地震交互分析软件MSDP-DM和EDSP-IAS的对比分析
|
摘要
详细地对比了国内两款地震交互分析软件MSDP-DM和EDSP-IAS的相同点和不同点。从软件的运行环境、存储方式、界面设计和主要功能等方面对软件进行了多角度分析,并结合几个熟悉的有代表性的震例进行实际分析对比,在各项对比中得出了两套软件各有的功能特点及长处;同时分析了国内地震交互分析软件开发现状,提出了国内应加强对地震交互分析软件及系统的开发与建设,从而推进地震事业的发展。
This thesis is a comprehensive study of the similarities and differences of the two types of domestic seismic alternating analytical software MSDP-DM and EDSP-IAS.It makes a multidimensional analysis of their functioning environment,storage mode,interface design,and chief functions,etc.By analyzing and comparing some familiar and typical instances of seism,it summarizes respectively the characteristics of the functions and advantages of the two kinds of software.Meanwhile,it investigates the current development of the domestic seismic alternating analytical software,and proposes that the domestic researchers should reinforce the development and construction of them,so as to promote the development of the seismic undertaking.
This thesis is a comprehensive study of the similarities and differences of the two types of domestic seismic alternating analytical software MSDP-DM and EDSP-IAS.It makes a multidimensional analysis of their functioning environment,storage mode,interface design,and chief functions,etc.By analyzing and comparing some familiar and typical instances of seism,it summarizes respectively the characteristics of the functions and advantages of the two kinds of software.Meanwhile,it investigates the current development of the domestic seismic alternating analytical software,and proposes that the domestic researchers should reinforce the development and construction of them,so as to promote the development of the seismic undertaking.
引文
[1]MSDP-DM地震台网数据处理及数据库管理软件用户手册[M]．广东省地震监测中心，2003，11
[2]交互分析软件EDSP-IAS使用手册[M]．北京港震机电技术有限公司，2005，11
[3]罗灵军，张远等．常用GIS基础软件对比研究[J]．城市勘测，2001，01
[2]交互分析软件EDSP-IAS使用手册[M]．北京港震机电技术有限公司，2005，11
[3]罗灵军，张远等．常用GIS基础软件对比研究[J]．城市勘测，2001，01
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心