信息化环境下中小学生综合素质评价指标体系构建
|
摘要
信息化环境下中小学生综合素质评价指标体系作为支撑教育评价的一种量规,对于促进信息技术与素质评价深度融合具有重要的意义。针对领域中研究的缺失,首先通过文献和个案分析,提出评价基本模型,提取有效的一、二、三级指标与观测点,形成指标体系初步框架,然后,以佛山市顺德区为例,采用教师问卷法和访谈法,对三级指标与学生行为表现进行两轮筛选,通过德尔菲法对专家进行两轮意见征询并对指标加权,最终构建出完整的评价指标体系,包括思想道德素质、学业表现、身心素质、审美素质和创新实践素质5个一级指标,道德品质、公民素养等14个二级指标以及35个三级指标与学生行为表现,整合了中小学各学段的评价,融入21世纪技能和信息化应用要素,具有一定的前瞻性、通用性、可定制性,体现了个性化评价,初步应用效果良好,可作为中小学生综合素质整合评价以及评价工具开发与应用的标准,促进教育信息化评价的革新与发展。
The evaluation index system of comprehensive quality for primary and secondary school students, as a gauge used to support education evaluation in the information environment, is of great significance to promote the in-depth integration of information technology and quality evaluation. In view of the lack of research in the field, this paper firstly puts forward a basic evaluation model through literature and case analysis, extracts the effective first-level, second-level and third-level indicators and observation points, and forms the preliminary framework of the index system. Then, taking Shunde District of Foshan City as an example, this paper conducts two rounds of screening for the third-level indicators and students' behaviors by means of teacher questionnaires and interviews. Experts are consulted through Delphi method for two rounds and the indicators are weighted. Finally, a complete evaluation index system has been established. This system includes five first-level indicators of ideological and moral quality, academic performance, physical and mental quality, aesthetic quality and innovative practice quality, 14 second-level indicators, such as moral quality and civic literacy, and 35 third-level indicators and students' behavior, which integrates the evaluation of all sections of primary and secondary schools, 21 st century skills and information application elements. Therefore,this system is forward-looking, universal and customizable, which reflects the personalized evaluation. The effects of the preliminary application of this index system are good. It can be used as the standard for the integrated evaluation of primary and secondary school students' comprehensive quality and the development and application of evaluation tools to promote the innovation and development of educational informatization evaluation.
The evaluation index system of comprehensive quality for primary and secondary school students, as a gauge used to support education evaluation in the information environment, is of great significance to promote the in-depth integration of information technology and quality evaluation. In view of the lack of research in the field, this paper firstly puts forward a basic evaluation model through literature and case analysis, extracts the effective first-level, second-level and third-level indicators and observation points, and forms the preliminary framework of the index system. Then, taking Shunde District of Foshan City as an example, this paper conducts two rounds of screening for the third-level indicators and students' behaviors by means of teacher questionnaires and interviews. Experts are consulted through Delphi method for two rounds and the indicators are weighted. Finally, a complete evaluation index system has been established. This system includes five first-level indicators of ideological and moral quality, academic performance, physical and mental quality, aesthetic quality and innovative practice quality, 14 second-level indicators, such as moral quality and civic literacy, and 35 third-level indicators and students' behavior, which integrates the evaluation of all sections of primary and secondary schools, 21 st century skills and information application elements. Therefore,this system is forward-looking, universal and customizable, which reflects the personalized evaluation. The effects of the preliminary application of this index system are good. It can be used as the standard for the integrated evaluation of primary and secondary school students' comprehensive quality and the development and application of evaluation tools to promote the innovation and development of educational informatization evaluation.
引文
[1]王咸伟,徐晓东,刘欢欢,齐海云.中小学学生综合素质评价指标体系与评价标准[A].佛山市顺德区中小学学生成长电子档案支持系统一期项目验收报告[R].广州:华南师范大学,2016.12:1-17.
[2]王咸伟,徐晓东,李碧莹,陈青云,郑少珍.中小学学生成长电子档案支持系统的需求分析、设计、开发与应用[A].佛山市顺德区中小学学生成长电子档案支持系统一期项目验收报告[R].广州:华南师范大学,2017.2:93-115.
[3]王咸伟,刘欢欢,陈青云,郑少珍.中小学生电子档案系统中素质评价指标与评语库的构建[C]//徐福荫,黄慕雄.教育技术协同创新与多元发展——2012教育技术国际学术会议(ETIF2012)论文集,北京:北京邮电大学出版社,2012:521-526.
[4] WIKIPEDIA. Programme for international student assessment[EB/OL].[2016-07-26]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment.
[5]陈时见,谭菲.国际学生评价项目(PISA)的发展现状及未来走向[J].比较教育研究,2015(7):107-111.
[6] SCARDAMALIA M,BRANSFORD J,KOZMA B,et al. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills[M]. Netherlands:Springer,2015:110.
[7] American School Counselor Association. ASCA national standards for students[EB/OL].(2014-01-30)[2015-12-22]. http://www.doc88.com/p-7184318021452.html.
[8]刘妍.初中学生综合素质评价研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2009:16-17.
[9] KOH K H,TAN C,NG P T. Creating thinking schools through authentic assessment the case in singapore[J]. Educ asse acc.2012,24(24):135-149.
[10]崔允漷.普通高中综合素质评价的国际/地区比较研究总报告[R].北京:教育部,2011.
[11]教育部.关于积极推进中小学评价与考试制度改革的通知[J].人民教育,2003(3):40-42.
[12]教育部.关于推进中小学教育质量综合评价改革的意见(教基二[2013]2号)[DB/OL].(2013-06-03)[2016-05-11]. http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s7054/201306/153185.html.
[13]教育部.关于加强和改进普通高中学生综合素质评价的意见(教基二[2014]11号)[DB/OL].(2014-12-10)[2016-05-11]. http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s4559/201412/181667.html.
[14]袁文得,艾思柏,许锦屏,等.香港学生发展指导标准[EB/OL].(2011-09-07)[2016-03-21]. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/dde624f9fab069dc5022018e.html.
[15]李栋.台港沪三地普通高中“学生发展指导制度”比较研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2011.
[16]张爱兰.中小学学生发展评价体系研究——北京市中小学学生发展评价方案简介[J].中小学管理,2005(8):35-38.
[17]上海市教育委员会.关于印发《上海市中小学生综合素质评价方案(试行)》的通知(沪教委基[2006]66号)[DB/OL].(2006-09-05)[2016-06-23]. http://www.110.com/fagui/law_115974.html.
[18]广东省教育厅.关于印发《广东省普通高中学生综合素质评价方案(试行)的通知》(粤教[2006]号)[DB/OL].(2010-09-12)[2016-09-08]. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/9f99bdc58bd63186bcebbc58.html.
[19]广东省教育厅.关于印发普通高中学业水平考试和学生综合素质评价实施办法的通知[DB/OL].(2016-08-23)[2016-09-16].http://www.gd.gov.cn/govpub/bmguifan/201609/t20160930_239973.htm
[20]付莉.小学生综合素质评价研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2008:9-11.
[21]魏金宝,黄秦安,张勇.中小学生综合素质评价研究综述[J].考试研究,2016(3):73-78.
[22]王咸伟,徐晓东,赵学孔,等.开源网络教学管理系统的体系结构与选择[J].电化教育研究,2013(2):61-67.
[2]王咸伟,徐晓东,李碧莹,陈青云,郑少珍.中小学学生成长电子档案支持系统的需求分析、设计、开发与应用[A].佛山市顺德区中小学学生成长电子档案支持系统一期项目验收报告[R].广州:华南师范大学,2017.2:93-115.
[3]王咸伟,刘欢欢,陈青云,郑少珍.中小学生电子档案系统中素质评价指标与评语库的构建[C]//徐福荫,黄慕雄.教育技术协同创新与多元发展——2012教育技术国际学术会议(ETIF2012)论文集,北京:北京邮电大学出版社,2012:521-526.
[4] WIKIPEDIA. Programme for international student assessment[EB/OL].[2016-07-26]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_Student_Assessment.
[5]陈时见,谭菲.国际学生评价项目(PISA)的发展现状及未来走向[J].比较教育研究,2015(7):107-111.
[6] SCARDAMALIA M,BRANSFORD J,KOZMA B,et al. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills[M]. Netherlands:Springer,2015:110.
[7] American School Counselor Association. ASCA national standards for students[EB/OL].(2014-01-30)[2015-12-22]. http://www.doc88.com/p-7184318021452.html.
[8]刘妍.初中学生综合素质评价研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2009:16-17.
[9] KOH K H,TAN C,NG P T. Creating thinking schools through authentic assessment the case in singapore[J]. Educ asse acc.2012,24(24):135-149.
[10]崔允漷.普通高中综合素质评价的国际/地区比较研究总报告[R].北京:教育部,2011.
[11]教育部.关于积极推进中小学评价与考试制度改革的通知[J].人民教育,2003(3):40-42.
[12]教育部.关于推进中小学教育质量综合评价改革的意见(教基二[2013]2号)[DB/OL].(2013-06-03)[2016-05-11]. http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s7054/201306/153185.html.
[13]教育部.关于加强和改进普通高中学生综合素质评价的意见(教基二[2014]11号)[DB/OL].(2014-12-10)[2016-05-11]. http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s4559/201412/181667.html.
[14]袁文得,艾思柏,许锦屏,等.香港学生发展指导标准[EB/OL].(2011-09-07)[2016-03-21]. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/dde624f9fab069dc5022018e.html.
[15]李栋.台港沪三地普通高中“学生发展指导制度”比较研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2011.
[16]张爱兰.中小学学生发展评价体系研究——北京市中小学学生发展评价方案简介[J].中小学管理,2005(8):35-38.
[17]上海市教育委员会.关于印发《上海市中小学生综合素质评价方案(试行)》的通知(沪教委基[2006]66号)[DB/OL].(2006-09-05)[2016-06-23]. http://www.110.com/fagui/law_115974.html.
[18]广东省教育厅.关于印发《广东省普通高中学生综合素质评价方案(试行)的通知》(粤教[2006]号)[DB/OL].(2010-09-12)[2016-09-08]. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/9f99bdc58bd63186bcebbc58.html.
[19]广东省教育厅.关于印发普通高中学业水平考试和学生综合素质评价实施办法的通知[DB/OL].(2016-08-23)[2016-09-16].http://www.gd.gov.cn/govpub/bmguifan/201609/t20160930_239973.htm
[20]付莉.小学生综合素质评价研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2008:9-11.
[21]魏金宝,黄秦安,张勇.中小学生综合素质评价研究综述[J].考试研究,2016(3):73-78.
[22]王咸伟,徐晓东,赵学孔,等.开源网络教学管理系统的体系结构与选择[J].电化教育研究,2013(2):61-67.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |