用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于高压压汞技术和分形理论的致密砂岩储层分级评价标准
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Grading evaluation criteria of tight sandstone reservoir based on high pressure mercury injection technology and fractal theory
  • 作者:程泽虎 ; 李文浩 ; 薛海涛 ; 卢双舫 ; 谭昭昭
  • 英文作者:CHENG Zehu;LI Wenhao;XUE Haitao;LU Shuangfang;TAN Zhaozhao;School of Geosciences,China University of Petroleum(East China);Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry,Chinese Academy of Sciences;
  • 关键词:致密砂岩 ; 孔喉结构 ; 高压压汞技术 ; 分形理论 ; 核桃园组三段 ; 泌阳凹陷
  • 英文关键词:tight sandstone;;microscopic pore-throats structure;;high pressure mercury injection technology;;fractal theory;;3rd member of Hetaoyuan Formation;;Biyang Sag
  • 中文刊名:DQSY
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Northeast Petroleum University
  • 机构:中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院;中国科学院广州地球化学研究所;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:东北石油大学学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.43;No.215
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(41402122);; 中国石化股份有限公司科技计划项目(P15028)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:DQSY201901007
  • 页数:11
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:23-1582/TE
  • 分类号:8+62-71
摘要
利用铸体薄片与场发射扫描电镜观察,分析南襄盆地泌阳凹陷核桃园组三段致密砂岩储层储集空间;基于高压压汞技术和分形理论,对致密砂岩储层进行分类与分级。结果表明:研究区致密砂岩储层孔隙系统可划分为小孔(孔隙直径<0.1μm)、过渡孔(孔隙直径为0.1~1.0μm)、中孔(孔隙直径为1.0~3.0μm)和大孔(孔隙直径>3.0μm)。根据储层中不同类型的孔隙所占比例,可将致密砂岩储层分为4类,Ⅰ类(以大孔为主)、Ⅱ类(以中孔为主)、Ⅲ类(以过渡孔为主)和Ⅳ类(以小孔为主)。根据不同微观孔喉参数与储层物性的相关关系,可将致密砂岩储层分为4级,Ⅰ级储层孔隙度>10.0%,渗透率>1.000×10-3μm2;Ⅱ级储层孔隙度为5.0%~10.0%,渗透率为(0.200~1.000)×10-3μm2;Ⅲ级储层孔隙度为2.5%~5.0%,渗透率为(0.030~0.200)×10-3μm2;Ⅳ级储层的孔隙度<2.5%,渗透率<0.030×10-3μm2。利用储层分级评价标准选取最优质储层,为致密砂岩储层的油气勘探与开发提供指导。
        Through the casting thin sections as well as field emission scanning electron microscope,characteristics of the tight sandstone reservoir space in 3 rd member of the Hetaoyuan Formation in the Biyang Sag of the Nanxiang Basin have been analyzed.The tight sandstone reservoir was classified and graded based on high pressure mercury injection technology and fractal theory.The results show that a division method for micropore pores(less than 0.1μm),transitional pores(0.1~1.0μm),mesopores(1.0~3.0μm)and macropores(greater than 3.0μm)within tight sandstone reservoir in the study area was established.According to the volume percentage of various types of pores in the reservoir,the tight sandstone reservoirs were divided into Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ categories:category Ⅰ(mainly with macropores),categoryⅡ(mainly with mesopores),categoryⅢ(mainly with transitional pores),categoryⅣ(mainly with micropores).Further according to the correlation between different microscopic pore throat parameters and reservoir physical properties,the tight sandstone reservoirs are divided into four grades:the porosity of gradeⅠis greater than 10.0%,and the permeability of gradeⅠis greater than1.000×10-3μm2;the porosity of grade Ⅱ is 5.0% ~10.0%,and the permeability of grade Ⅱ is(0.200~1.000)×10-3μm2;the porosity of gradeⅢis 2.5%~5.0%,and the permeability of gradeⅢis(0.030~0.200)×10-3μm2;the porosity of gradeⅣis less than 2.5%,and the permeability of gradeⅣis less than 0.030×10-3μm2.The optimum reservoir is selected by the standard of division,which is aimed to provide guidance for the order of tight oil and gas development.
引文
[1]GAO Hui,LI Huazhou Andy.Pore structure characterization,permeability evaluation and enhanced gas recovery techniques of tight gas sandstones[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2016,28:536-547.
    [2]白斌,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.非常规油气致密储层微观孔喉结构表征新技术及意义[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(3):78-86.BAI Bin,ZHU Rukai,WU Songtao,et al.New micro-throat structural characterization techniques for unconventional tight hydrocarbon reservoir[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2014,19(3):78-86.
    [3]汪少勇,李建忠,王社教,等.辽河坳陷雷家地区沙四段致密储层孔隙结构及物性下限[J].东北石油大学学报,2016,40(1):51-61.WANG Shaoyong,LI Jianzhong,WANG Shejiao,et al.Pore-structure and physical property cut-off of tight reservoirs in the fourth Shahejie Formation,Leijia District,Liaohe Depression[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2016,40(1):51-61.
    [4]徐守立,尤丽,李才,等.文昌A凹陷10区珠海组低渗储层孔喉结构特征[J].东北石油大学学报,2016,40(5):55-62.XU Shouli,YOU Li,LI Cai,et al.Characterization of pore-throat structure in low-permeability reservoir from Zhuhai Formation of10area in Wenchang A Sag[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2016,40(5):55-62.
    [5]LAI Jin,WANG Guiwen,WANG Ziyuan,et al.A review on pore structure characterization in tight sandstones[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2018,177:436-457.
    [6]TIAN Hui,PAN Lei,XIAO Xianming,et al.A preliminary study on the pore characterization of lower Silurian black shales in the Chuandong thrust fold belt,southwestern China using low pressure N2adsorption and FE-SEM methods[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2013,48:8-19.
    [7]白斌,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.利用多尺度CT成像表征致密砂岩微观孔喉结构[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(3):329-333.BAI Bin,ZHU Rukai,WU Songtao,et al.Multi-scale method of Nano(Micro)-CT study on microscopic pore structure of tight sandstone of Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(3):329-333.
    [8]白宝君,孙永鹏,刘凌波.加拿大魁北克省奥陶系Utica页岩岩石物理特性[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(1):69-76.BAI Baojun,SUN Yongpeng,LIU Lingbo.Petrophysical properties characterization of Ordovician Utica shale in Quebec,Canada[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(1):69-76.
    [9]SHAO Xinhe,PANG Xiongqi,JIANG Fujie,et al.Reservoir characterization of tight sandstones using nuclear magnetic resonance and incremental pressure mercury injection experiments:implication for tight sand gas reservoir quality[J].Energy&Fuels,2017,31(10):10420-10431.
    [10]CAO Zhe,LIU Guangdi,ZHAN Hongbin,et al.Pore structure characterization of Chang-7tight sandstone using MICP combined with N2 GA techniques and its geological control factors[J].Scientific Reports,2016,6:36919.
    [11]ZHAO Peiqiang,WANG Zhenlin,SUN Zhongchun,et al.Investigation on the pore structure and multifractal characteristics of tight oil reservoirs using NMR measurements:permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusaer Sag,Junggar Basin[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2017,86:1067-1081.
    [12]CLARKSON C R,SOLANO N,BUSTIN R M,et al.Pore structure characterization of North American shale gas reservoirs using USANS/SANS,gas adsorption,and mercury intrusion[J].Fuel,2013,103:606-616.
    [13]JARVIE D M,HILL R J,RUBLE T E,et al.Unconventional shale-gas systems:the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
    [14]蒋裕强,陈林,蒋婵,等.致密储层孔隙结构表征技术及发展趋势[J].地质科技情报,2014,33(3):64-71.JIANG Yuqiang,CHEN Lin,JIANG Chan,et al.Characterization techniques and trends of the pore structure of tight reservoirs[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2014,33(3):64-71.
    [15]XIAO Dianshi,LU Shuangfang,YANG Jinxiu,et al.Classifying multiscale pores and investigating their relationship with porosity and permeability in tight sandstone gas reservoirs[J].Energy&Fuels,2017,31(9):9188-9200.
    [16]鲍海娟,刘旭,周亚丽,等.吉木萨尔凹陷致密油有利区预测及潜力分析[J].特种油气藏,2016,23(5):38-42.BAO Haijuan,LIU Xu,ZHOU Yali,et al.Favorable area and potential analyses of tight oil in Jimsar Sag[J].Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs,2016,23(5):38-42.
    [17]何翠,郭少斌,吕修祥,等.巴楚北部寒武系沉积相及储层特征评价[J].特种油气藏,2016,23(3):35-39.HE Cui,GUO Shaobin,LYU Xiuxiang,et al.Cambrian sedimentary facies and reservoir characterization in Northern Bachu[J].Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs,2016,23(3):35-39.
    [18]IUPAC.Manual of symbols and terminology[J].Pure&Applied Chemistry,1972,31:578.
    [19]唐辉明.工程地质学基础[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2008:39-49.TANG Huiming.Foundations of engineering geology[M].Beijing:Chemical Industry Press,2008:39-49.
    [20]朱如凯,吴松涛,崔景伟,等.油气储层中孔隙尺寸分级评价的讨论[J].地质科技情报,2016,35(3):133-144.ZHU Rukai,WU Songtao,CUI Jingwei,et al.Classification and evaluation of pore size in oil&gas reservoir rocks[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2016,35(3):133-144.
    [21]贾芬淑,沈平平,李克文.砂岩孔隙结构的分形特征及应用研究[J].断块油气田,1995,2(1):16-21.JIA Fenshu,SHEN Pingping,LI Kewen.Study on the fractal characteristies of sandstone pore structureand its application[J].Fault-Block Oil&Gas Field,1995,2(1):16-21.
    [22]张婷,徐守余,杨珂.储层微观孔隙结构分形维数应用[J].大庆石油学院学报,2010,34(3):44-47.ZHANG Ting,XU Shouyu,YANG Ke.Application of fractal dimension of micro-pore structure[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,2010,34(3):44-47.
    [23]王晓莲.徐家围子断陷沙河子组致密储层分级评价[J].特种油气藏,2016,23(3):113-117.WANG Xiaolian.Classification evaluation of tight reservoirs in Shahezi Formation of Xujiaweizi Fault-Depression[J].Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs,2016,23(3):113-117.
    [24]孙靖,薛晶晶,曾德龙,等.准噶尔盆地腹部深层八道湾组致密储层特征及主控因素[J].东北石油大学学报,2017,41(1):1-10.SUN Jing,XUE Jingjing,ZENG Delong,et al.Deep tight reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Badaowan Formation in the central Junggar Basin[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2017,41(1):1-10.
    [25]邱荣华,付代国,万力.泌阳凹陷南部陡坡带油气勘探实例分析[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(5):605-609.QIU Ronghua,FU Daiguo,WAN Li.A case study of hydrocarbon exploration in the southern steep slope zone of the Biyang Depression[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2007,28(5):605-609.
    [26]董田,何生,林社卿.泌阳凹陷核桃园组烃源岩有机地化特征及热演化成熟史[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(2):187-194.DONG Tian,HE Sheng,LIN Sheqing.Organic geochemical characteristics and thermal evolution maturity history modeling of source rocks in Eocene Hetaoyuan Formation of Biyang Sag,Nanxiang Basin[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2013,35(2):187-194.
    [27]朱筱敏,董艳蕾,胡廷惠,等.精细层序地层格架与地震沉积学研究:以泌阳凹陷核桃园组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(4):615-624.ZHU Xiaomin,DONG Yanlei,HU Tinghui,et al.Seismic sedimentology study of fine sequence stratigraphic framework:a case study of the Hetaoyuan Formation in the Biyang Sag[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2011,32(4):615-624.
    [28]李苗苗,马素萍,夏燕青,等.泌阳凹陷核桃园组湖相烃源岩微观形态特征与形成机制[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(3):45-50.LI Miaomiao,MA Suping,XIA Yanqing,et al.Microscopic morphology and formation mechanism of lacustrine source rocks of Hetaoyuan Formation in Biyang Sag[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(3):45-50.
    [29]章新文,王优先,王根林,等.河南省南襄盆地泌阳凹陷古近系核桃园组湖相页岩油储集层特征[J].古地理学报,2015,17(1):107-118.ZHANG Xinwen,WANG Youxian,WANG Genlin,et al.Reservoir characteristics of lacustrine shale oil of the Paleogene Hetaoyuan Formation in Biyang Sag of Nanxiang Basin,Henan Province[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2015,17(1):107-118.
    [30]国家能源局.岩石毛管压力曲线的测定:SY/T 5346—2005[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2005:1-2.National Energy Administration.Rock capillary pressure measurement:SY/T 5346—2005[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2005:1-2.
    [31]郭春华,周文,林璠,等.页岩气储层毛管压力曲线分形特征[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2014,41(6):773-777.GUO Chunhua,ZHOU Wen,LIN Fan,et al.Fractal characteristics of capillary pressure curve in shale gas reservoir[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science&Technology Edition),2014,41(6):773-777.
    [32]LIU Xiangjun,XIONG Jian,LIANG Lixi.Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of organic-rich Yanchang Formation shale in central China by nitrogen adsorption/desorption analysis[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2015,22:62-72.
    [33]LI Ang,DING Wenlong,HE Jianhua,et al.Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of organic-rich shale reservoirs:a case study of Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Malong Block of eastern Yunnan Province,South China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2016,70:46-57.
    [34]文慧俭,闫林,姜福聪,等.低孔低渗储层孔隙结构分形特征[J].大庆石油学院学报,2007,31(1):15-18.WEN Huijian,YAN Lin,JIANG Fucong,et al.The fractal characteristics of the pore texture in low porosity and low permeability reservoir[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,2007,31(1):15-18.
    [35]WASHBURN E W.The dynamics of capillary flow[J].Physical Review,1921,17(3):273-283.
    [36]陈程,孙义梅.砂岩孔隙结构分维及其应用[J].沉积学报,1996,14(4):108-113.CHEN Cheng,SUN Yimei.Fractional dimension of the pore-texture in sandstones and its application[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1996,14(4):108-113.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700