全球价值链的核算及其与环境要素的关联研究综述
|
摘要
全球价值链作为联系全球生产的跨国价值链,不仅产生了各国的价值收入,也对各国的环境影响深远。在既有研究中,全球价值链的核算主要基于垂直专业化、出口技术复杂度及增加值口径等视角来进行,对于全球价值链与环境要素的关联研究,主要通过规模效应、结构效应、技术效应等对各国环境产生的影响而展开,其中规模效应起主导作用。既有研究还通过全球价值链中的隐含碳测算来剖析价值链中的污染转移问题,并从全球价值链嵌入的环境效应及环境治理对全球价值链的影响等方面展开了实证研究。未来相关全球价值链核算的研究应将各国文化、社会、环境等所受影响纳入分析框架,在研究环境治理对全球价值链的影响方面应切入行业能源利用效率、污染属性、人力资本等差异性视角。
As a transnational value chain connecting global production, global value chain not only generates value income of each country, but also has far-reaching impact on the environment of each country. The existing global value chain accounting is mainly calculated from the perspectives of vertical specialization, the complexity of export techniques and the caliber of added value. The research on the correlation between global value chain and environmental factors is mainly carried out through the effect of scale effect, structural effect and technical effect on the environment of various countries, and among them, scale effect plays a leading role. The existing research also implies the carbon measurement in the global value chain to analyze the problem of pollution transfer in the global value chain. The study also makes an empirical research on the environmental effects embedded in global value chain and the impact of environmental governance on global value chain.In the future, the relevant study on global value chain accounting should incorporate the impacts on the culture, society and environment into the analysis framework, and in terms of studying the impact of environmental governance on global value chain, the perspective of industrial differences in energy efficiency, pollution attributes and human capital should be included.
As a transnational value chain connecting global production, global value chain not only generates value income of each country, but also has far-reaching impact on the environment of each country. The existing global value chain accounting is mainly calculated from the perspectives of vertical specialization, the complexity of export techniques and the caliber of added value. The research on the correlation between global value chain and environmental factors is mainly carried out through the effect of scale effect, structural effect and technical effect on the environment of various countries, and among them, scale effect plays a leading role. The existing research also implies the carbon measurement in the global value chain to analyze the problem of pollution transfer in the global value chain. The study also makes an empirical research on the environmental effects embedded in global value chain and the impact of environmental governance on global value chain.In the future, the relevant study on global value chain accounting should incorporate the impacts on the culture, society and environment into the analysis framework, and in terms of studying the impact of environmental governance on global value chain, the perspective of industrial differences in energy efficiency, pollution attributes and human capital should be included.
引文
[1]刘琳.中国参与全球价值链的测度与分析—基于附加值贸易的考察[J].世界经济研究,2015(6):71-83.
[2]Krugman P, Cooper R N, Srinivasan T N. Growingworld trade:causes andconsequences[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995(1):327-377.
[3]UNCTAD.Global value chains and development:investment andvalue added trade in the global economy[EB/OL].[2018-08-29].http://unctad. org/en/PublicationsLibrary/diae2013dlen. Pdf.2002.
[4]Hummels D, Ishii J, Yi K M.The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade[J]. Journal of International Economics,2001(1):75-96.
[5]Robert Koopman, William Powers, Zhi Wang, et al. Give credit where credit is due:tracing value added in global production chains[EB/OL].https://ssrn.com/abstract=1949669,2011-10-26/2018-08-29.
[6]Wang, et al. Value chains in East Asian production networks[EB/OL].HYPERLINK"https://www.researchgate.net"https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295756035, 2011-02-08/2018-08-29.
[7]Koopman R, Wang Z, Wei S J. How much of Chinese exports is really made in China? assessing domestic value-added when processing trade is pervasive[EB/OL].http://www.nber.org/papers/w14109,2008-06-12/2018-08-29.
[8]Daudin G,Rifflart C, Schweisguth D. Who produces for whom in the world economy[J].Canadian Journal of Economics, 2011(44):1403-1437.
[9]Lall S, Weiss J Zhang. The“Sophistication”of exports:a new trade measure[J]. World Development, 2006(2):222-237.
[10]Hausmann R, Hwang J, Rodrik D. What you export matters[J].Journal of Economic Growth, 2007(12):1-25.
[11]Blonigen M. Please pass the catch-up:the relative performance of Chinese and foreign firms in Chinese exports[M]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2007.
[12]杨汝岱,姚洋.有限赶超与经济增长[J].经济研究,2008(8):29-41.
[13]杨善奇.环境规制对出口技术复杂度区域异质性影响研究[J].大连理工大学学报,2016(4):46-51.
[14]王直,魏尚进,祝坤福.总贸易核算法:官方贸易统计与全球价值链的度量[J].中国社会科学,2015(9):108-206.
[15]Koopman et al.Estimating domestic content in exports when processing trade is pervasive[J].Development Economics,2012,99(1):178-189.
[16]程大中.中国参与全球价值链分工的程度及演变趋势基于跨国投入-产出分析[J].经济研究,2015(9):4-16.
[17]胡飞.制造业全球价值链分工的环境效应及中国的对策[J].经济问题探索,2016(3):151-155.
[18]巩爱凌.中国制造业在全球价值链分工中的地位与出口隐含碳研究[J].经济与管理,2013(8):72-76.
[19]许统生,薛智韵.制造业出口碳排放:总量、结构、要素分解[J].财贸研究,2011(2):15-23.
[20]Lo?pez L A,Arce G,Zafrilla J.Financial crisis,virtual carbon in global value chains,and the importance of linkage effects,the Spain-China case[J].Environmental Science&Technology,2014(1):36-44.
[21]Jiang X,Liu Y.Global value chain,trade and carbon:case of information and communication technology manufacturing sector[J].Energy for Sustainable Development,2015(25):1-7.
[22]李小平.国际贸易中隐含的CO2测算-基于垂直专业化分工的环境投入产出模型分析[J].财贸经济,2010(5):66-70.
[23]潘安.全球价值链分工对中国对外贸易隐含碳排放的影响[J].国际经贸探索,2017(3):14-26.
[24]Ji Z,Wu M,Lai X.The effect of China’s integration into global value chain on energy efficiency[J].International Journal of Management Sciences,2014(2):28-42.
[25]刘婧.我国加工贸易与环境污染的因果关系检验[J].国际贸易问题,2009(8):85-91.
[26]王玉燕,王建秀,阎俊爱.全球价值链嵌入的节能减排双重效应-来自中国工业面板数据的经验研究[J].中国软科学,2015(8):148-162.
[27]刘慧,陈晓华,周禄松.出口技术复杂度赶超对能源效率的影响研究-基于跨国面板数据门槛效应模型的非线性检验[J].国际贸易问题,2014(8):25-35.
[28]Levinson A.Technology,international trade,and pollution from USmanufacturing[J].American Economic Review,2009(5):2177-2192.
[29]杨飞,孙文远,张松林.全球价值链嵌入、技术进步与污染排放-基于中国分行业数据的实证研究[J].世界经济研究,2017(2):126-134.
[30]廖涵.低碳经济中全球价值链的经济学分析[J].企业经济,2012(7):5-10.
[31]唐杰英.垂直专业化、环境规则和中国工业的贸易竞争力[J].世界经济研究,2013(7):52-58.
[32]周康.环境管制、区域异度性与出口技术复杂度[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2015(2):17-27.
[33]余娟娟.环境规制对行业出口技术复杂度的调整效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015(8):125-13.
[2]Krugman P, Cooper R N, Srinivasan T N. Growingworld trade:causes andconsequences[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995(1):327-377.
[3]UNCTAD.Global value chains and development:investment andvalue added trade in the global economy[EB/OL].[2018-08-29].http://unctad. org/en/PublicationsLibrary/diae2013dlen. Pdf.2002.
[4]Hummels D, Ishii J, Yi K M.The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade[J]. Journal of International Economics,2001(1):75-96.
[5]Robert Koopman, William Powers, Zhi Wang, et al. Give credit where credit is due:tracing value added in global production chains[EB/OL].https://ssrn.com/abstract=1949669,2011-10-26/2018-08-29.
[6]Wang, et al. Value chains in East Asian production networks[EB/OL].HYPERLINK"https://www.researchgate.net"https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295756035, 2011-02-08/2018-08-29.
[7]Koopman R, Wang Z, Wei S J. How much of Chinese exports is really made in China? assessing domestic value-added when processing trade is pervasive[EB/OL].http://www.nber.org/papers/w14109,2008-06-12/2018-08-29.
[8]Daudin G,Rifflart C, Schweisguth D. Who produces for whom in the world economy[J].Canadian Journal of Economics, 2011(44):1403-1437.
[9]Lall S, Weiss J Zhang. The“Sophistication”of exports:a new trade measure[J]. World Development, 2006(2):222-237.
[10]Hausmann R, Hwang J, Rodrik D. What you export matters[J].Journal of Economic Growth, 2007(12):1-25.
[11]Blonigen M. Please pass the catch-up:the relative performance of Chinese and foreign firms in Chinese exports[M]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2007.
[12]杨汝岱,姚洋.有限赶超与经济增长[J].经济研究,2008(8):29-41.
[13]杨善奇.环境规制对出口技术复杂度区域异质性影响研究[J].大连理工大学学报,2016(4):46-51.
[14]王直,魏尚进,祝坤福.总贸易核算法:官方贸易统计与全球价值链的度量[J].中国社会科学,2015(9):108-206.
[15]Koopman et al.Estimating domestic content in exports when processing trade is pervasive[J].Development Economics,2012,99(1):178-189.
[16]程大中.中国参与全球价值链分工的程度及演变趋势基于跨国投入-产出分析[J].经济研究,2015(9):4-16.
[17]胡飞.制造业全球价值链分工的环境效应及中国的对策[J].经济问题探索,2016(3):151-155.
[18]巩爱凌.中国制造业在全球价值链分工中的地位与出口隐含碳研究[J].经济与管理,2013(8):72-76.
[19]许统生,薛智韵.制造业出口碳排放:总量、结构、要素分解[J].财贸研究,2011(2):15-23.
[20]Lo?pez L A,Arce G,Zafrilla J.Financial crisis,virtual carbon in global value chains,and the importance of linkage effects,the Spain-China case[J].Environmental Science&Technology,2014(1):36-44.
[21]Jiang X,Liu Y.Global value chain,trade and carbon:case of information and communication technology manufacturing sector[J].Energy for Sustainable Development,2015(25):1-7.
[22]李小平.国际贸易中隐含的CO2测算-基于垂直专业化分工的环境投入产出模型分析[J].财贸经济,2010(5):66-70.
[23]潘安.全球价值链分工对中国对外贸易隐含碳排放的影响[J].国际经贸探索,2017(3):14-26.
[24]Ji Z,Wu M,Lai X.The effect of China’s integration into global value chain on energy efficiency[J].International Journal of Management Sciences,2014(2):28-42.
[25]刘婧.我国加工贸易与环境污染的因果关系检验[J].国际贸易问题,2009(8):85-91.
[26]王玉燕,王建秀,阎俊爱.全球价值链嵌入的节能减排双重效应-来自中国工业面板数据的经验研究[J].中国软科学,2015(8):148-162.
[27]刘慧,陈晓华,周禄松.出口技术复杂度赶超对能源效率的影响研究-基于跨国面板数据门槛效应模型的非线性检验[J].国际贸易问题,2014(8):25-35.
[28]Levinson A.Technology,international trade,and pollution from USmanufacturing[J].American Economic Review,2009(5):2177-2192.
[29]杨飞,孙文远,张松林.全球价值链嵌入、技术进步与污染排放-基于中国分行业数据的实证研究[J].世界经济研究,2017(2):126-134.
[30]廖涵.低碳经济中全球价值链的经济学分析[J].企业经济,2012(7):5-10.
[31]唐杰英.垂直专业化、环境规则和中国工业的贸易竞争力[J].世界经济研究,2013(7):52-58.
[32]周康.环境管制、区域异度性与出口技术复杂度[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2015(2):17-27.
[33]余娟娟.环境规制对行业出口技术复杂度的调整效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015(8):125-13.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |