通过选择育种降低绵羊甲烷排放的研究进展
|
摘要
羊等反刍家畜是全球温室效应气体的重要贡献者,如何降低温室效应气体、尤其甲烷排放量已是畜牧业进一步发展面临的挑战之一。目前已提出许多减缓家畜甲烷排放的方法,而选择育种策略以其能形成持久、可累积的改变以及相对低的成本,成为主要候选方法。本文主要对利用选择育种方法降低羊甲烷排放量的相关研究进行综述,以便为今后该领域进一步的研究提供借鉴。
Ruminants, especially sheep and goat, contribute to the total green house gas(GAS). How to reduce GAS emission, especially methane emission, has become one of the important challenges to further develop animal husbandry. Presently, a number of different strategies have been tested to reduce methane emissions in livestock, however, the optimizing breeding has become the priority option due to its permanent and cumulative changes as well as its relatively low cost. In this paper, relevant research on reducing methane emissions by optimizing breeding was introduced to provide reference for further study in this field.
Ruminants, especially sheep and goat, contribute to the total green house gas(GAS). How to reduce GAS emission, especially methane emission, has become one of the important challenges to further develop animal husbandry. Presently, a number of different strategies have been tested to reduce methane emissions in livestock, however, the optimizing breeding has become the priority option due to its permanent and cumulative changes as well as its relatively low cost. In this paper, relevant research on reducing methane emissions by optimizing breeding was introduced to provide reference for further study in this field.
引文
[1] Herrero M, Gerber P, Vellinga T et al. Livestock and greenhouse gas emissions:The importance of getting the numbers right[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011,(166–167):779–782.
[2] Pinares-Patin.o CS, Hickey SM, Young EA et al. Heritability estimates of methane emissions from sheep[J]. Animal, 2013,(7):316–321.
[3] Pickering NK, Oddy VH, Basarab J et al. Animal board invited review:genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants[J]. Animal 2015,(9):1431–1440.
[4] Johnson KA,Johnson DE. Methane emission from cattle[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1995,(73):2483-2492.
[5] Hristov AN, Oh J, Firkins JL, et al. Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations:1. A review of enteric methane mitigation options[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2013,(91):5045–5069.
[6] Goopy JP, Donaldson A, Hegarty R, et al. Low-methane yield sheep have smaller rumens and shorter rumen retention time[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 2014,(111):578–585.
[7] Kittelmann S, Pinares-Patin.o CS, Seedorf H, et al. Two different bacterial community types are linked with the low-methane emission trait in sheep[EB/OL]. PLoS ONE,2014,9(7):e103171. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103171.
[8] Pinares-Patin.o CS, Ulyatt M, Lassey K, et al. Persistence of differences between sheep in methane emission under generous grazing conditions[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2003,(140):227–233.
[9] Brand T. Grazing behaviour and diet selection by Dorper sheep[J]. Small Rum. Res., 2000,(36):147–158.
[10] Hegarty R, Genotype differences and their impact on digestive tract function of ruminants:a review[J].Austr. J. Expl. Agric., 2004,(44):459–467.
[11] Shi W, Moon CD, Leahy SC, et al. Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome[J]. Genome Research, 2014, doi:10.1101/gr.168245.113.
[12] Hegarty RS, Alcock D, Robinson DL, et al. Nutritional and flock management options to reduce methane output and methane per unit product from sheep enterprises[J]. Animal production science, 2010,(50):1026-1033.
[13] Pinares-Pati.o CS, McEwan JC, Dodds KG, et al. Repeatability of methane emissions from sheep[J]. In‘Proceedings of the 4th international conference on greenhouse gases and animal agriculture’,2010,(Eds EJ McGeough, SM McGinn)p. 146.
[14] Goopy JP, Woodgate R, Hegarty RS, Validation of short-term methane measurements as estimates of daily methane production in sheep:development and proving of portable chambers for field testing[J]. In‘Proceedings of the 4th international conference on greenhouse gases and animal agriculture’,2010,(Eds EJ McGeough, SM McGinn)p. 77.
[15] Pinares-Patin CS, Ebrahimi SH, McEwan JC, et al. Is rumen retention time implicated in sheep differences in methane emission[J]. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 2011,(71):219–222.
[16] Pinares-Patin. CS, McEwan JC, Dodds KG, et al. Repeatability of methane emissions from sheep[J]Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011,(166):210–218.
[17] Hegarty RS, Goopy JP, Herd RM, et al. Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2007,(85):1479–1486. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-236.
[18] Wall E, Simm G, Moran D. Developing breeding schemes to assist mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Animal, 2010,(4):366–376.
[19] Alcock DJ, Hegarty RS. Potential effects of animal management and genetic improvement on enteric methane emissions[J] emissions intensity and productivity of sheep enterprises at Cowra[J]. Australia,Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011,(166–167):749–760.
[20] Cruickshank GJ, Thomson B C, Muir PD. Modelling management change on production efficiency and methane output within a sheep flock[J]. Report for the Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry, 2008, New Zealand Government.
[21] Cameron IL, Timothy JB, Judith AS, et al. Selection indices offer potential for New Zealand sheep farmers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions per unit of product[J].International Journal of Agricultural Management, 2012,(1):29-40.
[2] Pinares-Patin.o CS, Hickey SM, Young EA et al. Heritability estimates of methane emissions from sheep[J]. Animal, 2013,(7):316–321.
[3] Pickering NK, Oddy VH, Basarab J et al. Animal board invited review:genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants[J]. Animal 2015,(9):1431–1440.
[4] Johnson KA,Johnson DE. Methane emission from cattle[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1995,(73):2483-2492.
[5] Hristov AN, Oh J, Firkins JL, et al. Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations:1. A review of enteric methane mitigation options[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2013,(91):5045–5069.
[6] Goopy JP, Donaldson A, Hegarty R, et al. Low-methane yield sheep have smaller rumens and shorter rumen retention time[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 2014,(111):578–585.
[7] Kittelmann S, Pinares-Patin.o CS, Seedorf H, et al. Two different bacterial community types are linked with the low-methane emission trait in sheep[EB/OL]. PLoS ONE,2014,9(7):e103171. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103171.
[8] Pinares-Patin.o CS, Ulyatt M, Lassey K, et al. Persistence of differences between sheep in methane emission under generous grazing conditions[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2003,(140):227–233.
[9] Brand T. Grazing behaviour and diet selection by Dorper sheep[J]. Small Rum. Res., 2000,(36):147–158.
[10] Hegarty R, Genotype differences and their impact on digestive tract function of ruminants:a review[J].Austr. J. Expl. Agric., 2004,(44):459–467.
[11] Shi W, Moon CD, Leahy SC, et al. Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome[J]. Genome Research, 2014, doi:10.1101/gr.168245.113.
[12] Hegarty RS, Alcock D, Robinson DL, et al. Nutritional and flock management options to reduce methane output and methane per unit product from sheep enterprises[J]. Animal production science, 2010,(50):1026-1033.
[13] Pinares-Pati.o CS, McEwan JC, Dodds KG, et al. Repeatability of methane emissions from sheep[J]. In‘Proceedings of the 4th international conference on greenhouse gases and animal agriculture’,2010,(Eds EJ McGeough, SM McGinn)p. 146.
[14] Goopy JP, Woodgate R, Hegarty RS, Validation of short-term methane measurements as estimates of daily methane production in sheep:development and proving of portable chambers for field testing[J]. In‘Proceedings of the 4th international conference on greenhouse gases and animal agriculture’,2010,(Eds EJ McGeough, SM McGinn)p. 77.
[15] Pinares-Patin CS, Ebrahimi SH, McEwan JC, et al. Is rumen retention time implicated in sheep differences in methane emission[J]. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 2011,(71):219–222.
[16] Pinares-Patin. CS, McEwan JC, Dodds KG, et al. Repeatability of methane emissions from sheep[J]Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011,(166):210–218.
[17] Hegarty RS, Goopy JP, Herd RM, et al. Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2007,(85):1479–1486. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-236.
[18] Wall E, Simm G, Moran D. Developing breeding schemes to assist mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Animal, 2010,(4):366–376.
[19] Alcock DJ, Hegarty RS. Potential effects of animal management and genetic improvement on enteric methane emissions[J] emissions intensity and productivity of sheep enterprises at Cowra[J]. Australia,Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011,(166–167):749–760.
[20] Cruickshank GJ, Thomson B C, Muir PD. Modelling management change on production efficiency and methane output within a sheep flock[J]. Report for the Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry, 2008, New Zealand Government.
[21] Cameron IL, Timothy JB, Judith AS, et al. Selection indices offer potential for New Zealand sheep farmers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions per unit of product[J].International Journal of Agricultural Management, 2012,(1):29-40.