基于景观格局指数的城市群生态安全格局优化研究
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：A Optimization Research on Ecological Security Pattern of Urban Agglomeration based on Landscape Pattern Metrics
- 论文作者：吴冰 ; 张剑波 ; 刘晓光
- 年：2015
- 作者机构：哈尔滨工业大学建筑学院;
- 论文关键词：景观格局指数 ; 空间管控 ; 聚集度 ; 成渝城市群
- 英文论文关键词：Landscape Pattern Metrics ; Space Controlling ; Aggregation Index ; Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration
- 会议召开时间：2015-10-31
- 会议录名称：中国风景园林学会2015年会论文集
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：TU984.115
- 学会代码：ZGFV
- 会议名称：中国风景园林学会2015年会
- 会议地点：中国北京
- 主办单位：中国风景园林学会
- 学会名称：中国风景园林学会
- 页数：7
- 文件大小：1968k
- 原文格式：O
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
目前以城市群为核心的城镇化发展路线已逐步开始实施。因尺度不同,针对市域范围内生态安全格局的空间管控技术,已不适合为城市群发展提供空间约束。本文以成渝城市群为例,运用景观生态学中景观格局理论,将城市群城市建设用地及生态用地作为景观格局中不同类别斑块进行量化分析,计算景观格局指数;随后对世界上生态环境完整且经济运行良好的主要城市群的景观格局指数进行计算分析,对比彼此景观格局指数结果,得出合理的城市群生态安全格局指数控制区间,用以控制成渝城市群城市空间发展,并维护加强其生态环境条件。
Currently,the urbanization development route,which takes the urban agglomeration as the core,has been gradually implemented.The traditional space control technology for ecological security pattern in a city range has already not been suitable for new ecological space constraints of the urban agglomeration development,because of the different scales.In this paper,taking Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration as the example,the land-use of the urban agglomeration,which has been classified into artificial construction land-use and natural ecological land-cover,was analyzed quantitatively and the landscape pattern metrics was calculated,based on the landscape pattern theory of landscape ecology.Whereafter,the landscape metrics of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration and the main urban agglomerations in the world which were chosen because of their intact ecological environment and well-run economy were compared,in order to get the reasonable control interval of the ecological security pattern metrics for controlling the space development of the urban agglomeration,meanwhile maintaining and strengthening the ecological environment conditions.
Currently,the urbanization development route,which takes the urban agglomeration as the core,has been gradually implemented.The traditional space control technology for ecological security pattern in a city range has already not been suitable for new ecological space constraints of the urban agglomeration development,because of the different scales.In this paper,taking Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration as the example,the land-use of the urban agglomeration,which has been classified into artificial construction land-use and natural ecological land-cover,was analyzed quantitatively and the landscape pattern metrics was calculated,based on the landscape pattern theory of landscape ecology.Whereafter,the landscape metrics of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration and the main urban agglomerations in the world which were chosen because of their intact ecological environment and well-run economy were compared,in order to get the reasonable control interval of the ecological security pattern metrics for controlling the space development of the urban agglomeration,meanwhile maintaining and strengthening the ecological environment conditions.
引文
[1]Fu B J.The spatial pattern analysis of agricultural landscape in the loess area.Acta Ecologica Sinica,1995.15(2):113-120.
[2]Tischendorf L.Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently?Landscape Ecology,2001.16:235-254.
[3]HarbinL,Wu J G.Use and misuse of landscape indices.Landscape Ecology,2004.19:389-399.
[4]Chen JJ,Zhang S W,Zheng D M.Uncertainty of the Quantitative Analysis on Landscape Patterns.Arid Zone Research,2005.22(1):63-66.
[5]Lin ML,Cao Y,Wang X.Limitations of landscape pattern analysis based on landscape indices:a ca se study of Lizejian wetland in Yilan of TaiwanProvince,China.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2008.19(1):139-143.
[6]Regional Plan Association,USA."America 2050——Megaregions"[2014-01-16].http://www.america2050.org/content/megaregions.html.
[7]Gottman,Jean.(1961).Megalopolis:The Urbanized Northeast Seaboard of the United States.Cambridge:MIT Press.
[8]Lang,Robert E.and DawnDhavale.(2005)."Beyond Megalopolis:Exploring America's New'Megapolitan'Geography."Metropolitan Institute Census Report Series(05:01,May 2005).Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech.Lang,Robert E.and Taylor,Peter J.(February 2005)."U.S.Cities in the'World City Network.'"Metropolitan Policy Program,The Brookings Institution,Washington D.C.,
[9]Lincoln Institute of Land Policy,Regional Plan Association,University of Pennsylvania School of Design.(2004)."Toward an American Spatial Development Perspective:Briefing Book for a Policy Roundtable on the Federal Role in Metropolitan Development."New York:Regional Plan Association.
[10]李秀珍.景观格局指标对不同景观格局的反应[J].生态学报,2004.24(1).
[11]布仁仓.景观指数之间的相关分析[J].生态学报,2005.25(10).
[12]景观格局-土壤侵蚀研究中景观指数的意义解释及局限性[J].生态学报,2011.31(1).
[13]傅伯杰.黄土区农业景观空间格局分析.生态学报,1995.15(2):113-120.
[14]陈建军,张树文,郑冬梅.景观格局定量分析中的不确定性.干旱区研究,2005.22(1):63-66.
[15]林孟龙,曹宇,王鑫.基于景观指数的景观格局分析方法的局限性:以台湾宜兰利泽简湿地为例[J].应用生态学报,2008.19(1):139-143.
[16]王俊朝.中部三大城市群结构形态比较研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2011.
[17]齐爽.英国城市化发展研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2014.
[18]美国和日本城市群发展的比较研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2006.
[19]城市集群发展机理及发展对策研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2008.
[20]桑秋,修春亮.都市圈政策浅析[J].城市发展研究,2003.10(4):55-59.
[21]Richard Florida,Tim Gulden,Charlotta Mellander.The Rise of the Mega-Region[J].Toronto,University of Toronto.
[2]Tischendorf L.Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently?Landscape Ecology,2001.16:235-254.
[3]HarbinL,Wu J G.Use and misuse of landscape indices.Landscape Ecology,2004.19:389-399.
[4]Chen JJ,Zhang S W,Zheng D M.Uncertainty of the Quantitative Analysis on Landscape Patterns.Arid Zone Research,2005.22(1):63-66.
[5]Lin ML,Cao Y,Wang X.Limitations of landscape pattern analysis based on landscape indices:a ca se study of Lizejian wetland in Yilan of TaiwanProvince,China.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2008.19(1):139-143.
[6]Regional Plan Association,USA."America 2050——Megaregions"[2014-01-16].http://www.america2050.org/content/megaregions.html.
[7]Gottman,Jean.(1961).Megalopolis:The Urbanized Northeast Seaboard of the United States.Cambridge:MIT Press.
[8]Lang,Robert E.and DawnDhavale.(2005)."Beyond Megalopolis:Exploring America's New'Megapolitan'Geography."Metropolitan Institute Census Report Series(05:01,May 2005).Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech.Lang,Robert E.and Taylor,Peter J.(February 2005)."U.S.Cities in the'World City Network.'"Metropolitan Policy Program,The Brookings Institution,Washington D.C.,
[9]Lincoln Institute of Land Policy,Regional Plan Association,University of Pennsylvania School of Design.(2004)."Toward an American Spatial Development Perspective:Briefing Book for a Policy Roundtable on the Federal Role in Metropolitan Development."New York:Regional Plan Association.
[10]李秀珍.景观格局指标对不同景观格局的反应[J].生态学报,2004.24(1).
[11]布仁仓.景观指数之间的相关分析[J].生态学报,2005.25(10).
[12]景观格局-土壤侵蚀研究中景观指数的意义解释及局限性[J].生态学报,2011.31(1).
[13]傅伯杰.黄土区农业景观空间格局分析.生态学报,1995.15(2):113-120.
[14]陈建军,张树文,郑冬梅.景观格局定量分析中的不确定性.干旱区研究,2005.22(1):63-66.
[15]林孟龙,曹宇,王鑫.基于景观指数的景观格局分析方法的局限性:以台湾宜兰利泽简湿地为例[J].应用生态学报,2008.19(1):139-143.
[16]王俊朝.中部三大城市群结构形态比较研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2011.
[17]齐爽.英国城市化发展研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2014.
[18]美国和日本城市群发展的比较研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2006.
[19]城市集群发展机理及发展对策研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2008.
[20]桑秋,修春亮.都市圈政策浅析[J].城市发展研究,2003.10(4):55-59.
[21]Richard Florida,Tim Gulden,Charlotta Mellander.The Rise of the Mega-Region[J].Toronto,University of Toronto.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |