摘要
以来自全国31个省份的共31种类型993个实际土壤样品为主要研究对象,经全国67个实验室分析测试,统计分析土壤中镉(Cd)元素测定精密度控制结果,同时将其与现行标准与规范进行比对分析。结果表明,推荐的精密度控制评价标准为:样品ω(Cd)<0. 4 mg/kg时,实际样品明码样或标准样品测试实验室内相对偏差(RD)≤30%、实验室间相对标准偏差RD’≤35%,实际样品盲样测试RD≤35%、RD’≤40%;样品ω(Cd)≥0. 4 mg/kg时,实际样品明码样或标准样品测试RD≤25%、RD’≤30%,实际样品盲样测试RD≤30%、RD’≤35%。此外,土壤类型也会影响精密度控制结果。
For analyzing Cd in soil,precision control and evaluation standards have been studied by using the comparison determination data from 67 laboratories in 31 provinces,involving 993 soil samples and 31 soil types. Also it was compared with the current standard for soil monitoring. It is proposed to control RD≤30% in laboratory and RD'≤35% inter laboratories of the open code test sample and standard sample when the concentration of Cd is less than 0. 4 mg/kg,and RD≤35% in laboratory and RD'≤40% inter laboratories of the blind test sample. In the case of the concentration of Cd is higher than 0. 4 mg/kg,it is proposed to control RD≤25% in laboratory and RD'≤30% inter laboratories of the open code test sample and standard sample,and RD≤30%in laboratory and RD'≤35% inter laboratories of the blind test sample. It is also found that the results of precision control may be affected by different soil types.
引文
[1]王文宝,王小春,滕颖,等.江苏省不锈钢产业集聚区土壤重金属污染评价与分析[J].环境监控与预警,2010,2(5):40-43.
[2]张琪,沈志群,江峰琴.钢丝绳产业区重金属对土壤-农产品的复合污染及生态风险评价[J].环境监控与预警,2013,5(6):45-48.
[3]陆泗进,王业耀,何立环.某集中式饮用水源地保护区土壤重金属监测与评价[J].中国环境监测,2017,33(3):1-7.
[4]中华人民共和国生态环境部.土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行):GB 15618—2018[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2018.
[5]中华人民共和国生态环境部.土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行):GB 36600—2018[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2018.
[6]王宇游,夏新,米方卓,等.《土壤环境质量标准》中六种重金属测定精密度控制指标研究[J].土壤通报,2014,45(6):1500-1504.
[7]夏新,陈纯,米方卓,等.原子荧光法测定土壤中砷的质量控制评价标准研究[J].中国环境监测,2015,31(3):19-23.