审视灾区的历史文化名城保护工作,发现问题并提出解决思路,可对今后灾后重建工作提供借鉴,具有重要的理论和实践价值。本文以地震灾害和历史文化名城保护综合考虑的思路开展研究,通过分析国内外大灾之后的历史文化恢复理论和实践,以及历史文化名城保护的一般理论和方法,针对灾区历史文化名城的震后现状,分析其价值的变化,建立历史文化名城价值的地震影响综合评价模型,明确了评价的原则、标准、内容和方法。进而实地考察汶川地震极重灾区的都江堰、汶川、什邡、绵竹、北川5个城市,分析其历史文化价值,地震灾损,恢复重建规划和实施,防灾减灾系统,以及景观风貌恢复和保护,应用设计的评价体系,进行灾后历史文化名城价值评价,并对灾后历史文化名城保护提出建议。最后从名城价值、防灾系统的构建、景观风貌的塑造、地震遗址和纪念建筑、政策法规导向等方面,探讨历史文化名城保护可供操作的一般经验和需要注意的问题。基于以上的综合研究分析,本论文的主要研究内容和结论有以下几个方面：
一、汶川地震灾区的历史文化名城具有历史价值高、文化遗存丰富、地理区位独特、历史影响深远、地域特征明显等特征。震后,文物点本身的属性发生变化,传统风貌、现状肌理和整体格局的改变导致名城价值受到影响；同时,地震遗址和纪念物等物质载体及抗震救灾与灾后重建精神等方面的成就也给名城价值增添了新的内容。
二、建立历史文化名城价值的地震影响综合评价模型,将整个评价体系划分为历史文化价值特色、地震影响评估、地震景观与社会影响、保护规划和抗震措施4个一级指标,继续分解为13个二级指标,29个三级指标。通过定量与定性结合的评价方法对历史文化名城价值进行综合评价,再依据分级标准对评价结果进行等级评判。
三、对汶川地震极重灾区的五个城市进行考察分析并提出历史文化名城保护建议：
1.修复紧邻世界遗产都江堰景区的历史街区建筑,划分有价值的区域为历史文化街区进行保护,如幸福路、大观街、书院街、瑞莲街、井福街、蒲阳镇古廊桥地区；增加城市开放空间,分级设置城市公园、地区公园、社区公园、儿童公园、街头绿地等,作为休憩和疏散场地；拆除文物古迹周边的棚户区和工厂区,更新城区老化设施,开展水域综合环境治理,引导商业文化设施集聚中心。
2.合理引导、强化汶川历史文化名城意识和保护名城的责任感；扩大现代建筑与文物古迹间缺乏必要的过渡协调地带,如姜维城遗址；挖掘原有的历史文化底蕴,强化禹羌文化特色,并借助震后“汶川”的名气,丰富历史文化名城的内涵。
3.绵竹历史文化名城保护专项规划中增加对文物建筑的抗震防震措施；整治民主巷历史文化风貌,开展民主巷历史文化街区保护规划；加强新城区与旧城之间必要的过渡和引导,明确风貌控制区和建设协调区,新建筑应体现川西建筑特色。
4.提升什邡历史文化特色和品质,整治周家大院街区和罗汉寺街区,进行城区风貌改造,有条件的街区进行保护,如马井正大街、师古回龙街、蓥华红旗街；改善文物古迹用地现状的局促,对慧剑寺和关帝庙周边进行改造,拆除现代化建筑,划定文物保护控制区和协调区；建立立体绿化游憩网络,保护和完善绿化建设,如留春苑公园内以及筏子河两岸,在重要节点建设相应街头绿地和小游园。
5.北川是汶川地震灾区唯一异地重建的城市,灾后重建塑造了“北川模式”。通过研究,认为北川申报“灾难型”历史文化名城,其历史文化名城特色定位为大禹故里,现代化的羌族文化城,灾后重建模范城市；历史文化保护核心区为曲山原县城遗址、县城南部的任家坪地区以及北部的唐家山堰塞湖堰塞体周边；永昌新城大禹文化轴线街区可列为历史文化街区,市民中心、北川大酒店、羌族博物馆与羌文化研究综合体、抗震纪念馆等可适当列为文物保护单位。
四、进一步提出了增强历史文化名城历史文化保护和抗灾防灾能力的建议：对老城区进行功能疏解,调整用地性质和规模,降低老城区密度；防灾避灾和城市历史空间相结合,利用古城水系等要素形成城市公园兼具疏散作用,整治不合理的历史街巷,满足避难所和疏散通道要求；按照城市新抗震设防要求,增加文物保护单位和历史建筑的抗震防震措施；综合解决古城交通的现代化、用地功能的调整、风貌特色的形成等对历史文化名城保护有重大影响的问题；原真性修复地震中受损的历史古迹和历史街区,保持地域传统特色,最大限度地发挥历史文化遗产在构成城市风貌特色中的积极作用；积极保护地震遗址,利用灾后恢复重建的物质和精神成果,扩大城市的历史文化价值范畴,提高历史文化名城的社会影响力。
期望本文对汶川地震灾区历史文化名城的进一步保护工作提供科学参考,同时也为其他历史文化名城的防灾减灾提供借鉴。
The disaster area of5.12Wenchuan great earthquakes is rich in historical and cultural resources, and has large amounts of national and provincial historical cultural cities. The great earthquake damaged considerable quantities of historical cultural cities. About a thousand units of cultural relic protection, innumerable historical buildings and street with high historical and cultural value had suffered from a great calamity. Until now, the reconstruction task of disaster area has been fully completed. The housing and infrastructure construction has been resolved, and the production and life of the people in the disaster area are gradually on track. In this context, examining the protection of the historical and cultural cities in the disaster area, finding problems and putting forward to solving methods can provide successful experience for the post-disaster reconstruction, which has important value of theory and practice. This paper was carried out based on the thought of combining earthquake disaster with protection of historical and cultural cities. There is a need to set up an earthquake impact assessment system of historical and cultural cities and to have clear evaluation principles, standards, contents and methods in accordance with the existing state after earthquake in historical and cultural cities by analyzing the changes in the values from the analysis of the theory and practice of city protection and restoration after disaster home and abroad, and of general theory and methods of protecting the historical and cultural cities. And then, analyzing the historical and cultural value and the damage in the earthquake of the5most damaged cities of Dujiangyan, Wenchuan County, Shifang City, Mianzhu City, and Beichuan County in Wenchuan earthquake by field investigation to recover the reconstruction planning and implementation and disaster prevention and deduction system, and to restore and protect landscape. It can make assessment on the value of the historical and cultural cities after disaster using the designing assessment system, and to propose protecting the historical and cultural cities after disaster. At last, we discuss operational experience and problems needing attention of historical and cultural cities protection from the aspects of historical and cultural cities value, disaster prevention system construction, landscape creation, earthquake sites and monuments and policy orientation. Based on the aforementioned comprehensive research and analysis, the main research contents and conclusion of this paper are as followed:
1. The historical and cultural cities of Wenchuan earthquake disaster area had the characteristics of high historical value, rich cultural heritage, unique geographical location, profound historical influence, and obvious regional characters. After the earthquake, the inherent properties of the historical and cultural cities have changed. The changes of traditional style, the present situation and texture and overall situation would influence the value of these cities. Meanwhile, the material carriers of earthquake site and memorial, the achievements of earthquake relief and rebuilding of spirit after disaster have added new values to the historical and cultural cities.
2. Setting up an earthquake impact assessment system of values of historical and cultural cities, which was divided into4first-class indicators:characteristic of historical cultural value, assessment of earthquake impact, seismic landscape and social influence and conservation planning and seismic measures. These4first-class indicators can be divided into13second-class indicators,29third-class indicators. The historical and cultural cities can be evaluated comprehensively through the combination of quantitative and qualitative evaluation method, and then be evaluated into grade according to the classification standard.
3. Investigate and analyze the5most damaged cities in the Wenchuan earthquake and recommend protecting the historical and cultural cities:
(1) Restore the historic building next to world heritage site of Dujiangyan. Divide valued region into historical and cultural blocks for protection, such as Happiness Road, Grand Street, College Street, Lotus Street, Well Street, Poyang Town, and Ancient Lounge Area. Set up free places with classification, such as City Park, Regional Park, Community Park, Children Park, Green Street and so on for rest and evacuation. Remove the shanty towns and industrial areas around the cultural relics and historic sites, update urban aging facilities, carry out water integrated environmental management, and guide commercial and cultural facilities center.
(2) Reasonably guide and strengthen the consciousness of Wenchuan historical and cultural cities and the responsibility of protecting historical and cultural cities; enlarge the lacked and indispensible transition coordination area between the modern building and cultural relics, such as the ruins of Jiang Weicheng; excavate the original historical and cultural heritage, and strengthen the Yu Qiang characteristic; enrich historical and cultural cities cultivation with the help of "Wenchuan earthquake"
(3) Add anti-seismic measures to architectural heritage in the planning of protecting Mianzhu historical and cultural cities; renovate historical and cultural features of Democracy Lane, and develop historic blocks protection planning of Democracy Lane; strengthen the necessary transition and guide between the new city and the old city; make clear feature control areas and construction coordination area, in which the new building should reflect the architectural features of Chuanxi.
(4) Promote the historical and cultural characteristics and qualities of Shifang, dredge Zhou Jia courtyard blocks and arhat Temple Street, transform the urban style and features and protect conditioned blocks, such as the Horse Jingzheng Street, Division ancient dragon Street, Ying Hua street; improve the cramped situation of cultural relics and historic sites, reform the surrounding places of Hui sword Temple and Guan Yu Temple, tear down the modernizd architecture, delimit cultural relics protection control and coordination zones, establish three-dimensional green recreation network, protect and improve the greening construction, for example the green street and small garden built at the important joint in the Liu Chunyuan Park and on both sides of Raft River.
(5) Beichuan is the only city to reconstruct elsewhere in Wenchuan earthquake areas and the post-disaster reconstruction has represent "Beichuan mold". Beichuan registered the "catastrophic" historical and cultural cities after investigation. The historical and cultural city characters of Beichuan is defined as the "the hometown of Da Yu", modernized Qiang culture city, and Post disaster reconstruction model city. The core area of historical culture protection is Qu Shanyuan county ruins, Ren Jiaping zone in the south of the county, and the surroundings of Tang Jiashan barrier lake which in the north of the county; Yongchang Metro Dayu culture axis block can be listed as historical and cultural blocks; Civic Center, Beichuan Hotel, Qiang Museum and Qiang culture research center, Earthquake Memorial can be properly classified as heritage conservation units.
4. We further put forward suggestions of strengthening the historical cultural protection and disaster prevention ability of historical and cultural cities:mediate the old city function, adjust the land nature and scale, reduce the density of the old city; combine the disaster avoidance with the city historical space, develop city park with evacuation function through ancient city water system and other elements, remediate unreasonable historical streets to meet the requirements of refuge and the evacuation channels; increase the anti-seismic measurements to cultural relic units and historic building according to the new requirements against earthquakes; solve comprehensively the problems that have major effects on the protection of historical and cultural cities, for example traffic modernization of ancient city, adjustment of land usage, the formation of style and characteristics; authentically repair historical monuments and historic districts damaged in earthquake to reserve regional traditional characteristics and maximize the positive role the historical and cultural heritage has played in the formation of city style and features; positively protect the earthquake sites, enlarge the city's historical and cultural value category and improve social influence of the historical and cultural cities with the help of post-war reconstructed material and spiritual achievements.
We expect that this paper can provide reference to the further protection of historical and cultural cities in the Wenchuan earthquake areas, and can provide reference to the disaster prevention of other historical and cultural cities at the same time.
一、汶川地震灾区的历史文化名城具有历史价值高、文化遗存丰富、地理区位独特、历史影响深远、地域特征明显等特征。震后,文物点本身的属性发生变化,传统风貌、现状肌理和整体格局的改变导致名城价值受到影响；同时,地震遗址和纪念物等物质载体及抗震救灾与灾后重建精神等方面的成就也给名城价值增添了新的内容。
二、建立历史文化名城价值的地震影响综合评价模型,将整个评价体系划分为历史文化价值特色、地震影响评估、地震景观与社会影响、保护规划和抗震措施4个一级指标,继续分解为13个二级指标,29个三级指标。通过定量与定性结合的评价方法对历史文化名城价值进行综合评价,再依据分级标准对评价结果进行等级评判。
三、对汶川地震极重灾区的五个城市进行考察分析并提出历史文化名城保护建议：
1.修复紧邻世界遗产都江堰景区的历史街区建筑,划分有价值的区域为历史文化街区进行保护,如幸福路、大观街、书院街、瑞莲街、井福街、蒲阳镇古廊桥地区；增加城市开放空间,分级设置城市公园、地区公园、社区公园、儿童公园、街头绿地等,作为休憩和疏散场地；拆除文物古迹周边的棚户区和工厂区,更新城区老化设施,开展水域综合环境治理,引导商业文化设施集聚中心。
2.合理引导、强化汶川历史文化名城意识和保护名城的责任感；扩大现代建筑与文物古迹间缺乏必要的过渡协调地带,如姜维城遗址；挖掘原有的历史文化底蕴,强化禹羌文化特色,并借助震后“汶川”的名气,丰富历史文化名城的内涵。
3.绵竹历史文化名城保护专项规划中增加对文物建筑的抗震防震措施；整治民主巷历史文化风貌,开展民主巷历史文化街区保护规划；加强新城区与旧城之间必要的过渡和引导,明确风貌控制区和建设协调区,新建筑应体现川西建筑特色。
4.提升什邡历史文化特色和品质,整治周家大院街区和罗汉寺街区,进行城区风貌改造,有条件的街区进行保护,如马井正大街、师古回龙街、蓥华红旗街；改善文物古迹用地现状的局促,对慧剑寺和关帝庙周边进行改造,拆除现代化建筑,划定文物保护控制区和协调区；建立立体绿化游憩网络,保护和完善绿化建设,如留春苑公园内以及筏子河两岸,在重要节点建设相应街头绿地和小游园。
5.北川是汶川地震灾区唯一异地重建的城市,灾后重建塑造了“北川模式”。通过研究,认为北川申报“灾难型”历史文化名城,其历史文化名城特色定位为大禹故里,现代化的羌族文化城,灾后重建模范城市；历史文化保护核心区为曲山原县城遗址、县城南部的任家坪地区以及北部的唐家山堰塞湖堰塞体周边；永昌新城大禹文化轴线街区可列为历史文化街区,市民中心、北川大酒店、羌族博物馆与羌文化研究综合体、抗震纪念馆等可适当列为文物保护单位。
四、进一步提出了增强历史文化名城历史文化保护和抗灾防灾能力的建议：对老城区进行功能疏解,调整用地性质和规模,降低老城区密度；防灾避灾和城市历史空间相结合,利用古城水系等要素形成城市公园兼具疏散作用,整治不合理的历史街巷,满足避难所和疏散通道要求；按照城市新抗震设防要求,增加文物保护单位和历史建筑的抗震防震措施；综合解决古城交通的现代化、用地功能的调整、风貌特色的形成等对历史文化名城保护有重大影响的问题；原真性修复地震中受损的历史古迹和历史街区,保持地域传统特色,最大限度地发挥历史文化遗产在构成城市风貌特色中的积极作用；积极保护地震遗址,利用灾后恢复重建的物质和精神成果,扩大城市的历史文化价值范畴,提高历史文化名城的社会影响力。
期望本文对汶川地震灾区历史文化名城的进一步保护工作提供科学参考,同时也为其他历史文化名城的防灾减灾提供借鉴。
The disaster area of5.12Wenchuan great earthquakes is rich in historical and cultural resources, and has large amounts of national and provincial historical cultural cities. The great earthquake damaged considerable quantities of historical cultural cities. About a thousand units of cultural relic protection, innumerable historical buildings and street with high historical and cultural value had suffered from a great calamity. Until now, the reconstruction task of disaster area has been fully completed. The housing and infrastructure construction has been resolved, and the production and life of the people in the disaster area are gradually on track. In this context, examining the protection of the historical and cultural cities in the disaster area, finding problems and putting forward to solving methods can provide successful experience for the post-disaster reconstruction, which has important value of theory and practice. This paper was carried out based on the thought of combining earthquake disaster with protection of historical and cultural cities. There is a need to set up an earthquake impact assessment system of historical and cultural cities and to have clear evaluation principles, standards, contents and methods in accordance with the existing state after earthquake in historical and cultural cities by analyzing the changes in the values from the analysis of the theory and practice of city protection and restoration after disaster home and abroad, and of general theory and methods of protecting the historical and cultural cities. And then, analyzing the historical and cultural value and the damage in the earthquake of the5most damaged cities of Dujiangyan, Wenchuan County, Shifang City, Mianzhu City, and Beichuan County in Wenchuan earthquake by field investigation to recover the reconstruction planning and implementation and disaster prevention and deduction system, and to restore and protect landscape. It can make assessment on the value of the historical and cultural cities after disaster using the designing assessment system, and to propose protecting the historical and cultural cities after disaster. At last, we discuss operational experience and problems needing attention of historical and cultural cities protection from the aspects of historical and cultural cities value, disaster prevention system construction, landscape creation, earthquake sites and monuments and policy orientation. Based on the aforementioned comprehensive research and analysis, the main research contents and conclusion of this paper are as followed:
1. The historical and cultural cities of Wenchuan earthquake disaster area had the characteristics of high historical value, rich cultural heritage, unique geographical location, profound historical influence, and obvious regional characters. After the earthquake, the inherent properties of the historical and cultural cities have changed. The changes of traditional style, the present situation and texture and overall situation would influence the value of these cities. Meanwhile, the material carriers of earthquake site and memorial, the achievements of earthquake relief and rebuilding of spirit after disaster have added new values to the historical and cultural cities.
2. Setting up an earthquake impact assessment system of values of historical and cultural cities, which was divided into4first-class indicators:characteristic of historical cultural value, assessment of earthquake impact, seismic landscape and social influence and conservation planning and seismic measures. These4first-class indicators can be divided into13second-class indicators,29third-class indicators. The historical and cultural cities can be evaluated comprehensively through the combination of quantitative and qualitative evaluation method, and then be evaluated into grade according to the classification standard.
3. Investigate and analyze the5most damaged cities in the Wenchuan earthquake and recommend protecting the historical and cultural cities:
(1) Restore the historic building next to world heritage site of Dujiangyan. Divide valued region into historical and cultural blocks for protection, such as Happiness Road, Grand Street, College Street, Lotus Street, Well Street, Poyang Town, and Ancient Lounge Area. Set up free places with classification, such as City Park, Regional Park, Community Park, Children Park, Green Street and so on for rest and evacuation. Remove the shanty towns and industrial areas around the cultural relics and historic sites, update urban aging facilities, carry out water integrated environmental management, and guide commercial and cultural facilities center.
(2) Reasonably guide and strengthen the consciousness of Wenchuan historical and cultural cities and the responsibility of protecting historical and cultural cities; enlarge the lacked and indispensible transition coordination area between the modern building and cultural relics, such as the ruins of Jiang Weicheng; excavate the original historical and cultural heritage, and strengthen the Yu Qiang characteristic; enrich historical and cultural cities cultivation with the help of "Wenchuan earthquake"
(3) Add anti-seismic measures to architectural heritage in the planning of protecting Mianzhu historical and cultural cities; renovate historical and cultural features of Democracy Lane, and develop historic blocks protection planning of Democracy Lane; strengthen the necessary transition and guide between the new city and the old city; make clear feature control areas and construction coordination area, in which the new building should reflect the architectural features of Chuanxi.
(4) Promote the historical and cultural characteristics and qualities of Shifang, dredge Zhou Jia courtyard blocks and arhat Temple Street, transform the urban style and features and protect conditioned blocks, such as the Horse Jingzheng Street, Division ancient dragon Street, Ying Hua street; improve the cramped situation of cultural relics and historic sites, reform the surrounding places of Hui sword Temple and Guan Yu Temple, tear down the modernizd architecture, delimit cultural relics protection control and coordination zones, establish three-dimensional green recreation network, protect and improve the greening construction, for example the green street and small garden built at the important joint in the Liu Chunyuan Park and on both sides of Raft River.
(5) Beichuan is the only city to reconstruct elsewhere in Wenchuan earthquake areas and the post-disaster reconstruction has represent "Beichuan mold". Beichuan registered the "catastrophic" historical and cultural cities after investigation. The historical and cultural city characters of Beichuan is defined as the "the hometown of Da Yu", modernized Qiang culture city, and Post disaster reconstruction model city. The core area of historical culture protection is Qu Shanyuan county ruins, Ren Jiaping zone in the south of the county, and the surroundings of Tang Jiashan barrier lake which in the north of the county; Yongchang Metro Dayu culture axis block can be listed as historical and cultural blocks; Civic Center, Beichuan Hotel, Qiang Museum and Qiang culture research center, Earthquake Memorial can be properly classified as heritage conservation units.
4. We further put forward suggestions of strengthening the historical cultural protection and disaster prevention ability of historical and cultural cities:mediate the old city function, adjust the land nature and scale, reduce the density of the old city; combine the disaster avoidance with the city historical space, develop city park with evacuation function through ancient city water system and other elements, remediate unreasonable historical streets to meet the requirements of refuge and the evacuation channels; increase the anti-seismic measurements to cultural relic units and historic building according to the new requirements against earthquakes; solve comprehensively the problems that have major effects on the protection of historical and cultural cities, for example traffic modernization of ancient city, adjustment of land usage, the formation of style and characteristics; authentically repair historical monuments and historic districts damaged in earthquake to reserve regional traditional characteristics and maximize the positive role the historical and cultural heritage has played in the formation of city style and features; positively protect the earthquake sites, enlarge the city's historical and cultural value category and improve social influence of the historical and cultural cities with the help of post-war reconstructed material and spiritual achievements.
We expect that this paper can provide reference to the further protection of historical and cultural cities in the Wenchuan earthquake areas, and can provide reference to the disaster prevention of other historical and cultural cities at the same time.
引文
①引自2008年10月8日胡锦涛同志在全国抗震救灾总结表彰大会上的讲话。
②引自百度百科词条——5.12汶川地震。http://baike.baidu.com/view/1587399.htm
①引自2008年5月16日,住房和城乡建设部部长姜伟新在国务院新闻办抗震救灾新闻发布会上的讲话。
②四川的国家级历史文化名城有：成都市、自贡市、宜宾市、阆中市、乐山市、都江堰市、泸州市、会理县。省级历史文化名城有：巴中、通江、剑阁、资中、邛崃、崇州、新都、松潘、江油、眉山、叙永、广元、西昌、南充、三台、汶川、芦山、旺苍、广汉、绵阳、绵竹、雅安、什邡、江安、罗江。中国历史文化名镇有：安仁镇、太平镇、尧坝镇、老观镇、平乐镇、黄龙溪镇、李庄镇、仙市镇。省级历史文化名镇有：上里、安顺、新繁镇、城厢镇、龙华镇、恩阳镇、铁佛镇、罗泉镇、郡江场、石桥镇、礼州镇、孝泉镇、青莲镇、江口镇、罗城、昭化镇、木门。中国历史文化名村有：丹巴县梭坡乡莫洛村、攀枝花市仁和区平地镇迤沙拉村、汶川县雁门乡萝卜寨村、阆中市天宫乡天宫院村。
③引自2008年5月27日中国青年报。http://zqb.cyol.com/content/2008-05/27/content_2198141.htm
①引自2008年10月8日胡锦涛同志在全国抗震救灾总结表彰大会上的讲话。
①“1+9”规划中9个专项规划包括：①汶川地震灾后恢复重建城镇体系专项规划.2008.②汶川地震灾后恢复重建城乡住房建设专项规.(2008.③汶川地震灾后恢复重建农村建设专项规划.2008.④汶川地震灾后恢复重建生态修复专项规划.2008.⑤汶川地震灾后恢复重建防灾减灾专项规划.2008.⑥汶川地震灾后恢复重建上地利用专项规划.2008.⑦汶川地震灾后恢复重建市场服务体系专项规划.2008.⑧汶川地震灾后恢复重建生产力布局与产业调整专项规划.2009.⑨汶川地震灾后恢复重建文化设施专项规划.2009.
②“3+2”规划中的“3”是指：①灾后重建城镇体系规划.②灾后重建城乡住房规划.③灾后重建农村建设规划.“2”是指2个专题规划：①灾后重建市政基础设施规划.②世界遗产地及国家重点风景名胜区灾后重建规划.
③引自2012年2月24日,四川省人民政府常务副省长魏宏在国新办就四川灾后恢复重建全面完成等情况举行新闻发布会上的发言。
①仇保兴.在城市建设中容易发生的八种错误倾向.中国建设报.2005-12-13.
①赵中枢.从文物保护到历史文化名城保护.城市规划.2001,25(10)：33-36.董鉴泓,阮仪三.名城文化鉴赏与保护.同济大学出版社,1993：6.
②陈桥驿.中国历史名城.中国青年出版社,2004：4-134.
① North D. and Knight J. Explaining economic change:the interplay between cognition and institutions, Legal Theory, 1997:3;211-226.
①贾鸿雁.中国历史文化名城通论.东南大学出版社,2007：1-197.
③ Fanni Z. Cities and urbanization in Iran after the Islamic Revolution. Cities.2006:23(6)407-411.
④ Madanipour A, Parsa A. A review of Methods of Public Land Ownership and Allocation for Housing in Iran. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.1988:31(2)110-115.
⑤ Evans P. Government Action, Social Capital and Development:Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy. World Development.,1996:24(6)1119-1132.
⑥ Pelling M. High C. Understanding adaptation:what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity, Global Environmental Change A.2005:15;308-319.
⑦ Adger N. Social and ecological resilience:are they related? Progress in Human Geography.2000:24 (3),347-364.
① Khan. M.'State Failures in Weak States:A Critique of New Institutionalist Explanations', in Harriss. J., Hunter, J. and Lewis, C. M. New Directions in Institutional Economics. London:Routledge.1996.
② Khatam A. The Destruction of Bam and Its Reconstruction Following the Earthquake of December 2003, Cities.2006: 3(6)462-464.
③英国保护规划手册与登录建筑及保护区规划法(1990).中国城市规划设计研究院.1996,8.
④晏大宁.中欧历史城市保护之比较研究.硕士论文.1997.
⑤王景慧.日本的古都保存法.城市规划,1987(5).
⑥王骏.历史街区的保护.博士论文.1998.
⑦叶华.日本传统建筑群保存地区的概要与特点.国外城市规划,1997(3).
⑧刈芥刃雅.都市景观的形成与保全研究(日文版).1993
⑨陶信平.日本历史文化遗产法律保护对我国的借鉴.西北农林科技大学学报2009.9.104-108.
⑩ Creative Environment:Japanese Land2 scape. Process Architecture,2006(59).
11 Communaute Urbaine de Brest et de la Ville de Brest. ZPPAUP du Centre-Ville de Brest [R].2000.
12刘道明.这样老城区无需作太多太大的变动.安徽建筑.2003.4.39-40.
①Alain Marinos. Zone de protection du patrimoine architectural, urban et paysager:Le temps de Γevaluation [R].2011.
②张松.日本的历史城镇和传统街区保护时间.小城镇建设.2003.4.77-79.
③王景慧,阮仪三,王林.历史文化名城保护理论与规划.同济大学出版社,2002：1—5.
④UNESCO. Convention sur la protection et la promotion de la diversite des expressions culturelles[R].2005.
④邵甬.法国建筑、城市、景观遗产保护与价值重现[M].上海：同济大学出版社,2010.
⑤张松.日本历史环境保护的理论与实践—法律、政策与公众参与.建筑.2001.19,84-88.
⑦National Report of the Islamic Republic of Iran on Disaster Reduction, World Conference on Disaster Reduction, 18th-22nd January, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.2005.
⑥张岚.历史城镇的调查研究.同济大学硕士论文.2001.
⑨ M. Canak Medic. The Architecture of Nemanja's period<<, The Monuments of Serbian Architecture in Middle Age, Beograd 1989,136.
⑩Lalosevic. I. Traditional aseismic approach in the Kotor Bay's historic buidings, International Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, ISEE 2000, Proceedings, Montenegro,2000,409, notebook.9, pic.3.
① Bhat, MK, U Fernando, D Marut, K Louwes, H Ketel. 'Real-Time'Evaluation of ACT International Tsunami Disaster Programs. Action by Churches Together. Appeal-Asia Earthquake and Tsunamis-ASRE51.2005.
② Bhattacharjee, A., Rawal, V., Fautin, C., Moore, J.-L., Kalonge, S.,& Walden, V. M. Multi-Agency Evaluation of Tsunami Response:India and Sri Lanka:IWG-CARE International, Oxfam GB & World Vision International.2005.
①陈静,翟国方,李莎莎.“311”东日本大地震灾后重建思路、措施与进展.国际城市规划.2012,27(1)
①Adberd. Policy Brief:Highlighting Poverty as Vulnerability:The 2005 Earthquake in Pakistan. Manila:Asian Development Bank.2005.
② Aiprd. Assessment of Priority Mapping Needs Nanggroe Aceh Darussalum and Nias Island, Northern Sumatra. Canberra:AusAID, Australia Indonesia Partnership for Reconstruction and Development.2005.
③ Barakat, S. Humanitarian Practice Network, Network Paper:Housing Reconstruction After Conflict and Disaster. London: Overseas Development Institute, Humanitarian Practice Network.2003.
④ I.Tahirovic:"The Masoned Dome and the Effects of the Earthquake, the Reasons for Cracks and the Appearance Area. ", Kulturna bastina Balkana i seizmicki problemi, CANU. Titograd 1983,171,180.
⑤Repair and Strengthening of Historical Monuments and Buildings in Urban Nuclei, Building Construction under Seismic Conditions in the Balkan Region, vol.6. UNDP, Vienna 1984, passim.
⑥ Alnap. Humanitarian Action:Improving performance through improved learning, Annual Review 2002:ALNAP.2002.
① Battista, F and S Baas. The Role of Local Institutions in Reducing Vulnerability to Recurrent Natural Disasters and in Sustainable Livelihoods Development. Consolidated Report on Case Studies and Workshop Findings and Recommendations. Rome:FAO, Rural Institutions and Participation Service.2004.
② Schwab J, Topping K, Eadie C, Deyle R, Smith R. Planning for Post-disaster Recovery and Reconstruction, American Planning Association.1998.
③ Vandenberg P. North's institutionalism and the prospect of combining theoretical approaches, Cambridge Journal of Economics.2002:26(2)217-235.
④Ghafoury-Ashtiany M, Mousavi R. History, Geography, and Economy of Bam, Earthquake Spectra.2005:21 (S1) S3-S11.
⑤ Khazai B, Hausler E. Intermediate Shelters in Bam and Permanent Shelter Reconstruction in Villages Following the 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake, Earthquake Spectra.2005:21 (S1) S487-S511.
⑥ Quarantelli EL. The Importance of Thinking of Disasters as Social Phenomena, Disaster Research Center University of Delware, Preliminary Papers 184.1992.
Quarantelli EL. General and Particular observations on Sheltering and Housing in American Disasters, Disasters,1982: 6,(3)202-206.
⑧ Tajbakhsh K. Municipal Management and Decentralization Study:Iran, World Bank:Regional Municipal Management and Decentralization Project.2003.
International Cooperation and Earthquake Disaster Reduction:Implementation of earthquake safer housing through technological and social approaches
⑩ Arkansas'Shelter Initiative for Residences and Schools Mitigation Case Studies.
11Planning for a Disaster-Resistant Community.
12 Earthquake Risk and Mitigation Studies in Istanbul.
13 Beck, T and C Nesmith.'Building on poor people's capacities. The case of common property resources in India and West Africa'. World Development.2001:29(1):119-133.
① Ono, K. and A. Kimura. Hanshin-Awaji Daishinsai Hisaichiku deno Kyoudousaiken (Co-Housing after The Great Hanshin Awaji Earthquake):Jutaku Vol.49, Japan Housing Association.2000.
② Misuga Kakushudantai Renraku Kyougikai (Misuga Association of Local Organizations 1986) Sketches and Plans for Community Design in Misuga.2000.
③ Alexander D. The Study of Natural Disasters,1977-97:Some Reflections on a Changing Field of Knowledge. Disasters. 1997.21(4).
④ Freeman PK. Allocation of post-disaster reconstruction financing to housing. Building Research and Information. 2004:32(5)427-437.
⑤ Bowles S, Gintis H. Social Capital and Community Governance. The Economic Journal,2002:112,419-436.
⑥ Emaulleia Gllidoboni. Graziano Fermri. The effects of earthquakes in historical cities:the peculiarity of the Italian case. ANNAL DI GEOFISICA,2000.43(4):667-686.
①学术关注度是以cnki知识资源总库中与关键词最相关的文献数量为基础,统计关键词做为文献主题出现的次数, 形成的学术界对某一学术领域关注度的量化表示。
①金良浚.北京历史文化名城保护的几点规划思路.北京规划建设。2009,5,48-51.
②吴良镛.北京旧城保护研究(上篇).北京规划建设.2005(1).吴良镛.北京旧城保护研究(下篇).北京规划建设.2005(2).
③王国庆.历史文化名城保护与城市紫线规划管理.山西建筑.2008.31.61-64.
④余龙.成都宽窄巷子历史文化保护区保护与利用研究.四川建筑科学研究,2006,(4).
⑤马志韬,李映涛.社区文化：成都宽窄巷子传统风貌的商业化重构.中华文化论坛,2008,4,112-115.
⑥王琪,魏宏杨,等.保留传统建筑“内涵信息”——以“丽江现象”为例谈传统建筑的保护与更新.历史文化村镇保护,2005(9)：52-53.
⑦朱良文.深化认识传统明确保护真谛——在制定《世界文化遗产丽江古城传统民居保护维修技术手册》中的思考.新建筑,2006(1)：12-14.
⑧吴其付,王汝辉.世界文化遗产丽江古城研究综述.旅游科学.2007,21,17-21.
①刘先觉.历史文化名城的建筑遗产保护策略.广西城镇建设.2011(11).
②王景慧.历史文化名城的概念辨析.城市规划.2011,35：9-12.
③兰伟杰,赵中枢.中小历史文化名城风貌延续问题研究.中国名城.2011.14.14-20.
④用户关注指数是以用户在cnki系列数据库中所下载文章的数量为基础,统计关键词做为主题的文章被下载的次数,形成的用户对某一学术领域关注度的量化表示.
①李映东,李俊.日本与台湾震后重建的经验教训及对我国的启示.电子科技大学学报2009(2)
②邱建.汶川地震震中映秀镇灾后重建规划思路.规划师,2009.05.
③邱建.汶川地震对我国公园防灾减灾系统建设的启示.城市规划,2008.11
④王兰生.汶川县城地震灾后重建的可能性和建议.城市发展研究.2008,4.
⑤周干峙.汶川重建规划中应重视的问题.城市发展研究.2008,3.
①周毓华,赵曦.羌族文化空间均多重性与发展价值考量.西北民族大学学报：哲学社会科学版,2008(5)：41-45.
②四川省发展和改革委员会.川西北生态经济区区域规划.2008.
③曾旭正.灾后重建规划体制问题的分析与建议.城市规划学刊2008,4.
④成都市规划设计研究院.成都平原城市群发展规划.2007
⑤成都市规划管理局,都江堰灾后重建规划专家评审纪要.2008.
⑥戴继锋,殷广涛.北川新县城规划中人性化交通系统的构建.城市交通,2010(1)：36-43
⑦中国社会科学院城市发展与环境研究中心成都市规划设计研究院.都江堰灾后重建规划概念方案.2008
⑧郑德高,付磊,李新阳,陈烨.“后重建时代”北川发展路径的思考.城市规划,35,2
⑨仇保兴.借鉴日本经验,求解四川灾后规划重建的若干难题.中国城市规划年会大会主题报告,2008：26-30.
⑩中国城市规划设计研究院,武汉市勘测设计院就院绵阳市“5.12”特大地震灾后恢复重建城镇体系规划,2008：12.
11周江评.中小学校和幼儿同防灾减灾：美国加州《费尔德法令》及措施.国际城市规划,2008(3)：127-135.
①尹强.汶川特大地震的反思与重建规划的思考[J].城市规划,2008(7)：25,28-32.
②林娜.北川国家地震遗址博物馆欲耗资引发争议.建筑创作,2009.05.
③黄光宇.山地城市空间结构的生态学思考[J].城市规划,2005(1)：57-63
④孙彤,殷会良,朱了瑜.北川新县城总体规划及设计理念[J].建设科技,2009(9)：26-30.
⑤朱了瑜.城镇风貌与建筑风格的城市设计引导[J].建筑技艺,2010,(Z2)：28-31.
⑥梁航林、杨昌鸣.中国城市化进程中文化遗产保护对策研究--文化遗产的动态保护观.建筑师,2006.02,
⑦中国城市规划设计研究院.北川羌族自治县新县城灾后重建规划(2008-2020).2009
⑧何旻,姚南.“心灵之城”—都江堰灾后重建规划探讨.规划师.2008,24.
⑨中国城市规划设计研究院.四川省北川羌族自治县新县城灾后重建总体规划.2009.
⑩四川省人民政府关于北川羌族自治县灾后重建总体规划的批复(川府函[2009]60号).2009.
11杨保军,王飞.“器”“道”有别,“新”“古”相谐——北川新县城城镇风貌与建筑风格的基本取向.城市规划,2009(12)：9-15.
12荆锋,黄鹭新.北川新县城灾后重建规划中的公众参与.城市规划.2011,35(1).
13孙施文,殷悦.西方城市规划中公众参与的理论基础及其发展[J].国外城市规划,2004,19(1).
14李晓江,孙彤,朱波,殷会良.北川新县城科学选址研究.城市规划.2011,35(2)
15民政部关于四川省调整北川羌族自治县行政区划的批复(民函[2009]41号).2009.
①韩宝磊.自然灾害的影响分析及其应对措施.山东纺织经济.2009(02).
②http://www.worlduc.com/blog2012.aspx?bid=257432
① Emergency Management Australia (EMA) (2004) Australian Emergency Manual:Disaster Recovery, EMA, Australia.
②Zuo, K., Potangaroa. R. And Wilkinson. S. (2007). "Supply Chain and Material Procurement for Post-Disaster Construction:The Boxing Day Tsunami Reconstruction Experience in Aceh".
③林迪广,江头邦道.历史的环境と社会法.京都：法律文化社,1984.
④滕五晓,加藤孝明.日本地震灾害保险体制的形成及其问题.自然灾害学报,2003,12(4)：96.
①苑利.日本文化遗产保护运动的历史和今天.中国非物质文化遗产网.2006.12；8221
②日本建筑学会编.建筑杂志特集o广.り变化する“保存”の世界.东京：日本建筑学会,1997,(1)：1654.
①阴朝民,刘瑞丰.美国地震监测系统发展规划.中国地震局.2004,5.
②曾立新.美国巨灾风险融资和政府干预研究.北京：对外经贸大学出版社,2008.
③张祖荣.国外地震保险制度的主要模式及对我国的启示.浙江金融.2009(06)
④林锦南.美国地震综合防御管理简介.杭州科技.1998(04)
①Tokyo Declaration for the Protection of World Cultural Heritage from Seismic Disasters.2008.11.17
①International Symposium on Protecting World Cultural Heritage Sites and their Historic Urban Environment from Earthquakes. Katmandu Recommendations. Kathmandu Valley,16-19 February,2009.
① Kyoto-Kathmandu Recommendation on Sustainable Protection of World Cultural Heritage in Earthquake Zones. Kyoto,30 August 2009 & Kathmandu,12 September 2009.
①王林.中外历史文化遗产保护制度比较.城市规划,2000(8)：50-51
②“文化财”相当与我国的文物保护单位,但含义更广。分为有形文化财、无形文化财、民俗文化则、纪念物和传统的建造物群等五大类。
③王军.日本的文化财保护.北京：文物出版社,1997.
①邱静支.历史文化名城保护制度比较研究.中州学刊,2003(1)：167.
②Non-Life Insurance Rating Organization of Japan(NLIRO). Chapter2 Earthquake Insurance System in Japan. Earthquake Insurance in Japan,2009(4):39-43.
②赵苑达.日本地震保险：制度设计评析与借鉴.东北财经大学学报,2003(2)：19.
③唐元琦.国际地震保险制度比较以及对我国的启示.西南石油大学学报(社会科学版).2009(05)
④姚庆海.巨灾风险损失补偿机制研究——兼论政府和市场在巨灾风险管理中的作用.中国人民银行金融研究所,博士学位论文,228.
①Hewitt, J., Potangaroa. R. and Wilkinson, S. (2006). "The Role of Urban Change Hierarchies in the Planning of Disaster Responses".
②Le Masurier, J., Wilkinson, S., Zuo, K and Rotimi, O.B. (2008). "Building Resilience by focusing on Legal and Contractual frameworks for Disaster Reconstruction".
③ Singh, B. and Wilkinson, S. (2008). "Post-disaster Resource Availability following a Wellington Earthquake:Aggregates, Concrete and Cement".
④ Rotimi, O.B., Le Masurier, J., and Wilkinson, S. (2006). "The Regulatory Framework for Effective Post-Disaster Reconstruction in New Zealand".
⑤ Schwarb, J., Topping, K.C., Eadie, C.C., Deyle, R.E., Smith, R.A., (1998) Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction, FEMA/American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report 483/484.
①齐心.唐山地震遗迹选(二)——唐山一中·新华路体育场·陡河利民桥.山西地震.1982(03)
②康仲远.中外大城市灾例对比研究系列报告(二)——唐山地震和阪神地震[.灾害学.1996(03)
③党素华.试论地震灾区的恢复与重建.中国减灾.1993(01)
①于洪.丽江古城形成发展与纳西族文化变迁.中央民族大学2007
②郭大烈,郭净,杨福泉.重建古城丽江与保护民族文化遗产.民族艺术.1997(02)
①和良辉.从“丽江现象”到“丽江模式”.理论前沿.2005(03)
②段松廷.丽江启示录——从丽江现象到丽江模式.中国民族.2001(1)：54-55.
③保明东.云南丽江地震民房恢复重建模式.中国减灾.2001(01)
④张世雄.变大灾难为大机遇促大发展——丽江地震灾后旅游业恢复重建的启示.西南金融.2008(08)
①乔迎春.台湾地震为科学家提供大量数据.国际地震动态.2000,07.
①朱凤岚.日本的地震灾后重建经验.华夏时报.2008.5.24.
②袁艺.日本灾害管理的法律体系.中国减灾.2004(11).
③干名,李刃,廖鸿,黄浩明.日本非营利组织,北京大学出版社.2007：30—31.
④王名,李刃,廖鸿,黄浩明.日本非营利组织,北京大学出版社.2007：124.
①文心.两岸亲情血浓于水 祖国大陆伸出援手——外电外报评台湾大地震及祖国大陆对台提供援助.两岸关系.1999(10)
②台湾地震救助重建考察交流团在祖国大陆.两岸关系.1999(12)
①刘发良,高兵.历史名城谱写新篇——记泉州历史文化名城的保护和现代化建设.城市发展研究,2002(06)：69-73.
②王景慧.历史地段保护的概念和作法.城市规划,1998(03)：34-36.
③历史文化名城保护规划规范(GB50357-2005).中国建筑工业出版社.2005.
①单霁翔. 加强世界文化遗产保护管理工作的思考(上).北京规划建设.2005(01)
②赵红红,阎瑾.世界遗产、亚太地区文化遗产与一般民居保护——以广东省从化市广裕祠保护修复为例.规划师.2005(01)
①王军.长城岂可自毁.时代潮.1998(07)
②俞孔坚.世界遗产概念挑战中国：第28届世界遗产大会有感.中国园林.2004(11)
③阮仪二.冷眼看热潮——中报世界遗产和保护历史文化遗存.城市规划汇刊.2000(06)
①谢凝高.“世界遗产”不等于旅游资源.北京规划建设.2001(06).
②袁芳.历史文化名城保护与开发的中外法律制度比较研究.广西师范大学硕士论文.2008.
①王景慧,张兵,傅冬楠,林永新,耿健,徐明,王刃.中国名城.城市规划.2012(02)：60.
②赵琳.法国古建筑保护概况.古建园林技术.2002(01)：57.
③史晨暄.世界遗产保护新趋势.世界建筑.2004(06)
④张松.历史城市保护学导论——文化遗产和历史环境保护的‘种整体性方法.上海科学技术出版社.2001.
①王景慧.日本的《古都保存法》.城市规划.1987(5).
②陶信平.日本历史文化遗产法律保护对我国的借鉴.西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版).2009,9(04)：104-106.
③Albert Rains and Laurence G. Henderson. With heritage so rich. Washington D.C.:Preservation Press,1983:208
①龙灏,李昂博威.美国历史建筑保护体系研究及其对我国的启示.室内设计.2011(02)：52-56.
①陈古祥.雅典宪章与马丘比丘宪章述评.国际城市规划.2009(S1).
②王育.重读《雅典宪章》.北京城市学院学报.2009(03).
③吕舟.《威尼斯宪章》与中国文物建筑保护.中国文物报.2002.08.
④童明康.关于文物建筑原址重建的几点思考.中国文物报.2009-12-25.
①马明飞.自然遗产保护的立法与实践问题研究.武汉大学博士论文.2010..
②陈志华.介绍几份关于文物建筑和历史性城市保护的国际性文件.世界建筑.1989(02).
③杨铭.新视野下的党家村.西安建筑科技大学硕士论文.2010.
①陈古祥.雅典宪章与马比丘宪章述评.国际城市规划,2009.,S1.
②傅岩,石佳.历史园林：“活”的古迹——《佛罗伦萨宪章》解读.中国园林,2002,03.
③赵中枢.从文物保护到历史文化名城保护——概念的扩大与保护方法的多样化.城市规划,2001,10.
①张祖谦.《华盛顿宪章》——个值得重视的文件.国际展望,1992.14.
①顾军,苑利.美国文化及自然遗产保护的历史与经验.西北民族研究.2005(03).
②周密.美国建筑市场现状及发展机遇.国际经济合作,2009.08.
①刘松茯,程世卓.当代英国建筑技术审美的源点.建筑师,2010(04).
②王琪,下芳.英国登录建筑的选定与我国文物建筑指定制度的比较研究.新建筑.2004(5).
③高辉.传统建筑文化氛围中的建筑教育——意大利建筑教育特色.建筑学报.2000.02.
①刘临安.意大利建筑文化遗产保护概观.规划师.1996.01.
②方晓风.完美的穹顶——意大利文艺复兴建筑的创新路径.装饰.2011.09.
①国务院法制办农业资源环保法制司,住房与城乡建设部法规司,城乡规划司.历史文化名城名镇名村保护条例释义.知识产权出版社.2009
王玲玲.历史文化名城保护规划的发展与演变研究.中国城市规划设计院硕士论文.2006.
刘敦桢主编.中国古代建筑史.中国建筑工业出版社,1984
①张勃著.当代北京建筑艺术风气与社会心理.机械工业出版社,2002
②叶廷芳. 北京的建筑与规划[J].北京规划建设.2004(06)
③杜亨庆,钟新.北京前门大街“新貌”将换“旧颜”.建筑工人.2007(09)
①潘秋玲,李雪茹.旅游开发对西安传统民俗文化的影响效应.地域研究与开发.2006(01)
②胡蔡清. 浅谈西安古城的保护.技术与市场.园林工程.2005(04)
①章迎庆.当代上海建筑形态变迁——从西方极少主义建筑思潮看.建筑学报.2002.08.
①姚跃,蔡军.上海市优秀历史建筑临近处现代建筑形体设计手法研究.华中建筑.2012(04).
②汶川县人民政府.汶川县年鉴(2005-2008).巴蜀书社.2009：30
①冯广宏.都江堰文献集成.成都：巴蜀书社,2007.
②邹礼洪.从石刻碑铭看都江堰历史上的生态环境保护.中国农史.2008.4,110-116。
③李直蓉.富川旅游资源开发可持续性探析.贺州学院学报,2007.5,55-59.
④四川省文化厅文物处等.都江堰文物志第四篇金石.四川师范大学学报.1986.5,62-67
⑤吴金钟.都江堰兴建史学术讨论会综述.1984.01,64-72.
⑥彭述明,谭徐明.都江堰史.北京：科学出版社,2004.
①黎沛虹,李可可.长江文化研究文库-长江治水.长江文化研究文库.武汉：湖北教育出版社,2004.
②何明江.历史文化名城-都江堰,中国文联出版社,2004.12.
③李可可,黎沛虹.都江堰——我国传统治水文化的璀璨明珠.2004.18,75-78.
①史记-河渠书.
②汉书-沟渠志.
③四川省城乡规划设计研究院.都江堰市城市总体规划(2006-2020).2005.
④张帅.都江堰水文化与可持续发展.四川水利.2005.01,52-56.
⑤彭世彰.都江堰灌区水稻节水灌溉探讨.中国水利.2004.18,29.
⑥陈昌笃.都江堰生物多样性研究与保护.成都：四川科学技术出版社,2000.11-14.
⑦四川省地方志编纂委员会·都江堰志.成都：四川辞书出版社,1993,96-110.
①邹礼洪.古都江堰岁修中的生态环境保护意识.西华大学学报.2006.02,25-29.
②邹礼洪.古都江堰“以水治水”的技术成就.地方文化研究辑刊.2010.01,13-19.
③李可可.都江堰——分疏治水的成功典范.中国农村水利水电.2008.03,79-82.
①王骏,张樵,屈军.都江堰灾后重建概念规划国际征集方案综述.城市规划学刊.2008,178(6).
①黄家祥.四川汶川县姜维城新石器时代遗址发掘简报.考古,2006,(11).
①汶川县人民政府.汶川县年鉴(2005-2008).巴蜀书社.2009：61.
②彭邦本.汶川三题——历史文化资源与灾后重建刍议[J]阿坝师范高等专科学校学报,2009,(03)
①郭继艳.川滇地区石棺葬的区域类型.四川大学,2002.
①李维维.岷江上游地区石棺葬研究.中央民族大学,2007.
①汶川县委书记王斌语。
②威州镇政府提供的数据。
①“穿心店地震遗址区”应永久保存.新华日报2009-03-10.
①柴铁锋,徐卫,李纯.传承·希望——汶川县县城(威州镇)灾后原址重建城市设计研究建筑与文化.2009(05).
①李晓江,孙彤,朱波,殷会良.北川新县城科学选址研究.城市规划.2012(01)
①李晓江,张兵,束晨阳,张健.回望生命的光辉——北川地震遗址博物馆及震灾纪念地规划的思考.城市规划.2008(07).
①蔡永洁,刘韩昕,邱鸿磊.裂缝中的记忆北川地震纪念馆建筑方案设计.时代建筑.2011(11).
①陈巍.震后北川文化旅游资源开发研究.西南财经大学硕士论文.2008.
[1]Luis F. Ribeird. The Cultural Landscape and the Uniqueness of Place:A Greenway Heritage Network for Landscape Conservation of Lisbon Metropolitan Area. University of Massachusetts Amherst,1998.
[2]J. F. Coeterier. Lay people's evaluation of historic sites. Landscape and Urban Planning,59 (2002)111-123.
[3]R. Hanna. Environmental appraisal of historic buildings in Scotland:the case study of the Glasgow School of Art. Building and Environment,37 (2002) 1-10.
[4]Weinberg, N, Preservation in American towns and Cities, Colorado:Westview press,1991
[5]Silvio Mendes Zancheti. Conservation and Urban Sustainable development. Rua do Bom Jesus: CCIUT,1999
[6]John Punter. Design Control in England. Built Environment, Vol.18 No.2
[7]Sebastian loew. Design Control in France. Built Environment, Vol.18 No.2
[8]Robert Pickard. Policy and Law in Heritage Conservation. London and New York:Spon Press,2001
[9]New York Landmarks Conservancy William G. Foulks, Editor. Historic Building Facades. New York:Preservation Press,1997
[10]Alexander Stille. The Future of The Past. New York:Farrar, Straus and Giroux,2002
[11]Jane Jacobs. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York:Random House,1961
[12]J. Kirk Irwin. Historic Preservation Handbook. New York:McGraw-Hill,2003
[13]Eduardo Rojas. Old Cities, New ASSETS. Baltimore and London:Inter-American Development Bank,1999
[14]A Guide for Collectors and Curators. Conservation Concerns. New York:Cooper-Hewitt,1975
[15]GDANIEC, C. (1997). Reconstruction in Moscow's historic centre:conservation, planning and finance strategies-the example of the Ostozhenka district. GeoJournal 42,377-384.
[16]Aldrich R. Homosexuality and the city:an historical overview. Urban Studies.2004;41:1719-37.
[17]Ando M. A fault model of the 1946 Nankaido earthquake derived from tsunami data. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors.1982;28:320-36.
[18]Babu SC, Mthindi G. Developing decentralized capacity for disaster prevention:lessons from food security and nutrition monitoring in Malawi. Disasters.1995;19:127-39.
[19]Binder A, Geis G, Bruce DD. Juvenile delinquency:Historical, cultural, and legal perspectives: Anderson Pub Co; 2001.
[20]Boyer MC. The city of collective memory:its historical imagery and architectural entertainments:The MIT Press; 1996.
[21]Cardona OD. Environmental Management and Disaster Prevention:two related topics:A holistic risk assessment and management approach. Natural Disaster Management Tudor Rose, London. 1999:151-3.
[22]Cole M, Engestrom Y. A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. Distributed cognitions:Psychological and educational considerations.1993:1-46.
[23][8] Evans G. Hard-branding the cultural city-from Prado to Prada. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.2003;27.
[24]FANG M, QI Y, ZHANG J. Research of Lanzhou City Geological Disaster Mass Observation and Mass Prevention Informationization based on WebGIS Remote Sensing Technology and Application.2011;26.
[25]Formica S, Uysal M. Market segmentation of an international cultural-historical event in Italy. Journal of Travel Research.1998;36.
[26]Freire P. The adult literacy process as cultural action for freedom. Harvard Educational Review. 1970;40.
[27]Gascuel JD, Cani MP, Desbrun M, Leroy E, Mirgon C. Simulating landslides for natural disaster prevention.1998.
[28]Gracey M. Historical, cultural, political, and social influences on dietary patterns and nutrition in Australian Aboriginal children. The American journal of clinical nutrition.2000; 72.
[29]Greif A. Cultural beliefs and the organization of society:A historical and theoretical reflection on collectivist and individualist societies. Journal of political economy.1994:912-50.
[30][15] Halberstein RA. Medicinal plants:historical and cross-cultural usage patterns. Annals of epidemiology.2005.
[31]Hamilton RM. Science and technology for natural disaster reduction. Natural Hazards Review. 2000; 1
[32]Haurie A, Moresino F. A stochastic control model of economic growth with environmental disaster prevention. Automatica.2006;42.
[33]Hessler M, Zimmermann C. Creative urban milieus:historical perspectives on culture, economy, and the city:Campus Verlag Gmbh; 2008.
[34]Hunter E, Reser J, Baird M, Reser P. An analysis of suicide in Indigenous communities of North Queensland:the historical, cultural and symbolic landscape. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra.1999.
[35]IRIKURA K, MIYAKE H. Destructive Earthquake:Forecast and Disaster Prevention Measures. Prediction of Strong Ground Motions for Scenario Earthquakes. Journal of Geography. 2001;110.
[36]Ito Y, Obara K, Shiomi K, Sekine S, Hirose H. Slow earthquakes coincident with episodic tremors and slow slip events. Science.2007;315.
[37]Kearns G, Philo C. Selling places:the city as cultural capital, past and present:Pergamon Press; 1993.
[38]Kimura T, Tanaka S, Takahashi N, Hashimoto R. Sensor device, and disaster prevention system and electronic equipment each having sensor device incorporated therein. Google Patents; 1998.
[39]Larson A. Social context of human immunodeficiency virus transmission in Africa:historical and cultural bases of east and central African sexual relations. Review of Infectious Diseases. 1989;11:716-31.
[40]Liu D, Pang L, Xie B. Typhoon disaster in China:prediction, prevention, and mitigation. Natural hazards.2009;49:421-36.
[41]Lukacs J. Budapest 1900:a historical portrait of a city and its culture:Grove Pr; 1994.
[42]McEntire DA. Balancing international approaches to disaster:rethinking prevention instead of relief. Australian Journal of Emergency Management.1998;13:50-5.
[43]McEntire DA. Coordinating multi-organisational responses to disaster:lessons from the March 28,2000, Fort Worth tornado. Disaster Prevention and Management.2002; 11:369-79.
[44]Miller MN, Pumariega AJ. Culture and eating disorders:A historical and cross-cultural review. Psychiatry:Interpersonal and Biological Processes.2001;64:93-110.
[45]Mommaas H. Cultural clusters and the post-industrial city:towards the remapping of urban cultural policy. Urban Studies.2004;41:507.
[46]Monterescu D, Rabinowitz D. Mixed towns, trapped communities:historical narratives, spatial dynamics, gender relations and cultural encounters in Palestinian-Israeli towns:Ashgate Pub Co; 2007.
[47]Moran C, Colless E. Positive reactions following emergency and disaster responses. Disaster Prevention and Management.1995;4:55-60.
[48]Obara K. Nonvolcanic deep tremor associated with subduction in southwest Japan. Science. 2002;296:1679.
[49]Obara K, Kasahara K, Hori S, Okada Y. A densely distributed high-sensitivity seismograph network in Japan:Hi-net by National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention. Review of scientific instruments.2005;76:021301.
[50]Ofori G. Construction industry development for disaster prevention and response.2002.
[51]Paton D. Training disaster workers:promoting wellbeing and operational effectiveness. Disaster Prevention and Management.1996;5:11-8.
[52]Paton D, Jackson D. Developing disaster management capability:an assessment centre approach. Disaster Prevention and Management.2002; 11
[53]Paton D, Johnston D. Disasters and communities:vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management.2001; 10.
[54]Paton D, Smith L, Violanti J. Disaster response:risk, vulnerability and resilience. Disaster Prevention and Management.2000;9.
[55]Prasad D. Social and Cultural Geography of Hyderabad City:A Historical Perspective: Inter-India Publications New Delhi; 1986.
[56]Quarantelli EL. Problematical aspects of the information/communication revolution for disaster planning and research:ten non-technical issues and questions. Disaster Prevention and Management.1997:6.
[57]Radford L. On psychology, historical epistemology, and the teaching of mathematics:Towards a socio-cultural history of mathematics. For the learning of mathematics.1997; 17.
[58]Ragland B. The year 2000 problem solver:a five-step disaster prevention plan:McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1997.
[59]Rose A. Defining and measuring economic resilience to disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management.2004; 13
[60]Roth WM, Tobin K, Elmesky R, Carambo C, McKnight YM, Beers J. Re/making identities in the praxis of urban schooling:A cultural historical perspective. Mind, Culture, and Activity. 2004;11.
[61]Scheer J, Groce N. Impairment as a Human Constant:Cross-Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Variation. Journal of Social Issues.1988;44.
[62]Sharp K. Between Relief and Development:targeting food aid for disaster prevention in Ethiopia:Overseas Development Institute; 1998.
[63]Singh F. The City of Amritsar:a study of historical, cultural, social, and economic aspects: Oriental Publishers & Distributors; 1978.
[64]Tadokoro S, Kitano H, Takahashi T, Noda I, Matsubara H, Shinjoh A, et al. The robocup-rescue project:A robotic approach to the disaster mitigation problem. IEEE; 2000. p.4089-94 vol.4.
[65]Teichner VJ, Cadden JJ, Berry GW. The Puerto Rican patient:Some historical, cultural and psychological aspects. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry.1981;9.
[66]Tsou T. The Cultural Revolution and post-Mao reforms:A historical perspective:University of Chicago press; 1999.
[67]Willems E. Peasantry and city:Cultural persistence and change in historical perspective, a European case. American Anthropologist.1970;72.
[68]Youpo S, Mayajie LR. Types, functions and disposition rules of the disaster prevention gardens in japan. World Information On Earthquake Engineering.2004;4.
[69]NELSON, A. C. and FRENCH, S. P. (2002). Plan quality and mitigating damage from natural disasters:A case study of the Northridge earthquake with planning policy considerations. Journal of the American Planning Association 68,194-207.
[70]仇保兴.地震后重建家园指导手册(1-8).中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
[71]顾林生,宋金文.灾后恢复重建实施手册.中国劳动社会保障出版社,2008.
[72]李雄飞.城市规划与古建筑保护.天津科学技术出版社,1989.
[73]M·B·波索欣.建筑·环境与城市建设.冯文炯.中国建筑工业出版社,1988.
[74]D普林茨.城市景观设计方法.李维荣.天津大学出版社,1989.
[75]邵甬.城市遗产研究与保护(理想空间丛书).同济大学出版社,2004.
[76]荆其敏,张立安.图解中国名城(城市意匠).中国电力出版社,2005.
[77]荆其敏,张立安.图解外国名城(城市意匠).中国电力出版社,2005.
[78]陈春生,张文辉,徐荣.中国古建筑文献指南1900-1990.科学出版社,2000.
[79]董鉴泓.中国城市建设史.第三版.中国建筑工业出版社,2004.
[80]盖湘涛.城市景观美学.东北师范大学出版社,1988.
[81]段进.城市空间发展论.江苏科学技术出版社,1999.
[82]凯文·林奇.城市形态.林庆怡,陈朝晖,邓华.华夏出版社,2001.
[83]罗小未主编,沙永杰等编著.上海新天地——旧区改造的建筑历史、人文历史与开发模式的研究.东南大学出版社,2002.
[84][奥]L·贝塔兰菲著,秋同、袁嘉新译.一般系统论.社会科学文献出版社,1987.
[85]常青编著.建筑遗产的生存策略——保护与利用设计实验.同济大学出版社,2003.
[86]王惠君主编.历史建筑保存·维护·再利用执行手册.屏东县文化局,2004.
[87]王景慧、阮仪三、王林编著.历史文化名城保护理论与规划.同济大学出版社,1999.
[88]李经远、王晓东编.中国历史文化名城便览.成都出版社,1991.
[89]宛素春等编著.城市空间形态解析.科学出版社,2004.
[90]章俊华著.规划设计学中的调查分析法与实践.中国建筑工业出版社,2005.
[91]刘临安著.近百年意大利历史建筑保护的理论与流派.中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
[92]应金华、樊丙庚主编.四川历史文化名城.四川人民出版社,2000.
[93]陆地著.建筑的生与死——历史建筑再利用研究.东南大学出版社,2004.
[94]辞海(1979年版).上海辞书出版社,1979.
[95]中国大百科全书·建筑园林城市规划卷.中国大百科全书出版社,1988.
[96]汶川县人民政府主办.汶川县年鉴(2005-2008).四川出版集团巴蜀书社,2009
[97]国务院法制办农业资源环保法制司.历史文化名城名镇名村名城保护条例释义,知识产权出版社,2009.
[98]何旻,姚南.“心灵之城”——都江堰灾后重建规划探讨.规划师.2008,24(12).
[99]毛锋,马金锋,周文生.北京防震历史经验与汶川地震灾后城镇选址再建.地球信息科学.2008,10(4).
[100]张倩,李志民,冯青.城市历史文化街区密集居住现状中的防灾避害策略研究——以西安碑林历史街区传统民居院落生存现状研究为例.西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版).2009,41(4).
[101]冯勇,彭锐.从长沙“文夕大火”谈城市灾后重建.规划师.2006,22(9).
[102]叶鹏,陈捷.都江堰灾后城镇住宅重建的规划管理.安徽建筑工业学院学报(自然科学版).2010,18(1).
[103]王骏,张樵,屈军.都江堰灾后重建概念规划国际征集方案综述.城市规划学刊.2008,(6).
[104]胡以志.对话爱德华·布莱克力教授——美国新奥尔良重建与中国汶川大地震灾后重建.国际城市规划.2008,23(3).
[105]林世超.古迹的震后重建.建筑学报.2008,(7).
[106]杨亚弟,杜景林,李桂荣.古建筑震害特性分析.世界地震工程.2000,16(3).
[107]郭黛女亘.关于文物建筑遗迹保护与重建的思考.建筑学报.2006,(6).
[108]岳培宇.国内城镇灾后重建经验梳理.西部广播电视.2008(6).
[109]何茂华,丁建生.日本阪神大地震启示.江苏建筑(增刊).1998,(1).
[110]刘本玉.城市抗震防灾规划的研究与展望.世界地震工程.2008,(3).
[111]腾五晓.日美地震灾害紧急对应对中国灾害应急体制建立的启示.防灾减灾工程学报.2004,(9).
[112]沈彩文,石荣珺,周法献,陈永,宋朝彝.国内外地震灾后重建经验与对策(上).建筑.2009,(16).
[113]陈捷.科学规划引导都江堰灾后重建.城乡建设.2010,(1).
[114]吴春苑.利用文化重建复兴旧城街区的城市设计方法探讨.规划师.2007,23(1).
[115]陈敏.绵竹地震灾后重建中的历史文脉保护建设浅析.科技资讯.2009,(5).
[116]张松.日本阪神·淡路震灾复兴规划的特征及启示.城市规划学刊.2008,(4).
[117]李映东,李俊.日本与台湾震后重建的经验教训及对我国的启示.电子科技大学学报(社科版).2009,11(2).
[118]金磊.四川汶川灾后重建规划策略研究.2008,(6).
[119]徐百柯.台湾灾后重建的启示.中国减灾.2008,(8).
[120]阎波,谭文勇,陈蔚.汶川大地震灾后重建规划的思考.重庆大学学报(社会科学版).2009,15(4).
[121]魏皓严,郑曦.汶川地震灾后重建词条简例——从城乡规划与建筑生产的角度.时代建筑.2009,(1).
[122]仇保兴.对历史文化名城名镇名村保护的思考.中国名城.2010(1).
[123]汶川地震灾后重建规划思考.地球信息科学.2008,10(4).
[124]尹强.汶川特大地震的反思与重建规划的思考.城市规划.2008,32(7).
[125]汶川重建规划中应重视的问题——周干峙院士访谈录.城市发展研究.2008,15(3).
[126]袁锦富,赵毅.灾后重建背景下城市总体规划的编制与思考——以四川省绵竹市为例.规划师.2009,25(11).
[127]曾旭正.灾后重建规划体制问题的分析与建议——以台湾9.21地震为例.城市规划学刊.2008,176(4).
[128]俞静.抓住重建机遇,创新城市特色空间——都江堰灾后重建规划中的总体城市设计探讨.规划师.2009,25(11).
[129]邱建,蒋蓉.关于构建地震灾后恢复重建规划体系的探讨——以汶川地震为例.城市规划.2009(7).
[130]仇保兴.借鉴日本经验求解四川灾后规划重建的若干难题.城市规划学刊.2008(6).
[131]邱建,江俊浩,贾刘强.汶川地震对我国公园防灾减灾系统建设的启示.城市规划.2008,(11).
[132]沈清基,马继武.唐山地震灾后重建规划：回顾、分析及思考.城市规划学刊.2008,(4).
[133]孙施文,胡丽萍.灾后重建规划,为了现在和未来的责任.城市规划学刊.2008,(4).
[134]吕海平、王鹤.城市景观建设中历史建筑的保护与开发模式.沈阳建筑工程学院学报(自然科学版),2003,19(2).
[135]赵秀恒.城市景观的控制要素.时代建筑.1995(3).
[136]孙善芳.城市景观的视觉分析与模拟控制方法.武汉测绘科技大学学报.1994(3).
[137]刘奇志.城市景观体系规划探讨.城市规划.2000,24(5).
[138]陈蔚、胡斌.城市历史建筑保护与现代城市建设的关系初探.重庆建筑大学学报,2004(5).
[139]郑孝燮.文态环境与建筑特色——关于历史文化名城保护的问题.城市发展研究.1998(6).
[140]邓清南、许虹.四川历史文化名城的保护.成都电子机械高等专科学校学报.2005(3).
[141]顾晓伟.试谈我国历史性城市的景观控制.
[142]肖志哲.试论城市景观风貌特色的创造.城市问题,1996(3).
[143]阮仪三.上海外滩地区历史建筑保护.规划师,2003,19(1).
[144]吴祥艳、付军.美国历史景观保护理论和实践浅析.中国园林,2004(3).
[145]阮仪三.历史建筑与城市保护的历程.时代建筑,2000(3).
[146]黄禹康.历史建筑遗存：城市发展的“溃疡”还是财富?.城市与减灾.2004(6).
[147]吴承照、曹霞.景观资源量化评价的主要方法——综述及比较.旅游科学.2005(2).
[148]林楠.历史建筑——城市中不可缺少的资源.山西建筑.2005,31(9).
[149]王信、陈迅.历史建筑保护和开发的制度经济学探讨.同济大学学报.2004,15(5).
[150]蓝刚.历史城市景观控制体系初探.苏州城建环保学院学报.2000,13(2).
[151]何一民.经营城市应重视对历史文化名城文化资源的保护.四川省情,2003(9).
[152]李燕、司徒尚纪.近年来我国历史文化名城保护研究的进展.人文地理.2001年,16(5).
[153]郑小明.成都的历史文化名城保护与城市发展总体规划.城市发展研究.1997(6).
[154]李艳莉.构建成都市文物建筑登录制度——成都市优秀近现代建筑保护规划编制有感.四川建筑.2005,25(9).
[155]仇保兴.风景名胜和历史文化名城资源的保护策略.中国经贸导刊.2004(4).
[156]刘临安.当前欧洲对文物建筑保护的新观念.时代建筑.1997(4).
[157]李长君.创造宜人的城市景观——简析城市设计中的城市景观要素.华中建筑.2000(2).
[158]刘滨谊、母晓颖.城市文化与城市景观吸引力构建.规划师.2004,20(2).
[159]黄建、王碧琴.多种评价方法在景观评价中的综合应用.江西科学.2006(4).
[160]陈宇.景观评价方法研究.室内设计与装修.2005(3).
[161]周干峙.城市化和历史文化名城.城市规划.2002,26(4).
[162]周俭,张松,王骏.保护中求发展发展中求特色——世界遗产城市丽江发展概念规划要略.城市规划汇刊.2003(2).
[163]邱建,“5.12”汶川地震灾后恢复重建城乡规划设计,建筑学报,2010.9
[164]舒波,邱建,石春初,悉心呵护地域文化、多维并举重塑民族文化.建筑学报.2010(9).
[165]周庆华,李岳岩,陈静,吴左宾.四川汉旺地震遗址保护地概念规划探讨.规划师.2010(02).
[166]宋盈.城市化进程中历史街区保护与利用方法研究——以历史文化名城长沙为例.湖南大学,2003.
[167]王琪.城市历史保护的若干理论与方法——英国的经验.浙江大学,2003.
[168]侯正华.城市特色危机与城市建筑风貌的自组织机制.清华大学,2003.
[169]毛贺.论城市历史文化景观与周边环境关系的处理原则.苏州大学,2004.
[170]王家倩.历史环境中的新旧建筑结合.重庆大学,2002.
[171]蔡效军.中国历史建筑保护中价值观的探讨.华南理工大学,2002.
[172]王云峰.历史建筑保护二元论.同济大学,2002.
[173]金鸣.应用伦理学中的历史建筑保护研究.华中科技大学,2004.
[174]郑静.城市景观的量化研究.北京工业大学,2003.
[175]周雅.汶川地震遗址遗迹景观保护规划与展示研究.西南交通大学,2010.
[176]陈秀刚.城市景观特色定位研究.同济大学,2003.
[177]张继刚.城市风貌的评价与管治研究.重庆大学,2001.
[178]钱晨佳.城市景观的结构与规划布局研究.同济大学,2003.
[179]中华人民共和国文物保护法.
[180]中华人民共和国文物保护法实施细则.
[181]建设部、国家文物局.历史文化名城保护规划编制要求.
[182]国际古迹遗址理事会中国国家委员会.中国文物古迹保护准则.
[183]关于加强对城市优秀近现代建筑规划保护的指导意见.
[184]关于保护景观和遗址的风貌与特性的建议.
[185]国际建筑协会.雅典宪章.1933.
[186]从事历史文物建筑工作的建筑师和技术人员国际议会.保护文物建筑及历史地段的国际宪章.1964.
[187]联合国教科文组织.保护世界文化和自然遗产公约.1972.
[188]联合国教育、科学及文化组织.关于历史地区的保护及其当代作用的建议.1976.
[189]国际建筑协会CIAM马丘比丘宪章.1977.
[190]国际古迹遗址理事会与国际历史园林委员会.佛罗伦萨宪章.1981.
[191]国际古迹遗址理事会ICOMOS保护历史城镇与城区宪章华盛顿宪章.1987.
[192]西安宣言——保护历史建筑、古遗址和历史地区的环境.2005.
[193]关于保护历史的或传统的建筑群及它们在现代生活中的地位的建议(内罗毕建议).1976.
[194]地震灾害中世界文化遗产保护的东京宣言.2008.
[195]对于保护易受地震损害的世界遗产及其历史城区环境的若干建议.2009.
[196]在地震带中京都——加德满都世界文化遗产的可持续保护的建议.2009.
[197]国务院.汶川地震灾后恢复重建条例(国务院令第526号).2008.
[198]国务院.国务院关于做好汶川地震灾后恢复重建工作的指导意见(国发(2008]22号).2008.
[199]国务院抗震救灾总指挥部灾后恢复重建规划组.汶川地震灾后恢复重建总体规划.2008.
[200]国家发展和改革委员会,住房和城乡建设部.汶川地震灾后恢复重建城镇体系规划.2008.
[201]国家发展和改革委员会,住房和城乡建设部,农业部等.汶川地震灾后恢复重建农村 建设规划.2008.
[202]国家发展和改革委员会、住房和城乡建设部,民政部,等.汶川地震灾后恢复重建城乡住房建设规划.2008.
[203]四川省汶川地震灾后恢复重建规划组.四川省汶川地震灾后恢复重建城镇体系规划.2008.
[204]都江堰市人民政府,上海同济城市规划设计研究院.都江堰市总体规划(2008-2020)2008.
[205]成都市规划设计研究院.都江堰市主城区控制性详细规划.2008.
[206]上海同济城市规划设计研究院.都江堰市西街历史文化街区保护与整治修建性详细规划.2010.
[207]汶川县人民政府,广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院.汶川县县城[威州镇]灾后恢复重建总体规划(2008-2020.2008.
[208]江苏省城市规划设计研究院.江苏省城市交通规划研究中心.绵竹市历史文化名城保护规划.2011.
[209]江苏省城市规划设计研究院.绵竹市城市总体规划(2008-2020).2009.
[210]北京市城市规划设计研究院.什邡市城区控制性详细规划.2008.
[211]北京中联环建文建筑设计有限公司.什邡历史文化名城保护规划.2009.
[212]北川羌族自治县人民政府,中国城市规划设计研究院.北川羌族自治县县城城市总体规划(2011-2030).2011.
②引自百度百科词条——5.12汶川地震。http://baike.baidu.com/view/1587399.htm
①引自2008年5月16日,住房和城乡建设部部长姜伟新在国务院新闻办抗震救灾新闻发布会上的讲话。
②四川的国家级历史文化名城有：成都市、自贡市、宜宾市、阆中市、乐山市、都江堰市、泸州市、会理县。省级历史文化名城有：巴中、通江、剑阁、资中、邛崃、崇州、新都、松潘、江油、眉山、叙永、广元、西昌、南充、三台、汶川、芦山、旺苍、广汉、绵阳、绵竹、雅安、什邡、江安、罗江。中国历史文化名镇有：安仁镇、太平镇、尧坝镇、老观镇、平乐镇、黄龙溪镇、李庄镇、仙市镇。省级历史文化名镇有：上里、安顺、新繁镇、城厢镇、龙华镇、恩阳镇、铁佛镇、罗泉镇、郡江场、石桥镇、礼州镇、孝泉镇、青莲镇、江口镇、罗城、昭化镇、木门。中国历史文化名村有：丹巴县梭坡乡莫洛村、攀枝花市仁和区平地镇迤沙拉村、汶川县雁门乡萝卜寨村、阆中市天宫乡天宫院村。
③引自2008年5月27日中国青年报。http://zqb.cyol.com/content/2008-05/27/content_2198141.htm
①引自2008年10月8日胡锦涛同志在全国抗震救灾总结表彰大会上的讲话。
①“1+9”规划中9个专项规划包括：①汶川地震灾后恢复重建城镇体系专项规划.2008.②汶川地震灾后恢复重建城乡住房建设专项规.(2008.③汶川地震灾后恢复重建农村建设专项规划.2008.④汶川地震灾后恢复重建生态修复专项规划.2008.⑤汶川地震灾后恢复重建防灾减灾专项规划.2008.⑥汶川地震灾后恢复重建上地利用专项规划.2008.⑦汶川地震灾后恢复重建市场服务体系专项规划.2008.⑧汶川地震灾后恢复重建生产力布局与产业调整专项规划.2009.⑨汶川地震灾后恢复重建文化设施专项规划.2009.
②“3+2”规划中的“3”是指：①灾后重建城镇体系规划.②灾后重建城乡住房规划.③灾后重建农村建设规划.“2”是指2个专题规划：①灾后重建市政基础设施规划.②世界遗产地及国家重点风景名胜区灾后重建规划.
③引自2012年2月24日,四川省人民政府常务副省长魏宏在国新办就四川灾后恢复重建全面完成等情况举行新闻发布会上的发言。
①仇保兴.在城市建设中容易发生的八种错误倾向.中国建设报.2005-12-13.
①赵中枢.从文物保护到历史文化名城保护.城市规划.2001,25(10)：33-36.董鉴泓,阮仪三.名城文化鉴赏与保护.同济大学出版社,1993：6.
②陈桥驿.中国历史名城.中国青年出版社,2004：4-134.
① North D. and Knight J. Explaining economic change:the interplay between cognition and institutions, Legal Theory, 1997:3;211-226.
①贾鸿雁.中国历史文化名城通论.东南大学出版社,2007：1-197.
③ Fanni Z. Cities and urbanization in Iran after the Islamic Revolution. Cities.2006:23(6)407-411.
④ Madanipour A, Parsa A. A review of Methods of Public Land Ownership and Allocation for Housing in Iran. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.1988:31(2)110-115.
⑤ Evans P. Government Action, Social Capital and Development:Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy. World Development.,1996:24(6)1119-1132.
⑥ Pelling M. High C. Understanding adaptation:what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity, Global Environmental Change A.2005:15;308-319.
⑦ Adger N. Social and ecological resilience:are they related? Progress in Human Geography.2000:24 (3),347-364.
① Khan. M.'State Failures in Weak States:A Critique of New Institutionalist Explanations', in Harriss. J., Hunter, J. and Lewis, C. M. New Directions in Institutional Economics. London:Routledge.1996.
② Khatam A. The Destruction of Bam and Its Reconstruction Following the Earthquake of December 2003, Cities.2006: 3(6)462-464.
③英国保护规划手册与登录建筑及保护区规划法(1990).中国城市规划设计研究院.1996,8.
④晏大宁.中欧历史城市保护之比较研究.硕士论文.1997.
⑤王景慧.日本的古都保存法.城市规划,1987(5).
⑥王骏.历史街区的保护.博士论文.1998.
⑦叶华.日本传统建筑群保存地区的概要与特点.国外城市规划,1997(3).
⑧刈芥刃雅.都市景观的形成与保全研究(日文版).1993
⑨陶信平.日本历史文化遗产法律保护对我国的借鉴.西北农林科技大学学报2009.9.104-108.
⑩ Creative Environment:Japanese Land2 scape. Process Architecture,2006(59).
11 Communaute Urbaine de Brest et de la Ville de Brest. ZPPAUP du Centre-Ville de Brest [R].2000.
12刘道明.这样老城区无需作太多太大的变动.安徽建筑.2003.4.39-40.
①Alain Marinos. Zone de protection du patrimoine architectural, urban et paysager:Le temps de Γevaluation [R].2011.
②张松.日本的历史城镇和传统街区保护时间.小城镇建设.2003.4.77-79.
③王景慧,阮仪三,王林.历史文化名城保护理论与规划.同济大学出版社,2002：1—5.
④UNESCO. Convention sur la protection et la promotion de la diversite des expressions culturelles[R].2005.
④邵甬.法国建筑、城市、景观遗产保护与价值重现[M].上海：同济大学出版社,2010.
⑤张松.日本历史环境保护的理论与实践—法律、政策与公众参与.建筑.2001.19,84-88.
⑦National Report of the Islamic Republic of Iran on Disaster Reduction, World Conference on Disaster Reduction, 18th-22nd January, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.2005.
⑥张岚.历史城镇的调查研究.同济大学硕士论文.2001.
⑨ M. Canak Medic. The Architecture of Nemanja's period<<, The Monuments of Serbian Architecture in Middle Age, Beograd 1989,136.
⑩Lalosevic. I. Traditional aseismic approach in the Kotor Bay's historic buidings, International Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, ISEE 2000, Proceedings, Montenegro,2000,409, notebook.9, pic.3.
① Bhat, MK, U Fernando, D Marut, K Louwes, H Ketel. 'Real-Time'Evaluation of ACT International Tsunami Disaster Programs. Action by Churches Together. Appeal-Asia Earthquake and Tsunamis-ASRE51.2005.
② Bhattacharjee, A., Rawal, V., Fautin, C., Moore, J.-L., Kalonge, S.,& Walden, V. M. Multi-Agency Evaluation of Tsunami Response:India and Sri Lanka:IWG-CARE International, Oxfam GB & World Vision International.2005.
①陈静,翟国方,李莎莎.“311”东日本大地震灾后重建思路、措施与进展.国际城市规划.2012,27(1)
①Adberd. Policy Brief:Highlighting Poverty as Vulnerability:The 2005 Earthquake in Pakistan. Manila:Asian Development Bank.2005.
② Aiprd. Assessment of Priority Mapping Needs Nanggroe Aceh Darussalum and Nias Island, Northern Sumatra. Canberra:AusAID, Australia Indonesia Partnership for Reconstruction and Development.2005.
③ Barakat, S. Humanitarian Practice Network, Network Paper:Housing Reconstruction After Conflict and Disaster. London: Overseas Development Institute, Humanitarian Practice Network.2003.
④ I.Tahirovic:"The Masoned Dome and the Effects of the Earthquake, the Reasons for Cracks and the Appearance Area. ", Kulturna bastina Balkana i seizmicki problemi, CANU. Titograd 1983,171,180.
⑤Repair and Strengthening of Historical Monuments and Buildings in Urban Nuclei, Building Construction under Seismic Conditions in the Balkan Region, vol.6. UNDP, Vienna 1984, passim.
⑥ Alnap. Humanitarian Action:Improving performance through improved learning, Annual Review 2002:ALNAP.2002.
① Battista, F and S Baas. The Role of Local Institutions in Reducing Vulnerability to Recurrent Natural Disasters and in Sustainable Livelihoods Development. Consolidated Report on Case Studies and Workshop Findings and Recommendations. Rome:FAO, Rural Institutions and Participation Service.2004.
② Schwab J, Topping K, Eadie C, Deyle R, Smith R. Planning for Post-disaster Recovery and Reconstruction, American Planning Association.1998.
③ Vandenberg P. North's institutionalism and the prospect of combining theoretical approaches, Cambridge Journal of Economics.2002:26(2)217-235.
④Ghafoury-Ashtiany M, Mousavi R. History, Geography, and Economy of Bam, Earthquake Spectra.2005:21 (S1) S3-S11.
⑤ Khazai B, Hausler E. Intermediate Shelters in Bam and Permanent Shelter Reconstruction in Villages Following the 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake, Earthquake Spectra.2005:21 (S1) S487-S511.
⑥ Quarantelli EL. The Importance of Thinking of Disasters as Social Phenomena, Disaster Research Center University of Delware, Preliminary Papers 184.1992.
Quarantelli EL. General and Particular observations on Sheltering and Housing in American Disasters, Disasters,1982: 6,(3)202-206.
⑧ Tajbakhsh K. Municipal Management and Decentralization Study:Iran, World Bank:Regional Municipal Management and Decentralization Project.2003.
International Cooperation and Earthquake Disaster Reduction:Implementation of earthquake safer housing through technological and social approaches
⑩ Arkansas'Shelter Initiative for Residences and Schools Mitigation Case Studies.
11Planning for a Disaster-Resistant Community.
12 Earthquake Risk and Mitigation Studies in Istanbul.
13 Beck, T and C Nesmith.'Building on poor people's capacities. The case of common property resources in India and West Africa'. World Development.2001:29(1):119-133.
① Ono, K. and A. Kimura. Hanshin-Awaji Daishinsai Hisaichiku deno Kyoudousaiken (Co-Housing after The Great Hanshin Awaji Earthquake):Jutaku Vol.49, Japan Housing Association.2000.
② Misuga Kakushudantai Renraku Kyougikai (Misuga Association of Local Organizations 1986) Sketches and Plans for Community Design in Misuga.2000.
③ Alexander D. The Study of Natural Disasters,1977-97:Some Reflections on a Changing Field of Knowledge. Disasters. 1997.21(4).
④ Freeman PK. Allocation of post-disaster reconstruction financing to housing. Building Research and Information. 2004:32(5)427-437.
⑤ Bowles S, Gintis H. Social Capital and Community Governance. The Economic Journal,2002:112,419-436.
⑥ Emaulleia Gllidoboni. Graziano Fermri. The effects of earthquakes in historical cities:the peculiarity of the Italian case. ANNAL DI GEOFISICA,2000.43(4):667-686.
①学术关注度是以cnki知识资源总库中与关键词最相关的文献数量为基础,统计关键词做为文献主题出现的次数, 形成的学术界对某一学术领域关注度的量化表示。
①金良浚.北京历史文化名城保护的几点规划思路.北京规划建设。2009,5,48-51.
②吴良镛.北京旧城保护研究(上篇).北京规划建设.2005(1).吴良镛.北京旧城保护研究(下篇).北京规划建设.2005(2).
③王国庆.历史文化名城保护与城市紫线规划管理.山西建筑.2008.31.61-64.
④余龙.成都宽窄巷子历史文化保护区保护与利用研究.四川建筑科学研究,2006,(4).
⑤马志韬,李映涛.社区文化：成都宽窄巷子传统风貌的商业化重构.中华文化论坛,2008,4,112-115.
⑥王琪,魏宏杨,等.保留传统建筑“内涵信息”——以“丽江现象”为例谈传统建筑的保护与更新.历史文化村镇保护,2005(9)：52-53.
⑦朱良文.深化认识传统明确保护真谛——在制定《世界文化遗产丽江古城传统民居保护维修技术手册》中的思考.新建筑,2006(1)：12-14.
⑧吴其付,王汝辉.世界文化遗产丽江古城研究综述.旅游科学.2007,21,17-21.
①刘先觉.历史文化名城的建筑遗产保护策略.广西城镇建设.2011(11).
②王景慧.历史文化名城的概念辨析.城市规划.2011,35：9-12.
③兰伟杰,赵中枢.中小历史文化名城风貌延续问题研究.中国名城.2011.14.14-20.
④用户关注指数是以用户在cnki系列数据库中所下载文章的数量为基础,统计关键词做为主题的文章被下载的次数,形成的用户对某一学术领域关注度的量化表示.
①李映东,李俊.日本与台湾震后重建的经验教训及对我国的启示.电子科技大学学报2009(2)
②邱建.汶川地震震中映秀镇灾后重建规划思路.规划师,2009.05.
③邱建.汶川地震对我国公园防灾减灾系统建设的启示.城市规划,2008.11
④王兰生.汶川县城地震灾后重建的可能性和建议.城市发展研究.2008,4.
⑤周干峙.汶川重建规划中应重视的问题.城市发展研究.2008,3.
①周毓华,赵曦.羌族文化空间均多重性与发展价值考量.西北民族大学学报：哲学社会科学版,2008(5)：41-45.
②四川省发展和改革委员会.川西北生态经济区区域规划.2008.
③曾旭正.灾后重建规划体制问题的分析与建议.城市规划学刊2008,4.
④成都市规划设计研究院.成都平原城市群发展规划.2007
⑤成都市规划管理局,都江堰灾后重建规划专家评审纪要.2008.
⑥戴继锋,殷广涛.北川新县城规划中人性化交通系统的构建.城市交通,2010(1)：36-43
⑦中国社会科学院城市发展与环境研究中心成都市规划设计研究院.都江堰灾后重建规划概念方案.2008
⑧郑德高,付磊,李新阳,陈烨.“后重建时代”北川发展路径的思考.城市规划,35,2
⑨仇保兴.借鉴日本经验,求解四川灾后规划重建的若干难题.中国城市规划年会大会主题报告,2008：26-30.
⑩中国城市规划设计研究院,武汉市勘测设计院就院绵阳市“5.12”特大地震灾后恢复重建城镇体系规划,2008：12.
11周江评.中小学校和幼儿同防灾减灾：美国加州《费尔德法令》及措施.国际城市规划,2008(3)：127-135.
①尹强.汶川特大地震的反思与重建规划的思考[J].城市规划,2008(7)：25,28-32.
②林娜.北川国家地震遗址博物馆欲耗资引发争议.建筑创作,2009.05.
③黄光宇.山地城市空间结构的生态学思考[J].城市规划,2005(1)：57-63
④孙彤,殷会良,朱了瑜.北川新县城总体规划及设计理念[J].建设科技,2009(9)：26-30.
⑤朱了瑜.城镇风貌与建筑风格的城市设计引导[J].建筑技艺,2010,(Z2)：28-31.
⑥梁航林、杨昌鸣.中国城市化进程中文化遗产保护对策研究--文化遗产的动态保护观.建筑师,2006.02,
⑦中国城市规划设计研究院.北川羌族自治县新县城灾后重建规划(2008-2020).2009
⑧何旻,姚南.“心灵之城”—都江堰灾后重建规划探讨.规划师.2008,24.
⑨中国城市规划设计研究院.四川省北川羌族自治县新县城灾后重建总体规划.2009.
⑩四川省人民政府关于北川羌族自治县灾后重建总体规划的批复(川府函[2009]60号).2009.
11杨保军,王飞.“器”“道”有别,“新”“古”相谐——北川新县城城镇风貌与建筑风格的基本取向.城市规划,2009(12)：9-15.
12荆锋,黄鹭新.北川新县城灾后重建规划中的公众参与.城市规划.2011,35(1).
13孙施文,殷悦.西方城市规划中公众参与的理论基础及其发展[J].国外城市规划,2004,19(1).
14李晓江,孙彤,朱波,殷会良.北川新县城科学选址研究.城市规划.2011,35(2)
15民政部关于四川省调整北川羌族自治县行政区划的批复(民函[2009]41号).2009.
①韩宝磊.自然灾害的影响分析及其应对措施.山东纺织经济.2009(02).
②http://www.worlduc.com/blog2012.aspx?bid=257432
① Emergency Management Australia (EMA) (2004) Australian Emergency Manual:Disaster Recovery, EMA, Australia.
②Zuo, K., Potangaroa. R. And Wilkinson. S. (2007). "Supply Chain and Material Procurement for Post-Disaster Construction:The Boxing Day Tsunami Reconstruction Experience in Aceh".
③林迪广,江头邦道.历史的环境と社会法.京都：法律文化社,1984.
④滕五晓,加藤孝明.日本地震灾害保险体制的形成及其问题.自然灾害学报,2003,12(4)：96.
①苑利.日本文化遗产保护运动的历史和今天.中国非物质文化遗产网.2006.12；8221
②日本建筑学会编.建筑杂志特集o广.り变化する“保存”の世界.东京：日本建筑学会,1997,(1)：1654.
①阴朝民,刘瑞丰.美国地震监测系统发展规划.中国地震局.2004,5.
②曾立新.美国巨灾风险融资和政府干预研究.北京：对外经贸大学出版社,2008.
③张祖荣.国外地震保险制度的主要模式及对我国的启示.浙江金融.2009(06)
④林锦南.美国地震综合防御管理简介.杭州科技.1998(04)
①Tokyo Declaration for the Protection of World Cultural Heritage from Seismic Disasters.2008.11.17
①International Symposium on Protecting World Cultural Heritage Sites and their Historic Urban Environment from Earthquakes. Katmandu Recommendations. Kathmandu Valley,16-19 February,2009.
① Kyoto-Kathmandu Recommendation on Sustainable Protection of World Cultural Heritage in Earthquake Zones. Kyoto,30 August 2009 & Kathmandu,12 September 2009.
①王林.中外历史文化遗产保护制度比较.城市规划,2000(8)：50-51
②“文化财”相当与我国的文物保护单位,但含义更广。分为有形文化财、无形文化财、民俗文化则、纪念物和传统的建造物群等五大类。
③王军.日本的文化财保护.北京：文物出版社,1997.
①邱静支.历史文化名城保护制度比较研究.中州学刊,2003(1)：167.
②Non-Life Insurance Rating Organization of Japan(NLIRO). Chapter2 Earthquake Insurance System in Japan. Earthquake Insurance in Japan,2009(4):39-43.
②赵苑达.日本地震保险：制度设计评析与借鉴.东北财经大学学报,2003(2)：19.
③唐元琦.国际地震保险制度比较以及对我国的启示.西南石油大学学报(社会科学版).2009(05)
④姚庆海.巨灾风险损失补偿机制研究——兼论政府和市场在巨灾风险管理中的作用.中国人民银行金融研究所,博士学位论文,228.
①Hewitt, J., Potangaroa. R. and Wilkinson, S. (2006). "The Role of Urban Change Hierarchies in the Planning of Disaster Responses".
②Le Masurier, J., Wilkinson, S., Zuo, K and Rotimi, O.B. (2008). "Building Resilience by focusing on Legal and Contractual frameworks for Disaster Reconstruction".
③ Singh, B. and Wilkinson, S. (2008). "Post-disaster Resource Availability following a Wellington Earthquake:Aggregates, Concrete and Cement".
④ Rotimi, O.B., Le Masurier, J., and Wilkinson, S. (2006). "The Regulatory Framework for Effective Post-Disaster Reconstruction in New Zealand".
⑤ Schwarb, J., Topping, K.C., Eadie, C.C., Deyle, R.E., Smith, R.A., (1998) Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction, FEMA/American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report 483/484.
①齐心.唐山地震遗迹选(二)——唐山一中·新华路体育场·陡河利民桥.山西地震.1982(03)
②康仲远.中外大城市灾例对比研究系列报告(二)——唐山地震和阪神地震[.灾害学.1996(03)
③党素华.试论地震灾区的恢复与重建.中国减灾.1993(01)
①于洪.丽江古城形成发展与纳西族文化变迁.中央民族大学2007
②郭大烈,郭净,杨福泉.重建古城丽江与保护民族文化遗产.民族艺术.1997(02)
①和良辉.从“丽江现象”到“丽江模式”.理论前沿.2005(03)
②段松廷.丽江启示录——从丽江现象到丽江模式.中国民族.2001(1)：54-55.
③保明东.云南丽江地震民房恢复重建模式.中国减灾.2001(01)
④张世雄.变大灾难为大机遇促大发展——丽江地震灾后旅游业恢复重建的启示.西南金融.2008(08)
①乔迎春.台湾地震为科学家提供大量数据.国际地震动态.2000,07.
①朱凤岚.日本的地震灾后重建经验.华夏时报.2008.5.24.
②袁艺.日本灾害管理的法律体系.中国减灾.2004(11).
③干名,李刃,廖鸿,黄浩明.日本非营利组织,北京大学出版社.2007：30—31.
④王名,李刃,廖鸿,黄浩明.日本非营利组织,北京大学出版社.2007：124.
①文心.两岸亲情血浓于水 祖国大陆伸出援手——外电外报评台湾大地震及祖国大陆对台提供援助.两岸关系.1999(10)
②台湾地震救助重建考察交流团在祖国大陆.两岸关系.1999(12)
①刘发良,高兵.历史名城谱写新篇——记泉州历史文化名城的保护和现代化建设.城市发展研究,2002(06)：69-73.
②王景慧.历史地段保护的概念和作法.城市规划,1998(03)：34-36.
③历史文化名城保护规划规范(GB50357-2005).中国建筑工业出版社.2005.
①单霁翔. 加强世界文化遗产保护管理工作的思考(上).北京规划建设.2005(01)
②赵红红,阎瑾.世界遗产、亚太地区文化遗产与一般民居保护——以广东省从化市广裕祠保护修复为例.规划师.2005(01)
①王军.长城岂可自毁.时代潮.1998(07)
②俞孔坚.世界遗产概念挑战中国：第28届世界遗产大会有感.中国园林.2004(11)
③阮仪二.冷眼看热潮——中报世界遗产和保护历史文化遗存.城市规划汇刊.2000(06)
①谢凝高.“世界遗产”不等于旅游资源.北京规划建设.2001(06).
②袁芳.历史文化名城保护与开发的中外法律制度比较研究.广西师范大学硕士论文.2008.
①王景慧,张兵,傅冬楠,林永新,耿健,徐明,王刃.中国名城.城市规划.2012(02)：60.
②赵琳.法国古建筑保护概况.古建园林技术.2002(01)：57.
③史晨暄.世界遗产保护新趋势.世界建筑.2004(06)
④张松.历史城市保护学导论——文化遗产和历史环境保护的‘种整体性方法.上海科学技术出版社.2001.
①王景慧.日本的《古都保存法》.城市规划.1987(5).
②陶信平.日本历史文化遗产法律保护对我国的借鉴.西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版).2009,9(04)：104-106.
③Albert Rains and Laurence G. Henderson. With heritage so rich. Washington D.C.:Preservation Press,1983:208
①龙灏,李昂博威.美国历史建筑保护体系研究及其对我国的启示.室内设计.2011(02)：52-56.
①陈古祥.雅典宪章与马丘比丘宪章述评.国际城市规划.2009(S1).
②王育.重读《雅典宪章》.北京城市学院学报.2009(03).
③吕舟.《威尼斯宪章》与中国文物建筑保护.中国文物报.2002.08.
④童明康.关于文物建筑原址重建的几点思考.中国文物报.2009-12-25.
①马明飞.自然遗产保护的立法与实践问题研究.武汉大学博士论文.2010..
②陈志华.介绍几份关于文物建筑和历史性城市保护的国际性文件.世界建筑.1989(02).
③杨铭.新视野下的党家村.西安建筑科技大学硕士论文.2010.
①陈古祥.雅典宪章与马比丘宪章述评.国际城市规划,2009.,S1.
②傅岩,石佳.历史园林：“活”的古迹——《佛罗伦萨宪章》解读.中国园林,2002,03.
③赵中枢.从文物保护到历史文化名城保护——概念的扩大与保护方法的多样化.城市规划,2001,10.
①张祖谦.《华盛顿宪章》——个值得重视的文件.国际展望,1992.14.
①顾军,苑利.美国文化及自然遗产保护的历史与经验.西北民族研究.2005(03).
②周密.美国建筑市场现状及发展机遇.国际经济合作,2009.08.
①刘松茯,程世卓.当代英国建筑技术审美的源点.建筑师,2010(04).
②王琪,下芳.英国登录建筑的选定与我国文物建筑指定制度的比较研究.新建筑.2004(5).
③高辉.传统建筑文化氛围中的建筑教育——意大利建筑教育特色.建筑学报.2000.02.
①刘临安.意大利建筑文化遗产保护概观.规划师.1996.01.
②方晓风.完美的穹顶——意大利文艺复兴建筑的创新路径.装饰.2011.09.
①国务院法制办农业资源环保法制司,住房与城乡建设部法规司,城乡规划司.历史文化名城名镇名村保护条例释义.知识产权出版社.2009
王玲玲.历史文化名城保护规划的发展与演变研究.中国城市规划设计院硕士论文.2006.
刘敦桢主编.中国古代建筑史.中国建筑工业出版社,1984
①张勃著.当代北京建筑艺术风气与社会心理.机械工业出版社,2002
②叶廷芳. 北京的建筑与规划[J].北京规划建设.2004(06)
③杜亨庆,钟新.北京前门大街“新貌”将换“旧颜”.建筑工人.2007(09)
①潘秋玲,李雪茹.旅游开发对西安传统民俗文化的影响效应.地域研究与开发.2006(01)
②胡蔡清. 浅谈西安古城的保护.技术与市场.园林工程.2005(04)
①章迎庆.当代上海建筑形态变迁——从西方极少主义建筑思潮看.建筑学报.2002.08.
①姚跃,蔡军.上海市优秀历史建筑临近处现代建筑形体设计手法研究.华中建筑.2012(04).
②汶川县人民政府.汶川县年鉴(2005-2008).巴蜀书社.2009：30
①冯广宏.都江堰文献集成.成都：巴蜀书社,2007.
②邹礼洪.从石刻碑铭看都江堰历史上的生态环境保护.中国农史.2008.4,110-116。
③李直蓉.富川旅游资源开发可持续性探析.贺州学院学报,2007.5,55-59.
④四川省文化厅文物处等.都江堰文物志第四篇金石.四川师范大学学报.1986.5,62-67
⑤吴金钟.都江堰兴建史学术讨论会综述.1984.01,64-72.
⑥彭述明,谭徐明.都江堰史.北京：科学出版社,2004.
①黎沛虹,李可可.长江文化研究文库-长江治水.长江文化研究文库.武汉：湖北教育出版社,2004.
②何明江.历史文化名城-都江堰,中国文联出版社,2004.12.
③李可可,黎沛虹.都江堰——我国传统治水文化的璀璨明珠.2004.18,75-78.
①史记-河渠书.
②汉书-沟渠志.
③四川省城乡规划设计研究院.都江堰市城市总体规划(2006-2020).2005.
④张帅.都江堰水文化与可持续发展.四川水利.2005.01,52-56.
⑤彭世彰.都江堰灌区水稻节水灌溉探讨.中国水利.2004.18,29.
⑥陈昌笃.都江堰生物多样性研究与保护.成都：四川科学技术出版社,2000.11-14.
⑦四川省地方志编纂委员会·都江堰志.成都：四川辞书出版社,1993,96-110.
①邹礼洪.古都江堰岁修中的生态环境保护意识.西华大学学报.2006.02,25-29.
②邹礼洪.古都江堰“以水治水”的技术成就.地方文化研究辑刊.2010.01,13-19.
③李可可.都江堰——分疏治水的成功典范.中国农村水利水电.2008.03,79-82.
①王骏,张樵,屈军.都江堰灾后重建概念规划国际征集方案综述.城市规划学刊.2008,178(6).
①黄家祥.四川汶川县姜维城新石器时代遗址发掘简报.考古,2006,(11).
①汶川县人民政府.汶川县年鉴(2005-2008).巴蜀书社.2009：61.
②彭邦本.汶川三题——历史文化资源与灾后重建刍议[J]阿坝师范高等专科学校学报,2009,(03)
①郭继艳.川滇地区石棺葬的区域类型.四川大学,2002.
①李维维.岷江上游地区石棺葬研究.中央民族大学,2007.
①汶川县委书记王斌语。
②威州镇政府提供的数据。
①“穿心店地震遗址区”应永久保存.新华日报2009-03-10.
①柴铁锋,徐卫,李纯.传承·希望——汶川县县城(威州镇)灾后原址重建城市设计研究建筑与文化.2009(05).
①李晓江,孙彤,朱波,殷会良.北川新县城科学选址研究.城市规划.2012(01)
①李晓江,张兵,束晨阳,张健.回望生命的光辉——北川地震遗址博物馆及震灾纪念地规划的思考.城市规划.2008(07).
①蔡永洁,刘韩昕,邱鸿磊.裂缝中的记忆北川地震纪念馆建筑方案设计.时代建筑.2011(11).
①陈巍.震后北川文化旅游资源开发研究.西南财经大学硕士论文.2008.
[1]Luis F. Ribeird. The Cultural Landscape and the Uniqueness of Place:A Greenway Heritage Network for Landscape Conservation of Lisbon Metropolitan Area. University of Massachusetts Amherst,1998.
[2]J. F. Coeterier. Lay people's evaluation of historic sites. Landscape and Urban Planning,59 (2002)111-123.
[3]R. Hanna. Environmental appraisal of historic buildings in Scotland:the case study of the Glasgow School of Art. Building and Environment,37 (2002) 1-10.
[4]Weinberg, N, Preservation in American towns and Cities, Colorado:Westview press,1991
[5]Silvio Mendes Zancheti. Conservation and Urban Sustainable development. Rua do Bom Jesus: CCIUT,1999
[6]John Punter. Design Control in England. Built Environment, Vol.18 No.2
[7]Sebastian loew. Design Control in France. Built Environment, Vol.18 No.2
[8]Robert Pickard. Policy and Law in Heritage Conservation. London and New York:Spon Press,2001
[9]New York Landmarks Conservancy William G. Foulks, Editor. Historic Building Facades. New York:Preservation Press,1997
[10]Alexander Stille. The Future of The Past. New York:Farrar, Straus and Giroux,2002
[11]Jane Jacobs. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York:Random House,1961
[12]J. Kirk Irwin. Historic Preservation Handbook. New York:McGraw-Hill,2003
[13]Eduardo Rojas. Old Cities, New ASSETS. Baltimore and London:Inter-American Development Bank,1999
[14]A Guide for Collectors and Curators. Conservation Concerns. New York:Cooper-Hewitt,1975
[15]GDANIEC, C. (1997). Reconstruction in Moscow's historic centre:conservation, planning and finance strategies-the example of the Ostozhenka district. GeoJournal 42,377-384.
[16]Aldrich R. Homosexuality and the city:an historical overview. Urban Studies.2004;41:1719-37.
[17]Ando M. A fault model of the 1946 Nankaido earthquake derived from tsunami data. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors.1982;28:320-36.
[18]Babu SC, Mthindi G. Developing decentralized capacity for disaster prevention:lessons from food security and nutrition monitoring in Malawi. Disasters.1995;19:127-39.
[19]Binder A, Geis G, Bruce DD. Juvenile delinquency:Historical, cultural, and legal perspectives: Anderson Pub Co; 2001.
[20]Boyer MC. The city of collective memory:its historical imagery and architectural entertainments:The MIT Press; 1996.
[21]Cardona OD. Environmental Management and Disaster Prevention:two related topics:A holistic risk assessment and management approach. Natural Disaster Management Tudor Rose, London. 1999:151-3.
[22]Cole M, Engestrom Y. A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. Distributed cognitions:Psychological and educational considerations.1993:1-46.
[23][8] Evans G. Hard-branding the cultural city-from Prado to Prada. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.2003;27.
[24]FANG M, QI Y, ZHANG J. Research of Lanzhou City Geological Disaster Mass Observation and Mass Prevention Informationization based on WebGIS Remote Sensing Technology and Application.2011;26.
[25]Formica S, Uysal M. Market segmentation of an international cultural-historical event in Italy. Journal of Travel Research.1998;36.
[26]Freire P. The adult literacy process as cultural action for freedom. Harvard Educational Review. 1970;40.
[27]Gascuel JD, Cani MP, Desbrun M, Leroy E, Mirgon C. Simulating landslides for natural disaster prevention.1998.
[28]Gracey M. Historical, cultural, political, and social influences on dietary patterns and nutrition in Australian Aboriginal children. The American journal of clinical nutrition.2000; 72.
[29]Greif A. Cultural beliefs and the organization of society:A historical and theoretical reflection on collectivist and individualist societies. Journal of political economy.1994:912-50.
[30][15] Halberstein RA. Medicinal plants:historical and cross-cultural usage patterns. Annals of epidemiology.2005.
[31]Hamilton RM. Science and technology for natural disaster reduction. Natural Hazards Review. 2000; 1
[32]Haurie A, Moresino F. A stochastic control model of economic growth with environmental disaster prevention. Automatica.2006;42.
[33]Hessler M, Zimmermann C. Creative urban milieus:historical perspectives on culture, economy, and the city:Campus Verlag Gmbh; 2008.
[34]Hunter E, Reser J, Baird M, Reser P. An analysis of suicide in Indigenous communities of North Queensland:the historical, cultural and symbolic landscape. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra.1999.
[35]IRIKURA K, MIYAKE H. Destructive Earthquake:Forecast and Disaster Prevention Measures. Prediction of Strong Ground Motions for Scenario Earthquakes. Journal of Geography. 2001;110.
[36]Ito Y, Obara K, Shiomi K, Sekine S, Hirose H. Slow earthquakes coincident with episodic tremors and slow slip events. Science.2007;315.
[37]Kearns G, Philo C. Selling places:the city as cultural capital, past and present:Pergamon Press; 1993.
[38]Kimura T, Tanaka S, Takahashi N, Hashimoto R. Sensor device, and disaster prevention system and electronic equipment each having sensor device incorporated therein. Google Patents; 1998.
[39]Larson A. Social context of human immunodeficiency virus transmission in Africa:historical and cultural bases of east and central African sexual relations. Review of Infectious Diseases. 1989;11:716-31.
[40]Liu D, Pang L, Xie B. Typhoon disaster in China:prediction, prevention, and mitigation. Natural hazards.2009;49:421-36.
[41]Lukacs J. Budapest 1900:a historical portrait of a city and its culture:Grove Pr; 1994.
[42]McEntire DA. Balancing international approaches to disaster:rethinking prevention instead of relief. Australian Journal of Emergency Management.1998;13:50-5.
[43]McEntire DA. Coordinating multi-organisational responses to disaster:lessons from the March 28,2000, Fort Worth tornado. Disaster Prevention and Management.2002; 11:369-79.
[44]Miller MN, Pumariega AJ. Culture and eating disorders:A historical and cross-cultural review. Psychiatry:Interpersonal and Biological Processes.2001;64:93-110.
[45]Mommaas H. Cultural clusters and the post-industrial city:towards the remapping of urban cultural policy. Urban Studies.2004;41:507.
[46]Monterescu D, Rabinowitz D. Mixed towns, trapped communities:historical narratives, spatial dynamics, gender relations and cultural encounters in Palestinian-Israeli towns:Ashgate Pub Co; 2007.
[47]Moran C, Colless E. Positive reactions following emergency and disaster responses. Disaster Prevention and Management.1995;4:55-60.
[48]Obara K. Nonvolcanic deep tremor associated with subduction in southwest Japan. Science. 2002;296:1679.
[49]Obara K, Kasahara K, Hori S, Okada Y. A densely distributed high-sensitivity seismograph network in Japan:Hi-net by National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention. Review of scientific instruments.2005;76:021301.
[50]Ofori G. Construction industry development for disaster prevention and response.2002.
[51]Paton D. Training disaster workers:promoting wellbeing and operational effectiveness. Disaster Prevention and Management.1996;5:11-8.
[52]Paton D, Jackson D. Developing disaster management capability:an assessment centre approach. Disaster Prevention and Management.2002; 11
[53]Paton D, Johnston D. Disasters and communities:vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management.2001; 10.
[54]Paton D, Smith L, Violanti J. Disaster response:risk, vulnerability and resilience. Disaster Prevention and Management.2000;9.
[55]Prasad D. Social and Cultural Geography of Hyderabad City:A Historical Perspective: Inter-India Publications New Delhi; 1986.
[56]Quarantelli EL. Problematical aspects of the information/communication revolution for disaster planning and research:ten non-technical issues and questions. Disaster Prevention and Management.1997:6.
[57]Radford L. On psychology, historical epistemology, and the teaching of mathematics:Towards a socio-cultural history of mathematics. For the learning of mathematics.1997; 17.
[58]Ragland B. The year 2000 problem solver:a five-step disaster prevention plan:McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1997.
[59]Rose A. Defining and measuring economic resilience to disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management.2004; 13
[60]Roth WM, Tobin K, Elmesky R, Carambo C, McKnight YM, Beers J. Re/making identities in the praxis of urban schooling:A cultural historical perspective. Mind, Culture, and Activity. 2004;11.
[61]Scheer J, Groce N. Impairment as a Human Constant:Cross-Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Variation. Journal of Social Issues.1988;44.
[62]Sharp K. Between Relief and Development:targeting food aid for disaster prevention in Ethiopia:Overseas Development Institute; 1998.
[63]Singh F. The City of Amritsar:a study of historical, cultural, social, and economic aspects: Oriental Publishers & Distributors; 1978.
[64]Tadokoro S, Kitano H, Takahashi T, Noda I, Matsubara H, Shinjoh A, et al. The robocup-rescue project:A robotic approach to the disaster mitigation problem. IEEE; 2000. p.4089-94 vol.4.
[65]Teichner VJ, Cadden JJ, Berry GW. The Puerto Rican patient:Some historical, cultural and psychological aspects. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry.1981;9.
[66]Tsou T. The Cultural Revolution and post-Mao reforms:A historical perspective:University of Chicago press; 1999.
[67]Willems E. Peasantry and city:Cultural persistence and change in historical perspective, a European case. American Anthropologist.1970;72.
[68]Youpo S, Mayajie LR. Types, functions and disposition rules of the disaster prevention gardens in japan. World Information On Earthquake Engineering.2004;4.
[69]NELSON, A. C. and FRENCH, S. P. (2002). Plan quality and mitigating damage from natural disasters:A case study of the Northridge earthquake with planning policy considerations. Journal of the American Planning Association 68,194-207.
[70]仇保兴.地震后重建家园指导手册(1-8).中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
[71]顾林生,宋金文.灾后恢复重建实施手册.中国劳动社会保障出版社,2008.
[72]李雄飞.城市规划与古建筑保护.天津科学技术出版社,1989.
[73]M·B·波索欣.建筑·环境与城市建设.冯文炯.中国建筑工业出版社,1988.
[74]D普林茨.城市景观设计方法.李维荣.天津大学出版社,1989.
[75]邵甬.城市遗产研究与保护(理想空间丛书).同济大学出版社,2004.
[76]荆其敏,张立安.图解中国名城(城市意匠).中国电力出版社,2005.
[77]荆其敏,张立安.图解外国名城(城市意匠).中国电力出版社,2005.
[78]陈春生,张文辉,徐荣.中国古建筑文献指南1900-1990.科学出版社,2000.
[79]董鉴泓.中国城市建设史.第三版.中国建筑工业出版社,2004.
[80]盖湘涛.城市景观美学.东北师范大学出版社,1988.
[81]段进.城市空间发展论.江苏科学技术出版社,1999.
[82]凯文·林奇.城市形态.林庆怡,陈朝晖,邓华.华夏出版社,2001.
[83]罗小未主编,沙永杰等编著.上海新天地——旧区改造的建筑历史、人文历史与开发模式的研究.东南大学出版社,2002.
[84][奥]L·贝塔兰菲著,秋同、袁嘉新译.一般系统论.社会科学文献出版社,1987.
[85]常青编著.建筑遗产的生存策略——保护与利用设计实验.同济大学出版社,2003.
[86]王惠君主编.历史建筑保存·维护·再利用执行手册.屏东县文化局,2004.
[87]王景慧、阮仪三、王林编著.历史文化名城保护理论与规划.同济大学出版社,1999.
[88]李经远、王晓东编.中国历史文化名城便览.成都出版社,1991.
[89]宛素春等编著.城市空间形态解析.科学出版社,2004.
[90]章俊华著.规划设计学中的调查分析法与实践.中国建筑工业出版社,2005.
[91]刘临安著.近百年意大利历史建筑保护的理论与流派.中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
[92]应金华、樊丙庚主编.四川历史文化名城.四川人民出版社,2000.
[93]陆地著.建筑的生与死——历史建筑再利用研究.东南大学出版社,2004.
[94]辞海(1979年版).上海辞书出版社,1979.
[95]中国大百科全书·建筑园林城市规划卷.中国大百科全书出版社,1988.
[96]汶川县人民政府主办.汶川县年鉴(2005-2008).四川出版集团巴蜀书社,2009
[97]国务院法制办农业资源环保法制司.历史文化名城名镇名村名城保护条例释义,知识产权出版社,2009.
[98]何旻,姚南.“心灵之城”——都江堰灾后重建规划探讨.规划师.2008,24(12).
[99]毛锋,马金锋,周文生.北京防震历史经验与汶川地震灾后城镇选址再建.地球信息科学.2008,10(4).
[100]张倩,李志民,冯青.城市历史文化街区密集居住现状中的防灾避害策略研究——以西安碑林历史街区传统民居院落生存现状研究为例.西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版).2009,41(4).
[101]冯勇,彭锐.从长沙“文夕大火”谈城市灾后重建.规划师.2006,22(9).
[102]叶鹏,陈捷.都江堰灾后城镇住宅重建的规划管理.安徽建筑工业学院学报(自然科学版).2010,18(1).
[103]王骏,张樵,屈军.都江堰灾后重建概念规划国际征集方案综述.城市规划学刊.2008,(6).
[104]胡以志.对话爱德华·布莱克力教授——美国新奥尔良重建与中国汶川大地震灾后重建.国际城市规划.2008,23(3).
[105]林世超.古迹的震后重建.建筑学报.2008,(7).
[106]杨亚弟,杜景林,李桂荣.古建筑震害特性分析.世界地震工程.2000,16(3).
[107]郭黛女亘.关于文物建筑遗迹保护与重建的思考.建筑学报.2006,(6).
[108]岳培宇.国内城镇灾后重建经验梳理.西部广播电视.2008(6).
[109]何茂华,丁建生.日本阪神大地震启示.江苏建筑(增刊).1998,(1).
[110]刘本玉.城市抗震防灾规划的研究与展望.世界地震工程.2008,(3).
[111]腾五晓.日美地震灾害紧急对应对中国灾害应急体制建立的启示.防灾减灾工程学报.2004,(9).
[112]沈彩文,石荣珺,周法献,陈永,宋朝彝.国内外地震灾后重建经验与对策(上).建筑.2009,(16).
[113]陈捷.科学规划引导都江堰灾后重建.城乡建设.2010,(1).
[114]吴春苑.利用文化重建复兴旧城街区的城市设计方法探讨.规划师.2007,23(1).
[115]陈敏.绵竹地震灾后重建中的历史文脉保护建设浅析.科技资讯.2009,(5).
[116]张松.日本阪神·淡路震灾复兴规划的特征及启示.城市规划学刊.2008,(4).
[117]李映东,李俊.日本与台湾震后重建的经验教训及对我国的启示.电子科技大学学报(社科版).2009,11(2).
[118]金磊.四川汶川灾后重建规划策略研究.2008,(6).
[119]徐百柯.台湾灾后重建的启示.中国减灾.2008,(8).
[120]阎波,谭文勇,陈蔚.汶川大地震灾后重建规划的思考.重庆大学学报(社会科学版).2009,15(4).
[121]魏皓严,郑曦.汶川地震灾后重建词条简例——从城乡规划与建筑生产的角度.时代建筑.2009,(1).
[122]仇保兴.对历史文化名城名镇名村保护的思考.中国名城.2010(1).
[123]汶川地震灾后重建规划思考.地球信息科学.2008,10(4).
[124]尹强.汶川特大地震的反思与重建规划的思考.城市规划.2008,32(7).
[125]汶川重建规划中应重视的问题——周干峙院士访谈录.城市发展研究.2008,15(3).
[126]袁锦富,赵毅.灾后重建背景下城市总体规划的编制与思考——以四川省绵竹市为例.规划师.2009,25(11).
[127]曾旭正.灾后重建规划体制问题的分析与建议——以台湾9.21地震为例.城市规划学刊.2008,176(4).
[128]俞静.抓住重建机遇,创新城市特色空间——都江堰灾后重建规划中的总体城市设计探讨.规划师.2009,25(11).
[129]邱建,蒋蓉.关于构建地震灾后恢复重建规划体系的探讨——以汶川地震为例.城市规划.2009(7).
[130]仇保兴.借鉴日本经验求解四川灾后规划重建的若干难题.城市规划学刊.2008(6).
[131]邱建,江俊浩,贾刘强.汶川地震对我国公园防灾减灾系统建设的启示.城市规划.2008,(11).
[132]沈清基,马继武.唐山地震灾后重建规划：回顾、分析及思考.城市规划学刊.2008,(4).
[133]孙施文,胡丽萍.灾后重建规划,为了现在和未来的责任.城市规划学刊.2008,(4).
[134]吕海平、王鹤.城市景观建设中历史建筑的保护与开发模式.沈阳建筑工程学院学报(自然科学版),2003,19(2).
[135]赵秀恒.城市景观的控制要素.时代建筑.1995(3).
[136]孙善芳.城市景观的视觉分析与模拟控制方法.武汉测绘科技大学学报.1994(3).
[137]刘奇志.城市景观体系规划探讨.城市规划.2000,24(5).
[138]陈蔚、胡斌.城市历史建筑保护与现代城市建设的关系初探.重庆建筑大学学报,2004(5).
[139]郑孝燮.文态环境与建筑特色——关于历史文化名城保护的问题.城市发展研究.1998(6).
[140]邓清南、许虹.四川历史文化名城的保护.成都电子机械高等专科学校学报.2005(3).
[141]顾晓伟.试谈我国历史性城市的景观控制.
[142]肖志哲.试论城市景观风貌特色的创造.城市问题,1996(3).
[143]阮仪三.上海外滩地区历史建筑保护.规划师,2003,19(1).
[144]吴祥艳、付军.美国历史景观保护理论和实践浅析.中国园林,2004(3).
[145]阮仪三.历史建筑与城市保护的历程.时代建筑,2000(3).
[146]黄禹康.历史建筑遗存：城市发展的“溃疡”还是财富?.城市与减灾.2004(6).
[147]吴承照、曹霞.景观资源量化评价的主要方法——综述及比较.旅游科学.2005(2).
[148]林楠.历史建筑——城市中不可缺少的资源.山西建筑.2005,31(9).
[149]王信、陈迅.历史建筑保护和开发的制度经济学探讨.同济大学学报.2004,15(5).
[150]蓝刚.历史城市景观控制体系初探.苏州城建环保学院学报.2000,13(2).
[151]何一民.经营城市应重视对历史文化名城文化资源的保护.四川省情,2003(9).
[152]李燕、司徒尚纪.近年来我国历史文化名城保护研究的进展.人文地理.2001年,16(5).
[153]郑小明.成都的历史文化名城保护与城市发展总体规划.城市发展研究.1997(6).
[154]李艳莉.构建成都市文物建筑登录制度——成都市优秀近现代建筑保护规划编制有感.四川建筑.2005,25(9).
[155]仇保兴.风景名胜和历史文化名城资源的保护策略.中国经贸导刊.2004(4).
[156]刘临安.当前欧洲对文物建筑保护的新观念.时代建筑.1997(4).
[157]李长君.创造宜人的城市景观——简析城市设计中的城市景观要素.华中建筑.2000(2).
[158]刘滨谊、母晓颖.城市文化与城市景观吸引力构建.规划师.2004,20(2).
[159]黄建、王碧琴.多种评价方法在景观评价中的综合应用.江西科学.2006(4).
[160]陈宇.景观评价方法研究.室内设计与装修.2005(3).
[161]周干峙.城市化和历史文化名城.城市规划.2002,26(4).
[162]周俭,张松,王骏.保护中求发展发展中求特色——世界遗产城市丽江发展概念规划要略.城市规划汇刊.2003(2).
[163]邱建,“5.12”汶川地震灾后恢复重建城乡规划设计,建筑学报,2010.9
[164]舒波,邱建,石春初,悉心呵护地域文化、多维并举重塑民族文化.建筑学报.2010(9).
[165]周庆华,李岳岩,陈静,吴左宾.四川汉旺地震遗址保护地概念规划探讨.规划师.2010(02).
[166]宋盈.城市化进程中历史街区保护与利用方法研究——以历史文化名城长沙为例.湖南大学,2003.
[167]王琪.城市历史保护的若干理论与方法——英国的经验.浙江大学,2003.
[168]侯正华.城市特色危机与城市建筑风貌的自组织机制.清华大学,2003.
[169]毛贺.论城市历史文化景观与周边环境关系的处理原则.苏州大学,2004.
[170]王家倩.历史环境中的新旧建筑结合.重庆大学,2002.
[171]蔡效军.中国历史建筑保护中价值观的探讨.华南理工大学,2002.
[172]王云峰.历史建筑保护二元论.同济大学,2002.
[173]金鸣.应用伦理学中的历史建筑保护研究.华中科技大学,2004.
[174]郑静.城市景观的量化研究.北京工业大学,2003.
[175]周雅.汶川地震遗址遗迹景观保护规划与展示研究.西南交通大学,2010.
[176]陈秀刚.城市景观特色定位研究.同济大学,2003.
[177]张继刚.城市风貌的评价与管治研究.重庆大学,2001.
[178]钱晨佳.城市景观的结构与规划布局研究.同济大学,2003.
[179]中华人民共和国文物保护法.
[180]中华人民共和国文物保护法实施细则.
[181]建设部、国家文物局.历史文化名城保护规划编制要求.
[182]国际古迹遗址理事会中国国家委员会.中国文物古迹保护准则.
[183]关于加强对城市优秀近现代建筑规划保护的指导意见.
[184]关于保护景观和遗址的风貌与特性的建议.
[185]国际建筑协会.雅典宪章.1933.
[186]从事历史文物建筑工作的建筑师和技术人员国际议会.保护文物建筑及历史地段的国际宪章.1964.
[187]联合国教科文组织.保护世界文化和自然遗产公约.1972.
[188]联合国教育、科学及文化组织.关于历史地区的保护及其当代作用的建议.1976.
[189]国际建筑协会CIAM马丘比丘宪章.1977.
[190]国际古迹遗址理事会与国际历史园林委员会.佛罗伦萨宪章.1981.
[191]国际古迹遗址理事会ICOMOS保护历史城镇与城区宪章华盛顿宪章.1987.
[192]西安宣言——保护历史建筑、古遗址和历史地区的环境.2005.
[193]关于保护历史的或传统的建筑群及它们在现代生活中的地位的建议(内罗毕建议).1976.
[194]地震灾害中世界文化遗产保护的东京宣言.2008.
[195]对于保护易受地震损害的世界遗产及其历史城区环境的若干建议.2009.
[196]在地震带中京都——加德满都世界文化遗产的可持续保护的建议.2009.
[197]国务院.汶川地震灾后恢复重建条例(国务院令第526号).2008.
[198]国务院.国务院关于做好汶川地震灾后恢复重建工作的指导意见(国发(2008]22号).2008.
[199]国务院抗震救灾总指挥部灾后恢复重建规划组.汶川地震灾后恢复重建总体规划.2008.
[200]国家发展和改革委员会,住房和城乡建设部.汶川地震灾后恢复重建城镇体系规划.2008.
[201]国家发展和改革委员会,住房和城乡建设部,农业部等.汶川地震灾后恢复重建农村 建设规划.2008.
[202]国家发展和改革委员会、住房和城乡建设部,民政部,等.汶川地震灾后恢复重建城乡住房建设规划.2008.
[203]四川省汶川地震灾后恢复重建规划组.四川省汶川地震灾后恢复重建城镇体系规划.2008.
[204]都江堰市人民政府,上海同济城市规划设计研究院.都江堰市总体规划(2008-2020)2008.
[205]成都市规划设计研究院.都江堰市主城区控制性详细规划.2008.
[206]上海同济城市规划设计研究院.都江堰市西街历史文化街区保护与整治修建性详细规划.2010.
[207]汶川县人民政府,广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院.汶川县县城[威州镇]灾后恢复重建总体规划(2008-2020.2008.
[208]江苏省城市规划设计研究院.江苏省城市交通规划研究中心.绵竹市历史文化名城保护规划.2011.
[209]江苏省城市规划设计研究院.绵竹市城市总体规划(2008-2020).2009.
[210]北京市城市规划设计研究院.什邡市城区控制性详细规划.2008.
[211]北京中联环建文建筑设计有限公司.什邡历史文化名城保护规划.2009.
[212]北川羌族自治县人民政府,中国城市规划设计研究院.北川羌族自治县县城城市总体规划(2011-2030).2011.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |