多种结构形式住宅抗震性能对比
|
摘要
本文采用ADINA软件对两个多层框架(一个普通矩形柱框架和一个异型柱框架)和三个小高层结构(普通剪力墙、短肢剪力墙和框架剪力墙)分别进行了抗震推倒分析。通过位移、振动周期、层间剪力等方面的对比分析表明,对于多层住宅异型柱框架结构可以满足抗震要求;对于小高层住宅,短肢剪力墙有较好的抗震性能。
The article makes pushover analysis for two multiplayer frames(one common frame and one abnormity columniation frame)and three small high-rise structures(shearwall,short-climbed shearwall and frame-shearwall structure)based on software ADINA.Consequently,from displacement,vibration period and storey shear force,it is shown that the abnormity columniation frame can meet the seismic requirement and the short-climbed shearwall have better seismic capacity.
The article makes pushover analysis for two multiplayer frames(one common frame and one abnormity columniation frame)and three small high-rise structures(shearwall,short-climbed shearwall and frame-shearwall structure)based on software ADINA.Consequently,from displacement,vibration period and storey shear force,it is shown that the abnormity columniation frame can meet the seismic requirement and the short-climbed shearwall have better seismic capacity.
引文
[1]肖建庄,黄珏,李杰,等.异型柱框架结构抗震设计研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2002,(4):15-19.
[2]A.M.Mwafy,A.S.Elnashai.Stastic push-over versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings[J].Engineering Structures,2001,(23):407-424.
[3]叶献国,李康宁.Push-over方法与循环往复加载分析的研究[J].合肥工业大学学报,2001,(12):26-28.
[2]A.M.Mwafy,A.S.Elnashai.Stastic push-over versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings[J].Engineering Structures,2001,(23):407-424.
[3]叶献国,李康宁.Push-over方法与循环往复加载分析的研究[J].合肥工业大学学报,2001,(12):26-28.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心