洱海流域农村生活污水治理技术评价

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Evaluation of rural domestic wastewater treatment technologies in Lake Erhai Basin 作者：李梁 ; 曹欣然 ; 庞燕 ; 许秋瑾 ; 胡小贞 ; 管鹤卿 英文作者：LI Liang;CAO Xinran;PANG Yan;XU Qiujin;HU Xiaozhen;GUAN Heqing;Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgy, China National Nuclear Corporation;Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences;Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning; 关键词：洱海 ; 农村生活污水 ; 层次分析法 ; 技术效益评价 ; 指标分级赋值 英文关键词：Lake Erhai;;rural domestic wastewater;;analytic hierarchy process;;technical benefit assessment;;indicators grading and assignment 中文刊名：HKWZ 英文刊名：Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology 机构：核工业北京化工冶金研究院;中国环境科学研究院;生态环境部环境规划院; 出版日期：2019-04-24 09:52 出版单位：环境工程技术学报 年：2019 期：v.9 基金：国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2014ZX07510-001-01) 语种：中文; 页：HKWZ201904004 页数：6 CN：04 ISSN：11-5972/X 分类号：17-22

摘要

水污染治理技术评价对了解技术现状与技术水平具有重要意义。针对洱海流域农村生活污水治理技术特点,建立了全量化的技术评价指标体系,包括经济效益、环境效益与技术水平3个方面共8项指标,基于专家咨询和层次分析法,提出了技术效益评价的计算方法,并对洱海流域5项农村生活污水治理技术〔湖湾周边直接入湖污水处理技术、厌氧塘+表流湿地技术、兼氧膜生物反应器(FMBR)处理生活与养殖混合废水技术、农村生活和养殖污水处理集成技术、厌氧池土壤净化槽集成技术〕进行评价。结果表明:5项技术综合效益(A)得分为6. 11～8. 19,其中厌氧池土壤净化槽集成技术、农村生活和养殖污水处理集成技术等级为优秀,其余3项技术等级为良好。基于技术评价结果进行技术应用决策时,应根据经济效益与环境效益分项评价结果因地制宜地选择适用技术。
        The evaluation of water pollution treatment technologies is of great significance to understand the current situation and level of technologies. According to the technical characteristics of rural domestic wastewater treatment in Lake Erhai Basin, a fully quantified technical evaluation index system was established, including 8 indicators in economic benefit, environmental benefit and technical level. Based on expert consultation and analytic hierarchy process, the calculation method of technical benefit evaluation was put forward, and five rural domestic wastewater treatment technologies in Lake Erhai Basin were evaluated, including a whole set of wastewater treatment technology from perimeter of the lake bay, the anaerobic pond and surface flow wetland technology, the FMBR technology for mixed wastewater of living and farming, the integrated technology of living and farming wastewater treatment, the integrated technology of anaerobic pond and soil treatment tank. The results showed that the comprehensive benefit( A) score of the five technologies was 6. 11-8. 19. The integrated technology of anaerobic pond and soil treatment tank, and the integrated technology of living and farming wastewater treatment were excellent, and the other three technologies were good. As the technologies are applied according to the results of the technology evaluation, the appropriate technologies should be selected according to the results of the itemized evaluation of technical and economic benefits and environmental benefits.

引文

[1]许秋瑾,胡小贞,林明利,等.流域水体污染控制与治理技术集成及效益评价[N].中国环境报,2018-07-16(004).
    [2]解洪兴,杨晓航,谭清良,等.运用技术示范评价助力蓝天保卫战[N].中国环境报,2018-04-03(003).
    [3]许春莲,宋乾武,黄海明,等.我国环境技术验证(ETV)评价体系建设研究[J].环境工程技术学报,2011,1(5):396-402.XU C L,SONG Q W,HUANG H M,et al.Study on the framework of environmental technology verification(ETV)system in China[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2011,1(5):396-402.
    [4]邓双,孙现伟,束韫,等.燃煤电厂烟气一次PM2.5控制技术的综合评价[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(3):1157-1164.DENG S,SUN X W,SHU Y,et al.Comprehensive assessment of primary PM2.5control technologies for coal-fired power plants[J].China Environmental Science,2018,38(3):1157-1164.
    [5]廖海涛.污水处理厂污泥处理处置技术评价[J].环境与发展,2017,29(3):89-91.LIAO H T.Analysis on the technology of sludge treatment and disposal in sewage treatment plant[J].Environment and Development,2017,29(3):89-91.
    [6]王涛,楼上游.中国城市污水处理工艺现状调查与技术经济指标评价[J].给水排水,2004,30(5):1-4.
    [7]俞庭康,杨健.城镇污水处理最佳实用技术新进展[J].环境污染治理技术与设备,2000,1(5):54-60.YU T K,YANG J.The new best practical environmental options of sewage treatment[J].Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control,2000,1(5):54-60.
    [8]李友平,尹华强.燃煤电厂烟气脱硫技术综合评价研究[J].四川环境,2008,27(2):64-66.
    [9]杨忠权,吴颖,袁德美.德尔菲法的定量探讨[J].情报理论与实践,1995(5):12-15.
    [10]SAATY T L.The analytic hierarchy process[M].New York:Mc Graw Hill,1980.
    [11]BOTTERO M,COMINO E,RIGGIO V.Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems[J].Environmental Modelling&Software,2011,26(10):1211-1224.
    [12]CHANG N B,CHANG Y H,CHEN H W.Fair fund distribution for a municipal incinerator using GIS-based fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2009,90(1):441-454.
    [13]DEY P K,RAMCHARAN E K.Analytic hierarchy process helps select site for limestone quarry expansion in Barbados[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2008,88(4):1384-1395.
    [14]HALIDE H,STIGEBRAND A,REHBEIN M,et al.Developing a decision support system for sustainable cage aquaculture[J].Environmental Modelling&Software,2009,24(6):694-702.
    [15]李艳苓,朱昌雄,李红娜,等.基于层次分析法的农业面源污染防治技术评价[J].环境工程技术学报,2019,9(3):355-361.LI Y L,ZHU C X,LI H N,et al.Evaluation of agricultural non-point source pollution control technology based analytic hierarchy process[J].Journal of Environmental engineering Technology,2019,9(3):355-361.
    [16]李达,王崑声,马宽.技术成熟度在国家科技重大专项评价中的应用[J].科技管理研究,2006,36(1):153-157.LI D,WANG K S,MA K.The application of technology readiness in the evaluation of major state science and technology projects[J].Science and Technology Management Research,2006,36(1):153-157.
    [17]王心,姜琦,魏东洋,等.水专项技术的分类及其就绪度评价[J].科技管理研究,2017(1):69-74.WANG X,JIANG Q,WEI D Y,et al.Research on technical classification and readiness assessment of water special techniques[J].Science and Technology Management Research,2017(1):69-74.