高效玉米秸秆生物饲料的研制及其在肉鸡生产中的应用研究
|
摘要
目前,能量饲料的短缺是世界各国面临的一个重大问题。中国是世界上秸秆产量最多的国家,秸秆产量占中国生物质资源的一半,经济有效地利用秸秆能够实现可再生资源的利用,缓解能源危机,保护环境,实现农业和经济的可持续发展。随着动物生产中最主要的能量饲料——玉米价格的上涨,切实可行地将木质纤维类物质转化为动物饲料已迫在眉睫。本文将秸秆的预处理与微生物发酵相结合,研制出高效的生物发酵秸秆饲料,并进行工厂化生产,研究其营养价值和代替玉米对肉鸡生产性能的影响,结果表明:
(1)对玉米秸秆进行不同物理化学预处理的研究表明,玉米秸秆预处理的最优条件为:风干玉米秸秆在压力2.5 Mpa,保压时间200 s的条件下直接进行爆破处理,蒸汽爆破使秸秆中纤维素、半纤维素和木质素的降解率分别达到8.47%、50.45%和36.65%(P<0.05)。选择该条件进行预处理,在实际生产中是可行的,为后续微生物发酵奠定了基础。
(2)首先对玉米秸秆进行蒸汽爆破预处理(2.5 Mpa, 200 s),然后再进行不同微生物发酵,研究物理和生物学处理对秸秆成分、相关酶活和微观结构的影响。结果表明,两种微生物发酵均显著降低了秸秆中的纤维素含量(P<0.05),米曲霉在降解爆破秸秆中的中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维方面的效果显著高于康氏木霉(P<0.05),说明米曲霉发酵更有利于秸秆中不溶性纤维成分的转化。爆破预处理秸秆经米曲霉发酵6 d后,秸秆中纤维素和半纤维素的降解率分别为27.89%和64.80%(P<0.05),发酵秸秆中的滤纸酶、羧甲基纤维素酶、淀粉酶和蛋白酶活力分别达到335.10、1138.92、32.57和201.99 U/g。爆破秸秆经米曲霉发酵后,甲酸含量降低,糠醛全部被降解,有效地减少了爆破产物对动物生产可能产生的潜在负面影响。扫描电镜对微观结构的观察表明,未处理秸秆的表面规则平滑,紧密完整。爆破处理后的秸秆表面有许多球形的凸起结构,使秸秆中的木质素发生重排,提高了秸秆的比表面积。爆破秸秆经微生物发酵后,机械组织破碎,内部有更多的纤维组织暴露,更有利于动物对纤维成分的利用。爆破预处理和米曲霉发酵相联合,对于提高玉米秸秆的降解率具有非常重要的意义。
(3)以爆破玉米秸杆为主要原料(81-100%),以玉米(0、2.5、5.0%)、麸皮(0、2.5、5.0%)、豆粕(0、2.5、5.0%)和复合营养物质(0、2.0%、4.0%)设计四因素三水平正交试验,对爆破秸秆微生物发酵的培养基进行优化,正交试验结果表明爆破秸秆生物降解的最优培养基组合为:83.5%爆破玉米秸杆、5.0%玉米、2.5%麸皮、5.0%豆粕和4.0%营养液。其中营养液、豆粕和玉米的不同水平对纤维素的降解率有显著的影响(P<0.05)。
(4)分别采用套算法和强饲法测定生物秸秆肉鸡的表观代谢能。套算法选用16只AA商品肉鸡,分为2个处理,每个处理8只鸡。处理1饲喂基础日粮(基础日粮中添加了8%的生物秸秆),处理2饲喂试验日粮(以30%的生物秸秆代替基础日粮中的能量饲料和蛋白质饲料)。计算出基础日粮的肉鸡表观代谢能12.63 MJ/Kg,推算出生物秸秆的表观代谢能为12.46 MJ/kg,而根据套算法计算出生物秸秆的表观代谢能为4.38 MJ/Kg。强饲法选用10只AA商品肉鸡,分为2个处理,每个处理5只鸡。处理1饲喂生物秸秆,处理2饲喂爆破秸秆。计算出生物秸秆和爆破秸秆对肉鸡表观代谢能分别为5.30和6.33 MJ/kg。
(5)为研究生物秸秆替代玉米的适宜比例及生物秸秆对肉鸡生产性能和各项指标的影响,对肉鸡进行前期(1～21 d)和后期(22～42 d)两个阶段的饲养试验。前期选择1日龄健康的AA肉仔鸡200只鸡,分为5处理,每个处理4个重复,每个重复10只鸡。后期在前期原处理内共选择150只鸡,分为5个重复,每个重复6只鸡。对照组饲喂基础日粮,试验1组用生物秸秆代替基础日粮中4%的玉米(ME按照推算法计算结果12.46 MJ/kg计),试验2组用生物秸秆代替基础日粮中8%的玉米(ME按照推算法计算结果12.46 MJ/kg计),试验3组用生物秸秆代替基础日粮中12%的玉米(ME按照推算法计算结果12.46 MJ/kg计),试验4组用生物秸秆代替基础日粮中8%的玉米(ME按照强饲法计算结果5.30 MJ/kg计,各项营养指标与对照组平衡)
结果表明:在试验前期,饲料中添加各水平的生物秸秆均降低了肉鸡的日增重和饲料转化效率。12%的生物秸秆添加组和对照组相比显著降低了肉鸡对有机物质、能量和蛋白质的代谢率(P<0.05),显著降低了肉鸡回肠和盲肠的乳酸菌数量(P<0.05);12%的生物秸秆添加组和8%的生物秸秆加油组显著提高了肉鸡的血清尿酸的水平(P<0.05);饲料中添加12%的生物秸秆对肉鸡性能有显著的负面影响。8%生物秸秆添加组肉鸡十二指肠滤纸酶和CMC酶、盲肠的滤纸酶显著高于其它各组(P<0.05),添加8%的生物秸秆代替玉米更有利于纤维素酶活力的增加和肉鸡对饲料中纤维成分的消化。不同比例的生物秸秆代替玉米均降低了肉鸡饲养的经济效益。
在试验后期,饲料中添加4%和8%的生物秸秆代替玉米和对照组相比显著提高了肉鸡的采食量(P<0.05),其中8%组肉鸡日增重比对照组提高5.75%;4%和8%的生物秸秆代替玉米组饲料中中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维的代谢率显著高于对照组(P<0.05);8%生物秸秆代替玉米组肉鸡回肠和盲肠中的乳酸菌高于对照组(P<0.05),该组肉鸡十二指肠和盲肠的滤纸酶、CMC酶均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。饲料中添加12%的生物秸秆和对照组相比显著降低了肉鸡能量的代谢率(P<0.05);12%的生物秸秆添加组肉鸡回肠和盲肠的乳酸菌显著低于8%的生物秸秆代替玉米组(P<0.05);饲料中添加12%的生物秸秆代替玉米显著提高了肉鸡十二指肠和回肠的相对重量(P<0.05)。8%的生物秸秆能量平衡组显著提高了血清总蛋白、白蛋白和球蛋白的水平(P<0.05),提高了蛋白质的利用效率;8%的生物秸秆能量平衡组肉鸡回肠和盲肠中的乳酸菌高于对照组(P<0.05);8%的生物秸秆能量平衡组使肉鸡胸肌的红度升高,提高肉的品质。在肉鸡后期饲料中添加4%的生物秸秆代替玉米,提高了肉鸡的经济效益,添加8%的生物秸秆代替玉米,经济效益和对照组相当,饲料中添加8%的生物秸秆代替玉米经济效益高于8%的生物秸秆能量平衡组。因此,在肉鸡饲养后期的饲粮中添加4-8%的生物秸秆代替玉米有利于肉鸡生产性能和经济效益的提高,对于农作物秸杆的利用及节粮型畜牧业的发展具有重要意义。
Energy feed shortage is a major problem all over the world. China is the leading crop straw producer in the world, and the straw yield accounts for half of the biomass resources. It can realize the use of renewable resources, relieve the energy resources crisis, protect the environment and realize the sustainable development of agriculture and economy by the economic and effective utilization of straw. With the rising price and shortage of corn, the main energy feed in animal production, it is imminent to convert straws into animal feed.
In this study, the pretreatment and microbial fermentation was combined in developing the biological fermentation of corn stalk (BFCS). Study on its nutritional value and effect on production performance of broiler was conducted. The results were as follows:
(1) The effect of different physical and chemical pretreatments on corn stalk degradation was studied. The results showed that the optimum condition of corn stalk pretreatment was air dry corn stalk exploded directly under 2.5 Mpa pressure for 200 s. The degradation rates of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin in the corn stalk were 8.47%, 50.45% and 36.65%, respectively. The pretreatment was practical and suitable for the subsequent microbial fermentation.
(2) To study the combined effect of physical and biological treatments on corn stalk degradation, microstructure, composition and enzyme productions, the corn stalk was steam exploded (2.5 Mpa, 200 s), and then followed by microbial fermentation. The results showed that microbial fermentation could reduce the contents of cellulose in original and exploded stalks significantly (P<0.05). NDF and ADF contents in the exploded corn stalk fermented by Aspergillus oryzae was significantly lower than that fermented by Trichoderma koningii (P<0.05), which indicated Aspergillus oryzae fermentation was more effective than Trichoderma koningii for the insoluble fiber degradation. After the exploded corn stalk was fermented by Aspergillus oryzae for 6 days, the contents of cellulose and hemicellulose in the fermented corn stalk were decreased by 27.89% and 64.80% respectively, compared with the original corn stalk (P<0.05). The filter paper cellulase, CMCase, amylase and protease activities in the fermented products were 335.10, 1138.92, 32.57 and 201.99 U/g, respectively. The content of formic acid in the fermented products was lower than that in the exploded stalk, and furfural in the fermented products was all degraded, which indicated that fermentation treatment effectively reduced the content of inhibitors produced in the pretreatment. The microstructure was analyzed by scanning electron microscope, the surface of untreated corn stalk was smooth and tightly complete. There were many spherical structures on the surface of exploded corn stalk, indicating explosion treatment made the lignin in corn stalk rearrangement to increase the specific surface area. The fermentation of exploded corn stalk by Aspergillus oryzae made the tissues broken, and more internal fibrous exposed, which contributed to the utilization of animals. The corn stalk pre-treated by steam explosion and followed by Aspergillus oryzae fermentation seems to be a new prospective method for corn stalk degradation and application.
(3) The four-factor and three-level orthogonal experiment was used to determine the optimum fermentation prescription of exploded corn stalk. The result showed that the optimal medium for biodegradation of exploded corn stalk was 5% corn meal, 2.5% wheat bran, 5% soybean meal and 4% the nutrient solution. The levels of nutrient solution, corn, and soybean had significant effect on stalk degradation (P<0.05).
(4) Substitution method and emptying-force-feeding method were used to determine the apparent metabolic energy of BFCS separately. In substitution method, a total of 16 AA broilers were assigned to 2 groups, 8 broilers for each group. Group 1 was fed with the basal diet (consist of 8% BFCS); group 2 was added with 30% BFCS to replace the same percent of energy and protein feed in the basal diet. The results showed that the apparent metabolic energy (AME) of broiler in basal diet is 12.63 MJ/kg, AME of BFCS predicted by the formulation of basal diet was 12.46 MJ/kg,which was 4.38 MJ/Kg calculated by the formula. In emptying-force-feeding method, a total of 10 AA broilers were assigned to 2 groups, 5 broilers for each group. Group 1 was added with the BFCS; and group 2 was added with exploded corn stalk. The result showed that AME of broilers in group1 and group 2 was 5.30 and 6.33 MJ/kg, respectively.
(5) A 2-period feeding program was adopted in the experiment to study the effect of BFCS for replacing corn meal on broiler production, and to get the suitable substitution rate for broiler farming.
In the earlier stage (1-21 d), a total of 200 one-day-old AA broilers were assigned to 5 groups, 40 broilers for each group consisting of 4 replicates. In the later stage (22-42 d), a total of 150 22-day-old AA broilers were assigned to 5 groups, 30 broilers for each group consisting of 5 replicates. The control group was the basal diet; group 1, 2 and group 3 was added with 4%, 8% and 12% BFCS for replacing the same percent of corn meal in the basal diet, respectively. Group 4 was added with 8% BFCS for replacing the same percent of corn meal in the basal diet, and the energy was balanced with the control.
In the earlier stage, the results showed that the average daily gain (ADG) and the feed conversation (FCR) were decreased significantly in the groups added with BFCS (P<0.05); the organic matter, energy and protein metabolic rates in group 3 were lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The counts of lactic acid bacteria in the ileum and cecum in group 3 was reduced, compared with the control group (P<0.05). The serum uric acid content in group 3 and 4 was higher than that in the control (P<0.05). The activities of filter paper enzyme, CMC enzyme in duodenum and the filter paper enzyme in cecum in group 2 were higher than that in the other group (P<0.05). Economic benefit of the groups added with BFCS were reduced, compared with the control.
In the later stage, the feed intake was improved in group 1 and group 2 (P<0.05); metabolic rate of NDF and ADF in group1 and group 2 were significantly higer than that in the control group (P<0.05); lactic acid bacteria counts in ileum and cecum of group 2 was increased significantly (P<0.05). The activities of filter paper and CMC enzymes in duodenum and cecum in group 2 were higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The average daily gain (ADG) was improved in group 2, 3 and 4 (P<0.05); the energy metabolic rate was reduced in group 3 (P<0.05); lactic acid bacteria counts in ileum and cecum of group 3 were significantly lower than that in group 2 (P<0.05); relative weight of duodenal and ileum were improved in group 3. The serum total protein, albumin and globin were improved in group 5 (P<0.05), lactic acid bacteria counts in ileum and cecum were increased significantly in group 5 (P<0.05), the red degree of pectorals in group 5 was also increased. The economic benefit in group 1 was higher than that in the control group, the economic benefit in group 2 was comparable to that in the control, and was higher than that in group 4.
In conclusion, 4-8% BFCS to replace corn meal in the diets of broilers at later feeding stage could improve production performance of broilers, and the application of BFCS in animal production is an economic and feasible way.
(1)对玉米秸秆进行不同物理化学预处理的研究表明,玉米秸秆预处理的最优条件为:风干玉米秸秆在压力2.5 Mpa,保压时间200 s的条件下直接进行爆破处理,蒸汽爆破使秸秆中纤维素、半纤维素和木质素的降解率分别达到8.47%、50.45%和36.65%(P<0.05)。选择该条件进行预处理,在实际生产中是可行的,为后续微生物发酵奠定了基础。
(2)首先对玉米秸秆进行蒸汽爆破预处理(2.5 Mpa, 200 s),然后再进行不同微生物发酵,研究物理和生物学处理对秸秆成分、相关酶活和微观结构的影响。结果表明,两种微生物发酵均显著降低了秸秆中的纤维素含量(P<0.05),米曲霉在降解爆破秸秆中的中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维方面的效果显著高于康氏木霉(P<0.05),说明米曲霉发酵更有利于秸秆中不溶性纤维成分的转化。爆破预处理秸秆经米曲霉发酵6 d后,秸秆中纤维素和半纤维素的降解率分别为27.89%和64.80%(P<0.05),发酵秸秆中的滤纸酶、羧甲基纤维素酶、淀粉酶和蛋白酶活力分别达到335.10、1138.92、32.57和201.99 U/g。爆破秸秆经米曲霉发酵后,甲酸含量降低,糠醛全部被降解,有效地减少了爆破产物对动物生产可能产生的潜在负面影响。扫描电镜对微观结构的观察表明,未处理秸秆的表面规则平滑,紧密完整。爆破处理后的秸秆表面有许多球形的凸起结构,使秸秆中的木质素发生重排,提高了秸秆的比表面积。爆破秸秆经微生物发酵后,机械组织破碎,内部有更多的纤维组织暴露,更有利于动物对纤维成分的利用。爆破预处理和米曲霉发酵相联合,对于提高玉米秸秆的降解率具有非常重要的意义。
(3)以爆破玉米秸杆为主要原料(81-100%),以玉米(0、2.5、5.0%)、麸皮(0、2.5、5.0%)、豆粕(0、2.5、5.0%)和复合营养物质(0、2.0%、4.0%)设计四因素三水平正交试验,对爆破秸秆微生物发酵的培养基进行优化,正交试验结果表明爆破秸秆生物降解的最优培养基组合为:83.5%爆破玉米秸杆、5.0%玉米、2.5%麸皮、5.0%豆粕和4.0%营养液。其中营养液、豆粕和玉米的不同水平对纤维素的降解率有显著的影响(P<0.05)。
(4)分别采用套算法和强饲法测定生物秸秆肉鸡的表观代谢能。套算法选用16只AA商品肉鸡,分为2个处理,每个处理8只鸡。处理1饲喂基础日粮(基础日粮中添加了8%的生物秸秆),处理2饲喂试验日粮(以30%的生物秸秆代替基础日粮中的能量饲料和蛋白质饲料)。计算出基础日粮的肉鸡表观代谢能12.63 MJ/Kg,推算出生物秸秆的表观代谢能为12.46 MJ/kg,而根据套算法计算出生物秸秆的表观代谢能为4.38 MJ/Kg。强饲法选用10只AA商品肉鸡,分为2个处理,每个处理5只鸡。处理1饲喂生物秸秆,处理2饲喂爆破秸秆。计算出生物秸秆和爆破秸秆对肉鸡表观代谢能分别为5.30和6.33 MJ/kg。
(5)为研究生物秸秆替代玉米的适宜比例及生物秸秆对肉鸡生产性能和各项指标的影响,对肉鸡进行前期(1～21 d)和后期(22～42 d)两个阶段的饲养试验。前期选择1日龄健康的AA肉仔鸡200只鸡,分为5处理,每个处理4个重复,每个重复10只鸡。后期在前期原处理内共选择150只鸡,分为5个重复,每个重复6只鸡。对照组饲喂基础日粮,试验1组用生物秸秆代替基础日粮中4%的玉米(ME按照推算法计算结果12.46 MJ/kg计),试验2组用生物秸秆代替基础日粮中8%的玉米(ME按照推算法计算结果12.46 MJ/kg计),试验3组用生物秸秆代替基础日粮中12%的玉米(ME按照推算法计算结果12.46 MJ/kg计),试验4组用生物秸秆代替基础日粮中8%的玉米(ME按照强饲法计算结果5.30 MJ/kg计,各项营养指标与对照组平衡)
结果表明:在试验前期,饲料中添加各水平的生物秸秆均降低了肉鸡的日增重和饲料转化效率。12%的生物秸秆添加组和对照组相比显著降低了肉鸡对有机物质、能量和蛋白质的代谢率(P<0.05),显著降低了肉鸡回肠和盲肠的乳酸菌数量(P<0.05);12%的生物秸秆添加组和8%的生物秸秆加油组显著提高了肉鸡的血清尿酸的水平(P<0.05);饲料中添加12%的生物秸秆对肉鸡性能有显著的负面影响。8%生物秸秆添加组肉鸡十二指肠滤纸酶和CMC酶、盲肠的滤纸酶显著高于其它各组(P<0.05),添加8%的生物秸秆代替玉米更有利于纤维素酶活力的增加和肉鸡对饲料中纤维成分的消化。不同比例的生物秸秆代替玉米均降低了肉鸡饲养的经济效益。
在试验后期,饲料中添加4%和8%的生物秸秆代替玉米和对照组相比显著提高了肉鸡的采食量(P<0.05),其中8%组肉鸡日增重比对照组提高5.75%;4%和8%的生物秸秆代替玉米组饲料中中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维的代谢率显著高于对照组(P<0.05);8%生物秸秆代替玉米组肉鸡回肠和盲肠中的乳酸菌高于对照组(P<0.05),该组肉鸡十二指肠和盲肠的滤纸酶、CMC酶均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。饲料中添加12%的生物秸秆和对照组相比显著降低了肉鸡能量的代谢率(P<0.05);12%的生物秸秆添加组肉鸡回肠和盲肠的乳酸菌显著低于8%的生物秸秆代替玉米组(P<0.05);饲料中添加12%的生物秸秆代替玉米显著提高了肉鸡十二指肠和回肠的相对重量(P<0.05)。8%的生物秸秆能量平衡组显著提高了血清总蛋白、白蛋白和球蛋白的水平(P<0.05),提高了蛋白质的利用效率;8%的生物秸秆能量平衡组肉鸡回肠和盲肠中的乳酸菌高于对照组(P<0.05);8%的生物秸秆能量平衡组使肉鸡胸肌的红度升高,提高肉的品质。在肉鸡后期饲料中添加4%的生物秸秆代替玉米,提高了肉鸡的经济效益,添加8%的生物秸秆代替玉米,经济效益和对照组相当,饲料中添加8%的生物秸秆代替玉米经济效益高于8%的生物秸秆能量平衡组。因此,在肉鸡饲养后期的饲粮中添加4-8%的生物秸秆代替玉米有利于肉鸡生产性能和经济效益的提高,对于农作物秸杆的利用及节粮型畜牧业的发展具有重要意义。
Energy feed shortage is a major problem all over the world. China is the leading crop straw producer in the world, and the straw yield accounts for half of the biomass resources. It can realize the use of renewable resources, relieve the energy resources crisis, protect the environment and realize the sustainable development of agriculture and economy by the economic and effective utilization of straw. With the rising price and shortage of corn, the main energy feed in animal production, it is imminent to convert straws into animal feed.
In this study, the pretreatment and microbial fermentation was combined in developing the biological fermentation of corn stalk (BFCS). Study on its nutritional value and effect on production performance of broiler was conducted. The results were as follows:
(1) The effect of different physical and chemical pretreatments on corn stalk degradation was studied. The results showed that the optimum condition of corn stalk pretreatment was air dry corn stalk exploded directly under 2.5 Mpa pressure for 200 s. The degradation rates of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin in the corn stalk were 8.47%, 50.45% and 36.65%, respectively. The pretreatment was practical and suitable for the subsequent microbial fermentation.
(2) To study the combined effect of physical and biological treatments on corn stalk degradation, microstructure, composition and enzyme productions, the corn stalk was steam exploded (2.5 Mpa, 200 s), and then followed by microbial fermentation. The results showed that microbial fermentation could reduce the contents of cellulose in original and exploded stalks significantly (P<0.05). NDF and ADF contents in the exploded corn stalk fermented by Aspergillus oryzae was significantly lower than that fermented by Trichoderma koningii (P<0.05), which indicated Aspergillus oryzae fermentation was more effective than Trichoderma koningii for the insoluble fiber degradation. After the exploded corn stalk was fermented by Aspergillus oryzae for 6 days, the contents of cellulose and hemicellulose in the fermented corn stalk were decreased by 27.89% and 64.80% respectively, compared with the original corn stalk (P<0.05). The filter paper cellulase, CMCase, amylase and protease activities in the fermented products were 335.10, 1138.92, 32.57 and 201.99 U/g, respectively. The content of formic acid in the fermented products was lower than that in the exploded stalk, and furfural in the fermented products was all degraded, which indicated that fermentation treatment effectively reduced the content of inhibitors produced in the pretreatment. The microstructure was analyzed by scanning electron microscope, the surface of untreated corn stalk was smooth and tightly complete. There were many spherical structures on the surface of exploded corn stalk, indicating explosion treatment made the lignin in corn stalk rearrangement to increase the specific surface area. The fermentation of exploded corn stalk by Aspergillus oryzae made the tissues broken, and more internal fibrous exposed, which contributed to the utilization of animals. The corn stalk pre-treated by steam explosion and followed by Aspergillus oryzae fermentation seems to be a new prospective method for corn stalk degradation and application.
(3) The four-factor and three-level orthogonal experiment was used to determine the optimum fermentation prescription of exploded corn stalk. The result showed that the optimal medium for biodegradation of exploded corn stalk was 5% corn meal, 2.5% wheat bran, 5% soybean meal and 4% the nutrient solution. The levels of nutrient solution, corn, and soybean had significant effect on stalk degradation (P<0.05).
(4) Substitution method and emptying-force-feeding method were used to determine the apparent metabolic energy of BFCS separately. In substitution method, a total of 16 AA broilers were assigned to 2 groups, 8 broilers for each group. Group 1 was fed with the basal diet (consist of 8% BFCS); group 2 was added with 30% BFCS to replace the same percent of energy and protein feed in the basal diet. The results showed that the apparent metabolic energy (AME) of broiler in basal diet is 12.63 MJ/kg, AME of BFCS predicted by the formulation of basal diet was 12.46 MJ/kg,which was 4.38 MJ/Kg calculated by the formula. In emptying-force-feeding method, a total of 10 AA broilers were assigned to 2 groups, 5 broilers for each group. Group 1 was added with the BFCS; and group 2 was added with exploded corn stalk. The result showed that AME of broilers in group1 and group 2 was 5.30 and 6.33 MJ/kg, respectively.
(5) A 2-period feeding program was adopted in the experiment to study the effect of BFCS for replacing corn meal on broiler production, and to get the suitable substitution rate for broiler farming.
In the earlier stage (1-21 d), a total of 200 one-day-old AA broilers were assigned to 5 groups, 40 broilers for each group consisting of 4 replicates. In the later stage (22-42 d), a total of 150 22-day-old AA broilers were assigned to 5 groups, 30 broilers for each group consisting of 5 replicates. The control group was the basal diet; group 1, 2 and group 3 was added with 4%, 8% and 12% BFCS for replacing the same percent of corn meal in the basal diet, respectively. Group 4 was added with 8% BFCS for replacing the same percent of corn meal in the basal diet, and the energy was balanced with the control.
In the earlier stage, the results showed that the average daily gain (ADG) and the feed conversation (FCR) were decreased significantly in the groups added with BFCS (P<0.05); the organic matter, energy and protein metabolic rates in group 3 were lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The counts of lactic acid bacteria in the ileum and cecum in group 3 was reduced, compared with the control group (P<0.05). The serum uric acid content in group 3 and 4 was higher than that in the control (P<0.05). The activities of filter paper enzyme, CMC enzyme in duodenum and the filter paper enzyme in cecum in group 2 were higher than that in the other group (P<0.05). Economic benefit of the groups added with BFCS were reduced, compared with the control.
In the later stage, the feed intake was improved in group 1 and group 2 (P<0.05); metabolic rate of NDF and ADF in group1 and group 2 were significantly higer than that in the control group (P<0.05); lactic acid bacteria counts in ileum and cecum of group 2 was increased significantly (P<0.05). The activities of filter paper and CMC enzymes in duodenum and cecum in group 2 were higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The average daily gain (ADG) was improved in group 2, 3 and 4 (P<0.05); the energy metabolic rate was reduced in group 3 (P<0.05); lactic acid bacteria counts in ileum and cecum of group 3 were significantly lower than that in group 2 (P<0.05); relative weight of duodenal and ileum were improved in group 3. The serum total protein, albumin and globin were improved in group 5 (P<0.05), lactic acid bacteria counts in ileum and cecum were increased significantly in group 5 (P<0.05), the red degree of pectorals in group 5 was also increased. The economic benefit in group 1 was higher than that in the control group, the economic benefit in group 2 was comparable to that in the control, and was higher than that in group 4.
In conclusion, 4-8% BFCS to replace corn meal in the diets of broilers at later feeding stage could improve production performance of broilers, and the application of BFCS in animal production is an economic and feasible way.
引文
[1] Sánchez O J, Cardona C A. Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2008, 99: 5270–5295.
[2]毕于运,高春雨,王亚静,等.中国秸秆资源数量估算[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(12):211–217.
[3]严妍,接梅梅,韩姗珊.农作物秸秆综合利用方法浅析农作物秸秆综合利用方法浅析[J].污染防治技术.2010,23(4):87–88.
[4] Laureano P L, Teymouri F, Alizadeh H, et al. Understanding factors that limit enzymatic h y d r o ly s i s o f b i o m a s s [ J ] . A p p l . B i o c h e m . 2 0 0 5 , 1 8 : 1 0 8 1– 1 0 9 9 .
[5] William O S, Dohertya, Payam M, et al. Value-adding to cellulosicethanol: Ligninpolymers[J]. Industrial Crops and Products. 2010, 5: 18–22.
[6] Saha B C, Iten L B, Cotta M A, et al. Dilute acid pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of wheat straw to ethanol. Process Biochem[J]. 2005, 40: 3693–3700.
[7]冯仰廉,张子仪.低质粗饲料的营养价值及合理利用[J].中国畜牧杂志,2001,37(6):3–5.
[8] Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2002, 83:1–11.
[9] Hendriks A, Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2009, 100: 10–18.
[10] Taherzadeh M J, Karimi K. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review[J]. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9: 1621–1651.
[11] Koullas D P, Christakopoulos P, Kekos D, et al. Correlating the effect of pretreatment on the enzymatic hydrolysis of straw[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering.1992, 39: 113–116.
[12] Farid T, Dimitar K, Irini A. Production of bioethanol from wheat straw: An overview on pretreatment,hydrolysis and fermentation[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2010, 101: 4744–4753.
[13] Bobleter O. Hydrothermal degradation of polymers derived from plants[J]. Prog. Polym. 1994, 19: 797–841.
[14] Garrote G, Dominguez H, Parajo J C. Hydrothermal processing of lignocellulosic materials[J]. Holz Roh Werkst. 1999, 57:191–202.
[15] Brownell H H, Yu E K C, Saddler J N. Steam-explosion pretreatment of wood: effect of chip size, acid, moisture content and pressure drop[J]. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1986, 28:792–801.
[16] Azuma J I, Tanaka F, Koshijima T. Enhancement of enzymatic susceptibility of lignocellulosic wastes by microwave irradiation[J]. Ferment Technol. 1984, 62:377–384.
[17]邓华,李淳,曾秋苑,等.微波辐射下秸秆纤维微观结构的变化[J].分析测试学报,2010,29(4):336–340.
[18] Galbe M, Zacchi G. A review of the production of ethanol from softwood[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2002, 59: 618–628.
[19] Sanchez G, Pilcher L, Roslander C, et al. Dilute-acid hydrolysis for fermentation of the Bolivian straw material[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2004, 93 (3): 249–256.
[20] Kootstra A M J, Beeftink H H, Scott E L, et al. Comparison of dilute mineral and organic acid pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw[J].Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2009, 46: 126–131.
[21] Kumar P, Barrett D M, Delwiche M J, et al. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production[J].Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2009, 48: 3713–3729.
[22] Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review [J]. Bioresource Technol. 2002, 83: 1–11.
[23] Cheng Z S. Recent developments in China pulp and paper research on wheat straw. In: Straw - A Valuable Raw Material[J]. Pira Conference Proceedings. 1993, 2: l–23.
[24] Sun R C, Mark L J, Banks W B. Influence of alkaline pre-treatments on the cell wall components wheat straw[J]. Industrial Crops and Products. 1995, 4:127–145.
[25] Kim S, Holtzapple M T. Delignification kinetics of corn stover in lime pretreatment[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2006, 97:778–785.
[26] Mosier N, Wyman C E, Dale B D, et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2005, 96: 673–686.
[27] Owen E, Klopfenstein T, Urio N A. Treatment with other chemicals, Straw and Other Fibrous By-products as Feed[J]. Bioresour Technol. 1984, 8: 248–275.
[28] Azzam A M. Pretreatment of cane bagasse with alkaline hydrogen peroxide for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and ethanol fermentation[J]. Environ. Sci. 1989, 24 (4): 421–433.
[29]余洪波,张晓昱,柯静,等.碱氧化预处理玉米秸秆酶解条件的优化[J].农业工程学报.2009,4:201–205.
[30] Teixeira L C, Linden J C, Schroeder H A. Alkaline and peracetic acid pretreatments of biomass for ethanol production[J]. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1999, 3:19–34.
[31] Gould J M. Alkaline peroxide delignification of agricultural residues to enhance enzymatic saccharification[J]. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1984, 26: 46–52.
[32] Gregg D, Saddler J N. A techno-economic assessment of the pretreatment and fractionation steps of a biomass-to-ethanol process[J]. Appl Biochem.Biotechnol. 1996, 4: 711–727.
[33] Gossett J M, Stuckey D C, Owen W F, et al. Heat treatment and anaerobic digestion of refuse[J]. Environ Eng Div. 1982, 108: 437–454.
[34] Xu F, Yu S, Jian Z, et al. Status and prospect of lignocellulosic bioethanol production in China.Bioresource Technology[J]. 2010, 101: 4814–4819.
[35] Hana G P, Deng J, Zhang S Y, et al. Effect of steam explosion treatment on characteristics of wheat straw[J]. Industrial Crops and Products . 2010, 31: 28–33.
[36] Zhang L H , Li D, Wang L J, et al. Effect of steam explosion on biodegradation of lignin in wheat straw[J]. Bioresource Technology 2008, 99: 8512–8515.
[37]王许涛,张百良,宋安东,等.蒸汽爆破技术在秸秆厌氧发酵中的应用[J].农业工程学报.2008,24(8):189–192.
[38] Morjanoff P J, Gray P P. Optimization of steam explosion as method for increasing susceptibility of sugarcane bagasse to enzymatic saccharification[J]. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1987, 29: 733–741.
[39] Oliva J M, Sáez F, Ballesteros I, et al. Effect of lignocellulosic degradation compounds from steam explosion pretreatment on ethanol fermentation by thermotolerant yeast[J]. Bioresource Technology 2003, 59: 5122–5130.
[40] Petersen M O, Larsen J, Thomsen M H. Optimization of hydrothermal pretreatment of wheat straw for production of bioethanol at low water consumption without addition of chemicals[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2009, 33: 834–840.
[41] Laser M, Schulman D, Allen S G, et al. A comparison of liquid hot water and steam pretreatments of sugar cane bagase for conversion to ethanol[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2002, 81: 33–44.
[42] Beguin P, Aubert J P. The biological degradation of cellulose[J]. Ferm Microbiol Rev. 1994, 13: 25–58.
[43] Kerem Z, Hadar Y. Effect of manganese on preferential degradation of lignin by Pleurotus ostreatus during solid-state fermentation[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995, 61: 3057–3062.
[44] Karunanandaa K, Varga G A. Colonization of rice straw by white-rot fungi (Cyathus stercoreus): effect on ruminal fermentation pattern, nitrogen metabolism, and fiber utilization during continuous culture[J]. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1996, 61:1–16.
[45] Yu H B, Zhang X Y, Song L L, et al. Evaluation of white-rot fungi-assisted alkaline/oxidative pretreatment of corn straw undergoing enzymatic hydrolysis by cellulase[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2010, 110(6): 660–664.
[46] Taniguchi M Y, Suzuki H, Watanabe D, et al. Evaluation of Pretreatment with Pleurotus ostreatus for Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Rice Straw[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2005, 100(6): 637–643.
[47] Harman G E, Kubicek C P, Gliocladium. Enzymes, Biological Control and Commercial Applications. Bioresour Technol. 1988, 50:18–23.
[48]王石玉,陈雄,王永泽,等.拟康氏木霉同态发酵产纤维素酶系的研究[J].中国饲料,2008,23:23–26.
[49]方浩,宋向阳,赵晨,等.里氏木霉与黑曲霉混合发酵产纤维素酶的研究[J].林产化学与工业. 2009, 29(6):1–19.
[50] Cariello M E, Casta?eda L, Riobo I, et al. Endogenousmicroorganisms inoculant to speed up the composting process of urban swage sludge[J].Soil SC Plant Nutr. 2007, 7: 26–37.
[51] Singh A, Sharma S. Composting of a crop residue through treatment with microorganisms and subsequent vermicomposting. Bioresour Technol .2002, 85: 107–110.
[52]孙凯,孟宁,冯琳,等.产纤维素酶细菌的分离鉴定及产酶特性研究[J].兰州交通大学学报,2009,28(4):159–162.
[53]苏丽萍.纤维素复合酶对豌豆秸秆营养价值的影响[J].青海大学学报(自然科学版),2009,27(3):51–54.
[54]李荣斌,董绪燕,魏芳,等.微波预处理超声辅助酶解大豆秸秆条件优化[J].中国农学通报,2009,19:314–318.
[55] Silas G V B, Elisa E, David A M. Microbial conversion of lignocellulosic residues for production of animal feeds[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2002, 98: 1–12.
[56] Huettermann A, Hamza A S, Chet I, et al. Recycling of agricultural wastes by white-rot fungi for the production of fodder for ruminants[J]. Agro Food Ind. Hi-Technol. 2000, 6: 29–32.
[57] Tengerdy R P, Szakacs G, Sipocz J. Bioprocessing of sweet sorghum with in situ produced enzymes[J]. Appl. Biochem. 1996, 58: 563–569.
[58] Prasad R D D, Reddy M R, Reddy G V N. Effect of feeding baled and stacked urea treated rice straw on the performance of crossbred cows[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 1998, 73: 347–352.
[59] Chaudhry A S. Rumen degradation in sacco in sheep of wheat straw treated with calcium oxide, sodium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide plus hydrogen peroxide[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2000, 83: 313–323.
[60]侯进,李婷,吕文龙,等.应用白腐真菌发酵曲种发酵玉米秸秆的研究[J].中国奶牛,2010, 7:25–28.
[61]李婷,李杰,侯进,等.绵羊对侧耳菌处理玉米秸秆的采食特性和表观消化率的研究[J].饲料博览,2010,4: 1–3.
[62] Viola F, Zimbardi, Cardinale M. Processing cereal straws by steam extrusion in a pilot plant to enhance digestibility in ruminants[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2008, 99: 681–689.
[63]孙耀华,场奎林.纤维素复合酶半干贮秸秆饲料制作与饲喂效果[J].四川畜牧兽医.1997,2:32–33.
[64]逮素芬.高效秸秆微生物调制剂发酵农作物秸秆试验[J].内蒙古畜牧科学. 2002,3:27–29.
[65] Robinson T, Nigam P. Bioreactor design for protein enrichment of agricultural residues by solid state fermentation[J]. Biochem. Eng. 2003, 13: 197–203.
[66] Manmdebvu P, West J W, Froetschel M A, et al. Effects of enzyme and microbial treatment of bermudagrass forages before ensiling on cell wall composition, end products of silage fermentation and in situ digestion kinetics[J]. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1999, 77: 317–329.
[67] Tripathi J P, Yadav J S. Optimization of solid-state fermentation of wheat straw into animal feed by Pleurotus ostreatus: a pilot effort[J]. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1992, 37: 59–72.
[68]崔秀艳,王长文,乔洁,等.鹅对玉米秸秆和羊草消化利用的研究.饲料研究,2009,2:52–56.
[69]黄建华,娄军,张志勇,等.复合酶解玉米秸秆和活菌制剂应用饲喂蛋鸡试验[J].饲料研究. 1998,9:27–28.
[70]胡建宏,许秀娟.新型秸秆微贮饲料饲喂肉猪的生长动态研究[J].西北农业学报. 2002, 11(2):10–12.
[71]杨德智,胡江,魏时来.微贮玉米秸秆对猪生长及饲粮养分利用的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2008,3:56–59.
[72]宋金昌,范莉.利用微生物提高秸秆粗蛋白质的试验[J].动物科学与动物医学,2002,1:47–49.
[73]杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1999.
[74] Kerley M S, Fahey J, Berger G C, et al. Effect of treating wheat straw with pH-regulated solutions of alkaline hydrogen peroxide on nutrient digestion by sheep[J].Dairy Sci. 1987, (70): 2078–2084.
[75] Torget R, Walter P, Himmel M, et al. Dilute acid pretreatment of corn residues and short rotation woody crops [J]. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1991, 28: 75–86.
[76] Ropars M, Marchal R, Pourquie J, et al. Large-scale enzymatic hydrolysis of agricultural lignocellulosic biomass. Part 1: Pretreatment procedures. Biores Technol[J]. 1992, 42: 197–204.
[77] Alexandre E, Alvaro L,Mathias, et al. Fractionation of Eucalyptus grandis chips by dilute acid-catalysed steam explosion[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2003, 86: 105–115.
[78] Linde M, Galbe M, Zacchi G. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated barley straw at low enzyme loadings and low yeast concentration[J]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2007, 40: 1100–1107.
[79] Keikhosro K,Shauker K,Mohammad J,et al. Conversion of rice straw to sugars by dilute-acid hydrolysis, Biomass and Bioenergy[J]. 2006, (30): 247–253.
[80] Moyson E, Verachtert H. Growth of higher fungi on wheat straw and their impact on the digestibility of the substrate[J]. Appl Microbial Biotechnol.1991,36: 421–424.
[81]孙军德,陈南.秸秆纤维素降解细菌的筛选及其产酶条件的研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2010,41 (2):210–213.
[82] Lasser B, Masson M, Philippe T. Isolation and identification of a new fungle strain for amylase biosynthesis[J]. Polish Journal of Microbiology. 2009, 58(3): 269–273.
[83]王朋朋,常娟,王平,等.蛋白酶和淀粉酶产生菌的筛选及酶学性质分析研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2009,45 (21):48–51.
[84]王平,王朋朋,左瑞雨,等.牛瘤胃中米曲霉的分离鉴定及对玉米秸秆降解效果的研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2010,(44) 3:295–299.
[85] Li H Q, Chen H Z. Detoxification of steam-exploded corn straw produced by anindustrial-scale reactor. Process Biochemistry. 2008,43:1447–1451.
[86] Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review[J]. Bioresource Technol, 2002, 83(1): 1–11.
[87] Vansoest P J. Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology[J]. 2006, 130:137–171.
[88] Yuichi Y, Jin F, Shinya I, et al. Properties of cellulose-degrading enzymes from Aspergillus oryzae and their contribution to material utilization and alcohol yield in sake mash fermentation[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2002, 93(5):179–484.
[89] Nasib Q, Badalc S, Ronalde H, et al. Removal of fermentation inhibitors from alkaline peroxide pretreated and enzymatically hydrolyzed wheat straw:Production of butanol from hydrolysate using Clostridium beijerinckii in batchreactors[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2008, 32: 1353–1358.
[90]林贝.玉米秸秆酸解副产物对酒精发酵影响的研究[D].大连:大连理工大学环境与生命学院,2007.
[91] Halliwell G, Vincent R. The action on cellulose and its derivatives of a purified 1,4-β-glucanase from Trichoderma koningii[J]. Biochem. 1981, (199): 409–417.
[92] Palmqvist, Hahn H B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolyzates, II. Inhibitors and mechanism of inhibition[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2000, 74: 25–33.
[93] Palmqvist E, Hahn H B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolyzates, I. Inhibition and detoxification[J], Bioresour Technol, 2000, 74: 17–24.
[94] Huang C F, Lin T H, Guo G L, et al. Enhanced ethanol production by fermentation of rice straw hydrolysate without detoxification using a newly adapted strain of Pichia stipitis[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2009,100:3914–3920.
[95] Karl R, Hugo J J, Van B, et al. Punt1 Microbial renewable feedstock utilization[J]. Bioengineered Bugs. 2010,1(5): 359–366.
[96] Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hagerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2000, 74: 17–24.
[97] Xu Z, Wang Q H, Jiang Z H, et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated soybean straw[J]. Biomass and Bio-energy. 2007, 31: 162–167.
[98] Yan L, Li W, Yang J,et al. Direct visualization of straw cellwalls by AFM[J]. Macromol Biosci. 2004, 4: 112–118.
[99] Jan B K, Lisbeth G T, Claus F, et al. Cell-wall structural changes in wheat straw pretreated forbioethanol production[J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2008, 1: 1–5.
[100] Selig M J, Viamajala S, Decker S R, et al. Deposition of lignin droplets produced during dilute acid pretreatment of maize stems retards enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose[J]. Biotechnol Prog. 2007, 23:1333–1339.
[101] Hendriks A T, Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass[J].Bioresource Technology. 2009, 100:10–18.
[102] Fan Y T, Li C L, Lay J J, et al. Optimization of initial substrate and pH levels for germination of sporing hydrogen-producing anaerobes in cow dung compost[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2004, 91(2):189–193.
[103]张丽英,饲料分析与饲料质量检测技术[M].中国农业大学出版社. 2003.
[104]赵峰,张子仪.对家禽饲料代谢能值评定方法中若干误区的探讨[J].动物营养学报. 2006,18 (1):1–5.
[105] Sibbald I R,Summers J D,Slinger S J.Factors of afecting the metabolizable energy content of poultry feeds[J].Poultry Science. 1960, 39:544–556.
[106]聂大娃,赵养涛,武书庚,等.套算法测定玉米代谢能适宜的玉米替代比例研究[J].动物营养学报. 2008,20 (5):606–610.
[107]张子仪,吴克谦,吴同礼,等.应用回归分析评定鸡饲料表观代谢能值的研究[J].畜牧兽医学报,1981,12 (4):223–229.
[108]贺建华,黄美华,金宏,等.饲料用稻谷和糙米的营养特性.中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养分会第八届学术研讨会[J]. 2000, 10:189–193.
[109] Abiola S S , Amalime A C, Akadiri K C. The utilization of alkali-treated melon husk by broilers[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2002, 84:247–250.
[110] Gear J S S, Bredribb A J M, Ware A, et al. Fibre and bowel transit times[J]. Br. J. Nutrit. 1981, 45:77–82.
[111] Teguia A, Njwe R M, Foyette C N. Effects of replacement of maize with dried leaves of sweet potato on the growth performance of finishing broilers[J]. Animal Feed Science Technology. 1997, 66: 283–287.
[112] Abe H, Yamakawa M, Okamoto M. The effect of steam treatment and ammonia treatment of rice straw on voluntary intake and digestibility in sheep[J]. Jap. Grassl. 1999, 44:378–380.
[113] Just A, Jorgensen H, Fernardez. Correlation of protein deposited in growing female pigs to the ideal and fecal digestible crude protein and animo acids[J]. Livestock Prod Sci. 1985, 12:145–159.
[114] Ehle F R,Jeraci J L, Robertson J B, et al. The influence of dietary fiber on digestibility ,rate of passage and gastrointestinal fermentation in pigs[J]. Anim.Sci. 1982, 55: 1071–1706.
[115] Barrow P A. Probiotics for chickens. In: Fuller, R. (Ed.), Probiotics: TheScientific Basis. Chapman and Hall, London. 1992, 255–257.
[116] Metzler B U, Vahjen W, Baumgartel T, et al. Changes in bacterial populations in the ileum of pigs fed low-phosphorus diets supplemented with different sources of fermentable carbohydrates[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2009, 148: 68–89.
[117] Durmic Z, Pethick D W, Pluske J R, et al. Changes in bacterial populations in the colon of pigs fed different sources of dietary fibre, and the development of swine dysentery after experimental infection[J]. Appl Microbiol. 1998, 85:574–582.
[118] Hogberg A, Lindberg J E, Leser T, et al. Influence of cereal non-starch polysaccharides on ileo-caecal and rectal microbial populations in growing pigs[J]. Acta Vet. Scand. 2004, 45:87–98.
[119] Bedford M R, Schulze H. Exogenous enzymes for pigs and poultry. Nutrition Research Reviews[J]. 1998, 11:91–114.
[120] Buyse J, Jassens K, Van D G, et al. Pre and postprandial changes in plasma hormone and metabolite levels and hepatic deiodinase activities in meal-fed broiler chickens[J]. Br. J. Nutr. 2002, 88:641–653.
[121] Swennen Q, Janssens G P J, Millet S, et al. Effect of substitution between fat and protein on feed intake and its regulatory mechanisms in broiler chickens: endocrine functioning and intermediary metabolism[J]. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84:1051–1057.
[122] Amerah A M, Ravindran V. Influence of method of whole-wheat feeding on the performance, digestive tract development and carcass traits of broiler chickens[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2008, 147:326–339.
[123] Amerah A M, Ravindran V, Lentle R G, et al. Feed particle size: implications on the digestion and performance in poultry[J]. World’s Poult Sci. 2007, 63:439–451.
[124]梁成云,刘笑笑,孟令丽,等.日粮中植物油水平对解冻延边黄牛肉色与脂肪酸组成的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医. 2009, 3: 40–42.
[2]毕于运,高春雨,王亚静,等.中国秸秆资源数量估算[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(12):211–217.
[3]严妍,接梅梅,韩姗珊.农作物秸秆综合利用方法浅析农作物秸秆综合利用方法浅析[J].污染防治技术.2010,23(4):87–88.
[4] Laureano P L, Teymouri F, Alizadeh H, et al. Understanding factors that limit enzymatic h y d r o ly s i s o f b i o m a s s [ J ] . A p p l . B i o c h e m . 2 0 0 5 , 1 8 : 1 0 8 1– 1 0 9 9 .
[5] William O S, Dohertya, Payam M, et al. Value-adding to cellulosicethanol: Ligninpolymers[J]. Industrial Crops and Products. 2010, 5: 18–22.
[6] Saha B C, Iten L B, Cotta M A, et al. Dilute acid pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of wheat straw to ethanol. Process Biochem[J]. 2005, 40: 3693–3700.
[7]冯仰廉,张子仪.低质粗饲料的营养价值及合理利用[J].中国畜牧杂志,2001,37(6):3–5.
[8] Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2002, 83:1–11.
[9] Hendriks A, Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2009, 100: 10–18.
[10] Taherzadeh M J, Karimi K. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review[J]. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9: 1621–1651.
[11] Koullas D P, Christakopoulos P, Kekos D, et al. Correlating the effect of pretreatment on the enzymatic hydrolysis of straw[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering.1992, 39: 113–116.
[12] Farid T, Dimitar K, Irini A. Production of bioethanol from wheat straw: An overview on pretreatment,hydrolysis and fermentation[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2010, 101: 4744–4753.
[13] Bobleter O. Hydrothermal degradation of polymers derived from plants[J]. Prog. Polym. 1994, 19: 797–841.
[14] Garrote G, Dominguez H, Parajo J C. Hydrothermal processing of lignocellulosic materials[J]. Holz Roh Werkst. 1999, 57:191–202.
[15] Brownell H H, Yu E K C, Saddler J N. Steam-explosion pretreatment of wood: effect of chip size, acid, moisture content and pressure drop[J]. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1986, 28:792–801.
[16] Azuma J I, Tanaka F, Koshijima T. Enhancement of enzymatic susceptibility of lignocellulosic wastes by microwave irradiation[J]. Ferment Technol. 1984, 62:377–384.
[17]邓华,李淳,曾秋苑,等.微波辐射下秸秆纤维微观结构的变化[J].分析测试学报,2010,29(4):336–340.
[18] Galbe M, Zacchi G. A review of the production of ethanol from softwood[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2002, 59: 618–628.
[19] Sanchez G, Pilcher L, Roslander C, et al. Dilute-acid hydrolysis for fermentation of the Bolivian straw material[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2004, 93 (3): 249–256.
[20] Kootstra A M J, Beeftink H H, Scott E L, et al. Comparison of dilute mineral and organic acid pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw[J].Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2009, 46: 126–131.
[21] Kumar P, Barrett D M, Delwiche M J, et al. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production[J].Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2009, 48: 3713–3729.
[22] Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review [J]. Bioresource Technol. 2002, 83: 1–11.
[23] Cheng Z S. Recent developments in China pulp and paper research on wheat straw. In: Straw - A Valuable Raw Material[J]. Pira Conference Proceedings. 1993, 2: l–23.
[24] Sun R C, Mark L J, Banks W B. Influence of alkaline pre-treatments on the cell wall components wheat straw[J]. Industrial Crops and Products. 1995, 4:127–145.
[25] Kim S, Holtzapple M T. Delignification kinetics of corn stover in lime pretreatment[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2006, 97:778–785.
[26] Mosier N, Wyman C E, Dale B D, et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2005, 96: 673–686.
[27] Owen E, Klopfenstein T, Urio N A. Treatment with other chemicals, Straw and Other Fibrous By-products as Feed[J]. Bioresour Technol. 1984, 8: 248–275.
[28] Azzam A M. Pretreatment of cane bagasse with alkaline hydrogen peroxide for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and ethanol fermentation[J]. Environ. Sci. 1989, 24 (4): 421–433.
[29]余洪波,张晓昱,柯静,等.碱氧化预处理玉米秸秆酶解条件的优化[J].农业工程学报.2009,4:201–205.
[30] Teixeira L C, Linden J C, Schroeder H A. Alkaline and peracetic acid pretreatments of biomass for ethanol production[J]. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1999, 3:19–34.
[31] Gould J M. Alkaline peroxide delignification of agricultural residues to enhance enzymatic saccharification[J]. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1984, 26: 46–52.
[32] Gregg D, Saddler J N. A techno-economic assessment of the pretreatment and fractionation steps of a biomass-to-ethanol process[J]. Appl Biochem.Biotechnol. 1996, 4: 711–727.
[33] Gossett J M, Stuckey D C, Owen W F, et al. Heat treatment and anaerobic digestion of refuse[J]. Environ Eng Div. 1982, 108: 437–454.
[34] Xu F, Yu S, Jian Z, et al. Status and prospect of lignocellulosic bioethanol production in China.Bioresource Technology[J]. 2010, 101: 4814–4819.
[35] Hana G P, Deng J, Zhang S Y, et al. Effect of steam explosion treatment on characteristics of wheat straw[J]. Industrial Crops and Products . 2010, 31: 28–33.
[36] Zhang L H , Li D, Wang L J, et al. Effect of steam explosion on biodegradation of lignin in wheat straw[J]. Bioresource Technology 2008, 99: 8512–8515.
[37]王许涛,张百良,宋安东,等.蒸汽爆破技术在秸秆厌氧发酵中的应用[J].农业工程学报.2008,24(8):189–192.
[38] Morjanoff P J, Gray P P. Optimization of steam explosion as method for increasing susceptibility of sugarcane bagasse to enzymatic saccharification[J]. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1987, 29: 733–741.
[39] Oliva J M, Sáez F, Ballesteros I, et al. Effect of lignocellulosic degradation compounds from steam explosion pretreatment on ethanol fermentation by thermotolerant yeast[J]. Bioresource Technology 2003, 59: 5122–5130.
[40] Petersen M O, Larsen J, Thomsen M H. Optimization of hydrothermal pretreatment of wheat straw for production of bioethanol at low water consumption without addition of chemicals[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2009, 33: 834–840.
[41] Laser M, Schulman D, Allen S G, et al. A comparison of liquid hot water and steam pretreatments of sugar cane bagase for conversion to ethanol[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2002, 81: 33–44.
[42] Beguin P, Aubert J P. The biological degradation of cellulose[J]. Ferm Microbiol Rev. 1994, 13: 25–58.
[43] Kerem Z, Hadar Y. Effect of manganese on preferential degradation of lignin by Pleurotus ostreatus during solid-state fermentation[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995, 61: 3057–3062.
[44] Karunanandaa K, Varga G A. Colonization of rice straw by white-rot fungi (Cyathus stercoreus): effect on ruminal fermentation pattern, nitrogen metabolism, and fiber utilization during continuous culture[J]. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1996, 61:1–16.
[45] Yu H B, Zhang X Y, Song L L, et al. Evaluation of white-rot fungi-assisted alkaline/oxidative pretreatment of corn straw undergoing enzymatic hydrolysis by cellulase[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2010, 110(6): 660–664.
[46] Taniguchi M Y, Suzuki H, Watanabe D, et al. Evaluation of Pretreatment with Pleurotus ostreatus for Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Rice Straw[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2005, 100(6): 637–643.
[47] Harman G E, Kubicek C P, Gliocladium. Enzymes, Biological Control and Commercial Applications. Bioresour Technol. 1988, 50:18–23.
[48]王石玉,陈雄,王永泽,等.拟康氏木霉同态发酵产纤维素酶系的研究[J].中国饲料,2008,23:23–26.
[49]方浩,宋向阳,赵晨,等.里氏木霉与黑曲霉混合发酵产纤维素酶的研究[J].林产化学与工业. 2009, 29(6):1–19.
[50] Cariello M E, Casta?eda L, Riobo I, et al. Endogenousmicroorganisms inoculant to speed up the composting process of urban swage sludge[J].Soil SC Plant Nutr. 2007, 7: 26–37.
[51] Singh A, Sharma S. Composting of a crop residue through treatment with microorganisms and subsequent vermicomposting. Bioresour Technol .2002, 85: 107–110.
[52]孙凯,孟宁,冯琳,等.产纤维素酶细菌的分离鉴定及产酶特性研究[J].兰州交通大学学报,2009,28(4):159–162.
[53]苏丽萍.纤维素复合酶对豌豆秸秆营养价值的影响[J].青海大学学报(自然科学版),2009,27(3):51–54.
[54]李荣斌,董绪燕,魏芳,等.微波预处理超声辅助酶解大豆秸秆条件优化[J].中国农学通报,2009,19:314–318.
[55] Silas G V B, Elisa E, David A M. Microbial conversion of lignocellulosic residues for production of animal feeds[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2002, 98: 1–12.
[56] Huettermann A, Hamza A S, Chet I, et al. Recycling of agricultural wastes by white-rot fungi for the production of fodder for ruminants[J]. Agro Food Ind. Hi-Technol. 2000, 6: 29–32.
[57] Tengerdy R P, Szakacs G, Sipocz J. Bioprocessing of sweet sorghum with in situ produced enzymes[J]. Appl. Biochem. 1996, 58: 563–569.
[58] Prasad R D D, Reddy M R, Reddy G V N. Effect of feeding baled and stacked urea treated rice straw on the performance of crossbred cows[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 1998, 73: 347–352.
[59] Chaudhry A S. Rumen degradation in sacco in sheep of wheat straw treated with calcium oxide, sodium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide plus hydrogen peroxide[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2000, 83: 313–323.
[60]侯进,李婷,吕文龙,等.应用白腐真菌发酵曲种发酵玉米秸秆的研究[J].中国奶牛,2010, 7:25–28.
[61]李婷,李杰,侯进,等.绵羊对侧耳菌处理玉米秸秆的采食特性和表观消化率的研究[J].饲料博览,2010,4: 1–3.
[62] Viola F, Zimbardi, Cardinale M. Processing cereal straws by steam extrusion in a pilot plant to enhance digestibility in ruminants[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2008, 99: 681–689.
[63]孙耀华,场奎林.纤维素复合酶半干贮秸秆饲料制作与饲喂效果[J].四川畜牧兽医.1997,2:32–33.
[64]逮素芬.高效秸秆微生物调制剂发酵农作物秸秆试验[J].内蒙古畜牧科学. 2002,3:27–29.
[65] Robinson T, Nigam P. Bioreactor design for protein enrichment of agricultural residues by solid state fermentation[J]. Biochem. Eng. 2003, 13: 197–203.
[66] Manmdebvu P, West J W, Froetschel M A, et al. Effects of enzyme and microbial treatment of bermudagrass forages before ensiling on cell wall composition, end products of silage fermentation and in situ digestion kinetics[J]. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1999, 77: 317–329.
[67] Tripathi J P, Yadav J S. Optimization of solid-state fermentation of wheat straw into animal feed by Pleurotus ostreatus: a pilot effort[J]. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1992, 37: 59–72.
[68]崔秀艳,王长文,乔洁,等.鹅对玉米秸秆和羊草消化利用的研究.饲料研究,2009,2:52–56.
[69]黄建华,娄军,张志勇,等.复合酶解玉米秸秆和活菌制剂应用饲喂蛋鸡试验[J].饲料研究. 1998,9:27–28.
[70]胡建宏,许秀娟.新型秸秆微贮饲料饲喂肉猪的生长动态研究[J].西北农业学报. 2002, 11(2):10–12.
[71]杨德智,胡江,魏时来.微贮玉米秸秆对猪生长及饲粮养分利用的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2008,3:56–59.
[72]宋金昌,范莉.利用微生物提高秸秆粗蛋白质的试验[J].动物科学与动物医学,2002,1:47–49.
[73]杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1999.
[74] Kerley M S, Fahey J, Berger G C, et al. Effect of treating wheat straw with pH-regulated solutions of alkaline hydrogen peroxide on nutrient digestion by sheep[J].Dairy Sci. 1987, (70): 2078–2084.
[75] Torget R, Walter P, Himmel M, et al. Dilute acid pretreatment of corn residues and short rotation woody crops [J]. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1991, 28: 75–86.
[76] Ropars M, Marchal R, Pourquie J, et al. Large-scale enzymatic hydrolysis of agricultural lignocellulosic biomass. Part 1: Pretreatment procedures. Biores Technol[J]. 1992, 42: 197–204.
[77] Alexandre E, Alvaro L,Mathias, et al. Fractionation of Eucalyptus grandis chips by dilute acid-catalysed steam explosion[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2003, 86: 105–115.
[78] Linde M, Galbe M, Zacchi G. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated barley straw at low enzyme loadings and low yeast concentration[J]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2007, 40: 1100–1107.
[79] Keikhosro K,Shauker K,Mohammad J,et al. Conversion of rice straw to sugars by dilute-acid hydrolysis, Biomass and Bioenergy[J]. 2006, (30): 247–253.
[80] Moyson E, Verachtert H. Growth of higher fungi on wheat straw and their impact on the digestibility of the substrate[J]. Appl Microbial Biotechnol.1991,36: 421–424.
[81]孙军德,陈南.秸秆纤维素降解细菌的筛选及其产酶条件的研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2010,41 (2):210–213.
[82] Lasser B, Masson M, Philippe T. Isolation and identification of a new fungle strain for amylase biosynthesis[J]. Polish Journal of Microbiology. 2009, 58(3): 269–273.
[83]王朋朋,常娟,王平,等.蛋白酶和淀粉酶产生菌的筛选及酶学性质分析研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2009,45 (21):48–51.
[84]王平,王朋朋,左瑞雨,等.牛瘤胃中米曲霉的分离鉴定及对玉米秸秆降解效果的研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2010,(44) 3:295–299.
[85] Li H Q, Chen H Z. Detoxification of steam-exploded corn straw produced by anindustrial-scale reactor. Process Biochemistry. 2008,43:1447–1451.
[86] Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review[J]. Bioresource Technol, 2002, 83(1): 1–11.
[87] Vansoest P J. Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology[J]. 2006, 130:137–171.
[88] Yuichi Y, Jin F, Shinya I, et al. Properties of cellulose-degrading enzymes from Aspergillus oryzae and their contribution to material utilization and alcohol yield in sake mash fermentation[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2002, 93(5):179–484.
[89] Nasib Q, Badalc S, Ronalde H, et al. Removal of fermentation inhibitors from alkaline peroxide pretreated and enzymatically hydrolyzed wheat straw:Production of butanol from hydrolysate using Clostridium beijerinckii in batchreactors[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2008, 32: 1353–1358.
[90]林贝.玉米秸秆酸解副产物对酒精发酵影响的研究[D].大连:大连理工大学环境与生命学院,2007.
[91] Halliwell G, Vincent R. The action on cellulose and its derivatives of a purified 1,4-β-glucanase from Trichoderma koningii[J]. Biochem. 1981, (199): 409–417.
[92] Palmqvist, Hahn H B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolyzates, II. Inhibitors and mechanism of inhibition[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2000, 74: 25–33.
[93] Palmqvist E, Hahn H B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolyzates, I. Inhibition and detoxification[J], Bioresour Technol, 2000, 74: 17–24.
[94] Huang C F, Lin T H, Guo G L, et al. Enhanced ethanol production by fermentation of rice straw hydrolysate without detoxification using a newly adapted strain of Pichia stipitis[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2009,100:3914–3920.
[95] Karl R, Hugo J J, Van B, et al. Punt1 Microbial renewable feedstock utilization[J]. Bioengineered Bugs. 2010,1(5): 359–366.
[96] Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hagerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2000, 74: 17–24.
[97] Xu Z, Wang Q H, Jiang Z H, et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated soybean straw[J]. Biomass and Bio-energy. 2007, 31: 162–167.
[98] Yan L, Li W, Yang J,et al. Direct visualization of straw cellwalls by AFM[J]. Macromol Biosci. 2004, 4: 112–118.
[99] Jan B K, Lisbeth G T, Claus F, et al. Cell-wall structural changes in wheat straw pretreated forbioethanol production[J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2008, 1: 1–5.
[100] Selig M J, Viamajala S, Decker S R, et al. Deposition of lignin droplets produced during dilute acid pretreatment of maize stems retards enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose[J]. Biotechnol Prog. 2007, 23:1333–1339.
[101] Hendriks A T, Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass[J].Bioresource Technology. 2009, 100:10–18.
[102] Fan Y T, Li C L, Lay J J, et al. Optimization of initial substrate and pH levels for germination of sporing hydrogen-producing anaerobes in cow dung compost[J]. Bioresour Technol. 2004, 91(2):189–193.
[103]张丽英,饲料分析与饲料质量检测技术[M].中国农业大学出版社. 2003.
[104]赵峰,张子仪.对家禽饲料代谢能值评定方法中若干误区的探讨[J].动物营养学报. 2006,18 (1):1–5.
[105] Sibbald I R,Summers J D,Slinger S J.Factors of afecting the metabolizable energy content of poultry feeds[J].Poultry Science. 1960, 39:544–556.
[106]聂大娃,赵养涛,武书庚,等.套算法测定玉米代谢能适宜的玉米替代比例研究[J].动物营养学报. 2008,20 (5):606–610.
[107]张子仪,吴克谦,吴同礼,等.应用回归分析评定鸡饲料表观代谢能值的研究[J].畜牧兽医学报,1981,12 (4):223–229.
[108]贺建华,黄美华,金宏,等.饲料用稻谷和糙米的营养特性.中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养分会第八届学术研讨会[J]. 2000, 10:189–193.
[109] Abiola S S , Amalime A C, Akadiri K C. The utilization of alkali-treated melon husk by broilers[J]. Bioresource Technology. 2002, 84:247–250.
[110] Gear J S S, Bredribb A J M, Ware A, et al. Fibre and bowel transit times[J]. Br. J. Nutrit. 1981, 45:77–82.
[111] Teguia A, Njwe R M, Foyette C N. Effects of replacement of maize with dried leaves of sweet potato on the growth performance of finishing broilers[J]. Animal Feed Science Technology. 1997, 66: 283–287.
[112] Abe H, Yamakawa M, Okamoto M. The effect of steam treatment and ammonia treatment of rice straw on voluntary intake and digestibility in sheep[J]. Jap. Grassl. 1999, 44:378–380.
[113] Just A, Jorgensen H, Fernardez. Correlation of protein deposited in growing female pigs to the ideal and fecal digestible crude protein and animo acids[J]. Livestock Prod Sci. 1985, 12:145–159.
[114] Ehle F R,Jeraci J L, Robertson J B, et al. The influence of dietary fiber on digestibility ,rate of passage and gastrointestinal fermentation in pigs[J]. Anim.Sci. 1982, 55: 1071–1706.
[115] Barrow P A. Probiotics for chickens. In: Fuller, R. (Ed.), Probiotics: TheScientific Basis. Chapman and Hall, London. 1992, 255–257.
[116] Metzler B U, Vahjen W, Baumgartel T, et al. Changes in bacterial populations in the ileum of pigs fed low-phosphorus diets supplemented with different sources of fermentable carbohydrates[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2009, 148: 68–89.
[117] Durmic Z, Pethick D W, Pluske J R, et al. Changes in bacterial populations in the colon of pigs fed different sources of dietary fibre, and the development of swine dysentery after experimental infection[J]. Appl Microbiol. 1998, 85:574–582.
[118] Hogberg A, Lindberg J E, Leser T, et al. Influence of cereal non-starch polysaccharides on ileo-caecal and rectal microbial populations in growing pigs[J]. Acta Vet. Scand. 2004, 45:87–98.
[119] Bedford M R, Schulze H. Exogenous enzymes for pigs and poultry. Nutrition Research Reviews[J]. 1998, 11:91–114.
[120] Buyse J, Jassens K, Van D G, et al. Pre and postprandial changes in plasma hormone and metabolite levels and hepatic deiodinase activities in meal-fed broiler chickens[J]. Br. J. Nutr. 2002, 88:641–653.
[121] Swennen Q, Janssens G P J, Millet S, et al. Effect of substitution between fat and protein on feed intake and its regulatory mechanisms in broiler chickens: endocrine functioning and intermediary metabolism[J]. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84:1051–1057.
[122] Amerah A M, Ravindran V. Influence of method of whole-wheat feeding on the performance, digestive tract development and carcass traits of broiler chickens[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2008, 147:326–339.
[123] Amerah A M, Ravindran V, Lentle R G, et al. Feed particle size: implications on the digestion and performance in poultry[J]. World’s Poult Sci. 2007, 63:439–451.
[124]梁成云,刘笑笑,孟令丽,等.日粮中植物油水平对解冻延边黄牛肉色与脂肪酸组成的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医. 2009, 3: 40–42.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |