摘要
在适用条件及适用后果上,认罪认罚从宽制度与公诉案件刑事和解程序存在一定的交叉。随着认罪认罚从宽制度的铺开,公诉案件刑事和解面临着适用范围狭隘,从宽幅度小以及被害人主体地位虚化的现实困境。认识并解决这些困境,应顺应认罪人罚从宽的制度背景,从宏观高度重新厘清制度定位,扩大和解的适用范围,赋予被害人明确的量刑建议权。
On the applicable conditions and the applicable consequences,there is a certain intersection between the leniency system of guilty plea and victim-offender-reconciliation in public prosecuting cases. With the spread of the leniency system of guilty plea,there are some practical difficulties,such as the small scope,the small reduction in sentence and the indifference of the victim's position,which need to be understood and solved by complying with the leniency system of guilty plea,re-clarifying the institutional orientation from the macro level,expanding the scope of application of reconciliation,and giving victims a clear right to propose sentences.
引文
[1]陈卫东.认罪认罚从宽制度研究[J].中国法学,2016(02):54.
[2]黄京平.认罪人罚从宽制度的若干实体法问题[J].中国法学,2017(05):193.
[3]周倩.公诉案件刑事和解制度实证研究———以S市B区法院为样本[D].重庆:西南政法大学,2016:16.
[4]韩轶.对我国刑罚目的之理性审视[J].武汉大学学报(社会科学版),2002(01):5.