干旱区绿洲城市生态文明建设公众参与意识研究——以“一带一路”沿线城市乌鲁木齐为例
|
摘要
生态文明是人类文明发展的新阶段,其强调人与自然的协调发展。基于公众科学理论框架,采用模型模拟方法、实地问卷调查、多元回归方法,分析了乌鲁木齐居民参与城市生态文明建设的自我感知、满意程度、参与意愿,并构建了结构方程模型(SEM),探讨了居民参与城市生态文明意愿的可行路径,分析了居民参与城市生态文明建设的意愿与其相关因素间的关系,揭示了居民参与城市生态文明建设主要限制因素。结果表明:(1)居民自我感知与城市生态文明建设参与意愿呈显著正相关,满意程度与参与意愿呈显著负相关;(2)45.36%的受访者表示非常愿意参与城市生态文明建设;(3)居民主体意识和支持度占比分别为72.92%、72.04%,生态认知、生态关注及参与信心占比分别为43.08%、64.33%和55.14%;(4)受访者对城市生态文明建设状况满意度的平均偏效应为2.32,各项满意度均值情况为:城市绿化状况(2.51)>政府环境信息公开程度(2.41)>城市空气状况(2.35)>城市垃圾处理与分类状况(1.99)。研究成果以期为建立和推进城市生态文明建设提供科学参考。
Ecological civilization is a new stage in the development of human civilization, which emphasizes the harmonious development of man and nature. Based on citizen science theory, this study used model simulation methods, field surveys, and multiple regression methods to analyze residents′ self-perception, satisfaction, and willingness to participate in the construction of urban ecological civilization. We explored the feasible path of residents′ participation in urban ecological civilization using structural equation modeling(SEM). In addition, multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship between residents′ willingness to participate in urban ecological civilization construction and impact factors. The study revealed that the main factors restricting residents′ participation in urban ecological civilization construction.(1) Residents′ self-perception had a significant positive impact on their willingness to participate in urban ecological civilization construction, while satisfaction had a significant negative impact on willingness to participate.(2) 45.36% of respondents expressed willingness to participate in the construction of urban ecological civilization.(3) Subject consciousness and support for residents′ self-awareness accounted for 72.92% and 72.04%, respectively, of the variance in willingness to participate and ecological cognition, ecological concern, and participation confidence accounted for 43.08%, 64.33%, and 55.14% respectively.(4) The average bias effect of respondents′ satisfaction with urban ecological civilization construction was 2.32. The average satisfaction rate was satisfaction with urban green status(2.51) > satisfaction with environmental information transparency(2.41) > satisfaction with urban air condition(2.35) > satisfaction with urban garbage treatment(1.99). The study provides a reference for the establishment and implementation of urban ecological civilization.
Ecological civilization is a new stage in the development of human civilization, which emphasizes the harmonious development of man and nature. Based on citizen science theory, this study used model simulation methods, field surveys, and multiple regression methods to analyze residents′ self-perception, satisfaction, and willingness to participate in the construction of urban ecological civilization. We explored the feasible path of residents′ participation in urban ecological civilization using structural equation modeling(SEM). In addition, multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship between residents′ willingness to participate in urban ecological civilization construction and impact factors. The study revealed that the main factors restricting residents′ participation in urban ecological civilization construction.(1) Residents′ self-perception had a significant positive impact on their willingness to participate in urban ecological civilization construction, while satisfaction had a significant negative impact on willingness to participate.(2) 45.36% of respondents expressed willingness to participate in the construction of urban ecological civilization.(3) Subject consciousness and support for residents′ self-awareness accounted for 72.92% and 72.04%, respectively, of the variance in willingness to participate and ecological cognition, ecological concern, and participation confidence accounted for 43.08%, 64.33%, and 55.14% respectively.(4) The average bias effect of respondents′ satisfaction with urban ecological civilization construction was 2.32. The average satisfaction rate was satisfaction with urban green status(2.51) > satisfaction with environmental information transparency(2.41) > satisfaction with urban air condition(2.35) > satisfaction with urban garbage treatment(1.99). The study provides a reference for the establishment and implementation of urban ecological civilization.
引文
[1] Zhang M,Liu Y M,Wu J,Wang T T.Index system of urban resource and environment carrying capacity based on ecological civilization.Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2018,68:90- 97.
[2] 王奇,缪婧雯.基于生态化的我国各省份生态文明建设评估研究.生态经济,2018,34(9):212- 218.
[3] 李巍,郗永勤.效率视角下的省域生态文明建设评价研究.生态学报,2016,36(22):7354- 7363.
[4] 赵其国,黄国勤,马艳芹.中国生态环境状况与生态文明建设.生态学报,2016,36(19):6328- 6335.
[5] 周传斌,戴欣,王如松,黄锦楼.生态社区评价指标体系研究进展.生态学报,2011,31(16):4749- 4759.
[6] 毛惠萍,何璇,何佳,牛冬杰,包存宽.生态示范创建回顾及生态文明建设模式初探.应用生态学报,2013,24(4):1177- 1182.
[7] Nov O,Arazy O,Anderson D.Dusting for science:motivation and participation of digital citizen science volunteers//Proceedings of the 2011 iConference Conference.Seattle,Washington,USA:ACM,2011:68- 74.
[8] 王静.基于结构方程模型的环境行为影响因素研究.西安:长安大学,2014.
[9] Liang Y,Shin K,Managi S.Subjective Well-being and Environmental Quality:The impact of air pollution and green coverage in China.Ecological Economics,2018,153:124- 138.
[10] 刘怡,杜流洪,王成,蒋文虹.新型农村社区农户生态满意度影响因素分析——以整村推进示范区“大柱新村”为例.西南师范大学学报自然科学版,2015,40(7):151- 157.
[11] OFaircheallaigh C.Public participation and environmental impact assessment:Purposes,implications,and lessons for public policy making.Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2010,30(1):19- 27.
[12] 白杨,黄宇驰,王敏,黄沈发,沙晨燕,阮俊杰.我国生态文明建设及其评估体系研究进展.生态学报,2011,31(20):6295- 6304.
[13] 张利,雷军,张小雷,董雯.乌鲁木齐城市社会区分析.地理学报,2012,67(6):817- 828.
[14] 乌鲁木齐市统计局.乌鲁木齐市统计年鉴2016.北京:中国统计出版社,2016.
[15] Grace J B,Anderson T M,Olff H,Scheiner S M.On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems.Ecological Monographs,2010,80(1):67- 87.
[16] Lamb E G,Mengersen K L,Stewart K J,Attanayake U,Siciliano S D.Spatially explicit structural equation modeling.Ecology,2014,95(9):2434- 2442.
[17] Huang J H,Hua Y.Eco-efficiency convergence and green urban growth in China.International Regional Science Review,2018,doi:10.1177/0160017618790032.
[18] 张欢,成金华,冯银,陈丹,倪琳,孙涵.特大型城市生态文明建设评价指标体系及应用——以武汉市为例.生态学报,2015,35(2):547- 556.
[19] 周鸿,吕汇慧.乡村旅游地生态文化传统与生态环境建设的互动效应——以云南石林县彝族阿着底村为例.生态学杂志,2006,25(9):1114- 1118.
[20] Ercoskun O Y.Green and Ecological Technologies for Urban Planning:Creating Smart Cities.Hershey,PA:Information Science Reference,2012.
[21] 莫张勤.生态保护红线在环境法律制度中的融合与创新.生态环境学报,2018,27(3):588- 594.
[22] 王文娟,玉米提·哈力克,塔依尔江·艾山.乌鲁木齐居民对城市生态文明建设认知度分析.干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(12):34- 40.
[23] 杨超.亚洲人居环境关注热点及其时空特征分析研究.上海:同济大学,2008.
[24] 倪珊,何佳,牛冬杰,包存宽,王娟.生态文明建设中不同行为主体的目标指标体系构建.环境污染与防治,2013,35(1):100- 105.
[25] 赵玉,张玉,熊国保,严武.区域异质性视角下赣江生态系统服务支付意愿及其价值评估.生态学报,2018,38(5):1698- 1710.
[26] 胡彪,王锋,李健毅,于立云,张书豪.基于非期望产出SBM的城市生态文明建设效率评价实证研究——以天津市为例.干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(4):13- 18.
[27] Zhang W J,Yang J,Ma L Y,Huang C H.Factors affecting the use of urban green spaces for physical activities:Views of young urban residents in Beijing.Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2015,14(4):851- 857.
[28] Jiang P,Yang J,Huang C H,Liu H K.The contribution of socioeconomic factors to PM2.5 pollution in urban China.Environmental Pollution,2018,233:977- 985.
[29] 张启蒙,张越.垃圾处理设施周边居民风险感知与邻避行为倾向研究.环境科学与管理,2017,42(2):1- 4,26- 26.
[30] Smetanová A,Paton E N,Maynard C,Tindale S,Fernández‐Getino A P,Marqéus Pérez M J,Bracken L,Le Bissonnais Y,Keesstra S D.Stakeholders′ perception of the relevance of water and sediment connectivity in water and land management.Land Degradation & Development,2018,29(6):1833- 1844.
[31] 贺桂珍,吕永龙,张磊,Mol Arthur P J,冯嫣.中国政府环境信息公开实施效果评价.环境科学,2011,32(11):3137- 3144.
[32] 白凯,李创新,张翠娟.西安城市居民绿色出行的群体参照影响与自我价值判断.人文地理,2017,32(1):37- 46.
[33] 杨文越,曹小曙.居住自选择视角下的广州出行碳排放影响机理.地理学报,2018,73(2):346- 361.
[2] 王奇,缪婧雯.基于生态化的我国各省份生态文明建设评估研究.生态经济,2018,34(9):212- 218.
[3] 李巍,郗永勤.效率视角下的省域生态文明建设评价研究.生态学报,2016,36(22):7354- 7363.
[4] 赵其国,黄国勤,马艳芹.中国生态环境状况与生态文明建设.生态学报,2016,36(19):6328- 6335.
[5] 周传斌,戴欣,王如松,黄锦楼.生态社区评价指标体系研究进展.生态学报,2011,31(16):4749- 4759.
[6] 毛惠萍,何璇,何佳,牛冬杰,包存宽.生态示范创建回顾及生态文明建设模式初探.应用生态学报,2013,24(4):1177- 1182.
[7] Nov O,Arazy O,Anderson D.Dusting for science:motivation and participation of digital citizen science volunteers//Proceedings of the 2011 iConference Conference.Seattle,Washington,USA:ACM,2011:68- 74.
[8] 王静.基于结构方程模型的环境行为影响因素研究.西安:长安大学,2014.
[9] Liang Y,Shin K,Managi S.Subjective Well-being and Environmental Quality:The impact of air pollution and green coverage in China.Ecological Economics,2018,153:124- 138.
[10] 刘怡,杜流洪,王成,蒋文虹.新型农村社区农户生态满意度影响因素分析——以整村推进示范区“大柱新村”为例.西南师范大学学报自然科学版,2015,40(7):151- 157.
[11] OFaircheallaigh C.Public participation and environmental impact assessment:Purposes,implications,and lessons for public policy making.Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2010,30(1):19- 27.
[12] 白杨,黄宇驰,王敏,黄沈发,沙晨燕,阮俊杰.我国生态文明建设及其评估体系研究进展.生态学报,2011,31(20):6295- 6304.
[13] 张利,雷军,张小雷,董雯.乌鲁木齐城市社会区分析.地理学报,2012,67(6):817- 828.
[14] 乌鲁木齐市统计局.乌鲁木齐市统计年鉴2016.北京:中国统计出版社,2016.
[15] Grace J B,Anderson T M,Olff H,Scheiner S M.On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems.Ecological Monographs,2010,80(1):67- 87.
[16] Lamb E G,Mengersen K L,Stewart K J,Attanayake U,Siciliano S D.Spatially explicit structural equation modeling.Ecology,2014,95(9):2434- 2442.
[17] Huang J H,Hua Y.Eco-efficiency convergence and green urban growth in China.International Regional Science Review,2018,doi:10.1177/0160017618790032.
[18] 张欢,成金华,冯银,陈丹,倪琳,孙涵.特大型城市生态文明建设评价指标体系及应用——以武汉市为例.生态学报,2015,35(2):547- 556.
[19] 周鸿,吕汇慧.乡村旅游地生态文化传统与生态环境建设的互动效应——以云南石林县彝族阿着底村为例.生态学杂志,2006,25(9):1114- 1118.
[20] Ercoskun O Y.Green and Ecological Technologies for Urban Planning:Creating Smart Cities.Hershey,PA:Information Science Reference,2012.
[21] 莫张勤.生态保护红线在环境法律制度中的融合与创新.生态环境学报,2018,27(3):588- 594.
[22] 王文娟,玉米提·哈力克,塔依尔江·艾山.乌鲁木齐居民对城市生态文明建设认知度分析.干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(12):34- 40.
[23] 杨超.亚洲人居环境关注热点及其时空特征分析研究.上海:同济大学,2008.
[24] 倪珊,何佳,牛冬杰,包存宽,王娟.生态文明建设中不同行为主体的目标指标体系构建.环境污染与防治,2013,35(1):100- 105.
[25] 赵玉,张玉,熊国保,严武.区域异质性视角下赣江生态系统服务支付意愿及其价值评估.生态学报,2018,38(5):1698- 1710.
[26] 胡彪,王锋,李健毅,于立云,张书豪.基于非期望产出SBM的城市生态文明建设效率评价实证研究——以天津市为例.干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(4):13- 18.
[27] Zhang W J,Yang J,Ma L Y,Huang C H.Factors affecting the use of urban green spaces for physical activities:Views of young urban residents in Beijing.Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2015,14(4):851- 857.
[28] Jiang P,Yang J,Huang C H,Liu H K.The contribution of socioeconomic factors to PM2.5 pollution in urban China.Environmental Pollution,2018,233:977- 985.
[29] 张启蒙,张越.垃圾处理设施周边居民风险感知与邻避行为倾向研究.环境科学与管理,2017,42(2):1- 4,26- 26.
[30] Smetanová A,Paton E N,Maynard C,Tindale S,Fernández‐Getino A P,Marqéus Pérez M J,Bracken L,Le Bissonnais Y,Keesstra S D.Stakeholders′ perception of the relevance of water and sediment connectivity in water and land management.Land Degradation & Development,2018,29(6):1833- 1844.
[31] 贺桂珍,吕永龙,张磊,Mol Arthur P J,冯嫣.中国政府环境信息公开实施效果评价.环境科学,2011,32(11):3137- 3144.
[32] 白凯,李创新,张翠娟.西安城市居民绿色出行的群体参照影响与自我价值判断.人文地理,2017,32(1):37- 46.
[33] 杨文越,曹小曙.居住自选择视角下的广州出行碳排放影响机理.地理学报,2018,73(2):346- 361.