用户名: 密码: 验证码:
想象与真实——昆仑与蓬莱神话中山岳意象的文化解读
详细信息    查看官网全文
摘要
神话是对自然世界与人文社会的系统解释。昆仑、蓬莱神话与山岳具有紧密关系,尤以蓬莱神话的"一池三山"模式对后世中国园林营造产生深远影响。本文通过文本解读,分析昆仑、蓬莱神话中以山岳为主体的景观构成要素及特征;梳理两神话地理殊异和文化融合的过程;结合地理空间想象认知,总结由"象"催生的地中乐园、海上仙乡"意"的联想;指出两神话中的山岳意象是"绝地天通"神权政治化的产物,是五行思想与方士化道教哲学的体现,是先人时空无限宇宙观的映射。
Myth is the systematic interpretation of natural world and human society.Kunlun and Peanglai myths tightly connect with mounts,especially the landscape pattern of three mounts in a pool abstracted from Penglai myth is used widely in the Chinese classic garden aftertime.Through reading the content,the paper analyzes the physical elements and characteristics of landscape in Kunlun and Penglai myths;describe the process that how two different myths converged;and combined with the imagination of geography,the paper concludes the image of Eden in middle earth and fairyland in the sea.The paper also points out the mount image in the myths is the product of theocracy which represents five elements thought and alchemist' s philosophical Taoism,it also reflects the infinity cosmology of ancestor.
引文
[1]顾颉刚.《庄子》和《楚辞》中昆仑和蓬莱两个神话系统的融合[A]//钱小柏.顾颉刚民俗学论集[M].上海:上海文艺出版社,1998:41-80.
    [2]梁启超.神话史、宗教史及其他[A]//马昌仪.中国神话学百年文论选[M].西安:陕西师范大学出版社总社有限公司,2003:47.
    [3]袁珂.山海经校注[M].成都:巴蜀书社,1993.
    [4](宋)李防等.太平御览[M].北京:中华书局,1960:245.
    [5](汉)刘安.淮南子[M].(汉)高诱,注.北京:中华书局,1978:57.
    [6]北大历史系《论衡》注释小组.论衡注释[M].北京:中华书局,1979:第二册:413.
    [7](北魏)郦道元.水经注[M].上海:商务印书馆,1933:1.
    [8](唐)徐坚.初学记[M].北京:中华书局,1962:87
    [9](宋)洪兴祖,注.楚辞补注.北京:中华书局,1957:上册:71.
    [10](汉)司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
    [11](清)毕沅.释名疏证[M].北京:中华书局,1985:84.
    [12]闻一多.神仙考[A]//朱自清等.闻一多全集——神话与诗[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1982:153-180.
    [13]李炳海.蓬莱、昆仑神话同源于东夷考[J].东岳论丛,1991,01:47-51+46.
    [14]李炳海.昆仑地望及东夷文化区的西限[J].东岳论丛,1992,02:100-104+73.
    [15](春秋)左丘明.国语[M].李维琦,标点.长沙:岳麓书社,1988:136.
    [16]张光直.考古学专题六讲[M].北京:文物出版社,1986:10.
    [17]米尔恰·伊利亚德著,王建先译.神圣与世俗.北京:华夏出版社,2002:98-103.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700