火电厂主厂房不同布置方式下地震反应对比分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
大型火力发电厂是重要的生命线工程,主厂房传统的布置方式采用三连式布置方式,而新的布置方式采用汽机房和煤仓间交叉布置方式。用有限元分析软件对两种布置方式进行反应谱分析,从而对两种布置方式在不同地震烈度条件下的主厂房的层间剪力、层间位移及层间位移角进行对比分析。结果表明,在不同地震烈度条件下,主厂房采用交叉布置方式时,主厂房的质量、刚度的分布较采用三连式布置方式时均匀;主厂房采用交叉布置方式时,主厂房的抗震性能要比主厂房采用三连式布置方式时要好。
Huge heat-engine plant is the crucial lifeblood project,the traditional arrangement formation of which is the triple-connected method,but the latest arrangement formation of which is the cross arrangement method between the turbine hall and coal-store hall.Comparing and analyzing the response spectrum of the said two methods by using finite element software,the interlaminated shear force,interlaminated displacement and interlaminated displacement angle under different seismic intensity are compared and analyzed.The results indicate that the quality and rigidity of the main workshop by using cross arrangement method are more even than those of the one by using triple-connected method under different seismic intensity,and the anti-seismic performance of the former is better than that of the latter.
引文
[1]文良谟.火力发电厂土建结构抗震设计的回顾和展望[J].电力建设,1998,(6):18-20,24.
    [2]吴涛,白国良,刘伯权.大型火力发电厂钢筋混凝土框排架主厂房结构抗震性能实验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2007,28(3):46-52.
    [3]宋远齐,汪小刚,温彦锋,等.大型火电厂主厂房框排架结构静力弹塑性地震反应分析[J].电力建设,2009,30(5):59-62.
    [4]刘大海,杨翠如.厂房抗震设计[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997.
    [5]葛增茂.火力发电厂主厂房结构形式和体系评述[J].电力建设,1998,(6):15-17.
    [6]GB50011-2001.建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心