大气污染治理的财政支出政策效果研究——基于京津冀及周边地区面板数据分析
|
摘要
本文基于京津冀及周边10个地市的面板数据进行分析,以财政环保支出为主要解释变量,充分考虑气象、能源和经济结构等影响大气污染状况的重要因素和区域特征,研究财政支出政策对大气污染治理的有效性。实证研究结果显示,财政环保支出与大气污染程度呈"倒U形",财政资金的投入能有效改善大气污染状况,在达到治理拐点前存在财政环保支出的边际效率递减规律。据此本文对下一步京津冀地区大气污染治理提出相应的财政支出政策建议。
Based on the panel data of Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei and the surrounding 10 cities, this article takes fiscal environmental protection expenditure as the main explanatory variable, and fully considers the important factors and regional characteristics of meteorological, energy and economic structure that affect air pollution, and studies on the effectiveness of financial expenditure policy for air pollution control. The empirical research results show that the fiscal environmental protection expenditure and the level of air pollution are inverted "U"-shaped, and the input of fiscal funds can effectively improve the air pollution situation. Before the governance turning point, there is a law of diminishing marginal efficiency of fiscal environmental protection expenditure. According to the empirical results, the corresponding financial expenditure policy recommendations for the next step of air pollution control in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region are proposed.
Based on the panel data of Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei and the surrounding 10 cities, this article takes fiscal environmental protection expenditure as the main explanatory variable, and fully considers the important factors and regional characteristics of meteorological, energy and economic structure that affect air pollution, and studies on the effectiveness of financial expenditure policy for air pollution control. The empirical research results show that the fiscal environmental protection expenditure and the level of air pollution are inverted "U"-shaped, and the input of fiscal funds can effectively improve the air pollution situation. Before the governance turning point, there is a law of diminishing marginal efficiency of fiscal environmental protection expenditure. According to the empirical results, the corresponding financial expenditure policy recommendations for the next step of air pollution control in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region are proposed.
引文
[1]陈鹏,徐顺青,逯元堂,高军,刘双柳.美国联邦财政环保支出经验借鉴[J].中国环境管理,2018(3):84-88.
[2]李淼焱.中央和地方环保事权与支出责任匹配研究[J].财政监督,2018(23):12-17.
[3]陈鹏,逯元堂,吴舜泽.转移支付制度改革对政府环保支出影响分析[J].生态经济,2015,31(4):118-120.
[4]逯元堂,吴舜泽,苏明.中国环境保护财税政策分析[J].环境保护,2008(15):41-46.
[5]平卫英.加拿大环境保护支出账户的架构与内容[J].统计与决策,2012(11):8-10.
[6]李静萍.环保支出账户:理论框架与试点研究[J].统计研究,2013,30(5):17-24.
[7]杨志安,吴洋.我国财政性环保支出现状及问题探究[J].沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版),2016(6):59-62.
[8]TODD R,The Political Economy of Balanced Budget Requirements:Evidence from U.S. State Environmental Expenditure,1974-2011[J]. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Taxation,2016,109(1):1-31.
[9]MULLINS J,Effect of Short-Term Measures to Curb Air Pollution:Evidence from SANTIAGO,CHILE[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2015,97,(4):1107-1134.
[10]BOSTAN I,ONOFREI M. Impact of Sustainable Environmental Expenditures Policy on Air Pollution Reduction,During European Integration Framework[J]. Amfiteatru Economic,2016,18(42):286-302.
[11]李宏岳.我国地方政府环保财政支出和环保行为的环境治理效应实证研究[J].经济体制改革,2017(4):130-136.
[12]朱小会,陆远权.开放经济、环保财政支出与污染治理—来自中国省级与行业面板数据的经验证据[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017(10):10-18.
[13]田淑英,董玮,许文立.环保财政支出、政府环境偏好与政策———基于省际工业污染数据的实证分析[J].经济问题探索,2016(7):14-21.
[14]田时中.财政分权视角下中国环境污染综合评价:1998-2015———基于省际工业污染面板数据的实证[J].华东经济管理,2017,31(5):34-41.
[15]龚明辉.浅谈财政支出的部门绩效评价———从环保专项资金谈起[J].时代金融,2015(36):145-154.
[16]贠晓哲,王罡.地方环保专项财政支出绩效评价体系构建[J].财会月刊,2013(18):95-96.
[17]赵敏,王蕾.财政支出绩效评价的质量标准及控制体系研究———国际绩效评价的经验与启示[J].财政研究,2016(10):76-84.
[18]陈明,张剑智.借鉴国际经验构建环保部门财政支出绩效评价体系[J].环境保护,2013,22(7):68-70.
[19]周曙东,欧阳纬清,葛继红.京津冀PM2.5的主要影响因素及内在关系研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(4):102-109.
[20]杨奔,黄洁.经济学视域下京津冀地区雾霾成因及对策[J].经济纵横,2016(4):54-57.
[21]金荣学,张迪.我国省级政府环境治理支出效率研究[J].经济管理,2012,34,(11):152-159.
[22]杨陈,陈庆海.财政分权视角下地方政府环保支出效率分析[J].华东经济管理,2017,31(7):111-117.
[2]李淼焱.中央和地方环保事权与支出责任匹配研究[J].财政监督,2018(23):12-17.
[3]陈鹏,逯元堂,吴舜泽.转移支付制度改革对政府环保支出影响分析[J].生态经济,2015,31(4):118-120.
[4]逯元堂,吴舜泽,苏明.中国环境保护财税政策分析[J].环境保护,2008(15):41-46.
[5]平卫英.加拿大环境保护支出账户的架构与内容[J].统计与决策,2012(11):8-10.
[6]李静萍.环保支出账户:理论框架与试点研究[J].统计研究,2013,30(5):17-24.
[7]杨志安,吴洋.我国财政性环保支出现状及问题探究[J].沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版),2016(6):59-62.
[8]TODD R,The Political Economy of Balanced Budget Requirements:Evidence from U.S. State Environmental Expenditure,1974-2011[J]. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Taxation,2016,109(1):1-31.
[9]MULLINS J,Effect of Short-Term Measures to Curb Air Pollution:Evidence from SANTIAGO,CHILE[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2015,97,(4):1107-1134.
[10]BOSTAN I,ONOFREI M. Impact of Sustainable Environmental Expenditures Policy on Air Pollution Reduction,During European Integration Framework[J]. Amfiteatru Economic,2016,18(42):286-302.
[11]李宏岳.我国地方政府环保财政支出和环保行为的环境治理效应实证研究[J].经济体制改革,2017(4):130-136.
[12]朱小会,陆远权.开放经济、环保财政支出与污染治理—来自中国省级与行业面板数据的经验证据[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017(10):10-18.
[13]田淑英,董玮,许文立.环保财政支出、政府环境偏好与政策———基于省际工业污染数据的实证分析[J].经济问题探索,2016(7):14-21.
[14]田时中.财政分权视角下中国环境污染综合评价:1998-2015———基于省际工业污染面板数据的实证[J].华东经济管理,2017,31(5):34-41.
[15]龚明辉.浅谈财政支出的部门绩效评价———从环保专项资金谈起[J].时代金融,2015(36):145-154.
[16]贠晓哲,王罡.地方环保专项财政支出绩效评价体系构建[J].财会月刊,2013(18):95-96.
[17]赵敏,王蕾.财政支出绩效评价的质量标准及控制体系研究———国际绩效评价的经验与启示[J].财政研究,2016(10):76-84.
[18]陈明,张剑智.借鉴国际经验构建环保部门财政支出绩效评价体系[J].环境保护,2013,22(7):68-70.
[19]周曙东,欧阳纬清,葛继红.京津冀PM2.5的主要影响因素及内在关系研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(4):102-109.
[20]杨奔,黄洁.经济学视域下京津冀地区雾霾成因及对策[J].经济纵横,2016(4):54-57.
[21]金荣学,张迪.我国省级政府环境治理支出效率研究[J].经济管理,2012,34,(11):152-159.
[22]杨陈,陈庆海.财政分权视角下地方政府环保支出效率分析[J].华东经济管理,2017,31(7):111-117.