“当代文学史”的余华书写——以洪子诚、陈思和为例

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Writing YU Hua in the History of Contemporary Literature:Taking the Books of HONG Zicheng and CHEN Sihe as Examples 作者：梅向东 英文作者：MEI Xiangdong;School of Literature,Anqing Normal University; 关键词：当代文学史 ; 洪子诚 ; 陈思和 ; 余华书写 英文关键词：History of contemporary literature;;HONG Zicheng;;CHEN Sihe;;writing YU Hua 中文刊名：YBSG 英文刊名：Journal of Yibin University 机构：安庆师范大学文学院; 出版日期：2018-10-26 10:17 出版单位：宜宾学院学报 年：2018 期：v.18;No.237 基金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“新时期中国小说发展史论”(10BZW089) 语种：中文; 页：YBSG201810007 页数：8 CN：10 ISSN：51-1630/Z 分类号：46-52+61

摘要

余华的富有争议性是"当代文学史"书写中的一个挑战。洪子诚和陈思和著的余华书写是两种代表性的"历史化"方式。从"一体化"到"多元化"的文学史观与从"共名"到"无名"的文学史观,是洪子诚与陈思和书写余华的最终依据。前者去繁就简和搁置个性的价值中立,非乐观、非进化论的价值倾向,体现为对余华一定的意义抑制;后者强力性文化阐释和个性化、学术化倾向,乐观的、进化论的价值取向,则体现出对余华过度的意义阐扬。二著的差异,表明了当代文学史难以对余华作文学史的还原。
        Writing YU Hua in the history of contemporary literature was very controversial. HONG Zicheng and CHEN Sihe used two different typical "historization"methods to write him in their books. The final bases of them were the total and multiple viewpoints of the history of literature. The former always ignored the personality of writers,used the non-optimistic and non-evolutionary value tendency,suspended the interpretation of meaning for YU Hua; however,the later usually showed the personality of writers,insisted on the optimistic and evolutionary value tendency,stressed the meaning of YU Hua continuously. The difference between HONG Zicheng and CHEN Sihe reveals that it is very difficult to reduce YU Hua in the history of contemporary literature.

引文

[1]梅向东.余华小说的极端叙述与意义坚守[J].宜宾学院学报,2017(8):87-94.
    [2]杜士玮,许明芳.给余华拔牙:盘点余华的“兄弟”店[M].北京:同心出版社,2006.
    [3]莫言.清醒的说梦者:关于余华及其小说的杂感[J].当代作家评论,1991(2).
    [4]洪子诚.中国当代文学史[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
    [5]洪子诚.中国当代文学概说[M].南宁:广西教育出版社,2000.
    [6]李杨,洪子诚.当代文学史写作及相关问题的通信[J].文学评论,2002(3).
    [7]陈思和.中国当代文学史教程[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2006.
    [8]董健,丁帆,王彬彬.中国当代史新稿[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2011.
    [9]陈思和,李振声,郜元宝,等.余华:中国小说的先锋性究竟能走多远?:关于世纪末小说多种可能性对话之一[J].作家,1994(4).
    [10]洪治纲.余华论[J].中国现代文学研究丛刊,2017(2):131-143.