用户名: 密码: 验证码:
百草枯染毒小鼠血清总抗氧化态及甲泼尼龙干预的实验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
自十九世纪六十年代以来,百草枯已经成为许多国家广泛使用的除草剂。从七十年代初开始,研究发现百草枯(PQ)对人类和动物具有较强的毒性。百草枯的中毒机制主要是在机体内经过氧化还原过程产生大量的活性氧类物质(ROS),破坏过氧化-抗氧化平衡,引起脂质、蛋白和DNA的氧化损伤,导致细胞、组织功能障碍。虽然在百草枯中毒的患者中广泛应用了甲泼尼龙,但疗效不明确。由于缺乏特效的解毒剂或有效的治疗方法,百草枯中毒患者死亡率高。尽管人们已经意识到氧化应激在百草枯中毒机制中的重要性,但关于百草枯中毒患者体内总抗氧化态的变化及给予大剂量甲泼尼龙治疗的影响等方面的研究非常有限。本研究旨在评估百草枯中毒小鼠的血清总抗氧化态(TAS)变化及大剂量应用甲泼尼龙的作用。实验主要由以下几部分构成:
     第一部分小鼠腹腔百草枯染毒后血清总抗氧化态变化的研究
     目的:本部分研究旨在探讨小鼠腹腔注射百草枯对其血清总抗氧化态的影响。
     方法:小鼠随机分为对照组和百草枯染毒组(PQ组),PQ组小鼠又分别按照50、70、100、150、200和300mg/kg的百草枯染毒剂量分成6组,给予一次性腹腔注射百草枯;PQ组小鼠分别在染毒后1h和3h留取血样,进行血清2,2-联氮-双(3-乙基-苯并噻唑-6-磺酸)二铵盐﹝ABTS﹞自由基清除率的检测,并与对照组比较;每个血样采集点均有5个样本。
     结果:1、不同染毒剂量组小鼠染毒后1、3h的血清ABTS自由基清除率显著低于对照组小鼠(P<0.05);2、但同一染毒剂量染毒后1、3h测定的血清ABTS自由基清除率无显著性差异(P>0.05);3、小鼠染毒后1、3h的血清ABTS自由基清除率与染毒剂量间无显著相关性。
     结论:百草枯染毒后小鼠的血清ABTS自由基清除率下降,血清总抗氧化态降低,且染毒后1、3h无显著性差异。
     第二部分百草枯染毒小鼠早期应用甲泼尼龙对血清总抗氧化态的影响
     目的:本部分研究旨在评估百草枯染毒小鼠早期应用大剂量甲泼尼龙(medrol)对小鼠血清总抗氧化态的影响。
     方法:小鼠被随机分成对照组、PQ组、PQ+medrol组和medrol组。PQ组小鼠按照一次性腹腔注射50、70、100、150、200和300mg/kg的百草枯染毒剂量分成6组;PQ+medrol组小鼠在腹腔分别一次性注射百草枯50、70、100、150、200和300mg/kg后即刻注射medrol200mg/kg;medrol组小鼠仅给予腹腔一次性注射medrol200mg/kg;PQ组、PQ+medrol组和medrol组小鼠在染毒后1h和3h取血样,进行血清ABTS自由基清除率的检测,并与对照组比较;每个血样采集点均有5个样本。
     结果:1、PQ组与PQ+medrol组小鼠1、3h的血清ABTS自由基清除率均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)2、同一染毒剂量的PQ组与PQ+medrol组小鼠同一采血时点测定的血清ABTS自由基清除率比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);3、medrol组小鼠在1、3h血清ABTS自由基清除率与对照组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);4、PQ+medrol组小鼠1、3h的血清ABTS自由基清除率与染毒剂量间无明显相关性。
     结论:本实验研究证实了百草枯对机体过氧化-抗氧化平衡的破坏作用,未发现早期大剂量应用甲泼尼龙可以提高染毒小鼠的血清抗氧化态。
     第三部分甲泼尼龙可能加速急性百草枯中毒小鼠死亡的初步研究
     目的:本部分研究拟对急性百草枯中毒小鼠进行甲泼尼龙冲击治疗,明确糖皮质激素能否加速急性百草枯中毒小鼠的死亡。
     方法:小鼠随机分为对照组、染毒组、治疗组和甲泼尼龙对照组。染毒组30只小鼠被随机分为6组,分别一次性腹腔注射50、70、100、150、200和300mg/kg剂量的百草枯;治疗组小鼠30只,在与染毒组相同处理的基础上,百草枯染毒后一次性腹腔注射甲泼尼龙200mg/kg;甲泼尼龙对照组5只小鼠,仅给予一次性腹腔注射甲泼尼龙200mg/kg;观察小鼠的中毒症状,比较染毒组和治疗组小鼠的半数致死量。
     结果:给予百草枯后的不同时间内,小鼠出现自由活动减少,濒死时呼吸频率增快、张口呼吸、鼻翼扇动等中毒症状。治疗组在染毒后24h、48h和72h的半数致死量均小于染毒组。甲泼尼龙对照组小鼠在观察期内未出现死亡。
     结论:腹腔注射大剂量甲泼尼龙有可能加速百草枯中毒小鼠的死亡。
Paraquat (PQ) has been a widely used herbicide in many countries since the1960s.From70s, its high toxicity has been reported in animals as well as in human.Mthylprednisolone is widely practiced, but evidence for efficacy is very weak.The highmortality rate observed following paraquat exposure has been attributed to the lack ofan antidote or effective treatment to ameliorate the toxic effects of the poison. Paraquatinduced toxicity is a manifestation of its ability to undergo an alternative reduction andreoxidation known as redox cycling and subsequent generation of reactive oxygenspecies(ROS), which disrupt the prooxidative/antioxidative balance in the body,causeoxidative damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA,and lead to cell and tissueDysfunction.Despite recognizing the importance of oxidative stress as a mechanism ofparaquat toxicity,limited studies exist regarding the variation of total antioxidant status(TAS) and the effect of high doses of methylprednisolone administration in patientswith paraquat poisoning.This study was designed to evaluate the serum TAS and theaction of high doses of methylprednisolone in mice with paraquat poisoning.
     PartⅠThe study on changes in serum total antioxidant status of micepoisoned with paraquat by ip injection
     Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the serum TAS of micepoisoned with paraquat by ip injection.
     Methods: The mice were randomLy divided into control groups and PQgroups.The mice in PQ groups were divided into6subgroups, which received50,70,100,150,200,and300mg/kg, respectively, of paraquat by i.p. injection. The bloodsamples were taken not only from control group but also from PQ group at1h and3h,respectively, after exposure,in order for the comparative study of ABTS radicalscavenging activity. Blood samples of5mice were taken at each blood sampling point.
     Results:1.The serum ABTS free radical scavenging activities at either1h or3h after PQ administration in PQ subgroups were significantly lower than in controlgroup(P<0.05).2. There was no significant difference in the serum ABTS free radicalscavenging activities in blood samples between the two studied sampling times afterexposure to the same dose of PQ(P>0.05).3.There was no significant correlationbetween the exposure dose and the serum ABTS free radical scavenging activities ateither1h or3h after PQ administration.
     Conclusion: The serum ABTS free radical scavenging activities were reduced andthe serum total antioxidant status was lowed for the mice after PQ administration. Thedifference was not significant between1h value and3h value after PQ administration.
     PartⅡThe effescts of early use of methylprednisolone on the serum totalantioxidant status in the mice with paraquat poisoning
     Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the effescts of early use ofmethylprednisolone on the serum total antioxidant status in the mice with paraquatpoisoning.
     Methods: The mice were randomLy divided into control group,PQ group, PQ+medrol group and medrol group. The mice in PQ group were divided into6subgroups,which received50,70,100,150,200,and300mg/kg, respectively, of paraquat by i.p.injection. The mice in PQ+medrol group all received200mg/kg of methylprednisoloneby i.p. injection immediately after receiving50,70,100,150,200,and300mg/kg,respectively, of paraquat by i.p. injection. The mice in medrol group only received200mg/kg of methylprednisolone by i.p. injection. The blood samples were taken notonly from control group but also from PQ group, PQ+medrol group and medrol group at1h and3h,respectively, after exposure for the comparative study of ABTS radicalscavenging activity. Blood samples of5mice were taken at each blood sampling point.
     Results:1.The serum ABTS free radical scavenging activities at either1h or3hafter PQ administration in PQ group and PQ+medrol group were significantly lowerthan in control group(P<0.05).2. There was no significant difference in the serumABTSfree radical scavenging activities in blood samples between1h value and3h value afterexposure to the same dose of PQ for PQ group and PQ+medrol group,respectively(P >0.05).3.There was no significant difference in the serum ABTS free radical scavengingactivities in blood samples between control group and medrol group at1h and3h,respectively after exposure to PQ(P>0.05).4.In PQ+medrol group, there was nosignificant correlation between the exposure dose and the serum ABTS free radicalscavenging activities at either1h or3h after PQ administration.
     Conclusion:The study confirmed paraquat can disrupt the peroxidation/antioxidantbalance in the body, but it failed to prove that the early use of high doses ofmethylprednisolone can improve the serum total antioxidant status of the mice with PQpoisoning.
     PartⅢThe high-dose methylprednisolone could accelerate mortality in micewith acute paraquat poisoning:Apreliminary Study
     Objective: In this study, the effects of methylprednisolone pulse therapy on micewith acute paraquat poisoning were evaluated,in order to determine if glucocorticoidscould accelerate mortality in the mice with acute paraquat poisoning.
     Methods:30mice in poisoning group were randomLy divided into6groups,which received50,70,100,150,200,and300mg/kg/d, respectively, of paraquat by i.p.injection. After recieving the same treatment as poisoning group,each of30mice intreatment group received200mg/kg of methylprednisolone by i.p. injection.5mice inMedrol control group only received200mg/kg of methylprednisolone by i.p. injection.Symptoms of poisoning in mice were observed and the LD50values between poisoninggroup and treatment group were compared.
     Results: The times o f movement of mice reduced after paraquat administration.Before death, the mice had toxicosis symptoms of a low respirator y rate,gasping breathand flapping of nose wing, and so on.The LD50values in treatment group were smallerthan that in poisoning group at either24,48or72h after exposure to paraquat.
     Conclusion: A single intraperitoneal injection of high-dose methylprednisolonecould accelerate mortality in mice with paraquat poisoning.
引文
[1]Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Duarte JA, Sánchez-Navarro A, et al.Paraquat poisonings:mechanisms of lung toxicity, clinical features, and treatment.Crit Rev Toxicol,2008,38(1):13-71.
    [2]Jeyaratnam J. Acute pesticide poisoning: a major global health problem.WorldHealth Stat Q,1990,43:139-44.
    [3]Kim SJ, Gil HW, Yang JO,et al.The clinical features of acute kidney injury inpatients with acute paraquat intoxication. Nephrol Dial Transplant,2009,24(4):1226-32.
    [4]阮艳君,菅向东,郭广冉.急性百草枯中毒发病机制及治疗的研究进展.中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2009,27(2):114-116.
    [5]Craig SA. Herbicides and fungicides. In: Viccellio P, ed.Emergency Toxicology.2nded. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Raven;1998:415-417.
    [6]Vale JA, Meredith TJ, Buckly BM. Paraquat poisoning:clinical features andimmediate general management.Hum Toxicol,1987;6:41-47.
    [7]Botella de Maglia J, Belenguer Tarin JE. Paraquat poisoning. A study of29casesand evaluation of the effectiveness of the “Caribbean scheme”. Med Clin (Barc),2000,115:530-533.
    [8]Afzali S, Gholyaf M.The effectiveness of combined treatment withmethylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide in oral paraquat poisoning. Arch Iran Med,2008,11(4):387-91.
    [9]Sabzghabaee AM, Eizadi-Mood N, Montazeri K,et al.Fatality in paraquat poisoning.Singapore Med J,2010,51(6):496-500.
    [10]Gawarammana IB, Buckley NA.Medical management of paraquat ingestion.Br JClin Pharmacol,2011,72(5):745-57.
    [11]郑雪冰,孙晓莉.百草枯中毒的治疗.中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2008,26(10):635-638.
    [12]Fukushima T, Tanaka K, Lim H, et al.Mechanism of cytotoxicity of paraquat.Environ Health Prev Med,2002,7(3):89-94.
    [13]杭瑛,朱长清.百草枯中毒与多胺摄取系统.中国急诊医学杂志,2010,919(4):443-444.
    [14]Dupiereux I, Falisse-Poirrier N, Zorzi W, et al.Protective effect of prion protein viathe N-terminal region in mediating a protective effect on paraquat-induced oxidativeinjury in neuronal cells. J Neurosci Res,2008,86(3):653-659.
    [15]Piotrowski WJ, Pietras T, Kurmanowska Z,et al.Effect of paraquat intoxication andambroxol treatment on hydrogen peroxide production and lipid peroxidation in selectedorgans of rat.JAppl Toxicol,1996,16(6):501-7.
    [16]Mitsopoulos P, Suntres ZE.Protective Effects of Liposomal N-Acetylcysteineagainst Paraquat-Induced Cytotoxicity and Gene Expression. J Toxicol,2011,2011:808967.
    [17]Zhang J, Lv G, Zhao Y.The significance of serum xanthine oxidase and oxidationmarkers in acute paraquat poisoning in humans. Clin Biochem,2011,44(2-3):221-5.
    [18]Hong SY, Hwang KY, Lee EY,et al.Effect of vitamin C on plasma total antioxidantstatus in patients with paraquat intoxication.Toxicol Lett,2002,126(1):51-59.
    [19]Yang JO, Gil HW, Kang MS,et al.Serum total antioxidant statuses of survivors andnonsurvivors after acute paraquat poisoning.Clin Toxicol (Phila),2009,47(3):226-9.
    [1]Dinis-Oliveira RJ, DuarteJA, Sánchez-NavarroA,et al.Paraquat poisonings: mechanismsof lung toxicity, clinical features, and treatment.Crit Rev Toxicol,2008,38(1):13-71.
    [2]Sun S, Wang H, Zhao G, et al.Complement inhibition alleviates paraquat-inducedacute lung injury.Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol,2011,45(4):834-42.
    [3]Lee EY,Hwang KY,Yang JO,etc.Predictors of survival after acute paraquatpoisoning. Toxicol Ind Health,2002,18:201-206.
    [4]Proudfoot AT, Stewart MS, Levitt T,etc.Lancet. Paraquat poisoning: significance ofplasma-paraquat concentrations,1979,18;2(8138):330-2.
    [5] Gil HW, Kang MS, Yang JO,et al. Association between plasma paraquat level andoutcome of paraquat poisoning in375paraquat poisoning patients.Clin Toxicol,2008,46:515-518.
    [6]Takahashi K, Cohen HJ.Selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase protein andactivity:immunological investigations on cellular and plasma enzymes. Blood,1986,68(3):640-5.
    [7]Liu C, Hong J, Yang H,et al.Frog skins keep redox homeostasis by antioxidantpeptides with rapid radical scavenging ability. Free Radic Biol Med,2010,48(9):1173-81.
    [8]俸家富,赵平武,王东.血液中总抗氧化态与疾病的关系.国际检验医学杂志,2009,30(6):571-573.
    [9]Jab ecka A, Bogdański P, Balcer N,et al.The effect of oral L-arginine supplementation on fastingglucose, HbA1c, nitric oxide and total antioxidant status in diabetic patients with atheroscleroticperipheral arterial disease of lower extremities. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2012,16(3):342-50.
    [10]Aydemir O, Akar M, Uras N, Eras Z,et al.Total antioxidant capacity and totaloxidant status in perinatal asphyxia in relation to neurological outcome. Neuropediatrics,2011,42(6):222-6.
    [11]Wang D, Feng JF, Zeng P,et al.Total oxidant/antioxidant status in sera of patientswith thyroid cancers. Endocr Relat Cancer,2011,18(6):773-82.
    [12]Osterreicher CH, Schultheiss J, Wehler M,et al.Genetic polymorphisms ofmanganese-superoxide dismutase and glutathione-S-transferase in chronic alcoholicpancreatitis. Mutagenesis,2007,22(5):305-10.
    [13]Caimi G, Canino B, Lo Presti R.Interrelationships between lipid peroxidation andtotal antioxidant status in sedentary controls and unprofessional athletes. ClinHemorheol Microcirc,2010,45(1):35-8.
    [14]Kuklinska AM, Mroczko B, Musial WJ,et al.High-sensitivity C-reactive protein andtotal antioxidant status in patients with essential arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia.Adv Med Sci,2009,54(2):225-32.
    [15]Antébi H, Mansoor O, Ferrier C,et al.Liver function and plasma antioxidant statusin intensive care unit patients requiring total parenteral nutrition: comparison of2fatemulsions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr,2004,28(3):142-8.
    [16]Ajala MO, Ogunro PS, Odun A.Effect of hemodialysis on total antioxidant status ofchronic renal failure patients in government hospitals in Lagos Nigeria. Niger J ClinPract,2011,14(2):154-8.
    [17]贾宁人,王钢.血清总抗氧化水平测定用于重症患者临床监护的意义初探,中国中西医结合急救杂志,2002,9(1):19-20.
    [18]Meulenbelt J, Vale A.Serum total antioxidant statuses of survivors and nonsurvivorsafter acute paraquat poisoning. Clin Toxicol (Phila),2009,47(3):257.
    [19]Wu D, Yotnda P.Production and detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS) incancers.J Vis Exp,2011,21(57). pii:3357
    [20] Ranjbar A, Pasalar P, Sedighi A,et al. Induction of oxidative stress in paraquatformulating workers. Toxicol Lett,2002,131(3):191-4.
    [21]Mito F, Kitagawa K, Yamasaki T, et al. Oxygen concentration dependence of lipidperoxidation and lipid-derived radical generation: application of profluorescentnitroxide switch.Free Radic Res,2011,45(9):1103-10.
    [22]Abd Ellah MR.The role of liver biopsy in detection of hepatic oxidative stress.VetMed Int,2011,14;2011:613602.
    [23]Singh SK, Dimri U, Sharma MC, et al.Determination of oxidative status andapoptosis in peripheral blood of dogs with sarcoptic mange.Vet Parasitol,2011,178(3-4):330-8.
    [24]Assady M, Farahnak A, Golestani A,et al.Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) EnzymeActivity Assay in Fasciola spp. Parasites and Liver Tissue Extract.Iran J Parasitol,20116(4):17-22.
    [25]Cagen SZ, Gibson JE.Liver damage following paraquat in selenium-deficient anddiethyl maleate-pretreated mice. ToxicolAppl Pharmacol,1977,40(2):193-200.
    [1] Min YG, Ahn JH, Chan YC, et al. Prediction of prognosis in acute paraquatpoisoning using severity scoring system in emergency department.Clin Toxicol (Phila).2011,49(9):840-5.
    [2]Huang WD, Wang JZ, Lu YQ,et al.Lysine acetylsalicylate ameliorates lung injury inrats acutely exposed to paraquat.Chin Med J (Engl).2011Aug;124(16):2496-501.
    [3]刘鹏,梁宇光,何跃忠,等.百草枯中毒的基础研究及救治进展.中国工业医学杂志,2010,2(5):364-366.
    [4]Afzali S, Gholyaf M.The effectiveness of combined treatment withmethylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide in oral paraquat poisoning. Arch Iran Med.2008,11(4):387-91.
    [5]Lin JL, Lin-Tan DT, Chen KH,et al.Repeated pulse of methylprednisolone andcyclophosphamide with continuous dexamethasone therapy for patients with severeparaquat poisoning. Crit Care Med.2006,34(2):368-73
    [6]Lin NC, Lin JL, Lin-Tan DT, et al.Combined initial cyclophosphamide with repeatedmethylprednisolone pulse therapy for severe paraquat poisoning from dermal exposure.J Toxicol Clin Toxicol.2003,41(6):877-81.
    [7]Chen GH, Lin JL, Huang YK.Combined methylprednisolone and dexamethasonetherapy for paraquat poisoning.Crit Care Med.2002,30(11):2584-7.
    [8]Zerin T, Kim YS, Hong SY, etc.Protective effect of methylprednisolone onparaquat-induced A549cell cytotoxicity via induction of efflux transporter,P-glycoprotein expression.Toxicol Lett.2012Jan25;208(2):101-7.
    [9]Liu C, Hong J, Yang H,etc.Frog skins keep redox homeostasis by antioxidantpeptides with rapid radical scavenging ability. Free Radic Biol Med.2010,48(9):1173-81.
    [10]Serra A, Domingos F, Prata MM.Paraquat intoxication.Acta Med Port.2003,16(1):25-32.
    [11]Sun S, Wang H, Zhao G, et al.Complement inhibition alleviates paraquat-inducedacute lung injury.Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol.2011,45(4):834-42.
    [12]范小勇,许震,郝向峰.乌司他丁联合甲强龙治疗百草枯中毒的疗效研究.中国实用医药,2011,6(17):53-55.
    [13]刘伟,赵敏.血必净联合甲强龙治疗百草枯中毒患者肺损伤的研究,实用药物与临床,2009,12(01):13-15.
    [14]陈文清.甲强龙治疗重度百草枯中毒30例疗效分析,吉林医学,2008,29(7):577-578.
    [15]Gawarammana IB, Buckley NA.Medical management of paraquat ingestion. Br JClin Pharmacol.2011,72(5):745-57.
    [16]Lin JL, Lin-Tan DT, Chen KH,et al.Repeated pulse of methylprednisolone andcyclophosphamide with continuous dexamethasone therapy for patients with severeparaquat poisoning.Crit Care Med.2006,34(2):368-73
    [17]Zhang Q, Wu WZ, Lu YQ,et al.Successful treatment of patients with paraquatintoxication: three case reports and review of the literature. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B.2012,13(5):413-8
    [18]Chen CM, Su B, Hsu CC,et al.Methylprednisolone does not enhance the surfactanteffects on oxygenation and histology in paraquat-induced rat lung injury.Intensive CareMed.2002,28(8):1138-44.
    [19]Young W.Methylprednisolone and spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg.2002Jan;96(1Suppl):141-2.
    [20]Jia Z, Zhu H, Li J, etc.Oxidative stress in spinal cord injury and antioxidant-basedintervention. Spinal Cord.2012,50(4):264-74.
    [21]Hall ED. Lipid antioxidants in acute central nervous system injury. Ann EmergMed.1993,22(6):1022-7.
    [22]Bracken MB, Holford TR. Neurological and status1year after acute spinal cordinjury: estimates of functional recovery in National Spinal Cord Injury Study fromresults modeled in National Spinal Cord Injury Study[J]. J Neurosurg,2002,96(3):259-266.
    [23]Hal1ED.The neuroProtective Pharmacology of methylPrednisolone. Jneurosurg,1992,76:13-22.
    [24]Mclord JM.Oxygen-derived free radical inpostischemic tissue injury.N Engl J Med,1985,321:159.
    [25]Welbourn R,Goldman G,Kobzik L,et al.Neutrophil adherence receptors(CD18)in isehemia dissociation between quantitative cell surface expression and diapedicsmediated by leukotriene B4.J Immund,1990,145:1906.
    [26]Kawamura T, Yoshioka T, Bills T,et al.Glucocorticoid activates glomerularantioxidant enzymes and protects glomeruli from oxidant injuries. Kidney Int.1991Aug;40(2):291-301.
    [27]Kjaeve J, Vaage J, Bjertnaes L.Increased microvascular permeability caused bytoxic oxygen metabolites is partly reversed by exchanging the perfusate in isolated ratlungs. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand.1989Oct;33(7):605-9.
    [1]刘鹏,梁宇光,何跃忠,等.百草枯中毒的基础研究及救治进展.中国工业医学杂志,2010,23(5):364-366.
    [2]刘鹏,何跃忠,张锡刚,等.血液灌流结合连续性静脉-静脉血液滤过对急性百草枯中毒疗效的研究.中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2011,29(4):266-269.
    [3]王庆,冯丽伟,夏春霞等.急诊抢救百草枯中毒1例.中国危重病急救医学,2009,21(11):663.
    [4]王辉,张莉.血浆吸附治疗百草枯中毒17例临床观察.中国危重病急救医学,2006,18(5):296
    [5]林涛,余华.3种不同血液净化方法治疗急性百草枯中毒疗效分析.中国中西医结合急救杂志,2009,16(2):116-117.
    [6]Gil HW, Kang MS, Yang JO,et al. Association between plasma paraquat level andoutcome of paraquat poisoning in375paraquat poisoning patients. Clin Toxicol,2008,46(6):515-518.
    [7]Castro R,Prata C,Oliveira L, et al. Paraquat intoxication and hemocarboperfusion.Acta Med Port,2005,18(6):423-431.
    [8]Afzali S,.The effectiveness of combined treatment with methylprednisolone andcyclophosphamide in oral paraquat poisoning.Arch Iran Med,2008,11(4):387-391.
    [9]Dinis RJ, Duarte JA, Sánchez-Navarro A. Paraquat poisonings: mechanisms of lungtoxicity, clinical features, and treatment. Crit Rev Toxicol,2008,38(1):13-71.
    [10]孔庆福,张华,王丽等.急性百草枯中毒早期器官损害与细胞因子的变化.中国中西医结合急救杂志,2010,17(3)159-162.
    [11]Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Duarte JA,Remiao F,et al.Single high dose dexamethasonetreatment decreases the pathological score and increases the survival rate of paraquat-intoxicated rats[J]. Toxicology,2006,227(12):73-85.
    [12]刘鹏,何跃忠,王浩春,等.急性百草枯中毒患者预后影响因素的研究.中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,211,29(3):212-215..
    [13]刘为义,李作吉,杨光.地塞米松致白细胞增多不良反应38例分析.药学实践杂志,2006,24(4):244-246.
    [1] Proudfoot AT, Stewart MJ, Levitt T, et al. Paraquat poisoning: significance ofplasma-paraquat concentration.Lancet1979,2,330-332.
    [2]陈灏珠.实用内科学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.163-764.
    [3]Yoon SC. Clinical outcome of paraquat poisoning.Korean J Intern Med,2009,24(2):93-94.
    [4]冯红军.急性百草枯中毒进展[J].中国现代临床医学杂志,2007,6(23):33-36.
    [5]白光兴,李晋.百草枯中毒的基础和临床研究进展.西南国防医药,2008,18(4):615-617.
    [6]高夫海,早期彻底清除消化道用于百草枯中毒41例疗效观察.中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2008,11(18):886-887.
    [7]Marc Licker, Alexander Schweizer,Laurent Hohn. Single lung transplantation foradult respiratory distress syndrome after paraquat poisoning.Thorax,1998,53(7):620-621.
    [8]Hoet PH,Lewis CP,Demedts M,et al.Putrescine and paraquat uptake in human lungslices and isolated Ⅱt ype pneumocytes.Biochemical pharmacology,1994,48(3):517-524.
    [9]Hoet PH,Dinsdale D,Lewis CP,et al.Kinetics and cellular locatization of putrescineuptake in human lung tissue. Thorax,1993,48(12):1235-1241.
    [10]Forman HJ,Aldrich TK,Posner MA,et al.Differential paraquat uptake and redoxkinetics of rat granular pneumocytes and alveolar macrophages.J pharmacol expther,1982,221(2):428-433.
    [11]Bismuth C,Sherrmann JM,Garnier R,et al.Elimination of paraquat. HumToxicol,1987,6,63-67.
    [12]Moon-Soo Kang, Hyo-Wook Gil,Jong-Oh Yang, et al. Comparison between kidneyand hemoperfusion for paraquat elimination. J Korean Med Sci,2009;24(Suppl1):S156-60.
    [13]Lock EA,Ishmael J,et al.The acute toxic effects of paraquat and diquat on the ratkidney.ToxicolAppl. Pharmacol.1979,50:67-76.
    [14]Sae-Yong Honga, Jong-Oh Yanga, Eun-Young Lee, et al. Effect of haemoperfusionon plasma paraquat concentration in vitro and in vivo. Toxicology and Industrial Health.2003,19:17-23.
    [15]Yasaka T, Okudaria K, Fujito H, et al. Further studies of lipid peroxidation inhuman paraquat poisoning. Arch Intern Med,1986,146(4):681-685.
    [16]赵玉红,邱泽武.急性百草枯中毒及其治疗.药物不良反应杂志,2006,8(32):42-44.
    [17]Tsukamata M, Tampo Y, Sawada M, et al. Paraquat-induced oxidative stress anddysfunction of the glutathione redox cycle in pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells.ToxicolAppl Pharmacol,2002,178(2):82-92.
    [18]Wong RC, Stevens JR. Paraquat toxicity in vitro.I.Pulmonary alveolar macrophages.J toxicol Environ Health,1985,15(3-4):417-429.
    [19]高艳敏,赵雄,丁佳,等.百草枯中毒大鼠的肝损伤及抗氧化药物对其保护作用.肝病,2009,14(10):210-213.
    [20]Chollet A, Muszynsky J, Bismuth C, et al. Hypo-oxygenation in paraquatpoisoning:Apropos of6cases.Toxicol.Eur.Res,1983,5:71-75.
    [21]Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Duarte JA,Remiao F,et al.Single high dose dexamethasonetreatment decreases the pathological score and increases the survival rate ofparaquat-intoxicated rats. Toxicology,2006,227(12):73-85.
    [22]Lin JL,Wei MC,Liu YC.Pulse therapy with cyclophosphamide andmethylprednisolone in patients with moderate to severe paraquat poisoning:Apreliminary report. Thorax,1996,51:661-663.
    [23]Kwon-Hyun Lee1, Hyo-Wook GIL1, Young-Tong Kim,et al. Marked recoveryfrom paraquat-induced lung injury during long-term follow-up. The Korean Journal ofInternal Medicine.2009,24(2):95-100.
    [24]Marc Licker, Alexander Schweizer, Laurent Hohn. Single lung transplantation foradult respiratory distress syndrome after paraquat poisoning. Thorax,1998,53:620-621.
    [25]曹钰,董玉龙,等.急性百草枯中毒所致急性肺损伤机制研究.中国呼吸与危重病监护杂志,2005,4(11):303-305.
    [26]Senator A, Rachidi W, Lehmann S, et al. Prion protects against DNA damageinduced by paraquat in cultured cells. Free radical Biology andmedicine,2004,37(8):1224-1230.
    [27]Sorensen M,Loft S.No significant paraquat induced oxidative DNA damage inrats.Free Radic,2000,32(5):423-428.
    [28]Peng J, Mao XO, Stevenson FF, et al.The herbicide paraquat induces dopaminergicnigral apoptosis through sustained activation of the JNK pathway.J BiolChem,2004,279(31),32626-232632.
    [29]Kim S J, Kim J E, Moon I S. Paraquat induces apoptosis of cultured rat cortical cell.Mol Cells.2004,17(1):102-107.
    [30]Kang X, Chen J, Xu Z, et al. Protective effects of Ginkgo biloba extraction paraquatinduced apoptosis of PC12cells. Toxicol Vitro,2007,21(6):1003-1009.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700