用户名: 密码: 验证码:
巴麦地区小海子组礁滩体的识别与沉积储层综合研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
生物礁是一种特殊的碳酸盐岩构造体,主要由生物构筑而成。自上世纪八十年代以来,国内外地质专家对各个时代生物礁的成因、结构、类型、相带划分、成岩作用、生长发育演化规律等作了广泛的研究,取得了丰硕成果。近年来的一些地球物理工作者对生物礁的地震鉴别也做了一些探索性研究,然而对区域性生物礁及其含油气性预测研究相对较少。因此,本文以地质、地面地质调查资料、测井、岩心、三维地震、测试分析和前人研究成果为基础,利用岩石学、石油地质学、构造地质学、地球物理学、沉积学、地震地层学等学科交叉的优势,配合三维地震处理及解释技术对塔里木盆地巴麦地区石炭纪的生物礁滩复合体及其可能形成的油气藏作了较详细的研究。
     塔里木盆地石炭纪是一个北、东、南三面被隆起环绕向西南开口并变深的克拉通盆地,全盆大部分地区发育了生屑灰岩、标准灰岩、小海子组灰岩三套灰岩层。巴麦地区即塔西南地区巴楚隆起—麦盖提斜坡,具有台地边缘—斜坡的古构造和古地理背景。钻井在小海子组灰岩中揭示了数米至十数米广泛分布的高能浅滩亮晶颗粒碳酸盐岩,它们与塔中和塔北地区低能泥晶灰岩明显不同。这种台地边缘和典型的浅滩沉积暗示了该区可能具有发育生物礁的环境特征。在先巴扎600km2三维地震探区,通过差异厚度法、底面拉平法、地震属性法、正反演模型法等识别出小海子组发育近东西向的台地边缘障壁礁,东西走向延伸超过25km,超出了三维地震工区范围,其周边二维地震测线也具礁滩复合体响应。礁核区小海子组灰岩最厚62m,礁外的小海子组50m。台缘斜坡南倾,坡度陡,水平宽度1-2km。礁后生屑滩北倾,坡度缓,水平宽度3-6km。三维区内障壁礁由6个礁块呈串珠状连接而成,礁块之间为窄的入潮口。礁外主要为生屑及鲕粒灰岩浅滩。由于印支和喜山构造运动,礁体后期东抬西降,上倾方向被北北西向断裂错断。尽管如此,临近钻井表明该区可能存在多种与该礁滩体有关的油气藏,该礁滩体的发现揭示了巴麦地区油气勘探的新领域。
     论文的主要研究内容和关键成果如下:
     ①通过钻井地震相结合的长距离大范围层序地层对比,提出了塔里木盆地满加尔和塔河地区的石炭系巴楚组盐岩段分布于中泥岩段与标准灰岩段之间,在巴麦地区该层位被命名为卡拉沙依组膏云岩段,其实二者应属于同一层位。该研究成果对区域地层对比和油气勘探研究具有重要的参考价值。
     ②首次在塔里木盆地巴麦地区石炭系小海子组识别出生物礁滩复合体,其证据在古构造古地理背景、露头、岩心、地球物理正演、反演和属性分析等方面得到了相互印证。
     ③通过精细地震解释对礁体展布特征进行了定量研究。六个礁异常体群的分布面积可达153.34km2,占研究区三维工区面积的25.6%,礁体平均厚度20m。呈串珠状北东东向横跨三维工区南部,北东变宽,北西变窄。
     ④提出地质与地球物理有机结合是生物礁滩体研究的可靠手段。即通过古构造、古地理环境分析明确适合礁滩体发育的位置,通过露头、岩心和地震反射标志对礁滩体进行定性认识,通过井震结合的地球物理正演、反演和属性分析对礁滩体的形态特征和展布进行定量刻画。本次研究认为,均方根振幅属性图能有效反映礁滩复合体面积及形态;相干体属性能较准确识别断裂及礁体陡坡与缓坡界线。
     ⑤系统分析了巴麦地区生物礁滩体的沉积相和微相特征,总结了礁滩体发育模式。根据现场踏勘及岩石结构、类型、构造、生物及剖面结构特征等,结合区域岩相古地理及地震属性分析资料,确定塔西南巴麦地区小海子组主要发育台地边缘礁滩、局限台地及潮坪三种沉积相带;进一步将礁体以东地区滩相细致划分为砂屑滩、鲕粒滩、生屑滩、半局限台地鲕粒滩、豆粒滩及开阔台地滩间海相。
     ⑥查明了巴麦地区生物礁滩体的储层特征和控制因素,并结合油气成藏模式分析,指出其勘探潜力。根据先巴扎三维区几口井的岩心观察得出,小海子组的储集空间类型主要为裂缝、溶孔型,油气成藏富集规律研究表明:塔里木盆地巴麦地区石炭系小海子组礁滩可能形成的油气藏具有受构造和储层复合控制油气富集成藏的特点;虽然在巴楚隆起隆升过程中的断裂和掀斜作用对小海子组生物礁及其可能形成的油气藏发生了一定的破坏,但与礁前、礁后、入潮口相变和断裂遮挡封堵有关的圈闭油气藏仍有可能部分地保留下来,是该区今后油气勘探的一个新领域。根据断裂断距大小和对礁滩储层的封堵性以及古构造演化对油气聚集的控制,可将三维区礁滩储层分为有利勘探区和较有利勘探区。
Reefs is a special kind of carbonate structure that were mainly built with biology, it is belonged to hydrocarbon bearing sedimentary type with a broad hydrocarbon potential. Since1980s, home and abroad experts have made great achievements on extensively research of the reefs geological formation, structure, type, facies classification, diagenesis, growth evolution rules in different period. In recent years, some of the geophysicist also did exploratory research on seismic identification of reef, but the regional hydrocarbon potential of reef and its prediction research are relatively few. Therefore, based on geological, ground geology survey data, logging, core,3D seismic, analysis of samples and previous research as the foundation, using petrology, petroleum geology, tectonic geology, geophysics, sedimentology, such as seismic stratigraphy of interdisciplinarity advantage with3D seismic processing and interpretation techniques and reservoir prediction techniques, the reef and bank complex reservoir in Tarim Basin was found and its hydrocarbon prediction has been studied in details.
     Tarim Basin is surrounded on north, east and south three sides by the uplift southwest openings and darker craton basin during Carboniferous, bioclastic limestone, standard limestone and Xiaohaizi limestone developed in most parts of the whole basin. Bamai area stands for Bachu uplift-Maikit slope in south-western regions of Tarim Basin with the platform margin-slope ancient tectonic paleogeographic background. A few to ten meters of high-energy shallow bank sparry particles carbonate was revealed by drilling in Xiaohaizi formation which are markedly different from low-energy micritic limestone in Tazhong and Tabei area. This platform margin and typical shallow bank sedimentary implies a reef development environment. Through the difference thickness method, the underside flattened method, seismic attribute method and forward and inverse model method in three-dimensional seismic exploration area of600km2in Bamai area, a nearly east-west platform margin barrier reef was identified, its east-west direction extends more than25km which beyond the scope of3D seismic work area, neighboring two-dimensional seismic line also had special response. Reef core limestone in Xiaohaizi formation is62m thick the most, surrounding with50m thick of limestone outside the reef core area. Platform margin slope is a south tilting steep slope, horizontal width1-2km. organic bank behind reefs is a north tilting slow slope, horizontal width3-6km. This barrier reef and bank complex contains6reef cores which take the shape of moniliform in3D seismic work area, inlets are in between. Outside Reef is shallow bank composed mainly bioclastic and oolitic limestone. Reefs body were eastern lift up and western dropped down by the Indo-China and Himalayan tectonic movement and were cut by a NNW fault on the up-tilt direction. Nonetheless, wells near reefs show that reef-bank complex related reservoirs are possibly exist, and its discovery reveals a new field of oil and gas exploration in Bamai area.
     The main research results are as follows:
     (1) Through long distance and large-scale sequence stratigraphic correlation using well and seismic combination, salt rock of was found developed only between the Mid-mudstone Formation and the Standard Limestone Formation in Manjiaer depression and Tahe area, which was named Karratha Formation in Bachu area, in fact, the two should belong to the same layer. The research has important reference value to the regional stratigraphic correlation, and oil and gas exploration.
     (2) Identification of the reef-bank complex of Xiaohaizi Fromation in Bamai area in Tarim Basin was made at the first time, its evidence was mutual confirmed by the paleogeographical paleostructure outcrop, core, geophysical forward modeling, inversion and attribute analysis.
     (3) Through the fine seismic interpretation, the quantitative of the distribution characteristics of the reef-bank complex was studied. Six reef abnormal distribution area of the group of up to153.34km2, accounting for25.6%of the area in3D work area, the average thickness of the reef is20m. It was beaded NEE narrowing across the southern part of the3D work area, north east wider than north west.
     (4)Geology and Geophysics combination research can be a reliable method of reef study. Using paleotectonic and paleogeographic environment to analyse the location of the reef-bank complex development, and a qualitative understanding of the reef can be achieve by outcrop, core and seismic reflection, then quantitative study of morphological characteristics and distribution of the reef can be carried out through the combination of geophysical well seismic inversion, forward and attribute analysis. This study suggests that the RMS(root mean-square) amplitude attributes can effectively reflect the area and form of reef-bank complex; coherence attributes can accurately identify faults and borders between reef steep slope and slow slope.
     (5) Facies and microfacies characteristics of Bamai area were studied, and the development model of reef-bank complex was summarized. Site reconnaissance and rock structure, type, structure, bio and profile structure characteristics, combined with regional lithofacies paleogeography and seismic attribute analysis data, three sedimentary facies were found in Xiaohaizi Fromation, reef-bank platform margin, restricted platform and tidal, bank on the east of the reef was meticulous divided into calcarenite bank, oolitic bank, bioclastic bank, semi-restricted platform of oolitic bank, beans bank and open platform inter-bank marine.
     (6)Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of the reef-bank complex in Bamai area were identified, combined with the hydrocarbon accumulation model, the exploration potential was pointed out. According to the well core observation of XBZ3D work area, reservoir space was mainly cracks and dissolving type, reservoir property and the hydrocarbon enrichment regularity study shows that this reef-banks reservoir had complex characteristics of controlling by both structure sealing and reservoirs; although the uplift process in Bachu area may occurred some damage to reef and its possible traps, but the facies transformation of before, after reef, inlets and fracture reservoirs relevant traps are still may partly be reserved, it can be a new field of oil and gas exploration in the future.From hydrocarbon accumulation conditions comprehensive analysis, the abnormal body reefs in this research area possess the basic condition of forming large reservoirs.
引文
[1]A. Vecsei. Fore-reef carbonate production:development of a regional census-based method and first estimates[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,2001, 175:185-200
    [2]Allen M. B and Vincent S J. Structural features of northern Tarim basin:Implications for regional tectonics and petroleum traps:Discussion[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1999,83 (8): 1279-1283
    [3]Brown A. R. Interpretation of three-dimentional seismic data[J]. AAPG,Mem,1999,42 (5): 97-188
    [4]Cooke D A,Schneider W A. Generalized linear inversion of reflection seismic data[J]. Geophysics,1983,48 (6):665-676
    [5]Cumings,E. R.. Bull. Geol. Soc. America,1932,43:331-352
    [6]Evan N. Edinger,Gino V. Limmon,Jamaluddin Jompa,et al. Normal coral growth rates on dying reefs:are coral growth rates good indicators of reef health[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin,2000,40(5):404-425
    [7]Evan N. Edinger.Jamaluddin Jompa,Gino V. Limmon. Reef degradation and coral biodiversity in Indonesia:Effects of land-based pollution, destructive fishing practises and changes over time[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin,1998,36(8):617-630
    [8]Fontaine J. M..R. Cussey,J. Lacaze.et al. Seismic interpretation of carbonate depositional environments [J]. AAPG Bulletin,1987,71 (3):281-297
    [9]Garry R. Russ, Laurence J. McCook. Potential effects of a cyclone on benthic algal production and yield to grazers on coral reefs across the central Great Barrier Reef[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,1999,235:237-254
    [10]James B. Wood. Caribbean reef squid, Sepioteuthis sepioidea,use ink as a defense against predatory French grunts,Haemulon flavolineatum[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,2010, (38):20-27
    [11]James N. P. Reef environment in carbonate depositional environment[J]. AAPG,Mem,1983,33:345-643
    [12]Jerome Chablais,Tetsuji Onoue, Rossana Martini. Upper Triassic reef-limestone blocks of southwestern Japan:New data from a Panthalassan seamount[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,2010,293:206-222
    [13]Jody M. Webstera,Juan Carlos Bragad.David A. Clague et al. Coral reef evolution on rapidly subsiding margins[J]. Global and Planetary Change,2009,66 (1-2):129-148
    [14]L.B. Collins,Z.R.Zhu,K.H. Wyrwoll. The structure of the Easter Platform, Houtman Abrolhos Reefs:Pleistocene foundations and Holocene reef growth[J]. Marine Geology, 1996,135:1-13
    [15]Ladd,H. S. Nat. Res. Coun. Div. Geol. and Geogr Ann. Report[R],1994,26-29
    [16]Lowenstam,H. A. Jour. Geology,1950,58:430-438
    [17]Mark M. Littler,Diane S.Littler.Barrett L. Brooks. The effects of nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment on algal community development:Artificial mini-reefs on the Belize Barrier Reef sedimentary lagoon[J]. Harmful Algae,2010,9:255-263
    [18]Michael P. Lesser, Marc Slattery,James J. Leichter. Ecology of mesophotic coral reefs[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,2009,375:1-8
    [19]Nelson,H. F., Brown,C. W.,and Brineman,J. H. A. A. P. G. mem,1962,1:224-252
    [20]P. Chabanet,V. Dufourb,Galzin. Disturbance impact on reef fish communities in reunion island (Indian Ocean)[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,1995, 188:29-48
    [21]Paul Copper. Reef development at the Frasnian/Famennian mass extinction boundary [J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,2002,181:27-65
    [22]Robert Riding. Structure and composition of organic reefs and carbonate mud mounds: concepts and categories[J]. Earth-Science Reviews,2000,58:163-231
    [23]Vincent, B, Ambeau.C. R,Mmanuel, L. E.Loreau, J. P. Sedimentology and trace element geochemistry of shallow-marine carbonates:an approach to paleoenvironmental analysis along the Pagny-sur-Meuse Section (Upper Jurassic,France)[J]. Facies,2006,52 (1): 69-84
    [24]Walker. C. T. Evaluation of boron as a paleosalinity indicator and its application to offshore prospects[J]. AAPG Bull,1968,52:751-76
    [25]Walter C. Jaap. Coral reef restoration[J]. Ecological Engineering,2000,15:345-364
    [26]Wilson,J.L.Carbnate facies in geologic historty[M]. New York:Springer Verlag,1975,471
    [27]蔡希源.塔里木盆地大中型油气田成控因素与展布规律[J].石油与天然气地质.2007,28(6):693-702
    [28]蔡希源.塔里木盆地台盆区油气成藏条件与勘探方向[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(4):590-597
    [29]陈永权,周新源.杨文静,等.塔里木盆地寒武系自云崭的主要成因类型及其储层评价[J].地层沉积.2009,14(4):17
    [30]程刚,丁琳.生物礁与其他岩隆的地震特征对比[J].中国西部油气地质,2006,2(3): 329-332
    [31]楚宪波.塔中地区上古生界地震构造制图与演化研究[D].西安:西北大学硕士论·文,2008
    [32]丁孝忠,郭宪璞,彭阳.新疆塔里木盆地白垩—第三纪沉积相及储集体分析[J].岩石矿物学杂志.2001,20(2):146-155
    [33]丁跃潮,杨品.塔里木盆地西部石炭、二叠系划分对比[J].新疆石油地质.1998,19(6):498-528
    [34]范嘉松,张维.生物礁的基本概念、分类及识别特征[J].岩石学报,1985,1(3):45-61
    [35]范嘉松等.广两、贵州和川东二叠纪生物礁的钙藻化石及其古生态环境[J].微体古生物学报,2002,19(4):337-347
    [36]范嘉松.中国生物礁与油气[M].海洋出版社,1996:1-150
    [37]冯增昭.中国沉积学[M].石油工业山版社,1994:1-198
    [38]冯增昭.沉积岩石学[M].石油工业出版社,1986:1-206
    [39]高岩,赵秀岐等.塔里木盆地层序地层学及非圈闭构造[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:1-130
    [40]巩恩普,关广岳.石炭纪生物绝灭事件对造礁群落的影响[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),1998,19(2):122-124
    [41]巩恩普.辽宁本溪本溪组生物礁的发现[J].地层学杂志,1992,16(3):222-228
    [42]顾家裕,张兴阳,郭彬程.塔里木盆地东河砂岩沉积和储层特征及综合分析[J].古地理学报,2006,8(3):285-294
    [43]顾家裕,朱筱敏,贾进华,等.塔里木盆地沉积与储层[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:1-255
    [44]何登发,李德生.塔里木盆地构造演化与油气聚集[M].北京:地质出版社,1996:617-621
    [45]何发岐,翟晓先,俞仁连,等.塔河油田石炭系卡拉沙依组沉积与成因分析[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(3):258-262
    [46]黄智斌,杜品德,张师本.塔里木盆地石炭系卡拉沙依组的厘定[J].地层学杂志,2005,29(1):55-61
    [47]贾承造,张师本,吴绍组等,塔里木盆地及周边地层上册[M],科学出版社,2004:100-247
    [48]贾承造.中国塔里木盆地构造特征与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997:1-438
    [49]蒋晓光.生物礁隐蔽油气藏的精细研究—以滨里海盆地生物礁油气藏的预测为例[D].成都:成都理工大学,2006
    [50]金善炳,鞠天吟.中国南方震旦纪—三叠纪生物礁分布特征、成因及储集性能的研究[M].上海科学技术出版社,1998:1-152
    [51]金雨溪.生物礁分类及研究方法综述[J].内江科技,2005,(3):76
    [52]康志宏,魏历灵.塔里木盆地油气藏形成期分析[J].新疆石油地质,2001,,22(6):462-464
    [53]赖仲康.如向判别地震资料极性做好井约束反演[J].新疆石油地质,1999.,20(4):302-306
    [54]李洪辉,张光亚,刘建新,等.塔里木盆地巴楚断隆油气勘探模式[J].石油勘探与开发,1998,25(5):11-13
    [55]李罗照.塔里木盆地石炭—二叠纪生物地层[M],北京:地质出版社,1997,17-35.
    [56]李梅,乌光辉,韩剑发,等.塔中Ⅰ号坡折带礁滩体油气成藏机理分析[C].第十一届全国有机地球化学学术会议,2007.
    [57]李庆忠.论地震约束反演的策略石油地球物理勘探[J].1998,33(4):423-438
    [58]李庆忠.走向精确勘探的道路[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994:1-7
    [59]李学义.四川盆地碳酸盐岩地区地震勘探技术难点及对策探讨[J].天然气工业.2000,20(2):12-17
    [60]林畅松.塔里木盆地形成演和构造作用报告[R].乌鲁木齐:中国石化西部新区勘探指挥部,2004
    [61]刘企英.利用地震信息进行油气预测[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994:23-156
    [62]刘殊,杨继友.一个可能的生物礁预测[J].石油物探,2004.43(1):20-25
    [63]刘新华,柳祖汉,杨孟达.黔南布寨泥盆纪生物礁的初步研究[J].地质科学,2004,39(1):92-97
    [64]柳祖汉,刘新华,,杨孟达,等,.贵州布寨泥盆纪生物礁的古生物学和古生态学特征[J].湖南科技人学学报(自然科学版).2003,18(3):29-32
    [65]罗金海,周新源,邱斌,等.塔里木盆地西部中、新生代5次构造事件及其石油地质学意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(1):18-22
    [66]罗平,张兴阳,顾家裕,等.塔里术盆地奥陶系生物礁露头的地球物理特征[J].沉积学报.2003,21(3):423-427
    [67]罗群,郑德山,孙宏智.地质地震综合地层划分对比法及其应用[J].江汉石油学院学报.2001,23(1):26-29
    [68]麻建明,侯明才,陈洪德,等.晚古生代右江盆地层序格架中的生物礁[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版).2005.,32(1):34-40
    [69]孟庆龙,李曰俊,师骏,等.塔里木盆地西部色力布亚断裂和康西断裂的主要特征及活动时代[J].地质科学,2008,43(2):282-293
    [70]牟传龙,谭钦银,王立全.四川宣汉盘龙洞晚二叠世生物礁古油藏的发现及其重要意义[J].地质论评.2003,(3):315
    [71]牟中海,肖又军,王国林,等.从岩相古地理论塔里木盆地西南地区石炭系油气潜景[J].地球学报,2001,22(1):79-84
    [72]欧阳睿,焦存礼,白利华.塔里木盆地塔中地区生物礁特征及分布[J].石油勘探与开发.2003,30(2):33-36
    [73]潘仁芳.苏里格庙气田盒8段砂岩AVO正演模型研究[J].天然气工业,2002,22(5):7-10
    [74]蒲仁海.钙质含量旋回在卡拉沙依组小层对比中的应用[J].地层学杂志,2005,29(3):264-269
    [75]齐文同,范嘉淞,等.生物礁生态系统演化历史与地球环境的进化[J].地学前缘.2002,9(3):21
    [76]钱荣钧,王尚旭,詹世凡等.石油地球物理勘探技术进展[M],北京:石油工业出版社,2006:21-10
    [77]丘中建,龚再生主编.中国油气勘探[M].石油工业出版社.1999:1-111
    [78]邱燕.利用地震地层学方法在珠江口盆地寻找生物礁尝试[J].天然气工业,1987,(2):6-10
    [79]阮状,于炳松,朱金富.塔里木盆地奥陶系礁滩相储集体特征[J].现代地质,2009,23(4):691-698
    [80]沈安江等.南盘江地区二叠纪生物礁成因类型及潜伏礁预测[J].石油勘探与开发.2001,28(3):29-32
    [81]宋裕发,张永辂,刘家润.湖南新邵巨口铺中泥盆世棋梓桥期生物礁群落生态[J].古生物学报,1994,33(6):739-755
    [82]孙林,陈笑青,张亚中,等.多方法识别和预测盐下生物礁[J].石油地球物理勘 探,2009,44(增刊1):79-83
    [83]孙龙德.碳酸盐岩油气成藏理论及勘探开发技术[M].石油工业出版社,2007:1-6
    [84]孙永传.碎屑岩沉积相和沉积环境[M].地质出版社,1985:1-59
    [85]田树刚.东昆仑早一中二叠世生物礁建造特征[J].地质学报,2002,76(2):145-154
    [86]万超,李双应,王松,等.塔里木盆地侏罗—白垩纪古气候研究[J].安徽地质,2010,20(1):25-29
    [87]王芳,温志峰,钟建华,等.柴达木盆地西部生物礁的识别与测井解释[J].测井技术,2005,29(2):133-136
    [88]王黎栋,于炳松,张永旺,等.塔里木盆地康克林组沉积期沉积相及相模式[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(6):707-712
    [89]王龙樟.塔里木盆地阿瓦提—满加尔坳陷三叠—侏罗纪沉积物源变迁[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报.2000,25(1):39-42
    [90]王瑞,焦养泉,吴立群,等.重庆开县上二叠统长兴组红花生物礁成礁模式[J].古地理学报,,2009,,11(2):157-166
    [91]王毅,纪友亮,熊继辉,等.塔里木盆地上泥盆统与石炭系层序地层分析[J].沉积学报,1998,,16(2):75-81
    [92]王招明,田军,申银民,等.塔里木盆地晚泥盆世-早石炭世东河砂岩沉积相[J].古地理学报,2004,6(3):289-296
    [93]卫平生,刘全新,张景廉,等.再论生物礁与大油气田的关系[J].石油学报,2006,27(2):38-42
    [94]吴川,朱青奇,常炳章,等.利用地展模型正演技术进行井间储层横向预测[J].石油地球物理勘探,1998,33(增刊2):82-85
    [95]吴亚生,范嘉松,金玉开.晚二叠世末的生物礁出露及其意义[J].地质学报,2003,77(3):289-296
    [96]奚瑾秋,刘宝珺.碳酸盐沉积和生物礁—国外研究现状[J].岩相古地理,1990(4):41-48
    [97]肖世禄,吴绍祖.地层的划分,新疆柯坪地区石炭系—二叠系及其生物群[M].北京:海洋出版社,1987:1-31
    [98]谢用良.模型正演技术在川西地区砂体预测中的应用研究[J].天然气工业,2004,24(10):35-37
    [99]徐怀大,王世凤,陈开远.地震地层学基础[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1990:28-50
    [100]徐向华,周庆凡,张玲.塔里木盆地油气储量及其分布特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(3):300-303
    [101]许杰,郭建华,何治亮.塔里木盆地石炭系层序地层研究[J].海洋地质动态.2008,,24(10):19-28
    [102]阎建国.生物礁地球物理响应特征及储层预测[D].成都:成都理工大学,2008
    [103]姚逢昌,甘利灯.地震反演的应用与限制[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(2):53-56.
    [104]叶俭.鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘奥陶纪生物礁[M].北京:地质出版社,1995:1-74
    [105]曾鼎乾,刘炳温,黄蕴明.中国各地质历史时期生物礁[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1988:1-51
    [106]曾鼎乾.世界礁油气藏文献汇编[G].南海西部石油公司,1985
    [107]张德林.地震资料油气显示研究原理与实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000:1-120
    [108]张继庆.四川盆地及邻区晚二叠世生物礁[M].北京:地质出版社,1990:1-92
    [109]张静,王彦春,陈启林,等.储层特征曲线重构技术在储层预测中的应用研究[J].2008,19(3):396-401
    [110]张琳婷.塔里木盆地二叠系层序地层学研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2009
    [111]张师本,黄智斌.塔里木盆地覆盖区显生宙地层[M].北京:石油工业出版社.,2004:1-158
    [112]张师本,王成源.从牙形刺动物群论依木干他乌组的时代[M].地层学杂志,1995,19(2):133-135
    [113]张万选.陆相断陷盆地区域地震地层学研究[M].北京:石油大学出版社,1988:56-79
    [114]张维,张孝林.中国南方二叠纪生物礁与古生态[M].北京:地质出版社,1992:1-86
    [115]张现军,王月华,玛丽克,等.塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡西段上石炭统研究新进展[J].新疆石油地质,2006,27(1):56-58
    [116]张翔,田景春,彭军.塔里木盆地志留—泥盆纪岩相古地理及时空演化特征研究[J].沉积学报,2008,26(5):762-771
    [117]张一伟,金之钧,刘国臣,等.塔里木盆地环满加尔地区主要不整合形成过程及剥蚀量研究.地学前缘,2000,7(4):449-457
    [118]张银.巴麦地区上古生界地震构造制图与演化研究[D].西安:西北大学,2008
    [119]张增耀,杨松岭,赵秀岐.塔里木盆地盆内震旦系特征[J].海相油气地质,2007,12(2):51-56
    [120]张仲培,王毅,云金表,等.塔里木盆地台盆区海西期地质事件及其油气成藏效应[J].大庆石油学院学报,2007,31(4):1-6
    [121]赵澄林,朱筱敏.沉积岩石学(第三版)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:121-157
    [122]赵靖舟,王清华.塔里木古生界克拉通盆地海相油气富集规律与古隆起控油气论[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(6):703-712
    [123]赵秀岐,张振生,李洪文.塔里木盆地石炭系层序地层学及岩相古地理研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,1995,30(4):533-545
    [124]赵治信.塔里木盆地石油地质研究新进展[M].北京:科学出版社,1996:1-7
    [125]赵重远,张小会,任战利,等.油气成藏动态预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2002,23 (4):314-320
    [126]赵宗举,潘文庆,张丽娟,等.塔里木盆地奥陶系层序地层格架[J].大地构造与成矿学,2009,33(1):175-188
    [127]郑显华.塔里木盆地西部巴楚—麦盖提地区石油地质特征及勘探建议[J].石油实验地质,1995,17(2):114-119
    [128]钟建华,温志峰,李勇.生物礁的研究现状与发展趋势[J].地质论评,2005,51(3):288-299
    [129]周环玲.广西环江泥盆纪生物礁[C].岩相古地理文集,1985
    [130]周路,赵文智,何登发.塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡油气地质与勘探[M].石油工业出版社,2006,6:42-68
    [131]周义军,熊玉萍.模型正演技术在鄂托克前旗地区的应用[J].石油物探,2008,47(2):161-166
    [132]周志毅,赵治信,胡兆殉,等.塔里木盆地各纪地层[M].北京:科学出版社,2001:103-170
    [133]朱广生.地震资料储层预测方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995:56-89
    [134]朱怀诚,张师本.塔里木盆地泥盆系-石炭系界线研究新进展[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(增刊):370-372
    [135]朱如凯,罗平.塔里木盆地晚泥盆世及石炭纪岩相古地理[[J].古地理学报.2002,4 (1):13-24
    [136]朱筱敏.塔里木盆地重点层系储盖层评价,北京:石油工业出版社,2003:12-45
    [137]朱筱敏,王贵文,谢庆宾.塔里木盆地志留系沉积体系及分布特征[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2002,26(3):5-11

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700