基于AHP的省界缓冲区监管考核指标体系研究
|
摘要
目前,我国水资源监管考核工作主要集中于行政区域内的监管考核,水功能区划中的省界缓冲区因其跨界性特点,适用性存在问题。因此,研究者依据国家对省界缓冲区的有关规定和水功能区限制纳污红线制度确定的纳污红线控制指标,基于层次分析法(AHP)原理构建了以省界水质、总量与浓度控制、入河排污口管理、基础设施与制度实施作为关键绩效指标的三级省界水资源保护监管考核指标体系,并以川渝省界缓冲区为例验证了该指标体系及权重设计的合理性与可行性。
At present, the supervision and assessment of water resources in China are mainly conducted within an administrative region. The application of this supervision and assessment system in the buffer zone of water function zoning system is not fully suitable due to the trans-boundary characteristics. Therefore, based on relevant regulations on provincial buffer zone and pollutant control key index of water function zone, a three-layer supervision, monitoring and assessment index system is designed for the assessment of buffer zone management effectiveness by analytic hierarchy process( AHP), in which the water quality, pollutant concentration and total quantities, sewage outfall management, infrastructure and regulatory implementation are key index. A case study is carried out in the buffer zone between Sichuan and Chongqing of Yangtze River.The results of case study prove the feasibility and applicability of assessment index system and proposed factor weight.
At present, the supervision and assessment of water resources in China are mainly conducted within an administrative region. The application of this supervision and assessment system in the buffer zone of water function zoning system is not fully suitable due to the trans-boundary characteristics. Therefore, based on relevant regulations on provincial buffer zone and pollutant control key index of water function zone, a three-layer supervision, monitoring and assessment index system is designed for the assessment of buffer zone management effectiveness by analytic hierarchy process( AHP), in which the water quality, pollutant concentration and total quantities, sewage outfall management, infrastructure and regulatory implementation are key index. A case study is carried out in the buffer zone between Sichuan and Chongqing of Yangtze River.The results of case study prove the feasibility and applicability of assessment index system and proposed factor weight.
引文
[1]李航,张颖,李昊,等.黄河流域省界缓冲区监督管理初探[J].人民黄河,2012,34(12):66-68.
[2]蒋英姿,江溢,成新.太湖流域省际边界地区水资源保护问题与对策[J].水资源保护,2006,22(3):88-90.
[3]韩宇.跨行政区域水污染纠纷处理机制研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2007:3-7.
[4]黄冬娅,杨大力.考核式监管的运行与困境:基于主要污染物总量减排考核的分析[J].政治学研究,2016(4):101-112+128.
[5]曹永强,游海林,罗麟,等. AHP在省界缓冲区水资源保护方案评价中的应用[J].长江科学院院报,2009,26(12):26-28,49.
[6]郭金玉,张忠彬,孙庆云.层次分析法的研究与应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2008(5):148-153.
[7]徐建华.计量地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:226-232.
[8]邓雪,李家铭,曾浩健,等.层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2012,42(7):93-100.
[9]卿海龙,戴良铁.基于层次分析法的绩效评估指标权重确定方法[J].商场现代化,2005(25):266-267.
[10]王为人,屠梅曾.基于层次分析法的流域水资源配置权重测算[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2005(8):1133-1136.
[11]李靖,周孝德,吴文娟.层次分析法在水环境承载力评价中的应用[J].水利科技与经济,2008(11):866-869.
[12]金菊良,张礼兵,张少文,等.层次分析法在水资源工程环境影响评价中的应用[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004(2):187-192.
[13]温淑瑶,马占青,周之豪,等.层次分析法在区域湖泊水资源可持续发展评价中的应用[J].长江流域资源与环境,2000(2):196-201.
[2]蒋英姿,江溢,成新.太湖流域省际边界地区水资源保护问题与对策[J].水资源保护,2006,22(3):88-90.
[3]韩宇.跨行政区域水污染纠纷处理机制研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2007:3-7.
[4]黄冬娅,杨大力.考核式监管的运行与困境:基于主要污染物总量减排考核的分析[J].政治学研究,2016(4):101-112+128.
[5]曹永强,游海林,罗麟,等. AHP在省界缓冲区水资源保护方案评价中的应用[J].长江科学院院报,2009,26(12):26-28,49.
[6]郭金玉,张忠彬,孙庆云.层次分析法的研究与应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2008(5):148-153.
[7]徐建华.计量地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:226-232.
[8]邓雪,李家铭,曾浩健,等.层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2012,42(7):93-100.
[9]卿海龙,戴良铁.基于层次分析法的绩效评估指标权重确定方法[J].商场现代化,2005(25):266-267.
[10]王为人,屠梅曾.基于层次分析法的流域水资源配置权重测算[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2005(8):1133-1136.
[11]李靖,周孝德,吴文娟.层次分析法在水环境承载力评价中的应用[J].水利科技与经济,2008(11):866-869.
[12]金菊良,张礼兵,张少文,等.层次分析法在水资源工程环境影响评价中的应用[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004(2):187-192.
[13]温淑瑶,马占青,周之豪,等.层次分析法在区域湖泊水资源可持续发展评价中的应用[J].长江流域资源与环境,2000(2):196-201.