生态现代化进程中的技术发展解读
|
摘要
生态现代化是人类文明演进的新形态,技术的生态化为生态现代化提供了支撑。生态现代化进程中的技术发展在人和自然的关系上复归到有机体的本源,在人和人的关系上形成了基于绿色经济的新生产模式,在人和自身的关系上达到了人和自然的双向解放。生态技术范式形成的一般性规律与中国的具体实践相结合为中国的生态现代化道路提供了新的路径选择。
Ecological modernization which based on the ecological shift of technology,is the new form of human civilization process. During the process of ecological modernization,the development of technology returns to its organic origin on the relationship between human and nature,facilitates new production modes based on green economy on human relations,and achieves two-way liberation of human and nature on the relationship between human and themselves. Combining the general rule of forming ecological technological paradigm with China's concrete practices provides new path for China's road to ecological modernization.
Ecological modernization which based on the ecological shift of technology,is the new form of human civilization process. During the process of ecological modernization,the development of technology returns to its organic origin on the relationship between human and nature,facilitates new production modes based on green economy on human relations,and achieves two-way liberation of human and nature on the relationship between human and themselves. Combining the general rule of forming ecological technological paradigm with China's concrete practices provides new path for China's road to ecological modernization.
引文
[1]艾凯.世界范围内的反现代化思潮[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1991.
[2][美]Feenberg A.Modernity Theory and Technology Studies:Reflections on Bridging the Gap[EB/OL].[2004-05-09].http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/feenberg.html.
[3][美]芒福德.城市发展史[M].宋俊岭,等译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005.
[4][德]马克思.1884年经济学哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,2000.
[5]佘谋昌.生态哲学[M].西安:陕西人民教育出版社,2000.
[6][美]霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿.哲学走向荒野[M].叶萍,刘耳,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2000.
[7]Murray Bookchin.The Ecology of Freedom:The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy[M].Palo Alto,1982.
[8][美]大卫·格里芬.后现代科学-科学魅力的再现[M].马季方,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2004.
[9]Keller,Golley.The Philosophy of Ecology,from Science to Synthesis[M].The University of Georgia Press,1995.
[10]E.Selinger.Towards a Postphenomenology of Artifacts:A Review of Peter-Paul Verbeek’s What Things Do[J].Techné,2005(9):2.
[11][美]欧文·拉兹络.人类的内在限度:对当今价值、文化和政治的异端的反思[M].黄觉,等译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004.
[12]佟立.当代西方生态哲学思潮[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2017.
[13]复旦大学哲学系现代西方哲学研究室,编译.西方学者论《1844年经济学-哲学手稿》[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1983.
[2][美]Feenberg A.Modernity Theory and Technology Studies:Reflections on Bridging the Gap[EB/OL].[2004-05-09].http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/feenberg.html.
[3][美]芒福德.城市发展史[M].宋俊岭,等译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005.
[4][德]马克思.1884年经济学哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,2000.
[5]佘谋昌.生态哲学[M].西安:陕西人民教育出版社,2000.
[6][美]霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿.哲学走向荒野[M].叶萍,刘耳,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2000.
[7]Murray Bookchin.The Ecology of Freedom:The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy[M].Palo Alto,1982.
[8][美]大卫·格里芬.后现代科学-科学魅力的再现[M].马季方,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2004.
[9]Keller,Golley.The Philosophy of Ecology,from Science to Synthesis[M].The University of Georgia Press,1995.
[10]E.Selinger.Towards a Postphenomenology of Artifacts:A Review of Peter-Paul Verbeek’s What Things Do[J].Techné,2005(9):2.
[11][美]欧文·拉兹络.人类的内在限度:对当今价值、文化和政治的异端的反思[M].黄觉,等译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004.
[12]佟立.当代西方生态哲学思潮[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2017.
[13]复旦大学哲学系现代西方哲学研究室,编译.西方学者论《1844年经济学-哲学手稿》[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1983.