中国与CGIAR合作效果评价研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Research on Measurement of Cooperation Effect Between China and CGIAR 作者：黄丹丹 ; 张学福 英文作者：HUANG Dandan;ZHANG Xuefu;Agricultural Information Institute,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; 关键词：CGIAR ; 合作效果 ; 指标体系 ; 评价 英文关键词：CGIAR;;evaluation;;measurement;;Indicators;;analysis 中文刊名：NKDB 英文刊名：Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 机构：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所; 出版日期：2019-04-15 出版单位：中国农业科技导报 年：2019 期：v.21;No.140 基金：中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(Y2018ZK25)资助 语种：中文; 页：NKDB201904002 页数：8 CN：04 ISSN：11-3900/S 分类号：14-21

摘要

中国自加入国际农业研究磋商组织(CGIAR)以来,与CGIAR建立了长期友好的合作伙伴关系,在合作过程中双方收获颇丰,但一直存在二者合作效果评估体系缺失的问题,无法量化地比较CGIAR与中国合作尤其是各所属中心与中国的合作差异。通过研究中国与CGIAR合作的情况与成效,结合CGIAR所属中心发布的报告等材料提取了与中国合作效果的量化指标,构建了中国与CGIAR合作效果测度的指标体系并确定了指标权重,再以13个参与评估的CGIAR中心为样本,基于权重,计算出各中心的科研绩效值,并通过横向(各中心之间)和纵向(不同年度)的对比,全面评估了CGIAR各中心的科研绩效表现和潜力的差异,为今后科学有效地分配中国政府对各中心的捐款提供了指导依据。
        Since China joined CGIAR,it has established long-term friendly partnership and cooperation with CGIAR.China also gained a lot of benefits during the cooperation with CGIAR,but there was quantitative evaluation's missing in measuring China's CGIAR's cooperation,so it was necessary to build an effect index system,methods as well as the giving weight to each index. This paper took 13 CGIAR centers as examples,and formed the performance scale of research achievements of each center based on the evaluation index system and performance basic data of the cooperation effect between China and CGIAR. The research performance of each center was calculated based on the weight,and the research performance and potential of each center was comprehensively evaluated through the comparison of horizontal (between each center) and vertical (in different years),which had a reference for China to allocate its contribution to various CGIAR centers.

引文

[1]中国农业科学院国际合作局.中国与国际农业研究磋商组织战略合作三十年[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2015,117-118.Department of International Cooperation,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. 30 years of strategic collaboration between China and CGIAR.[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2015:117-118.
    [2] Charter of the CGIAR System Organization[EB/OL]. https://cgspace. cgiar. org/bitstream/handle/10947/4370/Charter%20CGIAR%20Organization.pdf? sequence=82016.
    [3]郭碧坚,韩宇.同行评议制──方法、理论、功能、指标[J].科学学研究,1994(3):63-73.
    [4]罗文标,吴冲.我国非营利组织绩效评价的新思路[J].商场现代化,2006(6):61-63.
    [5]夏炜,叶金福,蔡剑锋,等.非营利组织绩效评估理论综述[J].软科学,2010(4):120-125.Xia W,Ye J F,Cai J F,et al.. Overview of the nonprofit organization performance appraisal theory[J]. Soft Sci.,2010(4):120-125.
    [6]李延瑾.科技项目立项评审的同行评议方法研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,硕士学位论文,2002.Li Y J. The research of the method of the peer preview in registration and appraisement[J]. Wuhan:Wuhan University of Technology,Master Dissertation,2002.
    [7]戚安邦.项目评估学[M].天津:南开大学出版,2006,3.
    [8]王瑞,陈军,姚佐文.基于项目成功度评价方法的世行贷款农业科技项目绩效评价研究——以利用世界银行贷款加强灌溉农业项目为例[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(9):517-521.Wang R,Chen J,Yao Z W. A performance appraisal of WB loan for agricultural scientific project through success degree evaluation methodology——taking the project of improving irrigation agriculture through Loaning from WB as an instance[J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull.,2008,24(9):517-521.
    [9]申志东.运用层次分析法构建国有企业绩效评价体系[J].审计研究,2013(2):106-112.Shen Z D. Analysis of analytic hierarchy process to build a state-owned enterprises evaluation system[J]. Auditing Res.,2013(2):106-112.