基于welch功率谱估计的地磁GM4秒数据频段分析

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCE FREQUENCY BANDS ANALYSIS OF GEOMAGNETIC GM4 SECONDS DATA BASED ON WELCH METHOD 作者：雷晴 ; 丁新娟 ; 翟世龙 英文作者：LEI Qing;DING Xin-juan;ZHAI Shi-long;Earthquake Agency of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region; 关键词：welch功率谱估计 ; GM4秒数据 ; 磁扰频段 ; 振幅谱 ; 功率谱 英文关键词：Power spectrum analysis with Welch method;;GM4 second data;;Geomagnetic disturbance frequency band;;Amplitude spectrum;;Power spectrum 中文刊名：LLDZ 英文刊名：Inland Earthquake 机构：新疆维吾尔自治区地震局; 出版日期：2018-09-15 出版单位：内陆地震 年：2018 期：v.32;No.127 基金：新疆地震科学基金(201609) 语种：中文; 页：LLDZ201803006 页数：8 CN：03 ISSN：65-1119/P 分类号：39-46

摘要

基于welch算法的经典功率谱估计对新疆区域内乌鲁木齐台、喀什台和且末台的3台GM4磁通门磁力仪磁扰日时段的秒数据进行分析。实验首先分别对3台GM4秒数据的高频数据进行FFT分析,磁扰日时段3台GM4秒数据受磁扰较为明显的频段均集中在0. 005～0. 025 Hz,此频段内振幅较大,突跳点较多。实验基于welch算法的功率谱估计对3台GM4秒数据进行功率谱分析,频率域采用受磁扰较为集中的频段,结果表明:3台GM4秒数据受到的干扰主要为地磁场的高频部分,干扰的频段范围集中在0. 002～0. 006 Hz内,H分量数据波动较大,在该频段内数据曲线出现毛刺和高频震荡现象; D分量在此频段内有轻微波动; Z分量数据整体较为平滑,受扰最小。
        This paper analyzed geomagnetic GM4 seconds data from Urumqi station,Kashi station and Qiemo station of Xinjiang taking geomagnetic disturbance frequency bands based on Welch method. First,FFT analysis about high frequency part of GM4 seconds data was carried out in experiment. We found the dominant frequency bands was 0. 005 Hz ～ 0. 025 Hz during the magnetic disturbance time. The amplitude was larger and more jumping points came out in this frequency band. Second,power spectrum analysis was carried out based on Welch algorithm. In frequency domain,more concentrated frequency bands were used. Results showed thatthe high frequency part of geomagnetic field mainly provoked the interference of GM4 seconds data. The frequency range of interference was concentrated in the range of 0. 002 Hz to 0. 006 Hz. The horizontal component signals of GM4 second data fluctuated greatly,and the data curve glitched and presented high frequency oscillation phenomenon in this frequency band; the declination component signals of GM4 second data had slight fluctuation in this frequency band; the vertical of GM4 second data was relatively smooth and the disturbance was the smallest of these three component signals.

引文

[1]邹广,高守全,赵刚,等.温泉台FHD-2B质子磁力仪资料干扰分析[J].内陆地震,2015,29(4):371-377.
    [2]杨涛,刘庆生,付媛媛,等.震磁效应研究及进展[J].地震地磁观测与研究,2004,25(6):63-71.
    [3]徐文耀.我国地磁观测研究的发展[J].地球物理学报,1997,40(增刊):217-230.
    [4]张学民,赵国泽,陈小斌,等.国外地震电磁现象观测[J].地球物理学进展,2007,22(3):687-694.
    [5]曹丙霞,薛敬宏,乔晓林.地震——电离层扰动探测技术的研究进展[J].地球物理学进展,2009,24(1):51-57.
    [6]艾萨·伊斯马伊力,高丽娟,邢喜明. 2016年12月8日呼图壁Ms6. 2地震前地磁异常[J].内陆地震,2017,31(3):270-275.
    [7]伊鑫,曲爱华.基于welch算法的经典功率谱估计的Matlab分析[J].现代电子技术,2010,314(3):7-9.
    [8]宋宁,关华.经典功率谱估计及仿真[J].现代电子技术,2008,31(11):159-161.
    [9]杨蔚原. Welch功率谱估计方法的参数选择[J].环境技术,2009,10(5):23-27.
    [10]杨晓明,晋玉剑,李永红.经典功率谱估计Welch法的MATLAB仿真分析[J].电子测试,2011,7(7):101-104.
    [11]张峰,石现峰,张学智. Welch功率谱估计算法仿真及分析[J].西安工业大学学报,2009,29(4):353-356.
    [12]胡广书.数字信号处理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007.