基于社会网络的虚拟社区知识共享研究
|
摘要
在知识经济时代,知识这种无形资源正逐步取代传统的有形资源(如土地、自然资源、资本和劳动力等)成为推动社会进步的关键因素,“知识就是力量”即是对此最好的诠释。然而大部分的组织和个人不可能拥有其所需的所有知识,而必须依赖与外界的知识共享来获取新的知识。
随着互联网技术的发展和普及,人与人之间的知识共享与交流不一定需要面对面,还可以凭借各种电子媒介,形成新的网上交流空间--虚拟社区(Virtual Community)。虚拟社区这种新的交流方式使得知识的共享与传播达到了前所未有的迅捷和广度,顺应了人们迫切的知识共享与学习的需求,在短短的时间里得到了迅猛发展,引起了理论界和企业界的关注,虚拟社区的兴起被认为是知识管理研究的重要推动力。
作为互联网上的交流平台,丰富的知识、热烈的讨论、及时的互动是虚拟社区繁荣发展的重要标志,如果社区内的成员积极参与知识共享,使虚拟社区成为汇集人气的空间和平台,那么他们也就会为虚拟社区经营者创造更大的利益,因此虚拟社区经营者的重要目标之一就是促进社区内成员之间的知识共享与交流。虽然虚拟社区为知识共享提供了一个便捷的交流平台,但并不是只要建了它,人们就会积极来参与共享。相对于知名社区网站,还有很多虚拟社区面临着用户参与不足、知识共享交流气氛不浓等问题,以致社区创建之后很快便走向衰落。因此,有必要研究虚拟社区中知识共享行为的形成机制与影响因素,进而探寻提高虚拟社区知识共享水平的措施。
从严格意义上来说,知识并不能脱离作为其主体的人而单独存在,知识是隐藏在人脑之中的,所以知识的共享传播是通过人与人之间的交互而产生的。近年来,学者们越来越关注知识共享活动背后的人与人之间的社会关系网络,基于社会网络的知识共享研究成为新兴的研究范式。该范式从社会网络的关系和结构角度来分析知识共享行为。
目前基于社会网络的知识共享研究大都是针对团队或组织的,这些研究多采用实证研究的方法通过对各种横向数据的分析研究影响知识共享行为的社会网络中的关系和结构因素。虚拟社区的虚拟性和开放性使得虚拟社区的知识共享有别于传统组织、团队中的知识共享,有其特殊性。虚拟社区中知识共享的过程和特点有待进一步的探讨分析,同时,虚拟社区中成员间的社会关系也有别于传统组织或团队中的社会关系,其社会网络的结构和对知识共享的影响作用也有待于进一步探究。
本文正是基于以上背景,在前人的研究基础上结合社会网络理论、知识共享理论和公共物品理论,运用社会网络分析、统计分析方法和软件工具,结合对一个专业虚拟社区的实证分析开展基于社会网络的虚拟社区中的知识共享研究。论文的主要研究内容包括：
(1)基于社会网络的虚拟社区知识共享研究理论框架的建立。从虚拟社区与传统社区的对比分析得出了虚拟社区的特点,进而对虚拟社区中的知识共享过程进行分析与阐述,总结了虚拟社区中的知识共享相对于传统的组织知识共享的特点,并对虚拟社区中的知识共享水平的衡量提出了量化的方法；最后,从社会网络的视角分析了虚拟社区中成员间的人际互动关系和知识关系两种关系对知识共享行为的影响。
(2)虚拟社区知识共享网络模型的建立。在前述理论框架的基础上,对虚拟社区中的知识共享网络进行分析建模,并从理论上分析了两种关系间的相关性,然后结合前面虚拟社区知识共享的过程和特点分析,从虚拟社区中知识的公共物品特性分析入手,将虚拟社区的知识共享行为看作是产生社区公共知识的集体行动,从理论上分析了虚拟社区知识共享行为的形成机制,结合实证分析对虚拟社区知识共享网络的结构模式和两种关系之间的相关性进行了解析和验证。
(3)虚拟社区中知识共享网络的演化和对知识共享的影响分析。首先运用社会网络分析软件工具对知识共享网络中两种关系的联结强度、节点度、网络密度、网络中心性、互惠指数等关系和网络结构指标在各个时期的演化进行了分析,并与各个时期该社区的知识共享水平进行对比,通过对各个时期的知识共享网络中的关系和结构指标与社区知识共享水平之间的相关性分析揭示了知识共享网络的关系和结构对虚拟社区知识共享的数量和质量的影响和作用。
(4)虚拟社区知识共享支持策略的研究。从虚拟社区知识寻求者的支持与培养、个性化的知识共享技术支持、虚拟社区核心成员的发展与培养三个方面探讨了虚拟社区的知识共享支持问题。
本研究的创新点可以概括为以下几点：
(1)建立了融合人际互动关系和知识关系的虚拟社区知识共享网络模型。在基于社会网络的虚拟社区知识共享研究中,同时考虑和分析了人际互动关系和知识关系两种关系对知识共享的影响,而在已有的研究中大多只研究了一种关系的影响。
(2)提出从纵向的、动态的视角研究社区成员关系与网络结构对虚拟社区知识共享水平的影响。本研究考虑到虚拟社区的虚拟性和开放性,运用纵向的历史数据展现了虚拟社区知识共享网络的演化和社区知识共享水平的变化,从中发现知识共享网络的关系和网络结构对虚拟社区知识共享的影响和作用,属于动态的分析。而现有的关于社会网络对知识共享的影响研究大多是假定社会关系和网络结构是不变的,属于横向的静态的分析,这一假设不适合于虚拟社区这种高度动态变化的网络。
(3)结合社区知识的公共物品特性对虚拟社区知识共享网络结构和知识共享行为形成机制的分析,而已有的研究中还未见有对虚拟社区中的知识的公共物品特性的分析。
(4)提出个性化的虚拟社区知识共享支持系统框架。结合社区成员的知识关系与人际互动关系提出了个性化的知识共享支持系统框架以提高虚拟社区的知识共享效率和水平。
本研究是对当前知识共享和社会网络领域的理论与应用研究的发展和补充,为虚拟社区中的知识共享研究提出了一个新的研究视角,具有重要的理论价值,同时研究结果也对如何提高虚拟社区知识共享效果和活跃社区人气,使社区成员能更多地从中获益和为其经营者创造更大的价值具有一定的参考价值,具有重要的实践意义。
为了从纵向的、动态的角度研究虚拟社区中的知识共享问题,本研究通过网页抓取软件抓取了一个有代表性的专业论坛型虚拟社区--ChinaASP从2001年7月至2011年6月底跨度为10年的历史数据,数据完整地展现了随着该社区的发展其知识共享网络的演化和知识共享水平的变化过程,为本研究提供了完备的实证数据基础。
In the era of knowledge-based economy, knowledge, an intangible resource, is gradually replacing the traditional physical resources (such as land, natural resources, capital and labor) to become a key factor in promoting social progress, "knowledge is power" is a true reflection of the stress on knowledge. However, most of the organizations and individuals can not have all the knowledge they need, but must rely on knowledge sharing with the outside world to acquire new knowledge.
With the impressive development and popularization of the Internet, knowledge sharing do not necessarily need face to face communication, it also can be achieved through various electronic media, such as E-mail, instant messaging or chat rooms, forums and newsgroups, discussion lists, etc. These new electronic techniques have thus given birth to a new online communication space, which now is usually named virtual community (VC). VC, the new computer-mediated communication method on the Internet, has greatly accelerated the speed, breadth and ease of knowledge transfer, and thus meet the urgent demands for knowledge exchange and learning. The rapid development of virtual communities has aroused the interest of researchers and industry, the rise of virtual communities is considered an important driving force for knowledge management research.
VC is an online communication platform in which people with common interests, goals, or practices interact to share information and knowledge, and engage in social interactions. It is centered upon the communications and interactions of participants to generate specific domain knowledge that enables the participants to perform common tasks and to learn from, contribute to, and collectively build upon that knowledge. The richness of knowledge, enthusiastic discussion and timely interaction in VC are the key indicators of its prosperity. Knowledge sharing has been found to be a motivation for participation in VCs and VC builders. Although VCs provides a convenient platform for knowledge sharing, but not as long as it was built, people will actively participate to share. Contrast to those well-known community sites, there are still many VCs in which user participation is not sufficient, so that the community declines soon after its creation. Therefore, it is necessary to study the the mechanism and influencing factors of knowledge sharing behavior in VCs and then explore the measures to improve knowledge sharing in VCs.
Strictly speaking, knowledge, especially the particular tacit knowledge, can not be self-existent independent of its owners. Knowledge is concealed in human brains and shared through mutual interactions. Recently, more and more researchers begin to focus on the underlying social network among peoples in studying their knowledge sharing behavior, social network based research on knowledge sharing becomes a new research paradigm. In this research paradigm, knowledge sharing behaivior and its influencing factors are analyzed from the aspect of relations and structure of social network. The important theory basis for studying knowledge sharing in social network is that the subjects of knowledge sharing, humans, are embedded in concrete and real-time social relation sytems.
Currently, most social network based researches on knowledge sharing are devoted to traditional groups or organizations, these studies usually examine the social relations and network structure which influence knowledge sharing behavior through empirical researches with transverse data collections. The openness and virtuality of VC make the knowledge sharing in VCs different from that in traditonal organizations, so the process and characterisics of knowledge sharing in VC needs to be further studied. At the same time, the social relationship among VC members is also different from that in traditional organizations and the structure and its impact on knowledge sharing are not clear yet.
Based on the above background analysis and prior researches, this dissertation tries to expand the social network based knowledge shaing research in virtual communities integrating theories of social network, knowledge sharing and public goods. Social network analysis and statistical analysis methods and tools are used and a typical professional VC, ASPChina, is studied in empirical research. The main content and contributions of this dissertation are as following:
(1) The establishment of theoretical framework for social network based knowledge sharing research in VC. Beginning with the definition of VC, the character of VC was analyzed by comparing with traditional communities. The relationship between knowledge sharing and VC was clarified and the process of knowledge sharing in VCs was described. The characteristics, challenges and advantages of knowledge shaing in VCs, compared to that in tradional organizations, were also elaborated. A quantitative method for evaluation of knowledge sharing in VCs was proposed. Finally, the influence of human interaction relationship and knowledge relationship among VC members on knowledge sharing behavior was analyzed from the prospective of social network
(2) The development of the model for knowledge sharing network in virtual communities. Based on prior theoretical reserach framework, the knowledge sharing network in VCs was modeled and the correlation of the two kinds of relations was analyzed in theory. Then, the public goods characteristics of community public knowledge was analyzed and the knowledge sharing behavior in VCs was looked as collective action to generate community public knowledge.The mechanism of knowledge sharing behavior in VCs was analyzed in theory from the perspective of social network, combining with empirical study, the knowledge sharing network structure and the correlation between the two kinds of relationships was analyzed and validated.
(3)The evolution analysis of knowledge sharing network and it's impact on knowledge sharing in VC. Firstly,the evolution of the two relations and the structure of knowledge sharing network were analyzed through social network analysis, including the evolution of tie strength, node degree distribution, network density, network centrality and network reciprocity through each period, and the result was compared with the knowledge sharing level in each period. The correlation analysis of changes in relation and network structure with changes in the level of knowledge sharing revealed the influences of knowledge sharing network structure on the quantity and quality of knowledge sharing in VC
(4) Studies on support strategies for knowledge sharing in VC. Based on prior analysis of knowledge sharing in VC, support strategies were studied from three aspects:(a) support and keeping of knowledge seekers in VC; (b) personalized technical support system for knowledge sharing in VC and (c) development of core members in VC.
The innovative points of this dissertation can be summarized as following:
(1)Propose the knowledge sharing network model integrating interpersonal interaction relationship and knowledge relationship to investigate knowledge sharing in VC. In the social network based research on knowledge sharing in VC, two kinds of relationships, interpersonal relationship and knowledge relationship, were considered simultaneously. In most prior researches, only the impact of one relationship, the interpersonal relationship, was invetigated.
(2) Invetigate the impact of relation and network structure of knowledge sharing network on knowledge sharing in virtual communities from a longitudinal and dynamic perspective. In this study, considering the virtual nature and openness of virtual communities, the overall development process of a virtual community was divided into four stages, the longitudinal data collection was used to show the evolution of knowledge sharing network and the fluctuation in knowledge sharing in a virtual community, and investigate the influence of relation and network structure of knowledge sharing network on knowledge sharing, and the study belongs to dynamic analysis. While in almost all current social networks based researches on knowledge sharing, it is assumed that social relations and network structure keep stable, and these researches belong_to static analysis, but this assumption is not suitable for virtual communities.
(3) Analyze the mechanism of knowledge sharing behavior and knowledge sharing network structure in virtual community integrating public goods characteristics analysis of community knowledge, and this is not present in prior researches on virtual communities.
(4) Propose personalized support system framework for knowledge sharing in virtual community. In this framework, community members' knowledge relationship and interpersonal interaction relationship are all considered to provide personalized support for community members to improve the efficiency of knowledge sharing.
Above all, this study presents a new perspective for research on knowledge sharing in virtual communities, and it is the development and supplement of the current theory and application research on knowledge sharing and social networks, the study has important theoretical implication. While the results also provide some advices on how to improve knowledge sharing in virtual community and make the community more attractive and popular, so that community members can benefit more from the community and create greater value for its builders, so the study also has important practical significance.
In order to study knowledge sharing in virtual community from a longitudinal and dynamic perspective, a representative of the professional forum-based virtual community-ChinaASP is studied and historical knowledge sharing interaction data of 10 years span, from July 2001 to June 2011, is collected using web crawling software, the data completely shows the development process of the community with the evolution of its knowledge sharing network and the fluctuation in knowledge sharing, it provides a comprehensive empirical data base for this study.
随着互联网技术的发展和普及,人与人之间的知识共享与交流不一定需要面对面,还可以凭借各种电子媒介,形成新的网上交流空间--虚拟社区(Virtual Community)。虚拟社区这种新的交流方式使得知识的共享与传播达到了前所未有的迅捷和广度,顺应了人们迫切的知识共享与学习的需求,在短短的时间里得到了迅猛发展,引起了理论界和企业界的关注,虚拟社区的兴起被认为是知识管理研究的重要推动力。
作为互联网上的交流平台,丰富的知识、热烈的讨论、及时的互动是虚拟社区繁荣发展的重要标志,如果社区内的成员积极参与知识共享,使虚拟社区成为汇集人气的空间和平台,那么他们也就会为虚拟社区经营者创造更大的利益,因此虚拟社区经营者的重要目标之一就是促进社区内成员之间的知识共享与交流。虽然虚拟社区为知识共享提供了一个便捷的交流平台,但并不是只要建了它,人们就会积极来参与共享。相对于知名社区网站,还有很多虚拟社区面临着用户参与不足、知识共享交流气氛不浓等问题,以致社区创建之后很快便走向衰落。因此,有必要研究虚拟社区中知识共享行为的形成机制与影响因素,进而探寻提高虚拟社区知识共享水平的措施。
从严格意义上来说,知识并不能脱离作为其主体的人而单独存在,知识是隐藏在人脑之中的,所以知识的共享传播是通过人与人之间的交互而产生的。近年来,学者们越来越关注知识共享活动背后的人与人之间的社会关系网络,基于社会网络的知识共享研究成为新兴的研究范式。该范式从社会网络的关系和结构角度来分析知识共享行为。
目前基于社会网络的知识共享研究大都是针对团队或组织的,这些研究多采用实证研究的方法通过对各种横向数据的分析研究影响知识共享行为的社会网络中的关系和结构因素。虚拟社区的虚拟性和开放性使得虚拟社区的知识共享有别于传统组织、团队中的知识共享,有其特殊性。虚拟社区中知识共享的过程和特点有待进一步的探讨分析,同时,虚拟社区中成员间的社会关系也有别于传统组织或团队中的社会关系,其社会网络的结构和对知识共享的影响作用也有待于进一步探究。
本文正是基于以上背景,在前人的研究基础上结合社会网络理论、知识共享理论和公共物品理论,运用社会网络分析、统计分析方法和软件工具,结合对一个专业虚拟社区的实证分析开展基于社会网络的虚拟社区中的知识共享研究。论文的主要研究内容包括：
(1)基于社会网络的虚拟社区知识共享研究理论框架的建立。从虚拟社区与传统社区的对比分析得出了虚拟社区的特点,进而对虚拟社区中的知识共享过程进行分析与阐述,总结了虚拟社区中的知识共享相对于传统的组织知识共享的特点,并对虚拟社区中的知识共享水平的衡量提出了量化的方法；最后,从社会网络的视角分析了虚拟社区中成员间的人际互动关系和知识关系两种关系对知识共享行为的影响。
(2)虚拟社区知识共享网络模型的建立。在前述理论框架的基础上,对虚拟社区中的知识共享网络进行分析建模,并从理论上分析了两种关系间的相关性,然后结合前面虚拟社区知识共享的过程和特点分析,从虚拟社区中知识的公共物品特性分析入手,将虚拟社区的知识共享行为看作是产生社区公共知识的集体行动,从理论上分析了虚拟社区知识共享行为的形成机制,结合实证分析对虚拟社区知识共享网络的结构模式和两种关系之间的相关性进行了解析和验证。
(3)虚拟社区中知识共享网络的演化和对知识共享的影响分析。首先运用社会网络分析软件工具对知识共享网络中两种关系的联结强度、节点度、网络密度、网络中心性、互惠指数等关系和网络结构指标在各个时期的演化进行了分析,并与各个时期该社区的知识共享水平进行对比,通过对各个时期的知识共享网络中的关系和结构指标与社区知识共享水平之间的相关性分析揭示了知识共享网络的关系和结构对虚拟社区知识共享的数量和质量的影响和作用。
(4)虚拟社区知识共享支持策略的研究。从虚拟社区知识寻求者的支持与培养、个性化的知识共享技术支持、虚拟社区核心成员的发展与培养三个方面探讨了虚拟社区的知识共享支持问题。
本研究的创新点可以概括为以下几点：
(1)建立了融合人际互动关系和知识关系的虚拟社区知识共享网络模型。在基于社会网络的虚拟社区知识共享研究中,同时考虑和分析了人际互动关系和知识关系两种关系对知识共享的影响,而在已有的研究中大多只研究了一种关系的影响。
(2)提出从纵向的、动态的视角研究社区成员关系与网络结构对虚拟社区知识共享水平的影响。本研究考虑到虚拟社区的虚拟性和开放性,运用纵向的历史数据展现了虚拟社区知识共享网络的演化和社区知识共享水平的变化,从中发现知识共享网络的关系和网络结构对虚拟社区知识共享的影响和作用,属于动态的分析。而现有的关于社会网络对知识共享的影响研究大多是假定社会关系和网络结构是不变的,属于横向的静态的分析,这一假设不适合于虚拟社区这种高度动态变化的网络。
(3)结合社区知识的公共物品特性对虚拟社区知识共享网络结构和知识共享行为形成机制的分析,而已有的研究中还未见有对虚拟社区中的知识的公共物品特性的分析。
(4)提出个性化的虚拟社区知识共享支持系统框架。结合社区成员的知识关系与人际互动关系提出了个性化的知识共享支持系统框架以提高虚拟社区的知识共享效率和水平。
本研究是对当前知识共享和社会网络领域的理论与应用研究的发展和补充,为虚拟社区中的知识共享研究提出了一个新的研究视角,具有重要的理论价值,同时研究结果也对如何提高虚拟社区知识共享效果和活跃社区人气,使社区成员能更多地从中获益和为其经营者创造更大的价值具有一定的参考价值,具有重要的实践意义。
为了从纵向的、动态的角度研究虚拟社区中的知识共享问题,本研究通过网页抓取软件抓取了一个有代表性的专业论坛型虚拟社区--ChinaASP从2001年7月至2011年6月底跨度为10年的历史数据,数据完整地展现了随着该社区的发展其知识共享网络的演化和知识共享水平的变化过程,为本研究提供了完备的实证数据基础。
In the era of knowledge-based economy, knowledge, an intangible resource, is gradually replacing the traditional physical resources (such as land, natural resources, capital and labor) to become a key factor in promoting social progress, "knowledge is power" is a true reflection of the stress on knowledge. However, most of the organizations and individuals can not have all the knowledge they need, but must rely on knowledge sharing with the outside world to acquire new knowledge.
With the impressive development and popularization of the Internet, knowledge sharing do not necessarily need face to face communication, it also can be achieved through various electronic media, such as E-mail, instant messaging or chat rooms, forums and newsgroups, discussion lists, etc. These new electronic techniques have thus given birth to a new online communication space, which now is usually named virtual community (VC). VC, the new computer-mediated communication method on the Internet, has greatly accelerated the speed, breadth and ease of knowledge transfer, and thus meet the urgent demands for knowledge exchange and learning. The rapid development of virtual communities has aroused the interest of researchers and industry, the rise of virtual communities is considered an important driving force for knowledge management research.
VC is an online communication platform in which people with common interests, goals, or practices interact to share information and knowledge, and engage in social interactions. It is centered upon the communications and interactions of participants to generate specific domain knowledge that enables the participants to perform common tasks and to learn from, contribute to, and collectively build upon that knowledge. The richness of knowledge, enthusiastic discussion and timely interaction in VC are the key indicators of its prosperity. Knowledge sharing has been found to be a motivation for participation in VCs and VC builders. Although VCs provides a convenient platform for knowledge sharing, but not as long as it was built, people will actively participate to share. Contrast to those well-known community sites, there are still many VCs in which user participation is not sufficient, so that the community declines soon after its creation. Therefore, it is necessary to study the the mechanism and influencing factors of knowledge sharing behavior in VCs and then explore the measures to improve knowledge sharing in VCs.
Strictly speaking, knowledge, especially the particular tacit knowledge, can not be self-existent independent of its owners. Knowledge is concealed in human brains and shared through mutual interactions. Recently, more and more researchers begin to focus on the underlying social network among peoples in studying their knowledge sharing behavior, social network based research on knowledge sharing becomes a new research paradigm. In this research paradigm, knowledge sharing behaivior and its influencing factors are analyzed from the aspect of relations and structure of social network. The important theory basis for studying knowledge sharing in social network is that the subjects of knowledge sharing, humans, are embedded in concrete and real-time social relation sytems.
Currently, most social network based researches on knowledge sharing are devoted to traditional groups or organizations, these studies usually examine the social relations and network structure which influence knowledge sharing behavior through empirical researches with transverse data collections. The openness and virtuality of VC make the knowledge sharing in VCs different from that in traditonal organizations, so the process and characterisics of knowledge sharing in VC needs to be further studied. At the same time, the social relationship among VC members is also different from that in traditional organizations and the structure and its impact on knowledge sharing are not clear yet.
Based on the above background analysis and prior researches, this dissertation tries to expand the social network based knowledge shaing research in virtual communities integrating theories of social network, knowledge sharing and public goods. Social network analysis and statistical analysis methods and tools are used and a typical professional VC, ASPChina, is studied in empirical research. The main content and contributions of this dissertation are as following:
(1) The establishment of theoretical framework for social network based knowledge sharing research in VC. Beginning with the definition of VC, the character of VC was analyzed by comparing with traditional communities. The relationship between knowledge sharing and VC was clarified and the process of knowledge sharing in VCs was described. The characteristics, challenges and advantages of knowledge shaing in VCs, compared to that in tradional organizations, were also elaborated. A quantitative method for evaluation of knowledge sharing in VCs was proposed. Finally, the influence of human interaction relationship and knowledge relationship among VC members on knowledge sharing behavior was analyzed from the prospective of social network
(2) The development of the model for knowledge sharing network in virtual communities. Based on prior theoretical reserach framework, the knowledge sharing network in VCs was modeled and the correlation of the two kinds of relations was analyzed in theory. Then, the public goods characteristics of community public knowledge was analyzed and the knowledge sharing behavior in VCs was looked as collective action to generate community public knowledge.The mechanism of knowledge sharing behavior in VCs was analyzed in theory from the perspective of social network, combining with empirical study, the knowledge sharing network structure and the correlation between the two kinds of relationships was analyzed and validated.
(3)The evolution analysis of knowledge sharing network and it's impact on knowledge sharing in VC. Firstly,the evolution of the two relations and the structure of knowledge sharing network were analyzed through social network analysis, including the evolution of tie strength, node degree distribution, network density, network centrality and network reciprocity through each period, and the result was compared with the knowledge sharing level in each period. The correlation analysis of changes in relation and network structure with changes in the level of knowledge sharing revealed the influences of knowledge sharing network structure on the quantity and quality of knowledge sharing in VC
(4) Studies on support strategies for knowledge sharing in VC. Based on prior analysis of knowledge sharing in VC, support strategies were studied from three aspects:(a) support and keeping of knowledge seekers in VC; (b) personalized technical support system for knowledge sharing in VC and (c) development of core members in VC.
The innovative points of this dissertation can be summarized as following:
(1)Propose the knowledge sharing network model integrating interpersonal interaction relationship and knowledge relationship to investigate knowledge sharing in VC. In the social network based research on knowledge sharing in VC, two kinds of relationships, interpersonal relationship and knowledge relationship, were considered simultaneously. In most prior researches, only the impact of one relationship, the interpersonal relationship, was invetigated.
(2) Invetigate the impact of relation and network structure of knowledge sharing network on knowledge sharing in virtual communities from a longitudinal and dynamic perspective. In this study, considering the virtual nature and openness of virtual communities, the overall development process of a virtual community was divided into four stages, the longitudinal data collection was used to show the evolution of knowledge sharing network and the fluctuation in knowledge sharing in a virtual community, and investigate the influence of relation and network structure of knowledge sharing network on knowledge sharing, and the study belongs to dynamic analysis. While in almost all current social networks based researches on knowledge sharing, it is assumed that social relations and network structure keep stable, and these researches belong_to static analysis, but this assumption is not suitable for virtual communities.
(3) Analyze the mechanism of knowledge sharing behavior and knowledge sharing network structure in virtual community integrating public goods characteristics analysis of community knowledge, and this is not present in prior researches on virtual communities.
(4) Propose personalized support system framework for knowledge sharing in virtual community. In this framework, community members' knowledge relationship and interpersonal interaction relationship are all considered to provide personalized support for community members to improve the efficiency of knowledge sharing.
Above all, this study presents a new perspective for research on knowledge sharing in virtual communities, and it is the development and supplement of the current theory and application research on knowledge sharing and social networks, the study has important theoretical implication. While the results also provide some advices on how to improve knowledge sharing in virtual community and make the community more attractive and popular, so that community members can benefit more from the community and create greater value for its builders, so the study also has important practical significance.
In order to study knowledge sharing in virtual community from a longitudinal and dynamic perspective, a representative of the professional forum-based virtual community-ChinaASP is studied and historical knowledge sharing interaction data of 10 years span, from July 2001 to June 2011, is collected using web crawling software, the data completely shows the development process of the community with the evolution of its knowledge sharing network and the fluctuation in knowledge sharing, it provides a comprehensive empirical data base for this study.
引文
[1]Alavi, D E Leidner. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues [J]. MIS Quarterly. 2001,25(1):107-136
[2]Drucker, P. The next Society:A survey of the near future [J].The Economist, 2001(3):2-20
[3]P M Senge. System Thinking and Organizational Learning:Acting locally and Thinking globally in the Organization of future. European Journal of Operational Reasearch.1992,59:137-150
[4]Nonaka.1. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation [J]. Organization Science.1994,5(1):14-37
[5]Lee J N. The Impact of Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Capability and Partnership Quality on IS Outsourcing Success[J]. Information & Management, 2001,38(5):323-335
[6]Garvin D A., Building Learning Organizations [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1993(July):327-332
[7]Ensign P C. Innovation in the Multinational Firm with Globally Dispersed R&D:Technological Knowledge Utilization and Accumulation [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,1997,10(2):217-234
[8]Connelly C E, Kelloway E I. Predictors of employees'perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures [J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2003,24(3):294-301
[9]Niwa K. Toward successful implementation of knowledge-based systems: expert systems vs knowledge sharing systems [J]. IEEE Transactons on Engineering Management.1990,37(4):277-283
[10]Buckman R H, Knowledge sharing at Buckman Labs[J] Journal of Business Strategies,1998,19(1):11-15
[11]McLure W M, Faraj S. It is What One Does:Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice? [J]. Journal of Strategic Information System,2000,9(2-3)155-173
[12]Davenport T H, Prusak I. Working knowledge:how organizations manage what they know[M]. Boston:Harvard Business School Press,1998,
[13]Gupta, A. K. V. Govinaarajan. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational comporations. The Academy of Management Review, 1991(16):768-792
[14]樊治平,孙永洪.知识共享研究综述[J].管理学报,2006(5)：371-377
[15]张玉华,王红霞.知识共享的挑战与对策[J].经济论坛,2004(2)：64-66
[16]Aspremont C, Bhattacharya S. Knowledge as a Public Good:Efficient Sharing and Incentives for Development Effort[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economic s,1998,30(4):389-404
[17]王敬稳,陈春英.知识产权与知识共享[J].经济论坛,2003(18)：21-22
[18]陈博,知识距离与知识定价[J]科学学研究,2007,25(1)：14-18
[19]夏火松,蔡淑琴.基于分形的知识共享元素与成本模型[J].情报学报,2002,21(6)：664-667
[20]周波,高汝熹.知识转移的经济分析[J].科学学和科学技术管理,2006(5)：53-59
[21]Subhajyoti B and Yopadhyay, Knowledge sharing and cooperation in outsourcing projects-A game theoretic analysis [J]. Decision Support Systems 43 (2007):349-358
[22]宁烨,樊治平,冯博,知识联盟中知识共享的博弈分析[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2006,27(9)：1046-1049
[23]Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension[M]. London:Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.
[24]汪应洛,李勖.知识的转移特性研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002(10)：8-11
[25]宋建元,陈劲.企业隐性知识的共享的效率分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(2)：58-61
[26]张淑华,方华.企业组织氛围与组织隐性知识共享之关系研究[J].心理科学,2005.28(2)：383-387
[27]Scott Fernie, Stuart D Green, Knowledge sharing:context, confusion and controversy [J], International Journal of Project Management, 21 (2003):177-187
[28]肖小勇,基于知识特性与转移动机的知识转移机制研究[J].社会主义研究,2005(2)：111-114
[29]Ryu S, Ho SH, Han I. Knowledge Sharing Behavior of Physicians in Hospitals[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2003,25(1):113-122
[30]李涛,谢伟,徐彦武.基于信息技术的组织内知识共享动机的研究[J].情报学 报,2004,23(3)：275-281
[31]Liebowitz J, Megbolugbe I. A Set of Frameworks to Aid the Project Manager in Conceptualizing and Implementing Knowledge Management Initiatives [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2003,21 (3):189-198
[32]张长涛,刘希宋.企业产品开发人员知识共享机理研究[J].管理科学,2003,16(2)：6-10
[33)梁跃进,梁棵,俞雁.基于团队的知识共享和知识形成机理研究[J].运筹与管理,2004,13(5)：151-154
[34]Ruuska 1, Vartiainen M. Characteristics of Knowledge Sharing Communities in Project Organizations [J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2005,23(5):374-379
[35]闰芬,陈国权.实施大规模定制中组织知识共享研究[J].管理工程学报,2002,16(3)：39-44
[36]Koh J, Kim Y G. Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities:an E-business Perspective [J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2004,26(2):155-166
[37]和金生,王雪利.母公司对子公司知识转移的影响因素研究.西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2006年3月,16(2)：87-91
[38]Bong Y S, Kim Y H. Web-based Knowledge Management for Sharing Product Data in Virtual Enterprises [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2002,75(1-2):173-183
[39]王兴元.名牌生态系统中的知识传播与分享研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(8)：4851
[40]Pantelia N, Sockalingam S. Trust and Conflict With in Virtual Inter-organizational Alliances:a Framework for Facilitating Knowledge Sharing [J] Decision Support Systems,2005,39(4):599-617
[41]Baalen P V, Bloemhof-Ruwaard J, Heck E V. Knowledge Sharing in an Emerging Network of Practice:T he Role of a Knowledge Portal[J]. European Management Journal,2005,23(3):300-314
[42]张成洪,严正,宋亮.协同商务环境下的知识共享框架[J].复旦大学学报(自然科学版),2003,42(5)：755-760
[43]凌卓华.协同商务环境下知识共享的障碍因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(9)：37-40
[44]Carayannis E G.Alexander J, Ioannidis A. Leveraging Knowledge, Learning, and Innovation in Forming Strategic Government-university-industry (GUI) R&D Partnerships[J].Technovation,2000,20(9):477-488
[45]Roche C. Corporate Ontologies and Concurrent Engineering [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2000,107(1-3):187-193
[46]徐锐.战略联盟知识共享的关系风险及其控制方式[J].情报杂志,2005(8)：2-4
[47]Liu D R, Wu I C, Yang K S. Task-based K-Support System:Disseminating and Sharing Task-relevant Knowledge[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2005,29(2):408-423
[48]Soekijad M, Andriessen E. Conditions for Knowledge Sharing in Competitive Alliances[J]. European Management Journal,2003,21(5):578-587
[49]和金生,熊慧敏.知识共享的条件与簇群机制[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2003,5(4)：341-344
[50]王冰,顾远飞.簇群的知识共享机制和信任机制[J].外国经济与管理,2002,24(5)：2-7
[51张志远,谭跃进.客户知识共享过程中的完全信息动态博弈分析[J].上海工程技术大学学报,2003,17(1)：39-43
[52]张作凤.知识共享的可能性：一个博弈分析[J].图书情报工作,2004,48(2)：57-60
[53]Fernie S, Green S D, Weller S J, et al. Knowledge Sharing:Context, Confusion and Controversy[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2003,21(3):177-187
[54]Pan S L, Leidner D E.. Bridging Communities of Practice with Information Technology in Pursuit of Global Knowledge Sharing[J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems,2003,12(1):71-88
[55]Zhuge H. A Knowledge Grid Model and Platform for Global Knowledge Sharing[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2002,22(4):313-320
[56]Vasconcelos W, et al. On the Insufficiency of Ontologies:Problems in knowledge Sharing and Alternative Solutions [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2002, 15(3):147-167
[57]Chen H, Schroeder J, Hauck R V. COPLINK Connect:Information and Knowledge Management for Law Enforcement [J]. Decision Support Systems,2002,34(3):271 —285
[58]郝永平,王崇海基于本体论的产品全过程知识共享研究[J].机械工程学报,2002,38(12)：126-130
[59]吴健,陈刚,尹建伟等.基于本体的产品配置知识共享[J].浙江大学学报(工学 版),2004,38(4)：478-494
[60]康虹,王敏.基于Web的企业知识共享系统设计[J].情报杂志,2005(6)：17-19
[61]李生琦,徐福缘,徐静.支持企业知识共享的企业本体论及其获取[J].计算机工程与应用,2004,40(2)：197-200
[62]杨溢.企业内知识共享与知识创新的实现[J].情报科学,2003,21(10)：1107-1109
[63]李富强,葛新权,吴永林.知识共享的企业知识管理系统[J].中国软科学,2002(10)：56-59
[64]马红梅,朗诵真,解玲.有关知识共享的几点思考[J].情报杂志,2001(4)：53-54
[65]张作凤.谈咨询企业知识共享机制的构建[J].情报杂志,2003(12)：45-47
[66]陈娟,王文平.知识型企业生命体智能单元间知识共享策略与激励措施研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2004,34(6)：842-846
[67]邓建友,周晓东.企业文化对知识共享的影响分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(9)：82-85
[68]宋亮,王建军,林丽闽等.打造知识平台,注重知识共享[J].研究与发展管理,2003,15(4)：14-18
[69]谭亚莉.促进组织内知识分享的人力资源管理对策[J].科学管理研究,2003,21(5)：102-105
[70]Jones S. Employee Rights, Employee Responsibilities and Knowledge Sharing in Intelligent Organization [J]. Employee Responsibilities and Rights journal, 2002,14(2-3):69-78
[71]Earl M. What on Earth is a CKO? [M]. London: Earl & Lan Scott, Survey IBM London Business School,1998.
[72]宋建元,张钢.组织网络化中的知识共享—基于知识链的分析[J].研究与发展管理,2004,16(4)：25-30
[73]王艳艳,李锡元.知识共享与企业激励制度[J].科技进步与对策,2004,21(4)：63-65
[74]孙卫忠,刘丽梅,孙梅.组织学习和知识共享影响因素试析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(7)：135-138
[75]Hedlund G. A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-form Corporation[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1):73-90
[76]Romme A G L. A Note on the Team-Hierarchy Debate [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(5):411-417
[77]Szulanski, G.. Exploring internal stickiness:Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996,17, Special Issue:27-43
[78]谭大鹏,霍国庆,知识转移一般过程研究[J]当代经济管理,2006,28(3)：1-15
[79]王兆祥知识转移过程的层次模型[J],中国管理科学,2006,14(3)：22-127.
[80]Fraser V M. Employee perceptions of knowledge sharing:Employment threat or synergy for the greater good?[J] Competitive Intelligence Review, 2000,11 (2):39-52
[81]Chow C W, Deng F J, Ho J L. The openness of knowledge sharing within organizations:A comparative study of the United States and the People'S Republic of China[J]. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2000(12):65-95
[82]Ford D P, Chan Y E. Knowledge sharing in a multi-cultural setting:A case study[J]. Knowledge Management Research and Practice,2003(1):11-27
[83]Thomas-hunt M et al, Who's really sharing? efects of social and expert status of knowledge exchange with groups[J]. Management Science, 2003,49(4):464-477
[84]Pan S,Sacrbrough H. A socio-technical view of knowledge sharing at Buckman Labs[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,1998,2(1):55-66
[85]McDermott R,0'Dell C. Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge [J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,2001,5(1):76-85
[86]Bock, Kim. Breaking the myths of rewards:An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing [J]. Information Resources Management Journal,2002,15(2):14-21
[87]Gupta A K, et al. Knowledge flows within a multinational corporations [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000(21):473-496
[88]谈正达,王文平,谈英姿.产业集群的知识共享机制的演化博弈分析[J].运筹与管理,2006,15(2)：61-64
[89]卢兵等.组织间隐性知识转移的微分动力学模型[J].系统工程,2005,23(11)：44-49
[90]Rong Du, Shizhong Ai, Yuqing Ren. Relationship between knowledge sharing and performance:A survey in Xian, China [J]. Expert systems with Applications 32(2007):38-46
[91]Tian-hui You, Fei-fei Li, and Zhu-chao Yu. A Method for Evaluating the Knowledge Transfer Ability in Organization[J]. SEM 2006,4092:576-585
[92]Chao-Min Chiu, Meng-Hsiang Hsu, Eric T G Wang. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities:An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 42(2006):1872-1888
[93]边燕杰,丘海雄.企业的社会资本及其功效.中国社会科学,2002(2)：87-99
[94]A L Barabasic, H Jeong. Evolution of social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A,311(2002):590-614.
[95]M Granovetter.The Strength of Weak Ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1973 (78):1360-1380
[96]J Coleman. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital [J]. American Journal of Sociology,1988 (94):95-120
[97]R Burt. Structural Holes [M]. MA Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1992.
[98]Andrew C. Inkpen, ERIC W. K. TSANG. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer [J]. Academy of Management Review 2005,30 (1):146-165
[99]Tsai, W.,& Ghoshal, S. Social capital and value creation:The role of intrafirm networks [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1998,41:464-476
[100]Hansen M. The Search-Transfer Problem:The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organizational Subunits [J]. Admin. Sci. Quart,1999: 82-111
[101]Uzzi, B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks:The paradox of embeddedness [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42: 35-67
[102]Daniel Z Levin, Rob Cross. The strength of weak ties you can trust:The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer [J]. Management Science 2004,50(11):1477-1490
[103]P Ingram, P Roberts. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry [J]. American Journal of Sociology,2000,106:387-423
[104]R Reagans, E Zuckerman. Networks diversity and performance:The social capital of R&D units [J]. Organization Science,2001,12:502-517
[105]Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks:Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44:996-1004.
[106]Rob Cross, Andrew P, L Prusak, Stephen P. Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks[J]. Organizational Dynamics,2001,30(2):100-120
[107]Ray Reagans, Bill McEvily, Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer:The Effects of Cohesion and Range [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,48 (2003): 240-267
[108]王三义,刘新梅等.社会资本结构维度对企业间知识转移影响的实证研究[J],科学进步与对策,2007(4)：105-108
[109]王夏洁,刘红丽.基于社会网络理论的知识链分析[J].情报杂志,2007(2)：18-21
[110]马费成,王晓光.知识转移的社会网络模型研究[J].江西社会科学,2006(7)：38-43
[111]王越.组织内社会网络的知识传导及成本研究[J].科学管理研究,2004,(8)：24-28
[112]Robin Cowan, Nicolas Jonard. Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 28(2004):1557-1575
[113]Fangcheng Tang, Jifeng Mu, Douglas L. MacLachlan, Implication of network size and structure on organizations'knowledge transfer[J], Expert Systems with Applications, in press.
[114]Stephen J.H.Yang, Irene Y. L. Chen. A social network-based system for supporting interactive collaboration in knowledge sharing over peer-to-peer network [J]. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies,68(2007):321-332
[115]杜骏飞.存在于虚无：虚拟社区的社会实在性辨析[J],现代传播,2004(1)：73-77
[116]林致立.虚拟社群的商业性应用：本质、分类与关键议题[D],台湾东吴大学企业管理学系硕士学位论文,2000年.
[117]周德民,吕耀怀.虚拟社区：传统社区概念的拓展[J].湖湘论坛,2003(6)：6-8
[118]易徽.网络虚拟社区的文化特色及其影响叮].西安政治学院学报,2002,15(2)：23-26
[119]刘秀生.虚拟社区市场与营销[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2001,(04)：20-24
[120]刘龙.关于网络经济中虚拟社区与品牌塑造的研究[J].经济问题探索,2002,(09)：14-18
[121]Hall, Hazel, Dianne Graham. Creation and recreation:motivating collaboration to generate knowledge capital in online communities [J]. International Journal of Information Management,24(2004):235-246
[122]Chan, Calvin M L, Mamata Bhandar, Lin-Bin Oh, Hock-Chuan Chan. Participation in a Virtual Community[C]. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on System Sciences.2004, Hawaii.
[123]Meng-Hsiang Hsu, Teresa L JU, Chia-Hui Yen, Chun-Ming Chang, Knowledge sharing in virtual communities:The relationship between trust, self-efficacy and outcome expectations[J]. International Journal of human-computer studies 65(2007):153-169
[124]M. M. Wasko, S. Fraja. Why should I share? Examing social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2005,29(1):35-57
[125]向海华.电子商务环境中虚拟社区的知识共享活动[J].情报杂志,2004,(07)：75-76
[126]李志刚电子商务中虚拟社区知识共享的作用及对策研究[J]情报杂志,2006(10)：35-39
[127]M. M. Wasko, S. Fraja., It is what one does:why people participant and help others in electronic Cops[J]. Journal of strategic Information systems, 2000,9(2-3):155-173
[128]A. Kankanhalli, B. C. Y. Tan, K.K.Wei. Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories [J]. MIS Quarterly,2005,29(1):113-143
[129]C.C.Wang, C.Y.Lai. Knowledeg contribution in online virtual community: capability and motivation [J]. Knowledge Science, engineering and management[M] Berlin:Spinger-relag,2006:442-453
[130]M. K.0. Lee, C. M. K. Cheung. Understanding customer knowledge sharing in web based discussion boards-An exploratory study [J].Internet Reasearch,2006,16(3):289-303
[131]S. Ye, H. P. Chen, X. L. Jin. An empirical study of what drives users to share knowledge in virtual communities [J]. Knowledge Science, engineering and management,2006:563-575
[132]Chih-Jou Chen, Shiu-Wan Hung. To give or to receive? Factors influencing members'knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities [J]. Information & Management 47 (2010) 226-236
[133]Tai-kuai Yu, Long-chuan Lu, Tsai Feng liu. Exploring Factors influence knowledge sharing behavior via weblogs [J]. Computers in Human Behavior 26(2010):32-41
[134]Ming-Ji Lin, Shiu-Wan hung, Chih-Jou Chen. Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities [J]. Computers in Human Behavior 25(2009):929-939
[135]周涛,鲁耀斌.基于社会影响理论的虚拟社区用户知识共享行为研究[J].研究与发展管理,2009年8月：78-82
[136]刘丽群,宋咏梅.虚拟社区中知识交流的行为动机及影响因素研究[J].新闻与传播研究,2007年第14卷第1期：43-51
[137]Howard Rheingold. Virtual Cornrnunity:Home steading on the electronic Frontier[M]. Addison-Wesley,1993.
[138]范晓屏,杨艳,卢艳峰.基于知识交流的虚拟社区管理方式研究[J].经济论坛,2005,19：53-56.
[139]柴晋颖,王飞绒.虚拟社区研究现状及展望[J].情报杂志,2007(5)：101-103
[140]武艳君,刘丽晶.论虚拟社区的自组织现象[J].系统科学学报,2007(1)：53-58
[141]王方华,徐小龙.虚拟社区前沿探析[J].外国经济与管理,2007,2(9)：10-16.
[142]Armstrong A, Hagel J. The real value of online communities[J]. Havard business review,1996(23):134-141
[143]徐小龙,王方华.虚拟社区的知识共享机制研究[J].自然辨证法研究,2007年8月(23)：83-86
[144]孔德超.虚拟社区的知识共享模式研究[J].图书情报学研究,2009,10：95-98
[145]赵玲,鲁耀斌,邓朝华.基于社会资本理论的虚拟社区感研究[J].管理学报,2009(9)：1169-1175
[146]罗家德.社会网分析讲义[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社.2010.
[147]Newman M E J. Scientific collaboration networks. Ⅱ.Shortest paths, weighted networks,and centrality[J]. Physical Review E,2001(65):1-7
[148]刘军.社会网络分析方法初探[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社2004.
[149]Dixon, N. M. Common knowledge:How Companies Thrive by Sharing what They Know[M]. Harvard Business School Press.2000.
[150]S. P. Borgatti, R. Cross, A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks, Management Science 49 (7) (2003):432-445
[151]Cross R, Prusak L. The people who make organizations go or stop[J]. Harvard Business Review,2002(6):5-12
[152]Wasserman, Stanley, Katherine Faust. Social Network Analysis:Methods and Applications[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.1994.
[153]Coleman, James. Foundations of Social Theory [M]. Cambridge, MA:H award University Press.1990.
[154]Thanasis Daradoumis, Alejandra Martlnez-Mone's, Fatos Xhafa. A layered framework for evaluating on-line collaborative learning interactions [J]. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 64 (2006) 622-635.
[155]王道平,许有志,王锐兵,供应链知识共享绩效的模糊综合评价方法[J].软科学,2008年12月第22卷第12期(总第108期)：14-18
[156]胡平波.基于BP网络模型的网络组织中知识共享效率评价[J].情报杂志,2009年9月：78-82
[157]李丽红,尹贻林,孙春玲,李淑洁.基于知识资本视角的知识共享绩效测度[J].情报科学,第26卷第10期,2008年10月：1482-1487
[158]安世虎,贺宾.KMS中用户知识共享行为模型的构建[J].计算机工程与设计,2006年11月：4081-4083
[159]埃利泽·盖斯勒,周萍译.科学技术测度体系[M].北京：科学技术文献出版社,2004.
[160]Luria, A. R, Cognitive Development [M]. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.1978.
[161]Sangman Han, Beom Jun Kim. Network analysis of an online community [J] Physica A,387(2008):5946-5951
[162]Joon Koh, young-Gul kim, Brain Butter and Gee-Woo Bock. Encouraging participation in virtual communities [J]. Communication of ACM,2007,50(2): 69-73.
[163]詹姆斯·M.布坎南(著),马珺(译).公共物品的需求与供给[M].上海人民出版社,2009.
[164]R.S. Burt, Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition [M]. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA,1992.
[165]S. Shmanske, Public Goods, Mixed Goods, and Monopolistic Competition [M]. Texas A&M University Press, College Station,1991.
[166]M.S. Granovetter. Problems of explanation in economic sociology [A]. in:N. Nohria, R. Eccles (Eds.), Organizations and networks:Structure, form, and action[C], Harvard Business School Press, Boston,1992:25-56
[167]D. D. Heckathorn, The dynamics and dilemmas of collective action [J]. American Sociological Review,41 (April), (1996):250-277
[168]C. Jones, W. S. Hesterly, S.P. Borgatti. A general theory of network governance:exchange conditions and social mechanisms [J]. Academy of Management Review,22(4), (1997):911-945
[169]P. Kollock, The economies of online cooperation:gifts, and public goods in cyberspace [A]. in:M. A. Smith, P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in Cyberspace[C], Routledge, New York,1999, pp.220-239
[170]D. Krackhardt, The strength of strong ties:the importance of philos in organizations [A].in:N. Nohria, R. Eccles (Eds.), Organizations and networks:Structure, form, and action[C], Harvard Business School Press, Boston,1992, pp.216-239
[171]G. Marwell, P. Oliver, The Critical Mass in Collective Action:A Micro-Social Theory [M], Cambridge University Press, New York,1993.
[172]G. Marwell, P. Oliver, Social networks and collective action:a theory of the critical mass Ⅲ[J]. American Journal of Sociology,94 (3), (1988): 502-534
[173]J. Nahapiet, S. Ghoshal, Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review,23(2) (1998):242-266
[174]P. Oliver, G Marwell. The paradox of group size in collective action: A theory of the critical mass Ⅱ [J]. American Sociological Review,53 (1988):1-8
[175]R. Putnam. Tuning in, tuning out:the strange disappearance of social capital in America [J]. Political Science and Politics, (December) (2000): 664-683
[176]沈满洪,谢慧明.公共物品问题及其相关解决思路-公共物品理论文献综述[J].浙江大学学报(人文社科版),2009年10月：45-56
[177]曼库尔·奥尔森：集体行动的逻辑[M].上海人民出版社,2006.
[178]Wellman B, Berkowitz S D. Social Structure:'A Network Approach[M]. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press,1988.
[179]George Kuk. Strategic interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List[J]. Management Science, Vol 52, No 7,2006:1031-1042
[180]J Vertommen, et al. Multiple-vector user profiles in support of knowledge sharing [J]. Information Science, April(2008):235-242
[181]R Baeza-Yates, R. Ribeiro-Neto, Modern Information Retrieval[M]. Addison-Wesley,1999.
[182]王众托,王志平.超网络初探[J].管理学报,2008年1月：1-8
[183]席运江,党延忠,廖开际.组织知识系统的知识超网络模型及应用[J].2009年6月：12-21
[184]沈秋英,王文平.基于社会网络与知识传播网络互动的集群超网络模型[J].东南大学学报：自然科学版,2009,39(2)：413-418
[185]宫辉等.Tobit模型在网络社区信息传播与管理中的应用[J].预测,2009年1月：77-80
[186]吴渝,肖开洲,刘洪涛,唐红.BBS虚拟社区的演化规律探索及仿真[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010年10月,Vol 30：1883-1890
[187]张立,刘云.虚拟社区网络的演化过程分析[J].物理学报,2008年9月,Vol57(09)：5419-5424
[188]尼葛洛庞蒂,胡泳,范海燕译.数字化生存[M].1996,海南出版社.
[189]唐·泰普斯科特.数字化成长[M].2009年11月,中国人民大学出版社.
[2]Drucker, P. The next Society:A survey of the near future [J].The Economist, 2001(3):2-20
[3]P M Senge. System Thinking and Organizational Learning:Acting locally and Thinking globally in the Organization of future. European Journal of Operational Reasearch.1992,59:137-150
[4]Nonaka.1. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation [J]. Organization Science.1994,5(1):14-37
[5]Lee J N. The Impact of Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Capability and Partnership Quality on IS Outsourcing Success[J]. Information & Management, 2001,38(5):323-335
[6]Garvin D A., Building Learning Organizations [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1993(July):327-332
[7]Ensign P C. Innovation in the Multinational Firm with Globally Dispersed R&D:Technological Knowledge Utilization and Accumulation [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,1997,10(2):217-234
[8]Connelly C E, Kelloway E I. Predictors of employees'perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures [J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2003,24(3):294-301
[9]Niwa K. Toward successful implementation of knowledge-based systems: expert systems vs knowledge sharing systems [J]. IEEE Transactons on Engineering Management.1990,37(4):277-283
[10]Buckman R H, Knowledge sharing at Buckman Labs[J] Journal of Business Strategies,1998,19(1):11-15
[11]McLure W M, Faraj S. It is What One Does:Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice? [J]. Journal of Strategic Information System,2000,9(2-3)155-173
[12]Davenport T H, Prusak I. Working knowledge:how organizations manage what they know[M]. Boston:Harvard Business School Press,1998,
[13]Gupta, A. K. V. Govinaarajan. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational comporations. The Academy of Management Review, 1991(16):768-792
[14]樊治平,孙永洪.知识共享研究综述[J].管理学报,2006(5)：371-377
[15]张玉华,王红霞.知识共享的挑战与对策[J].经济论坛,2004(2)：64-66
[16]Aspremont C, Bhattacharya S. Knowledge as a Public Good:Efficient Sharing and Incentives for Development Effort[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economic s,1998,30(4):389-404
[17]王敬稳,陈春英.知识产权与知识共享[J].经济论坛,2003(18)：21-22
[18]陈博,知识距离与知识定价[J]科学学研究,2007,25(1)：14-18
[19]夏火松,蔡淑琴.基于分形的知识共享元素与成本模型[J].情报学报,2002,21(6)：664-667
[20]周波,高汝熹.知识转移的经济分析[J].科学学和科学技术管理,2006(5)：53-59
[21]Subhajyoti B and Yopadhyay, Knowledge sharing and cooperation in outsourcing projects-A game theoretic analysis [J]. Decision Support Systems 43 (2007):349-358
[22]宁烨,樊治平,冯博,知识联盟中知识共享的博弈分析[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2006,27(9)：1046-1049
[23]Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension[M]. London:Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.
[24]汪应洛,李勖.知识的转移特性研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002(10)：8-11
[25]宋建元,陈劲.企业隐性知识的共享的效率分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(2)：58-61
[26]张淑华,方华.企业组织氛围与组织隐性知识共享之关系研究[J].心理科学,2005.28(2)：383-387
[27]Scott Fernie, Stuart D Green, Knowledge sharing:context, confusion and controversy [J], International Journal of Project Management, 21 (2003):177-187
[28]肖小勇,基于知识特性与转移动机的知识转移机制研究[J].社会主义研究,2005(2)：111-114
[29]Ryu S, Ho SH, Han I. Knowledge Sharing Behavior of Physicians in Hospitals[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2003,25(1):113-122
[30]李涛,谢伟,徐彦武.基于信息技术的组织内知识共享动机的研究[J].情报学 报,2004,23(3)：275-281
[31]Liebowitz J, Megbolugbe I. A Set of Frameworks to Aid the Project Manager in Conceptualizing and Implementing Knowledge Management Initiatives [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2003,21 (3):189-198
[32]张长涛,刘希宋.企业产品开发人员知识共享机理研究[J].管理科学,2003,16(2)：6-10
[33)梁跃进,梁棵,俞雁.基于团队的知识共享和知识形成机理研究[J].运筹与管理,2004,13(5)：151-154
[34]Ruuska 1, Vartiainen M. Characteristics of Knowledge Sharing Communities in Project Organizations [J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2005,23(5):374-379
[35]闰芬,陈国权.实施大规模定制中组织知识共享研究[J].管理工程学报,2002,16(3)：39-44
[36]Koh J, Kim Y G. Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities:an E-business Perspective [J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2004,26(2):155-166
[37]和金生,王雪利.母公司对子公司知识转移的影响因素研究.西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2006年3月,16(2)：87-91
[38]Bong Y S, Kim Y H. Web-based Knowledge Management for Sharing Product Data in Virtual Enterprises [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2002,75(1-2):173-183
[39]王兴元.名牌生态系统中的知识传播与分享研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(8)：4851
[40]Pantelia N, Sockalingam S. Trust and Conflict With in Virtual Inter-organizational Alliances:a Framework for Facilitating Knowledge Sharing [J] Decision Support Systems,2005,39(4):599-617
[41]Baalen P V, Bloemhof-Ruwaard J, Heck E V. Knowledge Sharing in an Emerging Network of Practice:T he Role of a Knowledge Portal[J]. European Management Journal,2005,23(3):300-314
[42]张成洪,严正,宋亮.协同商务环境下的知识共享框架[J].复旦大学学报(自然科学版),2003,42(5)：755-760
[43]凌卓华.协同商务环境下知识共享的障碍因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(9)：37-40
[44]Carayannis E G.Alexander J, Ioannidis A. Leveraging Knowledge, Learning, and Innovation in Forming Strategic Government-university-industry (GUI) R&D Partnerships[J].Technovation,2000,20(9):477-488
[45]Roche C. Corporate Ontologies and Concurrent Engineering [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2000,107(1-3):187-193
[46]徐锐.战略联盟知识共享的关系风险及其控制方式[J].情报杂志,2005(8)：2-4
[47]Liu D R, Wu I C, Yang K S. Task-based K-Support System:Disseminating and Sharing Task-relevant Knowledge[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2005,29(2):408-423
[48]Soekijad M, Andriessen E. Conditions for Knowledge Sharing in Competitive Alliances[J]. European Management Journal,2003,21(5):578-587
[49]和金生,熊慧敏.知识共享的条件与簇群机制[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2003,5(4)：341-344
[50]王冰,顾远飞.簇群的知识共享机制和信任机制[J].外国经济与管理,2002,24(5)：2-7
[51张志远,谭跃进.客户知识共享过程中的完全信息动态博弈分析[J].上海工程技术大学学报,2003,17(1)：39-43
[52]张作凤.知识共享的可能性：一个博弈分析[J].图书情报工作,2004,48(2)：57-60
[53]Fernie S, Green S D, Weller S J, et al. Knowledge Sharing:Context, Confusion and Controversy[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2003,21(3):177-187
[54]Pan S L, Leidner D E.. Bridging Communities of Practice with Information Technology in Pursuit of Global Knowledge Sharing[J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems,2003,12(1):71-88
[55]Zhuge H. A Knowledge Grid Model and Platform for Global Knowledge Sharing[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2002,22(4):313-320
[56]Vasconcelos W, et al. On the Insufficiency of Ontologies:Problems in knowledge Sharing and Alternative Solutions [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,2002, 15(3):147-167
[57]Chen H, Schroeder J, Hauck R V. COPLINK Connect:Information and Knowledge Management for Law Enforcement [J]. Decision Support Systems,2002,34(3):271 —285
[58]郝永平,王崇海基于本体论的产品全过程知识共享研究[J].机械工程学报,2002,38(12)：126-130
[59]吴健,陈刚,尹建伟等.基于本体的产品配置知识共享[J].浙江大学学报(工学 版),2004,38(4)：478-494
[60]康虹,王敏.基于Web的企业知识共享系统设计[J].情报杂志,2005(6)：17-19
[61]李生琦,徐福缘,徐静.支持企业知识共享的企业本体论及其获取[J].计算机工程与应用,2004,40(2)：197-200
[62]杨溢.企业内知识共享与知识创新的实现[J].情报科学,2003,21(10)：1107-1109
[63]李富强,葛新权,吴永林.知识共享的企业知识管理系统[J].中国软科学,2002(10)：56-59
[64]马红梅,朗诵真,解玲.有关知识共享的几点思考[J].情报杂志,2001(4)：53-54
[65]张作凤.谈咨询企业知识共享机制的构建[J].情报杂志,2003(12)：45-47
[66]陈娟,王文平.知识型企业生命体智能单元间知识共享策略与激励措施研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2004,34(6)：842-846
[67]邓建友,周晓东.企业文化对知识共享的影响分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(9)：82-85
[68]宋亮,王建军,林丽闽等.打造知识平台,注重知识共享[J].研究与发展管理,2003,15(4)：14-18
[69]谭亚莉.促进组织内知识分享的人力资源管理对策[J].科学管理研究,2003,21(5)：102-105
[70]Jones S. Employee Rights, Employee Responsibilities and Knowledge Sharing in Intelligent Organization [J]. Employee Responsibilities and Rights journal, 2002,14(2-3):69-78
[71]Earl M. What on Earth is a CKO? [M]. London: Earl & Lan Scott, Survey IBM London Business School,1998.
[72]宋建元,张钢.组织网络化中的知识共享—基于知识链的分析[J].研究与发展管理,2004,16(4)：25-30
[73]王艳艳,李锡元.知识共享与企业激励制度[J].科技进步与对策,2004,21(4)：63-65
[74]孙卫忠,刘丽梅,孙梅.组织学习和知识共享影响因素试析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(7)：135-138
[75]Hedlund G. A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-form Corporation[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1):73-90
[76]Romme A G L. A Note on the Team-Hierarchy Debate [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(5):411-417
[77]Szulanski, G.. Exploring internal stickiness:Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996,17, Special Issue:27-43
[78]谭大鹏,霍国庆,知识转移一般过程研究[J]当代经济管理,2006,28(3)：1-15
[79]王兆祥知识转移过程的层次模型[J],中国管理科学,2006,14(3)：22-127.
[80]Fraser V M. Employee perceptions of knowledge sharing:Employment threat or synergy for the greater good?[J] Competitive Intelligence Review, 2000,11 (2):39-52
[81]Chow C W, Deng F J, Ho J L. The openness of knowledge sharing within organizations:A comparative study of the United States and the People'S Republic of China[J]. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2000(12):65-95
[82]Ford D P, Chan Y E. Knowledge sharing in a multi-cultural setting:A case study[J]. Knowledge Management Research and Practice,2003(1):11-27
[83]Thomas-hunt M et al, Who's really sharing? efects of social and expert status of knowledge exchange with groups[J]. Management Science, 2003,49(4):464-477
[84]Pan S,Sacrbrough H. A socio-technical view of knowledge sharing at Buckman Labs[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,1998,2(1):55-66
[85]McDermott R,0'Dell C. Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge [J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,2001,5(1):76-85
[86]Bock, Kim. Breaking the myths of rewards:An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing [J]. Information Resources Management Journal,2002,15(2):14-21
[87]Gupta A K, et al. Knowledge flows within a multinational corporations [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000(21):473-496
[88]谈正达,王文平,谈英姿.产业集群的知识共享机制的演化博弈分析[J].运筹与管理,2006,15(2)：61-64
[89]卢兵等.组织间隐性知识转移的微分动力学模型[J].系统工程,2005,23(11)：44-49
[90]Rong Du, Shizhong Ai, Yuqing Ren. Relationship between knowledge sharing and performance:A survey in Xian, China [J]. Expert systems with Applications 32(2007):38-46
[91]Tian-hui You, Fei-fei Li, and Zhu-chao Yu. A Method for Evaluating the Knowledge Transfer Ability in Organization[J]. SEM 2006,4092:576-585
[92]Chao-Min Chiu, Meng-Hsiang Hsu, Eric T G Wang. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities:An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 42(2006):1872-1888
[93]边燕杰,丘海雄.企业的社会资本及其功效.中国社会科学,2002(2)：87-99
[94]A L Barabasic, H Jeong. Evolution of social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A,311(2002):590-614.
[95]M Granovetter.The Strength of Weak Ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1973 (78):1360-1380
[96]J Coleman. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital [J]. American Journal of Sociology,1988 (94):95-120
[97]R Burt. Structural Holes [M]. MA Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1992.
[98]Andrew C. Inkpen, ERIC W. K. TSANG. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer [J]. Academy of Management Review 2005,30 (1):146-165
[99]Tsai, W.,& Ghoshal, S. Social capital and value creation:The role of intrafirm networks [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1998,41:464-476
[100]Hansen M. The Search-Transfer Problem:The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organizational Subunits [J]. Admin. Sci. Quart,1999: 82-111
[101]Uzzi, B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks:The paradox of embeddedness [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42: 35-67
[102]Daniel Z Levin, Rob Cross. The strength of weak ties you can trust:The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer [J]. Management Science 2004,50(11):1477-1490
[103]P Ingram, P Roberts. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry [J]. American Journal of Sociology,2000,106:387-423
[104]R Reagans, E Zuckerman. Networks diversity and performance:The social capital of R&D units [J]. Organization Science,2001,12:502-517
[105]Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks:Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44:996-1004.
[106]Rob Cross, Andrew P, L Prusak, Stephen P. Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks[J]. Organizational Dynamics,2001,30(2):100-120
[107]Ray Reagans, Bill McEvily, Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer:The Effects of Cohesion and Range [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,48 (2003): 240-267
[108]王三义,刘新梅等.社会资本结构维度对企业间知识转移影响的实证研究[J],科学进步与对策,2007(4)：105-108
[109]王夏洁,刘红丽.基于社会网络理论的知识链分析[J].情报杂志,2007(2)：18-21
[110]马费成,王晓光.知识转移的社会网络模型研究[J].江西社会科学,2006(7)：38-43
[111]王越.组织内社会网络的知识传导及成本研究[J].科学管理研究,2004,(8)：24-28
[112]Robin Cowan, Nicolas Jonard. Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 28(2004):1557-1575
[113]Fangcheng Tang, Jifeng Mu, Douglas L. MacLachlan, Implication of network size and structure on organizations'knowledge transfer[J], Expert Systems with Applications, in press.
[114]Stephen J.H.Yang, Irene Y. L. Chen. A social network-based system for supporting interactive collaboration in knowledge sharing over peer-to-peer network [J]. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies,68(2007):321-332
[115]杜骏飞.存在于虚无：虚拟社区的社会实在性辨析[J],现代传播,2004(1)：73-77
[116]林致立.虚拟社群的商业性应用：本质、分类与关键议题[D],台湾东吴大学企业管理学系硕士学位论文,2000年.
[117]周德民,吕耀怀.虚拟社区：传统社区概念的拓展[J].湖湘论坛,2003(6)：6-8
[118]易徽.网络虚拟社区的文化特色及其影响叮].西安政治学院学报,2002,15(2)：23-26
[119]刘秀生.虚拟社区市场与营销[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2001,(04)：20-24
[120]刘龙.关于网络经济中虚拟社区与品牌塑造的研究[J].经济问题探索,2002,(09)：14-18
[121]Hall, Hazel, Dianne Graham. Creation and recreation:motivating collaboration to generate knowledge capital in online communities [J]. International Journal of Information Management,24(2004):235-246
[122]Chan, Calvin M L, Mamata Bhandar, Lin-Bin Oh, Hock-Chuan Chan. Participation in a Virtual Community[C]. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on System Sciences.2004, Hawaii.
[123]Meng-Hsiang Hsu, Teresa L JU, Chia-Hui Yen, Chun-Ming Chang, Knowledge sharing in virtual communities:The relationship between trust, self-efficacy and outcome expectations[J]. International Journal of human-computer studies 65(2007):153-169
[124]M. M. Wasko, S. Fraja. Why should I share? Examing social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2005,29(1):35-57
[125]向海华.电子商务环境中虚拟社区的知识共享活动[J].情报杂志,2004,(07)：75-76
[126]李志刚电子商务中虚拟社区知识共享的作用及对策研究[J]情报杂志,2006(10)：35-39
[127]M. M. Wasko, S. Fraja., It is what one does:why people participant and help others in electronic Cops[J]. Journal of strategic Information systems, 2000,9(2-3):155-173
[128]A. Kankanhalli, B. C. Y. Tan, K.K.Wei. Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories [J]. MIS Quarterly,2005,29(1):113-143
[129]C.C.Wang, C.Y.Lai. Knowledeg contribution in online virtual community: capability and motivation [J]. Knowledge Science, engineering and management[M] Berlin:Spinger-relag,2006:442-453
[130]M. K.0. Lee, C. M. K. Cheung. Understanding customer knowledge sharing in web based discussion boards-An exploratory study [J].Internet Reasearch,2006,16(3):289-303
[131]S. Ye, H. P. Chen, X. L. Jin. An empirical study of what drives users to share knowledge in virtual communities [J]. Knowledge Science, engineering and management,2006:563-575
[132]Chih-Jou Chen, Shiu-Wan Hung. To give or to receive? Factors influencing members'knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities [J]. Information & Management 47 (2010) 226-236
[133]Tai-kuai Yu, Long-chuan Lu, Tsai Feng liu. Exploring Factors influence knowledge sharing behavior via weblogs [J]. Computers in Human Behavior 26(2010):32-41
[134]Ming-Ji Lin, Shiu-Wan hung, Chih-Jou Chen. Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities [J]. Computers in Human Behavior 25(2009):929-939
[135]周涛,鲁耀斌.基于社会影响理论的虚拟社区用户知识共享行为研究[J].研究与发展管理,2009年8月：78-82
[136]刘丽群,宋咏梅.虚拟社区中知识交流的行为动机及影响因素研究[J].新闻与传播研究,2007年第14卷第1期：43-51
[137]Howard Rheingold. Virtual Cornrnunity:Home steading on the electronic Frontier[M]. Addison-Wesley,1993.
[138]范晓屏,杨艳,卢艳峰.基于知识交流的虚拟社区管理方式研究[J].经济论坛,2005,19：53-56.
[139]柴晋颖,王飞绒.虚拟社区研究现状及展望[J].情报杂志,2007(5)：101-103
[140]武艳君,刘丽晶.论虚拟社区的自组织现象[J].系统科学学报,2007(1)：53-58
[141]王方华,徐小龙.虚拟社区前沿探析[J].外国经济与管理,2007,2(9)：10-16.
[142]Armstrong A, Hagel J. The real value of online communities[J]. Havard business review,1996(23):134-141
[143]徐小龙,王方华.虚拟社区的知识共享机制研究[J].自然辨证法研究,2007年8月(23)：83-86
[144]孔德超.虚拟社区的知识共享模式研究[J].图书情报学研究,2009,10：95-98
[145]赵玲,鲁耀斌,邓朝华.基于社会资本理论的虚拟社区感研究[J].管理学报,2009(9)：1169-1175
[146]罗家德.社会网分析讲义[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社.2010.
[147]Newman M E J. Scientific collaboration networks. Ⅱ.Shortest paths, weighted networks,and centrality[J]. Physical Review E,2001(65):1-7
[148]刘军.社会网络分析方法初探[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社2004.
[149]Dixon, N. M. Common knowledge:How Companies Thrive by Sharing what They Know[M]. Harvard Business School Press.2000.
[150]S. P. Borgatti, R. Cross, A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks, Management Science 49 (7) (2003):432-445
[151]Cross R, Prusak L. The people who make organizations go or stop[J]. Harvard Business Review,2002(6):5-12
[152]Wasserman, Stanley, Katherine Faust. Social Network Analysis:Methods and Applications[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.1994.
[153]Coleman, James. Foundations of Social Theory [M]. Cambridge, MA:H award University Press.1990.
[154]Thanasis Daradoumis, Alejandra Martlnez-Mone's, Fatos Xhafa. A layered framework for evaluating on-line collaborative learning interactions [J]. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 64 (2006) 622-635.
[155]王道平,许有志,王锐兵,供应链知识共享绩效的模糊综合评价方法[J].软科学,2008年12月第22卷第12期(总第108期)：14-18
[156]胡平波.基于BP网络模型的网络组织中知识共享效率评价[J].情报杂志,2009年9月：78-82
[157]李丽红,尹贻林,孙春玲,李淑洁.基于知识资本视角的知识共享绩效测度[J].情报科学,第26卷第10期,2008年10月：1482-1487
[158]安世虎,贺宾.KMS中用户知识共享行为模型的构建[J].计算机工程与设计,2006年11月：4081-4083
[159]埃利泽·盖斯勒,周萍译.科学技术测度体系[M].北京：科学技术文献出版社,2004.
[160]Luria, A. R, Cognitive Development [M]. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.1978.
[161]Sangman Han, Beom Jun Kim. Network analysis of an online community [J] Physica A,387(2008):5946-5951
[162]Joon Koh, young-Gul kim, Brain Butter and Gee-Woo Bock. Encouraging participation in virtual communities [J]. Communication of ACM,2007,50(2): 69-73.
[163]詹姆斯·M.布坎南(著),马珺(译).公共物品的需求与供给[M].上海人民出版社,2009.
[164]R.S. Burt, Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition [M]. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA,1992.
[165]S. Shmanske, Public Goods, Mixed Goods, and Monopolistic Competition [M]. Texas A&M University Press, College Station,1991.
[166]M.S. Granovetter. Problems of explanation in economic sociology [A]. in:N. Nohria, R. Eccles (Eds.), Organizations and networks:Structure, form, and action[C], Harvard Business School Press, Boston,1992:25-56
[167]D. D. Heckathorn, The dynamics and dilemmas of collective action [J]. American Sociological Review,41 (April), (1996):250-277
[168]C. Jones, W. S. Hesterly, S.P. Borgatti. A general theory of network governance:exchange conditions and social mechanisms [J]. Academy of Management Review,22(4), (1997):911-945
[169]P. Kollock, The economies of online cooperation:gifts, and public goods in cyberspace [A]. in:M. A. Smith, P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in Cyberspace[C], Routledge, New York,1999, pp.220-239
[170]D. Krackhardt, The strength of strong ties:the importance of philos in organizations [A].in:N. Nohria, R. Eccles (Eds.), Organizations and networks:Structure, form, and action[C], Harvard Business School Press, Boston,1992, pp.216-239
[171]G. Marwell, P. Oliver, The Critical Mass in Collective Action:A Micro-Social Theory [M], Cambridge University Press, New York,1993.
[172]G. Marwell, P. Oliver, Social networks and collective action:a theory of the critical mass Ⅲ[J]. American Journal of Sociology,94 (3), (1988): 502-534
[173]J. Nahapiet, S. Ghoshal, Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review,23(2) (1998):242-266
[174]P. Oliver, G Marwell. The paradox of group size in collective action: A theory of the critical mass Ⅱ [J]. American Sociological Review,53 (1988):1-8
[175]R. Putnam. Tuning in, tuning out:the strange disappearance of social capital in America [J]. Political Science and Politics, (December) (2000): 664-683
[176]沈满洪,谢慧明.公共物品问题及其相关解决思路-公共物品理论文献综述[J].浙江大学学报(人文社科版),2009年10月：45-56
[177]曼库尔·奥尔森：集体行动的逻辑[M].上海人民出版社,2006.
[178]Wellman B, Berkowitz S D. Social Structure:'A Network Approach[M]. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press,1988.
[179]George Kuk. Strategic interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List[J]. Management Science, Vol 52, No 7,2006:1031-1042
[180]J Vertommen, et al. Multiple-vector user profiles in support of knowledge sharing [J]. Information Science, April(2008):235-242
[181]R Baeza-Yates, R. Ribeiro-Neto, Modern Information Retrieval[M]. Addison-Wesley,1999.
[182]王众托,王志平.超网络初探[J].管理学报,2008年1月：1-8
[183]席运江,党延忠,廖开际.组织知识系统的知识超网络模型及应用[J].2009年6月：12-21
[184]沈秋英,王文平.基于社会网络与知识传播网络互动的集群超网络模型[J].东南大学学报：自然科学版,2009,39(2)：413-418
[185]宫辉等.Tobit模型在网络社区信息传播与管理中的应用[J].预测,2009年1月：77-80
[186]吴渝,肖开洲,刘洪涛,唐红.BBS虚拟社区的演化规律探索及仿真[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010年10月,Vol 30：1883-1890
[187]张立,刘云.虚拟社区网络的演化过程分析[J].物理学报,2008年9月,Vol57(09)：5419-5424
[188]尼葛洛庞蒂,胡泳,范海燕译.数字化生存[M].1996,海南出版社.
[189]唐·泰普斯科特.数字化成长[M].2009年11月,中国人民大学出版社.