摘要
为弥补民事诉讼保全制度的结构性缺陷,2012年修正的《民事诉讼法》确立了行为保全制度,为申请人的合法权益提供了更多救济途径。作为一种新的制度,行为保全的立法过于笼统,尚处于摸索实践中,司法适用率较低,有必要在理论上予以细化完善,以更好地指导司法实践。
In order to remedy the structural defects of preservation system in civil procedure,the act preservation system was established and implemented at Civil Procedure Law on January 1,2013,which provides more relief ways for the legitimate rights and interests of the applicants.As a new system,the legislation of behavior preservation is too general,is still in exploration practice,the judicial application rate lowly,it is necessary to be refined and improved in theory to guide judicial practice better.
引文
[1]梅因.古代法[M].沈景一,译.北京:商务印书馆,1984.
[2]江伟,肖建国.民事诉讼中的行为保全初探[J].政法论坛,1994(3):56-59.
[3]毕玉谦,谭秋贵.民事诉讼研究及立法论证[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2006:260.
[4]柴若冰.完善我国民事诉讼法行为保全制度探析[J].河北大学成人教育学院学报,2010(1):118-119.
[5]段丽丽.构建中国行为保全制度的思考[J].社科纵横,2007(10):93-96.
[6]托克维尔.论美国的民主:上卷[M].董果良,译.北京:商务印书馆,1993:110.
[7]谢文利.新民事诉讼法下行为保全适用法律问题研究[D].大连:大连海事大学,2014.
[8]江伟.民事诉讼法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:209.
[9]张娜,连强,周祖继.新民诉法保全问题的实践探索[N].人民法院报,2013-04-10(7).