用户名: 密码: 验证码:
川西南威远地区页岩气效益“甜点区”地震综合预测方法及其应用
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Seismic comprehensive predicting method and its application of the shale gas effect “sweet spot region” in Weiyuan area of Southwest Sichuan
  • 作者:邓宇 ; 陈胜 ; 欧阳永林 ; 曾庆才 ; 苏旺 ; 管全中
  • 英文作者:DENG Yu;CHEN Sheng;OUYANG Yonglin;ZENG Qingcai;SU Wang;GUAN Quanzhong;Chinese Academy of Sciences University;Institute of Porous Flow and Fluid Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences;PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development;
  • 关键词:页岩气 ; 效益“甜点区” ; 叠前同时反演 ; 孔隙度 ; 总有机碳(TOC) ; 脆性指数 ; 裂缝
  • 英文关键词:shale gas;;effect "sweet-spot region/block";;pre-stack simultaneous inversion;;porosity;;total organic carbon(TOC);;brittleness index;;crack/fracture
  • 中文刊名:DQSK
  • 英文刊名:Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing
  • 机构:中国科学院大学;中国科学院渗流流体力学研究所;中国石油勘探开发研究院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-15 09:06
  • 出版单位:大庆石油地质与开发
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.38;No.192
  • 基金:国家科技重大专项“富有机质页岩储层精细描述与定量表征”(2017ZX05035-02)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:DQSK201902017
  • 页数:11
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:23-1286/TE
  • 分类号:115-125
摘要
川西南威远地区钻井少,仅靠运用岩心、测井资料评价预测w(TOC)、孔隙度和脆性等"甜点区"核心指标的平面分布难度较大。利用地震资料预测不但能弥补该区钻井资料少的不足,而且能评价无井地区页岩"甜点区"的核心指标。以研究区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段为研究对象,首先在页岩储层测井响应特征和岩石物理分析的基础上,明确页岩储层孔隙度和w(TOC)的敏感参数分别为纵波速度和密度,并建立定量关系和地震预测模型;然后依据定量关系开展地震数据全道集叠前同时反演,从而预测页岩储层的孔隙度、w(TOC)和脆性指数;最后对页岩储层孔隙度、w(TOC)、裂缝和脆性等核心参数的预测结果进行综合分析及评价。结果表明:地震预测的效益"甜点区"分布趋势与已钻井符合率较高,预测结果较为可靠;研究区中部和南部地区孔隙度、总有机碳含量整体较高,裂缝较发育,脆性指数高,为页岩气勘探开发的效益"甜点区"。页岩气效益"甜点区"地震预测方法能有效预测"甜点"的空间分布,对该区块乃至川西南地区页岩气的规模效益开发具有指导意义。
        There are few drilled wells in Weiyuan area of Southwest Sichuan, it is rather difficult to evaluate and predict the planar distributions of the core indicators of the "sweet spot block" such as TOC, porosity, brittleness and so on only by means of the core, well logging data. With the help of the seismic data prediction, the lack of drilling data in this area can not only be made up, but also can evaluate the core indicators of the shale sweet-point block in the no-well area. Take Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation Sub-member Longyi-1 in the study area as the research object,firstly, based on the log response characteristics and petrophysical analysis of the shale reservoirs, the shale reservoir porosity and TOC sensitivity parameters were determined as the longitudinal wave velocity and density, and moreover the quantitative relationships and seismic prediction models were established; and then, according to the quantitative relationships, the pre-stacked simultaneous inversion was conducted for the seismic data full-gather, the porosity, TOC and brittleness index of the shale reservoirs were predicted; finally, the predicted results of the core parameters such as the shale reservoir porosity, TOC, crack and brittleness and so forth were comprehensively analyzed and evaluated. The results show that the distribution trend of the effect "sweet spot block" for the seismic prediction has a higher coincidence rate with the drillings, the prediction results are more reliable; the porosity and TOC content in the central and southern parts of the study area are higher overall, the cracks are more developed, and the brittleness index is pretty higher, thus these areas have become the effect "sweet spot blocks" of the shale gas exploration and development. The seismic predicting method for the shale-gas effect "sweet spot block" can effectively predict the spatial distribution of the sweet-point, and possess the guiding significance for the scale-benefit development of the shale gas in this block and even in Southwest Sichuan.
引文
[1]王红岩, 刘德勋. 中国南方海相页岩气高效开发的基础研究[J].科技纵览, 2017,5(5): 54-55. WAGN Hongyan, LIU Dexun. Basic research on efficient development of marine shale gas in South China[J].Science & Technology Overview, 2017,5(5): 54-55.
    [2]彭嫦姿, 彭俊, 陈燕辉, 等. 四川盆地元坝地区大安寨段页岩气“甜点”地震预测[J].天然气工业, 2014,34(6): 42-47. PENG Changzi, PENG Jun, CHEN Yanhui, et al. Seismic prediction of sweet spots in the Da′anzhai shale play,Yuanba area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014,34(6): 42-47.
    [3]董大忠, 王玉满, 李新景, 等. 中国页岩气勘探开发新突破及发展前景思考[J].天然气工业, 2016,36(1): 19-32.DONG Dazhong, WANG Yuman, LI Xinjing, et al. Breakthrough and prospect of shale gas exploration and development in China[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2016,36(1): 19-32.
    [4]董大忠, 高世葵, 黄金亮, 等. 论四川盆地页岩气资源勘探开发前景[J].天然气工业, 2014,34(12): 1-15. DONG Dazhong, GAO Shikui, HUANG Jinliang, et al. A discussion on the shale gas exploration & development prospect in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2014,34(12): 1-15.
    [5]LI Shizhen, JIANG Wenli, WANG Qian, et al. Research status and currently existent problems of shale gas geological survey and evaluation in China[J].Geological Bulletin of China, 2013,32(9):1440-1446.
    [6]孙振涛,刘俊州,罗延.面向开发目标的高精度三维地震优势分析:以大牛地气田为例[J].物探化探计算技术,2017, 39(5):691-697.SUN Zhentao, LIU Junzhou, LUO Yan.For the development goals of high precision 3D seismic advantage analysis:Take Daniudi Gas Feild for example[J].Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,2017,39(5): 691-697.
    [7]周德华, 焦方正. 页岩气“甜点”评价与预测:以四川盆地建南地区侏罗系为例[J].石油实验地质, 2012,34(2): 109-114.ZHOU Dehua, JIAO Fangzheng.Evaluation and prediction of shale gas sweet spots:A case study in Jurassic of Jiannan area, Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2012,34(2): 109-114.
    [8]黄捍东, 纪永祯, 张骋, 等. 地震流体识别方法在四川盆地页岩气“甜点”预测中的应用[J].古地理学报, 2013,15(5) : 673-678.HUANG Handong, JI Yongzhen, ZHANG Cheng, et al. Application of seismic liquid identification method in prediction of shale gas “sweet spots” in Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography, 2013,15(5): 673-678.
    [9]郭旭升, 尹正武, 李金磊. 海相页岩含气量地震定量预测技术及其应用:以四川盆地焦石坝地区为例[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2015,50(1): 144-149.GUO Xusheng, YIN Zhengwu, LI Jinlei. Quantitative seismic prediction of marine shale gas content:A case study in Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2015,50(1): 144-149.
    [10]周印明, 刘雪军, 张春贺, 等. 快速识别页岩气“甜点”目标的时频电磁勘探技术及应用[J].物探与化探, 2015,39(1): 61-63.ZHOU Yinming, LIU Xuejun, ZHANG Chunhe, et al. The TEEM technology for quick identification of “sweet spot” of shale gas and its applications[J].Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2015,39(1): 61-63.
    [11]许杰,何治亮,董宁,等.含气页岩有机碳含量地球物理预测[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2013,48(增刊1):64-68.XU Jie, HE Zhiliang, DONG Ning, et al. Total organic carbon content prediction of gas-bearing shale with geophysical methods[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2013, 48(S1):64-68.
    [12]胡伟光, 刘珠江, 范春华, 等. 四川盆地J地区志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝地震预测与评价[J].海相油气地质, 2014,19(4): 25-30.HU Weiguang, LIU Zhujiang, FAN Chunhua, et al. Seismic prediction and evaluation of fractures in Silurian Longmaxi Shale at J Area in Sichuan Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2014,19(4): 25-30.
    [13]翟光明, 宋建国, 靳久强, 等. 板块构造演化与含油气盆地形成和评价[M].北京: 石油工业出版社, 2002. ZHAI Guangming, SONG Jianguo, JIN Jiuqiang, et al. Plate tectonic evolution and petroliferous basin formation and evaluation[M].Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2002.
    [14]侯华星, 欧阳永林, 曾庆才, 等. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩气“甜点区”地震预测技术[J].煤炭科学技术, 2017,45(5): 154-163.HOU Huaxing, OUYANG Yonglin, ZENG Qingcai, et al. Seismic prediction technology of shale gas sweet spots in Longmaxi Formation of South Sichuan area[J].Coal Science and Technology, 2017,45(5): 154-163.
    [15]齐迎凯. 含流体孔隙介质的地震响应数值模拟与分析[D].成都:成都理工大学, 2016.QI Yingkai. Numerical analysis of seismic response characteristic in fluid-saturated porous medium[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2016.
    [16]黄新平. 叠前地震反演方法综述[J].内蒙古石油化工,2009(14):49-50.HUANG Xinping. A review of prestack seismic inversion methods[J].Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2009(14): 49-50.
    [17]苏建龙, 屈大鹏, 陈超, 等. 叠前地震反演方法对比分析:焦石坝页岩气藏勘探实例[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2016,51(3): 581-588. SU Jianlong, QU Dapeng, CHEN Chao, et al. Application of prestack inversion technique for shale gas in Jiaoshiba Gas Field[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting , 2016,51(3): 581-588.
    [18]陈胜, 赵文智, 欧阳永林, 等. 利用地球物理综合预测方法识别页岩气储层甜点:以四川盆地长宁区块下志留统龙马溪组为例[J].天然气工业, 2017,37(5): 20-30.CHEN Sheng, ZHAO Wenzhi, OUYANG Yonglin,et al.Comprehensive prediction of shale gas sweet spots based on geophysical properties:A case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Fm in Changning Block,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2017,37(5): 20-30.
    [19]刘笑伟, 崔跃, 耿懿. 页岩气储层总有机碳含量的影响因素及预测技术[J].辽宁化工, 2015,44(3):267-270. LIU Xiaowei, CUI Yue,GENG Yi. Effect factors and forecasting techniques of TOC Content in shale gas reservoir[J].Liaoning Chemical Industry, 2015,44(3):267-270.
    [20]PASSEY Q R, CREANEY S, KULLA J B, et al. A pratical model for organic richness from porosity and resistivity log[J].AAPG Bulletin, 1990,74(12): 1777-1794.
    [21]陈宗清. 四川盆地下寒武统九老洞组页岩气勘探[J].中国石油勘探, 2012,17(5): 71-78, 84.CHEN Zongqing. Shale gas exploration in Jiulaodong Formation of Lower Cambrian, Sichuan Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2012,17(5): 71-78, 84.
    [22]LOSETH H, WENSAAS L,GADING M, et al. Can hydrocarbon source rocks be identified on seismic data[J].Geology, 2011,39(12): 1167-1170.
    [23]林建东, 任森林, 薛明喜, 等. 页岩气地震识别与预测技术[J].中国煤炭地质, 2012,24(8): 56-60. LIN Jiandong, REN Senlin, XUE Mingxi, et al.Shale gas seismic identification and prediction techniques[J].Coal Geology of China, 2012,24(8): 56-60.
    [24]陆益祥, 潘仁芳, 唐廉宇, 等. 沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三下亚段页岩储层的岩石力学与脆性评价研究[J].中国石油勘探, 2017,22(6):69-77. LU Yixiang, PAN Renfang, TANG Lianyu, et al. Rock mechanics and brittleness of shale reservoirs in the Lower Sha 3 Member in Luojia area, Zhanhua Sag[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2017,22(6): 69-77.
    [25]张晨晨, 王玉满, 董大忠, 等. 川南长宁地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩脆性特征[J].天然气地球科学, 2016,27(9):1629-1639.ZHANG Chenchen, WANG Yuman, DONG Dazhong, et al. Brittleness characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale in Changning region,Southern Sichuan,China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(9): 1629-1639.
    [26]李金磊, 李文成. 涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块页岩脆性指数地震定量预测[J].地质勘探, 2017,37(7): 13-19.LI Jinlei, LI Wencheng. Quantitative prediction of shale brittleness index in the Jiaoshiba Block of the Fuling shale gas field[J].Geological Prospecting, 2017,37(7): 13-19.
    [27]陈桂华, 白玉湖, 陈晓智, 等. 页岩油气纵向综合甜点识别新方法及定量化评价[J].石油学报, 2016,37(11): 1337-1342. CHEN Guihua, BAI Yuhu, CHEN Xiaozhi, et al. A new method for the identification of shale oil and gas longitudinal integrated desserts and its quantitative evaluation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016,37(11): 1337-1342.
    [28]蒋廷学, 卞晓冰. 页岩气储层评价新技术:甜度评价方法[J].石油钻探技术, 2016,44(4): 1-6. JIANG Tingxue, BIAN Xiaobing.The novel technology of shale gas play evaluation:Sweetness calculation method[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016,44(4):1-6.
    [29]HOWELL J V. Glossary of geology and related sciences[M].Washington: American Geological Institute, 1957: 99-102.
    [30]JARVIE D. Finding bypassed or overlooked pay zones using geochemistry technique[R].IPTC 12918, 2008.
    [31]李庆辉, 陈勉, 金衍, 等. 页岩气储层岩石力学特性及脆性评价[J].石油钻探技术, 2012,40(4): 17-22.LI Qinghui, CHEN Mian, JIN Yan, et al. Evaluation of rock mechanical properties and brittleness of shale gas reservoirs[J].Petroleum Drilling Technique, 2012,40(4): 17-22.
    [32]聂海宽, 唐玄, 边瑞康. 页岩气成藏控制因素及中国南方页岩气发育有利区预测[J].石油学报, 2009,30(4):484-491. NIE Haikuan, TANG Xuan, BIAN Ruikang.Controlling factors of shale gas accumulation and prediction of beneficial areas for shale gas development in South China[J].Journal of Petroleum, 2009,30(4): 484-491.
    [33]胡进科, 李皋, 陈文可, 等. 国外页岩气勘探开发综述[J].重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2011,13(2): 72-83.HU Jinke, LI Gao, CHEN Wenke, et al.Review on overseas exploration and exploitation of shale gas[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition),2011,13(2): 72-83.
    [34]孔选林, 李军, 徐天吉, 等. 三维曲率体地震提取技术研究与应用[J].石油天然气学报, 2011, 33(5): 71-75. KONG Xuanlin, LI Jun, XU Tianji, et al. Research and application of three-dimensional curvature body seismic extraction technology[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2011,33(5): 71-75.
    [35]赖锦, 王贵文, 范卓颖, 等. 非常规油气储层脆性指数测井评价方法研究进展[J].石油科学通报, 2016,1(3):330-341. LAI Jin, WANG Guiwen, FAN Zhuoying, et al. Research progress on logging evaluation method for unconventional oil and gas reservoir brittleness index[J].Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2016,1(3): 330-341.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700