隔震结构不同阻尼比地震影响系数曲线的改进研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
对我国现行建筑抗震设计规范中不同阻尼比隔震结构的地震影响系数曲线进行了研究。对于隔震结构的计算分析,规范建议采用时程分析方法进行求解;在特定情况下,也可根据规范中不同阻尼比结构的地震影响系数曲线,采用简化的等效线性化方法进行迭代求解。建立了一个典型的采用叠层橡胶支座隔震的12层钢筋混凝土结构;分别采用等效线性化方法和时程分析方法,对隔震层位移、基底剪力等进行分析和比较。发现等效线性化方法的隔震分析结果相对于时程分析方法严重偏大,说明当结构阻尼比大于0.05时,我国规范的阻尼调整系数值过于保守。在此基础上,对规范中地震影响系数曲线采用的阻尼调整和形状参数提出了改进建议。在不同的场地类别和地震分组情况下,改进后的等效线性化方法的计算精度均得到了很大提高,可以准确计算隔震结构的基本动力响应。
The seismic influence coefficient curve of seismic isolated structure with different damping ratio,which was recommended in the Chinese code for seismic design buildings,was studied.In Chinese code,time-history analysis method is recommended for seismic isolated structure,while a simplified iteration procedure based on equivalent linear analysis is also permitted under limited conditions by using a response reduction factor to account for the variation of response as a result of damping.Subsequently,a typical 12-story reinforced concrete building isolated with lead-rubber bearings was established,and the displacement and base shear force of the isolation level were analyzed and compared by using the above two methods.The calculated results from the equivalent linear analysis are generally significantly larger than those from time-history analysis;and it can be concluded that,when the damping ratio of building structures is not equal to 0.05,the damping adjustment factor in Chinese code is too conservation.The improvement suggestions of damping adjusting and forming parameters on the seismic influence coefficient curve in Chinese code were proposed.Using the new parameters,the calculation precisions of the equivalent linear analysis can get greatly improved under different site-classes and design earthquake groups,and can be used to accurately analyze the basic dynamic response of seismic isolated building.
引文
[1]Housner G W,Bergman L A,Caughey T K,et al.Structural control:past,present,and future[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1997,123(9):897-971.
    [2]Masahiko Higashino,Shin Okamoto.Response controland seismic isolation of buildings[M].London:Taylor&Francis,2006.
    [3]周福霖.工程结构减震控制[M].北京:地震出版社,1997.(Zhou Fulin.Response control of engineeringstructures[M].Beijing:Earthquake Press,1997.(inChinese))
    [4]GB 50011—2001建筑抗震设计规范[S].(GB50011—2001 Code for seismic design of buildings[S].(in Chinese))
    [5]赵斌,王亚勇.关于《建筑抗震设计规范》GB50011—2001中设计反应谱的几点讨论[J].工程抗震,2003,25(1):13-14.
    [6]李英民,郑妮娜,周长安.结构设计地震作用效应影响因素及规律分析[J].世界地震工程,2003,19(1):51-56.(Li Ying min,Zheng Ni na,Zhou Changan.Analysis on factors influencing the structuralseismic effects based on comparison of the last and now-used seismic codes of China[J].World Information onEarthquake Engineering,2003,19(1):51-56.(inChinese))
    [7]黄东梅,李创第,朱乐东.基础隔震结构基于设计反应谱的地震作用取值[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,39(4):504-511.(HuangDongmei,Li Chuangdi,Zhu Ledong.Earthquakeaction calculation for base seismic isolation systembased on the designed response spectrum[J].Journalof Xi’an University of Architecture&Technology(Natural Science Edition),2007,39(4):504-511.(inChinese))
    [8]胡聿贤.地震工程学[M].第二版.北京:地震出版社,2006.(Hu Yuxian.Earthquake Engineering[M].2nd ed.Beijing:Earthquake Press,2006.(inChinese))
    [9]Demin Feng,Wenguang Liu,Keiji Masuda,et al.Acomparative study of seismic isolation codes worldwide[C]//The First European Conference on EarthquakeEngineering and Seismology.Geneva,Switzerland:European Association of Earthquake Engineering,2006:3-8.
    [10]国土交通省国土技術政策総合研究所,独立行政法人建築研究所,日本建築行政会議,社団法人日本免震構造協会,財団法人日本建築センタ?.免震建築物の技術基準解説及び計算例とその解説[M].東京:日本建築センタ?,平成17年(2005年).

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心